THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING
HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA
MAY 5, 2015
PLANNING BOARD ROOM 2075 KING ROAD, KING CITY, ON Page
1. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS Any additional items not listed on the agenda would be identified for approval.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
4. AGENDA ITEMS 3-20 4.1 Heritage Permit Application 13456 Dufferin Street; St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church – Written Report (J. Elkow)
4.2 2015 Ontario Heritage Conference
4.3 Doors Open 2016 – Verbal Report (P. Iaboni)
4.4 Maintenance of Township Cemeteries – Verbal Report (P. Iaboni, A. Nalli)
4.5 Heritage Plaque Program – Verbal Report (M. Hubert)
21-24 4.6 Heritage Brochures – Verbal Report (J. Elkow)
25 4.7 17225 10th Concession; Jesse Lloyd House – Verbal Report (C. Creighton)
26-32 4.8 15 Old Church Road – Verbal Report (J. Elkow)
33-35 4.9 12974 Keele Street; Crawford and Maud Wells House - Verbal Report (J. Elkow)
36-37 4.10 2220 King Road – Verbal Report (J. Elkow)
Page 1 of 74 Heritage Advisory Committee Agenda Page
4. AGENDA ITEMS 38-40 4.11 6012 King Road; Hambly House – Verbal Report (J. Elkow)
41-70 4.12 Heritage Property Evaluations
15 John Street 24 Kingsworth Road 75 Kingsworth Road 30 Station Road 45 Station Road 50 Station Road 38 Clearview Heights 104 Martin Street 12720 Keele Street 12845 Keele Street
5. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 71-74 5.1 Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting of April 1, 2015.
6. CORRESPONDENCE/INFORMATION ITEMS 6.1 Upcoming Events
(a) King Township Volunteer Appreciation Night (May 7 at Trisan Centre) (b) Kettleby Storyboard Unveiling (May 30, 1:00pm at Christ Church) (c) “Eaton Hall: Pride of King Township” Book Launch (June 27) (d) “A Shift in the Landscape” Screening (June 27, 6:00pm at Kingbridge Centre) (e) Brûlé-Wendats Expedition 400th Anniversary (September 11 – 13)
7. NEW BUSINESS
8. NEXT MEETING 8.1 Thursday, June 4, 2015
9. MOTION TO ADJOURN MEETING
Page 2 of 74 Heritage Permit Application Page 3 of 74 13456 Dufferin Street; St. ._.:m mmoozaoE_o: n3 :mm_mz>.:oz” 4:m u3_um:< _oom2ma m283¢ U:2m_,_: m.:mm2émm amm_o:m2m:Eamq mmozo:mm9. Em O:2m:o _._m_.2mmm>o2_ Ammo:<_w<._m<<$-82. ._.:_mm<-_m<<:m:Em mama.o2 :mm6:m2_:o :oE Em .:2m:o_. m:: mx2m_._o« 9. Em ::__:_:om::Em _33m:_m2m _m::mo: 5:3: 2 m2m::m. w<-_m<<$3-3: m3m:n_ma Em :mm6:m2_o: w<-_m<<2o .m3o ..m2m2m3m:29. O:2:qm_ 2 :mm:_m2o:om_\mmmoo_m2. 2 m_mo_mmmmoo_m2mn_E2: Em _m2m5% mm2o:Amxm_u_o3 mm2o3.<<:ou:3:mmmn_Em o::3: E 88 E_.o:o: :m_.:m:_m2m« E oam? .8 mm Ummo:2.0: o2 _._m:2m m>2_._::2mm _Am - 2m3:c:_< aammmma.._m_am2o:moo:m.::o2_o: ms:m2o:moo:3_:o“ - 2mm__m:2_ H. 3.0 m _=3..3m:o: _<_:3n:um_>qa..mmn _.o.nzo.3&2 xmmr?mwmqEm: zo >mmmmm3m3mo:2 N. 9232. _:mo.._.=mzo: 2m3m” >353 o?O<<: uomS_ noqmu 3 __ 9&1 5.6 ...o<<: Bum m_. 0 O 53m W. ma\t:U\5 53m05.. O _ _ :m€_.m __ 2 9. oE:m_.E FDR ~:uE_.mO 2 >mm_..n Emusosm LW‘| omamamC. P mnomom< .n=u:_.:.u! .2: no.3 Page 13 of 74 Emmmo33.. 5.» E62 3335.. _?uumom..~o_.: 8; =3 <2... ..ouuo:m_a==<3 o m:..¢ =5. ooasanmozz__._§_ >..._. no.u=mmacao:.cn.. Eu 5:: .89: _m.8§ _u3n.._n=o: 32 _.onm.<_:m Susan msE: 32.3%..:Q as*o_. 2. : ,_osa <2: 05%: mssaosa muu..o .3 <6: mam:$5 cam>o3_§ N83 8% ncmqozma 03:52. no3um=<22:9 mama.9 33¢ 0&3: mama 13456 Dufferin Street; St. Heritage Permit Application w:_:::=1§ no Page 14 of 74 Eommo....:on...2» E62 om..2.=S\. 5 mmm.._m2o:: 83 = <9... _.mmuo:m=u__=<3 26:3 .53 ooamaumo_.§_§a >5. .33..» Ed oo:.on.. < J.o $92 mam:$5 :8 >033, N003 .8_.. ncmwoima nozusnu. oo3um:<22:9 mamam We?zw .: ~30 2._mx.:Q <<_.._$ .uosa..08.3 u5 3 = .34.: i V 235. _.....m3mz_o::._:m 253.. a: icon»: _u..m_.:£ - w..< ._.. K 2: V 3.. 238. 353» o:_..::cas nozoqonmv .m...02668 moasa 5:. cmcmma _u 52% ._.. OU._._OZ - mnqmé o: 4..x UO<<¢_. oo?wa :55. .._.m3mmag oo:n..m$ - zo moqwém m_o:o3m .2. - 33. mm2 sa <3: cmcmma8 mmo:mag <<_:n_o<<_u_.m3m Emmmo2.8.. =...m.263 om..os:=.<.Page 15 of 74 oai. =_m 3muo=m_a__:< noa:m:_.o =5. 02! 2.2.0: 3. Ba <05. . . ooasa.mozzcan. >_._.. n_3m__u mamoo_.33. < suo 1doU013 ncm?osma 002.390.... no3um: wus m. :u§.:.n3u.1=n nos lil . L. 11111:, <<:=m .uo< 1. mac .58.. =._muaooqnm3x==.<.Page 16 of 74 =3 _.mmuo:m.u__= Jo <52 mam:$5 cmm>o3um.~83 62. Heritage Permit Application Page 17 of 74 13456 Dufferin Street; St. 13456 Dufferin Street; St. Heritage Permit Application _<_m..n_..Nu.BE 23 <_u# _u:o3m_.mu_.. Page 18 of 74 Heritage Permit Application Page 19 of 74 13456 Dufferin Street; St. 13456 Dufferin Street; St. Heritage Permit Application ‘ -b~._ ~. - s. _ :h:=!'??FA‘?(};§v~b§_§.~«y,.3‘ ~‘ .' -5:." *1 , ‘ ~.¢£§.\{‘‘”£.\\E.hA-\‘ Q‘. ‘ A 1' -J , , .,.. "-’z‘i"‘é*§*.aa‘.:e‘:'«'w'==».'*~"*;'-:5? ‘W -vg':.‘1g?‘_.‘:i;‘_§f‘§.'r',—:.':'~’_3..“'9' .;‘ _‘. F ~" 177. -38. - _<_m«n_._um.BG 23 <.....:vsonomqmu ‘IV Page 20 of 74 What does it mean to be How do I find out if my included on the Register? property is included on the King Report (J. Elkow) Heritage Brochures The inclusion of a property on the Register? Township Reg ister does not introduc e restrictions or obligations on the Call the Heritage Coordinator at the property owner to the Building Township of King at 905-833-5321 Permit process for alterations or ext. 4061 to find out more renovations. information. – An owner of a Listed property shall Visit the Township offices at 2075 Verbal not demolish or remove a building or structure or permit demolition or King Road and ask Reception to removal unless the owner gives view a copy of the Heritage Register. the Township Council at least 60 days written notice of the owner’s intention. This allows the Township explore possible options and opportunities with the property owner. A property on the Register may be required to have its heritage value fully considered and assessed in the context of environmental assessments and Planning Act A Property Owner’s applications. Guide to the Municipal Page 21 of74 Heritage Register Township of King Planning Department 2075 King Road King City, Ontario L7B 1A1 905-833-5321 Report (J. Elkow) Heritage Brochures What is Heritage? What is the King Township How are properties added to Heritage Register? Heritage is more than old and attractive the Register? buildings. Heritage may apply to buildings Under the Ontario Heritage Act, King Township is undertaking a or structures, landscapes, archaeological municipalities are responsible for process of reviewing potential sites, cemeteries, or even a streetscape identifying, evaluating and conserving – that defines a neighborhood. properties of heritage value in order to heritage properties through their Verbal update its Heritage Register. The Heritage Advisory Committee and staff. Why is Heritage Important? Heritage Advisory Committee (previously known as the King The Act (OHA) also requires the Clerk of The presence of heritage helps sustain Township LACAC) has identified over every municipality to keep a current, a sense of identity and understanding 500 potential properties in 30 years, publicly accessible Municipal Register of of a community’s cultural heritage and creating a Built Heritage inventory. properties with cultural heritage value or history. interest. From this inventory, heritage staff Conserving heritage properties selects properties for the Heritage enhhances the diversity of our built Originally, a Heritage Register only Advisory Committee to review and envvironment and provides a continuum included designated properties. These recommend to Council for inclusion on of our human history. are properties that are protected by the Register. Reusing and readapting our built by-law under Part IV (individual) or Part heriitage means a more sustainable V (Heritage Conservation Districts) of the If selected a notification letter is sent out to the property owner to inform community. Ontario Heritage Act. them of their property’s upcoming Since 2005, changes to the Act and the addition to the Register. Provincial Policy Statement have allowed municipalities to add properties The Township Council's approval is Page 22 of74 to the Register that are NOT designated required to add cultural heritage but which Council believes to be of properties that have not been cultural heritage value or interest. These designated to the Register. properties are commonly referred to as “listed”. Requests to list a property on the Register may come from a property The identification, listing, evaluation and owner, the Heritage Advisory protection of heritage resources is an Committee, or municipal heritage staff. ongoing process. Tips for a Successful Heritage Project Before beginning a restoration project, research your property. It should not be based on what you think was there, but Report (J. Elkow) Heritage Brochures what you know was there. The King King Township Public Library website offers Township some heritage resources. http://king-library.on.ca Designated heritage Learn about the materials of your building and aim to repair or conserve the Properties materials. Your property already has – lasted decades and can last for decades CemeteriesVerbal longer. Permits will be required for Do not demolish later additions to a building or structure solely to restore a Cleaning stone monuments. property back to a single historical time Removing landscape elements identified period. in the by-law. Reconstruction or restoration of stone Whenever possible, alterations should monuments. minimize the impact on the existing Rubbings of grave markers. building or structure. NOTE: If the designated property is an active New work should be distinguishable from cemetery, new burials are NOT considered an old - new buildings should be recognized A Property Owner’s alteration and may proceed as usual. as products of their time. Additions do not need to blend into the existing fabric, but How do I apply for a Heritage Permit? be sympathetic to it. Guide to Altering Applications may be picked up or dropped off at Consult Canada’s Standards and Designated Properties the Planning Counter or the Main reception of Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic the Township Offices. Places in Canada available for download at http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/ HeritagePage 23 of74 Property Grant Program Owners of properties designated under Part IV or Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act may be eligible for to receive a matching contribution of up to $6000.00 from the Township towards the preservation or restoration of defined heritage Township of King attributes. Planning Department 2075 King Road How Can I Learn More? King City, ON For all inquiries please call the King Township L7B 1A1 offices to confirm at 905-833-5321 or email [email protected] 905-833-5321 What is a designated property? When do I need a Heritage Permit? Maintenance A designated property is a property that has Under the Ontario Heritage Act, no owner of a Routine maintenance extends the life of your Report (J. Elkow) Heritage Brochures been municipally designated by By-Law property designated under Part IV, Section 20, property. King Township has deemed the under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act shall alter the property unless the owner applies following activities to be maintenance and do not to recognize and protect significant cultural to the Council of the municipality and receives require a permit. heritage resources. Designation ensures their consent in writing, approving the alteration. alteration to a property does not destroy its All owners or agents of the heritage properties, Projects that do not require a Heritage Permit heritage value, and prevents demolition. must receive permission from the Township General repairs to weather stripping, eaves Once designated, an owner who wishes to Council or in limited circumstances, Council’s troughs, downspouts, caulking, roofs, alter a heritage property must ensure that designate. Please consult our brochure “A chimneys, fences, existing cladding, repair of the changes are sympathetic to the heritage Property Owner’s Guide to Heritage Permit broken window panes, installation of existing – Verbal value of the property. Applications” for more information on delegated storm doors and windows, minor installation permits. including lighting, flagpoles, cable and phone Designation: lines, satellite dishes, central air, etc. Projects that require a Heritage Permit Does NOT restrict the use or zoning of a Installations of storm windows, screen doors, property. New construction such as additions, raising the height of a building or new exterior archi- door knobs, awnings or signs done on existing Does NOT restrict the sale of a property. tectural detailing and finishes, new founda- hardware. Does NOT require owners to open their tions. Outbuildings - You may build or alter tool and property to the public. garden sheds, gazebos or other small New signs, awnings etc. that are being Does NOT automatically include the interior installed for the first time or require a major outbuildings that do not require a foundation or of a property - only a few designated change in hardware. a building permit. properties in King have interior heritage Landscaping such as gardening, backyard Major structural alterations and rehabilitation attributes protected. projects, such as replacement, removal and patios, repair of existing landscape features Does NOT automatically prevent an owner changes to existing porches, decks, windows, such as fences. from making changes to the property - the doors, chimneys, foundations and roofs. Painting exterior cladding EXCEPT if painting purpose of designation is to help guide over masonry (brick or stone) or removing Changes to exterior cladding, such as change. installation of siding, painting or cleaning of paint from masonry. masonry OR the removal of paint from mason- NOTE: If a feature is described in the property's Page 24 of74 ry. by-law or Reason for Designation, it is a heritage attribute and will require consultation with Remember... heritage staff in order to determine if a permit is There is NO fee for a heritage permit. needed. Please allow for 4-6 weeks to process most Interior alterations do not require a heritage permit, UNLESS a property has interior King Township reserves the right to determine designation. if a heritage permit is needed in order to include other types of projects that are not If your project does not fall on either included in the above list or that may develop list, please contact the Township for in the future. Examples include: installation of review. solar panels, green roofs, wind turbines, etc. Last updated 2/28/2011 Jesse Lloyd's House Listed on Inventory 17225 10th Concession PROPERTY INFORMATION Community Rural Roll Number 107 185 (Legal) Property CON 9 PT LOT 34 RS65R5836 PART 3 Description RS65R15946 PART 1 Current Registered GLEASON, JOSEPH EDWARD Owner(s) Property Dimensions 14.48 acres Current Use Residential Reference Number 9-34-30 Binder B HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Importance Architectural, historical Construction Date c. 1845 Builder Lloyd, Jesse Taken in 1975. From Elizabeth Original Owner Lloyd, Jesse Original Use Residential McClure Gillham's "Early Settlements of King, Ontario." Previous Registered Jennings, Hugh; Previous Owners Jennings, Jean Uses Significant Owners Historical Features ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE Exterior Wall Brick Plan Style Rectangular Number of Bays Number of Storeys 1.5 Architectural Features Gable roof; dormers on front and rear; part of first floor protrudes into hillside, thus is a type of “bank house”; stone foundation. Alterations Since Porch on west façade has been completely enclosed and its roof has been modified. Construction General Condition Good Contribution to Vista Fair Harmony of Building's Architecture with Surrounding Buildings Good Harmony of Building's Present Use with Neighbouring Land Uses Good Physical Contribution of Building to its Environment (architectural details)Fair Vulnerabilities (areas of special concern) 17225 10th Concession; Page 25 of 74 Jesse Lloyd House – Verbal THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING KIN REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, April 1, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 15 Old Church Road, Laskay Reference No. 5-3-2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the property known as 15 Old Church Road not be considered for inclusion onto the Heritage Register and that it be removed from the Built Heritage Inventory for the reasons expressed in more detail below. xxxxxxxxx 4.‘. 0 u I ——§_% ‘ BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1904 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 1983. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 15 Old King Road displays a two-storey rectangular plan with a hip roof. The building is supported by brick buttresses along both sides of the dwelling. HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE The dwelling was originally used as a Methodist Church, and later operated as the Laskay 15 Old Church Road – Page 26 of 74 Verbal Report (J. Elkow) United Church until 1969. CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the hamlet character of Laskay. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 15 Old Church Road has undergone significant modifications since its original construction in 1904. The original building was built in a style typical of late 19th century Ontario churches. Original defining attributes, such as a steep gable roof and gothic windows have since been removed. The original doorway, with a centre-pointed surround has been removed and replaced with an overhead door to accommodate a garage. In addition, the original elements of the interior, such as the original floors, have been replaced. Despite the historical / associative value from its former use as a church, only the brick buttresses remain from the original construction. Staff are not satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value. Therefore, staff recommend that this property not be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register and that it be removed from the Built Heritage Inventory. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page 15 Old Church Road – Page 27 of 74 Verbal Report (J. Elkow) |as1-nu-mauzazanil Laskay Primltlve Methodist L.,,.,, .,...,..,,.. 15 Old Church Road ..,,,, PROPERTV INFORMATION Cmllmulilv may nnuummmua (Lead) Pmrmlv con 5 Pl’ mr 3 nuulmion Cunanl Reaismma wuumwuen,arzumum o-mm pmneny Dillensnmns mm nusr Cunlnl uu Resllulal Rzlemnu lumber 5&2 aim: K HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE lrllholhnoe msnmz: Cnnsmlclinn Date mm Oriuitl omm pmious neaismma mmus warms: mum, unis: mulch o-mu Uses Slrllmnanl o-mu Histnliul Felllles gunmen n cmmumncmm n June, was ARcHrrEc1uRAL SIGNIFICANCE Extaimwall mm P|In style Reclauuhr nu-mm of Bays llumhev m scams 1 Avdiletilnl Felines Hv mot nmxn-mesa: Ammimssinoeznmsueamcanmsnmepvxxmugaammsgrulynalamcmnnuuyornm mmmmmmuucn mun-u.amnm:ssesa.emymvgruecm.ecnsua:we«enuagwaa 6u|uilCnndilim|6mx1 umlnmlmn novma Far Hammllvm manna’: Avummn mm Surmuminn Bananas Far Hammllvm manna’: Pvusenl use will: ueiamm-in L-m Uses Gmd pt-vsinal Cnmrimllion m mung In its Envimnmall 1-mmemnn -seuisrmr vunnmmmes I-us of mu’: concern) 15 Old Church Road – Page 28 of 74 Verbal Report (J. Elkow) Ministry of Ministére des Government Services Services gouvernementaux O Consumer Protection Branch Direction de la protection du consommateur 5775 Yonge Street, 15th Floor 5775 rue Yonge, 15e étage Toronto ON M7A 2E5 Toronto ON M7A 2E5 Te|.: (416) 326-8393 Téléphone : (416) 326-8393 Toll-free 1-800-359-9768 Sans lrais 1-800-889-9768 Fax: (416) 326-3406 Téléoopieur : (416) 326-8406 Cemeteries Regulation Unit Unilé de la réglemantation des cimetiéres February 8, 2007 Township of King 2075 King Road King City ON L7B 1A1 Attention : Mr. Bert Duclos, Researcher Township of King Heritage Committee Dear Mr. Duclos: Re: Laskay Primitive Methodist Church Cemetery This is further to your telephone discussion with Michael D’Mello, Registrar, on February 6, 2007, and the subsequent documentation that you forwarded to us, regarding the Laskay Primitive Methodist Church Cemetery. The Registrar has asked me to review your inquiry on his behalf. Contrary to the information we initially provided, this cemetery is in fact the Laskay Cemetery that is currently registered under the licence held by the Township of King and that has been designated as Site 04961. Our records show the location of the cemetery to be in Lot 4, Concession 6, however, there are reports filed by Mr. Cam Duncan, a former Clerk of the Township, that indicate the cemetery is located in Lot 4, Concession 5. Upon further review, it appears that the Ministry conducted an inspection of the site on July 24, 1989. The inspector met with Mr. Duncan from the Township, who indicated that the Township had assumed responsibility for the cemetery, but that the cemetery was being maintained by the property owner, Mr. Baumhard. Mr. Duncan provided our inspector with a report prepared by Eleanor and Pat Boultbee, dated February 29, 1988, that indicated that the cemetery was located behind the home of Mr. Baumgard, on Old Church Road, in Laskay, Ontario, and that the cemetery contained the headstone of two Warren girls that were possibly step-sisters. The report also indicated that a neighbour to the south, Mr. Bert Ezard, believed that the rest of the remains in this cemetery were reinterred in King City Cemetery. Mr. Duncan acknowledged the Township's responsibility for the cemetery under the legislation at the time and indicated that no building permit would be issued for this property. We assume that this was because there was an inquiry or concern at that time regarding the maintenance of the cemetery or possible development near or on this property, butwe have documentation to confirm this. 15 Old Church Road – Page 29 of 74 Verbal Report (J. Elkow) Mr. Duclos Page 2 Please be advised that we do consider this cemetery to be registered and to be the responsibility of the Township. in addition, our records do not indicate that this cemetery, or a part of this cemetery, was ever closed. As such, the graves cannot be disturbed and the property owner or Township is not permitted to use the land for other purposes or erect a structure or building within 15 feet of an inground grave. We are also assuming that the Township never proceeded with a formal application to have the cemetery legally declared abandoned and have the land title transferred to the Township, however, should the Township still wish to do so, we would suggest approaching the property owner directly. Itrust that this will address your inquiry regarding the status of the cemetery, however, should you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 416-326-8514 or the Registrar, Michael D’Mello at 416-326-8404. Our toll-free telephone number is 1-800-889-9768. Yours truly, Corina Burnell Registration & Compliance Officer Cemeteries Regulation Unit 15 Old Church Road – Page 30 of 74 Verbal Report (J. Elkow) Towns?ip ofKing Heritage Committee Conservation of Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest Ontario Heritage Act, Part IV Designation of Properties February 26, 2009 Ms. Chris Somerville Township Clerk The Township of King Regarding: Designation of Property, Advice to Council Property Name: Primitive Methodist Cemetery, Laskay Street Address: 15 Old Church Road Location: Concession 5, Part Lot 3 Municipality: Township of King, Regional Municipality of York Assessment Roll: #040 622 Property Owner: Brunhild Baumbard The Township of King Heritage Committee wishes to advise King Township council the property known municipally as the Primitive Methodist Cemetery, Laskay is recommended for designation for its cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. It meets criteria for municipal designation prescribed by Ontario Regulation 9/06 under the three categories of design/physical value, historical/associative value and contextual value. Description of Property The Primitive Methodist Cemetery, Laskay is an inactive, small, rural mid 19th-century community cemetery located at 15 Old Church Road. Measuring approximately 20,038 square feet, it is situated to the rear of the one time Laskay Primitive Methodist Church, on the east side of Old Church Road, Concession 5 Part Lot 3, in the hamlet of Laskay. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The cultural heritage value of the Primitive Methodist Cemetery, Laskay is related to its design/physical value as a good example of a small, mid 19th-century, local community cemetery situated in a rural setting. Its level, grassed park like setting amidst mature trees and bushes containing at least a single gravesite and a single displaced simple marker demonstrates the secure and comforting site for the peaceful, undisturbed final resting place intended for the deceased of the community. The cultural heritage value of the Primitive Methodist Cemetery, Laskay is related to its historical/ associative value as the one time burial site of members of a number of the original families of the hamlet of Laskay and the final burial site of two half-sisters. English immigrant Joseph Baldwin, founder of the hamlet of Laskay, donated this portion of his land to the Primitive Methodist Church for a church, parsonage and the cemetery established in 1852. It is situated on property with the one time Laskay Primitive Methodist Church. While Baldwin and members of his family’s graves were later moved, as it is believed were many others, the single marker of half-sisters Margaret L. Warren, 16 years old and Alberta R. Warren, 1 year old, attest to the untimely passing of the children of the earliest settlers. The cultural value of the Primitive Methodist Cemetery, Laskay also relates to its contextual value for its more than 156 years influence on the continued rural character of the immediate landscape. Its rustic and treed setting serves as a spiritual reminder of the rural past to the community. 15Towns?ip Old Churchqf_7 Description of Heritage Attributes The heritage attributes of the Primitive Methodist Cemetery, Laskay related to its cultural heritage value as a small, mid 19th-century, rural burial site of early settlers of the hamlet of Laskay, its influence on the rural character of the landscape, and its spiritual landmark value to the community are portrayed by: • the style and material of its surviving original marker with its surviving inscription • the continued location on the property of its surviving original marker • the original placement of gravesites • the mature trees and bushes • the park like setting • its location and dimensions • the level, grassed landscape ~&I2M:UR. Elaine Robertson Chair, Township of King Heritage Committee 15 Old Church Road – Page 32 of 74 Verbal Report (J. Elkow) THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING BY-LAW NUMBER 2009-73 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE THE CRAWFORD AND MAUD WELLS HOUSE AS A HERITAGE SITE UNDER THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT WHEREAS Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.18, as amended authorizes the Council of a municipality to enact by-laws to designate real property, including all buildings and structures thereon, to be of cultural value or interest, AND WHEREAS the Council (‘Council’) of the Corporation of the Township of King (‘Township’) has determined that the Crawford and Maud Wells House located on lands described as Concession 4, Part Lot 5 and Plan 84, Lot 2 and municipally known as 12974 Keele Street in the Village of King City in the Township of King in the Regional Municipality of York (the ‘Lands’) shall be designated as a property of cultural heritage value or interest pursuant to Section IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, 1990, c.O.18; AND WHEREAS Council has caused to be served on the Ontario Heritage Trust notice of intention to so designate the Crawford and Maud Wells House for the reasons set out in Appendix “A’ attached to this By-law, and has caused such notice of the intention to be published in the local newspaper having general circulation in the municipality; AND WHEREAS no notice of objection to the proposed designation has been served on the Clerk of the Municipality; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The property known as the Crawford and Maud Wells House located on lands described as Concession 4, Part Lot 5, and Plan 84, Lot 2, in the Village of King City, Township of King in the Regional Municipality of York is designated pursuant to Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as a building of cultural heritage value or interest. …2 12974 Keele Street; Page 33 of 74 Crawford and Maud Wells -2- By-law Number 2009-73 2. The Township Solicitor is authorized to cause a copy of this By-law to be registered against the Lands as described in Clause 1 above in the proper Land Registry Office. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a copy of this By-law to be served on the Ontario Heritage Trust and to cause notice of passing of this By-law to be published in the local newspaper having general circulation in the municipality. READ a FIRST and SECOND time this 24th day of August, 2009 READ a THIRD time and FINALLY PASSED this 24th day of August, 2009 ______Margaret Black, Mayor ______Chris Somerville, Clerk 12974 Keele Street; Page 34 of 74 Crawford and Maud Wells APPENDIX ‘A’ TO BY-LAW NUMBER 2009-73 THE CRAWFORD AND MAUD WELLS HOUSE, KING CITY, TOWNSHIP OF KING REASONS FOR DESIGNATION: Description Property Name: Crawford & Maud Wells House Street Address: 12974 Keele Street Location: Plan 84 Lot 2, Concession 4 Part Lot 5 Municipality: Township of King, Regional Municipality of York Assessment Roll: #036 797 Description of Property The Crawford & Maud Wells House, is a unique example of a Victorian era Ontario Farmhouse is situated on the west side of Keele Street, south of King Road in the village of King City. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The cultural heritage value of the Crawford & Maud Wells House is related to its design/physical value as a unique example of a late Victorian era Ontario Farmhouse. Its original, vernacular red brick, L-shaped plan, familiar features of the Ontario Farmhouse style, combine many of the typical and more decorative elements common to late 19th - early 20th century Victorian homes. While other features add a distinctive Gothic flavour that together demonstrate an attractive mixture of styles. The cultural heritage value of the Crawford & Maud Wells House is related to its historical/ associative value as the one time home of Crawford G. Wells and (Cora Beatrice) Maud Watson, for over 60 years merchants and owners of Crawford Wells general store located across the road. Built in 1900, the house became home to the couple in 1916 where they remained until his 1959 and her 1977 death. For 61 years the property was the well known home of the Wells, widely respected for their long standing mercantile service to the community. The cultural value of the Crawford & Maud Wells House also relates to its contextual value as a well known landmark, prominent anchor and influence to the streetscape. For over 100 years the house and property have continued to serve as a reminder and link to the small town past of the community of King City. Description of Heritage Attributes The heritage attributes of the Crawford & Maud Wells House related to its cultural heritage value as an unique example of a late Victorian era Ontario Farmhouse, the home of a well known local merchant couple, and as an over 100 year influence on the streetscape and reminder of the small town past of the community are portrayed by its: • red brick construction • yellow brick quoins • yellow brick lintels on windows and doors • vertical red brick lintels on windows • arched lintels and narrow arched windows on second storey of east and north façades • position and construction of wood frame windows and sills • east façade veranda with wood bargeboard and columns • steep gable and dormer on second storey east and north façades • steep gable on second storey of east and south facades • red brick chimney on west façade • projecting 2 storey east façade • l-shape plan Reference: Clerks Department Report CL-2009-23, June 22, 2009. 12974 Keele Street; Page 35 of 74 Crawford and Maud Wells Last updated 2/28/2011 Listed on Register 2220 King Road PROPERTY INFORMATION Community King City Roll Number 033 427 (Legal) Property PLAN 85 PT LOT 40 Description Current Registered 1721608 Ontario Limited Owner(s) Property Dimensions 0.73 acres Current Use Commercial Reference Number 3-6-3 Binder F HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Importance Architectural, historical Construction Date c. 1860-1880 Builder Taken in 1982. From Heritage Original Owner Wilson, Lyman Original Use Residential Inventory Binder F. Previous Registered Strachan, Jim Previous Bakery; veterinary office; financial group Owners Uses Significant Owners Burns, William; Pinkerton, David Historical Features ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE Exterior Wall Brick Plan Style L-shaped Number of Bays Number of Storeys 2 Architectural Features Stone foundation; 2 brick chimneys with dichromatic detailing; decorative entablature door surround on southwestern entrance; yellow brick lintels and quoins; large display windows around southeastern entrance. Alterations Since Greatly altered in 1880s. Construction General Condition Good Contribution to Vista Good Harmony of Building's Architecture with Surrounding Buildings Good Harmony of Building's Present Use with Neighbouring Land Uses Good Physical Contribution of Building to its Environment (architectural details)Good Vulnerabilities (areas of special concern) 2220 King Road – Verbal Page 36 of 74 Report (J. Elkow) TOWNSHIP OF KING Heritage Property Information Sheet Address: 2220 King Road Location: Plan 85 Lot 40 Assessment Roll: 033-427-00-000 The property known as 2220 King Road is worthy of inclusion of the King Township Municipal Heritage Register under Pan IV, Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value or interest. It meets the necessary criteria prescribed by the Province of Ontario in one or more categories of design or physical value, historical value and contextual value. Statement of Cultural Value Originally built as a residence between1860-1880, 2220 King Road has long been a landmark building along the north side of King Road. It is now a commercial building that has at various times housed a bakery, veterinary office and ?nancial group. It also was owned by Jim Strachan, who was a part of the King LACAC for many group and was a great promoter of local heritage. HERITAGE VALUE PHYSICAL/DESIGN Stone foundation, red brick with yellow brick quoins and straight yellow brick lintels, 2 dichromatic brick chimneys, decorative entablature door on south west entrance, several of the windows also retain their heritage value. Features stone retaining wall, which is a common feature in the King City village streetscapes. HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE CONTEXTUAL VALUE Property has had a long standing presence on King Road. Contributes to King City streetseape in terms of scale and design. 2220 King Road – Verbal Page 37 of 74 Report (J. Elkow) THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING BY-LAW NUMBER.. 82-144 A - A BY-LAWVI TO DESIGNATE. THE PROPERTY KNOWN-4 MUNICIPALLY. AS. 6 HIGHWAY,, NO. 27 NORTH. AS BEING OF ARCHITECTURAL AND/OR HISTORICAL. VALUE. OR INTEREST..r - ‘ WHEREAS section 29 of The—. Ontario3 HeritageI n Act, 1974I authorizesI : — the Council of a municipalityI to enact2 1- by-lawsan-; to designate5 real-» property, including allv buildings I and5 structuresI -v thereon, to be- of ~ — architectural or historic. value or interest;I II andI WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of King ‘ ' has caused to be servedI- I on the4 owners»~ of the lands< : and~ premises3-. known as "The Hambly House"I>' at- 6 Highway.; No.- 27 Northu and1- upon the I " ‘ ' Ontario Heritage Foundation, notice * of intentionv to soV designate:I ' F ' ' the aforesaid real property-' and= hasv: caused: 5- such» notice - of intentionA to be published in theI sameIl‘v». newspaperp»~I.''' having'' general-' ‘ * circulation- in ‘ ‘ the municipality onceI for eachI— of three .I consecutive= V weeks:r“.! I and:1 ’ ‘ WHEREAS no notice of objection to the I proposedI" designation-I I hasII - _ been served on the I clerk§ of the municipality; ' " ‘ THEREFORE the I Council of the I CorporationI of the - TownshipI of King enacts as follows:‘I ,-. ,_ 7 _ _ _ _ _ 1. There is designated. as. being of architectural . value or interest A. ' the real property known asII "The » EamblyI House"II at-. 6 Highway No. — - 27 North, more » particularly described.. ;.-. in schedule. . 3 A hereto.V — - - - — - - The municipal solicitor is hereby-. authorized »., to cause a copy , of this by-lawI‘ to be-I registeredw- I I I against.2 I : the ‘- property4 described-_- as "' in Schedule A heretoI I in the I! properw land- registryI 5 office. ‘. ‘ - ' - 3. The Clerk is hereby:. authorized 1.. to cause.-A a copy of this by-law-. to ' ‘ ‘ be served on the ‘ er of the I aforesaid-' property- andI on the I - ' ‘ Ontario Heritage u- Foundation and1 to causeV notice -. of the passing of this by-law-» to be—. publishedI ~ in the - same~- :5 newspaper: having- - general circulation. in the I municipality- once for eachI of v three . consecutive weeks.,.-,- I READ a FIRST and SECOND time this 1st day of November, 1982. ., . * Clerk‘ V‘ - - ., READ a THIRD time andI FINALLY PASSED this I let dayI of November,I 1982. ' . T 4 6012 King Road; Hambly Page 38 of 74 House – Verbal Report (J. n a SCHEDULE"A" TO ALL AND SINGULAR that certain parcel or tr ct of land, situate, lying and being in the Township of King, in the Regional Municipality of York (formerly in the Village of Nobleton, in the Township of King, in the County of York) and being part of Lot 6 in Concession 9 of the Township of King more particularly described as being composed of the easterly two hundred and seventy (270) feet of Lot 1 as shon on Registered Plan 19 deposited in the Registry office for the Registry Division of the North Riding of the County of York on the 11th day of February, 1870. 6012 King Road; Hambly Page 39 of 74 House – Verbal Report (J. Last updated 2/28/2011 Listed on Register, Hambly House Part IV designated 6012 King Road 82-144 PROPERTY INFORMATION Community Nobleton Roll Number 061 390 (Legal) Property CON 9 PT LOT 6 RS65R1965 PTS 1 & 3 Description ROW OVER PT 2 Current Registered WALLABEE LIMITED Owner(s) Property Dimensions 29170.00 SF Current Use Commercial Reference Number 9-6-1 Binder G HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Importance Architectural, historical Construction Date c. 1885 Builder Taken in 1983. From Heritage Original Owner Hambly, Charles Original Use Residential Inventory Binder G. Previous Registered Previous Owners Uses Significant Owners Historical Features Likely replaced earlier house on site. ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE Exterior Wall Brick Plan Style Asymmetrical Number of Bays Number of Storeys 2 Architectural Features 3 storey tower with mansard roof, iron cresting; 2-storey projecting bays on south, east sides; bargeboard, finials, urns on gables; brick chimney on west side; yellow brick quoins, banding, segmental arches over and rectangles under windows; front verandah; gable roof. Alterations Since Restored in 1981. Construction General Condition Good Contribution to Vista Good Harmony of Building's Architecture with Surrounding Buildings Good Harmony of Building's Present Use with Neighbouring Land Uses Good Physical Contribution of Building to its Environment (architectural details)Good Vulnerabilities (areas of special concern) Unique/rare architecture. 6012 King Road; Hambly Page 40 of 74 House – Verbal Report (J. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 15 John Street, King City Reference No. 4-6-4 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 3855 15th Sideroad on the Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its architectural and contextual value. BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1853 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 1983. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 15 John Street is 1.5 storeys tall on a rectangular plan. The dwelling has a centre gable roof. The dwelling has two bays and both front facing windows have sidelights. The doorway has a rectangular transom and sidelights. HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE The dwelling dates back to 1853, when it would have been located on a 100 acre parcel of land (the east half of lot 6, concession 4) owned by Nathaniel Pearson Crossley. Crossley later offered a portion of the lands for the purpose of starting what became the King City Cemetery. Heritage Property Page 41 of 74 Evaluations CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the character of the surrounding area. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 15 John Street provides a simple interpretation of the Ontario Cottage style commonly seen throughout the Township. While the dwelling has undergone significant repairs over the years, due to its age and historical association staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value. Therefore, staff recommends that this property be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 42 of 74 Evaluations mm“ 37112111 ummnmmxy 15 John Slreel rkorarrv IIFORIIATION Cnlnmuilv Iangcny mnnmmurmm (usual: nunnynm 366l0T2 Dsxll?ion ununmiaeaa wamm, Jmn Framxs o-nuts) Wov?lvhilievlslmns 13417 nnsr Onullllse Raesllulal Ibleruuxllulhevb?-4 Bi|d=1F |Is1oIucAL SIGNIHCAMCE mum-meummcnua, nsmmz cmmuaim mm :2 1m mm: orisiuoun. Omil lllse Raesrlulal nuiousmsinnna nmmn,hm; Pn.-wmus on-us Uses snuur-2-no-ms nr atllbs mmnuPgsx.cnmey.nnu: nimuiznraues Rzbatndcbsermrmdnmdztlnaxmllv. AR¢HfI'E¢‘I'llRAL s|GuIFIcAm:E Elhsiu w.n sum nu. style mcmgua: lIIllIII2nlBIIS3 nmmaasnor-.-1:15 Aniihillll ran-scam game. gall: mm Amaiunsmoeznummmmmmsnemm-nmIummn.mu.Iannam.x-mmsnnus (:4-usw-u:io..n:uenm.mmex:un:munemu:vvx:a-snzncn, Gausll cmaionam mmmmmwm (‘mud nummuaminnnrsuuinmnmmsqnmnnuu humus (‘ma nmnmyamumrsnaunuu-nrugmnuunugg (‘mud ?lysizl cmnm. ol mung In :3 Enviunlnull lkliitnsxlnl aaaspum vunnmmmes was orsnow:oonxlll Heritage Property Page 43 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 24 Kingsworth Road, King City Reference No. 4-9-1 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the property known as 24 Kingsworth Road be considered for inclusion onto the Heritage Register for its BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1956 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 2010. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 24 Kingsworth Road features a two-storey asymmetrical plan. The dwelling demonstrates elements consistent with the Art Moderne style, and includes geometric elements with straight lines, and square or rectangular window openings. Heritage Property Page 44 of 74 Evaluations HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE The dwelling is located within Kingscross Estates, thought to be the first “estate” subdivision development in Canada. Kingscross Estates was developed in 1954 by Joseph Gelleny and Gath Ltd. CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the estate residential character of the area. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 24 Kingsworth Road is a sprawling and modern residential estate. While there are few similar dwellings within Kingscross Estates, or the Township at large, the uniqueness of this dwelling is significant. The Kingscross Estates are defined by a varied mixture of architectural styles on 2+ acres parcels designed to complement the natural landform of the area. As such, staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value. Therefore, staff recommend that this property be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 45 of 74 Evaluations 24 Kingsworlh Road rkorarrv IIFORIIATION cmmu-ily nun mu lIIllm2(n23937 (usual: nweny PLAN 4n LOT in Dsxll?i?l Onull misem: m, nusuywan um o-nuts) noveny ninumms as was Ollull Ilse Raesllulal muuunmmwc Bi|d=1NA |Is1oIucAL SIGNIHCAMCE I-man-me Nmmecmli cmmuaim om ms mm: ori?ul (Tuna Omil I Ilse Raes?ulul Plvvious mixeua Pn.-wmus on-us Uses Slllufuxll on-us nimuiznraues u:mx:mmnnrasxussE_&ue»e4wean¢wwmsax.J,e:|uvya.ans mmw-yzanmmanm-ea-umbunnsnnamm AR¢HfI'E¢‘I'llRAL s|GuIFIcAm:E Elhsiu w.n mm: mm style Myn-mun: nmmmuarts ll|lmaolSIorI.'IS 2 Aniihillll rams (‘munleimz mums will mumnu: ma sum: or momma:wnwlt ave-Ir-gs Amazons Since C4xIs1n|aion Gausll cmaioncm-1 mmmmmwm (‘mud numm-yamimnrsuuinsmnmmsunmnmuu manna: (‘ma ?um?wdmiluilfbhcsunuseuinlld?bulil?lanuseg (‘ma ?lysizl cmnm. ol mung In :3 Enviunlnull lkliitnsxlnl aaaspum Vlllnuizlilzestlusalsneull oolcxlil un-zuenzemm» Heritage Property Page 46 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 75 Kingsworth Road, King City Reference No. 4-10-2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 75 Kingsworth Road on the Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its architectural and contextual value. BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1973 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 2010. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 75 Kingsworth Road features a two-storey asymmetrical plan. The dwelling features geometric elements with straight lines, and rectangular window openings. There are six prominently displayed rectangular columns, featuring circular openings above the roof line. HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE The dwelling is located within Kingscross Estates, thought to be the first “estate” subdivision development in Canada. Kingscross Estates was developed in 1954 by Joseph Gelleny and Heritage Property Page 47 of 74 Evaluations Gath Ltd. CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the estate residential character of the area. AREAS OF CONCERN None. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 75 Kingsworth Road is a modern residential estate, punctuated by its distinctive columns. Since its initial construction the dwelling has seen minimal alterations and remains in a good state of repair. The architectural style is representative of a modern style unique within the Township. The Kingscross Estates are defined by a varied mixture of architectural styles on 2+ acres parcels designed to complement the natural landform of the area. As such, staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value. Therefore, staff recommend that this property be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 48 of 74 Evaluations n.4-ma mun Lmm on ummxv 75 Kingsworlh Road rkorarrv IIFORIIATION cmmu-ily nun mun:-nnmmms l|J!Ill]I>lw¢I|vPI.AN54!1LoT21ABLKA Dsxll?i?l Onull miaeaa PETERS.MARGIT ROSE o-nuts) noveny Dilievlsunns 557 was Ollull Ilse Raesllulal Iblerunx mung um um: NA |Is1oIucAL SIGNIHCAMCE moon-meNmmecmli cmmuaimnm can mm: orisiulounu nuxnsssr,rm Omil lllse Raes?ulul nuiousminarna Pn.-wmus on-us Uses suuur-xno-umwas-s,n.x....=mrn onnnunuxwanm nimuiznraues u:mx:mmnnrasxussE_&ue»e4wean¢wwmsax.J,e:|uvya.ans mmw-yzanmmanm-ea-umbunnsnnamm AR¢HfI'E¢‘I'llRAL s|GuIFIcAm:E Elhsiu w.n mm: mm style Myn-mun: nmmmuarts ll|lmaolSIorI.'IS 2 Aniihillll rams (‘munlemc euIIu§.sI1L?B vmtmru lav: Amazons Since C4xIs1n|aion Gausll cmaioncm-1 mmmmmwm (‘mud numm-yamimnrsuuinsmnmmsunmnmuu manna: (‘ma ?um?wdmiluilfbhcsunuseuinlld?bulil?lanuseg (‘ma ?lysizl cmnm. ol mung In :3 Enviunlnull lkliitnsxlnl aaaspum Vlllnuizlilzestlusalsneull oolcxlil un-zuenzemm» Heritage Property Page 49 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 30 Station Road, King City Reference No. 4-4-2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 30 Station Road on the Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its physical and contextual value. BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1896 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 1983. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 12738 Weston Road is 1.5 storeys and displays a rectangular plan with a gable roof and brick chimney on the east end. The dwelling has a stone foundation and the exterior wall is composed of brick. There are two offset gables at the front of the building with narrow rectangular windows. The dwelling has five bays, with all of the windows featuring lugstills and arch radiating voissoirs. Heritage Property Page 50 of 74 Evaluations HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE There is no known historical / associative value. CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the historic Station Road streetscape. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 30 Station Road remains in a state of good repair with minimal alterations over the years. The most significant of which was the removal of a front verandah, which can be noted across the midpoint of the front façade. Staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value and recommend that this property be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 51 of 74 Evaluations 30 Slalion Road PROPEIITV INFORMATION cmmu-ily Iaracvly mmmmunanua (LenI)nnnnycoouPrLm4Puu2sLms11a.1n Dsull?i?n nsarmmeg mzr 2n umun Rlistzrnd van dun Hand, Animus o-nuts) pmneny Dillensmns 1mm sr Dmlnl uu Raesllulal Iblerunx llunber 4+2 Binder r H|§TOR|CAL SIGNIFICANCE nnnomnoeummcnua, nsmmz cmmmmun om mes " Ori?ll om. $'s'.''_.‘? _' Previous Reisteml o-ms sniumznl cums nimuiunrem-as Panmanusmcsmgamsmve ARcHrrEc1uRAL slmuncnucz Ensim Will mm P|In style Rediuuhr ummnmm-ys 5 nummsuzmys 15 Mdibmnl Feiueslslalziesm lrunf:(:3de_ um nanwltrmzrglhvulrlmrg smnecmmm, um mum; on and in ms: was AltnnIioInSinoeFlwnvu:rnhh|:|m1va1PlIxhI963 EmIs1n|c1ion Ganail cmmionrar cammmmwm (‘mud Harlll?llv ol mnanrs Ammmn mm surmuminu mninus (‘ma H:nlI0llvo1B|il1in|l'iPl!senIUsewillIll1!'?l>oIli|?Ll|dUse: (‘mm mm: Cnmriblllion ol mung In its Envimnlnull livuibmnl -seuasrmm Vlllmcizlinesl-enolinecil conueml Sasdrrenlsxtuzdxsmutzlurvnl, Heritage Property Page 52 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 45 Station Road, King City Reference No. 4-3-1 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 45 Station Road on the Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its physical and contextual value. ,‘7: BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1948 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 2000. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 45 Station Road features a two-storey square plan with a hip roof. There are hipped dormers on the east and west ends of the roof, and a brick chimney on the east. The exterior wall is composed of ornamental sculpted concrete block, with quoining on the corners. The windows are framed with lugsills, and lintels. Heritage Property Page 53 of 74 Evaluations HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE There is no known historical / associative value. CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the historic Station Road streetscape. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 45 Station Road contributes well to the streetscape of Station Road. The ornamental sculpted concrete block exterior is unique to the area and has been well maintained over the years. There is a one-storey addition to the dwelling, however it is located at the rear and does not detract from the dwelling’s heritage attributes. As such, staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value and recommend that this property be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 54 of 74 Evaluations 45 Slalion Road PROPERTV INFORMATION Cnlnmulilv Iar-qcvly mu nu-nmmannsa (Lead) wmneny PLAN wasLOTS 31 TO an nuuumion Cunanl Reaimma nsuoua em ovlluls) pmneny Dillenslmns 27443 nsr Cunlnl uu Resllulal Rzlemnu lumber ‘>31 aim: mx HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE lmpolhnoe Nmmecnua, mom: Cnnsmlclinn Date c I9I? oriaim mum Mlnlm, mm pmious Reaimma o-mu SIrl|l?n:nI o-mu HislnIiI;:lFellIles Panmanusmcsmnamsmne ARcHrrEc1uRAL SIGNIFICANCE Extaimwa Onmxmn P|In Style mum nu-mm M says 3 llumbev m scams2 Avdiletilnl Fellllesollamu? smug: mum um memr.mulls. sits, Iuuasznamanew mkmr, upped mm Ammms Since unmmmm Gunuil CnImiIiM|6md umlnmlmn m was Gmd Harlllnllvm amnanrsArumemn mm surmuminn Biil?n?i Gmd Harlllnllvm amnanrsmsem use -im Ileiamm-in Lam Uses Gmd pt-vsinal Cnmrimllion m mung In its Envimnmall 1-mmemnn deuisfar vunnmmmes I-us of mu’: concern) Heritage Property Page 55 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 50 Station Road, King City Reference No. 4-4-9 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 50 Station Road on the Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its physical and contextual value. BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1890 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 2000. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 50 Station Road features a 1.5 storey L-shaped plan with a gable roof and cornice returns. There is a centre gable on the east side of the dwelling in addition to a brick chimney. HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE There is no known historical / associative value. CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the historic streetscape of Station Road. Heritage Property Page 56 of 74 Evaluations AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 50 Station Road has seen alterations since its original construction and remains in good condition. The front porch has been enclosed and a garage was added to the rear of the dwelling in 2001. However, the dwelling is one of the few remaining original buildings along Station Road. As such, staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value and recommend that this property be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 57 of 74 Evaluations mm“ 37112111 ummnmmxy 50 Slalion Road rkorarrv IIFORIIATION Cnlnmuilv Iangcny mnnmmunancan l|—EIlllI>loIIeI|vP|.ANB5PrL0TS7IA72Rs66RIIxE9 DsxII?onFARTS$6&2I Ollull was-'s1=m:«mum orm\RIo INC o-nuts) nmertynimsums 23925 nnsr Onullllse Raesllulal Ibluruux mung us Bi|d=vNA |Is1oIucAL SIGNIHCAMCE muomnoeummcnua, nsmmz cmmuaim mm :2 mm snuur-zno-ms nimuiznraues Panmanusmcsmgamuve AR¢HfI'E¢‘I'llRAL s|euIFIcAm:E Elhsiuwill mm: mm style Lsnavea nmmmuarts ll|lmaolSIorI.'IS 15 uuanumnnrau-=seauevutuummumuxm,uxnmym.ms Aluiionssiloe C4xIs1n|aion Ganail cmaioncm-1 mmmmmwm (‘mud Ilim?lvolnqiluill?lrdiksmlevnim Slnmlnilu manna: (‘ma ?xm?wdmiluilfbhaunuuuinlld?bulil?lanuseg (‘ma ?lysizl cmnm. ol mung In :3 Enviunlnull liliitnsxlnl aaaspum vunnmmmes was orsnow:oonxlll Heritage Property Page 58 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 38 Clearview Heights, King City Reference No. 3-4-5 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 38 Clearview Heights on the Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its physical and contextual value. BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1880 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 1983. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 38 Clearview Heights was originally designed following a 1864 “Canada Farmer” Plan for a suburban villa / farmhouse. Of the remaining original dwelling, the dwelling follows an L-shaped plan with an offset gable. The exterior wall is composed of brick with decorative quoining. The windows feature brick lugsills and arch radiating voussoirs. A one-storey bay projects on the front of the dwelling. HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE The property was originally owned by Isaac McBride, with Herman McBride later having possession of the dwelling in the early 1900’s. The McBride family was very active in the early Heritage Property Page 59 of 74 Evaluations community of Springhill, operating a grain business associated with the coming of the railway. Isaac McBride also operated McBride’s Hotel on Station Road, which was later closed following prohibition. The land on which the new United Church was built on in 1963 was donated by Mr. and Mrs. Herman McBride. CONTEXTUAL VALUE The remaining portion of the original dwelling is consistent with the historic character of King City, however the immediate surrounding area is comprised of significantly newer development. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 38 Clearview Heights has undergone significant alterations recently. The eastern portion of the dwelling has been completely removed, while a large addition is currently being added to the western side of the dwelling. Prior to these significant changes, the dwelling was in a poor state of repair. A front verandah which spanned the front façade, aside from the centre bay, significantly detracted from the heritage attributes of the dwelling. As part of the ongoing alterations to the dwelling, the remaining original attributes are being restored. Given the architectural value remaining and the high historical association with the dwelling, staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value. Therefore, staff recommend that this property be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 60 of 74 Evaluations |as1-nu-mauzazanil um: on summary 38 Clearview Heighls PROPERTV INFORMATION Cnlnmulilv Iar-qcvly mu nu-nmmanasa (Lead) wmneny PLAN 459 LOT 21 nuuumion Cunanl Reaimma Nlxmsi. Dzm! ovlluls) pmneny Dillensnmns am ansr Cunlnl uu Resllulal Rzlemnu llumber 3421 nine: r HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE nmnomnoeArmmecnua, nsmmz Cnnsmnilinn Date mm Oriaill Game! ms:-newIsaac ';'£'r'."..."?....""' Previous nuaimm: o.-mu surllmnanlcums Histnliul Felllles ARcHrrEc1uRAL SIGNIFICANCE Extaim W: mm P|In style Mvnnnnul nu-mm M says llumhev m scams :5 Au:lIile1:lllIlFellIlesIB6l'Czanh rannaruz:nnaecmnMvnusmltl sue:nmxmmr-eym easl sae:uuusen»e«:nav:mamaxnunrs,ma.samemxxsa:numxanarnrea red Altumimls Since &v2l1 eaetecuzra?dixxns dune run I: «an mmng flame arldinrl.garage unmmmm added In east sue Gunuil CrumilMmFar umlnhulmnmvlsta (‘mud Harlll?llv m amnanrsArumemn mm surmuminn Biil?n?i (‘ma Harlll?llv m amnanrsmsem use -im Ileiamm-in Lam Uses (‘ma pt-vsinal Cnmrimllion m amnmaIn its Ellvimnrm!l1lIll:lIile1:lIlilI!eIJisK‘mud Vullmizlillesl-easofsnecil conum) smnssumsgsmneglem Heritage Property Page 61 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 104 Martin Street, King City Reference No. 4-7-1 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 104 Martin Street on the Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its physical and contextual value. BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1859 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 1983. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 10 Old Church Road displays a 1.5-storey rectangular plan with a gable roof and a centre dormer on the front façade. The dwelling is constructed from stone, with brick chimneys on the east and west ends of the roof. A partially enclosed verandah spans the front façade. HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE There is no known historical / associative value. Heritage Property Page 62 of 74 Evaluations CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the character of the area. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 104 Martin Street has seen some modifications over the years. The verandah along the front façade was enclosed prior to 1983, and a two-car garage was added to the rear of the dwelling in 1968. While the enclosing of the verandah does impact the historic character of the dwelling, the remaining heritage attributes such as the stone exterior remain in good condition and provide the opportunity for future restoration. Staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value and recommend that this property be considered for inclusion on the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 63 of 74 Evaluations ham... mun ummnmmxy 104 Marlin Slreel rkorarrv IIFORIIATION cmmu-ily Iarucny mnnmmmmaaa (usual: nwenv run an LOT an Dsxll?i?l Onull Rb?ttrnd Ewell mm: mum Emma o-nuts) nwerlynim-mm: 311541nnsr Ollull Ilse Raesllulal Ibluruux mung u—1 um: r |Is1oIucAL SIGNIHCAMCE ...... ,mm... "W c...... m... M. C 159 m... o..,....—— 0.... c._.a..,...... _4... omin .....n...... af."..":-.2.-'2 Plvvious Rb?ttrld Pn.-wlnus 0..., u... s.....r....o....., m, McPlu, hunts ..i.....—... 5...... AR¢HfI'E¢‘I'llRAL s|euIFIcAm:E Elhsiuwill an nu. style mcmgua: lIIllIInnlBIIS numaasux-.-rs15 ArI1ih1Il:lFu§ll=CuImdxxm:r4x\fluIf:;3de,mdxmlmeymmnmdiusunsmhbrmrt mane?udshueenuutvelznnalmmlu?mmlmnhpdgmmlummzsi AI2IiioInS'lIoeVuiIlalIu|dn$1 mumI9Ki:mosInlEyIln1ixm mnuemn um, C4xIs1n|aion Ganail cmaioncm-1 mmmmmwm (‘mud nzmm-yamimnrsuuinsmnmmsunmnmuu manna: (‘ma ?xm?wdmiluilfbhaunuuuinlld?bulil?lanuseg (‘ma ?lysizl cmnm. ol mung In :3 Enviunlnull liliitnsxlnl aaaspum vunnmmmes was orsnow:oonxlll Heritage Property Page 64 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 12720 Keele Street, King City Reference No. 4-4-1 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 12720 Keele Street on the Heritage Register under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its physical and contextual value. BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1900 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 1983. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 12720 Keele Street displays a two-storey square plan with a pyramidal roof. There is a centre dormer and brick chimneys on the north and south sides of the roof. The dwelling has two bays, with the windows featuring wooden lugsills and the upper two windows and door featuring plain stone lintels. The verandah runs along the front façade, and is supported by wooden columns on brick peirs Heritage Property Page 65 of 74 Evaluations HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE There is no known historical or associative value. CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the character of the streetscape. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 12720 Keele Street has seen minimal modifications over the years and appears to retain the original architectural character. Given the age and well-maintained condition of the dwelling, staff are satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value. Therefore, staff recommend that this property be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 66 of 74 Evaluations ...«-ma... zmmnl Lists! on nmmzry 12720 Keele Slreel PROPERTV INFORMATION cmnmu-my Iar-qcvly mu NIll|he¢n36122 (Le1:l)Pnw!¢lv PLAN an LOT :1 mr 42 nuuumion Cunanl Reaimma cmmno, EVEIJNA euussppnm ovlluls) pmneny llillenslnns n51 mes Cumnl uu Resrlulal Rzlemnu llumber M1 aim. r HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE nmnomnoeArmmecnua, nsmmz Cnnsmlclinn Date c um cm... 0...... '~.,,,_,~:=_:;---r p...... mam... 0...... s.....m....0...... Histnliul Felllles ARcHrrEc1uRAL SIGNIFICANCE Extaimwa mm P|In Style mum nu-nan M says 2 llumbev m scams2 Avu?emnlFemIsPWImKhlm1_m¢memxrm(vsamah:kxah¢?hd?mnn;:demmmmu\ mums....n.nne.s,sn.e sllsamiimek hmxcllmrleysmrmmztlsuulh sues Ammiom Since nannmmm Gunuil CnndiIMmFar unmlhulllrnn m mm (‘mm Harlll?llv m amnanrsArumemn mm surmuminn Biil?n?i (‘ma Harlll?llv m amnanrsmsem use -im Ileiamm-in Lam Uses (‘mud pt-vsinal Cnmrimllion m auinma In its Envimnmall 1-vummnn aeuisrmm vunmunumes(am of mu’: conum) rmm mm mnmns.s paema Heritage Property Page 67 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING REPORT TO HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Planning Department Prepared By: Jeffrey Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator RE: Heritage Property Evaluation 12845 Keele Street, King City Reference No. 3-4-3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends including the property known as 12845 Keele Street not be considered for inclusion on the Township’s Heritage Register and that it be removed from the Built Heritage Inventory for the reasons expressed in more detail below. BACKGROUND This dwelling was built circa 1890 and was added to the Heritage Inventory in 1983. HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES PHYSICAL/DESIGN The dwelling at 12845 Keele Street displays a two-storey square plan with a gable roof. There are two gables on the south side of the building and a brick chimney to the east. The windows feature segmental arches and concrete lugsills. A verandah with a sloping roof partially covers the front façade. HISTORICAL/ASSOCIATIVE VALUE There is no known historical / associative value. Heritage Property Page 68 of 74 Evaluations CONTEXTUAL VALUE The dwelling contributes to the streetscape. AREAS OF CONCERN No outstanding concerns. EVALUATION OF HERITAGE VALUE The dwelling located at 12845 Keele Street has been modified over the years, most notably in covering over the exterior brick wall with stucco. In addition, the decorative window shutters on the front of the dwelling are not original elements. Given there is no known historical / associative value to the property staff are not satisfied that this property meets the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural heritage value. Therefore, staff recommend that this property not be considered for inclusion onto the Township’s Heritage Register and that it be removed from the Built Heritage Inventory. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Built Heritage Inventory Page Heritage Property Page 69 of 74 Evaluations n..«-mm zazann um: on summary 12845 Keele Slreel PROPERTV INFORMATION Cnlllmulilv Iangcny mu ummunas :93 (Le1:aI)I>ror-my PLAN as LOT 3 Duulmion Cunanl Reaimma HAMAWAV.Ammgw msuaznc o-mm pmneny |TllIens|nns mm onsr Cunlnl uu Resrlulal Rzlemnu lumber 1+: aim: r HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE lmpolhnoe Nmnecnui, nsmmn Cnnsmnilinn Date c um oriaiu mum pmious Reaimma o-mu SIrl|l?n:nI o-mu Histnliul Felllles ARcHrrEc1uRAL SIGNIFICANCE Extaimwa mm mm Style mum nu-mm M says llumhev m scams2 Mu?emnlkmls?mal?ulmmlu?lmm?x?urm?segmu?auesmumnammdmx?. mugauesmsumnganezgaxeuutmumemnawsins Ammimusinoesnmmcsameapv-xu2nm mnmmm Gunuil CnndiIion(‘mud umlnmlmn m was (‘uni Harlll?llv m amnanrsAwllilecnle mm surmuminn Biil?n?i (‘ma Harlll?llv m amnanrsmsem use -im Ileiamm-in Lam Uses (‘ma pt-vsinal Cnmrimllion of mine In its Ellvimnrm!l1lIll:lIile1:lIlilI!eIJisK‘mud vunnmmmes (am of mu’: concern) Heritage Property Page 70 of 74 Evaluations THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1st, 2015 AT 7:00 P.M. MUNICIPAL OFFICE – PLANNING BOARD ROOM 2075 KING ROAD, KING CITY The Heritage Advisory Committee (HAC) met at 7:00 pm in the Council Chambers, Township of King Municipal Building, 2075 King Road, King City. The following were present at this meeting: The following were absent at this meeting: Committee Members: Committee Members: Peter Iaboni, Chair Todd Coles Augusto Nalli, Vice Chair Christopher Creighton Councillor Debbie Schaefer Michelle Hubert Kelly Mathews Staff: Jeff Elkow, Planner II / Heritage Coordinator Public: Julie Thompson, Engel & Volkers 1. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS None. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Christopher Creighton, seconded by Kelly Mathews and carried that the Agenda for the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting of April 1, 2015 be adopted. 3. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST None. 4. AGENDA ITEMS 4.1 Heritage Permit Application 13456 Dufferin Street; St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church – Written Report (J. Elkow) Julie Thompson, Manager of Engel and Volkers at 13456 Dufferin Street, was present to speak to her application for Heritage Permit to install awnings on the three southern windows and two eastern facing windows. The applicant stated Minutes of the Heritage Page 71 of 74 Advisory Committee The Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 1, 2015 that the intent of the alteration was to mitigate heat, add shade, and help protect the windows from the elements. The awnings are not moving, and would be installed in the concrete surrounding the windows, but may result in the puncturing of the stone heritage attributes. Kelly Mathews suggested the applicant consider installing blinds on the inside of the building to avoid any impact of the heritage features. The applicant agreed to look into this option further. A motion was made by Peter Iaboni, seconded by Augusto Nalli and carried that recommendation to Council on Heritage Permit Application HP-15-01 be deferred until the next Committee meeting. 4.2 2015 Goals / Work Plan The Committee discussed the approved 2015 Work Plan and delegated tasks. Of note, the Committee discussed forming a Doors Open subcommittee featuring representatives from the Committee and other stakeholder groups. Peter Iaboni volunteered to contact Kathleen Fry, Museum Curator to receive guidance on the last Doors Open in King Township. Michelle Hubert volunteered to develop draft policies for the Heritage Plaque Program. The Committee will look into getting more content available on the Township’s website, potentially including a newsletter or featured property write ups. The Committee will continue to work with Planning staff to review properties on the Built Heritage Inventory for inclusion on the Heritage Register. Jeff Elkow indicated that a report to Council on the reviewed Nobleton properties will be coming in the following months. Presentations will also be given by Jeff Elkow to the Committee in the future help provide additional information about heritage evaluation. 4.3 Maintenance of Township Cemeteries – Verbal Report (P. Iaboni, A. Nalli) The Committee received a verbal report from Peter Iaboni and Augusto Nalli regarding how the Committee should approach the continued maintenance of Township Cemeteries. The Department of Parks, Recreation & Culture currently is responsible for this practice, however there are no established guidelines for how this work should be undertaken. Additional research to be undertaken. 4.4 Jesse Lloyd House – Verbal Report (C. Creighton) The Committee received a verbal report from Christopher Creighton regarding the Jesse Lloyd House. Christopher Creighton stated he would continue to research this property. 4.5 15310 Keele Street; Plaque – Verbal Report – (P. Iaboni) The Committee received a verbal report from Peter Iaboni regarding the plaque at 15310 Keele Street. The property owner had contacted him to inquire if the date on the plaque was incorrect. The Committee reviewed the information provided and determined it to be inconclusive. Peter Iaboni agreed to follow up with the owner. 4.6 12936 Keele Street; Kingcrafts – Verbal Report (J. Elkow) The Committee received a verbal report from Jeff Elkow regarding the property located at 12936 Keele Street. Since the previous Committee meeting, representatives from Kingcrafts have informed staff that they are no longer interested in exploring designation of the property at this time. Minutes of the Heritage Page 72 of 74 Advisory Committee The Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 1, 2015 4.7 17225 Highway 27; Sproule House – Verbal Report (J. Elkow) The Committee received a verbal report from Jeff Elkow regarding the property located at 17225 Highway 27. The agent for the property has indicated that discussions are ongoing with the owner of the property regarding the details of their forthcoming proposal. The agent stated he would arrange a meeting with staff once their plans are finalized to discuss next steps. 4.8 7305 18th Sideroad; Rainey Farmhouse – Verbal Report (J. Elkow) The Committee received a verbal report from Jeff Elkow regarding the property located at 7305 18th Sideroad. The property is currently designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. A representative from the property has been in contact with staff regarding the possibility of removing a portion of the farmhouse designated under the Act, or potentially rezoning the property to add a second dwelling. Staff will provide an update if either project advances to the stage of application. 4.9 Heritage Brochures – Verbal Report (J. Elkow) The Committee received a verbal report from Jeff Elkow regarding the Township’s brochures for the “Municipal Heritage Register” and “A Property Owner’s Guide to Altering Designated Properties”. The Committee reviewed the brochures and provided feedback for ways to improve upon the brochures. 4.10 Heritage Property Evaluations The Committee voted to recommend to Council that the following properties be added to the Township’s Heritage Register: 13681 Dufferin Street 13235 Weston Road 10 Old Church Road 25 Laskay Mills Drive 3855 15th Sideroad 13980 Weston Road 14450 Weston Road The Committee voted to recommend to Council that the following properties not be added to the Township’s Heritage Register and be removed from the Township’s Built Heritage Inventory: 15 Old Church Road 12738 Weston Road 12868 Weston Road 12952 Weston Road 12990 Weston Road 5. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 5.1 Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes (a) Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting of March 4, 2015. Minutes of the Heritage Page 73 of 74 Advisory Committee The Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 1, 2015 A motion was made by Augusto Nalli, seconded by Christopher Creighton and carried that the Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting of March 4, 2015 be adopted. 6. CORRESPONDENCE/INFORMATION ITEMS 6.1 Upcoming Events (a) Ontario Heritage Conference (April 30 – May 3) (b) Doors Open (April – October) (c) “Eaton Hall: Pride of King Township” Book Launch (June 27) (d) “A Shift in the Landscape” Screening (June 27 at 6:00pm) (e) Brûlé-Wendats Expedition 400th Anniversary (September 11 – 13) 7. NEW BUSINESS None. 8. NEXT MEETING 8.1 The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, May 5, 2015. 9. MOTION TO ADJOURN MEETING A motion was made by Christopher Creighton, seconded by Peter Iaboni and carried that the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting be adjourned at 9:30 pm. Minutes of the Heritage Page 74 of 74 Advisory Committee