DOCSLIB.ORG

The Corporation of the Township of King Committee of the Whole Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Corporation of the Township of King Committee of the Whole Agenda THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA MONDAY, JUNE 11TH, 2012 TO FOLLOW COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 2075 KING ROAD, KING CITY Chair: Councillor Grandilli Page 1. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM REPORTS Any additional items not listed on the agenda would be identified for approval. Motion to add the items to the Agenda. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Motion to approve the agenda, if any Addendum Items - as amended. 3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 4. DETERMINATION OF COMMITTEE ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION 5. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION Motion to approve those items which were not requested to be separated. All of these are adopted with one Motion. 6. CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION 7. NEW BUSINESS 8. ADJOURNMENT 9. AGENDA ITEMS 4-69 9.1 Administration Department Report Number ED-2012-04 Re: Rural/Agricultural Business Retention + Expansion (BR+E) Project (Jamie Smyth, Economic Development Officer will do a presentation on this item) a) THAT the 2012 Business Retention + Expansion Report and Action Plan included as Appendix “A” be received; b) AND THAT Council supports staff’s implementation of immediate actions Page 1 of 107 Committee of the Whole Agenda Monday, June 11th, 2012 Page 9. AGENDA ITEMS identified in this report. c) AND THAT staff be directed to report back in the Fall 2012 with additional information on the proposed implementation of the plan in alignment with Sustainable King and other broader initiatives underway such as the Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Action Plan 2021. d) AND THAT copies of this report be made available electronically and in print to all project partners, interviewees and local MPP’s: De. Helena Jaczek and Julia Monroe. 70-88 9.2 Planning Department Report Number P-2012-45 Re: Municipal Heritage Register – Review of Deferred Properties A. That the Planning Report P - 2012-45 be received as information. B. That the following properties be added to the Municipal Heritage Register: i. 19026 Dufferin Street ii. 19110 Dufferin Street iii. 19070 Dufferin Street C. That the following property be removed from consideration for the Municipal Heritage Register and removed from the Township of King Built Heritage Inventory: i. 4330 15th Sideroad 89-91 9.3 Parks, Recreation and Culture Department Report Number PR-2012-08 Re: Trisan Fitness Centre Membership Fees a) That Parks, Recreation & Culture Department report PR-2012-08 be received as information. b) That the fitness membership rates listed in Schedule "G" of By-law 2012-35 be amended to include the four proposed membership rates. c) That the necessary By-law be drafted for the June 11, 2012 Council meeting. (By-law Number 2012-79 has been prepared for Council’s consideration this evening.) Page 2 of 107 Committee of the Whole Agenda Monday, June 11th, 2012 Page 9. AGENDA ITEMS 92-102 9.4 Engineering and Public Works Department Report Number EPW 2012-19 Re: Purchase of Easement – Proposed Culvert Repair 7350 16th Sideroad a) That Engineering and Public Works Department Report No. EPW 2012-19 be received for information. b) That Council approve the purchase of a permanent easement and a temporary construction easement as described in, and substantially on the terms and conditions contained in the draft agreement attached as Attachment 1 to this Report. The purpose being for the repair of the culvert located at 7350 16th Sideroad. c) That Council enact a Bylaw authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement substantially in the form attached as Attachment 1 to this Report, subject to such any minor changes as are authorized by the Chief Administrative Officer in consultation with the Township’s solicitor. d) That the Township Solicitor proceed with the land transfer and acquisition of the lands as well as the agreement of behalf of the Township of King. (By-law Number 2012-80 has been prepared for Council’s consideration this evening.) 10. NOTICES 103-107 10.1 Notices Page 3 of 107 TOWNSHIP OF KING DATE: June 11, 2012 TO: Committee of the Whole FROM: Administration SUBJECT: Administration Report No. ED-2012-04 Rural/Agricultural Business Retention + Expansion (BR+E) Project 1. RECOMMENDATIONS Administration respectfully submits the following recommendations: a) THAT the 2012 Business Retention + Expansion Report and Action Plan included as Appendix "A" be received; b) AND THAT Council supports staffs implementation of immediate actions identified in this report. c) AND THAT staff be directed to report back in the Fall 2012 with additional information on the proposed implementation of the plan in alignment with Sustainable King and other broader initiatives underway such as the Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Action Plan 2021. d) AND THAT copies of this report be made available electronically and in print to all project partners, interviewees and local MPPs: Dr. Helena Jaczek and Julia Monroe. 2. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the results of the 2012 joint Business Retention and Expansion project entitled King + WS Cultivating Business with the Township of King. The report contains the key findings from the business retention and expansion survey from which an action plan was created to ensure that our local rural and agricultural businesses can prosper and succeed. 3. BACKGROUND The majority of new jobs in a community come from the expansion of existing employers. Ensuring those existing businesses have the necessary tools and resources to thrive are vital to developing a strong community. The Township of King and the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville exist in unique economic environments. Located on the north central fringe of the Greater Toronto Area, both municipalities benefit from the "spill over" effect of the large regional economy and have a dominant rural economy with a number of challenges: Administration Department Report Number ED-2012-04 Page 4 of 107 Re: Rural/Agricultural Business Retention + Expansion Administration Report No. ED -2012-04 Page 2 of 7 Re: Business Retention + Expansion (BR+E) Report And Action Plan • Limited understanding of and communication with the agricultural and rural business community; • Lack of strategy to address agricultural and rural business issues and opportunities; • Near urban agriculture with untapped potential for valued added opportunities; • Fragmented land base; • Perceived restrictive land use regulations (i.e.: Oak Ridges Moraine & Greenbelt Act). Along with home based business/industries, agricultural businesses have been excluded from the annual York Region Employer survey the Township has been participating in over the past 5+ years. Therefore there is a need to focus a concerted effort at identifying and addressing issues and opportunities that effect rural & agricultural business operations within King that are not being captured through other means. This BR+E project was conceived in order to address such economic challenges through engaging the rural business community to better understand how barriers can be removed and opportunities can be furthered. In 2011, the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville in partnership with the Township of King undertook the process of applying for grant funding from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) to conduct a BR+E focussed on agricultural and rural businesses under Council direction. On May 30th, 2011, Council approved the following: a) That Administration Report No. ED-2011-01 be received; and b) That Council supports the submission of a funding application to the Rural Economic Development (RED) Program for the development and implementation of a Rural/Agricultural Business Retention & Expansion project in Partnership with the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville and if successful the Program's application be authorized by respective CAO's of each municipality. Grant funding was received from OMAFRA and the project was carried forward commencing in the Fall of 2011. The King + WS Cultivating Business BR+E project commenced on November 18, 2011. Interviews began in December 2011 and ended on March 31, 2012. In total, 71 business respondents from King (33 respondents) and Whitchurch- Stouffville (38 respondents) were interviewed by the Project Coordinator, Economic Development Officers from King and Whitchurch-Stouffville and members of the Leadership Team. One of the primary objectives of this process was to build stronger relationships with local businesses. Administration Department Report Number ED-2012-04 Page 5 of 107 Re: Rural/Agricultural Business Retention + Expansion Administration Report No. ED -2012-04 Page 3 of 7 Re: Business Retention + Expansion (BR+E) Report And Action Plan Business Retention + Expansion Methodology The methodology employed to achieve the project objectives, as outlined in the report (see APPENDIX "A") included: Creating a mailing list by using traffic zones from the YLM (Your Local Marketplace) business directory to target businesses. Utilize the mailing list of the York Federation of Agriculture to send letters of invitation to their membership. Circulating media releases in King and Whitchurch-Stouffville to generate awareness of the project. Hiring a BR+E Project Coordinator to schedule and conduct interviews. Mobilizing a Leadership Team to guide the BR+E process and provide insight into the process and provide assistance in conducting interviews. Hiring a consultant to analyze the data, present the key findings, facilitate strategic planning sessions with the Leadership Team and develop the action plan. Conducting in-person interviews with interested business owners/operators. Analyzing the results from the retention survey and group them into themes. Generating a draft report and Action Plan for all stakeholders, utilizing the key findings and guidance from the Leadership Team. Two meetings were held: April 20th, 2012 and May 11th, 2012 where key findings were presented and a vision and set of actions were developed. Hosting public information sessions in Whitchurch-Stouffville (May 29, 2012) and King (May 31, 2012) to gain input from survey respondents and the general public.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of the Wetlands in the Lake Simcoe Watershed Ontario Streams Technical Report No
    July 2018 State of the Wetlands in the Lake Simcoe Watershed Ontario Streams Technical Report No. 2018-01 Alexander Kissel, Habitat Technician & Alice Choi, GIS Technician, Ontario Streams ontariostreams.ca Summary Wetlands in the Lake Simcoe Watershed are critical to the health of the Lake and its surrounding ecosystem. They cover 18.4% of the surface area around the Lake or 52 847 hectares (ha). About 62.4% of these wetlands have been evaluated using the Ontario Wetland Evaluation System (OWES) Southern Manual. The distribution of wetlands vary with fewer and smaller wetlands on the Oak Ridges Moraine (7.1% of surface area), the Schomberg Clay Plains (5.5%) and the uplands west of the the Lake (10.9 to 12.7%), contrasting with the larger valley and shoreline wetlands in the lowlands around the Lake (25.7%). Small wetlands play an important role particularly in the landscapes where they make up a large portion of the wetlands. A high resolution (15 centimetre pixel) analysis of aerial imagery from 1999/2002 to 2013/2016 for the Lake Simcoe Watershed has shown that many small wetland losses, and the occasional larger ones, add up over this time period to a loss of almost eight square kilometres or 773 ha (1.5% of the total wetland area). This loss is higher than previous estimates using lower resolution (30-metre pixel) satellite imagery which cannot pick out the smaller losses that have a large cumulative impact. The highest losses have been from agriculture (46.4% of all losses), following in descending order by residential (10.5%), peat extraction (10.4%), canals (9.6%), highways/roads (6.6%), industrial/commercial (5.7%), fill (4.6%), dug-out ponds (4.3%), recreation (1.6%) and aggregates (0.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • The Corporation of the Township of King Council Meeting Agenda #9 Monday, May 7, 2018
    THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA #9 MONDAY, MAY 7, 2018 - 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS Any additional items not listed on the agenda would be identified for approval. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 5. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 6. PUBLIC MEETING(S) 5-82 6.1 Planning Department Report Number P-2018-20 King City North-East Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications (Refer to Section 3 for application and file numbers) Subject Lands: King City East – Phase 2 (North); Part of Lots 5 – 10, Conc. 3 Applicant: King City East Landowners Group (Refer to Section 3 for individual applicants/owners) Date of Notice: April 17, 2018 A. That Planning Report No. P-2018-20 be received; B. That the matter of the applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment (refer to section 3 below for application and file numbers) submitted by the King City East Landowners Group (refer to section 3 below for individual applicant/owner information), in relation to the development of the north-east quadrant of King City, for residential uses, be referred back to staff, together with all agency, Applicant, Township department and public comments, for a further report following the completion of the Planning Department’s review; C. That staff continue the review of the King City North East Functional Servicing/ Development Area Study (FSDAS) and advance the processing and review of the related applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment concurrently with the FSDAS.
    [Show full text]
  • Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Surface Water Quantity
    Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Surface Water Quantity 2008 Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Surface Water Quantity EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • As of 2002, only one quarter (25%) of the total urban area in the Humber River watershed had stormwater management controls in place to treat urban run-off prior to it being released to receiving watercourses. • The majority of annual stream flow in both the Main and East Humber subwatersheds is generated by groundwater discharge (baseflow) due to the permeable soils and hummocky terrain of the Oak Ridges Moraine area, predominantly rural land uses and presence of aquifers. • The Oak Ridges Moraine, particularly its southernmost extent, and the Iroquois Sand Plain are major influences on the distribution of baseflow in the watershed. Both of these physiographic regions are characterized by highly permeable soils and underlying geology (sand and gravel) which produce high rates of infiltration and groundwater discharge to streams. • Half (50%) of the total stream flow in the Humber River during baseflow conditions originates from within the Main Humber and East Humber subwatersheds. Secondary subwatersheds observed to be major contributors to baseflow are Upper Main, Centreville Creek and Purpleville Creek. • Baseflows in the West Humber subwatershed are low with large tributaries becoming dry during summer months. The majority of stream flow is generated by surface run-off due to low permeability soils, impervious surfaces, and in some areas no aquifers being present. • The majority of baseflow in the West Humber originates from the west branch. • Seasonal variations in baseflow and minimum sustained baseflow rates at long term stream gauge sites have not changed significantly since continuous monitoring began in the late 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Crb1003 Conservation Review Board
    Conservation Commission des Review Board biens culturels 655 Bay St Suite 1500 655 rue Bay Bureau 1500 Toronto, ON M5G 1E5 Toronto, ON M5G 1E5 Tel (416) 326-3594 Tel (416) 326-3594 Fax (416) 326-6209 Fax (416) 326-6209 Email: [email protected] Website: www.crb.gov.on.ca ISSUE DATE: October 17, 2012 CRB1003 CONSERVATION REVIEW BOARD RE: THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING – INTENTION TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS 12605 KEELE STREET (“SHIFT PROPERTY”) IN THE TOWNSHIP OF KING, ONTARIO Su Murdoch, Chair Stuart Kidd, Member This Hearing was convened under s.29(8) of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter O.18, amended to 2009 (“Act”), for the purpose of reporting to the Council of the Township of King (“Township”), whether, in the opinion of the Conservation Review Board, on the basis of the evidence it heard, the property known as 12605 Keele Street (“Shift Property”) should be protected by bylaw under s.29 of the Act. The legal description of the property is Part Lot 2, Concession 3, King Township. Notice of this Hearing was served by the Review Board on the Parties and was published in The Weekly Sentinel of August 1, 2012, in the manner required under the Act. A Statement of Service was filed as Exhibit 1. The Hearing convened at 11:00 a.m. on August 13, 2012, at the Township of King municipal office at 2075 King Road. The Hearing ended at about 5:00 p.m. on the same day. No site visit was conducted due to the subject property being under agricultural cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL AGENDA #8 - Amended March 15, 2019 MONDAY, MARCH 18, 2019 6:00 P.M
    2585 King Rd., King City, ON L7B 1A1 COUNCIL AGENDA #8 - Amended March 15, 2019 MONDAY, MARCH 18, 2019 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS Any additional items not listed on the agenda would be identified for approval. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 5. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 6. PUBLIC MEETING(S) 6 - 72 6.1. Planning Department Report Number P-2019-07 Official Plan Amendment Application, File No. OP-2018-03 Zoning By-law Amendment Application, File No. Z-2018-07 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, File No. 19T-18-K05 Draft Plan of Condominium Application, File No. 19CDM-18-06 Part Lot 55 and 56, Registered Plan 85; Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360, and Part Lot 7, Concession 3 13151, 13165, 13175, 13193, 13211 Keele Street, King City Owner: King Keele Developments LP Applicant: Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate Inc.) Agent: Humphries Planning Group, Adam Grossi Date of Notice: February 25, 2019 A. That Planning Report No. P-2019-07 be received; B. That the matter of Official Plan Amendment Application (OP-2018-03), Zoning By-law Amendment Application (Z-2018-07), Draft Plan of Subdivision Page 1 of 176 Application (19T-18-K05), Draft Plan of Condominium Application (19CDM-18- 06), submitted by Humphries Planning Group on behalf of Stateview Homes (High Crown Estate) Inc. to facilitate the redevelopment of the lands described as Part Lot 55 and 56, Registered Plan 85; Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 360, and Part Lot 7, Concession 3, and providing for: • re-designation
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: January 14Th, 2008
    TOWNSHIP OF KING DATE: January 14th, 2008 TO: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Clerks Department Report CL-2008-03 Re: Designation of Property under the Ontario Heritage Act Cultural Landscape of'Shift' Sculpture 12605 Keele Street, King City Part Lot 2, Concession 3, Assessment Roll # 021-000 1. RECOMMENDATIONS • It is respectfully recommended that: (a) Report CL-2008-03 be received as information. (b) Committee consider approval of the Township Heritage Committee proposal for designation of the Shift and associated cultural landscape to be of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; (c) Should the above-noted proposal be approved, the Clerk is authorized to proceed with the Notice of Intention to Designate; (d) Township staff and members of the Heritage Committee endeavour to work with the owners of the subject property towards a form of agreement to address the needs of the owners and of the Township in protecting and preserving the Shift. 2. PURPOSE This Report is advise of a request from the Township Heritage Committee for designation of property considered to be of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 Heritage Committee Request The Heritage Committee has submitted the correspondence attached as Appendix 'A' to recommend that a portion of the property municipally known as 12605 Keele Street be designated pursuant to Part IV of the Ontario Hentage Act. The subject portion of the property deemed to be of cultural heritage value or interest is the sculpture known as 'Shift' and its associated landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • King Township's Integrated Community SUSTAINABILITY
    King Township’s Integrated Community SUSTAINABILITY PLAN APPENDICES A - D April 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A – Potential Action Bank 4 Appendix B – Potential Indicators & Targets 27 Appendix C – Possible Funding Sources 39 Appendix D – List of Potential Partners 59 King Township’s ICSP: Appendices - Prepared by Lura Consulting 2 Appendix A – Potential Action Bank King Township’s ICSP: Appendices - Prepared by Lura Consulting 3 APPENDIX A: POTENTIAL ACTION BANK ENVIRONMENTAL PILLAR THEME 1: LAND-USE PLANNING STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS AND POTENTIAL ACTIONS 1.1 Identify and measure incoming development. Create a user-friendly online map that shows the locations and status of new development Provide opportunities for the public to learn about new development, considering different levels of planning literacy 1.2 Support and encourage ‘green building’ design, development and construction as well as the adoption of accredited, recognizable standards such as LEED™. Require green building and safety standards in all new buildings Consider the use of finance-based incentives and accelerated approvals to encourage going beyond minimum green building standards Educate the public and development industry about the benefits of green development Work more closely and collaboratively with developers to find mutually beneficial solutions for green development Facilitate a more integrated approach to development, by encouraging more interaction and collaboration between planners, developers as well as other agencies and interest groups Participate in the review of the Ontario Building Code Consider offering bonus density to developers in exchange for obtaining LEED™ certification or the equivalent 1.3 Strategically direct planned future growth, intensification and infill to communities where existing servicing and public transit exists or where there is planned transit service while avoiding key natural heritage and hydrological features Educate the development industry about environmental protection – e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • King Township's Integrated Community
    King Township’s Integrated Community SUSTAINABILITY PLAN April 2012 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary i Forwards from the Mayor, CAO and Chair vi Acknowledgements viii INTRODUCTION 1 HOW THE PLAN WORKS 10 OUR VISION 12 SUSTAINABILITY PILLARS AND THEMES 14 IMMEDIATE PRIORITIES 15 GOALS AND STRATEGIES 26 Environmental Pillar 27 Economic Pillar 40 Socio-cultural Pillar 48 Financial Pillar 60 HOW THE PLAN WAS DEVELOPED 66 FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION 68 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND LIST OF ACRONYMS 74 MAPS Map A – Township of King in a Regional Context 3 Map B – Township of King Natural Features, Roads & Settlement Areas 4 Map C – 2031 York Region Transportation Network 34 APPENDICES Appendix A – Potential Action Bank Appendix B – Potential Indicators and Targets Appendix C – Possible Funding Sources Appendix D – List of Potential Partners Appendix E – Sustainability Alignment Tool EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Our Sustainability Plan – What is it? King Township’s Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (referred to as the Plan) demonstrates that we, as a community, are committed to making smarter decisions about how we use our resources, design our communities and manage our finances. Our Plan is a resource that defines the future for the Township of King (i.e., the municipality), community groups, businesses, local organiza- tions and the broader public. It guides and directs how we make deci- sions, develop partnerships and take action. Our Plan promotes com- munity vitality and prosperity while respecting, preserving and restor- In King Township, sustainability ll ing our natural environment. It emphasizes a balance between the a has 4 pillars: economic, environ- in lt environmental, economic, socio-cultural, and financial priorities of our mental, socio-cultural and nan- e f E community and it recognizes the interconnections between them.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Was Retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act E-Register, Which Is Accessible Through the Website of the Ontario Heritage Trust At
    This document was retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act e-Register, which is accessible through the website of the Ontario Heritage Trust at www.heritagetrust.on.ca. Ce document est tiré du registre électronique. tenu aux fins de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, accessible à partir du site Web de la Fiducie du patrimoine ontarien sur www.heritagetrust.on.ca. \r*.y TOWNSHIPOFKING (905) wffs Municipal Offices Telephone: 833-532 I Toll Free: 1-800-6t18-501 3 2075 King Road Fax: (905) 833-2300 'i L- King City, Ontario E-mail: [email protected] L7B Website: www.king.ca a- IAI ll K|NG I Wiars.r.,.. '*:.r INCORPOI{ATI]T) I85O OilTTil() HTRRAGE TRU$I May 31 ,2013 JUN 0 4 2013 mcEnmD Ontario Heritage Trust 10 Adelaide Street East Toronto. ON MsC 1J3 To Whom lt May Concern, RE: Notice of Passing a By-law to Designate the 'SHIFT' Sculpture Under the Ontario Heritage Act Parts 1,2, & 3 of Reference Plan 65R-34232, Goncession 3, Part Lot 2 Previously known municipally as 12605 Keele Street Please find enclosed a certified copy of By-law Number 2013-50, which was enacted by Council at its meeting of May 271^,2013 to designate the'SHIFT'sculpture as a Heritage Site under the Ontario Heritage Acf. Notice of Passing of the By-law will be published in the King Weekly Sentinel on Thursday, June 6tn, 2013, as required by the Acf. The Township Solicitor has received similar notice and information, to proceed with the registration of the documents on title.
    [Show full text]