Appendix B, Inventory
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
History and Cultivation of Parma Violets (Viola, Violaceae) in the United Kingdom and France in the Nineteenth Century
History AND Cultivation OF PARMA VIOLETS (VIOLA, VIOLACEAE) IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND FRANCE IN THE NINETEENTH Century LUÍS MENDONÇA DE CARVALHO,1,2 FRANCISCA MARIA FERNANDES,3 MARIA DE FÁTIMA NUNES,3 JOÃO BRIGOLA,3 NATHALIE CASBAS,4 AND CLIVE GROVES5 Abstract. Scented cultivars of Parma violets were among the most important urban plants during the nineteenth century, with many references in literature, fashion, art and flower trade. Our research analyzed data related to Parma violets in France and in the United Kingdom and presents the cultivars introduced during the nineteenth century. Keywords: Parma violets, Viola cultivars, United Kingdom, France, social history The first records describing the use of violets origin. Earlier Italian literature from the XVI (Viola L., Violaceae) in Europe are from Ancient century refers to violets with a strong fragrance Greece: fragrant violets were sold in the and pleiomerous flowers that were obtained Athenian agora; praised by Greek poets, as in the from the East, near the city of Constantinople writings of Sappho (Jesus, 2009); used in (now Istanbul), capital of the former Byzantine medicine (Theophrastus, 1916); had an active role Empire. These texts describe violets that looked in myths, such as in the abduction of Persephone like roses, probably referring to ancestral plants (Ovid, 1955; Grimal, 1996); were used in gar- of the contemporary Parma violets (Malécot et lands (Goody, 1993) and present in the Odyssey’s al., 2007). In Naples (Italy), a local tradition garden of Calypso (Homer, 2003). They proposes that these violets came from Portugal, continued to be used throughout the Middle Ages brought by the Bourbon royal family during the and were present in Renaissance herbals (Cleene XVIII century; hence the local name Violetta and Lejeune, 2002). -
Orderform.Pdf
2021 SUMMER & FALL TO USE THIS ORDER FORM Send this page with all orders. Fill in all required information. Fill in customer info at top of every page. If faxing - total pages sent Fax to: 1-800-863-7814. CONTENTS CUSTOMER INFORMATION Annuals 1 Herbs 9 Foliage 9 Customer Ferns 10 Succulents 10 Address Perennials 11 City State/Province Zip/Postal Code Effective for shipments between July 1, 2021 Contact & October 31, 2021. Phone # METHOD OF PAYMENT For details, see Terms & Conditions of Sale. 1. Prepayment 2. Charge on Jolly Farmer account (if previously approved) 3. ACH (replaces draft check) 4. Visa MasterCard Give us a call with American Express your card number. Discover (US only) 5. E-Transfer - CANADA ONLY (Send to: [email protected]) CALENDULa – FLOWERING KALE Customer Name Zip/Postal ☑ Mark desired size Fill in desired shipdates Trays Strips ▼ Tag Code Specie Variety 512 288 144 26 51 Qty Annuals 1165 Calendula , Costa Mix 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1800 Dianthus , Coronet Mix 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1805 Dianthus , Coronet Strawberry 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1815 Dianthus , Diana Mix Formula 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1820 Dianthus , Diana Mix Lavendina 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1825 Dianthus , Diana Mix Picotee 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1830 Dianthus , Ideal Select Mix 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1840 Dianthus , Ideal Select Red 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1845 Dianthus , Ideal Select Rose 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1850 Dianthus , Ideal Select Violet 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1852 Dianthus , Ideal Select White 512 288 144 n/a n/a 1855 Dianthus , Ideal Select Whitefire 512 288 -
Recommendation Report Packet
Kent County Department of Planning Services Division of Planning SARAH E. KEIFER, AICP Phone: 302/744-2471 Director of Planning Services FAX: 302/736-2128 KRISTOPHER S. CONNELLY, AICP Assistant Director of Planning Services REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REPORT July 1, 2021 Ordinance : LC21-10 Application # & Name : CZ-21-03 MKJ Properties, LLC Present Zoning / : AC (Agricultural Conservation) / Comp Plan Map Designation : Low Density Residential Proposed Zoning / : BN (Neighborhood Business) / Comp Plan Map Designation : Neighborhood Commercial Relation to Growth Zone : Inside Area and Location : 9.52 ± acres located on the north side of Irish Hill Road, approximately 1,121’ west of Almond Way and approximately 5,695’ east of Sanbill Lane, at the intersection of Peachtree Run, east of Viola. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information presented, the Kent County Code, and the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request to amend the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The following are the findings of fact for Staff’s recommendation of approval: • The property is currently zoned AC and is located within the Growth Zone Overlay District. • The Future Land Use Map (7-B) of the 2018 Kent County Comprehensive Plan indicates that the subject site be utilized for low-residential purposes. However, the Land Use Strategy Map (7-C) reflects a long term development strategy where specific mixed use, higher density, commercial, industrial, and employment center development could be supported, provided it is in keeping with the character of the area and adequate infrastructure is in place or planned to serve it. Map 7-C recommends Neighborhood Commercial use for the subject site. -
Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus Quinquefolia) Control Herbicide Options
Publication Number 006 November 2015 Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) Control Herbicide Options E. David Dickens – Forest Productivity Professor and David J. Moorhead – Silviculture Professor UGA Warnell School Brief Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), also known as five-leaved ivy and Victoria ivy, is in the Vitaceae (grape) family. It is native to eastern and central North America. Virginia creeper can occupy our SE US forests and can be a competitor in pine stands. Virginia creeper is a deciduous vine that can “climb” trees up to 50 feet or greater heights (Photo 1) or in clumps growing on shrubs (Photo 2). If not controlled, it can kill trees by canopying over the crowns and blocking sunlight to the tree’s foliage for photosynthesis. The leaves are palmately compound, composed of five leaflets (occasionally but rarely three) ranging from 3 to 8 inches in diameter with serrated (toothed) edges (Photo 3). The flowers are small and greenish, produced in late spring, and mature in late summer or early fall into small hard purplish-black berries ¼ to 1/3 inch in diameter. The berries are moderately toxic to humans and other mammals. The fruit (Photo 4) seeds are bird dispersed. Virginia creeper control is best done during active growth periods from mid-June to early October in Georgia. If Virginia creeper has climbed up into the trees, a prescribed burn, or cutting the vines to groundline may be needed to get the climbing vine down to the ground where foliar treatment can be made to new regrowth after the burn or cutting. Herbicides labeled to Control Virginia Creeper I. -
2010 the Michigan Botanist 73
2010 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST 73 NOMENCLATURE OF THE THICKET CREEPER, PARTHENOCISSUS INSERTA (VITACEAE) James S. Pringle Royal Botanical Gardens P.O. Box 399 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3H8 ABSTRACT Parthenocissus inserta (A. Kern.) Fritsch, rather than P. vitacea (Knerr) Hitchc., is the correct name for the thicket creeper, a species related to the Virginia creeper, P. quinquefolia . KEY WORDS: Parthenocissus , Vitaceae Two species of Parthenocissus are native to eastern and central North Amer - ica. One of these, to which the common name Virginia creeper is more appropri - ately applied, is P. quinquefolia (L.) Planch. Its natural range extends from Mex - ico probably to southern Maine, southern Ontario, and southern Minnesota, although it has escaped from cultivation farther north. The other species, the nomenclature of which is discussed here, has a more northern and western range, from Pennsylvania, Texas, and California north to ca. 50°N in Ontario and Man - itoba. “False Virginia creeper,” “thicket creeper,” and “grape-woodbine” have been proposed as vernacular names for the northern species, but none of these names has become widely used. Because of their abundance and the size of the plants, these species are ecologically important, influencing succession and pro - viding cover and food for wildlife. They are widely cultivated as ornamental vines in North America and Europe, although they may sometimes become a problem, as when shrubs or specimen trees are engulfed. Until early in the twentieth century few botanists distinguished between these species, and the assumption that “the” Virginia creeper is Parthenocissus quin - quefolia continues to result in reports of P. quinquefolia from localities north of its true range. -
Phylogenetic Analysis of Vitaceae Based on Plastid Sequence Data
PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF VITACEAE BASED ON PLASTID SEQUENCE DATA by PAUL NAUDE Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTAE in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: DR. M. VAN DER BANK December 2005 I declare that this dissertation has been composed by myself and the work contained within, unless otherwise stated, is my own Paul Naude (December 2005) TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Abstract iii Index of Figures iv Index of Tables vii Author Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements ix CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Vitaceae 1 1.2 Genera of Vitaceae 6 1.2.1 Vitis 6 1.2.2 Cayratia 7 1.2.3 Cissus 8 1.2.4 Cyphostemma 9 1.2.5 Clematocissus 9 1.2.6 Ampelopsis 10 1.2.7 Ampelocissus 11 1.2.8 Parthenocissus 11 1.2.9 Rhoicissus 12 1.2.10 Tetrastigma 13 1.3 The genus Leea 13 1.4 Previous taxonomic studies on Vitaceae 14 1.5 Main objectives 18 CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 21 2.1 DNA extraction and purification 21 2.2 Primer trail 21 2.3 PCR amplification 21 2.4 Cycle sequencing 22 2.5 Sequence alignment 22 2.6 Sequencing analysis 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 32 3.1 Results from primer trail 32 3.2 Statistical results 32 3.3 Plastid region results 34 3.3.1 rpL 16 34 3.3.2 accD-psa1 34 3.3.3 rbcL 34 3.3.4 trnL-F 34 3.3.5 Combined data 34 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 42 4.1 Molecular evolution 42 4.2 Morphological characters 42 4.3 Previous taxonomic studies 45 4.4 Conclusions 46 CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES 48 APPENDIX STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DATA 59 ii ABSTRACT Five plastid regions as source for phylogenetic information were used to investigate the relationships among ten genera of Vitaceae. -
Moorhead Ph 1 Final Report
Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Ecological Assessment of a Wetlands Mitigation Bank August 2001 (Phase I: Baseline Ecological Conditions and Initial Restoration Efforts) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kevin K. Moorhead, Irene M. Rossell, C. Reed Rossell, Jr., and James W. Petranka 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Departments of Environmental Studies and Biology University of North Carolina at Asheville Asheville, NC 28804 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report Research and Special Programs Administration May 1, 1994 – September 30, 2001 400 7th Street, SW Washington, DC 20590-0001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the North Carolina Department of Transportation, through the Center for Transportation and the Environment, NC State University. 16. Abstract The Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank, the first wetlands mitigation bank in the Blue Ridge Province of North Carolina, was created to compensate for losses resulting from highway projects in western North Carolina. The overall objective for the Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank has been to restore the functional and structural characteristics of the wetlands. Specific ecological restoration objectives of this Phase I study included: 1) reestablishing site hydrology by realigning the stream channel and filling drainage ditches; 2) recontouring the floodplain by removing spoil that resulted from creation of the golf ponds and dredging of the creek; 3) improving breeding habitat for amphibians by constructing vernal ponds; and 4) reestablishing floodplain and fen plant communities. -
Appendix 2: Plant Lists
Appendix 2: Plant Lists Master List and Section Lists Mahlon Dickerson Reservation Botanical Survey and Stewardship Assessment Wild Ridge Plants, LLC 2015 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Acalypha rhomboidea Native 1 Forb 9 Acer palmatum Invasive 0 Tree 1 Acer pensylvanicum Native 7 Tree 2 Acer platanoides Invasive 0 Tree 4 Acer rubrum Native 3 Tree 27 Acer saccharum Native 5 Tree 24 Achillea millefolium Native 0 Forb 18 Acorus calamus Alien 0 Forb 1 Actaea pachypoda Native 5 Forb 10 Adiantum pedatum Native 7 Fern 7 Ageratina altissima v. altissima Native 3 Forb 23 Agrimonia gryposepala Native 4 Forb 4 Agrostis canina Alien 0 Graminoid 2 Agrostis gigantea Alien 0 Graminoid 8 Agrostis hyemalis Native 2 Graminoid 3 Agrostis perennans Native 5 Graminoid 18 Agrostis stolonifera Invasive 0 Graminoid 3 Ailanthus altissima Invasive 0 Tree 8 Ajuga reptans Invasive 0 Forb 3 Alisma subcordatum Native 3 Forb 3 Alliaria petiolata Invasive 0 Forb 17 Allium tricoccum Native 8 Forb 3 Allium vineale Alien 0 Forb 2 Alnus incana ssp rugosa Native 6 Shrub 5 Alnus serrulata Native 4 Shrub 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia Native 0 Forb 14 Amelanchier arborea Native 7 Tree 26 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 4 Vine, herbaceous 18 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Anagallis arvensis Alien 0 Forb 4 Anaphalis margaritacea Native 2 Forb 3 Andropogon gerardii Native 4 Graminoid 1 Andropogon virginicus Native 2 Graminoid 1 Anemone americana Native 9 Forb 6 Anemone quinquefolia Native 7 Forb 13 Anemone virginiana Native 4 Forb 5 Antennaria neglecta Native 2 Forb 2 Antennaria neodioica ssp. -
Wetland Plants This Plant List Shows Many of the Common Species That Are Found in Wetlands and That Are Available from Nurseries on the Wetland Plant Suppliers List
Wetland Plants This plant list shows many of the common species that are found in wetlands and that are available from nurseries on the Wetland Plant Suppliers list. The wetland indicator status refers to how frequently a species is found in wetlands out of the range of habitats the species will grow in. The abbreviations for status in the table stand for: OBL - Obligate >99% occurrence in wetlands FACW - Facultative Wetland 66-99% occurrence in wetlands FAC - Facultative 33-66% occurrence in wetlands FACU - Facultative Upland 1-33% occurrence in wetlands A positive sign indicates a frequency toward the higher end of the category (more frequently found in wetlands), and a negative sign indicates a frequency toward the lower end of the category (less frequently found in wetlands). The wetland indicator status was found in the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 Maryland. The area of the state in which species occur commonly as natives are also shown. The following abbreviations refer to physiographic regions of the state: S - Statewide A - Allegheny Mountain Section (Garrett County) R - Ridge and Valley Section (Allegany, Washington, and western Frederick Counties) P - Piedmont Section (eastern Frederick, Carroll, Montgomery, Howard, northern and central Baltimore and Harford, and northern Cecil Counties) C - Coastal Plain Section (St. Mary's, Charles, Calvert, Prince George's, Anne Arundel, southern Baltimore, Harford, and Cecil, Kent, Queen Anne's, Talbot, Caroline, Dorchester, Wicomico, Somerset, and Worchester -
Native Herbaceous Plant List
North American Native Plants for New England Gardens Sun, average soil Actaea racemosa (syn. Cimicifuga racemosa) Aster novi-belgii Amsonia rigida Aster pilosus Amsonia tabernaemontana Aster umbellatus Anemone multifida Baptisia australis Aster nova-angliae Baptisia tinctoria Boltonia asteroides Heliopsis helianthoides Chelone glabra Hypoxis hirsuta Chelone lyonii Liatris graminifolia Chrysogonum virginianum Liatris scariosa var. novae angliae Coreopsis tripteris Liatris squarrosa Coreopsis verticillata Lilium canadense Delphinium tricorne Lilium philadelphicum Delphinium exaltatum Lobelia cardinalis Dodecatheon media Lobelia siphilitica Eupatorium sp. Monarda didyma Geranium maculatum Monarda fistulosa Helenium autumnale Oenothera fruticosa Helianthus angustifolius Opuntia humifusa Helianthus divaricatus Penstemon laevigatus Penstemon digitalis Penstemon hirsutus Phlox caroliniana Silene virginica Phlox paniculata Sedum sp. Phlox subulata Sisyrinchium sp. Physotegia virginiana Solidago rigida Podophylum peltatum Solidago rugosa Porteranthus stipulatus Solidago sempervirens Porteranthus trifoliatus Talinum sp. Ratibida pinata Vernonia lettermanii Rudbeckia hirta Viola sp. Salvia sp. Yucca sp. Scutellaria ovata Xanthorhiza simplicissima Scutellaria serrata Zizia aptera Sun, dry soil Agastache rupestris Asclepias syriaca Allium cernuum Asclepias tuberosa Allium stellatum Asclepias pupurescens Amsonia tabernaemontana Aster cordifolius Anemone patens multifida Aster divaricatus Antennaria sp. Aster umbellatus Asclepias pupurescens Aster laevis -
Io Moth Automeris Io (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Saturniidae)1 Donald W
EENY608 Io Moth Automeris io (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Saturniidae)1 Donald W. Hall2 Introduction The beautiful Io moth, Automeris io (Fabricius), is one of our most recognizable moths. It is distinctive because of its prominent hind wing eyespots. The Io moth, like many of the other saturniid moths, is less common now in parts of its range. With the exception of Cape Cod and some of the Massachusetts islands, it is now rare in New England where it was once common, and its populations have declined in the Gulf States (with the exception of Louisiana) since the 1970s (Manley 1993). The attractive Io moth caterpillar is also well-known because of its painful sting. Figure 1. Male Io moth, Automeris io (Fabricius). Automeris is a large genus with about 145 species (Heppner Credits: Donald W. Hall, University of Florida 1996). All Automeris species are characterized by large eyespots in the middle of the hind wings. Most species Synonymy are found in Central and South America. There are seven Fabricius (1775, p.560) described the Io moth and named species in the United States. Five of these, Automeris it Bombyx io. Abbott and Smith (1797, p.97) published zephyria Grote (New Mexico and western Texas), Automeris the first account of the Io moth’s life cycle under the cecrops (Boisduval), Automeris iris (Walker), Automeris name Phalaena io. Some early references used the genus patagoniensis Lemaire, and Automeris randa Druce name Hyperchiria (e.g., Eliot & Soule 1902, Lintner 1872, (southeastern Arizona) are found only in the western U.S. Stratton-Porter 1921, Strecker 1872). -
Business Organic Discards Composting
COMMERCIAL RECYCLING BUSINESS ORGANIC DISCARDS COMPOSTING California businesses should begin planning to separate their organic discards for composting. Beginning in 2016, AB 1826 requires that busi- nesses must arrange for composting if they dis- card 8 cubic yards or more of organic materials weekly. That threshold moves to 4 cubic yards of organics in 2017, and 4 cubic yards of solid waste in 2019. “Organic” materials include food, landscape debris (leaves, grass, branches), and woody ma- terial including lumber. Composting turns these raw materials into soil amendments that meet California goals to reduce water use, increase statewide recycling and avoid landfill methane emissions. High Desert communities are working with local haulers and composters to implement a compre- hensive local organics recycling program, and to provide options for effected businesses. WORKING TOGETHER 1 Businesses will be contacted to verify their organics generation. This may include onsite reviews to assess eligibility and capacity to separate organics effectively. 2 Qualifying businesses will be informed when composting capacity is secured and collec- tion programs are ready. 3 Businesses may make their own arrange- ments to send organic materials to com- posting and may be asked to verify those arrangements. 4 Edible food may be donated to qualified non-profits. We are compiling a list of groups that may be able to accept and distribute ed- ible food at no risk to donating businesses. For more information, look at the State’s fre- quently asked questions http://www.calrecycle. ca.gov/Recycle/Commercial/FAQ.htm Call the Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority at (888) 873-2925 or the Town of Yucca Valley’s Recycling Coordinator at (760) 369-7207, ext.