Agriculture and Agri-Food

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agriculture and Agri-Food Name and location of contractor with brief description and province of project Amount 2019-2020 Expenditures (in dollars) Contracted Expenditures to date Agriculture and Agri-Food Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food 4089171 Canada Inc, Ottawa, Ontario 2 f Renovations of room 2048-2050, building 20, Ottawa, Ontario........................................... 396,654 6,654 396,654 All-Brite Electric Company Ltd, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 2 Greenhouse LED retrofit, Regina, Saskatchewan............................................................... 1,228,862 991,562 991,562 Allen & Bolack Excavating Ltd, Brandon, Manitoba 2 f Watermain replacement, Brandon research and development centre, Brandon, Manitoba. 1,563,187 0 1,563,187 Ameresco Canada Inc, Richmond Hill, Ontario Energy efficiency project under Harrow research and development centre federal building 2 initiative, Gatineau, Quebec................................................................................................. 4,781,926 148,900 148,900 Architecture49 Inc, Winnipeg, Manitoba Architectural and engineering services for research centre rehabilitation project, Swift 2 Current, Saskatchewan........................................................................................................ 4,649,469 171,512 4,562,034 Associated Engineering, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 2 f Architectural and engineering services for watermain replacement, Brandon, Manitoba..... 259,593 12,234 259,593 Atlantica Mechanical Contractors Inc, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia 2 Emergency generator upgrade, Halifax, Nova Scotia.......................................................... 546,665 510,377 510,377 Bähler Biogaz Inc, Sherbrooke, Quebec 2 Finalization and commissioning of a bioreactor, Sherbrooke, Quebec................................ 2,074,091 2,020,370 2,020,370 Bähler Biogaz Inc, Sherbrooke, Quebec Supply and installation of a bioreactor, Sherbrooke research and development centre, 2 f Sherbrooke, Quebec............................................................................................................ 969,932 32,434 969,932 Bisson Fortin Architecture + Design Inc, Laval, Quebec Architectural and engineering services for roofs refection of the main building, Saint- 2 Hyacinthe, Quebec............................................................................................................... 307,423 78,331 305,260 Boald Construction Management Ltd, Edmonton, Alberta 1 2 f Beef feedlot water renovation and expansion, Lacombe, Alberta........................................ 802,816 0 802,816 Bradford M Hubbard Construction Inc, Spencerville, Ontario 1 2 f Building 54 envelope conservation, Ottawa, Ontario........................................................... 675,567 0 675,567 Brandon Heating & Plumbing (1998) Ltd, Brandon, Manitoba 2 Chiller and cooling tower, Brandon, Manitoba..................................................................... 796,007 673,706 673,706 Chandos Construction LP, Calgary, Alberta Lethbridge research and development centre laboratory annex exterior envelope 2 f replacement, Lethbridge, Alberta......................................................................................... 3,544,080 0 3,544,080 Chandos Construction LP, Calgary, Alberta 2 f New Lacombe abattoir, Lacombe, Alberta........................................................................... 347,729 199,089 347,729 Chriscan Construction, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 2 Elevator replacement, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan............................................................... 1,017,054 591,474 591,474 CLS Roofing, Ottawa, Ontario 2 Central experimental farm building 88 roof replacement, Ottawa, Ontario.......................... 748,076 608,250 608,250 Construction Bon-Air, Saint-Félicien, Quebec Replacement of particles and dust collection equipment systems at Normandin, Montréal, Quebec................................................................................................................................. 490,127 485,227 485,227 Construction Bugère Inc, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec 2 f Roofs refection of the main building, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec........................................... 1,138,239 479,077 1,138,239 Construction GCP Inc, St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec Re-roofing of the garage of building 4, Montréal, Quebec................................................... 310,401 264,898 264,898 Controlled Environments Ltd, Winnipeg, Manitoba 1 2 f Growth chamber replacement, London, Ontario.................................................................. 906,345 0 906,345 Controlled Environments Ltd, Winnipeg, Manitoba 2 f New growth chambers, Summerland, British Columbia....................................................... 3,177,409 0 3,177,409 Cougar Engineering & Construction Ltd, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador Sanitary sewer upgrades, St John's research and development centre, St John's, 2 f Newfoundland and Labrador................................................................................................ 963,875 0 963,875 Couverture Montréal Nord Ltée, St-Léonard, Quebec 2 Roof refection main building lot 2, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec................................................... 375,008 362,908 362,908 Acquisition of Land, Buildings and Works - 3 - Public Accounts of Canada, 2019-2020 Name and location of contractor with brief description and province of project Amount 2019-2020 Expenditures (in dollars) Contracted Expenditures to date Defran Inc, Gatineau, Quebec 1 f Saunders renovation, building 49, Ottawa, Ontario............................................................. 336,354 113,239 336,354 Fournier Gersovitz Moss Drolet & Associés Architectes, Montréal, Quebec Architectural and engineering services for building 54 envelope conservation, Ottawa, 1 2 f Ontario.................................................................................................................................. 502,624 22,095 502,624 FWBA Architects, Lethbridge, Alberta 1 2 f Lab annex exterior envelope replacement, Lethbridge, Alberta........................................... 257,910 20,715 257,910 G Hahn Contracting Ltd, Fort Qu'Appelle, Saskatchewan Pesticide and chemical storage facility, Indian Head research farm, Indian Head, 2 f Saskatchewan....................................................................................................................... 867,197 29,657 867,197 Gagnon Letellier Cyr Ricard Mathieu & Associés Architectes, Québec, Quebec Architectural and engineering services for research greenhouse reconstruction, Québec, 2 f Quebec................................................................................................................................. 783,952 4,452 783,952 JP Gravel Construction Inc, Ottawa, Ontario 2 f Renovation of laboratory 1007-1024, Building 20, Ottawa, Ontario..................................... 469,299 0 469,299 K&L Construction (Ontario) Ltd, London, Ontario 2 London exhaust fume manifold project, London, Ontario.................................................... 2,055,597 1,704,603 1,704,603 Kontzamanis Graumann Smith MacMillan Inc, Winnipeg, Manitoba 1 2 f Architectural and engineering services for greenhouse expansion, Morden, Manitoba....... 293,691 0 293,691 LAT49 Architecture Inc, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador St John's research and development centre expansion and retrofit, St John's, 2 Newfoundland and Labrador................................................................................................ 897,703 212,678 212,678 Les Constructions Béland & Lapointe Inc, Lévis, Quebec 2 f Research greenhouse reconstruction, Québec, Quebec..................................................... 4,176,616 0 4,176,616 Martech Electrical Systems Ltd, Castlegar, British Columbia 2 f Transformers upgrade, Lethbridge research and development centre, Lethbridge, Alberta 1,837,126 29,007 1,837,126 MIRA Construction Ltd, Fredericton, New Brunswick Removal of surplus infrastructures and installation of Arch buildings, Fredericton, New 2 f Brunswick.............................................................................................................................. 1,025,339 0 1,025,339 MVA Power Inc, Montréal, Quebec 2 f Main transformer replacement, Lethbridge, Alberta............................................................. 277,555 13,878 277,555 Peak Mechanical Partnership, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Modifications to cryobank heating ventilation and air conditioning, Saskatoon, 1 f Saskatchewan....................................................................................................................... 330,188 0 330,188 Stantec, Lethbridge, Alberta 2 Architectural and engineering services for irrigation upgrade, Vauxhall, Alberta................. 380,698 5,909 267,343 Stantec, London, Ontario Architectural and engineering services for London Exhaust Fume Manifold Project, 2 London, Ontario.................................................................................................................... 298,530 106,416 106,416 Stantec, Longueuil, Quebec 2 Replacement of controls, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec............................................................ 420,525 231,064 231,064 Stantec, Vancouver, British Columbia Architectural and engineering services for mechanical and electrical systems upgrade, 2 f Summerland, British Columbia............................................................................................. 332,082 0 332,082 Taylor Hazell Architects Ltd, Toronto,
Recommended publications
  • Aboard MV Swell
    Maple Leaf Adventures Mail: PO Box 8845, Stn Central, Victoria, B.C., V8W 3Z1, Canada Courier: 209-1110 Government St., Victoria, B.C. V8W 1Y2, Canada Phone +1.250.386.7245 Toll free 1.888.599.5323 www.MapleLeafAdventures.com Rated one of Canada’s “Best Travel Experiences” by Frommer’s Canada How to Get There and Back Whales & Vancouver Is. Inside Passage: Oct 19 – 26, 2017 Aboard MV Swell Port of Departure Port McNeill, BC, Municipal Wharf (airport is Port Hardy, BC) Boarding Time Boarding time is at 2 pm While you are making your way to the ship your crew is busily preparing Swell for your voyage. Our turnaround activities between trips are precisely timed and as it is important to us that the ship and crew be in top shape for your arrival, please plan to arrive at the ship only at the designated boarding time. Where to Meet Meet at the entrance to the marina, at the top of the dock. Your crew will help you with your bags. Port of Return Sidney, BC, Van Isle Marina. Address: 2320 Harbour Road Disembarking Time Guests disembark last day at 12 noon How to Get to the Ship Port McNeill is located at the northern tip of Vancouver Island. The municipal docks are located in the heart of Port McNeill’s downtown. It takes approximately 25 minutes, via taxi, from the Port Hardy Airport to arrive at the Port McNeill municipal docks. By Air: We have used Vancouver Airport as the starting point for these instructions. From Vancouver International Airport, you will fly to Port Hardy and from there you can hire a taxi to take you to Port McNeill.
    [Show full text]
  • Article: Delcosecurity Featured in Itbusiness
    6 TECHNOLOGYin GOVERNMENT News December 2003 CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ...~ '" ~ Iu ~ 0 , if] ii..0 ..~ EdmontonInstitutionupdatesprison SKI!)!I doorcontrolsystemwithtouchscreens Overhaulispartof anITupgradethat will replacecurrentpush-locksystem BY NEIL SUTTON is replacing "a console that's safe environment for both staff anada's prison system is un- probably eight feet long and five and offenders," said Tim Krause, dergoing an IT upgrade feet deep that wraps around and regional prairie region commu- Cwhereby certain institutions takes up most of the control cen- nications manager for the Cor- are replacing push-button lock- tre room. It's full of switches rectional Service of Canada. ing systems with touch-screen (and) LEDs," he said. By com- "The biggest thing would be technology to im- parison, the Delco ease of operation for the security prove security. technology is "a staff that are going to be operat- The most recent smaller console ing all the different locking addition is the with a flat panel mechanisms," he added. "This is Delco Automation's touch-screen technology keeps Edmonton Institution inmates behind bars. Edmonton Insti- monitor with a part of a standard operations and tution, a maxi- few other systems maintenance program that we're Stony Mountain Institution in Legimodiere. mum security mounted on the seeing in the prairie region that Manitoba. Julia Noonan, a spokesperson prison which console. " updates various systems to the Other facilities across the with the Ontario Ministry of houses more than In the event of a modern-day technology." country are receiving the same Public Safety and Security, says 300 inmates. It's power failure, the Edmonton Institution inmates treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Dymchurch Martello Tower No 24 KENT
    English Heritage Dymchurch Martello Tower No 24 KENT J G LOAD MA, FSA Inspector of Ancient Monuments Between 1793 and 1815 Britain was at War with the French Republic. After his campaigns in Italy, Egypt and Syria, Napoleon Bonaparte began extensive preparations to invade England. To counter the threatened invasion, the English built a chain of 74 Martello gun-towers along the Channel shores of Kent and East Sussex between 1805 and 1812. Of those that survive today, the Martello tower at Dymchurch is perhaps the best preserved. Fully restored and open to the public, it is dominated by an original 24-pounder gun carrying the cipher of King George III. CONTENTS 2 HISTORY 2 The Invasion Coast, 1803 6 Defending the South Coast 7 Origins and purpose of the Martellos 9 Building the Martello Towers, 1805-12 10 Design of the South Coast towers 13 Later History 14 DESCRIPTION 15 Interior of the Tower 17 Gun Platform 18 BIBLIOGRAPHY 18 GLOSSARY of technical terms Copyright © English Heritage 1990 First published 1990 Printed in England for HMSO Dd 6018381 C15 8/90 498 53309 ISBN 1 85074 300 2 1 HISTORY The Invasion Coast 1803 Dymchurch Martello Tower - no 24 in a chain of 74 built along the Channel coasts of Kent and East Sussex between 1805 and 1812 - was constructed to meet a threat of invasion as serious as the later one which faced England after the fall of France in the summer of 1940. The Peace of Amiens, signed in March 1802, had ended nine years of war with Revolutionary France, but Napoleon's territorial ambitions in Europe and elsewhere were to ensure that peace was short-lived.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Henry National Historic Site of Canada
    © Copyright Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2006 Government of Canada Catalogue No. R64-105/41-2006E ISBN: 0-662-44230-X Aussi disponible en français. Fort Henry national historic site of canada Management Plan February, 2007 FORT HENRY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction . .1 1.1 Purpose of a Management Plan . .1 1.2 Preparation of this Management Plan . .1 1.3 Legislative and Policy Context for Management Planning . .2 1.4 Brief History of the Site . .3 1.5 Administered Place . .4 1.6 Local and Regional Context . .4 2.0 The Role of Fort Henry in the Family of National Historic Sites . .6 2.1 Role of Fort Henry in the National Historic Sites System . .6 3.0 Commemorative Integrity . .8 3.1 Concept of Commemorative Integrity . .8 3.2 The Commemorative Integrity Statement for Fort Henry . .8 3.3 Statement of Commemorative Intent . .8 4.0 Current Situation Analysis . .10 4.1 Cultural Resources . .10 4.1.1 Built Heritage . .10 4.1.2 Archaeological Sites . .12 4.1.3 Collections . .13 4.1.4 The Cultural Landscape . .13 4.2 The Presentation of Messages at Fort Henry . .15 4.2.1 Heritage Presentation Programming at Fort Henry . .16 4.3 Natural Resources at Fort Henry . .17 4.4 Visitor Use and Operations . .17 5.0 Vision for Fort Henry . .18 5.1. Context of a Site Vision . .18 5.2 Vision for Fort Henry National Historic Site in 2021 .
    [Show full text]
  • Replacement Class Screening Report
    REPLACEMENT CLASS SCREENING WORKS ON OVER-WINTERING SITES FOR OYSTER AQUACULTURE REPLACEMENT CLASS SCREENING WORKS ON OVER-WINTERING SITES FOR OYSTER AQUACULTURE TRANSPORT CANADA ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ATLANTIC REGION Heritage Court 95 Foundry Street Moncton, NB E1C 8K6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.2. ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF RESIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ....................................... 14 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................1 5. ISSUES SCOPING AND VALUED ENVIRONMENTAL 1.1. CLASS SCREENING AND THE CANADIAN COMPONENT SELECTION ................................................................. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT (CEAA) ...................................3 5.1. ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON 1.2. RATIONALE FOR REPLACEMENT CLASS SELECTED VECS ................................................................................. 15 SCREENING (RCS).................................................................................4 5.2. MARINE HABITAT (MARINE WATERS AND MARINE 1.3. CONSULTATION................................................................5 SEDIMENTS)........................................................................................ 15 1.4 CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 5.2.1. WILDLIFE/MIGRATORY BIRDS................................... 16 REGISTRY (THE REGISTRY)....................................................................5 5.2.2. SPECIES AT RISK.......................................................... 16 2. PROJECTS SUBJECT TO CLASS
    [Show full text]
  • Official Community Plan Bylaw 15-2011
    PLAN THE ADVENTURE AHEAD THE DISTRICT OF PORT HARDY OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN BYLAW No. 15-2011 AS AMENDED Consolidation: May 27, 2014 CONSOLIDATED COPY FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY Amending Bylaws: Bylaw 1025-2014 · Text Amendment: Sec 7.10.3 Development Permit Exemptions · Map 1 Land Use: Changing the land use designation of a portion of the property which is legally described as Northwest ¼ of Section 25, Township 9, Rupert District, Except Part in Plan 49088, from Rural Resource to Industrial and Comprehensive Development A BYLAW TO ADOPT THE DISTRICT OF PORT HARDY OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN DISTRICT OF PORT HARDY BYLAW No. 15-2011 GIVEN THAT the District of Port Hardy wishes to adopt an Official Community Plan; The Council of the District of Port Hardy in open meeting assembled ENACTS as follows: 1. This bylaw may be cited as the "Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 15-2011". 2. The plan titled District of Port Hardy Official Community Plan set out in Schedule A to this bylaw is adopted and designated as the Official Community Plan for the District of Port Hardy. 3. Bylaw No. 18-99, 1999, Official Community Plan for the District of Port Hardy, as amended is repealed. Read a first time the 13th day of September, 2011. Read a second time the 13th day of September, 2011. Read a third time the 11th day of October, 2011. Adopted the 11th day of October, 2011. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY: ______________________________ ______________________________ Director of Corporate Services Mayor Certified to be a true copy of District of Port Hardy Official Community Plan Bylaw No.
    [Show full text]
  • Martello Towers Research Project
    Martello Towers Research Project March 2008 Jason Bolton MA MIAI IHBC www.boltonconsultancy.com Conservation Consultant [email protected] Executive Summary “Billy Pitt had them built, Buck Mulligan said, when the French were on the sea”, Ulysses, James Joyce. The „Martello Towers Research Project‟ was commissioned by Fingal County Council and Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, with the support of The Heritage Council, in order to collate all known documentation relating to the Martello Towers of the Dublin area, including those in Bray, Co. Wicklow. The project was also supported by Dublin City Council and Wicklow County Council. Martello Towers are one of the most well-known fortifications in the world, with examples found throughout Ireland, the United Kingdom and along the trade routes to Africa, India and the Americas. The towers are typically squat, cylindrical, two-storey masonry towers positioned to defend a strategic section of coastline from an invading force, with a landward entrance at first-floor level defended by a machicolation, and mounting one or more cannons to the rooftop gun platform. The Dublin series of towers, built 1804-1805, is the only group constructed to defend a capital city, and is the most complete group of towers still existing in the world. The report begins with contemporary accounts of the construction and significance of the original tower at Mortella Point in Corsica from 1563-5, to the famous attack on that tower in 1794, where a single engagement involving key officers in the British military became the catalyst for a global military architectural phenomenon. However, the design of the Dublin towers is not actually based on the Mortella Point tower.
    [Show full text]
  • The Star Fort, September, 1814
    D-JLJ- UNITED STATES DEPARTHEI'irrr OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE BALTIMORE 30, MARYLAND \\St ARtftlOlOGY The .Star Fort, September, 1814 Prepared by: Dr. W. Richard Walsh Contract Historian · Georgetown University Georgetown, D.C. November, 1958 r~ , .. I . ,. .. - •• '' I• ,•' --:• ' . '·· ~ -,, .. ., . · .· .. :· .·. • , :: .:'~ .: :/ F.1 _r1 .. .J '~ l. \ '. \~ IJ li :i. /:i1('fl ---. \J .. •• 1 : ... .. .. .. ,,.. - l ~ j Table of Contents Page Frontispiece ••••••••••••••• • • • • ii I. Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 II. The Star Fort, September 12-14, 1814 • • • • • • • 7 24 III. Conclusions. • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 • • • • • • ._: I f ,\ .. i ) ~ ',...___/ Errata p .. 2, line 60 '0 indiaten should read '0 indicate.io p. 3, line 4o "war-fare" should read 10 warfareo 18 p. a, line 8. "amatuer" should read "amateur.~ p .. 7, fn. 1, line 5. "principle" should read ~principal." p. 9, line 12. "wa.tteries" should read "batteries. ~ p. 10, · line 10. Delete "which." p .. 10, line 11. "patforms" should read "platforms." p. 10, line 17. "Descius" should read "Decius." p. 13, fn. \:1 9 line 5. "Jessup" should read "Jesupn in this and all subsequent mention of the name. o. 19, line 16~ "orciinarilly" should read "ordinarily .. '° p. 26, line 5. "Carrol" should read "Carroll." p. 26, line 7. "confederates" should read "Confederates." .a- -. ( ... ~ "'·. / I Introduction In 1776, Baltimore prepared itself for. attack by the British~ Already apprehensive because of threats from the sea by His Majesty's vessel, the Otter, the Committee of Safety choose Whetstone Point as the best fortifiable site against enemy destruction to the Baltimore harbor. A fort of sorts was therefore erected, but because the threat of a general naval attack never materialized and the actual fight­ ing of the war of the Revolution by-passed Baltimoreans, a well armed Fort vVhetstone was not accomplished.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 26(1-2)
    Beaver Creek Institution Anonymous Prisoner 11 he reason I am contributing to this Dialogue on penal reform in Canada Tis because I am in my sixties and my crime was an isolated incident, resulting in a sentence for second degree murder in the 1990s. I did 15 years inside as a model prisoner and was paroled in 2008 to a halfway house. Once there, I spent two years in the community without incident and was subsequently given full parole. However, in 2013, I was revoked for a negative urine sample. I have been back inside since, incurring unnecessary costs to taxpayers as my breach did not constitute a danger or threat to the public. Prior to my incarceration, I was never a burden on society. With several skilled trades under my belt, I owned a home and business. Ever since Harper’s ‘tough on crime’ and ‘life means life’ approach to imprisonment, a lot of us Lifers were revoked with no new criminal charges and with no help from our parole offi cers. This leaves us with no light at the end of the tunnel. There should be a time limit that restricts revoking parolees who have committed no new crimes once they have completed a signifi cant portion of time under supervised release. 147 Beaver Creek Institution Anonymous Prisoners aving served more than a decade in federal penitentiaries, I have seen Hmany things change for the worse. Below, is a list of recommendations that a number of us at Beaver Creek Minimums who meet regularly to discuss how we can atone for our actions with our victims and communities compiled during one of our meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch Wars of Independence and the Republic's Golden Age C.1570-C
    The Dutch Wars of Independence and the Republic’s Golden Age c.1570-c.1680 Marjolein C. ’t Hart University of Amsterdam [email protected] 1 Contents Introduction – The Dutch Revolt, the Global Context, and the Military Revolution Interpretations of the Dutch Revolt The Military Revolution and its Societal Impact Warfare, Territorial State Formation, and Capital Accumulation About this Book Chapter 1 - The Wars: from the Dutch Revolt to ‘la Guerre de Hollande’, c. 1570-c.1680 The Dutch Revolt and the Struggle for Survival, 1570s-1580s Respite and Consolidation in the 1590s Stalemate and Truce, 1600-1621 Frederick Henry’s Counteroffensive and the Renewed Stalemate, 1620s-1640s Independence, the Stadholderless period, and the Wars with England and Munster 1672: The Year of Disaster and its Aftermath Conclusion: The Different Strategies of the Belligerents Chapter 2 – A Professional Military Force in the Making From Beggars and Landsknechts to a Standing Profeesional Army Pay, Mustering, Medical Care and the Prisoners of War Appointment of Officers and Decreasing Professionalization after 1648 Conclusion: Civilian Control over the Army Chapter 3 – The Dutch “Schoole of War”: Drill, Tactics, and Siege Warfare Increasing Standardization and the Proportion of Firearms Regular Exercises and New Formations Fortresses and Fortifications The Art of Siege Warfare Tactical Limits, Provisioning, and Army Size Conclusion: The Model of a Disciplined Army Chapter 4 – Garrisons and Civic Communities: Strengthening the Local Bonds The Difficult Start in
    [Show full text]
  • Sailing Directions (Enroute)
    PUB. 154 SAILING DIRECTIONS (ENROUTE) ★ BRITISH COLUMBIA ★ Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Bethesda, Maryland © COPYRIGHT 2007 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. 2007 TENTH EDITION For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: http://bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Preface 0.0 Pub. 154, Sailing Directions (Enroute) British Columbia, 0.0NGA Maritime Domain Website Tenth Edition, 2007, is issued for use in conjunction with Pub. http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/maritime 120, Sailing Directions (Planning Guide) Pacific Ocean and 0.0 Southeast Asia. Companion volumes are Pubs. 153, 155, 157, 0.0 Courses.—Courses are true, and are expressed in the same 158, and 159. manner as bearings. The directives “steer” and “make good” a 0.0 Digital Nautical Chart 26 provides electronic chart coverage course mean, without exception, to proceed from a point of for the area covered by this publication. origin along a track having the identical meridianal angle as the 0.0 This publication has been corrected to 21 July 2007, includ- designated course. Vessels following the directives must allow ing Notice to Mariners No. 29 of 2007. for every influence tending to cause deviation from such track, and navigate so that the designated course is continuously Explanatory Remarks being made good. 0.0 Currents.—Current directions are the true directions toward 0.0 Sailing Directions are published by the National Geospatial- which currents set.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition
    DEFINING A FOREST REFERENCE CONDITION FOR KOUCHIBOUGUAC NATIONAL PARK AND ADJACENT LANDSCAPE IN EASTERN NEW BRUNSWICK USING FOUR RECONSTRUCTIVE APPROACHES by Donna R. Crossland BScH Biology, Acadia University, 1986 BEd, St Mary's University, 1990 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Forestry in the Graduate Academic Unit of Forestry and Environmental Management Supervisor: Judy Loo, PhD, Adjunct Professor of Forestry and Environmental Management/Ecological Geneticist, Canadian Forest Service, NRCan. Examining Board: Graham Forbes, PhD, Department of Forestry and Environmental Management, Chair Antony W. Diamond, PhD, Department of Biology This thesis is accepted. Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK December 2006 © Donna Crossland, 2006 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-49667-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-49667-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats.
    [Show full text]