39Th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
m l AIAA 2001-0311 Flying Wings / Flying Fuselages Richard M. Wood and Steven X. S. Bauer NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit 8-11 January 2001 / Reno, NV For permission to copy or republish, contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20191-4344 AIAA 2001-0311 Flying Wings / Flying Fuselages Richard M. W_x)d and Steven X. S. Bauer: ABSTRACT The present cultural environment is slightl)improved but the public perception and politics continue to The present paper has documented the historical haunt this concept today relationships between various classes of all lifting vehicles, which includes the flying wing, all wing, tailless, lifting body, and lifting fuselage. The diversity in vehicle focus was to ensure that all A review of the most recent aircraft design studies vehicle types that ma) have contributed to or been shows a significant number of flying wing concepts influenced by the development of the classical fl)ing are under consideration, especiall_ for militar 5 wing concept was investigated. applications. It is clear that the realization of the flying wing concept is benefiting from recent "['he paper has provided context and perspective for technological advances in aerodynamics, floxs present and future aircraft design studies that may control, flight control s3stems, materials, structures, emplo_ the all lifting vehicle concept. The paper also and propulsions s_stems. It also appears that the demonstrated the benefit of developing an cultural barriers of the past are also deteriorating understanding of the past in order to obtain the allowing for the rich body of flying wing research to required knowledge to create future concepts with be shared and studied and thus, contribute to future significantl2_ improved aerodynamic performance. vehicle development activities. However, a review of the ongoing research indicates that we continue to re-create the past instead of INTRODUCTION learning from the past to create the future _5_. These sentiments are clearl 3 stated through the ff)llowing Even after more than a century of research and quotes from A. R. Weyl, 1944. -_-_-"-_ development the flying wing is still viewed as a unique and unconventional aircraft concept _4v. This "...Flying Wing, in which at the present period more realit3 is even more surprising when you consider the interest than ever is being displayed." significant aerodynamic and structural benefits afforded rising wing designs, compared to "...it seems a fact that experience collected in the past conventional designs. Historical revie_vs 5__'_5"_7 on with tailless aeroplanes is either unknown or this topic appear to point to a variety of reasons for forgotten or. at the least ill-judged..." the slow acceptance of flying wing type vehicles. From a technical point of view, the dominant issue "...it is by no means sufficient that a crazy design has been stability and control, which to this day flies: it must fly far better than eveo'thing else in continues to plague this class of vehicle. As a result, order to raise attention attlong those closed flying wing aircraft continue to be limited to missions circles..." comprised of only low lift (cruise) conditions. In addition to the technical issues, there were cultural The relevance of these three statements after nearly issues faced by this class of aircraft that consisted of six decades its quite remarkable. The_ point to the negative public perceptions and politics. In the first need for a thorough understanding of the design half of the 2() _h century, which was the most prolific trends, historical contributions, and technical period of flying wing development, these two issues relationships for fl3ing wing vehicles as well as other severely restricted technical discussions and as a closely related vehicle types before significant work result the opportunity to mature this concept was lost. is performed. With this understanding will come new Senior Research Aerodynamicist, Configuration Copyright ,_, 2001 by the American Institute of Aerod?namics Branch NASA Langley Research Aeronautics and Astronautics. Inc. No copyright is Center, Associate Fellow AIAA asserted in the United States under Title 17, U. S. Code. The U. S. Government has a royalty-free license to exercise all rights under the copyright claimed herein for government purposes. All other fights are reserved b? the copyright owner. American Institute of Aeronauhcs and Astronautics AIAA 2001-03 i I design knowledge and thus, new opportunities to Lifting Fuselage create new concepts that approach the optimum A thick aerodynamically shaped body with performance boundaries of powered flight. Failure to section lift characteristics equivalent to that develop this understanding will ensure that we will of a wing. once again re-create past accomplishments. Lifting Body In support of this issue the present paper is focused Aircraft that chiefly or solely generate lift by on documenting the historical relationships between their bodies. various classes of all lifting vehicles that includes the flying wing. The diversity in vehicle focus is to The discussion presented within the paper will use ensure that all vehicle types that may have the Flying Wing (FW) and Flying Fuselage (FF) contributed to or been influenced by the development terms as the primary ALV descriptors with All-Wing of the flying wing concept are investigated. By and Tailless being sub-elements of FW and Lifting investigating these relationships, it is expected that Fuselage and Lifting Body as sub-elements of FF. today's aircraft designers will have an improved understanding of the brilliant aircraft designs of the A goal of this paper is to provide context and past. perspective for present and expected future aircraft design studies that may employ the ALV concept. It The following definition of the All-Lifting-Vehicle is also hoped that this paper will demonstrate the (ALV) is offered: benefit of developing an understanding of the past in A vehicle that has all horizontal orientated order to obtain the required knowledge to create elements (i.e., wing, fuselage, tail. etc,.) are future concepts with significantly improved continuous and aerodynamically shaped to aerodynamic performance. contribute proportionally equivalent amounts of lift throughout the flight envelope. The discussion that follows will first review the ALV historical development in an effort to focus the reader This broad definition allows for the inclusion of all to the relationship between the various ALV types. existing definitions for flying wing, all-wing, tailless, The paper will then provide a more detailed and lifting body. Note, the above definition does not discussion of the history of the FW concept. The allow for a vehicle that has a fuselage that does not final sections of the paper will focus on the historical provide appropriate lift, a tail/canard that only development of ALV within the United States. functions as a trim/control surface, or a nacelle that only houses the propulsion system. The various ALV HISTORY names that make up the ALV category are as diverse as the concepts themselves and vary from flying wing ALV have been under continued development for to flying fuselage. Definitions of the six specific over a century with the majority of the earl3 work concepts to be investigated are listed below to assist (pre 1950) centered in Europe and thc post 1950 the reader. work being performed within the United States. This transfer in ALV leadership to the tlnited State,', Flying Wing H5.47.__ coincides with the transfer in the world economic and A tailless airplane accommodating all of its parts military leadership to the United States. Thi_ within the outline of a single airfoil. technical dominance by one country (United States) resulted in an increased conservatism in aircraft All-Wing design during the middle decades of the 20 _hcentur 3 Aircraft consisting of nothing but wing. Most of these aircraft, designed since the 1950s, ma) (Northrop's definition) be characterized as typical vehicles with wings tt, produce lift, fuselages to carry cargo/payload. Tailless tails/canards for control, and nacelles to house An aircraft consisting of a single wing, propulsion systems. Another change that drasticall3 without conventional fuselage or tail. influenced aircraft design within the United States, in the post 1950 era, was the growing interest, effort. Flying Fuselage 10.69-116 and resources expended toward space exploration An aircraft consisting of an aerodynamically These efforts led to the development of lifting body shaped fuselage that generates a majority of the aircraft for atmospheric reentry. However, recentl 3 total aircraft lift. there has been a new beginning in ALV design as 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA 2001-0311 evident by the Blended Wing Body (BWB) 49-53 been performed in the llnited States and was initiated X43, and Pathfinder. within NASA in the 1950s. An initial assessment of the histor 3 of AIN identifies The final concept is the lifting fuselage, see figure 3. three primary categories as noted in figure 1. These The concept depicted is the Burnelli, UB-14, which categories are flying wing, lifting fuselage, and lifting at first glance would appear to be out of step _ith this body. The chart of figure 1 shows that the flying discussion. However, a review of the lifting fuselage wing category is the most populous with well over aircraft design objective and motivation shows a 125 aircraft whereas both the lifting fuselage and match with that for the flying wing concepts of the lifting bod 3 categories number well under 25 aircraft. same time period. These concepts were characterized The majority of both the flying wing and lifting by thick airfoil shaped fuselages that were designed fuselage aircraft were developed prior to 1950 to produce a significant portion of the required lift.