DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Environment Facility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Environment Facility MONIQUE BARBUT GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY Chif!f Uf!CutiVf! Officf!r and Chairperson VEST ! G IN OUR PlA ET 1818 HStreet, NW Washington, DC 20·03 USA Tel: 202.~73.3Z02 fax: 202.5U.32401J2~5 E-mail: mbarbutttTheGEf.org February 16, 2011 Dear Council Member, The UNDP as the Implementing Agency for the project entitled: India: IND-BD Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Conservation into Production Sectors in the Godavari River Estuary in Andhra Pradesh State under the India: IND-BD: GEF Coastal and Marine Program (IGCMP), has submitted the attached proposed project document for CEO endorsement prior to final Agency approval of the project document in accordance with the UNDP procedures. The Secretariat has reviewed the project document. It is consistent with the project concept approved by the Council in June 2009 and the proposed project remains consistent with the Instrument, and GEF policies and procedures. The attached explanation prepared by the UNDP satisfactorily details how Council's comments and those of the STAP have been addressed. We have today posted the proposed project document on the GEF website at www.TheGEF.or£! for your information. We would welcome any comments you may wish to provide by March 19, 2011 before I endorse the project. You may send your comments to [email protected] . If you do not have access to the Web, you may request the local field office of UNDP or the World Bank to download the document for you. Alternatively, you may request a copy of the document from the Secretariat. If you make such a request, please confirm for us your current mailing address: Sincerely, Attachment: Project Doc ume nt Copy to : Countly Operational Focal Point. GEF Agencies. STAP. Trustee REQUEST FOR CEO ENDORSEMENT/APPROVAL PROJECT TYPE: FULL SIZED PROJECT THE GEF TRUST FUND Submission Date: November 30, 2010 Resubmission: February 8, 2011 PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Expected Calendar GEFSEC PROJECT ID: 3936 Milestones Dates Work Program (for FSP) GEF AGENCY PROJECT ID: 4257 COUNTRY: India CEO Endorsement/ Approval Nov. 2010 PROJECT TITLE: Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity GEF Agency Approval Apr. 2011 Conservation into Production Sectors in the East Godavari River Implementation Start Jun. 2011 Estuarine Ecosystem Mid-term Evaluation Oct. 2012 GEF AGENCY: UNDP OTHER EXECUTING PARTNER: Ministry of Environment & Implementation Completion Mar. 2016 Forests (MoEF), Government of India / Wildlife Wing, Environment, Forests, Science & Technology Department, State Government of Andhra Pradesh GEF FOCAL AREA: Biodiversity GEF-4 STRATEGIC PROGRAM: SO-2, SP-4 Strengthening policy and regulatory frameworks for mainstreaming biodiversity NAME OF PARENT PROGRAM/ UMBRELLA PROJECT: India GEF Coastal and Marine Program (IGCMP) A. PROJECT FRAMEWORK Project Objective: To mainstream coastal and marine biodiversity conservation into production sectors in the East Godavari River Estuarine Ecosystem Project Type Expected Outcomes Expected Outputs GEF financing Cofinancing Total ($) Components ($) % ($) % 1. Sectoral TA 80,000ha of landscape/seascape Cross-sectoral institutional 605,900 12% 4,500,000 88% 5,105,900 planning in the area in the EGREE where mechanism is in place. EGREE production activities mainstream mainstreams biodiversity conservation Biodiversity-friendly Strategic biodiversity Plan (SP) is prepared for the conservation By project end, any new project area using a strategic considerations manufacturing units entering the environmental assessment licensing process in the EGREE approach. are subject to the CRZ 2010 Guidelines System for knowledge management and exchange Population size of following across the GEF programme. critical species remains stable or increases: Scyphiphora Strategies for incorporating hydrophyllacea, Olive Ridley turtle, coastal and marine biodiversity Fishing cat, population size of conservation considerations birds into sector policies and guidelines of production % of open (degraded) mangrove sectors. areas in the project area reduced to the minimum (from 40% to 10%) 2. Enhanced TA Increased capacity for Development and 2,937,900 33% 6,000,000 67% 8,937,900 capacity of mainstreaming biodiversity implementation of sector conservation into production biodiversity-friendly sector institutions for sectors as measured by UNDP plans, along with associated implementing a Capacity Development Scorecard1 capacities for implementation biodiversity- 1 This scorecard has been designed specifically for this project, as a tool to measure success in terms of developing national capacity to mainstream biodiversity conservation considerations into production sectors. While, the tool is conceptually based on the UNDP Capacity Development Scorecard, it is different in its substantive focus and the indicators because the UNDP Capacity Development Scorecard is meant to assess the development of capacities vis-à-vis the management of protected areas. During project development, the Capacity Scorecard has been applied at a general level to all production sectors operating in the EGREE. However, during the 1st 6 months of project implementation, it will be applied separately to different sectors, and within each sector, separately to state, private sector and community institutions. 1/ 59 Project Type Expected Outcomes Expected Outputs GEF financing Cofinancing Total ($) Components ($) % ($) % friendly sector By project end, at least 70-80% of Compendium of best practices plan including commercial fishing operations are on mainstreaming biodiversity monitoring and using correct fishing gear for each key production sector enforcement of 70-80% decline in concentrations Revised management plan for regulations of Nuvan and Endosulfan in the the CWLS is under effluents of aqua farms in the implementation along with target landscape over baseline associated capacities for levels implementation 50% decline in effluents from System for effective manufacturing units over baseline monitoring and enforcement of levels the Strategic Plan and the Sector Plans 50% decline in number of violations of CWLS Management Plan, compared with year of initial patrolling [NB baseline values and targets will be reconfirmed once production sector plans are finalized] 3. Community TA Strengthened capacity of SHGs/ Capacity development of 2,053,236 25% 6,000,000 75% 8,053,236 livelihoods and CBOs in 44 villages community institutions natural resource use are Skills-development activities Development and sustainable in carried out for SHGs/ CBOs/ and implementation of a the EGREE other local institutions for sustainable community natural alternative and/ or sustainable resource use plan ecosystem-based livelihoods that reduce pressures on biodiversity Implementation of livelihood as measured by indicators such as: diversification strategy and 50% decline in incidents of felling related socio-economic of mangrove trees, non-adherence interventions based on market to the seasonal ban on fishing, and community needs destructive fishing practices by local communities within the project area compared to baseline levels. [NB confirmation of these pressure indicator targets will be made once the micro-plans have been completed] Project management 426,600 22% 1,500,000 78% 1,926,600 Total project costs 6,023,636 25% 18,000,000 75% 24,023,636 B. SOURCES OF CONFIRMED CO-FINANCING FOR THE PROJECT Name of Co-financier (Source) Classification Type Amount ($) Government of Andhra Pradesh -- Department of Environment, Confirmed with Cash (partner- 18,000,000 Forest, Science, and Technology letter managed) Total Cofinancing 18,000,000 C. FINANCING PLAN SUMMARY FOR THE PROJECT ($) Project Agency Total (c + d) For comparison: Project Total Preparation Fee GEF and Co-financing at PIF b c = a + b a d GEF financing 100,000 6,023,636 6,123,636 612,364 6,736,000 6,626,000 Co-financing 100,000 18,000,000 18,100,000 18,100,000 17,700,000 Total 24,023,636 24,223,636 612,364 24,836,000 24,326,000 2/ 59 D. GEF RESOURCES REQUESTED BY AGENCY, FOCAL AREA(S) AND COUNTRY (IES): NOT APPLICABLE E. CONSULTANTS WORKING FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COMPONENTS: Cost Item Estimated person weeks GEF ($) Other sources ($) Project total ($) Local consultants 4,545 580,100 1,160,200 1,740,300 International consultants 20 70,000 70,000 TOTAL 4,565 650,100 1,160,200 1,810,300 Detailed information regarding the consultants is in Annex C. F. PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUDGET/COST Total Estimated GEF amount $ Co-financing ($) Project total ($) person weeks Cost Items (GEF only) Project Manager (NPMU) 216 108,000 108,000 Project Associate (NPMU) 216 81,000 81,000 2 Office Assistants (NPMU) 432 32,400 32,400 Project Coordinator (SPMU) 216 75,600 75,600 Financial cum Admin Assistant (SPMU) 216 43,200 43,200 2 Office Assistants (SPMU) 432 32,400 32,400 Personnel 500,000 500,000 Office facilities, equipment and communications 5,000 500,000 505,000 (NPMU) Office facilities, equipment and communications 10,000 300,000 310,000 (SPMU) Travel (NPMU) 15,000 100,000 115,000 Travel (SPMU) 24,000 50,000 74,000 Miscellaneous 50,000 50,000 Total 426,600 1,500,000 1,926,600 Detailed information is provided in Annex C and notes on other cost items are provided in Annex E. G. DOES THE PROJECT INCLUDE A “NON-GRANT” INSTRUMENT? NO H. DESCRIBE THE BUDGETED MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN: Monitoring and evaluation will be conducted in accordance with established UNDP and GEF procedures. The Project Results Framework (in Section 3) provides performance and impact indicators for project implementation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Note
    THE NAUTILUS 130(3):132–133, 2016 Page 132 Research Note A tumbling snail (Gastropoda: The width of the shell, based on the camera’s scale dots, Vetigastropoda: Margaritidae) seems to have been close to 40 mm, with the extended foot as much as 100 mm. The characteristic covered In August 2015, the NOAA ship OKEANOS EXPLORER con- umbilicus can only partially be seen in the photograph, ducted deep-sea studies in the northwestern Hawaiian so the identification remains uncertain. Hickman (2012) Islands, which now are within the Papahanaumokuakea noted that species of Gaza from the Gulf of Mexico Marine National Monument. The ship deployed the might be associated with chemosynthetic communi- remotely operated vehicle DEEP DISCOVERER (D2 ROV), ties, but the mollusk in the photographs was living on whose live video feed was shared with researchers on manganese-encrusted basalt. shore via satellite transmission. Hickman (2003; 2007) reported “foot thrashing” as an On 5 August 2015, the D2 ROV was exploring angular escape response to predators and in the laboratory by basalt blocks and sediment patches on the steep inner “mechanical disturbance” in the trochoidean gastropods slope of Maro Crater, an unusual 6 km-wide crater east Umbonium vestiarium (Linnaeus, 1758), Isanda coronata of Maro Reef (25.16o N, 169.88o W, 2998–3027 m). The A. Adams, 1854, and other species of the family cameras recorded what appeared to be a fish attacking or Solariellidae. The observations provided here are the first being attacked by some other unidentified animal. When of such behavior in Gaza spp. and among the few reports the ROV cameras were zoomed in on the encounter, the on behavior of non-cephalopod deep-sea mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Singapore's Seawalls Host Non-Native Marine Molluscs?
    Aquatic Invasions (2018) Volume 13, Issue 3: 365–378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2018.13.3.05 Open Access © 2018 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2018 REABIC Research Article Do Singapore’s seawalls host non-native marine molluscs? Wen Ting Tan1, Lynette H.L. Loke1, Darren C.J. Yeo2, Siong Kiat Tan3 and Peter A. Todd1,* 1Experimental Marine Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Block S3, #02-05, Singapore 117543 2Freshwater & Invasion Biology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Block S3, #02-05, Singapore 117543 3Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 2 Conservatory Drive, Singapore 117377 *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 9 March 2018 / Accepted: 8 August 2018 / Published online: 17 September 2018 Handling editor: Cynthia McKenzie Abstract Marine urbanization and the construction of artificial coastal structures such as seawalls have been implicated in the spread of non-native marine species for a variety of reasons, the most common being that seawalls provide unoccupied niches for alien colonisation. If urbanisation is accompanied by a concomitant increase in shipping then this may also be a factor, i.e. increased propagule pressure of non-native species due to translocation beyond their native range via the hulls of ships and/or in ballast water. Singapore is potentially highly vulnerable to invasion by non-native marine species as its coastline comprises over 60% seawall and it is one of the world’s busiest ports. The aim of this study is to investigate the native, non-native, and cryptogenic molluscs found on Singapore’s seawalls.
    [Show full text]
  • Hand Book of Statistics East Godavari District 2019
    HAND BOOK OF STATISTICS EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2019 . CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, E.G.DT., KAKINADA. Sri D. Muralidhar Reddy,I.A.S., District Collector & Magistrate, East Godavari, Kakinada. PREFACE I am delighted to release the Handbook of Statistics 2019 of East Godavari District with Statistical data of various departments for the year 2018-19. The Statistical data of different schemes implementing by various departments in the district have been collected and compiled in a systemic way so as to replicate the growth made under various sectors during the year. The Sector-wise progress has depicted in sector-wise tables apart from Mandal-wise data. I am sure that the publication will be of immense utility as a reference book to general public and Government and Non-Governmental agencies in general as well as Administrators, Planners, Research Scholars, Funding Agencies, Banks, Non-Profit Institutions etc., I am thankful to all District Officers and Heads of other Institutions for their co-operation by furnishing the information of their respective departments to the Chief Planning Officer for publication of this Handbook. I appreciate the efforts made by Chief Planning Officer, East Godavri District and his staff in collection and compilation of data to bring out this publication for 2018-19. Any suggestions meant for improvement of the Handbook are most welcome. Station : KAKINADA DISTRICT COLLECTOR Date : 25-10-2019 EAST GODAVARI, KAKINADA. OFFICERS AND STAFF ASSOCIATED WITH THE PUBLICATION 1. Sri K.V.K. Ratna Babu : Chief Planning Officer 2. Sri P. Balaji : Deputy Director 3. Smt. Aayesha Sultana : Statistical Officer 4. Sri G.
    [Show full text]
  • Iasbaba's Daily Quiz
    IASbaba’s Daily Quiz January 23, 2018 Q.1) Global Talent Competitiveness Index – 2018 is released by 1. Adecco 2. Insead 3. Tata Communications Select the correct code: a) 1 and 2 b) 2 and 3 c) 1 and 3 d) All of the above Q.1) Solution (d) The 2018 study is released by Adecco, Insead and Tata Communications. India has moved up on a global index of talent competitiveness to the 81st position. It is released every year on the first day of the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting. China has moved up to 43rd now, Russia to 53rd, South Africa to 63rd and Brazil to 73rd position. Source: https://www.ndtv.com/business/india-ranks-81st-on-global-talent- competitiveness-index-1803347 Q.2) National Regulatory Authority of India (NRAI) comprises of a) Pharmaco-vigilance Programme of India (PvPI) b) Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) c) Both (a) and (b) d) Neither (a) nor (b) Q.2) Solution (c) The National Regulatory Authority of India (NRAI), the vaccine regulating authority of India, has been given the highest ratings by global health body World Health Organization for vaccine regulations. IASbaba’s Daily Quiz January 23, 2018 WHO carried out assessment of the NRA of India comprising the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), State Drug Regulatory Authorities, Pharmaco-vigilance Programme of India (PvPI) and Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) structures at the Central and States level. National Regulatory Agencies (NRAs) are responsible for ensuring that pharmaceuticals and biological products, such as vaccines released for public distribution are evaluated properly and meet international standards of quality and safety.
    [Show full text]
  • State and Non-State Marine Fisheries Management: Legal Pluralism in East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India
    STATE AND NON-STATE MARINE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT: LEGAL PLURALISM IN EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA …. Sarah Southwold-Llewellyn Rural Development Sociology Department of Social Sciences Wageningen University Wageningen, The Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] Sarah Southwold-Llewellyn, 2010 Key words: marine fisheries, traditional fishing, mechanised fishing, management, legal pluralism, East Godavari District This 2010 report is a revision of an earlier working paper, Cooperation in the context of crisis: Public-private management of marine fisheries in East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India. IDPAD Working Paper No. 4. IDPAD: New Delhi and IDPAD: The Hague, 2006 (www. IDPAD.org). The Project, Co-operation in a Context of Crisis: Public-Private Management of Marine Fisheries in South Asia, was part of the fifth phase of the Indo-Dutch Programme for Alternative Development (2003-2006). IDPAD India Secretariat: Indian Institute of Social Science Research (ICSSR), New Delhi IDPAD The Netherlands secretariat: Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Tropical Research (WOTRO), The Hague, The Netherlands 2 Acknowledgements My research in East Godavari District would not have been possible without the cooperation and help of many more than I can acknowledge here. The help of many Government officers is greatly appreciated. On the whole, I was impressed by their professionalism, commitment and concern. They gave me their valuable time; and most of them were extremely candid. Much that they told me was ‘off the record’. I have tried to protect their anonymity by normally not citing them by name in the report. There are far too many to individuals to mention them all.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Treatise of Shore Dynamics and Spit Growth Near Kakinada Coast, Godavari Delta, Andhra Pradesh
    HISTORICAL TREATISE OF SHORE DYNAMICS AND SPIT GROWTH NEAR KAKINADA COAST, GODAVARI DELTA, ANDHRA PRADESH K.Mruthyunjaya Reddy*1 and B.L.Deekshatulu2 1Director General, A.P. State Remote Sensing Applications Centre (APSRAC), B-Block, 8th Floor, Swarnajayanthi Complex, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-500 038, India; Tel: +91-40-23755543. +91-9949626969 E-mail: [email protected] 2FNA, FIEEE (USA), FTWAS (Italy), Padmasri, Chairman, BOG NIT Warangal, Former Professor, IISC, Bangalore, Distinguished Scientist & Director NRSA, Director CSSTEAP (UN), Visiting Professor, University of Hyderabad 10-3-123/3, East Marredpally, Secunderabad-500 026, India E-mail: [email protected] KEY WORDS: Progradation, accretion, erosion, spit, shoreline ABSTRACT: India has 7517 km long coastline with major deltas on the east coast. Godavari delta is the 3rd largest, located in Andhra Pradesh, and it is familiar as rice bowl of the State. The presence of spit makes Kakinada a natural harbor. It is home for an anchorage port and a deep water port. Kakinada's deep-water port is the second largest in the state after Visakhapatnam port built in the year 1996.Hence its time sequential study is vital to understand the coastal processes and its environment. The study of multi-date remote sensing data and the historical maps revealed that during the period 1851-1893 the delta progradation is insignificant, but there was substantial growth from 1893-1957 to an extent of about 150 km2 at the rate of 1.66 km2 per year. For a period of 44 years i.e., from 1957-2001 the growth of the delta is marginal or almost stable.
    [Show full text]
  • And Babylonia Zeylanica (Bruguiere, 1789) Along Kerala Coast, India
    ECO-BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES OF THE WHELK, BABYLONIA SPIRATA (LINNAEUS, 1758) AND BABYLONIA ZEYLANICA (BRUGUIERE, 1789) ALONG KERALA COAST, INDIA Thesis submitted to Cochin University of Science and Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Under the faculty of Marine Sciences By ANJANA MOHAN (Reg. No: 2583) CENTRAL MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE Indian Council of Agricultural Research KOCHI 682 018 JUNE 2007 ®edi'catec[ to My Tarents. Certificate This is to certify that this thesis entitled “Eco-biology and fisheries of the whelk, Babylonia spirata (Linnaeus, 1758) and Babylonia zeylanica (Bruguiere, 1789) along Kerala coast, India” is an authentic record of research work carried out by Anjana Mohan (Reg.No. 2583) under my guidance and supervision in Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Ph.D degree in Marine science of the Cochin University of Science and Technology and no part of this has previously formed the basis for the award of any degree in any University. Dr. V. ipa (Supervising guide) Sr. Scientist,\ Mariculture Division Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute. Date: 3?-95' LN?‘ Declaration I hereby declare that the thesis entitled “Eco-biology and fisheries of the whelk, Babylonia spirata (Linnaeus, 1758) and Babylonia zeylanica (Bruguiere, 1789) along Kerala coast, India” is an authentic record of research work carried out by me under the guidance and supervision of Dr. V. Kripa, Sr. Scientist, Mariculture Division, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, in partial fulfillment for the Ph.D degree in Marine science of the Cochin University of Science and Technology and no part thereof has been previously formed the basis for the award of any degree in any University.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Project Location – Key Map 0 0 82 30’ 820 15’ 820 20’ 82 25’
    F1 - 26 Proposed LNG FSRU Terminal Annexure - 1 Proposed Project Location – Key Map 0 0 82 30’ 0 0 82 25’ 82 15’ 82 20’ 0 17 05’ F1 Proposed Widening and - Deepening of entry channel 27 Proposed Subsea pipeline 170 Proposed Onshore Island Jetty Facility 00’ Proposed 600 mɸ Turning Circle Annexure - 0 16 2 55’ Preliminary Layout of Proposed Project F1 - 28 (A) Identified location for Offshore Facility (Island Jetty & FSRU) Annexure - 3 (B) Identified location for Onshore Facility (landfall Point) Project Site Photographs APPENDEX I (Revised as per MoEF Notification S.O.3067(E) dt. 01.12.2009) (See paragraph – 6) FORM 1 (I) Basic Information Sr. Item Details No. 1. Name of the Project/s Development of offshore LNG FSRU Facility at Kakinada Deep Water Port 2. S.No. in the schedule 7(e) 3. Proposed The project will be designed for 6.5 Million Ton capacity/area/length/tonnage to be Per Annum (MTPA) LNG throughput (Equivalent handled/command area/lease to Approx. 26.9 MMSCMD Natural Gas flow area/number of wells to be drilled rate) 4. New/Expansion/Modernization Expansion 5. Existing Capacity/Area etc. The existing Kakinada Deep Water Port handled 10.8 Million Metric ton Multiple Cargo during 2010-’11 6. Category of Project i.e., 'A' or 'B' ‘A’ 7. Does it attract the general Not applicable, since proposed project falls in ‘A’ condition? If yes, category Please specify. 8. Does it attract the specific -No- condition? If yes, Please specify. 9. Location Kakinada Deep Water Port, Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh (Annexure- 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Content on E-Panchayat Mission Mode Project
    Centre for Innovations in Public Systems (CIPS) (An Organization Established with Funding from Government of India) CIPS - Content on e-Panchayat Mission Mode Project Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Project Conceptualization ................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Objectives of e-Panchayat MMP ......................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Applications Developed Under e-Panchayat MMP ............................................................................................................. 4 5. Adoption Status of PES Applications in States/UTs ............................................................................................................ 6 6. State Specific Applications corresponding to PES Applications .......................................................................................... 8 7. State Wise - No. of Panchayats providing services electronically ..................................................................................... 33 8. Model Panchayats for implementation of PES / State specific applications .................................................................... 40 9. e-Taal - Standard Services of e-Panchayat .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • District Census Handbook, East Godavari, Part X
    CENSUS 1971 SERIES 2 ANDHRA PRADESH DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK EAST GODA V ARt PART X-A VILLAGE & TOWN DIRECTORY PART X-B VILLAGE & TOWN PRIMARY CENSUS ABSTRACT T. VEDANTAM Of THE INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE DIRECTOR OF CENSUS OPERATIONS ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 1973 Rajahmundry had been in the 'News' e,ven btrl'iJl-c this saw mill unit started producing the "Gossip Bench". 3. There is g~od d~mand tor the wooden furniture pre jJared at thiS umt. The Indian Navy the P 'J T V' I ' 01 ru,~ts at lsak tapatnam and Madras, the Housing BOa1ds of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu th H O 1 lh Si 0 b 01 ' C In­ l us .an, up Ul ding yard at Visakhapatnam, Central and State Warehousing Corporations, Post and Tele­ graph; and Defence Departments figure prominently among the major consumers of the mill's products. 40 The volume of business transacted between the yea) 196-1·65 and 1970-71 indicates the stupendous gTOwth made by this unique concern during a short span of about 6 years. The turnover in the three main divisions of th~ unit viz., Sawing, Pmcessing and Treatment whzch stood in the order of 13 ,600 c.tt., 600 c.ft. and 3iOO c.ft.} valued totally at Rs. 2.6 lakhs in 1964-65 increased to 2,65,000c.ft., 14}OO c.ft. and THE INTEGRATED SAW MILL UNIT, 68,~QO c.~t. valued at over Rs. 21 lakhs in 1970-71. RAJAHMUNDRY Thz~ umt. with countrywide fame is looked upon as a pwneerznfj p~oject in the field of country wood The motif on the, cover page depicts a fully manufactunng zndustry.
    [Show full text]
  • Farms Permitted for Culture SPF L. Vannamei
    COASTAL AQUACULTURE AUTHORITY Ministry of Agriculture Government of India Farms permitted for culture SPF L. vannamei Sl. Name of the Firm/Applicant & Address Total Water CAA Registration Location of the No for communication Farm Spread Number Farm Area Area (ha) (ha) 1. M/s.Onaway Industries Ltd. Bawaria Falia, Matruchaya Complex, Mendher Village, 100.00 59.00 GJ-II-2008 (0099) Navjivan Colony, Navsari District, Bilimora – 396321, Gujarat Gujarat 2. M/s.Siri Aqua Fams & Exports Pvt Ltd. Etadam, Payaka Falt No: 204, Sita Towers, ASR Nagar, J.P. Rao AP-II-2009 (7733) Road, Bhimavaram – 534 202, West 71.30 63.15 Peta Mandal, Godavari District, A.P Visakhapatnam District 3. Shri.V. Vasant Kumar Near Harita Chollangi Village Nursing Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari district- College, Yanam 11.90 6.00 AP-II-2009 (8787) 533001, Andhra Pradesh Road, Chollangi Village, Tfallarevu Mandal 4. Smt.V.Uma Devi Near Harita Chollangi Village Nursing Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari district- AP-II-2009 (8788) College, Yanam 7.20 5.80 533001, Andhra Pradesh Road, Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal 5. M/s.Prathyusha Global Trade pvt. Ltd. Ravivaripalem Ravivaripalem Village, 28.50 21.00 AP-II-2009 (7749) Village, Tangutur(M) Tangutur Mandal Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh 6. M/s.Devi Sea Foods Ltd. Gadepalem 9-14-8/1, C.B.M. Compound, Village, 40.00 25.00 AP-II-2009 (7742) Visakhapatnam – 530003, Andhra Pradesh Kothapatnam Mandal 7. M/s.Devi Fisheries Ltd. Gadepalem 7-8-20/1, Kasturiba Marg, Village, Near Ramakrishna Mission, 36.00 23.00 AP-II-2009 (7741) Kothapatnam Visakhapatnam – 530 003 Mandal 8.
    [Show full text]
  • District Census Handbook, East Godavari, Part XII-A & B, Series-2
    CENSUS OF INDIA 1981 SERIES 2 ANDHRA PRADESH DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK EAST GODAVARI PARTS XIU-A & B VILLAGE & TOWN DIRECTORY VILLAGE & TOWNWISE PRIMARY CENSteJS ABSTRACT S. S. JAYA RAO OF THE INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE DIRECTOR OF CENSUS OPERATIONS ANDHRA PRADESH PUBUSHED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 1985 RAIL·CUM·ROAD BRIDGE ACROSS RIVER GODAVARI AT RAJAHMUNDRY The motif on the cover page represents the longest rail-cum-road bridge in Asia built across the river Godavari at Rajahmundry. Godavari is the most important river in Andhra Pradesh often referred to as 'Dakshina .. Ganga'. Taking its origin in the Western ::--~<. - .." -~~-~~ojL;~ Ghats near Nasik and after cutting across the r. ",.~:#. -;'~~~~'IIi!~~~~ Eastern Ghats through the magnificent Papi Hills gorge, Godavari emerges at Polavaram into the coastal plain. From hereon, the river widens and assumes majestic proponions of about 3 kms. at Rajahmundry and nearly 6 kms. at Do wleshwaram, before it flows into the Bay 01 Bengal near Kakinada on the East Coast. At Rajahmundry, the vital Madr~s-Howrah East-Coast line crosses the Godavari and a single line bridge constructed in 1900 A. D. at a cost of Rs. 48 lakhs. spans the river. The old bridge consists of 56 span~ of 45.7 metres (150 ft.) and a land span of 12 metres (40 ft.) totalling 2,771 metres (9,096 ft.) between the abutments. The Howrah-Madras line is one of the vital Railway trunk-routes in the country carrying principally coal, steel and surplus food grains from the rich agricultural lands of coastal Andhra Pradesh to the south.
    [Show full text]