No. In the Supreme Court of the United States COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE REGULATION, INC., ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., GREAT NORTHERN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, L.P., AND NATIONAL CATTLEMEN’S BEEF ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI JOHN P. ELWOOD ERIC GROTEN JEREMY C. MARWELL Counsel of Record VINSON & ELKINS LLP VINSON & ELKINS LLP 2200 Pennsylvania Ave- 2801 Via Fortuna, nue, NW, Suite 500W Suite 100 Washington, DC 20037 Austin, TX 78746 (202) 639-6500 (512) 524-8709
[email protected] PAUL D. PHILLIPS HOLLAND & HART LLP PATRICK R. DAY, P.C. 555 17th Street, HOLLAND & HART LLP Suite 3200 2515 Warren Avenue, Denver, CO 80202 Suite 450 (303) 295-8131 Cheyenne, WY 82001 (307) 778-4209 [Additional Counsel Listed On Inside Cover] JOHN A. BRYSON JAMES A. HOLTKAMP HOLLAND & HART, LLP HOLLAND & HART LLP 975 F Street, NW 60 E. South Temple, Washington, DC 20004 Suite 2000 (202) 393-6500 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 (801) 799-5800 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Clean Air Act (“Act”) and this Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. EPA prohibit the Envi- ronmental Protection Agency from considering whether regulations addressing greenhouse gases under Section 202 of the Act would meaningfully mit- igate the risks identified as the basis for their adop- tion. (I) II PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Challenges to 74 Fed. Reg. 66,496 (Dec. 15, 2009) (“Endangerment Finding”) and 75 Fed. Reg. 49,556 (Aug.