Shahba, Northern Syria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shahba, Northern Syria SHAHBA, NORTHERN SYRIA June 15, 2018 REPORT ON THE DISPLACED PEOPLE IN THE SHAHBA CAMPS THE DEMOCRATIC SELF ADMINISTRATION OF AFRIN [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Afrin - Save Haven for Refugees during the Syrian Civil War ................................ 3 2. Mass Displacement from Afrin City from 14/03/2018 – 18/03/2018 ........................ 6 3. Situation in Shehba Region ............................................................10 4. Report on the General Situation of Refugee Camps in Shahba .............................13 5. Number of Refugees Accomodated in Refugee Camps ...................................21 5.1. Berxwedan. 22 5.2. Serdem .........................................................................22 5.3. Efrin ............................................................................22 5.4. Total Number of Refugees Living in Camps in Shehba ................................22 6. Health Situation in the Refugee Camps (Kurdish Red Crescent - heyva sor) .................23 7. Education for Refugee Children (Committee of Education for a Democratic Society) ..........30 8. General Supplies and Infrastructure (Municipality of Afrin and Shehba) .....................35 9. International Call for Support ..........................................................47 THE DEMOCRATIC SELF ADMINISTRATION OF AFRIN [email protected] 01 AFRIN - SAVE HAVEN FOR REFUGEES DURING THE SYRIAN CIVIL WAR 3 of 50 AFRIN – SAVE HAVEN FOR REFUGEES Many refugees also lived in houses and flats among DURING THE SYRIAN the locals. CIVIL WAR The Robar Refugee Camp was created by the Board of Work and Social Affairs to address the needs of poorer refugees. The camp, which accommodated 3,000 people, was funded in full by the Kurdish administration ince the beginning of the Syrian conflict, and by the people of Afrin. All people there were thousands of displaced people from other parts provided with food and water. Meetings about mutual of the country have poured into the Canton coexistence and fraternity of peoples, violence against of Afrin, fleeing terrorism and civil war. To women, risks associated with teenage marriages, Sthem, Afrin was a pocket of peace and stability under childrens’ issues, cleanliness and sanitation were the rule of the Kurdish Autonomous Administration, held there. The main goal of these programs was to which espoused ethnic and religious coexistence and help the people there adapt to normal life after facing tolerance. the trauma of war and displacement. While Afrin was under siege by both the Turkish The administration also provided free transport for state and its allied jihadist militias in Syria, the economic refugees to and from work, so that they could be situation deteriorated. Nevertheless, Afrin and its self-sufficient like any other civilian in the region. surrounding areas managed to accommodate more At the camp itself, special work opportunities for than three hundred thousand mostly Arab refugees. women were introduced. The local administration had to accommodate some of them in mosques, schools, and other places, like When more displaced people arrived in 2013, a sec- Qetme, Kafr Janna, and Midan Akbaz train stations. ond camp was set up between Der Jamal and Kashtar 4 of 50 village, known as the Shahba Camp. Its inhabitants no international organizations even lifted a finger to were displaced people from Shahba region, including put an end to the Turkish attacks. This caused many places like Tel Rifat, Azaz, Sheikh Eyssa , Jarablus, refugees to leave the camps and go to live among the Idlib, and refugee camps around Azaz. local people of Afrin. The daily needs of the refugees in Afrin were secured The Kurdish Autonomous Administration spared no through the cooperation of the local people from efforts to render all aid possible to those refugees despite Afrin and the Kurdish Administration’s Department the siege and lack of resources. They gave them of Civil Society Organizations. However, despite stoves, firewood, bread, and water, The Kurdish Red non-stop pleas to several relief agencies, including Crescent provided them with an ill-equipped ambulance, UN´s Bureau for Humanitarian Affairs, UNICEF and along with medicines and baby milk. Medical cen- Refugees´ High Commission, these refugees were ters, Arabic-language schools and mosques were also almost completely let down by the international opened inside the camps. community. Several social activities took place inside the camps. Problems associated with sewage systems and with For example, on World Children Day, celebrations the lack of sanitary materials, food, staff, and other were held where children were given gifts to grant basic needs increased their suffering. On top of that, them hope. Also, on Women’s Day, celebrations constant shelling from Turkish artillery killed and were held for women to share their grievances and injured people in the camps. These continous attacks wish them a safe and timely return to their native from 2017 on created horror, panic, and pervasive homes. feelings of depression among children and adults alike. Unfortunately, despite several pleas of distress, Refugees were given the same rights of citizenship granted to the people of the Canton of Afrin, according to the concepts of Democratic Nation and Fraternity of Peoples adopted by the local administration. However, in the wake of the barbaric Turkish assault on Afrin, those refugees had to flee to Shahba and other places, living side by side with other displaced people in new refugee camps and war-torn residential homes. Report by the Board of Labour and Social Affairs Afrin 5 of 50 02 MASS DISPLACEMENT FROM AFRIN CITY FROM 14/03/2018 – 18/03/2018 6 of 50 People leaving Afrin in cars and vehicles. MASS DISPLACEMENT FROM AFRIN CITY FROM 14/03/2018 – 18/03/2018 uring the Astana meetings, Turkey made several concessions to Russia to gain permission to loot the north- ern regions of Syria. The decisions made in Astana allowed Turkey to enter Syrian territory with interna- Dtional approval. These decisions were a gift to the Turkish state, which had been planning to attack Afrin. Under the false pretext of combating terrorism, the Turkish state attacked the safe province of Afrin, in cooperation with jihadist groups gathered in Azaz and Idlib and with other terrorists that had fled Raqqa and Mosul. After Russia opened its airspace on 20/1/2018, Turkey indiscriminately bombed every part of Afrin province for 58 days. After weeks of fighting in the surrounding towns, the occupying Turkish forces reached Afrin City itself. Afrin City at that time was full of civilians, many of whom had fled there as Turkish bombs and jihadist gangs advanced through their neighborhoods. The people of Afrin then faced an impossible choice. They knew that the invading forces would not differentiate between civilians and fighters. The weeks of war leading up to that day had made it clear that such indiscriminate attacks were a fundamental part of Turkish strategy, and that civilian and military targets were both at risk. Many civilians fell victim to artillery attacks and Bombs falling on Afrin - March 17, 2018 airstrikes on their neighborhoods. Some were even wounded or killed by sniper fire in their own homes, coming through their windows*. * As registered by Afrin’s main hospital, Avrin, there were 238 civilian deaths and 706 injured civilians as of 13/03/2018. 7 of 50 To emphasize that they cared only for bloodshed, the invading Turkish army and its jihadist allies shelled Afrin City with even greater intensity from 14/3/2018 onward. Airstrikes and artillery killed and injured hundreds of people. An atmosphere of fear and panic spread among the city’s population, as the bombing never stopped and so many people were injured that the hospitals ran out of room to accom- modate them. The city itself was almost encircled by the occupying forces. b) child killed by Turkish airstrike during flight out of Afrin in Tirinde road. Because of this strategy of targeted civilian casualties, it was only to be expected that the invading foot soldiers were ordered to commit massacres and all kinds of war crimes against the people of Afrin. The Islamist ideology of the groups allied with the Turkish army there allows for the kidnapping and rape of women. The women of Afrin not only feared for their a) An elderly womand and her granddaughter injured lives, but also their honor and freedom. Facing all of after being attacked by a Turkish bomb during displace- this, the people of Afrin fled in all directions. ment from their village Qude on the Meydanki road. Fleeing civilians were still targeted by airstrikes and artillery, especially in Afrin’s Mahmodiye district, on the roads out of Afrin in Zediye, and on the road towards Tirinde. Turkish forces also destroyed vital infrastructure. Witnesses stated that Turkish artillery fire singled out bakeries and water tanks for destruction. On 16/03/2018, Afrin’s main hospital, “Avrin”, was shelled and completely destroyed. To avoid genocide, the population of Afrin headed towards Shahba Canton. The mass displacement caused even more tragedies. Many people had to walk on foot, as they couldn’t find an available car. They had to carry their children on their back, suffering in the cold and rain. Elderly people got heart attacks from stress and exertion. People also died on the way because of car accidents, as some drivers lost control over their vehicles in fear and panic and overran others. The few medical staff still able to work were not able to recover the bodies. Many of the displaced people from Afrin are still suffering from these traumatic experiences today. People walking on the way out of Afrin. 8 of 50 Afrin’s main hospital “Avrin” has been hit and mainly destroyed by Turkish artillery on 16th of March 2018. Source: Facebook page of Avrin Hospital 9 of 50 03 SITUATION IN SHAHBA REGION 10 of 50 SITUATION IN SHAHBA REGION hen they arrived in Shahba, the displaced people of Afrin found war-torn villages, none of which could Wproperly accommodate hundreds of thousands of refugees.
Recommended publications
  • SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021
    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, 6 May 2018a; administrative divisions: GADM, 6 May 2018b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 12 March 2021; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 1539 195 615 violence Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 2 Battles 650 308 1174 Violence against civilians 394 185 218 Methodology 3 Strategic developments 364 1 1 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 158 0 0 Riots 9 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 3114 689 2008 Disclaimer 7 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). 2 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
    [Show full text]
  • RECOVER) Third Quarterly Report April 1 – June 30, 2017 Funded by USAID/Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA)
    Restorative, Essential, and Comprehensive assistance for Vulnerable populations to Enhance Resiliency (RECOVER) Third Quarterly Report April 1 – June 30, 2017 Funded by USAID/Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) Country Contact Headquarters Contact Program Summary: Award Number: AID- OFDA-A-16-00050 Start Date: October 1, 2016 End Date: September 30, 2017 Report Date: July 31, 2017 Total New Award: $24,291,687 Mercy Corps – North Syria Quarter 1: AID- OFDA-A-16-00050 1 ABBREVIATIONS AOG – Armed Opposition Group AIU – Access and Information Unit BCP – Border Crossing Point GoS – Government of Syria IDP – Internally Displaced Person IED – Improvised Explosive Device INGO – International Non-Governmental Organization ISIS – Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (also known as ISIL/IS) LC – Local Council M&E – Monitoring and Evaluation NFI – Non-Food Item NGO – Non-Governmental Organization OFDA – Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance PDM – Post Distribution Monitoring PSS – Psychosocial Support RuAF – Russian Air Force SDF – Syrian Defense Forces RVD - Registration, Verification, and Distribution TRC – Turkish Red Crescent YPG – People’s Protection Unit (A Kurdish armed group) Mercy Corps – North Syria Quarter 3: AID- OFDA-A-16-00050 2 I. Program Overview Until the revocation of Mercy Corps’ NGO status in Turkey, on February 21, 2017, Mercy Corps had been implementing cross border programming from Turkey to northern Syria since 2012, providing multi-sector, lifesaving and holistic assistance (NFIs, WASH, Protection, Shelter, Food Security
    [Show full text]
  • Isis: the Political History of the Messianic Violent Non-State Actor in Syria
    2016 T.C. YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DISSERTATION ISIS: THE POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE MESSIANIC VIOLENT NON-STATE ACTOR IN SYRIA PhD Dissertation Ufuk Ulutaş Ufuk Ulutaş PhD INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Ankara, 2016 ISIS: THE POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE MESSIANIC VIOLENT NON-STATE ACTOR IN SYRIA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY BY UFUK ULUTAŞ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILISOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AUGUST 2016 2 Approval of the Institute of Social Sciences Yrd.Doç. SeyfullahYıldırım Manager of Institute I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr.Birol Akgün Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Birol Akgün Prof. Muhittin Ataman Supervisor Co-Supervisor Examining CommitteeMembers Prof. Dr. Birol Akgün YBÜ, IR Prof. Dr. Muhittin Ataman YBÜ, IR Doç Dr. Mehmet Şahin Gazi, IR Prof. Dr. Erdal Karagöl YBÜ, Econ Dr. Nihat Ali Özcan TOBB, IR 3 I hereby declare that all information in this thesis has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work; otherwise I accept all legal responsibility. Ufuk Ulutaş i To my mom, ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There is a long list of people to thank who offered their invaluable assistance and insights on ISIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Afrin Sitrep #1
    Syrian Arab Republic : Afrin Crisis Situation Report No. 1 as of 5 April 2018 This report is produced by OCHA in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period from 29 March to 5 April 2018. Highlights 137 ,070 20 ,000 32,200+ $73m people remain outpatient medical Nutrition supplies in additional funding displaced from Afrin district consultations conducted on delivered for children under required by the UN and to other locations in Aleppo partners in Syria to assist a daily basis five and mothers governorate those affected • Following military confrontations in the Afrin district of Aleppo governorate since 20 January an estimated 137,070 people remain displaced in the Tall Refaat area, Nabul and Zahraa, Fafin, and surrounding villages. • There is a lack of freedom of movement for IDPs, and many continue to be prevented by different parties to the conflict from seeking safety and services in Aleppo city or from returning to their homes in Afrin district. • The UN and its partners have scaled up the response to the displaced in the Tall Refaat area, Nabul and Zahraa, Fafin, and surrounding villages, with the provision of food, NFIs, WASH, shelter, nutrition and health and protection services among others forms of assistance. Between 02 and 04 April, several UN shipments consisting of food supplies, as well as NFIs, health and WASH items were sent to assist the affected population that remains in Afrin district. Distribution of these supplies by Syrian NGOs on the ground is ongoing. • The UN and partners in Damascus reiterate that they are facing a $73m funding gap to respond with life-saving assistance and protection services to all those displaced from Afrin district to Tall Refaat and surrounding communities and are urgently appealing for additional funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Conflict Summary | 24 February – 1 March 2020
    WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 24 FEBRUARY – 1 MARCH 2020 WHOLE OF SYRIA SUMMARY • NORTHWEST | The Government of Syria (GoS) offensive in northwest Syria changed focus to southern areas of the Hayyat Tahrir al Sham dominated enclave. Turkish and GoS military forces traded fire in the northwest for a second consecutive week. Conflict in the Tal Rifaat area reached the highest levels in 12 months. Two explosions struck Al Bab city, bringing the total for 2020 to four. • SOUTH & CENTRAL | Improvised explosive devices (IED) struck Damascus again this week. There was an increase in attacks on GoS-aligned personnel in southern Syria. In Quneitra Governorate, there was an increase in Israeli against GoS and Palestinian targets. • NORTHEAST | For the first time in five weeks, there was a reduction in conflict levels around the Turkish occupied Operation Peace Spring areas. Attacks on Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) personnel continued along the Euphrates and Khabour River Valleys, including an SDF-aligned municipal building in Hajin. Figure 1: Dominant actors’ area of control and influence in Syria as of 29 February 2020. NSOAG stands for Non-state Organized Armed Groups. Also, please see footnote 1 on page 2. Page 1 of 5 WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 24 FEBRUARY – 1 MARCH 2020 NORTHWEST SYRIA1 The focus of the Government of Syria (GoS) offensive against the Hayyat Tahrir al Sham (HTS) dominated northwest Syria switched focus this week. After the previous week’s gains in areas west of Aleppo City, GoS forces captured large areas in the south of the enclave, in the vicinity of Kafr Nabol town. Over 42 locations were captured in this maneuver,2 including seven areas3 that were taken after opposition groups withdrew.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematisch Ambtsbericht Syrië De Veiligheidssituatie
    Thematisch ambtsbericht Syrië De veiligheidssituatie Datum Juli 2019 Pagina 1 van 103 Thematisch ambtsbericht Syrië | De veiligheidssituatie juni 2019 Colofon Plaats Den Haag Opgesteld door Cluster Ambtsberichten (CAB) Pagina 2 van 103 Thematisch ambtsbericht Syrië | De veiligheidssituatie juni 2019 Inhoudsopgave Colofon ....................................................................................................... 2 Inhoudsopgave ............................................................................................. 3 Inleiding ...................................................................................................... 5 1 Veiligheidssituatie ....................................................................................... 7 1.1 Politieke ontwikkelingen ................................................................................. 7 1.2 Veiligheidssituatie ........................................................................................ 17 1.2.1 Provincies Damascus en Rif Dimashq (Ruraal Damascus) ................................... 17 1.2.2 Provincies Dara’a en Quneitra ........................................................................ 19 1.2.3 Provincie Al-Suweida .................................................................................... 23 1.2.4 Provincie Tartous ......................................................................................... 24 1.2.5 Provincie Lattakia ........................................................................................ 24 1.2.6
    [Show full text]
  • G S Yrian a Rab R Ep Ub
    36°20'0"E 36°30'0"E 36°40'0"E 36°50'0"E 37°0'0"E 37°10'0"E 37°20'0"E 37°30'0"E 37°40'0"E 37°50'0"E 38°0'0"E 38°10'0"E 1 2 c 0 i THE INFORMATION DISPLAYED ON THIS MAP CAN CHANGE AT ANY 2 TIME DUR TO THE CURRENT SITUATION IN SYRIA. LOGISTICS l y Road Rehabilitation Status CLUSTER CANNOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS r OF THE INFORMATION DISPLAYED AND ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR Bubana Be!kok a b Completed RELIANCE ON THE DATA. PLEASE TAKE CARE TO VERIFY THE u INFORMATION BEFORE USE. PLEASE ALSO NOT THE MAP REFLECTS Salim r ONLY CONFIRMED INFORMATION RECEIVED BY THE CLUSTE! R AND !Dakmatash b Ongoing u SYRIAN ARAB DOES NOT COVER ALL ACCESS INFORMATION IN SYRIA. THE MAP Upper Qurran e REPUBLIC DOES NOT REFLECT THE POLITIONCAL! SITUATION OR ADDRESS F SECURITY ISSUES. Planned Jebnet Qantarra - JARABLUS ! p Lower Jbeileh Qantaret N MEIDAN EKBIS " ! - 0 - Qorrat Quri ' !Zur Maghar Kikan ! 0 THIS MAP NEEDS YOUR HELP 5 ° Qalam - 6 s Border Crossing Point 3 ! IF YOU HAVE UPDATED ACCESS INFORMATIDOeNre bCzOanNCERNING e Bandrak ! !Kherbet Atu g! u Hozan Kusan ! Hjeileh - ACCESS, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOGISTICS CLU! STER INFORMATION g ! Shankal ! t Jarablus Upper Dar ! Ali Jrables ! MANAGEMENT OFFICER g Open ! Elbaz Mazdalfa a ! Elatrash - Bistek De!rbazina ! t - Olikar !Dawdaw ! !Halawaniyeh R !Za'ra !Darb Elnob S Hayamli ! Tall Shair ! g Qorna Sporadically Open ! ! ! Sara Rajabiyeh - Himar Middle Qojli n ! ! Aaliaa - !Shaltah !Marwiyeh o Lower Shyookh Ali B!aski ! i b Qarah Baba g ! ! Khader Closed ! Ali Jaru t ! ! Qandariya Tal Elamara Bilaliyeh
    [Show full text]
  • Parte 4: Visión General De Las Infraestructuras Públicas Y Los Servicios Sociales
    PARTE 4: VISIÓN GENERAL DE LAS INFRAESTRUCTURAS PÚBLICAS Y LOS SERVICIOS SOCIALES 11. INFORME GENERAL SOBRE EL CANTÓN DE SHEHBA EN BASE A LA INFORMACIÓN APORTADA POR LA ADMINISTRACIÓN DEL CANTÓN DE SHEHBA Grupos islamistas apoyados por Turquía controlan el cantón de Shehba desde Azaz a Manbij, incluyendo las siguientes áreas: Azaz, Tel Rifat, Akhtarin, Bab, Alraii, Jarablus y Manbij. Desde 2014, este cantón ha sufrido la injusticia y brutalidad de terroristas y mercenarios, entre los que se incluyen ISIS, Nusra, el Grupo del Sultán Murad y Ahrar al-Sham. Estos grupos provocaron el desplazamiento de unas 90.000 personas de la región (Shehba) hacia el cantón de Afrin. Afrin 25 ha hospedado a cientos de miles de personas desplazadas de diferentes partes de Siria, quienes, como los propios pobladores de Shehba, habían sufrido esta injusticia y terrorismo de mercenarios apoyados por Turquía y otros Estados regionales. Algunas partes de Shehba, que estuvieron previamente bajo el control de los mercenarios y terroristas apoyados por Turquía, incluido Daesh, fueron liberadas en enero de 2016. Estas áreas incluyen Tel Rifat, Kafr Naya, Kafr Naseh, Ahris, Um Hosh y Fafin, así como 58 aldeas. Algunos de estos pueblos estaban deshabitados como resultado de las minas y la destrucción causada por ISIS. El 3 de febrero de 2016, mantuvimos nuestra segunda reunión en Afrin. A esta reunión asistieron más de 500 miembros de los comités de consejo, entre los cuales el Consejo de Ancianos y los Comités de éste. Como resultado de nuestro trabajo, cambiamos la denominación de nuestro consejo por el de Consejo de la Administración del Cantón de Shehba.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdyjska Ofensywa Pod Ostrzałem
    15.02.2016 KURDYJSKA OFENSYWA POD OSTRZAŁEM. SCENARIUSZE INTERWENCJI W SYRII Syryjskie Siły Demokratyczne (SDF) z kantonu Afrin, kontynuują ofensywę w rejonie Azaz. Wywołało to nerwową reakcję Turcji, która rozpoczęła ostrzał pozycji SDF. Przejęcie przez SDF kontroli nad Azaz zniweczy bowiem ostatecznie tureckie plany w Syrii. Jednocześnie Arabia Saudyjska przygotowuje się do wojny w Syrii, choć w tej kwestii wciąż jest dużo niewiadomych i niepotwierdzonych informacji - pisze Witold Repetowicz. SDF, którego trzonem jest kurdyjskie YPG, ale w którego skład wchodzą też oddziały umiarkowanej opozycji, niezwiązanej z Turcją i Arabią Saudyjską (m.in. Jaysh al Thuwar czy Jabhat al Akrad), rozpoczęło natarcie na Azaz oraz Tell Rifaat. Jeżeli chodzi o to drugie miasto to w nocy z 14/15.02 zostało w połowie opanowane przez SDF. SDF przejęła też całkowitą kontrolę nad drogą łączącą Tell Rifaat z Azazem, zdobywając m.in. wioskę Ayn Daqnah. Natomiast na południe od Tell Rifaat SAA (armia syryjska) zajęła wioskę Kafr Naya. Postępy SDF możliwe są częściowo dzięki wsparciu lotnictwa rosyjskiego, gdyż siły USA nie wspierają SDF w rejonie Afrin-Azaz. Ponadto niektóre tereny dobrowolnie poddają się SDF, chcąc w ten sposób uniknąć nalotów rosyjskich i zajęcia przez SAA (tak było m.in. w przypadku Menagh). Zdobycie przez SDF Tall Rifat otworzy im drogę do Mare (10 km od Tall Rifaat), ostatniego obok Azazu miasta w dystrykcie Azaz, które pozostaje pod kontrolą protureckich dżihadystów. Mare to również miejsce, w którym przebiega granica z terenami pod kontrolą Państwa Islamskiego (Daesh), z której jest zaledwie około 70 km do miasta Manbidż, kontrolowanego przez Daesh, od którego z kolei siły SDF z kantonu Kobane dzieli tylko kilka kilometrów.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Displaced People from Afrin Canton in Shahba, Northern Syria and Surrounding Areas
    REPORT ON THE DISPLACED PEOPLE FROM AFRIN CANTON IN SHAHBA, NORTHERN SYRIA AND SURROUNDING AREAS THE DEMOCRATIC SELF ADMINISTRATION OF AFRIN [email protected] CONTENTS Part 1: Preface 1. Introduction .......................................................................... 4 2. Shahba Region ........................................................................ 5 Part 2: Overview of Displaced People from Afrin / Census 3. Number of Displaced People from Afrin .................................................. 7 4. Number of Displaced People Formerly Displaced from Shahba ............................. 8 5. Estimated Number of People Displaced to Other Cities .................................... 9 Part 3: Field Studies – Examples of Displaced People in Different Villages of Shahba 6. Fafine ...............................................................................11 6.1. Fafine Chips Factory ..............................................................11 6.2. Heleza School ...................................................................12 7. Ahris ................................................................................15 7.1. KPC Building ....................................................................15 7.2. Al-Sharq School .................................................................16 8. Kafr Naya ...........................................................................17 9. Tel Rifat .............................................................................18 10. Sherawa ...........................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Situational Overview 137,070 150,000 100,000 $73M
    Syrian Arab Republic : Afrin Crisis Situation Report No. 3 as of 24 April 2018 This report is produced by OCHA with inputs from Sectors and humanitarian partners. It covers the period from 16 April to 24 April 2018. Highlights 137,070 150,000 100,000 $73m people remain People estimated to IDPs benefited from in funding required by displaced from Afrin district in remain in Afrin district, water trucking services in IDP the UN and partners in Syria to locations in Aleppo exposed to hostilities and with locations assist those affected by the governorate and Al-Hassakeh limited access to humanitarian Afrin crisis assistance • An estimated 137,070 individuals remain displaced from Afrin district to the Tall Refaat, Nabul, Zahraa and Fafin areas as a result of military operations in Afrin that began on 20 January. At the same time, it is estimated that as many as 50,000 people are still in Afrin city and an additional 100,000 in rural Afrin. • The freedom of movement of IDPs remains restricted, preventing the displaced population from seeking safety and services in Aleppo city or returning to Afrin district. • Humanitarian organizations remain concerned about the safety, protection, and freedom of movement of civilians from Afrin district impacted by hostilities. While the UN remains unable to reach Afrin from inside Syria, cross-border convoys have so far delivered food and healthcare assistance for 20,000 people. • As per the latest update of the humanitarian community, the UN and partners in Damascus require at least $73m in order to continue responding with life-saving assistance and protection services to those displaced from Afrin district to Nabul, Zahraa, Tall Refaat, Fafin, and surrounding communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bi-Weekly Situation Report Whole of Syria
    BI-WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT: WHOLE OF SYRIA – ISSUE 8 | 16 – 30 APRIL 2021 BI-WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT WHOLE OF SYRIA Issue 12 | 16 – 30 June 2021 BI-WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT: WHOLE OF SYRIA – ISSUE 12 | 16 – 30 JUNE 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. COVID-19 UPDATE .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. COVID-19 Statistical Summary at Whole of Syria Level............................................................................... 1 1.2. Daily Distribution of COVID-19 Cases at Whole of Syria Level .................................................................... 1 1.3. Distribution of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths at Whole of Syria Level .......................................................... 2 1.4. Distribution of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Governorate and Outcome ............................................... 2 2. WHO-SYRIA RESPONSE........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1. COVAX Vaccines .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Points of Entry (PoE) .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4. Environmental Health ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]