Criminal Futures; Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Criminal Futures; Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work This timely book presents rare ethnographic data within an outstanding analysis of current debates on predictive policing. Conceptualising predictive policing as a sociotechnical system, the book describes various translation processes that lay bare the political, cultural and organizational forces at work. This welcome book sets the standards for future research on data-driven policing. —Janet Chan, Professor, UNSW Law Wary of simplistic dystopia/utopia dichotomies, Criminal Futures offers a theoretically sophisticated and empirically rich account of predictive policing as a sociotechnical process. This is a landmark study, providing frameworks and analytical tools for understanding – and responding to – the rapid datafication of security that is unfolding. —Dean Wilson, Professor of Criminology, University of Sussex Criminal Futures This book explores how predictive policing transforms police work. Police departments around the world have started to use data- driven applications to produce crime forecasts and intervene into the future through targeted prevention measures. Based on three years of field research in Germany and Switzerland, this book provides a theoretically sophisticated and empirically detailed account of how the police produce and act upon criminal futures as part of their everyday work practices. The authors argue that predictive policing must not be analyzed as an isolated technological artifact, but as part of a larger sociotechnical system that is embedded in organizational structures and occupational cultures. The book highlights how, for crime prediction software to come to matter and play a role in more efficient and targeted police work, several translation processes are needed to align human and nonhuman actors across different divisions of police work. Police work is a key function for the production and maintenance of public order, but it can also discriminate, exclude, and violate civil liberties and human rights. When criminal futures come into being in the form of algorithmically produced risk estimates, this can have wide- ranging consequences. Building on empirical findings, the book presents a number of practical recommendations for the prudent use of algorithmic analysis tools in police work that will speak to the protection of civil liberties and human rights as much as they will speak to the professional needs of police organizations. An accessible and compelling read, this book will appeal to students and scholars of criminology, sociology, and cultural studies as well as to police practitioners and civil liberties advocates, in addition to all those who are interested in how to implement reasonable forms of data- driven policing. Simon Egbert is a postdoc researcher at the Department of Sociology, Technische Universität Berlin. Trained in sociology and criminology, his research interests include science and technology studies, security studies, sociology of prediction, time studies, discourse theory, visual knowledge studies, and sociology of testing. He has published papers on predictive policing, drug testing, lie detection, and ignition interlock devices. Matthias Leese is Senior Researcher for governance and technology at the Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich. His research is primarily interested in the social effects produced at the intersections of security and technology. It pays specific attention to the normative repercussions of new security technologies across society, in both intended and unintended forms. His work covers various application contexts of security technologies, including airports, borders, policing, and R&D activities. Routledge Studies in Policing and Society Series Editors Jenny Fleming, University of Southampton, UK Jennifer Wood, Temple University, USA Routledge Studies in Policing and Society aims to establish an inter- disciplinary, international intellectual space of original contributions to either classic or emerging debates about the nature and effects of policing in society. The works in this series will advance our theoretical, methodological and/or empirical knowledge of policing in various societies across the world. It is the hope of the series editors that the works in this series will help fill gaps in our global understanding of policing and society. Criminal Futures Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work Simon Egbert and Matthias Leese Criminal Futures Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work Simon Egbert and Matthias Leese First published 2021 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2021 Simon Egbert and Matthias Leese The right of Simon Egbert and Matthias Leese to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis. com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of Technische Universität Berlin, as well as by the Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing- in- Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN: 978- 0- 367- 34926- 4 (hbk) ISBN: 978- 0- 429- 32873- 2 (ebk) Typeset in Bembo by Apex CoVantage, LLC Contents Preface viii List of figures x 1 Criminal futures 1 2 Predictive policing and its origins 19 3 The police and technology 44 4 Data and the need for speed 69 5 Humans and machines 94 6 Putting risk on the map 116 7 Patrolling risk 145 8 Does it work, though? 164 9 “Bad” predictions 186 10 The future of (predictive) policing 206 Index 226 Preface This book is the product of a windfall encounter. Each of us individually would have probably written a quite different book – or, even more likely, no book at all. We were lucky enough that our paths crossed at a workshop in Freiburg, Germany, in March of 2017. At the time, both of us had, independent of each other, only recently started to engage with predictive policing. The research outlines that both of us presented at that workshop were remarkably similar, and as it turned out during a couple of longer follow-up conversations, we were in fact interested in almost identical questions surrounding the use of algorithmic crime analysis software. There was a large overlap in the theoretical and conceptual literature that we had been reading. And we had at that point even started to interview some of the same police representatives and software developers. The decision to join forces and proceed with our research together there- fore only felt natural. Admittedly, conducting a multiyear qualitative research and writing project across a physical distance came with a set of challenges. In- person meetings were few and far between, so not only did the weekly coordination of activities have to be done via video-conferencing but also the coding and analysis of our empirical material, the interpretations of interview segments and ethnographic observations, debates about arguments, and so on. Matters were further complicated by the usual struggles of academic precarity: funding ran out, applications were written, and jobs and cities were changed. The book manuscript was finished from the confines of our homes, as the COVID-19 pandemic forced universities to shut down. Three years after we first met at the said workshop, we are, however, more than happy with how things turned out. Almost needless to say, our profes- sional relationship has turned into a friendship. And this book has offered us the opportunity to work through our empirical material at adequate length and in adequate depth. It will, so at least our modest hope, contribute some nuance to current debates about algorithms, data, and the prediction and prevention of crime. Obviously, we could not have realized this book without the support of a number of people and institutions. First and foremost, although for reasons of Preface ix anonymization we cannot do so by name, we must thank our research partici- pants for sharing their thoughts, concerns, experiences, and daily work prac- tices with us. We are aware that access to security agencies and their lifeworlds is not always easy. All the more do we appreciate the willingness of police departments and other predictive policing actors to support our research. Over the years, our work has benefited from countless conversations with colleagues, whose generous engagement with our thoughts has continuously pushed the boundaries of our project. We would like to particularly high- light the support and feedback we received from John Austin, Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Dominik Gerstner, Jens Hälterlein, Lucas Introna, Mareile Kaufmann, Anna Leander, Thomas Linder, Monique Mann, Lars Ostermeier, Bettina Paul, Nikolaus Pöchhacker, Tobias Singelnstein, Dean Wilson, Aleš Završnik, and Nils Zurawski, as well as series editors Jenny Fleming and Jennifer Wood. Last but not least, our work was to a large extent facilitated by the institu- tional support from our employers. The Universität Hamburg, the
Recommended publications
  • Multilateral Peace Operations and the Challenges of Organized Crime
    SIPRI Background Paper February 2018 MULTILATERAL PEACE PROJECT SUMMARY w The New Geopolitics of Peace OPERATIONS AND THE Operations III: Non‑traditional Security Challenges initiative CHALLENGES OF was launched with support from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, co‑sponsored ORGANIZED CRIME by Ethiopia, and in continued partnership with the Friedrich‑ jaÏr van der lijn Ebert‑Stiftung (FES). This phase of the initiative seeks to enhance understanding I. Introduction about peace operations and non‑traditional security Multilateral peace operations are increasingly confronting a set of challenges such as terrorism interrelated and mutually reinforcing security challenges that are relatively and violent extremism, new to them, that do not respect borders, and that have causes and effects irregular migration, piracy, which cut right across the international security, peacebuilding and organized crime and environmental degradation. It development agendas.1 Organized crime provides one of the most prominent aims to identify the various examples of these ‘non-traditional’ security challenges.2 perceptions, positions and There are many different definitions of organized crime depending on the interests of the relevant context, sector and organization. The United Nations Convention against stakeholders, as well as to Transnational Organized Crime defines an ‘organized criminal group’ as stimulate open dialogue, ‘a structured group of three or more persons, existing for a period of time cooperation and mutual and acting in concert with the aim of committing one or more serious crimes understanding by engaging key or offences . in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other stakeholders and mapping the material benefit’.3 However, this definition is not unchallenged.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Law Enforcement Officers, 2016
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics October 2019, NCJ 251922 Bureau of Justice Statistics Bureau Federal Law Enforcement Ofcers, 2016 – Statistical Tables Connor Brooks, BJS Statistician s of the end of fscal-year 2016, federal FIGURE 1 agencies in the United States and Distribution of full-time federal law enforcement U.S. territories employed about 132,000 ofcers, by department or branch, 2016 Afull-time law enforcement ofcers. Federal law enforcement ofcers were defned as any federal Department of ofcers who were authorized to make arrests Homeland Security and carry frearms. About three-quarters of Department of Justice federal law enforcement ofcers (about 100,000) Other executive- provided police protection as their primary branch agencies function. Four in fve federal law enforcement ofcers, regardless of their primary function, Independent agencies worked for either the Department of Homeland · Security (47% of all ofcers) or the Department Judicial branch Tables Statistical of Justice (33%) (fgure 1, table 1). Legislative branch Findings in this report are from the 2016 0 10 20 30 40 50 Census of Federal Law Enforcement Ofcers Percent (CFLEO). Te Bureau of Justice Statistics conducted the census, collecting data on Note: See table 1 for counts and percentages. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Census of Federal Law 83 agencies. Of these agencies, 41 were Ofces Enforcement Ofcers, 2016. of Inspectors General, which provide oversight of federal agencies and activities. Te tables in this report provide statistics on the number, functions, and demographics of federal law enforcement ofcers. Highlights In 2016, there were about 100,000 full-time Between 2008 and 2016, the Amtrak Police federal law enforcement ofcers in the United had the largest percentage increase in full-time States and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Models of the Criminal Process Kent Roach
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 89 Article 5 Issue 2 Winter Winter 1999 Four Models of the Criminal Process Kent Roach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Kent Roach, Four Models of the Criminal Process, 89 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 671 (1998-1999) This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/99/8902-0671 THM JOURNAL OF QMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 89, No. 2 Copyright 0 1999 by Northwestem University. School of Law Psisd in USA. CRIMINOLOGY FOUR MODELS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCESS KENT ROACH* I. INTRODUCTION Ever since Herbert Packer published "Two Models of the Criminal Process" in 1964, much thinking about criminal justice has been influenced by the construction of models. Models pro- vide a useful way to cope with the complexity of the criminal pro- cess. They allow details to be simplified and common themes and trends to be highlighted. "As in the physical and social sciences, [models present] a hypothetical but coherent scheme for testing the evidence" produced by decisions made by thousands of actors in the criminal process every day.2 Unlike the sciences, however, it is not possible or desirable to reduce the discretionary and hu- manistic systems of criminal justice to a single truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Recidivism As a Performance Measure Ryan King Brian Elderbroom Washington State Offender Accountability Act of 1999
    Improving Recidivism as a Performance Measure Ryan King Brian Elderbroom Washington State Offender Accountability Act of 1999 Goal: “reduce the risk of reoffending by offenders in the community” Legislation calls for Department of Corrections to: • Classify supervised individuals based on risk of reoffending and severity of prior criminal offending • Shift resources toward higher-risk persons Washington Recidivism Rates Source: Washington State Institute for Public Policy Establishing Metrics for Success and Assessing Results Why measure correctional performance? • Understand the outcomes of funding and policy decisions • Assess the effectiveness of justice agencies at reducing reoffending • Provide the best return on taxpayer investments Most Common Correctional Performance Measure: Recidivism The Good: • Correctional interventions (prison, community supervision) are supposed to reduce reoffending, so recidivism is a natural metric for success The Bad: • Frequently a single-indicator, which doesn’t allow for policy-relevant comparisons across groups • Irregularly collected • Presented absent context Four Steps to Make Recidivism a Meaningful Performance Measure Define Collect Analyze Disseminate Definition Use Multiple Measures of Success Desistance Severity Time to failure Behavior Change Time to Failure (Delaware) Percent Rearrested 2008 2009 2010 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 6 12 18 24 36 Months from prison release Collection Develop Protocols to Ensure Data Are Consistent, Accurate, and Timely Assign unique identifiers Develop long-term records Collect contextual information Update change in status Photo: Flickr/Kevin Dl Breaking Recidivism Down by Policy- Relevant Factors (Colorado) 3-year return to prison rates for 2010 release cohort Analysis Account for Underlying Composition of the Prison Population Photo: Flickr/Thomas Hawk Photo: Flickr/Thomas Hawk Remember that Washington Story from Earlier .
    [Show full text]
  • A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspective on Interactions Between Police and Persons with Mental Disabilities Michael L
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 43 Number 3 Mental Health, the Law, & the Urban Article 5 Environment 2016 "Had to Be Held Down by Big Police": A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspective on Interactions Between Police and Persons with Mental Disabilities Michael L. Perlin Alison J. Lynch Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Recommended Citation Michael L. Perlin and Alison J. Lynch, "Had to Be Held Down by Big Police": A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspective on Interactions Between Police and Persons with Mental Disabilities, 43 Fordham Urb. L.J. 685 (2016). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol43/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “HAD TO BE HELD DOWN BY BIG POLICE”: A THERAPEUTIC JURISPRUDENCE PERSPECTIVE ON INTERACTIONS BETWEEN POLICE AND PERSONS WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES Michael L. Perlin, Esq.* & Alison J. Lynch, Esq.** Introduction ............................................................................................. 685 I. Current State of Affairs ................................................................... 696 II. Therapeutic Jurisprudence ............................................................. 701 A. What Is Therapeutic Jurisprudence? .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kriminalprävention in Deutschland Länder-Bund-Projektsammlung
    Polizei + Forschung Infopool Prävention ojektsammlung 2001 Bundeskriminalamt (Hg.) Der Infopool Prävention des Bundeskriminalamts ist eine im November 1995 begonnene Informationssammlung zu natio- nalen und internationalen Präventionsakteuren, -aktivitäten, -projekten und -modellen. Ziele des Infopool Prävention sind u. a. das Erkennen von Entwicklungen, Schwerpunkten, aber auch Defiziten im Bereich der Kriminalprävention, das Erkennen von relevanten The- Länder-Bund-Pr Kriminal- menfeldern für die präventionsbezogene Forschung inklusive der Initiierung und Durchführung von Forschungsprojekten. Der Infopool Prävention ist auch als Angebot eines Forums für den nationalen und internationalen Erfahrungsaustausch prävention zwischen Polizei und sonstigen Akteuren der Kriminalpräven- tion zu verstehen. Nachahmenswerte Präventionsprojekte werden regelmäßig in Deutschland in Zusammenarbeit mit den Landeskriminalämtern in Form der vorliegenden „Länder-Bund-Projektsammlung“ oder themen- spezifischen Sonderbänden veröffentlicht. Unter http://www.bka.de stellt das Bundeskriminalamt zudem Länder-Bund-Projektsammlung eine Datenbank mit bisher veröffentlichten Präventionspro- jekten aus dem Infopool Prävention zur Verfügung. 2001 Kriminalprävention www.luchterhand.de Luchterhand Kriminalprävention in Deutschland Länder-Bund-Projektsammlung Polizei + Forschung Bd. 13 herausgegeben vom Bundeskriminalamt (BKA) Kriminalistisches Institut Beirat: Prof. Dr. Hans-Jürgen Kerner Direktor des Instituts für Kriminologie der Universität Tübingen Wolfgang Sielaff
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview Anarchist Criminology 2
    ISSN: 2535-3241 Vol. 5, No. 1 (2021): 143-159 https://doi.org/10.5617/jea.8949 Interview Anarchist Criminology On the State Bias in Criminology Mark Seis and Stanislav Vysotsky Interviewed by Václav Walach Anarchist criminology is not a new approach to the critical study of harm, crime, and criminalization, but it has been largely overlooked and gained serious impetus only in recent years. This interview features two scholars who have been at the forefront of this development. Mark Seis co-edited the volumes Contemporary Anarchist Criminology (Nocella, Seis and Shantz 2018) and Classic Writings in Anarchist Criminology (Nocella, Seis, and Shantz 2020), which bring together some of the key texts that utilize anarchist theorizing to challenge the status quo, both in society and in criminology. Stanislav Vysotsky has recently published his book American Antifa (Vysotsky 2021), where he explores, inter alia, militant antifascism as informal policing. The interview emerged somewhat unconventionally. Stanislav was interviewed first on March 22, 2021. The resulting transcript was edited and sent to Mark who was unable to join the online meeting due to technical difficulties. I received his answers on May 24. The following is a slightly shortened and edited version of the interview. Václav Walach: Anarchist criminology – to some this sounds as a surprising combination. Why are some people so amazed when hearing about anarchist criminology? Stanislav Vysotsky: Probably because people associate anarchism with not the actual philosophy and the tenets of anarchism but with nihilism. They see anarchism as fundamental lawlessness and as the Hobbesian war of all against all, where without law we are simply free to engage in any acts of anti-social harm that we feel like engaging in.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Shreveport Predictive Policing Experiment
    Safety and Justice Program CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Safety and Justice Program View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that ad- dress the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Evaluation of the Shreveport Predictive Policing Experiment Priscillia Hunt, Jessica Saunders, John S.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive POLICING the Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations
    Safety and Justice Program CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Safety and Justice Program View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that ad- dress the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Safety and Justice Program PREDICTIVE POLICING The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations Walter L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Resolutions Adopted February 2021
    2020 Resolutions Adopted February 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Support to Enhance Protection for Child Passengers in Motor Vehicles ................................................................. 3 Opposing Increases in Size and Weight of Large Trucks ............................................................................................. 5 Issuance of Digital License Plates ..................................................................................................................... 7 Support of Data-Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety (DDACTS 2.0)............................................... 9 Support Quick Clearance of Roadway Incidents Using Traffic Incident Management Practices ....................... 10 Support for The National Move-Over Initiative .............................................................................................. 12 Support for Police Access to Federal Communications Commission, Network Outage Reporting System, and Disaster Information Reporting System................................................................................................................ 13 Support for Police Use of National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST)-approved AES Encryption Standard(s) in Voice and Data Communications ........................................................................................................ 15 Support for Community-Police Engagement.................................................................................................. 18 Create a Crime Prevention Program
    [Show full text]
  • Community Policing in Switzerland's Major Urban Areas
    Unicentre CH-1015 Lausanne http://serval.unil.ch Year : 2012 COMMUNITY POLICING IN SWITZERLAND'S MAJOR URBAN AREAS KREIS CHRISTIAN KREIS CHRISTIAN, 2012, COMMUNITY POLICING IN SWITZERLAND'S MAJOR URBAN AREAS Originally published at : Thesis, University of Lausanne Posted at the University of Lausanne Open Archive. http://serval.unil.ch Droits d’auteur L'Université de Lausanne attire expressément l'attention des utilisateurs sur le fait que tous les documents publiés dans l'Archive SERVAL sont protégés par le droit d'auteur, conformément à la loi fédérale sur le droit d'auteur et les droits voisins (LDA). A ce titre, il est indispensable d'obtenir le consentement préalable de l'auteur et/ou de l’éditeur avant toute utilisation d'une oeuvre ou d'une partie d'une oeuvre ne relevant pas d'une utilisation à des fins personnelles au sens de la LDA (art. 19, al. 1 lettre a). A défaut, tout contrevenant s'expose aux sanctions prévues par cette loi. Nous déclinons toute responsabilité en la matière. Copyright The University of Lausanne expressly draws the attention of users to the fact that all documents published in the SERVAL Archive are protected by copyright in accordance with federal law on copyright and similar rights (LDA). Accordingly it is indispensable to obtain prior consent from the author and/or publisher before any use of a work or part of a work for purposes other than personal use within the meaning of LDA (art. 19, para. 1 letter a). Failure to do so will expose offenders to the sanctions laid down by this law.
    [Show full text]