Submitter 297 Heritage Taranaki
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Submitter 297 Heritage Taranaki Inc Provision Sub No/ Position Summary of Submission Decision Request Point No EW / Policies / EW-P4 297.43 Support The Policy EW-P4 (avoids adverse effects on archaeological sites and sites Retain Policy EW-P4 as notified. and areas of significance to Māori) is supported. HC / Strategic Objectives / 297.41 Support Supports Strategic Direction - Historic and Cultural Objective HC-1 Retain Strategic Direction - Historic and Cultural Objective HC-1 as notified. HC-1 (Heritage and cultural values contribute to the district's sense of place and identity and are recognised and protected) as they are appropriate and reasonable. HC / Strategic Objectives / 297.42 Support Supports Strategic Direction - Historic and Cultural Objective HC-2 Retain Strategic Direction - Historic and Cultural Objective HC-2 as notified. HC-2 (Cultural, spiritual and/or historical values associated with historic heritage) as they are appropriate and reasonable. HH / Objectives / HH-O1 297.1a Support Supports HH-O1 (historic heritage is recognised, protected and Retain HH-O1 as notified. maintained) because historic heritage deserves special protection and the objective is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Objectives / HH-O2 297.1b Support Supports HH-O2 (historic heritage is appreciated by the community and is Retain HH-O2 as notified. acknowledged as important to the district's identity) because historic heritage deserves special protection and the objective is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Objectives / HH-O3 297.1c Support Supports HH-O3 (heritage buildings are actively used and maintained) Retain HH-O3 as notified. because historic heritage deserves special protection and the objective is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P1 297.2 Support Supports HH-P1 (identify, map and schedule significant heritage buildings Retain HH-P1 as notified. and items...) because it is appropriate and reasonable but considers that Note the submitter has also requested that NPDC list further heritage the number listed is too few and far from representative, the new listings buildings, items and archaeological sites, district wide. The submitter has are largely in the CBD, and the delisting of B's and C's increases the prepared more than 90 draft heritage assessments which they consider likelihood that they will be lost. should be treated as a representative sample of a much larger group of unprotected items deserving protection. These matters are addressed in SCHED1. HH / Policies / HH-P2 297.3a Support Supports HH-P2 (identify and map heritage character areas involving Retain HH-P2 as notified. groups of buildings, structures, spaces and other features that collectively have historic heritage values, cultural or social values and/or special Note the submitter has also requested that NPDC revisit the decision not qualities and contribute to the district's identity, character and sense of to schedule the 17 areas (4.1.3.2 Heritage Character Areas) outlined in the place) because it is appropriate and reasonable but considers that heritage Section 32 report and investigate including areas of contiguous character areas should not be limited to the CBD and the 17 previously archaeological sites, such as the Waitara battleground. These matters are recognised heritage character areas should be included as well as some addressed in SCHED1. new ones. HH / Policies / HH-P3 297.4 Support Supports HH-P3 (protect and maintain heritage buildings, items and Retain HH-P3 as notified. character areas from inappropriate activities…) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P4 297.5 Support in Supports HH-P4 (allow the following activities that involve heritage Retain HH-P4 as notified in conjunction with a review of the scheduled part buildings and items or that are within a heritage character area, provided character areas. they contribute to the long-term viability and retention or ongoing functional use of the building, item or area and do not compromise historic heritage values...) because it is generally appropriate and reasonable but Submitter 297 Heritage Taranaki Inc │ 335 Provision Sub No/ Position Summary of Submission Decision Request Point No considers that the 17 previously recognised heritage character areas should be reviewed. HH / Policies / HH-P5 297.6 Support Supports HH-P5 (manage activities that occur on or in proximity to Retain HH-P5 as notified. heritage buildings and items which have the potential to adversely impact on the building's or item's historic heritage values) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P6 297.8 Support Supports HH-P6 (in addition to HH-P5, manage activities that occur within Retain HH-P6 as notified. a heritage character area…) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P7 297.7 Support in Supports HH-P7 (avoid total or partial demolition or removal of heritage Retain HH-P7 as notified but clauses 1-3 should be adopted only following part buildings and items and specified interior elements...) but considers that: the establishment of a position on the council (such as a heritage officer) ● Allowing demolion on the grounds for significant public benefit that to ensure that appropriate consideration of heritage values are taken prior could not otherwise be achieved may be used without appropriate care. to demolition. ● NPDC does not employ qualified heritage professionals and there is no- one with suitable institutional knowledge that would guide the planning team in weighing the significant public benefit against the retention of the heritage building or item, or to what extent heritage fabric is damaged beyond repair and would require demolition. HH / Policies / HH-P8 297.9 Support Supports HH-P8 (ensure that activities adjacent to or affecting heritage Retain HH-P8 as notified. buildings and items avoid adverse effects on the building's or item's historic heritage values…) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P9 297.11 Support Supports HH-P9 (ensure additions and alterations to heritage buildings and Retain HH-P9 as notified. items are appropriate…) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P10 297.10 Support Supports HH-P10 (in addition to HH-P9 ensure that new buildings and/or Retain HH-P10 as notified. that additions and alterations to contributory buildings within a heritage character area are appropriately located and/or that the overall scale, form, composition and design of the structure is appropriate...) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P11 297.12 Support Supports HH-P11 (support landowners to manage, maintain and preserve Retain HH-P11 as notified. However, the built heritage and natural heritage buildings, items and character areas by using one or more of the protection grant is woefully underfunded and should be significantly following methods…) because it is appropriate and reasonable. augmented to better provide assistance for owners in maintaining heritage buildings and caring for archaeological sites. HH / Policies / HH-P12 297.16 Support Supports HH-P12 (map and schedule archaeological sites that have been Retain HH-P12 as notified. identified...) because it is appropriate and reasonable and applauds NPDC for including 31 pre 1900 buildings as archaeological sites but considers Note the submitter has requested that NPDC review the NZAA database, that more archaeological sites should be added. review the list of pre 1900 buildings list supplied by the submitter, make background information publicly accessible and consider scheduling significant archaeological assemblages. These matters are addressed in SCHED3. Submitter 297 Heritage Taranaki Inc │ 336 Provision Sub No/ Position Summary of Submission Decision Request Point No HH / Policies / HH-P13 297.15 Support Supports HH-P13 (protect and maintain archaeological sites from Retain HH-P13 as notified. inappropriate activities…) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P14 297.14 Support in Considers that clause 2 and 3 of HH-P14 (allow the following activities on Amend HH-P14 as follows: part or adjacent to an archaeological site provided they do not compromise the Allow the following activities on or adjacent to an archaeological site site's historic heritage values) should be clarified. The submitter questions provided they do not compromise the site's historic heritage values: what happens when the archaeological site IS a built archaeological 1. land disturbance; site/building and the alteration or demolition allowed in these clauses may 2. demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures, except where allow the site to be adversely affected or destroyed. the archaeological site is the building or structure; 3. alterations to existing buildings and structures, except where the archaeological site is the building or structure; 4. maintenance and repair or upgrading of existing network utility structures; and 5. erection of signs. HH / Policies / HH-P15 297.19 Support Supports HH-P15 (manage activities that occur on or adjacent to scheduled Retain HH-P15 as notified. archaeological sites…) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P16 297.13 Support Supports HH-P16 (ensure that activities on, adjacent to or affecting Retain HH-P6 as notified. archaeological sites or on land where there is reasonable cause to suspect an archaeological site may exist avoid adverse effects on the site...) because it is appropriate and reasonable. HH / Policies / HH-P17