DOCSLIB.ORG

Plague , ‘Bulmuş Provides a Truly Remarkable Synthesis of Medical History and the History of European–Ottoman Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plague , ‘Bulmuş Provides a Truly Remarkable Synthesis of Medical History and the History of European–Ottoman Relations Plague ‘Bulmuş provides a truly remarkable synthesis of medical history and the history of European–Ottoman relations. Scientific complexities are clearly explained in the contexts of the rise of modern science and modern European imperialism. Bulmuş , utilises a wide range of sources, including previously under-used Muslim sources, to Quarantines strengthen her analysis.’ John Voll, Professor of Islamic History and Associate Director, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim–Christian Understanding, Georgetown University A sweeping examination of Ottoman plague treatise writers and from the Black Death until 1923 Geopolitics Were you aware that many of the greatest and most colourful Ottoman statesmen and literary figures from the 15th to the early 20th century considered plague as a grave threat to their empire? Did you know that many Ottomans applauded the establishment of a quarantine against the disease in 1838 as a tool to resist British and French political and commercial penetration? Or that later Ottoman sanitation efforts in the to prevent urban outbreaks would help engender the Arab revolt against the empire in 1916? This book explores these facts in an engaging study of Ottoman plague treatise writers throughout their almost 600-year struggle with this epidemic disease. And it Ottoman Empire deals with the political, economic and social consequences of the methods they used to combat it. Key Features • Studies the premodern ways in which plague was viewed by Ottoman Plague, Islamic thinkers • Traces the eventual Ottoman acceptance of quarantines and other modern Quarantines medical reforms • Analyses international debates over plagues and quarantines as a struggle about and colonialism and national sovereignty Birsen Bulmuş Geopolitics Birsen Bulmuş is an Assistant Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at Appalachian State University. in the ISBN 978-0-7486-4659-3 Ottoman Empire www.euppublishing.com Jacket image: The ‘Fortress of Silence’ near Bombay where the Persians left their dead © Servet-i Fünun Birsen (İstanbul), volume: 19, number: 482, 25 May 1316 (1898). Jacket design: Barrie Tullett Bulmuş PLAGUE, QUARANTINES AND GEOPOLITICS IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd i 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd iiii 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 PLAGUE, QUARANTINES AND GEOPOLITICS IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE . BIRSEN BULMUS¸ BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd iiiiii 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 For my mother, Beyaz Bulmuş and my late father, Ahmet Bulmuş © Birsen Bulmuş, 2012 Edinburgh University Press Ltd 22 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LF www.euppublishing.com Typeset in JaghbUni Regular by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire, and printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon CR0 4YY A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 0 7486 4659 3 (hardback) ISBN 978 0 7486 4660 9 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 0 7486 5547 2 (epub) ISBN 978 0 7486 5546 5 (Amazon ebook) The right of Birsen Bulmuş to be identifi ed as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd iivv 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 Contents Acknowledgements vi Map showing the Ottoman Empire, 1914 viii 1. PRELIMINARY REMARKS 1 2. CONCEPTUALISING PLAGUE IN OTTOMAN ISLAMIC THOUGHT 15 3. PLAGUE AND OTTOMAN MEDICAL THOUGHT 39 4. MAGIC AND PLAGUE IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE 68 5. HAMDAN BIN EL-MERHUM OSMAN AND THE OTTOMAN QUARANTINE REFORM 97 6. PLAGUE AND QUARANTINES IN THE COLONIAL ERA 130 7. PLAGUE, SANITARY ADMINISTRATION AND THE END OF EMPIRE 152 8. TOWARDS A NEW UNDERSTANDING OF PLAGUE AND QUARANTINES IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE 177 Bibliography 181 Index 191 BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd v 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 Acknowledgements This book is the product of many years of labour, and evolved out of my PhD thesis, ‘Plague in the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1838’, which I completed at the Department of History, Georgetown University in May 2008. I would have not completed my work without the encouragement of my mentor, Dr Kathy Olesko, and that of the other members of my PhD dissertation committee, Dr John O. Voll and Dr Carol Benedict. I have also been guided by a wide range of scholars in Ottoman, Middle Eastern and European history, Turkish studies and historical sociology. These include: Dr Sandra Horvath-Peterson, Georgetown University; Dr Özkul Çobanoğlu, Hacettepe University; Dr Kelvin A. Santiago-Valles, Binghamton University; Dr Halil İnalcık, world-renowned scholar and my great MA mentor at Bilkent University; and Dr Ali Doğramacı, Rector of Bilkent University. I also feel an enormous debt of gratitude to Dr Farhan Ahmad Nizami, director at Centre for Islamic Studies and Dr Eugene L. Rogan, Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford, for their assistance following my visit to Oxford in the summer of 1996. I have also been the benefi ciary of support from a number of research insti- tutions, whose help was absolutely critical to the successful completion of my book. These include the Ankara University Faculty of Divinity Library, Atatürk Library, Devlet Library, Hacı Selim Ağa Rare Manuscript Library, Millet Rare Manuscript Library, National Library, Religious Affairs Library, Süleymaniye Library, T. C. Prime Ministry State Archives, Turkish Religious Foundation Centre for Islamic Studies (İSAM) and Turkish Historical Society Library, all in Ankara and Istanbul, Turkey. I also benefi ted greatly from collections at the Georgetown University Library, Library of Congress, National Library of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries and New York Public vi BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd vvii 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 Acknowledgements vii Library. I would like to thank several librarians and related offi cials, particularly Servet Arıtürk, İstanbul Metropolitan Municipality; Salih Gülen, Editor and Chief of Hazine Yayınları; Ebubekir Kaya, İstanbul University Central Library; Erdem Selçuk, Beyazıt State Library; Perihan Sezen, İstanbul University Medical School Hulusi Behçet Library; and Mustafa Birol Ülker, Director of the Turkish Religious Foundation Centre for Islamic Studies. I am also very grateful to Crystal Smith and Karen Pitts from the National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC. I have also benefi ted recently from continuous feedback from my friends, especially my fellow colleagues in the Department of History at Appalachian State University, particularly Dr Lucinda McCray, who shares a common inter- est in the history of medicine, Dr James Goff, Dr Tim Silver and Dr Michael Wade. I also have gained much encouragement in recent months from Mehmet Ali Akat of Paterson, New Jersey and Orçun Temizkan of Charlotte, North Carolina. Mohamed Ben Yahia of Fairfax, Virginia has also been a great friend and has provided generous time in reading relevant Arabic texts related to my project. In addition, I would especially like to thank Dr York Norman of Buffalo State College for his generous support during all stages of this project, including his patient editing of my work and his translations of relevant materials from Bosnian and German to English. I am also very grateful to Dr Nancy Gallagher of the University of California- Santa Barbara and Dr Colin Imber of the University of Manchester for their reviews of my work. Nicola Ramsey, Senior Commissioning Editor, and her colleagues at Edinburgh University Press were ultimately also key to the successful completion of the book. BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd vviiii 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 Map showing the Ottoman Empire, 1914 (United States Military Academy) BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd vviiiiii 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd iixx 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd x 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 Chapter 1 Preliminary Remarks One day in the summer of 2004 I wandered down to the shores of Istanbul’s Golden Horn and saw a peculiar sight: a grand, yellow, nineteenth-century build- ing sitting directly on top of one of the district’s most famous mosques. Right next to it was an equally elegant red-brown offi ce, directly on the shores of the bay. International travellers to the city who come by boat have to go to these buildings even today in order to undergo medical inspection to see if they have contracted any epidemic disease. Certainly, most travellers to Istanbul before the mid-twentieth century would almost certainly have been familiar with the compound, as ships were the mode of overseas travel. After learning from the guards that the buildings were constructed in the mid- nineteenth century, I, as a student of the history of medicine in the Middle East, wondered why the Ottomans had waited so long. Travellers began to complain of plague spreading from the district’s docks to the surrounding city shortly after Sultan Mehmed II’s conquest of the city in 1453, and yet it took about 400 years for a quarantine to be built. I wondered, then, to what extent geopolitical and cultural infl uences explained this development. I remembered that the Ottomans essentially remained a premodern state until Napoleon’s conquest of Egypt in 1798 forced the Sultanate to embark on modernising reform in order to save the empire from disintegration. Istanbul and the realm’s other major port cities had relatively few Muslim merchants and a comparatively weak navy, and relied on non-Muslims and foreigners to develop their overseas trade. The result was a lack of both a politically conscious Muslim middle class and a lively press culture that expressed interest in modernising reform and economic development. I had the impression from the Ottoman primary sources that I looked at 1 BBULMUSULMUS PPRINT.inddRINT.indd 1 006/03/20126/03/2012 116:346:34 2 Plague, Quarantines and Geopolitics in the Ottoman Empire over the next few months that the Istanbul quarantine facility was one of many innovations partially inspired by the Europeans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consuls of the Dardanelles and Gallipoli
    1 COLLABORATIVE ONLINE RESEARCH PROJECT Consuls of “THE DARDANELLES” and “GALLIPOLI” (Updated Version no: 4 – February 2013) Welcome to a resource being compiled about the consuls and consulates of “The Dardanelles” and “Gallipoli”. This is an ongoing project. In this fourth update, many new details have been added, especially from genealogical sources, and some questions clarified. The information shown here is not complete and may contain errors. For this reason, it may appear rather haphazard in some places. In time, a more coherent narrative will emerge. The project aims to take advantage of the Internet as a source of information and as a means of communication. There is now a vast and increasing amount of information online which allows us access to sources located in various countries. Many sources are quoted verbatim until the content can be confirmed in comparision with other sources. If you are a researcher, family member, or simply interested in some aspect of this topic, you may be able to help by providing additions, corrections, etc., however short. This will help to fill in gaps and present a fuller picture for the benefit of everybody researching these families or this locality. Comments and contributions should be sent to the following e-mail address: (contact[at]levantineheritagefoundation.org) The information here will be amended in the light of contributions. All contributions will be acknowledged unless you prefer your name not to be mentioned. Many different languages are involved but English is being used as the “lingua franca” in order to reach as many people as possible. Notes in other languages have been and will be included.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the Coronavirus and Its Impact on International Relations
    Vol. 14(3), pp. 116-125, July-September 2020 DOI: 10.5897/AJPSIR2020.1271 Article Number: FA1630564661 ISSN: 1996-0832 Copyright ©2020 African Journal of Political Science and Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJPSIR International Relations Full Length Research Paper The politics of the coronavirus and its impact on international relations Bheki Richard Mngomezulu Department of Political Science, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Western Cape, South Africa. Received 7 June, 2020; Accepted 1 July, 2020 Pandemic outbreaks are not a new phenomenon globally. There is plethora of evidence to substantiate this view. However, each epidemic has its own defining features, magnitude, and discernible impact. Societies are affected differently. The coronavirus or COVID-19 is not an incongruity. Although it is still active, thus making detailed empirical data inconclusive, it has already impacted societies in many ways - leaving indelible marks. Regarding methodology, this paper is an analytic and exploratory desktop study which draws evidence from different countries to advance certain arguments. It is mainly grounded in political science (specifically international relations) and history academic disciplines. Firstly, the paper begins by looking at how the coronavirus has affected international relations – both positively and negatively. Secondly, using examples from different countries, it argues that the virus has exposed the political leadership by bringing to bear endemic socio-economic inequalities which result in citizens responding differently to government regulations meant to flatten the curve of infection. Thirdly, in the context of Africa, the paper makes a compelling argument that some of the socio-economic situations found within the continent are remnants of colonialism and apartheid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty (1623-1687): Never Translated Into Spanish Language
    518297-LLP-2011-IT-ERASMUS-FEXI THE ECONOMIC WRITINGS OF SIR WILLIAM PETTY (1623-1687): NEVER TRANSLATED INTO SPANISH LANGUAGE VICTORIA CORREA MERLASSINO DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT – UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA BARCELONA , SPAIN [email protected] ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to outline the fact that the economic writings of Sir William Petty were never translated into Spanish. Although Petty contributes meaningfully to the economic thought, his works did not arrive to Spain in our language, that means that his ideas were not widely extended in our country or they arrived under the writings and citations of other authors. Another remarkable aspect related to William Petty to point out is, that the writings of some other theorist, philosophers, scientist contemporaneous to him were indeed translated into Spanish. This is the case of Thomas Hobbes, Francis Bacon, Thomas Mun and John Locke. On the other hand, Petty’s thought was based, in few points, on the ideas of some of the; especially on T. Hobbs and F. Bacon. Last but not least, this paper will contain a summary of his most important contributions for the economic thought described in ‘A treatise of Taxes and Contributions (1662)’, ‘Verburn Sapienti (1665)’, ‘Political Arithmetick (1676)’ and ‘Treatise of Ireland (1687)’. William Petty had a long-continued writing activity. His first essays are dated in 1662 and he carried on writing until his death in 1687. He wrote before the formal treatises on political economy were long extended. His writings were far from the systematized abstraction about every-days affairs. He was a man interested in the theory as well as the experimentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Standard Measures of Human Capital Are Misleading
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hanushek, Eric A. Article Why Standard Measures of Human Capital are Misleading KDI Journal of Economic Policy Provided in Cooperation with: Korea Development Institute (KDI), Sejong Suggested Citation: Hanushek, Eric A. (2015) : Why Standard Measures of Human Capital are Misleading, KDI Journal of Economic Policy, ISSN 2586-4130, Korea Development Institute (KDI), Sejong, Vol. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 22-37, http://dx.doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2015.37.2.22 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/200770 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ www.econstor.eu KDI Journal of Economic Policy 2015, 37(2): 22–39 Why Standard Measures of † Human Capital are Misleading By ERIC A.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiology E-Journal
    From the Principal’s Desk I would like to congratulate the entire team of Department of Microbiology for their wonderful though very strenuous attempt to publish a journal exclusively for the students. Presently the e-version of the journal is going to be released on auspicious day of 5th September, i.e. the Teacher's Day. I hope, later on the print version will be published. In my perception it is a tribute to the entire faculty members by the students because these write ups simply say that how much they assimilate from their teachers in this subject. We all know and still experiencing a very stressful as well as fearful daily life due to the pandemic. We came to know many information regarding this covid-19 virus from many microbiologists not only from India but also from other countries like Canada, USA and many more. The Department of Microbiology, Vijaygarh Jyotish Ray College produced many students who are pursuing their research in India as well as abroad. In response to the call from their teachers they shared their knowledge with us in many webinars organized by the department. In my perception all the students of this department are budding scientist of future. No one knows it may so happen that we come to know that one of our students succeed to be associated with the invention of any life-saving drug or vaccine. Once again, I want thank all students and faculties for initiating this attempt and hope that this will continue to publish. Dr. Rajyasri Neogy, Principal, Vijaygarh Jyotish Ray College Contents Paper Title Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Corona and Other Virus: Their Useful and Harmful Aspects
    Current Trends on Biotechnology & Microbiology DOI: ISSN: 2641-6875 10.32474/CTBM.2020.02.000129Review Article Corona and Other Virus: Their Useful and Harmful Aspects Birhanu Gizaw* Microbial Biodiversity Directorate, Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: Birhanu Gizaw, Microbial Biodiversity Directorate, Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 30726, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Received: June 15, 2020 Published: September 22, 2020 Abstract How the single virus is forceful and shakes the world is eyewitness during this contemporary COVID 19 pandemic time. People primarily think of viruses such as HIV, Ebola, Zika, Influenza, Tobacco mosaic virus or whatever new outbreak like SARS, Corona are Understandingall viruses worst the and microbial non-beneficial. world isHowever, very critical not all and viruses crucial are thing detrimental that they and are influential driving force to human, and governing animal and the plantphysical health. world In fact, some viruses have beneficial properties for their hosts in a symbiotic relationship and scientific research in many disciplines. industry,and biosphere agriculture, at all. Thehealth virus and and environment other microbial are the life application those of bacteria, of microbes fungi, andprion, their viroid, products virion are are too requiring high for great human attention being and researchenvironment. to enhance Without their microbes utilization all lifefrom would majority be cease of useful on earth.aspects However, of microbial some genetic microbes resource. are very The dangerous secret behind like of Corona every virus, HIV, Ebola, Mycobacterium and others that destroy human life, but majority of microorganisms are too useful to promote virusdevelopment. in respect Through with health, building environment, and strengthening agriculture microbial and biotechnological culture collection application centers during and through this Covid19 strong pandemic conservation time strategy, to raise awarenessit is possible about to exploit virus atmore all.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The State as a Standard of Civilisation: Assembling the Modern State in Lebanon and Syria, 1800-1944 Andrew Delatolla A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2017 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledge is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe on the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 101,793 words. 2 Acknowledgements This PhD has been much more than an academic learning experience, it has been a life experience and period of self-discovery. None of it would have been possible without the help and support from an amazing network of family, colleagues, and friends. First and foremost, a big thank you to the most caring, attentive, and conscientious supervisor one could hope for, Dr. Katerina Dalacoura. Her help, guidance, and critiques from the first draft chapter to the final drafts of the thesis have always been a source of clarity when there was too much clouding my thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • During the Great Plague of London (1665-1666)
    Learning Intention: To discover some simple facts about the Great Plague of London. By the end of this session, I will have completed an exercise and be able to recall at least two facts about the Great Plague. During the Great Plague of London (1665-1666), the disease called the bubonic plague killed almost one quarter of London's population (one out of every four Londoners). At its worst, in September of 1665, the plague killed 7,165 people – about 71 times the number of staff and students in our school) in one week. After this, the number of people dying from the plague began to slow down. Around September of 1666, the great outbreak ended. The Great Fire of London, which happened on 2-3 September 1666, may have helped end the outbreak by killing many of the rats and fleas who were spreading the plague. Though most of the people who died during the Great Plague lived in London, the plague also killed people in other areas of England. By the time the Great Plague ended, about 2.5% of England's population had died from the plague. To compare, about 2% of the entire United Kingdom's population (including soldiers and civilians) died in World War I, and about 1% of the entire United Kingdom's population died in World War II. Use your fact file above to answer the following questions about the Great Plague. Write your answers in full sentences using correct punctuation: 1. How many years did the Great Plague last? 2. What percentage of Londoners died of the plague? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mathematics of Diseases (SCNC1001)
    The mathematics of diseases – On Modeling Hong Kong’s SARS Outbreak Dr. Tuen Wai Ng Department of Mathematics, HKU Content Basic Epidemic Modeling SIR Model My Recent works on Modeling of the SARS propagation in Hong Kong Infectious disease modeling Epidemics: rat flea Black Death Europe lost 1/3 of population in 1347 - 1350. Great Plague of London, 1664–66. Killed more than 75,000 of total population of 460,000. Infectious disease modeling Epidemics: Influenza influenza virus killed 25 million in 1918-19 in Europe Infectious disease modeling Epidemics: AIDS virus AIDS Coronavirus SARS Infectious disease modeling Epidemics: bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease) Chicken flu Infectious disease modeling Mathematical models can: predict rate of spread, peak, etc., of epidemics predict effects of different disease control strategies . The WHO's eradication project reduced smallpox (variola) deaths from two million in 1967 to zero in 1977–80. Smallpox was officially declared smallpox eradicated in 1979. virus First Infection Latency to transmission occurs infectious to another transition susceptible Individual’s disease Immune / state : Susceptible Latent Infectious Removed time t t t t t Epoch : A B C D E Incubation period Individual no longer infectious to Serial interval susceptibles (recovery or Symptoms removal) appear Note : tD is constrained to lie in the interval (tB , tE), so tD > tC (as shown) and tD < tC are both possible. Basic Assumptions of the simplest epidemic model, the SIR model Population size is large and constant - No birth,death,immigration or emigration No latency Homogeneous mixing - that is each pair of individuals has equal probability of coming into contact with one another (this is reasonable for a school or households in a building).
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Plague 1665- 1666 How Did London Respond to It?
    The National Archives Education Service The Great Plague 1665- 1666 How did London respond to it? London scenes of the Plague 1665-1666 – Museum of London The Great Plague 1665-1666 How did London respond? Introduction Lesson at a Glance The Plague This was the worst outbreak of plague in England since the black death Suitable For: KS3 of 1348. London lost roughly 15% of its population. While 68,596 deaths were recorded in the city, the true number was probably over Time Period: 100,000. Other parts of the country also suffered. Early Modern 1485-1750 The earliest cases of disease occurred in the spring of 1665 in a parish outside the city walls called St Giles-in-the-Fields. The death rate Curriculum Link: began to rise during the hot summer months and peaked in September The development of when 7,165 Londoners died in one week. Church, state and society Rats carried the fleas that caused the plague. They were attracted by in Britain 1509-1745 city streets filled with rubbish and waste, especially in the poorest areas. Society, economy and culture across the period Those who could, including most doctors, lawyers and merchants, fled Learning Objective: the city. Charles II and his courtiers left in July for Hampton Court and then Oxford. Parliament was postponed and had to sit in October at Oxford, the increase of the plague being so dreadful. Court cases were To closely examine a also moved from Westminster to Oxford. document in order to discover information. The Lord Mayor and aldermen (town councillors) remained to enforce the King’s orders to try and stop the spread of the disease.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Money
    THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS 12, NO. 4 (2009): 22–45 THE QUALITY OF MONEY PHILIPP BAGUS ABSTRACT: Much has been written about the quantity of money and its effects on money’s purchasing power. However, changes in the quality of money have been widely neglected. This paper ana- lyzes changes in the quality of money and its influence on the purchasing power of money. I. INTRODUCTION he economics profession has recently neglected the connections between the purchasing power and the quality of money. In order Tto cover this gap, I will analyze the quality of money and how its changes affect the purchasing power of money. I will argue that changes in the quality of money can be far more important for the value of money than changes in its quantity. This conclusion is in line with the subjec- tivist approach of the Austrian School. In fact, the quantity of money is an objective and measurable aggregate. The quantity theory of money is the heart of neoclassical monetary theory, but does not reconcile well with the Austrian approach. In contrast, the quality of money is a sub- jective concept and should stand at the center of a monetary theory based on human action. Money serves people in attaining their subjec- tive ends more efficiently and it fulfills certain functions for people. The better these functions of money are fulfilled in the eyes of actors the higher they value money. The quality of money is, consequently, defined Philipp Bagus ([email protected]) is assistant professor of economics at Univer- sidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid.
    [Show full text]
  • ICRP Calendar
    The notions of International Relations (IR) in capital letters and international relations (ir) in lowercase letters have two different meanings. The first refers to a scholarly discipline while the second one means a set of contemporary events with historical importance, which influences global-politics. In order to make observations, formulate theories and describe patterns within the framework of ‘IR’, one needs to fully comprehend specific events related to ‘ir’. It is why the Institute for Cultural Relations Policy (ICRP) believes that a timeline on which all the significant events of international relations are identified might be beneficial for students, scholars or professors who deal with International Relations. In the following document all the momentous wars, treaties, pacts and other happenings are enlisted with a monthly division, which had considerable impact on world-politics. January 1800 | Nationalisation of the Dutch East Indies The Dutch East Indies was a Dutch colony that became modern Indonesia following World War II. It was formed 01 from the nationalised colonies of the Dutch East India Company, which came under the administration of the Dutch government in 1800. 1801 | Establishment of the United Kingdom On 1 January 1801, the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Kingdom of Ireland united to form the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Most of Ireland left the union as the Irish Free State in 1922, leading to the remaining state being renamed as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1927. 1804 | Haiti independence declared The independence of Haiti was recognized by France on 17 April 1825.
    [Show full text]