DOCSLIB.ORG

Otay Ranch Phase 2 Resource Management Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Otay Ranch Phase 2 Resource Management Plan Update Otay Ranch Phase 2 Resource Management Plan Update Prepared for County of San Diego 5510 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Prepared by RECON Environmental, Inc. 1927 Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 P 619.308.9333 RECON Number 8117 June 22, 2018 Cailin Lyons, Associate Biologist Page intentionally left blank Phase 2 Resource Management Plan Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms..................................................................................................................... iv Preface.. ........................................................................................................................ v 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ...............................................................................................1 1.2 Project History ....................................................................................................1 1.3 Environmental Setting .......................................................................................3 1.4 Regulatory Context ............................................................................................ 9 1.4.1 Otay Ranch General Development Plan/ Subregional Plan .................. 9 1.4.2 Phase 1 Resource Management Plan ................................................... 10 1.4.3 Multiple Species Conservation Program Plan ..................................... 15 1.4.3.1 County of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan .............................15 1.4.3.2 City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan ...............................16 1.4.3.3 City of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan ..................................16 2.0 Existing Conditions....................................................................................... 17 2.1 Otay Ranch Planning Components .................................................................. 17 2.2 Comparison of Phase 1 RMP and Existing Conditions ................................... 21 3.0 Land Use Considerations in the Preserve ............................................... 22 3.1 Interim Uses ..................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Permitted Uses ................................................................................................. 22 3.2.1 Preserve Management, Scientific, and Biologic Activities ................... 23 3.2.1.1 Mitigation Banking ................................................................23 3.2.1.2 Habitat Restoration ................................................................23 3.2.2 Emergency, Safety, and Police Services ............................................... 24 3.2.3 Motorized Vehicle Use .......................................................................... 24 3.2.4 Public Access and Recreation ............................................................... 24 3.2.4.1 Otay Valley Regional Park .....................................................25 3.2.5 Infrastructure ....................................................................................... 26 3.2.5.1 County of San Diego ...............................................................26 3.2.5.2 City of Chula Vista .................................................................31 3.3 Incompatible Uses ............................................................................................ 34 3.4 Adjacent Land Uses .......................................................................................... 34 3.4.1 Preserve Edge ....................................................................................... 34 4.0 Preserve Management, Conveyance, & Funding ................................... 35 4.1 Preserve Management ...................................................................................... 35 4.1.1 Management Structure ......................................................................... 35 4.1.1.1 County of San Diego & City of Chula Vista ...........................35 4.1.1.2 Preserve Steward/ Biologist ...................................................35 4.1.2 Decision Making Process ...................................................................... 36 4.2 Preserve Funding ............................................................................................. 36 4.2.1 County of San Diego Funding ............................................................... 36 Otay Ranch i Phase 2 Resource Management Plan Update 4.2.2 City of Chula Vista Funding ................................................................. 36 4.2.3 Ancillary Funding ................................................................................. 37 4.3 Preserve Conveyance ........................................................................................ 37 4.3.1 Fee Title ................................................................................................ 37 4.3.2 Covenant of Easement .......................................................................... 38 4.3.3 Irrevocable Offer of Dedication ............................................................ 38 4.3. 4 Fee-In-Lieu ............................................................................................ 38 4.3.5 Non-Otay Ranch Project Mitigation Lands Program ........................... 38 5.0 Biota Monitoring Program .......................................................................... 39 6.0 Regulatory Framework for Future Development .................................. 40 6.1 Conveyance Requirement ................................................................................. 41 6.1.1 Development Lands Subject to Conveyance ......................................... 41 6.1.2 Common Use & Restricted Development Areas Not Subject to Conveyance ........................................................................................... 42 6.2 Preservation Standards .................................................................................... 43 6.3 Preserve Boundary Modifications .................................................................... 44 6.3.1 County of San Diego ............................................................................. 45 6.3.2 City of Chula Vista ............................................................................... 45 6.4 Preserve Edge Plan Requirements .................................................................. 46 6.4.1 Adjacency Guidelines ............................................................................ 47 6.4.1.1 County of San Diego ...............................................................49 6.4.1.2 City of Chula Vista .................................................................49 7.0 Administration ............................................................................................... 51 7.1 RMP Amendments ........................................................................................... 51 7.1.1 County of San Diego ............................................................................. 51 7.1.2 City of Chula Vista ............................................................................... 53 8.0 References Cited ............................................................................................ 55 Otay Ranch ii Phase 2 Resource Management Plan Update TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) FIGURES 1: Regional Location of Otay Ranch ........................................................................................ 5 2: Ownership Areas & Jurisdictional Boundaries .................................................................. 7 3: Otay Ranch in Relation to Other Conserved Lands (2017) ...............................................11 4: Original Otay Ranch Planning Components (1993) ..........................................................13 5: Otay Ranch Planning Components (2017) .........................................................................19 6: Otay Ranch in Relation to the Otay Valley Regional Park ...............................................29 TABLES 1: Jurisdictions Within Otay Ranch ....................................................................................... 3 2: Comparison of 1996 Estimate and Existing Acreage of Otay Ranch Planning Components .......................................................................................................................21 3: Restoration & Translocation Requirements for Otay Ranch Development Projects .......43 4. Preserve Set-back Requirements ......................................................................................48 ATTACHMENTS 1: Summary of GDP/SRP Amendments and Policy Changes (October 1993-December 2017) 2: Status of Phase 1 RMP Policies and Standards (2017) 3: Conveyance Forecast and Preserve Assembly 4: Biota Monitoring Program 5: Preserve Configuration Preservation Summary Otay Ranch iii Phase 2 Resource Management Plan Update Acronyms BLM Bureau of Land Management BMO Biological Mitigation Ordinance BMPs Best Management Practices CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act City City of Chula Vista County County of San Diego CFD Community Facilities District EIR Environmental Impact Report GDP City of Chula Vista General Development Plan GIS Geographical Information System HCP/NCCP Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan HLIT Habitat Loss and Incidental Take (Ordinance)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summer 2019, Volume 65, Number 2
    The Journal of The Journal of SanSan DiegoDiego HistoryHistory The Journal of San Diego History The San Diego History Center, founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928, has always been the catalyst for the preservation and promotion of the history of the San Diego region. The San Diego History Center makes history interesting and fun and seeks to engage audiences of all ages in connecting the past to the present and to set the stage for where our community is headed in the future. The organization operates museums in two National Historic Districts, the San Diego History Center and Research Archives in Balboa Park, and the Junípero Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The History Center is a lifelong learning center for all members of the community, providing outstanding educational programs for schoolchildren and popular programs for families and adults. The Research Archives serves residents, scholars, students, and researchers onsite and online. With its rich historical content, archived material, and online photo gallery, the San Diego History Center’s website is used by more than 1 million visitors annually. The San Diego History Center is a Smithsonian Affiliate and one of the oldest and largest historical organizations on the West Coast. Front Cover: Illustration by contemporary artist Gene Locklear of Kumeyaay observing the settlement on Presidio Hill, c. 1770. Back Cover: View of Presidio Hill looking southwest, c. 1874 (SDHC #11675-2). Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Copy Edits: Samantha Alberts Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Capitalism, and Urbanization in the Californias, 1848-1982
    TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 14, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Hillar Yllo Schwertner All Rights Reserved ii TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: John Tutino, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This is a history of Tijuandiego—the transnational metropolis set at the intersection of the United States, Mexico, and the Pacific World. Separately, Tijuana and San Diego constitute distinct but important urban centers in their respective nation-states. Taken as a whole, Tijuandiego represents the southwestern hinge of North America. It is the continental crossroads of cultures, economies, and environments—all in a single, physical location. In other words, Tijuandiego represents a new urban frontier; a space where the abstractions of the nation-state are manifested—and tested—on the ground. In this dissertation, I adopt a transnational approach to Tijuandiego’s water history, not simply to tell “both sides” of the story, but to demonstrate that neither side can be understood in the absence of the other. I argue that the drawing of the international boundary in 1848 established an imbalanced political ecology that favored San Diego and the United States over Tijuana and Mexico. The land and water resources wrested by the United States gave it tremendous geographical and ecological advantages over its reeling southern neighbor, advantages which would be used to strengthen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • “La Mojonera” and the Marking of California's U.S.-Mexico Boundary
    The Journal of San Diego History “La Mojonera” and the Marking of California’s U.S.-Mexico Boundary Line, 1849-1851 Charles W. Hughes Winner of the Marc Tarasuck Award On a bluff overlooking the “Arroyo de Tia Juana” several hundred feet up from the shoreline of the Pacific Ocean, a boundary monument—La Mojonera—has marked the start of the 1,952 mile line separating Mexico and the United States for the last 156 years. Captain Edmund L. F. Hardcastle, of the U.S. Topographical Engineers, and Ricardo Ramírez, a zoologist and botanist attached to the Mexican Boundary Commission, dedicated it on July 14, 1851.1 Today it is one of 276 monuments marking the boundary line running between El Paso, Texas, and the Pacific coast. John Russell Bartlett’s 1852 drawing of the Monument at the Initial Point on the Pacific from Bartlett’sPersonal Narrative of Exploration and Incidents in Texas, New Mexico, California, Sonora and Chihuahua (1854). ©SDHS, OP#17134. Charles W. Hughes is a local historian currently studying the history of California’s U.S. Mexico border. He gratefully acknowledges the research assistance provided by the staffs of the Oceanside and San Diego public libraries, San Diego State University Library, and the National Archives. 126 U.S.-Mexico Boundary Line Topographical sketch of the southernmost point of the port of San Diego as surveyed by the Mexican Commission. José Salazar Ilarregui, Datos de los trabajos astronómicos y topograficos… por la Comissión de Límites Mexicana en la línea que divide esta República de la de los Estados-Unidos (1850).
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Otay Mesa Can Be Traced to the 1880S
    OTAY MESA COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY City of San Diego City Planning and Community Investment 202 C Street San Diego, California 92101 December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .............................................................................................. 1 Project Overview ................................................................................................... 3 Historic Context ...................................................................................................... 6 Early History of Otay Mesa ................................................................................ 7 Homesteads and Agriculture ........................................................................... 8 Aviation and Military on Otay Mesa ............................................................. 14 Annexation to the City of San Diego ............................................................ 15 Property Types .................................................................................................. 18 Survey Results ....................................................................................................... 20 Recommendations .............................................................................................. 20 Bibliography ......................................................................................................... 21 Executive Summary This historic context statement was prepared in support of the City of San Diego’s
    [Show full text]
  • California Partners in Flight Coastal Shrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan
    California Partners in Flight Coastal Shrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan Coastal Cactus Wren ( Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus ) Photo by James Gallagher, Sea and Sage Audubon Prepared by: Christopher W. Solek ([email protected]) University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 Dr. Laszlo J. Szijj ([email protected]) Biological Sciences Department California State Polytechnic University, Pomona RECOMMENDED CITATION: Solek, C. and L. Szijj. 2004. Cactus Wren ( Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus ). In The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan: a strategy for protecting and managing coastal scrub and chaparral habitats and associated birds in California. California Partners in Flight. http://www.prbo.org/calpif/htmldocs/scrub.html Range Map: ACTION PLAN SUMMARY Species: Coastal Cactus Wren ( Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus) Status: A coastal population from San Diego County was nominated for subspecies status as C. b. sandiegensis in 1990 and subsequently proposed for Federal Threatened status in 1991. Since this subspecies designation was not recognized by the American Ornithologists’ Union Committee on Classification and Nomenclature, the San Diego population was declined for Federal Threatened listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 1994. Habitat Needs: Coastal sage scrub with patches of tall Opuntia cacti for nesting and breeding. This coastal population appears to nest almost exclusively in Opuntia cacti of at least 1 m in height. Protection of habitat areas with this vegetation type and structure should be a high priority. Concerns: Habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation are the most critical management issues facing this species. Although the species appears capable of sustaining breeding populations in small, fragmented areas containing suitable habitat, isolation of coastal populations due to urban fragmentation may be promoting loss of genetic variation within these smaller populations and compromise long-term metapopulation viability.
    [Show full text]
  • Otay Ranch Resort Village Archaeological/Historical Study
    OTAY RANCH RESORT VILLAGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL STUDY COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO USGS Jamul Mountains Quadrangle; 1,869 Acres GPA 04-03/REZ 04-009/SP 04-02/TM 5361/Log No. 04-19-005 Applicants: JPB Development, LLC 1392 East Palomar Street, Suite 202 Chula Vista, California 91913 And: Baldwin & Sons, LLC 610 West Ash Street, Suite 1500 San Diego, California 92101 Lead Agency: County of San Diego Planning and Development Services Contact: Dennis Campbell 5510 Overland Drive, 3rd Floor, Suite 310 San Diego, California 92123 (858) 505-6380 Prepared by: Brian F. Smith, Principal Investigator, Johnna L. Buysse, Project Archaeologist, Larry Pierson, Senior Historian, Michael Tuma, Project Archaeologist, and Kyle Guerrero, Project Archaeologist Signature: _____________________ Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 November 22, 2010; Revised August 26, 2014 An Archaeological/Historical Study for the Otay Ranch Village 13 Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– National Archaeological Database Information Author(s): Brian F. Smith, Principal Investigator, Johnna L. Buysse, Project Archaeologist, Larry Pierson, Senior Historian, Michael Tuma, Project Archaeologist, and Kyle Guerrero, Project Archaeologist Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 Report Date: November 22, 2010; Revised August 26, 2014 Report Title: Otay Ranch
    [Show full text]
  • African Americans and Historic Preservation in San Diego: the Douglas and the Clermont/Coast Hotels Leland T
    The Journal of Volume 54 2008 Winter Volume 1 • The Number Journal of San Diego History San Diego History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History has been partially funded by generous grants from the Joseph W. Sefton Foundation; Natale A. Carasali Trust; Quest for Truth Foundation of Seattle, Washington, established by the late James G. Scripps; Philip M. Klauber; and an anonymous friend and supporter of the Journal. Publication of this issue of The Journal of San Diego History has also been supported by a grant from “The Journal of San Diego History Fund” of the San Diego Foundation. PRESERVE A SAN DIEGO TREasURE The San Diego Historical Society is able to share the resources of four museums Your $100 contribution will help to create an endowment for and its extensive collections with the community through the generous support of the following: City of San Diego Commission for Art and Culture; County of San The Journal of San Diego History Diego; foundation and government grants; individual and corporate memberships; corporate sponsorship and donation bequests; sales from museum stores and Please make your check payable to The San Diego Foundation. Indicate on reproduction prints from the Booth Historical Photograph Archives; admissions; the bottom of your check that your donation is for The Journal of San Diego and proceeds from fund-raising events. History Fund. The San Diego Foundation accepts contributions of $100 and up. Your contribution is tax-deductible. Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • A Teacher's Guide to Historical and Contemporary Kumeyaay Culture
    A Teacher’s Guide to Historical and Contemporary Kumeyaay Culture A Supplemental Resource for Third and Fourth Grade Teachers by Geralyn Marie Hoffman and Lynn H. Gamble, Ph.D. Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias San Diego State University 2006 A Teacher’s Guide to Historical and Contemporary Kumeyaay Culture A Supplemental Resource for Third and Fourth Grade Teachers by Geralyn Marie Hoffman and Lynn H. Gamble, Ph.D. Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias San Diego State University 2006 i The first version of this project was produced as part of a master’s thesis at San Diego State University. Geralyn Hoffman completed her B.A. in Anthropology and Archaeology at Boston University and her M.A. in Anthropology at San Diego State University. She is currently the Education Coordinator at the San Diego Museum of Man. Lynn Gamble is Associate Professor and Director of the Collections Management Program in the Department of Anthropology at San Diego State University. Her recent publications have focused on a wide range of topics, including the origin of the plank canoe in the New World, the emergence of a ranked society among the Chumash Indians, trading activities in Southern California, adaptations to paleoclimatic change, and the challenges surrounding site preservation in the United States. Her recent research entails working with the Kumeyaay on both sides of the border in the interpretation of cultural landscapes and material culture. This guide was published with the generous support of the Campo Kumeyaay Nation, the Barona Band of Mission Indians, the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, the Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research and Policy, and the Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias.
    [Show full text]
  • PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Otay Ranch Village 13 Otay Lakes Road Chula Vista, California
    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Otay Ranch Village 13 Otay Lakes Road Chula Vista, California TORC Reference Number: ORC-524-RH C2C Project Number: 2005-033 Prepared for: Gatzke Dillon & Ballance LLP 1525 Faraday Avenue, Suite 150 Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared by: Coast 2 Coast Environmental, Inc. 13964 Boquita Drive Del Mar, California 92014 (619) 889-6232 [email protected] FINAL REPORT January 25, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................... iii 2.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 2.1 Purpose.............................................................................................................................1 2.2 Scope of Services.............................................................................................................1 2.3 Significant Assumptions ..................................................................................................2 2.4 Limitations .......................................................................................................................2 2.5 Exceptions to ASTM Standard Practice E1527-00..........................................................2 2.6 Special Terms and Conditions .........................................................................................2 2.7 User Reliance...................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Notice of Preparation (Nop)
    APPENDIX A NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP) Appendix A-1: 2050 RTP/SCS EIR NOP Appendix A-2: NOP Comment Letters Appendix A-3: Summary of NOP Comment Letters Appendix A-4: NOP Workshop Transcripts APPENDIX A-1 2050 RTP/SCS EIR NOP APPENDIX A-2 NOP COMMENT LETTERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 May 19,2010 Rob Rundle Principal Regional Planner SANDAG 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 Re: Notice of Preparation for the 2050 RTP Dear Mr. Rundle, The above referenced Notice of Preparation (NOP) was received by this office on April 19, 2010. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the environmental review process related to the 2050 RTP for the San Diego region. We offer these comments as general direction relative to the policies ofthe Coastal Act that should be incorporated into the environmental review ofany development slated within the RTP that would either directly or indirectly affect the resources of the California Coastal Zone. The presented goals ofthe 2050 RTP, to improve "Quality ofTravel and Livability, and Sustainability" create an opportunity to enhance San Diego's established transportation system in a manner that is supportive ofmany tenants ofthe Coastal Act. These stated goals, which are inclusive ofa Sustainable Communities Strategy pursuant to the requirements of SB 375, afford the possibility to address both local and regional efforts to address likely climate change scenarios. The development ofsmart growth solutions to future transportation and land use challenges is strongly supported through Coastal Act policies.
    [Show full text]
  • 05-Culturalresourceassessment.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND SETTING ......................................................................................................... 2 Project Goals ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Environment: Climate, Topography, and Geology .................................................................................... 6 Geology ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 III. PREHISTORIC CONTEXT ................................................................................................................... 9 The Peopling of California ......................................................................................................................... 9 Local Archaeology ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Late Pleistocene .................................................................................................................................... 9 Early Holocene ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Middle Holocene ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]