2000 Quakertown Stony Creek Rail Restoration Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2000 Quakertown Stony Creek Rail Restoration Study Final Report Quakertown-Stony Creek Rail Restoration Study submitted to the Bucks County Planning Commission submitted by Parsons Brinckerhoff Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in association with Norman Day Associates KKO and Associates July 2000 Q UAKERTOWN-STONY C REEK R AIL R ESTORATION S TUDY Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Study Overview..................................................................................................................................................... i B. Development of Preliminary Alternatives.............................................................................................................vi C. Selection of the Lead Alternative .........................................................................................................................ix D. Refinement of the Lead Alternative......................................................................................................................ix E. Evaluation of the Lead Alternative ......................................................................................................................xv F. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................ xvii FINAL REPORT 1. Study Overview.................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Study Approach............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Study Organization.......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Existing and Future Conditions in the Corridor .................................................................................................... 2 2.1. Location and Limits of the Study Corridor ....................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Existing Study Corridor Conditions.................................................................................................................. 5 2.3. Future Study Corridor Conditions.................................................................................................................. 40 2.4. Preliminary Station Locations........................................................................................................................ 46 3. Development of Preliminary Alternatives........................................................................................................... 49 3.1. Guidelines for Preliminary Alternatives Development ................................................................................... 49 3.2. Development of Preliminary Alternatives....................................................................................................... 49 3.3. Definition of Preliminary Alternatives............................................................................................................. 56 3.4. Initial Public Meetings.................................................................................................................................... 62 4. Screening of Preliminary Alternatives................................................................................................................ 62 4.1. Operating Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 62 4.2. Engineering Requirements and Operating Characteristics ........................................................................... 69 4.3. Cost Assessment of Alternatives................................................................................................................... 77 5. Initial Patronage Assessment ............................................................................................................................ 85 6. Selection of the Lead Alternative ....................................................................................................................... 89 7. Refinement of the Lead Alternative.................................................................................................................... 90 7.1. Definition of the Lead Alternative................................................................................................................... 90 7.2. Refinement of the Lead Alternative ............................................................................................................... 92 8. Evaluation of the Lead Alternative ................................................................................................................... 111 8.1. Follow-Up Public Meetings.......................................................................................................................... 112 8.2. Determination of Feasibility ......................................................................................................................... 113 8.3. Next Steps................................................................................................................................................... 113 9. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................... 114 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF in association with Norman Day Associates and KKO & Associates QUAKERTOWN-STONY CREEK RAIL RESTORATION STUDY Final Report TABLE OF FIGURES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure A. Study Corridor Boundaries................................................................................................................................iii Figure B. Alternative 2 Alignment and Stops ....................................................................................................................xi Figure C. Alternatives 2A & 2B Alignment and Stops ..................................................................................................... xiii FINAL REPORT Figure 1. Study Corridor Boundaries ................................................................................................................................ 4 Figure 2. Study Corridor Demographics—1997 Estimated Population............................................................................. 7 Figure 3. Study Corridor Demographics—1997 Estimated Households......................................................................... 10 Figure 4. Study Corridor Demographics—1997 Estimated Employment........................................................................ 13 Figure 5A. Existing Land Use ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 5B. Existing Land Use ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 6A. 1993-1998 Proposed Residential Dwelling Units .......................................................................................... 21 Figure 6B. 1993-1998 Proposed Residential Development Acreage ............................................................................. 22 Figure 6C. 1993-1998 Proposed Non-Residential Development Square Footage......................................................... 23 Figure 6D. 1993-1998 Proposed Residential Development Acreage ............................................................................. 24 Figure 7. 1995 Undeveloped Land.................................................................................................................................. 27 Figure 8A. Current Zoning .............................................................................................................................................. 29 Figure 8B. Current Zoning .............................................................................................................................................. 30 Figure 9. Study Corridor Transit Services....................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 10. Study Corridor Railroad Facilities .................................................................................................................. 35 Figure 11. SEPTA Allentown/Bethlehem Line Weekday Ridership ................................................................................ 36 Figure 12. Study Corridor Demographics—2020 Projected Population.......................................................................... 43 Figure 13. Study Corridor Demographics—2020 Projected Households........................................................................ 44 Figure 14. Study Corridor Demographics—2020 Projected Employment....................................................................... 45 Figure 15. Preliminary Study Corridor Station Locations................................................................................................ 48 Figure 16. Lansdale Track Alignments ........................................................................................................................... 55 Figure 17. Norristown Track Alignments........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Transportation Improvement Program and FY2015-2026 Twelve-Year Program
    FY2015-2026 TIP/TWELVE-YEAR PROJECT LISTING MPMS PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION MPMS PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION 14698 US 422 Roadway reconstruction (M2B). 73214 Ardmore Transit Center, high-level platforms, ADA, lighting, 16150 Tookany Cr. Pkwy. over Tookany Cr. shelters, signs, paving. 16214 PA 611 over SEPTA; replace state bridge. 74813 Ambler Pedestrian Sidewalk Improvements. 16216 Pennswood Rd. over Amtrak; replace local bridge. 74815 Upper Gwynedd curb & sidewalk reconstruction. 16239 New Hanover Sq. Rd. over Swamp Cr.; replace state bridge. 74817 PA 263 Hatboro Corridor safety improvements. 16248 Union Ave. over rail; replace local bridge. 74937 Whitemarsh Township Improvements; new curb, bumpouts, ADA ramps, ped x-ings. 16334 PA 73 at Greenwood Ave.; improve intersection. 77183 Conshohocken station improvements, high-level platforms; con- 16396 Church Rd. over NHSL; replace bridge. struct parking garage. 16400 Arcola Rd. over Perkiomen Cr.; replace county bridge. 77183 Modernize Hatboro station, improve accessibility. 16408 Fruitville Rd. over Perkiomen Cr.; replace county bridge. 77183 Jenkintown station, improve station building; high-level plat- FY2015-2018 16484 Edge Hill Rd. over PA 611; replace state bridge. forms, ADA accessibility. 16577 Ridge Pk. reconstruct, widen & upgrade signals Butler Pk. to Phila. 77183 Roslyn Station Improvements, modernize station; provide im- proved accessibility. 16599 PA 320 reconstruct & widen btw Arden & U. Gulph Rds. Transportation Improvement Program 77183 Willow Grove Station Improvements; to station building, high- 16610 Ashmead Rd. over Tookany Cr.; replace local bridge. level platforms, ADA accessibility. 16658 Old Forty Ft. Rd. over Skippack Cr.; replace state bridge. 77211 PA 309 Connector (Ph. 2), new road from Allentown Rd. and FY2015-2026 Twelve-Year Program 16705 Chester Valley Trail Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande Station Cape May County, NJ Name of Property County and State 5
    NPS Form 10-900 JOYf* 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) !EO 7 RECE!\ United States Department of the Interior National Park Service n m National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ii:-:r " HONAL PARK" -TIO.N OFFICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategones from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form I0-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property________________________________________________ historic name R'Q Grande Station____________________________________ other names/site number Historic Cold Spring Village Station______________________ 2. Location street & number 720 Route 9 D not for publication city or town Lower Township D vicinity state New Jersey_______ code NJ county Cape May_______ code 009 zip code J5§204 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this Q nomination G request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property S meets D doss not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-28-21 Pdf Flyer June-July 21
    The Newsletter of the Potomac Division June-July 2021 Brian Sheron’s Long Island Rail Road 1. What is the name of your layout? Long Island Rail Road - Port Jefferson Branch, Atlantic Branch, and City Terminal Zone [note: Rail Road is two words in the Long Island RR name] 2. What scale is your layout? HO 3. Does your layout have a specific era and/or location? It can be late 1940’s-early 1950’s, or early to mid 1960’s depending upon whether I run steam or diesel and paint scheme on the diesels and passenger cars. 4. What are the overall dimensions of your layout? Approximately 310 square feet covering about 3/4 of my basement Potomac Division, MER, NMRA "56 The Newsletter of the Potomac Division June-July 2021 5. How do you control your layout? Digitrax DCC wireless - one command station and two boosters. 6. When did you start making your layout? Port Jefferson Branch was started in 1988. City Terminal Zone was started in 2005, and Atlantic Branch was started in 2015. 7. Do you host operating sessions or would you consider doing so? I belong to an operations group that meets every week at a different member’s layout and operates for about 1-1/2 hours. The layout can accommodate about 8 operators. Guest are welcome when there are operator vacancies. 8. What type of track (sectional, flex track or hand laid) and switches are on your layout and what is its code? With the exception of the trackage in Sunnyside Yard (which is code 70), all of the trackage on the layout is Code 83 flex track.
    [Show full text]
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Congestion Management Process Supplemental Projects Status Memorandum
    2011 Congestion Management Process Supplemental Projects Status Memorandum May 2012 2011 Congestion Management Process Supplemental Projects Status Memorandum May 2012 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is dedicated to uniting the region’s elected officials, planning professionals, and the public with a common vision of making a great region even greater. Shaping the way we live, work, and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting the environment, and enhancing the economy. We serve a diverse region of nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Philadelphia Region — leading the way to a better future. The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) New Jersey
    Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) for New Jersey By ORF 467 Transportation Systems Analysis, Fall 2004/05 Princeton University Prof. Alain L. Kornhauser Nkonye Okoh Mathe Y. Mosny Shawn Woodruff Rachel M. Blair Jeffery R Jones James H. Cong Jessica Blankshain Mike Daylamani Diana M. Zakem Darius A Craton Michael R Eber Matthew M Lauria Bradford Lyman M Martin-Easton Robert M Bauer Neset I Pirkul Megan L. Bernard Eugene Gokhvat Nike Lawrence Charles Wiggins Table of Contents: Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction to Personal Rapid Transit .......................................................................................... 3 New Jersey Coastline Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Burlington County (M. Mosney '06) ..............................................................................................6 Monmouth County (M. Bernard '06 & N. Pirkul '05) .....................................................................9 Hunterdon County (S. Woodruff GS .......................................................................................... 24 Mercer County (M. Martin-Easton '05) ........................................................................................31 Union County (B. Chu '05) ...........................................................................................................37 Cape May County (M. Eber '06) …...............................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Rail Road T E a Shelter Island) Montauk D M U N S S O H Ip D C N O L A
    B r i d Cross Sound Ferry g e p o (Orient Point, LI- r t & New London, Conn) P Greenport o r North Ferry Co. t J e (Greenport-Shelter Island) f f e r s o Southold n South Ferry Co. S (North Haven- Long Island Rail Road t e a Shelter Island) Montauk d m u n s o h S i p d C n o l a . Key I s Mattituck g Amagansett o n East Hampton Full Time rail station L Peconic Port Jefferson Bridgehampton Accessible station Bay Stony Brook Part Time rail station Riverhead PORT JEFFERSON BRANCH Southampton Kings Park Major Transit Hub St. James Hampton Bays Locust Valley Northport MONTAUK BRANCH © 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Authority Oyster Bay Glen Cove Greenlawn Smithtown SUFFOLK Westhampton Glen Street OYSTER BAY BRANCH Huntington Speonk Port Sea Cliff RONKONKOMA BRANCH Yaphank Washington Cold Spring Harbor PORT WASHINGTON BRANCH Glen Head Medford Manhas Syosset Ronkonkoma G Plandome Greenvale Mastic-Shirley r THE ea s t e NA SSAU BRONX Li Nec t Central Islip t Bellport Doug tle Nec k Roslyn Brentwood Fl N N M ush Aubu Patchogue A B B l et i Murra a asto k Albertson Hicksville Great Oakdale T s ng–M road Deer Park -W rnda ysi Davis Park T n River i y w d New Mer East Wyandanch A ll a Hi le e M Sayville Ferry Co. et in S ay i Williston W s l i neol Pinelawn Islip Poin l F H llon Westbury NH oo t loral y d B de P a Farmingdale A s t e A Carle Place Bethpage Bay Shore Sayville Ferry id QUEENS lle Par v M e Queens k s ros Service, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Passenger System Survey, Phase III Date Published June 2004 a Working Document Publication No
    JUNE 2004 intermodal passenger system survey phaseiii A WORKING DOCUMENT DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Septa-Phila-Transit-Street-Map.Pdf
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q v A Mill Rd Cricket Kings Florence P Kentner v Jay St Linden Carpenter Ho Cir eb R v Newington Dr Danielle Winding W Eagle Rd Glen Echo Rd B Ruth St W Rosewood Hazel Oak Dr Orchard Dr w For additional information on streets and b v o o r Sandpiper Rd A Rose St oodbine1500 e l Rock Road A Surrey La n F Cypress e Dr r. A u Dr Dr 24 to Willard Dr D 400 1 120 ant A 3900 ood n 000 v L v A G Norristown Rd t Ivystream Rd Casey ie ae er Irving Pl 0 Beachwoo v A Pine St y La D Mill Rd A v Gwynedd p La a Office Complex A Rd Br W Valley Atkinson 311 v e d 276 Cir Rd W A v Wood y Mall Milford s r Cir Revere A transit services ouside the City of 311 La ay eas V View Dr y Robin Magnolia R Daman Dr aycross Rd v v Boston k a Bethlehem Pike Rock Rd A Meyer Jasper Heights La v 58 e lle H La e 5 Hatboro v Somers Dr v Lindberg Oak Rd A re Overb y i t A ld La Rd A t St ll Wheatfield Cir 5 Lantern Moore Rd La Forge ferson Dr St HoovStreet Rd CedarA v C d right Dr Whitney La n e La Round A Rd Trevose Heights ny Valley R ay v d rook Linden i Dr i 311 300 Dekalb Pk e T e 80 f Meadow La S Pl m D Philadelphia, please use SEPTA's t 150 a Dr d Fawn V W Dr 80- arminster Rd E A Linden sh ally-Ho Rd W eser La o Elm Aintree Rd ay Ne n La s Somers Rd Rd S Poplar RdS Center Rd Delft La Jef v 3800 v r Horseshoe Mettler Princeton Rd Quail A A under C A Poquessing W n Mann Rd r Militia Hill Rd v rrest v ve m D p W UPPER Grasshopper La Prudential Rd lo r D Newington Lafayette A W S Lake Rd 1400 3rd S eldon v e Crestview ly o TURNPIKE A Neshaminy s o u Rd A Suburban Street and Transit Map.
    [Show full text]
  • CC Visitors Map 2018 48X48
    Center City Philadelphia Street & SEPTA Transit Map Suburban Station Jefferson Station Museum of the American Revolution Penn Medicine Station © 2020 SEPTA 1 Penn’s Landing Center, Philadelphia History Museum 6 City Hall 9 Philadelphia Museum of Art 13 South Philadelphia Sports Delaware River Waterfront at the Atwater Kent Broad & Market Sts Benjamin Franklin Pkwy & Kelly Drive & Entertainment Complex Independence Seaport Museum, Grand Routes: MFL, 17, 21, 33, 38, 42, 48 City Hall Visitor’s Center, Masonic Temple, Fairmount Water Works, Broad St & Pattison Ave Plaza, Riverlink Ferry PA Academy of Fine Arts Boathouse Row, Azalea Garden Route: BSL, 4 Routes: MFL, 17, 21, 33, 42, 48 4 African American Museum Routes: MFL, BSL, 4, 7, 16, 33, 38, 48 Routes: 32, 38 in Philadelphia 14 South Street 2 Christ Church 7th & Arch Sts 7 Love Park / Suburban Station 10 Please Touch Museum Front St to 10th St 2nd & Market Sts Routes: MFL, 47, 48, 17, 33 16th & JFK Blvd 4231 Avenue of the Republic Fairmount Park Dining, Shopping, Entertainment Old City Restaurants/Shops Routes: MFL, BSL, 17, 32, 38, 48 Routes: 38 Routes: 47, 57 Routes: MFL, 17, 33, 48, 57 5 Convention Center Area 12th & Market Sts 8 Parkway Museums District 11 Philadelphia Zoo 15 Italian Market 3 Independence Mall Area PA Convention Center, Reading Terminal, Benjamin Franklin Pkwy at 18th St 34th & Girard Ave 9th St & Washington Ave 3rd & 6th, Walnut to Race Fashion District, Chinatown, Franklin Institute, Academy of Routes: BSL to Route 15 Trolley America’s oldest outdoor market Visitor’s
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Transportation on Long Island
    Access to Transportation on Long Island Technical Report Prepared by: In association with: Abrams-Cherwony & Associates Eng-Wong, Taub & Associates Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates April 2007 Access to Transportation on Long Island Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1 2.0 Existing Conditions...................................................................................................................3 2.1 Demographic Analysis.................................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Population Density ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Transit-Supportive Areas............................................................................................ 6 2.1.3 Target Markets ........................................................................................................... 8 Senior Citizens.................................................................................................................... 8 Persons with Disabilities ..................................................................................................... 8 Youth................................................................................................................................... 8 Households Without Automobiles ......................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Center City Tear-Off Map
    ® SEPTA CENTER CITY PHILADELPHIA STREET AND TRANSIT MAP Aquar Chestnut S 1 P C ennsylv Mt V ernon St Fair H d mount A 38 61 Hill East, 57 r U M K Green St 47 v Y 33 a Clay St o elly Dr L r ium Dr f K t B Fox Chase, St 5-25 i 38 Wilcox St Franklin I n Green k L L 7-48 r L u ania Green St o Lansdale/ ianna St n 25 33-49 H.S. 9 t 5-57 - h 32 Brandywine St a a 25-43 Shedwic 2 e r d 47 7 r Or 7-48 Doylestown, Spring Garden St 43 -4 K 2 - Brandywine St 18 F 4 in A Monterey St Masterman H.S. R v r -6 g id Manayunk/ o Spring airmount 2 D Spring Garden St t e 43 t F Av - r g 43 1 e 47m e Norristown, n Garden 2 4 S n e Melon St - p i Station k St Nectarine St 49 C 1 43 Spring Garden 43-61 Warminster, S 43 L 38 u 38 2 43 32 ood r E Buttonw n 5 Beach St Station Nectarine St t d Buttonwood St West Trenton P allace St o St r o W le i 25 T 30 Eakins Oval F Nob o t Community College 47-61 f A Buttonw e Lines ican St v ood St a non St St k t r P A 43 57 er of Philadelphia n V 32nd St R r 38 n ord ercy St Mt National St Hamilton St ront St 61 R o 4-16 erf e a vDouglas St EXPWY Hamilton St o r 5th St Ha 38 c g p F Amer 5 s s F F Transportation Center Transportation Transportation Center Transportation i 43 7th St 6th St 19th St k - 31 o - n n t t 12th St T 2 45 n 33-49 a Noble St .
    [Show full text]