January 2004
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rocky Mountain Hss,E
PAC-E 1 r_ i r i fl r\ r.'.-l t t-J ROCKY MOUNTAIN HSS,E#"* 1407 W. North Temple, Suite 330 Salt Lake City, Utah 841'16 May 19,2020 VA OVERNIGHT DELIWRY Idaho Public Utilities Commission I l33l W Chinden Blvd. Building 8 Suite 20lA Boise,ID 83714 Attention: Diane Hanian Commission Secretary Re: Annual Idaho Form 1 Report -2019 Rocky Mountain Power, a division of PacifiCorp, hereby submits for filing an original and seven (7) copies of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission Annual State Form 1 report for 2019. This is being provided with PacifiCorp's annual FERC Form 1. It is respectively requested that all formal correspondence and staffrequests regarding this matter be addressed to: By E-mail (preferred): datarequest@Pac ifi Corp.com By Fax: (503) 813-6060 By regular mail: Data Request Response Center PacifiCorp 825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000 Portland, OR97232 Any informal inquiries may be directed to Ted Weston, Idaho Regulatory Manager at80l-220- 2963. Vice President, Regulation ANNUAL REPORT IDAHO SUPPLEMENT TO FERC FORM NO. 1 FOR MULTI-STATE ELECTRIC COMPANI ES INDEX Page Title Number 1 Statement of Operating lncome for the Year 2 Electric Operating Revenues 3 -o Electric Operation and Maintenance Expenses 7 Depreciation and Amortization of Electric Plant I Taxes, Other Than lncome Taxes 9 Non-Utility Property 10 Summary of Utility Plant and Accumulated Provisions I 1 -1 2 Electric Plant in Service 13 Materials and Supplies provided in this report is consistent with the unadjusted data reflected in the company's Results of perations in the ldaho general rate case, which will be filed with the ldaho Public Utilities Commission on June 1,2020. -
Peter Baldwin UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Features Forum Conference Reports GHI News WHY ARE UNIVERSITIES OPEN ACCESS LAGGARDS? Peter Baldwin UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES Copyright was invented in the eighteenth century to give cultural producers property rights in their works, allowing them to live from their eff orts.1 It was specifi cally intended to benefi t those who worked independently, not for wages or salary. Work-for-hire was the only element of copyright dealing with salaried employees. That evolved only later in any detail, and then not equally in all nations. Work-for-hire gives employers — not the creators — most rights in works produced by their employees. It was introduced in the nine- teenth century to deal with commissioned art works. Who owned a portrait, the painter or the commissioner? But it was elaborated in law mainly in the twentieth century, especially in the U.S., and largely at the behest of the fi lm industry. It is not hard to see why. Film is an inherently collaborative art form, demanding cooperation among scores of diff erent creators, all with reasonable claims to be important participants. Copyright stakes two primary claims: the artistic or moral rights, like those of attribution and integrity, and the economic or monopoly rights. The fi rst give authors the right to be identifi ed as such and to prevent their works from being changed without approval. They are largely uncontroversial and need no further comment here. The property right grants a temporary monopoly over dissemination, thus stimulating creators to further eff orts by rewarding them. Equally important, copyright’s monopoly made dissemination possible in the fi rst place. -
ALEXIS PERI Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Rd
ALEXIS PERI Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Rd. Boston, MA 02215 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2019-current Associate Professor of History, Boston University Spring 2020 Visiting Associate Professor of History, University of California, Berkeley 2014-19 Assistant Professor of History, Boston University 2011-14 Assistant Professor of History, Middlebury College 2011 Lecturer, Saint Mary’s College of California ADDITIONAL EMPLOYMENT 2002-04 Administrative Assistant & Interview Auditor, Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley EDUCATION 2011 Ph.D., History, University of California, Berkeley Awarded Distinction 2006 M.A., History, University of California, Berkeley 2002 B.A., History, Psychology, University of California, Berkeley Awarded Highest Achievement in General Scholarship PUBLICATIONS Books: The War Within: Diaries from the Siege of Leningrad. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017. Polish-Language Edition: Leningrad: Dzienniki z obezonego miasta. Siwek Grzegorz, trans. Krakow: Spoleczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak, 2019. Awards: Peri 1 of 14 Winner, Pushkin House Russian Book Prize, 2018 (“supports the best non-fiction writing in English on the Russian-speaking world”) http://www.pushkinhouse.org/2018-winner/ Winner, University of Southern California Book Prize in Literary and Cultural Studies, 2018 (“for an outstanding monograph published on Russia, Eastern Europe or Eurasia in the fields of literary and cultural studies”) https://www.aseees.org/programs/aseees-prizes/usc-book-prize-literary-and- -
Scholarly Research and Information
ISSN 2658-3143 (Online) ТОМ 1, № 1, 2018 WWW.NEICONJOURNAL.COM НАУКА И НАУЧНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND INFORMATION В НОМЕРЕ: Отношение российского научного сообщества к открытому доступу: 2018 г. Анализ результа- тов опроса Разумова И.К., Литвинова Н.Н., Шварцман М.Е., Кузнецов А.Ю. Сетевые сервисы БЕН РАН как основа информа- ционного сопровождения научных исследований Каленов Н.Е. Функции библиотеки в наукометрической оценке публикационной активности вуза Дудникова О.В., Смирнова О.А. Библиотеки в программе 5-100, или За 3 года до… Михайлова Ю.В., Плохих М.В., Расплетина Е.Г. Организация единой точки доступа к ресурсам библиотеки: поиск вариантов реализации Литвинова Н.Н. Методика оценки зарубежных журналов в рамках выбранной тематики для публикации российских статей Глушановский А.В. МОСКВА, 2018 Наука и научная информация Том 1, № 1, 2018 Scholarly Research and Information V. 1, No. 1, 2018 Наука и научная информация научный рецензируемый журнал Цели и задачи Цель журнала «Наука и научная информация» — содействие развитию науки и образования за счет интеграции авторитетных электронных научных ресурсов в исследовательский и образовательный процесс. Одной из основных задач журнала является обобщение научных и практических достижений в части развития электронных информа- ционных ресурсов и сервисов, их вклад в процесс научных исследований и решение вопросов государственной политики, направленной на повышение уровня образования и науки, качества научных публикаций и развития си- стемы научных периодических изданий и расширения их присутствия в международном научно-информационном пространстве. Научная концепция издания предполагает публикацию материалов в следующих областях знания: «Науковеде- ние», «Народное образование. Педагогика», «Библиотечное дело. Библиотековедение» (по классификатору ГРНТИ). К публикации в журнале приглашаются как отечественные, так и зарубежные ученые и специалисты в вышепере- численных областях знания. -
Siege of Leningrad Revisited: Narrative, Image, Self
SIEGE OF LENINGRAD REVISITED: NARRATIVE, IMAGE, SELF Introduction Polina Barskova The siege of Leningrad, the longest-lasting military blockade in modern history, has never suffered from a dearth of written documentation. As early as September 1941, this tragedy drew the attention of journalists, historians, and poets, both in the USSR and the west. During the war, the most immediate purpose of this coverage was that of propaganda, to en courage Leningraders to persevere despite the loss of at least one million lives. After the siege ended in 1944, its narration acquired a somewhat peculiar character: often sensational and only partially informed in the west and euphemistically "neutralized" in the Soviet Union.1 Study of this topic was severely hampered as a consequence of "The Leningrad Affair" (1949-53); after a wave of severe purges, museums and archives dedi cated to collecting siege materials were shut down, thus disrupting any attempt at responsible scholarship. For the next four decades, until the time of perestroika, the siege engendered a mighty flow of descriptions. (A full bibliography of Soviet siege texts could easily number in the thousands.) Unfortunately, these accounts typically rehearsed variations on the themes of heroism and sto icism, with Blokadnaia kniga, in which the writers Daniil Granin and Ales' Adamovich used victims' and survivors' diary accounts to present a more objective interpretation of conditions during the siege, constituting the major and valuable exception.2 In this book, attention is focused not on the allegorical virtues of the "front-city" but rather on the price Lenin graders were forced to pay for their city's endurance. -
The Axis Advances
wh07_te_ch17_s02_MOD_s.fm Page 568 Monday, March 12, 2007 2:32WH07MOD_se_CH17_s02_s.fm PM Page 568 Monday, January 29, 2007 6:01 PM Step-by-Step German fighter plane SECTION Instruction 2 WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO Objectives Janina’s War Story As you teach this section, keep students “ It was 10:30 in the morning and I was helping my focused on the following objectives to help mother and a servant girl with bags and baskets as them answer the Section Focus Question they set out for the market. Suddenly the high- and master core content. pitch scream of diving planes caused everyone to 2 freeze. Countless explosions shook our house ■ Describe how the Axis powers came to followed by the rat-tat-tat of strafing machine control much of Europe, but failed to guns. We could only stare at each other in horror. conquer Britain. Later reports would confirm that several German Janina Sulkowska in ■ Summarize Germany’s invasion of the the early 1930s Stukas had screamed out of a blue sky and . Soviet Union. dropped several bombs along the main street— and then returned to strafe the market. The carnage ■ Understand the horror of the genocide was terrible. the Nazis committed. —Janina Sulkowska,” Krzemieniec, Poland, ■ Describe the role of the United States September 12, 1939 before and after joining World War II. Focus Question Which regions were attacked and occupied by the Axis powers, and what was life like under their occupation? Prepare to Read The Axis Advances Build Background Knowledge L3 Objectives Diplomacy and compromise had not satisfied the Axis powers’ Remind students that the German attack • Describe how the Axis powers came to control hunger for empire. -
The Siege of Leningrad (1941-1944)
War fronts The siege of Leningrad (1941-1944) François-Xavier NÉRARD ABSTRACT Lasting 900 days between September 1941 and January 1944, the siege of Leningrad claimed the lives of 800,000 of the city’s inhabitants, mainly through cold and hunger. The population of the city was subjected, moreover, to enemy fire and to ruthlessly strict control by the Soviet authorities. The memory of the suffering of Leningrad’s population was first celebrated, then stifled, and is only gradually re-emerging. Tanya Savicheva's Diary The siege of Leningrad by German and Finnish forces (as well as the soldiers of the Division Azul, Spanish volunteers) is a key episode in the Second World War on Soviet territory and saw the reappearance of a form of warfare that was thought to have died out in the nineteenth century. Although less present in narratives of the war in the West, the siege was a major traumatic event for the USSR and Russia. As a symbol of resistance and suffering, it differs from Stalingrad, a heroic victory that could be celebrated more easily. Of Leningrad’s 2.5 million inhabitants on the eve of the conflict, only 600,000 were still alive in the city when it was liberated by the Red Army on 27 January 1944, around one million having been evacuated before and during the siege. It is estimated today that 800,000 people died in the siege, mostly from cold and hunger. Leningrad, along with Moscow and Kiev, was one of the major objectives of the German offensive launched on 21 June 1941, but the city was not taken during the attack. -
Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 1996
Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting_1996 collect by macbookpro2100 Afternoon Session - 1996 Meeting BerkshireHathaway Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger discuss why they think portfolio diversification is a "protection against ignorance," explain why they're fearful of change, and argue that people rewarded by capitalism have an obligation to help people who don't do as well. 1. Investing with "the two wealthiest guys" 1.投资“两个最富有的人” WARREN BUFFETT: OK, if we've got a monitor over in zone 1, we're ready to start. WARREN BUFFETT:好的,如果我们在第1区有一台显示器,我们已准备好开始了。 AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yes.Thank you very much.My name is Maria Nicholas Kelly (PH).I'm from Tacoma, Washington. 听众会员:是的。非常 感谢你。我叫Maria Nicholas Kelly(PH)。我来自华盛顿州的塔科马。 And my husband and I have rather different investment approaches.And in 1988, he bought me one share of Berkshire, so that I could learn something about investing.We both started about that same time. 而我丈夫和 我有不同的投资方式。 1988年,他给我买了伯克希尔的一份股票,这样我就能学到一些 关于投资的知识。我们都是在同一时间开始的。 And he has chosen to invest in, let's say, about 40 different stocks and buying and selling, and doing rather well for us, frankly. 他坦言,他已经选择投资,约40 种不同的股票和买卖,并为我们做得相当好。 My approach is more simple.And basically, I finally figured out last year that I should invest in the companies of the two wealthiest men in the world. 我的方法更简单。基本上,我终于在去年想到我应该 投资世界上最富有的两个人的公司。 So — (laughter) — I decided we should buy, monthly, more Berkshire and Microsoft.So, then this year — and so, we've been able to do that. 所以 - (笑声) - 我决定每月购买更多伯克希 尔和微软。所以,今年 - 所以,我们已经能够做到这一 点。 This year, we read -
Comparison of Bibliographic Data Sources: Implications for the Robustness of University Rankings
RESEARCH ARTICLE Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang , Cameron Neylon , Chloe Brookes-Kenworthy , Richard Hosking , Lucy Montgomery , Katie Wilson , and Alkim Ozaygen an open access journal Centre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Western Australia Keywords: bibliographic data, data quality, open access, OpenCitations, research evaluation, Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/qss/article-pdf/1/2/445/1885863/qss_a_00031.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 university ranking, Unpaywall Citation: Huang, C.-K., Neylon, C., Brookes-Kenworthy, C., Hosking, R., ABSTRACT Montgomery, L., Wilson, K., & Ozaygen, A. (2020).Comparison of bibliographic Universities are increasingly evaluated on the basis of their outputs. These are often converted data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings. to simple and contested rankings with substantial implications for recruitment, income, and Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 445–478. https://doi.org/10.1162/ perceived prestige. Such evaluation usually relies on a single data source to define the set of qss_a_00031 outputs for a university. However, few studies have explored differences across data sources DOI: and their implications for metrics and rankings at the institutional scale. We address this gap https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00031 by performing detailed bibliographic comparisons between Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Supporting Information: and Microsoft Academic (MSA) at the institutional level and supplement this with a manual https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/ suppl/10.1162/qss_a_00031 analysis of 15 universities. We further construct two simple rankings based on citation count and open access status. Our results show that there are significant differences across data- Received: 29 August 2019 Accepted: 14 January 2020 bases. -
Volume 4, Issue 3
ENERPO Journal Volume 4 June 2016 Issue 3 ENERPO Journal management Irina Mironova Editor-in-Chief ([email protected]) Zachary Waller Assistant Editor ([email protected]) Jerry Byers Associate Editor, Online Editor ([email protected]) Aaron Wood Technical Editor ([email protected]) Nikita Lomagin Academic Director, ENERPO Program ([email protected]) Yulia Vymyatnina Professor, Department of Economics, EUSP ([email protected]) Maurizio Recordati Executive Director, ENERPO Research Center ([email protected]) Michael Camarda Associate Director, ENERPO Program ([email protected]) Nicholas Watt ENERPO Journal Co-Founder ([email protected]) Editorial council John Francis Collins ENERPO student Pierre Jouvellier ENERPO student Lina Strandvaag Nagell ENERPO student Patrick Osborne ENERPO/MARCA student Glenda Pavon-Suriel ENERPO student Bogdan Polishchuk ENERPO student Michael Roh ENERPO student Soojeong Shin ENERPO student Henrik Vorloeper ENERPO student Contents China's Possible Accession to the ECT: Benefits and Obstacles 03 Lina Nagell ANALYSIS This paper addresses two main questions. The first asks what the benefits to China are in joining the ECT, the second whether the One Belt, One Road initiative will accelerate the country’s accession to the treaty. The paper finds that the main benefits facing Chinese accession to the ECT are: (1) the increased protection of Chinese foreign investments, (2) the improvement of investor confidence in the Chinese energy market, and (3) the boost of Chinese influence in global energy governance. The main obstacles are: (1) fear of international arbitration cases against the Chinese government and (2) the scarcity of political support and geographically asymmetrical protection coverage for China. -
Norman J.W. Goda Curriculum Vitae Personal Information
NORMAN J.W. GODA CURRICULUM VITAE PERSONAL INFORMATION Address: Center for Jewish Studies, Walker Hall, University of Florida (352-392-2168) E-Mail: [email protected] EDUCATION • Ph.D. History (May 1991), The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill • M.A. History (May 1986), The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill • B.A. History, English (May 1983), Rice University • Further Study: Universität Bonn (1988), Universität Freiburg (1989) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: ACADEMIC • Norman and Irma Braman Professor for Holocaust Studies, Center for Jewish Studies and Department of History, University of Florida, 2009- • Professor of History, Ohio University, Fall 2006 – Spring 2009 • Associate Professor of History, Ohio University, Fall 1999-Spring 2006 • Assistant Professor of History, Ohio University, Fall 1996 – Spring 1999 • Assistant Professor of History, The University of Maine at Presque Isle, Fall 1991-Spring 1996 • Instructor, Department of History, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Spring 1991 • Courses Taught (University of Florida): History of the Holocaust; Holocaust in the Courtroom; Holocaust Studies (interdisciplinary); Nazi Germany, History Practicum: Eichmann; Undergraduate Research Seminar – The Holocaust as World History; Graduate Seminar – Readings on the Holocaust; Graduate Seminar – Readings in Modern Europe. • Courses Taught (Ohio University): Western Heritage: Modernity (Undergrad); Nazi Germany (Undergrad); Balance of Power – 1815-1914; Origins of World War II (Undergrad/Grad); The Cold War (Undergrad/Grad); -
Lna 2006 Profiles J.Qxp
1 | Advertising Age | June 26, 2006 SpecialSpecial ReportReport:100 Profiles LEADING NATIONAL ADVERTISERSSupplement SUPPLEMENT June 26, 2006 100 LEADING NATIONAL ADVERTISERS Profiles of the top 100 U.S. marketers in this 51st annual ranking INSIDE TOP 100 RANKING COMPANY PROFILES SPONSORED BY The nation’s leading marketers Lead marketing personnel, ranked by U.S. advertising brands, agencies, agency expenditures for 2005. contacts, as well as advertising Includes data from TNS Media spending by media and brand, Intelligence and Ad Age’s sales, earnings and more for proprietary estimates of the country’s 100 largest unmeasured spending. PAGE 8 advertisers PAGE 10 This document, and information contained therein, is the copyrighted property of Crain Communications Inc. and The Ad Age Group (© Copyright 2006) and is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You may not reproduce, display on a website, distribute, sell or republish this document, or information contained therein, without prior written consent of The Ad Age Group. Are proud to connect you with the leading CMOs See all the interviews at adage.com/point LAUNCHING JUNE 28 © 2006 Crain Communications Inc. www.adage.com 3 | Advertising Age | June 26, 2006 Special Report 100 LEADING NATIONAL ADVERTISERS SUPPLEMENT ABOUT THIS PROFILE EDITION THE 51ST ANNUAL 100 Leading National the Top 100 ($40.13 billion) and for all measured spending in 18 national media, Advertisers Report crowned acquisition- advertisers ($122.79 billion) in the U.S. Yellow Pages Association contributed ladened Procter & Gamble Co. as the top U.S. ad spending by ad category: This spending in Yellow Pages and TNS Marx leader, passing previous kingpen General chart (Page 6) breaks out 18 measured Promotion Intelligence provided free- Motors Corp.