DOCSLIB.ORG

LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting 6717150 Alaska Arctic Floodplain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting 6717150 Alaska Arctic Floodplain LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting 6717150 Alaska Arctic Floodplain This BPS is lumped with: This BPS is split into multiple models: General Information Contributors (also see the Comments field Date 10/8/2008 Modeler 1 Kori Blankenship [email protected] Reviewer Janet Jorgenson Janet_Jorgenson@fws .gov Modeler 2 Keith Boggs [email protected] Reviewer Modeler 3 Reviewer Vegetation Type Map Zone Model Zone Wetlands/Riparian 67 Alaska N-Cent.Rockies California Pacific Northwest Dominant Species* General Model Sources Great Basin South Central Literature SAAL DRIN4 Great Lakes Southeast Local Data SARI4 CHLA13 Northeast S. Appalachians SAGL LUPIN Expert Estimate Northern Plains Southwest SAPU15 POBA2 Geographic Range This BpS is found on floodplains throughout the Arctic region of AK. It includes all floodplains except those associated with the Yukon and Kuskokwim rivers. Biophysical Site Description This system includes active and inactive glacially- and non-glacially-fed floodplains. It is mosaiced with various wetland systems but these are modeled separately. The rivers are typically braided, and the floodplain terraces may be short-lived (<100yrs) or last for more than a 1,000yrs (Boggs et al. 2008). Soils develop on alluvium and are typically shallow and well-drained; barren alluvium is common (Boggs et al. 2008). Permafrost is usually present on the North Slope but may be absent elsewhere. Vegetation Description The following information was taken from the draft Arctic Ecological Systems description (Boggs et al. 2008): Common existing vegetation types include: mesic herbaceous, low-tall willow, Dryas, dwarf shrub, and patches of Populus balsamifera or Betula papyrifera. Herbaceous species include Chamerion latifolium and Lupinus spp. Common willows include Salix alaxensis, Salix richardsonii (= Salix lanata), Salix glauca and Salix pulchra. Dryas integrifolia dominates the Dryas existing vegetation type, but other species may also be common such as Lupinus spp., Cassiope tetragona, Vaccinium uliginosum, Salix spp. and Arctostaphylos rubra. The tall-low willow class may be absent at higher elevations. Disturbance Description Floodplain succession begins with herbaceous or shrub species colonizing bare ground after a flood. Dryas or poplar and paper birch patches can eventually develop. Experts at the arctic meeting disagreed about how to treat dryas for BpS modeling. Some felt that dryas may take hundreds of years to develop and *Dominant Species are from the NRCS PLANTS database. To check a species code, please visit http://plants.usda.gov. **Fire Regime Groups are: I: 0-35 year frequency, surface severity; II: 0-35 year frequency, replacement severity; III: 35-100+ year frequency, mixed severity; IV: 35-100+ year frequency, replacement severity; V: 200+ year frequency, replacement severity. Tuesday, December 29, 2009 Page 99 of 102 would therefore be treated as a separate system outside of the floodplain. Others felt that dryas could develop more quickly and could be modeled as part of floodplain succession. This model takes the later approach. Frequent river channel migration and associated flooding are the major disturbances affecting this type. Adjacency or Identification Concerns Wetlands systems are mosaiced with this system but modeled separately. Floodplains occur adjacent to most other systems that occur in the arctic. Native Uncharacteristic Conditions Scale Description Linear. Issues/Problems This model should also contain a separate early seral bare ground phase but this is not included because LANDFIRE does not map barren seral stages. Input from experts at the Arctic Modeling Meeting (April 08) indicated that on the North Slope the low- tall willow stage can persist for 300 years and then might succeed to dryas/dwarf shrub. A separate model would be required to capture this dynamic. This model contains two later seral endpoints: forest (Populus balsamifera or Betula papyrifera) or dryas. In reality some areas will likely succeed to dryas whereas other sites will succeed to the forested stage. This could be accounted for by creating separate models but a clear geographic distinction would have to be made for where each model would apply. It is recommended that this be evaluated for future modeling efforts. Comments This model was based on input from the experts who attended the LANDFIRE Fairbanks Arctic (April 08) modeling meeting and refined by Kori Blankenship and Keith Boggs. Minor edits were made to the description as a result of review comments. Vegetation Classes Class A 20 % Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Min Max Early Development 1 All Structures Cover Herbaceous Herbaceous Upper Layer Lifeform Indicator Species* and Height Herbaceous Herbaceous Canopy Position Herbaceous Tree Size Class None Shrub CHLA13 Upper Tree LUPIN Upper Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. Description 0-5yrs Herbaceous vegetation colonizes bare ground after a flood. This class succeeds to class B. Flooding (probability = 0.05) resets the age of this class. *Dominant Species are from the NRCS PLANTS database. To check a species code, please visit http://plants.usda.gov. **Fire Regime Groups are: I: 0-35 year frequency, surface severity; II: 0-35 year frequency, replacement severity; III: 35-100+ year frequency, mixed severity; IV: 35-100+ year frequency, replacement severity; V: 200+ year frequency, replacement severity. Tuesday, December 29, 2009 Page 100 of 102 Class B 65 % Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Min Max Mid Development 1 All Structures Cover Open Shrub (25-74% shrub cover) Closed Shrub (> 75% shrub cover) Upper Layer Lifeform Indicator Species* and Height Low Shrub (20cm to 1.5m) Tall Shrub (>1.5m) Herbaceous Canopy Position Tree Size Class None Shrub SAAL Upper Tree SARI4 Upper Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. SAGL Upper SAPU15 Upper Description 1-99yrs Low and tall shrubs gain dominance (succession from class A) or colonize bare ground after a flood. This stage should start at age zero but LANDFIRE rules only allow one seral stage to start at age zero; therefore, for modeling purposes it starts at age one year. On colder sites, this class is more likely to succeed to the dryas stage (class D). This class may be absent at higher elevations (Boggs et al. 2008). This class can succeed to class D or follows an alternate succession pathway (probability = 0.001) to class C. Flooding (probability = 0.05) causes a transition to class A. Class C 10 % Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Min Max Late Development 1 Closed Cover Open (25-59% tree cover) Closed (60-100% tree cover) Upper Layer Lifeform Indicator Species* and Height Tree (> 3m) Tree (> 3m) Herbaceous Canopy Position Tree Size Class Pole 5–9" (swd)/5–11" (hwd) Shrub POBA2 Upper Tree BEPA Upper Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. Description 20yrs+ Closed patches of Populus balsamifera or Betula papyrifera may occur in some areas as a later seral stage within the floodplain but their presence will diminish closer to the coast. This class may persist in the absence of disturbance. Flooding (probability = 0.01) causes a transition to class A. Class D 5 % Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Late Development 2 All Structures Min Max Cover Open Shrub (25-74% shrub cover) Open Shrub (25-74% shrub cover) Upper Layer Lifeform Indicator Species* and Height Dwarf Shrub (< 20 cm) Dwarf Shrub (< 20 cm) Canopy Position Herbaceous Tree Size Class None Shrub DRIN4 Upper Tree SALIX Upper Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. CATE11 Upper VAUL Upper *Dominant Species are from the NRCS PLANTS database. To check a species code, please visit http://plants.usda.gov. **Fire Regime Groups are: I: 0-35 year frequency, surface severity; II: 0-35 year frequency, replacement severity; III: 35-100+ year frequency, mixed severity; IV: 35-100+ year frequency, replacement severity; V: 200+ year frequency, replacement severity. Tuesday, December 29, 2009 Page 101 of 102 Description 100yrs+ Dryas dwarf shrubs are a likely late seral stage within the floodplain, especially on sites that are too cold to support trees. Dryas will take longer to develop than the poplar or birch patches (class C) but the age range on this class is uncertain and probably highly variable. This class persists in the absence of disturbance. Flooding (probability = 0.01) causes a transition to class A. Class E 0 % Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Min Max [Not Used] [Not Used] Cover Upper Layer Lifeform Indicator Species* and Height Canopy Position Herbaceous Tree Size Class Shrub Tree Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. Description Disturbances Fire Intervals Fire Regime Group**: NA Avg FI Min FI Max FI Probability Percent of All Fires Replacement Historical Fire Size (acres) Mixed Avg 0 Surface Min 0 All Fires Max 0 Fire Intervals (FI): Fire interval is expressed in years for each fire severity class and for all types of fire Sources of Fire Regime Data combined (All Fires). Average FI is central tendency modeled. Minimum and Literature maximum show the relative range of fire intervals, if known. Probability is the inverse of fire interval in years and is used in reference condition modeling. Percent of all Local Data fires is the percent of all fires in that severity class. Expert Estimate Additional Disturbances Modeled Insects/Disease Native Grazing Other (optional 1) Flooding Wind/Weather/Stress Competition Other (optional 2) References Boggs et al. 2008. International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications. Draft Ecological Systems Description for the Alaska Arctic Region. *Dominant Species are from the NRCS PLANTS database. To check a species code, please visit http://plants.usda.gov. **Fire Regime Groups are: I: 0-35 year frequency, surface severity; II: 0-35 year frequency, replacement severity; III: 35-100+ year frequency, mixed severity; IV: 35-100+ year frequency, replacement severity; V: 200+ year frequency, replacement severity. Tuesday, December 29, 2009 Page 102 of 102.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Willows of Interior Alaska
    1 Willows of Interior Alaska Dominique M. Collet US Fish and Wildlife Service 2004 2 Willows of Interior Alaska Acknowledgements The development of this willow guide has been made possible thanks to funding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge - order 70181-12-M692. Funding for printing was made available through a collaborative partnership of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Alaska, Department of Defense; Pacific North- west Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture; National Park Service, and Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; and Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. The data for the distribution maps were provided by George Argus, Al Batten, Garry Davies, Rob deVelice, and Carolyn Parker. Carol Griswold, George Argus, Les Viereck and Delia Person provided much improvement to the manuscript by their careful editing and suggestions. I want to thank Delia Person, of the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, for initiating and following through with the development and printing of this guide. Most of all, I am especially grateful to Pamela Houston whose support made the writing of this guide possible. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author. Disclaimer This publication is designed to provide accurate information on willows from interior Alaska. If expert knowledge is required, services of an experienced botanist should be sought. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 • Principles of Conserving the Arctic's Biodiversity
    Chapter 10 Principles of Conserving the Arctic’s Biodiversity Lead Author Michael B. Usher Contributing Authors Terry V.Callaghan, Grant Gilchrist, Bill Heal, Glenn P.Juday, Harald Loeng, Magdalena A. K. Muir, Pål Prestrud Contents Summary . .540 10.1. Introduction . .540 10.2. Conservation of arctic ecosystems and species . .543 10.2.1. Marine environments . .544 10.2.2. Freshwater environments . .546 10.2.3. Environments north of the treeline . .548 10.2.4. Boreal forest environments . .551 10.2.5. Human-modified habitats . .554 10.2.6. Conservation of arctic species . .556 10.2.7. Incorporating traditional knowledge . .558 10.2.8. Implications for biodiversity conservation . .559 10.3. Human impacts on the biodiversity of the Arctic . .560 10.3.1. Exploitation of populations . .560 10.3.2. Management of land and water . .562 10.3.3. Pollution . .564 10.3.4. Development pressures . .566 10.4. Effects of climate change on the biodiversity of the Arctic . .567 10.4.1. Changes in distribution ranges . .568 10.4.2. Changes in the extent of arctic habitats . .570 10.4.3. Changes in the abundance of arctic species . .571 10.4.4. Changes in genetic diversity . .572 10.4.5. Effects on migratory species and their management . .574 10.4.6. Effects caused by non-native species and their management .575 10.4.7. Effects on the management of protected areas . .577 10.4.8. Conserving the Arctic’s changing biodiversity . .579 10.5. Managing biodiversity conservation in a changing environment . .579 10.5.1. Documenting the current biodiversity . .580 10.5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vegetative Key to the Willows of Colorado© by Gwen Kittel
    A Vegetative Key to the Willows of Colorado© By Gwen Kittel (March 6, 2016) This key uses only vegetative characteristics that are mature (or fully expanded). As The characteristics of willows are highly variable, be sure to look at several leaves and twigs on one shrub to get an overall feel (an average) for the size, shape and color. Leaf characteristics and measurements refer to the leaf blade only, unless otherwise noted. Ignore stipules (paired bracts at the base of leaf petioles) and leaves of sucker shoots (unusually large). Stipules occur on most Salix species, are very temporary and do not aid in distinguishing among them. Sucker shoots are vigorous, non-flowering twigs that grow from the base of the shrub, and can have really huge leaves, far beyond the parameters listed here. While this key is based only on vegetative characters, distinguishing catkin characteristics are occasionally noted. Two catkin characteristics are useful even when the catkin is over mature: the stipe length and the catkin length. I often find catkins late in the season still dangling on the shrub, or lying on the ground underneath the shrub. Key to Groups 1. Trees. Either large shade trees or at least tall, large diameter single trunk (occasionally split into two or more) up 30 feet (10 meters) in height, generally at lower elevations on the eastern plains and western valleys. ............................................................................................... Group A 1. Shrubs. Usually multi-stemmed, if single trunk than diameter not more than 10 inches (5 cm). Height from less than 10 cm creeping on the ground to large shrubs of stream banks and floodplains, up to 15 feet (5 meters) tall .........................................................................................2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • George Argus
    Skvortsovia: 1(2): 99–111 (2014) Skvortsovia ISSN 2309-6497 (Print) Copyright: © 2014 Russian Academy of Sciences http://skvortsovia.uran.ru/ ISSN 2309-6500 (Online) Editorial George W. Argus, salicologist for life Irina Belyaeva1,2* and Keith Chamberlain3 1 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW9 3AE, UK 2 Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch: Institute Botanic Garden, 8 Marta, 202A, 620144, Yekaterinburg, Russia 3 Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Published on line: 30 April 2014 This April saw the 85th birthday of one of the world’s greatest salicologists, George W. Argus. Despite having retired, officially, almost 20 years ago he continues his scientific research, editorial work and the identification of specimens at the Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa where he is Professor and Curator Emeritus. He also runs workshops on the identification of willows anywhere that he is invited to do so. However, he did not start his career as a botanist, having studied engineering at Valparaiso University, Indiana, and subsequently worked as a labourer on the Alaskan Railroad and a lineman’s assistant in the Alaskan gold mines. It was in this special environment of mountains and glaciers that he Ottawa, local field trip, 2006 developed a lifelong interest in natural history, especially in geology and palaeontology and completed his undergraduate degree at the University of Alaska in biology and geology in 1952. After a brief spell as a surveyor on the Juneau Icefield Research Project George entered the US army as an instructor in arctic techniques. He was a founder of the Alaska Alpine Club and while he was in the army, in April, 1954, George joined with three others in an expedition to climb Mount McKinley (Denali) in what was to become an impressive story of survival in extreme conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting 6817130 Alaska Arctic Active Inland Dune
    LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting 6817130 Alaska Arctic Active Inland Dune This BPS is lumped with: This BPS is split into multiple models: General Information Contributors (also see the Comments field Date 6/4/2008 Modeler 1 Kori Blankenship [email protected] Reviewer Janet Jorgenson Janet_Jorgenson@fws .gov Modeler 2 Keith Boggs [email protected] Reviewer Modeler 3 Reviewer Vegetation Type Map Zone Model Zone Barren 68 Alaska N-Cent.Rockies California Pacific Northwest Dominant Species* General Model Sources Great Basin South Central Literature SAGL BRINP Great Lakes Southeast Local Data SAAL LEMO8 Northeast S. Appalachians SANI10 CHLA13 Expert Estimate Northern Plains Southwest SARI4 CAOB4 Geographic Range Active Inland Dunes are a minor but widespread system across the Alaskan arctic and boreal forest regions. It occurs from the Bristol Bay lowlands in southwestern AK to the North Slope on the Arctic Ocean. It also occurs in the Alaskan boreal region as isolated features. Some of the most noteworthy active areas are the Kobuk Dunes in western AK and the Carcross Dunes in the southern Yukon. Biophysical Site Description The following information was taken from the draft Arctic and Boreal Ecological Systems descriptions with minor modifications (Boggs et al. 2008, Boucher et al. 2008): Active inland dunes occur as remnants of a larger system of dunes and sand sheets that developed under the climatic conditions of the late Pleistocene. Strong storm winds carried glacio-fluvial silts and sands across vast areas of northwestern North America. Most of these sand deposits have been stabilized by forest and tundra vegetation, but areas of active transport and deposition still exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Height and Growth Rings of Salix Lanata Ssp. Richardsonii Along the Coastal Temperature Gradient of Northern Alaska
    Height and growth rings of Salix lanata ssp. richardsonii along the coastal temperature gradient of northern Alaska D. A. WALKER Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, UniversiQ of Colorado, Boulder, CO, U.S.A. 80309 Received March 14, 1986 WALKER,D. A. 1987. Height and growth rings of Salix lanata ssp. richardsonii along the coastal temperature gradient of northern Alaska. Can. J. Bot. 65: 988-993. Salix lanata ssp. richardsonii from open-tundra and streamside populations were studied at seven sites along a 100-km north-south transect following the Sagavanirktok River from the Alaskan arctic coast to the foothills of the Brooks Range. Mean July temperatures along this transect vary from 2.6 at the coast to 10°C at the base of the foothills. Mean maximum heights of the sampled open-tundra willows increased from 10 + 2 at the coast to 37 + 8 cm at the southern end of the transect. Mean maximum heights of sampled streamside willows increased from 0 at the coast to 147 i 25 cm. The mean maximum height of willows in both habitats showed very strong correlations with thawing degree-days. Mean growth-ring widths increased from 92 + 20 at the coast to 188 i 57 pm at the southern end of the transect and were also highly correlated with the temperature gradient. The results are discussed in light of other arctic studies of willow growth rings and Cantlon's system of vegetation subdivisions within the Alaskan arctic. WALKER,D. A. 1987. Height and growth rings of Salix lanata ssp. richardsonii along the coastal temperature gradient of northern Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Willows of Southcentral Alaska
    1 Willows of Southcentral Alaska Dominique M. Collet Kenai Watershed Forum 2002 2 Willows of Southcentral Alaska Acknowledgements The development of this willow guide has been made possible thanks to funding from the Cook Inlet Coastal Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service– Grant 70181-1-G092. Additional funding for printing was made available through a collabo- rative partnership of the US Forest Service, the Alaska Department of Transpor- tation, the Plant Materials Center of the Alaska Department of natural Re- sources, the Kenai Peninsula Borough through the Coastal Impact Assistance Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Alaska Native Plant Society. Many individuals have contributed to this guide. Special thanks go to John DeLapp (USFWS) for his support from the beginning of the project, Robert Lipkin (Alaska Natural Heritage Program) who helped initiate and define the project, Robert Ruffner (Kenai Watershed Forum) for his administrative support, George Argus, who has been the leading teacher and mentor to the author, and numerous willow students in Alaska. Suggestions and editing notes from Ed Berg, Kelley Shea, and Pauline Simmons provided much improvement to the original manuscript. Field-testing was expedited through the assistance of John Mohorchich of the Kenai River Center, where numerous landowners and contractors seek assistance with revegetation projects. The data for the distributions maps were provided by George Argus, Al Batten, Garry Davies, Rob deVelice, Mike Gracz, Carolyn Parker, and Mike Tetreau. Special thanks go to Roy Baldwin for his information on diamond willows. Most of all, I am especially grateful to Pamela Houston, whose support made the writing of this guide possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty of the Most Thermophilous Vascular Plant Species in Svalbard and Their Conservation State
    Twenty of the most thermophilous vascular plant species in Svalbard and their conservation state Torstein Engelskjøn, Leidulf Lund & Inger Greve Alsos An aim for conservation in Norway is preserving the Svalbard archi- pelago as one of the least disturbed areas in the Arctic. Information on local distribution, population sizes and ecology is summarized for 20 thermophilous vascular plant species. The need for conservation of north- ern, marginal populations in Svalbard is reviewed, using World Conser- vation Union categories and criteria at a regional scale. Thirteen species reach their northernmost distribution in Svalbard, the remaining seven in the western Arctic. Nine species have 1 - 8 populations in Svalbard and are assigned to Red List categories endangered or critically endangered: Campanula rotundifolia, Euphrasia frigida, Juncus castaneus, Kobresia simpliciuscula, Rubus chamaemorus, Alchemilla glomerulans, Ranuncu- lus wilanderi, Salix lanata and Vaccinium uliginosum, the last four spe- cies needing immediate protective measures. Five species are classifi ed as vulnerable: Betula nana, Carex marina ssp. pseudolagopina, Luzula wahlenbergii, Ranunculus arcticus and Ranunculus pallasii. Six species are considered at lower risk: Calamagrostis stricta, Empetrum nigrum ssp. hermaphroditum, Hippuris vulgaris (only occurring on Bjørnøya), Juncus triglumis, Ranunculus lapponicus and Rhodiola rosea. The warmer Inner Arctic Fjord Zone of Spitsbergen supports most of the 20 target species and is of particular importance for conservation. Endan- gered or vulnerable species were found in a variety of edaphic conditions; thus, several kinds of habitats need protection. T. Engelskjøn, I. G. Alsos, Tromsø Museum, University of Tromsø, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway, torstein@ tmu.uit.no; L. Lund, Phytotron, University of Tromsø, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta Mundi
    A journal of world insect systematics INSECTA MUNDI 0788 The psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea) of Florida: newly established and rarely collected taxa and checklist Susan E. Halbert Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, P.O. Box 147100, Gainesville, Florida 32614-7100 USA Daniel Burckhardt Naturhistorisches Museum, Augustinergasse 2, 4001 Basel, Switzerland Date of issue: September 25, 2020 Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc., Gainesville, FL Halbert SE, Burckhardt D. 2020. The psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea) of Florida: newly established and rarely collected taxa and checklist. Insecta Mundi 0788: 1–88. Published on September 25, 2020 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P.O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 USA http://centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non- marine arthropod. Topics considered for publication include systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, checklists, faunal works, and natural history. Insecta Mundi will not consider works in the applied sciences (i.e. medi- cal entomology, pest control research, etc.), and no longer publishes book reviews or editorials. Insecta Mundi publishes original research or discoveries in an inexpensive and timely manner, distributing them free via open access on the internet on the date of publication. Insecta Mundi is referenced or abstracted by several sources, including the Zoological Record and CAB Abstracts. Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, with completed manuscripts assigned an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are reviewed by the editorial board to ensure quality. One author of each submitted manuscript must be a current member of the Center for Systematic Entomology.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrub Expansion Student Guide
    Changing Landscapes Shrub Expansion High School Guide REACH Up Raising Educational Achievement through Cultural Heritage Up Changing Landscapes How does climate change impact the landscape? The climate in the Bering Strait region of western Alaska is warming. Increasing temperatures change the landscape in a variety of ways. Landscape changes impact local ecosystems and ways of life for local residents. What are these changes? What processes cause them? How do these changes impact Bering Strait communities? Bering Strait, Alaska Shrub Expansion One of the frequently discussed impacts of climate change is shrub expansion. It has been referred to as the “greening of the Arctic”. Elders and scientists alike have observed changes in vegetation on the tundra; plants such as spruce trees and tall willow shrubs have grown up in areas where previously only short plants such as blueberries and Labrador tea were found. Scientists have documented these changes using repeat photography. Photo Credit: Charles Sheldon (1908), Willie Karidis (2008), Denali National Park REACH Up ©2017 K-12 Outreach, UAF 1 Impacts of Shrub Expansion Moose on the Move Like many environmental changes, shrub expansion brings both benefits and concerns. Taller shrubs decrease visibility, which changes the way people hunt and gather berries. As the vegetation in an area changes, the animal populations will change too. In recent history, moose have extended their range north. The map below shows the dates when established moose populations were documented in new areas. Image credit: Ken D. Tape, et al. “Range Expansion of Moose in Arctic Alaska Linked to Warming and Increased Shrub Habitat”. Public Library of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Loamy Flood Plains (131B 100)
    Loamy Wet High Flood Plains (M135A_156) Ecoregion Classification Section: Alaska Mountains (M135A) Subsection(s): Lowland Flood Plains & Terraces & Fans (M135A.V1L) Physiographic Features RV Range Elevation (meters): 636 493 to 865 Slope Gradient (percent): 1 0 to 4 Aspect (clockwise direction): non-influencing Landform: flood plains on alluvial fans Frequency Duration Beginning Month Ending Month Flooding: Occasional Brief May Sep Ponding: None Climatic Features RV Range Annual Precipitation (millimeters): 589 344 to 923 Annual Air Temperature (°C): -3.1 -6.0 to -2.1 Frost Free Days: 70 60 to 80 Soil Features Parent Materials: sandy and silty alluvium over sandy and gravelly alluvium Rooting Depth (cm): RV: 23 Range: 16 to 33 Soil Layers and Properties within Representative Rooting Depth: Layers are described from the surface downward. If more than one texture is listed, the predominant texture is listed first. AWC = available water capacity. CEC = cation exchange capacity. Thickness Texture Permeability AWC pH Effective CEC CEC (cm) (cm/cm) (me/100g) (me/100g) 4 moderately decomposed plant moderately rapid .34 6.4 30 material 19 stratified fine sand to silt moderate .15 6.8 20 Restrictive Features: strongly contrasting textural stratification at 33 cm Water Table (May to September): 0 to 60 cm Drainage Class: very poorly drained Vegetation Features Common Vegetation Types: Vegetation Type Ecological Status White spruce/Richardson willow/horsetail woodland Climax plant community Ecological Status-Transition Description: A single plant community with white spruce/Richardson willow/horsetail woodland is identified on this site. Flooding is considered a transitional pathway between this site and other geographically associated sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin, Volume 53 (1993)
    Tree-Ring Bulletin, Volume 53 (1993) Item Type Article Publisher Tree-Ring Society Journal Tree-Ring Bulletin Rights Copyright © Tree-Ring Society. All rights reserved. Download date 28/09/2021 15:30:30 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/263019 TREE -RING BULLETIN 1993 PUBLISHED BY THE TREE RING SOCIETY with the cooperation of THE LABORATORY OF TREE -RING RESEARCH THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA® Printed in 1995 TREE -RING BULLETIN EDITORIAL POLICY The Tree -Ring Bulletin is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees, and the application of tree -ring studies to problems in a wide variety of fields, including but not limit- ed to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or sub- ject oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication. Two categories of manuscripts are considered. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double- spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees.Research Reports, which normally are not reviewed, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well- documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Papers are published only in English, but abstracts of Articles appear in at least two addi- tional languages. Contributors are encouraged to include German and/or French translations of the abstracts with their manuscripts. Abstracts in other languages may be printed if sup- plied by the author(s) with English translations.
    [Show full text]