DOCSLIB.ORG

Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/22786 SHARE Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization DETAILS 113 pages | 8.5 x 11 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-21405-6 | DOI 10.17226/22786 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Sheri Ernico, Bruce Boudreau, Dan Reimer, and Steve Van Beek; Airport Cooperative Research Program; Transportation Research Board; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine FIND RELATED TITLES Confidential [email protected] 2020-01-15 16:51:21 +0000 Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM ACRP REPORT 66 Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization Sheri Ernico Bruce Boudreau LEIGHFISHER Burlingame, CA Dan Reimer KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWEll LLP Denver, CO Steve Van Beek LEIGHFISHER/ENO TRANSPORTATION FOUNDATION Reston, VA Confidential [email protected] 2020-01-15 16:51:21 +0000 Subscriber Categories Aviation • Administration and Management • Finance Research sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 2012 www.TRB.org Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM ACRP REPORT 66 Airports are vital national resources. They serve a key role in trans­ Project 01­14 portation of people and goods and in regional, national, and inter­ ISSN 1935­9802 national commerce. They are where the nation’s aviation system ISBN 978­0­309­21405­6 connects with other modes of transportation and where federal respon­ Library of Congress Control Number 2012936874 sibility for managing and regulating air traffic operations intersects with the role of state and local governments that own and operate most © 2012 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. airports. Research is necessary to solve common operating problems, to adapt appropriate new technologies from other industries, and to introduce innovations into the airport industry. The Airport Coopera­ COPYRIGHT INFORMATION tive Research Program (ACRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the airport industry can develop innovative near­term solutions Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously to meet demands placed on it. published or copyrighted material used herein. The need for ACRP was identified in TRB Special Report 272: Airport Research Needs: Cooperative Solutions in 2003, based on a study spon­ Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this sored by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The ACRP carries publication for classroom and not­for­profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB or FAA endorsement out applied research on problems that are shared by airport operating of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the agencies and are not being adequately addressed by existing federal material in this document for educational and not­for­profit uses will give appropriate research programs. It is modeled after the successful National Coopera­ acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. For other uses of tive Highway Research Program and Transit Cooperative Research Pro­ the material, request permission from CRP. gram. The ACRP undertakes research and other technical activities in a variety of airport subject areas, including design, construction, main­ tenance, operations, safety, security, policy, planning, human resources, NOTICE and administration. The ACRP provides a forum where airport operators can cooperatively address common operational problems. The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the Airport Cooperative Research The ACRP was authorized in December 2003 as part of the Vision Program, conducted by the Transportation Research Board with the approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. 100­Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act. The primary participants in the ACRP are (1) an independent governing board, the ACRP Oversight The members of the technical panel selected to monitor this project and to review this Committee (AOC), appointed by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. The report was reviewed by the technical panel and accepted for publication according to Transportation with representation from airport operating agencies, other procedures established and overseen by the Transportation Research Board and approved stakeholders, and relevant industry organizations such as the Airports by the Governing Board of the National Research Council. Council International­North America (ACI­NA), the American Associa­ The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the tion of Airport Executives (AAAE), the National Association of State Confidentialresearchers who performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Aviation Officials (NASAO), Airlines for America (A4A), and the Airport Research Board, the National Research Council, or the program sponsors. Consultants Council (ACC) as vital links to the airport community; (2) The Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, the National Research the TRB as program manager and secretariat for the governing board; Council, and the sponsors of the Airport Cooperative Research Program do not endorse and (3) the FAA as program sponsor. In October 2005, the FAA executed products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because a contract with the National Academies formally initiating the program. they are considered essential to the object of the report. The ACRP benefits from the cooperation and participation of airport professionals, air carriers, shippers, state and local [email protected] officials, equipment and service suppliers, other airport users, and research orga­ nizations. Each of these participants has different interests and respon­ sibilities, and each is an integral part of this cooperative2020-01-15 research effort. 16:51:21 +0000 Research problem statements for the ACRP are solicited periodically but may be submitted to the TRB by anyone at any time. It is the responsibility of the AOC to formulate the research program by iden­ tifying the highest priority projects and defining funding levels and expected products. Once selected, each ACRP project is assigned to an expert panel, appointed by the TRB. Panels include experienced practitioners and research specialists; heavy emphasis is placed on including airport pro­ fessionals, the intended users of the research products. The panels pre­ pare project statements (requests for proposals), select contractors, and provide technical guidance and counsel throughout the life of the project. The process for developing research problem statements and Published reports of the selecting research agencies has been used by TRB in managing cooper­ AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM ative research programs since 1962. As in other TRB activities, ACRP are available from: project panels serve voluntarily without compensation. Primary emphasis is placed on disseminating ACRP results to the Transportation Research Board Business Office intended end­users of the research: airport operating agencies, service 500 Fifth Street, NW providers, and suppliers. The ACRP produces a series of research reports Washington, DC 20001 for use by airport operators, local agencies, the FAA, and other inter­ ested parties, and industry associations may arrange for workshops, and can be ordered through the Internet at training aids, field visits, and other activities to ensure that results are http://www.national­academies.org/trb/bookstore implemented by airport­industry practitioners. Printed in the United States of America Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. On the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It
Recommended publications
  • Appendix H Detailed Airport Case Studies

    Appendix H Detailed Airport Case Studies

    ACRP 01-14 Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization Appendix H Appendix H Detailed Airport Case Studies H.1 Case Study Selections Case studies can be a useful means of illustrating first-hand experiences and lessons learned from those experiences. The purpose of this task is to document case studies to illustrate lessons learned for a range of airport sizes, privatization strategies, and forms of governance for both successful and unsuccessful efforts. For each case study, the research team documented (1) the initial goals and objectives of the airport sponsor for undertaking the privatization initiative, (2) a summary of the process employed, (4) a summary of the business terms of the initiative, (4) documentation of the experience to date, and (5) lessons learned. Literature reviews, transaction document reviews, and interviews were used to gather information for the case studies. Each case study considers the objectives, timeline, competitive bidding process, stakeholder interests, business terms, and the consequences (including development and operational experiences) and then presents lessons learned. It should be noted that, where the responses of individual interview participants are referred to in this report, these represent the interviewee’s own views and perceptions. However such responses have only been included to where they appear to represent opinions held more widely, or have been directly substantiated by other means On the basis of recommendations and justifications put forth by the research team, the ACRP Panel decided to ask the team to conduct case studies of the domestic and international airports as noted below. H.1.1 Domestic Airports Airport System Management Contract: 1.
  • ACRP Report 66 – Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization

    ACRP Report 66 – Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization

    124 pages; Perfect Bind with SPINE COPY (can reduce type to 12 pts) AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 66 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2012 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor of Planning, University of Arizona, Tucson Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority VICE CHAIR: Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern (retired) Corporation, Norfolk, VA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board VICE CHAIR Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY William A.V. Clark, Professor of Geography and Professor of Statistics, Department of Geography, MEMBERS University of California, Los Angeles James Crites Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport James M. Crites, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, TX Richard de Neufville Paula J. C. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Massachusetts Institute of Technology Michael W. Hancock, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort Kevin C. Dolliole Chris T. Hendrickson, Duquesne Light Professor of Engineering, Carnegie-Mellon University, Unison Consulting Pittsburgh, PA John K. Duval Adib K. Kanafani, Professor of the Graduate School, University of California, Berkeley Austin Commercial, LP Gary P. LaGrange, President and CEO, Port of New Orleans, LA Kitty Freidheim Michael P. Lewis, Director, Rhode Island DOT, Providence Freidheim Consulting Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City Steve Grossman Jacksonville Aviation Authority Joan McDonald, Commissioner, New York State DOT, Albany Kelly Johnson Michael R.
  • The Airport Concession Industry: Important Issues and Trends

    The Airport Concession Industry: Important Issues and Trends

    ANDREW YOUNG SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES The Airport Concession Industry: Important Issues and Trends Bruce A. Seaman, Ph.D.* Final Version July 2011 Bruce A. Seaman is Associate Professor of Economics, the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, and member of the Adjunct Faculty of the School of Public Policy at Georgia Tech. However, the research for this report was done independently. 1 I. Introduction Airport growth in the United States was historically facilitated by long-term contracts with prime concession operators yielding guaranteed revenues, which was considered important to support the revenue bonds that were critical to the financing of airport expansion. As noted by Boudreau and Davies (2010/2011), such contracts were successful in guaranteeing concession revenues to airports, but they also “produced high prices, poor service, and lackluster shops and restaurants with an unfavorable reputation that has taken years to overcome” (p. 3). As airline passenger traffic suffered through the post 9/11 chaos, and later the passenger traffic downturns linked to escalating jet fuel prices and the powerful 2008 recession (see Table 1 below), it became clearer than ever that airports needed to explore alternatives for increasing their non-aeronautical revenues and take better advantage of the dramatic increases in the average time spent by passengers in airports linked largely to greatly enhanced security requirements – at 108 minutes this time was more than double the average time spent in the last few years of
  • ACRP Report 54 – Resource Manual for Airport In-Terminal Concessions

    ACRP Report 54 – Resource Manual for Airport In-Terminal Concessions

    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 54 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Resource Manual for Airport In-Terminal Concessions ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2011 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (re- VICE CHAIR: Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor of Planning, University of Arizona, Tucson tired) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board VICE CHAIR MEMBERS Jeff Hamiel Minneapolis–St. Paul J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY Metropolitan Airports Commission Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk, VA MEMBERS William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles James Crites Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport James M. Crites, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, TX Richard de Neufville Paula J. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Massachusetts Institute of Technology Michael W. Hancock, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort Kevin C. Dolliole Unison Consulting Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley John K. Duval Michael P. Lewis, Director, Rhode Island DOT, Providence Austin Commercial, LP Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City Kitty Freidheim Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Freidheim Consulting Steve Grossman Tracy L. Rosser, Vice President, Regional General Manager, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Mandeville, LA Jacksonville Aviation Authority Steven T. Scalzo, Chief Operating Officer, Marine Resources Group, Seattle, WA Tom Jensen Henry G.
  • Jun 3 2002 Libraries

    Jun 3 2002 Libraries

    From Government Management and Ownership to Professionally Managed and Publicly Traded Airport Organizations by Rafael Roberto Enriquez Andrade B.S., Civil Engineering Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (1982) Master in Business Administration Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico (1986) Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2002 © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of the Author ........ .................. ..................................... Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 10, 2002 Certified by............... .................... Amedeo Odoni T. Wilson Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Civ and Environmental Engineering hesis Supervisor Accen td b ... .... ....................... p y Oral Buyukozturk MASSACHUSETS INSTITUTE Chairman, Departmental Committee of Graduate Studies OF TECHNOLOGY JUN 3 2002 3NPKER LIBRARIES From Government Management and Ownership to Professionally Managed and Publicly Traded Airport Organizations by Rafael Roberto Enriquez Andrade Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 10, 2002 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation ABSTRACT As a result of the deregulation of the air transport industry in the United States and Europe, and the globalization of the world's economy, governments have being facing important challenges to meet the demands of a growing and changing air transport sector. The participation of private investors and private management in the ownership and operation of airports has become an important element in the effort to satisfy these demands. The flexibility, efficiency, and innovation capabilities provided by a privately managed airport organization are widely accepted.
  • Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis Around Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, Appendices

    Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis Around Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, Appendices

    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Urban Publications Affairs 1-1-2010 Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis Around Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, Appendices Claudette Robey Cleveland State University, [email protected] Daila Shimek Cleveland State University, [email protected] James Wyles Cleveland State University, [email protected] Brian A. Mikelbank Cleveland State University, [email protected] Jim Robey See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Repository Citation Robey, Claudette; Shimek, Daila; Wyles, James; Mikelbank, Brian A.; Robey, Jim; O'Brien, Kevin; and et.al., "Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis Around Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, Appendices" (2010). Urban Publications. 0 1 2 3 413. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub/413 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Claudette Robey, Daila Shimek, James Wyles, Brian A. Mikelbank, Jim Robey, Kevin O'Brien, and et.al. This report is available at EngagedScholarship@CSU: