DOCSLIB.ORG

A Conceptual Design of a Tailless Sailplane with a Stabilizing Fuselage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Conceptual Design of a Tailless Sailplane with a Stabilizing Fuselage The Conceptual Design of a Tailless Sailplane Having a Stabilizing Fuselage Ippei Otani and Mark D. Maughmer Department of Aerospace Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 [email protected] Abstract A conceptual design of a tailless Standard Class sailplane is presented in this paper. Longitudinal static stability requires a negative pitching moment gradient with respect to the lift coefficient and a positive pitching moment at zero lift. The former depends on the position of the center of gravity with respect to the neutral point of the aircraft, while the latter, in the case of tailless sailplanes, is obtained by designing the wing to take over the stabilizing function normally provided by the empennage. The two methods employed to achieve this, often in combination, are the use of an airfoil with a positive moment coefficient about its aerodynamic center, and the aft sweeping with washout of the wing to provide the needed positive pitching moment at zero lift. The idea introduced here explores a fuselage design that helps to support the stabilizing function. The pressure distribution around the fuselage is tailored to contribute to the stability of the vehicle. To determine the overall benefit of this concept, the cross-country performance of the tailless aircraft is predicted and compared to that of a current conventional sailplane. It is found that the conceptual design is predicted to achieve performance levels comparable to those of conventional designs. Nomenclature Refuse Reynolds number of fuselage c mean aerodynamic chord S reference area S vertical tail reference area CD drag coefficient VT S wing planform area CDPfuse pressure drag coefficient of the fuselage W V airspeed CL lift coefficient V average cross-country speed CLfuse lift coefficient of the fuselage ACC V climb velocity CLmax maximum lift coefficient (aircraft) c V glide velocity clmax maximum lift coefficient (airfoil) g V sink velocity CLreq required lift coefficient for turn S V turning sink rate CLtrim trim lift coefficient sink turn V turning velocity CM moment coefficient turn V trim velocity Cmac moment coefficient about the aerodynamic center trim (airfoil) VVT vertical stabilizer volume W weight CMnp moment coefficient about the neutral point w average width of fuselage section CMo moment coefficient at zero lift fuse x longitudinal displacement of center of gravity from the CMofuse moment coefficient of the fuselage at zero lift D drag neutral point x chordwise location of the center of gravity Df skin friction drag cg d ground distance angle of attack h altitude difference ow angle of attack of the zero-lift-line relative to the ifuse local incidence angle of fuselage camberline fuselage reference line k2-k1 fuselage fineness ratio x length of fuselage increments L lift elev elevon deflection angle Lreq lift required wing wing sweep angle lfuse length of fuselage ρ atmospheric density lVT moment arm of vertical tail bank angle M moment MNP moment about neutral point Introduction m mass of aircraft Since the early days of the successful flights of Lilienthal NP neutral point of aircraft and the Wrights, various overall configurations have been R turn radius considered by airplane designers with the objective of TECHNICAL SOARING 79 VOLUME 31, NO. 3 - July 2007 increasing performance and efficiency.1-2 The configuration with a positive pitching moment about the aerodynamic center, that has predominated has been that having an empennage as achieved by using an airfoil having a reflexed camberline. positioned at the end of a tail boom of some length, providing a Reflexed airfoils have been traditionally of lower moment arm aft of the main wing.1-2 A different design performance than the conventional ones, due to the fact that approach is one without the tail boom and empennage.1, 3-4 At having a pressure distribution that produces a positive moment first glance, such a design appears promising for reducing drag, coefficient is at odds with the achievement of high lift and low as significant portion of the non-lifting components of the drag.2 Recent developments in airfoil design, however, have aircraft are eliminated. made possible the development of laminar airfoils with a Unfortunately, as a result of the wing taking over the positive or a small negative moment coefficient at the stability and control functions of the tail, the attainment of a aerodynamic center, and performance that is more comparable high maximum lift coefficient and low drag are adversely to conventional ones.2, 6 affected such that, in many cases, the gain obtained by Another method for attaining longitudinal static stability is eliminating the tail boom is negated.2-3, 5 One of the reasons to sweep the wings aft and include washout along the for this is that, for the vehicle to have positive static stability, wingspan. The resulting difference between the local angles of the airfoils used on tailless configurations must have a small, attack at the root and the tip, which are also separated in the or positive, moment coefficient about the aerodynamic center. longitudinal direction due to the sweep, creates a nose-up As this limits the amount of aft loading that can be utilized, the pitching moment for the entire aircraft at zero lift.2, 9 maximum lift coefficient achievable by such airfoils is compromised. This results in an increased wing area being The stabilizing fuselage needed for low-speed operation, which largely offsets the For the H02g, the feasibility of using a stabilizing fuselage reduced drag benefit achieved by eliminating the tail boom, is explored. Such a fuselage has a pressure distribution that although recent advances in airfoil design have lessened this results in a nose-up pitching moment, thus creating a positive 2, 6 disadvantage to some extent. Historically, while some zero-lift pitching moment CMo and helping to reduce the tailless sailplanes fulfilled their mission requirements adverse effects of the traditional approaches explained above.2 satisfactorily,7-8 it is still generally advantageous from the A prone position for the pilot was chosen over the aerodynamic point of view to have an empennage, even though conventional seated position. Three-dimensional panel method this increases the wetted area of the non-lifting components.3 results have demonstrated that a prone position results in the Nevertheless, the knowledge base on tailless aircraft is still fuselage shape having the most favorable pitching-moment relatively small and additional research may lead to new characteristics. successful solutions.1-2 The current project, named H02g, The design process began with conceptual ideas for the further explores the concept by considering the conceptual stabilizing fuselage, which were then analyzed using the three- design of a tailless Standard Class competition sailplane. dimensional, low-order panel code, DWT.10 This was the main tool used for predicting the overall aerodynamic characteristics Static longitudinal stability requirements of the H02g, while the primary tool used for designing the The conditions for an airplane to be longitudinally wing geometry was a multiple lifting-line code.11 An iterative statically stable and trimmable are a negative pitching moment process led to a wing design satisfying the requirements of low derivative with respect to lift and a positive pitching moment stall speed and low drag. Once the geometry of both the coefficient at zero lift.9 That is, fuselage and the wing was fixed, the wing/body combination was analyzed to determine the static longitudinal stability C parameters. The neutral point and the moment coefficients M 0 (1) C were calculated to ensure the viability of the design. Once a L configuration displayed longitudinal static stability, its performance was evaluated. The multiple lifting-line code was and again used to calculate the spanwise lift distribution and induced drag. The airfoil profile drag properties of the wing (2) CMo 0 were predicted using the two-dimensional airfoil analysis capability of the software package, XFOIL.12 The final outputs The first condition is satisfied by positioning the center of of the entire evaluation process are the speed polar diagram 9 gravity in front of the neutral point of the aircraft. The second and the average cross-country speed calculated over a selected 2 condition is more challenging for tailless designs. In range of thermal strengths. These results were then compared conventional configurations, the horizontal tail mounted with a with those of the Schempp-Hirth Discus 2, a modern negative incidence angle relative to the wing creates a competitive Standard Class racing sailplane.13 downward force at zero lift and, with the tailboom acting as a lever arm, produces a positive pitching moment.9 In the absence of the tail, the wing has to provide the necessary moment. One method of accomplishing this uses an airfoil VOLUME 31, NO. 3 - July 2007 80 TECHNICAL SOARING xl Configuration and aerodynamic design k k 2 2 1 (4) CMofuse w fuse(ow i fuse )x Sizing and weight estimation 36.5Sc x0 The first step in the conceptual design of the H02g was sizing and weight estimation. As there were no In considering the quantities that could make a positive unconventional weight saving technologies incorporated into contribution to the pitching moment at zero lift, the correction this new design, the weight estimation process relied on factor for the body fineness ratio (k -k ) and the average width 2, 14 2 1 historical trends. For the fuselage, a weight between that of of the fuselage section (wfuse) could not be altered significantly the tailless design of Akaflieg Braunschweig, the SB13, and from typical values without having a detrimental effect on the that of other tailed sailplanes is thought to be a reasonable performance. The term ifuse refers to the local incidence angle, estimation, noting that the absence of the tailboom does not that is, the angle between the fuselage camberline and the 15 amount to as much weight savings as might be expected.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AMA FPG-9 Glider OBJECTIVES – Students Will Learn About the Basics of How Flight Works by Creating a Simple Foam Glider
    AEX MARC_Layout 1 1/10/13 3:03 PM Page 18 activity two AMA FPG-9 Glider OBJECTIVES – Students will learn about the basics of how flight works by creating a simple foam glider. – Students will be introduced to concepts about air pressure, drag and how aircraft use control surfaces to climb, turn, and maintain stable flight. Activity Credit: Credit and permission to reprint – The Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) and Mr. Jack Reynolds, a volunteer at the National Model Aviation Museum, has graciously given the Civil Air Patrol permission to reprint the FPG-9 model plan and instructions here. More activities and suggestions for classroom use of model aircraft can be found by contacting the Academy of Model Aeronautics Education Committee at their website, buildandfly.com. MATERIALS • FPG-9 pattern • 9” foam plate • Scissors • Clear tape • Ink pen • Penny 18 AEX MARC_Layout 1 1/10/13 3:03 PM Page 19 BACKGROUND Control surfaces on an airplane help determine the movement of the airplane. The FPG-9 glider demonstrates how the elevons and the rudder work. Elevons are aircraft control surfaces that combine the functions of the elevator (used for pitch control) and the aileron (used for roll control). Thus, elevons at the wing trailing edge are used for pitch and roll control. They are frequently used on tailless aircraft such as flying wings. The rudder is the small moving section at the rear of the vertical stabilizer that is attached to the fixed sections by hinges. Because the rudder moves, it varies the amount of force generated by the tail surface and is used to generate and control the yawing (left and right) motion of the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Equations for the Application of to Pitching Moments
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19670002485 2020-03-24T02:43:10+00:00Z View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NASA Technical Reports Server NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-3738 00 M h U GPO PRICE $ c/l U z CFSTl PRICE@) $ ,2biJ I 1 Hard copy (HC) ' (THRU) :: N67(ACCES~ION 11814NUMBER) 5P Microfiche (MF) > Jo(PAGES1 k i ff 853 July 85 2 (NASA CR OR TMX OR AD NUMBER) '- ! EQUATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF * WIND-TUNNEL WALL CORRECTIONS TO PITCHING MOMENTS CAUSED BY THE TAIL OF AN AIRCRAFT MODEL by Harry He Heyson Langley Research Center Langley Stdon, Hampton, Vk NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. NOVEMBER 1966 . NASA TN D-3738 EQUATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF WIND-TUNNEL WALL CORRECTIONS TO PITCHING MOMENTS CAUSED BY THE TAIL OF AN AIRCRAFT MODEL By Harry H. Heyson Langley Research Center Langley Station, Hampton, Va. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - Price 61.00 , EQUATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF WIND-TUNNEL WALL CORmCTIONS TO PITCHING MOMENTS CAUSED BY THE TAIL OF AN AIRCRAFT MODEL By Harry H. Heyson Langley Research Center SUMMARY Equations are derived for the application of wall corrections to pitching moments due to the tail in two different manners. The first system requires only an alteration in the observed pitching moment; however, its application requires a knowledge of a number of quantities not measured in the usual wind- tunnel tests, as well as assumptions of incompressible flow, linear lift curves, and no stall.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Aircraft Stability and Control Course Notes for M&AE 5070
    Introduction to Aircraft Stability and Control Course Notes for M&AE 5070 David A. Caughey Sibley School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853-7501 2011 2 Contents 1 Introduction to Flight Dynamics 1 1.1 Introduction....................................... 1 1.2 Nomenclature........................................ 3 1.2.1 Implications of Vehicle Symmetry . 4 1.2.2 AerodynamicControls .............................. 5 1.2.3 Force and Moment Coefficients . 5 1.2.4 Atmospheric Properties . 6 2 Aerodynamic Background 11 2.1 Introduction....................................... 11 2.2 Lifting surface geometry and nomenclature . 12 2.2.1 Geometric properties of trapezoidal wings . 13 2.3 Aerodynamic properties of airfoils . ..... 14 2.4 Aerodynamic properties of finite wings . 17 2.5 Fuselage contribution to pitch stiffness . 19 2.6 Wing-tail interference . 20 2.7 ControlSurfaces ..................................... 20 3 Static Longitudinal Stability and Control 25 3.1 ControlFixedStability.............................. ..... 25 v vi CONTENTS 3.2 Static Longitudinal Control . 28 3.2.1 Longitudinal Maneuvers – the Pull-up . 29 3.3 Control Surface Hinge Moments . 33 3.3.1 Control Surface Hinge Moments . 33 3.3.2 Control free Neutral Point . 35 3.3.3 TrimTabs...................................... 36 3.3.4 ControlForceforTrim. 37 3.3.5 Control-force for Maneuver . 39 3.4 Forward and Aft Limits of C.G. Position . ......... 41 4 Dynamical Equations for Flight Vehicles 45 4.1 BasicEquationsofMotion. ..... 45 4.1.1 ForceEquations .................................. 46 4.1.2 MomentEquations................................. 49 4.2 Linearized Equations of Motion . 50 4.3 Representation of Aerodynamic Forces and Moments . 52 4.3.1 Longitudinal Stability Derivatives . 54 4.3.2 Lateral/Directional Stability Derivatives .
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF} Cold War Delta Prototypes : the Fairey Deltas, Convair Century
    COLD WAR DELTA PROTOTYPES : THE FAIREY DELTAS, CONVAIR CENTURY-SERIES, AND AVRO 707 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Tony Buttler | 80 pages | 22 Dec 2020 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781472843333 | English | New York, United Kingdom Cold War Delta Prototypes : The Fairey Deltas, Convair Century-series, and Avro 707 PDF Book Last edited: Apr 6, New page book apparently due from Tony Buttler this coming December via Osprey's X-Planes series although no cover image available yet : Cold War Delta Prototypes: The Fairey Deltas, Convair Century-Series, and Avro Description from Amazon: This is the fascinating history of how the radical delta-wing became the design of choice for early British and American high-performance jets, and of the role legendary aircraft like the Fairey Delta series played in its development. Install the app. Added to basket. Brendan O'Carroll. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. As said before, I'll await more details from SP readers to order or not. For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now. I couldn't find it on Amazon. Out of Stock. Gli architetti di Auschwitz. Norman Ferguson. Risponde Luigi Cadorna. Joined Oct 29, Messages 1, Reaction score Torna su. Meanwhile in America, with the exception of Douglas's Navy jet fighter programmes, Convair largely had the delta wing to itself. In Britain, the Fairey Delta 2 went on to break the World Air Speed Record in spectacular fashion, but it failed to win a production order. Convair did have its failures too — the Sea Dart water-borne fighter prototype proved to be a dead end.
    [Show full text]
  • Longitudinal Static Stability
    Longitudinal Static Stability Some definitions M pitching moment without dimensions C m 1 (so without influence of ρ, V and S) V2 Sc 2 it is a ‘shape’ parameter which varies with the angle of attack. Note the chord c in the denominator because of the unit Nm! L For the wing+aircraft we use the C L 1 surface area of the wing S! VS2 2 L For the tail we use the surface of the tail: SH ! C H LH 1 VS2 2 H Definition of aerodynamic center of a wing: The aerodynamic center (a.c.) is the point around which the moment does not change when the angle of attack changes. We can therefore use Cmac as a constant moment for all angles of attack. The aerodynamic center usually lies around a quarter chord from the leading edge. 1 Criterium for longitudinal static stability (see also Anderson § 7.5): We will look at the consequences of the position of the center of gravity, the wing and the tail for longitudinal static stability. For stability, we need a negative change of the pitching moment if there is a positive change of the angle of attack (and vice versa), so: CC 0 mm 00 0 Graphically this means Cm(α) has to be descending: For small changes we write: dC m 0 d We also write this as: C 0 m 2 When Cm(α) is descending, the Cm0 has to be positive to have a trim point where Cm = 0 and there is an equilibrium: So two conditions for stability: 1) Cm0 > 0; if lift = 0; pitching moment has to be positive (nose up) dC 2) m 0 ( or C 0 ); pitching moment has to become more negative when d m the angle of attack increases Condition 1 is easy to check.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Symbols
    List of Symbols a atmosphere speed of sound a exponent in approximate thrust formula ac aerodynamic center a acceleration vector a0 airfoil angle of attack for zero lift A aspect ratio A system matrix A aerodynamic force vector b span b exponent in approximate SFC formula c chord cd airfoil drag coefficient cl airfoil lift coefficient clα airfoil lift curve slope cmac airfoil pitching moment about the aerodynamic center cr root chord ct tip chord c¯ mean aerodynamic chord C specfic fuel consumption Cc corrected specfic fuel consumption CD drag coefficient CDf friction drag coefficient CDi induced drag coefficient CDw wave drag coefficient CD0 zero-lift drag coefficient Cf skin friction coefficient CF compressibility factor CL lift coefficient CLα lift curve slope CLmax maximum lift coefficient Cmac pitching moment about the aerodynamic center CT nondimensional thrust T Cm nondimensional thrust moment CW nondimensional weight d diameter det determinant D drag e Oswald’s efficiency factor E origin of ground axes system E aerodynamic efficiency or lift to drag ratio EO position vector f flap f factor f equivalent parasite area F distance factor FS stick force F force vector F F form factor g acceleration of gravity g acceleration of gravity vector gs acceleration of gravity at sea level g1 function in Mach number for drag divergence g2 function in Mach number for drag divergence H elevator hinge moment G time factor G elevator gearing h altitude above sea level ht altitude of the tropopause hH height of HT ac above wingc ¯ h˙ rate of climb 2 i unit vector iH horizontal
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Dynamics and Control of a Vertical Tailless Aircraft
    cs & Aero ti sp au a n c o e r E e n Bras et al., J Aeronaut Aerospace Eng 2013, 2:4 A g f i o n Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace l e DOI: 10.4172/2168-9792.1000119 a e r n i r n u g o J Engineering ISSN: 2168-9792 Research Article Open Access Flight Dynamics and Control of a Vertical Tailless Aircraft Bras M1, Vale J1, Lau F1 and Suleman A2* 1Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal 2University of Victoria, Victoria BC, Canada Abstract The present work aims at studying a new concept of a vertical tailless aircraft provided with a morphing tail solution with the purpose of eliminating the drag and weight created by the vertical tail structure. The solution consists on a rotary horizontal tail with independent left and right halves to serve as control surfaces. Different static scenarios are studied for different tail configurations. The proposed morphing configurations are analyzed in terms of static and dynamic stability and compared with a conventional configuration. The stability derivatives defining the limits of static stability are calculated for the whole range of tail rotation angles. The aircraft’s dynamic model is developed and feedback control systems are implemented. A sideslip suppression system, a heading control system and a speed and altitude hold system are studied for three different configurations, MC1, MC2 and MC3 configurations. Static results show that the aircraft is longitudinally stable for a wide range of tail rotation angles. Variation of tail dihedral and rotation angles are two mechanisms able to maintain directional and lateral stability but only the last is able to produce lateral force and yawing moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Variations in the Airfoil Trace the History of Flight
    Variations in the airfoil trace the history of flight. By Walter J. Boyne INGS have always captured the wing, or the elimination of all or W human imagination. The my- part of the wing. thology of flight is found in every culture. Despite this fascination, it Aerodynamic Magic was not until the nineteenth century Since the late 1940s, aerodynamic that scientists began to use precise progress has accelerated at an ever mathematics to compute the opti- greater rate, so much so that modern mum size and shape of wings for a engineering methods and materials flying machine. have combined with new require- Orville and Wilbur Wright did it ments to create totally new wing best with their 1903 Flyer, forcing configurations. Now, elaborate high- competitors to try wings of all shapes, lift devices are tucked into wing lead- styles, and dimensions to avoid in- ing and trailing edges to deploy dur- fringing on their patents. Some went ing the approach to landing, with the to multiple wings—triplanes, quadra- slats and flaps folding out like hand- planes, and more. Others altered the kerchiefs from a magician's sleeve. shape of wings to sweptback, tan- Some by-products have become dem, joined, and cruciform. perhaps too sophisticated. Where Most of the results were too inef- the thick wing of a Douglas C-47 ficient to fly; some were capable of "Gooney Bird" would let you plow generating just enough lift to stag- through cold, wet clouds forever, ger through the air if coupled with a shaking off the ice buildup with sufficiently powerful engine, and a pneumatic boots, some modern air- very few were both stable and effi- foils—as on the Aerospatiale/Alenia cient.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Center1 Suppose We Have the Forces and Moments
    Aerodynamic Center1 Suppose we have the forces and moments specified about some reference location for the aircraft, and we want to restate them about some new origin. N ~ L N ~ L M AAM z ref new x x ref xnew M ref = Pitching moment about xref M new = Pitching moment about xnew xref = Original reference location xnew = New origin N = Normal force ≈ L for small ∝ A = Axial force ≈ D for small ∝ Assuming there is no change in the z location of the two points: MxxLMref=−() new − ref + new Or, in coefficient form: xx− new ref CCCmLM=− + ref cN new mean ac.. The Aerodynamic Center is defined as that location xac about which the pitching moment doesn’t change with angle of attack. How do we find it? 1 Anderson 1.6 & 4.3 Aerodynamic Center Let xnew= x ac Using above: ()xx− CCC=−ac ref + M refc LM ac Differential with respect to α : ∂CM xx− ∂C ref ac ref ∂CL M ac =− + ∂∂∂αααc By definition: ∂CM ac = 0 ∂α Solving for the above ∂C xxac− ref M ref ∂C =−L , or c ∂∂αα ∂C xxac− ref x ref M ref =− ccC∂ L Example: Consider our AVL calculations for the F-16C • xref = 0 - Moment given about LE ∂C • Compute M ref for small range of angle of attack by numerical ∂CL differences. I picked αα= −=300 to 3. x • This gave ac ≈ 2.89 . c x ∂C • Plotting Cvsα about ac shows M ≈ 0 . M c ∂α ∂C Note that according to the AVL predictions, not only is M ≈=0 @ x 2.89 , but ∂α ac also that CM = 0 .
    [Show full text]
  • Static Stability and Control
    CHAPTER 2 Static Stability and Control "lsn't it astonishing that all these secrets have been preserved for so many years just so that we could discover them!" Orville Wright, June 7, 1903 2.1 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE By the start of the 20th century, the aeronautical community had solved many of the technical problems necessary for achieving powered flight of a heavier-than-air aircraft. One problem still beyond the grasp of these early investigators was a lack of understanding of the relationship between stability and control as well as the influence of the pilot on the pilot-machine system. Most of the ideas regarding stability and control came from experiments with uncontrolled hand-launched gliders. Through such experiments, it was quickly discovered that for a successful flight the glider had to be inherently stable. Earlier aviation pioneers such as Albert Zahm in the United States, Alphonse Penaud in France, and Frederick Lanchester in England contributed to the notion of stability. Zahm, however, was the first to correctly outline the requirements for static stability in a paper he presented in 1893. In his paper, he analyzed the conditions necessary for obtaining a stable equilibrium for an airplane descending at a constant speed. Figure 2.1 shows a sketch of a glider from Zahm's paper. Zahm concluded that the center of gravity had to be in front of the aerodynamic force and the vehicle would require what he referred to as "longitudinal dihedral" to have a stable equilibrium point. In the terminology of today, he showed that, if the center of gravity was ahead of the wing aerodynamic center, then one would need a reflexed airfoil to be stable at a positive angle of attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Investigation of an Airfoil with a Gurney Flap
    Numerical investigation of an airfoil with a Gurney flap Cory S. Jang�, James C. Ross�, Russell M. Cummings� � California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA � NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA Abstract A two-dimensional numerical investigation was performed to determine the effect of a Gurney flap on a NACA 4412 airfoil. A Gurney flap is a flat plate on the order of 1—3% of the airfoil chord in length, oriented perpendicular to the chord line and located on the airfoil windward side at the trailing edge. The flowfield around the airfoil was numerically predicted using INS2D, an incompressible Navier—Stokes solver, and the one-equation turbulence model of Baldwin and Barth. Gurney flap sizes of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.25%, 1.5%, 2.0%, and 3.0% of the airfoil chord were studied. Computational results were compared with available experi­ mental results. The numerical solutions show that some Gurney flaps increase the airfoil lift coefficient with only a slight increase in drag coefficient. Use of a 1.5% chord length Gurney flap increases the airfoil lift � + coefficient by C� 0.3 and decreases the angle of attack required to obtain a given lift coefficient by �� '! ��� 3°. The numerical solutions show the details of the flow structure at the trailing edge and provide a possible explanation for the increased aerodynamic performance. Nomenclature c airfoil reference chord e, f inviscid flux terms in x, y directions, respectively " C� sectional drag coefficient ( d/q�c) e�, f� viscous flux terms in x, y directions, respectively
    [Show full text]
  • Procedures for the Design of Low-Pitching-Moment Airfoils
    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE 14 PROCEDURES FOR THE DESIGN \ OF LOW-PITCHING-MOMENT AIRFOILS \/ , Raymond L. Burger Langley Reseurcb Center Humpton, Va. 23665 4. it NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMlN&TRATlON2.- . WASHINGTON, D. C. ,AUGUSH975 iif TECH LIBRARY MFB. NM 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TN D-7982 I 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date PROCEDURES FOR THE DESIGN OF LOW-PITCHING- Aueust 1975 MOMENT AIRFOILS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) i 8. Performing Organization Report No. L- 10114 P Raymond L. Barger 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 505-06-31-02 Y NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Va. 23665 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Note ~~ National Aeronautics and Space Administration I 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20546 I 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Three approaches to the design of low-pitching-moment airfoils are treated. The first method decreases the pitching moment of a given airfoil by specifying appropriate modifica- I tions to its pressure distribution. The second procedure designs an airfoil of desired pitch- I ing moment by prescribing parameters in a special formula for the Theodorsen +function. The third method involves appropriate camber-line design with superposition of a thickness distribution and subsequent tailoring. Advantages and disadvantages of the three methods I I I are discussed. I x rp 17. Key-Words (Suggested by Authoris) 1 18. Distribution Statement Airfoils Unclassified - Unlimited Design Low -pitching-moment airfoil Subi ect Cate gorv 0 1 19.
    [Show full text]