DOCSLIB.ORG

Bc Uk Conservation Strategy Appendix 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bc Uk Conservation Strategy Appendix 5 BC UK CONSERVATION STRATEGY APPENDIX 5: REGIONAL AND COUNTRY CONSERVATION STRATEGIES PRIORITY LANDSCAPES AND SPECIES Butterflies BC UK Conservation Strategy Species Priority Class A A A A A A A A A B B B B B B B B C C C C C C C C Landscape name Landscape Number Landscape priority Landscape Branch Skipper Chequered Lulworth Skipper Wood White FritillaryPearl-bordered High FritillaryBrown Marsh Fritillary Fritillary Heath of Burgundy Duke Blue Large Dingy Skipper Grizzled Skipper Heath Large Grayling Small Fritillary Pearl-bordered Glanville Fritillary Blue Silver-studded Argus Brown Northern Swallowtail Wood White Cryptic Mountain Ringlet Admiral White Hairstreak Brown Hairstreak White-letter Hairstreak Black Small Blue West Cumbria Coastal Plain 1 High Priority Landscape Cumbria H H H Solway Woods 2 High Priority Landscape Cumbria H H H H North West Eden Valley 3 High Priority Landscape Cumbria H H H Cumbria High Fells 4 High Priority Landscape Cumbria H H H H South Orton Fells 5 Priority Landscape Cumbria H H H South Cumbria Low Fells 6 High Priority Landscape Cumbria H H H H H H H Morecambe Bay Limestones 7 High Priority Landscape Cumbria; Lancashire H H H H H H H H M North Bowland Fells 8 Priority Landscape Lancashire H H M Sefton Coast and the Wirral (Lancashire) 9 Priority Landscape Lancashire H M Sefton Coast and the Wirral (Cheshire) 9 Priority Landscape Cheshire H H M Border Uplands 10 Priority Landscape North East England H H H North Northumberland Coastal Plain 11 Priority Landscape North East England H H Durham Coalfield Pennine Fringe 12 High Priority Landscape North East England H H North East Brownfields 13 High Priority Landscape North East England H H M Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau 14 High Priority Landscape North East England H H M Yorkshire Dales and Craven Lowlands 15 High Priority Landscape Yorkshire H H H M North York Moors 16 High Priority Landscape Yorkshire H H H H H M Yorkshire Wolds 17 Priority Landscape Yorkshire H H M Border Hills (Oswestry Uplands) 18 High Priority Landscape West Midlands H H H H H H North Shropshire Meres and Mosses 19 High Priority Landscape West Midlands H H H H H Stiperstones, Long Mynd and Stretton Hills 20 High Priority Landscape West Midlands H H H H Telford and Wrekin Brownfields 21 Priority Landscape West Midlands H M North Herefordshire and South Shropshire Woods and Pastures 22 High Priority Landscape West Midlands H H H E H E H Clee Hills 23 Priority Landscape West Midlands H Queens Wood and Lower Lugg Valley 24 Priority Landscape West Midlands H H Black Mountains and Golden Valley (England) 25 High Priority Landscape West Midlands E? H H H H Woolhope Dome 26 High Priority Landscape West Midlands H H H H M H Doward and Coppett Hill 27 High Priority Landscape West Midlands E H H E H Malvern Hills 28 High Priority Landscape West Midlands E E E H E H E M H Staffordshire Moorlands 29 Priority Landscape West Midlands E H E E H E Stoke-on-Trent Brownfields 30 Priority Landscape West Midlands H West Staffordshire Woods and Brownfields 31 Priority Landscape West Midlands H H E Cannock Chase 32 High Priority Landscape West Midlands H H H Wider Wyre 33 High Priority Landscape West Midlands H H H H H M H West Worcestershire Woods 34 High Priority Landscape West Midlands E H E H Forest of Feckenham 35 High Priority Landscape West Midlands R R H H M H H Bredon Hill and Vale of Evesham 36 Priority Landscape West Midlands H H H Black Country Brownfields 37 Priority Landscape West Midlands H North Warwickshire Brownfields 38 Priority Landscape Warwickshire H H M H Princethorpe Woodlands 39 High Priority Landscape Warwickshire H R H H E M H H Rugby Railways and Spoilbanks 40 Priority Landscape Warwickshire H H M H South Western Woodlands and Grasslands 41 Priority Landscape Warwickshire H H M H Southam Lias Grasslands 42 High Priority Landscape Warwickshire E H H M H H Bardney Limewoods 43 Priority Landscape Lincolnshire R E M H H R Kesteven Uplands 44 Priority Landscape Lincolnshire H H H M H White Peak 45 Priority Landscape East Midlands H E H E Central Coalfields 46 Priority Landscape East Midlands H H H East Midlands Plain 47 Priority Landscape East Midlands H H The National Forest 48 Priority Landscape East Midlands H E M H West Norfolk Heathlands 49 Priority Landscape Norfolk H H M M North Norfolk Coast 50 Priority Landscape Norfolk E M M M Holt Ridge 51 Priority Landscape Norfolk E E M H M M North Norwich Heaths 52 High Priority Landscape Norfolk H M M Norfolk Broads (inc. Waveney Fens) 53 High Priority Landscape Norfolk H M North East Coastal Strip 54 Priority Landscape Norfolk M Cut Off Channel 55 Priority Landscape Norfolk H H The Brecks (Norfolk) 56 High Priority Landscape Norfolk H H M M M The Brecks (Suffolk) 56 High Priority Landscape Suffolk H M M M Suffolk Coast and Heaths 57 High Priority Landscape Suffolk M H M M Ipswich Heaths 58 High Priority Landscape Suffolk M H M M Essex Sea Wall & Coastal Grasslands 59 Priority Landscape Cambridgeshire & Essex E M Essex Heaths 60 Priority Landscape Cambridgeshire & Essex M M South East Essex Woodlands 61 High Priority Landscape Cambridgeshire & Essex H Langdon Hills 62 Priority Landscape Cambridgeshire & Essex H M East Anglian Chalk 63 Priority Landscape Cambridgeshire & Essex H M E Cambridgeshire Elm Belt 64 High Priority Landscape Cambridgeshire & Essex H M H Cambridgeshire Great Fen 65 Priority Landscape Cambridgeshire & Essex H M Rockingham Forest 66 High Priority Landscape Beds & Northants E H H H M M H Yardley-Whittlewood Ridge 67 High Priority Landscape Beds & Northants H H H M M H Bedfordshire Greensand Ridge 68 Priority Landscape Beds & Northants H H M Marston Vale (Bedfordshire Brownfields) 69 Priority Landscape Beds & Northants H H M M H The Chilterns (Bedfordshire) 70 High Priority Landscape Beds & Northants H H H M H The Chilterns (Hertfordshire) 70 High Priority Landscape Herts & Middlesex E E H H E E E M H North Herts Chalk 71 Priority Landscape Herts & Middlesex E H E M M H East Herts Brownfields 72 Priority Landscape Herts & Middlesex E H M M North West London Urban Fringe 73 Priority Landscape Herts & Middlesex E E E E E M E M H Isles of Scilly 74 Priority Landscape Cornwall The Lizard 75 Priority Landscape Cornwall H M M M M Praa Sands and Loe Bar 76 Priority Landscape Cornwall West Penwith 77 Priority Landscape Cornwall H M M M H Mid Cornwall Moors 78 Priority Landscape Cornwall H M H M M H Bodmin Moor 79 High Priority Landscape Cornwall H H M M North Cornwall Coast 80 High Priority Landscape Cornwall E M H H M H East Cornwall Coast 81 Priority Landscape Cornwall H M M H M Tamar Valley 82 High Priority Landscape Cornwall; Devon H H M The Culm 83 High Priority Landscape Devon H H E H M H L E M Dartmoor 84 High Priority Landscape Devon H H H H E M E M M M H Bovey Basin and Heath 85 Priority Landscape Devon H H M H H H H M M Torbay 86 Priority Landscape Devon M M M H East Devon Commons 87 Priority Landscape Devon M M M H M East Devon Coast 88 Priority Landscape Devon H M M H Exmoor 89 High Priority Landscape Devon; Somerset & Bristol E H H H M M M Blackdown Hills 90 High Priority Landscape Somerset & Bristol H H H M H M H H M The Quantocks 91 Priority Landscape Somerset & Bristol M M Polden Hills 92 High Priority Landscape Somerset & Bristol H H M M M H M M M Mendip Hills 93 Priority Landscape Somerset & Bristol M M M M H M M West Dorset Coast 94 Priority Landscape Dorset H H H M M E M H Wessex Vales 95 Priority Landscape Dorset E H M M E M Chesil Beach 96 Priority Landscape Dorset H M Isle of Portland 97 High Priority Landscape Dorset H M M H Purbeck Coast 98 High Priority Landscape Dorset H M M M E H Dorset Heaths 99 Priority Landscape Dorset M H L H H Blackmoor Vale 100 High Priority Landscape Dorset H M E H H M South Wessex Downs and Cranborne Chase 101 High Priority Landscape Dorset; Wiltshire H H M H E H M M M South East Wiltshire and West Hampshire Downs and Woods (Wiltshire) 102 High Priority Landscape Wiltshire E H H H M H H H H H M M South Wiltshire Downs and Woods 103 Priority Landscape Wiltshire H H H M M E E M H H M Salisbury Plain 104 High Priority Landscape Wiltshire H H M H H H H M M West Wiltshire Woodlands 105 Priority Landscape Wiltshire E E E E H E E E E M Vale of Pewsey 106 Priority Landscape Wiltshire H H M H H Marlborough Downs 107 Priority Landscape Wiltshire H H M H H H M M Braydon Forest Woodlands 108 Priority Landscape Wiltshire H H H H H H M M The Cotswolds 109 High Priority Landscape Gloucestershire H H H H M H E H M H M Cirencester Park Woodlands 110 Priority Landscape Gloucestershire H H H H H H Forest of Dean 111 High Priority Landscape Gloucestershire H H H H E H H H Wye Valley and Southern Woodlands 112 High Priority Landscape Gloucestershire H E H H H H New Forest 113 High Priority Landscape Hampshire & IOW M H H H H L M North Wessex Downs 114 High Priority Landscape Hampshire & IOW H M M L M South East Wiltshire and West Hampshire Woods and Downs (Hampshire) 102 High Priority Landscape Hampshire & IOW H H M M M L M M Langstone, Chichester and Solent Coast 115 Priority Landscape Hampshire & IOW H H M Isle of Wight North Western Woods 116 Priority Landscape Hampshire & IOW M H L M Isle of Wight Central Ridge 117 Priority Landscape Hampshire & IOW M H H H L M M Isle of Wight Southern Uplands 118 Priority Landscape Hampshire & IOW M H H M M Isle of Wight Southern Coastline 119 Priority Landscape Hampshire & IOW H Northern Clay Vales 120 Priority Landscape Upper Thames H H M M M M M Yardley-Whittlewood Ridge (Whittlewood Forest) 67 High Priority Landscape Upper Thames
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Significance of the Landscape
    Norfolk Coast AONB Management Plan 2014-19 Supporting Information The significance of the Norfolk Coast landscape Summarised from 'The Norfolk Coast Landscape: An assessment of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty' (Countryside Commission, CCP 486, 1995). This document is now out of print and not available in digital format, but a copy is available at the Norfolk Coast Partnership office if you wish to read it in full. AONB designation Judging the importance of a particular area of landscape is no easy matter. The importance and value attached to the Norfolk Coast landscape has already been reflected by its designation, in 1968, as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) as well as by the separate definition in 1975 of a more limited part of the area as a Heritage Coast. It is helpful to consider the area's special qualities under four main headings: ● the value of the landscape as part of the national and regional landscape resource , by virtue of its rarity or representativeness, and including comparison with other areas of similar landscape character and with the surrounding landscape; ● the scenic qualities of the landscape, including the particular combination of landscape elements, aesthetic qualities, local distinctiveness and 'sense of place'; ● evidence about how the landscape is perceived and valued by the general public and by writers and others who may have been inspired by it; ● other special values attached to the landscape including historical and cultural associations and special conservation interests, relating to features of outstanding nature conservation or archaeological interest. Summarised below are the ways in which the Norfolk Coast demonstrates these qualities to an extent that makes the area a truly outstanding landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of 2008 CPA the Scale of Things
    Analysis of 2008 CPA The Scale of Things Councillor Newton Wood Chair Overview and Scrutiny 23 JULY 2008 1 FOREWORD The contents of this report have the approval of the Overview and Scrutiny Coordinating Group for presentation to the full Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting for their consideration on Wednesday 23 rd July 2008. It is important that this report identifies, for officers, members and the community, the exact position Teesdale is in, that is in relation to the scale of performance within our own county, County Durham and in the bigger picture that is in the country as a whole. Without being aware of where we are, we are unlikely to know where we are going! Unitary status is on the horizon. Durham County Council is a 4 star authority and has compared itself to other single tier councils in the country. Beyond doubt, with such expertise, acknowledged skills and professionalism the new authority will serve to compliment and improve upon the quality of services for the Teesdale community. However, as many weaknesses have been identified by the 2008 CPA inspection, our position in relation to the rest of the country has already been determined by The Audit Commission. This report highlights:- • Where we are at this point in time • Areas which need attention • Those weaknesses which can be handed over to county methods and procedures. • Some areas which need urgent attention by Teesdale District Council • The new county councillors representing Teesdale will now, hopefully, be aware of where we are in the scale of things and the work they have ahead of them to bring us in line with our fellow districts in County Durham.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Hills Aonb Areas of Search
    CONFIDENTIAL SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL LCA PHASE 2 SURREY HILLS AONB AREAS OF SEARCH NATURAL BEAUTY EVALUATION by Hankinson Duckett Associates HDA ref: 595.1 October 2013 hankinson duckett associates t 01491 838175 f 01491 838997 e [email protected] w www.hda-enviro.co.uk The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA Hankinson Duckett Associates Limited Registered in England & Wales 3462810 Registered Office: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BA CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Assessment Background ............................................................................................................. 1 Table 1: LCA Landscape Types and Character Areas ...................................................................................... 2 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 5 4 Guidance ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2: Natural England Guidance Factors and Sub-factors ........................................................................... 6 4.5 Application of the Guidance ............................................................................................................................. 10 5 The Surrey Hills Landscape
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Census Report for Parliamentary Constituencies
    Reference maps Page England and Wales North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 42 North West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 43 Yorkshire & The Humber: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 44 East Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 45 West Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 46 East of England: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 47 London: County & Parliamentary Constituencies 48 South East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 49 South West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 50 Wales: Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 51 Scotland Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Regions 52 Central Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 53 Glasgow Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 54 Highlands and Islands Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 55 Lothians Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 56 Mid Scotland and Fife Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 57 North East Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 58 South of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 59 West of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 60 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland: Parliamentary Constituencies 61 41 Reference maps Census 2001: Report for Parliamentary Constituencies North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies Key government office region parliamentary constituencies counties
    [Show full text]
  • Worcestershire Has Fluctuated in Size Over the Centuries
    HUMAN GENETICS IN WORCESTERSHIRE AND THE SHAKESPEARE COUNTRY I. MORGAN WATKIN County Health Department, Abet ystwyth Received7.x.66 1.INTRODUCTION THEwestern limits of Worcestershire lie about thirty miles to the east of Offa's Dyke—the traditional boundary between England and Wales —yet Evesham in the south-eastern part of the county is described by its abbot in a petition to Thomas Cromwell in as situated within the Principality of Wales. The Star Chamber Proceedings (No. 4) in the reign of Henry VII refer to the bridge of stone at Worcester by which the king's subjects crossed from England into Wales and the demonstrations against the Act of 1430 regulating navigation along the Severn were supported by large numbers of Welshmen living on the right bank of the river in Worcestershire. The object of the investigation is to ascertain whether significant genetic differences exist in the population of Worcestershire and south-western Warwickshire and, in particular, whether the people living west of the Severn are more akin to the Welsh than to the English. The possibility of determining, on genetic grounds, whether the Anglo- Saxon penetration was strongest from the south up the rivers Severn and Avon, or across the watershed from the Trent in the north, or from the east through Oxfordshire and Warwickshire is also explored. 2. THECOUNTY Worcestershirehas fluctuated in size over the centuries and Stratford-on-Avon came for a period under its jurisdiction while Shipston-on-Stour, now a Warwickshire township, remained in one of the detached portions of Worcestershire until the turn of the present century.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Deprivation in Shropshire
    HEALTH DEPRIVATION IN SHROPSHIRE Shropshire Rank National Rank Whitchurch Whitchurch Ellesmere Market Drayton Ellesmere Market Drayton Oswestry Wem Oswestry Wem Shrewsbury Shrewsbury Shifnal Shifnal Albrighton Albrighton Church Stretton Bridgnorth Church Stretton Bridgnorth Bishops Castle Bishops Castle Craven Arms Craven Arms Ludlow Ludlow Shrewsbury Inset Shrewsbury Inset IMD - Health Deprivation Shropshire Quintiles Least IMD - Health Deprivation National Quintiles 4 Least deprived 3 4 2 3 Most 2 Market Towns Most deprived Market Towns Source: IMD 2010, Communities & Local Government and SOA Boundaries, Office of National Statistics © Crown copyright and database rights 2011 Source: IMD 2010, Communities & Local Government Ordnance Survey 100049049 and SOA Boundaries, Office of National Statistics © Crown copyright and database rights 2011 Ordnance Survey 100049049 Health Deprivation This domain measures premature death and the impairment of quality of life by poor health. It considers both physical and mental health. The domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality but not aspects of behaviour or environment that may be predictive of future health deprivation. Four indicators are used to calculate this domain: • Years of Potential Life Lost – an age & sex standardised measure of premature death • Comparative Illness & Disability Ratio – an age and sex standardised measure of morbidity and disability • Measures of acute morbidity – an age and sex standardised rate of emergency admissions to hospital. • Proportion of
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    10 February 2010 Our ref: Your ref: Southgate Street Bury St Edmunds Matt Deakin Suffolk Suffolk Coastal District Council IP33 2FE Melton Hill T 0300 060 2384 Woodbridge F 0300 060 1662 IP12 1AU Dear Matt Suffolk Coastal District Council Local Development Framework Habitat Regulations Appropriate Assessment and Clarification Summary of the Core Strategy Thank you for your letter of 13 January 2010 consulting Natural England on the above. Following on from my email of last week, below are Natural England’s full and final comments on the Clarification Summary and the Appropriate Assessment of the Core Strategy. 1. The maths involved in estimating the increase in visitors to European sites was more clearly explained in the Clarification Summary in Point 2, so Natural England are now able to agree to the predicted increase of 2-5% of all visitors. 2. We agree with the comments made in 2.6-2.8 that the predicted growth in population in the Suffolk Coastal District Council area of 0.9 people per dwelling should not be used as the occupancy rate for the proposed development areas; also that the increase in population at these growth locations will not necessarily be balanced out by reductions elsewhere, as the growth locations are situated nearer to the SPAs. The proposed development areas East of Ipswich and in the Felixstowe area could therefore mean significant increases in populations locally and therefore potentially significantly high impacts from recreational disturbance. 3. Whilst the statistics in the ‘Heaths’ studies may show that most people have walked less than 1km to get to Dorset Heaths and 79% walked less than 1km to get to Thames Basin Heaths, we do not believe that means that significant numbers of new residents will NOT walk to the estuaries from the proposed development areas (the studies are related specifically to heaths, the coast is different).
    [Show full text]
  • AONB Team Response to Matter 7 (Environment Policies) Question 7.6 A-C
    AONB Office Dock Lane Melton Suffolk IP12 1PE 01394 384948 W: www.dedhamvalestourvalley.org W: www.suffolkcoastandheaths.org 3 June 2021 AONB team response to Matter 7 (Environment Policies) Question 7.6 a-c This response has been prepared by Beverley McClean on behalf of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) team. The AONB team that works across the Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley and the Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB. The AONB team welcome the opportunity to comment on Matter 7 Q7.6 a-c. 7.6 a) Is policy LP20 consistent with national policy? Policy LP20 is not considered to be consistent with national policy namely paragraph 172 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). In our response to the Regulation 19 consultation, the AONB team highlighted its broad support of the policy LP20. However, the team also requested several amendments to policy LP20 which we considered were necessary to ensure that the policy is sound. The NPPF provides the framework which Local Plans and other development plans must accord with. Paragraph 172 sets out the development approach for all nationally Protected Landscapes including AONBs. Paragraph 172 states ‘Great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, which have the highest status of protection in relation to these issues. The conservation and enhancement of wildlife and cultural heritage are also important considerations in these areas and should be given great weight in National Parks the Broads. The scale and extent of development within these designated areas should be limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy
    Shropshire Local Development Framework : Adopted Core Strategy March 2011 “A Flourishing Shropshire” Shropshire Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Spatial Portrait 7 Shropshire in 2010 7 Communities 9 Economy 10 Environment 13 Spatial Zones in Shropshire 14 3 The Challenges We Face 27 Spatial Vision 28 Strategic Objectives 30 4 Creating Sustainable Places 34 Policy CS1: Strategic Approach 35 Policy CS2: Shrewsbury Development Strategy 42 Policy CS3: The Market Towns and Other Key Centres 48 Policy CS4: Community Hubs and Community Clusters 61 Policy CS5: Countryside and Green Belt 65 Policy CS6: Sustainable Design and Development Principles 69 Policy CS7: Communications and Transport 73 Policy CS8: Facilities, Services and Infrastructure Provision 77 Policy CS9: Infrastructure Contributions 79 5 Meeting Housing Needs 82 Policy CS10: Managed Release of Housing Land 82 Policy CS11: Type and Affordability of Housing 85 Policy CS12: Gypsies and Traveller Provision 89 6 A Prosperous Economy 92 Policy CS13: Economic Development, Enterprise and Employment 93 Policy CS14: Managed Release of Employment Land 96 Policy CS15: Town and Rural Centres 100 Policy CS16: Tourism, Culture and Leisure 104 7 Environment 108 Policy CS17: Environmental Networks 108 Policy CS18: Sustainable Water Management 111 Policy CS19: Waste Management Infrastructure 115 Policy CS20: Strategic Planning for Minerals 120 Contents Page 8 Appendix 1: Saved Local and Structure Plan Policies replaced by the Core Strategy 126 9 Glossary 138
    [Show full text]
  • The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648
    The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Worton, Jonathan Citation Worton, J. (2015). The royalist and parliamentarian war effort in Shropshire during the first and second English civil wars, 1642-1648. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Publisher University of Chester Download date 24/09/2021 00:57:51 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/612966 The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of The University of Chester For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Jonathan Worton June 2015 ABSTRACT The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Jonathan Worton Addressing the military organisation of both Royalists and Parliamentarians, the subject of this thesis is an examination of war effort during the mid-seventeenth century English Civil Wars by taking the example of Shropshire. The county was contested during the First Civil War of 1642-6 and also saw armed conflict on a smaller scale during the Second Civil War of 1648. This detailed study provides a comprehensive bipartisan analysis of military endeavour, in terms of organisation and of the engagements fought. Drawing on numerous primary sources, it explores: leadership and administration; recruitment and the armed forces; military finance; supply and logistics; and the nature and conduct of the fighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto for the Landscape
    Manifesto for the Landscape March 2013 A secure future for our finest landscapes We call on the Government to ensure: Adequate funding: Our National Parks and AONBs deserve secure funding so they can plan ahead for the future. Government should recognise the benefits they bring to the nation through the happiness and well-being of visitors, the high quality of landscape and resource management by the National Park Authorities and the role of the Parks in supporting English tourism. Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty also face an uncertain future as local authority budgets are cut and money for the management of AONBs comes under greater pressure. New and extended Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty: A commitment from Government to support new AONBs in the Yorkshire Wolds, Forest of Dean and the Marches in Herefordshire. Natural England must have sufficient resources to develop our AONB network, including extensions to the Surrey Hills and Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONBs. Lake District and Yorkshire Dales National Park extensions: the areas in between the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales National Parks are widely regarded as unfinished business dating back to when the National Parks first came into being. These stunning landscapes belong within the National Parks and their exclusion is both an administrative anomaly and puts them at risk from damaging development. Natural England first proposed designating land between the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales National Parks in 2009. Public opinion is in favour of the extensions. A Public Inquiry will begin in June 2013. We call on Government to confirm the extensions promptly.
    [Show full text]