Historical Report on Hamilton Street and City Names
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Redalyc.Charles Darwin, Robert Fitzroy and Simón Rodríguez Met In
Interciencia ISSN: 0378-1844 [email protected] Asociación Interciencia Venezuela Whittembury, Guillermo; Jaffé, Klaus; Hirshbein, Cesia; Yudilevich, David Charles Darwin, Robert Fitzroy and Simón Rodríguez met in Concepción, Chile, after the earthquake of february 20, 1835 Interciencia, vol. 28, núm. 9, septiembre, 2003, pp. 549-553 Asociación Interciencia Caracas, Venezuela Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33908410 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative CHARLES DARWIN, ROBERT FITZROY AND SIMÓN RODRÍGUEZ MET IN CONCEPCIÓN, CHILE, AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE OF FEBRUARY 20, 1835 Guillermo Whittembury, Klaus Jaffé, Cesia Hirshbein and David Yudilevich SUMMARY Simón Rodríguez (SR) was in Concepción during the earth- elevation to coincide, the three must have talked and exchanged quake of Feb 20 1835 that destroyed the city. A month later, he ideas and views about the earthquake within the mentioned and two other dwellers were asked for a report on the state of dates. This statement is supported by additional facts: FR and the city. The report, dated Aug 13, 1835 mentions: “FitzRoy Esq. CD were hosted by a friend of SR during their visits. They men- noted that the Island of Santa Maria was upheaved 9 feet after tion having talked extensively with the inhabitants. SR was one the earthquake”. The same value appears in the reports of Rob- of the most learned persons at the time in Concepción. -
Southern Taranaki Settlers Fled. Still, I Do Not See How the Maori, Heavily Outnumbered, Had Any Hope of Winning the War. As
200 REVIEWS southern Taranaki settlers fled. Still, I do not see how the Maori, heavily outnumbered, had any hope of winning the war. As always, James Belich writes well and wittily, a gift not given to all our historians. The story is exciting, the pace rapid. Maori boys are massacred, prisoners killed — by kupapa. One section is written like a novel, inviting us to visit Whanganui in 1868 and engage in various activities such as visiting the kupapa leader, Mete Kingi, stopping for a morning draught at James Cathro's hotel, and so on. This comes off very well. The only problem is that, while we feel sure that it could be documented, there are no footnotes, only lists of sources for each chapter, so that we cannot follow up, at all easily, any point which interests us. During a recent discussion of the' new history', Dr Belich said that previous historians had forced their readers to 'chomp their way through a dry muesli'. Presumably he belongs to a 'snap, crackle, pop' school of history. Dr Belich is particularly good at writing pen-portraits of his characters, such as Colonels Whitmore and McDonnell, and Titokowaru, but at least once he misses a trick. He says that E. W. Stafford, the longest serving nineteenth-century Premier, had (and he. quotes someone) 'an entire want of social magnetism'. In fact, he was noted for his very great attraction to women: the closeness of his relationships is not known, though an historian is working on it. And a final point, not at all critical: the photograph on p.64 of Lucy Takiora Dalton appears to be one of another woman, often called 'Queen Victoria' or the Queen of Nukumaru. -
Unsettling a Settler Family's History in Aotearoa New Zealand
genealogy Article A Tale of Two Stories: Unsettling a Settler Family’s History in Aotearoa New Zealand Richard Shaw Politics Programme, Massey University, PB 11 222 Palmerston North, New Zealand; [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27609-8603 Abstract: On the morning of the 5 November 1881, my great-grandfather stood alongside 1588 other military men, waiting to commence the invasion of Parihaka pa,¯ home to the great pacifist leaders Te Whiti o Rongomai and Tohu Kakahi¯ and their people. Having contributed to the military campaign against the pa,¯ he returned some years later as part of the agricultural campaign to complete the alienation of Taranaki iwi from their land in Aotearoa New Zealand. None of this detail appears in any of the stories I was raised with. I grew up Pakeh¯ a¯ (i.e., a descendant of people who came to Aotearoa from Europe as part of the process of colonisation) and so my stories tend to conform to orthodox settler narratives of ‘success, inevitability, and rights of belonging’. This article is an attempt to right that wrong. In it, I draw on insights from the critical family history literature to explain the nature, purposes and effects of the (non)narration of my great-grandfather’s participation in the military invasion of Parihaka in late 1881. On the basis of a more historically comprehensive and contextualised account of the acquisition of three family farms, I also explore how the control of land taken from others underpinned the creation of new settler subjectivities and created various forms of privilege that have flowed down through the generations. -
Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 2 June 2014
Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document JUNE 2014 INTERNAL DRAFT Information Document Reference Waikato Sports Facility Plan Authors Craig Jones, Gordon Cessford Sign off Version Internal Draft 4 Date 4th June 2014 Disclaimer: Information, data and general assumptions used in the compilation of this report have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Visitor Solutions Ltd has used this information in good faith and makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of this information. Interested parties should perform their own investigations, analysis and projections on all issues prior to acting in any way with regard to this project. Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 2 June 2014 Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 3 June 2014 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 Our challenges 8 3.0 Our Choices for Maintaining the network 9 4.0 Key Principles 10 5.0 Decision Criteria, Facility Evaluation & Funding 12 6.0 Indoor Court Facilities 16 7.0 Aquatic Facilities 28 8.0 Hockey – Artifical Turfs 38 9.0 Tennis Court Facilities 44 10.0 Netball – Outdoor Courts 55 11.0 Playing Fields 64 12.0 Athletics Tracks 83 13.0 Equestrian Facilities 90 14.0 Bike Facilities 97 15.0 Squash Court Facilities 104 16.0 Gymsport facilities 113 17.0 Rowing Facilities 120 18.0 Club Room Facilities 127 19.0 Bowling Green Facilities 145 20.0 Golf Club Facilities 155 21.0 Recommendations & Priority Actions 165 Appendix 1 - School Facility Survey 166 Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 4 June 2014 1.0 INTRODUCTION Plan Purpose The purpose of the Waikato Facility Plan is to provide a high level strategic framework for regional sports facilities planning. -
Full Publication
COVER IMAGE Leafa Wilson/Olga Krause Ich Heisse Olga Krause, Deutsche Kuenstlerin 2005 Poster print (detail). Image reproduced in full below. The life-long work of performance artist Leafa Wilson/Olga Krause began in 2005. These propagandist poster-styled works are loosely based around the Russian Constructivist design aesthetic adopted by the German band ‘Kraftwerk’. With both Samoan and German ancestry, the artist reconciles their past and present by creating utopic race relations in the site of their body: I am Olga Krause, German artist (Ich Heisse Olga Krause, Deutsche Kuenstlerin) GUEST EDITOR Amelia Williams EDITOR Nadia Gush EDITORIAL ADVISORY GROUP Giselle Byrnes, Massey University Te Kunenga Ki Purehuroa, Palmerston North. Catharine Coleborne, University of Newcastle, Australia. Nadia Gush, Waikato Museum Te Whare Taonga o Waikato, Hamilton; University of Waikato Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato, Hamilton. Stephen Hamilton, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia; Massey University Te Kunenga Ki Purehuroa, Palmerston North. Bronwyn Labrum, Canterbury Museum, Christchurch. Mark Smith, Oamaru Whitestone Civic Trust, Oamaru. NZJPH7.1 2020 ISSN 2253-153X © 2020 The New Zealand Journal of Public History 7.1 HISTORY AND RECONCILIATION Amelia Williams EDITORIAL 1 Leah Bell DIFFICULT HISTORIES 7 Vincent O’Malley STREET TALK: HISTORY, MYTH AND MEMORY ON THE WAIKATO FRONTIER 13 Graeme Ball THE LONG HISTORY OF LEARNING ABOUT OUR OWN HISTORY 20 Renika Sicilliano ‘IWI’ HISTORIES IN TE TIRITI O WAITANGI SETTLEMENTS: THE IMPACT OF A CROWN FRAMEWORK ON OUR NARRATIVE HISTORIES 31 Geoff Canham KOPURERERUA AUETU: THE VALE OF TEARS 39 Nicholas Haig SUMMARY: Once More, With Feeling 47 Charlotte Greenhalgh REVIEW: Past Caring? Women, Work and Emotion 51 HISTORY AND RECONCILIATION, MĀ MURI Ā MUA KA TIKA. -
10. South Taranaki
10. South Taranaki Fighting in South Taranaki began when General Cameron’s invasion army marched north from Whanganui on 24 January 1865. This was a major New Zealand campaign, exceeded in the number of Pākehā troops only by the Waikato War a year earlier. A chain of redoubts protected communications, notably on each bank of the Waitotara, Patea, Manawapou and Waingongoro rivers. Pā were mostly inland, at or near the bush edge, and were left alone. The invasion halted at Waingongoro River on the last day of March 1865. British troops then stayed on at the redoubts, while colonial forces took Māori land in return for service, with local fortifications put up for refuge and defence. On 30 December 1865, General Chute marched north from Whanganui on a very different campaign. By the time his combined British Army, colonial and Whanganui Māori force returned on 9 February 1866, seven fortified pā and 21 kāinga had been attacked and taken in search and destroy operations. When British regiments left South Taranaki later that year, colonial troops took over the garrison role. Titokowaru’s 1868–69 campaign was an outstanding strategic episode of the New Zealand Wars. Colonial troops were defeated at Te Ngutu o te Manu and Moturoa and forced back to Whanganui, abandoning Pākehā settlement north of Kai Iwi but for posts at Patea and Wairoa (Waverley). The Māori effort failed early in 1869 when Tauranga Ika, the greatest of Titokowaru’s pā, was given up without a fight. In the years that followed, Pākehā settlers on Māori land were protected by Armed Constabulary and militia posts. -
New Zealand Wars Sources at the Hocken Collections Part 2 – 1860S and 1870S
Reference Guide New Zealand Wars Sources at the Hocken Collections Part 2 – 1860s and 1870s Henry Jame Warre. Camp at Poutoko (1863). Watercolour on paper: 254 x 353mm. Accession no.: 8,610. Hocken Collections/Te Uare Taoka o Hākena, University of Otago Library Nau Mai Haere Mai ki Te Uare Taoka o Hākena: Welcome to the Hocken Collections He mihi nui tēnei ki a koutou kā uri o kā hau e whā arā, kā mātāwaka o te motu, o te ao whānui hoki. Nau mai, haere mai ki te taumata. As you arrive We seek to preserve all the taoka we hold for future generations. So that all taoka are properly protected, we ask that you: place your bags (including computer bags and sleeves) in the lockers provided leave all food and drink including water bottles in the lockers (we have a researcher lounge off the foyer which everyone is welcome to use) bring any materials you need for research and some ID in with you sign the Readers’ Register each day enquire at the reference desk first if you wish to take digital photographs Beginning your research This guide gives examples of the types of material relating to the New Zealand Wars in the 1860s and 1870s held at the Hocken. All items must be used within the library. As the collection is large and constantly growing not every item is listed here, but you can search for other material on our Online Public Access Catalogues: for books, theses, journals, magazines, newspapers, maps, and audiovisual material, use Library Search|Ketu. -
Whanganui Ki Maniapoto
'. " Wai 903, #A 11 OFFICIAL WAI48 Preliminary Historical Report Wai 48 and related claims Whanganui ki Maniapoto \ Alan Ward March 1992 "./-- · TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I THE NA TURE OF THE CLAIMS AND GENERAL HISTORICAL BA CKGROUND ...................... 9 1. The claims . .. 9 2. The oreliminarv report . .. 10 3. The iwi mainlv affected . .. 10 4. Early contacts with Europeans ................. 12 5. The Treaty of Waitangi ...................... 13 6. Early Land Acquisitions: .................. , . .. 15 7. Underlving Settler Attitudes . .. 16 8. Government land ourchase policy after 1865 ....... 18 fl. WHANGANUI AND THE MURIMOTU ................ 20 1. Divisions over land and attempts to contain them ... 20 2. Sales proceed . ........................... 22 /------, 3. Murimotu .. .................•............ 23 -1< ____)' 4. Strong trading in land? ...................... 25 5. Dealings over Murimotu-Rangipo ............... 26 6. Further attempts to limit land selling ............ 27 7. Kemp's Trust . 29 Iff THE KING COUNTRY ........... .. 30 1. Increasing contacts with government. .. 30 2. The Rotorua model ......................... 33 3. Whatiwhatihoe, May 1882: origins of the Rohe Potae concep t . , . .. , , , . , , . , , . 33 4. Government policy ., ....................... 36 5. Legislative preparations ........ , . , ...... , , , . 36 6. The Murimotu legislation .......... , .. ,....... 37 7. The Mokau-Mohakatino .. , ............. , , ... , 38 - 2 - 8. Maungatautari. • . • . • . • • . • . • • . 39 ) 9. Native Committees, 1883 -
The Story of the Treaty Part 1 (Pdf
THE STORY OF THE TREATY Introduction This is the story of our founding document, the Treaty agreement contained within it. At the outset it of Waitangi. It tells of the events leading up to the should be noted that, while the steps leading to the Treaty at a time when Mäori, far outnumbering Treaty are well known and have been thoroughly Päkehä, controlled New Zealand. It describes the studied, historians do differ in what they see as the The Treaty of Waitangi is New Zealand’s founding document. Over 500 Mäori chiefs and essential bargain that was struck between Mäori main developments and trends. Some historians, for representatives of the British Crown signed the Treaty in 1840. Like all treaties it is an exchange and the British Crown and what both sides hoped example, emphasise the humanitarian beliefs of the of promises; the promises that were exchanged in 1840 were the basis on which the British to obtain by agreeing to it. However, it does not tell 1830s; others draw attention to the more coercive Crown acquired New Zealand. The Treaty of Waitangi agreed the terms on which New Zealand the full story of what has happened since the signing aspects of British policy or take a middle course would become a British colony. of the Treaty in 1840: of the pain and loss suffered of arguing that while British governments were by Mäori when the Treaty came to be ignored concerned about Mäori, they were equally concerned This is one of a series of booklets on the Treaty of Waitangi which are drawn from the Treaty of by successive settler-dominated governments in about protecting the interests of Britain and British Waitangi Information Programme’s website www.treatyofwaitangi.govt.nz. -
Treaties Nobody Counted On
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Open Journal Systems at the Victoria University of Wellington Library 653 TREATIES NOBODY COUNTED ON R P Boast* This article is based on the author's inaugural professorial lecture delivered at Victoria University of Wellington in March 2011. The author's subject is treaties and treaty-like agreements, entered into between the New Zealand government and Māori after the Treaty of Waitangi. In the early 1880s there was a prolonged process of negotiation between representatives of an indigenous and autonomous Polynesian state; a state which a prominent New Zealand historian has described as being "two thirds the size of Belgium" which "not all historians have noticed".1 This autonomous state had its own monarch, a port of its own, and was actively trying to build its economy, manage its own lands, and develop overseas trade and commerce. The process of negotiation took a number of years, involved frequent consultations at the highest level, was embodied in a number of documents, and was given effect to in legislation. To this day, those negotiations and the agreements that came out of them remain pivotal to the indigenous groups affected and are well-remembered. I am speaking of the King Country, and the negotiations that took place in the 1880s in which two Native Ministers, John Bryce and John Ballance, were involved, as well as King Tawhiao and a number of leading rangatira of the Ngāti Maniapoto, Ngāti Raukawa and other tribes.2 The historian I have referred to is of course Professor James Belich, who at the end of his The New Zealand Wars, expressed his puzzlement that the persistence of this independent Māori state in the middle of the North Island could remain off the historical radar for so long. -
The Social History of Taranaki 1840-2010 Puke Ariki New Zealand
Date : 07/06/2006 Common Ground: the social history of Taranaki 1840-2010 Bill Mcnaught Puke Ariki New Zealand Meeting: 153 Genealogy and Local History Simultaneous Interpretation: No WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 72ND IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 20-24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/index.htm Abstract: Puke Ariki opened in 2003 and is the flagship museum, library and archival institution for Taranaki. Some commentators have suggested that there is no region in New Zealand with a richer heritage than Taranaki, but some episodes were among the most difficult in New Zealand’s history. There is a growing view that New Zealand needs to talk about some of its difficult history before it can heal the wounds that are still apparent in society. ‘Common Ground’ is a ground-breaking 5 year programme that begins in 2006 to look at the social history of Taranaki including some of the painful chapters. This paper explains some of the background and ways of joint working across library, museum and archival professions at Puke Ariki. Puke Ariki (pronounced ‘poo kay ah ree kee’ with equal emphasis on each syllable) means ‘Hill of Chiefs’ in the Māori language. Before Europeans arrived it was a fortified Māori settlement - also a sacred site because the bones of many chiefs are said to have been interred there. When the British settlers founded the small city of New Plymouth in the 19th century they removed the hill and used the soil as the foundation material for industrial building. Today it is the location for the flagship Taranaki museum, library and archival institution. -
Defending the High Ground
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. i ‘Defending the High Ground’ The transformation of the discipline of history into a senior secondary school subject in the late 20th century: A New Zealand curriculum debate A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Education Massey University (Palmerston North) New Zealand (William) Mark Sheehan 2008 ii One might characterise the curriculum reform … as a sort of tidal wave. Everywhere the waves created turbulence and activity but they only engulfed a few small islands; more substantial landmasses were hardly touched at all [and]…the high ground remained completely untouched. Ivor F. Goodson (1994, 17) iii Abstract This thesis examines the development of the New Zealand secondary school history curriculum in the late 20th century and is a case study of the transformation of an academic discipline into a senior secondary school subject. It is concerned with the nature of state control in the development of the history curriculum at this level as well as the extent to which dominant elites within the history teaching community influenced the process. This thesis provides a historical perspective on recent developments in the history curriculum (2005-2008) and argues New Zealand stands apart from international trends in regards to history education. Internationally, curriculum developers have typically prioritised a narrative of the nation-state but in New Zealand the history teaching community has, by and large, been reluctant to engage with a national past and chosen to prioritise English history.