DOCSLIB.ORG

Update on North-West Syria Planning Assumptions 15 August 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Update on North-West Syria Planning Assumptions 15 August 2018 Update on North-West Syria Planning Assumptions 15 August 2018 Overview-Idleb Total estimated Areas population Area 1 380,524 Area 2 17,449 Area 3 169,844 Area 4 425,266 Total estimated 993,083 population Pop (HNO IDP (HNO PiN (HNO Pop Updated IDP Updated PiN Updated Areas 2018) 2018) 2018) (May 2018) (May 2018) (May 2018) Idleb, western Aleppo, Northern Hama and 2,650,019 1,158,469 1,730,637 2,987,716 1,379,629 2,095,296 Eastern Latakia Scenario 1: GoS and allies launch a large-scale military offensive against HTS and NSAGs- MEDIUM to HIGH Description: • Large-scale military operation against NSAGs in northern Hama and south & east Idleb countryside with the aim to control the M5 highway. Humanitarian Impact: • Displacement of about 487,000 people mainly towards northern Idleb, Afrin, Azaz, Atareb and Albab districts. • A smaller number is anticipated to go to GoS areas 70,000-100,000. The number is likely to be increased if the offensive continues for long time and evacuation corridors were identified. Scenario 2: Negotiations between the Astana guarantors, GoS and NSAGs reach a local agreement- MEDIUM to HIGH Description: • Local agreements may be reached starting in locations in northern Hama, eastern Lattakia and east of the M5 (areas marked as 1, 2, 3 in the map) • Inter-factional fighting may be exacerbated and spoilers of the agreements may resort to violence Humanitarian Impact: • Displacement to north-western parts of Idleb. • Restrictions on cross-border activities. • Return movement of 150,000-200,000 to areas of origin, mainly in northern Hama. Scenario 3: Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) and allied FSA groups launch an offensive against HTS and other Al-Qaeda affiliated groups- HIGH Description: • Military operation against HTS and other Al Qaeda affiliated groups. Humanitarian Impact: • up to 300,000-500,000 people could be displaced within NSAG-controlled areas as a result, mainly from Idleb city. • Increased limitations on humanitarian operations Scenario 4: Inter-factional fighting between NSAGs in Idleb and in west Aleppo countryside- HIGH Description: • Fighting may erupt between NSAGs & HTS. • Increased tension between HTS and ISIL cells in Idleb (previously witnessed in Salqin). Humanitarian Impact: • Displacement of about 300,000-500,000 people mainly from Idleb city. • Displacement from NSAG areas to GoS areas could reach 70,000-100,000 people. • Increased interference and restrictions on humanitarian operations Overview- Afrin & Tall Refaat Total estimated Areas population Fafin Area 34,360 Tall Refaat Area 74,508 Total 108,868 Scenario 1: Status Quo- High Description: • Tall Refaat will remain under joint YPG and GoS control. Humanitarian Impact: • Very limited movement from Afrin to Tall Refaat. • Very limited movement from Tall Refaat to NES. Scenario 2: Agreement that allows Turkey/TAF to control Tall Refaat- LOW Description: • Agreement between Turkey and RF reach an to hand over control of Tall Refaat (town or sub-district) to TAF/FSA or establishing a jon TAF/RF buffer zone under joint Russian- Turkish monitoring. Humanitarian Impact: • FSA/TAF controls Tall Refaat town: Displacement of some 30,000 people to KSA/GoS areas in Fafin and surrounding areas or to NES. • FSA/TAF controls Tall Refaat enclave including Fafin: Displacement of some 90,000-100,000 people to NES. • Return of some 5,000 IDPs from Azaz to Tall Refaat. Scenario 3: FSA/TAF offensive over Tall Refaat enclave- LOW Description: • FSA/TAF military offensive to control over of Tall Refaat town or the whole subdistrict, including villages under Kurdish forces (Fafin and surrounding) or former Kurdish forces held areas (Kafr Naya, dir Jmal, Ziyaraa, etc.). Humanitarian Impact: • Displacement of some 90,000-100,000 people to GoS areas in Nubl and surrounding area. • No access for SARC nor other humanitarian actors from within Syria. • Increase humanitarian access for XB partners. • Return of some 5,000 IDPs from Azaz to Tall Refaat. Questions .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021
    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, 6 May 2018a; administrative divisions: GADM, 6 May 2018b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 12 March 2021; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 1539 195 615 violence Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 2 Battles 650 308 1174 Violence against civilians 394 185 218 Methodology 3 Strategic developments 364 1 1 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 158 0 0 Riots 9 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 3114 689 2008 Disclaimer 7 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). 2 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
    [Show full text]
  • RECOVER) Third Quarterly Report April 1 – June 30, 2017 Funded by USAID/Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA)
    Restorative, Essential, and Comprehensive assistance for Vulnerable populations to Enhance Resiliency (RECOVER) Third Quarterly Report April 1 – June 30, 2017 Funded by USAID/Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) Country Contact Headquarters Contact Program Summary: Award Number: AID- OFDA-A-16-00050 Start Date: October 1, 2016 End Date: September 30, 2017 Report Date: July 31, 2017 Total New Award: $24,291,687 Mercy Corps – North Syria Quarter 1: AID- OFDA-A-16-00050 1 ABBREVIATIONS AOG – Armed Opposition Group AIU – Access and Information Unit BCP – Border Crossing Point GoS – Government of Syria IDP – Internally Displaced Person IED – Improvised Explosive Device INGO – International Non-Governmental Organization ISIS – Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (also known as ISIL/IS) LC – Local Council M&E – Monitoring and Evaluation NFI – Non-Food Item NGO – Non-Governmental Organization OFDA – Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance PDM – Post Distribution Monitoring PSS – Psychosocial Support RuAF – Russian Air Force SDF – Syrian Defense Forces RVD - Registration, Verification, and Distribution TRC – Turkish Red Crescent YPG – People’s Protection Unit (A Kurdish armed group) Mercy Corps – North Syria Quarter 3: AID- OFDA-A-16-00050 2 I. Program Overview Until the revocation of Mercy Corps’ NGO status in Turkey, on February 21, 2017, Mercy Corps had been implementing cross border programming from Turkey to northern Syria since 2012, providing multi-sector, lifesaving and holistic assistance (NFIs, WASH, Protection, Shelter, Food Security
    [Show full text]
  • Isis: the Political History of the Messianic Violent Non-State Actor in Syria
    2016 T.C. YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DISSERTATION ISIS: THE POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE MESSIANIC VIOLENT NON-STATE ACTOR IN SYRIA PhD Dissertation Ufuk Ulutaş Ufuk Ulutaş PhD INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Ankara, 2016 ISIS: THE POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE MESSIANIC VIOLENT NON-STATE ACTOR IN SYRIA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY BY UFUK ULUTAŞ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILISOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AUGUST 2016 2 Approval of the Institute of Social Sciences Yrd.Doç. SeyfullahYıldırım Manager of Institute I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr.Birol Akgün Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Birol Akgün Prof. Muhittin Ataman Supervisor Co-Supervisor Examining CommitteeMembers Prof. Dr. Birol Akgün YBÜ, IR Prof. Dr. Muhittin Ataman YBÜ, IR Doç Dr. Mehmet Şahin Gazi, IR Prof. Dr. Erdal Karagöl YBÜ, Econ Dr. Nihat Ali Özcan TOBB, IR 3 I hereby declare that all information in this thesis has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work; otherwise I accept all legal responsibility. Ufuk Ulutaş i To my mom, ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There is a long list of people to thank who offered their invaluable assistance and insights on ISIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Afrin Sitrep #1
    Syrian Arab Republic : Afrin Crisis Situation Report No. 1 as of 5 April 2018 This report is produced by OCHA in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period from 29 March to 5 April 2018. Highlights 137 ,070 20 ,000 32,200+ $73m people remain outpatient medical Nutrition supplies in additional funding displaced from Afrin district consultations conducted on delivered for children under required by the UN and to other locations in Aleppo partners in Syria to assist a daily basis five and mothers governorate those affected • Following military confrontations in the Afrin district of Aleppo governorate since 20 January an estimated 137,070 people remain displaced in the Tall Refaat area, Nabul and Zahraa, Fafin, and surrounding villages. • There is a lack of freedom of movement for IDPs, and many continue to be prevented by different parties to the conflict from seeking safety and services in Aleppo city or from returning to their homes in Afrin district. • The UN and its partners have scaled up the response to the displaced in the Tall Refaat area, Nabul and Zahraa, Fafin, and surrounding villages, with the provision of food, NFIs, WASH, shelter, nutrition and health and protection services among others forms of assistance. Between 02 and 04 April, several UN shipments consisting of food supplies, as well as NFIs, health and WASH items were sent to assist the affected population that remains in Afrin district. Distribution of these supplies by Syrian NGOs on the ground is ongoing. • The UN and partners in Damascus reiterate that they are facing a $73m funding gap to respond with life-saving assistance and protection services to all those displaced from Afrin district to Tall Refaat and surrounding communities and are urgently appealing for additional funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Conflict Summary | 24 February – 1 March 2020
    WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 24 FEBRUARY – 1 MARCH 2020 WHOLE OF SYRIA SUMMARY • NORTHWEST | The Government of Syria (GoS) offensive in northwest Syria changed focus to southern areas of the Hayyat Tahrir al Sham dominated enclave. Turkish and GoS military forces traded fire in the northwest for a second consecutive week. Conflict in the Tal Rifaat area reached the highest levels in 12 months. Two explosions struck Al Bab city, bringing the total for 2020 to four. • SOUTH & CENTRAL | Improvised explosive devices (IED) struck Damascus again this week. There was an increase in attacks on GoS-aligned personnel in southern Syria. In Quneitra Governorate, there was an increase in Israeli against GoS and Palestinian targets. • NORTHEAST | For the first time in five weeks, there was a reduction in conflict levels around the Turkish occupied Operation Peace Spring areas. Attacks on Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) personnel continued along the Euphrates and Khabour River Valleys, including an SDF-aligned municipal building in Hajin. Figure 1: Dominant actors’ area of control and influence in Syria as of 29 February 2020. NSOAG stands for Non-state Organized Armed Groups. Also, please see footnote 1 on page 2. Page 1 of 5 WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 24 FEBRUARY – 1 MARCH 2020 NORTHWEST SYRIA1 The focus of the Government of Syria (GoS) offensive against the Hayyat Tahrir al Sham (HTS) dominated northwest Syria switched focus this week. After the previous week’s gains in areas west of Aleppo City, GoS forces captured large areas in the south of the enclave, in the vicinity of Kafr Nabol town. Over 42 locations were captured in this maneuver,2 including seven areas3 that were taken after opposition groups withdrew.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematisch Ambtsbericht Syrië De Veiligheidssituatie
    Thematisch ambtsbericht Syrië De veiligheidssituatie Datum Juli 2019 Pagina 1 van 103 Thematisch ambtsbericht Syrië | De veiligheidssituatie juni 2019 Colofon Plaats Den Haag Opgesteld door Cluster Ambtsberichten (CAB) Pagina 2 van 103 Thematisch ambtsbericht Syrië | De veiligheidssituatie juni 2019 Inhoudsopgave Colofon ....................................................................................................... 2 Inhoudsopgave ............................................................................................. 3 Inleiding ...................................................................................................... 5 1 Veiligheidssituatie ....................................................................................... 7 1.1 Politieke ontwikkelingen ................................................................................. 7 1.2 Veiligheidssituatie ........................................................................................ 17 1.2.1 Provincies Damascus en Rif Dimashq (Ruraal Damascus) ................................... 17 1.2.2 Provincies Dara’a en Quneitra ........................................................................ 19 1.2.3 Provincie Al-Suweida .................................................................................... 23 1.2.4 Provincie Tartous ......................................................................................... 24 1.2.5 Provincie Lattakia ........................................................................................ 24 1.2.6
    [Show full text]
  • G S Yrian a Rab R Ep Ub
    36°20'0"E 36°30'0"E 36°40'0"E 36°50'0"E 37°0'0"E 37°10'0"E 37°20'0"E 37°30'0"E 37°40'0"E 37°50'0"E 38°0'0"E 38°10'0"E 1 2 c 0 i THE INFORMATION DISPLAYED ON THIS MAP CAN CHANGE AT ANY 2 TIME DUR TO THE CURRENT SITUATION IN SYRIA. LOGISTICS l y Road Rehabilitation Status CLUSTER CANNOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS r OF THE INFORMATION DISPLAYED AND ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR Bubana Be!kok a b Completed RELIANCE ON THE DATA. PLEASE TAKE CARE TO VERIFY THE u INFORMATION BEFORE USE. PLEASE ALSO NOT THE MAP REFLECTS Salim r ONLY CONFIRMED INFORMATION RECEIVED BY THE CLUSTE! R AND !Dakmatash b Ongoing u SYRIAN ARAB DOES NOT COVER ALL ACCESS INFORMATION IN SYRIA. THE MAP Upper Qurran e REPUBLIC DOES NOT REFLECT THE POLITIONCAL! SITUATION OR ADDRESS F SECURITY ISSUES. Planned Jebnet Qantarra - JARABLUS ! p Lower Jbeileh Qantaret N MEIDAN EKBIS " ! - 0 - Qorrat Quri ' !Zur Maghar Kikan ! 0 THIS MAP NEEDS YOUR HELP 5 ° Qalam - 6 s Border Crossing Point 3 ! IF YOU HAVE UPDATED ACCESS INFORMATIDOeNre bCzOanNCERNING e Bandrak ! !Kherbet Atu g! u Hozan Kusan ! Hjeileh - ACCESS, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOGISTICS CLU! STER INFORMATION g ! Shankal ! t Jarablus Upper Dar ! Ali Jrables ! MANAGEMENT OFFICER g Open ! Elbaz Mazdalfa a ! Elatrash - Bistek De!rbazina ! t - Olikar !Dawdaw ! !Halawaniyeh R !Za'ra !Darb Elnob S Hayamli ! Tall Shair ! g Qorna Sporadically Open ! ! ! Sara Rajabiyeh - Himar Middle Qojli n ! ! Aaliaa - !Shaltah !Marwiyeh o Lower Shyookh Ali B!aski ! i b Qarah Baba g ! ! Khader Closed ! Ali Jaru t ! ! Qandariya Tal Elamara Bilaliyeh
    [Show full text]
  • Parte 4: Visión General De Las Infraestructuras Públicas Y Los Servicios Sociales
    PARTE 4: VISIÓN GENERAL DE LAS INFRAESTRUCTURAS PÚBLICAS Y LOS SERVICIOS SOCIALES 11. INFORME GENERAL SOBRE EL CANTÓN DE SHEHBA EN BASE A LA INFORMACIÓN APORTADA POR LA ADMINISTRACIÓN DEL CANTÓN DE SHEHBA Grupos islamistas apoyados por Turquía controlan el cantón de Shehba desde Azaz a Manbij, incluyendo las siguientes áreas: Azaz, Tel Rifat, Akhtarin, Bab, Alraii, Jarablus y Manbij. Desde 2014, este cantón ha sufrido la injusticia y brutalidad de terroristas y mercenarios, entre los que se incluyen ISIS, Nusra, el Grupo del Sultán Murad y Ahrar al-Sham. Estos grupos provocaron el desplazamiento de unas 90.000 personas de la región (Shehba) hacia el cantón de Afrin. Afrin 25 ha hospedado a cientos de miles de personas desplazadas de diferentes partes de Siria, quienes, como los propios pobladores de Shehba, habían sufrido esta injusticia y terrorismo de mercenarios apoyados por Turquía y otros Estados regionales. Algunas partes de Shehba, que estuvieron previamente bajo el control de los mercenarios y terroristas apoyados por Turquía, incluido Daesh, fueron liberadas en enero de 2016. Estas áreas incluyen Tel Rifat, Kafr Naya, Kafr Naseh, Ahris, Um Hosh y Fafin, así como 58 aldeas. Algunos de estos pueblos estaban deshabitados como resultado de las minas y la destrucción causada por ISIS. El 3 de febrero de 2016, mantuvimos nuestra segunda reunión en Afrin. A esta reunión asistieron más de 500 miembros de los comités de consejo, entre los cuales el Consejo de Ancianos y los Comités de éste. Como resultado de nuestro trabajo, cambiamos la denominación de nuestro consejo por el de Consejo de la Administración del Cantón de Shehba.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdyjska Ofensywa Pod Ostrzałem
    15.02.2016 KURDYJSKA OFENSYWA POD OSTRZAŁEM. SCENARIUSZE INTERWENCJI W SYRII Syryjskie Siły Demokratyczne (SDF) z kantonu Afrin, kontynuują ofensywę w rejonie Azaz. Wywołało to nerwową reakcję Turcji, która rozpoczęła ostrzał pozycji SDF. Przejęcie przez SDF kontroli nad Azaz zniweczy bowiem ostatecznie tureckie plany w Syrii. Jednocześnie Arabia Saudyjska przygotowuje się do wojny w Syrii, choć w tej kwestii wciąż jest dużo niewiadomych i niepotwierdzonych informacji - pisze Witold Repetowicz. SDF, którego trzonem jest kurdyjskie YPG, ale w którego skład wchodzą też oddziały umiarkowanej opozycji, niezwiązanej z Turcją i Arabią Saudyjską (m.in. Jaysh al Thuwar czy Jabhat al Akrad), rozpoczęło natarcie na Azaz oraz Tell Rifaat. Jeżeli chodzi o to drugie miasto to w nocy z 14/15.02 zostało w połowie opanowane przez SDF. SDF przejęła też całkowitą kontrolę nad drogą łączącą Tell Rifaat z Azazem, zdobywając m.in. wioskę Ayn Daqnah. Natomiast na południe od Tell Rifaat SAA (armia syryjska) zajęła wioskę Kafr Naya. Postępy SDF możliwe są częściowo dzięki wsparciu lotnictwa rosyjskiego, gdyż siły USA nie wspierają SDF w rejonie Afrin-Azaz. Ponadto niektóre tereny dobrowolnie poddają się SDF, chcąc w ten sposób uniknąć nalotów rosyjskich i zajęcia przez SAA (tak było m.in. w przypadku Menagh). Zdobycie przez SDF Tall Rifat otworzy im drogę do Mare (10 km od Tall Rifaat), ostatniego obok Azazu miasta w dystrykcie Azaz, które pozostaje pod kontrolą protureckich dżihadystów. Mare to również miejsce, w którym przebiega granica z terenami pod kontrolą Państwa Islamskiego (Daesh), z której jest zaledwie około 70 km do miasta Manbidż, kontrolowanego przez Daesh, od którego z kolei siły SDF z kantonu Kobane dzieli tylko kilka kilometrów.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Displaced People from Afrin Canton in Shahba, Northern Syria and Surrounding Areas
    REPORT ON THE DISPLACED PEOPLE FROM AFRIN CANTON IN SHAHBA, NORTHERN SYRIA AND SURROUNDING AREAS THE DEMOCRATIC SELF ADMINISTRATION OF AFRIN [email protected] CONTENTS Part 1: Preface 1. Introduction .......................................................................... 4 2. Shahba Region ........................................................................ 5 Part 2: Overview of Displaced People from Afrin / Census 3. Number of Displaced People from Afrin .................................................. 7 4. Number of Displaced People Formerly Displaced from Shahba ............................. 8 5. Estimated Number of People Displaced to Other Cities .................................... 9 Part 3: Field Studies – Examples of Displaced People in Different Villages of Shahba 6. Fafine ...............................................................................11 6.1. Fafine Chips Factory ..............................................................11 6.2. Heleza School ...................................................................12 7. Ahris ................................................................................15 7.1. KPC Building ....................................................................15 7.2. Al-Sharq School .................................................................16 8. Kafr Naya ...........................................................................17 9. Tel Rifat .............................................................................18 10. Sherawa ...........................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Situational Overview 137,070 150,000 100,000 $73M
    Syrian Arab Republic : Afrin Crisis Situation Report No. 3 as of 24 April 2018 This report is produced by OCHA with inputs from Sectors and humanitarian partners. It covers the period from 16 April to 24 April 2018. Highlights 137,070 150,000 100,000 $73m people remain People estimated to IDPs benefited from in funding required by displaced from Afrin district in remain in Afrin district, water trucking services in IDP the UN and partners in Syria to locations in Aleppo exposed to hostilities and with locations assist those affected by the governorate and Al-Hassakeh limited access to humanitarian Afrin crisis assistance • An estimated 137,070 individuals remain displaced from Afrin district to the Tall Refaat, Nabul, Zahraa and Fafin areas as a result of military operations in Afrin that began on 20 January. At the same time, it is estimated that as many as 50,000 people are still in Afrin city and an additional 100,000 in rural Afrin. • The freedom of movement of IDPs remains restricted, preventing the displaced population from seeking safety and services in Aleppo city or returning to Afrin district. • Humanitarian organizations remain concerned about the safety, protection, and freedom of movement of civilians from Afrin district impacted by hostilities. While the UN remains unable to reach Afrin from inside Syria, cross-border convoys have so far delivered food and healthcare assistance for 20,000 people. • As per the latest update of the humanitarian community, the UN and partners in Damascus require at least $73m in order to continue responding with life-saving assistance and protection services to those displaced from Afrin district to Nabul, Zahraa, Tall Refaat, Fafin, and surrounding communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bi-Weekly Situation Report Whole of Syria
    BI-WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT: WHOLE OF SYRIA – ISSUE 8 | 16 – 30 APRIL 2021 BI-WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT WHOLE OF SYRIA Issue 12 | 16 – 30 June 2021 BI-WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT: WHOLE OF SYRIA – ISSUE 12 | 16 – 30 JUNE 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. COVID-19 UPDATE .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. COVID-19 Statistical Summary at Whole of Syria Level............................................................................... 1 1.2. Daily Distribution of COVID-19 Cases at Whole of Syria Level .................................................................... 1 1.3. Distribution of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths at Whole of Syria Level .......................................................... 2 1.4. Distribution of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Governorate and Outcome ............................................... 2 2. WHO-SYRIA RESPONSE........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1. COVAX Vaccines .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Points of Entry (PoE) .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4. Environmental Health ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]