DOCSLIB.ORG

POPSICLE BRIDGES: How to Engineer Bridges and Structures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POPSICLE BRIDGES: How to Engineer Bridges and Structures POPSICLE BRIDGES: How To Engineer Bridges and Structures Institute Of Electrical And Electronic Engineers, Phoenix Section Teacher In Service Program / Engineers In The Classroom (TISP/EIC) Arizona Science Lab www.azsciencelab.org “Helping Students Transfer What Is Learned In The Classroom To The World Beyond” Material Sources This presentation includes material copied from these web sites: HowStuffWorks — “How Bridges Work,” http://science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/civil/bridge.htm PBS “Building Big — The Labs,” http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/buildingbig/lab/index.html PBS “Building Big — Bridge Basics,” http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/buildingbig/bridge/basics.html Oracle Education Foundation, ThinkQuest, http://library.thinkquest.org/J002223/types/types.html YouTube — “Tacoma Bridge,” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mclp9QmCGs Bridge Types — Beam Structure Bridges, http://www.pennridge.org/works/brbeam.html National Grid for Learning — The Bridges Project: Bridge Types, http://www.bardaglea.org.uk/bridges/bridge-types/bridge-types-intro.html Bridge Basics — A Spotter's Guide to Bridge Design, http://www.pghbridges.com/basics.htm MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 2 What Is A Bridge? • A bridge is a structure built to span a valley, road, body of water, or other physical obstacle. • There are more than 500,000 bridges in the United States. • Do you know how they work? • Why are some bridges curved while some are straight? • Engineers must consider many factors before determining the size, shape, and overall look of a bridge. MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 3 What Is The Problem In Building A Bridge? • Most bridges are supported only at each end where it meets the terrain. – support in the middle of a bridge requires a vertical pillar, that may not be possible. • The weight of the people, cars, trains, on the middle of the bridge has to be supported by the two ends. • Somehow the weight in the middle of the bridge has to be transferred to the two ends. MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 4 An Experiment! • Place a 2” x 10” x 8’ piece of lumber between two work benches, with the flat side horizontal • Have one, then two, then three students stand on it • What happens? • Now turn the lumber so it is on edge and clamped at each end in the work benches • Have one, then two, then three students stand on it • What happens this time? • How do you explain the difference in results? • Understanding this is key to understanding how bridges work! MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 5 What Is A Force? In physics, a force is any external agent that causes a change in the motion of a free body, or that causes stress in a fixed body Or In Simpler Terms . MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 6 What Is A Force? It can also be described as a push or pull that can cause an object with mass to change its speed or direction ( to accelerate ) or which can cause a flexible object to deform. In this workshop we will deal with forces acting on flexible objects! MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 7 Compression, Tension & Shear Forces • Compression = squeezing • Tension = stretching • Shear = sliding • Torsion = twisting • All materials are stronger in compression, tension and shear than in twisting (torsion) or bending • Bridges are designed to maximize compression, tension and shear forces while minimizing torsion and bending forces MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 8 Beam Bridge • The beam bridge consists of a horizontal beam supported at each end by piers in the banks. – A log bridge thrown across a stream or river is the oldest and simplest beam bridge. • The weight of the beam pushes straight down on the piers / banks. • The farther apart its piers / banks, the weaker the beam becomes. • Beam bridges rarely span more than 76 meters / 250 feet. MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 9 An Experiment! • Put a large rubber ball on the table and push down on it – What happens? What does the ball do? What do you feel? – That is the force of compression • Take a bungee cord and have two of you pull it between you – What happens? What does the bungee cord do? What do you feel? – That is the force of tension • Take a swim noodle and have two of you twist the two ends in opposite directions – What happens? What does the swim noodle do? What do you feel? – That is the force of torsion MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 10 An Experiment! • Shear force is more difficult to demonstrate • Imagine a square sheet of thick cardboard • Suppose you apply a force to the top of the square while the bottom is held fixed in in a work bench • The force will try to change the shape of the square into a parallelogram by making the elements of cardboard slide relative to each other • We say the card board is experiencing a shear force MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 11 Beam Bridge: Forces • When something pushes down on the beam, the beam bends • Its top edge is pushed together (compression), and its bottom edge is pulled apart (tension) Any weight sitting on the center of the beam will be transferred to the two ends of the beam sitting on the river banks (for example) W • If the supported weight becomes very large a point will be reached when the beam bends and breaks LOG RIVER BED W/2 W/2 MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 12 Why Are Support Beams Always Oriented With The Depth Greater Than The Thickness? The location of the compression/tension forces! MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 13 Making The Beam Stronger • A single beam spanning any distance experiences compression and tension • The top of the beam experiences the most compression, and the bottom experiences the most tension • The middle of the beam experiences very little compression or tension • If the beam were designed with more material on top and bottom, and less in the middle, it would better handle the compression and tension forces better – For this reason, I-beams are more rigid than simple rectangular beams MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 14 Wooden I-beams (“Engineered Wood Beams”) Are Now Used In House Construction • Engineered wood I-beam is a structural component of top and bottom flanges, connected with a plywood flange of various depths • Engineered wood I-beams are primarily used for floor systems but also found in some roof applications MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 15 The Shape Of A Structure Affects How Strong It Is MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 16 Triangulation • The triangle is a very strong structural form. • The triangle is used in structural designs to reinforce and support weight. • All structures on this page rely on the strength of the triangle. MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 17 Triangles Can Be Assembled Into A Beam Structure • This wooden beam has been made from lengths of 2x4 studs joined together in triangular shapes. • Because of the triangles, the beam is very strong. • This beam extends the concept of the I-beam. • The center of the beam is made up of the diagonal members of the truss, while the top and bottom of the truss represent the top and bottom of the beam. • The top and bottom of the beam contain more material than its center. MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 18 These Structures Are Known As “Trusses” • The truss is made up from triangular designs and used to support more weight and span more distance. • A truss structure is much lighter than a solid beam of the same strength. • For this reason they are used both in building construction and bridge construction. • A truss is always under compression and tension. MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 19 House Construction Uses The Strength Of Triangles To Make Strong, Light Roof Supports Over Wide Spans From 2x4 Wooden Studs MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 20 Wooden Roof Trusses For Houses Come In A Variety Of Shapes MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 21 Truss Bridge • The truss bridge is an assembly of triangles. • A truss bridge is basically a fancy beam bridge. • The triangular supports span across the top and sides of the bridge. • There are also trusses across the bridge at top and bottom to give it side-to-side torsional (twisting) strength! MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 22 There Are A Large Number Of Truss Designs Used For Bridges MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 23 Let’s Build A Truss Bridge! MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 24 Let’s Build A Truss Bridge! • You will work in teams of two. • You will be given: – 200 Popsicle sticks – A hot glue gun • Your challenge is to design and build a truss structure bridge that will: – Span a gap of 61 cms / 24 inches between two work tables – Support a weight of 23 kg / 50 pounds at the center point of the bridge – Use no more than 200 popsicle sticks • The load weight will be placed on the upper surface of your bridge so do not worry about building road surfaces through the bridge! • Don’t forget to include side-to-side torsional (twisting) strength! MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 25 OTHER TYPES OF BRIDGES • There are other ways to design a bridge. • They all involve the same compression, tension and shear forces as the truss bridge. MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 26 Arch Bridge • The arch bridge has great natural strength • Thousands of years ago, Romans built arches out of stone • Today, most arch bridges are made of steel or concrete, and they can span up to 800 feet • Arches can also be set above the deck as on the Sydney harbor bridge in Australia MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 27 Arch Bridge: Forces • The design of the arch, the semicircle, naturally diverts the weight from the bridge deck to the abutments • Arch bridges are always under compression • The shape of the arch itself is all that is needed to effectively dissipate the weight from the center of the deck to the abutments MAY 2014 ARIZONA SCIENCE LAB 28 Starrucca Viaduct • A stone arch bridge that spans Starrucca Creek near Lanesboro, Pennsylvania • It was the largest stone rail viaduct in the mid-19th century.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance
    Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance Michael A. Ritter, Structural Engineer United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Ritter, Michael A. 1990. Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance. Washington, DC: 944 p. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the following individuals, Agencies, and Associations for the substantial contributions they made to this publication: For contributions to Chapter 1, Fong Ou, Ph.D., Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For contributions to Chapter 3, Jerry Winandy, Research Forest Products Technologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. For contributions to Chapter 8, Terry Wipf, P.E., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. For administrative overview and support, Clyde Weller, Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For consultation and assistance during preparation and review, USDA Forest Service Bridge Engineers, Steve Bunnell, Frank Muchmore, Sakee Poulakidas, Ron Schmidt, Merv Eriksson, and David Summy; Russ Moody and Alan Freas (retired) of the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; Dave Pollock of the National Forest Products Association; and Lorraine Krahn and James Wacker, former students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. In addition, special thanks to Mary Jane Baggett and Jim Anderson for editorial consultation, JoAnn Benisch for graphics preparation and layout, and Stephen Schmieding and James Vargo for photographic support. iii iv CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 TIMBER AS A BRIDGE MATERIAL 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................. l- 1 1.2 Historical Development of Timber Bridges ............................. l-2 Prehistory Through the Middle Ages ....................................... l-3 Middle Ages Through the 18th Century ................................... l-5 19th Century ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance
    Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance Michael A. Ritter, Structural Engineer United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Ritter, Michael A. 1990. Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance. Washington, DC: 944 p. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the following individuals, Agencies, and Associations for the substantial contributions they made to this publication: For contributions to Chapter 1, Fong Ou, Ph.D., Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For contributions to Chapter 3, Jerry Winandy, Research Forest Products Technologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. For contributions to Chapter 8, Terry Wipf, P.E., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. For administrative overview and support, Clyde Weller, Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For consultation and assistance during preparation and review, USDA Forest Service Bridge Engineers, Steve Bunnell, Frank Muchmore, Sakee Poulakidas, Ron Schmidt, Merv Eriksson, and David Summy; Russ Moody and Alan Freas (retired) of the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; Dave Pollock of the National Forest Products Association; and Lorraine Krahn and James Wacker, former students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. In addition, special thanks to Mary Jane Baggett and Jim Anderson for editorial consultation, JoAnn Benisch for graphics preparation and layout, and Stephen Schmieding and James Vargo for photographic support. iii iv CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 TIMBER AS A BRIDGE MATERIAL 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................. l- 1 1.2 Historical Development of Timber Bridges ............................. l-2 Prehistory Through the Middle Ages ....................................... l-3 Middle Ages Through the 18th Century ................................... l-5 19th Century ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Box Canyon Bridge) Mount Rainier National Park
    MUDDY FORK COWLITZ RIVER BRIDGE HAER No. WA-60 (Box Canyon Bridge) Mount Rainier National Park. h -^^ Spanning Muddy Fork Cowlitz River on Stevens Canyon Highway H nt-lC Packwood Vicinity V^f&H Lewis County ' Washington ©? |- fi^clt , \^ H- KiOTOGRAFHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIFTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior P.O. Box 37127 Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD tyA&ft MUDDY FORK COWLITZ RIVER BRIDGE (Box Canyon Bridge) Mount Rainier National Park HAER No. WA-60 I. INTRODUCTION Location: Spanning Muddy Fork of the Cowlitz River at Box Canyon, Stevens Canyon Highway, Mount Rainier National Park, Lewis County, Washington. Quad: Mount Rainier East, Wash. UTM: 10/604280/5179825 Date of Construction; 1950-52 Structure type: Stone-faced reinforced concrete filled spandrel arch bridge FHwA Structure No.: n/a Designer: Bureau of Public Roads, U.S. Department of Commerce Contractor: Hawkins and Armstrong, Seattle, Washington Owner: Mount Rainier National Park, National Park Service Use: Park highway bridge Significance: The "rustic style" of architecture survived into the 1950s when the Muddy Fork Cowlitz River and Nickel Creek bridges on the Stevens Canyon Highway were constructed as stone-faced reinforced concrete spandrel arch structures, echoing designs employed by the National Park Service as early as 1920. The Muddy Fork Bridge, built over the deep Box Canyon of the Cowlitz, relates especially well to the site; the gently arched bridge seems to spring naturally from the rock cliffs. The nearby tunnel [HAER No. WA-70] is a plain bore through a mountain spur; unlike other tunnels in the park, it has no masonry portals at the ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Wood Bridge Reference Guide by Moses Structural Engineers and Brown & Co
    Ontario Wood Bridge Reference Guide By Moses Structural Engineers and Brown & Co. Engineering Ltd. for the Canadian Wood Council and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry CONTACT Ontario Wood WORKS! 1350 Fisher Street, Unit 115 North Bay, ON P1B 2H1 Authors Moses Structural Engineers: David Moses, Mary Alexander, Katherine McAlister, Karen Mesa Brown & Co. Engineering Ltd.: Andrew Lehan, Stephen Brown, and Genaro Dulay Acknowledgements The Canadian Wood Council/Ontario Wood WORKS! wishes to thank the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, FedNor, Natural Resources Canada, the Province of Québec, and cecobois. Their financial and in-kind contributions made the publication of this document possible. This report was prepared with the technical assistance of Professor Paul Gauvreau, Dr.sc. techn., P.Eng., Professor at the University of Toronto, Department of Civil Engineering. Thank you to the following individuals who provided interviews to the authors: Jasmine Wang, Ph.D., P.Eng. of the Canadian Wood Council, Andrew Lehan, P.Eng., M.A.Sc. of Brown and Company., Marshall Leslie of M.Leslie, Inc., Caroline Frenette, ing. Ph.D. of cecobois, Richard Krutzler of LEA Consulting Ltd., and James Wacker of the US FPL. Thank you to the following individuals who peer reviewed the document: Jasmine Wang, Ph.D., P.Eng. of the Canadian Wood Council and Caroline Frenette, ing. Ph.D. of cecobois. Thank you to the following individuals who peer reviewed the design examples: Tyler McQuaker, P.Eng., Sr. Structural Engineer from NWR Structural Section/Ministry of Transportation Ontario, Cory Zurell, PhD, P.Eng., Principal from Blackwell Structural Engineers and François Pelletier, ing, Direction générale des structures from Ministère des Transports, de la Mobilité durable et de l’Électrification des transports.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16. Trail Bridges
    Chapter 16. Trail Bridges ...................................................................................... 16-1 16.1. Bridge Site Evaluation ................................................................................ 16-1 16.2. Selecting a Bridge Design .......................................................................... 16-7 16.2.1. Log Stringer Bridge ................................................................................. 16-9 16.2.1.1. Applications .................................................................................... 16-9 16.2.1.2. Attributes ........................................................................................ 16-9 16.2.1.3. Limitations ...................................................................................... 16-9 16.2.1. Milled Stringer Bridge ........................................................................... 16-11 16.2.1.1. Applications .................................................................................. 16-11 16.2.1.2. Limitations .................................................................................... 16-11 16.2.2. Glue-Laminated (Glulam) Stringer Bridge ............................................. 16-13 16.2.2.1. Applications .................................................................................. 16-13 16.2.2.2. Attributes ...................................................................................... 16-14 16.2.2.3. Limitations ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Timber Bridges
    Transportation Research Record 1053 l An Overview of Timber Bridges FONG L. OU and CLYDE WELLER ABSTRACT This paper contains a review of literature on timber bridges. It presents recent developments and evolving concepts in timber bridge technology, including aspects concerning wood material, bridge design, construction, inspection, rat­ ing, and maintenance. This review indicates that timber bridge technology has advanced with the design and construction of a prototype of a prestressed, laminated timber bridge in Ontario, Canada. In the United States, the main ef­ fort of government and the timber industry is to promote timber bridge tech­ nology transfer. Timber was probably the first type of material that bridge. Third, the fabrication of glued-laminated humans used to construct a bridge. Although concrete (glulam) timber members may take longer than the and steel replaced wood as the major materials for construction of steel beams or concrete sections (6); bridge construction in the 20th century, the use of however, a newly developed prefabricated modular sys­ wood in short-span bridges remains as great as ever. tem Of production may eliminate this time delay <ll· Of United States bridges that have a span of more Several studies have summarized the results of than 20 ft (6 m), 12.6 percent (or 71,200) are made research on timber bridges. The first study was per­ of timber. In the Forest Service (U.S. Department of formed by the American Institute of Timber construc­ Agriculture) alone, approximately 7,500 timber tion in 1973 (7). This study summarized the signifi­ bridges are in use, and more a.re being built each cant advances In the engineering and construction of year.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOTBRIDGES a Manual for Construction at Community And
    FOOTBRIDGES A Manual for Construction at Community and District Level Prepared for the Department for International Development, UK. by I.T. Transport Ltd. Consultants in Transport for Development June 2004 CONTENTS PAGE Page No ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (i) ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS (iii) 1. INTROUDCTION 1 2. FOOTBRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS 5 2.1 Planning 5 2.1.1 Location 5 2.1.2 Layout of the Footbridge 5 2.1.3 Height of Deck 6 2.2 Footbridge Users and Loading 8 2.2.1 Users 8 2.2.2 Design Loads 11 2.2.3 Design Criteria 13 3. SELECTING A FOOTBRIDGE DESIGN 15 3.1 Bamboo Bridges 16 3.1.1 Characteristics and Applications 16 3.1.2 Advantages and Disadvantages 16 3.1.3 Sources of Further Information 19 3.2 Timber Log Footbridges 20 3.2.1 Characteristics and Applications 20 3.2.2 Advantages and Disadvantages 20 3.2.3 Sources of Further Information 23 3.3 Sawn Timber Footbridges 24 3.3.1 Characteristics and Applications 24 3.3.2 Advantages and Disadvantages 25 3.3.3 Sources of Further Information 25 3.4 Steel Footbridges 30 3.4.1 Characteristics and Applications 30 3.4.2 Advantages and Disadvantages 31 3.4.3 Sources of Further Information 33 3.5 Reinforced Concrete (RCC) Bridges 34 3.5.1 Characteristics and Applications 34 3.5.2 Advantages and Disadvantages 34 3.5.3 Sources of Further Information 34 3.6 Suspension and Suspended Footbridges 36 3.6.1 Characteristics and Applications 36 3.6.2 Advantages and Disadvantages 36 3.6.3 Sources of Further Information 37 3.7 Selection of Type of Footbridge 41 3.7.1 Selection Criteria 41 3.7.2 Comparison of Footbridge Types Against Selection Criteria 43 3.7.3 Selection of Type of Footbridge 46 3.7.4 Recommended Selection Options 47 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Training
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 080 795 CE 000 008 TITLE Bridge Inspector's Training Manual.. INSTITUTION Federal Highway Administration (DOT), Washington, D.C. Bureau of Public Roads. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 241p.; Corrected Reprint 1971 AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..20402 (GPO 19720-930, $2.50) :MRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$9.87 DESCRIPTORS Building Trades; Civil Engineering; Component ' Building Systems; *Construction (Process); *Curriculum Guides; Equipment; *Inspection; *Job Training; *Manuals; Skilled Occupations; Vocational Education IDENTIFIERS *Bridge Inspectors ABSTRACT A guide for the instruction of bridge inspectors is provided in this manual as well as instructions for conducting and reporting on a bridge inspection. The chapters outline the qualifications necessary to become a bridge inspector. The subject areas covered are: The Bridge Inspector, Bridge Structures, Bridge Inspection Reporting System, Inspection Procedures, Bridge Component Inspection Guidance, and Reports and Recommendations..The duties of an inspector and the requirements for his training are laid out in chapters one through four. Chapter five covers the construction and design aspects of bridges together with the explanation of mechanical principles. The nature and theory of bridge construction occupies approximately two thirds of the manual. The rest of the manual covers the inspection field book, inspection equipment, foundation movements and effects on bridges, the nature of underwater inspections, and structural bridge deficiencies._ There are extensive diagrams, photographs, a glossary of bridge engineering and inspection terms, and a 62-item bibliography. (KP) FILMED FROM BEST AVAILABLE CO BRIDGE INSPECTOR'S TRAINING cc MANUAL 70 _ II I I I 1111VILLI,4 41.
    [Show full text]
  • Devon Bridges
    DEVON BUILDINGS GROUP 23RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE 14TH JUNE 2008 AT EXETER DEVON BRIDGES Speakers: Bill Harvey Brian George Stewart Brown Reconstruction of old Exe Bridge by Stewart Brown drawn up by Eric Kadow. Bridge Engineering Bill Harvey I am a Structural Engineer, a Fellow of the Institution the value of simple things. A smile on a child’s face is a of Structural Engineers which was founded in 1908, so great return for a few minutes engineering work. we are just 100 years old. This is an attempt to tell you enough about Structural But the swing has some more very important lessons Engineering in 40 minutes to enhance your for us. The rope seems to do the same job as the pole understanding of bridges without frightening you with of the shooting stick but it looks much simpler. No heavy maths or physics. In best 1066 and all that style, need for added stability and no need for STIFFNESS. A important words are in capitals as they will keep re- very thin piece of rope will make a swing, but we have appearing and you may find it useful to look back. seen that a shooting Structural Engineering stick pole Structural engineering is all about our need to put has to be weight where it doesn’t want to be. We hold a weight fat to in the air by putting something underneath it. The work. chair you are sitting on is a prime example and the Strong simplest chair (a piece of rock, a tree stump) just materials works.
    [Show full text]
  • Slab,Beam &Girder Bridges in Oregon
    SLAB, BEAM & GIRDER BRIDGES IN OREGON HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT BRIDGE NO. 8739, MOUNTAIN AVE OVER INTERSTATE 5, ASHLAND, JACKSON COUNTY OREGON, LOOKING SOUTH 259-Foot long Precast Concrete Girders (1963) with Type A/B Bridge Rail, Modified with Protective Fencing June 2003 Prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation Salem, Oregon Prepared by George Kramer, M.S., HP Senior Preservation Specialist Heritage Research Associates, Inc. Eugene, Oregon May 2004 SLAB, BEAM & GIRDER BRIDGES IN OREGON HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT PREPARED FOR THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY GEORGE KRAMER, M.S. HP SENIOR PRESERVATION SPECIALIST HERITAGE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. EUGENE, OREGON MAY 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PART 1.0 HISTORIC OVERVIEW 5 1.1 Geographic Boundaries 5 1.2 Temporal Boundaries — 1900-1966 5 1.3 Slab, Beam and Girder Bridge Construction 6 1.4 Timber 8 1.5 Steel 11 1.6 Concrete and its Application in Bridge Construction 14 1.6.1 Early Concrete Bridges in Oregon 16 1.7 Slab, Beam, and Girder Bridges: A Simplified Typology 22 1.7.1 Slab Bridges 23 1.7.2 Beam and Girder Bridges 24 1.7.3 Pre-cast and Pre-stressed Concrete 27 1.7.4 Box Girders 29 1.7.5 Frame Bridges 30 1.8 Concrete Bridge Designs, Post-WWII Aesthetics 31 PART 2.0 SBG BRIDGES IN OREGON 36 2.1 The Oregon Bridge Inventory 36 2.2. Previous Identification of Historic Slab, Beam and Girder Bridges 39 2.3 Post-War SBG Bridges 42 2.3.1 Bridge Rail Design 43 A. The "Picket Fence" Steel and Concrete Rail 44 B.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Water (Prof.Dr.Ir
    3 Water (Prof.dr.ir. C. van den Akker) 3.1 WATER BALANCE ..........................................................................................................................148 3.1.1 Evaporation and precipitation..........................................................................................148 3.1.2 Runoff .............................................................................................................................150 3.1.3 References to Water balance..........................................................................................151 3.2 RIVER DRAINAGE...........................................................................................................................152 3.2.1 River morphology............................................................................................................152 3.2.2 Q by measurement..........................................................................................................158 3.2.3 Q on different water heights in the same profile ..............................................................159 3.2.4 Calculating Q with rounghness........................................................................................161 3.2.5 Using drainage data........................................................................................................162 3.2.6 Probability of extreme discharges ...................................................................................163 3.2.7 Level and discharge regulators .......................................................................................165
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Bridges
    TYPES OF TIMBER BRIDGES 2.1 INTRODUCTION Timber bridges are seen today in many types and configurations. Some of these bridges evolved from designs developed many years ago, while others have developed as a result of modem technological advances in timber design and fabrication. Regardless of the specific configuration, all timber bridges consist of two basic components, the superstructure and the substructure (Figure 2-1). The superstructure is the framework of the bridge span and includes the deck, floor system, main supporting mem­ bers, railings, and other incidental components. The five basic types are the beam, deck (slab), truss, arch, and suspension superstructures. The substructure is the portion of the bridge that transmits loads from the superstructure to the supporting rock or soil. Timber substructures include abutments and bents. Abutments support the two bridge ends, while bents provide intermediate support for multiple-span crossings. Figure 2-1.- Basic components of a timber bridge. This chapter provides an introduction to the many types of timber bridges currently used in the United States. Superstructures are discussed first, followed by decks and substructures. Although decks are technically part of the superstructure, they are addressed separately because of their varied application on many superstructure types. 2-1 2.2 BEAM SUPERSTRUCTURES Longitudinal beam superstructures are the simplest and most common timber bridge type (in bridge design, the longitudinal direction is meas­ ured in the direction of the traffic flow). Longitudinal beam superstruc­ tures consist of a deck system supported by a series of timber beams between two or more supports. Bridge beams are constructed from logs, sawn lumber, glued-laminated timber, or laminated veneer lumber (LVL).
    [Show full text]