DOCSLIB.ORG

Triangular Co-Operation in the Era of the 2030 Agenda Sharing Evidence and Stories from the Field

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Triangular Co-Operation in the Era of the 2030 Agenda Sharing Evidence and Stories from the Field TRIANGULAR CO-OPERATION IN THE ERA OF THE 2030 AGENDA SHARING EVIDENCE AND STORIES FROM THE FIELD GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INITIATIVE ON EFFECTIVE TRIANGULAR CO-OPERATION 2 │ Table of contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1. Triangular co-operation at a glance ............................................................................... 12 1.1. Triangular co-operation connects all regions and is increasingly multi-stakeholder .................. 16 1.2. Triangular co-operation contributes to all SDGs ........................................................................ 18 1.3. Triangular co-operation provides low-cost, flexible and adapted solutions ............................... 20 Chapter 2. Sharing experiences, good practices and success stories of triangular co-operation in line with the project cycle ............................................................................................................... 21 2.1. Phase 1: Identification – matching demands............................................................................... 25 2.2. Phase 2: Partnership development and negotiation ..................................................................... 26 2.3. Phase 3: Formulation – complementarity and flexibility ............................................................ 30 2.4. Phase 4: Implementation and monitoring ................................................................................... 32 2.5. Phase 5: Project evaluation and follow-up .................................................................................. 34 2.6. Communication, knowledge sharing and feedback loops ........................................................... 38 Chapter 3. Comparative advantages and opportunities of triangular co-operation ..................... 39 3.1. Building ownership and trust ...................................................................................................... 39 3.2. Promoting complementarity and increasing co-ordination in development co-operation .......... 41 3.3. Sharing knowledge and learning jointly ..................................................................................... 42 3.4. Co-creating innovative solutions and flexibility ......................................................................... 44 3.5. Enhancing volume, scope and sustainability .............................................................................. 46 3.6. Contributing to cross-cutting issues of the 2030 Agenda ........................................................... 47 Chapter 4. Challenges and opportunities to strengthen the institutional framework of triangular co-operation ....................................................................................................................... 51 4.1. Institutional set-up of providing development co-operation ....................................................... 52 4.2. Elements for a skill set to engage in trilateral partnerships that contribute to achieving the 2030 Agenda ...................................................................................................................................... 55 4.3. Voluntary reporting on triangular co-operation to grow the evidence base ................................ 57 4.4. Mainstreaming triangular co-operation ....................................................................................... 58 Chapter 5. Working in multi-stakeholder trilateral partnerships .................................................. 62 5.1. Engaging the private sector in triangular co-operation ............................................................... 62 5.2. Working with civil society organisations in triangular co-operation .......................................... 69 5.3. Engaging institutional philanthropy in triangular co-operation .................................................. 71 5.4. Working with academia in triangular co-operation .................................................................... 72 5.5. Decentralised triangular co-operation ......................................................................................... 74 Chapter 6. Good practices of scaling-up triangular co-operation to achieve the 2030 Agenda ... 78 6.1. Scaling-up to other countries, regions or continents ................................................................... 78 6.2. Extending to other levels of governance ..................................................................................... 80 6.3. Scaling-up the partnership over time .......................................................................................... 81 │ 3 6.4. Scaling-up towards alliances that address global challenges ...................................................... 82 6.5. Opportunities and challenges of scaling-up triangular co-operation .......................................... 83 Chapter 7. Implications of BAPA +40 for the GPI’s engagement on effective triangular co- operation............................................................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography......................................................................................................................................... 87 List of contributors .............................................................................................................................. 91 Annex of contributed case stories ...................................................................................................... 93 Tables Table 1.1. Number of triangular co-operation projects by actor ........................................................... 17 Table 1.2. Number of projects by duration ............................................................................................ 20 Table 1.3. Number of projects by budget .............................................................................................. 20 Table 2.1. Case Story: Colombia, Japan and Cambodia ....................................................................... 26 Table 2.2. Case Story: Tunisia, Japan, African Development Bank and several African countries...... 26 Table 2.3. Case Story: PICA, Mozambique, Islamic Development Bank ............................................. 28 Table 2.4. Case Story: Morocco, Djibouti, Islamic Development Bank ............................................... 29 Table 2.5. Case Story: Example of matching complementary skills ..................................................... 30 Table 2.6. Case Story: Enhancing the value chain for exporting agricultural products ........................ 31 Table 2.7. Case Story: Indonesia, Myanmar and Germany trilateral co-operation ............................... 33 Table 2.8. Case Story: Example of evaluating the triangular co-operation between Paraguay, Chile and Spain ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Table 2.9. Case Story: Evalúa – EU-LAC triangular co-operation on evaluation................................. 37 Table 3.1. Case Story: The Forum of African Women Educationalists (FAWE) ................................. 40 Table 3.2. Case Story: ICT Capacity Building Program for Officials of Timor-Leste ......................... 40 Table 3.3. Case Story: Mexico, United Kingdom and Belize ............................................................... 41 Table 3.4. Case Story: Canada, Ghana, Israel ....................................................................................... 42 Table 3.5. Case Story: Afghanistan-Indonesia-Germany co-operate on anti-corruption ...................... 43 Table 3.6. Case Story: Exchanging experiences to advance competitiveness and innovation in the Americas ........................................................................................................................................ 44 Table 3.7. Case Story: Sharing and adapting an innovative solution to enhance financial inclusion ... 45 Table 3.8. Case Story: Co-creating innovative solutions to make Asunción more sustainable ............ 46 Table 3.9. Case Story: Mesoamerica without Hunger ........................................................................... 46 Table 3.10. Case Story: Trade unions leaving no informal workers behind in Niger and Burkina Faso ............................................................................................................................................... 48 Table 3.11. Case Story: Czech Republic sharing innovative ideas with Mongolia in collaboration with the European Commission..................................................................................................... 49 Table 3.12. Case Story: Accelerating clean energy access in Timor-Leste through triangular co- operation with Indonesia, Korea, and UNDOP ............................................................................. 50 Table 4.1. Case Story: Support Fund for Triangular Co-operation projects of Morocco and Belgium in other African countries .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Irrigation and Erosion/Flood Control At
    1 IRRIGATION AND EROSION/FLOOD CONTROL AT HIGH ALTITUDES IN THE ANDES W. van Immerzeel and R.J.Oosterbaan Published in ILRI Annual Report 1989, p. 8 – 24 International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI) Wageningen, The Netherlands On website: https://www.waterlog.info public domain, latest upload 20-11-2017 Table of contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................2 2. Land Use without Irrigation.......................................................................................2 3. Irrigation Prospects ....................................................................................................5 4. Field Irrigation Concepts and Practices .....................................................................7 5. Participative Action by the Communities................................................................10 6. Flood Control...........................................................................................................13 7. Erosion Control........................................................................................................14 8. Conclusions..............................................................................................................16 2 IRRIGATION AND EROSION/FLOOD CONTROL AT HIGH ALTITUDES IN THE ANDES 1. Introduction Interesting developments in irrigation and the control of floods and erosion are taking place in the Andean mountain range of Peru. They are increasingly
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples
    SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors PREFACE Population growth, rapid urbanisation, more water intense consumption patterns and climate change are intensifying the pressure on freshwater resources. The increasing scarcity of water, combined with other factors such as energy and fertilizers, is driving millions of farmers and other entrepreneurs to make use of wastewater. Wastewater reuse is an excellent example that naturally explains the importance of integrated management of water, soil and waste, which we define as the Nexus While the information in this book are generally believed to be true and accurate at the approach. The process begins in the waste sector, but the selection of date of publication, the editors and the publisher cannot accept any legal responsibility for the correct management model can make it relevant and important to any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, expressed or the water and soil as well. Over 20 million hectares of land are currently implied, with respect to the material contained herein. known to be irrigated with wastewater. This is interesting, but the The opinions expressed in this book are those of the Case Authors. Their inclusion in this alarming fact is that a greater percentage of this practice is not based book does not imply endorsement by the United Nations University. on any scientific criterion that ensures the “safe use” of wastewater. In order to address the technical, institutional, and policy challenges of safe water reuse, developing countries and countries in transition need clear institutional arrangements and more skilled human resources, United Nations University Institute for Integrated with a sound understanding of the opportunities and potential risks of Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources wastewater use.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-Mollinga-Veldwisch-Waa
    www.water-alternatives.org Volume 9 | Issue 2 Mollinga, P.P. and Veldwisch, G.J. 2016. Ruling by canal: Governance and system-level design characteristics of large-scale irrigation infrastructure in India and Uzbekistan. Water Alternatives 9(2): 222-249 Ruling by Canal: Governance and System-Level Design Characteristics of Large-Scale Irrigation Infrastructure in India and Uzbekistan Peter P. Mollinga Department of Development Studies, SOAS University of London, London, UK; [email protected] Gert Jan Veldwisch Water Resources Management Group of Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper explores the relationship between governance regime and large-scale irrigation system design by investigating three cases: 1) protective irrigation design in post-independent South India; 2) canal irrigation system design in Khorezm Province, Uzbekistan, as implemented in the USSR period, and 3) canal design by the Madras Irrigation and Canal Company, as part of an experiment to do canal irrigation development in colonial India on commercial terms in the 1850s-1860s. The mutual shaping of irrigation infrastructure design characteristics on the one hand and management requirements and conditions on the other has been documented primarily at lower, within-system levels of the irrigation systems, notably at the level of division structures. Taking a 'social construction of technology' perspective, the paper analyses the relationship between technological structures and management and governance arrangements at irrigation system level. The paper finds qualitative differences in the infrastructural configuration of the three irrigation systems expressing and facilitating particular forms of governance and rule, differences that matter for management and use, and their effects and impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights on Managing Drylands
    Sustainable Management of Marginal Drylands SUMAMAD: Figure 1. Experimental plots (SI BZ1 and SI BZ4) treated with artificial recharge of ground water and the control plot Drylands Managing On Insights New Figure 2. Hippos in a pond FigureFigure 5. 2. Targeted Soil Investigationgrazing locations (1: (left) Al Qanees, and 2: measurement Khraqah, 3: Wadi Om of Laila, vegetation cover (Right) at and 4: Om Al Fotos) in Al Barrah area. initial stage. SI (BZ1) Control 2 3 4 SI (BZ4) SI (BZ1) 2 New Insights On Managing Drylands Eighth International Workshop Alexandria (Egypt) The SUMAMAD Project is funded by the Flemish Government of Belgium Sustainable Management of Marginal Drylands New Insights On Managing Drylands Eighth International Workshop Alexandria (Egypt) 6–9 November 2010 1 Sustainable Management of Marginal Drylands THE WORKSHOP ORGANIZERS New Insights On Managing Drylands Eighth International Workshop Alexandria (Egypt) 6–9 November 2010 THE INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS The authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO or any of the specialized agencies of the United Nations system.The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the UNESCO Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization New Insights On Managing Drylands 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France Man and Biosphere Programme Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences Preface 1, rue Miollis, 75352 Paris 15 SP, France Fax: (33-1) 45 68 58 04 By Thomas Schaaf, MAB-UNESCO 7 http://www.unesco.org/mab Managing Sustainability of New Quinoa Production Systems through Farming Systems Management and Market Insertion.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolivia Agricultural Sector Review
    ReportNo. 9882-B0 Bolivia Agricultural SectorReview April6, 1992 Public Disclosure Authorized CountryDepartment Ill Latin Americaand the CaribbeanRegional Office MICROFICHE COPY Report No. 9882-BO Type: (SEC) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PANZER, J./ X39363 / I5059/ LA3AG Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized scmuwAtitoftbeWM Bdank~ Public Disclosure Authorized Thisdocumnent'has a restricted distribution and mnaybe usedby, recipients o4y inthe performanceof theirofficial duties.Its contents may not otherwise be disclosedwithou World Bankauthorization. FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 30 CURRENCY AND EOUIVALENCY UNITS Currency Unit - Boliviano (Be) Official Exchange Rate Effective April 31, 1991 US$1.00 - Bs 3.54 US$0.28 - Bs 1.00 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Metric System GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ADP - Alternative Development Program BAB - Bol'vian Agricultural Bank BCB - Bolivian Central Bank CDF Centro de Desarrollo Forestal CIAT - Centro de Investigaci6n de Agricultura Tropical CIFP - Centro de Investigaci6n Fitogenetica Pairumani CNIEA - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones y Extension Agropecuaria CNRA - Consejo Nacional de Reforma Agraria CNS - National Seed Council CORDECRUZ - Santa Cruz Regional Development Corporation CRA - Certificado Reintegracion Arancelaria FAO - Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations FDC - Peasant Development Fund FRFM - Formal Rural Financial Markets GDP - Gross Domestic Product IBTA - Instituto Boliviano de Tecnologia Agropecuaria IBTEN - Instituto Boliviano de Tecnologia Nuclear INC - National Colonization Institute INE - National Institute of Statistics MACA - Ministry of Agriculture and Peasant Affairs MINPLAN - Ministry of Planning and Coordination NEP - New Economic Policy NGO - Non-Governmental Organization NLP - New Lands Policies PSIP - Public Sector Investment Program RDC - Regional Development Corporation UDAPE - Unit for Political and Economic Analysis USAID - United States Agency for International Development FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BOLIVIA AGRICULTURALSECTOR REVIEW Table of Contents Paxe No.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples and Future Research Needs
    SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES AND FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS PROCEEDINGS Lima, Peru, 24-25 February 2016 Proceedings Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples and Future Research Needs Hiroshan Hettiarachchi (UNU-FLORES) 24-25 February 2016 Lima, Peru Co-Organised By: UNU-FLORES (Dresden, Germany) United Nations Environment Programme (Nairobi, Kenya) IPES – Promoción del Desarrollo Sostenible (Lima, Peru) Funded by: German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMBF) The views expressed in this publication are those of the presenters at the workshop. The presenters are responsible for ensuring that all figures, tables, text, and supporting materials are properly cited and necessary permissions were obtained. United Nations University Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES) Ammonstrasse 74, 01067 Dresden, Germany Tel.: + 49-351 8921 9370 Fax: + 49-351 8921 9389 Email: [email protected] Copyright UNU-FLORES 2017 Editorial Assistance: Arjun Avasthy, Atiqah Fairuz Salleh (UNU-FLORES) Design & Layout: Claudia Matthias (UNU-FLORES), mybluepencil Cover Image: gameanna/shutterstock (ID: 131796455) Photo Credit: IPES Print: Reprogress GmbH Print run: 300 ISBN: 978-3-944863-64-1 e-ISBN: 978-3-944863-65-8 This publication should be cited as: Hettiarachchi, Hiroshan. 2017. Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples and Future Research Needs. Proceedings, Lima, Peru, 24-25 February 2016. Dresden: United Nations University Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES). Background Wastewater irrigation has become commonplace in some parts of the world mainly due to scarcity of water available for agricultural purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Submitted To: USAID/Bolivia By
    () "" ......... ,:j ) ·i; ..- ...' Submitted to: USAID/Bolivia By MAY, 2001 LA PAZ, BOLIVIA , CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.•...•.........................•.................•..............•...•................•...•..•.............................•..• 1 2. OBJECTIVE OF THE MISSION..•...................................•..........................•..•..........•....•................. 2 3. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE MICRO mRiGATION SYSTEMS VISITED 2 3.1. LOCATION 2 3.2. PHYSICAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS 3 4. IMPACTS ACHIEVED WITH THE PROJECTS ..................................•...................................•..... 5 4.1. DEGREE OF CROP DIVERSIFICATION 5 4.2. PRODUCER GROUPS INVOLVED IN TIlE MANAGEMENT OF THE SySTEM 6 4.2.1. Management ofthe irrigation systems 7 4.2.2. Communal participation 9 4.3. DEGREE OF PROJECT SUSTAINAEILITY 9 4.4. ACCESSIBILITY OF TI-lE SYSTEM TO FARM'TO-MARKET ROADS 10 5. PRE-PROJECT PLANNING 13 5.1. POLICY, PROGRAMMING, AND PLANNING ISSUES 13 5.1.1. Micro irrigation potential infood insecure areas 13 5J2. Micro irrigation anditsfit within the.DAP approach. 16 5.1.3. The present water laws and Title 11. 17 5.1.4. Moving environmental considerations to the field 18 5.2. ECONOMICSOFMICROIRRlGATION 19 5.2. 1. PLACE OF ECONOMICS IN FOOD INSECURITY PROGRAMS 19 5.2.2. Applying economic andfinancial analysis to micro irrigation 19 5.2.3. Foodfor work and micro irrigation : 20 6. ADEQUACY OF IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SySTEM 22 ! 6.1. ROLE OF USER GROUPS c 22 6.2. CONTRACTING 22 6.3. LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPPORT 22 7. ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 24 7.1. FOLLOWINGPLANS c •• c: 24 7.2. TIMELINESS OF EXECUTION 24 7.3. COSTOVER-RUNS 25 7.4. ADEQUACY OF PLANNING VERSUS CURRENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION 26 8 ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING 27 8.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting of Water Rights Frameworks in Bolivia
    Propositions 1. In the Andean region’s river basins, diverse actor coalitions strategically deploy diverse and divergent water rights legitimation languages to reinforce their water claims and materialize their wished-for hydrosocial territories. (this thesis) 2. Irrigation development, beyond institute-based prescriptive projects, needs to be understood as a multi-actor negotiated process involving continuous contestation and redesign. (this thesis) 3. Technological instruments can be evaluated “not only for their contributions of efficiency and productivity, … but also for the ways in which they can embody specific forms of power and authority” (Winner, L. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109 (1): 121-136. Page 121). 4. “History is the fiction we invent to persuade ourselves that events are knowable and that life has order and direction” (Watterson, B. 1994. Homicidal psycho jungle cat: a Calvin and Hobbes collection. Andrews McMeel Publishing: Kansas City. Page 148). 5. It is easier to write about irrigation in the Bolivian Andes than to irrigate in this highlands region. 6. Natural resource management is conflict management. Propositions belonging to the thesis, entitled Hydrosocio-territorial struggles: Shifting of water rights frameworks in Bolivia Rígel Rocha López Wageningen, 26 August 2020 HYDROSOCIO-TERRITORIAL STRUGGLES Shifting of water rights frameworks in Bolivia Rígel Rocha-López Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr R.A. Boelens Personal chair, Water Resources Management Group Wageningen University & Research Co-promotors Dr J.M.C. Vos Associate Professor, Water Resources Management Group Wageningen University & Research Dr E. Rap Visiting researcher IHE Delft Institute for Water Education Other members Prof. Dr J.W.M. van Dijk, Wageningen University & Research Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico, Bolivia and Germany Announce the Results of Their Triangular Cooperation on Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
    Press release 210-16 Mexico City, 30 March 2016 Mexico, Bolivia and Germany announce the results of their triangular cooperation on wastewater treatment and reuse AMEXCID representative and the Director of GIZ Regional Fund for the Promotion of triangular cooperation in Latin America and the Caribbean, concurred the triangular cooperation between Mexico, Germany and Bolivia on wastewater reuse has been successful. The Deputy Minister of Water Resources and Irrigation of Bolivia stressed the programme is one of the most successful and a flagship initiative for his country. Salomon Abedrop, Deputy Director for Planning, National Water Commission (Conagua) reported that the rehabilitation and construction of wastewater treatment plants, organising training courses and workshops, and implementing water quality monitoring are the results from the Germany-Bolivia-Mexico triangular cooperation project to promote the reuse of recycled wastewater for agricultural irrigation in Bolivia, which initiated in 2012. During the closing event, headed by the Mexican Agency for International Development Cooperation (AMEXCID) and the Regional Fund for the Promotion of triangular cooperation in Latin America and the Caribbean of GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internartionale Zusammenarbeit), Mr Abedrop stressed that one of the objectives of Conagua’s National Water Plan is to strengthen Mexico's international participation on water, thus this type of cooperation is essential. Conagua sent a technical committee to Bolivia in 2014 to start up WWTP pilot projects. The Patacamaya WWTP in the rural municipality of Bolivian High Plateau was rehabilitated, and the Pucara-Esmeralda WWTP was built in Sacaba, Cochabamba, he said. Furthermore, wastewater standards and regulations were developed for WWTP projects aimed at agricultural reuse in Bolivia.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Treatment Plant Management on Human Health and Ecological Risks from Wastewater Irrigation in Developing Countries–Case Studies from Cochabamba, Bolivia
    Impact of treatment plant management on human health and ecological risks from wastewater irrigation in developing countries–case studies from Cochabamba, Bolivia Downloaded from: https://research.chalmers.se, 2019-11-13 18:50 UTC Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Cossio Grageda, C., Perez-Mercado, L., Norrman, J. et al (2019) Impact of treatment plant management on human health and ecological risks from wastewater irrigation in developing countries–case studies from Cochabamba, Bolivia International Journal of Environmental Health Research, In Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2019.1657075 N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. research.chalmers.se offers the possibility of retrieving research publications produced at Chalmers University of Technology. It covers all kind of research output: articles, dissertations, conference papers, reports etc. since 2004. research.chalmers.se is administrated and maintained by Chalmers Library (article starts on next page) International Journal of Environmental Health Research ISSN: 0960-3123 (Print) 1369-1619 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cije20 Impact of treatment plant management on human health and ecological risks from wastewater irrigation in developing countries – case studies from Cochabamba, Bolivia Claudia Cossio, Luis Fernando Perez-Mercado, Jenny Norrman, Sahar Dalahmeh, Björn Vinnerås, Alvaro Mercado & Jennifer McConville To cite this article: Claudia Cossio, Luis Fernando Perez-Mercado, Jenny Norrman, Sahar Dalahmeh, Björn Vinnerås, Alvaro Mercado & Jennifer McConville (2019): Impact of treatment plant management on human health and ecological risks from wastewater irrigation in developing countries – case studies from Cochabamba, Bolivia, International Journal of Environmental Health Research, DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2019.1657075 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2019.1657075 © 2019 The Author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Ruling by Canal: Governance and System-Level Design Characteristics of Large-Scale Irrigation Infrastructure in India and Uzbekistan
    www.water-alternatives.org Volume 9 | Issue 2 Mollinga, P.P. and Veldwisch, G.J. 2016. Ruling by canal: Governance and system-level design characteristics of large-scale irrigation infrastructure in India and Uzbekistan. Water Alternatives 9(2): 222-249 Ruling by Canal: Governance and System-Level Design Characteristics of Large-Scale Irrigation Infrastructure in India and Uzbekistan Peter P. Mollinga Department of Development Studies, SOAS University of London, London, UK; [email protected] Gert Jan Veldwisch Water Resources Management Group of Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper explores the relationship between governance regime and large-scale irrigation system design by investigating three cases: 1) protective irrigation design in post-independent South India; 2) canal irrigation system design in Khorezm Province, Uzbekistan, as implemented in the USSR period, and 3) canal design by the Madras Irrigation and Canal Company, as part of an experiment to do canal irrigation development in colonial India on commercial terms in the 1850s-1860s. The mutual shaping of irrigation infrastructure design characteristics on the one hand and management requirements and conditions on the other has been documented primarily at lower, within-system levels of the irrigation systems, notably at the level of division structures. Taking a 'social construction of technology' perspective, the paper analyses the relationship between technological structures and management and governance arrangements at irrigation system level. The paper finds qualitative differences in the infrastructural configuration of the three irrigation systems expressing and facilitating particular forms of governance and rule, differences that matter for management and use, and their effects and impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Triangular Co-Operation in the Era of the 2030 Agenda Sharing Evidence and Stories from the Field
    TRIANGULAR CO-OPERATION IN THE ERA OF THE 2030 AGENDA SHARING EVIDENCE AND STORIES FROM THE FIELD GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INITIATIVE ON EFFECTIVE TRIANGULAR CO-OPERATION 1 │ Triangular Co-operation in the Era of the 2030 Agenda Sharing evidence and stories from the field 2 │ Foreword by the OECD Secretary-General The Second UN High-level Conference on South-South Co-operation (BAPA +40) held in Buenos Aires, 20-22 March 2019,was a historical event: 40 years after the Buenos Aires Plan of Action (BAPA) was agreed, over 150 countries came back to Argentina to show that South-South and triangular co-operation are central elements of international co- operation. Moreover, BAPA+40 was instrumental in putting into action the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by calling for more and stronger partnerships with civil society organisations, research institutes, philanthropic organisations, and the private sector – just to name some partners beyond governments. Partnerships are at the heart of the OECD’s work and values. We believe that in a world where all countries and people are interconnected, the only way forward is to engage in inclusive partnerships. Triangular co-operation is such an example. It is a way to transcend binary spatial divides of ‘South’ and ‘North’, building trust and generating innovation through co-creation. Trilateral partnerships contribute to tackling some of the world’s most pressing challenges, such as climate change. In order to achieve the 2030 Agenda, horizontal partnerships, where each partner has lessons to share as well as lessons to learn – irrespective of income status or geographic location – are crucial to shaping the future of development co-operation.
    [Show full text]