DOCSLIB.ORG

H. Doc. 108-222

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THIRD CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1793, TO MARCH 3, 1795 FIRST SESSION—December 2, 1793, to June 9, 1794 SECOND SESSION—November 3, 1794, to March 3, 1795 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—March 4, 1793, for one day only VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—JOHN ADAMS, of Massachusetts PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—RALPH IZARD, 1 of South Carolina; HENRY TAZEWELL, 2 of Virginia SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—SAMUEL A. OTIS, of Massachusetts DOORKEEPER OF THE SENATE—JAMES MATHERS, of New York SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—FREDERICK A. C. MUHLENBERG, 3 of Pennsylvania CLERK OF THE HOUSE—JOHN BECKLEY, 4 of Virginia SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH WHEATON, of Rhode Island DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—GIFFORD DALLEY CONNECTICUT James Jackson William Hindman SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Samuel Smith Oliver Ellsworth Abraham Baldwin Thomas Sprigg Roger Sherman 5 Thomas P. Carnes Stephen M. Mitchell 6 MASSACHUSETTS REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE KENTUCKY SENATORS Joshua Coit SENATORS James Hillhouse John Edwards Caleb Strong Amasa Learned John Brown George Cabot Zephaniah Swift REPRESENTATIVES Uriah Tracy Jonathan Trumbull Christopher Greenup REPRESENTATIVES Jeremiah Wadsworth Alexander D. Orr Fisher Ames Shearjashub Bourne DELAWARE MARYLAND David Cobb SENATORS SENATORS Peleg Coffin, Jr. George Read 7 John Henry Henry Dearborn Henry Latimer 8 Richard Potts Samuel Dexter John Vining REPRESENTATIVES Dwight Foster REPRESENTATIVES Gabriel Christie Benjamin Goodhue John Patten 9 George Dent Samuel Holten Henry Latimer 10 John F. Mercer 11 William Lyman Gabriel Duvall 12 Theodore Sedgwick GEORGIA William Vans Murray George Thacher SENATORS Uriah Forrest 13 Peleg Wadsworth James Gunn Benjamin Edwards 14 Artemas Ward 1 Elected May 31, 1794. Samuel Livermore was elected 8 Elected to fill vacancy caused by resignation of George 10 Successfully contested the election of John Patten, and February 20, 1795, but declined. Read, and took his seat February 28, 1795. Kensey Johns took his seat February 14, 1794; resigned February 7, 2 Elected February 20, 1795. was appointed on March 19, 1794, to fill the vacancy 1795, having been elected Senator. 3 Elected December 2, 1793. and his credentials were presented March 24, 1794, but 11 Resigned April 13, 1794. 4 Reelected December 2, 1793. he was not permitted to qualify; March 28, 1794, the 12 Elected to fill vacancy caused by resignation of John 5 Died July 23, 1793. Senate declared he was not entitled to the seat; vacancy F. Mercer, and took his seat November 11, 1794. 6 Elected to fill vacancy caused by death of Roger Sher- in this class from September 18, 1793, to February 7, 13 Resigned November 8, 1794. 1795. 14 man, and took his seat December 2, 1793. 9 Elected to fill vacancy caused by resignation of Uriah 7 Served until February 14, 1794; succeeded by Henry Resigned September 18, 1793. Latimer, who contested his election. Forrest, and took his seat January 2, 1795. [ 49 ] 50 Biographical Directory NEW HAMPSHIRE William Johnston Dawson Andrew Pickens James Gillespie SENATORS William L. Smith William Barry Grove Richard Winn John Langdon Matthew Locke Samuel Livermore Nathaniel Macon VERMONT REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Joseph McDowell (P. G.) Nicholas Gilman Alexander Mebane SENATORS John S. Sherburne Benjamin Williams Moses Robinson Jeremiah Smith Joseph Winston Stephen R. Bradley Paine Wingate PENNSYLVANIA REPRESENTATIVES NEW JERSEY SENATORS Nathaniel Niles Israel Smith SENATORS Robert Morris Albert Gallatin 18 John Rutherfurd James Ross 19 Frederick Frelinghuysen VIRGINIA REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE SENATORS James Armstrong James Monroe 22 John Beatty William Findley Stevens T. Mason 23 Elias Boudinot Thomas Fitzsimons Lambert Cadwallader John Taylor 24 Andrew Gregg 25 Abraham Clark 15 Thomas Hartley Henry Tazewell 16 Aaron Kitchell Daniel Hiester REPRESENTATIVES Jonathan Dayton William Irvine Isaac Coles John Wilkes Kittera NEW YORK Thomas Claiborne William Montgomery William B. Giles SENATORS Frederick A. C. Muhlenberg Samuel Griffin Rufus King John Peter G. Muhlenberg George Hancock Aaron Burr Thomas Scott Carter B. Harrison John Smilie REPRESENTATIVES John Heath Theodorus Bailey RHODE ISLAND Richard Bland Lee James Madison Peter Van Gaasbeck SENATORS Ezekiel Gilbert Andrew Moore Theodore Foster Joseph Neville James Gordon William Bradford Henry Glen Anthony New REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Silas Talbot John Nicholas Thomas Tredwell Benjamin Bourne John Page Francis Malbone John E. Van Alen 17 Josiah Parker Francis Preston 26 Philip Van Cortlandt SOUTH CAROLINA John Watts Robert Rutherford SENATORS Abraham B. Venable NORTH CAROLINA Pierce Butler Francis Walker Ralph Izard SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES Benjamin Hawkins TERRITORY SOUTH OF THE Lemuel Benton RIVER OHIO 27 Alexander Martin Alexander Gillon 20 REPRESENTATIVES Robert Goodloe Harper 21 DELEGATE Thomas Blount John Hunter James White 28 15 Died September 15, 1794. 19 Elected to fill vacancy caused by the Senate declaring 24 Resigned May 11, 1794. 16 Elected to fill vacancy caused by death of Abraham the election of Albert Gallatin void, and took his seat 25 Elected to fill vacancy caused by resignation of John Clark, and took his seat January 29, 1795. April 24, 1794. Taylor, and took his seat December 29, 1794. 17 Election unsuccessfully contested by Henry K. Van 20 Died October 6, 1794. 26 Election unsuccessfully contested by Abraham Trigg. 21 Rensselaer. Elected to fill vacancy caused by death of Alexander 27 Created a district for the purposes of temporary gov- 18 Credentials presented in preceding Congress; took his Gillon, and took his seat February 9, 1795. ernment by act approved May 26, 1790, from territory 22 Resigned, effective May 27, 1794, having been ap- seat December 2, 1793, and served until February 28, pointed minister plenipotentiary to France. ceded to the United States by the State of North Carolina 1794, when the election was declared void, ‘‘he not having 23 Elected to fill vacancy caused by the resignation of and granted a Delegate in Congress. been a citizen of the United States the term of years James Monroe, but did not take his seat until June 8, 28 Took his seat November 18, 1794. required by the Constitution.’’ 1795, in the succeeding Congress. .
Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory

    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THt INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME i / \Statuary\ American Revolution , traf flc ~±slan3s an<t .arretttKi public buildings within the District of Columbia _NOT FOR PUB LI CATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT U»g-fcOtt. VICINITY OF STATE COUNTY District of Columbia OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —XPUBLIC —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE: —MUSEUM —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL 1LPARK —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT -.RELIGIOUS _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED GOVERNMENT SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED X-YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION NO —MILITARY —OTHER: I AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (ifapplicable) National Capital Region, National Park Service -__________;______Department of the- Inferior- /|J ' -•-•-••>--..,______ STREET & NUMBER 110Q' Ohio' Drive. • g.W.-''________________________' ; ; •-.-;- -^____ CITY. TOWN STATE Washington VICINITY OF District of Columbia LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. National Capital Region STREET & NUMBER 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. CITY. TOWN STATE ivnstnn Pis trio t- of Colnmh-fa 1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS T^!Y<an•l^^•^ J\ro 1 1 DATE ^-FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL National Capital Region CITY. TOWN STATF. -Wa gin -i r> o t- r\-a- District of Columbia CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X-EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED XJJNALTERED X_ORIGINAL SITE —GOOD _RUINS —ALTERED —MOVED DATE. _FAIR _UNEXPOSED This nomination includes outdoor statues commemorating figures of the American Revolutionary War period which are standing throughout the City of Washington and owned by the National Park Service.
  • Image Credits

    Image Credits

    the exclusive roster of conferees points to the fact that the honor remains one of the few ways the United States gov- NOTES ernment can acknowledge a foreigner’s contribution to the nation and/or to mankind. The congressional joint resolu- 1. T. Lawrence Larkin, “A ‘Gift’ Strategically tion clearly enumerated Gálvez’s contributions: he led a truly Solicited and Magnanimously Conferred: The multi-national military force to strategically significant American Congress, the French Monarchy, and the victories against Great Britain during the Revolutionary State Portraits of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette,” War; he later served the cause of science as viceroy of New Winterthur Portfolio 44, no. 1 (2010): 31–75; Larkin, Spain by sponsoring hydrographic expeditions of the Gulf “Final Report for Research Undertaken with the Aid of Mexico; his name has been given to several localities in of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society, April–June Texas and Louisiana; and the state of Florida named him a 2000,” Research Files, USCHS. “Great Floridian” in 2012. 2.James Alton James, “Oliver Pollock, Financier of In the spring of 2014, Representative Jeff Miller (FL) the Revolution in the West,” Mississippi Valley His- introduced H.J. Res. 105 in the House, and Senator Marco torical Review, 16, no. 1(June 1929): 67–80; Robert Rubio (FL) introduced S.J. Res. 38 in the Senate, to confer Morris to Bernardo de Gálvez, 21 Nov. 1781, in honorary United States citizenship on Gálvez. As president E. James Ferguson and John Catanzariti, eds., The general of the Sons of the American Revolution, I wrote a Papers of Robert Morris, 1781-1784 (9 vols., Pitts- letter to every member of the House Foreign Affairs Com- burgh, PA, 1980–99), 2:221–22.
  • Rhode Island Federal Courts a History

    Rhode Island Federal Courts a History

    Rhode Island Federal Courts A History The very first U.S. Supreme Court decision was West v. Barnes, a federal court case from Rhode Island. That case involved no less than three Rhode Island judges and had more twists and turns than a Grand Prix race course. It represents just one superb example of the fertile and fascinating history of the federal courts in the Ocean State. BY IRA COHEN PHOTO BY CHIEF JUDGE HON. WILLIAM E. SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND s this year’s Federal Bar Associ- No longer unaware Roger Williams would be proud to see his colony, ation (FBA) Annual Meeting and so don’t sell short this precious port AConvention is scheduled to take Rhode Island’s it for Me. place in Providence, R.I., it stands to rea- Rhode Island, oh Rhode Island Surrounded by the sea son that it would be appropriate for us to Some people roam the earth for home; familiarize ourselves with at least a rudi- Rhode Island’s it for Me.1 mentary knowledge of the unique back- The Federal Court in Rhode Island ground and rich judicial pedigree of the The U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island federal District Court in our host state. was established on June 23, 1790. The court has original jurisdiction over civil and criminal proceedings filed within its As the official song of the State of Rhode Island serenades us: jurisdiction, which comprises the entire state. Appeals from this trial-level court are properly taken to the U.S.
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA the Bill of Rights And

    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA the Bill of Rights And

    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Bill of Rights and Federalism: An Interpretation in Light of the Unwritten Constitution A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Politics School of Arts and Sciences Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Joseph S. Devaney Washington, D.C. 2010 The Bill of Rights and Federalism: An Interpretation in Light of the Unwritten Constitution Joseph S. Devaney, Ph.D. Director: Claes G. Ryn, Ph.D. According to conventional understanding, the primary purpose behind the framing and ratification of the Constitution was to preserve liberty through a form of government that provided for a highly structured system of federalism and separation of powers. The primary purpose behind the framing and ratification of the Bill of Rights was to allay Anti-Federalist fears that the Constitution did not sufficiently secure individual rights. For that reason, the original Constitution is frequently contrasted with the Bill of Rights. Yet distinguishing between the Constitution and the Bill of Rights obscures more about the nature of the Bill of Rights than it discloses. It is agreed that one of the primary Anti-Federalist objections to the Constitution was the absence of a bill of rights. A close examination of the debate over the absence of a bill of rights reveals that the first ten amendments to the Constitution occupy a much more complex place in the constitutional scheme than is commonly assumed. While individual rights did constitute an important theme during the ensuing debate concerning the importance of a bill of rights, they were not the only theme or even the prevailing theme.
  • The Constitution in Congress: Substantive Issues in the First Congress, 1789-1791 David P

    The Constitution in Congress: Substantive Issues in the First Congress, 1789-1791 David P

    The University of Chicago Law Review VOLUME 61 NUMBER 3 SUMMER 1994 of Chicago © 1994 by The University The Constitution in Congress: Substantive Issues in the First Congress, 1789-1791 David P. Curriet Judicial review of legislative and executive action has been such a success in the United States that we tend to look exclu- sively to the courts for guidance in interpreting the Constitution. The stock of judicial precedents is rich, accessible, and familiar, but it does not exhaust the relevant materials. Members of Congress and executive officers, no less than judges, swear to uphold the Constitution, and they interpret it every day in making and applying the law.' Like judges, they often engage in t Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor and Interim Dean, The University of Chicago Law School. The author wishes to thank the Kirkland & Ellis Faculty Research Fund, the Mayer, Brown & Platt Faculty Research Fund, the Morton C. Seeley Fund, the Raymond & Nancy Goodman Feldman Fund, and the Sonnenschein Faculty Research Fund for financial support; Charlene Bangs Bickford, Kenneth R. Bowling, and Helen E. Veit of the First Federal Congress Project for access to hitherto unpublished reports of the debates; Kenneth Bowling, Gerhard Casper, Richard Posner, and Richard Ross for invalu- able advice and encouragement; and Keith Garza for exemplary research assistance. ' "M[T]he whole business of Legislation," said Representative Theodore Sedgwick in 1791, "was a practical construction of the powers of the Legislature. ." Gales & Seaton, eds, 2 Annals of Congress 1960 (1791) ("Annals"). See generally Frank H. Easterbrook, PresidentialReview, 40 Case W Res L Rev 905 (1989-90); Jefferson Powell, ed, Languages of Power: A Source Book of Early American ConstitutionalHistory xi-xii (Carolina Aca- demic Press, 1991).
  • A History of George Varnum, His Son Samuel Who Came to Ipswich About

    A History of George Varnum, His Son Samuel Who Came to Ipswich About

    THE VARNUMS OF DRACUTT (IN MASSACHUSETTS) A HISTORY -OF- GEORGE VARNUM, HIS SON SAMUEL WHO CAME TO IPSWICH ABOUT 1635, AND GRANDSONS THOMAS, JOHN AND JOSEPH, WHO SETTLED IN DRACUTT, AND THEIR DESCENDANTS, <.tomptlet> from jfamill] ll)aper.s ant> @ffictal 'Necort>.s, -BY- JOHN MARSHALL VARNUM, OF BOSTON, 19 07. " trr:bosu mbo bo not tnasmn up tbe mimotl!: of tbdt S!nmitats bo not bumbt ta bi nmembtttb bl!: lf)osttrit11:." - EDMUND BURKE, CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE 5 HISTORY OF THE FAMILY, BY SQUIRE PARKER VARNUM, 5 1818 9 GENEALOGY: GEORGE V ARNUM1 13 SAMUEL V ARNUM2 16 THOMAS V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS 23 JOHN V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS - 43 J°'OSEPH V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS - 115 SKETCH OF GEORGE V ARNAM1 13 WILL OF' GEORGE VARNAM - 14 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF GEORGE V ARNAM - 15 SKETCH OF SAMUEL V ARNUM1 16 DEED OF SHATSWELL-VARNUM PuROHASE, 1664 17 TRANSFER OF LAND TO V ARNUMS, 1688-1735 21 SKETCH OF THOMAS VARNUM3 28 w ILL OF THOMAS VARNUM - 29 SKETCH OF SAMUEL V ARNUM4 30 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF THOMAS V ARNUM4 31 SKETCHES OF THOMAS V ARNUM1 34 DEACON JEREMIAH V ARNUM8 35 MAJOR ATKINSON C. V ARNUM7 36 JOHN V ARNUM3 45 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF JOHN VARNUM 41 iv VARNUM GENEALOGY. SKETCH OF LIEUT. JOHN V ARNUM4 51 JOURNAL OF LIEUT. JOHN VARNUM~ 54-64 vVILL 01' L1EuT. JoHN VARNU111• - 64-66 SKETCHES OF JONAS VARNUM4 67 ABRAHAM V ARNUl\14 68 JAMES VA RNUM4 70 SQUIRE p ARK.ER VARNUM. 74-78 COL, JAMES VARNUM" - 78-82 JONAS VARNUM6 83 CAPT.
  • PETITION Ror,RECOGNITION of the FLORIDA TRIBE Or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS

    PETITION Ror,RECOGNITION of the FLORIDA TRIBE Or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS

    'l PETITION rOR,RECOGNITION OF THE FLORIDA TRIBE or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS TH;: FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS and the Administra­ tive Council, THE NORTHWEST FLORIDA CREEK INDIAN COUNCIL brings this, thew petition to the DEPARTMENT Or THE INTERIOR OF THE FEDERAL GOVERN- MENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and prays this honorable nation will honor their petition, which is a petition for recognition by this great nation that THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is an Indian Tribe. In support of this plea for recognition THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS herewith avers: (1) THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS nor any of its members, is the subject of Congressional legislation which has expressly terminated or forbidden the Federal relationship sought. (2) The membership of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is composed principally of persons who are not members of any other North American Indian tribe. (3) A list of all known current members of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS, based on the tribes acceptance of these members and the tribes own defined membership criteria is attached to this petition and made a part of it. SEE APPENDIX----- A The membership consists of individuals who are descendants of the CREEK NATION which existed in aboriginal times, using and occuping this present georgraphical location alone, and in conjunction with other people since that time. - l - MNF-PFD-V001-D0002 Page 1of4 (4) Attached herewith and made a part of this petition is the present governing Constitution of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEKS INDIANS.
  • Charles Bartlett Interviewer: Fred Holborn Date of Interview: January 6, 1965 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C

    Charles Bartlett Interviewer: Fred Holborn Date of Interview: January 6, 1965 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C

    Charles Bartlett Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 1/6/1965 Administrative Information Creator: Charles Bartlett Interviewer: Fred Holborn Date of Interview: January 6, 1965 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 91 pp. Biographical Note Bartlett, Washington correspondent for the Chattanooga Times from 1948 to 1962, columnist for the Chicago Daily News, and personal friend of John F. Kennedy (JFK), discusses his role in introducing Jacqueline Bouvier to JFK, JFK’s relationship with Lyndon Baines Johnson, and JFK’s Cabinet appointments, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed October 11, 1983, copyright of these materials has been assigned to United States Government. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. Direct your questions concerning copyright to the reference staff.
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY

    Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY

    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY John Swanwick: Spokesman for "Merchant-Republicanism ' In Philadelphia, 1790-179 8 HE literature on the era of Jeffersonian democracy is largely- dominated by the great triumvirate of Thomas Jefferson, TJames Madison, and Albert Gallatin.* During the last dec- ade, however, historians have been paying more attention to state and local political leaders who played significant roles in the Demo- cratic-Republican movement.1 Among the more notable second-rank * In a somewhat abbreviated form this article was presented as a paper at the annual meeting of the Pennsylvania Historical Association held at Williamsport, Pa., on Oct. 22-23, 1971. The author wishes to express his gratitude to his colleague, Bernard Sternsher, for his helpful editorial suggestions. 1 Historians have given most of their attention to secondary Federalists, but since i960 the number of modern scholarly biographies of less prominent Republicans has increased. We now have first-rate biographies on Robert R. Livingston, David Rittenhouse, Aaron Burr, Daniel D. Tompkins, John Breckinridge, Luther Martin, Benjamin Rush (2), Samuel Smith, and James Monroe. There are also a number of good unpublished doctoral dissertations. Among the more notable studies are those on Elkanah Watson, Simon Snyder, Mathew Carey, Samuel Latham Mitchell, Melancton Smith, Levi Woodbury, William Lowndes, William Duane, William Jones (2), Eleazer Oswald, Thomas McKean, Levi Lincoln, Ephraim Kirby, and John Nicholson. Major biographies of Tench Coxe by Jacob E. Cooke, of John Beckley by Edmund Berkeley, and of Thomas McKean by John M. Coleman and Gail Stuart Rowe are now in progress. 131 132 ROLAND M.
  • Heads of Families at the First Census 179Q

    Heads of Families at the First Census 179Q

    HEADS OF FAMILIES AT THE FIRST CENSUS 179Q INTBODUUTION. The information contained in the published report of the First Census of the United States, a small vol- The l?irst Census of the United States (1790) com- ume of 56 pages, was not uniform for the several states prised an enumeration of the inhabitants of the present and territories, For New England and one or two of states of Connecticut, Delaware; Georgia, Kentucky, the other states the population was presented by coun- Maine, Maryland, Massaclmsetts, New Hampshire, ties and towns; that of New Je.rsey appeared partly New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, by counties and towns and partly by counties only; Rhode Island, Soutll Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, in other cases the returns were given by counties only. and Virginia. Thus the complete transcript of the names of heads of A complete set of.tho schedules for each state, with a families, with accompanying information, presents for summary for the counties, and in many cases for towns, the first time detailed information as to the number was filed in the State Department, but unfortunately of inhabitants-males, females, etc.-for each minor they are not now complete, the returns for the states civil division in all those states for which such infor- of Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, New Jersey, Tennes- mation was not originally published. see, and Virginia having been destroyed when the In response to repeated requests from patriotic so- British burned the Capitol at Washington during the cieties and persons interested in genealogy, or desir- War of 1812.
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

    CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

    Order Code RL30665 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Role of the House Majority Leader: An Overview Updated April 4, 2006 Walter J. Oleszek Senior Specialist in the Legislative Process Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The Role of the House Majority Leader: An Overview Summary The majority leader in the contemporary House is second-in-command behind the Speaker of the majority party. Typically, the majority leader functions as the Speaker’s chief lieutenant or “field commander” for day-to-day management of the floor. Although the majority leader’s duties are not especially well-defined, they have evolved to the point where it is possible to spotlight two fundamental and often interlocking responsibilities that orient the majority leader’s work: institutional and party. From an institutional perspective, the majority leader has a number of duties. Scheduling floor business is a prime responsibility of the majority leader. Although scheduling the House’s business is a collective activity of the majority party, the majority leader has a large say in shaping the chamber’s overall agenda and in determining when, whether, how, or in what order legislation is taken up. In addition, the majority leader is active in constructing winning coalitions for the party’s legislative priorities; acting as a public spokesman — defending and explaining the party’s program and agenda; serving as an emissary to the White House, especially when the President is of the same party; and facilitating the orderly conduct of the House’s business. From a party perspective, three key activities undergird the majority leader’s principal goal of trying to ensure that the party remains in control of the House.
  • Challenge Bowl 2020

    Challenge Bowl 2020

    Notice: study guide will be updated after the December general election. Sponsored by the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Challenge Bowl 2020 High School Study Guide Sponsored by the Challenge Bowl 2020 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Table of Contents A Struggle To Survive ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 1. Muscogee History ......................................................................................................... 5-30 2. Muscogee Forced Removal ........................................................................................... 31-50 3. Muscogee Customs & Traditions .................................................................................. 51-62 4. Branches of Government .............................................................................................. 63-76 5. Muscogee Royalty ........................................................................................................ 77-79 6. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Seal ...................................................................................... 80-81 7. Belvin Hill Scholarship .................................................................................................. 82-83 8. Wilbur Chebon Gouge Honors Team ............................................................................. 84-85 9. Chronicles of Oklahoma ............................................................................................... 86-97 10. Legends & Stories ......................................................................................................