Alaska International Airport System – Forecast Technical Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alaska International Airport System – Forecast Technical Report Forecast Technical Report Alaska International Airport System May 2013 Fairbanks International Airport Anchorage International Airport DOWL HKM This document was prepared by: As subcontractor to: HNTB Corporation DOWL HKM 2900 South Quincy St. 4041 B. Street Arlington, VA 22042 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, with a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration. The preparers gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the management and staff of the Alaska International Airport System, Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport and Fairbanks International Airport, along with the AIAS Airlines Airport Affairs Committee (AAAC). AIAS Airlines Airport Affairs Committee Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport - Fairbanks International Airport July 5, 2012 Mr. Steve Hatter Deputy Commissioner of Aviation 4111 Aviation Avenue P.O. Box 196900 Anchorage, AK 99519-6960 Re: AIAS Planning Study Forecasts Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the development and review of the forecasts for Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport, Lake Hood Seaplane Base, and Fairbanks International Airport. We appreciate the extensive effort made by the AIAS Planning team to reach out and actively solicit airline participation in the process. The AIAS (Alaska International Airport System) AAAC (Airlines Airport Affairs Committee) believes these forecasts accurately represent current economic uncertainties and trends and are a reasonable estimate of long term future activity levels. Given uncertainties of forecasts, especially today, we encourage future planning to be based on aviation activity trigger points rather than forecasted dates. We also believe the forecasts will need to be revisited prior to committing to any large capital projects. Thanks again for partnering with the airlines on the forecasts. We look forward to working with you on the Airport Master Plans. Best Regards, Kathy Smith Kevin Hoffmann Co-Chairperson Co-Chairperson AIAS Airlines Airport Affairs Committee AIAS Airlines Airport Affairs Committee cc: AIAS Airlines Airport Affairs Committee ALASKA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SYSTEM – FORECAST TECHNICAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0. Purpose and Background ...................................................................................... 1 1.1. Forecast Methodology ........................................................................................ 2 1.2. Survey of Air Carriers ......................................................................................... 2 1.3. Forecast Assumptions ........................................................................................ 3 2.0. Socioeconomic Background and Projections ........................................................ 4 2.1. Population .......................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Employment ....................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Global Economic Forecasts ............................................................................. 10 3.0. Fuel Costs and Air Fares ..................................................................................... 13 3.1. Oil and Jet Fuel Prices ..................................................................................... 13 3.2. Average Air Fares ............................................................................................ 16 4.0. Historical Aviation Activity at AIAS Airports ......................................................... 18 4.1. Historical Passenger Activity ............................................................................ 19 4.2. Historical Air Cargo Activity .............................................................................. 22 4.2.1. Historical Air Cargo at ANC ....................................................................... 22 4.2.2. Historical Air Cargo at FAI ......................................................................... 25 4.3. Historical Aircraft Operations ............................................................................ 26 5.0. Passenger Forecasts........................................................................................... 29 5.1. Passenger Forecast Assumptions .................................................................... 29 5.2. Domestic Passenger Forecast ......................................................................... 30 5.2.1. Methodology and Data Sources ................................................................ 30 5.2.2. Domestic Passenger Originations Forecasts ............................................. 31 5.2.3. Domestic Outbound Passenger Forecasts ................................................ 32 5.2.4. Seat Departure Forecast ........................................................................... 36 5.3. International Passenger Forecast .................................................................... 36 5.3.1. Methodology, Assumptions, and Data Sources ......................................... 37 5.3.2. Forecasts by International Region ............................................................. 38 5.3.3. International Transit Passenger Forecasts ................................................ 38 5.3.4. Non-Transit International Passengers ....................................................... 38 5.3.5. Seat Departure Forecast ........................................................................... 38 5.4. Peak Passenger Activity .................................................................................. 38 5.5. Passenger Forecast Summary ......................................................................... 39 5.6. Passenger Aircraft Operations Projections ...................................................... 40 May 2013 Page i ALASKA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SYSTEM – FORECAST TECHNICAL REPORT 5.6.1. Passenger Aircraft Operation Assumptions ............................................... 41 5.6.2. Peak Passenger Aircraft Operations ......................................................... 42 5.6.3. Summary of Passenger Aircraft Operations .............................................. 42 6.0. Cargo ................................................................................................................... 44 6.1. Survey/Interview Summary .............................................................................. 44 6.2. Cargo Forecast Assumptions ........................................................................... 46 6.3. Intra-state Cargo Tonnage Forecast ................................................................ 47 6.3.1. Background ............................................................................................... 47 6.3.2. Cargo Tonnage Forecasts ......................................................................... 51 6.3.3. Belly and Combi- Cargo Tonnage Forecasts ............................................. 52 6.3.4. Intrastate All Cargo Tonnage and Capacity ............................................... 52 6.3.5. Summary of Intrastate Cargo Tonnage Forecasts ..................................... 53 6.4. International/Other U.S. Cargo Tonnage Forecast ........................................... 54 6.4.1. Background ............................................................................................... 54 6.4.2. Cargo Tonnage Forecasts ......................................................................... 58 6.4.3. Belly Cargo Forecast ................................................................................. 67 6.4.4. International and Other U.S. All-Cargo Carrier Capacity ........................... 67 6.4.5. International/Other U.S. Air Cargo Summary ............................................. 69 6.5. All-Cargo Aircraft Departure Forecasts ............................................................ 70 6.6. All-Cargo Peaking Forecast ............................................................................. 73 7.0. Air Taxi and Other Activity Forecasts .................................................................. 74 8.0. General Aviation Forecasts ................................................................................. 78 9.0. Military Forecasts ................................................................................................ 82 10.0. Forecast Summary ........................................................................................... 84 10.1. Passenger Forecast Summary ..................................................................... 84 10.2. Cargo Forecast Summary ............................................................................. 87 10.3. Aircraft Operations Forecast Summary ......................................................... 90 10.4. Forecast Comparisons .................................................................................. 96 10.5. Conclusion .................................................................................................... 98 11.0. Forecast Scenarios ........................................................................................ 100 11.1. Scenario 1 – No Action ............................................................................... 100 11.2. Scenario 2 – High Fuel Price ...................................................................... 101 11.3. Scenario 3 – High Economic Growth/Increased International Air Cargo ..... 101 11.4. Scenario 4 – Starburst ...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • CFIT, World Airways, Inc., DC-8-63F, N802WA, King Cove, Alaska, September 8, 1973
    CFIT, World Airways, Inc., DC-8-63F, N802WA, King Cove, Alaska, September 8, 1973 Micro-summary: This DC-8-63F flew into mountainous terrain. Event Date: 1973-09-08 at 0542 ADT Investigative Body: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), USA Investigative Body's Web Site: http://www.ntsb.gov/ Cautions: 1. Accident reports can be and sometimes are revised. Be sure to consult the investigative agency for the latest version before basing anything significant on content (e.g., thesis, research, etc). 2. Readers are advised that each report is a glimpse of events at specific points in time. While broad themes permeate the causal events leading up to crashes, and we can learn from those, the specific regulatory and technological environments can and do change. Your company's flight operations manual is the final authority as to the safe operation of your aircraft! 3. Reports may or may not represent reality. Many many non-scientific factors go into an investigation, including the magnitude of the event, the experience of the investigator, the political climate, relationship with the regulatory authority, technological and recovery capabilities, etc. It is recommended that the reader review all reports analytically. Even a "bad" report can be a very useful launching point for learning. 4. Contact us before reproducing or redistributing a report from this anthology. Individual countries have very differing views on copyright! We can advise you on the steps to follow. Aircraft Accident Reports on DVD, Copyright © 2006 by Flight Simulation Systems, LLC All rights reserved. www.fss.aero File No. 1-0018 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT WORLD AIRWAYS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Land Use Study
    Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study United States Army, Fort Wainwright United States Air Force, Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks North Star Borough, Planning Department July 2006 Produced by ASCG Incorporated of Alaska Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Fairbanks Joint Land Use Study This study was prepared under contract with Fairbanks North Star Borough with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of Fairbanks North Star Borough and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. Historical Hangar, Fort Wainwright Army Base Eielson Air Force Base i Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Table of Contents 1.0 Study Purpose and Process................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Planning Area................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Participating Stakeholders.............................................................................................. 4 1.5 Public Participation........................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Issue Identification........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4910-13 DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/21/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-20567, and on govinfo.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49] RIN 2120-AA66 Proposed Technical Amendment to Separate Terminal Airspace Areas from Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L Offshore Airspace Areas; Alaska AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the following Offshore Airspace Areas in Alaska: Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L. The FAA found an error with the Offshore Airspace Legal Descriptions containing airspace descriptions not related to the need to apply IFR en route Air Traffic Control services in international airspace. This action would correct that error by removing terminal airspace, airspace associated with geographic coordinates, and airspace associated with NAVAIDs from the Offshore Airspace legal descriptions. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, D.C. 20590; telephone: 1(800) 647-5527, or (202) 366-9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 NATIONAL FLIGHT DATA DIGEST Aeronautical Information
    NATIONAL FLIGHT DATA DIGEST Aeronautical Information Services National Flight Data Center Toll Free 1-866-295-8236 Wednesday NO. 076 04/21/2021 EFFECTIVE UPON PUBLICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY AN EFFECTIVE DATE NAVAIDS ALASKA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ADAK ISLAND ADAK TACAN IDENT BER LAT 51-52-16.43 N LONG 176-40-26.8 W MAG VAR 7 E MODIFIED NORTH DAKOTA NFDD 076 - 2 04/21/2021 GRAND FORKS RED RIVER TACAN IDENT RDR LAT 47-57-25.41 N LONG 097-24-21.69 W RMK ....MILITARY VALIDATED (FIL FIDEX-RDR-200033).... NOTE RMK DME UNUSBL 209-219 BYD 30 NM. MODIFIED WAKE ISLAND NFDD 076 - 3 04/21/2021 WAKE ISLAND WAKE ISLAND VORTAC IDENT AWK LAT 19-17-11.69 N LONG 166-37-38.4 E NAVAID STATUS OPERATIONAL IFR MODIFIED RMK ....MILITARY VALIDATED (FIL FIDEX-AWK-200127).... NOTE RMK VOR UNUSBL 120-175 BYD 35 NM. DELETED INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEMS GEORGIA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ATLANTA ATLANTA RGNL FALCON FLD AIRPORT ILS/DME RWY 31 IDENT I-FFC DME DME STATUS OPERATIONAL IFR MODIFIED RMK DME UNUSBL BYD 25 DEGS L OF CRS. DELETED RMK ILS CLASSIFICATION CODE IA. MODIFIED Page 1 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWERS MICHIGAN NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 SAGINAW MBS INTL-ATCT IDENT MBS FREQUENCIES FREQUENCY 118.45 DELETED FREQUENCY USE ASR DELETED APCH/DEP CALL GREAT LAKES FREQUENCY 120.95 DELETED FREQUENCY USE APCH/S DEP/S DELETED AIRPORT ALASKA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ATQASUK ATQASUK EDWARD BURNELL SR MEML AIRPORT ( ATK ) 50044.5A LATITUDE - 70-28-01.6 N LONGITUDE - 157-26-08.4 W RMK COLD TEMPERATURE RESTRICTED AIRPORT.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • September, 2008
    WWW.AIRCARGOWORLD.COM SEPTEMBER 2008 International Trends & Analysis INTERNATIONAL EDITION The World’s Top Cargo Airlines50 Cargo Security • India • Anti-Trust 2008 SUPPLY CHAIN INNOVATION AWARD FINALIST 6H>6 IDD J#H# EDGII"ID "9DDG# 96NN"9:;>C>I::# ,% A:HH I=6C6>G# As fuel prices send airfreight costs soaring, only OceanGuaranteed ® provides day-definite delivery from Asia to the U.S. that’s just as reliable, but at a fraction of the cost.With the combined resources and expertise of APL Logistics and Con-way Freight, OceanGuaranteed provides a unique single-source LCL/LTL solution with proven 99% on-time performance. In fact, your shipment is guaranteed to arrive on schedule, or we’ll pay 20% of the invoice.* Call 866-896-2005 or visit www.oceanguaranteed.com/22 for more information or to book a shipment today. *Conditions and restrictions apply. See website for full details. Service also available to Canada and Mexico. International Edition September 2008 CONTENTS Volume 11, Number 7 COLUMNS Top Cargo 12 North America Airlines With all the turmoil in Ohio, 22 The annual ranking of the growth at Toledo Express the world’s top 50 cargo air- Airport as a freight center is lines by traffic, with aircraft noteworthy orders and cargo revenue. 14 Pacific Yields on freighters may be down, but handling cargo in China remains a feast • JAL Slimmer 17 Europe Despite its bad timing of entering the market, Cargo 30 India B could be a survivor among India could become a plenty of airline failures key growth market for air 30 cargo, but overcapacity could spoil the party for freight operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter 2 (PDF)
    SARAH PALIN, GOVERNOR 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303 Post Office Box 111800 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER Phone: 907-465-5066 Fax: 907-465-5070 www.dec.state.ak.us October 20, 2008 Elin Miller, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Mail Code: RA-140 Seattle, WA 98101-3140 Dear Ms. Miller: The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) has reviewed your th August 18 letter regarding EPA’s PM2.5 designations for Alaska and the nonattainment boundaries for the communities of Fairbanks and Juneau. We have carefully considered the available data and analyses. ADEC believes the available scientific evidence does not support EPA’s boundary recommendations which substantially expand upon those recommended by us. ADEC believes public health will be protected and the applicable legal requirements met by taking the actions described in this letter, which include a proposed nonattainment boundary for the Fairbanks area that is larger than originally proposed by ADEC, but smaller than proposed by EPA. For Juneau, we are requesting EPA revisit certain assumptions and include data from 2008 before making a final decision on whether a nonattainment designation is warranted, and if so, the appropriate boundaries of the nonattainment area. Protecting public health is a goal we share with EPA. As you are already aware, we are proactively and expeditiously working with the local governments to address identified PM2.5 concerns in Fairbanks and Juneau. To this end, ADEC does not believe EPA’s proposed boundaries will ultimately assist in protecting public health.
    [Show full text]
  • (Eu) 2015/ 1014
    27.6.2015 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 162/65 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 (2) established the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, some Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that Union list. Relevant information was also communicated by certain third countries. On the basis of that information and the verifications carried out by the Commission, the Union list should now be updated. (3) The Commission informed all air carriers concerned, either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Union list.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE BUDGET and AUDIT COMMITTEE Division of Legislative Audit
    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE Division of Legislative Audit P.O. Box 113300 Juneau, AK 99811-3300 (907) 465-3830 FAX (907) 465-2347 [email protected] SUMMARY OF: A Special Report on the Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Spill Prevention and Response, Oil and Hazardous Substance Release Prevention and Response Fund, March 18, 2008. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT In accordance with Title 24 of the Alaska Statutes and a special request by the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee, we have conducted a performance audit of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Division of Spill Prevention and Response (Division). Specifically, we were asked to review the expenditures and cost recovery revenues from the Oil and Hazardous Substance Release Prevention and Response Fund (Fund). REPORT CONCLUSIONS The conclusions are as follows: all expenditures are not recorded according to activities compliance with statutory cost recovery requirements is unclear Division is not efficiently and effectively recovering costs most expenditures were appropriate legal costs need an improved budgeting process certain contractual oversight practices are weak detailed information on the Fund’s financial activities is incomplete During the audit we reviewed a $9 million reimbursable services agreement between the Division and the Department of Law for legal services related to two transit pipeline spills on the North Slope. The contract was funded by the Response Account without specific legislative appropriation. It would have been more prudent to follow the established legislative budget process, especially for long-term legal activities. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Division Director should improve the accountability for the Division’s activities and reporting of Fund expenditures.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE of CONTENTS Page
    Alaska Aviation System Plan Update Yukon-Kuskokwim Region Air Versus Roads Access Construction and Maintenance Baseline Cost Comparison January 2013 YUKON-KUSKOKWIM REGION AIR VERSUS ROADS ACCESS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE BASELINE COST COMPARISON ALASKA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Division of Statewide Aviation 4111 Aviation Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Prepared by: DOWL HKM 4041 B Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 562-2000 W.O. 59825.10 January 2013 Yukon-Kuskokwim Region Air Versus Roads Access Alaska Aviation System Plan Update Construction and Maintenance Baseline Cost Comparison January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 2.0 ROADS COST ESTIMATE ................................................................................................4 2.1 Design Criteria ..................................................................................................................5 2.2 Roadway Unit Costs and Assumptions .............................................................................6 2.2.1 Roadway Unit Costs ...................................................................................................6 2.2.2 Roadway Cost Assumptions .......................................................................................7 2.2.3 Drainage Unit Costs and Assumptions .......................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • State of Alaska Itb Number 2515H029 Amendment Number One (1)
    STATE OF ALASKA ITB NUMBER 2515H029 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE (1) AMENDMENT ISSUING OFFICE: Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Statewide Contracting & Procurement P.O. Box 112500 (3132 Channel Drive, Room 145) Juneau, Alaska 99811-2500 THIS IS NOT AN ORDER DATE AMENDMENT ISSUED: February 9, 2015 ITB TITLE: De-icing Chemicals ITB OPENING DATE AND TIME: February 27, 2015 @ 2:00 PM Alaska Time The following changes are required: 1. Attachment A, DOT/PF Maintenance Stations identifying the address and contact information and is added to this ITB. This is a mandatory return Amendment. Your bid may be considered non-responsive and rejected if this signed amendment is not received [in addition to your bid] by the bid opening date and time. Becky Gattung Procurement Officer PHONE: (907) 465-8949 FAX: (907) 465-2024 NAME OF COMPANY DATE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE ITB 2515H029 - De-icing Chemicals ATTACHMENT A DOT/PF Maintenance Stations SOUTHEAST REGION F.O.B. POINT Contact Name: Contact Phone: Cell: Juneau: 6860 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801 Eric Wilkerson 465-1787 723-7028 Gustavus: Gustavus Airport, Gustavus, AK 99826 Brad Rider 697-2251 321-1514 Haines: 720 Main St., Haines, AK 99827 Matt Boron 766-2340 314-0334 Hoonah: 700 Airport Way, Hoonah, AK 99829 Ken Meserve 945-3426 723-2375 Ketchikan: 5148 N. Tongass Hwy. Ketchikan, AK 99901 Loren Starr 225-2513 617-7400 Klawock: 1/4 Mile Airport Rd., Klawock, AK 99921 Tim Lacour 755-2229 401-0240 Petersburg: 288 Mitkof Hwy., Petersburg, AK 99833 Mike Etcher 772-4624 518-9012 Sitka: 605 Airport Rd., Sitka, AK 99835 Steve Bell 966-2960 752-0033 Skagway: 2.5 Mile Klondike Hwy., Skagway, AK 99840 Missy Tyson 983-2323 612-0201 Wrangell: Airport Rd., Wrangell, AK 99929 William Bloom 874-3107 305-0450 Yakutat: Yakutat Airport, Yakutat, AK 99689 Robert Lekanof 784-3476 784-3717 1 of 6 ITB 2515H029 - De-icing Chemicals ATTACHMENT A DOT/PF Maintenance Stations NORTHERN REGION F.O.B.
    [Show full text]