DOCSLIB.ORG

New Zealand Firms: Reaching for the Frontier

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Zealand Firms: Reaching for the Frontier New Zealand firms: Reaching for the frontier 2021 April The Productivity Commission aims to provide insightful, well-informed and accessible advice that leads to the best possible improvement in the wellbeing of New Zealanders. New Zealand firms: Reaching for the frontier Final report April 2021 The New Zealand Productivity Commission Te Kōmihana Whai Hua o Aotearoa1 The Commission – an independent Crown entity – completes in-depth inquiry reports on topics selected by the Government, carries out productivity-related research and promotes understanding of productivity issues. The Commission aims to provide insightful, well-informed and accessible advice that leads to the best possible improvement in the wellbeing of New Zealanders. The New Zealand Productivity Commission Act 2010 guides and binds the Commission. You can find information on the Commission at www.productivity.govt.nz or by calling +64 4 903 5150. How to cite this document: New Zealand Productivity Commission (2021). New Zealand firms: Reaching for the frontier. Final report. Available at www.productivity.govt.nz/inquiries/frontier-firms/ Date: April 2021 ISBN: 978-1-98-851960-9 (print) ISBN: 978-1-98-851961-6 (online) Copyright: This copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. In essence you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the source of the work to the New Zealand Productivity Commission (the Commission) and abide by the other license terms. To view a copy of this license, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Please note that this license does not apply to any logos, emblems, and/or trademarks that may be placed on the Commission’s website or publications. Those specific items may not be reused without express permission. Inquiry contacts Administration T: (04) 903 5167 Website www.productivity.govt.nz E: [email protected] Twitter @nzprocom Other matters Geoff Lewis Linkedin NZ Productivity Commission Inquiry director T: (04) 903 5157 E: [email protected] Disclaimer The contents of this report must not be construed as legal advice. The Commission does not accept any responsibility or liability for an action taken as a result of reading, or reliance placed because of having read any part, or all, of the information in this report. The Commission does not accept any responsibility or liability for any error, inadequacy, deficiency, flaw in or omission from this report. 1 The Commission that pursues abundance for New Zealand Foreword i Foreword For the last thirty or forty years, New Zealand’s main approach to maintaining and growing our living standards has relied on adding more people into the workforce, having employees working longer hours, and expanding production in industries with damaging environmental impacts. This approach is not sustainable. Long working hours can be harmful to individual and social wellbeing, our labour force participation rates are already high, and we are harming our natural resources and taonga. If we in Aotearoa are to enjoy the incomes we aspire to while protecting our wellbeing and collective assets, we need to take a new approach. The key challenge for New Zealand is to increase our overseas earnings by growing the value of our export offerings. New Zealand needs to move from mainly exporting commodities to selling distinctive specialised goods and services. To do this, New Zealand needs to develop a cohort of large, globally significant firms that can innovate and take new goods and services to the world. Only such firms will have the scale and capability needed to successfully develop new products and enter new markets. They will also underpin innovation by networks of researchers and other local firms, raising the performance of the wider economy and acting as exemplars for others. Building this cohort of large firms will require a different approach from the Government. Rather than spreading its research and innovation efforts thinly, it will need to focus more tightly on areas where New Zealand has existing or emerging strengths and can achieve critical mass. The Government will also need to review its policy and regulatory settings to ensure they sufficiently support innovation. And there is a pressing need for the Government to test whether its policies and rules are holding back the development and growth of innovative Māori firms. These kaupapa Māori firms are distinctive for having long-term horizons and managing multiple stakeholders and objectives, and offer valuable lessons for other New Zealand businesses. Although this will be a new approach for New Zealand, we can look for lessons from other small advanced economies. Countries such as the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, Singapore – all with similar population sizes to New Zealand – have global firms that set the pace and frontier in specific market niches. New Zealand’s small size and distant location from markets have for too long been used as excuses. Other countries have escaped these traps and we can too. This report lays out the challenges New Zealand faces, and the way in which the Government can change direction to boost New Zealand’s long-run productivity and the incomes and wellbeing of all in Aotearoa. This inquiry commenced under the leadership of the previous Chair Murray Sherwin. I acknowledge and appreciate his contributions to this inquiry and report, as well as the major role he played in establishing the Commission and its reputation. I also acknowledge the support of my fellow Commissioners Andrew Sweet, Gail Pacheco and Bill Rosenberg, and the work and dedication of the inquiry team: Geoff Lewis (inquiry director), Steven Bailey, Ron Crawford, Sally Garden, Nicholas Green, Jenesa Jeram, Patrick Nolan, Hamed Shafiee, Geoff Simmons and Jo Smith. Also, the work of Anaru Mill and Declan Millin on Māori firms was hugely valuable. We all benefited immensely from our engagements with many firms and stakeholders, who shared their experiences, wisdom and insights with us, and from the consultants and experts who provided specialist advice and research to the inquiry. On behalf of the Commission, I thank each and every one who submitted on our issues paper and draft report, met with the Commission to discuss the inquiry topic, or provided research and policy inputs. Your contributions have made our advice stronger and better. Dr Ganesh R Ahirao (Ganesh Nana) Chair, New Zealand Productivity Commission Te Kōmihana Whai Hua o Aotearoa Paenga-whāwhā 2021 ii New Zealand firms: Reaching for the frontier Terms of reference New Zealand Productivity Commission inquiry into maximising the economic contribution of New Zealand’s frontier firms Issued by the Ministers of Finance, of Economic Development and of Trade and Export Growth. Pursuant to sections 9 and 11 of the New Zealand Productivity Commission Act 2010, we hereby request that the New Zealand Productivity Commission ("the Commission") undertake an inquiry into maximising the economic contribution of New Zealand's frontier firms. Context While aspects of New Zealand's recent economic performance have been strong, productivity growth is persistently weak and a significant drag on living standards and well•being. This inquiry focusses on a central aspect of New Zealand's productivity performance - the economic contribution of New Zealand's frontier firms. Frontier firms are the most productive firms in the domestic economy within their industry. These firms play an important role in shaping aggregate productivity performance, both through their own performance and through the way they diffuse new technologies and business practices into the New Zealand economy. While New Zealand has some world-leading firms, on average our frontier firms are not performing as well as their international peers, and the diffusion of innovations from the domestic frontier to other domestic firms seems slow. The purpose of this inquiry is to identify policies and interventions that could maximise the performance and contribution to the economy of New Zealand's frontier firms through: • improving the performance of the frontier firms themselves; and • helping innovations diffuse more effectively from frontier firms to other New Zealand firms. This requires using the Productivity Commission's high quality independent analytical capacity, and its links with OECD research and analysis, to accurately characterise the New Zealand situation and identify and evaluate relevant policies and interventions. As the final report will be delivered in the year that New Zealand is hosting APEC, its substance could inform discussions through the Economic Committees. Scope Having regard to the context outlined above, the referring Ministers request that the Commission undertake an inquiry into maximising the contribution of New Zealand's frontier firms to aggregate productivity growth through their own performance and through the diffusion of innovations from frontier firms to other domestic firms. For the purposes of the inquiry the Commission should: • establish a coherent and measurable classification of what constitutes a frontier firm, and what the distribution of New Zealand firms looks like behind the productivity frontier. This could include benchmarking the performance of New Zealand's firms with international peers. • building on research from New Zealand and elsewhere, investigate the internal or external characteristics of New Zealand's frontier firms that correlate with productivity performance, and where
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WAKE up NEW ZEALAND 3 Speech by Douglas Myers to the Tauranga Chamber of Commerce August, 1999
    WWWakeakeake UpUpUp NewNew ZealandZealand ª NEW ZEALAND BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE OCTOBER 1999 The New Zealand Business Roundtable is an organisation of chief executives of major New Zealand businesses. The purpose of the organisation is to contribute to the development of sound public policies that reflect overall New Zealand interests. First published in 1999 by New Zealand Business Roundtable, PO Box 10–147, The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand http://www.nzbr.org.nz ISBN 1–877148–54–7 © 1999 edition: New Zealand Business Roundtable © Text: as acknowledged Production by Daphne Brasell Associates Ltd, Wellington Printed by Astra Print Ltd, Wellington FOREWORD This collection of speeches, submissions and articles is the fifteenth in a series produced by the New Zealand Business Roundtable (NZBR). The previous volumes in the series were Economic and Social Policy (1989), Sustaining Economic Reform (1990), Building a Competitive Economy (1991), From Recession to Recovery (1992), Towards an Enterprise Culture (1993), The Old New Zealand and the New (1994), The Next Decade of Change (1994), Growing Pains (1995), Why Not Simply the Best? (1996), MMP Must Mean Much More Progress (1996), Credibility Promises (1997), The Trouble with Teabreaks, (1998) Excellence Isn't Optional (1998) and Turning Gain into Pain (1999). The material in this volume is organised in six sections: economic directions; the public sector; industry policy and regulation; education and the labour market; social policy; and miscellaneous. It includes an article by David Henderson,
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwisaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions
    PolicyP AdviceA DivisionD Treasury Report: KiwiSaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions Date: 21 October 2005 Treasury Priority: High Security Level: IN-CONFIDENCE Report No: T2005/1974, PAD2005/186 Action Sought Action Sought Deadline Minister of Finance Agree to all recommendations 28 October 2005 Refer to Ministers of Education and Housing Minister of Commerce Agree to recommendations r to dd 28 October 2005 Minister of Revenue Agree to recommendations e to q 28 October 2005 Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Phil Goff) Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Trevor Mallard) Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Clayton Cosgrove) Contact for Telephone Discussion (if required) Name Position Telephone 1st Contact Senior Analyst, Markets, Infrastructure 9 and Government, The Treasury Senior Policy Analyst, Regulatory and Competition Policy Branch, MED Michael Nutsford Policy Manager, Inland Revenue Enclosure: No Treasury:775533v1 IN-CONFIDENCE 21 October 2005 SH-13-0-7 Treasury Report: KiwiSaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions Executive Summary Officials have provided the Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO) with an initial set of drafting instructions on KiwiSaver. However, in preparing these drafting instructions, a range of further issues came to light. We are seeking decisions on these matters now so that officials can provide supplementary drafting instructions to PCO by early November. Officials understand that a meeting may be arranged between Ministers and officials for late next week to discuss the issues contained in this report and on the overall KiwiSaver timeline. A separate report discussing the timeline for KiwiSaver and the work on the taxation of qualifying collective investment vehicles will be provided to you early next week.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Statutes Drafting and Compilation Act 1920
    e31(107) May 2009, Wellington, New Zealand | RepoRt 107 ReVIeW oF tHe StAtUteS DRAFtING AND CoMpILAtIoN ACt 1920 e31(107) May 2009, Wellington, New Zealand | RepoRt 107 ReVIeW oF tHe StAtUteS DRAFtING AND CoMpILAtIoN ACt 1920 the Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of New Zealand. Its purpose is to help achieve law that is just, principled, and accessible, and that reflects the heritage and aspirations of the peoples of New Zealand. The Commissioners are: Right Honourable Sir Geoffrey palmer SC – president Dr Warren Young – Deputy president emeritus professor John Burrows QC George tanner QC Val Sim the General Manager of the Law Commission is Brigid Corcoran the office of the Law Commission is at Level 19, Hp tower, 171 Featherston Street, Wellington postal address: po Box 2590, Wellington 6140, New Zealand Document exchange Number: sp 23534 telephone: (04) 473-3453, Facsimile: (04) 471-0959 email: [email protected] Internet: www.lawcom.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-publication Data New Zealand. Law Commission. Review of the Statutes Drafting and Compilation Act 1920. (New Zealand. Law Commission. Report ; 107) ISBN 978-1-877316 (pbk.) ISBN 978-1-877316-71-5 (internet) 1. New Zealand. Statutes Drafting and Compilation Act 1920. 2. New Zealand. parliamentary Counsel office. 3. Bill drafting—New Zealand. I. title. II. Series: New Zealand. Law Commission. Report ; 107. 328.930773—dc
    [Show full text]
  • Proactive Release
    IN CONFIDENCE DEV-21-MIN-0097 Cabinet Economic Development Committee Minute of Decision This document contains information for the New Zealand Cabinet. It must be treated in confidence and handled in accordance with any security classification, or other endorsement. The information can only be released, including under the Official Information Act 1982, by persons with the appropriate authority. Modernising Landonline: Progress Update March 2021 Portfolio Land Information On 12 May 2021, the Cabinet Economic Development Committee: 1 noted that the Landonline rebuild is within budget and on track for delivery; 2 noted that Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) began the rebuild of core IT systems in August 2020 after completing detailed planning and building capacity; 3 noted that an independent Gateway review in May 2020 rated LINZ’s readiness to proceed with the core system rebuild as Green/Amber; 4 noted that the programme has developed and releasedRelease four Search and Notices products introducing early improvements to how Landonline customers (including the public, territorial authorities, and financial institutions) access LINZ property data; 5 noted that financial approvals from the Minister of Finance, Minister of Land Information, and Minister for the Digital Economy and Communications (joint Ministers) in April 2019 and August 2020 will maintain programme activity until December 2021; 6 noted that reforecast whole-of-life costs prepared for the August 2020 financial approval provided confidence that the programme can be delivered
    [Show full text]
  • Andrea Milković New Zealand and Its Tourism Potential
    New Zealand and its Tourism Potential Milković, Andrea Undergraduate thesis / Završni rad 2017 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: Polytechnic of Međimurje in Čakovec / Međimursko veleučilište u Čakovcu Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:110:471894 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-30 Repository / Repozitorij: Polytechnic of Međimurje in Čakovec Repository - Polytechnic of Međimurje Undergraduate and Graduate Theses Repository MEĐIMURSKO VELEUČILIŠTE U ČAKOVCU STRUČNI STUDIJ MENADŢMENT TURIZMA I SPORTA ANDREA MILKOVIĆ NEW ZEALAND AND ITS TOURISM POTENTIAL ZAVRŠNI RAD ČAKOVEC, 2016. POLYTECHNIC OF MEĐIMURJE IN ČAKOVEC PROFESSIONAL STUDY PROGRAME MANAGEMENT OF TOURISM AND SPORT ANDREA MILKOVIĆ NEW ZEALAND AND ITS TOURISM POTENTIAL FINAL PAPER Mentor: Marija Miščančuk, prof. ČAKOVEC, 2016 Zahvala: Veliku zahvalnost, u prvom redu, dugujem svojoj mentorici, prof. Mariji Miščančuk zbog savjetovanja, usmjeravanja i odvojenog vremena tijekom pisanja ovog završnog rada. Zahvaljujem se i ostalim djelatnicima na MeĎimurskom Veleučilištu u Čakovcu zbog kvalitetnog prenošenja znanja i pomoći tijekom studiranja. Veliko hvala Antoniju Kovačeviću i sestri Nikolini Milković na pomoći oko nabavljanja literature i tehničkoj podršci. Isto tako, zahvaljujem im se na ohrabrenju i moralnoj podršci za vrijeme pisanja rada, ali i tijekom cijelog studiranja. TakoĎer, hvala mojim prijateljima Goranu Haramasu, Martini Šestak, Petri Benotić, Petri Kozulić i Vinki Kugelman koji su bili uz mene i učinili ove studijske godine ljepšima. Hvala mojoj obitelji na podršci i strpljenju tokom studija. ABSTRACT Curiosity of people leads to traveling for pleasure to new places where they can visit and learn about historical buildings, natural beauty and anything that makes one country special, interesting and worth visiting.
    [Show full text]
  • Owner's Expectations Manual
    Owner’s Expectations Manual Owner’s Owner’s Expectations Manual | Crown Ownership Monitoring | Crown Unit Crown Ownership Monitoring Unit July 2012 © Crown Copyright reserved ISBN 978-0-478-39662-1 (Print) ISBN 978-0-478-39663-8 (Online) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Crown and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/nz/. Please note that no departmental or governmental emblem, logo or Coat of Arms may be used in any way which infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Attribution to the Crown should be in written form and not by reproduction of any such emblem, logo or Coat of Arms. Internet The URL for this document on the Treasury’s Crown Ownership Monitoring Unit’s website at July 2012 is http://www.comu.govt.nz/publications/guidance/owners-expectations-manual/ Persistent URL http://purl.oclc.org/nzt/g-oem Table of Contents What’s New? .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Summary of Significant Updates to the Owner’s Expectations Manual ........................................................................ 5 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Intent to 30 June 2016
    STATEMENT OF INTENT TO 30 JUNE 2016 Callaghan Innovation accelerates commercialisation of innovation by firms in New Zealand Contents Foreword 2 What We Do 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Vision for the future 6 3. Our mission, operating environment and objectives 8 4. Partnerships are key to our success 21 5. Managing organisational health and capability 24 6. Consultation and reporting to the Minister 27 7. Key risks and mitigation strategies 28 8. Forecast statement of service performance 29 Statement of responsibility 29 Prospective financial statements to 30 June 2016 39 Appendix One: Intervention logic and indicators 44 Appendix Two: Statement of accounting policies 47 Callaghan Innovation Statement of Intent 1 To 30 June 2013 Foreword The Callaghan Innovation Board is pleased to present this Statement of Intent for Callaghan Innovation for the three years to 30 June 2016. Callaghan Innovation is charged with: • Unlocking the potential of New Zealand’s High Value Manufacturing and Services (HVMS) sector and businesses through increased commercialisation of research, including science, engineering, technology and design (SETD) led innovation, and • Achieving this in ways which strengthen the SETD system’s potential and contribution to meeting businesses’ current and future innovation needs. Callaghan Innovation will do this through increasing the intensity, ambition, capability and benefits – including commercial returns – of engagement between business and SETD providers, and will be held to account for growing commercial outcomes which are directly attributable to leveraging science, technology, engineering and design based innovations. Callaghan Innovation’s performance will be critical to achieving the government’s aims of doubling business expenditure on research and development as a percentage of GDP, and ultimately achieving a step change in the value add and export intensity of New Zealand’s HVMS sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia and Japan Create a New Economic Paradigm
    Australia and Japan Create a New Economic Paradigm Australia-Japan Foundation Project 2015-16 By Manuel Panagiotopoulos Project Sponsored by AUSTRALIA AND JAPAN CREATE A NEW ECONOMIC PARADIGM Australia and Japan Create a New Economic Paradigm By Manuel Panagiotopoulos SEPTEMBER 2016 PREPARED FOR THE AUSTRALIA-JAPAN FOUNDATION Caveat: The opinions expressed herein are the personal opinions of the author. They do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Australia-Japan Foundation or any other Australian or Japanese institution, organisation, official nor any business with which the authors may be associated outside of this publication. Manuel Panagiotopoulos 2016 2 AUSTRALIA AND JAPAN CREATE A NEW ECONOMIC PARADIGM CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 FORWARD A PERSONAL REFLECTION 13 INTRODUCTION 15 SECTION 1 GEOPOLITICS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ECONOMICS… BUT GEOPOLITICS MUST BE INFORMED BY REAL UNDERSTANDING OF ECONOMICS 18 SECTION 2 GEOECONOMICS: USEFUL BUT LIMITED 21 SECTION 3 AUSTRALIA-JAPAN STRATEGIC PRIORITIES: MARITIME FREEDOM; US ALLIANCE; COOPERATION 24 SECTION 4 PROGRESS OF THE AUSTRALIA-JAPAN SECURITY RELATIONSHIP 30 SECTION 5 REITERATING THE NEW COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN AUSTRALIA AND JAPAN AND MOVING TOWARDS TOTAL ECONOMIC ENGAGEMENT NEW COMPLEMENTARITY, RELATIONAL ECONOMICS AND STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT 33 SECTION 6 AUSTRALIA’S SUBMARINE DECISION AND WIDER DEFENCE OPPORTUNITIES 40 SECTION 7 DEVELOPMENTS IN GOODS AND SERVICES TRADE 43 SECTION 8 NEW DIRECTIONS IN JAPANESE INVESTMENT AND 52 BANKING IN AUSTRALIA JAPAN NOW NO2, SOGO SHOSHA,
    [Show full text]
  • Currency Invoicing Decision: New Evidence from a Questionnaire Survey of Japanese Export Firms
    CENTER ON JAPANESE ECONOMY AND BUSINESS Working Paper Series March 2011, No. 293 Currency Invoicing Decision: New Evidence from a Questionnaire Survey of Japanese Export Firms Takatoshi Ito, Satoshi Koibuchi, Kiyotaka Sato, and Junko Shimizu This paper is available online at www.gsb.columbia.edu/cjeb/research COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK Currency Invoicing Decision: New Evidence from a Questionnaire Survey of Japanese Export Firms Takatoshi Itoa, Satoshi Koibuchib, Kiyotaka Satoc, Junko Shimizud Abstract There have been only a few studies that empirically examine the firm's decision on price setting or currency invoicing in international trade. This paper is the first study that conducts the questionnaire survey with all manufacturing firms listed in Tokyo Stock Exchange concerning the choice of invoicing currency at a firm level. Questionnaires were sent out to 920 Japanese firms in September 2009 and 227 firms responded. We present the new firm-level evidence on the choice of invoicing currency by destination and by type of trading partner, and also the share of invoicing currency of Japanese production subsidiaries in Asia. By conducting cross-section analysis, we found the following evidences: (1) highly differentiated goods and/or strong competitiveness of the products promote Japanese yen invoicing in exports to all countries, (2) larger share of intra-firm trade in exports promotes importer's currency invoicing in exports to advanced countries, and (3) the production-sales networks of Japanese firms whose Asian production subsidiaries export their final products to other countries/region promote US dollar invoicing in exports to Asian countries. Keywords: Invoice currency; Japanese exports; intra-firm trade; production network a Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo (Corresponding Author: [email protected]) and Faculty Fellow, RIETI.
    [Show full text]
  • Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister Hon Kris Faafoi Hon Stuart Nash
    Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister Hon Kris Faafoi Hon Stuart Nash Hon Grant Robertson Hon Simon Bridges Hon Paul Goldsmith Hon Todd McClay Parliament Building Wellington, 6160 16 April 2020 Dear Prime Minister, Government Ministers and Opposition Members of Parliament COVID-19 effect on small business leases – call for urgent action to be taken to prevent business closures We refer to our previous letter to each of you dated 2 April 2020. In our letter we wrote: a) calling for urgent action to be taken to prevent business closures; and b) we implored you to address the critical issue of rent relief to all tenants of commercial leases – as many leases do not provide any rent relief. We have had no response from government or the Ministry for Business, Innovation & Employment to our letter and our views do not appear to have been considered in the recent package that was announced yesterday to supposedly assist small to medium-sized businesses. We find this very disappointing. As we said in our letter, we are the peak body representing franchising in NZ. Turnover of the franchising sector represents circa 11% of New Zealand’s GDP. As such franchising is a critical part of the New Zealand economy. And most of the circa 37,000 franchisees in NZ are small businesses – the very people that the government has said need more government support. In our letter we explained to you why rent relief is critical and why we believe urgent action needs to be taken to put cash in the hands of small to medium-sized business owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Thesis Philip Carew
    Māori, Biculturalism and the Assemblies of God in New Zealand, 1970 - 2008 By Philip D. Carew A Thesis Submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in Religious Studies Victoria University of Wellington Te Whare W ānanga O Te Ūpoko O Te Ika a M āui 2009 i ABSTRACT This thesis examines the extent to which the New Zealand Assemblies of God, one of the largest and oldest Pentecostal denominations in the country, has fostered participation by M āori, and its success in doing so between 1970 and 2008. From the advent of the Mana M āori renaissance in the 1970s the idea of biculturalism became an important vehicle for M āori aspirations. As part of its broader agenda, the thesis also considers the church’s response to this bicultural emphasis. The Assemblies’ particular response is analysed in the light of experiences in the mainline denominations and the Apostolic and Destiny churches which either experienced considerable success in attracting M āori participation, or explicitly accommodated the call for a bicultural response using recognised bicultural models. The research is based on the published literature of the Assemblies of God and an extensive range of interviews. These provided detail on the motivations and underlying beliefs that have generated particular responses. The published literature of the other denominations has also been addressed for comparative purposes, along with a range of relevant secondary literature. The Assemblies of God’s flexible structure, clarity of teaching, fostering of indigenous leadership and emphasis on local church autonomy, has enabled it to grow rapidly throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Hauraki-Waikato
    Hauraki-Waikato Published by the Parliamentary Library July 2009 Table of Contents Hauraki-Waikato: Electoral Profile......................................................................................................................3 2008 Election Results (Electorate) .................................................................................................................4 2008 Election Results - Party Vote .................................................................................................................4 2005 Election Results (Electorate) .................................................................................................................5 2005 Election Results - Party Vote .................................................................................................................5 Voter Enrolment and Turnout 2005, 2008 .......................................................................................................6 Hauraki-Waikato: People ...................................................................................................................................7 Population Summary......................................................................................................................................7 Age Groups of the Māori Descent Population .................................................................................................7 Ethnic Groups of the Māori Descent Population..............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]