2585 King Rd., King City, ON L7B 1A1
COUNCIL AGENDA #8 - Amended March 15, 2019 MONDAY, MARCH 18, 2019 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Page
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS
Any additional items not listed on the agenda would be identified for approval.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
5. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
6. PUBLIC MEETING(S)
6 - 72 6.1. Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment Application, File No. OP-2018-03 Zoning By-law Amendment Application, File No. Z-2018-07 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, File No. 19T-18-K05 Draft Plan of Condominium Application, File No. 19CDM-18-06 Part Lot 55 and 56, Registered Plan 85; Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360, and Part Lot 7, Concession 3 13151, 13165, 13175, 13193, 13211 Keele Street, King City Owner: King Keele Developments LP Applicant: Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate Inc.) Agent: Humphries Planning Group, Adam Grossi Date of Notice: February 25, 2019
A. That Planning Report No. P-2019-07 be received;
B. That the matter of Official Plan Amendment Application (OP-2018-03), Zoning By-law Amendment Application (Z-2018-07), Draft Plan of Subdivision
Page 1 of 176 Application (19T-18-K05), Draft Plan of Condominium Application (19CDM-18- 06), submitted by Humphries Planning Group on behalf of Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate) Inc. to facilitate the redevelopment of the lands described as Part Lot 55 and 56, Registered Plan 85; Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360, and Part Lot 7, Concession 3, and providing for:
• re-designation of the “Existing Low Density Residential Area” to “Medium Density Residential Area” to allow for fifty-six (56) unit residential townhouse units to a maximum density of 46 units per hectare (18.4 units/acre); • alternative environmental buffer/minimum vegetation protection zones in specific identified areas; • a zoning amendment to rezone the lands to “Residential Townhouse R3 – Exception Section” with site-specific performance standards and “Environmental Protection (EP)”; and • a draft plan of subdivision to create three blocks of land;
be received and referred back to staff together with all agency, applicant, Township departments, Council and public comments for a further report following the receipt of the same and completion of the Planning Department’s review;
C. That staff continue to work and meet with the applicant to review and address the issues expressed by Council, the public, the applicant, Township departments and other public agencies and report back to Committee of the Whole. Public Mtg - Report No. P-2019-07
7. ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF COUNCIL MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE MINUTES
COUNCIL MINUTES
73 - 77 Council Meeting of February 25, 2019 February 25, 2019 Council Minutes (Draft)
78 - 80 Special Council Meeting of February 28, 2019 February 28, 2019 Special Council Minutes (Draft)
COMMITTEE MINUTES
81 - 82 Committee of the Whole Working Session Meeting of February 25, 2019 February 25, 2019 - COW Working Session (Draft)
83 - 89 Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 February 25, 2019 - COW (Draft)
Page 2 of 176 90 - 91 Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 25, 2019 February 25, 2019 - COW Closed Session (Draft)
92 - 93 Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 28, 2019 February 28, 2019 - COW Closed Session (Draft)
8. NOTICE OF MOTION
9. MOTION TO RECESS INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
10. RE-CONVENE COUNCIL MEETING
11. ADOPTION OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RECOMMENDATIONS
12. MOTION TO RECESS INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE, CLOSED SESSION TO CONSIDER:
Motion to move into Closed Session pursuant to the Procedural By-law Number 2018-60 to consider the items as set out in the Agenda.
12.1. ITEM 12.1 HAS BEEN PULLED FROM THE AGENDA
Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(e): Litigation or Potential Litigation Affecting the Municipality
Planning Department Report Re: Conservation Review Board (CRB) Pre-Hearing Matter, Direction Required (66 Main St. Schomberg)
12.2. Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) Personal Matters about an Identifiable Individual(s)
Clerks Department Verbal Report Re: Appointments to Township of King Committees and Boards 2018 – 2022 Term
12.3. Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) Personal Matters about an Identifiable Individual(s)
Clerks Department Verbal Report Re: Township of King Volunteer Award Nominations
12.4. (i) Committee Closed Session Confidential Report of February 11, 2019
Page 3 of 176 (ii) Committee Closed Session Confidential Report of February 25, 2019 (iii) Committee Closed Session Confidential Report of February 28, 2019
13. RE-CONVENE COUNCIL MEETING
14. BUSINESS ARISING FROM CLOSED SESSION
15. BY-LAWS
94 - 96 15.1. By-law #2019-025
A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A CERTAIN NO PRE-SALES AGREEMENT BETWEEN NOBLETON ESTATES INC. AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING (Ref. Planning Dept. Report No.: P-2018-16, C.O.W. Closed Session – April 23/18, Nobleton, File No. 19T-14K01) 2019-025 - Auth. No Pre-Sale Agreement - Nobleton Estates Inc.
97 - 151 15.2. By-law #2019-026
A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE AN UP-TO-DATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF KING (Ref. Fire & EMS Dept. Report No.: FD-2019-01, C.O.W. Mar. 18/19 – Emergency Response Plan) 2019-026 - Emergency Response Plan 2019-026 - Emergency Response Plan - Schedule A
152 15.3. By-law #2019-027
A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-63, BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A CERTAIN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN SENECA COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING (Ref. Administration Dept. Report No.: ADM CAO-2019-01, C.O.W. Mar. 18/19, Seneca College Land Lease, King City) 2019-027 - Auth Third Amend to MOU re Seneca College
15.4. By-law #2019-028
A BY-LAW TO APPOINT A MEMBER-AT-LARGE TO THE HOLLAND MARSH DRAINAGE SYSTEM JOINT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BOARD (Ref. Clerks’ Department Report, C.O.W. Closed Session, Mar. 18, 2019 - Appointment of Member-At-Large)
Page 4 of 176 153 - 171 15.5. By-law #2019-029
A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED DURING THE YEAR 2019 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING (Ref. Finance Dept. Report No.: FR-2019-08, C.O.W. Mar. 18, 2019 - 2022 Budgets & Business Plan) 2019-029 - Consolidated Budget By-law with Schedules
172 - 175 15.6. By-law #2019-030
A BY-LAW TO APPOINT A CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF KING (Ref. C.O.W. Closed Session, Feb. 25/19) 2019-030 - Appoint Chief Administrative Officer (CAO)
16. CONFIRMATION OF PROCEEDINGS BY-LAW
176 16.1. By-law #2019-031
A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING HELD ON MARCH 18, 2019 2019-031 Confirming March 18, 2019
17. ADJOURNMENT
Page 5 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. KING THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO COUNCIL
Monday, March 18, 2019
Planning Department Planning Report No. P-2019-07 RE: Official Plan Amendment Application, File No. OP-2018-03 Zoning By-law Amendment Application, File No. Z-2018-07 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, File No. 19T-18-K05 Draft Plan of Condominium Application, File No. 19CDM-18-06 Part Lot 55 and 56, Registered Plan 85; Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360, and Part Lot 7, Concession 3 13151, 13165, 13175, 13193, 13211 Keele Street, King City Owner: King Keeie Deveiopments LP Applicant: Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate inc.) Agent: Humphries Planning Group, Adam Grossi 1. RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Department respectfully submits the following recommendations:
A. That Planning Report No. P-2019-07 be received;
B. That the matter of Official Plan Amendment Application (OP-2018-03), Zoning By-law Amendment Application (Z-2018-07), Draft Plan of Subdivision Application (19T-18-K05), Draft Plan of Condominium Application (19CDM-18-06), submitted by Humphries Planning Group on behalf of Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate) Inc. to facilitate the redevelopment of the lands described as Part Lot 55 and 56, Registered Plan 85; Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360, and Part Lot 7, Concession 3, and providing for:
• re-designation of the "Existing Low Density Residential Area" to "Medium Density Residential Area" to allow for fifty-six (56) unit residential townhouse units to a maximum density of 46 units per hectare (18.4 units/acre); • alternative environmental buffer/minimum vegetation protection zones in specific identified areas; • a zoning amendment to rezone the lands to "Residential Townhouse R3 - Exception Section" with site-specific performance standards and "Environmental Protection (EP)"; and • a draft plan of subdivision to create three blocks of land;
be received and referred back to staff together with all agency, applicant, Township departments. Council and public comments for a further report following the receipt of the same and completion of the Planning Department's review;
C. That staff continue to work and meet with the applicant to review and address the issues expressed by Council, the public, the applicant, Township departments and other public agencies and report back to Committee of the Whole.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 6 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 2
2. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
The purpose of this report is to provide information with respect to the subject application and the related public meeting.
A pre-consultation meeting with Township staff and other agencies with respect to the subject lands was held on April 27, 2017. A pre-consultation meeting letter prepared by Township Planning staff, dated June 1, 2017 was provided to the applicant. The application was submitted in September 2018 and was deemed to be complete in November 2018. The Applicant hosted a public open house on December 5,2018.
3. PROPOSAL
The subject applications seek to facilitate a development consisting of 56 freehold townhouse residential units with access from common-element condominium roads with ingress/egress provided on Keele Street (opposite Norman Drive) and Dennison Street. The townhouse units are proposed to be built in a single phase of construction on full municipal water and sanitary services.
Official Plan Amendment Application OP-2018-03: The Official Plan Amendment application proposes to amend the King City Community Plan to change the designation of the lands from 'Existing Low Density Residential Area' to "Medium Density Residential Area" to permit a 56-unit residential townhouse development, to a maximum density of 46 units per hectare (18.4 units/acre).
The proposal includes alternative environmental buffer/minimum vegetation protection zones in the north-east corner of the site which would need to be addressed by the proposed amendment. The draft official plan amendment, prepared by the applicant is attached as Appendix A.
Zoning By-law Amendment Application Z-2018-07: The Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes to amend By-law 2017-66, being the Schomberg and King City Urban Areas Zoning By-law, to rezone the lands from "Residential Single Detached (R1)" and "Residential Single Detached "C" (R1C)" to "Residential Townhouse R3 - Exception Section" with site-specific performance standards. The by-law amendment also identifies the environmentaliy sensitive areas and places them in an "Environmental Protection (EP)" zone. The draft zoning by-law amendment, prepared by the applicant is attached as Appendix B.
Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 19T-18K05: The applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision propose three blocks on the subject lands (Schedule 7). The blocks consist of a 1.23 ha medium density residential block, a 0.37 ha environmental protection/ naturai heritage system biock, and a 0.15ha road widening block along King Road.
Within the medium density residential block, the application proposes a total of 56 townhouse units broken up into 11 blocks. The townhouse units include both traditional and rear-lane access units within biocks lengths ranging from four (4) to eight (8) units.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 7 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 3
Draft Plan of Condominium Application 19CDM-18-06: The application for Draft Plan of Condominium has been submitted to facilitate common- elements condominium tenure for the proposed laneways that would serve the townhouse units (Schedule 8).
It is anticipated that an application for Site Plan Development Approval will be received with the next submission and subsequent future applications for Part Lot Control are expected to facilitate the development. In support of the current applications, the applicant has submitted the following plans and reports: Draft Official Plan Amendment; Draft Zoning By-law; Planning Justification Report; Concept Plan; Concept Elevations; Draft Plan of Subdivision; Draft Plan of Common Element Condominium; Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Plan; Site Grading Plan; Site Servicing Plan; Service Connections Plan; Storm Detention Details; Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; Environmental Site Assessments; Geotechnical Investigation and Slope Stability Assessment; Hydro-geological Study; Hydrology Evaluations; Transportation Study; Noise Feasibility Study; Heritage Impact Assessment; Stage 1 and 2 Archeological Assessment; Arborist Report; Natural Heritage Evaluation; Preliminary Landscape Plan; and Sustainable Development Standards Checklist
4. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The site is located at the northeast corner of Keele Street and Dennison Street, in King City. The site consists of five existing properties, which would be consolidated, have residential dwellings and accessory structures. The colsolidated site measures approximately 1.75 ha (4.32 acres) with approximately 212.1 metres (696 ft.) of frontage on Keele Street and 36.9 metres (121 ft.) on Dennison Street. The surrounding lands are as follows:
North: Residential East: Residential/ Natural Heritage Feature South: Residential/Dennison Street West: Keele Street/ St. Andrews Presbyterian Church/ Residential
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 8 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 4
The subject lands contain a portion of, and are directly adjacent to, a significant valleyland feature associated with the East Number River and a significant woodland feature. The limits of the valleyland, long term stable top of slope, and significant woodlands have been confirmed by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TROA).
5. PUBLIC NOTICE/COMMENTS
Notice of the March 18, 2019 public meeting was mailed and circulated to the surrounding property owners, interested parties and agencies in accordance with the Planning Act on February 25, 2019. The Township published a notice of application and public meeting in the local newspaper on February 28, 2019.
In accordance with the Township's protocol for applications for official plan amendment and draft plan of subdivision, the Township encourages the applicant to host a public open house. While such an open house is not a statutory or mandatory requirement, the Township encourages such open houses in an effort to provide as much opportunity as possible for public input and participation and to enable the sharing of information. A public open house was hosted by the applicant on December 5, 2018. At the open house, the agent presented the concept plan submitted to the Township with the subject applications, as well as an alternative plan that has not been formally submitted to the Township. This report focuses only on the plan formally submitted to the Township. At the public open house comments pertained the following:
General opposition to the overall number of units and density of the proposal; Transition/compatibility of the proposed development with the character of the existing surrounding neighbourhoods; Concerns with the buffer area encroachments; Traffic congestion both existing on Keele Street and resulting from the proposed development; Overall height of the proposed townhouse units; Desire to see a range/mix of unit sizes and heights, including bungalows and two-storey units or single detached units; Concerns about the removal of vegetation and tree preservation; The provision of adequate parking for the units and visitors; Limited amount a permeable surface; The provision of adequate fire truck access/movement; Concerns with the architectural design of the townhouse blocks; and Lack of sustainable design elements, such as geothermal, solar panels, electrical supply for EV charging, optimization for energy efficiency.
At the time of the writing of this report. Planning staff has been contacted by members of the public identifying that units within the proposed development were being offered for sale. Sale of units prior to draft plan approval would be in contravention of the Planning Act.
6. AGENCY COMMENTS
The application has been circulated to various external agencies and internal Township departments. At the time of the writing of this report, comments have not yet been received from all agencies, including the Region of York. The comments received to date are summarized below.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 9 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 5
Agency Comments Toronto and TRCA staff reviewed the application and provided high level comments on Region the proposed Minimum Vegetative Protective Zone (MVPZ) and the proposed Conservation Trail Alignment. With respect to the proposed MVPZ, TRCA staff advised that Authority in principle, they have no objections to the proposed modification to the 30 metre vegetative protective zone, as the applicant has demonstrated no net loss of the overall buffer area; however, it is noted that if the Township or other agencies require changes to the proposed plans, TRCA recommends that the proponent explore all opportunities to alter the development to achieve a full 30 metres across the entire buffer area without any offsets. With respect to the proposed trail alignment, TRCA staff noted that the conceptual trail is proposed to bisect the buffer and does not connect to an existing public trail network. As such, all development and site alteration, which includes a private amenity features, should be located outside the vegetative protective zone, in order to ensure that the area functions as a fully naturalized ecological buffer. TRCA staff is generally satisfied with the proposed development plan and provided detailed design comments on the proposed stormwater management design, erosion and sediment control details and restoration planting requirements have been provided. TRCA staff has no objections of the Application for Draft Plan of Subdivision and have provided draft plan conditions. TRCA comments are attached as Appendix C. Engineering The Engineering and Public Works Department has provided detailed Comments comments related to general site design and layout, traffic impact study, geotechnical and hydrogeological investigations/reports, stormwater management/ storm drainage, servicing (sanitary and water).
Comments are attached as Appendix D. Heritage The property located at 13165 Keele Street is included on the Township's Advisory Built Heritage Inventory. The Built Heritage Inventory includes all properties Committee within the Township that have been identified as potentially having cultural heritage value or interest, but which require additional research and evaluation.
The current dwelling located at 13165 Keele Street is the former Church of the Disciples which was built sometime between 1860 and 1878. The Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) submitted with the development application finds that the property meets the criteria used to determine if a property has cultural heritage value or interest; however, due to the significant alterations to the former church (now dwelling) and its overall poor state of repair, the report recommends removal of the structure.
The Township's Heritage Advisory Committee has reviewed the HIA and advises of no objections to the removal of the structure. In an effort to reflect the history of the property and its role in the early history of King Township, the Heritage Advisory Committee recommends that a Interpretative Strategy be developed in conjunction with the Committee and the King Township Historical Society, to commemorate the site.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 10 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 6
Agency Comments Regarding the Archaeological Assessment, the Township's Heritage Coordinator notes that no construction shall take place within the subject lands prior to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sports confirming that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied to the satisfaction of the Ministry. Heritage Comments are attached as Appendix E Accessibility The Accessibility Advisory Committee provided comments acknowledging Advisory that the proposed development is considered a private development; Committee however, comments on behalf of the Committee for the consideration of the applicant have been provided which address accessibility. Comments are attached as Appendix F. Parks, With respect to the required parkland contribution, the proposed open space Recreation and and the tot-lot will not be considered acceptable. The Township will be Culture looking for a cash contribution to increase the size of St. Andrews Park.
GO Transit/ Metrolinx advised that the rail traffic information contemplated in the Noise Metrolinx Study is consistent with the current rail forecast, however, the consultant has modeled electric train inputs for passenger trains in the analysis. For acoustical analyses for adjacent development, it shall be assumed that electrified and diesel trains are equivalent. The consultant shall update the Study to use diesel train inputs for passenger trains and provide further information in this regard. Metrolinx also provided wording for warning clauses that are to be included in all development, offer to purchase, and agreements of purchase and sale or lease for each unit as the development is located within 300 metres of the of the railway right-of-way.
French and No objections. English Public School Boards Canada Post No obiections, standard conditions provided. Bell Canada No objections, standard conditions provided. Region of York Comments not received to date. Comments with respect to the proposed egress on Dennison Street relative to the intersection at Keele Street will be required.
7. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
7.1 Planning Act The Planning Act is provincial legislation that sets out the ground rules for land use planning in Ontario. Section 2 of the Planning Act speaks to matters of provincial interest and requires all decision makers to have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest. Section 3(5) of the Planning Act requires all planning decisions to be consistent with provincial policy statements and conform to provincial plans. The Provincial Policy Statement is discussed below in Section 7.2.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 11 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 7
7.2 Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning, policy and development. All decisions that affect a planning matter "shall be consistent with" the policy statements issued under the Planning Act Settlement areas, including villages are identified to be the focus of growth and development, including intensification and redevelopment. The PPS further identifies that land use must consider appropriate development to meet current and future needs while creating efficient development patterns which protect environmental sensitive areas and avoid risk to public health and safety. The following PPS policies are of particular relevance to the proposed official plan amendment:
"1.1.3.1 Settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development, and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted."
"1.1.3.2 Land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on: a) densities and a mix of land uses which: 1. efficiently use land and resources; 2. are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available, and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion; 3. minimize negative impacts to air quality and climate change, and promote energy efficiency; 4. support active transportation; 5. are transit-supportive, where transit is planned, exists or may be developed; and 6. are freight- supportive; and b) a range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment in accordance with the criteria in policy 1.1.3.3, where this can be accommodated."
"1.6.6.6 Subject to the hierarchy of services provided in policies 1.6.6.2, 1.6.6.3, 1.6.6.4 and 1.6.6.5 planning authorities may allow lot creation only if there is confirmation of sufficient reserve sewage system capacity and reserve water system capacity within municipal sewage services and municipal water services or private communal sewage services and private communal water services. The determination of sufficient reserve sewage system capacity shall include treatment capacity for hauled sewage from private communal sewage services and individual on-site sewage services."
"2.1.1 Natural features and areas shall be protected for the long term."
"2.1.2 The diversity and connectivity of natural features in an area, and the long-term ecological function and biodiversity of natural heritage systems, should be maintained, restored or, where possible, improved, recognizing linkages between and among natural heritage features and areas, surface water features and ground water features."
"2.1.3 Natural heritage systems shall be identified in Ecoregions 6E & 7E1, recognizing that natural heritage systems will vary in size and form in settlement areas, rural areas, and prime agricultural areas."
"2.1.8 Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on adjacent lands to the natural heritage features and areas identified in policies 2.1.4, 2.1.5, and 2.1.6 unless the ecological function of the adjacent lands has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or on their ecological functions."
"3.1.1 .b) Development shall generally be directed to areas outside of hazardous lands adjacent to river, stream and small inland lake systems which are impacted by flooding hazards and/or erosion hazards;"
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 12 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Paged
7.3 Region of York Official Plan and Provincial Policy/Plans The subject lands are designated 'Towns and Villages" as shown on Map 1 of the York Region Official Plan (2010), and are within the "Settlement Area" designation as per the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. The Regional Plan indicates that the Township is required to plan for population growth from 20,300 people in 2006 to 34,900 people in 2031, an increase of 14,600 people. This additional population is to be provided by a combination of development within the existing built up areas (intensification) and development within designated greenfield areas. The target set for intensification growth within the Township is 920 units.
The Province's "Places to Grow" Plan promotes intensification and sets specific targets for residential intensification. It should be noted that the targets set by the Growth Plan are to be considered in a broader community and regional context. The Growth Plan recognizes that one size does not fit all and that municipalities are to develop their own policies and phasing strategies to achieve the targets in a manner that respects and compliments the community's character.
The subject lands are also located within the Greenbelt area. However, they are located within a designated settlement area of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP) and, therefore, not subject to the Greenbelt Plan, but rather are to be governed by the King City Community Plan and the ORMCP. The subject lands are also designated "settlemenf by the ORMCP and, therefore, their development for residential purposes, in accordance with the King City Community Plan is permitted. In particular, it is noted that the subject application is seeking a reduction/reconfiguration in the extent of the environmental buffer/minimum vegetation protection zone identified by the ORMCP. Planning staff's review of this element of the subject application is ongoing. It is understood that the applications will require changes to address Township and agency comments. Through these changes, the proponent should explore all opportunities to alter the development to achieve a full 30 metres across the entire buffer area/ minimum vegetation protection zone without any offsets.
The subject lands are located in the Source Protection Plan (SPP) area under the Clean Water Act for the Credit Valley, Toronto and Region, and Central Lake Ontario (CTC) Source Protection Region. The CTC SPP contains policies to regulate and prevent significant drinking water threats. The CTC SPP identifies vulnerable areas referred to as Wellhead Protection Area -Q2 (WHPA-Q2). The WHPA-Q2 was identified to help manage activities that may reduce aquifer recharge and require site specific water balance assessments to mitigate development related impacts to recharge. The subject lands are located within the SPP and the WHPA-Q2 area. The policies of the SPP require a water balance assessment that demonstrates that pre- development recharge will be maintained. TRCA and Township staff will continue to review the water balance and technical documents to ensure compliance with the policies of the SPP.
7.4 Township of King Official Plan
7.4.1 Existino Kino Citv Communitv Plan
The King City Community Plan designates the subject lands "Existing Low Density Residential Area" (Schedule 2). The purpose of this designation is to recognize existing neighbourhoods and ensure that new development is generally compatible with the existing character and density of the area. The current land use designation permits existing uses and single detached dwellings.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 13 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 9
The subject Official Plan Amendment application proposes to redesignate the subject lands to "Medium Density Residential" to facilitate the development of the lands for 56 townhouse units accessed from a common-element condominium road to a maximum density of 46 units per hectare (18.4 units/acre). Planning staff is currently reviewing the development to with respect to the proposed density. Planning staff notes that the draft plan does not provide separate blocks and associated land area for the environmental buffers/vegetation protection zones. As a result, it is difficult to carry out density yield calculation for the subject lands since environmental features are to be excluded from the calculation but buffers are to be included. Planning staff will seek clarification from the applicant in this regard.
The current "Medium Density Residential" designation of the KCCP permits future development at a gross density of 25 units per hectare (10 units per acre), the purpose of which is to recognize the potential for higher density residential development. The Plan currently directs higher density development along King Road adjacent to the Core Area. Permitted uses in the Medium Density Residential designation include multiple forms of housing, including single detached, townhouse, and apartment dwellings.
The KCCP requires that special regard be had to the design of medium density development to ensure it is integrated with the community and that it reflects the rural character of King City. The relationship to adjacent low density residential development should be carefully planned and consideration should be given to mixing medium density development with low density development, rather than the development of large blocks.
The Community Plan contains design policies relating to the visual character of the natural and built environment in order to create developments with attractive streetscapes. Examples include, that garages should not be the dominant feature in residential areas and should generally not project beyond the house fagade, and that reverse lotting on streets shall generally be prohibited.
The Design Principles of the KCCP speak to King City's rural, low density character, and state that new development in existing neighbourhoods must be designed to be integrated with the character of the particular area, while providing for the opportunity for new neighbourhoods to create their own character within the context of the overall community. Further, infill housing development should generally be of a scale, type and density to complement existing housing stock, streetscapes, and neighbourhood patterns.
The Plan also speaks to transit insofar as to ensure that collector and arterial roads are designed to accommodate transit facilities, citing that development shall be designed to allow for efficient pedestrian access to transit routes.
The Environmental Protection Area policies for Key Natural Heritage Features (KNHF) and Minimum Vegetative Protective Zones (MVPZ) apply to the subject lands as they contain a portion of, and are directly adjacent to a significant valleyland feature associated with the East Number River and a significant woodland feature. In general, the KCCP policies, in accordance with the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, require a minimum vegetation protection zone/buffer of 30 metres from the environmental features to be incorporated into the future plan of subdivision and no development and/or lots are permitted to encroach into that buffer area. The proposed official plan amendment seeks reductions to these buffers. Based upon the current concept plan (Schedule 3), the proposed development would result in four areas of encroachment into the minimum vegetative protective zone:
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 14 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 10
•A portion of the private road and snow storage area north of Block 9; •A portion of Unit 40 and the associated rear yard; •A portion of the rear yards for units 41 -45; and •A portion of the rear yard for unit 38. The total area reduced from the required buffer is 168.3sq.m. (1,811.57 sq. ft.). The applicant is proposing to compensate for the proposed reduction in the buffer in adjacent areas on the property. As a result, the total of 168.47sq.m. (1,813.4 sq. ft.) of land will be added to the buffer area, resulting in a net gain of 0.17 sq.m. of buffer/MVPZ area. Staff notes that the draft official plan amendment submitted by the applicant does not address the request for a reduction/reconfiguration of the buffer.
In general. Planning staff has expressed concerns with respect to reductions to the MVPZ buffers within the KCCP, with the exception of minor adjustments to reflect isolated "pinch poinf areas. The Township has consistently emphasized the "environment firsf principle of the KCCP and the need to reflect this principle in the planning and consideration of development. As previously noted, staff's review of this element of the subject application is ongoing. It is understood that the applications will require changes to address Township and agency comments. Through these changes, the proponent should explore all opportunities to alter the development to achieve a full 30 metre buffer area/ minimum vegetation protection zone along the limits of the key natural heritage feature without any offsets.
Planning staff is considering the proposed amendment in the context of the policy direction of provincial and regional planning documents towards compact, efficient, and complete communities, the King City Community Plan policies, encouraging a wider mix and range of housing forms compatible with the character of existing neighbourhoods, and lastiy, in light of the Township's current Official Plan Review project.
7.4.2 Township Official Plan Review
In June, 2014, the Township identified a need to review and update the Township's Official Plan which was approved in 1970, as amended over time. The purpose of the review is to:
• develop a new Official Plan that will replace the current parent Official Plan which dates originally from 1970; • establish consistent policies through the updating of Secondary/Community Plan policies, including the King City Community Plan which directly relates to the subject application; • ensure that the Official Plan conforms to Provincial policies, Provinciai Plans and the Region of York Official Plan; • address longer-term growth management issues to 2031; • establish new policies to support additional economic growth; • entrench sustainable development principles, and • address other key issues identified through the review.
The first draft of the Official Plan, dated November 2017 proposes to place the subject lands within a Mixed Use Area designation and identifies the lands as being within a Special Development Area (#8 and #14). The Mixed Use Area designation contemplates development of new residential uses along with complementary low impact non-residential uses. Permitted uses include townhouse dwellings. The Special Development Areas identify the need for a comprehensive development plan for the lands. Policies in the draft speak to the need to ensure
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 15 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 11
compatibility with surrounding low density residential uses through the transition of height, buffering and setbacks, and landscaping.
Staff notes that the second draft of the Official Plan will be presented to Council on March 18'^ and will be subsequently released to the public. Staff will continue to review the proposal in light of the general direction of the draft Official Plan.
7.5 Zoning By-law The subject lands are currently zoned Residential Single Detached (R1)" and "Residential Single Detached "0" (RIG)" by the Schomberg and King City Urban Areas Zoning By-law #2017-66. The zoning by-law amendment application proposes to rezone the lands to "Residential Townhouse R3 - Exception Section" with site-specific performance standards. The proposed amendment also identifies the environmental features along with the proposed buffers and places them in an "Environmental Protection (EP)" zone.
The applicant has prepared a draft by-law, attached as Appendix B, accounting for the proposed townhouse dwelling units within the development and environmental protection area. The performance standards proposed in the draft by-law are summarized in the table below. The table also provides the performance standards of the R3 zone from By-law 2017-66 for comparative purposes (the bold text indicates provisions for which revisions are proposed).
R3 Zone Req. Requirement Proposed By-law 2017-66
Minimum Lot Area 175.0 m per dwelling unit 120.0 m
6.0 m Minimum Lot Frontage Not dentified* (9.0 m for a corner lot)
Minimum Front Yard 3.0 m
Minimum Rear Yard Not Identified
1.5 m (or 0.0 m where the Minimum Interior Side Yard 1.2 m dwelling unit \s attached\o another dwelling unif)
Minimum Exterior Side Yard 1.2 m
Maximum Lot Coverage Minimum pervious surface as a Not dentified percentage of the lot Minimum pemot/s surface as a percentage of the front yard ° Not Identified
Maximum Height 11.0 m 12.6 m
Lot Depth Not Identified 23.5 m *the townhouse units are proposed to be Cluster Townhouse Units, which are defined as Townhouse Dwellings that do not have individual frontage on a public street.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 16 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P'2019-07 Page 12
In terms of parking, By-law 2017-66 requires a minimum of 2.0 parking spaces per townhouse dwelling unit. The concept plan indicates that 28 units will have a total of four (4) parking spaces, two in the garage and two in the driveway and the remaining 28 units are proposed to have two (2) parking spaces, one being in the garage and the other in the driveway. Visitor parking has been proposed for the development at a rate of 0.25 spaces per unit, resulting in fourteen (14) required visitor spaces.
Planning staff notes that the proposed zoning amendment for the townhouse dwelling units applies to amend a significant number of the performance standards established for townhouses in the recently approved Zoning By-law for urban areas. While it is recognized that some relief from the standards may be necessary to accommodate the type of units proposed, more consideration needs to be given to achieving these standards, particularly since the By law was recently approved. The number of units and/or the size of the units may need to be reduced in order to achieve the performance standards of the By-law.
7.6 Development Concept The subject applications propose to redevelop the subject lands for fifty-six (56) townhouse units, at the northeast corner of Keele Street & Dennison Street in King City.
The fifty-six (56) townhouse units, intended to be freehold units with a common-element condominium road, are proposed to be arranged in eleven (11) blocks, ranging from four (4) to eight (8) dwelling units per block, running parallel to Keele Street, with the exception of block 8 which runs perpendicular to Keele Street. Access to the townhouse development is proposed via an internal roads with ingress/egress on Keele Street (opposite Norman Drive) and on Dennison Street.
The row of townhouses located closest to Keele Street is comprised of 6.0 metre rear lane units with street facing front facades to create a pedestrian oriented streetscape, and a window street experience along Keele Street. Access to the garages and internal road will be from the back of these units. Block 9, which is centrally located in the site is proposed to be the same type of 6.0 metre rear lane units. The northern and eastern rows of townhouse units, adjacent the existing residential lots to the east and south are proposed to be 6.0 metre wide conventional units, with access to the internal road from the front. Each townhouse unit within the development is proposed to have access to the common element condominium roads, accessing a private single car or double car garage, as shown on the proposed Concept Plan drawing, attached as Schedule 3. A tot-lot amenity space is proposed at the rear of the site adjacent to the environmental buffer and block 10 of the townhouses. A recreational trail is proposed within the buffer area. The development is proposed to be serviced by municipal water and sanitary sewers.
Natural Heritage Evaluation A detailed Natural Heritage Evaluation (NHE) was prepared by Beacon Environmental. The NHE identifies that the subject lands contain significant valleylands, significant woodlands, and a meander belt of a tributary of the Number River which are considered to be Key Natural Heritage Features (KNHFs) by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. The limits of the KNHFs are defined by the greater of the long term stable top of bank and the TRCA staked natural feature limit associated with the treed valley corridor.
The NHE identifies that the proposed development is outside of the identified KNHFs and the width of the buffer/ minimum vegetative protective zone will generally be 30 metres, with some
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 17 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 13
pinch points where the MVPZ is proposed to vary from 22 metres to 39 metres. Potential negative environmental impacts of the proposed development may include: • removal of 164 trees (including 8 hazard trees); • direct loss of common vegetation within the yard areas; • potential hydrological effects on features due to increased impervious surface and runoff; • soil mobilization during site grading and stockpiling of material; • indirect noise and light effects on wildlife; and • intrusion of people and pets into surrounding natural areas.
The NHE identifies mitigation measures to address the potential impacts outlined above. The encroachments into the MVPZ are proposed to be offset so that there is no net loss in the total area of the MVPZ. The NHE identifies that proposed encroachments in to the MVPZ are substantially less that the existing dwelling and accessory structures located at 13211 Keele Street (Schedule 4). Other mitigation measures include timing of tree removal outside nesting periods, tree preservation, low impact development (LID) techniques to achieve water balance requirements, erosion and sediment control measures, and landscape plantings within the MVPZ. The NHE concludes that with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the proposed development is not anticipated to have a negative impact on the adjacent Key Natural Heritage and Key Hydrological Features.
An Arborist Report, prepared by Beacon Environmental was also submitted with the applications. The report contains an inventory of all the trees on site and identifies the trees which are proposed to be removed and those identified for preservation. A total of 163 trees are proposed to be removed to accommodate the proposed development. The report recommends that tree removal be replaced after construction with native trees in the MVPZ.
A Preliminary Landscape Plan prepared by Strybos Barren King, dated August 2018 (Schedule 5) indicates plantings within the buffer/MVPZ and throughout the site. It is noted that further details on proposed plantings and compensation planting will be required through the Site Plan Approval process.
TRCA staff have reviewed the above noted documents and provided comment which are attached as Appendix C.
Traffic A Transportation Impact Study was prepared by Nextrans, dated July 2018, and was submitted in support of the subject applications. The report forecasts the number of trips generated by the development, assesses the impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding road network, and identifies any changes to the surrounding road system required to support the development. Traffic volumes were counted at the intersections of Keele Street & Dennison Street and Keele Street and King Road in June 2017 and October 2016. The Study concluded the following:
• Traffic on the subject section of Keele street is expected to grow an estimated rate of 2.2% per year; • The proposed development is anticipated to generate 32 two-way trips (5 inbound and 27 outbound) during the AM peak hours and 37 two-way trips (25 inbound and 12 outbound) during the PM peak hours.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 18 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P'2019-07 Page 14
• The intersection capacity analysis results indicate that the study intersection and access are expected to continue to operate with excellent levels of service. • Stop signs are recommended at the site egress driveways located on Keele Street and Dennison Street, as well as throughout the internal road network. • Southbound left turn and northbound right turn lanes are not warranted on Keele Street on approach to the site access; •A 12 metre garbage/emergency truck can maneuver throughout the site.
Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report A Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 2018 was submitted to illustrate the proposed servicing concept and establish the feasibility of servicing the proposed development on full municipal services. The report contains a stormwater management section to address proposed quality, quantity and water balance measures. The Report concluded the following: • The proposed townhouse and single detached dwellings can be serviced on full municipal water and sanitary services; • Through best management practices, stormwater management quality and quantity control can be achieved for 5 and 100 year storm through the use of an internal storm sewer network to collect and convey site runoff to the infiltration facilities, detention storage and quality treatment unit. The report notes that controlled release rates do not meet target release rates 2 year storm flows. • Predevelopment infiltration volumes can be achieved through proposed infiltration facilities. The Township's Engineering and Public Works Department and TRCA have provided comments on this report and are attached as Appendix D.
Noise HGC Engineering prepared a Noise Feasibility Study, dated August 2018, have beed submitted in support of the applications to assess the acoustical environment in as it relates to the proposed development. The Study identified Keele Street and the GO Tansit Rail line as the only dominant noise source and recommended that forced air ventilation systems with ductwork sized for future central air conditioning should be required for the proposed units closest to Keele Street.The Study also notes that warning clauses are also recommended to inform future occupants of traffic noise impacts and that the CN/GO Transit line is within 300 metres of the development.
Geotechnical, Hydrogeological and Hydrology Geotechnical, Hydrogeological and Hydrology reports prepared by Edward Wong & Associates Inc. have been submitted in support of the applications to evaluate the soils, stable top of slope, address runoff and infiltration, and demonstrate that the proposed development will have no adverse effects on the hydrologically sensitive features and their functions. An additional Geotechnical report was prepared by Canada Engineering Services Inc. The reports have been reviewed by the Township's Engineering and Public Works Department and TRCA staff. A number of comments and concerns have been raised that will need to be addressed by the applicant.
Phase 1 Environmental Assessments Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments have been prepared by Edward Wong & Associates for the subject lands. The purpose of the Assessment was to identify presence or absence of
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 19 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 15
areas of potential environmental concern. The Phase One ESAs do not include physical sampling or testing, and is based upon visual observations, and a review of available or supplied factual data. The Assessments states that no areas of potential concern were determined to exist and as a result, no contaminates of potential concern would be located on the property. The Assessment concluded that based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, no further work is warranted at this time.
Heritage Impact Assessment A Heritage Impact Assessment (MIA), prepared by ASI, dated August 2018 was prepared for the subject lands. The MIA examines cultural and heritage significance of the properties in the study area and address any negative impacts as a result to the proposed development. The assessment notes that the property at 13165 Keele Street is on the Township's Built Heritage Inventory. The Heritage Advisory Committee and the Township's Heritage Coordinator have reviewed the HI A and provided the comments summarized in Section 6 of this report and attached as Appendix E.
Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessments A Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment, prepared by ASI, dated July 2018, was submitted. The assessment concluded that no archaeological resources were encountered during physical assessment. The Assessment recommends that the proposed development be considered cleared of any further requirement for archaeological assessment. The Assessment has been forwarded to the Ministry of Culture, Tourism, and Recreation for their review and comment.
7.7 Planning Discussion
The subject applications have been submitted to facilitate the redevelopment of the subject lands for fifty-six (56) townhouse units. The development proposal, as currently configured requires an amendment to the King City Community Plan to address the reduction and reconfiguration of the Minimum Vegetative Protective Zone (MVPZ), amongst other matters. The Natural Heritage Evaluation submitted with the application is comprehensive and acknowledges that the proposed encroachments into the MVPZ are to be offset so that there is no net loss in the total area of the MVPZ. The NHE identifies that proposed encroachments in to the MVPZ are substantially less than currently occur as a result of the existing dwelling and accessory structures located at 13211 Keele Street (Schedule 4).
The townhouse development is proposed to be accessed via internal roads with ingress/egress on Keele Street (opposite Norman Drive) and on Dennison Street. The Concept Plan shows roadways with limited maneuvering space, being only 6.0 metres wide. Engineering comments recommend that all internal laneways be 7.5 metres wide (asphalt surface). The Township's Traffic Peer reviewer, R.J. Burnside has requested additional study In respect to the anticipated traffic demands and resulting impacts based on the proposed development and the overall anticipated growth in the community.
Additional issues have been brought to attention through the review by Township departments and TRCA staff. Additional details with regards to hydrogeology and stormwater is required. In particular, the approach of using low impact development techniques for infiltration is encouraged; however, more information/calculations are necessary to ensure that the techniques will function as intended and comply with all applicable standards.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 20 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 16
The resulting development would place added demand on the existing St. Andrews Park and as such, it has been identified that the park would require an expansion. The proposed tot lot within the development and the environmental buffer will not be considered towards the parkland contribution for the site. Staff notes that the location of the proposed tot lot may present safety concerns as it is tucked away at the rear of the development between the open space block and a block of townhouse units. Any common amenity space should be provided in a space that has clear visibility from the laneways.
The proposed development requires a number of amendments to the zone performance standards for townhouse units, reduction in the minimum buffer/MVPZ, reduced roadway standards, and will increase demand on stormwater management infrastructure. Based on these elements Staff has concerns that the proposed density of the site is too high and the applicant should look to reduce the number of units proposed to better address the development concerns. Through any redesign of the proposal, the proponent is encouraged to explore all opportunities to alter the development to achieve a full 30 metres across the entire buffer area without any offsets.
Preliminary townhouse elevations were submitted with the applications. Staff has concerns with the proposed design of the units. The proponent is encouraged to revise the proposal to include a variety of unit sizes, including two storey and bungalow-loft units adjacent to existing residential areas. The overall height of three-storey units is encouraged to be reduced by accommodating the third storey within the roofline. Townhouse blocks should not contain more than 6 units. The applicant is also encouraged to explore options to break-up the rooflines of the townhouse blocks and articulation of the walls and materials between units to assist with the overall massing of the blocks. The design of the units and elevations will continue to be reviewed through the future application for site plan approval. Architectural peer review would be required through the site plan process.
The subject site is located in the King City service area and the proposed development would be required to connect to the municipal sanitary sewer service. Water and wastewater servicing capacity to accommodate growth has been assigned to King City by the Region of York in the amount of 5,925 people for growth to year end 2021. The current servicing reserve for intensification may be sufficient to accommodate this development. Staff notes that the reserve for intensification and the overall servicing capacity in King City may be limited based on current development proposal.
Planning staff's preliminary review of the application in respect to the above noted matters has identified some issues that will require further discussions with the applicant. The proposed plan requires a reconfiguration of the buffer lands. The plan layout should be further explored to address concerns raised.
8. INTEGRATED SUSTAINABILITV PLAN LINKAGE
The recommendations of this report support the land use planning objectives of the Environmental Pillar, of the Township's Sustainability Plan. However, further analysis based upon a revised concept plan in regard to the Township's Sustainability Plan will be included in the subsequent recommendation report from Planning staff to Committee on this matter.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 21 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 17
9. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The required application fee has been submitted. In addition, any external costs (peer-review architect, legal, engineering, etc.) incurred by the Township through the processing and review of this appiication wili be recovered from the applicant in accordance with the Township's standard practice and owner's acknowledgement through the application form. Security deposits, levies, development charges, and cash-in-lieu of parkland, if required, will be collected at later stages in the development review process. Further financial implications, if any, will be assessed as the review proceeds.
10. CONCLUSION
The review of the application remains on-going by the Planning Department and other Township Departments and external agencies. Planning staff requires further opportunity to continue to review the application, provide comments, and work with the applicant to review and address the various issues raised in this report as well as by the public and Council. In addition, comments have not yet been received from all departments and agencies. As the review proceeds. Planning staff will report back to Committee of the Whole with respect to a decision on the application. It is recommended that this report be received and that the application be referred back to staff, together with any public and Council comments, for a future report.
Prepared and Recommended by: Reviewed by:
Kristen HarflsoTTTT/ICIP, RPP Gaspare Ritacca, MClP, RPP Planner Manager of Planning and Development
Reviewed and Recommended by:
Stephefi Nayi9r MClP, RPP Director of Planning and Development
ATTACHMENTS
Schedules 1. Location Map 2. King City Community Plan Land Use Schedule 3. Development Concept 4. Natural Heritage Evaluation Figure 3 5. Preliminary Landscape Plan 6. Concept Rendering (from Humphries Planning Group Planning Justification Report) 7. Draft Plan of Subdivision Plan
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 22 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Planning Department Report P-2019-07 Page 18
8. Draft Plan of Condominium Plan
Appendices A. Draft Official Plan Amendment (submitted by Applicant) B. Draft Zoning By-law Amendment 0. TRCA Comments D. Engineering Comments E. Heritage Advisory Committee Comments F. Accessibility Advisory Committee Comments
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 23 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Location Map
Stj. Andrew s Presbyteillan Cnurch
St. Anc ews Park
ennison Street
Heritage Park
Number Crescent
King Road
Subject Lands SCHEDULE 1 Official Plan Amendment Application, File No. OP-2018-03 Zoning By-law Amendment Application, File No. Z-2018-07 V Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, File No. 19T-18-K05 Prepared by Township of King Draft Plan of Condominium Application, File No. 19CDM-18-06 Planning Department 13151, 13165, 13175, 13193, 13211 Keele Street, King City Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 24 of 176 Official Plan Amendment App... Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07
Township of m King Schedule 4 Land Use and Transportation Strategy
Subject Lands King City Community Plan Community Plan Boundary • ExisUng Community OAK RIDGES MORAINE PLAN AREA ) I AmendmentBoundary I ] Oak Rides Moraine Settlement Area
Oak Rides Moraine Natural Core Area NATURAL ENVIRONMENT'®'^'^"'^''^""' Environmental Protection Area Special Study Area OPEN SPACE AND INSTITUTIONAL iR Cemetery • Community or Neighbourhood Park Site Elementary SchoolSite Institutional m Community Park Area RESIDENTIAL mH Existing Low Density Residential Area mil Estate Residential 1Area iS ' Estate Residential 2 Area Estate Residential 3 Area Low Density Residential t Area IJ..^iL'' LowDensity Residential 2 Area
HH Low Density Residential 3Area AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Page 25 of 176 Low Density Residential 4 Area Low Density Residential 5 Area Low Density Residential 6 Area # Medium Density Resldenllal Area MIXED USE
Core Area GO Station Area miM Mixed Use Area GeoNidiics "'•'I PresttgeEmployment Area CO 0 1000m Existing Commercial Area 1 RUF^L m HH Rural Area D c r~ m to LEGEND
S 1=' II! ;• ! ! : = i" KEYPLAN ' __. "ITi - Page 26 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. ITEM AGENDA
SA A»Ei>rgg>UE!>*IE3>K I"' L. ^ WT^VATguwejJ 3 'J .. \ PAflTOFLOTT, C0NCESSK)M3M} LOT Se AND PAJTTOF LOT SS REGISTERED PLAN es TOWNSHIP OF KING lEGIOKU. WJMCrALin W Ytr*
S T A T K VIE \V
y v'WlT. t'i' PRELIMINARY NOTTOBEUSEDF» CONSnUTW X' KE^|.€ STFVeET ^• I^ELE SJtREET ^
LOI S IMMAHY
KITAL
Srfi: SIAHMICS
DESIGN GROUP INC
yiCJjlW
XmPfClTECnOHZONE AREA 3ISAS
AREA TAKEN f ROM PROTECTION ZONE IQS 30 CONCEPT PLAN AREA CONlRlBUTeD TO PROTfiCTlON ZONE ^66 4?m tfOOJB TTT&t. U16S, 13193 & ISII KEEIE ST REDLX:iX» Of 3Qm PROTECTION ZONE AS A * CS rrowo# Of itKa
A toiilfiii CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN B LD-
Official Plan Amendment App... Amendment Plan Official Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
x-i' t-t.
Legend Proposed • Subject Property Figure 3 Proposed Devekppmenl Development - Long Term Stable Top of Bank (Edward Wong 4 Associates Inc. 2017) 13151 -13211 Keele Street, Township of King — Staked Natural Feature Limit(TRCA November 28. 2017) Stateview Homes (High Crown Estates) Inc. — — - 30 m Minimum Vegetation Protection Zone UTMZone17N,NAD 83 Meartder Belt (Beacon 2018) First Base Solutions Meander Belt » 30 m Web Mapping SerMce 2017 AreaErrcroadring onto MVPZ (168 m') 0 10 20 40 Metres AreaContrrbuted toMVPZ (168 m ') 1:900 1 I I I I ' I 'I
Project 216212 BEACON °° SCHEDULE 4 Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 27 of 176
Page 28 of 176 of 28 Page Official Plan Amendment App... Amendment Plan Official Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Number Report Department Planning
4 I I m
£ 6 t
I I i
!ll9il! AGENDA ITEM #6.1. ITEM AGENDA AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
HUMPHRIES PLANNING GROUP AUGUST 2018
FIGURE 4 - CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS
s
Rear Lane Townhouses
Traditional Townhouses
Stateview Homes (High Crown) Estate Inc. Page 8 of 31 Planning Justification Report SCHEDULE 6 Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 29 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
EXISTING residential
BLOCK 3 NATURAL HERITAG SYSTEM 0.371 ha tS.75
BLO0K1A roAd \ WIDENING 0.'148 ha RS
f^ORMANOR/VE
v„ BLOCK 2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1.234 ha
L
N" K2—'"V existing residential
mm
OENNISONSTREET ^ (/)
ACOmONAL Wf{:«?VATlOH DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION LAMO i;S£ fS«ctlenSl(W) o< ftonAaMAct,ft.SOi ItM. lOT 56 AND PAAT QT LOT 55 Rm4 WCcrn) e. P. IS. ot «rr.«A4«dto H** H. I*)?) •X t). e). I). * 0 - Of.(toi RCCSICReO PlAH 65 0«ns4ly «) - ^ toy OAP Kartai^ tf] • M« aeetdtc* T0TA4. h) • piped•«{« to to f>si(P«d ty JOKiOpor 0 - team. Mndyleem PART OP LOT y. < k) - oP tarwicn le t* n^oOoo»o*cBloty OontoOT TOWNSH^ Of Kmc
scale 1:400 0imn_r K 20 30m SCHEDULE 7 Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 30 of 176 Official Plan Amendment App... Planning Department ReportNumberP-2019-07
PLACE OF WORSHIP EXISJING RESIDENTIAL
KEELE STREET (counu «o*o si
I J._
I ® AGENDA ITEM#6.1.
Page 31 of176 DENNISON STREET
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
8i! i 1? AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
AMENDMENT NUMBER XX
TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN
OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING PLANNING AREA (KING CITY COMMUNITY PLAN)
appendix a Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 32 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
PART I-THE PREAMBLE
I AMENDMENT STRUCTURE
PART I- THE PREAMBLE is included for information purposes and is not an operative part of the
Amendment.
PART II - THE AMENDMENT, includes the Schedules attached hereto, indicates the specific aspects of the Official Plan being affected by Official Plan Amendment No. XX, and is the operative part of this
Amendment.
II PURPOSE
The purpose of this Amendment is to revise the land use designation of the area subject to this
Amendment, and as shown on Schedules "1" and "2", attached hereto. Specifically, this Amendment will change the land use designation from "Existing Low Density Residential Area", as shown on Schedule 4 - Land Use and Transportation Study of the King City Community Plan (OPA 540), to "Medium Density Residential Area", to permit a residential development consisting of fifty-six (56) freehold townhouse
dwellings, tied to a common element condominium road, serviced by municipal water and sanitary
services.
III LOCATION
The lands subject to this Amendment (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Lands), are shown on Schedule "1" attached hereto as "Area Subject to Amendment XX". The subject lands are located at the
north-east corner ofthe intersection of Keele Street and Dennison Street and are described as Part of Lot 55 and Lot 56, Registered Plan 85, Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360 and Part of Lot 7, Concession 3. The
lands are known municipally as 13151,13165,13175,13193 and 13211 Keele Street.
IV BASIS
The decision to amend the Official Plan, including those policies below, contained in Part 2 of this
amendment is based on the following:
1. The Provincial Policy Statement 2014 (the "PPS") sets out the direction for matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and the development of land, including
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 33 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
policies that encourage growth and redevelopment in existing urban areas. The PPS promotes development and land use patters that are efficient, cost effective and provide
densities that will:
a. Efficiently use land, resources, infrastructure, and existing and planning public
services;
b. Are appropriate for, and efficiently utilize existing and planned infrastructure and public service facilities, avoiding the need for unnecessary expansion; and,
c. Encourage place making through innovative and well-designed built form.
The PPS promotes a range and mix of housing types and residential densities that will meet the projected needs of current and future residents. This includes maintaining growth for a minimum often (10) years through redevelopment and intensification. The proposal is consistent with the PPS and promotes its goals and objectives.
The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2017 (the "Growth Plan) is intended to guide decisions on a range of matters, including land use planning, economic development, urban built form and housing. The Growth Plan provides a framework for managing growth in the Greater Golden Horseshoe including: directions for where and how to grow; the provision of infrastructure to support growth; the preservation of natural systems and the cultivation of cultural heritage resources. The Growth Plan promotes increased intensification of existing built-up areas. The subject lands are located within the built-up area and has been planned to provide a more diverse form of residential housing that what currently exists. The proposal will provide housing density to meet the needs of current and future residents, ensure appropriate transition in terms of built form and density and will maintain the goals and objectives of the King City Community Plan. The proposal conforms with the Growth Plan.
The York Region Official Plan (the "ROP") designates the Subject Lands "Towns and Villages". Towns and Villages are intended to have their own unique sense of place and identity, and contribute to the intensification of York Region through modest growth. The ROP encourages development that is designed to be at a pedestrian scale, with an emphasis on creating attractive buildings and landscaped areas to enrich streetscapes.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 34 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Development should also focus on pedestrian safety, comfort and mobility. The proposed
development will further diversify the housing stock in King City, and provide for an
attractive streetscape along Keele Street. Pedestrian routes in and around the development will encourage the use of multi-modal forms of transportation and help to reduce automobile use in the neighbourhood.
4. This amendment will permit a residential development that makes efficient use of available land and infrastructure, while ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses. The development has been designed to provide appropriate transition to the established low-density areas surrounding the subject lands, through the site design and the use of setbacks, building heights and landscaping.
5. This amendment will also ensure that existing key natural heritage features are protected through the creation of an appropriate Minimum Vegetation Protection Zone, based on the conclusions and recommendations of a Natural Heritage Evaluation prepared in support ofthe proposed development.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 35 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
PART II - THE AMENDMENT
I INTRODUCTION
All of this part of the document entitled Part II - The Amendment, consisting of the following text and
schedules, constitute Amendment No. XX to the King City Community Plan, 2000.
II DETAILS OF THE AMENDMENT
The King City Community Plan, as amended by Official Plan Amendment No. 540, is hereby and further
amended as follows:
1. By amending Schedule 4 - Land Use and Transportation Strategy to redesignate the Subject Lands from "Existing Low Density Residential Area" to "Medium Density
Residential Area - Policy 7.10.X"and "Environmental Protection Area", as shown on
Schedule "1" to this amendment;
2. By adding Section 7.10.X as follows:
7.10.x Medium Density Residential Area
Part of Lot 55 and Lot 56, Registered Plan 85, Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360
and Part of Lot 7, Concession 3
Township of King
(Official Plan Amendment Number XX)
Notwithstanding the policies of Sections 7.10.1,7.10.2 and 7.10.3 of this Plan, or
any other provisions of this Plan to the contrary, the subject lands shall be
developed in accordance with the following:
i) The maximum development density shall be 46 units per net residential
hectare;
ii) Permitted uses are townhouse dwelling units, with freehold or condominium tenure, accessed through a private road.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 36 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
iii) The maximum building height shall be three (3) storeys above finished
grade. iv) The maximum number of townhouse units in a block shall be eight (8).
II INTERPRETATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
Amendment No. XX to the Township of King Official Plan shall be interpreted and implemented in accordance with the respective policies of the Township of King Planning Area, as amended, specifically by the King City Community Plan (CPA 54) and further amended by Official Plan Amendment No. 540, being the Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity Amendment.
In accordance with Section 12.4 of the King City Community Plan, the policies of the Township of King Official Plan pertaining to the subject lands will be implemented by way an amendment to the Township of KingZoning By-law, and, through Draft Plan of Subdivision, Draft Plan of Condominium and Site Plan
approvals, pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.0.1990, c. P.13.
The boundaries of the subject lands, as shown on Schedules "1" and "2" are approximate. Minor Adjustments shall be permitted and shall not require further amendment to the Official Plan, so long as
the intent of the applicable policies is maintained.
The policies of the Official Plan as amended from time to time, regarding the interpretation of the Official Plan, apply in regard to this Official Plan Amendment No. XX. In the event of a conflict between the Official Plan, or any amendment thereto and this Official Plan Amendment, the policies of Official Plan
Amendment No. XX shall prevail unless otherwise specified.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 37 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
PLAN SHOWING
Part of Lot 55 and Lot 56, Registered Plan 85, Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360
and Part of Lot 7, Concession 3
TOWNSHIP OF KING
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
EAST KUMBER DRIVE
drive
'mmmm
y/^.y//%'y/,'7/.. 7/7/A//•'/.
HERTTAGePABK
LANDS RE0ESI6NATED FROM LANDS REDESIGNATED FROM "EXISTING LOW DENSfTY •EXISTINO LOW DENSITY -V./ RESiDBmALAREA" TO "MEDIUM RESIDENTIALAREA* TO DENSITY RESIDENTIALAREA- •ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY 7.10JC AREA"
THIS IS SCHEDULE"!" TO
OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. XX
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 38 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
BY-LAW NUMBER - 2018-XX
A BY-LAW TO AMEND ZONING BY-LAW NUMBER 2017-66-AS AMENDED
WHEREAS Zoning By-law Number 2016-71, being a by-law to regulate the use of land and the character, location and use of buildings and structures In the Township of King was passed on the 26th day of June, 2017;
AND WHEREAS It Is deemed necessary to further amend By-law Number 2017-66, as amended, where such amendment conforms to the King City Community Plan, of the Township of King;
AND WHEREAS authority Is granted pursuant to Sections 34 and 36 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter P. 13, to the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King, to exercise such powers;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the lands subject to this by-law consist of Part of Lot 55 and Lot 56, Registered Plan 85, Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360 and Part of Lot 7, Concession 3, In the Township of King, In the Regional Municipality of York, municipally known as 13151,13165,13175,13193 and 13211 Keele Street.
2. THAT Schedules "1" and "2" attached hereto form part of this By-law.
3. THAT Schedule "A4"of By-law Number 2017-66, as amended be further amended by:
a) Changing the zone symbols from "Rl" - Residential Single Detached and "R1C" - Residential Single Detached "C" Zones to "R3" - Residential Townhouse - Exception Section - 6.5.10.x and "EP" Environmental Protection Zones for those lands shown on Schedules "1" and "2" attached hereto.
4. THAT Section 6.5.10 of By-law Number 2017-66, as amended, be further amended by adding the following subsection:
6.5.10.x Exception re: Part of Lot 55 and Lot 56. Realstered Plan 85. Lots 1 and 2. Realstered Plan 360 and Part of Lot 7. Concession 3(as 13151.13165.13175.13193 and 13211 Keele Street)
Notwithstanding the provisions of this By-law, the lands delineated as "R3" - Residential Townhouse Zone - Exception Section - 6.5.10.X Zone, as shown on Schedules "1" and "2" attached hereto, my be used In accordance with the ifollowing provisions:
I. For the purpose of this by-law, all units shall be considered to be Cluster Townhouse Dwelling units.
II. Section 3.12 shall not apply.
III. A minimum of 0.25 parking spaces per dwelling units shall be provided for visitors.
APPENDIX B Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 39 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
iv. The minimum lot area shall be 120 m^per dwelling unit.
V. The minimum lot frontage for a corner lot shall be 7.4 m.
vi. The minimum lot depth shall be 23.5 m.
vii. The minimum front yard shall be 3.0 m.
viii. The minimum interior side yard shall be 1.2 m.
ix. The minimum exterior side yard shall be 1.2 m.
X. The maximum lot coverage shall be 65%.
xi. The maximum building height shall be 12.6 m.
xii. The maximum number of dwelling units shall be 56.
5. THAT this By-law shall come into force on the day it was passed, where no notice of appeal has been filed to the Township Clerk in accordance with the requirements and within the time prescribed under Section 34(19) of the Planning Act.
READ a FIRST and SECOND time this day of 2018.
READ a THIRD time and PASSED this day of 2018.
Steve Pellegrini, Mayor
Kathryn Moyle Director of Clerks/By-law Enforcement Township Clerk
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 40 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
THIS IS SCHEDLE "1" TO BY-LAW NO. 2018-
PART OF LOT 55 AND LOT 56, REGISTERED PLAN 85, LOTS 1 AND 2, REGISTERED PLAN 360 AND PART OF LOT 7, CONCESSION 3
TOWNSHIP OF KING
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
EAST HUMBER DRIVE
norman drive
R3 (6.5.10.X)
DENNISON STREET
heritage PARK
IILANDS SUBJECT TOTHIS BY-LAW ZONE BOUNDARY
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 41 of 176
Page 42 of 176 of 42 Page Official Plan Amendment App... Amendment Plan Official Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Number Report Department Planning
THIS IS SCHEDLE "2" TO BY-LAW NO. 2018-
PART OF LOT 55 AND LOT 56, REGISTERED PLAN 85, LOTS 1 AND 2, REGISTERED PLAN 360 AND PART OF LOT 7, CONCESSION 3
TOWNSHIP OF KING
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
UMBER
LANDS REZONED FROM "Rl" - RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DETACHED AND "RIC" - RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DETACHED "C" ZONES TO "R3" - RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE - EXCEPTION SECTION - 6.5.10.x AND "EP" ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ZONES.
RlB
Rl-30
Rl-30
DEW STREET u AGENDA ITEM #6.1. ITEM AGENDA AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
January 11, 2019 CFN 60668
BY E-MAIL [email protected])
Ms. Kristen Harrison Planner II Planning Department Township of King 2075 King Road King, ON L7B 1A1
Dear Ms. Harrison:
Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 19T-18-K05 Draft Plan of Condominium 19CDM-18-06 Official Plan Amendment Application OP-2018-03 Zoning By-Law Amendment Application Z-2018-07 13151 -13211 Keele Street Part of Lot 6 & 7, Concession 3; Township of King, York Region Stateview Homes (Highway Crown Estate Inc.)
This letter acknowledges receipt of the above noted applications in the Township of King, received by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) on November 22, 2016. TRCA staff has reviewed the above noted applications, and as per the "Living City Policies for Planning and Development within the Watersheds of the TRCA" (LCP), provides the following comments as part of TRCA's commenting role under the Planning Act, the Authority's delegated responsibility of representing the provincial interest on natural hazards encompassed by Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014\ TRCA's Regulatory Authority under Ontario Regulation 166/06, Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses: and, our Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Region of York where we advise our municipal partners on matters related to Provincial Policies relevant to TRCA's jurisdiction.
Background It is our understanding that the purpose of the above noted applications is to facilitate the development of 56 freehold residential townhouse units and a private common elements road.
Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 19T-18-K05 It is our understanding that the purpose of this application is to facilitate the creation of three blocks on the subject lands. The blocks are to consist of a 1.23 ha medium density residential block, a 0.37 ha environmental protection/natural heritage system block, and a 0.15 ha road widening block.
Draft Plan of Condominium 19CDM-18-06 It is our understanding the purpose of this application is to facilitate condominium tenure for the proposed private laneway that will service the townhouse units.
Official Plan Amendment Application OP-2018-03 It is our understanding that the purpose of this application is to Amendment the King City Community Plan (CPA 540) to change the land use designation from "Existing Low Density Residential Area" to "Medium Density Residential Area" with site specific provisions and "Environmental Protection Area".
7:416.661.6600 | F;416.661.6898 | [email protected] I 101 Exchange Avenue, Vaughan, ON L4K5R6 I www.trca.ca
APPENDIX C Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 43 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 2 January 11. 2019
Zoning By-Law Amendment Application Z-2016-14 It is our understanding that the purpose of this application is to amend Zoning By-Law No. 107-66 to change the zone symbols from "R1" - Residential Single Detached and "R1C" - Residential Single Detached "C" Zones to "R3" - Residential Townhouse with several site specific performance standards and "EP" Environmental Protection Zones.
Applicable Policies. Regulations Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP) The subject properties are located within an area designated Settlement Area under the ORMCP. The TRCA has an interest in conserving, protecting and enhancing the natural features of the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM) and provides technical advice to the Township on applications that are located on the ORM. However, given that municipalities are the designated approval authority under the Oak Ridges Moraine Act, the Township of King has the responsibility to ensure this proposal conforms to the provisions of the ORMCP.
CTC Source Protection Plan The Source Protection Plan (SPP) under the Clean WaterAct. 2006. developed for the Credit Valley, Toronto and Region and Central Lake Ontario (CTC) Source Protection Region took effect on December 31, 2015. The CTC SPP contains policies to ensure that existing activities occurring when the Plan takes effect cease to be significant drinking water threats, and to prevent future activities from becoming significant threats to drinking water. Vulnerable Areas referred to as Wellhead Protection Area-Q2 (WHPA-Q2) have been delineated by the CTC SPP in accordance with Technical Rules developed by the Ministry of the Environment under O. Reo. 287/07. This WHPA-Q2 area was identified to help manage activities that may reduce recharge to an aquifer (Prescribed Threat No. 20 under the Clean WaterAct, 2006). Certain types of applications within the WHPA-Q2 area are subject to CTC SPP Policy REC-1 parts 2 a) and b) and require the submission of a site-specific water balance assessment to mitigate development related impacts to recharge reduction. As a technical service provider to the municipality for the REC-1 2 a) and b) policies of the CTC SPP, TRCA's role is to review water balance assessments to ensure they comply with standard practices outlined in guidance to proponents and make recommendations to the Planning Approval Authority as to whether pre-development recharge will be maintained. However, as municipalities are the Planning Approval Authority responsible for implementing the REC-1 Policy, the Township of King is required to ensure this application conforms to the CTC SPP. Living City Policies The Living City Policies for Planning and Development in the Watersheds of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (LCP) describes a "Natural System" made up of water resources, natural features and areas, natural hazards, potential natural cover and/or buffers. The LCP recommends that development, infrastructure and site alteration not be permitted within the Natural System, and that these lands be conveyed into public ownership for their long term protection and enhancement. The LCP also provides policies for developing adjacent to, and in, the Natural System (where permitted), while meeting natural hazard management requirements, and maintaining and enhancing the functions of the protected Natural System. It is these policies that guide TRCA's review of the subject application, along with those found in other Provincial and municipal plans, documents and guidelines.
Ontario Regulation 166/06 A portion of the subject lands are located within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed. As such, a TRCA permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06 will be required for any development or site alteration within the Regulated Area.
General Comments Based on a review of the circulated materials, TRCA staff is generally satisfied with the proposed development plan. Detailed design comments on the proposed stromwater management design, erosion and sediment control details and restoration planting requirements have been included in Appendix 'C. In general, we note the following high level items with respect to the current submission:
Minimum Vegetation Protection Zone 1. The subject lands contain a portion of, and are directly adjacent to, a Significant Valleyland feature associated with the East Humber River and a Significant Woodland feature. The limits of the valleyland
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05. Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03. Z-2018-07,19CDM-18-06 - 13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 44 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 3 January 11. 2019
feature were previously staked/confirmed by TRCA staff as a part of a site visit which took place on November 28, 2017. Specifically, the limits of the physical top of bank were reconfirmed and new stakes to account for the limit of the dripline of contiguous vegetation were added. Subsequent to the site visit, the applicant provided a geotechnical slope stability report to TRCA in order to confirm the location of the Long Term Stable Top of Slope (LTSTOS) associated with the valley. The Geotechnical Investigation and Slope Stability Assessment, prepared by Edward Wong &Associates Inc., dated August 31, 2017, was reviewed and signed off on by TRCA Geotechnical staff.
Based on the current plans, the proponent has proposed a modified Vegetation Protection Zone (VPZ) from the Key Natural Heritage Features on the site. It is the understanding of TRCA staff that the current layout of the development will result in four areas of encroachment into the 30 metre VPZ.
• A portion of the private road and a snow storage area north of Block 9; • A portion of Unit 40 and its associated rear yard; • A portion of the rear yards for Units 41-45 and; • A portion of the rear yard for Unit 38.
In total, the area reduced from the required buffer is 168.30 sq. m. (1,811.57 sq. ft.). The applicant has proposed to compensate for the above noted areas of encroachment by increasing the buffer in other areas on the property. As a result, a total of 168.47 sq. m. (1,811.57 sq. m.) of land will be added to the buffer area, resulting in a net gain of 0.17 sq. m. of buffer area.
In principle, TRCA staff have no objections to the proposed modifications of the 30 metre VPZ, as the applicant has demonstrated no net loss of the overall buffer area. Ifthe Township or other agencies require changes to the proposed plans, TRCA recommends that the proponent explore all opportunities to alter the layout of the development to achieve a full 30 metres across the entire buffer area without any offsets.
Trail Alignment 2. Staff note that a conceptual trail is proposed to bisect the buffer. It is our understanding that the trail is a private amenity feature, as it does not connect to an existing public trail network. It is the position of TRCA staff that all development and site alteration, which includes private amenity features, should be located outside of the VPZ, in order to ensure that the area functions as a fully naturalized ecological buffer.
TRCA policies do support the development of trail networks that connect communities, parks and greenspaces within municipalities. The implementation of appropriately planned and designed public trail systems is a part of TRCA's objective to promote and monitor the use of the Natural System for recreational uses, which minimize impacts to the natural environment by striving for a balance between conservation and appropriate public use. In general, it is the preference of TRCA staff that public trails be located outside of Key Natural Heritage Features and VPZ's, as well as any associated hazard lands, to the extent possible. That being said, TRCA staff would be supportive, in principle, of a publicly accessible trail through the subject lands that provides for a connection to the existing municipal trail network in the area. The final acceptability of a new trail on the subject lands would be reliant on a suitable Justification, design and mitigation/compensation strategy to ensure an optimal alignment of the trail in relation to the existing natural features and natural hazards on, and adjacent to, the site.
The existing municipal trail system in the vicinityof the proposed development is located on the north side the watercourse within the adjacent valley corridor to the east of the subject lands. The northeastern corner of the subject lands (13211 Keele Street) is the only area which is directly abutting the municipally owned valley lands. The feasibility of aligning a trail through this area would be constrained due to the steep inclination of the valley slope (1.6 Horizontal:1 Vertical). Furthermore, in order to connect to the existing trail, a pedestrian crossing over the watercourse would be required. The watercourse has been identified by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) as being occupied Redside Dace habitat. As such, a crossing over the watercourse would be subject to review and approval by MNRF.
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05, Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03. Z-2018-07.19CDM-18-06 -13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 45 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 4 January 11. 2019
Based on the above, TRCA recommends that there be further discussion between the Township, proponent and TRCA staff regarding the implementation of a trail on the subject lands.
Recommendations Based on a review of the circulation materials, TRCA staff have no objection to the approval Official Plan Amendment OP-2018-03 and Zoning By-Law Amendment Z-2018-07.
Furthermore, TRCA staff have no objection to the approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 19T-18-K05 and Draft Plan of Condominium 19CDM-18-06, subject to the conditions included in Appendix 'A' of this letter. It is our expectation that the Owner will address all of TRCA's outstanding comments noted in Appendix 'C through fulfillment of the conditions of draft plan approval.
Should any revisions to the applications for draft plan of subdivision, draft plan of condominium, zoning by-law amendment or official plan amendment be proposed now, or in the future, TRCA asks to be given the opportunity to amend our conditions and comments accordingly.
Please provide the Notice of Decision for these files once they are approved.
TRCAwould liketo take this opportunity to commend the proponent on providing a comprehensive and detailed submission. We look forward to continuing to work with both the Township and proponent as the proposal progresses through the Planning and detailed design phase.
Fees/Timing By copy of this letter, the applicant is advised that the TRCA has implemented a fee schedule for our planning application review services. This application is subject to a $27,025 Draft Plan of Subdivision (Less than 5ha - Standard) review fee. The applicant is responsible for fee payment and should forward the application fee to this office as soon as possible.
At the time of requesting clearance of TRCA conditions of draft plan approval, we ask that the applicant submit their request in writing to TRCA offices a minimum of 90 days in advance of expected registration. Additional time may be required in cases where open space lands are to be dedicated into public ownership, and/or O.Reg. 166/06 permits are required from TRCA (i.e., SWM ponds/detailed infrastructure works). We ask that the applicant consider these requirements and take into consideration the required timelines prior to the submission of draft plan clearance requests.
We trust these comments are of assistance. Should you have any questions, please contact me at extension 5743 or at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Stephen Bohan Planner, York Region West Planning and Development
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05. Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03.2-2018-07,19CDM-18-06 -13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 46 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 5 January 11. 2019
Appendix 'A': Materials Reviewed bv TRCA
Materials received by TRCA on November 11, 2018
Planning Justification Report, prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc., dated August 2018;
Natural Heritage Evaluation, prepared by Beacon Environmental, dated November 22, 2018;
Arborist Report, prepared by Beacon Environmental, dated August 2018;
Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 3, 2018;
Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by Edward Wong &Associates Inc., dated November 17, 2017;
Geotechnical Investigation and Slope Stability Assessment, prepared by Edward Wong &Associates Inc., dated August 31, 2017;
Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by Canada Engineering Services Inc., dated April 30, 2015;
Hydro-geological Study, prepared by Edward Wong &Associates Inc., dated March 30, 2018;
Hydrology Evaluations, prepared by Edward Wong &Associates Inc., dated June 10, 2018;
Drawing No. A1, Draft Plan of Common Element Condominium, prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc., dated August 9, 2018;
Drawing No. A-01, Concept Plan, prepared by Jardin Design Group Inc., revision no. 4, dated August 8, 2018;
Drawing No. C01, Site Grading Plan, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 3, 2018;
Drawing No. C02, Site Servicing Plan, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 3, 2018;
Drawing No. C03, Service Connections, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 3, 2018;
Drawing No. C04, Storm Detention Details, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 3, 2018;
Drawing No. COS, Erosion &Sediment Control Plan, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 3, 2018;
Drawing No. COG, Details, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 3, 2018;
Drawing No. C07, Details, prepared by Aplin Martin, dated August 3, 2018;
Drawing No. LI00, Preliminary Landscape Plan, prepared by Strybos Barren King, dated August 8, 2018.
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05. Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03, Z-2018-07,19CDM-18-08 - 13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 47 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 6 January 11. 2019
Appendix 'B* - TRCA's Conditions of Draft Plan Approval
TRCA's Conditions of Draft Plan Approval TROA staff have no objection to the approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision, prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc., dated August 14, 2018, subject to the following conditions:
1. That prior to site alteration and prior to the registration of this plan or any phase thereof, the Owner shall submit a detailed engineering report (or reports) and plans as may be amended to the satisfaction of TROA and the Township of King. This submission shall include:
i. A description of the storm drainage system (quantity and quality) for the proposed development:
ii. Plans illustrating how this drainage system will tie into surrounding drainage systems, i.e., identifying if it is part of an overall drainage scheme, how external flows will be accommodated, the design capacity of the receiving system;
iii. Appropriate stormwater management techniques which may be required to control minor and major flows;
iv. Appropriate Stormwater Management Practices (SWMPs) to be used to treat stormwater, to mitigate the impacts of development on the quality and quantity of ground and surface water resources as it relates to the natural system, both aquatic and terrestrial;
V. Detailed plans and calculations for the proposed lot-level, conveyance, and end-of-pipe controls to be implemented on the site;
vi. Proposed measures to promote infiltration and maintain water balance for the plan area;
vii. Proposed measures to maintain feature-based water balance and to mitigate impacts to those natural features that have been assessed to be potentially impacted by the development;
viii. A subsurface investigation (including assessment of groundwater levels) for the final design of site grading and basement elevations. The recommendations of the subsurface assessment will be used to inform the final design and construction plans;
ix. An evaluation that addresses the need for groundwater dewatering during construction, including but not limited to details for its disposal, potential impacts to natural features due to groundwater withdrawal, mitigation and any permitting requirements;
X. The location and description of all outlets and other facilities or works which may require permits from TRCA pursuant to the Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 166/06), as may be amended;
xi. Grading plans for the subject lands;
xii. Cross-sections and details where grading is proposed in or adjacent to the Natural Heritage System (Block 3), including but not limited to existing and proposed grades, limits of the natural features and hazards, buffers, interim stabilization of the slopes/disturbed areas, mitigation, tree protection, sediment and erosion controls, and supporting geotechnical/soils analyses; and
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05. Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03. Z-2018-07,19CDM-18-06 -13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 48 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 7 January 11. 2019
xiii. An erosion and sediment control report and plans for the subject lands that includes proposed measures for controlling or minimizing erosion and siltation on-site and/or in downstream areas during and after construction.
2. That prior to site alteration and prior to the registration of this plan or any phase thereof, the Owner prepare a tree protection and preservation plan for the site that looks at opportunities for the retention of larger trees, means of protecting retained trees/forest edges from development activities, and opportunities for the salvage and re-use of trees throughout the site as buffer plantings to the satisfaction of TRCA.
3. That prior to the registration of this plan or any phase thereof, the Owner prepare comprehensive edge management and restoration planting plans to the satisfaction of TRCA for the Natural Heritage System (Block 3).
4. That prior to the registration of this plan or any phase thereof, the Owner prepare a plan that addresses the removal and restoration of historical, man-made intrusions in the Natural Heritage System (Block 3) to the satisfaction of TRCA, which must include but is not limited to the removal of paths, culverts, structures, fences, debris, etc. and the restoration of these areas to a natural state
5. That prior to the registration of this plan or any phase thereof, the Owner prepare trail plans and details to the satisfaction of TRCA for areas within and adjacent to the Natural Heritage System (Block 3). The exact location of the trails shall be to the satisfaction of TRCA and Township of King.
6. That prior to the registration of this plan or any phase thereof, the Owner obtain all necessary permits from TRCA pursuant to the Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 166/06), as may be amended, to the satisfaction of TRCA.
7. That the Natural Heritage System (Block 3) be dedicated into public ownership (TRCA or Township of King), free of all charges and encumbrances, to the satisfaction of TRCA.
8. That the implementing zoning by-law recognize the Natural Heritage System (Block 3) in an environmental protection, or other suitable environmental zoning category, which has the effect of prohibiting development, to the satisfaction of TRCA.
9. That the implementing zoning by-law be prepared to the satisfaction of TRCA.
10. That the Owner provide a copy of the approved implementing zoning by-law to TRCA, when available, to facilitate the clearance of conditions of draft plan approval.
11. That the Owner agrees in the subdivision agreement, in wording acceptable to TRCA which is standard, normal and consistent with applications and approvals for development of this kind:
i. To carry out, or cause to be carried out, to the satisfaction of TRCA, the recommendations of the reports/strategies and details of the plans referenced in TRCA's conditions of draft plan approval (Conditions 1 through 5 inclusive in TRCA's letter dated January 10, 2019);
ii. To install and maintain all stormwater management and erosion and sedimentation control structures operating and in good repair during the construction period, in a manner satisfactory to TRCA;
iii. To obtain all necessary permits from TRCA pursuant to the Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 166/06), as may be amended, to the satisfaction of TRCA;
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05. Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03, Z-2018-07.19CDM-18-06 -13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 49 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 8 January 11. 2019
iv. To comply with the permits approved under Ontario Regulation 166/06, as may be amended, including the approved plans, reports and conditions to the satisfaction of TRCA;
V. To erect a permanent fence along all residential lots that abut the Natural Heritage System (Block 3) to the satisfaction of TRCA and the Township of King;
vi. To prohibit grading works within the Natural Heritage System (Block 3) unless approved by TRCA; and,
vii. To prohibit retaining walls in or adjacent to the Natural Heritage System (Block 3) unless approved by TRCA.
12. That this draft plan of subdivision be subject to red-line revision(s) in order to meet the requirements of TRCA's conditions of draft plan approval (Conditions 1 through 11 inclusive in TRCA's letter dated January 10, 2019), if necessary, to the satisfaction of TRCA.
13. That the Owner provide a copy of the fully executed subdivision agreement to TRCA, when available, in order to expedite the clearance of conditions of draft plan approval.
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05. Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03, Z-2018-07,19CDM-18-06 -13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 50 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 9 January 11. 2019
Appendix 'C: Detailed Design Comments The following comments are based on a review of the materials noted in Appendix 'A'. Ontario Regulation 166/06 1. As noted above, a portion of the subject lands are located within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Number River Watershed. Specifically, the subject properties at 13211,13193 and 13175 Keele Street contain a portion of, or are adjacent to, a valley corridor associated with the East Number River. TRCA's Regulated Area extends 15 metres from the furthest extent of a valley corridor (i.e., top of slope, long term stable top of slope. Regional Storm flood plain, or meander belt). As such, a TRCA permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06 will be required for any development or site alteration within the Regulated Area on the property. Further details regarding TRCA's permitting process will be provided to the proponent as the application progresses through the detailed design phase.
Flood Plain Mapping 2. Based on TRCA's current flood plain modeling and mapping, the Regional Strom flood plain associated with the East Number River, reaches an elevation of 284.31 metres above sea level (masi) on the subject lands. For consistency, the proponent should identify the limitof the Regional Storm flood plain on all drawings to demonstrate that the proposed development is located outside the flood hazard.
Stormwater Management Quantity Control 3. As per Table 3 in the FSR, the controlled release rates did not meet the target release rates for 2, 50 and ICQyear flows. The proponent's consultant should ensure that the 2-year target release rate is met.
Erosion and Water Balance 4. The subject lands are located on the Oak Ridges Moraine and subject to Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. All three components of the water balance (Evaporation, Infiltration and Runoff) should be matched post-development to pre-development. As part of WNPA-Q requirements under the Source Protection Plan, the infiltration criteria should have been satisfied. Therefore, the applicant's consultant should ensure that runoff and evapotranspiration has also been included in the report. The report should be updated accordingly.
5. Erosion Control calculations and infiltration trench design have been provided. Nowever, as per Appendix D in the FSR, the initial abstraction of 1 mm is deducted for the paved area, which is not accepted by TRCA. The proponent's consultant should update the volume calculation to exclude the 1 mm initial abstraction for the paved area. The design should also be updated accordingly. TRCA will credit retention volume for roof area to a lawn ifthe lawn soil is 300 mm and amended per TRCA's soil amendment guidelines. The credit is limited to 50% of the 1:1 roof area to lawn area. Architectural control should be shown. For example, a 10 m^ lawn only with a maximum roof area of 10 m^can be credited at 50% of 5 mm, meaning 2.5 mm. To get the 2.5 mm credit, it has to be shown through architectural control that at least the 10 m^ can be directed to the lawn.
6. The total volume provided as per Appendix D in the FSR, based on the Soakaway Pit Design table is 11.5+4.2+7.9+13.8 = 37.4 m^ which is lower than the volume required as specified in the report. The applicant's consultant should update the design as necessary and account for the revisions from the comment above.
7. The proponent's consultant should provide a drainage area plan and a discussion in the report for the proposed LID's to clarify whether the first 5 mm onsite retention criteria are met.
Source Protection Plan - Water Balance The Nydrogeological Study indicates the hydraulic conductivity for siltyclay range from 2.39 X lO^^ m/sec to 3.29 X 10"^m/sec. TRCA's technical staff finds these values to be reasonable. Furthermore, the Nydrogeological Study provides a water balance and TRCA's technical staff finds these values to be reasonable. That being said, the report should be updated to address the following comments:
8. The Nydrogeological Study indicate groundwater levels of about 1.2 m to 11.2 m. It should be noted that the groundwater levels can vary and are subject to seasonal fluctuations in response to weather events.
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05, Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03. Z-2018-07,19CDM-18-06 -13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 51 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 10 January 11. 2019
TRCA's Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide generally recommends aim separation between an infiltration facility and the seasonally high water table. The proponent's consultant should confirm that there is a minimum 1 m vertical separation between the high ground water level and the infiltration facilities before finalizing trench locations.
For the reference of the proponents consultants, a copy of guide can be accessed through the following link: httD://www.sustainabletechnoloaies.ca/wD/home/urban-runoff-areen-infrastructure/low-imDact- develoDment/low-impact-develoDment-stormwater-manaaement-Dlanninq-and-desian-ouide/.
9. The Hydrogeological Study indicates that an infiltration gallery may be installed in the backyards of each townhouse unit. The proposed infiltration trenches should have an approved overflow to the stormwater system.
Erosion and Sediment Control (BSC) 10. The conceptual BSC Plan shows a sediment trap and rock flow check dam in the NE corner of the property adjacent to the valley. TRCA staff do not support discharging stormwater in this location and recommends that stormwater accumulated on the site during construction be treated and discharged to existing municipal infrastructure. The proponent should update the BSC plan as a part of a detailed design submission to ensure that site stormwater accumulated during construction is not directly discharged to the Natural System or to adjacent privately owned lands.
11. The proponent should include the following notes on the BSC plan:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented prior to, and maintained during the construction phases, to prevent entry of sediment into the water.
The erosion and sediment control strategies outlined on the plans are not static and may need to be upgraded/amended as site conditions change to prevent sediment releases to the natural environment. The TRCA Enforcement Officer should be immediately contacted should the erosion and sediment control plans change from the approved plans.
All erosion and sediment control measures should be inspected weekly, after every rainfall and significant snow melt event, and daily during periods of extended rain or snow melt.
All damaged erosion and sediment control measures should be repaired and/or replaced within 48 hours of the inspection.
All activities, including maintenance procedures, will be controlled to prevent the entry of petroleum products, debris, rubble, concrete or other deleterious substances into the water. Vehicular refueling and maintenance will be conducted 30 metres from the water.
All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored with native/non-invasive species upon completion of the work.
A rehabilitation plan is to be implemented to restore the construction site back to its pre-construction state, or better.
All existing grades within the Regional Storm flood plain will be maintained. Allexcess will be removed from the Regional Storm flood plain.
The contractor shall monitor the weather several days in advance of the onset of the project to ensure that the works will be conducted during favorable weather conditions. Should an unexpected storm arise, the contractor will remove all unfixed items from the Regional Storm flood plain and slope that would have the potential to cause a spill/ pollution (i.e., fuel tanks, porta-potties, machinery) or an obstruction to flow (i.e. machinery, equipment). Prior to forecasted precipitation event, all BSC measures to be inspected and confirmed to be in good condition
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Correspondence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05, Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03. Z-2018-07,19CDM-18-06 -13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 52 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Kristen Harrison 11 January 11. 2019
Restoration Planting Plan 12. It is the expectation of TRCA staff that a complete and comprehensive restoration/naturalization planting plan for the 30 m buffer area will be submitted by the proponent as a part of the detailed design. The planting plan should be a separate plan prepared by a qualified professional. It should contain the following standard details;
• The location and spacing of the plantings (1 metre on centre for shrubs and 5 metres on centre for trees) should be clearly outlined on the restoration drawing;
• The proposed species Latin name, common name, and quantity to be planted should be Identified on the plan;
• Ifa seed mix Is to be used on any disturbed area, please specify the location of Its use and provide the species composition (Latin name, common name, and %) on the plan.
The following documents can be used as a reference for helping to put together the plan:
• TRCA Seedmix Guideline: http://www.trca.on.ca/dotAsset/40025.pdf
• TRCA Post Construction Restoration Guideline: https://trca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Post- Constructlon Restoration Guidelines Julv 2004.pdf
Zoning By-Law Amendment Recommendation TRCA policies recommend that lands considered to be part of the natural system. Including the associated buffer/vegetation protection zone (VPZ), be zoned Into an appropriate open space designation. Furthermore, TRCA policies recommend that these lands by conveyed Into public ownership, free of all encumbrances, in order to ensure the long term protection and management of the lands.
Once the limits of the associated VPZ on the subject property are confirmed, TRCA recommends that these lands be appropriately zoned into an open space designation and conveyed Into public ownership.
Planning DepartmentJ:\DSS\Corresponclence\KING\2019\19T-18-K05. Report Number P-2019-07 OP-2018-03. Z-2018-07.19CDM-18-06 -13151-13211 Keele Street.docx Official Plan Amendment App... Page 53 of 176 R.J. Burnslde & Associates Limited 17345 Leslie Street. Suite 200 Newmarket ON L3YAGENDA0A4 CANADA ITEM #6.1. telephone (905) 953-8967 fax (905) 953-8945 webwww.rjburnside.com © BURNSiDE [the DifFERENCE IS OUR PEOPLe]
December 13, 2018 (Revised December 14, 2018)
Via; Email
Mr. Michael Cole, C.E.T. Deputy Director of Engineering and Development Township of King 2585 King Road King City ON L7B1L6
Dear Mr. Cole:
Re: Applications to Approve a Condominium Development and Draft Plan Including Applications to Amend Official Plan and Zoning By-law 13151, 13165,13175,13193, 13211 Keele Street Part Lot 7, Concession 3, King City Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate Inc) First Submission Township File Nos.i OP-2018-03, Z-2018-07, 19T-18K05,19CDM-18-06 Project No.: 300043836.0000
We have reviewed the following material relating to the above noted subdivision.
No. Description Issued Received
1. Circulation Memo, prepared by Township of King Nov. 20,2018 Nov. 21, 2018 (Town) 2. Cover Letter, prepared by prepared by Aug. 10,2018 Nov. 21.2018 Humphries Planning Group Inc. (HPG) 3. Planning Justification Report, prepared by HPG Aug. 2018 Nov. 21, 2018
4. Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan Aug.11,2018 Nov. 21, 2018 Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, prepared by HPG 5. Signed Draft Plan of Condominium and Aug. 14, 2018 Nov. 21,2018 Subdivision (A1), prepared by HPG 6. Concept Plan (A-01), prepared by Jardin Jun. 26, 2018 Nov. 21,2018
7. Noise Feasibility Study, prepared by HGC Aug. 3. 2018 Nov. 21,2018 Engineering 8. Functional Servicing and Stormwater Aug. 3, 2018 Nov. 21, 2018 Management Report, prepared by Aplin Martin
APPENDIX D
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 54 of 176 Mr. Michael Cole, C.E.T. AGENDAPage ITEM2 of 6 #6.1. December 13, 2018 (Revised December 14, 2018) Project No.: 300043836.0000
No. Description Issued Received 9. Civil Engineering Drawings, prepared by Aplin & Aug. 3, 2018 Nov. 21,2018 Martin Consultants Ltd. (Aplin Martin): • Site Grading Plan (C01) • Site Servicing Plan (C02) • Service Connection (C03) • Storm Detention Details (C04) • Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (C05) • Details (COB) • Notes (COT) 10. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Aug. 7, 2018 Nov. 21,2018 13165 Keele Street, prepared by Edward Wong & Associates Inc. (EWA) 11. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Aug. 7, 2018 Nov. 21, 2018 13175 Keele Street, prepared by EWA 12. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Dec. 10, 2016 Nov. 21,2018 13193 Keele Street, prepared by EWA 13. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Dec. 10, 2016 Nov. 21, 2018 13211 Keele Street, prepared by EWA 14. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Nov. 17. 2017 Nov. 21, 2018 13151 Keele Street, prepared by EWA 15. Geotechnical Investigation Reports (3), prepared Apr. 30, 2015, Nov. 21,2018 by EWA Aug. 31 and Nov. 17, 2017 16. Hydrogeological Study, prepared by EWA Mar. 30, 2018 Nov. 21,2018 17. Hydrogeological Evaluations, prepared by EWA Jun. 10. 2018 Nov. 21, 2018 18. Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Nextrans Jul. 2018 Nov. 21, 2018 Other documents not reviewed: 19. Arborist Report, prepared by Beacon Aug. 2018 Nov. 21,2018 Environmental (Beacon) 20. Landscape Master Plan (LI 00), prepared by Aug. 8, 2018 Nov. 21,2018 Strybos Barren King Landscape Architecture (SBK) 21. Natural Heritage Evaluation, prepared by Beacon Aug. 2018 Nov. 21. 2018 22. Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment, Jul. 10, 2018 Nov. 21,2018 prepared by ASI 23. Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by ASI Aug. 2018 Nov. 21,2018
24. Draft Sustainable Development Standards - Nov. 21,2018 Checklist 25. Planning Application Pre-consultation Letter, Apr. 27. 2017 Nov. 21,2018 prepared by Township
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 55 of 176 Mr. Michael Cole, C.E.T. AGENDAPage ITEM3 of 6 #6.1. December 13, 2018 (Revised December 14, 2018) Project No.: 300043836.0000
This application is to facilitate a development consisting of 56 freehold townhouse residential units with access from private common-element condominium roads. The development site is located at the northeast corner of Keele Street and Dennison Street, in King City. The site consists of five existing properties which have residential dwellings and accessory structures. The site measures approximately 1.75 ha (4.32 acres). The subject site is designated 'Existing Low Density Residential Area' by the King City Community Plan (CPA No. 540) and is zoned Residential Single Detached (R1) and Residential Single Detached "C" (R1C) by Zoning By-law No. 2017-66.
The application will provide a medium density designation to permit a 56-unit residential townhouse development, to a maximum density of 46 units per hectare (13 units/acre). The Zoning By-law Amendment will provide site specific provisions to the by-law to implement the development. The applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Condominium have been submitted to facilitate a future part lot control application and to establish the common elements condominium.
The proposed site layout includes common-element condominium roads to access individual units with ingress/egress provided on Keele Street (opposite Norman Drive) and Dennison Street. Watermains and sanitary sewers are installed along these roads with direct connection to the trunk lines along Keele Street. Stormwater is controlled on-site and then discharged to the storm sewer within Keele Street (which may not be acceptable to the Region of York).
It is our understanding that a subsequent application for Site Plan approval will be made. This application will be accompanied with detailed designs for the servicing which will be reviewed in more detail.
Our current submission comments follow in the table below (the "Re" refers to No. in previous submission comments; however, as this is the first submission, the "Re" column is blank). Comments on a drawing should be reflected on all drawings.
No. Re Description General Comments 1.1 Some red-lined comments are provided regrading the Draft Plan: • The entrance should include for daylighting which will be transferred to the Region of York. • The "Additional Information" section is not correct (it may be copied from another site) and should be revised. 1.2 Prior to the demolition of dwellings or the commencement of site servicing, all existing water and sanitary services are to be located and abandoned to the satisfaction of the Township. The locations of the existing services are to be documented (including coordinates) and shown on the Site Plan(s) for future reference. 1.3 The Concept Plan shows roadways with limited maneuvering space, being only 6.0 m wide. It is recommended all internal laneways be 7.5 m wide (asphalt surface). 1.4 The applicant should confirm with PRC staff whether there will be urbanization of the Keele Street sidewalk and boulevard.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 56 of 176 Mr. Michael Cole, C.E.T. AGENDAPage ITEM4 of 6 #6.1. December 13, 2018 (Revised December 14, 2018) Project No.: 300043836.0000
No. Re Description 1.5 A cost estimate is required for all roads and services to be constructed. (To be used to determine securities and fees.) Environmental Report(s) including Noise, ESA, Natural Environment 1.6 The noise report has been reviewed and we concur with the findings therein. (NOTE - there were minor differences detected between the digital and hard copies of the report.) 1.7 Should confirm ifthe NHS lands (northeast corner of site) will be transferred to the Township. Traffic Impact Study 1.8 A memo is attached from Henry Centen which should be referenced for traffic-related comments. Geotechnical and H ydrogeology Investigations/Reports 1.9 A memo is attached from Kim Hawkes indicating comments on the hydrogeological issues. 1.10 The geotechnical reports were reviewed for environmental and hydrogeological information and we have no other comments. 1.11 The submitted reports were prepared on behalf of a previous landowner. A letter should be provided which gives permission for the use of these reports and reliance (by the Township) on the contents therein. Stormwalter Management/Storm Drainage 1.12 We understand the target flow rates are based on the Number River unit flows, subject to review by the TRCA. 1.13 Storm discharge to Keele Street is also subject to review by the Region of York. The report should confirm that the proposed 100-year discharge to the existing Keele Street storm sewer does not exceed the existing 5-year peak flow rate. 1.14 There appears to be some external drainage from the existing adjacent properties southeast of the site (18, 24 and 30 Dennison Street). The extent of this drainage is to be confirmed and included in the stormwater management design. 1.15 The run-off coefficient should be increased by 25% for the 100-year storm. 1.16 An Operation and Maintenance manual should be provided for the proposed SWM facilities (i.e.. Jellyfish unit, Brentwood facility, CB Shields, Stormtech facility and infiltration trenches, etc.). 1.17 An internal storm sewer design sheet should be provided. 1.18 Drawings: • Control manhole details should be provided on the engineering plans. • Elevations should be shown on the infiltration trench details. • Details are to be provided for the SC310 chambers.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 57 of 176 Mr. Michael Cole, C.E.T. AGENDAPage ITEM5 of 6 #6.1. December 13, 2018 (Revised December 14, 2018) Project No.: 300043836.0000
No. Re Description 1.19 Concerns were expressed regarding the waterbalance calculations included in the hydrogeology report. In that report, they describe infiltrating the 10 mm runoff, but in the FSR/SWMR they use the 5 mm runoff. The latter is appropriate. The inconsistencies between the two analyses are to be corrected in the next submission. Servicing - Sanitary/Water 1.20 The report should include a sanitary analysis and accompanying discussion to confirm that the existing downstream sanitary system contains adequate capacity for the proposed development. 1.21 Water service is to be handled by a bulk water meter in chamber, including backflow prevention device, in accordance with the Township's standards. (Individual metering is at the discretion of the owner and for their use only.) 1.22 The locations of existing water/sewer services are to be located in the field and shown on the site servicing drawings. 1.23 Connections at Keele Street are to be competed to the satisfaction of the Region of York (and the Township), particularly regarding restoration. Drawings 1.24 A full topographical survey of the subject lands should be provided. 1.25 See attached red-lined drawings which indicate some comments on the designs. These are to be addressed as part of this written response. 1.26 External illumination designs are required for the future Site Plan application.
A written response to the above comments should be provided. Any matters which are not being addressed should include an explanation for same.
Should you have any questions in this regard, please contact the undersigned.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 58 of 176 Mr. Michael Cole, C.E.T. AGENDAPage ITEM6 of 6 #6.1. December 13, 2018 (Revised December 14, 2018) Project No.: 300043836.0000
Yours truly,
RJ. Burnslde & Associates Limited
Michael S. Dutschek, C.E.T. Senior Project Manager MD:bs
Enclosure(s) Copy of Draft Plan Technical Memos (2)
cc: Ms. Kristen Harrison Township Via: Email
181214_Cole_1st DP Submisslon_043836.docx 14/12/2018 3:37 PM
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 59 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited 17345 Leslie Street, Suite 200 Newmarket ON L3Y 0A4 CANADA telephone (905) 953-8967 fax (905) 953-8945 webwww.rjburnside.com © BurnsIde [the Difference is ouh People]
Memorandum
Date: November 30, 2018 Project No.: 300043836.0000 P . .f. Stateview Homes -13151-13211 Keele Street, King City (19T-18K06) Project Name,
Client Name: Township of King
To: Michael Dutschek, C.E.T.
From: Henry Centen, P.Eng.
This memorandum provides our peer review of the following documents: • Transportation Study. Proposed Residential Development, 13151-13211 Keele Street, King City, dated July 2018, prepared by Nextrans Consulting Engineers. • Concept Plan, 13151, 13165, 13193 and 13211 Keele Street, dated June 25, 2018, prepared by Jardin Design Group Inc.
Traffic Peer Review Comments: 1. Keele Street is under the jurisdiction of the Region of York. Comments should be obtained from the Region.
2. A background traffic growth rate of 2.2% per annum is assumed for through traffic on Keele Street, based on AADT growth between 2013 and 2017 on this road. This growth rate should also be applied to the turning movements at the intersection of Keele Street/King Road. However, the growth rate is much lower, for this section of Keele Street, than the growth forecasted in the King City East traffic studies. The assumed growth rate does not adequately capture the ongoing developments in King City (i.e., which were captured in the King City East study). The analysis should be revised based on a growth rate that adequately captures the forecasted growth from development within King City.
3. The transportation study recommends signal optimization to address the congestion at the Keele Street/King Road intersection. However, with the above noted adjustments to volumes, signal optimization may not be sufficient mitigation. In any case, if signal optimization is recommended at this intersection, the impacts of such adjustments on traffic queuing should also be assessed.
4. The forecasted trip distribution from the north in the PM peak hour (i.e., 1 vph) is lower than the distribution percentage being experienced at other local road intersections in this area.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 60 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Memorandum Page 2 of 2 300043836.0000 November 30, 2018
A sensitivity analysis of the left turn lane warrants (I.e., using the 5% left turn graphs) should be provided for the Keele Street access, assuming 7 vph In the PM peak hour. Considering the existing southbound left turn volumes at Dennlson Street, left turn lanes may be marginally warranted at both the Site Access/Keele Street intersection and at the Dennlson Street/Keele Street Intersection. We defer to the Region on whether a left turn lane will be required to support this development.
5. A turnaround should be provided at the north end of the Internal private lane.
6. The proposed parking supply equates to 70 spaces above the by-law requirement, with a number of units having 4 parking spaces. The higher parking supply acts counter to the shifting of travel demands to alternate travel modes (I.e., walking, cycling, transit) and may Increase traffic volumes beyond those forecasted using the standard ITE rates.
7. The study notes that sidewalks currently only exist on the west side of Keele Street; however, the sidewalk has now been extended along the east side of Keele Street, to about 1 km north of Dennlson Street.
HBC:bs
181130 Traffic_Review_043836.docx 12/13/2018 2:11 PM
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 61 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited ISTownline Orangeville ON L9W3R4 CANADA telephone (519) 941-5331 fax (519) 941-8120 webwww.rjburnside.com © BurnsIde [Tiu Difference is our People]
Technical Memorandum
Date: December 11, 2018 Project No.: 300043836.0000
Project Name: Stateview Homes - First Submission (19T-18K06)
Client Name: Township of King
Submitted To: Michael Dutschek, C.E.T.
Submitted By: Kim Hawkes, P.Eng., B.E.S., QPesa
Reviewed By: Jim Walls, B.Sc., P.Geo., QPesa
I have reviewed the following two documents:
• Hydrology Evaluations Proposed Residential Development 13151, 13165, 13175, 13193 and 13211 Keele Street, King City, Ontario. The document was prepared by Edward Wong & Associates Inc. for Ms. Martha Hadid, Neuhaus Developments Ltd., dated June 10, 2018.
• Hydro-geological Study, Proposed Residential Development 13151, 13165, 13175, 13193 and 13211 Keele Street, King City, Ontario. The document was prepared by Edward Wong & Associates Inc. for Ms. Martha Hadid, Neuhaus Developments Ltd., dated March 30, 2018.
1.0 Hydrology Report
The Hydrology Evaluations report essentially repeats the majority of what is contained in the Hydro-geological Study (including appendices) along with a short summary of natural heritage features as outlined In the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. The Hydrology report states that the site is not located In a Key Natural Heritage area nor is it a hydrologically sensitive feature. The Hydrology report describes the slope on the west bank of the East Humber River as being stable with no seepage and indicates that a minimum vegetation protection zone of 30 m has been applied to conform with Township of King and Conservation Authority Requirements. There is no site-specific data (groundwater levels or surface water levels) to confirm whether groundwater recharge or discharge conditions exist along the River banks near the Site.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 62 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Technical Memorandum Page 2 of 3 Project No.: 300043836.0000 December 11, 2018
The Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is expected to review this application, therefore, we defer to the TRCA for further comment.
2.0 Hydro-geology Report
The Site falls within a Wellhead Protection Area as shown in one of the Figures (figure number not specified on the figure) in the Report; therefore, I will defer to York Region for further comment in this regard.
2.1 Summary
a) The water table levels were recorded on three occasions; during drilling, upon completion and "after drilling". The report does not indicate when "after drilling" the water levels taken, given that a date is not provided. High water table conditions must be known to understand dewatering requirements and groundwater/surface water interaction.
b) Section 8.2 refers to water levels of 1.86 m and 2.65 m below grade. Where were these levels measured? They are not clearly referenced elsewhere in the report.
c) The conclusions reference a water level elevation of 280 masi; however, it is not clear how this value was derived.
d) King Township is serviced with municipal water that originates from both Lake Ontario and Municipal wells. Lake Ontario is the only source of water mentioned in the Hydro-geology Report, although the WHPA's for Municipal Wells are shown in the Figures.
e) It is not clear how the infiltration trenches will accommodate the infiltration deficit of 1,062 mYyear generated by the proposed development. I defer further comment to the stormwater reviewer for further comment.
f) The dewatering calculations should be revisited once a datum has been established and water levels are better understood (refer to Comment No. 1). The equations must be appropriate for the excavation proposed and account for the excavation of multiple townhouse units. It is highly unlikely that only one unit will be excavated at a time.
g) The figures/maps are difficult to read. The font is too small and unclear. Relevant features are not included, for example:
i) The site outline is not shown on Figure 1. The scale and road labels are illegible. The Cross-Section orientations are shown but not labelled. The location of the East Humber River relative to the Site should be clearly illustrated including a regional cross-section to put the site location in context with the River.
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 63 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1. Technical Memorandum Page 3 of 3 Project No.: 300043836.0000 December 11, 2018
ii) The location of water well records relative to the site are not shown on any figures/drawings.
a) Ifthe groundwater quality at the site does not meet the York Region storm sewer discharge requirements, then the consultant must demonstrate how the short term and/or long-term discharge of groundwater to the storm sewer system will meet these Region of York discharge requirements. It is expected that the Region of York will also review this application: therefore, I defer to the Region of York for further comment in this regard.
b) The following information must be included in a Hydrogeology report by the applicant, as a minimum: i. Location of wells within 500 m of the site must be clearly shown. ii. A water well inventory to verify MECP well records within 250 m of the site. iii. Regional cross-section showing the position of the site relative to the east Number River. iv. At least one year of water level data to assess seasonal water level trends and high water table conditions. V. The dewatering calculations need to be revised to reflect aquifer characteristic and high water table conditions. The interpretation of subsurface conditions need to be documented in the context of dewatering for the entire site not each individual unit. The dewatering impacts are likely cumulative around the perimeter of the building footprints.
There are gaps and errors in the reports that suggest a limited understanding of hydrogeology and the implications that the site setting can have on groundwater/surface water interactions and nearby surface water receivers. A report by a qualified experienced hydrogeological professional should be provided.
KSHibs
181206_HydroG Comments Stateview_KH.docx 12/13/2018 2:22 PM
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 64 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
KING Inter-office Memo
TO: Kristren Harrison, Planner II
FROM: John Vandenberg, Environmental Project Manager
CC: Mike Cole, Deputy Director of Engineering and Development Nick Vertelman, Urban Services Manager
RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, File No. 19T-18K05 Part Lot 55 and 56, Registered Plan 85; Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360, and Part Lot 7, Concession 3 13151, 13165, 13175, 13193, 13211 Keele Street, King City Owner: King Keele Developments LP Applicant: Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate Inc.)
Date: December 10. 2018
I have completed my review of the following documents as part of the first submission for the above referenced project;
1. Functional Servicing and Storm Water Management Report-dated August 03, 2018 by Alpin Martin: 2. Drawing C02-Site Servicing Plan- dated July 03, 2018 by Alpin Martin; 3. Drawing C03-Service Connections dated July 03, 2018 by Alpin Martin; 4. Drawing C06-Details dated July 03, 2018 by Alpin Martin; 5. Drawing C04-Storm Detention Details dated July 03, 2018 by Alpin Martin;
As per your November 20, 2018 memo, the application concerns 57 unit freehold townhouse development. I would like to provide the following comments:
Functional Servicing and Storm Water Management Report; • This Report indicates significant on site storm water quantity and quality controls. Considering the potential deleterious impacts in failure the proponent shall be required to enter into an Agreement with the Township for ongoing Operation, Maintenance and supporting documentation for the storm water management installations. These requirements may be incorporated into the parent Subdivision/Condominium Agreement. Details of these requirements shall be determined as this application moves forward and shall be in full compliance with manufacturer's recommendations and applicable Best Management Practices; • As a component of the proposed Agreement the proponent shall submit complete documentation for the proposed storm water management infrastructure around the installations including confirmation of compliant installation by a qualified professional and as-built information fully geo- referenced; • The proponent shall submit system distribution analysis utilizing the Township hydraulic water model in coordination with the Township's consulting engineer;
The Corporation of the Township of King
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 65 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
• This application proposes directing all storm water discharges to Keele Street infrastructure. The ownership of this infrastructure shall be discussed/determined.
Drawing C02-Sjte Servicing Plan • The proponent shall submit system distribution analysis utilizing the Township hydraulicwater model in coordination with the Township's consulting engineer; • The proponent shall submit comprehensive sanitary and storm design sheets supporting the proposed installations. The Township wastewater system is currently modelled in Info-Sewer and the proponent may wish to co-ordinate with the Township for model access; • The proponent shall install an insertion meter chamber at the connection to the Township distribution system before any individual service connections. The specifics of this requirement shall be determined through consultation with the proponent; • The proponent shall acquire the above referenced insertion meter through the Township. Details including costs, meter specifications and installation requirements shall be provided through consultation with the proponent; • The proponent shall install a Sampling Station as per Township Design Criteria, as amended. The specific location shall be determined through consultations with the proponent; • The water distribution infrastructure on this site will be considered private plumbing with all oversight and O&M requirements at the sole cost of the Condominium Corporation; • The proponent shall install a water meter and backflow chamber at the interface between the municipal distribution system and the private plumbing. This installation shall be in accordance with Township of King Standard Drawing KS-845; • The meter and backflow associated with the above shall be acquired through the Township; • All watermains larger than 50mm shall be tested and commissioned as per the Township of King DWQMS; • The proposed watermain dead-ends within the condominium site and the proponent shall install either a flushing hydrant or auto-flusher to the Township's satisfaction. Details of this installation shall be developed through consultation with the proponent. There may be value in considering/evaluating system looping; • All sanitary infrastructure shall be tested and inspected in accordance with the York Region Sanitary Sewer Testing, Inspection and Acceptance Guidelines as amended.
Drawing C03-Servlce Connections • This drawing proposes a relocation of the Township watermain including storm water crossings and insulation strategies. The proponent shall submit detailed plan & profiledrawings outlining and confirming the assumptions put forward.
Drawing C04-Storm Detention Detaiis • My only comments on this drawing are to echo that mentioned above regarding the complexity of the proposed storm water management installations, ownership and O&M requirements.
Drawing C06-Details • This drawing should include all applicable Standard Drawings associated with this application/design.
General Comments • The proponent shall append the Township of King General Notes Drawing to this application; • The proponent shall familiarize themselves withthe Township of King Drinking Water Quality Management System (DWQMS) and it's applicable Procedures through co-ordinations with Township staff; The Corporation of the Township of King
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 66 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
The proponent shall complete documents supporting these works associated with the DWQMS and Township staff shall co-ordinate these requirements with the proponent and the Township's consulting engineer; The proponent shall obtain an EGA from the MECP for sanitary and storm water works. Watermain works shall be permitted/approved by the Township as per above; Servicing allocations and Regional capacities shall be coordinated through the Region and Township of King Planning Department.
Regards, John Vandenberg
The Corporation of the Township of King
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 67 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Memo Township of King Planning Department 2585 King Road, King City, L7B 1A1 905-833-5321
TO: Kristen Harrison, Planner II
FROWI: Colin Pang, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator
DATE: March 11,2019
RE: 1®* Submission 13151, 13165, 13175,13193, and 13211 Keele Street Official Plan Amendment-OP-2018-02 Zoning By-law Amendment - Z-2018-07 Plan of Subdivision -19T-18-K05 Plan of Condominium -19CDM-18-06 King City, ON Owner: Stateview Homes Agent: Adam Grossi, Humphries Planning Group
This acknowledges receipt of the circulation package for the above noted application which includes:
• Draft Official Plan Amendment prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc.; • Draft Zoning By-law, prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc.; • Draft Plan of Condominium, Humphries Planning Group Inc.; • Planning Justification, prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc.; • Concept Plan, prepared by Jardin Design Group; • Conceptual Elevations, prepared by Jardin Design Group;
Staff has reviewed the above application proposal for the development of fifty-six (56) freehold townhouse residential units with access from private common-element condominium roads on the northeast corner of Keele Street and Dennison Street, north of King Road in the Village of King City. The site consists of five (5) properties which currently support single detached residential dwellings and accessory structures. The site measures approximately 1.75 hectares (4.32 acres) with approximately 212.1 metres (696 ft.) of frontage on Keele Street and 36.9 metres (121 ft.) on Dennison Street.
The subject properties are neither listed on the Township's Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act nor designated under Part IV of the Act. The property located at 13165 Keele Street is included on the Township's Built Heritage Inventory. The Built Heritage Inventory includes all properties within the Township that have been identified as potentially having cultural heritage value or interest, but which require additional research and evaluation.
An adjacent property located across the street on the west side of the development area at 13190 Keele Street is a property that is "Listed" on the Built Heritage Register and is known as St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church. It was built in 1873 and is not a part of the five (5) properties slated for redevelopment. As part of the report study, none of the properties at 13151, 13175, 13193 and 13211 Keele Street were found to demonstrate cultural heritage value or interest.
The Corporation of the Township of King APPENDIX E
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 68 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Provincial Policy Statement (2014)
The Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 provides policies regarding the wise use and management of resources with Section 2.6 specifically providing direction regarding cultural heritage and archaeology.
2.6.1 Significant Built Heritage Resources and Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes shall be conserved.
2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.
The PPS defines a significant heritage resource as one that has been determined to have cultural heritage value or interest for the important contribution they make to our understanding of the history of a place, and event, or a people.
Region of York Official Plan
The York Region Official Plan (2010) states in Section 3.4.11 that municipalities are required to conserve significant cultural heritage resources and ensure that development and site alteration on adjacent lands is protected and heritage properties will conserve the heritage attribute of the protected heritage property.
Kino Citv Community fOPA#540)
The King City Community Plan provides policies to identify, manage and protect heritage resources within King City. Section 9.3.4(v) states that all new development permitted by the Plan which is located near heritage resources shall be required to incorporate design features that are in harmony with the area's character. Section 9.3.4(i)(b) further states that new development shall demonstrate to the Township that the proposal will not adversely impact the heritage significance of the property in which it is located.
Review and Comments
Staff acknowledges that previous comments were also provided for the properties at (13165 Keele Street) for a separate application received in 2016 under File# OP-2016-01 and Z-2016-05. The application at that time proposed eighteen (18) common-element condominium townhouse dwellings serviced by municipal sanitary and water services and were held under different ownership. The comments provided at the time for this application were that the Committee agreed with the conclusion of the HIA prepared by that the property located at 13165 Keele Street does contain cultural heritage value or interest. However, due to the significant alterations to the dwelling, formerly the Church of the Disciples, and its overall poor state of repair, the Committee does not object to its removal as part of these applications. As part of the then application, the HAC requested that the site be commemorated with a plaque or suitable alternative.
As part of this review, staff have reviewed the current HIA submitted with this application and utilized previous materials from the previous application as noted above, which was found to be referenced to by the current HIA report.
The now present subject applications feature five (5) properties (13151, 13165, 13175, 13183 and 13211 Keele Street) proposed for the development of 56 townhomes. None of these properties are on the Township's Built Heritage Register, but the property at 13165 Keele Street is a property identified on the Township's Built Heritage Inventory. The current 1®' submission proposal will The Corporation of the Township of King
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 69 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
require the demolition of ail existing structures on these properties. The HIA report prepared by ASI Consultants focuses on the property at 13165 Keele Street as it has been previously identified to contain cultural heritage value or interest.
The HIA notes that the Disciples Church was possibly built by Gabriel Wells between 1860 and 1878, who was the property owner and a member of the Disciples of Christ. Furthermore, the HIA notes that the church was eventually moved 150 metres south from. Lot 7 into Lot 6, concession 3 which likely correlates to the frame structure shown on 13165 Keele Street in 1914. The building was later converted into a residence, which is the permitted use of the building on the property.
It is the opinion of the consultants that the property at 13165 Keele Street meets the criteria outlined in Ontario Regulation 9/06 which is the provincial evaluation tool used to determine if a property has cultural heritage value or interest. However, as noted above, due to the significant alterations to the dwelling, formerly the Church of the Disciples, and its overall poor state of repair, the Committee does not object to its removal as part of these applications.
The HIA concludes that Alternative 3 as quoted below is the recommended option as it allows for a balanced approach in allowing for future development of the area and also allows for the conservation of this cultural heritage asset held at 13165 Keele Street.
Alternative 3: Development of the study area as proposed with additional mitigation measures
"This alternative would still result in the removal of all structures in the study area. However, this option would build upon the existing development proposal by ultimately developing a heritage interpretation strategy with the preference of moving the primary structure at 13165 Keele Street to a new location. If relocation is not feasible and demolition is the only option, then a Documentation Report is required which would include an interpretation strategy based on the building's demolition."
In consultation with the Heritage Advisory Committee at its March 7, 2019 meeting, Staff have reviewed the previous comments issued for the previous development as noted above, which included the lands of interest at 13165 Keele Street and concur that the recommendations provided in 2016 for the previous application continue to be appropriate for this development.
In coordination with the HIA Report staff agree with the recommendation as found within the HIA Report:
"An Interpretation Strategy should be undertaken to provide the public with a greater understanding of the history of 13165 Keele Street, including its role in the early history of King Township regarding the Church of the Disciples. The Interpretation Strategy should include signage (textual and graphic material) and include input from the Heritage Advisory Committee and the King Township Historical Society. Should the application for the development be approved, the interpretative signage location should be incorporated into the final development plan of the site. It is recommended that the Interpretation Strategy be completed by a qualified heritage practitioner as part of the Documentation Report."
In an effort to reflect the history of the property and its role in the early history of KingTownship, the Committee recommends that the recommended Interpretative Strategy be developed in conjunction with the Committee and the King Township Historical Society, to commemorate the site.
The Corporation of the Township of King
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 70 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
Regarding the Archaeological Assessment, staff notes that no construction shall take place within the subject lands prior to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sports confirming that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied to the satisfaction of the Ministry.
The Corporation of the Township of King
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 71 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #6.1.
KING THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING MEMORANDUM
TO: Kristen Harrison Planner II
FROM: Kathryn Moyie Director of Clerks/By-law Enforcement &Townshlp Clerk Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC)
RE: Official Plan Amendment Application, File No. OP-2018-03 Zoning By-law Amendment Application, File No. Z-2018-07 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, File No. 19T-18-K05 Draft Plan of Condominium Application, File No.: 19CDM-18-06 Part of Lot 55 and 56, Registered Plan 85; Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360 and Part Lot 7, Concession 3 13151,136165, 13175, 13193,13211 Keele Street, King City Owner: King Keele Developments LP Applicant: Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate Inc.)
DATE: December 10,2018
The new term of AAC will not be meeting until February 2019. Upon receipt of your memo dated November 20, 2018, on behalf of the AAC, regarding the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision, and Draft Plan of Condominium applications to facilitate a proposed development of fifty-six (56) freehold townhouse residential units with access from private common-element condominium roads, I am forwarding the following comments on their behalf for your consideration:
In keeping with current Provincial Legislation, the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2001 (ODA) and the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA) that requires all of Ontario be accessible to everyone by 2025, Committee hopes that each unit constructed will have accessibility In mind as potential owners could be seniors or persons who have or may have family members or visitors with a disability.
It is appreciative that the application is not for public use but would like to provide the additional following comments for consideration:
• Interior hallways into bedrooms are made wide enough to accommodate a wheelchair or Ef\/IS stretcher Ensure any interior fixtures such as taps, showers are made accessible Ensure accessibility friendly smoke/carbon monoxide alarms are installed in all rooms with built in visual/audio units Ensure all exterior and interior doors are made accessible - all entrance ways are wide enough to accommodate wheelchairs, walkers, scooters, strollers, etc. Ensure flat walkways and transitional curb cuts/ ramps from driveway into unit Pathways and sidewalks to be constructed of materials suitable for wheelchairs, walkers, strollers, etc. Any proposed pedestrian areas/open spaces include accessible - landscaping, walkways, seating, lighting, signage Ensure there is accessible parking available for visitors in the planning of the common-element condominium roads That a copy of the Accessibility Evaluation Checklist be provided to the applicant for consideration during the construction process
APPENDIX F
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment App... Page 72 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
COUNCIL MEETING #6 – MINUTES (DRAFT)
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2019
Township Council met at 6:04 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Township of King Municipal Centre, 2585 King Road, King City, with Mayor Pellegrini presiding.
The following were present at this Meeting:
Council Staff
Mayor Steve Pellegrini Susan Plamondon – Chief Administrative Officer Councillor Jordan Cescolini Nancy Cronsberry – Deputy Clerk Councillor David Boyd Allan Evelyn – Director of Finance and Treasurer Councillor Jakob Schneider Gaspare Ritacca – Manager of Planning and Development Councillor Bill Cober Andrzej Drzewiecki – Director of Engineering, Public Works Councillor Debbie Schaefer and Building Councillor Avia Eek Chris Fasciano – Director of Parks, Recreation and Culture Jim Wall - Fire Chief/CEMC Diane Moratto – Admin Clerk – Council/Committee Jason Ballantyne – Communications Officer Jamie Smyth – Economic Development Officer Denny Timm – Manager of Legislative Services Colin Pang – Planner II / Heritage Coordinator Sarah Allin – Policy Planner
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Pellegrini called the meeting to order. A quorum was present.
2. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS
The Deputy Clerk advised that correspondence has been received and circulated prior to this evening’s meeting for: Committee of the Whole Item #3 – Planning Department Report Number P-2019-05 – Demolition Permit Application for Property Listed on Municipal Heritage Register, 446 Kettleby Road.
The Deputy Clerk advised that a Committee of the Whole Closed Session Agenda has been added to this evening’s meeting in accordance with Part 5, Section 39 of the Procedural By-law Number 2018-60.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Councillor Eek, seconded by Councillor Schaefer and carried that the Agenda for the Council Meeting of February 25, 2019 be adopted, as amended.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON Council Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 73 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # Council Minutes – February 25, 2019 4. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest.
5. MAYOR’S COMMENTS
Mayor Pellegrini highlighted the recently held and upcoming community events in the Township of King, being; celebrating Larry Gould’s fifty (50) years of coaching in King, and the release of the Regional Municipality of York’s 2019 Budget.
6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF COUNCIL MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
6.1 Council Minutes
(i) Minutes of the Council Meeting of February 11, 2019
A motion was made by Councillor Cober, seconded by Councillor Schneider and carried that the Minutes of the Council Meeting of February 11, 2019 be adopted.
6.2 Committee Reports
(i) Committee of the Whole Reports of February 11, 2019
A motion was made by Councillor Cober, seconded by Councillor Schneider and carried that the Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 11, 2019 be adopted.
(ii) Committee of the Whole Closed Session Reports of February 11, 2019
A motion was made by Councillor Cober, seconded by Councillor Schneider and carried that the Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 11, 2019 be adopted.
7. NOTICE OF MOTION
There were no notices of motions.
8. RECESS INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
A motion was made by Councillor Boyd, seconded by Councillor Cescolini and carried that the Council Meeting recess into Committee of the Whole.
The Council Meeting recessed at 6:08 p.m.
9. RE-CONVENE COUNCIL MEETING
A motion was made by Councillor Eek, seconded by Councillor Schaefer and carried that the Council Meeting re-convene.
The Council Meeting re-convened at 9:56 p.m.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON Council Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 74 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # Council Minutes – February 25, 2019 10. ADOPTION OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RECOMMENDATIONS OF FEBRUARY 25TH, 2019
(a) Committee of the Whole
A motion was made by Councillor Cober, seconded by Councillor Schneider and carried that the recommendations of the Committee of the Whole meeting of February 25th, 2019 be adopted.
11. MOTION TO RECESS INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE CLOSED SESSION
Motion to move into Closed Session pursuant to Part 5, Section 39 of the Procedural By-law Number 2018-60 to consider the items as set out in the Agenda.
11.1 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(e): Litigation or Potential Litigation Affecting the Municipality
Planning Department Report Re: Potential Litigation Matter, Direction Required Committee of Adjustment Decision - Minor Variance File No.: 03-A-19
11.2 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(c): Proposed or Pending Acquisition or Disposition of Land
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Land Acquisition Matter (Nobleton)
11.3 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) Personal Matters about an Identifiable Individual(s)
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Personnel Matter
The Council Meeting recessed into Closed Session at 9:57 p.m.
12. RE-CONVENE COUNCIL MEETING
A motion was made by Councillor Eek, seconded by Councillor Schneider and carried that the Council Meeting re-convene.
The Council Meeting re-convened at 11:04 p.m.
13. BUSINESS ARISING FROM CLOSED SESSION
13.1 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(e): Litigation or Potential Litigation Affecting the Municipality
Planning Department Report Re: Potential Litigation Matter, Direction Required Committee of Adjustment Decision - Minor Variance File No.: 03-A-19
The Manager of Planning and Development provided an update on a minor variance matter.
Committee reviewed and discussed the status of the file and gave direction to staff.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON Council Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 75 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # Council Minutes – February 25, 2019 Committee recommends that the Manager of Planning and Development’s report be received and that the recommendations be adopted within the Open Session of Council for staff to proceed as directed.
13.2 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(c): Proposed or Pending Acquisition or Disposition of Land
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Land Acquisition Matter (Nobleton)
The Chief Administrative Officer provided an update on a land acquisition matter pertaining to property located in Nobleton.
A motion was made by Councillor Eek, seconded by Councillor Schaefer and carried that the verbal report by the Chief Administrative Officer be received and staff proceeds as directed.
13.3 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) Personal Matters about an Identifiable Individual(s)
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Personnel Matter
The Chief Administrative Officer provided a report on a personnel matter.
A motion was made by Councillor Eek, seconded by Councillor Schaefer and carried that the verbal report by the Chief Administrative Officer be received and staff proceeds as directed.
14. BY-LAWS
A motion was made by Councillor Cescolini, seconded by Councillor Boyd and carried that the following By-law be taken as read a first, second and third time and passed:
By-law #2019-023 A BY-LAW TO ESTABLISH A SITE PLAN CONTROL AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING (Ref. Planning Dept. Report No.: P-2019-05, C.O.W. Feb. 25, 2019 – Demolition Permit, Kettleby)
15. CONFIRMATION OF PROCEEDINGS BY-LAW
By-law #2019-022 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 25, 2019
A motion was made by Councillor Cescolini, seconded by Councillor Boyd and carried that By- law Number 2019-022 be taken as read a first, second and third time and passed.
16. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Pellegrini declared the meeting to be adjourned.
The meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON Council Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 76 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # Council Minutes – February 25, 2019
______Steve Pellegrini Mayor
______Nancy Cronsberry Deputy Clerk
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON Council Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 77 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING #7 – MINUTES (DRAFT) MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2019
Township Council met at 6:00 p.m. in the King City (163) – Council Boardroom, 2585 King Road, King City, with Mayor Pellegrini presiding.
The following were present at this Meeting:
Council Staff
Mayor Steve Pellegrini Susan Plamondon - Chief Administrative Officer and Acting Township Clerk Councillor Jordan Cescolini Stephen Naylor – Director of Planning & Development Councillor Debbie Schaefer Tom Halinski – Township Solicitor Councillor Avia Eek Gaspare Ritacca – Manager of Planning & Development
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Pellegrini called the meeting to order. A quorum was present.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The CAO advised that an additional Closed Session Item is added to the agenda, being the CAO’s verbal report regarding a personnel matter, in accordance with Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) of the Procedural By-law.
A motion was made by Councillor Eek, seconded by Councillor Cescolini and carried that the Agenda for the Special Council Meeting of February 28, 2019, be adopted, as amended.
3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest.
4. MOTION TO RECESS INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE CLOSED SESSION
A motion was made by Councillor Schaefer, seconded by Councillor Eek and carried that the Council Meeting recess into Committee of the Whole, Closed Session, to consider the following items:
Motion to move into Closed Session pursuant to Part 5, Section 39 of the Procedural By-law Number 2018-60 to consider the items as set out in the Agenda.
The purpose of this special meeting is to accommodate a necessary Special Council Meeting regarding the following:
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON Special Council Meeting of February 28, 2019 Page 78 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # Special Council Minutes – February 28, 2019 (Draft) 4.1 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(e): Litigation or Potential Litigation Affecting the Municipality
Township Solicitor Verbal Report Re: Local Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT) Decisions, Direction Required (OMB Case No. PL160763, Municipal File No. OP-2015-03 – 22 & 32 Snowberry Lane) (OMB Case File No. PL161246, Municipal File No. OP-2011-01/Z-2011-05/SPD- 11-08 – Brock Aggregates)
4.2 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) Personal Matters about an Identifiable Individual(s)
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Personnel Matter
The Council Meeting recessed into Closed Session at 6:05 p.m.
5. RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING
A motion was made by Councillor Cescolini, seconded by Councillor Schaefer and carried that the Special Council Meeting reconvene.
The Council Meeting re-convened at 7:10 p.m.
6. BUSINESS ARISING FROM CLOSED SESSION
6.1 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(e): Litigation or Potential Litigation Affecting the Municipality
Township Solicitor Re: Local Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT) Decisions, Direction Required (OMB Case No. PL160763, Municipal File No. OP-2015-03 – 22 & 32 Snowberry Lane) (OMB Case File No. PL161246, Municipal File No. OP-2011-01/Z-2011-05/SPD- 11-08 – Brock Aggregates)
A motion was made by Councillor Eek, seconded by Councillor Cescolini and carried that the verbal report by the Township Solicitor be received and staff proceeds as directed.
6.2 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) Personal Matters about an Identifiable Individual(s)
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Personnel Matter
The Chief Administrative Officer provided a verbal update regarding a personnel matter.
A motion was made by Councillor Eek, seconded by Councillor Cescolini and carried that the verbal report by the Chief Administrative Officer be received and staff proceeds as directed.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON Special Council Meeting of February 28, 2019 Page 79 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # Special Council Minutes – February 28, 2019 (Draft) 7. CONFIRMATION OF PROCEEDINGS BY-LAW
By-law #2019-024 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF SPECIAL COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 28, 2019
A motion was made by Councillor Schaefer, seconded by Councillor Eek and carried that By-law Number 2019-024 be taken as read a first, second and third time and passed.
8. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Pellegrini declared the meeting to be adjourned.
The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
______Steve Pellegrini Mayor
______Susan Plamondon Acting Clerk
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON Special Council Meeting of February 28, 2019 Page 80 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WORKING SESSION MEETING – MINUTES (DRAFT) MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2019
Township Committee of the Whole, Working Session met at 5:05 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Township of King Municipal Building, 2585 King Road, King City with Councillor Cescolini presiding.
The following were present at this Meeting:
Council Staff
Mayor Steve Pellegrini Susan Plamondon – Chief Administrative Officer Councillor Jordan Cescolini Nancy Cronsberry – Deputy Clerk Councillor David Boyd Allan Evelyn – Director of Finance and Treasurer Councillor Jakob Schneider Andrzej Drzewiecki – Director of Engineering, Public Councillor Bill Cober Works and Building Councillor Debbie Schaefer Chris Fasciano – Director of Parks, Recreation and Culture Councillor Avia Eek Jim Wall – Fire Chief/CEMC Diane Moratto – Administrative Clerk – Council/Committee John Vandenberg – Env. Project Manager
1. CALL TO ORDER
Councillor Cescolini called the meeting to order. A quorum was present.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Committee recommended and carried that the Agenda for the Committee of the Whole, Working Session Meeting of February 25th, 2019 be approved.
3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There was no declaration of interest.
4. PRESENTATIONS
C.O.W. #1
Engineering, Public Works and Building Department Re: Township of King Drinking Water Quality Management System (DWQMS) and the Standard of Care
John Vandenberg, Environmental Project Manager, provided a slide presentation on the King Township drinking water quality management system (DWQMS). Mr. Vandenberg commented on the following: the drinking water management standard, the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Working Session Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 81 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 2 - C.O.W. Working Session – February 25, 2019
(SDWA), the municipal drinking water licence and drinking water works permit, standard of care purpose and overview, implication to Councillors, duties of owners and operating authorities, legal responsibility and accountability for individuals, failure to comply (offence) and penalties, three (3) things to remember, and next steps. Mr. Vandenberg provided members of Council and staff, a copy of the Province’s “Taking Care of Your Drinking Water – A Guide for Members of Municipal Councils’.
Mr. Vandenberg responded to questions from members of Committee.
Committee recommends that the presentation by Mr. Vandenberg be received.
5. ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Committee and carried that the Committee of the Whole, Working Session Meeting of February 25th, 2019 be adjourned.
The meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m.
At the meeting of March 18th, 2019, a motion was made by Councillor xx, seconded by Councillor xx and carried that the Committee of the Whole, Working Session Report for the Meeting of February 25th, 2019 be adopted.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Working Session Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 82 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTES (DRAFT) MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2019
Township Committee of the Whole met at 6:08 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Township of King Municipal Centre, 2585 King Road, King City with Councillor Cescolini presiding.
The following were present at this Meeting:
Council Staff
Mayor Steve Pellegrini Susan Plamondon – Chief Administrative Officer Councillor Jordan Cescolini Nancy Cronsberry – Deputy Clerk Councillor David Boyd Allan Evelyn – Director of Finance and Treasurer Councillor Jakob Schneider Gaspare Ritacca – Manager of Planning and Development Councillor Bill Cober Andrzej Drzewiecki – Director of Engineering, Public Councillor Debbie Schaefer Works and Building Councillor Avia Eek Chris Fasciano – Director of Parks, Recreation and Culture Jim Wall – Fire Chief/CEMC Diane Moratto – Admin. Clerk – Council/Committee Jason Ballantyne – Communications Officer Jamie Smyth – Economic Development Officer Denny Timm – Manager of Legislative Services Colin Pang – Planner II / Heritage Coordinator Sarah Allin – Policy Planner
1. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS
The Deputy Clerk advised that correspondence has been received and circulated prior to this evening’s meeting for: Committee of the Whole Item #3 – Planning Department Report Number P-2019-05 – Demolition Permit Application for Property Listed on Municipal Heritage Register, 446 Kettleby Road.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Committee recommended and carried that the Agenda for the Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 be approved, as amended.
3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest.
4. DETERMINATION OF COMMITTEE ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
4.1 Items # 1, 2, 3
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 83 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 2 - C.O.W. Minutes – February 25, 2019
5. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
5.1 Items # 4
6. DEPUTATION(S)
6.1 Superintendent Michael Slack, York Regional Police Re: York Region Police and Crime Trends in King
Superintendent Slack, York Regional Police (YRP) provided a slide presentation on policing and crime trends in King Township and commented on the following: snapshot of York Regional Police 1 District, front-line workload, trends in our community, traffic enforcement, resource deployment and response, business plan goals, and superior quality service.
Superintendent Slack responded to questions.
Committee recommends that the deputation by Superintendent Slack be received.
7. AGENDA ITEMS
C.O.W. #1
Finance Department Report Number FR-2019-05 Re: Draft 2019 – 2022 Operating & Capital Budgets
Allan Evelyn, Director of Finance & Treasurer, provided a slide presentation on the Draft 2019 – 2022 Operating & Capital Budgets and reviewed the following: 2019-2022 Budgets overview (framework, process and timelines), strategy (plan, build and operate), financial sustainability, Council priorities, context (capital and infrastructure reserves, reserves and reserve funds), 2019 Budgets at a Glance, 2019 estimated tax rate impacts, and the 2019-2022 Capital Budgets proposed as the four (4) year program.
DEPUTATION(S)
(i) Kelly Colasanti
Mr. Colasanti commented on his concerns with the following; the Township’s current debt load; method of payment of the new municipal centre; and cost impacts to the proposed new recreational centre at Seneca College and its related operating costs and impact on the Township. Mr. Colasanti advised he is not opposed to a new recreation centre but is opposed to its proposed location.
Committee recommends that the deputation by Mr. Colasanti be received.
Committee discussed the Draft 2019-2022 Operating & Capital Budgets and asked questions of staff pertaining to Program Changes and certain proposed Capital Items.
Staff responded to questions posed by members of Committee and indicated that comments received will be responded to within the final budget report that will be presented on March 18th, 2019.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 84 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 3 - C.O.W. Minutes – February 25, 2019
Committee considered Finance Department Report Number FR-2019-05 to release the Draft 2019-2022 Operating and Capital Budgets as the basis to formally engage Council in debate prior to requesting final consideration and approval of the 2019 Operating and 2019-2022 Capital Budgets at the Council meeting of Monday, February 25, 2019
Committee recommends that Finance Department Report Number FR-2019-05 be received, and the recommendations therein be approved, as follows:
a) That Finance Department Report Number FR-2019-05 be received.
C.O.W. #2
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-06 Re: Proposed Amendment 1 to the Growth Plan; Comments Policy Planning File #PP-2019-01
DEPUTATION(S)
(i) Bruce Craig
Mr. Craig, Chair, Concerned Citizens of King Township (CCKT) provided an overview on CCKT’s goals and commented on the following: intensification target, density, range and form of housing, no boundary expansion, employment lands/area, specialized crop areas, eco-tourism and effective use of existing infrastructure. Mr. Craig advised that CCKT supports staff’s comments in the Planning Report.
(ii) Mary Muter
Ms. Muter commented that in her opinion, King needs additional GO Station services such as a route connecting the Brampton, King and Caledon areas and asked that consideration be given to adding to staff’s comments the need for improved transportation services in King.
Committee recommends that the above deputations be received.
Staff responded to questions posed by members of Committee.
Committee considered Planning Department Report Number P-2019-06 to provide information on the Province’s proposed Amendment 1 to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2017 (“Growth Plan”), associated regulation changes, and a framework for provincially significant employment zones, and to present Planning staff’s comments on the proposed changes.
Committee recommends that Planning Department Report Number P-2019-06 be received and the recommendations therein be approved, as follows:
a) THAT Planning Report P-2019-06 be received as information;
b) THAT Council endorses this Report and Appendix A as King’s submission to the Province in response to the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) postings: Proposed Amendment to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2017 (ERO # 013-4504); Proposed Framework for Provincially Significant Employment Zones (ERO # 013-4506); Proposed Modifications to O.Reg. 311/06 (Transitional
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 85 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 4 - C.O.W. Minutes – February 25, 2019
c) Matters – Growth Plans) (ERO # 013-4505); and Proposed Modifications to O.Reg. 525/97 (Exemption from Approval – Official Plan Amendments) (ERO 013-4507).
d) THAT the Township Clerk forward this report and attachments to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Clerks of the local municipalities within York Region and the Clerk of the Regional Municipality of York; and
d) THAT correspondence submitted to the Township in relation to Proposed Amendment 1 to the Growth Plan be received.
C.O.W. #3
Planning Department Report Number P-2019-05 Re: Demolition Permit Application for Property Listed on Municipal Heritage Register 446 Kettleby Road
DEPUTATION(S)
(i) Kathy Cartan
Ms. Cartan advised that she is opposed to the application based on its contextual heritage value and noted that she has had her property designated under the Ontario Heritage Act inorder to protect its heritage attributes and expects others to share her journey in trying to preserve the heritage of Kettleby. Ms. Cartan commented on her concerns with; setting a village precedent, preserving the streetscaping, types of homes, adaptive reuse and maintenance of existing properties, effects on property values, and protecting the history of Kettleby. Ms. Cartan noted that allowing for extensive renovations is one thing but must ensure the existing building/streetscaping is protected.
(ii) Elaine Robertson
Ms. Robertson advised she is opposed to the demolition application as it will greatly impact the historical integrity of Kettleby and its exceptional streetscape. Ms. Robertson commented on the history of the existing home and the restoration/renovations that have taken place on the property over the years that did not impact the heritage of the building. Ms. Robertson asked that King respect the heritage in King Township and make the protection of the streetscaping in Kettleby a priority.
(iii) Jeremy Young
Mr. Young advised he is the owner of the subject property and has resided in King for over fifty (50) years, is third generation to do so and is proud to live in such a special area such as Kettleby. Mr. Young commented he has put a lot of thought and detail into his proposed application and had interviewed five (5) different heritage consultants before retaining the services of Su Murdoch, Murdoch Historical Consulting in 2018 who provided a Heritage Impact Assessment to accompany the demolition application which in summary found no compelling argument for its retention or for designation of the property under section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Mr. Young noted that the intent of the demolition and rebuild is to still retain the footprint of the original building and maintain the existing garage structure. Mr. Young further commented on; the fire and restoration of Brunswick Hall, evaluating properties under the guidance of the Act, the current state of the structure (shell), conceptual drawings of the proposed new dwelling, results of a stamped engineer’s letter pertaining to meeting the Ontario
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 86 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 5 - C.O.W. Minutes – February 25, 2019 Building Code, and issues with current living space. Mr. Young asked that Committee not designate his property and approve the demolition permit without conditions that would be too onerous for his family to handle financially.
(iv) Mark Hall
Mark Hall, President, MW Hall Corporation, advised he has been a licensed architect for sixty (60) years, is a professional planner and is a certified heritage consultant who can attest to the qualifications of Su Murdoch as she is well respected in her field. Mr. Hall commented the property has minimal contextual value, has very weak associative value, and as far as architectural design, the home is not in its original state as it has been renovated a number of times over the years and the current proposed design in his opinion, is positive. Mr. Hall asked that Committee not designate this property.
(v) Rick Sikorski
Mr. Sikorski commented; on the statements in the King Township Draft Official Plan and the Integrated Sustainability Plan which speaks to preserving the rich history and connection to the past for future generations; the intent to designate process; tension in the Kettleby community; and preservation of the Township’s heritage. Mr. Sikorski asked that Committee take time to review all aspects of this application before making any decision.
(vi) Gill Watt
Ms. Watt spoke on behalf of Susan Beharriell who was unable to attend the meeting and advised that Ms. Beharriell asks that Committee refuse the demolition permit and begin the process to designate the property.
(vii) Bruce Craig
Mr. Craig, Chair, Concerned Citizens of King Township (CCKT) commented that CCKT appreciates and values King Township’s rich history in particular, the very well preserved core area of Kettleby Village on Kettleby Road which is a true historic gem in southern Ontario. Mr. Craig advised that CCKT supports the designation of the property due to its contextual and cultural significance within the heritage streetscape in Kettleby and asked that King work with the owner to preserve and enhance the original heritage home, while supporting appropriate plans to upgrade the addition on the back of the home with a design that will integrate well and compliment the heritage character of Kettleby.
Committee recommends that the above deputations be received.
Committee considered Planning Department Report Number P-2019-05 to provide information on an application received to demolish an existing dwelling located at 446 Kettleby Road which is identified as “Listed” on the Municipal Heritage Register and as a result, a decision must be made by Council within sixty (60) days of receiving written notice of the owner’s intent to demolish and the plans and information required by Council.
Committee recommends that Planning Department Report Number P-2019-05 be received, the correspondence from; Elaine Kitteridge, Elaine Robertson, Jean and John Kell, Neil and Nancy Beatty, Bruce Craig, and Elizabeth Nicholas be received, and the recommendations therein be approved, as amended, as follows:
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 87 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 6 - C.O.W. Minutes – February 25, 2019
A. That Planning Report P-2019-05 BE RECEIVED as information;
B. That prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, Council enact a by-law at this evening’s Council meeting, to place the subject property (446 Kettleby Road) under Site Plan Control as per Section 41 of the Planning Act, for the purpose of reviewing the design of any new proposed building in order to deal with matters including but not limited to height, setbacks, building elevations, and architectural style; and
C. That the Site Plan Control application shall include plans and drawings to the satisfaction of the Township’s Director of Planning and Development.
C.O.W. #4
Parks, Recreation and Culture Department Report Number PRC-2019-02 Re: Selection of Pre-Qualified General Contractors King Road Streetscaping
Committee considered Parks, Recreation and Culture Department Report Number PRC-2019- 02 to provide information on the results of RFPQ 2019-PQ01 for General Contractor Services related to construction of the King Road Streetscaping Project and recommend six (6) proponents for inclusion on a pre-qualified roster.
Committee recommends that Parks, Recreation and Culture Department Report Number PRC- 2019-02 be received and the recommendations therein be approved, as follows:
a) That report PRC-2019-02 be received as information; and
b) That the six identified proponents listed below, being the highest rated proposals based on the selection criteria and meeting the terms and conditions of Request for Pre-Qualifications (RFPQ) 2019-PQ01, be added to the roster for the provision of construction of the King Road Streetscaping Project: • Fermar Paving Limited • Vaughan Paving Limited • CRCE Construction Limited • Pave-Al Limited • Rafat General Contractors Incorporated Midome Construction Services Limited
7. NEW BUSINESS
C.O.W. #5
Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) / Local Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT) Re: Litigation Matters – Impacts of Severance Decisions
Councillor Schaefer asked that Committee support a request to seek legal advice on OMB/LPAT decisions pertaining to severance matters in the Snowberry and Snowball areas of King at a special Committee Closed Session meeting. Motion Carried.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 88 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 7 - C.O.W. Minutes – February 25, 2019
8. ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Committee and carried that the Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 be adjourned.
The meeting adjourned at 9:56 p.m.
At the meeting of March 18, 2019, a motion was made by Councillor xx, seconded by Councillor xx and carried that the Committee of the Whole Report for the Meeting of February 25, 2019 be adopted.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 89 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE CLOSED SESSION MEETING – MINUTES (DRAFT) MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2019
Committee of the Whole, Closed Session met at 9:58 p.m. in the King City Room, Township of King Municipal Centre, 2585 King Road, King City with Councillor Cescolini presiding.
The following were present at this Meeting:
Council Staff
Mayor Steve Pellegrini Susan Plamondon – Chief Administrative Officer Councillor Jordan Cescolini Gaspare Ritacca – Manager of Planning and Development Councillor David Boyd Councillor Jakob Schneider Councillor Bill Cober Councillor Debbie Schaefer Councillor Avia Eek
The Chief Administrative Officer assumed the position of Acting Clerk for the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Councillor Cescolini called the meeting to order. A quorum was present.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Committee recommended and carried that the Agenda for the Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 25th 2019 be approved.
3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest.
4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
4.1 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(e): Litigation or Potential Litigation Affecting the Municipality
Planning Department Report Re: Potential Litigation Matter, Direction Required Committee of Adjustment Decision - Minor Variance File No.: 03-A-19
The Manager of Planning and Development provided an update on a minor variance matter.
Committee reviewed and discussed the status of the file and gave direction to staff.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 90 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 2 - COW Closed Session Minutes – February 25, 2019
Committee recommends that the Manager of Planning and Development’s report be received and that the recommendations be adopted within the Open Session of Council for staff to proceed as directed. Carried.
4.2 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(c): Proposed or Pending Acquisition or Disposition of Land
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Land Acquisition Matter (Nobleton)
The Chief Administrative Officer provided an update on a land acquisition matter pertaining to property located in the Village of Nobleton.
Committee recommends that the verbal report by the Chief Administrative Officer be received and that staff proceed as directed.
Staff present removed themselves from the meeting.
4.3 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) Personal Matters about an Identifiable Individual(s)
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Personnel Matter
The Chief Administrative Officer provided a verbal report on a personnel matter.
Committee recommends that the verbal report by the Chief Administrative Officer be received and that staff proceed as directed.
5. ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Committee and carried that the Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 25, 2019 be adjourned.
The meeting adjourned at 11:04 p.m.
At the meeting of March 18, 2019, a motion was made by Councillor xx, seconded by Councillor xx and carried that the Committee of the Whole Closed Session Report for the Meeting of February 25, 2019 be adopted.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 25, 2019 Page 91 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE CLOSED SESSION MEETING – MINUTES (DRAFT) MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2019
Committee of the Whole, Closed Session met at 6:05 p.m. in the King City(163) – Council Board Room, Township of King Municipal Centre, 2585 King Road, King City with Councillor Cescolini presiding.
The following were present at this Meeting:
Council Staff
Mayor Steve Pellegrini Susan Plamondon – Chief Administrative Officer (and Acting Township Clerk) Councillor Jordan Cescolini Stephen Naylor – Director of Planning and Development Councillor Debbie Schaefer Tom Halinski – Township Solicitor Councillor Avia Eek Gaspare Ritacca – Manager of Planning & Development
1. CALL TO ORDER
Councillor Cescolini called the meeting to order. A quorum was present.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Committee recommended and carried that the Agenda for the Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 28th 2019 be approved, as amended.
3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest.
4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
4.1 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(e): Litigation or Potential Litigation Affecting the Municipality
Township Solicitor Re: Local Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT) Decisions, Direction Required (OMB Case No. PL160763, Municipal File No. OP-2015-03 – 22 & 32 Snowberry Lane) (OMB Case File No. PL161246, Municipal File No. OP-2011-01/Z-2011-05/SPD- 11-08 – Brock Aggregates)
Tom Halinski, Township Solicitor provided an update on LPAT’s decisions on matters related to properties, 22 & 32 Snowberry Lane and Brock Aggregates in King.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 28, 2019 Page 92 of 176 AGENDA ITEM # - 2 - COW Closed Session Minutes – February 28, 2019
Committee reviewed and discussed the status of the files and gave direction to staff.
Committee recommends that the Township Solicitor’s report be received and that the recommendations be adopted within the Open Session of Council for staff to proceed as directed. Carried.
Mr. Halinski, Mr. Naylor and Mr. Ritacca all vacated the meeting upon conclusion of the first item.
4.2 Part 5, Section 39, Subsection 39.1(b) Personal Matters about an Identifiable Individual(s)
CAO Administration Department Verbal Report Re: Personnel Matter
The Chief Administrative Officer provided a verbal update regarding a personnel matter with respect to recruitment.
Committee recommends that the Chief Administrative Officer’s report be received and that the recommendations be adopted within the Open Session of Council for staff to proceed as directed. Carried.
5. ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Committee and carried that the Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 28, 2019 be adjourned.
The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
At the meeting of March 18, 2019, a motion was made by Councillor xx, seconded by Councillor xx and carried that the Committee of the Whole Closed Session Report for the Meeting of February 28, 2019 be adopted.
The Corporation of the Township of King, 2585 King Road, King City, ON
Committee of the Whole Closed Session Meeting of February 28, 2019 Page 93 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.1.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-025
A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A CERTAIN NO PRE-SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN NOBLETON ESTATES INC. AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King deems it advisable to enter into a No Pre-Sale Agreement with the owner of Part Lot 6, Concession 8, Township of King and as more particularly described on Schedule “A” attached hereto;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Township of King HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute a certain No Pre-Sale Agreement dated March 18, 2019 between Nobleton Estates Inc. and the Corporation of the Township of King for the lands described as Part Lot 6, Concession 8 and as more particularly described on Schedule “A” attached hereto.
READ a FIRST and SECOND time this 18th day of March, 2019.
READ a THIRD time and FINALLY PASSED this 18th day of March, 2019.
______Steve Pellegrini Mayor
______Kathryn Moyle Director of Clerks/By-law Enforcement Township Clerk
By-law #2019-025 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 94 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.1.
SCHEDULE “A” TO BY-LAW 2019-025
ALL AND SINGULAR that certain parcel or tract of land and premises situate, lying and being in the Township of King, in the Regional Municipality of York and being composed of the following:
PART LOT 6 CONCESSION 8 KING; TOWNSHIP OF KING; as shown on Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-K01, dated June 12, 2015, attached.
By-law #2019-025 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 95 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.1.
By-law #2019-025 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 96 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-26
A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE AN UP-TO-DATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
WHEREAS the Province of Ontario has passed Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.9, as amended by Bill 148, and Ontario Regulation 380/04 (the Act), which requires the development and implementation of an Emergency Management Program by the Council of the municipality;
AND WHEREAS the Act requires the emergency management program to conform to standards promulgated by Emergency Management Ontario in accordance with international best practices, including the four core components of emergency management, namely: mitigation/prevention, preparedness, response and recovery; and also makes provision for the municipality and Council to develop and implement an Emergency Management Program including an Emergency Response Plan to protect public safety, public health, the environment, the critical infrastructure and property, and to promote economic stability and a disaster-resilient community;
AND WHEREAS the Act makes provision for the Head of Council to declare that an emergency exists in the community or in any part thereof, and also provides the Head of Council with authority to take such action or make such orders as he/she considers necessary and not contrary to law, to implement the Emergency Response Plan and respond to an emergency;
AND WHEREAS the Act provides for the designation of one or more Members of Council who may exercise the powers and perform the duties of the Head of Council during his/her absence or his/her inability to act;
AND WHEREAS the Act authorizes employees of a community to respond to an emergency in accordance with the Emergency Response Plan where an emergency exists but has not yet been declared to exist;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOW:
1. THAT an Emergency Management Program be developed and implemented in accordance with the standards published by Emergency Management Ontario in accordance with international best practices;
2. THAT the Head of Council or designated alternate, as provided in the plan, be empowered to declare an emergency and implement the Emergency Response Plan;
3. THAT certain appointed officials or their designated alternates, as provided in the approved community Emergency Response Plan are empowered to cause an emergency notification to be issued to members of the Emergency Control
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 97 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2.
Group, and to respond to an emergency in accordance with the Emergency Response Plan where an emergency exists but has not yet been declared to exist;
4. THAT the Emergency Management Program Committee (as identified in the Annex of the Emergency Response Plan) will cause the Emergency Management Program to be reviewed annually and to recommend changes to the program as considered appropriate and refer recommendations to Council for further review and approval; and
5. THAT By-law Number 2016-60 being a By-law to formulate a plan for protecting property and the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of an emergency area within the Township of King is repealed.
6. THAT the Emergency Response Plan attached hereto as Schedule “A” of this By-law is hereby adopted.
READ a FIRST and SECOND time this 18th day of March, 2019.
READ a THIRD time and FINALLY PASSED this 18th day of March, 2019.
______Steve Pellegrini Mayor
______Kathryn Moyle Director of Clerks/By-law Enforcement Township Clerk
(Ref. Emergency Services Dept. Report No. 2019-01, C.O.W. March 18/19)
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 98 of 176
AGENDA ITEM #15.2.
Emergency Response Plan 2019
Township of
King
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 99 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 1 Emergency Response Plan
Table of Contents
1: Emergency Response Plan Overview
1.1 Definition of Emergency 4
1.2 Emergency Management Program 4
1.3 Emergency Response Plan Purpose 5
1.4 Emergency Response Plan Objectives 5
e 1.5 Emergency Response Plan Authority 6
1.6 Protection from Action 7
1.7 Requests for Assistance 7
1.8 Definitions and Acronyms 8
2: Emergency Operations Centre and Members
2.1 ECG and EOC Members 16
2.2 Community Emergency Management Coordinator (CEMC) 18
2.3 Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) 19
2.4 EOC Activation 20
2.5 Emergency Notification Procedures 20
2.6 OFMEM (PEOC) Notification 21
2.7 Operating Period 21
2.8 Declaration of an Emergency 23
2.9 Termination of an Emergency 23
3: EOC Members Responsibilities
3.1 Incident Management System (IMS) 24
3.2 EOC Organizational Chart 25
3.3 EOC Responsibilities 26
3.4 Standard Response Goals 27
3.5 All EOC Members 28
3.6 Head of Council 29
3.7 CAO 30
3.8 Command Section 31
3.9 Operations Section 35
3.10 Planning Section 42 3.11 Logistics Section 43 3.12 Finance Section 45
4: Plan Maintenance
4.1 Emergency Management Program Committee 46
4.2 Plan Maintenance and Revision 47
4.3 Testing of the Emergency Response Plan 47
4.4 Training 47
4.5 After Action Review 48
4.6 Emergency Response Plan Distribution List 49
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 100 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 2 Emergency Response Plan
Listing of Annexes
A. Contact Directory
Emergency Control Group EOC Phone Numbers and Email Additional EOC Members Sample Notification Procedure
B. Resource Directory
Additional King Township Employees Township of King Council York Region Council York Region Fire Chiefs OFMEM, Conservation Authorities, HAZMAT OPP, YRP, EMS, Medical Care Facilities, School Boards Enbridge, Hydro One, York Region Amateur Radio Club, York Region Transit
C. Emergency Operations Centre
D. Declaration and Termination of Emergencies
E. Reception Centre Information
F. Flood Contingency Plan
G. Emergency Plan for Water Distribution
H. Volunteer Management Plan
I. Debris Management Plan
J. Telecommunications Plan
K. Emergency Information Plan
L. Township of King Critical Infrastructure
M. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
N. Emergency Recovery Plan
O. Legislation, Regulations, Guidelines and By-Law
Township of King Emergency Response Plan By-law Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act Ontario Regulation 380/04 Ontario Regulation 378/18 Verification of Required ECG Training
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 101 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 3 Emergency Response Plan
Record of Amendments
Amendment Date Subject Approved By 1 Nov. 28/ 2011 By-Law updated Council 2 June 27/ 2016 By-Law updated Council 3 Feb 2019 ERP in full 4 Feb 2019 By-Law updated
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 102 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 4 Emergency Response Plan
1.1 Definition of an Emergency
The Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, defines an emergency as:
“a situation or an impending situation that constitutes a danger of major proportions that could result in serious harm to persons or substantial damage to property and that is caused by the forces of nature, a disease or health risk, an accident or an act whether intentional or otherwise.”
Emergencies can be categorized as natural, technological or human caused and can vary in magnitude. In many cases, routine emergencies that occur within a municipality are managed by township staff and emergency first responders; however some situations may escalate, and may require the assistance of additional and larger scale specialized response operations.
1.2 Emergency Management Program
The Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, specifies that every municipality is required to develop, implement and maintain an Emergency Management Program. An effective Emergency Management Program will provide the necessary framework to assist in achieving the standard response goals of protecting lives, property and the environment. The program consists of:
1. An Emergency Response Plan
2. Training programs and exercises for municipal employees with respect to the provision of necessary services and procedures during emergency response and recovery activities
3. Public education on safety, risks and emergency preparedness
To support the development of an appropriate and effective Emergency Management Program, a community risk assessment must be completed. This process identifies, analyzes, evaluates and prioritizes risks to public safety specifically within a municipality.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 103 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 5 Emergency Response Plan
1.3 Emergency Response Plan Purpose
An Emergency Response Plan (ERP) is an important component of an integrated Emergency Management Program pertaining to prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. In order to protect the residents, businesses and visitors of the Township of King, this Emergency Response Plan (ERP) has been prepared to:
1. Facilitate a controlled and coordinated response by a number of agencies to any type of emergency occurring within or affecting the Township of King that is distinct in arrangements and procedures from the normal day-to-day operations carried out by emergency services.
2. Protect public safety
3. Promote public confidence in the Township of King’s ability to manage a major emergency or disaster
4. Create a disaster resilient community
1.4 Emergency Response Plan Objectives
It is intended that this plan, when implemented, be used by the Township of King to maximize the effectiveness of resources, organizations and systems in response to emergencies and disasters. The plan is designed to:
1. Identify roles and responsibilities when preparing for, responding to and recovering from an emergency or disaster
2. Ensure a coordinated response of all agencies to save lives, prevent injuries and protect property and the environment
3. Efficiently and effectively deploy, organize and manage resources
4. Assist in achieving the Standard Response Goals of protecting life, property, critical infrastructure, the environment and reduce suffering, economic and social losses
For this Emergency Response Plan to be effective, every official, municipal department and agency must be familiar with its provisions and procedures. The information in this plan must be reviewed, tested and maintained on a regular schedule in order for it to remain effective, and current.
Public copies of this plan may be viewed at the Township of King Municipal Centre, Library Branches, or the Fire Department HQ. A public electronic version is available on the Township website: www.king.ca. The Annexes to this plan contain essential and supporting documentation that is confidential and therefore, are maintained separate from this document.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 104 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 6 Emergency Response Plan
1.5 Emergency Response Plan Authority
The Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter E.9, Ontario Regulation 380/04 and Ontario Regulation 378/18 provide the legal authority for this Emergency Response Plan in Ontario.
The Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act states that:
“Every municipality shall formulate an emergency plan governing the provision of necessary services during an emergency and the procedures under and the manner in which employees of the municipality and other persons will respond to the emergency and the council of the municipality shall by by-law adopt the emergency plan.” 2002, c.14, s 5(1) and;
“The Head of Council of a municipality may declare that an emergency exists in the municipality or in any part thereof and may take such action and make such orders he or she considers necessary and are not contrary to law to implement the emergency plan of municipality and to protect property and the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the emergency area.” 1990, c. E.9, s. 4(1)
When an emergency exists but has not yet been declared to exist, Township of King employees may take such action(s) under this Emergency Response Plan as may be required to protect property and the health, safety and welfare of the Township of King and its residents. The subordinate plans, attached as Annexes to this document, may also be implemented, in whole, or in part in the absence of a formal declaration.
In accordance with the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, the Township of King has adopted this Emergency Response Plan by By-law 2019-00 (Annex O) and a copy of this plan has been submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management, Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services.
Ontario Regulation 380/04 s. 15 (1) identifies that the Emergency Response Plan shall,
(a) assign responsibilities to municipal employees, by position, respecting implementation of the Emergency Response Plan; and
(b) set out procedures for notifying members of the Emergency Control Group (ECG)
Ontario Regulation 378/18 (effective July 1, 2019) specifies that every municipality must complete (every five years) and review (every one year) a community risk assessment that includes consideration of the mandatory profiles listed in Schedule 1.
In accordance with Ontario Regulation 378/18 (effective July 1, 2019), the Regional Municipality of York has completed a consolidated Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) and has identified hazards that are most relevant to the Township of King (Annex M).
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 105 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 7 Emergency Response Plan
1.6 Protection from Action
As per the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, s. 11 (1),
“No action or other proceeding lies shall be instituted against a member of council, an employee of a municipality, an employee of a local services board, an employee of a district social services administration board, a minister of the Crown, a public servant or any other individual acting pursuant to this Act or an order made under this Act for any act done in good faith in the exercise or performance or the intended exercise or performance of any power or duty under this Act or an order under this Act or for neglect or default in the good faith exercise or performance of such a power or duty.”
s. 11 (3) however, “does not relieve a municipality of liability for the acts or omissions of a member of council or an employee of the municipality referred to in subsection (1), and the municipality is liable as if subsection (1) had not been enacted and, in the case of a member of council, as if the member were an employee of the municipality.
1.7 Requests for Assistance
Local Assistance
Assistance may be requested from the Region of York at any time by contacting the Community Emergency Management Coordinator (CEMC) who will consult with the Office of the Regional Chair. A request for assistance from the Region of York shall not be deemed to be a request that the Region of York assume authority or control of the emergency. The Region of York’s role will be one of support and assistance.
Provincial Assistance
Assistance may also be requested from the Province of Ontario at any time without any loss of control or authority. A request for assistance should be made by contacting the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management Provincial Emergency Operations Centre (PEOC) Duty Officer.
Federal Assistance
Federal Assistance, including Department of National Defence can be requested through the Provincial Emergency Operations Centre (PEOC).
Subject to provisions under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, if a Provincial or Federal Declaration of an emergency exists, municipalities will have to relinquish some command and control depending on the type of emergency.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 106 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 8 Emergency Response Plan
1.8 Definitions and Acronyms
The following definitions are commonly used in Emergency Management:
Acceptable risk: the level of potential losses that a society or community considers acceptable, given existing social, economic, political, cultural, technical and environmental conditions
Activation: decisions and actions taken to implement a plan, a procedure or to open an Emergency Operations Centre
After-Action Report (AAR): a report that documents the performance of tasks related to an emergency, exercise or planned event and, where necessary, makes recommendations for improvements
Assessment: the evaluation and interpretation of available information to provide a basis for decision making.
Authority having jurisdiction (AHJ): the organization (political or private), office, or individual responsible for approving a plan, program, procedure or expenditure or having ownership of equipment, materials, or a facility.
Biological hazard: a virus, bacterium, micro-organism, fungus, prion, biological toxin or micro toxin produced by organisms capable of negatively affecting humans, animals or plants.
Business Continuity Planning: a management process that identifies risk, threats and vulnerabilities that could impact an entity's continued operations and provides a framework for building organizational resilience and the capability for an effective response.
Catastrophe: an emergency of particularly severe proportions.
CBRNE (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive) incident: an incident that involves a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and/or explosive situation that may require a response by specialized teams and equipment.
Cold zone: an uncontaminated area where workers and equipment could be assembled without risk of exposure to hazardous conditions.
Command: the act of directing, ordering, or controlling by virtue of explicit statutory, regulatory, or delegated authority.
Communications: advisories, directives, information and messages that are transmitted.
Community: a generic term that includes both municipalities and First Nations.
CEMC (Community Emergency Management Coordinator): a municipal employee who is the lead in delivering the municipality’s emergency management program including Prevention; Mitigation; Preparedness; Response and Recovery.
Comprehensive Emergency Management: an all-encompassing risk-based approach to emergency management that includes prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery measures.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 107 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 9 Emergency Response Plan
Consequence: the outcome of an event or situation expressed qualitatively or quantitatively, being a loss, injury or disadvantage.
Crisis management: from a business continuity planning perspective, this term refers to the overall coordination of an organization’s response to a crisis in an effective, timely manner, with the goal of avoiding or minimizing damage to the organization’s profitability, reputation, and ability to operate.
Critical Infrastructure (CI): interdependent, interactive, interconnected networks of institutions, services, systems and processes that meet vital human needs, sustain the economy, protect public safety and security, and maintain continuity of and confidence in government.
Damage assessment: an appraisal or determination of the effects of a disaster on people, property, the environment, the economy and/or services.
Declaration of emergency: a signed declaration made in writing by the Head of Council or the Premier of Ontario in accordance with the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act. This declaration is usually based on a situation or an impending situation that threatens public safety, public health, the environment, critical infrastructure, property, and/or economic stability and exceeds the scope of routine community emergency response.
Disaster: a serious disruption to an affected area, involving widespread human, property, environmental and / or economic impacts, that exceed the ability of one or more affected communities to cope using their own resources.
Disaster Recovery Assistance for Ontarians: helps individuals, small owner-operated businesses, farms and not-for-profit organizations cover emergency expenses and repair or replace essential property following a natural disaster.
Donations management: the management of donations (services, funds, material goods and volunteers) during an emergency by any level of government whose aim is to provide victims of disasters with as much support as possible by effective and efficient channeling of offers from the public and/or private sectors.
Emergency: a situation or an impending situation that constitutes a danger of major proportions that could result in serious harm to persons or substantial damage to property and that is caused by the forces of nature, a disease or other health risk, an accident or an act whether intentional or otherwise.
Emergency area: a geographic area within which an emergency has occurred or is about to occur, and which has been identified, defined and designated to receive emergency response actions.
Emergency Control Group (ECG): a group composed of senior staff and employees of an organization, and others that may be involved in directing that organization’s response to an emergency including, the implementation of its emergency response plans and procedures.
Emergency information (EI): information about an emergency that can be disseminated in anticipation of an emergency or during an emergency. It may provide situational information or directive actions to be taken by the public.
Emergency Information Centre (EIC): a designated facility that is properly equipped to monitor and coordinate emergency information activities including the dissemination of information to the public.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 108 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 10 Emergency Response Plan
Emergency management (EM): organized activities undertaken to prevent, mitigate, prepare for, respond to and recover from actual or potential emergencies.
Emergency management program: A risk-based program consisting of prescribed elements that may include prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery activities.
Emergency Operations Centre (EOC): a designated and appropriately equipped facility where officials from an organization(s) assemble to manage the response to an emergency or disaster.
Emergency Response Plan (ERP): a plan developed and maintained to direct an organization’s external and/or internal response to an emergency.
Emergency response organization: a group (public, private or volunteer), trained in emergency response that may be called upon to respond to an emergency situation.
Exercise: a simulated emergency in which players carry out actions, functions, and responsibilities that would be expected of them in a real emergency. Exercises can be used to validate plans and procedures, and to practice prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities.
Hazard: a phenomenon, substance, human activity or condition that may cause loss of life, injury or other health impacts, property damage, loss of livelihoods and services, social and economic disruption, or environmental damage. These may include natural, technological or human caused incidents or some combination of these.
HazMat (Hazardous Material): a substance (gas, liquid or solid) capable of causing harm to people, property and/or the environment, the economy and/or services, e.g., a toxic, flammable or explosive substance.
HUSAR (Heavy Urban Search and Rescue) Team: a multi-service, multi-skilled, and multifunctional task force that is trained and prepared to locate, treat and remove persons trapped in collapsed structures.
Hot zone: the area where contamination may occur; the primary activities performed in this area are hazard assessment, control of the release or hazard and rescue. Personnel working in the hot zone wear high- level personal protective equipment required for that site.
Human-caused hazard: a hazard which results from direct human action, either intentional or unintentional (e.g. terrorism, civil disorder ).
Impact: the negative effect of a hazardous incident on people, property, the environment, the economy and/or services.
Incident: an occurrence or event that requires an emergency response to people, property, the environment, the economy and/or services.
Incident Action Plan (IAP): within IMS, an oral or written plan containing general objectives reflecting the overall strategy for managing an incident. It may include the identification of operational resources and assignments. It may also include attachments that provide direction and important information for management of the incident during one or more operational periods.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 109 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 11 Emergency Response Plan
Incident Command/Incident Commander (IC): the entity/individual responsible for all incident activities, including the development of strategies and tactics and the ordering and release of resources. The IC has overall authority for conducting incident operations and is responsible for the management of all incident operations.
Incident Management System (IMS): a standardized approach to emergency management encompassing personnel, facilities, equipment, procedures, and communications operating within a common organizational structure. The IMS is predicated on the understanding that in any and every incident there are certain management functions that must be carried out regardless of the number of persons who are available or involved in the emergency response.
Intelligence: knowledge, information or data that may increase situational awareness of an event or an impending event
Interoperability: the ability of organizations and systems to exchange information, communicate effectively and work well together. This applies to technological and functional interoperability.
Lower tier municipality: a lower tier municipality is the most basic unit of local government and includes townships, towns, and cities within a county or region, but excludes single tier municipalities.
Mitigation: actions taken to reduce the adverse impacts of an emergency or disaster. Such actions may include diversion or containment measures to lessen the impacts of a flood or a spill.
Municipality: a geographic area whose inhabitants are incorporated
Municipal Disaster Recovery Assistance: reimburses municipalities for extraordinary costs associated with emergency response and repairs to essential property and infrastructure following a natural disaster
Mutual aid agreement: an agreement developed between two or more emergency services to render aid to the parties of the agreement. These types of agreements can include private sector emergency services when appropriate.
Mutual assistance agreement: an agreement developed between two or more jurisdictions to render assistance to the parties of the agreement. Jurisdictions covered with these types of agreements could include neighbouring, cities, regions, provinces or nations.
Natural hazard: a naturally occurring event such as a forest fire, flood and/or severe weather that has the potential to harm people, property, the environment, the economy and/or services.
NGO (Non-Governmental Organization): an entity with a common interest or focus that is not created by a government, but may work cooperatively with governments.
Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management (OFMEM): OFMEM is a branch within the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services with overall provincial emergency management responsibility. OFMEM replaced Emergency Management Ontario in 2013 and is responsible for the coordination, promotion, development, implementation and maintenance of effective emergency management programs throughout Ontario and for the coordination of these programs with the federal government.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 110 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 12 Emergency Response Plan
Preparedness: actions taken prior to an emergency or disaster to ensure an effective response. These actions include the formulation of emergency response plans, business continuity or continuity of operations plans, training, exercises, and public awareness and education.
Prevention: actions taken to stop an emergency or disaster from occurring. Such actions may include legislative controls, zoning restrictions, improved operating standards/procedures or critical infrastructure management.
Private sector: a business or industry not owned or managed by any level of government.
Probability: the likelihood of an event occurring that may result in an emergency, disaster or service disruption.
Provincial Disaster Assessment Team (PDAT): a multi-ministry recovery response team that is dispatched to a community to assess damage following a disaster event and to recommend on a financial disaster assistance program for recovery.
Provincial Emergency Operations Centre (PEOC): a fully equipped facility maintained by Emergency Management Ontario (EMO) that can be activated in response to, or in anticipation of, emergencies. The PEOC is staffed with appropriate representatives from ministries that have been delegated responsibilities for those emergencies as well as EMO staff. It serves as an initial point-of-contact for the affected municipality and federal interests.
Provincial Emergency Response Team (PERT): a response team comprised of relevant provincial officials that is dispatched to provide advice and assistance to local authorities during an emergency or disaster.
Public sector: all government services at the municipal, provincial and federal levels.
Reception Centre: usually located outside the impact zone of the emergency, the reception centre is a place where evacuees can go to register, receive assistance for basic needs, information and referral to a shelter if required.
Recovery: the process of restoring a stricken community to a pre-disaster level of functioning. This may include the provision of financial assistance, repairing buildings and/or restoration of the environment.
Recovery plan: an emergency plan that is developed and maintained to recover from an emergency or disaster.
Resilience: the ability to resist, absorb, accommodate and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner.
Resource management: efficient incident management requires a system for identifying available resources at all levels to enable timely and unimpeded access to resources needed to prepare for, respond to, or recover from an incident. Resource management under the IMS includes mutual-aid / mutual assistance agreements, and resource mobilization protocols.
Resources: these are personnel and major items of equipment, supplies, and facilities available or potentially available for assignment to incident operations and for which status is maintained. Resources are described by kind and type and may be used in operational or support capacities.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 111 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 13 Emergency Response Plan
Response: the provision of emergency services and public assistance or intervention during or immediately after an incident in order to protect people, property, the environment, the economy and/or services. This may include the provision of resources such as personnel, services and/or equipment.
Risk: the product of the probability of the occurrence of a hazard and its consequences.
Risk assessment: a methodology to determine the nature and extent of risk by analyzing potential hazards and the evaluation of vulnerabilities and consequences.
Severity: the extent of disruption and/or damages associated with a hazard.
Site: the geographical location of an incident.
Span of control: the number of individuals a supervisor is responsible for, usually expressed as the ratio of supervisors to individuals. Typically the span of control is between 1:3 and 1:7.
Staging area: location established where resources can be placed while awaiting a tactical assignment.
Technological hazard: a hazard which results from the failure or misuse of technology, either intentional or unintentional such as a power outage, cyber-attack etc.
Telecommunications: the transmission and/or receipt of messages, for the purpose of communicating over some distance, via a range of technical systems including radio and microwave communications, as well as fiber optics, satellites and the Internet.
Threat: a person, thing or event that has the potential to cause harm or damage.
Upper Tier Municipality: an upper tier municipality is a county or region. Upper-tier municipality" means a municipality of which two or more lower-tier municipalities form part for municipal purposes.
Vulnerability: the susceptibility of a community, system or asset to the damaging effects of a hazard.
Warm Zone: an area adjacent to a hot zone where decontamination of personnel and equipment takes place.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 112 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 14 Emergency Response Plan
The following acronyms are commonly used in Emergency Management:
AHJ Authority Having Jurisdiction ARES Amateur Radio Emergency Services BCP Business Continuity Plan CANUTEC Canadian Transport Emergency Centre CAO Chief Administrative Officer CBRNE Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive CEMC Community Emergency Management Coordinator CI Critical Infrastructure COOP Continuity of Operations Planning EIO Emergency Information Officer DRAO Disaster Recovery Assistance for Ontarians ECG Emergency Control Group EMA Emergency Management Act EMCPA Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act EMS Emergency Medical Services EOC Emergency Operations Centre ERP Emergency Response Plan EPG Emergency Power Generator ESM Emergency Site Manager GIS Geographic Information System HAZMAT Hazardous Material HIRA Hazard Identification Risk Assessment HUSAR Heavy Urban Search and Rescue IC Incident Commander IMS Incident Management System IT Information Technology KFES King Fire & Emergency Services LSRCA Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority MOE Ministry of Environment
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 113 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 15 Emergency Response Plan
NGO Non-Governmental Organization OFMEM Ontario Fire Marshal and Emergency Management OPP Ontario Provincial Police PEOC Provincial Emergency Operations Centre PIC Public Inquiry Centre PIO Public Information Officer RECG Regional Emergency Control Group REOC Regional Emergency Operations Centre SAC Spills Action Centre TRCA Toronto Region Conservation Authority VFRS Vaughan Fire & Rescue Services VOIP Voice Over Internet Protocol YRCHS York Region Community and Health Services YRP York Regional Police YRT York Region Transit
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 114 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 16 Emergency Response Plan
2.1 Emergency Control Group (ECG)
Ontario Regulation 380/04 which supports the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, requires every municipality to have an Emergency Control Group (ECG) that is responsible for directing the municipal response during an emergency, including the implementation of the municipal Emergency Response Plan. Members must be appointed by Council and participate in annual training and an annual emergency exercise.
The Township of King Emergency Control Group (ECG) is responsible for initiating, coordinating and implementing the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) through the use of the Incident Management System (IMS). To accomplish this, the ECG is authorized to take such actions as deemed necessary to bring about a satisfactory resolution to the emergency situation, including the expenditure of funds for the purpose of responding to and recovering from the emergency and to obtain volunteer support from public agencies and other persons as considered necessary.
The primary responsibilities of the ECG are:
1. Implement the ERP and appropriate Annexes and Business Continuity Plans; 2. Provide advice and assistance to the Head of Council; 3. Direct and coordinate all support to emergency operations by providing personnel and resources; 4. Ensure there is no interruption in the provision of emergency or essential services, and; 5. Designate at least one alternate in their absence, or if an EOC shift changeover is required.
In addition, as designated under Ontario Regulation 380/04, s. 12, and following Guidance Note 2018-01-01 issued by the Fire Marshal and Chief of Emergency Management, members of the ECG are required to annually demonstrate an adequate level of training and knowledge in each of the following areas:
1. All components of the Township of King Emergency Management Program, including the HIRA and Critical Infrastructure List; 2. The Township of King Emergency Response Plan (ERP), including their roles and responsibilities, and those of other organizations which may have a role; 3. Procedures used to activate and operate under the ERP; 4. Notification procedures of the ECG when the ERP is activated, and; 5. Location of the Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) and the communications and technology available in the EOC.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 115 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 17 Emergency Response Plan
ECG Members
The most critical component of the EOC is the staff. It is necessary to have pre-designated trained personnel each with their own individual expertise who understand their roles and responsibilities, in order to get the right resources to the right place at the right time.
The Township of King Emergency Control Group (ECG) is composed of the following members:
1. Mayor 2. CAO 3. CEMC 4. Alternate CEMC 5. Communications Officer 6. Director of Clerks & By-Law 7. Director of Engineering & Public Works 8. Director of Parks, Recreation & Culture 9. Director of Planning & Development 10. Director of Finance & Treasurer 11. Manager of Human Resources 12. Manager of Information Technology
Additional EOC Members
* Each of the above ECG members will designate at least one alternate, who in their absence will have the knowledge and authority to make decisions and exercise the full responsibilities assigned to the ECG member.
The ECG members may invite additional representatives to participate as consultants in the EOC to provide expertise in specialized areas as required. Additional personnel may be but not limited to representatives from any of the following:
• Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management • Hydro One, Alectra • Enbridge, Trans Canada Pipeline • Red Cross, Salvation Army, St. John’s Ambulance, OSPCA • Environment Weather Canada • Toronto Regional and or Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority • York Region Amateur Radio Club • Liaison staff from provincial ministries as determined • Any other officials, experts or representatives from the public or private sector as deemed necessary by the ECG
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 116 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 18 Emergency Response Plan
2.2 Community Emergency Management Coordinator (CEMC)
Every municipality is required to designate an Emergency Management Program Coordinator, also referred to as a Community Emergency Management Coordinator (CEMC). This CEMC is required to have completed certain courses offered by the OFMEM and is responsible for the following:
• Act as an advisor to the municipality on matters of emergency preparedness • Develop and maintain the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) • Provide advice and clarification about details of the ERP • Be available to fulfill any Incident Management System (IMS) role in the EOC • Maintain the Emergency Operations Centre in a state of constant readiness • Activate the EOC if required • Notify the ECG members if required to report to the EOC • Liaise with all emergency services and emergency management stakeholders • Ensure all Emergency Control Group (ECG) members have the necessary plans, resources, supplies, maps, equipment • Ensure all ECG members undergo the required annual training • Provide guidance, direction or assistance to any emergency or support personnel at the EOC or any other location • Schedule the After Action Review and coordinate post emergency debriefings
In the absence of the CEMC, the Alternate CEMC will assume all responsibilities outlined above.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 117 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 19 Emergency Response Plan
2.3 Emergency Operations Centre
The EOC is a facility that the Emergency Control Group (ECG) uses for strategic decision making and coordination and incident support. It is where data is collected, gathered, and analyzed in order to make decisions about priorities, and where actions and communications are coordinated.
It is crucial to ensure that timely, accurate and reliable communications are established between the emergency site and the EOC. The Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act requires each EOC to have the appropriate technological and telecommunications systems to ensure effective communication.
The Township of King Primary EOC has been equipped with the following technology:
• Telephones • Fax machine • Computer • LCD Projector • Intranet access • Photocopier • Power bars • GIS Maps
Stationary supplies in the EOC consist of:
• Easel Boards with Paper • Markers • Blank paper • Pens • Stapler • Tape
Also included in the EOC:
• IMS coloured vests • Table signage • 5 easels with flip chart paper pads • Township and King City, Schomberg, Nobleton Maps • Laminated copy of Standard Response Goals, EOC responsibilities, Operational Period Sample and EOC Floor Plan • Bin with hygiene kits and other comfort items
The locations of the Primary and Alternate Emergency Operations Centres are confidential and detailed in Annex C.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 118 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 20 Emergency Response Plan
2.4 EOC Activation
The magnitude and stage of the emergency event will determine EOC activation. The Township of King Emergency Control Group IMS organizational structure is flexible, therefore, allowing it to either expand or contract based on the emergency situational needs.
EOC Activation may occur with or without a Declaration of Emergency. Criteria for activating the EOC include:
• Significant number of people at risk • Large widespread event, multiple emergency sites, multiple municipalities involved • Limited municipal resources and significant need for outside resources • Extraordinary actions or expenditure of monies for the protection of life or property • Uncertain conditions, escalation of event, unknown extent of damage • Potential threat to people, property and / or the environment • Declaration of a Local Emergency or Provincial Emergency is made
Prior to activating the EOC, the Mayor, CAO, CEMC (or alternate), should assess the situation using the above criteria in addition to the Emergency Declaration Checklist found in Annex D.
2.5 Emergency Notification Procedures
The CEMC will regularly monitor and analyze any potential and impending threats that may impact the health, safety or economic stability of the Township of King.
The CEMC, Alternate CEMC or CAO are assigned the function of sending out the initial emergency notification and alerting members of the EOC by email and or phone using the Contact Directory found in Annex A.
Where a threat of an impending emergency exists and time permits, all EOC members will be notified by email to be on standby and await further instructions to participate as required. The EOC members should then notify their departmental staff of any actual or impending emergency situations.
Should the EOC need to be activated, all EOC members will be notified by email and the members that are requested to attend at that time will be listed. All other members not listed will be asked to remain on standby and await further instructions to participate as required.
The notification details and a sample script are found in Annex A.
All EOC members should advise the CEMC at their earliest opportunity of changes in their contact information, or any times they may be unavailable to respond
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 119 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 21 Emergency Response Plan
2.6 OFMEM (PEOC) Notification Procedures
If an emergency occurs or is pending, contact should be made with the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management for advice and assistance. The contact information for the OFMEM is located in Annex B.
After reviewing the Emergency Declaration Checklist, if a state of emergency is declared, the Head of Council (Mayor) or designate must fill out the Emergency Declaration Form found in Annex D and send it to the OFMEM (PEOC) by fax or email.
2.7 Operational Period
The EOC Commander and Section Chiefs will gather at regular intervals to inform each other of the actions taken and any problems encountered. The EOC Commander will determine and establish the frequency of meetings and agenda items. Meetings will be kept as brief as possible to allow members to carry out their individual responsibilities. The operational period should initially be 1-2 hours for any critical or life safety issues. The remaining operational periods can vary depending on objectives and priorities and are commonly 8-12 hours in length. A method of keeping all members informed of updates will be maintained using status boards and maps prominently displayed.
A diagram depicting the Operational Period is shown on the following page.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 120 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 22 Emergency Response Plan
OPERATIONAL PERIOD
1. ASSESS SITUATION
Gather Info Analyze Size-Up
5. EVALUATE, MONITOR & REPORT UPDATES 2. SET OBJECTIVES Operational Period Briefings Re-evaluate Prioritize things to be done Public and Media Identify desired results /outcome
4. IMPLEMENT ACTION PLAN
Post the plan Orderly 3. DEVELOP ACTION PLAN
Timely Provides direction Efficiently Assign responsibilities Obtain approvals “Who, What, Where, When, How”
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE EXAMPLES
S - Specific Establish perimeter control M – Measurable Rescue A - Achievable Triage & Transport injured R - Realistic Evacuate nearby residents T - Time Power restoration
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 121 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 23 Emergency Response Plan
2.8 Declaration of an Emergency
The Head of Council, or designate of the Municipality has the legislative authority under the provisions of the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act RSO 1990, to declare an emergency to exist in all or any part of the municipality.
The decision to declare an emergency may be made in consultation with the members of the Emergency Control Group (ECG). The ECG shall evaluate the emergency situation and the community impact and recommend to the Head of Council whether to declare an emergency. The Emergency Declaration Checklist can be found in Annex D.
Upon declaring an emergency, The Mayor (or designate) will complete the Declaration of Emergency Form found in Annex D and notify:
OFMEM, Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services at the PEOC Township of King Council Region of York Chair Public Neighbouring community officials, as required Local Members of Provincial Parliament (MPP) Local Member of Federal Government (MP)
2.9 Termination of an Emergency
A municipal emergency may be terminated at any time by:
1. The Head of Council, or designate 2. Township of King Council 3. The Premier of Ontario
When terminating an emergency, the Emergency Termination Form found in Annex D must be filled out and sent to the OFMEM by fax.
The Public Information Officer (PIO) will ensure the following are notified of the termination:
OFMEM, Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services at the PEOC Township of King Council Region of York Chair Public Neighbouring community officials, as required Local Members of Provincial Parliament (MPP) Local Member of Federal Government (MP)
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 122 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 24 Emergency Response Plan
3.1 Incident Management System (IMS)
The Incident Management System (IMS) is an internationally recognized standardized approach to emergency management. In order to provide a flexible, scalable, consistent command and control system that everyone can use at all levels of incidents, resources (personnel and equipment), facilities, procedures and communications need to operate within a common organizational structure. This structure allows responders from different jurisdictions and disciplines to interact and work together efficiently in a unified approach. In Ontario, the Region of York and the Township of King, the use of the term Incident Command System (ICS) is synonymous with IMS.
The Incident Management System has been adopted in this plan to establish and clearly define the organizational structure, to identify roles and responsibilities and to ensure effective resource management. IMS positions should be staffed as required, therefore, depending on the nature and extent of the incident, not every position has to be filled. The ECG should however, ensure the 5 IMS management functions (Command, Operations, Planning, Logistics, and Finance) are addressed, where appropriate, even if that results in assigning multiple functions to the same ECG member. The IMS functional sections have their own distinct colours:
Command = Green Command Staff = Red Operations = Orange Planning = Blue Logistics = Yellow Finance = Platinum
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 123 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 25 Emergency Response Plan
3.2 Emergency Operations Centre IMS Organizational Chart
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 124 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 26 Emergency Response Plan
3.3 EOC Responsibilities
1. Policy & Strategic Direction
2. Site Support & Consequence Management
3. Information Collection, Evaluation, Display & Distribution
4. Coordination of Agencies and / or Departments
5. Resource Management
6. Internal & External Communications
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 125 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 27 Emergency Response Plan
3.4 Standard Response Goals
1. Provide for Safety and Health of all Responders
2. Save Lives
3. Reduce Suffering
4. Protect Public Health
5. Protect Critical Infrastructure
6. Protect Property
7. Protect the Environment
8. Reduce Economic and Social Losses
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 126 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 28 Emergency Response Plan
3.5
Common Responsibilities for all EOC Members
Be Prepared. Have your 72 hour kit ready at home for you and your family members
ECG Member - Assign an alternate EOC member in your absence or inability to respond
Bring your copy of the Emergency Response Plan
Bring your ID Access Card, a laptop, cell phone and charger
Bring your personal “Go Bag” (include a change of clothes and toiletries)
If deemed appropriate, initiate internal notification procedures of your staff and volunteer organizations
Report to the appropriate EOC location as directed
If first to arrive, set up EOC as per training
Upon arrival at EOC, Sign In at designated location
Check in with your Section Chief for briefing and specific responsibilities
Check in with the Liaison Command Staff, if external agency
Set-up your work station and materials
Review your assigned contact information
Review Response Goals, Priorities, and tasks in progress
Ensure communication equipment is operating properly
Document your significant key activities, actions, instructions and decisions on your Position Log
Brief incoming personnel
Sign Out when leaving your work station for any period of time
Participate in post-emergency debriefing
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 127 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 29 Emergency Response Plan
3.6
HEAD OF COUNCIL
The Mayor, Deputy Mayor or Acting Mayor (when appointed) of the Township of King is responsible for:
Providing overall leadership in responding to an emergency
Declaring an emergency if appropriate, in consultation with ECG
Officially declaring when emergency is to be terminated
Notifying Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management, Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services (PEOC) of declaration and termination
Notifying Township of King Council of declaration and termination and keep them informed of emergency situation
Notifying the public of declaration of an emergency
Acting as the Community Spokesperson
Assigning a Deputy Mayor in their absence
At any time, the Mayor may wish to request his or her Administrative Assistant for support.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 128 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 30 Emergency Response Plan
3.7
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CAO)
The Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) for the Township of King is responsible for:
Activating the EOC and notifying the required members of the ECG in a timely fashion
In cooperation with the Liaison Officer, work with York Regional Police regarding security for the EOC
Advising Mayor on policies and procedures as appropriate
Approving in conjunction with the Mayor, major announcements and media releases prepared by the Public Information Officer (PIO) in consultation with the ECG
Calling out additional Township personnel to provide assistance as required
Assuming the role of EOC Command
Assigning an alternate ECG member in their absence or inability to respond
At any time, the CAO may wish to request his or her Administrative Assistant for support.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 129 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 31 Emergency Response Plan
3.8
COMM AND COMMAND
Command is the act of directing, ordering, or controlling by virtue of statutory, regulatory or delegated authority. Command has the overall authority for the emergency response and resources. The emergency incident may require the EOC Commander to designate a Command Staff which may include the following positions:
Liaison Officer Public Information Officer Safety Officer
EOC COMMANDER
The EOC Commander will assume responsibility for the overall management of the operations within the Emergency Operations Centre, and the provision of Incident Support. This support is typically strategic guidance, information and communications support, resource management support, legal support, and financial support. Should the EOC Commander require a period of rest, the ECG will appoint an alternate to assume the duties, as required.
Determine appropriate staffing level of EOC activation based on the situation as known
Obtain briefing from Incident Commander on site and determine the support needs
Assess incident situation and set priorities for response efforts in the affected areas
Ensure EOC facility is properly set up
Ensure EOC check in procedure is established
Determine which IMS positions are required; establish appropriate organizational structure; assign Section Chiefs
Ensure welfare and safety of all responders in conjunction with Safety Officer
Maintain communication with Incident Commander at emergency site
Establish Operational Period and briefing schedule
Approve and authorize implementation of Incident Action Plan
Authorize release of emergency information to the public in conjunction with PIO
Authorize demobilization
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 130 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 32 Emergency Response Plan
LIAISON
Ensure required external agencies are represented in the EOC.
Contact any supporting agencies required and reach out to any allied partners
Serve as the primary contact for external agencies and other EOC’s / REOC
Gather information from and about external agencies involved including:
• Contact person • Phone numbers / emails / radio frequencies • Resource type and availability • Number of personnel • Cooperative agreements • Agency constraints / limitations
Maintain regular contact with external agencies and brief as needed
Advise Command of issues related to external agencies including current or potential inter-organization needs.
Assist Command with briefings and meetings
Work with Public Information Officer (PIO) to coordinate media releases associated with inter-organizational issues
Bring complaints pertaining to logistical problems, communications and strategic and tactical direction to attention of Command
LEGAL
Provide solution oriented legal counsel to members of ECG
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 131 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 33 Emergency Response Plan
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Develop and release approved emergency information to the public, Township of King staff in a timely, accurate manner, after approval from Command
Establish and maintain media contacts
Coordinate media interviews, organize press conferences
Issue authoritative instructions to the public on what they need to do
Implement the Emergency Information Plan
Establish Emergency Information Centre (EIC) if circumstances dictate
Distribute hard copies of media release to EIC, ECG and other key persons
Prepare Community Spokesperson for media interviews or act as spokesperson when required
Monitor news coverage, correcting any erroneous information
Advise Command on issues related to media and public emergency information dissemination
Maintain copies of media releases, newspaper articles pertaining to emergency
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 132 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 34 Emergency Response Plan
SAFETY
Monitor safety conditions and develop safety measures to ensure health and safety of all responders
Maintain link with Incident Safety Officers on scene
Control or reduce occupational hazards and exposures by creating systems and procedures
Ensure all responders have received appropriate, hazard specific training
Ensure adequate levels of protective equipment are available and being utilized
Ensure adequate sanitation and safety in food preparation if required
Advise ECG on potential risks to responders
Recommend safety modifications to Operations Section Chief if necessary
If an accident occurs, investigate it and ensure it is properly documented. Coordinate with MOL, WSIB and other relevant officials.
Prepare accident reports as per the Township of King policy, procedures and direction
Arrange for and coordinate provision of Employee Assistance counseling and Critical Incident Stress debriefings for responders and ECG members, as necessary
Monitor safety in the EOC
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 133 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 35 Emergency Response Plan
3.9
OPERATIONS
Address Life Safety and Property Conservation
Coordinate with Emergency Site Operations
Develop tactical objectives
Directs and deploys resources
SECTION CHIEF
Develop and manage Operations Section to accomplish incident objectives set by Command
Coordinate and Support: • Fire, Police, EMS • Emergency Social Services • Public Health Services • EPW • Building • Utilities
Coordinate with Liaison Officer regarding need for External Organization representatives in the Operations Section
Establish Operational Period in conjunction with Command
Establish and demobilize Staging Areas if required
Determine need for additional resources and coordinate with Logistics Section Chief
Provide overall leadership and supervision to Operations Section
Reports to Command
Assume role of EOC Command in the event the CAO, CEMC and / or Alternate CEMC are unavailable
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 134 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 36 Emergency Response Plan
FIRE
Provide ECG with information and advice on firefighting and rescue matters
Establish ongoing communication with Senior Fire Official at emergency site
Coordinate with Police for alerting persons endangered and evacuation
POLICE
Provide ECG with information and advice on the provision of law and order, and conduct of evacuations
Establish ongoing communication with Senior Police Official at emergency site
Provide for security at the EOC and any other location as determined by ECG
Establish inner perimeter within the emergency area
Establish outer perimeter in vicinity of emergency to facilitate movement of emergency vehicles and to restrict access to all but essential emergency personnel
Provide traffic control to facilitate movement of emergency vehicles
Alert persons endangered by the emergency and coordinate evacuation procedures
Liaise with other community, provincial and federal police agencies as required
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 135 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 37 Emergency Response Plan
3 EMS (YORK PARAMEDIC SERVICE)
Provide ECG with updates on estimated number of casualties, injured and safety concerns
Establish ongoing communication with Senior EMS Official at emergency site
Ensure adequate emergency medical services at emergency site
Obtain EMS from other municipalities for support if required
Advise ECG and Liaison Section Chief if other means of transportation is required for large scale response
Liaise with YPS Department Operations Centre to ensure balance emergency coverage is available at all times throughout the Township and Region
Liaise with Medical Officer of Health or Public Health Nurse as required
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES
Provide ECG with information and advice on matters which may adversely affect public health
Coordinate local community medical resources (hospitals, family health teams)
Monitor risks to human health
Consult with the PIO to prepare information and instructions for dissemination to the media pertaining to public health risk reduction for distribution
Coordinate vaccine management and implement mass immunization plan if required
Consult with coroner on temporary morgue facilities as required
Consult on safe disposal of bio hazardous and other dangerous material that may affect public health
Coordinate with Emergency Social Services on preventing human health risks in Reception Centres including areas of safe food preparation, infection control practices, water quality and sanitation and accommodation standards for emergency lodging.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 136 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 38 Emergency Response Plan
EMERGENCY SOCIAL SERVICES
Follow Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for providing emergency social services to the residents of the Township of King
Ensure well-being of residents who have been displaced from their homes by arranging Reception Centres, clothing, food services, registration / inquiry and personal services and family reunification services
Establish and operate temporary and or long term Reception Centre(s) and ensure they are adequately staffed and maintained
Notify representative of Reception Centre when their facilities are required
Arrange for assistance from other organizations and agencies at the Reception Centre(s)
Liaise with Public Health with respect to mutual concerns regarding operations in Reception Centre(s) that includes food safety, water quality, infection control practices and accommodation standards
Communicate with Operations Section Chief the number of displaced residents
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 137 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 39 Emergency Response Plan
PUBLIC WORKS - ROADS
Provide ECG with information and advice on engineering and public works matters
Advise ECG regarding the efficient and effective use of transportation, infrastructure, road maintenance, road clearing, road construction
Establish ongoing communication with Senior Public Works official at emergency site
Liaise with Public works representative from neighbouring communities to ensure a coordinated response
Monitor roads to ensure any interruptions in service are addressed
Prioritize roads to be restored
Ensure construction, maintenance and repair of municipal roads and bridges
Discontinue any public works service to any property as required and restore these services when appropriate
Liaise with Utilities to disconnect any services representing a hazard and or arrange for the provision of alternate services
Procure staff, equipment and materials to assist with the emergency as required
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 138 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 40 Emergency Response Plan
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Provide ECG with information and advice on engineering and public works matters
Establish ongoing communication with Senior Public Works Official at emergency site
Ensure maintenance and repair of sanitary sewage / water systems
Ensure maintenance and repair of storm sewers and drainage systems
Provide equipment for emergency pumping operations
Liaise with Fire concerning emergency water supplies for firefighting purposes
Provide emergency potable water, supplies and sanitation facilities
Discontinue any public works service to any property as required and restore these services when appropriate
Liaise with Utilities to disconnect any services representing a hazard and or arrange for the provision of alternate services
Liaise with Conservation Authority regarding flood control, conservation and environmental matters and being prepared to take preventative action
Procure staff, equipment and materials to assist with the emergency as required
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 139 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 41 Emergency Response Plan
BUILDING
Provide ECG with information and advice on building safety
Liaise with Building Department Officials from neighbouring municipalities
Determine the need for any special equipment or resources
Ensure sufficient staff, equipment and materials to examine and certify a building’s structural integrity, order demolition, repairs or other work as required
UTILITIES
Provide ECG with information on outages, number of customers without service
Monitor status of outages
Coordinate with Public Works – Roads and Water with respect to disconnecting or discontinuing service and restoring of service to any properties
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 140 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 42 Emergency Response Plan
3.10
PLANNING
Collect, evaluate and display incident status information
Plan for resources and how to use them
Display resource status information
Review current and projected resource status
Determine Incident objectives and strategy
Develop the Incident Action Plan
Ensure all decisions made and actions taken by the ECG are recorded by establishing and maintaining a Master Event Log
Ensure GIS resources are available and maps are up to date
Post ECG objectives and priorities prominently in EOC
Arrange for printed materials, as required
Establish, implement and maintain the business continuity plan
SECTION CHIEF
Provide overall supervision and leadership to the Planning Section
Reports to Commander
Assume role of EOC Command in the event the CAO, CEMC and / or Alternate CEMC are unavailable
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 141 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 43 Emergency Response Plan
3.11
LOGISTICS
Coordinate: • Facilities • Transportation & Ground Support • Supplies • Food Services • Telecommunications
Responsible for Resource Management • Order • Receive • Distribute • Track • Demobilize
Determine which facilities should be activated to support the incident
Arrange for and manage facilities
Arrange for responder / personnel support (determine number and location)
Arrange for transportation resources for purpose of transporting persons and / or supplies) and other ground support (towing, fuelling, maintenance, repair)
Arrange for and provide food services for responding and support personnel
Obtain, maintain and account for resources inventory (personnel, equipment, supplies)
Develop Telecommunications Plan
Maintain vendor inventory for facilities, equipment
Work closely with Finance Chief to contract for and purchase resources
Support the set-up of Reception Centres if necessary
Debris Management
Determine if staff and responders require family care and make arrangements
Coordinate offers of and appeals for volunteers; ensure Volunteer Registration Forms are completed and retained; organize situation specific training for volunteers where practical
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 142 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 44 Emergency Response Plan
SECTION CHIEF
Provide overall supervision and leadership to the Logistics Section
Reports to Command
Assume role of EOC Command in the event the CAO, CEMC and / or Alternate CEMC are unavailable
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 143 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 45 Emergency Response Plan
3.12
FINANCE
Monitor and analyze Response and Recovery costs
Track personnel time (timesheets)
Prepare agreements and contracts
Coordinate claims and compensations
Provide financial summary on labour, materials and services
Prepare forecasts on costs to complete operations
Provide cost benefit analysis, as requested
Provide information and advice on financial matters relative to the emergency
Consider Disaster Recovery Assistance for Ontarians (DRAO) and Municipal Disaster Recovery Assistance
SECTION CHIEF
Provide overall supervision and leadership to the Finance Section
Reports to Command
Assume role of EOC Command in the event the CAO, CEMC and / or Alternate CEMC are unavailable
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 144 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 46 Emergency Response Plan
4.1 Emergency Management Program Committee
Ontario Regulation 380/04, s. 11(1) states that every municipality shall have an Emergency Management Program Committee. The members are appointed by council. A chair of the committee will also be appointed by council.
The Committee is responsible for:
1. Overseeing the development, implementation and evaluation of the Township of King Emergency Management Program. 2. Advising Council on the Emergency Response Plan 3. Reviewing the plan and it’s appendices) in January each year, recommend any revisions
The Committee will obtain input from outside agencies as deemed necessary or desirable.
The Township of King Emergency Management Program Committee is comprised of:
1. Mayor 2. CAO 3. CEMC * 4. Alternate CEMC 5. Communications Officer 6. Director of Clerks & Bylaw 7. Director of Engineering & Public Works 8. Director of Parks, Recreation & Culture 9. Director of Planning & Development 10. Director of Finance & Treasurer 11. Manager of Human Resources 12. Manager of Information Technology 13. Fire Administrative Assistant
* Chair
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 145 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 47 Emergency Response Plan
4.2 Plan Maintenance and Revision
The Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act s. 3 (6) states that every municipality shall review and, if necessary, revise its Emergency Response Plan every year.
The Township of King Emergency Response Plan will be maintained and distributed by the Fire Chief / CEMC.
At a minimum, this Emergency Response Plan will be reviewed annually for accuracy by the Emergency Management Program Committee and proposed administrative changes will be made to the plan by the CEMC. Amendments to the plan require formal approval from Council with the exception of changes, additions and revisions to the Annexes, and editorial or formatting changes (section numbering, page numbers).
Amendments shall be distributed to all Emergency Response Plan holders in a timely manner.
4.3 Testing of the Emergency Response Plan
Ontario Regulation 380/04, s. 12 (6) states the Emergency Control Group shall conduct an annual practice exercise for a simulated emergency incident in order to evaluate the Emergency Response Plan and its procedures.
The Township of King Emergency Response Plan will be tested in whole or part once per year.
The Emergency Notification System will be tested a minimum of once per year.
4.4 Training
In compliance with the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, s. 3 (5), the Emergency Control Group members will complete the required annual training and exercises to ensure readiness of the Township of King employees and other persons to act under the Emergency Response Plan.
Emergency Control Group members, their alternates and any other plan holders will be provided with regular orientation to the Emergency Response Plan and its contents. They are encouraged to review the ERP on a regular basis to ensure a complete understanding of the process and to assist in promoting personal confidence with respect to their individual roles and responsibilities during an emergency.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 146 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 48 Emergency Response Plan
4.5 After Action Review
An After Action Review shall be completed anytime the Emergency Response Plan is activated in part or in whole. All members of the ECG and any other Township staff members, or representatives of external agencies that were involved in the emergency response, shall participate in an After Action Review within 72 hours of Terminating the Emergency.
The CEMC (or Alternate CEMC) and CAO are responsible for scheduling the After Action Review.
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 147 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 49 Emergency Response Plan
4.6 ERP Distribution List
This Distribution List is used to record the name and position of every person who is a holder of the Emergency Response Plan.
Public Copies
COPY DEPARTMENT TITLE 1 Clerks King Township Municipal Centre – 2nd Floor 2 Fire Fire Department HQ – Assistant to the Fire Chief 3 Library Ansnorveldt 4 Library King City 5 Library Nobleton 6 Library Schomberg
EOC Copies
COPY DEPARTMENT TITLE 1 EOC Primary EOC 2 EOC Primary EOC 3 EOC Primary EOC 4 EOC Primary EOC 5 EOC Primary EOC 6 EOC Alternate EOC 7 EOC Alternate EOC 8 EOC Alternate EOC 9 EOC Alternate EOC 10 EOC Alternate EOC
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 148 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 50 Emergency Response Plan
Confidential Copies
COPY DEPARTMENT TITLE 1 Administration CAO 2 Administration Communications Officer 3 Building Chief Building Official 4 Clerks Clerk 5 Clerks Deputy Clerk / By-law 6 Council Mayor 7 Council Councillor – Ward 1 8 Council Councillor – Ward 2 9 Council Councillor – Ward 3 10 Council Councillor – Ward 4 11 Council Councillor – Ward 5 12 Council Councillor – Ward 6 13 EPW Director 14 EPW Deputy Director 15 EPW Operations Manager 16 EPW Environmental Project Manager 17 Finance Director 18 Finance Purchasing Coordinator 19 Fire Fire Chief / CEMC 20 Fire Deputy Chief / Alternate CEMC 21 Fire District Chief 3-4 22 Fire District Chief 3-6 23 Fire District Chief 3-8 24 HR Manager 25 HR Advisor 26 HR Assistant 27 IT Manager 28 IT Application Support 29 IT Desktop Support 30 IT GIS Coordinator 31 Library CEO / Chief Librarian 32 Library Administrative Services Manager 33 OPP Detachment Commander
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 149 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.2. Township of King 51 Emergency Response Plan
COPY DEPARTMENT TITLE 34 PRC Director 35 PRC Deputy Manager Recreation 36 PRC Facilities Operations Supervisor 37 PRC Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 38 Planning Director 39 Planning Manager of Planning & Development 40 Planning Planner 41 Solicitor Aird & Berlis 42 York Region CEMC 43 York Region EMS 44 YRP Chief of Police 45 YRP 1 District
By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 150 of 176
AGENDA ITEM #15.2.
Fire Chief / CEMC
2585 King Road King City, Ontario L7B 1A1
905.833.2800 www.king.ca By-law #2019-026 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A...Page 151 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.3.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-027
A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-63, BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A CERTAIN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN SENECA COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King deems it desirable to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology (“Seneca College”) for a future ground lease (25 acre site) and supporting agreement in favour of the Township of King from Seneca College (municipally known as 13990 Dufferin Street), for the purpose of providing a site for indoor and outdoor recreational facilities that would be constructed by the Township of King;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed necessary to amend the Memorandum of Understanding between Seneca College and the Corporation of the Township of King;
NOWTHEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute a certain Third Amending Agreement to the Memorandum of Understanding, attached as Appendix ‘A’, dated December 31, 2018, between Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology and the Corporation of the Township of King.
READ a FIRST and SECOND time this 18th day of March, 2018.
READ a THIRD time and FINALLY PASSED this 18th day of March, 2018.
______Steve Pellegrini Mayor
______Kathryn Moyle Director of Clerks/By-law Enforcement Township Clerk
(Ref. Administration Dept. Report No.: ADMIN CAO-2019-01, C.O.W. Mar. 18/19)
By-law #2019-027 A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-63, BEING A BY-LA... Page 152 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.5.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-029
A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED DURING THE YEAR 2019 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
WHEREAS Section 290(1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, provides that a local municipality shall in each year prepare and adopt a budget including estimates of all sums required during the year for the purposes of the municipality including: (a) amounts sufficient to pay all debts of the municipality falling due within the year; (b) amounts required to be raised for sinking funds or retirement funds; and (c) amounts required for any board, commission or other body.
AND WHEREAS pursuant to the Township of King Notice By-law Number 2002-60, public notice was given of Council’s intention to adopt the budget and a public meeting to hear and receive comments was held;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of the Township of King HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the 2019 Consolidated Operating Fund Budget as shown on the attached Schedules “1, 2 and 3” and associated 2019 Program Change Requests, as outlined on Schedule 4 attached hereto are hereby adopted.
2. THAT the 2020-2022 Consolidated Operating Fund Budgets as shown on Schedules “1, 2 and 3” and associated 2020-2022 Program Change Requests, as outlined on Schedule 4 attached hereto be received for information only. 3. THAT the 2019-2022 Capital Budgets as shown in Schedule “A” attached hereto are hereby adopted.
READ a FIRST and SECOND time this 18th day of March, 2019.
READ a THIRD time and FINALLY PASSED this 18th day of March, 2019.
______Steve Pellegrini, Mayor
______Kathryn Moyle, Clerk
(Ref. Finance Dept. Report No.: FR-2019-08, C.O.W. Mar. 18, 2019)
By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...Page 153 of 176 By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...
2019 Budget ‐ Consolidated (per Input tab) Schedule "1" As of November 30, 2018 29,339,194 Refresh Summary A=A1+A2 B C D=A+B+C 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget Year 2019 2019 Growth YTD 2018 Actual Adjusted Related 2019 Program 2019 Requested Fund Type Description 2015 Budget 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2016 Actual 2017 Budget 2017 Actual 2018 Budget (November 30, 2018) 2019 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 10 Expeditures Salaries 10,272,955 10,042,102 10,765,034 10,924,102 11,767,547 11,617,415 12,073,302 10,946,242 12,794,276 9,110 452,225 13,255,611 Benefits 2,381,783 2,330,864 2,706,636 2,709,596 3,017,470 2,963,710 3,398,680 2,674,600 3,440,556 ‐162,970 113,056 3,390,642 General Operations 5,065,802 4,663,699 5,149,469 4,169,178 5,080,129 4,847,422 5,541,779 4,236,004 5,541,779 46,490 ‐29,750 5,558,519 Contractual Services/Consultants 3,867,106 4,127,022 4,647,262 5,262,399 4,956,450 4,429,918 5,182,690 3,824,066 5,182,690 43,920 350,000 5,576,610 Utilities (Gas, Hydro, Water) 1,128,645 1,230,985 1,296,675 1,267,128 1,387,790 1,266,229 1,396,790 963,535 1,396,790 82,950 1,479,740 Other Expenditures 2,256,105 2,343,059 2,876,334 2,841,408 2,882,991 2,882,991 2,994,074 2,376,695 2,994,074 287,935 12,000 3,294,009 Minor Capital (Repairs and Maintenance) 977,955 1,103,888 1,083,110 1,061,373 1,225,060 1,130,654 1,192,729 1,004,715 1,192,729 ‐8,190 18,126 1,202,665 Internal Cost Recovery 217,535 217,535 235,590 235,590 (556,241) ‐446,242 ‐556,241 0 ‐556,241 ‐556,241 Transfer to Reserve and Reserve Fund 3,707,478 14,908,969 5,359,413 5,363,336 8,417,259 14,538,710 8,436,630 40,000 8,436,630 551,000 76,000 9,063,630 Expeditures Total 29,875,364 40,968,123 34,119,523 33,834,109 38,178,455 43,230,807 39,660,433 26,065,857 40,423,283 850,245 991,657 42,265,185 Revenue Taxation (22,347,621) (22,860,367) (25,156,956) (25,249,978) (29,782,194) ‐30,632,623 ‐30,524,194 ‐31,786,489 ‐30,524,194 ‐760,000 ‐31,284,194 User Charges (3,858,672) (5,575,487) (4,134,132) (4,900,487) (4,073,224) ‐4,043,578 ‐4,174,308 ‐4,107,676 ‐4,174,308 115,000 ‐4,059,308 Grant (466,800) (524,153) (513,200) (502,135) (482,100) ‐553,708 ‐441,400 ‐491,715 ‐441,400 3,500 ‐437,900 Other Revenue (2,464,215) (5,211,128) (3,518,635) (3,617,514) (2,241,206) ‐3,647,361 ‐2,449,382 ‐2,729,490 ‐2,449,382 ‐234,823 ‐2,684,205 Transfer from Reserve and Reserve Fund (738,056) (8,332,046) (796,600) (381,395) (1,599,731) ‐6,420,092 ‐2,071,149 0 ‐2,071,149 ‐752,171 ‐300,000 ‐3,123,320 Revenue Total (29,875,364) (42,503,180) (34,119,523) (34,651,509) (38,178,455) ‐45,297,362 ‐39,660,433 ‐39,115,371 ‐39,660,433 ‐1,628,494 ‐300,000 ‐41,588,927 10 Total 0 (1,535,057) 0 (817,400) 0 ‐2,066,554 0 ‐13,049,513 762,850 ‐778,249 691,657 676,258 REVENUE IN EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES 0 (1,535,057) 0 (817,400) 0 ‐2,066,554 0 ‐13,582,515 776,316 ‐791,715 691,657 676,258
Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.30% AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 154 of176
3/14/2019 12:57 PM H:\Budget 2019‐2022\Budget (Master)\2019 Budget ‐ GL Accounts by Fund and Department (Budget vs Actual 2015 ‐ 2018)_file setup_v9_2019‐03‐13\Pivot Detail‐by Object Page 1 of 2 By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...
2019 Budget ‐ Consolidated (per Input tab) Schedule "1" As of November 30, 2018 30,159,194 31,009,194 Refresh Summary Forecast ‐ Year 2020 Forecast ‐ Year 2021 Forecast ‐ Year 2022
Adjusted 2020 Base 2020 Growth 2020 Program 2020 Requested Adjusted 2021 Base 2021 Growth 2021 Program 2021 Requested Adjusted 2022 Growth 2022 Program 2022 Requested Fund Type Description Budget Related Adjustment Change(s) Budget Budget Related Adjustment Change(s) Budget 2022 Base Budget Related Adjustment Change(s) Budget 10 Expeditures Salaries 13,553,121 169,791 386,854 14,109,766 14,461,716 46,170 85,600 14,593,486 14,993,896 ‐26,650 49,600 15,016,846 Benefits 3,466,942 ‐153,380 96,713 3,410,275 3,495,515 21,400 3,516,915 3,613,645 ‐2,197 12,400 3,623,848 General Operations 5,558,519 10,850 8,750 5,578,119 5,578,119 ‐120,250 8,750 5,466,619 5,466,619 373,300 8,750 5,848,669 Contractual Services/Consultants 5,576,610 21,750 420,000 6,018,360 6,018,360 26,640 420,000 6,465,000 6,465,000 21,620 420,000 6,906,620 Utilities (Gas, Hydro, Water) 1,479,740 ‐10,500 1,469,240 1,469,240 250 1,469,490 1,469,490 500 1,469,990 Other Expenditures 3,294,009 209,625 35,122 3,538,756 3,538,756 49,105 28,589 3,616,450 3,616,450 22,014 28,589 3,667,053 Minor Capital (Repairs and Maintenance) 1,202,665 3,500 1,206,165 1,206,165 9,000 1,215,165 1,215,165 38,500 1,253,665 Internal Cost Recovery ‐556,241 ‐556,241 ‐556,241 ‐556,241 ‐556,241 ‐556,241 Transfer to Reserve and Reserve Fund 9,063,630 475,000 9,538,630 9,538,630 25,000 9,563,630 9,563,630 25,000 9,588,630 Expeditures Total 42,638,995 726,636 947,439 44,313,070 44,750,260 35,915 564,339 45,350,514 45,847,654 452,087 519,339 46,819,080 Revenue Taxation ‐31,284,194 ‐880,000 ‐32,164,194 ‐32,164,194 ‐900,000 ‐33,064,194 ‐33,064,194 ‐1,040,000 ‐34,104,194 User Charges ‐4,059,308 ‐16,000 ‐4,075,308 ‐4,075,308 ‐10,000 ‐4,085,308 ‐4,085,308 ‐4,085,308 Grant ‐437,900 ‐437,900 ‐437,900 ‐437,900 ‐437,900 ‐437,900 Other Revenue ‐2,684,205 ‐2,684,205 ‐2,684,205 ‐2,684,205 ‐2,684,205 ‐2,684,205 Transfer from Reserve and Reserve Fund ‐3,123,320 ‐744,650 ‐300,000 ‐4,167,970 ‐4,167,970 209,910 ‐300,000 ‐4,258,060 ‐4,258,060 ‐70,540 ‐300,000 ‐4,628,600 Revenue Total ‐41,588,927 ‐1,640,650 ‐300,000 ‐43,529,577 ‐43,529,577 ‐700,090 ‐300,000 ‐44,529,667 ‐44,529,667 ‐1,110,540 ‐300,000 ‐45,940,207 10 Total 1,050,068 ‐914,014 647,439 783,493 1,220,683 ‐664,175 264,339 820,847 1,317,987 ‐658,453 219,339 878,873 REVENUE IN EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES 1,071,458 ‐935,404 647,439 783,493 1,244,993 ‐688,485 264,339 820,847 1,345,397 ‐685,863 219,339 878,873
Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.60% Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.65% Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.75% AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 155 of176
3/14/2019 12:57 PM H:\Budget 2019‐2022\Budget (Master)\2019 Budget ‐ GL Accounts by Fund and Department (Budget vs Actual 2015 ‐ 2018)_file setup_v9_2019‐03‐13\Pivot Detail‐by Object Page 2 of 2 By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...
2019 Budget ‐ Consolidated (per Input tab) Schedule "2" Refresh Summary As of November 30, 2018 A=A1+A2 B C D=A+B+C 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget Year 2019 2019 Growth YTD 2018 Actual Adjusted Related 2019 Program 2019 Requested Fund Dept Name 2015 Budget 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2016 Actual 2017 Budget 2017 Actual 2018 Budget (November 30, 2018) 2019 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 10 Administration 1,768,055 1,727,803 1,936,011 1,940,369 2,108,247 1,995,472 2,162,216 1,896,240 2,175,705 53,800 157,076 2,386,581 Clerks & By‐laws 1,348,984 1,293,395 1,383,554 1,295,021 1,358,833 1,280,096 1,374,665 1,376,841 1,401,065 ‐6,280 0 1,394,785 Corporate (19,220,051) (20,346,441) (21,505,630) (21,848,116) (22,627,550) ‐23,488,097 ‐23,233,378 ‐32,587,178 ‐23,233,378 ‐1,106,750 ‐300,000 ‐24,640,128 Council 322,725 288,157 329,754 329,907 334,752 316,598 346,823 278,139 353,013 353,013 Drainage 172,900 313,674 172,900 82,246 172,900 380,683 172,900 ‐90,418 172,900 172,900 ePW & Building 6,716,715 6,293,208 8,241,285 7,580,666 8,277,828 8,023,363 8,684,422 7,978,250 8,709,728 86,829 559,500 9,356,057 Finance 818,016 910,872 868,062 814,289 762,037 329,695 572,440 379,082 584,493 ‐163,323 36,900 458,070 Fire & Emergency Services 2,239,440 2,278,279 2,354,526 2,305,694 2,542,486 2,368,835 2,612,873 2,221,463 2,657,884 ‐18,610 76,000 2,715,274 KT Public Library 1,409,710 1,409,710 1,471,124 1,471,124 1,512,707 1,512,707 1,623,790 1,064,912 1,623,790 137,935 12,000 1,773,725 Parks, Recreation & Culture 3,610,159 3,728,331 3,899,393 3,975,624 4,828,748 4,442,819 4,929,485 4,249,395 5,480,052 238,150 150,181 5,868,383 Planning & Committee of Adj 813,347 567,956 849,021 1,235,776 729,012 771,275 753,764 183,762 837,598 837,598 10 Total 0 (1,535,057) 0 (817,400) 0 ‐2,066,554 0 ‐13,049,513 762,850 ‐778,249 691,657 676,258 20 Wastewater Operations 00000‐0 0 139,776 ‐5,067 454 ‐4,613 Water Operations 0 (0) 000‐0 0 ‐672,778 18,533 ‐13,920 4,613 20 Total 00000‐0 0 ‐533,002 13,466 ‐13,466 0 REVENUE IN EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES 0 (1,535,057) 0 (817,400) 0 ‐2,066,554 0 ‐13,582,515 776,316 ‐791,715 691,657 676,258
Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.30% AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 156 of176
3/14/2019 1:00 PM H:\Budget 2019‐2022\Budget (Master)\2019 Budget ‐ GL Accounts by Fund and Department (Budget vs Actual 2015 ‐ 2018)_file setup_v9_2019‐03‐13\Pivot Detail‐by Dept Page 1 of 2 By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...
2019 Budget ‐ Consolidated (per Input Schedule "2" As of November 30, 2018
Forecast ‐ Year 2020 Forecast ‐ Year 2021 Forecast ‐ Year 2022
Adjusted 2020 Growth 2020 Program 2020 Requested Adjusted 2021 Growth 2021 Program 2021 Requested Adjusted 2022 Growth Related 2022 Program 2022 Requested Fund Dept Name 2020 Base Budget Related Adjustment Change(s) Budget 2021 Base Budget Related Adjustment Change(s) Budget 2022 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 10 Administration 2,422,421 98,431 104,200 2,625,052 2,669,952 97,100 8,750 2,775,802 2,828,362 57,100 8,750 2,894,212 Clerks & By‐laws 1,422,745 155,117 1,577,862 1,613,512 1,613,512 1,653,722 1,653,722 Corporate ‐24,636,338 ‐1,308,380 ‐300,000 ‐26,244,718 ‐26,244,248 ‐800,000 ‐300,000 ‐27,344,248 ‐27,343,718 ‐734,697 ‐300,000 ‐28,378,415 Council 359,643 359,643 367,163 367,163 375,643 375,643 Drainage 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 ePW & Building 9,447,857 250,350 400,000 10,098,207 10,205,527 ‐20,090 400,000 10,585,437 10,706,427 ‐20,540 400,000 11,085,887 Finance 485,090 75,000 560,090 592,670 592,670 629,400 629,400 Fire & Emergency Services 2,755,974 ‐7,890 2,748,084 2,793,764 ‐12,540 2,781,224 2,832,064 ‐14,580 2,817,484 KT Public Library 1,773,725 59,625 35,122 1,868,472 1,868,472 49,105 28,589 1,946,166 1,946,166 22,014 28,589 1,996,769 Parks, Recreation & Culture 5,984,383 ‐6,150 178,000 6,156,233 6,291,983 22,250 127,000 6,441,233 6,597,223 32,250 82,000 6,711,473 Planning & Committee of Adj 861,668 861,668 888,988 888,988 919,798 919,798 10 Total 1,050,068 ‐914,014 647,439 783,493 1,220,683 ‐664,175 264,339 820,847 1,317,987 ‐658,453 219,339 878,873 20 Wastewater Operations 3,847 ‐21,390 ‐17,543 ‐7,933 ‐24,310 ‐32,243 ‐21,403 ‐27,410 ‐48,813 Water Operations 17,543 17,543 32,243 32,243 48,813 48,813 20 Total 21,390 ‐21,390 0 24,310 ‐24,310 0 27,410 ‐27,410 0 REVENUE IN EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES 1,071,458 ‐935,404 647,439 783,493 1,244,993 ‐688,485 264,339 820,847 1,345,397 ‐685,863 219,339 878,873
Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.60% Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.65% Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.75% AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 157 of176
3/14/2019 1:00 PM H:\Budget 2019‐2022\Budget (Master)\2019 Budget ‐ GL Accounts by Fund and Department (Budget vs Actual 2015 ‐ 2018)_file setup_v9_2019‐03‐13\Pivot Detail‐by Dept Page 2 of 2 By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...
2019 Budget ‐ Consolidated (per Input tab) Schedule "3" Refresh Summary As of November 30, 2018 A=A1+A2 B C D=A+B+C 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget Year 2019 2018 YTD 2018 Actual Adjusted 2019 Growth Related 2019 Program 2019 Requested Fund Dept Dept Name Sub‐Dept Sub‐Dept Name 2015 Budget 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2016 Actual 2017 Budget 2017 Actual Budget (November 30, 2018) 2019 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget
10 05 Corporate 0425 Transfer ‐ To/From Discretionary RFs 0 (16,922) 0 (29,810) 0 ‐76,105 000 0 0500 Property Taxation (22,967,621) (23,708,674) (25,926,956) (26,233,046) (30,582,194) ‐31,690,638 ‐31,324,193 ‐32,871,055 ‐31,324,193 ‐760,000 ‐32,084,193 0525 Grants (421,300) (429,846) (445,200) (445,200) (445,200) ‐454,300 ‐398,400 ‐457,730 ‐398,400 ‐398,400 0550 Transfer ‐ To/From Reserves 3,366,905 5,310,087 4,314,216 4,719,211 7,990,666 11,070,084 7,990,037 43,896 7,990,037 ‐646,750 ‐300,000 7,043,287 0575 Transfer ‐ To/From Obligatory RFs (36,000) (16,345) (84,600) (14,073) 0 ‐2,696,914 000 0 0595 Others 807,965 (1,517,247) 606,910 63,848 89,178 238,526 469,178 487,688 469,178 300,000 769,178 Corporate Total (19,250,051) (20,378,947) (21,535,630) (21,939,069) (22,947,550) ‐23,609,348 ‐23,263,378 ‐32,797,202 ‐23,263,378 ‐1,106,750 ‐300,000 ‐24,670,128 06 Corporate 0600 Elections 30,000 32,506 30,000 31,781 30,000 32,137 30,000 112,377 30,000 30,000 Corporate Total 30,000 32,506 30,000 31,781 30,000 32,137 30,000 112,377 30,000 30,000 10 Council 1000 Council 322,725 288,157 329,754 329,907 334,752 316,598 346,823 334,287 353,013 353,013 Council Total 322,725 288,157 329,754 329,907 334,752 316,598 346,823 334,287 353,013 353,013 11 Administration 1100 Chief Administrative Officer 545,630 461,988 613,003 620,834 488,104 480,860 499,293 405,881 500,764 500,764 1102 Economic Development 266,843 273,455 272,762 281,721 319,036 304,900 319,409 295,363 296,161 37,000 333,161 1106 Human Resources 346,217 346,596 398,322 399,168 460,764 376,135 482,571 402,859 496,023 7,000 10,000 513,023 1108 Information Systems 609,365 645,764 651,924 638,646 682,625 682,555 701,092 649,701 717,300 46,800 110,076 874,176 1110 Communications 0 0 0 0 157,718 151,023 159,851 142,436 165,457 165,457 Administration Total 1,768,055 1,727,803 1,936,011 1,940,369 2,108,247 1,995,472 2,162,216 1,896,240 2,175,705 53,800 157,076 2,386,581 12 Clerks & By‐laws 1200 Clerks 716,936 763,850 744,101 780,202 769,136 878,852 798,836 760,545 816,997 2,220 819,217 1202 By‐law Enforcement 394,148 300,625 401,553 297,321 371,797 193,390 367,929 443,965 376,168 ‐11,500 0 364,668 1204 Canine Control 233,500 227,952 233,500 213,668 213,500 208,001 203,500 179,611 203,500 203,500 1208 Livestock Damages 1,000 3,244 1,000 1,337 1,000 ‐903 1,000 ‐263 1,000 1,000 1210 Cemetery 3,400 (2,277) 3,400 2,494 3,400 757 3,400 ‐7,018 3,400 3,000 6,400 Clerks & By‐laws Total 1,348,984 1,293,395 1,383,554 1,295,021 1,358,833 1,280,096 1,374,665 1,376,841 1,401,065 ‐6,280 0 1,394,785 13 Finance 1300 Finance 818,016 910,872 868,062 814,289 762,037 329,695 572,440 379,082 584,493 ‐163,323 36,900 458,070 Finance Total 818,016 910,872 868,062 814,289 762,037 329,695 572,440 379,082 584,493 ‐163,323 36,900 458,070 14 Fire & Emergency Services 1400 Fire 1,069,940 1,146,134 1,177,526 1,248,310 1,362,486 1,272,206 1,427,653 1,249,718 1,447,634 18,500 76,000 1,542,134 1402 Emergency Management 21,000 12,539 21,000 10,301 21,000 14,339 21,000 424 21,000 0 21,000 1404 Volunteer Force 1,148,500 1,119,606 1,156,000 1,047,083 1,159,000 1,082,290 1,164,220 971,321 1,189,250 ‐37,110 1,152,140 Fire & Emergency Services Total 2,239,440 2,278,279 2,354,526 2,305,694 2,542,486 2,368,835 2,612,873 2,221,463 2,657,884 ‐18,610 76,000 2,715,274 15 ePW & Building 1500 Building (1) (0) 000‐0 0 144,823 ‐51,329 51,329 0 1502 Public Works 0 0 0000 0 86,2820 0 1504 Bridge & Culvert 133,011 87,614 136,731 72,328 106,000 75,632 103,000 4,404 103,000 103,000 1506 Grading, Ditching, Gravel Maint. 995,187 895,775 990,004 959,702 0 0 0 0 0 0 1508 Stomrsewers & Catch Basins 109,460 84,265 107,550 94,706 93,000 93,533 92,000 125,139 92,000 10,000 102,000 1510 Sweeping & Cleaning 71,708 50,788 71,344 58,869 60,000 26,902 60,000 30,441 60,000 ‐10,000 50,000 1512 Asphalt Maint. & Patching 566,314 579,783 995,565 957,633 0 0 0 0 0 0 1514 Dust Suppressant 194,599 165,617 193,846 185,693 200,000 153,341 200,000 156,296 200,000 200,000 1516 Winter Maint. 590,910 736,155 760,503 741,828 1,020,557 1,071,747 1,153,919 912,600 1,279,758 1,279,758 1518 Sign Maint., Safety & Guide Posts 178,823 160,596 173,739 146,614 109,000 110,096 99,000 173,307 99,000 ‐54,000 45,000 1520 Tree Maint. 85,923 66,009 101,298 95,147 0 0 0 0 0 0
1522 Township Road Debenture Payments 840,199 898,699 1,399,014 1,364,088 1,364,088 1,364,088 1,364,088 1,305,588 1,364,088 150,000 1,514,088 1524 ePW ‐ Administration 1,044,896 770,082 1,140,838 1,051,944 1,128,848 1,248,860 1,233,421 1,767,891 1,268,987 ‐64,500 37,000 1,241,487 1526 Works Depot 114,500 112,373 117,700 109,194 75,000 117,455 75,000 79,816 75,000 75,000 1528 Equipment Operation 444,845 455,010 507,438 447,620 385,200 338,464 385,200 378,506 385,200 0 385,200 1530 Sidewalks 73,041 70,882 189,715 143,267 186,000 132,177 186,000 203,212 186,000 15,000 201,000 1532 Street Lighting 367,500 368,225 405,000 403,548 425,400 412,057 425,400 241,482 425,400 425,400 1534 Summer Maint. 0 0 0 0 2,166,835 2,047,345 2,186,878 1,583,873 2,102,108 4,000 522,500 2,628,608 1550 Waste Management 225,500 193,929 255,500 194,996 263,000 187,002 371,900 204,838 371,900 371,900 1552 Recycle Management 617,300 533,865 627,800 499,756 627,800 587,055 681,516 542,477 681,516 681,516 1554 Disposal Sites 63,000 63,543 67,700 53,731 67,100 57,610 67,100 37,275 67,100 ‐15,000 52,100 1556 EPW ‐ Ice Storm Cleanup 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 AGENDA ITEM#15.5.
Page 158 of176 ePW & Building Total 6,716,715 6,293,208 8,241,285 7,580,666 8,277,828 8,023,363 8,684,422 7,978,250 8,709,728 86,829 559,500 9,356,057 16 Parks, Recreation & Culture 1602 Parks Division 1,295,827 1,229,363 1,375,283 1,296,907 1,703,762 1,546,733 1,713,406 1,401,558 1,888,348 102,000 76,300 2,066,648 1610 Facilities ‐ Administration 468,755 323,403 448,551 406,609 683,155 473,135 727,206 480,987 849,616 0 849,616 1612 KC Community Recreation Centre 69,889 83,348 87,245 4,505 95,885 59,998 92,660 77,708 100,852 ‐8,800 9,000 101,052 Nobleton Community Recreation 1614 Centre 139,680 172,014 156,199 133,699 182,322 173,719 145,132 182,124 165,435 2,200 167,635 1616 Parks Depot 18,054 24,315 46,998 41,266 65,000 47,407 52,000 38,581 52,000 5,000 57,000 1618 Trisan Centre 346,055 416,973 372,040 449,281 420,160 417,837 375,267 394,195 372,548 ‐22,700 9,500 359,348 1619 Trisan Centre ‐ Fitness 45,798 116,045 51,266 159,847 46,389 159,832 ‐309 121,400 26,185 26,185 1620 Nobleton Outdoor Pool 49,563 37,593 54,889 46,458 57,611 60,699 46,072 78,902 52,526 ‐1,500 51,026 1629 Holy Name ‐ 2585 King Road 64,500 40,569 54,500 21,102 54,500 ‐307 54,500 7,009 54,500 259,000 313,500 1630 Township Offices ‐ 2075 King Road 254,200 298,986 252,000 250,840 259,100 162,967 259,100 115,959 259,100 ‐242,600 16,500 1631 Municipal Plaza ‐ 2075 King Road (133,447) (144,794) (143,000) (86,239) (117,000) ‐97,953 ‐73,000 ‐65,633 ‐73,000 ‐73,000 1632 KC Seniors Centre 9,400 10,551 9,290 8,611 11,290 26,150 11,290 5,297 11,290 138,800 150,090 1633 Laskay Community Hall 5,500 11,762 5,400 11,134 10,000 6,369 0 15,430 0 0
3/14/2019 1:01 PM H:\Budget 2019‐2022\Budget (Master)\2019 Budget ‐ GL Accounts by Fund and Department (Budget vs Actual 2015 ‐ 2018)_file setup_v9_2019‐03‐13\Pivot Detail‐by SubDept Page 1 of 4 By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...
2019 Budget ‐ Consolidated (per Input tab) Schedule "3" Refresh Summary As of November 30, 2018 A=A1+A2 B C D=A+B+C 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget Year 2019 2018 YTD 2018 Actual Adjusted 2019 Growth Related 2019 Program 2019 Requested Fund Dept Dept Name Sub‐Dept Sub‐Dept Name 2015 Budget 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2016 Actual 2017 Budget 2017 Actual Budget (November 30, 2018) 2019 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 10 16 Parks, Recreation & Culture 1634 Nobleton Community Hall (5,580) 9,443 (11,508) (6,373) (13,950) ‐5,511 ‐13,950 5,815 ‐13,950 ‐13,950 1635 Schomberg Community Hall 3,220 6,863 6,200 10,051 6,200 11,023 6,200 3,979 6,200 6,200 Kettleby Pottageville Lions Community 1636 Hall (1,776) 48,083 2,324 4,211 2,224 902 2,224 3,280 2,224 2,224 1637 Pottageville Pavilion 5,300 15,509 7,700 7,968 9,000 2,584 9,000 ‐275 9,000 ‐2,000 7,000 1638 Museum 94,610 169,336 116,121 131,642 132,086 116,943 112,071 108,380 137,701 4,000 141,701
1639 Holland Marsh District Christian School 0 0 0 0 0 11,464 17,000 ‐11,477 17,000 17,000 1640 Cold Creek 134,407 80,614 134,769 118,542 119,928 168,604 165,242 134,478 72,262 ‐500 71,762 Community Policing Program ‐ 1642 Schomberg 9,5773,1300000 0 0 0 0 1650 Recreation ‐ Administration 472,415 561,188 586,889 670,401 755,892 689,215 743,157 565,188 1,204,850 4,000 38,881 1,247,731 1652 Day Camp 25,003 11,267 59,837 12,945 47,579 55,648 118,939 205,397 93,044 ‐2,500 90,544 1654 Recreation ‐ Programs 9,454 21,262 29,572 37,861 31,811 48,995 31,403 48,353 4,323 ‐3,750 573 1656 Special Events 107,975 80,281 78,674 111,647 79,974 130,491 156,920 174,606 14,715 7,500 16,500 38,715 1658 Volunteers 0 0 0 0 28,816 12,426 ‐5,450 11,531 ‐5,450 ‐5,450 1660 Parks Depot 0 0 0 0 30,140 20,667 30,140 12,601 30,140 30,140 1682 Environmental Stewardships 71,692 56,961 68,054 81,993 78,274 90,425 88,465 86,853 91,127 91,127 1698 Crossing Guard Patrols 50,088 44,266 50,100 50,715 48,600 52,357 64,800 47,168 57,466 0 57,466 Parks, Recreation & Culture Total 3,610,159 3,728,331 3,899,393 3,975,624 4,828,748 4,442,819 4,929,485 4,249,395 5,480,052 238,150 150,181 5,868,383 17 KT Public Library 1750 Library 1,409,710 1,409,710 1,471,124 1,471,124 1,512,707 1,512,707 1,623,790 1,064,912 1,623,790 137,935 12,000 1,773,725 KT Public Library Total 1,409,710 1,409,710 1,471,124 1,471,124 1,512,707 1,512,707 1,623,790 1,064,912 1,623,790 137,935 12,000 1,773,725
18 Planning & Committee of Adj 1800 Planning 845,986 647,673 867,063 1,298,162 747,814 855,429 770,796 218,094 884,894 884,894 1802 Committee of Adjustment (32,639) (79,718) (18,042) (62,386) (18,802) ‐84,155 ‐17,032 ‐34,332 ‐47,296 ‐47,296 Planning & Committee of Adj Total 813,347 567,956 849,021 1,235,776 729,012 771,275 753,764 183,762 837,598 837,598 19 Drainage 1900 HMDS‐JMSB 172,900 313,674 172,900 82,246 172,900 380,683 172,900 ‐90,418 172,900 172,900 Drainage Total 172,900 313,674 172,900 82,246 172,900 380,683 172,900 ‐90,418 172,900 172,900 25 Corporate 2500 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 24,886 0 15,780 0 0 0 0 2502 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 14,952 0 0 0 0 0 0 2506 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 19,334 0 0 0 0 0 0 2510 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 2512 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 75,558 0 0 2514 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 2516 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 2518 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 12,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 2520 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 16,000 0 0 0 0 0 2522 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 35,000 43,527 0 0 0 0 2524 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 75,000 17,808 0 0 0 0 2526 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 2528 Township Initiatives 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 2530 Township Initiatives 0 0 0000 0 19,8430 0 2532 Township Initiatives 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 2534 Township Initiatives 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 2536 Township Initiatives 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 2538 Township Initiatives 0 0 0000 0 2,2460 0 Corporate Total 0 0 0 59,172 290,000 89,114 0 97,647 0 0 26 Council 2600 Mayor's Golf Challenge 0 0 0000 0 ‐56,147 00 Council Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ‐56,147 0 0 10 Total 0 (1,535,057) 0 (817,400) 0 ‐2,066,554 0 ‐13,049,513 762,850 ‐778,249 691,657 676,258 20 20 Water Operations 2000 Water Operations (673,801) (704,672) (777,444) (947,912) (923,452) ‐714,388 ‐922,951 ‐1,339,534 ‐919,796 ‐13,920 ‐933,716 2050 Water Transmission & Distribution 673,801 704,672 777,444 947,912 923,452 714,388 922,951 666,756 938,329 938,329 Water Operations Total 0 (0) 0 0 0 ‐0 0 ‐672,778 18,533 ‐13,920 4,613 AGENDA ITEM#15.5.
Page 159 of176 21 Wastewater Operations 2100 Wastewater Operations (308,700) (187,102) (347,817) (163,650) (345,089) ‐528,537 ‐437,488 ‐349,355 ‐536,497 5,454 ‐531,043
2150 Wastewater Collection & Transmission 308,700 187,102 347,817 163,650 345,089 528,537 437,488 489,131 531,430 ‐5,000 526,430 Wastewater Operations Total 0 0 0 0 0 ‐0 0 139,776 ‐5,067 454 ‐4,613 20 Total 0 0 000‐0 0 ‐533,002 13,466 ‐13,466 0 REVENUE IN EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES 0 (1,535,057) 0 (817,400) 0 ‐2,066,554 0 ‐13,582,515 776,316 ‐791,715 691,657 676,258
Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.30%
3/14/2019 1:01 PM H:\Budget 2019‐2022\Budget (Master)\2019 Budget ‐ GL Accounts by Fund and Department (Budget vs Actual 2015 ‐ 2018)_file setup_v9_2019‐03‐13\Pivot Detail‐by SubDept Page 2 of 4 By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...
b) Schedule "3" Refresh Summary
Forecast ‐ Year 2020 Forecast ‐ Year 2021 Forecast ‐ Year 2022 Adjusted 2020 Growth Related 2020 Program 2020 Requested Adjusted 2021 Growth Related 2021 Program 2021 Requested Adjusted 2022 Growth Related 2022 Program 2022 Requested Sub‐Dept Sub‐Dept Name 2020 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 2021 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 2022 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget
0425 Transfer ‐ To/From Discretionary RFs 000000 0500 Property Taxation ‐32,084,193 ‐880,000 ‐32,964,193 ‐32,964,193 ‐900,000 ‐33,864,193 ‐33,864,193 ‐1,040,000 ‐34,904,193 0525 Grants ‐398,400 ‐398,400 ‐398,400 ‐398,400 ‐398,400 ‐398,400 0550 Transfer ‐ To/From Reserves 7,043,697 ‐725,000 ‐300,000 6,018,697 6,019,167 ‐300,000 5,719,167 5,719,697 ‐52,197 ‐300,000 5,367,500 0575 Transfer ‐ To/From Obligatory RFs 000000 0595 Others 772,558 296,620 1,069,178 1,069,178 100,000 1,169,178 1,169,178 357,500 1,526,678 ‐24,666,338 ‐1,308,380 ‐300,000 ‐26,274,718 ‐26,274,248 ‐800,000 ‐300,000 ‐27,374,248 ‐27,373,718 ‐734,697 ‐300,000 ‐28,408,415 0600 Elections 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 1000 Council 359,643 359,643 367,163 367,163 375,643 375,643 359,643 359,643 367,163 367,163 375,643 375,643 1100 Chief Administrative Officer 510,724 71,831 582,555 595,665 70,000 665,665 682,375 682,375 1102 Economic Development 336,951 8,750 345,701 350,001 8,750 358,751 363,611 8,750 372,361 1106 Human Resources 520,563 6,000 95,450 622,013 632,973 6,500 639,473 651,833 6,500 658,333 1108 Information Systems 886,186 20,600 906,786 920,426 20,600 941,026 956,396 50,600 1,006,996 1110 Communications 167,997 167,997 170,887 170,887 174,147 174,147 2,422,421 98,431 104,200 2,625,052 2,669,952 97,100 8,750 2,775,802 2,828,362 57,100 8,750 2,894,212 1200 Clerks 835,677 835,677 854,387 854,387 875,487 875,487 1202 By‐law Enforcement 376,168 155,117 531,285 548,225 548,225 567,335 567,335 1204 Canine Control 203,500 203,500 203,500 203,500 203,500 203,500 1208 Livestock Damages 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1210 Cemetery 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,400 1,422,745 155,117 1,577,862 1,613,512 1,613,512 1,653,722 1,653,722 1300 Finance 485,090 75,000 560,090 592,670 592,670 629,400 629,400 485,090 75,000 560,090 592,670 592,670 629,400 629,400 1400 Fire 1,556,904 13,000 1,569,904 1,586,674 10,750 1,597,424 1,616,334 11,550 1,627,884 1402 Emergency Management 21,000 1,150 22,150 22,150 540 22,690 22,690 520 23,210 1404 Volunteer Force 1,178,070 ‐22,040 1,156,030 1,184,940 ‐23,830 1,161,110 1,193,040 ‐26,650 1,166,390 2,755,974 ‐7,890 2,748,084 2,793,764 ‐12,540 2,781,224 2,832,064 ‐14,580 2,817,484 1500 Building 19,650 ‐19,650 0 22,320 ‐20,090 2,230 27,400 ‐20,540 6,860 1502 Public Works 000000 1504 Bridge & Culvert 103,000 103,000 103,000 103,000 103,000 103,000 1506 Grading, Ditching, Gravel Maint. 000000 1508 Stomrsewers & Catch Basins 102,000 102,000 102,000 102,000 102,000 102,000 1510 Sweeping & Cleaning 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1512 Asphalt Maint. & Patching 000000 1514 Dust Suppressant 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1516 Winter Maint. 1,297,858 1,297,858 1,318,438 1,318,438 1,341,628 1,341,628 1518 Sign Maint., Safety & Guide Posts 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 1520 Tree Maint. 000000
1522 Township Road Debenture Payments 1,514,088 150,000 1,664,088 1,664,088 1,664,088 1,664,088 1,664,088 1524 ePW ‐ Administration 1,275,247 60,000 1,335,247 1,375,107 1,375,107 1,420,047 1,420,047 1526 Works Depot 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1528 Equipment Operation 385,200 385,200 385,200 385,200 385,200 385,200 1530 Sidewalks 201,000 201,000 201,000 201,000 201,000 201,000 1532 Street Lighting 425,400 425,400 425,400 425,400 425,400 425,400 1534 Summer Maint. 2,648,898 60,000 400,000 3,108,898 3,133,458 400,000 3,533,458 3,561,148 400,000 3,961,148 1550 Waste Management 371,900 371,900 371,900 371,900 371,900 371,900 1552 Recycle Management 681,516 681,516 681,516 681,516 681,516 681,516 1554 Disposal Sites 52,100 52,100 52,100 52,100 52,100 52,100 1556 EPW ‐ Ice Storm Cleanup 000000AGENDA ITEM#15.5.
Page 160 of176 9,447,857 250,350 400,000 10,098,207 10,205,527 ‐20,090 400,000 10,585,437 10,706,427 ‐20,540 400,000 11,085,887 1602 Parks Division 2,096,668 5,000 51,500 2,153,168 2,188,068 5,000 20,000 2,213,068 2,252,418 5,000 82,000 2,339,418 1610 Facilities ‐ Administration 862,976 25,000 887,976 903,156 25,000 43,000 971,156 989,456 25,000 1,014,456 1612 KC Community Recreation Centre 106,912 ‐300 106,612 113,272 113,272 120,782 120,782 Nobleton Community Recreation 1614 Centre 173,655 ‐4,800 168,855 175,695 175,695 183,405 183,405 1616 Parks Depot 57,000 ‐800 56,200 56,200 56,200 56,200 56,200 1618 Trisan Centre 370,738 22,000 392,738 406,228 406,228 421,438 421,438 1619 Trisan Centre ‐ Fitness 31,435 31,435 37,405 37,405 44,135 44,135 1620 Nobleton Outdoor Pool 52,296 52,296 53,726 53,726 55,346 55,346 1629 Holy Name ‐ 2585 King Road 313,500 313,500 313,500 313,500 313,500 313,500 1630 Township Offices ‐ 2075 King Road 16,500 ‐16,500 00 00 0 1631 Municipal Plaza ‐ 2075 King Road ‐73,000 ‐73,000 ‐73,000 ‐73,000 ‐73,000 ‐73,000 1632 KC Seniors Centre 150,090 150,090 150,090 150,090 150,090 150,090 1633 Laskay Community Hall 000000
3/14/2019 1:01 PM H:\Budget 2019‐2022\Budget (Master)\2019 Budget ‐ GL Accounts by Fund and Department (Budget vs Actual 2015 ‐ 2018)_file setup_v9_2019‐03‐13\Pivot Detail‐by SubDept Page 3 of 4 By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D...
b) Schedule "3" Refresh Summary
Forecast ‐ Year 2020 Forecast ‐ Year 2021 Forecast ‐ Year 2022 Adjusted 2020 Growth Related 2020 Program 2020 Requested Adjusted 2021 Growth Related 2021 Program 2021 Requested Adjusted 2022 Growth Related 2022 Program 2022 Requested Sub‐Dept Sub‐Dept Name 2020 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 2021 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 2022 Base Budget Adjustment Change(s) Budget 1634 Nobleton Community Hall ‐13,950 ‐13,950 ‐13,950 ‐13,950 ‐13,950 ‐13,950 1635 Schomberg Community Hall 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 Kettleby Pottageville Lions Community 1636 Hall 2,224 2,224 2,224 2,224 2,224 2,224 1637 Pottageville Pavilion 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 1638 Museum 145,461 ‐15,000 130,461 134,741 1,000 31,000 166,741 172,421 1,000 173,421
1639 Holland Marsh District Christian School 17,000 17,000 17,000 ‐10,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 1640 Cold Creek 74,442 500 35,000 109,942 113,862 500 114,362 118,762 500 119,262 Community Policing Program ‐ 1642 Schomberg 000000 1650 Recreation ‐ Administration 1,272,531 69,500 1,342,031 1,371,931 1,371,931 1,405,661 1,405,661 1652 Day Camp 97,074 97,074 104,494 104,494 112,864 112,864 1654 Recreation ‐ Programs 1,013 750 1,763 2,273 750 3,023 3,593 750 4,343 1656 Special Events 40,155 40,155 41,795 41,795 43,645 43,645 1658 Volunteers ‐5,450 ‐5,450 ‐5,450 ‐5,450 ‐5,450 ‐5,450 1660 Parks Depot 30,140 30,140 30,140 30,140 30,140 30,140 1682 Environmental Stewardships 93,007 93,007 95,147 33,000 128,147 131,457 131,457 1698 Crossing Guard Patrols 58,766 58,766 60,236 60,236 61,886 61,886 al 5,984,383 ‐6,150 178,000 6,156,233 6,291,983 22,250 127,000 6,441,233 6,597,223 32,250 82,000 6,711,473 1750 Library 1,773,725 59,625 35,122 1,868,472 1,868,472 49,105 28,589 1,946,166 1,946,166 22,014 28,589 1,996,769 1,773,725 59,625 35,122 1,868,472 1,868,472 49,105 28,589 1,946,166 1,946,166 22,014 28,589 1,996,769
1800 Planning 908,524 908,524 935,354 935,354 965,604 965,604 1802 Committee of Adjustment ‐46,856 ‐46,856 ‐46,366 ‐46,366 ‐45,806 ‐45,806 otal 861,668 861,668 888,988 888,988 919,798 919,798 1900 HMDS‐JMSB 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 172,900 2500 Township Initiatives 000000 2502 Township Initiatives 000000 2506 Township Initiatives 000000 2510 Township Initiatives 000000 2512 Township Initiatives 000000 2514 Township Initiatives 000000 2516 Township Initiatives 000000 2518 Township Initiatives 000000 2520 Township Initiatives 000000 2522 Township Initiatives 000000 2524 Township Initiatives 000000 2526 Township Initiatives 000000 2528 Township Initiatives 000000 2530 Township Initiatives 000000 2532 Township Initiatives 000000 2534 Township Initiatives 000000 2536 Township Initiatives 000000 2538 Township Initiatives 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2600 Mayor's Golf Challenge 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,050,068 ‐914,014 647,439 783,493 1,220,683 ‐664,175 264,339 820,847 1,317,987 ‐658,453 219,339 878,873 2000 Water Operations ‐930,316 ‐930,316 ‐926,446 ‐926,446 ‐922,086 ‐922,086 2050 Water Transmission & Distribution 947,859 947,859 958,689 958,689 970,899 970,899 17,543 17,543 32,243 32,243 48,813 48,813 AGENDA ITEM#15.5.
Page 161 of176 2100 Wastewater Operations ‐530,833 ‐21,390 ‐552,223 ‐551,983 ‐24,310 ‐576,293 ‐576,023 ‐27,410 ‐603,433
2150 Wastewater Collection & Transmission 534,680 534,680 544,050 544,050 554,620 554,620 3,847 ‐21,390 ‐17,543 ‐7,933 ‐24,310 ‐32,243 ‐21,403 ‐27,410 ‐48,813 21,390 ‐21,390 0 24,310 ‐24,310 0 27,410 ‐27,410 0 1,071,458 ‐935,404 647,439 783,493 1,244,993 ‐688,485 264,339 820,847 1,345,397 ‐685,863 219,339 878,873
Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.60% Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.65% Proposed Tax Levy Increase > 2.75%
3/14/2019 1:01 PM H:\Budget 2019‐2022\Budget (Master)\2019 Budget ‐ GL Accounts by Fund and Department (Budget vs Actual 2015 ‐ 2018)_file setup_v9_2019‐03‐13\Pivot Detail‐by SubDept Page 4 of 4 AGENDA ITEM #15.5.Page 1 of 2 TOWNSHIP OF KING Schedule "4" 2019-2022 Proposed Program Change Requests tab # 15 25‐Feb‐2019
Other Revenue / Cost Net Net Priority Complement Savings or Existing Tax Levy Tax Levy Ranking Program Change Requests Impact Gross Costs Base Impact Impact Program # " A ‐ B ‐ C " RECOMMENDED Department " FTE " $ $ $ %
1 A ServiceKing ‐ AIMS User Licence Admin (IT) 11,700 9,750 1,950 0.01% 2 A Economic Development Coordinator Admin (Ec‐Dev) 1.00 68,250 40,000 28,250 0.10% 3 A CIP Grant Enhancement ( 2019 ) $8,750 / yr Admin (Ec‐Dev) 8,750 ‐ 8,750 0.03% 4 A CIP Grant Enhancement ( 2020 ) $8,750 / yr Admin (Ec‐Dev) 8,750 ‐ 8,750 0.03% 5 A CIP Grant Enhancement ( 2021 ) $8,750 / yr Admin (Ec‐Dev) 8,750 ‐ 8,750 0.03% 6 A CIP Grant Enhancement ( 2022 ) $8,750 / yr Admin (Ec‐Dev) 8,750 ‐ 8,750 0.03% 7 A Network Analyst Admin (IT) 1.00 91,950 ‐ 91,950 0.31% 8 A Wellness Program Admin (HR) 10,000 ‐ 10,000 0.03% 9 A Health and Safety Coordinator Admin (HR) 2020 1.00 95,450 ‐ 95,450 0.33% 10 A Laserfiche ‐ E‐Docs and Records Management Clerks 92,556 77,130 15,426 0.05% 11 A AIMS Mobile Ticketer Android Application By‐laws 4,250 3,500 750 0.00% 12 B Clerks and By‐law Permit Administrator Clerks / By‐laws 2020 1.00 72,262 ‐ 72,262 0.25% 13 B By‐law Enforcement Officer‐Parking Level 1By‐laws 2020 1.00 82,855 ‐ 82,855 0.28% 14 A Finance Clerk Finance 0.50 73,800 36,900 36,900 0.13% 15 B Financial Analyst Finance 2020 1.00 75,000 ‐ 75,000 0.26% 16 A Administrative Assistant Fire Contract 43,698 43,698 ‐ 0.00% 17 A Emergency Management Reserve Fund Contribution Fire 25,000 ‐ 25,000 0.09% 18 A Personal Protective Gear ‐ Turnout Gear & Helmets Fire 51,000 ‐ 51,000 0.17% 19 A Construction Inspector ePW&B 1.00 97,000 60,000 37,000 0.13% 20 A Roads Supervisor ePW&B 1.00 122,500 ‐ 122,500 0.42% 21 A Road Surface Improvements ePW&B 100,000 ‐ 100,000 0.34% 22 A Road Surface Improvements ePW&B 2020 100,000 ‐ 100,000 0.34% 23 A Road Surface Improvements ePW&B 2021 100,000 ‐ 100,000 0.34% 24 A Road Surface Improvements ePW&B 2022 100,000 ‐ 100,000 0.34% 25 A Conversion of Gravel Roads to Hard Surface ePW&B 300,000 300,000 ‐ 0.00% 26 A Conversion of Gravel Roads to Hard Surface ePW&B 2020 300,000 300,000 ‐ 0.00% 27 A Conversion of Gravel Roads to Hard Surface ePW&B 2021 300,000 300,000 ‐ 0.00% 28 A Conversion of Gravel Roads to Hard Surface ePW&B 2022 300,000 300,000 ‐ 0.00% 29 A Parks Operators (2) ‐ conversion to F/T PR&C 0.10 119,000 108,000 11,000 0.04% 30 A Arena Operator ‐ conversion to F/T PR&C 0.20 54,000 44,500 9,500 0.03% 31 A Assistant Coordinator ‐ Special Events & Marketing PR&C 0.30 56,500 40,000 16,500 0.06% 32 A Customer Service Attendent (Permanent P/T) PR&C 0.33 9,000 ‐ 9,000 0.03% 33 A Facility Co‐ordinator ‐ General Operations (Contract) PR&C Contract 63,881 25,000 38,881 0.13% 34 A Parks Operator ‐ P/T (8 month contract) PR&C Contract 29,000 ‐ 29,000 0.10% 35 A Parks Operator I (3) 4 month contracts PR&C 1.00 36,300 ‐ 36,300 0.12% 36 A Crossing Guards ‐ outsource to 3rd Party PR&C Contract ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% Assistant Coordinator (conversion to F/T) 37 B ‐ Cultural Programming, Events & Marketing PR&C 2020 0.45 54,000 30,000 24,000 0.08% 38 B Parks Operator II ‐ Arborist (8 month contract) PR&C 2020 Contract 31,500 ‐ 31,500 0.11% 39 B Arena Operators (2) ‐ conversion to F/T PR&C 2020 0.20 110,000 88,000 22,000 0.07% 40 A Cold Creek Operators (2) ‐ conversion to F/T PR&C 2020/2021 0.33 95,000 60,000 35,000 0.12% 41 A Heritage Cemetary Restoration ($20,000 x 3 yrs) PR&C 2020 70,000 50,000 20,000 0.07% 42 B Booking and Event Coordinator PR&C 2020/2022 1.00 45,500 ‐ 45,500 0.15% 43 A Parks Operator ‐ P/T (4 month contract) PR&C 2021/2022 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 44 A Asst Co‐ordinator (P/T) ‐ Environmental Stewardship PR&C 2021 0.50 45,500 12,500 33,000 0.11% 45 B Facility Co‐ordinator ‐ General Operations PR&C 2021 0.67 43,000 ‐ 43,000 0.15% 46 B Site Administrator ‐ King Heritage & Cultural Centre PR&C 2021 1.00 41,000 10,000 31,000 0.11% 47 A Heritage Cemetary Restoration ($20,000 x 3 yrs) PR&C 2021 20,000 20,000 0.07% 48 A Heritage Cemetary Restoration ($20,000 x 3 yrs) PR&C 2021 20,000 20,000 0.07% 49 A Parks Operator I PR&C 2022 1.00 62,000 ‐ 62,000 0.21% 50 A King City Library Branch ‐ Telecom Library 2019 12,000 ‐ 12,000 0.04% 51 A Library Assistant 1 Library 2020 0.50 35,122 ‐ 35,122 0.12% 52 A Branch Services Librarian Library 2021 Pending 28,589 ‐ 28,589 0.10% 53 A Branch Services Librarian Library 2022 Pending 28,589 ‐ 28,589 0.10% 54 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 55 ‐ ‐ 0.00% TOTAL Program Change Requests 16.08 $ 3,761,752 $ 1,938,978 $ 1,822,774 6.21% RECOMMENDED
Sub-Totals by Year 2019 6.43 $ 1,480,135 $ 788,478 $ 691,657 2.36% 2020 6.48 1,175,439 528,000 647,439 2.21% 2021 2.17 586,839 322,500 264,339 0.90% 2022 1.00 519,339 300,000 219,339 0.75% Totals 16.08 $ 3,761,752 $ 1,938,978 $ 1,822,774 6.21%
Sub-Totals by Priority A 9.76 $ 1,255,129 $ 470,598 $ 784,531 2.67% B 6.32 555,117 128,000 427,117 1.45% C - - - - 0.00% No Staffing - 1,951,506 1,340,380 611,126 2.08% Totals 16.08 $ 3,761,752 $ 1,938,978 $ 1,822,774 6.21%
Recommended Program Changes to be funded from Township Initiatives Reserve
56 ServiceKing ‐ Customer Service Representative Admin 2.00 246,938 105,107 141,831 0.48% 57 Township Website Re-design Admin (IT) 100,000 ‐ 100,000 0.34% 58 Network Security and Penetration Testing (N6) Admin (IT) 30,000 ‐ 30,000 0.10% 59 HRIS ‐ Employee Relation Management Platform Admin (HR) 25,000 ‐ 25,000 0.09% 60 Structural Facility Audit PR&C 100,000 ‐ 100,000 0.34% 61 Official Plan Review Planning 56,300 ‐ 56,300 0.19% 62 Rural Zoning By‐law review Planning 75,000 ‐ 75,000 0.26% 63 Urban Design Guideline Update Planning 25,000 ‐ 25,000 0.09% 64 Graphic Design Assistance ‐ ICSP Update Planning 7,500 ‐ 7,500 0.03% 65 Meracki Telephone System (KC Branch) Library 12,000 ‐ 12,000 0.04% 66 KTPL ‐ Nobleton Branch Revitalization Library 2021 25,000 ‐ 25,000 0.09% 67 KTPL - Website Re-design Library 2022 50,000 ‐ 50,000 0.17% 68 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 69 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 70 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00%
TOTAL Program Change Requests 0% 2.00 $ 752,738 $ 105,107 $ 647,631 2.21% One-time Funding as "Township Initiatives" Tax Levy Impact
Sub-Totals by Year 2019 2.00 $ 677,738 $ 105,107 $ 572,631 1.95% 2020 0.00% 2021 - 25,000 - 25,000 0.09% 2022 - 50,000 - 50,000 0.17% Totals 2.00 $ 752,738 $ 105,107 $ 647,631 2.21%
Filename:By-law I:\FINANCE\2019 #2019-029‐2022 A Budget BY-LAW Docs (2018 TO‐12‐18)\A ADOPT‐ Departmental THE Submissions\4) ESTIMATES Program OF Changes\2019 ALL SUMS Program changeREQUIRED summary (2019 D...‐03‐13) Page 162 of 176 Date: 3/14/2019 1:03 PM AGENDA ITEM #15.5.Page 2 of 2 TOWNSHIP OF KING Schedule "4" 2019-2022 Proposed Program Change Requests tab # 15 25‐Feb‐2019
Other Revenue / Cost Net Net Priority Complement Savings or Existing Tax Levy Tax Levy Ranking Program Change Requests Impact Gross Costs Base Impact Impact Program # " A ‐ B ‐ C " RECOMMENDED Department " FTE " $ $ $ %
Other Revenue / Cost Net Net Program Change Requests Complement Gross Costs Savings or Existing Tax Levy Tax Levy Department NON-RECOMMENDED Impact $ Base Impact Impact Program # " FTE " $ $ %
1 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 2 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 3 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 4 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 5 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 6 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 7 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 8 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 9 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 10 ‐ ‐ 0.00% TOTAL Program Change Requests - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% NON-RECOMMENDED
Filename:By-law I:\FINANCE\2019 #2019-029‐2022 A Budget BY-LAW Docs (2018 TO‐12‐18)\A ADOPT‐ Departmental THE Submissions\4) ESTIMATES Program OF Changes\2019 ALL SUMS Program changeREQUIRED summary (2019 D...‐03‐13) Page 163 of 176 Date: 3/14/2019 1:03 PM Township of King Schedule "A" By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D... 2019-2022 Capital Budgets Project List
Total DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT/ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 - 2022
Municipal Buildings Dr. William Laceby Nobleton Community Centre/Arena Improvements 435,000 70,000 130,000 635,000 Township Wide Recreation Complex 2,500,000 12,520,340 12,500,000 9,479,660 37,000,000 King City Library and Seniors Centre Expansion & Renovation 10,764,000 10,764,000 Retrofit - Holland Marsh District Christian School ($340,000) 30,000 210,000 100,000 340,000 Parks Depot Renovation and Expansion (former Schomberg Arena) 150,000 540,000 810,000 1,500,000 Schomberg Library Upgrades 325,000 325,000 Schomberg Fire Hall Upgrades (Roof, Bay Floor, Paving) 100,000 95,000 195,000 Air Quality Improvements (works Yard and Parks Depot) 50,000 50,000 Nobleton Tennis Clubhouse 200,000 100,000 300,000 Nobleton Junior Public School - Acquisition 5,000,000 5,000,000 Schomberg Community Hall Renovation and Accessibility Upgrade 100,000 900,000 1,000,000 Nobleton Library Upgrades 180,000 180,000 Works Yard Roof (ancillary buildings) 119,000 119,000 Cold Creek Driveway and Parking Lot Paving, New Entrance Gate 425,000 425,000 King City Arena Floor 600,000 600,000 King City Arena Roo f 400,000 400,000 King City Arena Parking Lot 210,000 210,000 Pottageville Pavilion Upgrades 200,000 200,000 400,000 King Heritage & Cultural Centre Building Improvements ($700,000) 60,000 100,000 540,000 700,000
Total Municipal Buildings 19,754,000 14,194,340 14,540,000 11,654,660 60,143,000
Municipal Buildings - Funding Sources Taxation 1,168,420 614,340 2,090,000 2,175,000 6,047,760 Reserves 237,528 670,000 100,000 - 1,007,528 Reserve Fund 6,675,000 10,000 - - 6,685,000 DC Fund 7,823,052 5,090,000 6,500,000 - 19,413,052 Contribution - - - - - Other 850,000 7,810,000 3,000,000 4,500,000 16,160,000 Debenture 3,000,000 - 2,850,000 4,979,660 10,829,660 Total Municipal Buildings - Funding Sources 19,754,000 14,194,340 14,540,000 11,654,660 60,143,000
Libraries Collection Development (DC #1) 124,550 104,000 104,000 104,000 436,550
Total Libraries 124,550 104,000 104,000 104,000 436,550 AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 164 of176 Libraries - Funding Sources Taxation - - - - - DC Fund 112,095 93,600 93,600 93,600 392,895 Grant - - - - - Contribution 12,455 10,400 10,400 10,400 43,655 Debenture - - - - - Total Libraries - Funding Sources 124,550 104,000 104,000 104,000 436,550
Page 1 of 8 Township of King Schedule "A" By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D... 2019-2022 Capital Budgets Project List
Total DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT/ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 - 2022 Fleet & Equipment FIRE - Utility Truck (360 - 2008) - buy-out Bldg vehicle leases 15,000 15,000 FIRE - Public Educator Vehicle (3401 - 2010) 35,000 35,000 PRC - NEW 550 4x4 Roll Off w/ Refuse Body 170,000 170,000 PRC - Facilities (Electric) - buy-out Bldg vehicle leases 15,000 15,000 PRC - Facilities - buy-out Bldg vehicle leases 15,000 15,000 PRC - SUV - buy-out Bldg Vehicle leases 15,000 15,000 PRC - NEW Pumper/Water Truck (used) 50,000 50,000 PRC - Dodge Ram 3500 HD 4x4 (705-13) /1 Ton Crew Cab Dump w. Plow & Sander 95,000 95,000 PRC - 1 Ton Truck with Plow (707-13) 80,000 80,000 ROAD - 3/4 ton Long Box (803) 50,000 50,000 TOWNSHIP - Replace Fuel Tanks - Works Yard (Pottageville) 280,000 280,000 WATER - 1/2 Ton 4x4 pickup (607) (replace van with PU Truck) 50,000 50,000 FIRE - Pumper Rescue Truck (382 - 2001) - DC6 700,600 700,600 FIRE - Heavy Rescue Truck (389 - 1994/2009) 500,000 500,000 PRC - NEW Single Axle 4x4 Dump Truck and Plow - DC23 85,000 85,000 PRC - NEW Trail Groomer- DC12 15,000 15,000 PRC - NEW Offset Flail Mower - DC18 13,000 13,000 PRC - NEW 3/4 Ton 4x4 Pickup Truck - DC26 60,000 60,000 PRC - NEW 50hp Tractor w. Quick Attach Loader - DC20 80,000 80,000 PRC - NEW Landscaping Trailer - DC15 15,000 15,000 PRC - John Deere 1445 (755-12) 30 HP Tractor 35,000 35,000 PRC - John Deere 1445 (756-09) 30 HP Tractor 35,000 35,000 PRC - John Deere 997 (761-14) 30HP Tractor 35,000 35,000 PRC - Vermeer BC Chipper (767-07) (2002) Replacement 90,000 90,000 ROAD - 3/4 Ton Long Box (802) 38,650 38,650 ROAD - 3/4 Ton 4x4 Pickup (815) 42,120 42,120 ROAD - Single Axle Dump Truck (832) 250,000 250,000 ROAD - NEW Tandem Axle Dump Truck w. Plow - DC4 218,000 218,000 FIRE - Pumper Rescue Truck (349-2001) 650,000 650,000 PRC - NEW Chipper Truck 100,000 100,000 PRC - NEW 3/4 Pickup w. Plow - DC25 77,500 77,500 PRC - NEW Hydraulic Sander - DC22 15,000 15,000 PRC - NEW Landscaping Trailer - DC19 15,000 15,000 PRC - NEW Utility Van Facilities 40,000 40,000 PRC - Chevrolet Silverado 3500 4x4 (702-13) 95,000 95,000 PRC - John Deere 3720 (752-13) 60,000 60,000 PRC - 44HP Tractore (754-10) 60,000 60,000 PRC - Olympia Millenium (King City) (791-13) Ice Resurfacer 100,000 100,000 PRC - Tandem Dump Trailer (735-10) 10,000 10,000 AGENDA ITEM#15.5. PRC - Tandem Dump Trailer (736-10) 10,000 10,000 Page 165 of176 PRC - Utility Trailer (737-13) 10,000 10,000 ROAD - Grader (849) 300,000 300,000 ROAD - 6ft. Roadside Mower (890) 20,180 20,180 ROAD - 3/4 Ton 4x4 Pickup 52,000 52,000 ROAD - NEW Bobcat/Skid Steer & Accessories 100,000 100,000 WATER - Van (608) 40,000 40,000 FIRE - Tanker Truck (365 - 2002) 375,000 375,000 FIRE - Utility Truck (340 - 2012) 65,000 65,000 PRC - Chevrolet Express (706-14) 1/2 Ton Utility Van 50,000 50,000 PRC - GMC Sierra SLE 2500 HD 4x4 3/4 Ton Truck w. Plow (708-14) 80,000 80,000 PRC - GMC Sierra SLE 2500 HD 4x4 (710-14) 80,000 80,000 PRC - Carryon Utility Trailer (729-14) 4,000 4,000
Page 2 of 8 Township of King Schedule "A" By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D... 2019-2022 Capital Budgets Project List
Total DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT/ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 - 2022 PRC - Weberlane Trailer PT8 (730-13) 12,000 12,000 PRC - Weberlane Trailer PT9 (731-13) 12,000 12,000 PRC - Miska 5Ton Lower Bed Trailer (734-14) 12,000 12,000 PRC - Deckover Trailer (732-10) 14,000 14,000 PRC - Deckover Trailer (733-08) 14,000 14,000 PRC - Toro 4000D (762-12) Wide Area Mower 90,000 90,000 PRC - Toro ProCore 864 (766), Aerato r 55,000 55,000 PRC - Zamboni (Trisan) (792-02) Ice Resurface r 100,000 100,000 PRC - John Deere 997 (759-14) 30 HP Tracto r 35,000 35,000 ROAD - Single Axle Dump Truck (835) 250,000 250,000 ROAD - Culvert Trailer (893) 10,400 10,400 ROAD - Float King 20T60 Tandem Trailer (896) 40,000 40,000
Total Fleet & Equipment 870,000 2,212,370 1,754,680 1,298,400 6,135,450
Fleet & Equipment - Funding Sources Taxation 659,500 770,570 1,292,930 1,298,400 4,021,400 Reserves 57,500 500,000 365,000 - 922,500 Reserve Fund - - - - - DC Fund 153,000 941,800 96,750 - 1,191,550 Grant - - - - - Contribution - - - - - Other - - - - - Debenture - - - - - Total Fleet & Equipment - Funding Sources 870,000 2,212,370 1,754,680 1,298,400 6,135,450 AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 166 of176
Page 3 of 8 Township of King Schedule "A" By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D... 2019-2022 Capital Budgets Project List
Total DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT/ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 - 2022 Fire Projects E-hydraulics (Battery Operated Extrication Tools) 51,000 40,000 91,000 Self Contained Breathing Apparatus - SCBA (cycle to training program) 160,000 160,000 SCBA Air compressor/ Fill Station (Station 34) 105,000 105,000 Fire Equipment to support expansion of KC Fire Station 212,000 212,000
Total Fire Projects 316,000 40,000 212,000 - 568,000
Fire Projects - Funding Sources Taxation 316,000 40,000 212,000 - 568,000 Reserves - - - - - Reserve Fund - - - - - DC Fund - - - - - Grant - - - - - Contribution - - - - - Other - - - - - Debenture - - - - - Total Fire Projects - Funding Sources 316,000 40,000 212,000 - 568,000 AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 167 of176
Page 4 of 8 Township of King Schedule "A" By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D... 2019-2022 Capital Budgets Project List
Total DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT/ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 - 2022 Road, ROW Infrastructure Projects 10th Conc. King Rd. to 15th Sdrd. 400,000 2,825,000 3,225,000 15th Sdrd. 10th Conc. To Hwy. 27 400,000 2,600,000 3,000,000 15th Sdrd, Hwy 27 to 8th Con (incl. culverts 303, 304) 630,000 3,800,000 4,430,000 Brownsview Crt, off Western Ave - New pavement 30,000 350,000 380,000 Conversion of Gravel Roads to Paved Roads 600,000 600,000 900,000 1,200,000 3,300,000 Traffic Signals - Various Locations 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 South Canal Bank Rd - Asphalt Overlay 300,000 300,000 Pumphouse Rd 250,000 1,200,000 1,450,000 Culvert 210, King Caledon Townline (King's share only) 25,000 1,050,000 1,075,000 Culverts 205, 207 and 208, 7th Con N. of King Rd 60,000 800,000 860,000 Dr. Kay - Asphalt 350,000 350,000 King St. 100,000 500,000 600,000 Lockhart Lane, Kingcross to dead end 250,000 250,000 Lloydtown Rd, Victoria, Centre, Rebellion 800,000 800,000 Culvert 305 250,000 250,000 PRC Sidewalk/Typology Projects King Rd, Dufferin St to 2585 King Road 4,000,000 4,000,000 8,000,000 Main St Schomberg Reconstruction with MST incl. bridge 100,000 80,000 180,000 King Rd, 2585 King Rd to Jane St 200,000 200,000
Total Road, ROW Infrastructure Projects 6,895,000 16,655,000 3,250,000 2,250,000 29,050,000
Road, ROW Infrastrucutre Projects - Funding Sources Taxation 2,056,000 2,308,006 857,322 702,423 5,923,752 Reserves 600,000 3,582,337 1,615,276 590,175 6,387,788 Reserve Fund 520,000 2,064,469 777,402 777,402 4,139,272 DC Fund 3,544,000 7,935,000 - 180,000 11,659,000 Other 175,000 765,188 - - 940,188 Debenture - - - - - Total Road, ROW Infrastructure Projects - Funding Sources 6,895,000 16,655,000 3,250,000 2,250,000 29,050,000 AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 168 of176
Page 5 of 8 Township of King Schedule "A" By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D... 2019-2022 Capital Budgets Project List
Total DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT/ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 - 2022 Water and Sewer Projects Electrical Upgrades to Pumping Stations 200,000 200,000 WASTEWATER - Nobleton Sewers Phases 3 and 4 4,775,000 4,925,000 4,925,000 14,625,000 Nobleton Concurrent Works 1,057,180 2,114,370 2,114,370 5,285,920 SCADA System 50,000 50,000
Total Water and Sewer Projects 200,000 5,832,180 7,089,370 7,039,370 20,160,920
Water & Sewer Projects - Funding Sources Taxation - - - - - Reserves 200,000 5,832,180 2,512,500 2,462,500 11,007,180 Reserve Fund - - - - - DC Fund - - - - - Other - - 4,576,870 4,576,870 9,153,740 Debenture - - - - - Total Water & Sewer Projects - Funding Sources 200,000 5,832,180 7,089,370 7,039,370 20,160,920 AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 169 of176
Page 6 of 8 Township of King Schedule "A" By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D... 2019-2022 Capital Budgets Project List
Total DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT/ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 - 2022 Parks & Recreation Projects Skatepark - Schomberg (DC # 32) at Trisan Ctr 250,000 250,000 Pottageville Ball Diamond/ Tennis 60,000 540,000 600,000 Genview Park PPB DC #13 10,000 260,000 270,000 Maidenstone DC #26 420,000 420,000 Lions Park Playground - Schomberg 20,000 180,000 200,000 Fox Trail Park 180,000 180,000 Trail Development (DC) - N1 Cold Creek to Bolton 10,000 90,000 100,000 Ansnorveldt Park Upgrades 180,000 180,000 Blue Heron PPB DC #15 19,000 178,200 197,200 Kettle Lake Park PPB DC #14 23,520 211,680 235,200 Tomlinson Gardens Playground and Park 42,000 378,000 420,000 Nobleton Lions Community Park Phase 3 37,000 333,000 370,000 Trail Development (DC) - N21 51,000 151,000 151,000 353,000 Schomberg Tennis Court 250,000 250,000 King City North Community Park - Phase 1 DC#38 140,000 665,050 805,050 King City North Neighbourhood Park 1 (Future DC) 41,000 378,520 419,520 King City North Neighbourhood Park 2 (Future DC) 41,000 378,520 419,520 Tasca Community Park - DC#9, 22 (Post period benefit) 150,000 1,414,400 1,564,400 Salamander Park 23,520 211,680 235,200 Memorial Park Upgrade (DC, intensification) 28,000 252,000 280,000 St. Andrews Park Upgrade (DC, intensification) 36,000 324,000 360,000 Neiuland Park Upgrade (DC, intensification) 36,000 324,000 360,000 OSIN Park Phase 2 (DC #10) 49,000 437,360 486,360 Wellesley Park Upgrade (Partial DC, intensification) 49,000 49,000 Parks - Community Event Sign 90,000 90,000
Total Parks & Recreation Projects 1,130,000 1,242,520 2,136,400 4,585,530 9,094,450
Parks & Recreation Projects - Funding Sources Taxation 395,320 862,324 142,988 419,417 1,820,049 Reserves 135,280 3,528 121,752 - 260,560 Reserve Fund - - 250,000 - 250,000 DC Fund 599,400 376,668 1,616,760 4,081,013 6,673,841 Grant - - - - - Contribution - - - - - Other - - 4,900 85,100 90,000 Debenture - - - - - Total Parks & Recreation Projects - Funding Sources 1,130,000 1,242,520 2,136,400 4,585,530 9,094,450 AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 170 of176
Page 7 of 8 Township of King Schedule "A" By-law #2019-029 A BY-LAW TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL SUMS REQUIRED D... 2019-2022 Capital Budgets Project List
Total DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT/ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 - 2022 Information Technology Equipment 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000
Total Information Technology 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000
Information Technology Projects - Funding Sources Taxation 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000 Reserves 00000 Reserve Fund 00000 DC Fund 00000 Grant 00000 Contribution 00000 Other 00000 Debenture 00000 Total Information Technology Projects - Funding Sources 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 29,339,550 40,330,410 29,136,450 26,981,960 125,788,370
Total - Funding Sources Taxation 4,645,240 4,645,240 4,645,240 4,645,240 18,580,961 Reserves 1,230,308 10,588,045 4,714,528 3,052,675 19,585,556 Reserve Fund 7,195,000 2,074,469 1,027,402 777,402 11,074,272 DC Fund 12,231,547 14,437,068 8,307,110 4,354,613 39,330,338 Grant 00000 Contribution 12,455 10,400 10,400 10,400 43,655 Other 1,025,000 8,575,188 7,581,770 9,161,970 26,343,928 Debenture 3,000,000 0 2,850,000 4,979,660 10,829,660 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 29,339,550 40,330,410 29,136,450 26,981,960 125,788,370 AGENDA ITEM#15.5. Page 171 of176
Page 8 of 8 AGENDA ITEM #15.6.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-030
A BY-LAW TO APPOINT A CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
WHEREAS section 229 of the Municipal Act, 2001 provides that the Council may appoint a Chief Administrative Officer;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King deems it desirable for Council to appoint a Chief Administrative Officer;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. That Mr Daniel Kostopoulos is hereby appointed to assume the responsibilities of Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) for the Township of King, effective on the 1st day of April, 2019.
2. That, subject to the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001 and any other statute, Schedule ‘A’ attached hereto establishes the office and defines limits and determines the duties and responsibilities of the Chief Administrative Officer.
3. That By-law No. 2011-68, being a by-law to appoint a Chief Administrative Officer, be hereby repealed effective April 1, 2019.
READ a FIRST and SECOND time this 18th day of March, 2019.
READ a THIRD time AND FINALLY PASSED this 18th day of March, 2019.
______Steve Pellegrini Mayor
______Kathryn Moyle Director of Clerks/By-law Enforcement Township Clerk
By-law #2019-030 A BY-LAW TO APPOINT A CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR... Page 172 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.6.
SCHEDULE ‘A’ TO BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-030
POSITION SUMMARY:
Reporting to Council, the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) is the head official of the Municipality and is responsible for providing vision and leadership to the Township. Responsible for the strategic leadership and general management of the Corporation, and for acting as key advisor and liaison to Council. Major responsibilities include: overseeing the day to day administration of the Township; attending Council/Committee meetings and making policy, program and long range/strategic/business planning recommendations; communicating and facilitating the implementation of Council decisions; representing the Township with external agencies and on behalf of Council as required; monitoring the activities of local Boards/Agencies and service partners of the Corporation; overseeing and monitoring the sound fiscal management and legislative compliance of the Corporation; participating in labour/employee relations processes and fostering a positive and productive workplace environment.
Reports to: Members of Council
Direct Supervision Responsibilities:
CEO and Chief Librarian Director of Clerks/By-law Enforcement and Township Clerk Director of Engineering, Public Works and Building Director of Planning and Development Director of Finance/Treasurer Director of Parks, Recreation, Culture and Facilities Fire Chief/CEMC Manager of Human Resources Manager of Information Technology Communications Officer Economic Development Officer Executive Assistant to the CAO Executive Assistant to the Mayor
Indirect Supervision Responsibilities:
All other non-union and unionized positions within the Corporation
Duties and Responsibilities:
Subject to the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001 and any other statutes, the duties and responsibilities of the Chief Administrative Officer shall be:
1. Leads and directs the general/financial management and day-to-day administration of the Corporation through coordination of Departments and directing the activities of the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer. 2. Provides advice and opinion to Council on policy/program plans, service levels, legislative, corporate and general governance matters, and sensitive/controversial issues; makes recommendations to Council; attends Council/Committee and other/related meetings; communicates, champions and coordinates/directs the implementation of Council decisions/directives; provides day-to-day advice/support to the Mayor and Members of Council in their governance roles.
3. To lead the Senior Management Team in the efficient administration of the municipality in accordance with the Corporate Strategic Plan and other policies and plans approved and established by Council by considering ideas and receiving input on interdepartmental/corporate planning and strategic initiatives, items for Council/Committee consideration, sensitive and controversial issues, annual business/work plans, major policies and service levels or standards, and other corporate matters, facilitates consensus and resolution of items discussed and initiates corporate project teams where appropriate or beneficial.
4. Exercises those statutory duties and powers of the CAO as set out in the Municipal Act, 2001 as may be amended from time to time.
5. Assesses future staffing needs, and reviews and recommends complement amendments and organizational structure changes within the authority granted by Council.
By-law #2019-030 A BY-LAW TO APPOINT A CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR... Page 173 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.6.
SCHEDULE ‘A’ TO BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-030 Page 2
6. Directly supervises staff of the Office of the CAO including Human Resources, Information Technology, Communications, and Economic Development service areas, and oversees the effective supervision of all the other staff within the Corporation including staff development, performance management/review, coaching/mentoring, and health and safety within the parameters established by Council. Approves recruitment for all positions below the level of Director and recommends to Council the appointment of Departmental Directors. Appoints, promotes, demotes, suspends or dismisses staff, subject to the provisions of any personnel policies adopted by Council or collective agreements applicable to the employees of the Township except the most senior level management (Directors) and statutory officers. Recommends to Council the appointment, employment, suspension or dismissal of Directors.
7. Ensures the implementation of and oversees and monitors programs/practices that assure the integrity, security and on-going maintenance/rehabilitation of Township assets, infrastructure/buildings and other physical/financial resources; and regularly reports to Council on same; oversees the development of long-range infrastructure planning. 8. Monitors the review and evaluation of administrative and service delivery processes with a view to ensuring practices are coordinated between Departments, appropriate stakeholder consultation occurs, and that practices are contemporary, meet the needs of the Township and reflect customer service excellence; prepares periodic reports to Council on service delivery changes and enhancements; regularly reviews Township performance under the Provincial Municipal Performance Measurement Program (MPMP); and takes action for performance enhancement. 9. Responds to inquiries from and/or liaises with elected officials, internal departments, the development and business communities, other governments/agencies, residents, citizens’ and special interest groups, the media, unions, etc. on corporate initiatives, business/development proposals, Council activities/decisions, and other business of the Corporation; monitors and follows-up on complaints received, directing/taking remedial action where necessary. 10. Monitors activities and agreements with Local Boards/Agencies, York Region and service partners affiliated with the Township to promote and protect the Townships financial and other interests in these organizations; undertakes representative and/or inter-board/agency relations activities to foster cooperative working relationships; apprises Council of pertinent issues and strategies to address. 11. Ensures the Townships compliance with applicable Provincial legislation/regulations and Township by-laws and policies. Oversees, monitors and provides direction in the preparation of the Townships position on major or sensitive/controversial litigation, arbitrations, Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT), Provincial Court and other tribunals/hearings; consults with appropriate internal/external resources; keeps Council apprised of status and progress. 12. Undertakes representative duties as CAO in assigned matters involving the Provincial Government, issues respecting the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), and those involving Regional and other intergovernmental affairs, businesses/developers, community/special interest groups, the media, professional associations, other governmental agencies, and inter-municipally as required; attends meetings/events on behalf of Council and/or the Mayor as directed; and acts as an “ambassador” for the Township supporting and championing corporate goals and decisions and facilitating public education/relations within the community.
13. Makes recommendations on the hiring of consultants to assist with/undertake major corporate projects/studies, as required; monitors their work and administers and oversees the administration of the agreements in accordance with Township policies/procedures. 14. Undertakes special projects and performs other duties as assigned, in accordance with corporate objectives and Council direction. 15. Develops a process for maintaining long term corporate development plans, including financial implications and ensures that such plans are developed, approved, implemented and reviewed on a regular basis. 16. Leads, coordinates and directs the Senior Management Team in the preparation of plans and programs to be submitted to Council with suitable alternatives for the construction, maintenance, development and improvement of municipal properties, facilities and services.
By-law #2019-030 A BY-LAW TO APPOINT A CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR... Page 174 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #15.6.
SCHEDULE ‘A’ TO BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-030 Page 3 17. Coordinates and directs the implementation of the approved policies and programs of Council and deals with any matter, including complaints from citizens arising therefrom, in accordance with the policies of Council, without further reference to Council subject to regularly reporting to Council upon actions taken.
18. Establishes and maintains an ongoing program of annual evaluation of employee performance in all Departments and, with respect to Department Heads, evaluates their performance annually and reports thereon to Council.
19. Directs the exercise of a general financial control of all departments with the assistance of the Director of Finance/Treasurer.
20. Directs, with the assistance of the Director of Finance/Treasurer, the preparation of and the presentation to Council of the annual estimates of expenditures and revenues and the five (5) year forecast of capital expenditures, revenues and operating costs and the subsequent administration and control of the municipality’s financial affairs according to the estimates as approved by Council.
21. Carries out other duties and responsibilities assigned by Council or exercises any power from time to time lawfully granted by Council.
By-law #2019-030 A BY-LAW TO APPOINT A CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR... Page 175 of 176 AGENDA ITEM #16.1.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-031
A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF SPECIAL COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING HELD ON MARCH 18, 2019
The Council of the Corporation of the Township of King HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The action of Council in respect of each motion, resolution and other action passed and taken by the Council at its said meeting is, except where the prior approval of the Ontario Municipal Board is required, hereby adopted, ratified and confirmed.
2. The Mayor and the proper officers of the Municipality are hereby authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to the said action or to obtain approvals where required, and, except where otherwise provided, the Mayor and Clerk are hereby directed to execute all documents necessary in that behalf, and the said Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to affix the corporate seal of the Municipality to all such documents.
READ a FIRST and SECOND time this 18th day of March, 2019.
READ a THIRD time AND FINALLY PASSED this 18th day of March, 2019.
______Steve Pellegrini Mayor
______Kathryn Moyle Director of Clerks/By-law Enforcement Township Clerk
By-law #2019-031 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF COUNCIL AT ITS ...Page 176 of 176