What Is Differential Geometry?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Is Differential Geometry? What is Differential Geometry? Zhiqin Lu UCI, Recruitment Day April 3, 2009 Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 1/14 II IV N II 0 >< N II + >< N ~ '<: II ~ '<: Figure: From Vector Calculus, Marsden & Tromba Triple integrals Compute ZZZ xdxdydz; W where W is the region bounded by the planes x = 0; y = 0, and z = 2, and the surface z = x 2 + y 2 and lying in the quadrant x ≥ 0; y ≥ 0. Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 2/14 II IV N II 0 >< N II + >< N ~ '<: II ~ '<: Triple integrals Compute ZZZ xdxdydz; W where W is the region bounded by the planes x = 0; y = 0, and z = 2, and the surface z = x 2 + y 2 and lying in the quadrant x ≥ 0; y ≥ 0. Figure: From Vector Calculus, Marsden & Tromba Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 2/14 How to compute integrations over an n-dimensional object? Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 3/14 An example Zeros of a quintic polynomial: 5 5 5 5 5 Z0 + Z1 + Z2 + Z3 + Z4 + 10Z0Z1Z2Z3Z4 = 0 in C5. Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 4/14 Figure: From Wikipedia, the intersection of the quintic Calabi-Yau threefold to our three dimensional space Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 5/14 Use Linear Algebra Use Abstract Algebra Use the results in all other math/physics fields. How to study high dimensional geometric object? Use Partial Differential Equations; Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 6/14 Use Abstract Algebra Use the results in all other math/physics fields. How to study high dimensional geometric object? Use Partial Differential Equations; Use Linear Algebra Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 6/14 Use the results in all other math/physics fields. How to study high dimensional geometric object? Use Partial Differential Equations; Use Linear Algebra Use Abstract Algebra Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 6/14 How to study high dimensional geometric object? Use Partial Differential Equations; Use Linear Algebra Use Abstract Algebra Use the results in all other math/physics fields. Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 6/14 1 I xdy − ydx = 1: 2π x 2 + y 2 A simple example Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 7/14 A simple example 1 I xdy − ydx = 1: 2π x 2 + y 2 Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 7/14 A non-trivial example How many holes in the quintic Calabi-Yau manifold? Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 8/14 In 1977, S. T. Yau was able to solve the following PDE 0 @2u @2u @2u 1 g ¯ + g ¯ + g ¯ + 1;1 @z1@z¯1 1;2 @z1@z¯2 1;3 @z1@z¯3 @2u @2u @2u det Bg ¯ + g ¯ + g ¯ + C @ 2;1 @z2@z¯1 2;2 @z2@z¯2 2;3 @z2@z¯3 A @2u @2u @2u g ¯ + g ¯ + g ¯ + 3;1 @z3@z¯1 3;2 @z3@z¯2 3;3 @z3@z¯3 0 1 g1;1¯ g1;2¯ g1;3¯ F = e det @g2;1¯ g2;2¯ g2;3¯A ; g3;1¯ g3;2¯ g3;3¯ where gi¯j and F are given functions. After that, we are able to tell the topological properties of the manifold. Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 9/14 Hodge theory! Linear algebra Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 10/14 Linear algebra Hodge theory! Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 10/14 Conclusion: Differential Geometry is not a separate math field, it brought different fields like PDE, algebraic geometry, algebraic topology, Lie group theory, functional analysis, and many others together. Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 11/14 Peter Li, Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Chuu-Lian Terng, Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Ronald J. Stern,Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Chuu-Lian Terng, Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Ronald J. Stern,Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Peter Li, Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 Chuu-Lian Terng, Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Ronald J. Stern,Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Peter Li, Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Ronald J. Stern,Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Peter Li, Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Chuu-Lian Terng, Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 Ronald J. Stern,Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Peter Li, Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Chuu-Lian Terng, Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Peter Li, Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Chuu-Lian Terng, Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Ronald J. Stern, Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 Zhiqin Lu, complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Peter Li, Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Chuu-Lian Terng, Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Ronald J. Stern,Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Peter Li, Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Chuu-Lian Terng, Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Ronald J. Stern,Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 UCI's Geometry / Topology Group Peter Li, Geometric PDE, Analysis on manifolds; Chuu-Lian Terng, Differential Geometry, Integrable systems Ronald J. Stern,Smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic contact topology and geometry, knot theory Zhiqin Lu, complex geometry, Mirror symmetry. Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 12/14 http://math.uci.edu/~ zlu/geom-topo-group/index.php Members of the Geometry & Topology Group at UCI work in many different fields and have expertise in a diverse set of techniques. We have lively and well-attended seminars, and one of our key goals is the cross-pollination of ideas between geometry and topology. Our faculty consists of active researchers in many areas of geometry and low-dimensional topology including geometric PDE, differential geometry, integrable systems, mirror symmetry, smooth 4-manifolds, symplectic and contact topology and geometry, and knot theory and its invariants. Our faculty is highly-regarded. All have NSF Grants and one of its members, Peter Li, was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. The Geometry/Topology Group at UCI has a long-standing commitment to excellence in graduate and postdoctoral training: we have produced some outstanding graduate students, and we have been fortunate to have recruited and mentored exceptional postdoctoral fellows. Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 13/14 Welcome to UCI! Zhiqin Lu, UC. Irvine What is Geometry 14/14.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 13 the Geometry of Circles
    Chapter 13 TheR. Connelly geometry of circles Math 452, Spring 2002 Math 4520, Fall 2017 CLASSICAL GEOMETRIES So far we have been studying lines and conics in the Euclidean plane. What about circles, 14. The geometry of circles one of the basic objects of study in Euclidean geometry? One approach is to use the complex numbersSo far .we Recall have thatbeen the studying projectivities lines and of conics the projective in the Euclidean plane overplane., whichWhat weabout call 2, circles, Cone of the basic objects of study in Euclidean geometry? One approachC is to use CP are given by 3 by 3 matrices, and these projectivities restricted to a complex projective the complex numbers 1C. Recall that the projectivities of the projective plane over C, line,v.rhich which we wecall call Cp2, a CPare, given are the by Moebius3 by 3 matrices, functions, and whichthese projectivities themselves correspondrestricted to to a 2-by-2 matrices.complex Theprojective Moebius line, functions which we preservecall a Cpl the, are cross the Moebius ratio. This functions, is where which circles themselves come in. correspond to a 2 by 2 matrix. The Moebius functions preserve the cross ratio. This is 13.1where circles The come cross in. ratio for the complex field We14.1 look The for anothercross ratio geometric for the interpretation complex field of the cross ratio for the complex field, or better 1 yet forWeCP look= Cfor[f1g another. Recall geometric the polarinterpretation decomposition of the cross of a complexratio for numberthe complexz = refield,iθ, where r =orjz betterj is the yet magnitude for Cpl = ofCz U, and{ 00 } .Recallθ is the the angle polar that decomposition the line through of a complex 0 and znumbermakes with thez real -rei9, axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Connections Between Differential Geometry And
    VOL. 21, 1935 MA THEMA TICS: S. B. MYERS 225 having no point of C on their interiors or boundaries, the second composed of the remaining cells of 2,,. The cells of the first class will form a sub-com- plex 2* of M,. The cells of the second class will not form a complex, since they may have cells of the first class on their boundaries; nevertheless, their duals will form a complex A. Moreover, the cells of the second class will determine a region Rn containing C. Now, there is no difficulty in extending Pontrjagin's relation of duality to the Betti Groups of 2* and A. Moreover, every cycle of S - C is homologous to a cycle of 2, for sufficiently large values of n and bounds in S - C if and only if the corresponding cycle of 2* bounds for sufficiently large values of n. On the other hand, the regions R. close down on the point set C as n increases indefinitely, in the sense that the intersection of all the RI's is precisely C. Thus, the proof of the relation of duality be- tween the Betti groups of C and S - C may be carried through as if the space S were of finite dimensionality. 1 L. Pontrjagin, "The General Topological Theorem of Duality for Closed Sets," Ann. Math., 35, 904-914 (1934). 2 Cf. the reference in Lefschetz's Topology, Amer. Math. Soc. Publications, vol. XII, end of p. 315 (1930). 3Lefschetz, loc. cit., pp. 341 et seq. CONNECTIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND TOPOLOG Y BY SumNR BYRON MYERS* PRINCJETON UNIVERSITY AND THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY Communicated March 6, 1935 In this note are stated the definitions and results of a study of new connections between differential geometry and topology.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Mathematics
    Georgia Department of Education History of Mathematics K-12 Mathematics Introduction The Georgia Mathematics Curriculum focuses on actively engaging the students in the development of mathematical understanding by using manipulatives and a variety of representations, working independently and cooperatively to solve problems, estimating and computing efficiently, and conducting investigations and recording findings. There is a shift towards applying mathematical concepts and skills in the context of authentic problems and for the student to understand concepts rather than merely follow a sequence of procedures. In mathematics classrooms, students will learn to think critically in a mathematical way with an understanding that there are many different ways to a solution and sometimes more than one right answer in applied mathematics. Mathematics is the economy of information. The central idea of all mathematics is to discover how knowing some things well, via reasoning, permit students to know much else—without having to commit the information to memory as a separate fact. It is the reasoned, logical connections that make mathematics coherent. The implementation of the Georgia Standards of Excellence in Mathematics places a greater emphasis on sense making, problem solving, reasoning, representation, connections, and communication. History of Mathematics History of Mathematics is a one-semester elective course option for students who have completed AP Calculus or are taking AP Calculus concurrently. It traces the development of major branches of mathematics throughout history, specifically algebra, geometry, number theory, and methods of proofs, how that development was influenced by the needs of various cultures, and how the mathematics in turn influenced culture. The course extends the numbers and counting, algebra, geometry, and data analysis and probability strands from previous courses, and includes a new history strand.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Differential Calculus and Differential Geometry in Two
    1 A Two-Dimensional Comparison of Differential Calculus and Differential Geometry Andrew Grossfield, Ph.D Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology Abstract and Introduction: Plane geometry is mainly the study of the properties of polygons and circles. Differential geometry is the study of curves that can be locally approximated by straight line segments. Differential calculus is the study of functions. These functions of calculus can be viewed as single-valued branches of curves in a coordinate system where the horizontal variable controls the vertical variable. In both studies the derivative multiplies incremental changes in the horizontal variable to yield incremental changes in the vertical variable and both studies possess the same rules of differentiation and integration. It seems that the two studies should be identical, that is, isomorphic. And, yet, students should be aware of important differences. In differential geometry, the horizontal and vertical units have the same dimensional units. In differential calculus the horizontal and vertical units are usually different, e.g., height vs. time. There are differences in the two studies with respect to the distance between points. In differential geometry, the Pythagorean slant distance formula prevails, while in the 2- dimensional plane of differential calculus there is no concept of slant distance. The derivative has a different meaning in each of the two subjects. In differential geometry, the slope of the tangent line determines the direction of the tangent line; that is, the angle with the horizontal axis. In differential calculus, there is no concept of direction; instead, the derivative describes a rate of change. In differential geometry the line described by the equation y = x subtends an angle, α, of 45° with the horizontal, but in calculus the linear relation, h = t, bears no concept of direction.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Topology of Ending Lamination Space
    1 ON THE TOPOLOGY OF ENDING LAMINATION SPACE DAVID GABAI Abstract. We show that if S is a finite type orientable surface of genus g and p punctures where 3g + p ≥ 5, then EL(S) is (n − 1)-connected and (n − 1)- locally connected, where dim(PML(S)) = 2n + 1 = 6g + 2p − 7. Furthermore, if g = 0, then EL(S) is homeomorphic to the p−4 dimensional Nobeling space. 0. Introduction This paper is about the topology of the space EL(S) of ending laminations on a finite type hyperbolic surface, i.e. a complete hyperbolic surface S of genus-g with p punctures. An ending lamination is a geodesic lamination L in S that is minimal and filling, i.e. every leaf of L is dense in L and any simple closed geodesic in S nontrivally intersects L transversely. Since Thurston's seminal work on surface automorphisms in the mid 1970's, laminations in surfaces have played central roles in low dimensional topology, hy- perbolic geometry, geometric group theory and the theory of mapping class groups. From many points of view, the ending laminations are the most interesting lam- inations. For example, the stable and unstable laminations of a pseudo Anosov mapping class are ending laminations [Th1] and associated to a degenerate end of a complete hyperbolic 3-manifold with finitely generated fundamental group is an ending lamination [Th4], [Bon]. Also, every ending lamination arises in this manner [BCM]. The Hausdorff metric on closed sets induces a metric topology on EL(S). Here, two elements L1, L2 in EL(S) are close if each point in L1 is close to a point of L2 and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • 20. Geometry of the Circle (SC)
    20. GEOMETRY OF THE CIRCLE PARTS OF THE CIRCLE Segments When we speak of a circle we may be referring to the plane figure itself or the boundary of the shape, called the circumference. In solving problems involving the circle, we must be familiar with several theorems. In order to understand these theorems, we review the names given to parts of a circle. Diameter and chord The region that is encompassed between an arc and a chord is called a segment. The region between the chord and the minor arc is called the minor segment. The region between the chord and the major arc is called the major segment. If the chord is a diameter, then both segments are equal and are called semi-circles. The straight line joining any two points on the circle is called a chord. Sectors A diameter is a chord that passes through the center of the circle. It is, therefore, the longest possible chord of a circle. In the diagram, O is the center of the circle, AB is a diameter and PQ is also a chord. Arcs The region that is enclosed by any two radii and an arc is called a sector. If the region is bounded by the two radii and a minor arc, then it is called the minor sector. www.faspassmaths.comIf the region is bounded by two radii and the major arc, it is called the major sector. An arc of a circle is the part of the circumference of the circle that is cut off by a chord.
    [Show full text]
  • William P. Thurston the Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds
    William P. Thurston The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds Electronic version 1.1 - March 2002 http://www.msri.org/publications/books/gt3m/ This is an electronic edition of the 1980 notes distributed by Princeton University. The text was typed in TEX by Sheila Newbery, who also scanned the figures. Typos have been corrected (and probably others introduced), but otherwise no attempt has been made to update the contents. Genevieve Walsh compiled the index. Numbers on the right margin correspond to the original edition’s page numbers. Thurston’s Three-Dimensional Geometry and Topology, Vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, 1997) is a considerable expansion of the first few chapters of these notes. Later chapters have not yet appeared in book form. Please send corrections to Silvio Levy at [email protected]. CHAPTER 5 Flexibility and rigidity of geometric structures In this chapter we will consider deformations of hyperbolic structures and of geometric structures in general. By a geometric structure on M, we mean, as usual, a local modelling of M on a space X acted on by a Lie group G. Suppose M is compact, possibly with boundary. In the case where the boundary is non-empty we do not make special restrictions on the boundary behavior. If M is modelled on (X, G) then the developing map M˜ −→D X defines the holonomy representation H : π1M −→ G. In general, H does not determine the structure on M. For example, the two immersions of an annulus shown below define Euclidean structures on the annulus which both have trivial holonomy but are not equivalent in any reasonable sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Floer Homology, Gauge Theory, and Low-Dimensional Topology
    Floer Homology, Gauge Theory, and Low-Dimensional Topology Clay Mathematics Proceedings Volume 5 Floer Homology, Gauge Theory, and Low-Dimensional Topology Proceedings of the Clay Mathematics Institute 2004 Summer School Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics Budapest, Hungary June 5–26, 2004 David A. Ellwood Peter S. Ozsváth András I. Stipsicz Zoltán Szabó Editors American Mathematical Society Clay Mathematics Institute 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 57R17, 57R55, 57R57, 57R58, 53D05, 53D40, 57M27, 14J26. The cover illustrates a Kinoshita-Terasaka knot (a knot with trivial Alexander polyno- mial), and two Kauffman states. These states represent the two generators of the Heegaard Floer homology of the knot in its topmost filtration level. The fact that these elements are homologically non-trivial can be used to show that the Seifert genus of this knot is two, a result first proved by David Gabai. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Clay Mathematics Institute. Summer School (2004 : Budapest, Hungary) Floer homology, gauge theory, and low-dimensional topology : proceedings of the Clay Mathe- matics Institute 2004 Summer School, Alfr´ed R´enyi Institute of Mathematics, Budapest, Hungary, June 5–26, 2004 / David A. Ellwood ...[et al.], editors. p. cm. — (Clay mathematics proceedings, ISSN 1534-6455 ; v. 5) ISBN 0-8218-3845-8 (alk. paper) 1. Low-dimensional topology—Congresses. 2. Symplectic geometry—Congresses. 3. Homol- ogy theory—Congresses. 4. Gauge fields (Physics)—Congresses. I. Ellwood, D. (David), 1966– II. Title. III. Series. QA612.14.C55 2004 514.22—dc22 2006042815 Copying and reprinting. Material in this book may be reproduced by any means for educa- tional and scientific purposes without fee or permission with the exception of reproduction by ser- vices that collect fees for delivery of documents and provided that the customary acknowledgment of the source is given.
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT L. FOOTE CURRICULUM VITA March 2017 Address
    ROBERT L. FOOTE CURRICULUM VITA March 2017 Address/Telephone/E-Mail Department of Mathematics & Computer Science Wabash College Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933 (765) 361-6429 [email protected] Personal Date of Birth: December 2, 1953 Citizenship: USA Education Ph.D., Mathematics, University of Michigan, April 1983 Dissertation: Curvature Estimates for Monge-Amp`ere Foliations Thesis Advisor: Daniel M. Burns Jr. M.A., Mathematics, University of Michigan, April 1978 B.A., Mathematics, Kalamazoo College, June 1976 Magna cum Laude with Honors in Mathematics, Phi Beta Kappa, Heyl Science Scholarship Employment 1989–present, Wabash College Department Chair, 1997–2001, 2009–2012 Full Professor since 2004 Associate Professor, 1993–2004 Assistant Professor, 1991–1993 Byron K. Trippet Assistant Professor, 1989–1991 1983–1989, Texas Tech University, Assistant Professor (granted tenure) 1983, Kalamazoo College, Visiting Instructor 1976–1982, University of Michigan, Graduate Student Teaching Assistant 1976, 1977, The Upjohn Company, Mathematical Analyst Research Visits 2009, Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS), Visiting Scholar Three weeks at the invitation of C. K. Han. 2009, Pennsylvania State Univ., Shapiro Visitor Four weeks at the invitation of Sergei Tabachnikov. 2008–2009, Univ. of Georgia, Visiting Scholar (sabbatical leave) 1996–1997, 2003–2004, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Visiting Scholar (sabbatical leave) 1991, Pohang Institute of Science and Technology, Pohang, Korea Three months at the invitation of C. K. Han. 1990, Texas Tech University Ten weeks at the invitation of Lance D. Drager. Current Fields of Interest Primary: Differential Geometry, Integral Geometry Professional Affiliations American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Association of America. Teaching Experience Graduate courses Differentiable manifolds, real analysis, complex analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Riemann's Contribution to Differential Geometry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Historia Mathematics 9 (1982) l-18 RIEMANN'S CONTRIBUTION TO DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY BY ESTHER PORTNOY UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN, URBANA, IL 61801 SUMMARIES In order to make a reasonable assessment of the significance of Riemann's role in the history of dif- ferential geometry, not unduly influenced by his rep- utation as a great mathematician, we must examine the contents of his geometric writings and consider the response of other mathematicians in the years immedi- ately following their publication. Pour juger adkquatement le role de Riemann dans le developpement de la geometric differentielle sans etre influence outre mesure par sa reputation de trks grand mathematicien, nous devons &udier le contenu de ses travaux en geometric et prendre en consideration les reactions des autres mathematiciens au tours de trois an&es qui suivirent leur publication. Urn Riemann's Einfluss auf die Entwicklung der Differentialgeometrie richtig einzuschZtzen, ohne sich von seinem Ruf als bedeutender Mathematiker iiberm;issig beeindrucken zu lassen, ist es notwendig den Inhalt seiner geometrischen Schriften und die Haltung zeitgen&sischer Mathematiker unmittelbar nach ihrer Verijffentlichung zu untersuchen. On June 10, 1854, Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann read his probationary lecture, "iber die Hypothesen welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen," before the Philosophical Faculty at Gdttingen ill. His biographer, Dedekind [1892, 5491, reported that Riemann had worked hard to make the lecture understandable to nonmathematicians in the audience, and that the result was a masterpiece of presentation, in which the ideas were set forth clearly without the aid of analytic techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • SOME GEOMETRY in HIGH-DIMENSIONAL SPACES 11 Containing Cn(S) Tends to ∞ with N
    SOME GEOMETRY IN HIGH-DIMENSIONAL SPACES MATH 527A 1. Introduction Our geometric intuition is derived from three-dimensional space. Three coordinates suffice. Many objects of interest in analysis, however, require far more coordinates for a complete description. For example, a function f with domain [−1; 1] is defined by infinitely many \coordi- nates" f(t), one for each t 2 [−1; 1]. Or, we could consider f as being P1 n determined by its Taylor series n=0 ant (when such a representation exists). In that case, the numbers a0; a1; a2;::: could be thought of as coordinates. Perhaps the association of Fourier coefficients (there are countably many of them) to a periodic function is familiar; those are again coordinates of a sort. Strange Things can happen in infinite dimensions. One usually meets these, gradually (reluctantly?), in a course on Real Analysis or Func- tional Analysis. But infinite dimensional spaces need not always be completely mysterious; sometimes one lucks out and can watch a \coun- terintuitive" phenomenon developing in Rn for large n. This might be of use in one of several ways: perhaps the behavior for large but finite n is already useful, or one can deduce an interesting statement about limn!1 of something, or a peculiarity of infinite-dimensional spaces is illuminated. I will describe some curious features of cubes and balls in Rn, as n ! 1. These illustrate a phenomenon called concentration of measure. It will turn out that the important law of large numbers from probability theory is just one manifestation of high-dimensional geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis and Complex Geometry
    Complex Analysis and Complex Geometry Finnur Larusson,´ University of Adelaide Norman Levenberg, Indiana University Rasul Shafikov, University of Western Ontario Alexandre Sukhov, Universite´ des Sciences et Technologies de Lille May 1–6, 2016 1 Overview of the Field Complex analysis and complex geometry form synergy through the geometric ideas used in analysis and an- alytic tools employed in geometry, and therefore they should be viewed as two aspects of the same subject. The fundamental objects of the theory are complex manifolds and, more generally, complex spaces, holo- morphic functions on them, and holomorphic maps between them. Holomorphic functions can be defined in three equivalent ways as complex-differentiable functions, convergent power series, and as solutions of the homogeneous Cauchy-Riemann equation. The threefold nature of differentiability over the complex numbers gives complex analysis its distinctive character and is the ultimate reason why it is linked to so many areas of mathematics. Plurisubharmonic functions are not as well known to nonexperts as holomorphic functions. They were first explicitly defined in the 1940s, but they had already appeared in attempts to geometrically describe domains of holomorphy at the very beginning of several complex variables in the first decade of the 20th century. Since the 1960s, one of their most important roles has been as weights in a priori estimates for solving the Cauchy-Riemann equation. They are intimately related to the complex Monge-Ampere` equation, the second partial differential equation of complex analysis. There is also a potential-theoretic aspect to plurisubharmonic functions, which is the subject of pluripotential theory. In the early decades of the modern era of the subject, from the 1940s into the 1970s, the notion of a complex space took shape and the geometry of analytic varieties and holomorphic maps was developed.
    [Show full text]