DOCSLIB.ORG

Health Cluster Mobile Clinic Operational Status, January 2018 Buthidaung Township, Rakhine State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Health Cluster Mobile Clinic Operational Status, January 2018 Buthidaung Township, Rakhine State Health Cluster Mobile Clinic Operational Status, January 2018 Buthidaung Township, Rakhine State 92°30'E BANGLADESH INDIA / BANGLADESH MYANMAR Paletwa !( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taungpyoletwea ! !( ! ! ! ! ! Laung Chaung ! (! ! ! CHIN STATE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! N ! Nga Yant Chaung N ' ! ! ! ' 0 # ! 0 * ! ° ! ° ! ! 1 1 2 ! ! 2 ! ! ! Bo Gyi Chaung ! ! ! (! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Chin Tha Mar ! ! Nga Kyi Tauk Daing Nat ! ! (! ! ! RAKHINE STATE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (! ! ! Gone Nar Ywar ! Ywar Ma Rakhine ! ! Tha Pyay Gone Than Chay ! ! ! Let Wea Det Nan Yar !Kone Tha Pyay! Thar ! ! ! ! Pyin Shey (Musilm) Tat Min Chaung ! ! ! ! (! ! ! ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kyauk Hpyu Taung (!( ! (! ! ! (! !(! (!! ! War Khone Chaung (NaTaLa) ! B!uthidaung Thittaw Ywar !(*# ! (! (! ! (! Myo Paw Camp ! ! Tha Yet Kin Ma Nu ! (! ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tat Yar (Rakhine) ! ! ! ! (!Da Pyu Chaung ! ! (!*# Mhone Chee ! (! (! (! Myo Ma Chaung ! (! ! ! ! Kun Taung Ywar Gyi ! Za!ydi Taung(! Gandamar (NaTaLa) (! ! ! ! ! ! Inn Gyin Myaing (NaTaLa) ! (! ! Myo Ma Zaydi Taung ! !! Ka Kyet Bet ! ! ! (! Pyin Chaung Myaung Nar(!! Maungdaw ! ! Ah Twin Hnget Thay ! ! ( ! ! !( Ah Lel Chaung ! Do! ne Thein ! (! ! !! Htan Shauk Khan ( ! ! ! ! ! ! (! Tha Yet Pyin (Rakhine) Tha Peik Taung ! ! (! ! Kin Chaung ! (! ! (! Kyar Nyo Pyin (Ku Lar) ! !! ! !( ! ! ! ! ! Kyar Nyo Pyin (Rakhine) ! ! Tha Peik Taung (! ! (! ! ! Hpon Nyo Leik ! (Rakhine) ! ! Hta! ke Tu Tauk Shit Shar Taung ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Na N!win Ku ! ! ! ( ! (!! U Yin Thar ! ! (! Pyin Shey! ! ! ! ! ( ! ! Kyauk Yant (! (!! (! San Goe Taung ! (rakhine) ! ! (! ! ! ! Nwr Yon Taung ! ! ! (! Kun Taung ! ! ! ! ! Kan Pyin ! ! ! ! ! (! ! ! ! (! ! ! ! Say Taung ! Sa! Par Htar ! ! ! (! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tha Pyay Seik ! ! ! ! ! ( Hpa Yar Pyin ! ! Nyaung Chaung ! Thaing Ta Poke (!! ! ! (! (! ! ! Kyauk Pyin Seik ! ! Thein Taung Py!in! (! ! ! ! Thar Zi (Daing Net) ! ! Kyauk Pyin Seik (! ! ! (! ! ! Legend Maung Hn!it Ma ! Set Khaw ! (!! (!! ! !( Town Pauk Taw !(!! ! ! Village 0 4 8 16 km Shore Mobile Clinic Status Village Tract Boundary Map ID: MIMU1545v01 Creation Date: 16 January 2018, A3 Township Boundary Government Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 (! Fully operational State/ Region Boundary Data Source: International Boundary Non-Government Health Cluster (Rakhine State) BASE MAP - MIMU;Boundaries - WFP,modified by MIMU 2008; N N ' *# Non operational ' 0 Main Road Place name - Ministry of Home Affair (GAD) translated by MIMU 0 3 3 ° ° 0 0 2 Map produRceadt hbye tdhea MuInMgU -!( E-mail: [email protected] 2 Website: www.themimu.info Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit 2018. May be used free of charge with attribution. 92°30'E Disclaimer: The names shown and the boundaries used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Health Cluster Mobile Clinic Operational Status, January 2018 Kyaukpyu Township, Rakhine State 93°30'E 93°45'E INDIA MYEBON TOWNSHIP / BANGLADESH MYANMAR Zai C! haung ! ! *#! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! N N ' ' 0 ! 0 3 ! 3 ° ! ° ! ! ! 9 ! 9 1 *#Tankayoe 1 ! ! ! ! *#! Thaetan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kyaukpyu ! !( ! ! ! ! *# ! ! ! Kanyintaw ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Koung Paung ! Sai Cho Don ! # ! * ! *# ! ANN TOWNSHIP ! ! ! Shout Chaung ! ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! *#! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kyat Tane Ta Yu Taung ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! *# ! ! ! Tha Phan Kha ! ! ! Gaw Du ! ! ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Thae Chaung ! ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kyaung Koe! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Legend ! ! ! ! ! Chaung Myaung ! ! *# ! Mobile Clinic Status ! ! ! ! N ! N ' ! ! ' 5 Non-Government 5 ! ! 1 ! 1 ° ° 9 9 1 ! 1 ! *# Fully operational ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !( ! ! Town ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Village ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shore ! ! ! ! ! ! Village Tract Boundary ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Township Boundary ! ! ! ! ! State/ Region Boundary ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! International Boundary ! ! ! Main Road ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 2.75 5.5 11 km ! ! Ramree Map ID: MIMU1554v01 ! ! !( ! Creation Date: 19 January 2018, A3 ! ! Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 RAMREE TOWNSHIP Data Source: Health Cluster (Rakhine State) BASE MAP - MIMU;Boundaries - WFP,modified by MIMU 2008; Place name - Ministry of Home Affair (GAD) translated by MIMU Map produced by the MIMU - E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.themimu.info Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit 2018. May be used free of charge with attribution. 93°30'E 93°45'E Disclaimer: The names shown and the boundaries used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Health Cluster Mobile Clinic Operational Status, January 2018 Kyauktaw Township, Rakhine State 93°0'E INDIA / BANGLADESH CHIN STATE MYANMAR PALETWA TOWNSHIP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! BUTHIDAUNG ! ! ! TOWNSHIP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! N N ' ! ' 0 ! 0 ° ° 1 ! 1 2 Ta Paw 2 ! ! *# ! ! ! Za Lein Taung ! ! ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Lint Zin Ywar T!hit *#! ! ! ! *#! Wea Gyi Daunt ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Leik Kan ! Khaung Toke (Ku L! ar) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! *# ! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! Yoke Thar ! *# ! ! ! ! Khaung Toke (! Rakhine) Myin Kyet *#! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! *#! ! Ni Din ! ! Tha! Yet Ta Pin ! # ! * ! ! ! Ky! auktaw !( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Le!t Saung Kauk ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RAKHINE STATE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ah Pauk Wa ! ! ! ! ! Goke Pi Htaunt (Ku Lar) ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! *#! ! ! ! ! ! *# Goke Pi Htaunt (Rakhine) MRAUK-U TOWNSHIP Pyein Chaung ! ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RATHEDAUNG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TOWNSHIP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Legend ! ! Mobile Clinic Status ! Mrauk-U Non-Government !( *# Fully operational 0 3.25 6.5 13 km PONNAGYUN TOWNSHIP !( Town Map ID: MIMU1556v01 ! Village Creation Date: 19 January 2018, A3 Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 Shore Data Source: Village Tract Boundary Health Cluster (Rakhine State) N N ' ' 0 BASE MAP - MIMU;Boundaries - WFP,modified by MIMU 2008; 0 3 Township Boundary 3 ° ° 0 0 2 Place name - Ministry of Home Affair (GAD) translated by MIMU 2 RathedSatauten/ Rgeg i!(on Boundary Map produced by the MIMU - E-mail: [email protected] International Boundary Website: www.themimu.info Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit 2018. Main Road May be used free of charge with attribution. 93°0'E Disclaimer: The names shown and the boundaries used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Health Cluster Mobile Clinic Operational Status, January 2018 Maungdaw Township, Rakhine State 92°0'E 92°30'E INDIA Cox's Bazar BANGLADESH BANGLADESH MYANMAR Aung Chan Thar PALETWA CHIN STATE Kha Maung Seik North Min Kha Maung (NaTaLa) Ta Man Thar (Parnisar Ra) Taungpyoletwea That Kaing Nyar Thin Baw Hla (Rakhine) (Thar Yar Gone) Kyein Chaung BUTHIDAUNG TOWNSHIP Gyit Chaung Laung Don Ngan Chaung N N ' ' 0 0 ° ° 1 1 2 Hpar Wat Chaung 2 RAKHINE STATE Maung Hnit Ma (Gyi) Kyauk Hlay Kar Buthidaung Maungdaw Kan Pyin Thar Si Legend Pan Taw Pyin Ywar Thit Baw Di Kone Shwe Yin Aye (NaTaLa) Kan Thar Yar Town Mobile Clinic Status Kin Chaung Shwe Ba Ho Village Government Tha Ray Kon Baung (NaTaLa) Shore Fully operational Kine Gyi (NaTaLa) Village Tract Boundary Non-Government Maw Ra Waddy (NaTaLa) Township Boundary Fully operational Maw Tu Lar State/ Region Boundary Non operational International Boundary Joint Main Road Fully operational Myin Hlut (West) 0 5 10 20 km Map ID: MIMU1542v01 RATHEDAUNG Creation Date: 16 January 2018, A3 TOWNSHIP Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 Kyauk Pan Du Data Source: Health Cluster (Rakhine State) Inn Din (Middle) Inn Din N N ' BASE MAP - MIMU;Boundaries - WFP,modified by MIMU 2008; ' 0 0 3 3 ° ° 0 Place name - Ministry of Home Affair (GAD) translated by MIMU 0 2 Rathedaung 2 Map produced by the MIMU - E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.themimu.info Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit 2018. May be used free of charge with attribution. 92°0'E 92°30'E Disclaimer: The names shown and the boundaries used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Health Cluster Mobile Clinic Operational Status, January 2018 Minbya Township, Rakhine State 93°30'E INDIA BANGLADESH / CHIN STATE MYANMAR KYAUKTAW TOWNSHIP PALETWA TOWNSHIP RAKHINE STATE ! Mrauk-U ! ! ! !( !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MRAUK-U TOWNSHIP ! MINBYA TOWNSHIP ! ! ! ! N N ' ' 0 0 3 3 ° ! ° 0 ! 0 2 Aung Taing 2 ! ! ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Thay Kan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ann Thar San Ht!oe !Tan *#! ! # * ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! Set Yone Hmaw ! *# ! ! ! *# ! ! ! ! ! *# ! ! Khaung Laung (O! l!d) ! ! ! # ! Tha Dar! * ! ! ! Khaung! !Laung (New) ! ! ! ! ! !( Minbya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ANN TOWNSHIP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! PAUKTAW TOWNSHIP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Pauktaw ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MYEBON TOWNSHIP ! ! ! ! ! Myebon !( 0 4.5 9 18 km Legend Map ID: MIMU1550v01 N N ' Creation Date: 16 January 2018, A3 ' 0 0 ° ° 0 0 2 Shore Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 2 Mobile Clinic Status Village Tract Boundary Data Source: Township Boundary Non-Government Health Cluster (Rakhine State) BASE MAP - MIMU;Boundaries - WFP,modified by MIMU 2008; State/ Region Boundary *# Fully operational Place name - Ministry of Home Affair (GAD) translated by MIMU Map produced by the MIMU - E-mail: [email protected] International Boundary !(
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rakhine State Needs Assessment September 2015
    Rakhine State Needs Assessment September 2015 This document is published by the Center for Diversity and National Harmony with the support of the United Nations Peacebuilding Fund. Publisher : Center for Diversity and National Harmony No. 11, Shweli Street, Kamayut Township, Yangon. Offset : Public ation Date : September 2015 © All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Rakhine State, one of the poorest regions in Myanmar, has been plagued by communal problems since the turn of the 20th century which, coupled with protracted underdevelopment, have kept residents in a state of dire need. This regrettable situation was compounded from 2012 to 2014, when violent communal riots between members of the Muslim and Rakhine communities erupted in various parts of the state. Since the middle of 2012, the Myanmar government, international organisations and non-governmen- tal organisations (NGOs) have been involved in providing humanitarian assistance to internally dis- placed and conflict-affected persons, undertaking development projects and conflict prevention activ- ities. Despite these efforts, tensions between the two communities remain a source of great concern, and many in the international community continue to view the Rakhine issue as the biggest stumbling block in Myanmar’s reform process. The persistence of communal tensions signaled a need to address one of the root causes of conflict: crushing poverty. However, even as various stakeholders have attempted to restore normalcy in the state, they have done so without a comprehensive needs assessment to guide them. In an attempt to fill this gap, the Center for Diversity and National Harmony (CDNH) undertook the task of developing a source of baseline information on Rakhine State, which all stakeholders can draw on when providing humanitarian and development assistance as well as when working on conflict prevention in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking Rakhine State
    REMAKING RAKHINE STATE Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Aerial photograph showing the clearance of a burnt village in northern Rakhine State (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. © Private https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 16/8018/2018 Original language: English amnesty.org INTRODUCTION Six months after the start of a brutal military campaign which forced hundreds of thousands of Rohingya women, men and children from their homes and left hundreds of Rohingya villages burned the ground, Myanmar’s authorities are remaking northern Rakhine State in their absence.1 Since October 2017, but in particular since the start of 2018, Myanmar’s authorities have embarked on a major operation to clear burned villages and to build new homes, security force bases and infrastructure in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine State
    Myanmar Information Management Unit Township Map - Rakhine State 92° E 93° E 94° E Tilin 95° E Township Myaing Yesagyo Pauk Township Township Bhutan Bangladesh Kyaukhtu !( Matupi Mindat Mindat Township India China Township Pakokku Paletwa Bangladesh Pakokku Taungtha Samee Ü Township Township !( Pauk Township Vietnam Taungpyoletwea Kanpetlet Nyaung-U !( Paletwa Saw Township Saw Township Ngathayouk !( Bagan Laos Maungdaw !( Buthidaung Seikphyu Township CHIN Township Township Nyaung-U Township Kanpetlet 21° N 21° Township MANDALAYThailand N 21° Kyauktaw Seikphyu Chauk Township Buthidaung Kyauktaw KyaukpadaungCambodia Maungdaw Chauk Township Kyaukpadaung Salin Township Mrauk-U Township Township Mrauk-U Salin Rathedaung Ponnagyun Township Township Minbya Rathedaung Sidoktaya Township Township Yenangyaung Yenangyaung Sidoktaya Township Minbya Pwintbyu Pwintbyu Ponnagyun Township Pauktaw MAGWAY Township Saku Sittwe !( Pauktaw Township Minbu Sittwe Magway Magway .! .! Township Ngape Myebon Myebon Township Minbu Township 20° N 20° Minhla N 20° Ngape Township Ann Township Ann Minhla RAKHINE Township Sinbaungwe Township Kyaukpyu Mindon Township Thayet Township Kyaukpyu Ma-Ei Mindon Township !( Bay of Bengal Ramree Kamma Township Kamma Ramree Toungup Township Township 19° N 19° N 19° Munaung Toungup Munaung Township BAGO Padaung Township Thandwe Thandwe Township Kyangin Township Myanaung Township Kyeintali !( 18° N 18° N 18° Legend ^(!_ Capital Ingapu .! State Capital Township Main Town Map ID : MIMU1264v02 Gwa !( Other Town Completion Date : 2 November 2016.A1 Township Projection/Datum : Geographic/WGS84 Major Road Data Sources :MIMU Base Map : MIMU Lemyethna Secondary Road Gwa Township Boundaries : MIMU/WFP Railroad Place Name : Ministry of Home Affairs (GAD) translated by MIMU AYEYARWADY Coast Map produced by the MIMU - [email protected] Township Boundary www.themimu.info Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit Yegyi Ngathaingchaung !( State/Region Boundary 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgments
    FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Acknowledgments Thisresearch study was led by U Kyaw Khine & Associates with the assistance of the field survey team of the FSWG members organizations. The research team would like to express sincere thanks to Dr Ohnmar Khaing (FSWG Coordinator), Dr. Min Ko Ko Maung, (Deputy Coordinator), and Mr. Thijs Wissink (Programme Advisor) for their kind and effective support for the research. The team is especially grateful to Daw Yi Yi Cho (M&E Officer) for providing logistical and technical support along with study design, data collection, analysis, and report writing. Finally, this research would not have been possible without the valuable participation and knowledge imparted by all the respondents from the villages of Pauktaw and Taungup Townships and focus group discussion (FGD) participants. The research team would like to acknowledge the experts and professors from respective institutions concerned with livestock who willingly agreed to take part in the FGDs. We are greatly indebted to them. 1 FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Ensure adequate financial and human resources to village volunteers for veterinary extension services to cover all rural areas Upgrade local pig breeds with improved variety for better genetic performance in rural livestock production Attract private sector investment to finance all livestock support infrastructure, such as cold chain, cold storage, animal feed mills, veterinary drugs, and meat and
    [Show full text]
  • MYANMAR Buthidaung, Maungdaw, and Rathedaung
    I Complex MYANMAR Æ Emergency Buthidaung, Maungdaw, and Rathedaung Townships / Rakhine State Imagery analysis: Multiple Dates | Published 18 October 2018 | Version 1.0 CE20130326MMR 92°11'0"E 92°18'0"E 92°25'0"E 92°32'0"E 92°39'0"E 92°46'0"E Thimphu NUMBER OF AFFECTED SETTLEMENTS GROUPED BY LEVEL OF DESTRUCTION ¥¦¬ Level of destruction Buthidaung Maungdaw Rathedaung Total C H I N A Less than 50% destroyed 71 59 4 134 I N D I A More than 50% destroyed 18 62 80 N N Dhaka " Completely destroyed (>90%) 7 156 15 178 " 0 ' 0 ' ¥¦¬ 5 5 2 2 ° ° 1 1 2 Hano¥¦¬i In Tu Lar 2 M YA N M A R ¥¦¬Naypyidaw Vientiane Map location ¥¦¬ T H A I L A N D N N " " 0 ' 0 ' 8 Shee Dar 8 Bangkok 1 1 ° ° 1 1 ¥¦¬ 2 2 Phnom Penh ¥¦¬ Ah Shey Kha Maung Seik Nan Yar Kaing (NaTaLa) Nga/Myin Baw Ku Lar N N " " 0 ' 0 Hpon Thi Laung Boke ' 1 1 Affected settlements in 1 1 ° ° 1 1 2 Buthidaung, Maungdaw, and Mu Hti Pa Da Kar Taung 2 Rathedaung Townships of Pa Da Kar Ywar Thit Min Gyi (Ku Lar) Wet Kyein Rakhine State in Myanmar Pe Lun Kha Mway Saung Paing Nyar This map illustrates areas of satellite-detected destroyed or otherwise damaged settlements Goke Pi N N " " 0 ' 0 ' in Buthidaung, Maungdaw, and Rathedaung 4 See inset for close-up view 4 ° ° 1 1 2 Townships in Northern Rakhine State in of destroyed structures 2 Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine Operational Brief WFP Myanmar
    Rakhine Operational Brief WFP Myanmar OVERVIEW Rakhine State is located in the western part of Myanmar, bordering with Chin State in the north, Magway, Bago and Ayeyarwaddy Regions in the east, Bay of Bengal to the west and Chittagong Division of Bangladesh to the northwest. It is one of the most remote and second poorest state in Myanmar, geographically separated from the rest of the country by mountains. The estimated population of Rakhine State is 3.2 million. Chronic poverty and high vulnerability to shocks are widespread throughout the State. Acute malnutrition remains a concern in Rakhine. The food security situation is particularly critical in Buthidaung and Maungdaw townships with 15.1 percent and 19 percent prevalence of global acute malnutrition (GAM) among children 6-59 months respectively. Meanwhile the prevalence of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is 2 percent and 3.9 percent - above WHO critical emergency thresholds. The prevalence of GAM in Sittwe rural and urban IDP camps is 8.6 percent and 8.5 percent whereas the SAM prevalence is 1.3 percent and 0.6 percent. The existing malnutrition has been exacerbated by the 2015 nationwide floods as a Multi-sector Initial Rapid Assessment (MIRA) reported that 22 percent of assessed villages in Rakhine having nutrition problems with feeding children under 2. Moreover, WFP and FAO’s joint Crops and Food Security Assessment Mission in December 2015 predicted the likelihood of severe food shortage particularly in hardest hit areas of Rakhine. WFP is the main humanitarian organization providing uninterrupted food assistance in Rakhine. Its first PARTNERSHIPS operation in Myanmar commenced in 1978 in northern Rakhine, following the return of 200,000 refugees from Government Counterpart Bangladesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament-Elect, Myanmar/Burma
    To: Hon. Mr. Ban Ki-moon Secretary-General United Nations From: Members of Parliament-Elect, Myanmar/Burma CC: Mr. B. Lynn Pascoe, Under-Secretary-General, United Nations Mr. Ibrahim Gambari, Under-Secretary-General and Special Adviser to the Secretary- General on Myanmar/Burma Permanent Representatives to the United Nations of the five Permanent Members (China, Russia, France, United Kingdom and the United states) of the UN Security Council U Aung Shwe, Chairman, National League for Democracy Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, General Secretary, National League for Democracy U Aye Thar Aung, Secretary, Committee Representing the Peoples' Parliament (CRPP) Veteran Politicians The 88 Generation Students Date: 1 August 2007 Re: National Reconciliation and Democratization in Myanmar/Burma Dear Excellency, We note that you have issued a statement on 18 July 2007, in which you urged the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) (the ruling military government of Myanmar/Burma) to "seize this opportunity to ensure that this and subsequent steps in Myanmar's political roadmap are as inclusive, participatory and transparent as possible, with a view to allowing all the relevant parties to Myanmar's national reconciliation process to fully contribute to defining their country's future."1 We thank you for your strong and personal involvement in Myanmar/Burma and we expect that your good offices mandate to facilitating national reconciliation in Myanmar/Burma would be successful. We, Members of Parliament elected by the people of Myanmar/Burma in the 1990 general elections, also would like to assure you that we will fully cooperate with your good offices and the United Nations in our effort to solve problems in Myanmar/Burma peacefully through a meaningful, inclusive and transparent dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine State – Nutrition Information Analysis
    RAKHINE STATE – NUTRITION INFORMATION ANALYSIS January – December 2014 INTRODUCTION The Rakhine state nutrition response aims to achieve 4 key objectives: Sector objectives 1. To reduce malnutrition-related deaths in girls and boys under-5 by ensuring access to quality life-saving interventions for management of acute malnutrition, guided by global standards; 2. Ensure access to key preventive nutrition services routinely provided by Government; 3. Ensure enhanced monitoring and analysis of nutrition situation, needs, and evolving vulnerabilities; 4. Improve cross sector and actor collaboration to address underlying factors of malnutrition. This report addresses the first and second objectives for which the sector is able to obtain information regularly though the Nutrition Information Systems (NIS) and monitor indicators on a monthly basis; Outcome level indicators 1. Percentage of girls and boys CURED of acute malnutrition 2. Percentage of girls and boys with acute malnutrition who DIED 3. Percentage of children under 5 years provided with vitamin A and deworming treatment routinely provided by government 4. Percentage of affected women provided with skilled breastfeeding counselling Activities Active and passive screening of children 6-59 months for acute malnutrition Treatment of severe and moderate acute malnutrition in children 6-59 months through provision of ready-to-use therapeutic or supplementary food, routine medicines, medical consultation and counselling for cases of severe acute malnutrition with infant and young child feeding support Micronutrient prevention and control (children/ PLW) Vitamin A supplementation and deworming Blanket supplementary feeding (children/ PLW) Organizations involved in response DoH, ACF, MHAA, SCI, UNICEF, WFP, MNMA Rakhine State nutrition information December 2014 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • PPWG Assessment – Burma/Myanmar Conflict Prepared for the United States Atrocity Early Warning Task Force
    PPWG Assessment – Burma/Myanmar Conflict Prepared for the United States Atrocity Early Warning Task Force Conflict Background The government of Myanmar is split between the military-controlled ministries run by the Tatmadaw, who derive extensive power from political leverage, military force, and economic interests, and the civilian government currently led by the National League for Democracy (NLD), which struggles to exert influence over the military. Since 2015, Tatmadaw clashes with ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) and non-state armed actors created mass instability in Kachin, Shan, Chin, Karen, Kayin, and Rakhine states. Deeply rooted ethnic, religious, and social demarcations in Myanmar’s society layer the country with division. Under the military regime and continuing to this day, there have been devastating and widespread human rights abuses against minority populations in Myanmar. The acute violence against Rohingya people in Rakhine state in August and September 2017 were “unprecedented in terms of volume and speed” displacing more than 700,000 Rohingya people into neighboring Bangladesh. Current Situational Assessment In the months following the 2017 surge in violence against Rohingya, similar operations by the Tatmadaw in Shan, Kachin, Karen, Rakhine, and others have followed. As mentioned in previous assessments, we warned that violence would increase in conflict-affected areas ahead of the November elections. This has proven true. Violence has steadily escalated in Rakhine state. In late June, the Tatmadaw declared they
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Rome Statute
    ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 1/146 RH PT Cour Penale (/\Tl\) _ni _t_e__r an _t_oi _n_a_l_e �i��------------------ ----- International �� �d? Crimi nal Court Original: English No.: ICC-01/19 Date: 4 July 2019 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia, Presiding Judge Judge Robert Fremr Judge Geoffrey Henderson SITUATION IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH / REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR PUBLIC With Confidential EX PARTE Annexes 1, 5, 7 and 8, and Public Annexes 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10 Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15 Source: Office of the Prosecutor ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 2/146 RH PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Ms Fatou Bensouda Mr James Stewart Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Counsel Support Section Mr Peter Lewis Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section Victims Participation and Reparations Other Section Mr Philipp Ambach No. ICC-01/19 2/146 4 July 2019 ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 3/146 RH PT CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 II. LEVEL OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND REQUESTED PROCEDURE .................... 8 III. PROCEDURAL
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Risk Assessment for Fisheries and Aquaculture Based Adaptation in Myanmar
    ######################################################### Climate risk assessment for fisheries and aquaculture based adaptation in Myanmar Prepared By: Mark Dubois, Kimio Leemans, Michael Akester, Shwu Jiau Teoh, Bethany Smith, Hsu Mon Aung, Tinzar Win Pyae Kyaw, May Hsu Mon Soe & KuMuDara Win Maung Table of Content Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 Fisheries in Myanmar: A Brief Overview ............................................................................................ 1 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................................. 2 Overview of the Climate Based Risk Assessment Within Myanmar ................................................. 3 Ayeyarwady Region ......................................................................................................................... 5 Yangon Region ................................................................................................................................. 6 Rakhine State ................................................................................................................................... 7 The 2014 IPCC Risk Assessment Framework ...................................................................................... 8 Methodology .........................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • “Pre-Election Monitoring Study in Rakhine State”
    “Pre-Election Monitoring Study in Rakhine State” Table of Contents KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 5 1.1. POLITICAL PARTY LANDSCAPE IN RAKHINE STATE............................................................................ 7 1.2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS .............................................................. 8 1.3. ELECTORAL SYSTEM IN MYANMAR ................................................................................................. 10 2. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY ..................................................................................... 11 1. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1. SAMPLING ...................................................................................................................................... 11 1.2. RESEARCH PROCESS ........................................................................................................................ 12 1.3. LIMITATION OF STUDY .................................................................................................................... 12 2. FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]