DOCSLIB.ORG

January 18, 2011 Wikileaks Cables on Israel's Gaza Onslaught Http

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 18, 2011 Wikileaks Cables on Israel's Gaza Onslaught Http January 18, 2011 Wikileaks Cables on Israel's Gaza Onslaught http://www.counterpunch.org/wikigazacables.html S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 TEL AVIV 002864 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/22/2018 TAGS: PREL, PTER, PHUM, MOPS, KWBG, IS SUBJECT: PREPARING FOR AN ISRAELI MILITARY OPERATION IN GAZA Classified By: Ambassador James B. Cunningham, Reason 1.4 (b) (d) 1. (S) Summary. Since Hamas announced the end of the "tahdiya" truce agreement December 19, pressure has been building in Israel for the IDF to respond more aggressively to daily barrages of rockets and mortars from Gaza. The Israeli cabinet meeting December 21 was largely devoted to a lively debate about the appropriate military response in Gaza. While Defense Minister Barak, supported by PM Olmert, has so far managed to resist the pressure for an immediate, large-scale operation, the IDF has prepared a range of contingencies, and we assume these options are now under active consideration. The contingencies range from resumption of targeted assassinations of Hamas leaders to a full-scale invasion and reoccupation of Gaza. In the current environment, even such limited operations as air strikes on Hamas or PIJ rocket launching teams could set off such an intensive barrage of rockets that the IDF could be drawn into a ground operation to stop the shelling. Foreign Minister Livni, who is one of the primary advocates of an immediate, large-scale military response to the rocket fire, has instructed the MFA to prepare a diplomatic campaign to explain and justify likely Israeli military action. 2. (S) We recommend that the Department also begin to prepare press guidance, talking points and Security Council reaction in the event that Israel acts in the near future. Our suggestions as to the content appear in para 6 below. We further recommend contingency planning for humanitarian relief that will likely be needed in the aftermath of an Israeli military operation. End Summary. Pressure Building in Israel --------------------------- 3. (C) Pressure inside Israel is building for a much tougher response to rocket and missile attacks from Gaza. While it appears that the GOI has yet to take a specific decision, the Hamas announcement of the end of the "tahdiya" truce and the daily rocket and mortar firing -- over thirty rockets and mortars were fired from Gaza at Israeli communities over the weekend -- is adding to the pressure for an Israeli military response. At the December 21 cabinet session, PM Olmert and Defense Minister Barak had to fend off demands from much of the rest of the government, but especially Foreign Minister Livni, Transportation Minister Mofaz and Deputy PM Ramon, for an immediate, strong military response to the rocket fire. Livni and Ramon have called for overthrowing Hamas rule in Gaza, which would probably entail occupying the entire Strip. Opposition Likud Party leader Bibi Netanyahu visited Sderot yesterday and blasted the government's failure to take stronger military action in response to the shelling. Based on public statements by Barak and IDF Chief of General Staff Ashkenazi, it is clear that Barak and the military want to take action at a time of their choosing and not forewarn Hamas exactly what they have in mind. Nonetheless, the pressure on the GOI to "do something" is growing. Political posturing is part of the mix, as all of the players except Olmert -- who has resigned and will not seek reelection -- are focused on building public support in advance of the 1 February 10 general elections. IDF's Range of Military Options ------------------------------- 4. (S) The IDF has prepared a range of operational plans over the past year. These range from renewed targeted assassinations of Hamas leaders to limited brigade or several brigade-size ground incursions (such as the IDF conducted last March) up to a full scale combined air-land- sea invasion of Gaza. An interim operation often discussed before the tahdiya was signed in June was the IDF's seizure of the southern and northern ends of the Gaza Strip in order to stop the smuggling and make rocket launching more difficult. The precise mix of options is a political decision which the GOI probably has not yet taken and Barak is stressing the importance of limiting public discussion in order to preserve operational surprise. There is also the possibility, much discussed in the media here, that given the build-up in Hamas' rocket stockpiles and the extension of their range, even such limited Israeli military operations as air strikes on rocket squads could lead Hamas and the other organizations to launch massive barrages of rockets, which could in turn force the IDF to go in on the ground to stop it. In this environment, there is no guarantee that what starts out as a limited operation will remain that way. 5. (C) Livni has instructed the MFA's senior staff to prepare a diplomatic strategy to explain a large-scale Israeli military operation in Gaza. While international criticism of Israeli action is predictable, we anticipate that the tenor of the Arab and international response will be TEL AVIV 00002864 002 OF 002 determined by a number of unknown factors, including the scale and duration of the operation and the extent of the damage to the civilian populations on both sides. There is also the question of an Israeli exit strategy: if the GOI decides to reoccupy large parts of Gaza, as soon as the smoke clears the Israelis probably will be looking for a third party to whom they can transfer responsibility. Action Recommendation: Consider U.S. Response Now --------------------------------------------- ----- 6. (C) We strongly recommend that the Department consider now the U.S. response to the above-mentioned range of Israeli military operations, including press guidance, talking points and even Security Council action, bearing in mind that we are likely to have little to no advance warning and that even a relatively restrained operation could rapidly grow into something much bigger. Our recommendation is that the USG start with putting the blame on Hamas for the illegitimacy of its rule in Gaza, its policy of firing or allowing other factions to fire rockets and mortars at Israeli civilian targets, and its decision to end the "tahdiya" calming period; and support for Israel's right to defend itself, while also emphasizing our concern for the welfare of innocent Palestinian civilians and U.S. readiness to provide emergency humanitarian relief. On this last point, USAID points out that large-scale U.S. and international humanitarian assistance will be urgently needed in Gaza if the IDF ends up carrying out a broad-scale military operation. ********************************************* ******************** Visit Embassy Tel Aviv's Classified Website: http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/telaviv ********************************************* ******************** CUNNINGHAM 23.12 from Jerusalem Al Quds quotes a recent World Bank report that concludes trade in the West Bank cannot improve under the current Israeli restrictions and checkpoint regime. The report focused on the Allenby border crossing between the West Bank and Jordan where Palestinian exports must pass through several Israeli obstacles. It demands the lifting of existing Israeli limitations on the travel of Palestinian citizens and goods. The report also considers Gaza to be on the verge of economic collapse due to the Israeli siege. 2 29/12/08 S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 TEL AVIV 002906 NOFORN SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/28/2018 TAGS: KWBG, MOPS, PREL, PTER, PINR, EAID, EFIN, IS SUBJECT: GAZA SITUATION REPORT, DECEMBER 29, 18:00 REF: JERUSALEM 2295 Classified By: A/DCM Marc Sievers for reasons 1.4 (B/D). 1. (C) Summary: The IDF continued its deployment of ground forces around the Gaza periphery on December 29, with elements of at least three armored and two infantry brigades taking up positions opposite Gaza City and Beit Hanoun. Air strikes against strategic and tactical targets continued throughout the day, as did rocket and mortar fire from the Gaza Strip. One Israeli civilian was killed when a rocket landed in Ashkelon on the morning of December 29. According to IDF contacts, 63 truckloads of humanitarian supplies entered Gaza via Kerem Shalom during the day on December 29, with further deliveries scheduled for December 30. Israeli political leaders, including FM Livni and MoD Barak, caution that military operations could continue for weeks, and that the goal is to change the strategic environment and destroy Hamas' offensive rocket capabilities. Separately, Bank Hapoalim and Bank Discount announced that they will cease providing correspondent banking services to Gaza at midnight on December 31. End summary. Military Operations ------------------- 2. (SBU) The Israeli Air Force (IAF) is continuing its strategic campaign against Hamas leadership, personnel and infrastructure throughout Gaza. In addition to targets associated with the manufacture, storage and deployment of Kassam rockets, the IAF has also attacked the Hamas Interior Ministry, Islamic University (which contains labs that the GOI says are active in weapons and explosives research for Hamas), and a Hamas guest house used for official visitors. The IDF Spokesperson announced that the office of Hamas PM Ismail Haniyeh was attacked overnight (note: speaking on Israeli radio December 29, Deputy Defense Minister Vilnai denied that Haniyeh was personally targeted in the airstrike), as were "dozens of other Hamas-related targets." Israeli Naval forces also attacked Hamas vessels and coastal structures overnight, according to the Spokesperson,s office. In his radio interview, Deputy Defense Minister Vilnai also said the IDF has high morale, and in contrast to the Second Lebanon War, all levels of the military know their task and what is expected of them. Vilnai said the operations will last a long time, "perhaps much longer than people expect." Asked to comment on a possible ground campaign, he declined to answer, saying he did not intend to broadcast to Hamas Israel's military intentions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dr-Thesis-2015-Frode-Løvlie.Pdf (3.639Mb)
    7KHLQVWLWXWLRQDOWUDMHFWRU\RI+DPDV )URPUDGLFDOLVPWRSUDJPDWLVP²DQGEDFNDJDLQ" )URGH/¡YOLH Dissertation for the degree philosophiae doctor (PhD) at the University of Bergen Dissertation date: 0DUFK © Copyright Frode Løvlie The material in this publication is protected by copyright law. Year: 2015 Title: The institutional trajectory of Hamas From radicalism to pragmatism—and back again? Author: Frode Løvlie In memory of my father v Contents Illustrations xiii Tables xiv Abstract xv Acknowledgments xvi Chapter 1: Introduction 17 1.1 Research outline: Hamas as a case of party institutionalization 19 1.1.1 Institutionalization explained 19 1.1.2 From movement … 21 1.1.3 … toward institutionalized political party 22 1.2 Consequences of Palestinian politics ordinary politics 23 1.2.1 Hamas as a party—the empirical rationale 24 1.2.2 The theoretical case for traveling to Palestine 26 1.3 The analytical framework 27 1.3.1 Party institutionalization in Palestine 28 1.3.2 The roots of Hamas—a social movement organization in Palestine 30 1.3.3 The institutionalization of Hamas as a political party 34 The process of institutionalization 34 Institutionalization as a property variable 37 1.3.4 Tracing the process and measuring the degree of institutionalization 40 The criteria 42 1.4 Structure of thesis 44 Chapter 2: Researching Hamas—methods, sources, and data 50 2.1 Comparative case studies as a remedy to ideological bias 51 2.1.1 Theoretical comparisons 53 2.1.2 Within-case comparison 54 vi The spatial aspects 54 Temporal comparison 54 2.2 Sources
    [Show full text]
  • To Be Young in Palestine Pénélope Larzillière
    To Be Young in Palestine Pénélope Larzillière To cite this version: Pénélope Larzillière. To Be Young in Palestine: translation by William Snow of the book Etre jeune en Palestine (Paris, Balland, 2004, 205p.). Balland, 200p, 2004. halshs-00464037 HAL Id: halshs-00464037 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00464037 Submitted on 15 Mar 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. To Be Young in Palestine Pénélope Larzillière Translation by William Snow of the book: Larzillière, Pénélope (2004), Etre jeune en Palestine, Paris, Balland, 205p. 3 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 6 PART ONE: PALESTINIAN YOUTH ............................................................................................................. 14 CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................................................................ 15 THE NATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Hamas, the Gaza War and Accountability, Under International Law Updated Proceedings of an International Conference on June 18, 2009
    Hamas, the Gaza War and Accountability, under International Law Updated Proceedings of an International Conference on June 18, 2009 Hamas Activity in Northern Gaza Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( קרן קונרד אדנאור Hamas, the Gaza War and Accountability, under International Law Updated Proceedings of an International Conference on June 18, 2009 Maj.-Gen. (res.) Yaakov Amidror | Prof. George P. Fletcher | Dr. Dore Gold | Dr. Lars Hänsel | Sigall Horovitz, Adv. | Col. Richard Kemp CBE | Maj. Gil Limon | Col. (res.) Daniel Reisner | Dr. Roy S. Schondorf | Col. (ret.) Pnina Sharvit-Baruch | Prof. Gerald Steinberg Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( קרן קונרד אדנאור © 2011 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs and the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung The opinions expressed by the authors of this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel Tel. 972-2-561-9281 Fax. 972-2-561-9112 Email: [email protected] www.jcpa.org Editor: Mark Ami-El Production Director: Edna Weinstock-Gabay Production Coordinators: Odelia Zaguri, Adam Shay Graphic Design: Studio Rami & Jacky / Elisheva Cohen - www.ramijaki.co.il Photo Credits: Cover Photo - IDF spokesperson, AP Images, Michael Mass, UN website ISBN 978-965-218-090-2 Contents Opening Remarks Dr. Lars Hänsel 4 Introduction: The Dangerous Bias of the United Nations Goldstone Report Dr. Dore Gold 7 International Law’s Limitations on Contending with Terror Dr. Roy S. Schondorf 13 Redifining the Law of Armed Conflict? Legal Manipulations regarding Israel’s Struggle Against Terrorism Maj.
    [Show full text]
  • The NGO Front in the Gaza War
    The NGO Front in the Gaza War The Durban Strategy Continues February 2009 NGO Monitor Monograph Series Gerald M. Steinberg, Editor NGO Monitor Monograph Series: The NGO Front in the Gaza War: The Durban Strategy Continues (February 2009) NGO “Lawfare”: Exploitation of Courts in the Arab-Israeli Conflict (September 2008) Europe’s Hidden Hand: EU Funding for Political NGOs in the Arab-Israeli Conflict (April 2008) 1 Ben-Maimon Blvd. Jerusalem 92262 Israel Phone: +972-2-566-1020 Fax: +972-77-511-7030 [email protected] www.ngo-monitor.org NGO Monitor’s mission is to provide information and analysis, promote accountability, and support discussion on the reports and activities of NGOs claiming to advance human rights and humanitarian agendas in the framework of the Arab-Israeli conflict. NGO Monitor was founded jointly with the Wechsler Family Foundation The NGO Front in the Gaza War The Durban Strategy Continues © 2009 NGO Monitor. All rights reserved. Executive Summary hroughout Israel’s operation in Gaza, by labeling the policy “collective punishment,” and largely from December 27, 2008 to January 18, parrot a PLO “legal opinion” claiming that Israel remains 2009, and in its immediate aftermath, responsible for the welfare of the population in Gaza.iii over 50 NGOs claiming to promote T human rights and humanitarian A wide range of groups were responsible for implementing agendas issued more than 500 statements on the fighting. the Durban Strategy during the Gaza conflict: international These statements exhibit severe bias and double standards, “superpowers” – including Amnesty, Human Rights focus overwhelmingly on condemning Israel, and ignore Watch (HRW), and Oxfam; Israeli NGO, B’Tselem; Israeli- or give minimal attention to Israeli human rights and Arab organizations, Adalah, Ittijah, and Mossawa; and casualties.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Gaza War”
    THE “GAZA WAR”: A Strategic Analysis Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Final Review Draft: Circulated for Comment and Updating February 2, 2009 Cordesman: The ―Gaza War‖ A Strategic Analysis 3/3/09 Page ii Executive Summary One can argue whether the fighting between Israel and Hamas in Gaza is a ―war,‖ or should be seen as just one more tragic surge in violence in the decades-long struggle between Israel and the Palestinians. It is, however, the first major armed struggle between Israel and Hamas, as distinguished between Israel and the PLO and Fatah. It also is a case study in how Israeli capabilities have changed since the fighting with Hezbollah in 2006, and in the nature of asymmetric war between states and non-state actors. This report examines the war in terms of the lessons of the fighting, what it says about the changes in Israeli tactics and capabilities and the broader lessons it may provide for asymmetric warfare. It analyzes the fighting on the basis of briefings in Israel during and immediately after the fighting made possible by a visit sponsored by Project Interchange, and using day-to-day reporting issued by the Israeli Defense Spokesman. The analysis reveals impressive improvements in the readiness and capability of the Israeli Defense Forces since the fighting against the Hezbollah in 2006. It also indicates that Israel did not violate the laws of war. It did deliberately use decisive force to enhance regional deterrence and demonstrate that it had restored its military edge. These, however, are legitimate military objectives in spite of their very real humanitarian costs.
    [Show full text]
  • War Reporting in the International Press: a Critical Discourse Analysis of the Gaza War of 2008-2009
    War Reporting in the International Press: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Gaza War of 2008-2009 Dissertation Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Hamburg zur Erlangung des Grades des Doktors der Philosophie an der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften der Universität Hamburg Mohammedwesam Amer Hamburg, June 2015 War Reporting in the International Press: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Gaza War of 2008-2009 Evaluators 1. Prof. Dr. Jannis Androutsopoulos 2. Prof. Dr. Irene Neverla 3. Prof. Dr. Kathrin Fahlenbrach Date of Oral Defence: 30.10.2015 Declaration • I hereby declare and certify that I am the author of this study which is submitted to the University of Hamburg in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. • This is my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. • This original work or part of it has not been submitted to any other institution or university for a degree. Mohammedwesam Amer June 2015 I Abstract This study analyses the representation of social actors in reports on the Gaza war of 2008-09 in four international newspapers: The Guardian , The Times London , The New York Times and The Washington Post . The study draws on three analytical frameworks from the area of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) models: the transitivity model by Halliday (1985/1994), the socio- semantic inventory by Van Leeuwen (1996), and the classification of quotation patterns by Richardson (2007). The sample of this study consists of all headlines (146) of the relevant news stories and a non-random sample of (40) news stories and (7) editorials.
    [Show full text]
  • Extremism and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)
    Global Muslim Brotherhood Research Center Extremism and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) Steven Merley February 2007 Contents SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................................................................5 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................5 SCOPE OF INQUIRY AND DEFINITIONS .........................................................................................6 1. Fundamentalism ............................................................................................................................6 2. Anti-Semitism ...............................................................................................................................6 3. Terrorism ........................................................................................................................................6 FOUNDING OF ISNA ........................................................................................................................6 ISNA STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS ............................................................................................9 Affiliates ......................................................................................................................................... 10 1. The Association of Muslim Social Scientists .......................................................................... 10 2. Fiqh Council of North America
    [Show full text]
  • New Terrorism and International Law, the Matthew Lippman
    Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 2 3-1-2003 New Terrorism and International Law, The Matthew Lippman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tjcil Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Lippman, New Terrorism and International Law, The, 10 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 297 (2002). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tjcil/vol10/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law by an authorized administrator of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW TERRORISM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW Matthew Lippmant On September 11, 2001, nineteen foreign nationals, operating as separate terrorism teams, boarded and took control of four civilian aircraft.1 Two of planes crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York and a third careened into the Pentagon in Arlington Virginia.2 The passengers on a fourth realized that they were doomed to die, resisted, and in the resulting struggle spiraled into a Pennsylvania field.' This kamikaze attack transformed the three aircraft and the 200,000 pounds of jet fuel into weapons of mass destruction and resulted in the tragic death of as many as five thousand people The nominal head of the Al Queda terrorist organization, Osama Bin Laden, later praised this "good terror" and warned that the "battle has been moved inside tProfessor, Department of Criminal Justice, University of Illinois at Chicago; J.D., American; Ph.D., Northwestern; LL.M., Harvard.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion
    DECISION MAKING UNDER THREAT: ISRAELI AND PALESTINIAN PUBLIC OPINION A Dissertation Presented by Sheila Deborah Kohanteb To The Department of Political Science In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Field of Political Science Northeastern University Boston, MA March 2012 DECISION MAKING UNDER THREAT: ISRAELI AND PALESTINIAN PUBLIC OPINION By Sheila Deborah Kohanteb This research examines the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a new conceptual perspective that incorporates the psychology of threat into the study of inter-group conflict. The specific ob- jective of the proposed work is to develop a better understanding of how inter-group perceptions of threat may affect the decision-making of citizens and political leaders, and may ultimately af- fect progress in peace negotiations. The study utilizes data on Israelis and Palestinians over the period 1994 through 2011, drawing on public opinion polls, conflict related casualties, and major historical events in order to assess factors affecting public opinion. The research specifically ex- amines the impact of perceived threat on: changes in Palestinian public opinion regarding sup- port for punitive military actions against Israel, optimism about the future, and support for the peace process; and changes in Israeli public opinion regarding support for peace (negotia- tions/agreements). It is hypothesized that perceived threat pushes both Israelis and Palestinians toward more extreme positions regarding the peace process. This study also examines
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in Partial Fulfil
    THE DAHIYEH DOCTRINE: THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH STATES CAN ESTABLISH ASYMMETRIC DETERRENCE A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Rafael D. Frankel, M.S. Washington, DC July 3, 2013 Copyright 2013 by Rafael D. Frankel All Rights Reserved ii THE DAHIYEH DOCTRINE: THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH STATES CAN ESTABLISH ASYMMETRIC DETERRENCE Rafael D. Frankel, M.S. Thesis Advisor: Daniel L. Byman, Ph.D. ABSTRACT For the last decade, a growing body of research has sough to understand how classical deterrence methods could be adapted by states to establish asymmetric deterrence against non-state militant groups. Various strategies were suggested, but the research undertaken to date focused nearly exclusively on the actions of the defending state. This research project is the first formal effort to discover under what conditions deterrence against such groups can be established by focusing on important attributes of the non-state groups themselves. The result is the development of the Asymmetric Deterrence Matrix (ADM), which in eight temporally-bound case studies involving Hamas and Hezbollah successfully predicts the level of deterrence Israel should have been able to achieve against those groups at given periods of time. This research demonstrates that there are four main causal factors related to a non-state group’s characteristics that constrain and encourage the success of asymmetric deterrence strategies by states: elements of statehood (territorial control, political authority, and responsibility for a dependent population), organizational structure, ideology, and inter- factional rivalries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamas and UN Agencies (UNDP and UNESCO) Participated in Two Inaugurations in the Gaza Strip
    Hamas and UN agencies (UNDP and UNESCO) participated in two inaugurations in the Gaza Strip: a school named for senior terrorist operative Adnan al-Ghoul (involved in deadly terrorist attacks in Israel) and a space sciences chair at the Islamic University in Gaza City, a Hamas stronghold. Inaugurating the Adnan al-Ghoul elementary school, financed by Libya, implemented by the UNDP and sponsored by Ismail Haniya, head of the de-facto Hamas administration in the Gaza Strip (Dunya al-Watan, July 8, 2012) Overview 1. This past week an elementary school was opened and an academic chair established with Hamas and UN agency involvement: 1) On July 8 an elementary school named for terrorist operative Adnan al-Ghoul, financed by the Libyan government and built by the UNDP (the United Nations Development Programme), was officially opened. At the opening ceremony Ismail Haniya, head of the de-facto Hamas administration, publicly praised Adnan al-Ghoul's terrorist activities. 2) On July 10 a chair in astronomy, astrophysics and space sciences was established at the Islamic University in Gaza City, sponsored by UNESCO. 001-12 2 2. Adnan al-Ghoul, for whom the school is named, was one of the senior operatives in Hamas' military-terrorist apparatus. He specialized in explosives and among other attacks was behind the 1995 terrorist attack at the Beit Lid junction in central Israel, and the 1996 bombing at Dizengoff Center in the heart of Tel Aviv, together responsible for the deaths of 32 Israelis. Naming an educational institution for Adnan al-Ghoul is part of Hamas' policy of glorifying terrorists and turning them into role models for the younger generation.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Parliament Presentation
    Prepared Statement for European Parliament session on the “Situation of NGOs and Civil Society in Israel,” 23 June 2010 Prof. Gerald M. Steinberg I thank the committee for inviting me to address this important forum. Before my remarks, I wish to note that I have no connection with, nor receive any funding from the Israeli or any other government, and do not speak on behalf of anyone other than myself and NGO Monitor, which is an independent Israeli civil society organization. I am here to discuss the policies of and the role played by the European Union (EU) in funding numerous Palestinian, Israeli, and other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and “civil society” organizations (CSOs). The EU provides large sums of taxpayer funds for political advocacy through programs such as Partnership for Peace, the European Instrument for Human Rights and Democracy (EIDHR), EMHRN, and the Anna Lindh Foundation. The declared intentions are positive, but when the details of this funding are examined, many problems emerge. Projects supported by the EU systematically ignore Palestinian attacks, while condemning Israeli responses, with blanket accusations of “racism,” violations of “all international human laws and rules,” “torture”, “never ending colonial and expansionist desires,”1 sexual attacks against Arab women,2 and similar incendiary allegations. EU projects fund Palestinian-led conferences to plan the “Extra-judicial Executions and Prosecution of Israelis 1 ARIJ, Toward annexing Palestinian lands to the Israeli State: “New Israeli Military Orders to Fortify the Apartheid Israeli Segregation Plan in Hebron Governorate,” February 7, 2009. 2 Mada al-Carmel, “My Land, Space, Body and Sexuality: Palestinians in the Shadow of the Wall,” November 9, 2009.
    [Show full text]