Plants for Living Landscapes: Class 2 – Trees and Shrubs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Acer Leucoderme Chalk Maple1 Edward F
Fact Sheet ST-19 November 1993 Acer leucoderme Chalk Maple1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION This 25 to 30-foot-tall native North American tree is reportedly quite similar to Acer barbatum or Florida Maple and is often seen with multiple trunks (Fig. 1). The chalky white or light gray bark is quite attractive, with the bark on older trees becoming ridged and blackened near the ground. The two to three-inch- diameter, lobed leaves, with fuzzy undersides, give a spectacular display in the fall months, ranging from shimmering yellow to vivid orange and deep red. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Acer leucoderme Pronunciation: AY-ser loo-koe-DER-mee Common name(s): Chalk Maple, Whitebark Maple Family: Aceraceae USDA hardiness zones: 5B through 8 (Fig. 2) Origin: native to North America Uses: large parking lot islands (> 200 square feet in size); wide tree lawns (>6 feet wide); medium-sized tree lawns (4-6 feet wide); recommended for buffer strips around parking lots or for median strip plantings in the highway; near a deck or patio; reclamation Figure 1. Middle-aged Chalk Maple. plant; shade tree; specimen Availability: grown in small quantities by a small or less identical crown forms number of nurseries Crown shape: oval Crown density: dense DESCRIPTION Growth rate: slow Texture: medium Height: 25 to 30 feet Spread: 15 to 30 feet Crown uniformity: symmetrical canopy with a regular (or smooth) outline, and individuals have more 1. This document is adapted from Fact Sheet ST-19, a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. -
Downtown Tree Management Plan City of Atlanta, Georgia November 2012
Downtown Tree Management Plan City of Atlanta, Georgia November 2012 Prepared for: City of Atlanta Department of Planning and Community Development Arborist Division, Tree Conservation Commission 55 Trinity Avenue SW, Suite 3800 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Prepared by: Davey Resource Group A Division of The Davey Tree Expert Company 1500 North Mantua Street P.O. Box 5193 Kent, Ohio 44240 800-828-8312 Table of Contents Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... vi Section 1: Urban Forest Overview.............................................................................................................................. 1 Section 2: Tree Inventory Assessment and Analysis ................................................................................................. 8 Overall Findings ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 Downtown Area Findings .......................................................................................................................................... 21 Expanded Inventory Area Findings ......................................................................................................................... -
For: March 31, 2018
Plant Lover’s Almanac Jim Chatfield Ohio State University Extension For: March 31, 2018 AcerMania. AcerPhilia. The crazy love of one of our greatest group of trees. Maples. From maple syrup to maple furniture. From musical instruments due to their tone-carrying trait to a wondrous range of landscape plants. Here are a few queries about maples I have received recently and a few rhetorical questions I have added to the mix for proper seasoning. Q. – Which maples are used to make maple syrup? A. – How topical. The obvious answer is sugar maple, Acer saccharum, with sweetness of the sap sewn into its Latin name. Silver maple is also sometimes used, and its Latin name, Acer saccharinum, suggests this is so. Black maple, Acer nigrum, is commonly used and it is so closely-related to sugar maple that it is often considered a sub-species. Box elder, Acer negundo, is also used somewhat in Canada, but to me one of the most surprisingly tapped maples, increasing in popularity in Ohio is red maple, Acer rubrum. Its sap is less sweet but red maple sugar-bushes are easier to manage. Q. Where does the name “Ácer” come from? A. The origins are somewhat obscure, but one theory is that its roots mean “sharp”, which if true would relate to the pointed nature of the leaf lobes on many maples. As a Latin genus name, Acer has over 120 species worldwide, with only one in the southern hemisphere. Q. – Which maples are native to the United States? A. - Five are familiar to us here in the northeastern U.S., namely sugar maple, red maple, silver maple, striped maple and box elder. -
Ecological Site F136XY031GA PROVISIONAL - Bottomland Forest, Thermic Temperature Regime
Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site F136XY031GA PROVISIONAL - Bottomland Forest, Thermic Temperature Regime Accessed: 10/02/2021 General information MLRA notes Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 136X–Southern Piedmont This area is in North Carolina (29 percent), Georgia (27 percent), Virginia (21 percent), South Carolina (16 percent), and Alabama (7 percent). It makes up about 64,395 square miles (166,865 square kilometers). (Ag Bulletin 296) The northeast-southwest trending Piedmont ecoregion comprises a transitional area between the mostly mountainous ecoregions of the Appalachians to the northwest and the relatively flat coastal plain to the southeast. It is a complex mosaic of Precambrian and Paleozoic metamorphic and igneous rocks with moderately dissected irregular plains and some hills. (EPA Ecoregions descriptions) ADD APPROPRIATE ECOREGION DESCRIPTION(S) Classification relationships A PROVISIONAL ECOLOGICAL SITE is a conceptual grouping of soil map unit components within a Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) based on the similarities in response to management. Although there may be wide variability in the productivity of the soils grouped into a Provisional Site, the soil vegetation interactions as expressed in the State and Transition Model are similar and the management actions required to achieve objectives, whether maintaining the existing ecological state or managing for an alternative state, are similar. Provisional Sites are likely to be refined into more precise group during the process of meeting the APPROVED ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION criteria. This PROVISIONAL ECOLOGICAL SITE has been developed to meet the standards established in the National Ecological Site Handbook. The information associated with this ecological site does not meet the Approved Ecological Site Description Standard, but it has been through a Quality Control and Quality Assurance processes to assure consistency and completeness. -
Native Tree Families, Including Large and Small Trees, 1/1/08 in the Southern Blue Ridge Region (Compiled by Rob Messick Using Three Sources Listed Below.)
Native Tree Families, Including Large and Small Trees, 1/1/08 in the Southern Blue Ridge Region (Compiled by Rob Messick using three sources listed below.) • Total number of tree families listed in the southern Blue Ridge region = 33. • Total number of native large and small tree species listed = 113. (Only 84 according to J. B. & D. L..) There are 94 tree species in more frequently encountered families. There are 19 tree species in less frequently encountered families. • There is 93 % compatibility between Ashe & Ayers (1902), Little (1980), and Swanson (1994). (W. W. Ashe lists 105 tree species in the region in 1902. These are fully compatible with current listings.) ▸means more frequently encountered species. ?? = means a tree species that possibly occurs in the region, though its presence is not clear. More frequently encountered tree families (21): Pine Family Cashew Family Walnut Family Holly Family Birch Family Maple Family Beech Family Horse-chestnut (Buckeye) Family Magnolia Family Linden (Basswood) Family Laurel Family Tupelo-gum Family Witch-hazel Family Dogwood Family Plane-tree (Sycamore) Family Heath Family Rose Family Ebony Family Legume Family Storax (Snowbell) Family Olive Family Less frequently encountered tree families (12): Cypress Family Bladdernut Family Willow Family Buckthorn Family Elm Family Tea Family Mulberry Family Ginseng Family Custard-apple (Annona) Family Sweetleaf Family Rue Family Honeysuckle Family ______________________________________________________________________________ • More Frequently Encountered Tree Families: Pine Family (10): ▸ Fraser fir - Abies fraseri (a.k.a. Balsam) ▸ red spruce - Picea rubens ▸ shortleaf pine - Pinus echinata ▸ table mountain pine - Pinus pungens ▸ pitch pine - Pinus rigida ▸ white pine - Pinus strobus ▸ Virginia pine - Pinus virginiana loblolly pine - Pinus taeda ▸ eastern hemlock - Tsuga canadensis (a.k.a. -
Acer Leucoderme: Chalk Maple1 Edward F
ENH-178 Acer leucoderme: Chalk Maple1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 Introduction General Information This 25-to 30-foot-tall native North American tree is Scientific name: Acer leucoderme reportedly quite similar to Acer barbatum or Florida maple Pronunciation: AY-ser loo-koe-DER-mee and is often seen with multiple trunks. The chalky white Common name(s): Chalk maple, whitebark maple or light gray bark is quite attractive, with the bark on older Family: Aceraceae trees becoming ridged and blackened near the ground. USDA hardiness zones: 5B through 8B (Fig. 2) The two-to three-inch-diameter, lobed leaves, with fuzzy Origin: native to North America undersides, give a spectacular display in the fall months, Invasive potential: little invasive potential ranging from shimmering yellow to vivid orange and deep Uses: deck or patio; shade; reclamation; specimen; parking red. lot island 100-200 sq ft; parking lot island > 200 sq ft; tree lawn 4-6 feet wide; tree lawn > 6 ft wide; highway median Availability: not native to North America Figure 2. Range Figure 1. Middle-aged Acer leucoderme: Chalk Maple Credits: Ed Gilman 1. This document is ENH-178, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date November 1993. Reviewed February 2014. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Edward F. Gilman, professor, Environmental Horticulture Department; and Dennis G. Watson, former associate professor, Agricultural Engineering Department, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville FL 32611. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. -
Ecological Sustainability Will Probably Always Be Limited by Its Small Size and Fragmented Condition (See Section 3.5)
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 2011 Terrestrial Species Viability Evaluation for The Uwharrie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Requirements in the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) ............................. 1 3.0 Ecosystem Diversity ..................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Spatial Scales for Ecosystem Diversity ................................................................... 4 3.2 Characteristics of Ecosystem Diversity ................................................................... 7 3.3 Range of Variation .................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Current Condition and Trend of Ecosystem Characteristics and Status of Ecosystem Diversity ..................................................................................................... 15 3.5 – Risks to Selected Characteristics of Ecosystem Diversity ................................... 20 3.6 Recommended Forest Plan Components ............................................................... 21 3.7 Assessing effects of Forest Plan alternatives on viability .................................... -
Download PCN-Acer-2017-Holdings.Pdf
PLANT COLLECTIONS NETWORK MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ACER LIST 02/13/18 Institutional NameAccession no.Provenance* Quan Collection Id Loc.** Vouchered Plant Source Acer acuminatum Wall. ex D. Don MORRIS Acer acuminatum 1994-009 W 2 H&M 1822 1 No Quarryhill BG, Glen Ellen, CA QUARRYHILL Acer acuminatum 1993.039 W 4 H&M1822 1 Yes Acer acuminatum 1993.039 W 1 H&M1822 1 Yes Acer acuminatum 1993.039 W 1 H&M1822 1 Yes Acer acuminatum 1993.039 W 1 H&M1822 1 Yes Acer acuminatum 1993.076 W 2 H&M1858 1 No Acer acuminatum 1993.076 W 1 H&M1858 1 No Acer acuminatum 1993.139 W 1 H&M1921 1 No Acer acuminatum 1993.139 W 1 H&M1921 1 No UBCBG Acer acuminatum 1994-0490 W 1 HM.1858 0 Unk Sichuan Exp., Kew BG, Howick Arb., Quarry Hill ... Acer acuminatum 1994-0490 W 1 HM.1858 0 Unk Sichuan Exp., Kew BG, Howick Arb., Quarry Hill ... Acer acuminatum 1994-0490 W 1 HM.1858 0 Unk Sichuan Exp., Kew BG, Howick Arb., Quarry Hill ... UWBG Acer acuminatum 180-59 G 1 1 Yes National BG, Glasnevin Total of taxon 18 Acer albopurpurascens Hayata IUCN Red List Status: DD ATLANTA Acer albopurpurascens 20164176 G 1 2 No Crug Farm Nursery QUARRYHILL Acer albopurpurascens 2003.088 U 1 1 No Total of taxon 2 Acer amplum (Gee selection) DAWES Acer amplum (Gee selection) D2014-0117 G 1 1 No Gee Farms, Stockbridge, MI 49285 Total of taxon 1 Acer amplum 'Gold Coin' DAWES Acer amplum 'Gold Coin' D2015-0013 G 1 2 No Gee Farms, Stockbridge, MI 49285, USA Acer amplum 'Gold Coin' D2017-0075 G 2 2 No Shinn, Edward T., Wall Township, NJ 07719-9128 Total of taxon 3 Acer argutum Maxim. -
The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama
The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama T. Wayne Barger1* and Brian D. Holt1 1Alabama State Lands Division, Natural Heritage Section, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Montgomery, AL 36130 *Correspondence: wayne [email protected] Abstract provides public lands for recreational use along with con- servation of vital habitat. Since its inception, the Forever The Red Hills Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) is a 1785 ha Wild Program, managed by the Alabama Department of property that was acquired in two purchases by the State of Conservation and Natural Resources (AL-DCNR), has pur- Alabama Forever Wild Program in February and Septem- chased approximately 97 500 ha (241 000 acres) of land for ber 2010. The RHFWT is characterized by undulating general recreation, nature preserves, additions to wildlife terrain with steep slopes, loblolly pine plantations, and management areas and state parks. For each Forever Wild mixed hardwood floodplain forests. The property lies tract purchased, a management plan providing guidelines 125 km southwest of Montgomery, AL and is managed by and recommendations for the tract must be in place within the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural a year of acquisition. The 1785 ha (4412 acre) Red Hills Resources with an emphasis on recreational use and habi- Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) was acquired in two sepa- tat management. An intensive floristic study of this area rate purchases in February and September 2010, in part was conducted from January 2011 through June 2015. A to provide protected habitat for the federally listed Red total of 533 taxa (527 species) from 323 genera and 120 Hills Salamander (Phaeognathus hubrichti Highton). -
Best Management Practices for Community Trees
Best Management Practices for Community Trees A Technical Guide to Tree Conservation in Athens-Clarke County, Georgia The Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia, believes that we all have a responsibility to manage our community trees wisely and to conserve valuable community resources. To contribute to this mission, Athens-Clarke County has developed this Technical Guide to Tree Conservation in Athens- Clarke County… Best Management Practices for Community Trees A Technical Guide to Tree Conservation in Athens-Clarke County, Georgia Written by-- Constance P. Head Urban Forester and ISA Certified Arborist Technical Forestry Services Robinson Fisher Landscape Architect Robinson Fisher Associates Maureen O’Brien Landscape Architect Robinson Fisher Associates With special contributions by— Roger Cauthen Landscape Management Division Administrator and ISA Certified Arborist Athens-Clarke County Central Services Department Athens-Clarke County Planning Department Urban Tree Advisory Committee and the Future of Trees Committee Adopted April 3, 2001 To obtain additional copies of this document or to find out more about the Athens-Clarke County Community Tree Program, visit the Landscape Management Division Office at 350 Pound Street, Athens, GA 30601. Best Management Practices for Community Trees Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1 Who Should Use This Guide .........................................................................................................1 -
Uncultivated Nuts of the United States
Uncultivated Nuts of Forest Service The United States Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 450 Arnold Krochmal Connie Krochmal Pî f3 3 i-O CO D OJ U TJ 1 ■> li> en 0 h- < 0 CM c 0 o £ Q -ce ■y^ CCÎ CD .si <r CO T— ■¿i a _,i 0 CO < 0 0» D 2: I— HJ Figure 1.—Cherokee woman pounding nuts with wooden mortar and pestle (courtesy of the Smithsonian Institution, Neg. No. 55, 445). Uncultivated Nuts of The United States by Arnold Krochmal, Economic Botanist, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, N.C., and Connie Krochmal, Volunteer Writer United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service june 1982 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 81-600067 Krochmal, Arnold; Krochmal, Connie. Uncultivated nuts of the United States. Agrie. Info. Bull. 450. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Agri- culture; 1982.89 p. A handbook of nuts and nutlike seeds from trees and shrubs that are not cultivated in orchards but generally grow wild or that are sometimes grown as ornamentals. Descriptions, illustrations, and range maps help the reader to identify species. The nuts and seeds are also discussed as a renewable resource of present or potential use to human beings. KEYWORDS: Nutrition, renewable resources. Acknowledgments Study materials and samples were provided by David Stoller of the Cornell Plantations and Harold Grelen, Lisle Green, Franklin Bonner, Rudolph Strothmann, Douglas Roy, and David Priester, all of the Forest Service. Herbarium specimens and information on distribution and nomenclature were made available by Frederick Meyer and Peter Mazzeo, U.S. National Arboretum; Stanwyn Shetler, Smithsonian Institution; Carol Keener, Pennsylvania State University; Gene Wofford, University of Tennessee; Daniel Ward, University of Florida; John Freeman, Auburn University; L. -
Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park: 2014 Data Summary
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 ON THIS PAGE Tiny, bright yellow blossoms of Hypoxis hirsuta grace the forest floor at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network. ON THE COVER Spiraling compound leaf of green dragon (Arisaema dracontium) at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 Sarah Corbett Heath1 and Michael W. Byrne2 1National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, GA 31558 2National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Drive Athens, GA 30605 May 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed.