Jun 3 2002 Libraries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jun 3 2002 Libraries From Government Management and Ownership to Professionally Managed and Publicly Traded Airport Organizations by Rafael Roberto Enriquez Andrade B.S., Civil Engineering Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (1982) Master in Business Administration Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico (1986) Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2002 © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of the Author ........ .................. ..................................... Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 10, 2002 Certified by............... .................... Amedeo Odoni T. Wilson Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Civ and Environmental Engineering hesis Supervisor Accen td b ... .... ....................... p y Oral Buyukozturk MASSACHUSETS INSTITUTE Chairman, Departmental Committee of Graduate Studies OF TECHNOLOGY JUN 3 2002 3NPKER LIBRARIES From Government Management and Ownership to Professionally Managed and Publicly Traded Airport Organizations by Rafael Roberto Enriquez Andrade Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 10, 2002 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation ABSTRACT As a result of the deregulation of the air transport industry in the United States and Europe, and the globalization of the world's economy, governments have being facing important challenges to meet the demands of a growing and changing air transport sector. The participation of private investors and private management in the ownership and operation of airports has become an important element in the effort to satisfy these demands. The flexibility, efficiency, and innovation capabilities provided by a privately managed airport organization are widely accepted. However, the airport privatization movement around the world has being struggling with the problem of resolving the natural conflict between the interests of private investors and those of the public at large. This conflict is exacerbated by the fact that airports, to a greater or lesser extent, are natural monopolies when it comes to services for originating and terminating passengers. Although there is no perfect substitute for a competitive environment, an effective approach is to design and implement an economic regulation mechanism that, on the one hand, makes it possible to achieve the advantages of a privately managed organization, and on the other, protects the public interest. A more democratic stockholders' structure, through a publicly traded and professionally managed organization, can also be very useful in this respect. This thesis begins by presenting a quite detailed overview of the airport privatization movement around the world. Then, it addresses the basic regulatory issues that should be considered in designing and implementing the mechanisms that can facilitate a smooth transfer of airport activities to the private sector. The case of the Southeast Airport Group, as part of the Mexican airport privatization process, is used to illustrate many of these issues. There is some practical evidence to the effect that government regulation at major airports has achieved the objective of protecting airport users from monopolistic pricing of facilities and services. It is, however, important that the future economic regulation addresses objectives that go beyond pricing. These include the proper incentives for making timely investments in increasing airport capacity, as well as ensuring safety, security and an adequate level of service. Although, the events of September 11, 2001 will have a deep impact on the air travel industry, it is expected that the airport privatization movement around the world will manage to sustain its current momentum. Thesis Supervisor: Amedeo Odoni Title: T. Wilson Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Civil and Environmental Engineering Acknowledgements First, I would like to acknowledge and thank my thesis advisor, Professor Amedeo R. Odoni, for his continuous support during the development of this work. It was great to work with one of the most respected experts in the airport industry, but it was greater to work with a wonderful person. I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Joseph Sussman, who helped me with his advice and support during an incredible challenging adaptation process. I would also like to express my gratitude to Professor Cynthia Barnhart, Professor Peter Belobaba, Professor Moshe Ben-Akiva, and Professor Ismail Chabini. I am grateful for the financial support provided by the MIT Global Airline Industry Program. Gracias a DIOS por esta maravillosa e inolvidable oportunidad...... Gracias a la compaFera de mi vida Elisa, por la confianza, el apoyo, la entrega y el amor incondicional...... Gracias a mi Eli, que con su fortaleza y su entusiasmo me "ayud6 a soltarme de la cuerda"...... Gracias a mi Rafa, que su dulzura y entereza me hizo fuerte en las largas horas de sacrificio...... Gracias a mi Manuelito, que con su riza y sus caricias me hizo darme cuenta de las pocas cosas materiales que se necesitan para ser realmente feliz...... Gracias a nuestro jrbol que siempre nos ha dado las manzanas m~s jugosas en los momentos que mas las hemos necesitado. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract 2 Acknowledgements 3 Table of Contents 4 List of Tables 6 List of Figures 7 Chapter 1. Introduction 8 1.1. Objective and Scope 8 1.2. The Global Air Transport Industry 9 1.2.1. The Airline Sector 9 1.2.2. The Airport Sector 11 Chapter 2. The Emerging Private Airport Organization 13 2.1.The Objectives of the Airport Organization 15 Chapter 3. The Relevant Privatization History and Trends 16 3.1. Airport Privatization in Europe 16 3.2. Airport Privatization in North America 20 3.3. Airport Privatization in Latin America 23 3.4. Airport Privatization in Asia and Australia 25 3.5. Airport Privatization in Africa and the Middle East 27 3.6. Summary of the Airport Privatization History around the World 28 3.7. Relevant Privatization Schemes 30 3.8. Major International Airport Operators 31 Chapter 4. Economic Regulation 33 4.1. Limited Competition Among Airports 33 4.2. The need for Economic Regulation 35 4.3. Economic Regulation Objectives 36 4.4. Different Types of Services 37 4.5. The Economic Regulation Mechanism 40 4.6. "Single Till" Approach versus "Dual Till" Approach 43 4.7. The Landing Fee Methodologies used at U.S. Airports: Residual 49 versus Compensatory 4.8. Implementing the Regulation Mechanism under the Price Cap 51 Regime 4.9. Relevant Cases and Results 57 Chapter 5. Valuation Methodologies 61 5.1. The Major Economic-Value Drivers 63 5.2. Discount Cash Flow Analysis (DCF) 67 5.3. Comparative Market Valuation (Multiples) 79 4 Chapter 6. The Mexican Airport Privatization Case 83 6.1. The Mexican Airport System 83 6.2. Objectives and Principles 85 6.3. The Privatization Strategy 86 6.3.1. The First Phase: The Airport Grouping and the New 87 Corporate Structure 6.3.2. The Second Phase: The Strategic Partner Selection Process 89 6.3.3. The Third Phase: The Initial Public Offering 92 6.4. The Southeast Airport Group Case (ASUR) 93 6.4.1. The ASUR new Corporate Structure 93 6.4.2. Strategic Partner Selection Process 94 6.4.3. The ASUR Initial Public Offering 96 6.4.4. The Southeast Airport Group Investment Case 96 6.4.5. The Valuation of the Southeast Airport Group 96 6.5. First results 98 Chapter 7. General Considerations and Conclusions 100 7. 1. Advantages and Risks of a Private Airport Organization 102 7.2. Economic Regulation Conclusions and Recommendations 103 7.3. Valuation Methodology Conclusions and Recommendations 104 7.4. The Privatization Movement after September 11, 2001 104 Appendix 1: Relevant Statistics 106 Top 30 Airports in the World Y2000 Revenue Distribution in Major U.S. Airports (2000) Revenue Distribution in Major European Airports (2000) Appendix 2: Ownership of Publicly Traded Airport Authorities/Operators 109 Appendix 3: The RPI-X formula for BAA's London Airports 110 Appendix 4: The RPI-X formula for Mexican Airports 112 Appendix 5: The Southeast Airport Group (ASUR): Discount Cash Flow Valuation Model (Excel) 113 Appendix 6: IPO versus Trade Sale Analysis 117 Appendix 7: The Bidding Rules for the Strategic Partner Selection Process 119 Bibliography 127 5 List of Tables Table 1.1 Boeing Air Travel Growth Forecast by Region 10 Table 1.2 2000 World Airport Traffic 11 Table 3.1 Summary of Relevant Historic and Forthcoming Airport Privatizations 29 Table 3.2 Relevant Privatization Schemes 30 Table 3.3 Major Airport Operators in the World 31 Table 4.1 Essential Airport Services 37 Table 4.2 Complementary Services 38 Table 4.3 Commercial Services 39 Table 4.4 "Single Till" Advantages and Disadvantages 45 Table 4.5 "Dual Till" Advantages and Disadvantages 46 Table 4.6 Average projected price caps per passenger at BAA's London Airports 49 Table 4.7 Basic Projection Approaches 52 Table 4.8 Economic Regulation Relevant Cases 57 Table 5.1 Revenue from Essential Airport Services 63 Table 5.2 Revenue from Essential Landside Services 64 Table 5.3 Revenue from Complementary Services 64 Table 5.4 Revenue from Commercial Services 64 Table 5.5 Cost Reductions 65 Table 5.6 Most Common Revenues from Essential Airport Services 72 Table 5.7 Most Common Revenues from Complementary Services 73 Table 5.8 Most Common
Recommended publications
  • Appendix H Detailed Airport Case Studies
    ACRP 01-14 Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization Appendix H Appendix H Detailed Airport Case Studies H.1 Case Study Selections Case studies can be a useful means of illustrating first-hand experiences and lessons learned from those experiences. The purpose of this task is to document case studies to illustrate lessons learned for a range of airport sizes, privatization strategies, and forms of governance for both successful and unsuccessful efforts. For each case study, the research team documented (1) the initial goals and objectives of the airport sponsor for undertaking the privatization initiative, (2) a summary of the process employed, (4) a summary of the business terms of the initiative, (4) documentation of the experience to date, and (5) lessons learned. Literature reviews, transaction document reviews, and interviews were used to gather information for the case studies. Each case study considers the objectives, timeline, competitive bidding process, stakeholder interests, business terms, and the consequences (including development and operational experiences) and then presents lessons learned. It should be noted that, where the responses of individual interview participants are referred to in this report, these represent the interviewee’s own views and perceptions. However such responses have only been included to where they appear to represent opinions held more widely, or have been directly substantiated by other means On the basis of recommendations and justifications put forth by the research team, the ACRP Panel decided to ask the team to conduct case studies of the domestic and international airports as noted below. H.1.1 Domestic Airports Airport System Management Contract: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/22786 SHARE Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization DETAILS 113 pages | 8.5 x 11 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-21405-6 | DOI 10.17226/22786 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Sheri Ernico, Bruce Boudreau, Dan Reimer, and Steve Van Beek; Airport Cooperative Research Program; Transportation Research Board; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine FIND RELATED TITLES Confidential [email protected] 2020-01-15 16:51:21 +0000 Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM ACRP REPORT 66 Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization Sheri Ernico Bruce Boudreau LEIGHFISHER Burlingame, CA Dan Reimer KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWEll LLP Denver, CO Steve Van Beek LEIGHFISHER/ENO TRANSPORTATION FOUNDATION Reston, VA Confidential [email protected] 2020-01-15 16:51:21 +0000 Subscriber Categories Aviation • Administration and Management • Finance Research sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 2012 www.TRB.org Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM ACRP REPORT 66 Airports are vital national resources.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 66 – Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization
    124 pages; Perfect Bind with SPINE COPY (can reduce type to 12 pts) AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 66 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Considering and Evaluating Airport Privatization ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2012 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor of Planning, University of Arizona, Tucson Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority VICE CHAIR: Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern (retired) Corporation, Norfolk, VA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board VICE CHAIR Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY William A.V. Clark, Professor of Geography and Professor of Statistics, Department of Geography, MEMBERS University of California, Los Angeles James Crites Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport James M. Crites, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, TX Richard de Neufville Paula J. C. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Massachusetts Institute of Technology Michael W. Hancock, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort Kevin C. Dolliole Chris T. Hendrickson, Duquesne Light Professor of Engineering, Carnegie-Mellon University, Unison Consulting Pittsburgh, PA John K. Duval Adib K. Kanafani, Professor of the Graduate School, University of California, Berkeley Austin Commercial, LP Gary P. LaGrange, President and CEO, Port of New Orleans, LA Kitty Freidheim Michael P. Lewis, Director, Rhode Island DOT, Providence Freidheim Consulting Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City Steve Grossman Jacksonville Aviation Authority Joan McDonald, Commissioner, New York State DOT, Albany Kelly Johnson Michael R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Airport Concession Industry: Important Issues and Trends
    ANDREW YOUNG SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES The Airport Concession Industry: Important Issues and Trends Bruce A. Seaman, Ph.D.* Final Version July 2011 Bruce A. Seaman is Associate Professor of Economics, the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, and member of the Adjunct Faculty of the School of Public Policy at Georgia Tech. However, the research for this report was done independently. 1 I. Introduction Airport growth in the United States was historically facilitated by long-term contracts with prime concession operators yielding guaranteed revenues, which was considered important to support the revenue bonds that were critical to the financing of airport expansion. As noted by Boudreau and Davies (2010/2011), such contracts were successful in guaranteeing concession revenues to airports, but they also “produced high prices, poor service, and lackluster shops and restaurants with an unfavorable reputation that has taken years to overcome” (p. 3). As airline passenger traffic suffered through the post 9/11 chaos, and later the passenger traffic downturns linked to escalating jet fuel prices and the powerful 2008 recession (see Table 1 below), it became clearer than ever that airports needed to explore alternatives for increasing their non-aeronautical revenues and take better advantage of the dramatic increases in the average time spent by passengers in airports linked largely to greatly enhanced security requirements – at 108 minutes this time was more than double the average time spent in the last few years of
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 54 – Resource Manual for Airport In-Terminal Concessions
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 54 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Resource Manual for Airport In-Terminal Concessions ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2011 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (re- VICE CHAIR: Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor of Planning, University of Arizona, Tucson tired) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board VICE CHAIR MEMBERS Jeff Hamiel Minneapolis–St. Paul J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY Metropolitan Airports Commission Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk, VA MEMBERS William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles James Crites Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport James M. Crites, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, TX Richard de Neufville Paula J. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Massachusetts Institute of Technology Michael W. Hancock, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort Kevin C. Dolliole Unison Consulting Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley John K. Duval Michael P. Lewis, Director, Rhode Island DOT, Providence Austin Commercial, LP Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City Kitty Freidheim Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Freidheim Consulting Steve Grossman Tracy L. Rosser, Vice President, Regional General Manager, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Mandeville, LA Jacksonville Aviation Authority Steven T. Scalzo, Chief Operating Officer, Marine Resources Group, Seattle, WA Tom Jensen Henry G.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis Around Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, Appendices
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Urban Publications Affairs 1-1-2010 Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis Around Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, Appendices Claudette Robey Cleveland State University, [email protected] Daila Shimek Cleveland State University, [email protected] James Wyles Cleveland State University, [email protected] Brian A. Mikelbank Cleveland State University, [email protected] Jim Robey See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Repository Citation Robey, Claudette; Shimek, Daila; Wyles, James; Mikelbank, Brian A.; Robey, Jim; O'Brien, Kevin; and et.al., "Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis Around Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, Appendices" (2010). Urban Publications. 0 1 2 3 413. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub/413 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Claudette Robey, Daila Shimek, James Wyles, Brian A. Mikelbank, Jim Robey, Kevin O'Brien, and et.al. This report is available at EngagedScholarship@CSU:
    [Show full text]