INFORMATION TO USERS

This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.

The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.

Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.

Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order.

University Microhms n'terr jt.onai A Be" 4 Howe" Irtor'^aihjr Cor'cai", 300 Norm Zeet) Road Ann Arbor Ml 48’06-1 346 USA 313 761-4 700 800 53’-0600

Order Number 9238207

Regional disadvantages and economic and political integration within the European Community

Koh, Jae Bang, Ph.D.

The Ohio State University, 1992

UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106

REGIONAL DISADVANTAGES AND

ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL INTEGRATION

WITHIN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

DISSERTATION

Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for

the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate

School of The Ohio State University

By

Jae Bang Koh, M.A., M.P.A., B.A.

*****

The Ohio State University

1992

Dissertation Committees Approved by

Chadwick F. Alger

Anthony Mughan

Donald A. Sylvan Chadwick Department of Political Science DEDICATION

To Mom and Dad

- ii - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I express sincere appreciation to three committee mem­ bers, Drs. Chadwick F. Alger, Anthony Mughan, Donald A.

Sylvan, for their comments and critiques on this disserta­

tion. Special thanks go to Dr. Chadwick Alger for his con­

tinuous encouragement. I also offer thanks to my parents

for never giving up their faith in me. To my brother, Jae

Wun, and to my sisters, Jae Hyun, Young Ran, and Oak Hee, I

thank you for spiritual support and encouragement.

- iii - VITA

April 8, 1957 ...... Born - South Korea

1982 ...... B.A., Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

1984-1985 ...... Researcher, Ohio Governor's Office of Criminal Justice Services, Columbus, Ohio

1986-1989 ...... Human Service Analyst, Metropolitan Human Service Commission, Columbus, Ohio

1984-1990 ...... Graduate Research Associate, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

FIELDS OF STUDY

Major Field: Political Science Studies in International Politics Studies in Comparative Foreign Policy Studies in Transnational Relations

Minor Field: American Politics Studies in Public Policy Studies in Urban Politics

- iv - TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

D e d i c a t i o n ...... ii

Acknowledgements ...... iii

VITA ...... iv

LIST OF TABLES ...... viii

LIST OF FIGURES ...... X

CHAPTER

I. INTRODUCTION ...... 1

1.1 Research Problem ...... 1 1.2 Theoretical Significance ...... 2 1.3 The Concept of I n t e g r a t i o n ...... 4 1.4 The Measurement of Integration ...... 7 1.5 Integration Theory ...... 10 1.6 Integration Effects ...... 14 1.7 Regional Disadvantages ...... 17 1.8 The Theory of Regional Imbalance . . . 20 1.8.1 The Neoclassical T h e o r y ...... 20 1.8.2 The Export-Base Theory ...... 22 1.8.3 The Growth Pole Theory ...... 23 1.8.4 The Center-Periphery Theory . . . 25 1.9 H y p o t h e s e s ...... 28 1.10 Methodologies ...... 29

- v - II. INTEGRATION EFFORTS IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY . 30

2.1 I n t r o d u c t i o n ...... 30 2.2 The First P e r i o d ...... 33 2.3 The Second P e r i o d ...... 36 2.4 The Third P e r i o d ...... 40 2.5 The Fourth P e r i o d ...... 44 2.6 The Fifth Period ...... 46 2.7 C o n c l u s i o n ...... 48

III. REGIONAL DISADVANTAGES IN THE EUROPEAN C O M M U N I T Y ...... 50

3.1 I n t r o d u c t i o n ...... 50 3.2 Definition of Regions ...... 51 3.3 Regional Imbalances within the C o m m u n i t y ...... 55 3.3.1 Imbalances in GDP per capita in the Community ...... 57 3.3.2 Imbalances in GDP per Worker in the Community ...... 61 3.3.3 Imbalances in Unemployment Rate in the C o m m u n i t y ...... 64 3.3.4 Imbalances in Agricultural Employment in the Community . . . 68 3.3.5 Imbalances in Net Migration in the Community ...... 71 3.4 Development of Common Regional P o l i c i e s ...... 74 3.4.1 Overview of Regional Policy . . . 77 3.4.2 The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) ...... 80 3.5 C o n c l u s i o n ...... 81

IV. TWO CASE STUDIES: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REGIONAL DISADVANTAGE AND INTEGRATION IN THE MEZZOGIORNO AND . . 84

4.1 Introductory Discussion ...... 84 4.1.1 Theoretical Purpose of a Case S t u d y ...... 84 4.1.2 Review of the Center-Periphery T h e o r y ...... 88 4.1.3 Research Problem ...... 89 4.1.4 The Selection of Cases ...... 91 4.2 The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Integration in the Mezzogiorno and Northern Ireland . . . 93

- vi - 4.2.1 Case 1: The Mezzogiorno ...... 93 4.2.1.1 The Analysis of Regional Disadvantage ...... 95 4.2.1.2 The Rise of Social Unrest and Political Tension .... 100 4.2.1.3 Conclusion ...... 108 4.2.2 Case 2: Northern Ireland ...... 109 4.2.2.1 The Analysis of Regional Disadvantage ...... Ill 4.2.2.2 The Rise of Disintegrative F o r c e s ...... 115 4.2.2.3 Conclusion ...... 121 4.3 Discussion and Conclusion ...... 123

V. INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION FOR AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ...... 129

5.1 The Unit of A n a l y s i s ...... 129 5.2 I n d i c a t o r s ...... 132 5.3 Time Period ...... 140 5.4 M e t h o d s ...... 143 5.5 Data S o u r c e s ...... 146

VI. THE FIRST HYPOTHESIS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REGIONAL DISADVANTAGE AND INTEGRATION . . 148

6.1 Introductory Discussion ...... 148 6.2 Testing of the First Hypothesis.... 150 6.3 Summary and Conclusion ...... 163

VII. THE SECOND HYPOTHESIS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTEGRATION AND ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE IN URBAN AND RURAL AREAS . . . 171

7.1 Introductory discussion ...... 171 7.2 Testing of the Second Hypothesis . . . 176 7.3 Summary and Conclusion ...... 181

VIII. CONCLUSION ...... 185

8.1 I n t r o d u c t i o n ...... 185 8.2 Summary and Review of Findings .... 187 8.3 Limitations of Methodology and Data . . 195 8.4 Future R e s e a r c h ...... 198 8.5 Policy Implications ...... 201

- vii - APPENDICES

A. PREAMBLE, AND ARTICLES 2, 92 AND 113 OF THE TREATY OF R O M E ...... 207

B. PREAMBLE, ARTICLES 1, 2, 3, AND TITLE V OF THE SINGLE EUROPEAN A C T ...... 214

C. TABLES OF CORRELATIONS AMONG PGDP, UNEMP AND NMIG ...... 224

Bibliography ...... 225

- viii - LIST OF TABLES

The CV of GDP per capita between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982 ...... , 58

Difference between the Highest and the Lowest GDP per capita between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982 ...... 59

The CV of GDP per Worker between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982 ...... 62

Difference between the Highest and the Lowest GDP per worker between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982 ...... 63

The CV of Unemployment Rate between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982 ...... 66

Difference between the Highest and the Lowest Unemployment Rates between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982 ...... 67

The CV of the Proportion of Agricultural Employment between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982 ...... 69

Difference between the Highest and the Lowest Proportion of Agricultural Employment between Regions in the Community, 1973-1984 .... 70

The CV of Net Migration between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982 ...... 73

Difference between the Highest Emigration and Immigration between Regions in the Community, 1977-1985 ...... 74

Expenditures for the ERDF in the European Community, 1975-1988 ...... 80

GDP per capita by Region in ...... 96

- ix - 13. Unemployment Rate by Region in Italy ...... 98

14. Net Migration by Region in Italy (1000) .... 99

15. Public Opinion in Favour of the EC Membership . 104

16. The Proportion of Intra-EC Letter Traffic . . . 107

17. GDP per capita in Northern Ireland ...... Ill

18. Unemployment Rate in Northern Ireland ...... 113

19. Net Migration in Northern Ireland (1000) .... 114

20. Means of Deviations for Per Capita GDP, Unemployment, and Net Migration ...... 135

21. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Economic Integration (the State, Lag = 1) 151

22. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Economic Integration (the Most Favoured Region, Lag = 1 ) ...... 151

23. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Economic Integration (the Community, Lag = 1) 152

24. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Communication Measures, the State, Lag = 1) . . 155

25. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Communication Measures, the Most Favoured Region, Lag = 1 ) ...... 156

26. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Communication Measures, the Community, Lag = 1 ) ...... 156

27. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Public Opinion Measures, the State, Lag =1) . 159

28. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Public Opinion Measures, the Most Favoured Region, Lag = 1 ) ...... 160

- x - 29. The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Public Opinion Measures, the Community, Lag = 1 ) 160

30. The Relationship between Integration and All Regions, (Lag = 1) 177

31. The Relationship between Integration and Regions with an Extremely High Proportion of Agricultural Employment, (Lag =1).... 178

32. The Relationship between Integration and Regions with an Extremely Low Proportion of Agricultural Employment, (Lag =1).... 178

33. Correlations among Per Capita GDP, Unemployment and Net Migration, the Reference Group = the S t a t e ...... 224

34. Correlations among Per Capita GDP, Unemployment and Net Migration, the Reference Group = the Most Favored Region within the S t a t e ...... 224

35. Correlations among Per Capita GDP, Unemployment and Net Migration, the Reference Group = the Community ...... 224

- xi - LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE

1. The Regions of Italy and the Mezzogiorno .... 94

2. The Regions of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland ...... 110

- xii - CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 RESEARCH PROBLEM

The European Community (EC) intends to enter into a new stage of a United Europe. That is, the EC has adopted in

1985 an ambitious program to eliminate remaining internal frontiers - physical, technical, and fiscal - by 1992.1

During the past thirty years, the EC has experienced ups and downs in achieving integration among its member states.

The number of member states expanded from six to 12 when the United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark joined in 1973,

Greece in 1982, and Spain and Portugal in 1986. Also, many other countries, e.g. Austria, Switzerland, Sweden and Nor­ way, etc., have been recognized as associate members of the

EC.

Meanwhile, the gap between rich and poor regions has also widened. For example, in terms of per capita GDP, the ratio of the ten wealthiest regions in the Community to the ten poorest ones rose from 3.3 in 1970 to 4.3 in 1977.

When there exist regional imbalances within the Community,

1 Michael Emerson, What Model for Europe ? (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988), p.2.

- 1 - 2 they are likely to affect integration within the Community.

This study examines the relationship between regional dis­ advantages and integration.

1.2 THEORETICAL SIGNIFICANCE

There were many efforts to explain the relationship between regional disadvantages and integration. Ernst Haas saw that differences in the level of industrialization would sharply influence expectations of regional action and make the less developed eager to minimize dependence on the more developed.2 In a neo-Marxian interpretation, Gorz predict­ ed a failure to develop depressed regions, and a growing disparity between these regions and those which were better endowed.3 Keohane and Nye also argued that integration had distributive effects and might look different from the periphery than from the center of member states.4

Although those views were concerned with regional impacts of integration, they did not go beyond explaining imbalances among nation-states. Thus, I will extend these

2 Ernst B. Haas, "The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing," Regional Integration: Theory and Research, eds. Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), p.13.

3 Andre Gorz, Strategy for Labor: A Radical Proposal (Bos­ ton: Beacon Press, 1967), p.162.

4 Robert 0. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, "International Interdependence and Integration," International Politics, eds. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975), p.376. approaches by taking into account regions with different levels of development, rather than nation-states, as the unit of analysis for this study.

Also, previous studies were not supported by empirical studies to explain the relationship between regional disad­ vantages and integration. It seems that theory and data should go hand in hand. Thus, I will take a step forward to see the relationship between disadvantages and integra­ tion, based upon those data which have been cumulated for the last twenty years.

Lastly, integration theory has contributed to maintain­ ing peace in Europe. After World War II, many problems have been resolved peacefully rather than belligerently because integration has created an environment of peaceful problem­ solving. Furthermore, integration efforts have survived to date, through the ups and downs of its cycle. Also more ambitious efforts to transcend physical, technical, and fiscal barriers among member states have been going on.

However, there is the gap between rich and poor regions within the Community. It is likely that the deeper the gap is between regions within the Community, the harder inte­ gration would be to achieve. Thus, I will examine the impacts of regional disadvantages on integration. 4

1.3 THE CONCEPT OF INTEGRATION

As a general theory, integration theory can be applicable

within nations as well as between nations.5 In this sec­

tion, I will discuss the concept of integration, which can

be applicable at all levels: subnational, national and

international.

Integration is defined, depending upon how it is viewed,

either as a process, or as an end product.6 Those who view

integration as a process are divided about the need for

setting up supranational institutions, while those who view

integration as an end product have no agreement about what

would be an end product.

Karl Deutsch provided a definition of integration in his

books.7 Integration is the attainment within a territory,

5 Arend Lijphart argued that integration theory was the major example of a general theory that was applicable not only at the international level but also the national and subnational levels. For his discussion, see Arend Lijp­ hart, "Karl W. Deutsch and the New Paradigm in Interna­ tional Relations," From National Development to Global Community, eds. Richard L. Merritt and Bruce M. Russett (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981), pp. 233-251.

6 Robert 0. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, "International Interdependence and Integration," International Politics, eds. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975), pp. 363-414. They argued that integration could be viewed in four ways. That is, inte­ gration can be viewed, either as a process or as an end product, or as a combination of being integrated, or as any level of association ascertained by specific meas­ ures.

7 Karl W. Deutsch, et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957), p. 5; Karl W. Deutsch, International Polit­ ical Communities: An Anthology (Garden City, New York: of a "sense of community" and of institutions and practices strong enough and widespread enough to assure, for a "long" time, dependable expectations of "peaceful change" among its population. Following the communication approach,

Deutsch stressed transactions among societies. Also, by making a distinction between integration and amalgamation, he was more concerned with integration (i.e. absence of war) than amalgamation (i.e. political union). In this respect, Deutsch's understanding of integration will be distinguished from that of Ernst Haas, which will be dis­ cussed below.

As a neofunctionalist, Ernst Haas was concerned with institutions. The concept of integration was provided in his work, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and

Economic Forces, 1950-1957.6 Integration is the process whereby political actors in several distinct national set­ tings are persuaded to shift their loyalties, expectations, and political activities toward a new and larger center, whose institutions possessed or demanded jurisdiction over the preexisting nation states. Thus, Haas was more con­ cerned with conditions for creating political union. In his later work, Haas redefined integration. Regional integra­ tion is to explain how and why states cease to be wholly

Doubleday, 1966), p. 2.

8 Ernst B. Haas, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957 (Stanford: Stanford Uni­ versity Press, 1958), p. 16. 6 sovereign, how and why they voluntarily mingle, merge, and mix with neighbors so as to lose the factual attributes of sovereignty while acquiring new techniques for resolving conflict between them.9 However, Haas argued that integra­ tion theory was obsolete because it did not capture a per­ vasive condition that characterized the entire earth and the whole range of international relations.10

A neofunctional definition of integration was also pro­ vided by Joseph Nye. Integration is the process leading to political community - a condition in which a group of peo­ ple recognized mutual obligations and some notion of a com­ mon interest.11 External actors were also included in the process of integration.12 Like Nye, Philip Jacob and Henry

Teune defined political integration as the process for the creation of political communities.13

9 Ernst B. Haas, "The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing," International Organization 24 (1970): 607-46.

10 Ernst B. Haas, The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1975), p. 17.

11 Joseph S. Nye, Pan-Africanism and East African Integra­ tion (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965), p. 84.

12 Joseph S. Nye, "Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo- Functionalist Model," International Organization 24 (1970): 796-835.

13 Philip E. Jacob and Henry Teune, "Integrative Process: Guidelines for Analysis of the Bases of Political Commu­ nity," The Integration of Political Communities, eds. Philip E. Jacob and James V. Toscano (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1964), p. 4; Charles Pentland also argues that international political integration is a process Meanwhile, Donald Puchala asserted that integration is neither federalism, nor nationalism on the regional level, nor functionalism in the Mitrany tradition, nor power poli­ tics. Instead, he argued that integration could be best thought of as a set of processes that produce and sustain a

Concordance System, which was peaceful relations among nations.14

Amitai Etzioni provided a different definition of inte­ gration. Integration is an end product, not a process of getting there. That is, integration is an ability of a unit or system to maintain itself in the face of internal and external challenges.15

1.4 THE MEASUREMENT OF INTEGRATION

It is not likely that integration can be measured by a par­ ticular indicator.16 I will begin with the measurement

whereby a group of people, organized initially in two or more independent nation-states, came to constitute a political whole which can in some sense be described as a community. See Charles Pentland, International Theory and European Integration (Faber and Faber, 1973), p. 21.

14 Donald J. Puchala, "Of Blind Men, Elephants and Interna­ tional Integration,” Perspectives on World Politics, eds. Michael Smith, et al. (Londons The Open University Press, 1981), pp. 233-244.

15 Amitai Etzioni, Political Unification: A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces (New York: Rinehart and Win­ ston, 1965), p. 330.

16 Leon Hurwitz, Contemporary Perspectives on EC Integra­ tion: Attitudes, Nongovernmental Behavior, and Collec­ tive Decision Making (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 1980), p. 4. He argues that international integration 8 using transaction data.17 ' The utility of transaction data for integration dates back to the cybernetic approach, which Karl Deutsch advocated in the 1950s. Even those who doubt the utility of transaction data do not argue that transaction data are useless in order to measure integra­ tion. Instead, they argue that multiple measurements are needed, besides transaction data. For this purpose, they tend to dissect integration into political, economic, and social integration.

In his pioneering work on integration, Karl Deutsch argue that international community can be ascertained and measured by examining the volume, content, and scope of international transactions between hypothesized community

is a multifaceted societal attribute requiring multivar­ iate measurement; Leon N. Lindberg, "Political Integra­ tion as a Multidimensional Phenomenon Requiring Multi­ variate Measurement," International Organization 24 (Fall 1970}: 649-731.

17 For a discussion of transaction data, Steven J. Brains, "Transaction Flows in the International System," Ameri­ can Political Science Review 60 (December 1966): 880-98; Barry B. Hughes, "Transaction Analysis: The Impact of Operationalization," International Organization 25 (Win­ ter 1971): 132-139; Donald J. Puchala, "International Transactions and Regional Integration," International Organization 24 (Fall 1970): 732-763; I. Richard Savage and Karl W. Deutsch, "A Statistical Model of the Gross Analysis of Transaction Flows," Econometrica 28 (July 1960): 551-572; Ingo Walter, The European Common Market: Growth and Patterns of Trade and Production (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1967). They have dealt with tou­ rist traffic, labor flows, capital markets, foreign stu­ dents, information flow (mail, book transactions, tele­ phone calls), trade and other economic transactions, business collaboration, and cultural exchanges. 9 members.18 He used transaction data, e.g. absolute figures on mail, trade, tourism, and student interchanges, in order to show whether the EC countries have become a distinct transaction network.

As new indices, the sensitivity to economic development was suggested to replace absolute or relative volumes of transactions between the units. That is, sensitivities of societies to one another could be explained by an analysis of the diffusion of innovation in social patterns and of popular opinions and perceptions.19

Meanwhile, there is another measurement using attitudi- nal data.20 Those who followed the cybernetic approach were primarily concerned with attitudinal changes, while those who dissected integration into separate dimensions tended to take attitudinal data as a part of measurements for political integration. The latter employed multiple measurements for economic integration (e.g. trade), social

18 Karl W. Deutsch, Political Community at the Internation­ al Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement (Gar­ dens City, New York: Doubleday, 1954), pp. 46-64.

19 Robert 0. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, "International Interdependence and Integration," International Poli­ tics, eds. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975), pp. 368-371.

20 See Stuart A. Scheingold, "Domestic and International Consequences of Regional Integration," Regional Integra­ tion, eds. Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), pp. 395-396. It is difficult to get at causal relationship or account for opportunity costs with survey and aggre­ gate data. 1 0 integration (e.g. mass and elite transaction), and politi­ cal integration (a proportion of national budgets and staffs involved in an international institution, interde­ pendence in policy formation, mutual identity and obliga­ tion as reflected in elite and mass polls and by bargaining behavior, the degree of security community).21

1.5 INTEGRATION THEORY

Integration theory covers functionalism, neofunctionalism, and federalism. Core elements for each are not exactly the same. Rather, they include different elements for achieving integration. Thus, we will examine what the core elements are, and how they are related to each other.

Meanwhile, a question about the validity of integration theories has been raised. One line of argument is that none of them has any real validity.22 The other line of argument is that federalism is already falsified, while neofunctionalism is yet neither falsified nor proved to have predictive power, which can be applicable outside of

21 Joseph S. Nye, Peace in Parts (Boston: Little & Brown, 1971), p. 49.

22 George A. Codding, Jr., ''Federalism: The Conceptual Set­ ting," International Organization:____ A Conceptual Approach, eds. Paul Taylor and A.J.R. Groom (New York: Nicholas, 1978), p. 341; Ernst B. Haas, "Turbulent Fields and the Theory of Regional Integration," Interna­ tional Organization 30 (Spring 1976): 173-212. Haas also raised the same doubt about its validity, after observing the process of integration in the European Community. 11

Europe.23 However, slow as the process of integration is in the European Community, integration efforts continue, and furthermore, they have been showing some progress. In this context, it is time to reexamine integration theory.

David Mitrany's work, A Working Peace System, has been regarded as the starting point of integration theory as well as neofunctionalist thinking. With many unstated assumptions and little theoretical rigor, Mitrany argued for the generation of interdependence according to func­ tion. That is, interdependence by function was stressed to bring states more closely together in fruitful partnership and to maintain peace in international society. Since there was no institutional emphasis in the functionalist view of integration, its dictum says, form follows function.24

There are two core elements in functionalist views. One is the changing attitudes of people in the direction of greater amity, or towards a growing support for coopera-

23 Ernst B. Haas, "The Study of Regional Integration: Reflection on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing," Regional Integration: Theory and Research, eds. Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 19.

24 For a critique, see William Wallace, "Walking Backwards towards Unity," Policy-Making in the European Communi­ ties, eds. Helen Wallace, et al. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977), p. 302. The false dichotomy between 'politics' and 'welfare', which led functionalists to conclude that politics was fading in importance and the rational pursuit of welfare coming instead to occupy the central focus of government, also misled some critics of functionalism into misunderstanding the character of politics at the Community level. 12 tion. The other is the development between states of a widening range of interdependence.25 That is, functional­ ists are concerned with pressure from, and changes in mass attitudes in the process of integration, rather than with institutions. In this respect, Mitrany opposed movements toward regional political unification in Western Europe.

Neofunctionalism differs from functionalism in terms of how the former views the role of central institutions, which are distinctively federal.26 Also, the building of community does not depend initially upon mass support in neofunctionalist views. It is directed toward political union.27 In neofunctionalist views, there is no interven­ ing community, such as a socio-cultural community in a functionalist interpretation, between member states and community. The idea of.neofunctionalism was well reflected in an address by M. Robert Schuman in 1950. He said,

'•Europe will not be made all at once, or according to a single, general plan. It will be built through concrete achievements, which first create a de facto solidarity ...

The policy of coal and steel production will immediately provide for the setting-up of common bases for economic

25 Paul Taylor, "Functionalism: The Theory of David Mitra­ ny, " International Organization: A Conceptual Approach, eds. Paul Taylor and A.J.R. Groom (New York: Nicholas, 1978), p. 238.

26 R.J. Harrison, "Neofunctionalism," op. cit., p. 254.

2 7 Ibid., p. 256. 13 development as a first step in the federation of Europe."28

Thus, the attempt to build the European Community can be seen as an effort for testing the neofunctionalist view of integration.

Although there were many arguments for federalism prior to World War II, federalism was not seriously considered in the European context. However, World War II provided an impetus for the need for federalism in order to prevent any wars between states.

The core of federalism is to create a supranational gov­ ernment which shares power with member states. Carl Fried­ rich argued that, "a federal system is a particular kind of constitutional order. The function it is supposed to serve is to restrain the powers wielded by the inclusive communi­ ty, as well as those of the communities included within it.

It is ... a kind of division or separation of powers, but applied on a spatial basis."29 However, critics argued that, even though there were successful cases in federal­ ism, for example, the U.S., it would be unwise to copy those systems in Europe.30 In Federalist views of integra­ tion, direct structural change was stressed, which is dis­ tinct from those of functionalism and neofunctionalism.

28 M. Robert Schuman, Declaration of May 9, 1950.

29 Carl J. Friedrich, Man and His Government (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963), p. 597.

30 John Pinder and Roy Price, Europe after de Gaulle (Mid­ dlesex, England: Penguine, 1969), p. 176. 14

1.6 INTEGRATION EFFECTS

Integration effects were assumed to be positive by both theorists and practitioners. Based upon this unstated assumption, theorists tried to explain how to define, and how to measure integration, while practitioners tried to achieve integration. However, some questions would be asked. If there are integration effects, how can you recog­ nize them ? If integration effects are known, are they all positive to the Community ? Would integration effects be measured at the Community, national, or subnational level ?

Although these questions could not be unequivocally answered, the theory of integration effects will be exam­ ined in this section.

Economic integration was intended to achieve 'balanced expansion' and 'harmonious development' within the Communi­ ty, as stated in the Treaty of , Article 2. That is, all regions within the Community were intended to benefit from economic integration. It is unlikely, however, that all regions within the Community would have the same amount of benefits from integration,31 although there were only positive effects from integration, and that all regions

31 Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye also argue that economic integration has distributive effects, and that it may look different from the periphery. For example, there may be a mass immigration from the periphery to the cen­ ter, which would cause brain drain in the periphery. For further discussion, see Robert 0. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, op. cit., p. 376. 15 would have been affected In the same directions.32 Distin­ guishing industrial centers from rural peripheries, Herbert

Giersch also argued that the abolition of restriction on trade and factor movement would strengthen the attractive­ ness of highly industrialized centers for both labor and capital.33 The UN Economic Commission for Europe also cau­ tioned that the gap between levels of development in the high-income and the low-income areas of Europe would con­ tinue to widen.34 Since the enlargement of the Community in the 1970s, more concerns were given to how integration would affect regions with different levels of development.

It seemed that the gap between urban centers and rural peripheries has widened in the 1970s.

There are two kinds of integration effects: the spread and backwash effect. Gunnar Myrdal and Albert Hirschman provided the initial notions.35 Due to the spread effect,

32 For further discussion, see Hans O. Schmitt, "The National Boundary in Politics and Economics," Communica­ tion in International Politics, ed. Richard L. Merritt (Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1972), p. 4. He argues that instead of travelling in opposite directions toward each other, capital and labor will tend to migrate together towards concentrations of capi­ tal and technology to participate in higher returns there.

33 Herbert Giersch, "Economic Union between Nations and the Location of Industries," Review of Economic Studies 17 (1949): 87-97.

34 UN Economic Commission for Europe, Economic Survey of Europe since 1953 (Geneva, 1954), p. 220.

35 Gunnar Myrdal, Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions (London: G. Duckworth, 1957), p. 63; Albert 0. 16 the periphery would have favourable effects from the growth in the center, while, due to the backwash effect, regional inequalities would be exacerbated as a result of integra­ tion. Stressing the backwash effects, Andre Gorz, in a

Marxian tradition, argued that there would be a growing disparity between better endowed and disadvantaged regions, which economic integration would fail to resolve.36 In contrast, the UN Economic Commission for Europe argued that the spread effects would become more powerful, which would increase demand for the underdeveloped regions' products, rising proportion of mobile external economies, transmis­ sion of technological knowledge, and relocation of plants in response to wage differences.37 Since the 1970s, when the enlargement of the Community began, more attention was paid to regional imbalances within the Community, and how they would be affected by integration.38 Also, the Paris

Hirschman, The Strategy of Economic Development {New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958), p. 187.

36 Andre Gorz, Strategy for Labor: A Radical Proposal (Bos­ ton: Beacon Press, 1967), p. 162.

37 The UN Economic Commission for Europe, op. cit., p. 204.

38 See Leon N Lindberg, "Political Integration as Multidi­ mensional Phenomenon Requiring Multivariate Measure- ment," International Organization 24 (Autumn 1970): 660. He argues that an integration undertaking will not thrive and grow in scope unless it has significant dis­ tributive consequences for important actors; Also see Ernst Haas, "The Study of Regional Integration: Reflec­ tion on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing," Regional Integration: Theory and Research, eds. Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 13. He argues that differences in the 17 summit recognized that resolving regional imbalances would be needed in order to maximize integration effects within the Community. Member states subsequently agreed to the establishment of a Regional Development Fund in 1974.

Scholars, on the other hand, are keen about negative effects of integration on disadvantaged regions.39

1.7 REGIONAL DISADVANTAGES

Since the enlargement of the Community, imbalances between regions have widened. For example, even in rich provinces of Spain, per capita GDP is only 85 percent of the Communi­ ty average, while poor provinces reach a mere 36 percent.

For Greece, these percentages are 53 and 23, respectively, and for Portugal 37 and 13. Disadvantaged regions, mean­ while, have a relatively narrow industrial base, or a large and relatively backward agricultural sector. Thus, disad­ vantaged regions are clustered into two groups. The one is

level of industrialization sharply influence expecta­ tions of regional action and make the less developed eager to minimize dependence on the more developed.

39 See W.G.C.M. Haack, "The Selectivity of Economic Inte­ gration Theories: A Comparison of Some Traditional and Marxist Approaches," Journal of Common Market Studies 21 (June 1983): 381. He argues that the effects of inte­ gration are likely to increase regional and structural imbalances; Also see Peter Robson, The Economics of International Integration (London: Allen & Unwin, 1987), p. 177. He argues that the formation of a Community may accelerate regional problems; Harvey W. Armstrong, "Com­ munity Regional Policy: A Survey and Critique," Regional Studies 12 (1979): 513. Integration is likely to inten­ sify existing regional problems in the EEC. 18 underdeveloped regions which have predominant agricultural employment, e.g. the Mezzogiorno, Ireland, and the French overseas territories. The other is depressed regions with declining industries.

Two kinds of integration effects are discussed in the relationship between core and peripheral regions. One line of argument stresses positive effects of core-peripherty relations. That is, the periphery would have more opportu­ nities to develop its less developed structures, economic and political, because of the influences of the center within the Community. The other line of argument is con­ cerned with negative effects of core-periphery relations.

That is, the periphery may remain dependent, by transfer­ ring sovereign decisions on economic policy to the center, creating new economic hardships and enhancing existing dif­ ficulties. Cromwell argued that the Community’s decision to open membership to poorer and less stable southern Euro­ pean countries was made more for political than economic reasons.4 0

In terms of the relations between poor and rich regions,

Wallerstein's center-periphery model posits a hierarchy of economic centers and defines peripheries as territories dependent on economic centers.41 Also, Rokkan, et al. sug­

40 William C. Cromwell, "The European Community," Current History 77 (November 1979): 151.

41 Immanuel M. Wallerstein, The Modern World-System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European 19 gested three distinctive forms of peripherialization; by military conquest and administrative subjection, by econom­ ic dependence, or by cultural subordination.42

World cities, meanwhile, are likely to further develop the center, since they possess high-order banking and financial institutions, international transport, and commu­ nications.43 The development of world cities caused migra­ tion of people and movement of labor into the center. Such phenomena were observed in Italy (from the south to the northern industrial areas), as well as in Spain (to the

Mediterranean coast, Barcelona, Madrid, and the industrial area of Bilbao). In this respect, world cities accentuate the contrast between the core and periphery.

The EC intends to achieve prosperity and security for all member states. It is socially and politically essen­ tial to redistribute some of the gains from integration to disadvantaged regions. The number of instruments for regional policy has increased, including the European

Social Fund, the European Investment Bank, the European

Regional Development Fund, and the Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund. However, it was not until 1972 that

World-Economy 1600-1750 (New York: Academic Press, 1980).

42 Stein Rokkan, et al., Centre-Periphery Structures in Europe: An ISSC Workbook in Comparative Analysis (Frank­ furt and New York: Campus Verlag, 1987), p.41.

4 3 Hugh D. Clout, Regional Development in Western Europe (London: David Fulton Publishers, 1987). 20 real political commitment to regional policy was made to help reduce imbalances between regions.

1.8 THE THEORY OF REGIONAL IMBALANCE

The theory of regional imbalance was initially introduced in economics, and later followed in political science and geography. While those in economics were concerned with demand and supply effects of factors of production, e.g. capital and labor, and technical advances and exports in an open market, those in political science and geography were concerned with the center-periphery relations between regions. Some were more static, while others were more dynamic theories. In this section, I will examine core ele­ ments of the regional imbalance theory, and how they are related to each other. I will examine the neoclassical theory, the export-base theory, the growth-pole theory, and the center-periphery theory.

1.8.1 The Neoclassical Theory

The neoclassical theory is a useful starting point for understanding some of possible sources of regional dispari­ ties of growth. It is concerned with the growth of output, or the growth of output per capita, to explain regional imbalances. Three elements of regional imbalances are the growth of the labor force, the growth of capital stock, and 21 technical progress.44 The neoclassical theory is, on the other hand, concerned with the effects that interregional mobility of factors of production, e.g. labor and capital, can have on regional disparities.45

Strengths in the neoclassical theory are as follows.

First, it shows that the growth of capital and labor depends not only upon indigenous changes in regional factor supplies, but also upon interregional movements of capital and labour. Second, it makes a distinction between the simplistic one-sector and the two-sector model. The one- sector model stresses the potential significance of three factors, i.e. the labor force, capital, and technique, while the two-sector model provides a more realistic expla­ nation of regional disparities by considering the effect of export sector on movements of factors of production.

Weaknesses in the neoclassical theory are as follows.

First, in contrast to the export-base theory, which is con­ cerned with demand factors, the neoclassical theory is only

44 For a discussion of regional growth equation, see Harvey Armstrong and Jim Taylor, Regional Economic Policy and Its Analysis (Southampton, England; Philip Allan, 1978), p. 27. The regional growth equation is Qr = Ar + a Kr + (1-a) Lr where r; region Qs output A; technical progress K: capital L: labor Thus, regional differences would be expressed as fol­ lows: Qr - Lr = Ar + a (Kr - Lr)

4 5 Ibid., p. 28. 22 concerned with the influence of supply factors. For an

open economy, the demand for export commodities would have

effects on the growth of a region. Second, the neoclassi­

cal theory assumes that investors and workers are perfectly

informed about factor prices in all regions, and they would migrate to the most advantaged region. In practice, move­

ments of capital and labor are not as easy as they assume.

Third, the neoclassical theory is only concerned with

interregional shifts of factors of production. However, the

growth of output can be also achieved through intersectoral

shifts of factors of production, when there are many com­

modities in an economy. Fourth, unlike the growth pole

theory, which considers different returns to scale,46 the

neoclassical theory assumes constant returns to scale in a

model. However, in the long run, returns to scale are

likely to vary.

1.8.2 The Export-Base Theory

The Export-base theory is distinct from the neoclassical

theory, since it stresses the role of demand factors to

explain regional imbalances.47 That is, there are imba­

lances between regions with export-base and regions with-

46 That is, more output and jobs can be created due to economy of scale and scope.

47 There is a famous Hecksher-Ohlin theorem, which states that regions will specialize in the production and export of commodities that use their relatively abundant factor intensively. 23 out. The export-base of a region plays a primary role in determining the level of absolute and per capita income in

a region.48 There are, on the other hand, criticisms

against the export-base theory.' First, the export-base

theory only describes the historical development of regions

dependent on raw materials exports, and it provides little

insight into the conditions likely to have a dominant

effect on growth. Second, even though the export-base

theory is concerned with demand factors, it does not pro­

vide an explanation about what determines the demand of

export.

1.8.3 The Growth Pole Theory

The growth pole theory is concerned with why economic

development becomes increasingly concentrated in certain

'growth poles' among different regions.49 Unlike tradi­

48 For further discussion, see Douglas North, "Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth," Journal of Politi­ cal Economy (June 1955). North claimed that (1) the concept of a region should be defined in terms of its development around a common export base, and (2) the success of export base has been the determining factor in the growth of regions.

49 The terms, such as growth poles, development poles, growth centers, core regions, and regional centers, are often interchangeable; The concept of 'pole' was ini­ tially introduced by Francois Perroux, who used 'pole de croissance'. For further discussion, see Francois Per­ roux, "Note sur la notion des poles de croissance," Economie Appliquee 1 (1955): 307-320; Also, see J.R. Lausen, "On Growth Poles," Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development, ed. Niles M. Hansen (New York: Free Press, 1972), p. 22. He argues that the growth pole concept is the logical derivation of one such Per- rouxian type of abstract spaces; Also, see Macolm J. 24 tional theories of the location, which are concerned with equilibrium, the growth pole theory admits the asymmetry or inequality in interregional movements of capital.50 Also unlike the neoclassical theory, the growth pole theory admits the presence of internal and external economies of scale. Some regions have significant internal economies of scale, which would lead them to gain a competitive advan­ tage over other regions. The growth pole theory, on the other hand, is distinct from other theories, since it is more concerned with spatial factors.51 The growth pole

Moseley, Growth Centers in Spatial Planning (Oxfords Pergamon, 1974), p. 4. He argues that Perroux champi­ oned the idea of imbalance in development, in marked contrast to the equilibrium notions of more traditional economist, geographers and sociologists.

50 For this matter, see Stuart Holland, Capital versus the Regions (Londons Macmillan, 1976), pp. 54-59. He argues that not all services are equally mobile between regions, and the bulk of them are not mobile at all. They are in distribution and other activities which are location-bound, so that they cannot be shifted into problem regions. He also argues that the imbalance between job and income structure between regions in mature capitalist economies is increasing rather than decreasing.

51 For further discussion, see Thomas Hermanse, "Develop­ ment Poles and Related Theoriess A Synoptic Overview," Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development, ed. Niles M. Hansen (New York: Free Press, 1972), p. 174. He argues that the application of the growth pole con­ cept and theory in a specific geographical and regional context is primarily due to Boudeville, who distinguish­ es between space and region; Also see J.R. Boudeville, Problems of Regional Economic Planning (Edinburgh: Edin­ burgh University Press, 1966), p. 16. He distinguishes the programming space from the programming region. The one is a geographically discontinuous, and an economi­ cally functional, instrument, while the other is a geo­ graphically continuous tool. 25 theory is often regarded as a conditional theory of region­ al growth, since it indicates conditions under which accel­ erated regional development can occur.52 Meanwhile, ques­ tions were raised about a self-reinforcing process of growth within growth poles. The Mezzogiorno was often men­ tioned as an example, where there was no self-reinforcing process of growth generation by the Mezzogiorno, which was designated as a growth pole in Italy.53

1.8.4 The Center-Periphery Theory

The center-periphery theory extends the growth pole theory further into a general theory of regional imbalances, stressing spatial factors. It is concerned with cumulative and self-sustaining advantages of the center in the process of development, especially stressing the role of agglomera­ tion and external economies.5* The center-periphery theory was initially developed by Gunnar Myrdal and Albert Hirsch-

52 For further discussion, see Stuart Holland, op. cit., p. 51.

53 In the same context, Naylon argues tht growth pole strategy has a limited effect on regional inequalities and has exerted little influence further afield than its own municipal districts. See John Naylon, "Iberia," Regional Development in Western Europe, ed. Hugh D. Clout (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975), p. 305.

54 For further discussion, see Harry W. Richardson, Region­ al Growth Theory (New York: Macmillan, 1973), p. 57; David M. Smith, Industrial Location: An Economic Geo­ graphical Analysis (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981), p. 403. Economic growth can be transmitted from the core into the periphery through a hierarchical system of settlements, the creation of which helps to achieve the spatial integration of the economy. 26 man.5 6

The thrust of Myrdal's theory is based upon the notion of cumulative causation. That is, once a particular region has moved ahead of others, new increments of growth will focus on the already expanding region because of their derived advantages.

Divergence between favoured and disadvantaged regions is likely to become wider when there is an interchange between the two regions. Once development has been sparked in fav­ oured regions, it will eventually result in flows of labor, capital and commodities from disadvantaged regions. This is called the backwash effects because of their impact on the backward hinterland. Disadvantaged regions tend to lose their workers and local capital to favoured regions.

At the same time, markets in disadvantaged regions are swamped by cheap manufactured goods which throttle local industry such as traditional artisan manufacturing. Thus, backwash effects stifle economic growth in disadvantaged regions and stimulate and sustain further development in favoured regions.5 6

55 Gunnar Myrdal, Economic Development and Under- Development Regions (Bombay: Vora, 1957); Albert 0. Hirschman, The Strategy of Economic Development (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958).

56 Allan Rodgers, Economic Development in Retrospect: The Italian Model and Its Significance for Regional Planning in Market-Oriented Economies (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979). 27

A relation between integration and regional disadvantage was illuminated in Myrdal's argument: "To a low level of

economic development correspond low levels of social mobil­

ity, and communication. This implies greater impediments

to the spread effects."57

A relation between disadvantaged regions and integration

was also illuminated in Hirschman's argument. He suggested

the notion of polarization effects and trickle-down

effects, which were identical to backwash effects and

spread effects, respectively. Disadvantaged regions would

be likely to have more polarization effects and less

trickle-down effects. He argued that these would be

obstructive forces to integration.

57 Gunnar Myrdal, Ibid., p. 63. 28

1.9 HYPOTHESES

Hypothesis 1; The greater its economic disadvantage, the less economically and politically integrated the region.68

Hypothesis 2: The positive relationship between integra­ tion, economic and political, and economic advantage is stronger in urban areas than in rural areas.59

58 For a discussion of the relationship between regional disadvantage and integration, Nobert Vanhove and Leo H. Klaassen, Regional Policy: A European Approach (Brook­ field, Vermont: Gower, 1987). E.C. Hallett, "Economic Convergence and Divergence in the European Community: A Survey of the Evidence," Economic Divergence in the European Community, eds. Michael Hodges and William Wal­ lace (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981). Sergio Barzanti The Underdeveloped Areas within the Common Market (Prince­ ton: Princeton University Press, 1965). Harvey Arm­ strong and Jim Taylor Regional Economics and Policy (Oxford: Philip Allan, 1985). William Molle and Jean Paelinck, "Regional Policy," Economic Policies of the Common Market, ed. Peter Coffey (London: Macmillan, 1979).

59 For a discussion of the effects of integration on regions, Herbert Giersch, "Economic Union between Nations and the Location of Industries," Review of Eco­ nomic Studies 17 (1949): 87-97. Maurice Bye, "Customs Unions and National Interests," International Economic Papers 3 (1953): 208-34. UN Economic Commission for Europe, Economic Survey of Europe since 1953 (Geneva, 1954). Francois Perroux, Europe without Strands (Paris: University of France Press, 1954). Robert 0. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, "International Interdependence and Integration," International Politics, eds. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975), pp. 363-414. 29

1.10 METHODOLOGIES

I employ multivariate statistical analysis in order to examine the relationship between regional disadvantage and integration, and between integration and economic advantage in urban and rural areas.60

Regional data has been cumulated for the past twenty years in the Community. Based upon these data, multivari­ ate linear models are formulated to explain the relation­ ship between regional disadvantage and integration, and between integration and economic advantage in urban and rural areas. Data61 is collected from various issues of

Eurostat and Eurobarometer publications, and public opinion surveys conducted by Ronald Inglehart.

60 Refer to Chapter V for a discussion of methodology.

61 Refer to Section 5.5 in Chapter V for data sources. CHAPTER II

INTEGRATION EFFORTS IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

2.1 INTRODUCTION

Throughout the history of Europe, there were many efforts for integrating or unifying the continent. Adolf Hitler tried to unify the continent in the 1930s, and Bonapart

Napoleon also tried to unify the continent in the early nineteenth century. Also, the Roman Empire and the Holy

Roman Empire tried to unify the continent of Europe. How­ ever, those efforts are not likely to be understood as integration, which is intended for security, peace, and prosperity in the continent.62 On the other hand, the need

for integration was argued by many politicians, including

Winston Churchill and Robert Schuman, during and after

World War II. That idea of integration was gradually devel­ oped and fructified in 1951, when six countries, including

France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and

Luxembourg, agreed to join the European Coal and Steel Com­ munity (ECSC).

62 Chadwick F. Alger, "Analytical Approaches: Functionalism and Integration," International Social Science Journal 29 (1977): 73-93. Joining nations together by force is not integration (p. 80) .

- 30 - 31

Efforts for integration continued after the creation of the ECSC in 1951. The six member states also agreed to cre­ ate the European Economic Community (EEC) and Euratom by including more issue areas63 in which member states had common interests, in the Rome Treaty in 1957. Although they were mainly concerned with economic issues in the Treaty, it was believed that political integration would be an ultimate goal for member states to achieve.64

Until the early 1970s, efforts for economic and politi­ cal integration did not go beyond Euratom and the EEC, in which no new member states were accepted, besides the orig­ inal Six member states. Aside from de Gaulle's refusal to

63 For a discussion of issue area, see James N. Rosenau, "Foreign Policy as an Issue Area," Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy, ed. James N. Rosenau (The Free Press, 1967), pp. 11-50. Issue area is a category of issues that affects a political process in sufficiently simi­ lar ways to justify being clustered together.

64 Leon Lindberg also argued that the fundamental motiva­ tion was political, although the stated goal of the EEC was the creation of a customs union and the achievement of a significant measure of integration. It is, in the words of the Treaty, to establish "an ever closer union among the European peoples." (See the Preamble of the Treaty in Appendix A.) He also suggested that the Trea­ ty of Rome had a wide potential for political integra­ tion because it provided the setting up of a complex central decision-making machinery, which, though formal­ ly dependent upon the will of the Member States, did provide for an independent source of initiative and impulsion toward the Treaty's goal. See Leon N. Lind­ berg, The Political Dynamics of European Economic Inte­ gration (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963); Robert J. Shepherd, Public Opinion and European Integra­ tion (Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1975), p. 1. He also argued that the preamble to the Treaty of Rome referred to the eventual political unification. accept the United Kingdom into the EEC, there basically existed a deep gap between national policies and Community policy. That is, any member state was primarily interested in its national interest, prior to the Community interest.

During the first oil shock, the gap between them was clear­ ly shown. On the other hand, the enlargement of the EEC in

1973 can show that the majority of Europeans still did not lose a hope for integration, even with a gradual pace.

Thus, by adopting new member states, including the United

Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark, the scope of issue areas should be expanded, besides the size of the Community.

Also, the Community began to realize that it had to deal with new problems, which were due to regional imbalances in the Community. The second enlargement of the Community facilitated regional imbalances, by adopting new member states, which were less developed than original member states.

In a nutshell, I will examine the historical background of integration efforts since World War II, because those efforts were really oriented toward peace, security, and prosperity in Europe. Although the past forty-five years might be divided into many possible periods, five periods will be introduced. The first period covers from the end of

World War II until the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) in 1951, and the second period 33 from the establishment of the ECSC until that of the Euro­ pean Economic Community (EEC) and European Atomic Energy

Community (Euratom) in 1957. The third period will focus on the first enlargement of the Community in 1972. The fourth period will focus on negotiations with Mediterranean countries for the second enlargement of the Community in the 1970s. Lastly, the fifth period will focus on efforts for political cooperation in the 1980s.

2.2 THE FIRST PERIOD

Although there were not integration efforts for the entire continent, there was a thorough attempt at economic inte­ gration in the interwar period, which was the Belgium-

Luxembourg Economic Union in 1922. This initial effort made progress, and in 1944, an agreement was made for the estab­ lishment of a customs union between Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands, and subsequently, an economic union was established in 1947. During the fifties, economic inte­ gration was accelerated between the Benelux countries. The

"Agreement on the Status of Pre-economic Union" of 1949 proposed a system of cooperation between industrial sectors of the three economies in order to prepare the way for more binding action.

The Benelux integration, on the other hand, was an attempt for economic integration on a limited regional 34 scale in the continent. Right after World War II, new thinking for a United States of Europe was proposed by Win­ ston Churchill in 1946. In his speech at the University of

Zurich, on September 19, 1946, he stated:

We must build a kind of a United States of Europe. In this way only will hundreds of mil­ lions of toilers be able to regain the simple joys and hopes which make life worth living. The process is simple. All that is needed is the resolve of hundreds of millions of men and women to do right instead of wrong and gain as their reward blessing instead of cursing.65

In terms of how a United States of Europe would be achieved, Churchill stated:

The first step in the re-creation of the European family must be a partnership between France and Germany. In this way only can France recover the moral leadership of Europe. There can be no revi­ val of Europe without a spiritually great France and a spiritually great Germany.66

On the other side of the Atlantic, Secretary of State

George Marshall proposed the first systematic effort at

European integration in his address at Harvard University in June 1947.

the U.S policy would be ..... neither fitting nor effacious for this government to undertake to draw up unilaterally a program designed to place Europe on its feet economically. This is the business of the Europeans. The initiative, I think, must come from Europe.67

66 Uwe Kitzinger, The European Common Market and Community (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1967), p. 34.

6 6 Ibid., p. 36.

67 Finn B. Jensen and Ingo Walter, The Common Market: Eco­ nomic Integration in Europe (Philadelphia and New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1965), p. 8. 35

Marshall, in his speech, encouraged the European govern­ ments to formulate a definite program of joint action to accelerate economic recovery, which would be a precondition to substantial U.S. aid.

Encouraged by Marshall's speech, sixteen nations met in

Paris in 1947, and joined the European Recovery Programme.

They formulated a plan to raise both industrial and agri­ cultural output to levels considerably above prewar produc­ tion with U.S. aid. They also founded the Organization for

European Economic Co-operation (OEEC) in 1948, and subse­ quently in May 1948, a Congress was held in the Hague, which issued a resolution asserting that "it is the urgent duty of the nations of Europe to create an economic and political union in order to assure security and social progress."68

The OEEC was the first effective instrument for European

Cooperation because economic plans of member states were to be integrated into an overall recovery program to ensure economic harmony and to avoid unnecessary duplication of productive facilities.69 The OEEC also embodied the first steps toward multilateralism, although many of its works were accomplished through bilateral agreements between mem­ ber states.

6 8 The Congress brought together such leading European Fed­ eralists as Spaak, Monnet, de Gasperi, and Bidault, each calling for both economic and political unification.

69 Ibid., p. 9. 36

In 1949, the Council of Europe was instituted by ten states at Strasbourg. It was remarkable, in that it was a meeting place where the advocates of a United Europe could get together and debate the Community future. However, it still lacked in federal authority.

2.3 THE SECOND PERIOD

As a new approach to Germany, Robert Schuman, French For­ eign Minister, proposed to place French and German coal and steel under a Common High Authority.70 In his Declaration of May 8, 1950, Schuman stated:

The pooling of coal and steel production will immediately provide for the setting-up of common bases for economic development as a first step in the federation of Europe, and will change the destinies of those regions which have long been devoted to the manufacture of munities of war, of which they have been the most constant victims. The solidarity in production thus established will make it plain that any war between France and Germany becomes, not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible. The setting-up of this powerful production unit, open to all countries willing to take part, and eventually capable of providing all the member states with the basic elements of industrial production on the same terms, will lay the real foundations for their economic unification.71

As the first effective experiment in supranational economic integration,72 the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)

70 That is, a new approach was intended to achieve that Germany would be intertwined with the rest of Europe.

71 Uwe Kitzinger, op. cit., p. 38.

72 It even had the ability to tax. 37

Treaty was signed in Paris by six states,73 including Bel­ gium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Nether­ lands. The mission of the ECSC was stated in Article 2.

The mission of the Coal and Steel Community is to contribute to economic expansion, the development of employment and the improvement of the standard of living in the participating countries through the institution, in harmony with the general economy of member states of a common market.74

The success of the ECSC encouraged further efforts for integration, since "it proved, on a limited scale, that supranational economic integration is not only practicable, but also beneficial in the long run for the economic wel­ fare of the participating countries."75

73 Thus, it was sometimes called a 'Little European' approach. Britain declined to join the ECSC because supranational control over its mines and steel mills would be incompatible with national welfare; Also see Christopher Tugendhat, Making Sense of Europe (Middle­ sex, England: Viking, 1986), p. 33. He argues that, in the years between 1945 and 1950 the British had shown that they did not share the aspirations taking root on the continent; A statement by the National Executive at the Labour Party in June 1950 would reflect the under­ standing of European unity.

In every respect except distance we in Britain are closer to our kinsmen in Australia and New Zealand on the far side of the world than we are to Europe. We are closer in language and in origins, in social habits and institutions, in political outlook and economic interest.

74 That is, the tariffs and quotas on the movement of coal, steel, and iron ore within the Community were removed; subsidies were tapered off; take measures to end dis­ criminatory freight rates; establish common rules for price policies; regulate cartels and concentrations.

75 Finn B. Jensen and Ingo Walter, op. cit., p. 19. 38

On the other hand, Rene Pleven, French Prime Minister, proposed a European Defense Community (EDC) in October

1950, and the EDC Treaty was signed in Paris by the six

ECSC states in May 1952. The Constitution of the EDC was formulated to achieve 'European Political Community', where wide political powers were given based upon federal princi­ ples and a popular mandate through an elected parliament.76

However, the French National Assembly rejected the EDC

Treaty in August 1954, because it feared the potential loss of political and military sovereignty and the rebirth of the German wehrmach.

Another effort was made through British initiative, excluding supranational characteristics which the ECSC and the EDC had in common. In October 1954, the Western Europe­ an Union (WEU) was formed, including France, Britain, the

Benelux and Germany.77 It was intended to deal with secur­ ity matters, and had intergovernmental characteristics. In the mid-fifties, the pace of integration was slowing down.7 8

76 It was initially proposed that national military forces would be integrated with those of other countries, and later, a proposal for a European Political Community was added.

77 Five states except Germany signed in 1948 the Brussels Treaty, for the purpose of promoting collective defense and improving cooperation among them.

78 Finn B. Jensen and Inngo Walter, op. cit., p. 11. They also argued that, by 1955 the pace of economic integra­ tion was diminishing significantly. 39

In June 1955, the foreign ministers of the Six countries met at Messina, Italy, and organized a committee of experts under Paul-Henri Spaak. The committee was to formulate pro­ posals for the establishment of the atomic energy pool and an economic union. The Spaak report (1956) served to strengthen the federative nature of economic union. It emphasized eliminating distortions of competition, coordi­ nating national economic policies, integrating agriculture, and forming an economic union. Following these proposals,

negotiations were undertaken with a view to creating an

Economic Community and an Atomic Energy Community.

Besides national governments, unofficial organizations

also contributed to fostering ideas of European unifica­

tion. Since 1955, Jean Monnet's Action Committee for a

United States of Europe had been the most important of

those organizations. In May 1957, the Six signed the Treaty

of Rome that officially established the European Economic

Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community

(Euratom).79 The EEC (the Common Market) provided the pos­

sible nucleus for an economic union, however, "its purpose

79 In a Treaty, there are agreements on the creation of a customs union, with no barriers to trade among them­ selves; the creation of a common tariff on imports from the rest of the world; the provision for free movement for labor and capital; the coordination of financial and economic policies; the establishment of common rules concerning competition; the establishment of funds to help finance investment and economic adaptation in Europe and to aid overseas territories associated with the Community. 40 was not limited to economic integration but included the increasing convergence of the member-nations in political, social, and military matters as well.1'80 The preamble of the EEC reflected a determination 'to establish the founda­ tions of an even closer union among European peoples'.

2.4 THE THIRD PERIOD

Over a ten-year period Britain had membership negotiations with the Community, and finally became a member in 1972.

Thus, we will focus on the first enlargement of the Commu­ nity. Britain joined the WEU, while she declined to join

the ECSC, and stood aloof from negotiations in the EDC, the

EEC, and Euratom, because she was unwilling to accept sup­

ranational institutions and the idea of an eventual United

States of Europe. After the Common Market was instituted,

Britain proposed a free trade area that would include the

Six and the other members of the OEEC.81 However, negotia­

tions on a free trade area failed. Subsequently, Britain

joined with Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, Austria

and Portugal to form the European Free Trade Association

(EFTA) in January I960.82

80 Finn B. Jensen and Ingo Walter, op. cit., p. 22.

81 That is, the proposal of a free trade area included gradual removal of tariffs and quotas on trade in indus­ trial products, and a separate treatment of agricultural trade. Also, it included that each member states would keep its own tariff and trade policy in relations with the rest of world. 41

In July 1961, Britain requested negotiations with the

Six in order to become a full member of the Community.

Following Britain, some EFTA member states, including Den­ mark, Norway and Ireland, applied for full membership, and others, such as Austria, Sweden and Switzerland, applied

for association. For Britain, views of Prime Minister

Harold Macmillan and Labour opposition leader Hugh Gaits-

kell would reflect the British position during negotiations

for the membership. In July 1961 Macmillan stated:

no British government could join the EEC without prior negotiations with a view to meeting with needs of the Commonwealth countries, of our EFTA partners, and of British agriculture.

In October 1962 Gaitskell stated:

if we could carry the Commonwealth with us, safe­ guarded, flourishing, prosperous; if we could safeguard our agriculture and our EFTA friends were all in it; if we were secure in our employ­ ment policy, and yet have this wider, closer, association with Europe, it would indeed be a great ideal.

In January 1963, President de Gaulle clearly stated that

France would not agree to Britain becoming a member of the

Community, because Britain was not part of the essential

Europe and her ties were with the Commonwealth and the U.S.

82 The EFTA was called a 'Outer Seven'. It was formed along 'functionalist' lines; Also see William Diebold, Jr., ''The Process of European Integration," The Common Mar­ ket: Progress and Controversy, ed. Lawrence S. Krause (Inglewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964), p. 38. He argues that the EFTA is a move to improve the chances of striking a bargain with the Six; Also, see Finn B. Jen­ sen and Ingo Walter, op. cit., p. 23. They argue that the EFTA is a threat of European fragmentation in the form of economic blocs. 42

In his press conference in January 1963, de Gaulle stated:

For example, the means by which the people of Great Britain nourish themselves is in fact by importing foodstuffs purchased at low prices in the two Americas or in the former dominions, while still granting large subsidies to British farmers. This means is obviously incompatible with the system the Six have quite naturally set up for themselves.83

On the other hand, the Merger Treaty was signed in 1965, which would establish a single Council and a single Commis­ sion of the European Communities. However, many proposals for supranational development for the Community were rejected, because of French opposition. In May 1967 Brit­ ain reapplied to join the Community, and Ireland, Denmark, and Norway followed suit. Even though Britain displayed greater enthusiasm than before, not only as far as economic integration was concerned, but also on the highly contro­ versial issue of political unification,84 the Council of

Ministers failed to reach agreement on their memberships in the Community.

In December 1969 the Hague summit made agreements on a number of important matters, which would include strength­ ening the Community institutions, enlarging the Community, establishing economic and monetary union by 1980, and developing political cooperation.

83 Uwe Kitzinger, op. cit., p. 184.

84 Derek H. Hene, Decision on Europe: An Explanation of the Common Market (London: Jordan & Sons, 1970), p. 138. 43

Since the Hague summit, the Community was more concerned with the enlargement issue than before. In 1970 it signed a preferential trade agreement with Spain. It also reopened membership negotiations with Denmark, Ireland, Norway and

Britain. Two years later, the Treaty of Accession to the

European Communities was signed in Brussels by the Prime

Ministers of Denmark, Ireland, Norway and Britain. In both

Denmark and Ireland, Community accession was approved in a

referendum,85 whereas in Norway, the referendum resulted in

53.5 percent being cast against entry and 46.5 percent in

favour. As a result, Norway decided not to join the Commu­

nity, and Britain, Denmark, and Ireland became members of

the Community on January 1, 1973.86

85 For further discussion, see Keesing's Research Report, The European Communities: Establishment and Growth (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1975). The British Labour Party had shown continued opposition to entry into the European Communities on the terms negotiated by Mr. Heath's Government (p. 35). However, a majority vote was in favour of continued Community membership in British referendum in June 1975; In Denmark, ratifica­ tion of the Treaty of Accession was approved by Parlia­ ment on September 8, 1972, by 272 votes to 95, with 1 blank vote. Denmark entry into the Community was also approved in a referendum on October 3 by 63.3 percent of the votes cast to 36.7 percent (p. 36); In Ireland, those in favour constituted over 58 percent of the electorate and those against about 12 percent (p. 36).

86 See William Wallace, ''Walking Backwards towards Unity," op. cit., p. 316. The first enlargement, absorbing Britain, Ireland and Denmark with their distinctive pat­ terns of national policies and external ties into a Com­ munity not well enough organized for early adjustment of its established practices, provided a substantial shock to the Community institutions. 44

2.5 THE FOURTH PERIOD

Efforts were also made for cooperation on foreign policy matters. In October 1970 the Community accepted the Davig- non report on political cooperation. However, there was

little progress toward political cooperation. For example,

there was no cooperation among member states in the Commu­

nity during the Yom Kippur war and subsequent oil crisis.

The Dutch displayed more sympathy with Israel than most

other Europeans as a result of which the Netherlands became

a particular object of Arab hostility and was subjected to

oil boycott. Britain and France, on the other hand, scram­

bled all over the Gulf to make special deals with the sup­

pliers and it was left to multinational oil companies to

make sure that the Dutch and others without special influ­

ence in the Middle East were all right.87

In October 1972 future guidelines for the Community were

set in the Paris summit. They included a pledge to trans­

form the relations of member states into a European Union

by 1980, and an undertaking to institute a new regional

development fund to correct the structural and regional

imbalances which might affect the realization of economic

and monetary union. Two years later, details of a European

Regional Development Fund were agreed in the Paris summit.

Also, the principle of direct election to the European Par­

87 Christopher Tugendhat, op. cit., p. 62. 45 liament (EP) was agreed.88 In order to strengthen the

European Parliament budgetary powers, the Treaty amending

Certain Financial Provisions of the Treaties was signed in

July 1975. In 1979 the first direct elections to the EP were held, and the European Monetary System (EMS) came into operation.

Efforts for enlarging the Community were also made on the Mediterranean dimension. Greece has had an association agreement with the Community since 1961.89 From 1967 to

1974 the monarchy was replaced by a military dictatorship.

During this period relations with the Community were sus­ pended and not resumed until 1975 when Greece, having

restored a democratic government, applied to join the Com­ munity as a full member. The Accession Treaty between the

Community and Greece was signed in May 1979, and Greece

became a member in January 1981.

The Community made a preferential trade agreement with

Spain in 1970, and established a free trade area with Por­

tugal in 1973. The revolution in Portugal of April 1974

88 See Horst Reichenbach, "A Politico-economic Overview,'1 Integration and Unequal Development: The Experience of the EEC (New Yok: St. Martin's, 1980), p. 92. The direct election to the European Parliament and the for­ mation of European parties will contribute to political integration.

89 See Richard Pomfret, Mediterranean Policy of the Europe­ an Community: A Study of Discrimination in Trade (Lon­ don: Macmillan, 1986), p. 18. He argues that the Athens accord provided for the establishment of a customs union over a 22-year period for harmonization of policies and for the creation of joint institutions. 46 removed a political barrier to closer links with the Commu­ nity and the Potuguese Government hoped for improvement in her free trade agreement. This hope remained unfulfilled during 1974-1975 because of French and Italian opposition to any concessions on Portuguese agricultural exports, but the Community did express a desire for closer ties and showed its good will by granting financial aid in October

1975.90

Negotiations with Spain had been broken off by the Com­ munity in October 1975 after some Basque separatists were executed. However, Franco's death and the return of a con­ stitutional monarchy removed a political obstacle to closer ties with the Community.91 Portugal and Spain applied for full membership in the Community in March and July of 1977, and they became members in 1986.

2.6 THE FIFTH PERIOD

Further efforts were made in order to strengthen European political cooperation.92 In October 1981, agreement on the

90 Ibid., p. 22.

91 Among member states, the Benelux countries did not want contact with Franco's Spain.

92 See William Wallace and David Allen, op. cit., p. 244. The trend was towards a closer association of the polit­ ical structure with the Community institutions. This might culminate in the creation of a permanent secretar­ iat as a new branch of the Council Secretariat and the gradual assimilation of political cooperation into the Community process - the opposite outcome from that feared in 1969-70. 47

'London Report' was made for political cooperation. On the other hand, there are three cases in which the Community showed different degrees of cooperation among themselves.

First, when martial law was imposed in Poland in December

1981, the Community showed slow response. In other words, the crisis in Poland served to expose differences between member states rather than to demonstrate a common resolve.

Second, when Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands in

April 1982, the Community showed cooperation between member states. Under Article 113 of the Treaty of Rome, the Coun­ cil of Ministers, acting on a proposal from the Commission, could swiftly adopt a regulation suspending all imports from Argentina that had legally binding force on all member states. Third, when the Korean airliner was shot down by

Soviet fighters in September 1983, the Community barely reacted at all.93

In December 1985, the Luxembourg European Council meet­ ing agreed to the principles of the Single European Act.94

The Act incoporated Treaty revisions, gave European Politi­ cal Cooperation legal status, and established the comple­ tion of the internal market by 1992 as a top priority. In

February 1988, the European Council agreed to increase and

93 For more discussion, see Christopher Tugendhat, op. cit., pp. 63-65.

94 The Single European Act inserts regional policy into the Treaty of Rome for the first time. It offers hope of a doubling of the ERDF as well as an increased emphasis on concentrating resources in the poorest regions. 48 widen the Community's budgetary base, and to reduce expen­ diture on the CAP and to double expenditure on the regional and social funds.95

2.7 CONCLUSION

This chapter was concerned with how the Community was formed, what the main barriers are for the enlargement of the Community, and whether efforts for political integra­ tion, besides economic integration, exist. The ECSC was the first effective attempt for economic integration, and it was a 'Little European Approach', since the Six joined the

Community and Britain declined. Through a rollercoaster of integration efforts in the 1950s, the EEC and Euratom were instituted in the Treaty of Rome, while Britain still stood aloof from negotiations for them. However, Britain had mem­ bership negotiations with the Community over the ten year period in the 1960s. The Hague summit provided a spring­ board for the Community to accept new members, which resulted in the first and second enlargement.

The enlargement of the Community, on the other hand, drew concerns about the impacts of regional imbalances on integration. The Paris summit in 1972 realized that the

Community should provide measures for 'balanced growth' and

95 Social fund is intended to help member states with training and retraining scheme, while regional develop­ ment fund is intended to help them develop their poorer and isolated regions. 49

•harmonious development' for all regions within the Commu­ nity. In 1974 the Regional Development Fund was formally instituted in the Paris summit, in order to reduce regional imbalances. CHAPTER III

REGIONAL DISADVANTAGES IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

3.1 INTRODUCTION

The Treaty of Rome stipulated that the Community intended to achieve 'balanced growth' and 'harmonious development' in Article 2. There exist, however, gaps between developed and less developed areas, or between rich and poor areas, within the Community. Less developed or poor areas are called disadvantaged areas.96 Consequently, some questions are asked. Have the gaps widened or narrowed in the last forty years, during which the Community has enlarged from the Six to the Twelve ? What are effective indicators of regional imbalances ? What instruments have been used for the Community to redress regional imbalances ? These ques­ tions will be examined in this chapter.

96 Such terms as problem regions, development regions, and programming regions can also be understood as related to disadvantaged regions or areas. For problem regions, see David Smith, Industrial Location; An Economic Geo­ graphical Analysis (New Yorks John Wiley & Sons, 1981), p. 387; For development regions, see J.R. Friedmann, Regional Development - A Case Study of Venezuela (Cam­ bridge: MIT Press, 1966); For programming regions, see J.R. Boudeville, Problems of Regional Economic Planning (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966).

- 50 - 51

It was not until the 1970s that the Community began to realize that it needed to redress regional imbalances in order to achieve harmonious development within the Communi­ ty. Among new members, Ireland was heavily dependent upon agriculture for her GDP, and Britain also had many depressed areas. Among the original Six there were also many regions, which were depressed or less developed. For example, they were the Mezzogiorno in Italy, Wallonia in

Belgium, and south and west regions in France. When Greece,

Portugal and Spain became new members for the Community, the gap between rich and poor areas further widened.

The Community came up with various instruments to resolve regional imbalances. Some of them were already cre­ ated by the Treaty of Rome, while others were later insti­ tuted by member states. However, it was not until 1974 that the European Regional Develpment Fund (ERDF) was created.

In the last section, I will examine how the ERDF has been used to resolve regional imbalances within the Community.

3.2 DEFINITION OF REGIONS

There may be many ways to define regions in the Community.

On the one hand, when regions are too broadly defined, we may run the risk of losing distinctive characteristics for each and every region. Also, it would be hard to distin­ guish broadly defined regions from states. On the other 52 hand, when regions are too narrowly defined, questions arose about the availability of data for those regions.

Thus, in order to define Community regions to be used in this study, those questions will be considered at the same time.

Regions in this study will be based upon administrative units. That is, considering population and/or territory, regions will group together into some administrative units.97 For example, when the size of a territory is too small, e.g. Luxembourg, or when there is too small of a population, e.g. Denmark, Ireland, to be sub-divided, they will be regarded as one region, respectively. Regions defined in this study are as follows.

1. Belgium

(1) Flanders

(2) Wallonia

(3) Brussels

2. Denmark

3. Germany

(1) Schleswig-Holstein

(2) Hamburg

(3) Niedersachsen

(4) Bremen

(5) Nordhein-Westfalen

97 Actually, regions defined in this study are related to Level I regions of territorial units, according to the Eurostat. 53

(6) Hessen

(7) Rheinland-Pfalz

(8) Baden-Wurttemberg

(9) Bayern

(10) Saarland

(11) West Berlin

4. Greece

(1 Voreia Ellada

(2 Kentriki Ellada

(3 Anatolika kai notia nisia

5. Spain

(1 Noroeste: Galicia, Asturias, Cantabria

(2 Noreste: Pais Vasco, Navarra, Rioja, Aragon

(3 Madrid

(4 Centro: Castilla-Leon, Castilla-La Mancha, Extemadura

(5 Este: Cantaluna, Comunidad Valenciana, Baleares

(6 Sur: Andalucia, Murcia, Ceuta y Melilla

(7 Canarias

6 . France

(1 Ile-de-France

(2 Bassin Parisien

(3 Nord-pas-de-calais

(4 Est

(5 Ouest

(6 Sud-Ouest

(7 Centre-Est (8) Mediterranee

7. Ireland

8. Italy

(1) Northwest

(2) Lombardia

(3) Northeast

(4) Emilia-Romagna

(5) Cetro

(6)

(7)

(8) Abruzzi-Molise

(9) Sud: Calabria, Basilicata, Apulia

(10) Sicily

(11) Sardinia

9. Luxembourg

10. The Netherlands

(1) Noord-Nederland: Groningen, Friesland, Drenthe

(2) West-Nederland: Utrecht, Noord-Holland, Zuid-Holland

(3) Zuid-Nederland: Noord-Brabant, Limbourg, Zeeland

(4) Oost-Nederland: Overijssel, Gelderland

11. Portugal

(1) Norte do Continente

(2) Sul do Continente

(3) IIhas

12. The United Kingdom

(1) North 55

(2) Yorkshire and Humberside

(3) East Midlands

(4) East Anglia

(5) South-East

(6) South-West

(7) West Midlands

(8) North-West

(9) Wales

(10) Scotland

(11) Northern Ireland

3.3 REGIONAL IMBALANCES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY

Even before the first enlargement of the Community in 1973, there existed regional imbalances between regions in the

Community. Southern regions in Italy, e.g. Campania, Sici­ ly, Sardinia, Abruzzi, Molise, and Sud (i.e. Calabria,

Basilicata, Apulia), were much less developed than any oth­ er regions in the Six. The proportion of agricultural employment and emigration rate were very high compared with the Community average. Meanwhile, regional imbalances have widened within the Community since the enlargement in the

1970s. The impacts of regional disadvantages on integra­ tion will be examined in chapter VI.98

98 There is a caution against negative effects of regional imbalances. See Horst Reichenbach, "A Politico-economic Overview," Integration and Unequal Development:____ The Experience of the EEC, eds. Dudley Seers and Constantine Vaitsos (New York: St. Martin's, 1980), p. 96. He 56

What kind of indicators should be used in order to meas­ ure regional imbalances in the Community ? Even though many

indicators could be used, I will use five indicators, i.e.

GDP per capita, GDP per worker, unemployment rate, the pro­ portion of agricultural employment, and net migration.09

argues that the 'lack of convergence' will make further progress impossible; Also see Sergio Barzanti, The Underdeveloped Areas within the Common Market (Prince­ ton: Princeton University Press, 1965), p. 81. He argues that regional inequalities within the Community are very evident. They represent obstacles, brakes, and potentially disruptive elements in the way of unifica­ tion. They are an invitation to protectionism, escape clauses, preferential treatment, subsidies, and all the factors which go against a liberalization of trade.

99 See Wolfgang Stabenow, "Regional Policy in the EEC," Regional Policy and Planning for Europe, ed. Morgan Sant (Westmead, England: Saxon House, 1974), pp. 71-86; Geof­ frey Denton, "Regional Divergence and Policy in the Com­ munity, with Special Reference to Enlargement," Economic Divergence in the European Community eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981), p. 136. He suggests many indicators, such as unemployment rates, activity rates, income per head, rates of emigra­ tion, rates of economic growth, age and class structure of the population, industrial structure, degree of spa­ tial congestion and environmental condition; E.C. Hal- lett, "Economic Convergence and Divergence in the Euro­ pean Community: A Survey of the Evidence," op. cit., pp. 16-31. He suggests inflation rate, GDP per capita and exchange rate; Paul C. Cheshire and Dennis G. Hay, Urban Problems in Western Europe (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), pp. 43-86. He suggests income, unemployment rate, migration index, and index of travel demand; Francesco Vito, "Problems of the Underdeveloped Regions of Italy," Backward Areas in Advanced Countries ed. E.A.G. Robinson (London: Macmillan and St. Martin's, 1969), pp. 210-225. He suggests per capita income, unemployment rate, and net migration rate; Nobert Vanhove and Leo H. Klaassen, Regional Policy: A European Approach (Brookfield, Ver­ mont: Gower, 1987), p. 241. They suggest regional income, productivity, migration, sectoral structure and unemployment; Willem Molle, Industrial Location and Regional Development in the European Community: The FLEUR Model (Brookfield, Vermont: Gower, 1983), p. 115. 57

When indicators of regional imbalances are chosen, the standard deviation or coefficient of variation for each

indicator can measure how much regional imbalances have widened or narrowed within the Community.100 I will use the coefficient of variation, since it is a relative meas­ ure of variation, which represents the standard deviation

as a percentage of the arithmetic mean. However, the stan­ dard deviation is not comparable when the means and/or the units of measurement are different.

3.3.1 Imbalances in GDP per capita in the Community

Among many indicators, GDP per capita is the primary indi­

cator of regional imbalances,101 since GDP per capita can

He suggests employment by sector and region, unemploy­ ment, GDP per head, and migration.

100 For further discussion, see Marja-Liisa Kiljunen, "Regional Disparities and Policy in the EEC," Integra­ tion and Unequal Development; The Experience of the EEC, eds. Dudley Seers and Constantine Vaitsos (New York: St. Martin's, 1980), p. 208. Besides the coeffi­ cient of variation, ratios of regional maximum and min­ imum are suggested.

101 E.C. Hallett, "Economic Convergence and Divergence in the European Community: A Survey of the Evidence," Eco­ nomic Divergence in the European Community, eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981), p. 25. He argues that, if economic con­ vergence is defined as a process of narrowing income disparities in member states, the most appropriate indicator is probably gross domestic product per cap­ ita; John Naylon, "Iberia," Regional Development in Western Europe, eds. Hugh D. Clout (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975), p. 305. He argues that lessening regional imbalances is needed not in the sense of an even spread of employment but in terms of income per head; Willem Molle, "Regional Policy," Main Economic Policy Areas of the EEC - Towards 1992, ed. Peter Cof- 58 not only show one aspect of living standards but it can be also comparable across the Community. Table 1 shows how GDP per capita has varied between regions in the Community, in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV).

Table 1

The CV of GDP per capita between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982

YEAR CV of GDP per capita

1970 33. 77 1971 34.39 1972 35.44 1973 38.62 1974 42.23 1975 42.30 1976 42.63 1977 43.07 1978 43.88 1979 43.89 1980 44.14 1981 44.37 . 1982 44.95

Sources The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991.

As we can see in Table 1, regional imbalances have wid­ ened throughout the 1970s and early 1980s, during which the

Community has adopted new members, such as Ireland, Eng­

fey (Norwell: Kluwer Academic, 1989), p. 76. He argues that the disparity in income per head is generally felt to be one of the most painful disparities among the regions. 59

land, Denmark, and Greece. Differences between the highest and the lowest GDP per capita have also widened, which can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2

Difference between the Highest and the Lowest GDP per capita between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982

YEAR DIFFERENCE

1970 3580 1971 4053 1972 4452 1973 5458 1974 6284 1975 6473 1976 8490 1977 9708 1978 10594 1979 11761 1980 12447 1981 14104 1982 15375

Note: GDP per capita is measured by ECU. Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991.

During the period 1970-1982, the regions with the lowest

GDP per capita were Sicily, Campania, Abruzzi, Molise, Sar­

dinia, and Sud (i.e. Calabria, Basilicata, Apulia) in Ita­

ly, Ireland, and Greece. Regions with the highest GDP per

capita, on the other hand, were Brussels, Ile-de-France, 60

Noord-Nederland (i.e. Groningen, Friesland, Drenthe), and some urban areas in Germany (i.e. Hamburg, Bremen, Berlin).

For regions with the lowest GDP per capita, their GDP per capita only accounted for less than half of the Community average, while they accounted for 70 percent of their national averages. Also, the proportion of their GDP per capita to the Community average has decreased throughout the years, even though the proportion of their GDP per cap­ ita to their national averages increased or stayed the same. This is likely to indicate that regional imbalances worsened at the Community level. On the other hand, when lowest and highest GDP per capita regions are compared, the former is in many cases related to rural areas, while the latter is related to urban areas.102

Meanwhile, we can compare the top six regions with the highest GDP per capita (Group A) with the bottom six regions with the lowest GDP per capita (Group B). The gap between averages of Group A and B has widened over the years. That is, while the average of Group A was three times as high as that of Group B until the middle of the

1970s, the one has been four times as high as the other

102 Josep Fontana, "Economic Development of Mediterranean Countries in Historical Perspective," The Enlargement of the European Community:____ Case-Studies of Greece, Portugal and Spain, eds. Lyn Gorman and Marja-Liisa Kiljunen (London: Macmillan, 1983), p. 47. He argues that the machinery of unequal growth worked also inside Europe, among the economies that had first industrial­ ized and those that did so later. 61 since then. Also while the average of Group A is twice as much as the Community average, that of Group B is only half

as much as the Community average. In a nutshell, imbalanc­

es tended to worsen at the Community level between 1970 and

1982.

3.3.2 Imbalances in GDP per Worker in the Community

Unlike GDP per capita, which could be related to urban and

rural areas, GDP per worker is useful, since regions with

low GDP per worker can be related to depressed areas,

besides rural areas. That is, regions with declining indus­

tries are also likely to be disadvantaged regions in the

Community.103 Table 3 shows how GDP per worker has varied

in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV) from 1970 to

1982.

During the period 1970-1982, regions with the lowest GDP

per worker were Campania, Abruzzi, Molise, Sicily, Sardi­

nia, Sud, in Italy, Northern Ireland, Yorkshire and Humber­

side, North, in England, Greece, and Ireland. Regions with

the highest GDP per worker were Brussels, Ile-de-France,

103 Hugh D. Clout, Regional Development in Western Europe (New Yorks John Wiley & Sons, 1975), p. 7. For problem regions in the Community, he included regions with declining industries (e.g. coal mining and/or textile manufacturing); Harvey Armstrong and Jim Taylor, Regional Economics and Policy (Oxford: Philip Allan, 1985), p. 63. Depressed industrial areas are also problem regions in the Community; Nobert Vanhove and Leo H. Klaassen, op. cit., pp. 101-102. Stranded (depressed) regions are problem regions in the Communi­ ty. 62

Table 3

The CV of GDP per Worker between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982

YEAR CV of GDP per Worker

1970 20.94 1971 22.81 1972 24.65 1973 29.59 1974 31.86 1975 31.88 1976 36.47 1977 38.44 1978 38.55 1979 40.85 1980 41.12 1981 44.84 1982 46.15

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991.

Noord- and West-Nederland, and some urban areas in Germany

(i.e. Hamburg, Bremen, Berlin, Nordhein-Westfalen). With the lowest GDP per worker, such regions as Yorkshire, Hum­ berside, and North regions in England have declining indus­ tries other than farming, while some regions, i.e. Northern

Ireland, Ireland, the Mezzogiorno in Italy, and Greece, are peripheral rural areas. On the other hand, for regions with the lowest GDP per worker, their GDP per worker only accounted for about 60 percent of the Community average, 63 even though they accounted for more than 80 percent of their national averages. Also, the proportion of their GDP per worker to the Community average has decreased through­ out the years, reflecting growing gaps between regions in the Community. Table 4 shows differences between the high­ est and the lowest GDP per worker between regions in the

Community, 1970-1982.

Table 4

Difference between the Highest and the Lowest GDP per worker between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982

YEAR DIFFERENCE

1970 5690 1971 6436 1972 6758 1973 8449 1974 10027 1975 12408 1976 16733 1977 20254 1978 20922 1979 23654 1980 25756 1981 29965 1982 33404

Note: GDP per worker is measured by ECU. Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991. 64

Meanwhile, we can compare the top six regions with the highest GDP per worker (Group A) with the bottom six

regions with the lowest GDP per worker (Group B). The gap between the averages of Group A and B has widened through­ out the years. That is, while the average of Group A was

twice as high as that of Group B until the middle of the

1970s, the one has been three times as high as the other

since then. Also, while the average of Group A is 1.5 times

as high as the Community average, the average of Group B is

only half as much as the Community average. Although

regions in Group A and B have experienced increases of GDP

per worker, those regions in Group A showed more signifi­

cant increases than those in Group B, which tended to wors­

en imbalances between them.

3.3.3 Imbalances in Unemployment Rate in the Community

Unemployment rate is used along with GDP per worker, since

it is also related to rural and depressed regions in terms

of high unemployment rate.10* In the 1970s the Mezzogior-

no105 in Italy and Northern Ireland experienced very high

104 See Stein Rokkan, et al., Centre-Peripherv Structures in Europe:____ An ISSC Workbook in Comparative Analysis (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1987), p. 44. They argue that, to group regions economically, the best sources are statistics of employment and production.

los irhe Mezzogiorno includes most of Italy south of Rome. It is made up of seven administrative regions: Abruzzi-Molise, Campania, Calabria, Basilicata, Apulia, Sicily and Sardinia. Refer to a map in Section 4.2.1 in Chapter IV. 65 unemployment rates, and most regions in Spain had the high­ est unemployment rates in the Community.106 Other regions with high unemployment rates included North and Northwest of England, Mediterranee in France, Wallonia in Belgium, and Noord- and Zuid-Nederland in the Netherlands.107

Regions with the lowest unemployment rates, on the other hand, were Luxembourg, Denmark, most regions in Germany,

Ile-de-France, Lombardia and Northwest in Italy, East Ang­ lia and South-East of England, and West-Nederland in the

Netherlands. Except Luxembourg, each member state tended to have both high and low unemployment regions.108 Table 5 shows the coefficient of variation (CV) of unemployment rates between regions in the Community from 1970 to 1982.

Table 6 shows differences between the lowest and the highest unemployment rates between regions in the Community from 1970 to 1982. Even though the coefficient of varia­ tion for unemployment rate between regions became higher

106 For a discussion of Spanish problems, see Lyn Gorman and Marja-Liisa Kiljunen, op. cit., p. 14. Even in the most advanced province of Spain (e.g. Madrid), average income is only 85 percent of the Nine, while the less advanced provinces reach a mere 36 percent.

107 Andre Gorz, Strategy for Labor (Bostons Beacon Press, 1964), p. 155. The decline of certain regions (espe­ cially Wallonia and the Mezzogiorno) risked repercus­ sions on the economies of the nations concerned, as well as tensions and centrifugal tendencies which might endanger the cohesion of the EEC.

108 For similar argument, see Hugh D. Clout, op. cit., p. 8. He also argues that, except tiny Luxembourg, each member state contained regions with values both above and below the Community average. 66

Table 5

The CV of Unemployment Rate between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982

YEAR CV OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

1970 44.31 1971 46.43 1972 48.41 1973 50.20 1974 50.70 1975 50.94 1976 53.62 1977 55.49 1978 55.77 1979 60.38 1980 74.66 1981 75.67 1982 77.84

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991. during that period, differences between the lowest and the highest unemployment rates between regions changed little, since unemployment rates have increased for most regions in the Community. For example, it was only 7.3 percent in

1973, and 9.5 percent in 1979, because all regions in the

Community experienced the oil shocks in 1973 and 1979.

Meanwhile, we can compare the top six regions with the lowest unemployment rate (Group A) with the bottom six regions with the highest unemployment rate (Group B). The 67

Table 6

Difference between the Highest and the Lowest Unemployment Rates between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982

YEAR DIFFERENCE

1970 13.5% 1971 13.5 1972 24.0 1973 7.3 1974 14.8 1975 15.6 1976 21.8 1977 20.2 1978 15.7 1979 9.5 1980 31.8 1981 43.2 1982 47.8

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991. gap between averages of Group A and B has tended to worsen throughout the years. For example, while the average unem­ ployment rate in Group A has changed from 0.5 percent in

1970 to 5 percent in 1982, that in Group B has changed from

12 percent in 1970 to 23 percent in 1982. Also, while the average unemployment rate in Group A was only half as high as the Community average, that in Group B showed twice as high as the Community average. On the other hand, there are also imbalances between regions at national level. For 68 example, there exist some regions with the lowest unemploy­ ment rate and other regions with the highest unemployment rate within the same member state. In Italy, Lombardia and

Northwest experienced the lowest unemployment rates, while

Campania and Sud experienced the highest unemployment rates. In the United Kingdom, Southeast regions experienced the lowest unemployment rates, while North and North-West regions experienced the highest unemployment rates. How­ ever, imbalances among different regions tended to worsen at the Community level more than at national level.

3.3.4 Imbalances in Agricultural Employment in the

Community

Sectoral structure can be used to measure regional imba­ lances in the Community. When the proportion of agricultual employment is higher than the Community average, GDP per capita and GDP per worker are likely to be lower than their

Community averages.10 9

During the period 1970-1982, regions with the highest proportion of agricultural employment were Campania, Sici­ ly, Sardinia, Abruzzi, Molise, Sud, in Italy, Ouest region

109 Hugh D. Clout, op. cit., p. 7. Problem areas would include regions with more workers in farming than the Community average; Harvey Armstrong and Jim Taylor, op. cit., p. 63. Depressed agricultural areas are the poorest regions in the Community; Nobert Vanhove and Leo H. Klaassen, op. cit., p. 24. They divided agri­ cultural regions into peripheral and nonperipheral agricultural region; College of Europe, A Community of Twelve ? : The Impact of Further Enlargement on the European Communities (Belgium, 1978), p. 222. 69 in France, Ireland, and Portugal. Regions with the lowest proportion of agricultural employment, on the other hand, included Brussels, Ile-de-France, South-East and North-West in England, and some urban regions in Germany (i.e. Ham­ burg, Berlin, Bremen, Saarland). For regions with the high­ est proportion of agricultural employment, their proportion of agricultural employment was less than a half as much as the Community averages. Table 7 shows the coefficient of variation of the proportion of agricultural employment from

1970 to 1982.

Table 7

The CV of the Proportion of Agricultural Employment between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982

YEAR CV

1970 73.26 1971 76.17 1972 79.34 1973 80.78 1975 82.78 1979 82.80 1980 83.10 1981 83.36 1982 86.86

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991. 70

Differences between the highest and the lowest propor­ tion of agricultural employment in the Community from 1973 to 1984 are shown in Table 8/ in which we can see little change.

Table 8

Difference between the Highest and the Lowest Proportion of Agricultural Employment between Regions in the Community, 1973-1984

YEAR DIFFERENCE

1973 23.0 % 1975 26.6 1977 21.6 1979 30.5 1980 28.4 1981 27.7 1982 26.0 1983 25.5 1984 30.1

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991.

Meanwhile, we can compare the top six regions with the highest proportion of agricultural employment (Group A) with the bottom six regions with the lowest proportion of agricultural employment (Group B). The average of Group A has been more than 20 times as high as that of Group B throughout the years, while the average of Group A has been more than twice as high as the Community average. For 71 example, in Italy, where many regions with the highest pro­ portion of agricultural employment are located, the highest proportion of agricultural employment is 1.5 times as high as the national average in Italy, while it tends to be 2.5 times as high as the Community average. Thus, imbalances are likely to be wider at the Community level than at the national level.

3.3.5 Imbalances in Net Migration in the Community

Net migration is another indicator for measuring regional imbalances, since depressed regions or regions with high unemployment rates are likely to experience a high rate of emigration. Until the 1980s, rural areas also had a high emigration rate, for example, the Mezzogiorno in Italy.110

However, those regions tended to have more immigration than emigration since the 1980s.111

110 Niles argues that emigration from peripheral areas tends to be associated with problems of traditional agriculture. For further discussion, see Niles M. Han­ sen, Public Policy and Regional Bconomic Development: The Experience of Nine Western Countries (Cambridge: Ballinger, 1974), p. 31.

111 Commission of the European Communities, The Regions of Europe: First Periodic Report on the Social and Econom­ ic Situation of the Regions of the Community (Brussels, 1981), p. 114. Emigration from the periphery to the centre in the 1960s helped to reduce disparities, whereas the cessation and in some cases, reversal of these outward movements in the 1970s contributed to the increase in disparities. During the period 1970-1982, the regions with the high­ est emigration were Noord-Nederland in the Netherlands, Sud in Italy, Ireland, North, North-West, Northern Ireland,

Scotland, in England, Nord-pas-de-Calais, Ile-de-France,

Est, in France. Regions with the highest immigration, on the other hand, were Noreste in Spain, South-East, South-

West, East Anglia, in England, Mediterranee, Sud-Ouest,

Ouest, in France, Bayern, Hessen, Berlin, Niedersachen, in

Germany, and Lombardia, and Centro and Lazio (in the 1980s) in Italy. Regions with the highest emigration are likely to be either rural or depressed areas, whereas regions with the highest immigration are likely to be either urban or industrialized areas with low unemployment rate. Table 9 shows the coefficient of variation (CV) of net migration in the Community from 1970 to 1982.

Table 10 shows differences of the highest emigration and immigration between regions in the Community from 1977 to

1985. It appears that economic recession in late 1970s and early 1980s affected migratory trend between regions in the

Community. Differences seem to be at peak in 1979 and

1980, and once again increase rapidly in 1983 and 1984.

We will compare the top six regions with the highest immigration (Group A) with the top six regions with the highest emigration (Group B). While the average of Group A has increased, that of Group B has also increased through- 73

Table 9

The CV of Net Migration between Regions in the Community, 1970-1982

YEAR CV

1970 255.34 1971 288.07 1972 289.21 1973 310.05 1974 344.63 1975 389.21 1976 414.01 1977 456.12 1978 447.02 1979 498.30 1980 873.41 1981 1495.49 1982 1526.05

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991. out the years. That will lead to an argument that the gap between Group A and B has been wider in the Community. On the other hand, attention needs to be given to the fact that regions in both Group A and B could exist in the same member state. For example, in Italy, such regions as Lom­ bardia, and Centro brought in high immigration, while, such regions as Calabria, Basilicata, and Apulia recorded high emigration. Also, in France, Mediterranee and Sud-Ouest experienced high immigration, while Ile-de-France and Nord- 74

Table 10

Difference between the Highest Emigration and Immigration between Regions in the Community, 1977-1985

YEARDIFFERENCE

1977 72400 1978 72200 1979 195000 1980 104600 1981 85200 1982 98400 1983 129000 1984 145700 1985 77500

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population/ Employment/ Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983; Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investment, 1973-1975; Rapid Reports: Regions, 1989-1991. pas-de-Calais experienced high emigration. The United

Kingdom also experienced high emigration in such regions as

Scotland and North-West throughout the 1970s and early

1980s. In a nutshell, the movement of people is partly due to people leaving for regions with employment opportuni­ ties.

3.4 DEVELOPMENT OF COMMON REGIONAL POLICIES

Even though the Treaty of Rome in 1957 stated harmonious development and balanced growth in the Community, it was not until 1974 that more emphasis was put on common region- 75 al policies.112 On the one hand, different regions in the

Community were left with different inflation rates, which would in turn lead to different rates of growth and devel­ opment, after the oil shock in 1973. On the other hand, the

Community had to adopt some member states with many regions whose level of development was much lower than the Communi­ ty average, since the first enlargement of the Community.

Subsequently, the Paris summit in 1974 agreed to the cre­ ation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

As stated in the Treaty of Rome in 1957, regional poli­ cies are basically intended to achieve the 'harmonious development' and the 'balanced growth', without which inte­ gration is difficult to achieve within the Community. Tak­ ing into account the significance of regional policies, other policies, for example, industrial policy, competition policy, and agricultural policy, tend to have some aspects of regional policies. For the last forty years, the con­ cern with regional policies has been increasing. Among the original Six, regional policies had a scant interest, and only a token fund set aside for regional policies even until the middle of the 1970s. As the Community has enlarged from the Six to the Twelve, the need for regional

112 Michael Hodges, "Liberty, Equality, Divergency: The Legacy of the Treaty of Rome," Economic Divergence in the European Community, eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981), p. 11. He argues that the Community's regional policy has been of little use in reducing the gap between rich and poor member states, which widened during the 1970s. 76 policies was stressed to resolve imbalances between regions

in the Community. I will examine what regional policies

intend to achieve in the Community, why regional policies

are needed, and how they are likely to achieve their objec­

tives.

Many financial instruments were instituted to achieve

the objectives of regional policies since the 1950s. The

ECSC in 1951 was concerned with structural policy, which

would promote employment in areas with declining coal and

steel industries. The EIB (European Investment Bank) and

the ESF (European Social Fund) were instituted by the Trea­

ty of Rome. The former is intended for regional moderniza­

tion and conversion by granting loans to less favoured

regions, while the latter was amended in 1971 and intended

to improve employment in problem areas. The Guidance Sec­

tion of the EAGGF (European Agricultural Guarantee and Gui­

dance Fund) in 1962 was, on the other hand, concerned with

improving agricultural structures in less favoured regions.

The ERDF was created in 1975, and was intended to assist

regional development by industrial and infrastructure meas­

ures. 77

3.4.1 Overview of Regional Policy

Regional policy is distinct from other policies, since it

is a mixture of the economic, political, and social.113

Thus, when regional policy is made at the Community level,

it is concerned with the issues of redistribution as well

as economic growth and development.

Regional policy is a structural policy, which is con­

cerned with improving structures in less favoured regions.

Even though there are some policies at the Community level,

which also have, in part, the aspects of a structure poli­

cy, regional policy is wholly concerned with structural

changes in less favoured regions in the Community.114

113 E.T. Nevin, "Regional Policy," The Economics of the European Community, ed. Ali M. El-Agraa (New York: St. Martin's, 1985), p. 341; Also, see Paul Romus, "Region­ al Policy in the European Community," Economic Sover­ eignty and Regional Policy: A Symposium on Regional Problems in Britain and Ireland, ed. John Vaizey (Dub­ lin: Macmillan, 1975), p. 122. While regional policy is part of economic policy, it is also equally politi­ cal and this means that pressures exist which are not always dictated by economic means; A.J. Marques Mendes, "The Contribution of the European Community to Economic Growth," Journal of Common Market Studies 24 (June 1986): 276. He argues that the CAP increases inequally between countries, and the other common policies lack sufficient scope to have a major counteracting impact on growth; Willem Molle, "Regional Impact of Welfare Policies in the European Community," Human Behavior in Geographical Space: Essays in Honor of Leo H. Klaas- sen, ed. J.H.P. Paelinck (Brookfield, Vermont: Gower, 1986), p. 77. He argues that motives for regional pol­ icy include full employment, and more equal income and welfare distribution.

114 As an example of other policy which has in part the aspects of a structural policy, see David Deacon, "Com­ petition Policy in the Common Market: Its Links with Regional Policy," Regional Studies 16 (1982), p. 54. 78

As regards the objectives, and tasks of regional policy, the 'harmonious development' and the 'balanced growth' between regions in the Community were already stated in the

Treaty of Rome in 1957. That is, regional policy is prima­ rily intended to reduce regional disparities, especially in terms of income levels, and to reduce the concentration in congested regions in the Community.115 In terms of aid which regional policy would provide, the Treaty of Rome,

Article 92 states three categories: aid to areas with abnormally low standard of living or serious unemployment; aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of the member states; regional or sectoral aid, provided that trading conditions are not unduly affected.116

He argues that competition policy can also play a posi­ tive role in regional development when seen from a Com­ munity context.

115 In this perspective, there is an argument that regional policy is invariably place-oriented rather than people- oriented. For further discussion, see Niles M. Hansen, Public Policy and Regional Economic Development: The Experience of Nine Western Countries (Cambridge: Bal­ linger, 1974), p. 21.

116 Paul Romus developed more specific categories for regional policy. There are six categories: (1) the development of predominantly agricultural regions, which suffer from unemployment, underemployment, emi­ gration and low incomes; (2) the reconversion of long established industrial regions which are at present experiencing unemployment, emigration and fall in income; (3) the development of regions suffering from unemployment for other reasons than those indicated above; (4) the development of frontier regions which are on the borders of the Community and from this fact are at a disadvantage because of their proximity to certain third countries or which are inside the Commu­ nity and are penalized by imbalances which still exist 79

The primary reason why regional policy is needed at the

Community level is that economic and political integration would be difficult to achieve when there exist significant imbalances between regions in the Community.117 That is, regional policy at the Community level tends to be under­ stood as a necessary condition for integration, even though it is hardly a sufficient condition. The relationship between regional imbalances and integration will be exam-

between member states; (5) preventive measures to limit concentration in certain urban areas and in some instances decentralization from those areas; and (6) development of the tertiary (services) sector in cer­ tain urban areas of medium size. For further discus­ sion, see Paul Romus, op. cit., p. 125.

117 Gavin McCrone, "Regional Policy in the European Commu­ nities," Economic Integration in Europe, ed. G.R. Den­ ton (London: Weidenfeld, 1969), p. 195. He argues that it is necessary to have some sort of regional policy if political or economic union is to be succeded; Harvey W, Armstrong, "The Reform of the European Community Regional Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies 23 (June 1985): 321. EC regional policy is often justi­ fied as being necessary if Member States are to agree further economic and monetary integration; Harvey W. Armstrong, "Community Regional Policy: A Survey and Critique," Regional Studies 12 (1978), p. 527. Region­ al policy represents an essential prerequisite for eco­ nomic integration and is necessary if economic integra­ tion is not to lead to a further widening of regional disparities in the Community; Harvey W. Armstrong, "The Assignment of Regional Powers within the EC," Britain within the European Community, ed. Ali M. El-Agraa (London: Macmillan, 1983), p. 295. He argues that reduced regional disparities are necessary for greater political cooperation; Walter Hahn, "Fiscal Policy in the EEC," Europe and the Andean Countries: A Compari­ son of Economic Policies and Institutions (London: Pin­ ter, 1988), p. 94. Economic divergencies will make it increasingly difficult to complete the Common Market or even to preserve what has already been achieved in the field of fiscal and monetary integration. 80 ined more specifically in Chapters IV, V, VI and VII.

3.4.2 The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

The ERDF was established in 1975, and constituted 4.8 per­ cent of the Community budget. Since its establishment, it has increased on average 31 percent per year. Table 11 shows how expenditures for the ERDF have changed during the period 1975-1988.

Table 11

Expenditures for the ERDF in the European Community, 1975-1988

YEAR EXPENDITURE ANNUAL INCREASE SHARE OF TOTAL (Mio ECU) (%) COMMUNITY BUDGET(%)

1975 257.6 - 4.8 1976 394.3 53.1 5.6 1977 378.5 -4.0 4.9 1978 581.0 53.5 4.6 1979 945.0 62.7 6.1 1980 1165.0 23.3 6.7 1981 1540.0 32.2 7.3 1982 1759.5 14.3 7.6 1983 2010.0 14.2 7.6 1984 2140.0 6.5 7.3 1985 2289.9 7.0 7.5 1986 3098.0 35.3 8.8 1987 3311.0 6.9 9.1 1988 3684.8 11.3 8.1

Source: Data come from various issues of General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1970-1982; The Community Budget: The Facts and Figures, 1988; Financial Report, 1987; The European Community of its Regions: 10 Years of Community Regional Policy and of European Regional Development Fund, 1985; ERDF in Figures, 1975-1988. 81

Like most regional and social funds, it is a noncompul- sory fund. The ERDF is intended to help reduce regional disparities in the Community by subsidizing problem regions with structural unemployment and predominant agricultural employment. In the ERDF, an emphasis is put on coherent overall planning for less developed regions. The 1972 amendment included a non-quota section, for which 5 percent of the ERDF resources would be reserved. The inclusion of non-quota section would help finance specific Community measures for regional development, and operate outside the assisted areas defined for Community action in support of member states' own regional policy measures.

Meanwhile, a new Regional Fund regulation in 1985 stressed the coordination of regional policy measures at

Community and national levels in order to maximize their effects. Furthermore, it replaced the quota section with the 'indicative range' section so that regions most in need would get assistance from the ERDF.

3.5 CONCLUSION

There have existed rich and poor regions, or developed and less developed regions, or favoured and less favoured regions, in the Community. Those regions which are poor or less developed or less favoured are called disadvantaged regions. Meanwhile, I examined whether imbalances between 82 regions in the Community have widened or narrowed, and how . regional imbalances are measured, and how regional policy helps reduce regional disparities.

To measure imbalances between regions in the Community, such indicators as GDP per capita, GDP per worker, unem­ ployment rate, the proportion of agricultural employment, and net migration are used. Meanwhile, the coefficient of variation and range between the highest and the lowest val­ ue of each indicator were examined to see whether regional imbalances have worsened in the Community. In light of the five indicators, disadvantaged regions were related to regions with high structural unemployment, regions with predominant agricultural employment, or depressed regions

(i.e. regions with declining industries, e.g. coal and steel industries, or textile industry). Regional imbalanc­ es, on the other hand, have widened throughout the 1970s and 1980s.

Lastly, I have examined what regional policy is, why it is needed at the Community level, and what kind of finan­ cial instruments are employed to achieve the goals of regional policy. Regional policy seems to be a mixture of the economic, political, and social. It is also a structur­ al policy, which is meant to improve structures in disad­ vantaged regions, thereby reducing disparities between regions in the Community. 83

Meanwhile, the need for regional policy was stressed, since the removal of regional imbalances is likely to be a necessary, though not a sufficient, condition for integra­ tion. Further discussion of the relationship between regional imbalances and integration will be made in Chap­ ters IV, V, VI and VII. Other financial instruments and funds, which have the aspects of regional policy in charac­ ter, are the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the

European Social Fund (ESF), the European Investment Bank

(EIB), and the Guidance Section of the European Agricultur­ al Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF). Even though the

ECSC in 1951 had the aspects of regional policy in charac­ ter, and the ESF and the EIB were instituted in the Treaty of Rome, it was not until 1974 that the need for new regional policy drew attention from member states. The first oil shock in 1973 left different regions with differ­ ent rates of inflation, which would in turn affect the development and growth of each region in the Community. On the other hand, the enlargement of the Community brought in many regions with a lower level of development than the

Community average, which would widen the gap between devel­ oped and less developed regions.

In a nutshell, we cannot emphasize too much the need for

Community Regional Policy and more financial aids for dis­ advantaged regions in the Community in order to reduce dis­ parities . CHAPTER IV

TWO CASE STUDIES: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN

REGIONAL DISADVANTAGE AND INTEGRATION IN THE

MEZZOGIORNO AND NORTHERN IRELAND

4.1 INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION

4.1.1 Theoretical Purpose of a Case Study

A case study is an inductive approach toward theory- building. There are two distinct types of the inductive approach: the case study and the statistical approach. I will discuss the theoretical purpose of the case study in relation to the statistical approach.

George118 argued that the case study could be used for theory development by converting lessons of history into a theory. Historical cases are likely to have unique fea­ tures. However, when these cases are grouped into a class of similar events, we can find ways of describing and explaining individual cases that render them comparable.

118 Alexander L. George, "Case Studies and Theory Develop­ ment: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison," Diplomacy, ed. Paul Gordon Lauren (New York: Free Press, 1979); Alexander L. George and Richard Smoke, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Prac­ tice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974).

- 84 - 85

He argued that, when we employ an analytical inductive approach for historical cases, the outcomes of the depen­ dent variable can occur in different ways and for different reasons. Thus, the case study can show different causal patterns that can occur for the dependent variable, and different conditions under which different causal patterns occur.

George compared the case study with the statistical approach. The former deals with a relatively small number of cases, while the latter deals with a large number of cases. The large N in the statistical approach either includes all instances of the class of events in question or constitutes a representative sample of that universe. On the other hand, the small n in the case study is not neces­ sarily representative of the universe of instances belong­ ing to the class of events; furthermore, it needs not be representative in the statistical sampling sense in order to contribute to theory development. That is because the case study is intended to seek different causal factors to refine or reformulate current theories.

Like the statistical approach, the case study seeks to identify the causal relationship between the dependent variable and independent variable. Thus, the case study is neither competitive with nor a substitute for the statisti­ cal approach. Rather, they are complementary. The case 86 study should facilitate development of more sophisticated quantitative studies, while the statistical approach can subject the causal hypotheses developed in the case study to a different kind of statistical test of causal signifi­ cance.

Meanwhile, Achen and Snidal119 argued that case studies failed when used for theory construction and theory verifi­ cation, because the logic of case studies provided too lit­ tle logical constraint to generate dependable theory and too little inferential constraint to permit trustworthy theory testing. However, they argued that the case study was an important complement to statistical investigations because investigators could examine historical sequences in the search for causal processes. The case study can pro­ vide the intensive empirical analysis that can find previ­ ously unnoticed causal factors and historical patterns. It can also provide guidance in the revision and reformulation of analytic theory to account for a broader range of phe­ nomena .

Thus, they saw that the value of the case study was to provide historical wisdom about the limits of current theo­ ry and empirical generalization to be explained by future theory.

119 Christopher H. Achen and Duncan Snidal, "Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies,” World Politics 41 (January 1989): 143-169. 87

Russett120 argues that case studies have value when they are integrated with the findings from the statistical approach. He suggests four uses of case studies in theory- building. First, case studies can stimulate the production of hypotheses about possible regularities. It is noted that most hypotheses later investigated with correlation techniques are originally generated from case studies.

Second, case studies can test in a different and more appropriate context the inferences made from suggestive but not fully appropriate correlational analyses. Third, case studies can be employed to eliminate spurious correlations when the correlational pattern relating two variables is satisfactorily established. Fourth, case studies can refine and reformulate a hypothesis which is strongly sup­ ported by high correlations.

In this chapter, two case studies are concerned with the relationship between regional disadvantage and integration.

The case studies are intended to illuminate the relation­ ship between regional disadvantage and integration, the nature of the causal pattern between the two, and condi­ tions under which causal patterns occur. Thus, the case studies are intended to be a complement to the statistical approach in chapter VI.

120 Bruce M. Russett, 11 International Behavior Research: Case Studies and Cumulation," Approach to the Study of Political Science, eds. Michael Haas and Henry S. Kar- iel (Scranton: Chandler, 1970), pp. 425-443. 88

4.1.2 Review of the Center-Periphery Theory

Myrdal developed a "general theory of underdevelopment and development." It includes a Center-Periphery theory which is concerned with regional imbalances or regional disadvan­ tages, and illuminates a relation between regional disad­ vantage and integration.

The thrust of his theory is based upon the notion of cumulative causation. That is, once a particular region has moved ahead of others, new increments of growth will

focus on the already expanding region because of their derived advantages.

Divergence between favoured and disadvantaged regions is

likely to become wider when there is an interchange between

the two regions. Once development has been sparked in fav­

oured regions, it will eventually result in flows of labor,

capital and commodities from disadvantaged regions. This is

called the backwash effects because of their impact on the

backward hinterland. Disadvantaged regions tend to lose

their workers and local capital to favoured regions.

At the same time, markets in disadvantaged regions are

swamped by cheap manufactured goods which throttle local

industry such as traditional artisan manufacturing. Thus,

backwash effects stifle economic growth in disadvantaged

regions and stimulate and sustain further development in

favoured regions.121

121 Allan Rodgers, Economic Development in Retrospect: The 89

A relation between integration and regional disadvantage was illuminated in Myrdal's argument: "To a low level of

economic development correspond low levels of social mobil­

ity/ and communication. This implies greater impediments

to the spread effects."122

A relation between disadvantaged regions and integration was also illuminated in Hirschman's argument. He suggested

the notion of polarization effects and trickle-down

effects, which were identical to backwash effects and

spread effects, respectively. Disadvantaged regions would

be likely to have more polarization effects and less

trickle-down effects. He argued that these would be

obstructive forces to integration.

4.1.3 Research Problem

In the 1970s and early 1980s we experienced economic crises

- international currency disorder, the oil crisis, acceler­

ated inflation levels, economic recession, and growth in

unemployment. At the same time, it seemed that divergence

between regions became wider in the European Community. In

terms of per capita GDP, the gap between the ten most

developed and the ten most disadvantaged regions in the

Community rose from 2.9 to 1 in 1970 to 4.0 to 1 in 1977.

Italian Model and Its Significance for Regional Plan­ ning in Market-Oriented Economies (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979) .

122 Gunnar Myrdal, Ibid., p. 63. 90

With the accession of Greece to the Community on January 1,

1981, it reached the ratio of 5.0 to l.123

It is important that we realize that regional disadvan­ tage is likely to obstruct integration. That is, regional imbalances are likely to cause social unrest and political tensions. When they are combined with many other disrup­ tive tendencies, they are likely to create centrifugal forces, which obstruct solidarity and impair continuity.

Meanwhile, relative deprivation theory is concerned with how discontent is linked to political violence. Gurr argued that politicized discontent was a necessary condi­ tion for the resort to violence in politics. Also, the intensity of discontent seems to increase, as regional dis­ advantage becomes wider. The Commission of the European

Communities stated in 1976 that increasing economic diver­ gence between regions was a major obstacle to the progress of integration.12 4

123 Commission of the European Communities, European Regional Development Fund: Sixth Annual Report (1980) (Brussels, 1981), p. 3.

124 Commission of the European Communities, European Regional Development Fund: Second Annual Report (1976) (Brussels, 1977), p. 8. 91

4.1.4 The Selection of Cases

George argued that the desideratum that guided selection of cases was not numbers but variety, that is, cases belonging

to the same class that differ from each other. Thus, an

investigator in designing the case study would seek cases

in which the outcome of the dependent variable differed or

cases having the 'same outcome but a different explanation

for it. He also argued that cases needed not be represen­

tative of the universe of instances belonging to the class

of events.

I have selected two cases which have the same outcome -

lower development - but appear to have a different explana­

tion for it: the cases of the Mezzogiorno and Nothern Ire­

land. In the Mezzogiorno, regional disadvantage seems to

stem from economic underdevelopment, while in Northern Ire­

land, regional disadvantage appears to be based upon eco­

nomic underdevelopment, interacting with ethnic and secta­

rian divisions. Myrdal’s theory of underdevelopment and

development was concerned with regions with a lower level

of development.

Of course, in choosing case studies, I could have

selected one region from a class which comprises the most

favoured regions in the Community, and the other from a

class which comprises the most disadvantaged regions in the

Community. These two regions would illuminate different 92 outcomes for the dependent variable. However, since I am concerned with conditions under which integration is less likely to occur in disadvantaged regions, I have selected two disadvantaged regions.

The reasons for choosing the Mezzogiorno and Northern

Ireland as my two cases of disadvantaged regions still remains to be explained. First, the Mezzogiorno and North­ ern Ireland are among the most disadvantaged regions in terms of per capita GDP. They are priority regions that get assistances from the Community.

Second, the Mezzogiorno is chosen because regional dis­ advantage in the Mezzogiorno is based more on economic fac­ tor, and less on ethnic factor. The Mezzogiorno includes most of Italy south of Rome, and makes up of seven adminis­ trative regions: Abruzzi-Molise, Campania, Calabria,

Basilicata, Apulia, Sicily and Sardinia. These seven regions share similar geographical, cultural and economic characteristics. The economic gap between the Mezzogiorno and the north widened in the 1970s, and imposed a heavy burden on Italy and the Community so that it could inhibit

Italy from enjoying the potential benefits of European integration.

Third, Northern Ireland is chosen because regional dis­ advantage in Northern Ireland is based upon the interaction of ethnic, religious and economic factors. Anglo-Irish 93 relations, and inter- and intra-sectarian relations, inter­ acting with economic disadvantage, seemed to bring about opposition to integration.

Thus, two cases should show that the relationship between regional disadvantage and integration persists despite very different social and political conditions in the Mezzogiorno and Northern Ireland.

4.2 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REGIONAL DISADVANTAGE AND

INTEGRATION IN THE MEZZOGIORNO AND NORTHERN IRELAND

4.2.1 Case 1: The Mezzogiorno

In the Mezzogiorno case, I will examine whether regional imbalances widened in the 1970s, and what was likely to be an intervening process between regional disadvantage and integration. I will also examine whether there was a rela­ tionship between regional disadvantage and integration in the Mezzogiorno.

The Mezzogiorno includes most of Italy south of Rome.

As shown in Figure 1, it is made up of seven administrative regions: Abruzzi-Molise, Campania, Calabria, Basilicata,

Apulia, Sicily and Sardinia.

The population of the Mezzogiorno increased by 966,000 persons in the period 1970-1975 and by 406,000 persons in the period 1976-1979 to a total of 20,246,000 in 1979. The net migration in this period was on average 28,000 persons 94

IOHIAM iMA

Figure 1: The Regions of Italy and the Mezzogiorno. Sources Alan B. Mountjoy, The Mezzogiorno (Oxford, 1973), p.6.

per year. In the period 1970-1975 unemployment rose by

41,500 and in the period 1975-1979 by 172,000 to 762,000 persons in 1979, or 11 percent of the labor force, while

the level for the country as a whole was 7.7 percent. The

agricultural sector occupied about 25 percent of the labour

force in 1979, against 14 percent for Italy as a whole.

Per capita GDP was 33 percent below the Italian average in

1979.125

125 Commission of the European Communities, The Regional 95

Regional disadvantage in the Mezzogiorno seems to be based much less on ethnological, cultural, or religious division between the Mezzogiorno and the north, but it has more of an economic basis.126 When regional disadvantage persisted, social unrest and political insecurities seemed to affect integration. The Italian President, Giulio

Andreotti, was clearly aware of this when he stated that

"if the present imbalances and gaps were not removed,

Europe will only be united on paper."127

4.2.1.1 The Analysis of Regional Disadvantage

It is the purpose of this section to describe and assess whether the Mezzogiorno was relatively disadvantaged in the period 1970-1979, and the degree to which it was disadvan­ taged.

Per capita GDP is an indicator of the economic capacity of the regions, which stresses the production side. In

Table 12, we notice that per capita GDP of the Mezzogiorno was 75 percent of the Italian average in 1970 and declined to 66.4 percent in 1979, while that in the north was 115

Development Programmes of the Second Generation for the Period 1981-1985 (Brussels, 1985).

126 For a discussion, Dominick J. Coyle, Minorities in Revolt:____ Political Violence in Ireland, Italy and Cyprus (Londons Associated University Press, 1983), p. 89.

127 Emanuela Itta, "Italy at a Crossroads: The Problem of the South and European Union," Journal of Regional Pol­ icy 10 (1990): 665. 96 percent of the Italian average in 1970 and increased to

133.4 percent in 1979.

Table 12

GDP per capita by Region in Italy

1970 1979

Italy 100.0 100.0

North 115.0 133.4 Mezzogiorno 75.0 66.4

Note: Italy = 100. Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook, of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983.

In the Mezzogiorno 28 percent of laborers were employed

in the agricultural sector in 1970, and 25 percent in

1979.128 Farmers in the Mezzogiorno began to face intense

foreign competition in both export and domestic markets

based upon lower costs and higher quality. The result was

a decline of fruit and vegetable production in the Mezzo­

giorno.

Meanwhile, the intensity of the CAP support varied

depending upon the composition of agriculture. The produc­

tion of fruits, vegetables and wine dominated in the Mezzo­

giorno, while the production of cereals, milk and sugar did

128 Commission of the European Communities, The Regions of Europe (Brussels, 1981). 97 in northern regions. Because the CAP support was related to cereals, milk and sugar, the Mezzogiorno benefited less than did the north.129

Two theories are concerned with the relationship between economic structure and regional disadvantage. The one is location theory, which was developed in political science, and the other is the growth pole theory, which was devel­ oped in economics. Location theory, which was discussed in chapter I, suggests that the location of industries is related to economic growth because industrial areas have a skilled labor force and external economies. The growth pole theory argues that economic growth is likely to be led by regions with industrial infrastructure.

Industrial structure in the Mezzogiorno relied on small- and medium-sized firms, which concentrated on handicrafts.

During the period 1970-1979, industrial investment in the

Mezzogiorno was 60 percent of the Italian average, while the north had 134 percent of the Italian average.130

Table 13 shows that the unemployment rate of the Mezzo­ giorno was 5.7 percent in 1970 and increased to 11.0 per­ cent in 1979, which was nearly four times as high as that of the north in 1979.

129 Commission of the European Communities, The Regions of Europe (Brussels, 1981), p. 75.

130 Commission of the European Communities, Regional Imba­ lances and National Economic Performance (Brussels, 1985). 98

Table 13

Unemployment Rate bv Reqion in Italy

1970 1979

Italy 5.2% 7.7%

North 2.4% 3.0% Mezzogiorno 5.7% 11.0%

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983.

We note that there is a fair correlation between unem­ ployment rates and per capita GDP presented earlier. It seems that economic crises imposed more severe burden on the Mezzogiorno than the north.

The problem of unemployment worsened in terms of its nature as well as its overall level. In terms of long-term unemployment, where unemployment is of long duration (over six months), the Mezzogiorno had 6.0 percent in 1979, while the Italian average was 3.1 percent. In terms of youth unemployment, which is unemployed 14-24 years olds as a percentage of labour force aged 14-24, 40 percent of the young people were unemployed in the Mezzogiorno in 1979, while the Italian average was 18 percent, and that in the north 9.5 percent in 1979. 1 3 1

131 Eurostat, Labour Force Survey (Brussels, 1979). 99

Table 14 indicates that the Mezzogiorno experienced a

net loss of 13,400 laborers in 1970, and a net loss

increased to 20,000 in 1979. The main exodus was from the

rural areas of Basilicata, Molise, Calabria and Abruzzi.

The emigration was predominantly to the industrial areas of

the north. Despite reduced employment opportunities in the

north due to deteriorating economic conditions in the

1970s, the drawing power of the north persisted. In 1975

the mayor of Turin described his city as "the biggest town

of the Mezzogiorno."132

Table 14

Net Migration by Region in Italy (1000)

1970 1979

Italy 6.0 4.1

North 4.7 8.7 Mezzogiorno -13.4 -20.0

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983.

Although there is an argument that the movement from the

Mezzogiorno should be seen as part of the process of making

agriculture more efficient, of raising the per capita

income of the remaining population, thus increasing demand

132 Economist, August 16, 1986, pp. 30-31. 100 for goods and services and giving greater incentive to industrialization,133 it seems that the Mezzogiorno became disadvantaged at least partly because of the movement of the labor force to the north. That is, labor migration to the north drained the skilled labor pool in the Mezzogior­ no, and it led to the draining-off of potential enterprise or skills.134 Thus, it is necessary to move jobs to people

(rather than to move people to jobs) in order to have more job opportunities in the Mezzogiorno.

4.2.1.2 The Rise of Social Unrest and Political Tension

Regional disadvantage in the Mezzogiorno seemed to bring about grass-roots discontent, which in turn would cause social unrest and political tension. The Mezzogiorno has been a stronghold of the Christian Democrats. However, in the 1974 election in Sardinia, there occurred a strong swing away from the Christian Democrats toward parties such

133 G.N. Minshell, The New Europe: An Economic Geography of the EEC (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1980), pp. 245-246.

134 For a discussion of emigration in the Mezzogiorno, see Russell King, The Industrial Geography of Italy (Lon­ don: Croom Helm, 1985), p. 15. Internal flows of popu­ lation are closely related to increasing socio-economic disparity between Italian regions; Douglas F. Lamont, Managing Foreign Investment in Southern Italy (New York: Praeger, 1973), p. 99; Percy Selwyn, "Some Thoughts on Cores and Peripheries," Underdeveloped Europe: Studies in Core-Periphery Relations, eds. Dud­ ley Seers, et al. (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities, 1979), p. 38; Geoffrey Parker, The Countries of Commu­ nity Europe:____ A Geographical Survey of Contemporary Issues (London: Macmillan, 1979), p. 94. 101 as the Socialists and the Communists, which said that they could offer an economic alternative.135 Also, in Sicily

and Sardinia there were rumblings of separatist feeling.

Inhabitants of the Mezzogiorno were discontented with wider imbalances between the Mezzogiorno and the north.

Carlo Donat Cattin, Minister for the Development of the

South, offered this analysis of difficulties of the Mezzo­

giorno in a 1973 interview with Panorama; "The number of

workplaces did not increase, but stagnated around 1.8 mil­

lion for those employed in industry and agriculture. The

Cassa {Southern Development Fund} was slow in fulfilling

its objective, that of providing services for the new phase

of industrialization, and it was virtually absent in the

development of agriculture. The main delay was in the allo­

cation of incentives for new industrial initiatives, a

deficiency which provoked mistrust among entrepreneurs,

discontent among public opinion, and left practically

unchanged the imbalance between North and South."136

Grassroots discontent tends to develop when groups that

recognize common socioeconomic interests arise to represent

these interests. Emigration and improvements in communica­

tion and transportation have led to a broadening of the

peasant's sphere of social interaction. The peasant has

135 Economist, May 25, 1975, pp. 69-75.

136 Excerpt from interview with Panorama, August 9, 1973. John Earle, Italy in the 1970s (London; David & Charles, 1975), p. 96. 102 become ever more aware of the world beyond the boundaries of his own community, and with this growing awareness has come a growing class consiousness and intensification of feelings of relative deprivation. When peasants began to adhere to the trade unions, they tended to call for social and structural reforms in the name of the union.137

At the same time, Sergio Pininfarina, the President of the Confindustria {Confederation of Employers}, reached the conclusion in his Report to the 1975 Annual General Assem­ bly: ''There is no other way to improve the overall situ­ ation in Italy, other than that of coming to terms with and solving the problems of the Mezzogiorno."138

Discontent from inhabitants seemed to affect political parties. The rise of the Monarchists has been particularly noticeable in the Mezzogiorno. The Monarchists were led by two Southerners, Alfredo Covelli and Achille Lauro. The formal goal of the party was the restoration of the monar­ chy. It was able to gather the votes of a mass of poor peo­ ple. Its greatest success was in Naples, where it gathered

24 percent of votes and thus, it was available to join with

Christian Democrats and Liberals to form majorities in southern communal and provincial governments. The success of the Monarchists showed one of the centrifugal forces in the Mezzogiorno.

137 John Earle, Ibid., p. 147.

138 Emanuela Itta, Ibid., p. 658. 103

Meanwhile, when regional imbalances worsened, regional movements emerged demanding local autonomy or secession from the national political system. The Italian government was highly centralized and there was a lack of financial autonomy of local government. The assistance from the cen­ tral government was too slow in developing agriculture and providing services in the Mezzogiorno. As shown in the speech from Cattin,139 the delay in the allocation of incentives for new industrial initiatives provoked mistrust among entrepreneurs, and discontent among public opinion.

As regional disadvantage became wider, southern regions tended to call for autonomy or secession from the central government, which would decrease Italian integration.

Nevertheless, support for European integration remained exceedingly high despite its decline. As Shepherd argued, public opinion in favour of EC membership, European unifi­ cation and direct election to the European Parliament is likely to show the image and expectations of people about integration.

He distinguished utilitarian from affective support when the public was in favour of integration. Utilitarian sup­ port for integration stems from perceived economic and political interests - for example, increased standards of living or guarantee of peace. Affective support for inte­ gration, which is the non-rational attitude of loyalty,

139 John Earle, Ibid., p. 96. 104 sympathy and shared values, may reflect attachment to an international community. Since the European Community has, to date, been concerned with economic integration, support for integration seems to be mainly utilitarian.

Table 15

Public Opinion in Favour of the EC Membership

1970 1979

Mezzogiorno 79.0% 69.0% North 76.0% 76.0%

Public Opinion in Favour of European Unification

1970 1979

Mezzogiorno 94.0% 88.0% North 94.0% 93.0%

Public Opinion in Favour of Direct Election to EP

1970 1979

Mezzogiorno 90.0% 83.0% North 86.0% 93.0%

Source: Data comes from Ronald Inglehart, European Communities, Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan; Ronald Inglehart, Eurobarometer, Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan, 1985.

Table 15 shows public opinion in favour of EC member­ ship, European unification, and direct election to the 105

European Parliament. Public opinion in favour of EC mem­ bership declined from 79 percent in 1970 to 69 percent in

1979 in the Mezzogiorno, while it has been steady at 76 percent in the north. Public opinion in favour of European unification also declined from 94 percent in 1970 to 88 percent in 1979 in the Mezzogiorno, while it was stationary in the north. Public opinion in favour of direct election to the European Parliament declined from 90 percent in 1970 to 83 percent in 1979 in the Mezzogiorno, while it increased from 86 percent in 1970 to 93 percent in 1979 in the north. Bearing in mind that Italy is a country which cherished an idealistic vision of a genuinely united

Europe, it is not surprising that she showed more favoura­ ble attitudes toward integration compared with other member states. However, inhabitants in the Mezzogiorno became less favourable toward integration in 1979 than in 1970.

Public opinion surveys provide us, in part, with insight on the relationship between regional disadvantage and inte­ gration. There is a decline in support for integration along with economic decline. Thus, some may be less suppor­ tive of integration because of economic decline. But what does it mean that most still support integration ? Do they see that integration may overcome economic decline ? Do they see Italian disintegration and European integration as helping the Mezzogiorno ? 106

Although Italy has been favourable toward integration efforts since the 1950s, that did not necessarily mean that inhabitants in all regions had the same attitudes toward integration. Inhabitants in the Mezzogiorno had almost the same attitudes toward integration in 1970 as those in the north. However, they became less favourable toward inte­ gration, along with economic decline in the Mezzogiorno.

Deutsch advocated the utility of transaction data, for example, mail flows, trade, foreign students, and tourist traffic, as indicators of integration. He argued that international community could be ascertained and measured by examining the volume, content, and scope of internation­ al transactions between regions.

Table 16 shows the proportion of intra-EC letter and telegram traffic. The proportion of intra-EC letter traf­ fic is letter traffic with the other 64 regions in the EC as a percentage of letter traffic with the whole world. The proportion of intra-EC telegram traffic is telegram traffic with other EC regions as a percentage of the total telegram traffic.

The proportion of intra-EC letter traffic was 29.3 per­ cent in 1970 and declined to 23 percent in 1979 in the Mez­ zogiorno, while it was 35 percent in 1970 and increased to

41 percent in 1979 in the north. The proportion of intra-

EC telegram traffic was 14 percent in 1970 and declined to 107

Table 16

The Proportion of Intra-EC Letter Traffic

1970 1979

Mezzogiorno 29.3% 23.0% North 35.0% 41.0%

The Proportion of Intra-EC Telegram Traffic

1970 1979

Mezzogiorno 14.0% 10.0% North 25.0% 27.0%

Source: The figures are calculated from Statistical Yearbook, Transport, Communications, Tourism, 1970-1980.

10 percent in 1979 in the Mezzogiorno, while it was 25 per­ cent in 1970 and remained stationary in 1979 in the north.

There seems to be a correlation between regional disad­ vantage and intra-EC letter and telegram traffic. That is, regional disadvantage in the Mezzogiorno is negatively associated with intra-EC letter and telegram traffic. As

Deutsch argued, people are less likely to view others in the EC as partners and depend upon mutual communication when they are frustrated by becoming more disadvantaged. 108

4.2.1.3 Conclusion

The Mezzogiorno remained a disadvantaged or peripheral region, as it became economically more disadvantaged. The economic gap between the Mezzogiorno and the north widened in terms of per capita GDP, unemployment rate, and net migration.

Economic disadvantage in the Mezzogiorno seemed to bring about peasant discontent, which tended to create centrifu­ gal forces when it gathered around trade unions and/or political parties. These centrifugal forces tended to be in favour of secession or separatism, and were accompanied by a decline in support for European integration.

Support for European integration still remained very high in the Mezzogiorno, although it has been declining.

This raises a question: Do many inhabitants in the Mezzo­ giorno see disintegration from Italy and integration within the EC as helping the Mezzogiorno ? This question remains to be answered in future research.

Meanwhile, inhabitants in the Mezzogiorno appeared to feel less comfortable with others in the European Communi­ ty, as economic divergences became wider. The letter and telegraph traffics between the Mezzogiorno have showed a decline.

In a nutshell, the Mezzogiorno seemed over the course of the 1970s to become economically more disadvantaged and less integrated in the European Community as well as Italy. 109

4.2.2 Case 2: Northern Ireland

I will examine whether there is a correlation between

regional disadvantage in Northern Ireland and integration.

I will also examine conditions under which integration is

less likely to occur.

The population of Northern Ireland increased by 10,000

persons in the period 1970-1975 and by 6,000 persons in the

period 1976-1979 to a total of 1,543,000 in 1979. Unlike

the other regions of the United Kingdom, it depended heavi­

ly upon agriculture, i.e. 10 percent of the labour force in

1979 (2.9 percent for the British average). Figure 2 shows

the regions of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland

Unlike the Mezzogiorno case, regional disadvantage in

Northern Ireland seemed to be based upon not only economic

but also ethnic and religious factors. There was, on the

one hand, an ethnic division (Anglo-Irish), and on the oth­

er hand, inter- and intra-sectarian divisions (Catholic-

Protestant).

The issue of European integration tended to be linked to

such issues as a united Ireland, direct rule, power sharing

(between Protestants and Catholics), cross border (between

the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland), as well as

economic situations of Northern Ireland. Those who opposed

a united Ireland and were in favour of direct rule seemed

to oppose European integration, while those who were in 110

Figure 2: The Regions of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland favour of a united Ireland and cross border seemed to be in favour of European integration. The Democratic Union Party

(DUP) tended to see the whole idea of European integration as a threat to British sovereignty and tradition, while the

Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) viewed European integration as a stepping stone for a united Ireland, which meant that European integration could lead to a united

Ireland.1 * 0

140 Arthur Aughey, et al., Northern Ireland in the European Community: An Economic and Political Analysis (Bel­ fast, 1989), p. 156. Ill

Meanwhile, those who were in favour of power sharing tended to support European integration, while those who were against power sharing opposed European integration.

Those who opposed power sharing within Northern Ireland opposed power sharing between Northern Ireland and the

Republic of Ireland, or within the European Community.141

Thus, Northern Ireland seemed to be disintegrated whenever the issue of European integration was raised.

4.2.2.1 The Analysis of Regional Disadvantage

The purpose of this section is to assess whether Northern

Ireland was disadvantaged in the period 1970-1979. Table

17 indicates that per capita GDP of Northern Ireland was 86 percent of the British average in 1970 and declined to 80 percent in 1979.

Table 17

GDP per capita in Northern Ireland

1970 1979

United Kingdom 100.0 100.0

Northern Ireland 86.0 80.0

Note: United Kingdom = 100. Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983.

141 Economist, May 28, 1983, pp. 42-43. 112

The economy of Northern Ireland is more similar to the

Irish than the British economy, with a large proportion of the population engaged in agriculture. The population of agriculture in total employment was 10 percent in 1979, while the British average was 2.9 percent, and the Irish average was 19 percent.142

In the 1970s Northern Ireland suffered from the decline of traditional industries situated mainly in the area. Northern Ireland's industrial economy was built on two products, textile and shipbuilding. However, they proved vulnerable to low-cost competition from the NICs.

Employment in textile fell from 65,000 in 1970 to 9,800 in

1979 and in shipbuilding from 25,000 in 1970 to 7,500 in

1979. 1 43

Table 18 shows that the unemployment rate of Northern

Ireland was 7.5 percent in 1970 and increased to 10.5 per­ cent in 1979, while the British average was 3.0 and 3.5 percent respectively.

We can examine unemployment problems in terms of its nature. In terms of long-term unemployment, Northern Ire­ land had 4.7 percent in 1979, while the British average was

2.1 percent. In terms of youth unemployment, 21 percent of the young people were without a formal job, while the Brit-

142 For the United Kingdom data, OECD, Economic Outlook: Historical Statistics 1960-1980. For the Northern Ire­ land data, Central Statistical Office, Annual Abstract.

143 Eurostat, Labour Force Survey (Brussels, 1979). 113

Table 18

Unemployment Rate in Northern Ireland

1970 1979

United Kingdom 3.0% 3.5%

Northern Ireland 7.5% 10.5%

Source: The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983. ish average was 8.6 percent. It was much worse in some areas in Northern Ireland. The rate was 30 percent in the

Londonderry district, and 42 percent in Strabane.144

There was an economic gap between the Protestant and

Catholic communities. Catholics were worse off than Prot­ estants on average. The 1971 census indicated that Catho­ lic males were 2.62 times more likely than Protestant males to be unemployed. On the other hand, the 1981 census showed that Catholic males were 2.44 times more likely than Prot­ estant males to be unemployed. Rowthorn and Wayne145 showed in their empirical study that the Northern Ireland

Catholic male unemployment rate, at 30 percent, far out­ stripped the figure anywhere else, while the Northern Ire­

144 Eurostat, Labour Force Survey (Brussels, 1979).

145 Bob Rowthorn and Naomi Wayne, Northern Ireland: The Political Economy of Conflict (Cambridge: Polity, 1988), p. 115. 114 land Protestant male unemployment rate, at 12 percent, was only a little above the British average.

Table 19 shows that Northern Ireland had a net loss of

5,700 laborers in 1970, and of 6,800 in 1979, whereas fig­ ures for the United Kingdom as a whole were only 1,100 and

700 respectively.

Table 19

Net Migration in Northern Ireland (1000)

1970 1979

United Kingdom -1.1 -0.7

Northern Ireland -5.7 -6.8

Sources The figures are calculated from various issues of Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards, 1973-1977; Yearbook of Regional Statistics,1981-1988; Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 1970-1983.

There were differential emigration rates between Catho­ lic and Protestant in Northern Ireland. Compton146 argued that Catholics accounted for 60 percent of net migration in the period 1971-1980. Differential migration seemed to be a further source of inequality between the Catholic and

Protestant communities. But without it, the unemployment differential would be even greater.

146 Paul Compton, "An Evaluation of the Changing Religious Composition of the Population in Northern Ireland," Economic and Social Review 16 (1985): 201-224. 115

4.2.2.2 The Rise of Disintegrative Forces

The issue of European integration did not draw much atten­ tion in Northern Ireland until the United Kingdom applied for membership in the EEC in 1970. In the 1971 Stormont debate on the EC, Patrick Kennedy claimed that "possibly as a result of the troubles which we have experienced here for the past two or three years this whole issue has gone into the background and not enough public attention has been focused on it."147 Rather, direct rule, troops in (or out), power sharing, internment, the Council of Ireland, the Ulster Workers' Council strike and the security prob­ lems were the issues of the day.

The British application prompted concern over the eco­ nomic and political implications for Northern Ireland.

Economically, Northern Ireland had high unemployment and declining traditional industries. Those who hoped to get assistance from the Community were in favour of membership in the Community. Politically, a difference arose among

Unionists as regards membership in the EC. Traditional

Unionists who hoped to sustain British tradition opposed membership in the European Community, while liberal Union­ ists who hoped that membership in the Community would break down sectarian divisions in Northern Ireland were in favour of membership in the Community.148

147 Northern Ireland Commons Debates, volume 81, col. 1211.

148 Arthur Aughey, et al., Ibid., p. 109. 116

Robin Bailie, the Minister of Commerce, stated in the

1971 debate at Stormont: "preoccupation with the hatreds with bitterness of yesteryear has no place in the main­ stream of European thinking. We have to make up our minds whether we are going to be cornered in this cul-de-sac of history or get into the mainstream of European progress and thinking. I have no time at all for the Sinn Fein ideology or for its equivalent which it sometimes expressed in a narrow Ulster view."149

Also, Prime Minister , who hoped that mem­ bership would bring economic development and resolve secta­ rian divisions, argued that "when frontiers are no longer a barrier to the free movement of trade or a line of demarca­ tion between different fiscal, social, or economic systems they will remain primarily as a mark of people's continuing sense of national identity and loyalty. In such a context it would become even clearer than it is today how foolish as well as immoral it would be for any one to seek to remove frontiers against the will of the majority of the inhabitants. And if that were to be accepted the Border could at last recede from the forefront of many minds."150

149 Adrian Guelke, Northern Ireland: The International Per­ spective (New York: St. Martin's, 1988), p. 154.

150 Adrian Guelke, Ibid., p. 154. 117

To the dismay of traditional Unionists, the Heath Gov­ ernment in the United Kingdom managed to join the Communi­ ty. Also, a power sharing Executive was created in Ulster, although short-lived for 1973-1974. Thus, those who were in favour of European integration and power sharing seemed to be in the ascendency in Ulster.

In 1975, Northern Ireland began to experience more eco­ nomic difficulties with high unemployment, and a decline in traditional industries. The hopes that membership in the

Community would resolve economic problems in Northern Ire­ land tended to disappear. Also, the hopes that membership in the Community would transcend the Northern Ireland con­ flict tended to recede. The Institute for the Study of

Conflict dismissed the relevance of European integration:

"since the EEC has so far been unable to promote any really significant political integration among its own members, it seems far-fetched to expect it to offer much in the search for a political solution in Northern Ireland."151

The 1975 referendum on the British Labour Government's renegotiated terms of membership provided the opportunity for a debate within Northern Ireland on the advantages and disadvantages of membership and for a test of political opinion on European integration.

151 Adrian Guelke, Ibid., p. 156. 118

There was a linkage between support for continued mem­ bership in the Community and support for power sharing in

Northern Ireland. The Northern Ireland Executive, based upon power sharing, reflected a pro-EC argument. In its

"Statement of Economic and Social Aims: Steps to a Better

Tomorrow" (January 1974), the Executive recognized the EC and stressed the importance of seeking "methods of increas­ ing Northern Ireland participation and influence in the

EEC."15 2

The small pro-power sharing Unionist Party supported continued membership, as did the Alliance Party and the

Social Democratic and Labour Party, though two of the

SDLP’s leading figures, Gerry Fitt and Paddy Devlin, were opposed to membership because they thought that Britain was more interested in the industrial population rather than the agricultural population. However, the most strident opposition to the Community came from the leader of the

DUP, Ian Paisley, who made much of the Catholic character of the original six members of the EEC.

In 1975, 52 percent of the population voted "Yes" for membership in the European Community. It was a narrow majority in favour of continued membership and the turn-out

(47 Percent) was one of the lowest in the United Kingdom

(65 percent overall). This indicated that inhabitants of

152 paui Hainsworth, "Direct Rule in Northern Ireland: The European Community Dimension 1972-1979," Administration 31 (1983): 57. 119

Northern Ireland had disinterest, and apathy about European integration. Rather, they appeared to be more concerned about violence and terrorism occurred in Northern Ireland.

Since the 1975 referendum, there have been numerous signs of dissatisfaction with European integration. A 1978 opinion survey showed: "economic rather than political factors dominated attitudes towards the Common Market and only 16.4 percent of Protestants and 26.7 percent of Catho­ lics agreed with a proposition that membership in the Com­ munity made Northern Ireland's political problems easier to solve."15 3

In 1979 the British response to a European initiative in the economic field struck a considerable blow against con­ vergence between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ire­ land. The United Kingdom, unlike the Republic, decided not to participate in the EMS, a scheme to limit exchange rate fluctuations within the EC. As a consequence, parity between the Irish punt and the pound sterling was broken, providing an added economic dimension to partition.154

In the 1979 election to the European Parliament, three

Northern Ireland members of the European Parliament, Ian

Paisley, John Hume, and John Taylor, were elected. Ian

153 Edward Moxone-Browne, Nation, Class and Creed in North­ ern Ireland (Aldershot: Gower, 1983), p. 158.

154 For a discussion, European Commission Office in North­ ern Ireland, Northern Ireland in Europe: The Impact of Membership (Belfast, 1983). 120

Paisley who gathered most votes among the three tended to see the whole idea of European integration as detrimental to Northern Ireland’s status. Meanwhile, John Hume hoped to use the EEC as a means to further the cause of Irish nationalism by drawing support from members of the Communi­ ty.

Thus, when the process of European integration released centrifugal and centripetal forces, it seems that there existed disintegrative elements in the Northern Ireland

European election, which opposed European integration.155

Moreover, the DUP's electoral gains in Westminster, Europe­ an, and local elections represented the rise of forces opposed to European integration.

Public opinion surveys156 showed that public opinion in favour of EC membership declined from 37 percent in 1973 to

26 percent in 1979 in Northern Ireland, while it stayed at

61 percent in South-East of the United Kingdom. Public opinion in favour of European unification also declined from 53 percent in 1973 to 45 percent in 1979 in Northern

Ireland, while it increased from 61 to 78 percent in South-

East. Public opinion in favour of direct election of mem­ bers of the European Parliament declined from 43 percent in

165 Paul Hainsworth, "The European Election of 1979 in Northern Ireland," Parliamentary Affairs 32 (1979): 470-481.

156 Ronald Inglehart, European Communities (Ann Arbor: Cen­ ter for Political Studies). 121

1973 to 36 percent in 1979 in Northern Ireland, while it increased from 53 to 81 percent in South-East. Thus, we notice that inhabitants in Northern Ireland became less favourable toward European integration in 1979 than in

1973.

Furthermore, I discussed Deutsch's argument about the utility of communication indicators for integration in the

Mezzogiorno case. The proportion of intra-EC letter traf­ fic was 49.4 percent in 1973 and declined to 38.1 percent in 1979 in Northern Ireland. The proportion of intra-EC telegram traffic was 45.5 percent in 1973 and declined to

36.3 percent in 1979.157 Thus, when intra-EC letter and telegram traffic was an indicator of integration, Northern

Ireland seemed to become less integrated.

4.2.2.3 Conclusion

In Northern Ireland, there is an interaction of economic, and ethnic factors to affect European integration. In terms of cultural and ethnic distinction, we are concerned with language and religion. In Northern Ireland, sectarian division, i.e. Protestantism and Catholicism, seems to be associated with economic and political differences.

It seems that Northern Ireland is a disadvantaged or peripheral region because it is economically disadvantaged and ethnically divided.

157 Eurostat, Statistical Yearbook, Transport, Communica­ tions, Tourism, 12 vols. (Brussels, 1970-1981). 122

Northern Ireland became more disadvantaged in the United

Kingdom. The economic gap between Northern Ireland and the

British average widened in terms of per capita GDP, unem­ ployment rate, and net migration. Also, unlike the rest of

the United Kingdom, it has a high proportion of laborers

employed in agricultural sector.

In a nutshell, Northern Ireland became more disadvan­

taged and less integrated. It seems that ethnic division,

interacting with economic disadvantage, brought about dis­

integration within Northern Ireland, and opposition to

European integration. 123

4.3 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The case studies were conducted to examine the relationship between regional disadvantage and integration. The rela­ tionship between regional disadvantage and integration is examined for the Mezzogiorno and Northern Ireland because in the Mezzogiorno, regional disadvantage was based upon economic factors, while in Northern Ireland, it was based upon economic factors, interacting with ethnic and sectari­ an factors.

It seemed that regional disadvantage was negatively associated with integration. The Mezzogiorno and Northern

Ireland became more disadvantaged in 1979 than in 1970, and they seemed to become less integrated in 1979. However, the two cases showed that regional disadvantage could be negatively associated with integration under different political and social conditions.

As discussed earlier, case studies are intended to seek the development of an explanatory theory. Also, an expla­ natory theory must offer differentiated explanation of the outcomes of the dependent variable.

In the case studies, the outcome of the dependent vari­ able with which I was concerned was whether integration was less likely to occur. The independent variable was econom­ ic divergence between developed and disadvantaged regions.

The case studies sought to identify the causal relationship 124 between the dependent and independent variables. It seems that the outcome of the dependent variable occurred for different reasons in the Mezzogiorno and Northern Ireland.

In the Mezzogiorno, there seemed to be a correlation between regional disadvantage and social unrest, and between social unrest and disintegration. Although there were ethnic and linguistic differences in Sardinia and

Sicily, it was economic divergence between the Mezzogiorno

and the north which seemed to cause the Mezzogiorno to

become less integrated. Political differences between the

Mezzogiorno and the north did not seem to cause the former

to become less integrated. The Mezzogiorno has been a

stronghold of the Christian Democrats, and the Communist

party did not have roots in the Mezzogiorno.

Meanwhile, rumblings of secession were stimulated by

economic divergences. The Monarchists seemed to have an

impact on local and provincial elections when they made an

issue out of regional imbalances.

Economic divergences seemed to bring about centrifugal

forces in Italy. Regional movements arose demanding auton­

omy and secession in the Mezzogiorno when the Mezzogiorno

became more disadvantaged.

Also, inhabitants in the Mezzogiorno appeared to become

less favourable toward European integration, although there

remained a significant number of people who supported Euro­ 125 pean Integration. Inhabitants in the Mezzogiorno seemed to see others in the European Community less as partners when they became frustrated by economic divergences between the

Mezzogiorno and the rest of the Community.

Thus, we notice that economic divergence mainly caused

the Mezzogiorno to become less integrated in the European

Community as well as Italy.

In Northern Ireland, regional disadvantage, based upon

economic disadvantage, interacted with ethnic and sectarian

divisions. There was a correlation between economic disad­

vantage and sectarian divisions. The Catholics were more

likely to be unemployed than the Protestants. Also, the

Catholics tended to account for a higher proportion of

emigrants.

There was also a correlation between ethnic division and

sectarian division. Among the Protestants there was a

higher proportion of those who identified themselves with

the British, while among the Catholics there was a higher

proportion of those who identified themselves with the

Irish.15 8

We notice that economic disadvantage was negatively

associated with integration. Northern Ireland became more

disadvantaged in 1979 than in 1970, and it became less

integrated in 1979, in the European Community as well as

the United Kingdom.

158 Economist, May 28, 1983, pp. 42-43. 126

Thus, it seemed that economic disadvantage, interacting with ethnic and sectarian division, has an impact on oppo­ sition to integration.

The opposition to integration tended to be linked with the Protestants, or those who opposed power sharing

(between Protestants and Catholics), or loyalists who saw integration as a threat to British sovereignty. In con­ trast, integration was supported by the Catholics, or those who were in favour of power sharing (between Protestants and Catholics), or nationalists who saw integration as a stepping stone for a united Ireland.

Thus, although there was a correlation between economic disadvantage and integration, economic disadvantage seemed to be associated with a third variable, i.e. ethnic and sectarian divisions.

Reflecting on the two case studies, we can make a two­ fold typology of regional disadvantage to explain opposi­ tion to integration. The first type can be economic char­ acteristics, with which the Center-Periphery theory was concerned. The second type can be ethnic divisions.

Based on a two-fold typology, we can see some examples of those which have economic characterstics and ethnic divisions within the Community. The first group includes those which are economically disadvantaged and have strong­ ly felt ethnic divisions; Northern Ireland, Corsica, Brit- 127 tany and Galicia. The second group includes those which are not economically disadvantaged and have strongly felt ethnic divisions: Catalonia, and Basque country. The third group includes those which are economically disadvan­ taged and have not strongly felt ethnic divisions: the

Mezzogiorno, Andalucia, Asturias, Extremadura, the whole country of Greece, the whole country of Portugal, and the whole country of Ireland.

Bearing in mind the ethnic and national diversity within the Community, regional disadvantage which is based upon ethnic factors is likely to affect European integration.

Furthermore, when disadvantaged or peripheral regions with religion and language distinction become economically more disadvantaged, integration is less likely to occur. How­ ever, when they are not economically disadvantaged, those regions which have strongly felt ethnic divisions tended to be in favour of European integration. We can see such exam­ ples from Catalonia and the Basque country.1S9

Our case studies have offered insights on the Center-

Periphery theory, in which Myrdal and Hirschman illuminated a relation between regional disadvantage and integration.

As seen in the two case studies, although there is a corre­ lation between economic disadvantage and integration, there may be other causal factors which affect integration.

159 John Sallnow and Sarah Arlett, "European Centres of Dissent," The Geographical Magazine 61 (1989): 8. 128

* Thus, when we differentiate regional disadvantage into eco­ nomic characteristics and ethnic divisions, it is likely that the outcomes of the dependent variable can be better explained. To use the language of George, we have a "con­ tingent generalization1' about the relationship between regional disadvantage and integration. CHAPTER V

INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION FOR AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

I will discuss how the empirical analysis is conducted in

Chapters VI and VII. I am concerned with the unit of anal­ ysis, indicators, measurements, time period covered, meth­ ods, and data sources.

5.1 THE UNIT OF ANALYSIS

The traditional approach toward international relations was

based upon the nation-state; it was called the "state-

centric paradigm." However, a good deal of intersocial

relations have taken place between nonstate entities in

trade, personal contact, and communication. Thus, Keohane

and Nye defined world politics as political interactions

between any "significant actors," e.g. nation-states, sub­

national entities, nongovernmental entities, across state

lines.16 0

160 For a discussion of transnational relations, see Robert 0. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Transnational Relations and World Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970).

- 129 - 130

International relations where nonstate entities are involved are called transnational relations. Keohane and

Nye argue that transnational relations increase intersocial sensitivity and thereby alter relations between govern­ ments. First, states may be able to reduce their sensitiv­

ity to outside influence but only at the high price of

reducing the concomitant benefits which result from their

intercourse. Second, as a result of global mass communica­ tions, various groups in different societies can observe each other's behavior and copy it when it seems appropri­

ate. It may have an impact on interstate politics. Third,

face-to-face interactions between citizens of different

states may alter the opinions and perceptions of elites and

masses within each state.

In this thesis, I am concerned with interactions of sub­

national entities, i.e. regions within each state. That

is, the unit of analysis is the regions at different levels

of development in the European Community.

When we attempt to define regions, we have to deal with

two possible risks. The one is that we may lose distinc­

tive characteristics of each region when regions are too

broadly defined so that they may be difficult to distin­

guish from nation states. The other is that adequate data

may not be available when regions are too narrowly defined. 131

When regions are defined, we have the problems of com­ parability, homogeneity, and hetereogeneity between

regions. First, there is a problem of hetereogeneity in terms of ethnic and linguistic dispersion in the European

Community. For example, there are various linguistic dis­ persion, i.e. English, Romance (French, Portuguese,

Spanish-speaking), German-Dutch-Flemish, and multilingual states (Belgium, Luxembourg). Thus, cultural regions, which are defined based on ethnicity, culture and a common

identity, can deal with this problem. However, official

statistics broken down by cultural regions are not avail­

able .

Second, there is a problem of comparability between

regions within the Community. For example, Luxembourg,

though a nation-state, has a small population and a small

territory. However, if subnational entities of Luxembourg

are taken as the unit of analysis, subnational entities of

Luxembourg do not in size correspond to other subnational

entities, e.g. Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, in terms

of population and territory.

Third, Eurostat161 has drawn up a Nomenclature of Sta­

tistical Territorial Units (NUTS). Community Regions (RCE)

are drawn as homogeneous as possible with an average popu­

lation of five million. They were needed in order to study

161 Eurostat, Regional Statistics (Brussels, 1975), pp. 43-44. 132 the consequences of the creation of the Customs Union and of economic integration on subnational entities. For exam­ ple, the RCE consists of the ’Lander' in Germany, the

'Zones d'etude et d 'amenagement du territoire' in France, the 'Community regions' in Italy, the 'Landsdelen' in the

Netherlands, the 'Regions' in Belgium, the 'Standard regions' of the United Kingdom, Denmark, Ireland, and the

Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Thus, regions in this study are defined based on admin­ istrative units within each state. Although there are eth­ nic and linguistic dispersion across the European Communi­ ty, people with the same ethnic and linguistic characteristics tend to live with a geographical proximity, e.g. Flanders, Wallonia, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Britta­ ny, Tyrol, the Basque country, etc. On the other hand, when there is too small a population, e.g. Luxembourg, or too small a territory, e.g. Ireland and Denmark, to be sub­ divided, they are regarded as one region, respectively.

5.2 INDICATORS

Regional disadvantage is measured by per capita GDP (PGDP), unemployment (UNEMP), and net migration (NMIG), respective­ ly.162 First, per capita GDP is an indicator of economic

162 For a discussion of various indicators of regional dis­ advantages, see Wolfgang Stabenow, "Regional Policy in the EEC," Regional Policy and Planning for Europe, ed. Morgan Sant (Westmead, England: Saxon House, 1974), pp. 71-86; Geoffrey Denton, "Regional Divergence and Policy 133 capacity. It is the primary indicator of regional dispari­ ty, because it represents the result of the productive efforts of the active population, but it is also comparable across the Community. Low per capita GDP is related to low activity rates. Second, unemployment is an indicator of regional disparity, because it indicates regional disadvan­ tage in depressed regions, which have high unemployment rates, e.g. Wallonia. Third, net migration is another indicator of regional disparity, because it shows that more people emigrate from depressed regions or rural areas.

in the Community, with Special Reference to Enlarge­ ment ," Economic Divergence in the European Community, eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981), p. 136. He suggests many indicators, such as unemployment rates, activity rates, income per head, rates of emigration, rates of economic growth, age and class structure of the population, industrial structure, degree of spatial congestion and environmen­ tal condition; E.C. Hallett, "Economic Convergence and Divergence in the European Community: A Survey of the Evidence," op. cit., pp. 16-31. He suggests inflation rate, GDP per capita and exchange rate; Paul C. Che­ shire and Dennis G. Hay, Urban Problems in Western Europe (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), pp. 43-86. He sug­ gests income, unemployment, migration index, and index of travel demand; Francesco Vito, "Problems of the Underdeveloped Regions of Italy," Backward Areas in Advanced Countries, ed. E.A.G. Robinson (London: Mac­ millan and St. Martin’s, 1969), pp. 210-225. He sug­ gests per capita income, unemployment rate, and net migration rate; Nobert Vanhove and Leo H. Klaassen, Regional Policy: A European Approach (Brookfield, Ver­ mont: Gower, 1987), p. 241. They suggest regional income, productivity, migration, sectoral structure and unemployment; Willem Molle, Industrial Location and Regional Development in the European Community: The FLEUR Model (Brookfield, Vermont: Gower, 1983), p. 115. He suggests employment by sector and region, unemploy­ ment, GDP per head, and migration; Willem Molle, The Economics of European Integration (Brookfield, Vermont: Dartmouth, 1990), p. 418. 134

I will elaborate how these indicators are used to meas­ ure regional disadvantage. First, bearing in mind that the unit of analysis in this study is the regions, three refer­ ence groups are introduced: the state, the most favoured region within the state, and the Community as a whole.

The relative deprivation theory taps the psychological and political aspects of individuals or regions feeling deprived relative to a reference group.163 Feeling of rel­ ative deprivation arises when individuals perceive discrep­ ancy between their value expectations and their value capa­ bilities. It is likely to intensify when individuals feel deprived relative to a reference group. Furthermore, when discontent is widespread and intense among elite and mass, political strains are likely to develop.

It seems that regional disadvantage can be evaluated within states and within the Community. In terms of regional disadvantage within states, each region can be compared with the national average in order to see how it fares overall within states. However, each region may be more interested in how it fares compared with the most fav­ oured region. That is, regional disadvantage in the United

Kingdom may be more keenly felt when regions compare them­ selves with the most favoured region, South-East, rather than with the state as a whole. Regional disadvantage in

163 The relative deprivation theory will be more specifi­ cally discussed in next section. 135

Italy may be better measured when each region is compared with Lombardia. Meanwhile, in terms of regional disadvan­ tage within the Community, each region will be compared with the Community average. Thus, we can discover the ref­ erence group against which regional disadvantage is most keenly felt.

Second, deviations from each reference group are esti­ mated when the national average, the most favoured region value within each state, and the Community average are sub­ tracted from each region's score on the same variable.

Table 20 shows means of deviations from the national aver­ age (DEVI), the most favoured region value (DEV2), and the

Community average (DEV3), respectively.

Table 20

Means of Deviations for Per Capita GDP, Unemployment, and Net Migration

PGDPUNEMPNMIG

DEVI DEV 2 DEV3 DEVI DEV 2 DEV3 DEVI DEV2 DEV3

6.44 -1848 0 -0.06 1.93 0 275 1022 0

Third, PGDP is measured by ECU, and is standardized in terms of purchasing power parities over time as well as over regions.

Fourth, rurality is defined in terms of the proportion of agricultural employment to the total labor force within each region (EAGR). 136

Fifth, UNEMP is the proportion of the unemployed to the total labor force within each region, while EAGR is agri­ cultural employment as a percentage of the total labor force. EAGR indicates how many workers are employed in agriculture rather than in industry or service sectors.

Sixth, NMIG represents the balance between immigration and emigration. For example, positive figures for NMIG means that there is more immigration than emigration.

Seventh, the proportion of intra-EC export to total exports (EXPORT) and the proportion of intra-EC import to total imports (IMPORT)164 are used to calculate an index of economic integration (ECON_INT). I use an index of econom­ ic integration for the purpose of simplicity in reporting how economically integrated the Community became. On the other hand, a relationship between regional disadvantage and economic integration, as measured by EXPORT and IMPORT, respectively, was not changed when economic integration was measured by an index of economic integration (ECON_INT).

EXPORT and IMPORT are standardized across the Community, and then the standardized scores for EXPORT and IMPORT are added and then divided by two for each region. Thus,

ECON_INT is an indicator of economic integration in this study.

164 For a discussion of these measures, see chapter I. We have discussed various views of how to measure economic integration. 137

Eighth, intra-EC letter traffic (LETTER) is letter traf­ fic with other EC regions as a percentage of the total let­ ter traffic. Intra-EC telegram traffic (TELEGRAM) is tele­ gram traffic with other EC regions as a percentage of the total telegram traffic. COMM is a communication indicator of political integration. LETTER and TELEGRAM are stan­ dardized across the Community/ and then the standardized

scores for LETTER and TELEGRAM are added and then divided

by two for each region.

Ninth, Public opinion data was drawn from surveys con­

ducted by Ronald Inglehart from 1973 to 1985.165 Thus,

attitudinal indicators are public opinion in favour of EC membership (0PIN1), public opinion in favour of European

unification (0PIN2), and public opinion in favour of direct

election to European Parliament (0PIN3).166 0PIN1, 0PIN2,

and 0PIN3 are regional scores, and are standardized acorss

the Community, respectively. The standardized scores for

0PIN1, 0PIN2, and 0PIN3 are added and then divided by three

165 Ronald Inglehart, European Communities Studies (Ann Arbors University of Michigan, 1973-1984). (ICPSR 8434); Ronald Inglehart, Eurobarometer. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1985). (ICPSR 8513). Survey questions were: (1) Are you for or against Community membership ? (2) Are you for or against the efforts being made to unify West Europe ? (3) Are you for or against a direct election to European Parliament ?

166 por a discussion of these measures, see chapter I. We have discussed various views of how to measure politi­ cal integration. 138 for each region. Thus, OPIN is an attitudinal indicator of political integration.

Tenth, COMM and OPIN, as neofunctionalists argued, can provide multi-dimensionaJL aspects of political integration.

Clark and Merritt167 argued that increased communications are likely to change popular attitudes or to shape public opinion. People who have dealings or communications with other regions within the Community are more likely to favor integration. Changing public attitudes may provide a legit­ imate basis for elites attempting to promote further inte­ gration. Thus, they can have some impact on elite foreign policy decision-making.

The relationship between communication and political integration has been developed from Deutsch's work, Politi­ cal Community at the International Level: Problems of Def­ inition and Measurement. Deustch postulated and proved that it was empirically feasible to ascertain the existence of the community-ness by observing people's communications behavior. Countries so isolated from one another as to have no significant dealings among their populations would not be members of one community. Thus, increasing communi­ cation provides a basis for the development of a sense of community, and also movement upward on the scale of

167 Cal Clark and Richard L. Merritt, "European Community and Intra-European Communications: The Evidence of Mail Flows," Communications and Interaction in Global Politics, eds. Claudio Cioffi-Revilla, et al. (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1987), pp. 209-235. 139

"community-ness" is called integration because increasing communication enhances the need for decision rules to moni­ tor and coordinate the flows.

It is likely that communication serves to strenthen the sense of mutual identification between regions, and to pro­ mote a readiness to respond sympathetically to the need of others between regions. Puchala suggests that when a popu­ lation shares values, preferences, life-styles, common mem­ ories, aspirations, loyalties, and identification, people within this population communicate with one another fre­ quently, rapidly, clearly and effectively, over social, economic, cultural, and political concerns.168

Inglehart169 regarded attitudes as the psychological dimension of the transaction, and argued that the reduction in the psychological distance between the groups concerned would lead to reshaping the political aspirations of the major groups in the society.

Public preferences are likely to constitute an increas­ ingly effective influence on political decision-makers.

For example, changing attitudes favourable to integration are likely to provide a "permissive consensus" for decision-makers attempting to promote further integration.

168 Donald Puchala, "International Transactions and Region­ al Integration," International Organization 24 (Autumn 1970): 741.

169 Ronald Inglehart, "An End to European Integration," American Political Science Review 61 (March 1967): 91-105. 140

5.3 TIME PERIOD

This study covers the period from 1970 to 1981, because the

Community began to be enlarged beyond the original Six dur­ ing this period. Also, it was not until the 1970s that the

Community began to realize that there were regional imba­ lances within the Community, and began to disseminate its official statistics broken down by regions. The gap of per capita GDP between the ten most developed and the ten most less-favoured regions of the Community rose from 2.9 to 1 in 1970 to 4.0 to 1 in 1977. With the accession of Greece to the Community on January 1, 1981, it reached the ratio of 5.0 to l.170 The Community started to collect data by region as well by state since 1970. However, regional data is available only until 1981. On the other hand, during the period 1970-1981, the Community has enlarged from the original Six to Twelve member states. Thus, this study includes 76 regions from 1970 to 1971 (38 regions for each year), 357 regions from 1972 to 1978 (51 regions for each year), 108 regions from 1979 to 1980 (54 regions for each year), and 64 regions in 1981.

Regional disparities in per capita GDP or unemployment is likely to cause internal tension and political strains between regions, which would have an impact on the integra­ tion process. That is, divergence between regions at time

170 Commission of the European Communities, Regional Devel­ opment Fund: Sixth Annual Report (1980) (Brussels, 1981), p.3. 141

(t) is likely to cause internal tension and political strains between regions at time (t), which would affect integration efforts after time (t+1).

Gurr171 suggested that such strains could be explained in terms of relative deprivation theory. Relative depriva­ tion is defined as actors' perception of discrepancy between their value expectations and their value capabili­ ties. Gurr argued that it was the macro-analytic concept as well as the micro-analytic concept, because it referred both to individual states of mind and their collective dis­ tribution. When an individual or a group felt deprived or discontented, a reference point can be its own past condi­ tion, an abstract ideal, or the standards articulated by a leader as well as a "reference group." Gurr172 suggested an example of rural violence, when rural areas felt deprived relative to the most favoured region. Feelings of relative deprivation are likely to intensify when economic conditions, e.g. per capita GDP and unemployment, get worse relative to a reference group.

171 Ted Robert Gurr, Why Men Rebel (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1970); Ted Robert Gurr, "A Causal Model of Civil Strife: A Comparative Analysis Using New Indices," Anger, Violence, and Politics, eds. Ivo K. Feierabend, et al. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall, 1972), pp. 184-222.

172 Ted Robert Gurr, Why Men Rebel (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1970), p. 180.

173 Ted Robert Gurr, Why Men Rebel (Princeton, New Jersey: 142

Gurr173 argued that the frustration-aggression relation­ ship was significant for political violence. He suggested that "the spread of frustration in areas developing less rapidly than their people wish can be seen as the outcome of a deep imbalance between achievement and aspiration .,. aspiration outruns achievement so far that many people, even if they are making some progress toward their goal, are dissatisfied because they get so much less than they want." That is, it seems that an individual or a group is likely to be frustrated or feel deprived when it sees its status relative to its reference group.

In a nutshell, the relative deprivation theory is con­ cerned with how feeling of an individual's or a group's relative deprivation has developed, and how it leads to political violence, which negatively affects the unity and solidarity of a community. Thus, the relative deprivation theory seems to illuminate a relationship between regional disadvantage and integration.

I take into account time-lags in order to examine the

relationship between regional disadvantage and integration

in the Community. Since data was collected on a yearly

basis, lags will also be based on 1- or 2- or 3-year, etc.

I choose short lags rather than longer ones because econom­

ic welfare is the most salient issue in less developed

areas, and has a greater influence on political decisions

Princeton University Press, 1970), p. 39. 143 during a short period.174 Nye17S argued that the lower the

income, the lower the tolerance to differences in symmetry

and the more sensitive the problem of equitable distribu­

tion of benefits. That is, models with a 1-, or 2-year lag were examined, among which models with a 1-year lag seem to

explain the relationship between regional disadvantage and

integration better than the other models in terms of sig­

nificance of equation. In other words, both theoretical

and methodological considerations point to the superiority

of the one-year lag.

5.4 METHODS

In order to estimate the relationship between regional dis­

advantage and integration, regression analysis is employed.

The first hypothesis is concerned with the relationship

between regional disadvantage and integration, while the

second hypothesis is concerned with the relationship

between integration and economic advantage in urban and

rural areas.

A correct functional form for the relationship between

regional disadavantage and integration is determined

through the analysis of residuals. First, I examine wheth­

174 Ronald Inglehart, "Public Opinion and Regional Integra­ tion," International Organization 24 (Autumn 1970): 770.

175 Joseph S. Nye "Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functional Model," International Organization 24 (Autumn 1970): 832. 144 er the expected value of residuals is zero in order to see whether a linear relationship is adequate for the model.176

Second, I examine whether there is an autocorrelation, which means that residuals are correlated with each other, because the existence of serial correlation in the residu­ als indicates that a relevant independent variable might be omitted from the model, or the model might have an incor­ rect functional form.177 In order to examine the existence of autocorrelation, Durbin-Watson test is used.

Lastly, there are pros and cons about the significance test.178 Critics argued that it was simply impossible to

176 For a discussion of linear and curvilinear regression, James H. Heward and Peter M. Steele, Business Control Through Multiple Regression Analysis (Londons Gower, 1972). See pp. 30-34, and pp. 61-76; Allen L. Edwards, Multiple Regression and the Analysis of Variance and Covariance (San Franciscos W.H. Freeman, 1979), pp. 7-53; For a discussion of nonlinear regression model­ ing, David A. Ratkowsky, Handbook of Nonlinear Regres­ sion Models (New Yorks Marcel Dekker, 1990), pp. 19-48; Leona S. Aiken and Stephen G. West, Multiple Regres­ sions Testing and Interpreting Integration (Newbury Parks Sage, 1991), pp. 28-48; James Jaccard, et al., Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (Newbury Parks Sage, 1990), pp. 7-33.

177 For a discussion of autocorrelation, see Lawrence Salzman, Computerized Economic Analysis (New Yorks McGraw-Hill, 1968), pp. 133-190.

178 For those who do not favor the use of the significance test, Hanan C. Sevin, "A Critique of Tests of Sigifi- cance in Survey Research," American Sociology Review 22 (October 1957)$ 519-27. Denton E. Morrison and Ramon E. Henkel, The Significance Test Controversy (Chicagos Aldine, 1970), p. 185. Charles D. Cowger, "Statistical Significance Testss Scientific Ritualism or Scientific Method ?" Social Service Review 58 (September 1984)$ 358-72; For those who defend the significance test, G.E.P. Box, "Non-normality and Tests on Variations," 145 meet all of the assumptions (e.g. normal distribution, homogeneity of variance, etc.) required of the tests of significance. On the other hand, defenders argued that the tests were able to provide evidence, if not proof, for hypotheses and theories. Also, Box179 suggested that sta­ tistical tests were only inconsequentially affected by a violation of the underlying assumptions. Boneau100 showed that, based on the central limit theorem, when the sample sizes reach 25 or 30, one can ignore the effects of viola­

tions of assumptions except for extremes. Thus, the sig­

nificance test seems to be one of the best ways to express

the odds that the results of a study are not just chance

fluctuation.

Biometrika 40 (1950): 318-35. C.A. Boneau, "The Effects of Violations of Assumptions Underlying the t-Test," Psychological Bulletin 57 (1960): 49-64. Rob­ ert F. Winch and Donald T. Campbell, "Proof ? No. Evi­ dence ? Yes. The Significance of Tests of Signifi­ cance," American Sociologist 4 (1969): 140-3. Jacob Cohen and Patricia Cohen, Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Science (Hills­ dale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975), pp. 48-9. Charles Glisson, "In Defense of Statistical Tests of Significance," Social Service Review 59 (September 1985): 377-86.

179 G.E.P. Box, op. cit. pp. 318-35.

180 C. Alan Boneau, op. cit. p. 63. 146

5.5 DATA SOURCES

1. Intra-EC trade data

George M. Taber, Patterns and Prospects of Common Market

Trade (London: Peter Owen, 1974).

Commission of the European Communities, Basic Statistics of the Community, 14 vols. (Brussels, 1970-83).

Eurostat, EC External Trade Indices (Brussels, 1988).

Eurostat, Monthly External Trade Bulletin, 12 vols. (Brus­ sels, 1970-81).

2. Communication data

Herbert Ungerer, Telecommunications in Europe (Brussels,

1988).

Eurostat, Statistical Yearbook, Transport, Communications,

Tourism, 16 vols. (Brussels, 1970-1985).

3. Public opinion data

Ronald Inglehart, European Communities Studies (Ann Arbor:

Center for Political Studies, 1973-1984). (ICPSR 8434)

Ronald Inglehart, Eurobarometer (Ann Arbor: Center for

Political Studies, 1985). (ICPSR 8513)

4. Financial data

Commission of the European Communities, General Report on the Activities of the European Communities. 12 vols. (Brus­ sels, 1971-1982).

Commission of the European Communities, The Community Budg­ et: The Facts and Figures (Brussels, 1988). 147

Commission of the European Communities, Financial Report

(Brussels, 1987).

Commission of the European Communities, The European Commu­ nity and its Regions: 10 Years of Community Regional Poli­ cy and of European Regional Development Fund (Brussels,

1985) .

5. Data about EC institutions

Eurostat, Review, 14 vols. (Brussels, 1971-1984).

6. Data about GDP, unemployment, agricultural employment and net migration

Eurostat, Rapid Reports: Regions, 3 vols. (Brussels,

1989-1991).

Eurostat, Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Liv­ ing Standards, 5 vols. (Brussels, 1973-1977).

Eurostat, Yearbook of Regional Statistics, 8 vols. (Brus­ sels, 1981-1988).

Eurostat, Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators, 14 vols. (Brussels, 1970-1983).

Eurostat, Regional Statistics: The Community’s Financial

Participation in Investments, 3 vols. (Brussels,

1973-1975). CHAPTER VI

THE FIRST HYPOTHESIS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN

REGIONAL DISADVANTAGE AND INTEGRATION

The greater its economic disadvantage, the less eco­

nomically and politically integrated the region.

I______i

6.1 INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION

A relationship between regional disadvantage and integra­ tion was examined in two case studies in chapter IV. The two case studies suggested that regional disadvantage was negatively associated with integration. In this chapter, I will examine the relationship between economic disadvantage and integration more systematically. This involves esti­ mating it across all the regions in the Community and using multivariate statistical analysis to estimate the impact of the independent variables.

It seems that the greater the degree of regional disad­ vantage in the Community, the more likely it is to bring about political tensions which will in turn deter integra-

- 148 - 149

tion. That is, economic divergences between regions are

likely to affect both economic and political integration

because, as the neofunctionalists argued, economic integra­

tion is likely to be a stepping stone for political inte­

gration. The Commission of the European Communities point­

ed out in the 1976 annual report that an increasing

tendency of the economic divergence between regions was a major obstacle to economic integration.181 Reichenbach

argued that regional disadvantage would have a negative

effect on economic and political integration.182 Many dis­

advantaged regions are afraid that integration would bring

far greater benefits to the more advanced regions, leaving

behind the other regions. For example, there is more youth

unemployment and long-term unemployment in disadvantaged

regions. Young and skilled laborers in disadvantaged

regions are likely to migrate to favoured regions. Emigra­

tion of young people will leave disadvantaged regions with

an ageing population. The drain-off of skilled labor will

leave disadvantaged regions with few opportunity to develop

their regions. People in disadvantaged regions will feel

deprived, as discrepancy between regions increases in the

181 Commission of the European Communities, European Regional Development Fund: Second Annual Report (1976) (Brussels, 1977), p. 8.

182 Horst Reichenbach, "A Politico-economic Overview," Integration and Unequal Development: The Experience of the EEC, eds. Dudley Seers and Constantine Vaitsos (New York: St. Martin's, 1980), pp. 79-99. 150 process of integration. They may think that integration benefits only favoured regions.183 When regional dispari­ ties persist, political strains are likely to have an adverse impact on the unity and solidarity of the Communi­ ty. Thus, I hypothesize that there is a negative relation­ ship between regional disadvantage and integration.

6.2 TESTING OF THE FIRST HYPOTHESIS

The independent variables measuring economic disadvantage are regional per capita GDP (PGDP), unemployment rate

(UNEMP), and net migration (NMIG), respectively. The dependent variables measuring economic and political inte­ gration are EC0N__INT, COMM and OPIN, respectively.

EC0N_INT is an indicator of economic integration, as meas­ ured by the share of community trading in total trading.

COMM is an indicator of political integration, as measured by inter-regional communications, and OPIN is an indicator of political integration, as measured by peoples' attitudes toward integration.

Tables 21, 22, and 23 summarize the relationship between regional disadvantage and economic integration when the reference group is the state, the most favoured region lea Tony Cutler, et al., 1992 - The Struggle for Europe: A Critical Evaluation of the European Community {New York: Berg, 1989), p. 79; Eduardo Lizano, "Integration of Less Developed Areas and of Areas on Different Lev­ els of Development," Economic Integration: Worldwide, Regional, Sectoral, ed. Fritz Machlup (London: Macmil­ lan, 1976). 151 within the state, and the Community as a whole, respective­ ly.184

Table 21

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Economic Integration (the State, Lag = 1)

F R 2 D-W PGDP UNEMP NMIG

b beta b beta b beta

ECON 42.02** 0.27 1.12 50.31* 0.48 -43.42* -0.11 0.07 0.01 (5.31) (20.62) (0.28)

Note: *p<0.05; **p< 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis.

Table 22

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Economic Integration (the Most Favoured Region, Lag = 1)

F R2 D-W PGDP UNEMP NMIG

b beta b beta b beta

ECON 10.25** 0.20 1.22 1.16 0.03 -66.28* -0.32 -0.23 -0.09 (2.80) (13.82) (0.17)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis.

184 Tables of correlations between independent variables are presented in Appendix C. The correlations among any two independent variables are not extremely high. 152

Table 23

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Economic Integration (the Community, Lag = 1)

F R 2 D-W PGDPUNEMPNMIG

b beta b beta b beta o O CT\ 1 ECON 28.37** 0.21 1.22 22.65* 0.40 -27.15* • 0.18* 0.09 (3.14) (15.99) (0.09)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis.

Unemployment has a negative relationship with economic integration, whether the reference group is the state, or the most favoured region, or the Community. Regions with higher unemployment rates are less likely to be knitted into Community trading relative to regions with lower unem­ ployment rates. McHugh and Widdows185 argued that unem­ ployment rates were related to the composition of local industry and the characteristics of the local labor market.

There are two reasons why regions with higher unemployment rates are less likely to be integrated into the Community.

First, major items for intra-EC import are machinery and transport equipments. The higher unemployment rates in dis­ advantaged regions, the less economic activities in these regions, and the less the trade in machinery and transport

185 Richard McHugh and Richard Widdows, "The Age of Capital and State Unemployment Rates," Journal of Regional Sci­ ence 24 (February 1984): 85. 153 equipments with the Community. Second, major items which disadvantaged regions export into the Community are tradi­ tional manufactured goods. The higher unemployment rates

in disadvantaged regions, the greater impact on the tradi­ tional industry. In addition, the share of disadvantaged

regions in the Community export is likely to decrease, as

the share of low-cost manufactured goods, e.g. textiles, clothing, shoes, from the NICs increases.

The strength of unemployment's impact varies across the

three reference groups. The impact of unemployment on eco­

nomic integration is the largest when the reference group

is the most favoured region within the state. Gurr186

argued that most people probably chose their reference

groups from among those groups they perceived to be socioe­

conomically similar to themselves, but they were most like­

ly to set their expectations by those experiencing the most

rapid increase in well-being. Thus, regions with higher

unemployment rates are less likely to be integrated into

the Community when their unemployment rates are increasing

relative to the most favoured region.

Per capita GDP has a positive relationship with economic

integration when the reference group is the state or the

Community. Regions with higher per capita GDP relative to

the state or the Community are more likely to be integrated

186 Ted Robert Gurr, Why Men Rebel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), p. 107. 154 into the Community. As Nye187 argued, the lower the income, the lower the tolerance to differences in symmetry.

These regions are likely to have preference to protective measures against free trading within the Community. Thus, regions with lower per capita GDP are less likely to be integrated into the Community.

Net migration has a positive relationship with economic integration when the reference group is the Community. The immigrant regions, where labor tends to be scarce among factors of production, can increase their national products by utilizing foreign labor. Thus, they are more likely to be knitted into the Community trading. Meanwhile, the labor sending regions are likely to have the problem of declining agricultural production affected by large-scale emigration.

Their intra-EC trading of agricultural products will decrease.

It seems that regional disadvantage is most keenly felt when the reference group is the state because there is the strongest relationship between regional disadvantage and economic integration when the reference group is the state.

People are more likely to be sensitive to equitable income distribution within the state.

187 Joseph S. Nye, "Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functional Model," International Organization 24 (Autumn 1970): 832. 155

A functional form for the relationship between regional disadvantage and economic integration is based upon linear regression. Durbin-Watson statistics indicate that we do not reject the null hypothesis of no-first-order autocorre­ lation. The lower and upper values for D-W statistic are

0.7 and 1.8, respectively.

Tables 24, 25, and 26 summarize the relationship between regional disadvantage and political integration, as meas­ ured by inter-regional communications, when the reference group is the state, the most favoured region within the state, and the Community as a whole , respectively.

Table 24

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Communication Measures, the State, Lag = 1)

F R2 D-W PGDP UNEMP NMIG

b beta b beta b beta

COMM 13.46** 0.21 1.34 27.26* 0.31 -13.33 -0.04 -0.13 -0.03 (4.89) (19.00) (0.26)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis.

Per capita GDP has a positive relationship with politi­ cal integration, as measured by inter-regional communica­ tions, whether the reference group is the state, or the 156

Table 25

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Communication Measures, the Most Favoured Region/ Lag = 1)

F R 2 D-W PGDP UNEMPNMIG

b beta b beta b beta

COMM 6.07** 0.20 0.99 6.04* 0.18 -22.36* -0.13 0.21 0.10 (2.35) (11.58) (0.14)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis.

Table 26

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Communication Measures, the Community, Lag = 1)

F R 2. D-W PGDP UNEMP NMIG

b beta b beta b beta

COMM 20.33** 0.25 1.35 15.48* 0.33 -23.22* -0.09 0.17* 0.11 (2.70) (13.73) (0.08)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis. most favoured region, or the Community. Regions with higher per capita GDP relative to the state or the most favoured region or the Community as a whole are more likely to be integrated into the Community. Deutsch argued that if the 157 volume of communications increases, then mass and elite

responsiveness to their partners increases within a commu­

nity. The increase of mass and elite responsiveness will

strengthen the sense of mutual identification within the

Community. People will identify with one another, and dis­

tinguish between themselves and outside. Regions with

higher per capita GDP are likely to have more dealings or

communications with other regions within the Community.

Thus, they are more likely to have mutual identification

with other regions, and to be integrated into the Communi­

ty.

Unemployment has a negative relationship with political

integration, as measured by inter-regional communications,

when the reference group is the most favoured region within

the state, or the Community as a whole. As Inglehart

argues, regions with better economic conditions are likely

to have more communications with other regions, and to be

integrated into the Community.

Like the relationship between net migration and economic

integration, net migration has a positive relationship with

political integration, as measured by inter-regional commu­

nication, when the reference group is the Community. It

indicates that immigrant regions are more likely to be

integrated into the Community. The immigrant regions are

required to provide immigrants with housing, schools and 158 hospitals, as the number of married immigrants and their families grows. As Deutsch argued, the development of institutions, which resulted from increasing volume of transaction, will promote political integration. The immig­ rant regions are more likely to be integrated into the Com­ munity.

The strength of the relationship between regional disad­ vantage and political integration, as measured by inter­ regional communications, varies across the three reference groups. Economic disadvantage is most keenly felt when the reference group is the Community. People may be more con­ cerned with regional disparities within the Community in order to have the sense of the community-ness, i.e. friend­ liness, trust, mutual identification, etc. As Puchala188 argued, regions which share similar life-style within the

Community are more likely to identify with one another, and to be integrated into the Community.

A functional form for the relationship between regional disadvantage and political integration, as measured by inter-regional communications, is based upon linear regres­ sion. Durbin-Watson statistics indicate that we do not reject the null hypothesis of no-first-order autocorrela­ tion.

188 Donald Puchala, "International Transactions and Region­ al Integration," International Organization 24 (Autumn 1970): 741. 159

Tables 27, 28 and 29 summarize the relationship between regional disadvantage and political integration, as meas­ ured by peoples' attitudes toward integration, when the reference group is the state, the most favoured region within the state, and the Community as a whole, respective­ ly.

Table 27

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Public Opinion Measures, the State, Lag = 1)

F R 2 D-W PGDP UNEMP NMIG

b beta b beta b beta

OPIN 23.88** 0.20 1.10 7.50* 0.08 -52.36* -0.14 0.11 0.02 (5.67) (20.58) (0.34)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis.

Per capita GDP has a positive relationship with attitu­ dinal integration when the reference group is the state or the Community, and a negative relationship with attitudinal integration when the reference group is the most favoured region within the state. Regions with higher per capita

GDP relative to the state or the Community as a whole seem to have positive attitudes toward integration. On the oth­ er hand, because the region which has the highest per cap- 160

Table 28

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Public Opinion Measures, the Most Favoured Region, Lag = 1)

F R 2 D-W PGDPUNEMP NMIG

b beta b beta b beta

OPIN 48.49** 0.40 1.10 -20.00* -0.53 -83.52* -0.42 -1.42* -0.52 (2.50) (10.50) (0.10)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis.

Table 29

The Relationship between Regional Disadvantage and Political Integration (Public Opinion Measures, the Community, Lag = 1)

F R2 D-W PGDP UNEMP NMIG

b beta b beta b beta

OPIN 25.18** 0.21 1.05 14.00* 0.30 -20.50 -0.07 0.15* 0.10 (3.50) (16.50) (0.10)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis. ita GDP within the state was designated as the most fav­ oured region, any region is not likely to have higher per capita GDP than the most favoured region. As Inglehart189

189 Ronald Inglehart, "An End to European Integration ?11 American Political Science Review 61 (March 1967): 91-105. 161 argued, those satisfied with their standard of living are more likely to have attitudes favourable to integration.

Thus, regions with higher per capita GDP relative to the state or the Community are more likely to be integrated

into the Community. However, the larger the gap between a

region's per capita GDP and that of the most favoured

region, the less favourable to integration the region.

Unemployment has a negative relationship with attitudi-

nal integration when the reference group is the state or

the most favoured region within the state. Regions with

higher unemployment rates relative to the state or the most

favoured region are less likely to be integrated into the

Community. The Community would seem to be a less salient

reference group than the state. The impact of per capita

GDP and unemployment on attitudinal integration is most

salient when the reference group is the most favoured

region within the state. Also, the strength of the rela­

tionship between economic disadvantage and attitudinal

integration varies across the three reference groups. Eco­

nomic disadvantage manifests itself most strongly when the

reference group is the most favoured region within the

state. As discussed in the relative deprivation theory,

people tend to compare their economic conditions with the

most favoured region within the state. When their economic

conditions are getting worse relative to the most favoured 162 region# they are more likely to feel deprived# and have negative attitudes toward the unity and solidarity of the

Community.

Net migration has a positive relationship with attitudi­ nal integration when the reference group is the Community# and a negative relationship with attitudinal integration when the reference group is the most favoured region within the state. Positive net migration may bring about economic gains for immigrant regions. The immigrant regions# which have more net migration than the Community average# may see the inflow of foreign laborers as an opportunity to increase the national products by using them. They are more likely to have positive attitudes toward integration. How­ ever# when the number of immigrants grows# the immigrant regions may have greater economic burden in order to pro­ vide immigrants and their families with housing# hospitals and schools# etc. Meanwhile# immigrants may feel discrimi­ nated against because of their poor living conditions, social insecurity, and insufficient integration into socie­ ty. Thus# these regions with more net migration than the most favoured region are more likely to have negative atti­ tudes toward integration.

A functional form for the relationship between regional disadvantage and attitudinal integration is based upon lin­ ear regression. Durbin-Watson statistics indicate that we 163 do not reject the null hypothesis of no-first-order auto­ correlation.

6.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

This chapter addresses the issue of whether regional disad­ vantage is negatively associated with economic and politi­ cal integration.

Economic integration is measured by the share of intra-

EC trading in total trading. Political integration is measured by inter-regional communications and attitudinal integration.

Regional disadvantage is examined relative to the state, the most favoured region within the state, and the Communi­ ty as a whole. It is intended to discover the reference group against which regional disadvantge is most keenly felt. I will summarize the salience of the reference group and the impact of the independent variables.

The strength of the relationship between regional disad­ vantage and economic integration is the largest when the reference group is the state. People seem to be more con­ cerned with the regional disparities relative to the state.

As Nye argued, the lower the income, the lower the toler­ ance to differences in symmetry, the more protective meas­ ures against free trading, and the less likely it is to be integrated into the Community. 164

Unemployment has a negative relationship with economic integration, whether the reference group is the state, the most favoured region, or the Community. Regions with high­ er unemployment rates are less likely to be knitted into the Community trading relative to regions with lower unem­ ployment rates. The higher unemployment rates in disadvan­ taged . regions, the less economic activities in these regions, and the less imports of machinery and transport equipments from the Community. Also, the increasing exports of low-cost manufactured goods from the NICs will decrease the share of disadvantaged regions in Community trading.

Net migration has a positive relationship with economic integration. Immigrant regions are likely to have an oppo- tunity to increase their national products by using foreign laborers. However, the labor sending regions are likely to experience decrease in agricultural products in EC trading because of declining agricultural production affected by large-scale emigration.

The relationship between regional disadvantage and political integration, as measured by inter-regional commu­ nications, is most salient when the reference group is the

Community. It seems that people are more concerned with the regional disparities within the Community in order to have the sense of mutual identification with other regions in the Community. Regions are more likely to have mutual 165 identification with other regions which have similar levels of development within the Community.

Per capita GDP has a positive relationship with politi­ cal integration, as measured by inter-regional communica­ tions, whether the reference group is the state, the most favoured region, or the Community. Regions with higher per capita GDP are likely to have more communications with oth­ er regions, and to have the sense of mutual identification, and to be integrated into the Community.

Unemployment has a negative relationship with political integration, as measured by inter-regional communications, when the reference group is the most favoured region within the state, or the Community as a whole. Net migration has a positive relationship with political integration, as measured by inter-regional communication, when the refer­ ence group is the Community. As Deutsch argued, the devel­ opment of institutions, which resulted from inter-regional communications, is likely to bring about political integra­ tion. Immigrant regions are required to provide immigrants and their families with housing, hospitals, and schools, etc. Thus, they are more likely to develop institutions dealing with immigrants and to have mutual identification with one another.

The relationship between regional disadvantage and atti­ tudinal integration is most salient when the reference 166 group is the most favoured region within the state. The

impact of per capita GDP and unemployment on attitudinal

integration is also most salient when the reference group

is the most favoured region. People are more likely to compare their economic conditions with the most favoured

region within the state. When their economic conditions

are getting worse relative to the most favoured region,

they are more likely to feel deprived, and have negative

attitudes toward the unity and solidarity of the Community.

Per capita GDP has a positive relationship with attitu­

dinal integration when the reference group is the state or

the Community, and has a negative relationship when the

reference group is the most favoured region. As Inglehart

argued, those satisfied with their standard of living are

more likely to favour integration. On the other hand, the

most favoured region was defined as that which had the

highest per capita GDP within the state. Any region is not

likely to have higher GDP than the most favoured region

within the state. Thus, the larger the gap between a

region's per capita GDP and that of the most favoured

region, the less favourable to integration the region.

Unemployment has a negative relationship with attitudi­

nal integration when the reference group is the state, or

the most favoured region within the state. Regions are

more likely to be concerned with economic conditions within 167 the state because they want to be compared with regions which are socioeconomically similar to themselves, as dis­ cussed in the relative deprivation theory. Regions with better economic conditions relative to- other regions within the state are more likely to favour integation.

Net migration has a positive relationship with attitudi­ nal integration when the reference group is the Community, and a negative relationship when the reference group is the most favoured region. There seems to be a threshold for attitudinal integation due to positive net migration. The immigrant regions which have more net migration than the

Community average are more likely to have economic gains from the inflow of foreign laborers. However, when there are too many immigrants and their families are living in immigrant regions, which have more net migration than the most favoured region, these regions will have an economic burden of constructing housing, hospitals, and schools for immigrants. Immigrants, meanwhile, may feel discriminated against because of their poor living conditions, social insecurity, and insufficient integration into society.

People in these regions are more likely to have negative attitudes toward integration.

We notice that per capita GDP and unemployment rate have the largest impact on economic and political integration across the three reference groups. These findings about 168 per capita GDP and unemployment rate make sense when we examine the economic situation in the 1970s and early

1980s.190

First, we had the monetary crisis in 1971, which arose from the overvaluation of the U.S. dollar against gold and currencies valued in terms of gold. The monetary crisis upset the rate of economic expansion and level of employ­ ment in the Community. Unemployment seemed to increase in all regions, but more rapidly in disadvantaged regions, which might bring about greater disadvantage in less devel­ oped areas.

Second, oil crisis arose when the Arab countries quadru­ pled the price of crude oil later in 1973 and 1979. The

Community was hard hit by the oil crisis because it import­ ed 63 percent of its energy requirement in 1973 (55 percent in 1979), and imported 90 percent of imported oil from the

Middle East. The oil crisis forced up the commodity prices and seemed to affect the standards of living in all regions, but more significantly in disadvantaged regions, which might bring about wider discrepancy of per capita GDP between regions.

190 E.C. Hallett, "Economic Convergence and Divergence in the European Community: A Survey of the Evidence," Eco­ nomic Divergence in the European Community, eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981), p.25; Stein Rokkan, et al., Centre- Periphery Structures in Europe: An ISSC Workbook in Comparative Analysis (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1987), p. 44. 169

Findings also suggest that regional disadvantage is more

likely to have a negative effect on integration. The greater regional disadvantage, the more likely it is to

bring about interregional disaffection. Disintegrative

forces are likely to gather around political parties in

disadvantaged regions, seeking secession or separatism.

For example, the Sardinia Action Party has been seeking

full regional autonomy, and the Scottish National Party and

Plaid Cymru did in Scotland and Wales, respectively.

When there existed ethnic differences (e.g. cultural,

linguistic, religious differences) in economically disad­

vantaged regions, disintegrative forces are more likely to

interact with regionalism or nationalism. Examples are

Northern Ireland, Corsica, Brittany, Alsace, Wallonia, Tyr­

ol, and Andalucia, etc.

In conclusion, economic disadvantage is likely to affect

economic and political integration. As Deutsch argues,

more inter-regional communications will bring about the

sense of community-ness. As Inglehart argues, attitudinal

integration will lead to the reduction in the psychological

distance between regions. However, as Gurr argues in the

relative deprivation theory, disadvantaged regions are

likely to feel deprived or discontented when their economic

conditions are worse relative to the reference group,

whether it is the state, or the most favoured region within the state, or the Community as a whole. When feeling of relative economic deprivation intensifies, it is likely to bring about political strains between regions, which will have an adverse effect on the unity and solidarity of a community. CHAPTER VII

THE SECOND HYPOTHESIS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN

INTEGRATION AND ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE IN URBAN AND

RURAL AREAS

The positive relationship between integration, eco­

nomic and political, and economic advantage is

stronger in urban areas than in rural areas.

7.1 INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION

There are two views about the effects of integration, political and economic, on urban and rural areas. The one is an optimistic view,191 which argues that integration benefits all regions, even if some benefit more than oth­ ers. Each region specializes in the production of goods which it is able to produce relatively cheaply, and highly developed transport and communications systems promote

191 For those who have an optimistic view about the effects of integration, economic and political, on urban and rural areas, Karin Peschel, The Effects of European Integration on Regional Development - Some Lessons from the Past (Kiel, 1989). Roger D. Hansen, "European Integration: Forward March, Parade Rest, or Dismissed ?" International Organization 27 (1973): 225-54.

- 171 - 172

interregional exchanges. The other is a pessimistic view,192 which argues that integration, economic and polit­

ical, favours centralization and prosperous urban areas at the expense of rural areas, which brings about a decline in the well-being of rural areas.

Keohane and Nye193 are concerned with the effects of

integration, economic and political, on regions. They argue that it is not true that increases in levels of inte­ gration are necessarily beneficial to all regions. Too

often one finds an implicit assumption that integration is

a good thing per se. However, they argue that this is wrong

for several reasons. First, where many values are

involved, integration may enhance some values while dimin­

ishing others. For example, Canadians argue that increased

levels of economic integration with the U.S. have contrib­

uted to increased Canadian material welfare but decreased

Canadian political and cultural autonomy. Second, economic

integration has distributional effects, and may look dif­

ferent from the periphery than from the centre. What is

good for the whole is not necessarily good for each of the

192 For those who have a pessimistic view about the effects of integration, economic and political, on urban and rural areas, Stuart Holland, The Regional Problem (Lon­ dons Macmillan, 1976).

193 Robert 0. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, ’'International Interdependence and Integration," International Poli­ tics, eds. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975), pp. 363-414. 173 parts. Third, integration may introduce changes in socie­

ties that are undesired at least by many of the inhabi­

tants. For example, importation of new patterns of life may drastically alter established social patterns and lead

to more or less serious problems.

Parker194 argues that political integration will

increase the disparity between urban and rural areas by

making urban areas richer and rural areas poorer, because

new investment is most attracted to urban areas, which in

turn increases the advantages which urban areas possess

over rural areas. Clout195 also argues that political

integration benefits urban areas with more developed trans­

port and communications systems. Urban areas exert broaden­

ing control of their surrounding space, with individual

cities becoming bound together by roads and railways to

give rise to dynamic city regions and axes of movement and

economic activity. Rural areas, on the other hand, appear

even more deprived, lacking the stimulus of good communica­

tions to encourage employment growth.

194 Geoffrey Parker, The Logic of Unity (London: Longman, 1975)

19 5 Hugh D . Clout, Regional Development in Western Europe (London: David Fulton, 1987).

196 Herbert Giersch, "Economic Union between Nations and the Location of Industries," Review of Economic Studies 17 (1949): 87-97. 174

On the other hand, Giersch196 is concerned with the effects of economic integration on the location of indus­ tries and the economic structure. He maintains that the abolition of restrictions on trade and factor movements will strengthen the attractiveness of highly industrialized centres for both labor and capital. Bye197 also argues

that, as a result of economic integration, some regions might gain, while others would lose. Holland198 argues

that agglomeration economies stimulate the progressive

growth of productivity and production in urban areas. Ter­

tiary activities grow in urban areas, which attract the

most high-skilled labor, whose presense may then attract

new technologically advanced economic activities to that

region. Rural areas, on the contrary, may suffer if work­

ers migrate to other regions, leaving their markets deplet­

ed and their labor supply deprived of young and skilled

workers.

In this chapter I will examine whether the relationship

between integration, political and economic, and economic

advantage is stronger in urban areas than in rural areas.

As Stewart199 argues, the urban-rural dichotomy may not be

197 Maurice Bye, "Customs Unions and National Interests," International Economic Papers 3 (1953): 208-34.

198 Stuart Holland, Capital versus Regions (London: Macmil­ lan, 1976).

199 Charles T. Stewart, "The Urban-Rural Dichotomy: Con­ cepts and Uses," American Journal of Sociology 64 (1958): 152-58. 175 representative of the real world situation. Many regions are mixed rather than pure ideal types, e.g. rural or urban. For example, when the various cities form a discon­ tinuous conurbation enclosing large areas of agricultural land and important elements of rural population, urban and rural space coexist, the former being superimposed on the latter. On the other hand, Cloke200 argues that certain selected variables may be measured to ascertain whether regions incline towards the rural or urban pole. In this chapter the rural-urban distinction is made in terms of occupational structure, i.e. the share of agricultural employment in total labor force. There are two types of regions: Group A and Group B.201 Group A consists of regions, which have an extremely high proportion of agri­ cultural employment, and account for 10 percent of the total regions in the Community (77 regions). Group B con­ sists of regions, which have an extremely low proportion of agricultural employment, and account for 10 percent of the total regions in the Community (77 regions). I will com­ pare Group A with Group B in order to see whether the rela­

200 Paul J. Cloke, Key Settlements in Rural Areas (New York: Methuen, 1979), pp. 3-15.

201 The one case (Group A) contains regions whose share of agricultural employment is higher than 11 percent, while the other case (Group B) contains regions whose share of agricultural employment is lower than 4 per­ cent. The Community average in the share of agricul­ tural employment is 7 percent. Thus, with a 95 percent confidence, Group A and Group B are determined as two extreme cases in both ends. 176 tionship between integration, political and economic, and economic advantage is stronger in urban areas than in rural areas. Meanwhile, we may be missing the urban-rural dis­ tinction for single state regions, e.g. Luxembourg, Ireland and Denmark, which are regarded as one region, respective­ ly, because they have too small a population to be sub­ divided. For example, although the share of agricultural employment in Ireland is over 19 percent, there are few people employed in agriculture in Dublin, Ireland. How­ ever, because we are concerned with two extreme cases, i.e. areas with an extremely high share of agricultural employ­ ment and an extremely low share of agricultural employment, they are less likely to confound our findings in this study.

7.2 TESTING OF THE SECOND HYPOTHESIS

The independent variables measure economic and political integration. ECON_INT is an indicator of economic integra­ tion, as measured by the share of community trading in total trading. COMM is an indicator of political integra­ tion, as measured by inter-regional communications, and

OPIN is an indicator of political integration, as measured by peoples' attitudes toward integration. The dependent variables measuring economic advantage are per capita GDP

(PGDP), unemployment (UNEMP) and net migration (NMIG) 177

respectively. I want to see whether the whole community is wealthier by economic and political integration, and the

relationship between integration, economic and political, and economic advantage is stronger in urban areas than in

rural areas.

Tables 30, 31 and 32 summarize the relationship between

integration and all regions, between integration and

regions with an extremely high proportion of agricultural

employment, and between integration and regions with an

extremely low proportion of agricultural employment,

respectively.

Table 30

The Relationship between Integration and All Regions, (Lag = 1)

F R 2 D-W ECON _INT COMM OPIN

b beta b beta b beta

PGDP 32.95** 0.32 1.48 0.18* 0.20 0.16* 0.15 0.25* 0.25 (0.08) (0.09) (0.05)

UNEMP 16.18** 0.25 0.93 -0.25* • -0.10 -0.19* -0.09 -0.17* -0.08 (0.06) (0.05) (0.05)

NMIG 6.51 0.15 1.80 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.21 0.23 (0.08) (0.10) (0.15)

Note: * p < 0 .05; ** p < 0 .0001; one- tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis. 178

Table 31

The Relationship between Integration and Regions with an Extremely High Proportion of Agricultural Employment, (Lag = 1)

F R 2 D-W ECON _INT COMM OPIN

b beta b beta b beta

PGDP 15.04** 0.25 1.05 0.44* 0.61 -0.42* -0.47 -0.78* -0.40 (0.16) (0.22) (0.25)

UNEMP 14.62** 0.22 1.20 -0.50* ■-0.43 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.02 (0.27) (0.37) (0.42)

NMIG 3.79 0.13 1.41 0.13 0.22 0.01 0.02 0.50 0.31 (0.24) (0.19) (1.22)

Note: * p < 0 .05; ** p < 0 .0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis.

Table 32

The Relationship between Integration and Regions with an Extremely Low Proportion of Agricultural Employment, (Lag = 1)

F R 2 D-W ECON _INT COMM OPIN

b beta b beta b beta

PGDP 26.72** 0.53 1.02 0 .20* 0.15 0.79* 0.40 0.45* 0.32 (0.04) (0.12) (0.14)

UNEMP 12.32** 0.29 1.60 -0.25* -0.46 -0.08 -0.12 -0.08 -0.17 (0.07) (0.15) (0.06)

NMIG 8.03 0.25 1.93 0.59 0.57 0.09 0.06 0.57 0.52 (1.33) (0.31) (1.43)

Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001; one-tailed test. Note: D-W is Durbin-Watson statistic. Note: Estimated standard errors are put in parenthesis. 179

The more economically integrated the Community, the wealthier the Community. Economic integration has a posi­

tive relationship with per capita GDP (PGDP), and a neg­

ative relationship with unemployment (UNEMP) in urban and

rural areas. The increasing share of community trading is

likely to help rural economies, which tend to rely on the

trade in artisan goods, and agricultural products, e.g.

fruits, vegetables, wine, tobacco, and olive oil. Thus,

when rural areas are knitted into Community trading, eco­

nomic integration is likely to make rural areas wealthier.

On the other hand, urban areas, where tertiary activities

grow, attract the most high-skilled labor and capital.

Thus, the more economically integrated urban areas, they

are likely to be richer as economic core areas.

Integration, political and economic, has a stronger

relationship with per capita GDP than with unemployment.

Interregional mobility of capital and labour is likely to

affect per capita GDP more than unemployment, because per

capita GDP fluctuates as economic conditions change, while

unemployment does not fluctuate over a short period.

The more politically integrated the Community or urban

areas, the wealthier the Community as a whole or urban

areas. However, this is not the case for rural areas.

Political integration, as measured by inter-regional commu­

nications (COMM) and attitudinal integration (OPIN), has a positive relationship with per capita GDP (PGDP) and a neg­ ative relationship with unemployment (UNEMP) for all regions in the Community. Political integration has a positive relationship with per capita GDP 'PGDP) for regions with an extremely low proportion of agricultural employment, and has a negative relationship with per capita

GDP (PGDP) for regions with an extremely high proportion of agricultural employment. The more politically integrated rural areas, inhabitants in rural areas are likely to be attracted to urban areas, which have more environmental attractions with commercial and educational facilities.

Rural areas become depopulated and deprived of young and skilled workers, which makes a decline of the well-being in rural areas. Thus, as Clout202 argues, rural areas may be left with some financial inputs from tourists, second-home owners and retired people. On the other hand, the more politically integrated urban areas, urban areas with highly developed communications systems are likely to be richer, because inter-city links, e.g. the link between Paris and

Brussels, or between London and Paris, facilitate the flow of people and goods in favour of urban areas, which are economic core areas.

202 Hugh D. Clout, "Rural Space," Regional Development in Western Europe, ed. Hugh D. Clout (London; David Ful­ ton, 1987), pp. 39-64. 181

A- functional form for the relationship between integra­ tion, economic and political and economic advantage is based upon linear regression. Durbin-Watson statistics indicate that we do not reject the null hypothesis of no- first-order autocorrelation. The lower and upper values for D-W statistic are 0.8 and 1.9, respectively.

7.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

This chapter is concerned with whether the relationship between integration, political and economic, and economic advantage is stronger in urban areas than in rural areas.

I will summarize how economic and political integration affect urban and rural areas.

Unlike views of those, e.g. Holland, Giersch, Bye, who argue that economic integration brings about a decline in the well-being of rural areas, the more economically inte­ grated, the richer the Community as a whole, urban and rural areas. It appears that economic integration is good for each of the parts as well as for the whole. Economic integration has a positive relationship with per capita GDP

(PGDP), and has a negative relationship with unemployment

(UNEMP) for all regions, urban areas, and rural areas, respectively. As rural areas are more knitted into Commu­ nity trading, rural areas are likely to benefit from eco­ nomic integration, because they can export more artisan 182 goods and agricultural products into the Community. Thus,

economic integration is likely to be beneficial to rural

economies. On the other hand, the more economically inte­

grated urban areas, the more tertiary as well as manufac­

turing employment in urban areas, because interregional

mobility of labor and capital will attract skilled labor

and capital to urban areas. Thus, the more economically

integrated urban areas, the wealthier urban areas.

Like views of those, e.g. Parker, Clout, who argue that

political integration makes urban areas richer and rural

areas poorer, political integration seems to have different

effects on urban and rural areas. The more politically

integrated the Community and urban areas, the richer the

Community as a whole and urban areas. However, this is not

the case for rural areas. As Keohane and Nye argue, polit­

ical integration which seems to be good for the whole is

less likely to be good for each of the parts. Political

integration, as measured by inter-regional communications

and attitudinal integration, has a positive relationship

with per capita GDP (PGDP), and has a negative relationship

with unemployment (UNEMP) for all regions. Political

integration has a positive relationship with per capita GDP

(PGDP) in urban areas. However, political integration has a

negative relationship with per capita GDP (PGDP) in rural

areas. The more politically integrated (i.e. the more 183

interregional communications), the more likely it is that

inhabitants in rural areas are attracted to urban areas, which have more environmental attractions with commercial

and educational facilities. Rural areas become depopulated

and deprived of young and skilled workers, which brings

about a decline of the well-being of rural areas.203 Mean­ while, the more politically integrated urban areas, urban

areas with developed communications and transport systems

become more prosperous. Inter-city links in communications

and transport systems help the flow of people and goods in

favour of urban areas, where more skilled workers and capi­

tal are attracted.

It was expected that integration, economic and politi­

cal, is less likely to benefit rural areas in terms of

migration.204 They experience the depopulation because

more people emigrate to urban centres. They also experience

the ageing population because most emigrants are young

workers. However, the finding shows that there is no sta­

tistically significant relationship between integration and

migration for urban and rural areas. It is argued that it

is impossible to obtain statistically significant results

about migration because there are many determinants of

203 Hugh D. Clout, Regional Development in Western Europe (London: David Fulton, 1987).

204 Francesco Vito, "Problems of the Underdeveloped Regions of Italy," Backward Areas in Advanced Countries, ed. E.A.G. Robinson (London: Macmillan, 1969). 184 migration, e.g. migrant's characteristics (age, income, education, length of residence) and place attributes (ori­ gin, destination, interaction, regional-competitive charac­ teristics), and so many variables are controlled to see a relationship between integration and migration.205 Mean­ while, it seems that the pattern of urban-rural migration

is also affected by other determinants, e.g. land rent, taxes, long-distance commuting, cost of city living, etc.

In conclusion, as Keohane and Nye argue, integration is

less likely to benefit all regions. On the one hand, as

Peschel206 argues, economic integration benefits all

regions, even if some benefit more than others. That is,

economic integration is beneficial and desirable to urban

and rural economies. On the other hand, as Parker and

Clout207 argue, political integration which is beneficial

for urban areas is not the same case for rural areas.

205 Takatoshi Tabuchi, "Time-series Modeling of Gross Migration and Dynamic Equilibrium," Journal of Regional Science 25 (1985): 65-83.

206 Karin Peschel, The Effects of European Integration on Regional Development - Some Lessons from the Past (Kiel, 1989).

207 Geoffrey Parker, The Logic of Unity (London: Longman, 1975). Hugh D. Clout, Regional Development in Western Europe (London: David Fulton, 1987). CHAPTER VIII

CONCLUSION

8.1 INTRODUCTION

It is half a century ago that new thinking about a United

Europe began to draw attention from practitioners and political scientists. Since then, many efforts for inte­ gration were made in Europe, starting with the establish­ ment of the ECSC.

Europeans initially intended to create the Community in their continent in order to maintain permanent peace and security, after they experienced two world wars in Europe.

Thus, when the ECSC was established in 1951, one of its goals was to tie Germany with the rest of the Community. On the other hand, the Common Market was more concerned with economic matters, especially agricultural policy in the

Community, although political integration was an ultimate goal for the Community.208 The six-member Community has

208 Leon N. Lindberg argued that the fundamental motivation was political, although the stated goal of the EEC was the creation of a customs union and the achievement of a significant measure of integration. It is, in the words of the Treaty, to establish "an ever closer union among the European peoples." (See the Preamble of the Treaty in Appendix A . ) He also suggested that the Treaty of Rome had a wide potential for political inte­ gration because it provided the setting up of a complex

- 185 - 186 been enlarged, including Britain, Denmark and Ireland in

1973, Greece in 1981, and Spain and Portugal in 1983.

There existed regional imbalances in the Community, even before the enlargement of the Community. However, diver­ gence within regions became more marked as the Community adopted member states with a lower standard of living com­ pared with the Community average. Disadvantaged regions seem to have lower per capita GDP, lower per worker GDP, high unemployment rate, high emigration rate, and a high proportion of agricultural employment.

I examined in the first hypothesis whether there was a relationship between regional disadvantage and integration within the Community. Also, I examined in the second hypothesis whether there was a relationship between inte­ gration and disadvantge of rural areas.

In this chapter I will summarize findings, and discuss the limitations of the methodology and data. I will also discuss future research and policy implications drawn from this study.

central decision-making machinery, which, though for­ mally dependent upon the will of the Member States, did provide for an independent source of initiative and impulsion toward the Treaty's goal. See Leon N. Lind­ berg, The Political Dynamics of European Economic Inte­ gration (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963); Robert J. Shepherd, Public Opinion and European Inte­ gration (Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1975), p. 1. He also argued that the preamble to the Treaty of Rome referred to the eventual political unification. 187

8.2 SUMMARY AND REVIEW OF FINDINGS

This thesis consisted of seven chapters: (1) Theoretical

Underpinnings of Integration and Regional Disadvantage

(Chapter I); (2) Integration Efforts in the European Commu­ nity (Chapter II); (3) Regional Disadvantage in the Europe­ an Community (Chapter III); (4) Two Case Studies: The Rela­ tionship between Regional Disadvantage and Integration in the Mezzogiorno and Northern Ireland (Chapter IV); (5) An

Introductory Discussion for An Empirical Analysis (Chapter

V); and (6) The First Hypothesis: The Relationship between

Regional Disadvantage and Integration (Chapter VI); (7) The

Second Hypothesis: The Relationship between Integration and Economic Advantage in Urban and Rural Areas (Chapter

VII) .

Chapter I provided theoretical underpinnings of integra­ tion and regional disadvantage. Integration theory covers functionalism, neofunctionalism and federalism. The feder­ alists and neofunctionalists envisaged supranational insti­ tutions, while the functionalists were concerned with a feeling of mutual affection, identity, and loyalty. The latter was concerned with a socio-psychological community alongside a political and economic community. Meanwhile, the functionalists and neofunctionalists focused on econom­ ic, social and technological forces in the integration pro­ cess, and viewed that they could bring about political 188 change incrementally.209 In terms of the definition of integration, integration is viewed as either a process or an end product. However, there was divergence among those who viewed integration as a process. The main difference for divergence was over the need for setting up suprana­ tional institutions in the integration process.

In terms of the measurement of integration, those who followed the cybernetic approach210 argued that transaction and attitudinal changes would measure integration, while those who followed neofunctionalism argued that integration would be measured on a multi-dimensional level, including political, economic and social integration.

We examined the theory of regional imbalance. While the neoclassical theory is concerned with the aspects of the supply of factors of production, the export-base theory is concerned with the aspects of demand of factors of produc­ tion. Unlike the regional imbalance theories developed in economics, theories developed in political science, geogra­ phy, and sociology were concerned with locational aspects.

The growth pole theory is concerned with the spread

209 For a discussion, see Charles Pentland, International Theory and European Integration (Faber and Faber, 1973), p. 23.

210 Karl W. Deutsch was concerned with the 'sense of commu­ nity', which was measured by means of mutual trans­ action. He argued that the populations should share feelings of 'mutual relevance' and 'mutual responsive­ ness'. See Karl W. Deutsch, The Analysis of Interna­ tional Relations (Prentice-Hall, 1968), pp. 191-202. 189

effects, while the center-periphery theory is concerned with the backwash effects.

In Chapter II we examined the historical background of

integration efforts in the European Communityj (1) how the

Community was formed; (2) what the main barriers were for

the enlargement of the Community; and (3) whether efforts

for political integration existed. The ECSC was the first'

effective attempt for economic integration, and was a 'Lit­

tle European Approach', because only six states joined. In

1957 the Common Market and Euratom were established by the

Treaty of Rome. Meanwhile, the Hague summit provided a

springboard for the Community to adopt new member states,

which resulted in the first and second enlargement of the

Community. The Community began to be concerned about how

divergence between regions would affect the progress of

integration. In the 1972 Paris summit the Community pro­

vided measures for 'balanced growth' and 'harmonious devel­

opment' for all regions within the Community. Regional

Development Fund was formally instituted in the 1974 Paris

summit.

In Chapter III we examined: (1) whether imbalances

between regions in the Community have widened or narrowed;

(2) how regional disadvantage is measured; and (3) how a

common regional policy has developed. 190

Regions in this study were defined based upon adminis­

trative units. That is, considering population and/or ter­

ritory, regions grouped together into some administrative units. There were rich and poor regions, developed and

less developed regions, or favoured and less favoured

regions in the Community. Those regions which were poor,

less developed, less favoured were called disadvantaged

regions in this study.

Regional GDP per capita, GDP per worker, unemployment

rate, the proportion of agricultural employment, and net

migration were examined to see the existence of regional

disadvantage and the coefficient of variation of each indi­

cator were used to see whether regional imbalances have

worsened during the period 1970-1981. Meanwhile, there

were definitely two types of disadvantaged regions: those

with declining industries, and those with predominantly

agricultural employment.

Regional policy was a mixture of the economic, politi­

cal, and social. It was also a structural policy to improve

structures in disadvantaged regions. Regional policy was

needed because the removal of regional disadvantage was a

necessary condition for integration. It was not until 1974

that a common regional policy was instituted because the

enlargement of the Community adopted many regions with a

lower level of development compared with the Community 191 average, which widened the gap between developed and less developed regions.

In Chapter IV case studies were conducted to examine a relationship between regional disadvantage and integration in the Mezzogiorno and Northern Ireland. The two regions were selected for case studies because they were two of the most disadvantaged regions in the Community. That is, they were part of priority regions to get assistance in the integration process.

The Center-Periphery theory of Myrdal and Hirschman illuminated a relation between regional disadvantage and integration. When they were concerned with regional imba­ lance or disadvantage, it was primarily related to economic disadvantage. In the Mezzogiorno, regional disadvantage was based upon economic factors, while in Northern Ireland, regional disadvantage was based upon ethnic (Anglo-Irish),

religious (Catholic-Protestant) division, alongside econom­

ic divergence.

It seemed that regional disadvantage was negatively

associated with integration. The Mezzogiorno and Northern

Ireland became more disadvantaged in 1979 than in 1970, and

they became less integrated in 1979.

In the Mezzogiorno, economic divergence tended to bring

about grass-roots discontent, which would cause internal

tension and political strain, which would affect integra­ 192 tion. The centrifugal forces seemed to gather around the political parties which looked for separatism or secession.

In Northern Ireland, although regional disadvantage was negatively associated with integration, opposition to Euro­ pean integration was in part due to political differences

induced by ethnic conflict, e.g. anti-power sharing, or sectarian differences, e.g. Protestants, or ethnic divi­

sion, e.g. loyalists who viewed integration as a threat to

British sovereignty.

In Chapters VI and VII two hypotheses were tested.

Hypothesis 1: The greater its economic disadvantage, the

less economically and politically integrated the region.

Hypothesis 2: The positive relationship between integra­

tion, economic and political, and economic advantage is

stronger in urban areas than in rural areas.

The first hypothesis is concerned with a relationship

between regional disadvantage and integration, while the

second hypothesis is concerned with a relationship between

integration and economic advantage in urban and rural

areas.

In order to see a relationship between regional disad­

vantage and integration, I used multivariate statistical

analysis. I chose shorter time-lags between regional dis­

advantage and integration than longer ones because economic

welfare is the most salient issue in less developed areas,

and has a great influence on political decision during a 193 short period. Both theoretical and methodological consider­ ations seemed to point to the superiority of the one-year lag.

In the testing of the first hypothesis, regional disad­ vantage was examined relative to the state, the most fav­ oured region within the state, and the Community as a whole. On the one hand, regional disadvantage within the state is likely to be measured when each region is compared with the national average. However, it appeared that regional disadvantage in the United Kingdom was better measured when each region was compared with South-East, while regional disadvantage in Italy was better measured when it was compared with Lombardia. Thus, in terms of regional disadvantage within the state, two reference groups were used: the state and the most favoured regions within the state. On the other hand, regional disadvantage within the Community was measured when each region was com­ pared with the Community average.

In the testing of the second hypothesis, I compared two

types of regions over the effects of integration on

regions. The one type of region is those which have an

extremely high proportion of agricultural employment and

the other type of region is those which have an extremely

low proportion of agricultural employment. 194

I used indices of economic and political integration for the purpose of simplicity in reporting how economically and politically integrated the region becomes. Also, a rela­

tionship between regional disadvantage and integration was

not changed when indices of integration were used. For

indices of economic integration (ECON_INT), EXPORT and

IMPORT are standardized across the Community, and then the

standardized scores for EXPORT and IMPORT are added, and

then divided by two for each region. In order to measure

political integration, indices of communication (COMM) and

opinion (OPIN) measures are used. COMM is an indicator of

political integration, as measured by inter-regional commu­

nications, while OPIN is an indicator of political integra­

tion, as measured by peoples’ attitudes toward integration.

In conclusion, the results of case studies and findings

of multivariate statistical analysis are summarized as fol­

lows .

First, economic disadvantage is more likely to have an

adverse effect on economic and political integration within

the Community.

Second, disadvantaged regions which are resentful of a

decline of their standards of living relative to favoured

regions are less likely to be integrated into the Communi­

ty. 195

Third, the reference group against which disadvantaged regions keenly felt deprived can be either the most fav­ oured region within the state, e.g. the South-East in the

United Kingdom, the Lombardia in Italy, or the national average, or the Community average.

Fourth, when ethnic or cultural characteristics are strongly felt in disadvantaged regions, economic disadvan­ tage tends to be associated with regionalism or national­ ism, e.g. Northern Ireland, the Mezzogiorno.

Fifth, regionalism tends to have the disintegrative nature within the state, however, it inclines toward fav­ ouring integration within the Community. For example, many people in Northern Ireland who experience a decline of well-being Still favour integration within the Community.

Sixth, the more economically integrated the urban and

rural areas, the wealthier they are. However, the more politically integrated the urban and rural areas, the wealthier urban areas, and the poorer rural areas. Highly

developed communications and transport systems tend to help

urban areas attract highly skilled labor.

8.3 LIMITATIONS OF METHODOLOGY AND DATA

It seems that there are some limitations inherent in multi­

variate statistical analysis. Limitations are due to the

nature of statistical analysis. While statistical analysis 196 is very useful because it can show a relationship between the variables in a simple and proper form, all other fac­ tors except the independent and dependent variables are assumed to be constant, which is the assumption of 'ceteris paribus'. Those factors which are assumed to be constant may be changed over time, and affect a relationship between the independent and dependent variables in the model. How­ ever, the models based upon regression analysis will not show the impacts of 'all other factors' on the dependent variables.

There are some disadvantages of cross-sectional studies.

The problem of cross-sectional studies stems from the stat­

ic nature of cross-sectional studies. Cross-sectional results may be sensitive to the choice of the time period.

For example, the cross-sectional pictures for the 1970s and the 1980s may not appear similar. Thus, they may not lead

to generalizations of the dynamics of the relations.

There are also pros and cons about the significance

test. Critics argue that it is simply impossible to meet

all of the assumptions (e.g. normal distribution, homogene­

ity of variance) required of the tests of significance. On

the other hand, defenders argue that the significance test

is able to provide evidence, if not proof, for hypotheses

and theories. Boneau showed that when the sample sizes

reach 25 or 30, one can ignore the effects of violations of 197 assumptions except extremes. The significance test seems

to be useful in that it can show that the results of a

study are not just chance fluctuation.

There are also limitations for the data used in this

thesis. There was a lack of regional data available in the

Community. It was not until the 1970s that the Community was concerned with divergence between regions, and regional

data has been collected by the Eurostat since 1970. Even when regional data were collected, there was another prob­

lem. One problem was how to define regions. There were

three levels of territorial units suggested by the Euros­

tat: Level I regions, Level II regions, and Level III

regions. The definition of regions in this thesis was

related to Level I regions of territorial units suggested

by the Eurostat. Luxembourg, Ireland and Denmark are

regarded as one region, respectively because they have too

small a populationto be sub-divided. In these single state

regions there exist developed and less developed regions,

and urban and rural areas, which may confound findings of

multivariate statistical analysis.

The other problem was how to compare regions, based upon

indicators of regional disadvantage. Because member states

were reluctant to share regional data with each other, we

did not have a systematic and coherent regional data base

in the Community. This problem got worse when we were con­ 198 cerned with regional per capita GDP because different mone­ tary units were used and exchange rates kept changing.

8.4 FUTURE RESEARCH

An empirical analysis in this thesis examined a relation­ ship between integration and regional disadvantage over the period 1970-1981, based upon cross-sectional studies. We need to examine in future research time-series analysis.

Regional data has been collected since 1970. For time- series analysis, data for longer periods are needed in order to strengthen the time-series estimates. Even if we could get annual data from the period 1970-1990, a sample of this size, i.e. 20 years, is not "large.” However, when time-series analysis is conducted along with cross- sectional studies, it is comparable to the samples used in cross-sectional studies. There are also advantages of time-series analysis. Time-series analysis deals with the intertemporal dynamics. It can help identify explicit long­ itudinal phenomena and thereby show the relational patterns from being static to having a more continuous and dynamic focus. When monthly or quarterly data is used, seasonality can be identified, which can show cyclical aspects of the relational patterns.

We need to examine in future research whether a rela­ tionship between regional disadvantage and integration will 199 be also supported beyond the year 1981. It seems that this research is needed in light of the inner and outer environ­ ment of the Community after the year 1981. In terms of inner environment of the Community, the number of disadvan­ taged regions has increased since the adoption of Spain and

Portugal. In terms of outer environment of the Community, many countries, e.g. Turkey, Sweden, Austria, Switzerland,

Cyprus, Malta, Hungary, Poland, and Czechoslovakia, etc. intend to join the Community. However, many regions in those countries have a lower level of development compared with the Community average.311 Thus, it is likely that divergence between regions will not be narrowed in the Com­ munity. Meanwhile, the Community intends to achieve a high­ er level of economic and political integration. Future research should examine whether divergence between regions is likely to impede a higher level of economic and politi­ cal integration in the 1980s and 1990s.

We need to devise other ways of making urban-rural dichotomy. The share of agricultural employment was used in this study. However, it seems that the urban-rural dichotomy can be based upon population-density or commuting-out pattern or in-out migration balance, etc,

Meanwhile, urbanization can be based upon population densi-

311 For example, the Turkish economy is at a lower level of development than the Community average and prone to growing pains such as treble-digit inflation. See John Pinder, European Community: The Building of a Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 51. 200 ty or commuting-out pattern, while rurality can be based upon occupational structure or population aged over 65.

We also need to examine in future research how rural areas are related to the periphery in the Community. It is not likely that all rural areas are the periphery in the

Community. Thus, we need to examine conditions under which rural areas fall into the periphery, and whether any exploitative relations exist between urban and rural areas.

We need to examine in future research whether a Common

Regional Policy helps reduce regional imbalances within the

Community. A Common Regional Policy has been neglected in the past because the Common Agricultural Policy accounted for a high proportion of the Community budget, and member states were reluctant to share regional policies, which led to incoherent regional policy at the Community level.

Meanwhile, a Common Regional Policy did not always help disadvantaged regions, which were the most in need. Many regions with their living standards above the Community average were also supported by a Common Regional Policy.

Thus, we need to examine in future research how a Common

Regional Policy should be improved to reduce divergence between regions.

We need to examine in future research how economic, social and political integration are related to one another. I was concerned with economic and political inte­ 201 gration. Meanwhile, the functionalists were concerned with a socio-psychological community along with an economic and political community. We need to examine whether a socio- psychological community exists in the European Community, and whether a socio-psychological community is a precondi­ tion for an economic and political community or vice versa.

8.5 POLICY IMPLICATIONS

In this section I will discuss some problems in Common

Regional Policy. There is a caveat for discussing policy

implication: This study is not designed to deal with poli­ cy analysis.

The preamble to the Treaty of Rome212 states that member states are "anxious to strengthen the unity of their econo­ mies and to ensure their harmonious development by reducing

the differences existing between the various regions and by mitigating the backwardness of the less-favoured regions."

Despite the commitment in the Treaty of Rome, regional pol­

icy was overshadowed by the other activities, e.g. agricul­

tural policy, during the period 1958-1972. The 1972 Paris

Summit is a turning point in Community Regional Policy

(CRP). The heads of state agreed that "a high priority

should be given to the aim of correcting .... the struc­

tural and regional imbalances which might affect the reali­

212 Refer to the preamble to the Treaty of Rome in Appendix A. 202 zation of economic and monetary union." As a direct result of the Paris Summit, the European Regional Development Fund

(ERDF) emerged in 1975.

- The objectives of Community Regional Policy are to

reduce existing regional problems, and to prevent new

regional imbalances arising from the change in world eco­ nomic structures or from measures adopted by the Community within the framwork of its own policies. The Commission of

the European Communities states that "it is an illusion to hope for the covergence of Member States' economies so long

as regional problems continue to weigh so heavily on cer­

tain economies, and the strenthening of Community Regional

Policy is not only desirable, but it is also one of the

conditions of continuing European economic integration.213

Community Regional Policy has three distinct components:

(1) the ERDF, (2) the activities of other Community insti­

tutions and funds, i.e. the ECSC, the EIB, the ESF, the

Guidance Section of the EAGGF, (3) the coordination of the

regional policies of member states, the ERDF, and the

activities of other institutions and funds. The ERDF is

the most important element of Community Regional Policy

among the three. The ERDF is intended to make grants to

industrial, handicraft and service projects, and to infra­

structure investments, including infrastructure in certain

213 Commission of the European Communities, Guidelines for Community Regional Policy (Brussels, 1977). 203 designated less-favoured farming areas.

The most significant failing of the ERDF has been the paucity of resources allocated to it. The share of the

ERDF expenditures in total Community budget is 4.8 percent

in 1975/ and 7.3 percent in 1981. 214 The Community budget

is dominated by the Common Agricultural Policy/ and in par­

ticular by the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF. Commission­

er George Thompson argues that "the blunt truth about the

Community farm policy is that it is anti-regional."215 The

Guarantee Section of the EAGGF may not have operated in the

best interests of regional policy. The richer agricultural

areas seem to have benefited most from the operations of

the Common Agricultural Policy. For example, it was esti­

mated that in 1975 per capita spending on farm price sup­

port by the Community amounted to 56.4 European Units of

Account (EUA) in Denmark, 33.9 EUA in the Netherlands, 20.4

EUA in France, and 14.5 EUA in Italy.216

The other failing of the ERDF is that most of the ERDF

expenditures (about 87 percent) are allocated according to

national shares. It represents an unnecessary restriction

on the activities of Community Regional Policy, which is

intended to direct the Fund expenditures to desired loca-

214 Commision of the European Communities, ERDF in Figures, 1975-1988 (Brussels, 1989).

The Times, January 6, 1977.

The Times, January 6, 1977. 204 tions, i.e. regions which are the most in need, and to react quickly to changing regional problems.

Thus, several changes are needed so that Common Regional

Policy is better able to help less favoured regions. The share of the ERDF expenditures in total Community budget needs to increase. It appears that the proportion of appropriation for regional policy has been increasing in the Community budget. The share of the ERDF in the total community budget has increased from 4.8 percent in 1975 to

8.1 percent in 1988.217 However, because economic diver­ gence between regions has widened in the Community, more

resources are needed to help disadvantaged regions. Mean­ while, it has to be pointed out that the benefits which

Common Regional Policy produces are not confined either to

the assisted areas themselves or the member state of which

they are part, but encompass the whole Community.218

The share of the ERDF expenditures in total Community

budget will be likely to increase at the expense of the

Common Agricultural Policy, which accounts for about 70

percent of the Community budget. The CAP expenditures ben­

efit northern agricultural producers, e.g. Denmark, the

Netherlands, France, for whose products high prices are

217 Commission of the European Communities, ERDF in Fig­ ures, 1975-1988 (Brussels, 1989).

218 Harvey W. Armstrong, "The Reform of the European Commu­ nity Regional Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies 23 (1985); 319-43. 205 maintained, rather than southern producers. Thus, the

EAGGF appears to operate regressively, because the method

of supporting incomes of farmers via the prices of farm products concentrates assistance on the large producers in

favoured regions.219

Better ways to distribute the Fund expenditures and to

designate assisted areas should be sought. The quota sec­

tion of the ERDF (the indicative range section after 1985)

accounts for most of the Fund expenditures, which are allo­

cated according to national shares. Although the severity

of the regional problems faced by member states is reflect­

ed, the quota section tends to restrict unnecessarily the

activities of Community Regional Policy. Regional problems

should be assessed by objective standards across the Commu­

nity, e.g. regional per capita GDP, unemployment rate,

out-migration. For example, some member states, e.g. Ita­

ly, Ireland, Greece, the United Kingdom, have the majority

of the most depressed areas of the Community. On the other

hand, there seems to be a mismatch between the regional

problems faced by these states, and the ability of these

states to make available public funds for their own region­

al policy efforts.220 The ERDF expenditures should go to

219 Geoffrey Denton, "Regional Divergence and Policy in the Community, with Special Reference to Enlargement," Eco­ nomic Divergence in the European Community, eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981), p. 144.

220 Harvey W. Armstrong, "The Reform of the European Commu- 206 the areas which are the most in need.

nity Regional Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies 23 (1985): 319-43. Appendix A

PREAMBLE, AND ARTICLES 2, 92 AND 113 OF THE

TREATY OF ROME

Excerpts from the English translation of the Treaty of

Rome, made in 1958.221

HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS, THE PRESIDENT OF

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE PRESIDENT OF THE

FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, HER

ROYAL HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUCHESS OF LUXEMBOURG, HER MAJESTY

THE QUEEN OF THE NETHERLANDS,

DETERMINED to establish the foundations of an ever clos­ er union among the European peoples,

DECIDED to ensure the economic and social progress of their countries by common action in eliminating the barri­ ers which divide Europe,

DIRECTING their efforts to the essential purpose of con­ stantly improving the living and working conditions of their peoples,

221 The European Communities, Treaty Establishing the Euro­ pean Economic Community and Connected Documents (Brus­ sels, 1958).

- 207 - 208

RECOGNISING that the removal of existing obstacles calls for concerted action in order to guarantee a steady expan­ sion, a balanced trade and fair competition,

ANXIOUS to strengthen the unity of their economies and to ensure their harmonious development by reducing the dif­ ferences existing between the various regions and by miti­ gating the backwardness of the less favoured regions,

DESIROUS of contributing by means of a common commercial policy to the progressive abolition of restrictions on

international trade,

INTENDING to confirm the solidarity which binds Europe and overseas countries, and desiring to ensure the develop­ ment of their prosperity in accordance with the principles

of the Charter of the United Nations,

RESOLVED to strengthen the safeguards of peace and lib­

erty by establishing this combination of resources and

calling upon the other peoples of Europe who share their

ideal to join in their efforts,

HAVE DECIDED to create a European Economic Community and

to this end have designated as their plenipotentiaries:

HIS MAJESTY THE KING OP THE BELGIANS:

Mr. Paul-Henri Spaak, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Baron J.

Ch. Snoy et d'Oppuers, Secretary-General of the Ministry of

Economic Affairs, Head of the Belgian delegation to the

intergovernmental Conference; 209

THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY:

Dr. Konrad Adenauer, Federal Chancellor, Professor Dr. Wal­ ter Hallstein, State Secretary of the Federal Foreign

Office;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC:

Mr. Christian Pineau, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Mau­

rice Faure, Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC:

Mr. Antonio Segni, President of the Council of Ministers,

Professor Gaetano Martino, Minister of Foreign Affairs;

HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUCHESS OF LUXEMBOURG:

Mr. Joseph Bech, Prime Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr.

Lambert Schaus, Ambassador, Head of the Luxembourg delega­

tion to the Intergovernmental Conference;

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE NETHERLANDS:

Mr. Joseph Luns, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr. J. Lin-

thorst Homan, Head of the Netherlands delegation to the

Intergovernmental Conference;

WHO, having exchanged their full powers, found in good

and due form, HAVE AGREED as follows: ARTICLE 2

It shall be the aim of the Community, by establishing a

Common Market and progressively approximating the economic policies of Member States, to promote throughout the Commu­ nity a harmonious development of economic activities, a continuous and balanced expansion, an increased stability, an accelerated raising of the standard of living and closer relations between its Member States. 211

ARTICLE 92

1. Except where otherwise provided for in this Treaty, any aid, granted by a Member State or granted by means of State resources, in any manner whatsoever, which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain enterprises or certain productions shall, to the extent to which it adversely affects trade between Member States, be deemed to be incompatible with the Common Market.

2. The following shall be deemed to be compatible with Com­ mon Market:

(a) aids of a social character granted to individual consumers, provided that such aids are granted without any discrimination based upon the origin of the products con­ cerned;

(b) aids intended to remedy damage caused by natural calamities or other extraordinary events; or

(c) aids granted to the economy of certain regions of the Federal Republic of Germany affected by the division of

Germany, to the extent that such aids are necessary in order to compensate for the economic disadvantages caused by such division.

3. The following may be deemed to be compatible with the

Common Market: 212

(a) aids intended to promote the economic development of regions where the standards of living is abnormally low or where there exists serious under-employment;

(b) aids intended to promote the execution of important projects of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance of the economy of a Member State;

(c) aids intended to facilitate the development of cer­ tain activities or of certain economic regions, provided that such aids do not change trading conditions to such a degree as would be contrary to the Common interest. Any aids to shipbuilding existing on 1 January 1957 shall, to the extent that such aids merely offset the absence of cus­ toms protection, be progressively reduced under the same conditions as apply to the abolition of customs duties, subject to the provisions of this Treaty relating to the common commercial policy in regard to third countries; and

(d) such other categories of aids as may be specified by decision of the Council acting by means of a qualified majority vote on a proposal of the Commission. 213

ARTICLE 113

1. After the expiry of the transitional period, the common

commercial policy shall be based on uniform principles, particularly in regard to tariff amendments, the conclusion or tariff or trade agreements, the alignment of measures of

liberalisation, export policy and protective commercial measures including measures to be taken in cases of dumping

or subsidies.

2. The Commission shall submit proposals to the Council for

the putting into effect of this common commercial policy.

3. Where agreements with third countries require to be

negotiated, the Commission shall make recommendations to

the Council, which will authorise the Commission to open

the necessary negotiations.

The Commission shall conduct these negotiations in con­

sultation with a special Committee appointed by the Council

to assist the Commission in this task and within the frame­

work of such directives as the Council may issue to it.

4. The Council shall, when exercising the powers conferred

upon it by this Article, act by means of a qualified major­

ity vote. Appendix B

PREAMBLE, ARTICLES 1, 2, 3, AND TITLE V OF THE

SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT

Excerpts from the Single European Act.*22

HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS, HER MAJESTY THE

QUEEN OF DENMARK, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPBULIC OF

GERMANY, THE PRESIDENT OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, HIS

MAJESTY THE KING OF SPAIN, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH

REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, THE PRESIDENT OF THE

ITALIAN REPUBLIC, HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUKE OF

LUXEMBOURG, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE NETHERLANDS, THE

PRESIDENT OF THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN

IRELAND,

MOVED by the will to continue the work undertaken on the basis of the Treaties establishing the European Communities and to transform relations as a whole among their States into a European Union, in accordance with the Solemn Decla-

222 The European Communities, Treaties Establishing the European Communities (ECSC, EEC, EAEC): Single European Act and Other Basic Instruments (Brussels, 1987).

- 214 - 215 ration of Stuttgart of 19 June 1983,

RESOLVED to implement this European Union on the basis, firstly, of the Communities operating in accordance with their own rules and, secondly, of European Cooperation among the Signatory States in the sphere of foreign policy and to invest this union with the necessary means of action,

DETERMINED to work together to promote democracy on the basis of the fundamental rights recognized in the constitu­ tions and laws of the Member States, in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom and the European Social Charter, notably freedom, equality and social justice,

CONVINCED that the European idea, the results achieved in the fields of economic integration and political cooper­ ation, and the need for new developments correspond to the wishes of the democratic peoples of Europe, for whom the

European Parliament, elected by universal suffrage, is an indispensable means of expression,

AWARE of the responsibility incumbent upon Europe to aim at speaking ever increasingly with one voice and to act with consistency and solidarity in order more effectively to protect its common interests and independence, in par­ ticular to display the principles of democracy and compli­ ance with the law and with human rights to which they are 216 attached, so that together they may make their own contri­ bution to the preservation of international peace and

security in accordance with the undertaking entered into by

them within the framework of the United Nations Charter,

DETERMINED to improve the economic and social situation

by extending policies and pursuing new objectives, and to

ensure a smoother functioning of the Communities by

enabling the institutions to exercise their powers under

conditions most in keeping with Community interests,

WHEREAS at their Conference in Paris from 19 to 21 Octo­

ber 1972 the Heads of State or of Government approved the

objective of the progressive realization of Economic and

Monetary Union,

HAVING REGARDED to the Annex to the conclusions of the

Presidency of the European Council in Bremen on 6 and 7

July 1978 and the Resolution of the European Council in

Brussels on 5 December 1978 on the introduction of the

European Monetary System (EMS) and related questions, and

noting that in accordance with that Resolution, the Commu­

nity and the Central Banks of the Member States have taken

a number of measures intended to implement monetary cooper­

ation,

HAVE DECIDED to adopt this Act and to this end have des­

ignated as their plenipotentiaries:

HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS: 217

Mr Leo TINDEMANS, Minister for External Relations;

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF DENMARK:

Mr Uffe ELLEMANN-JENSEN, Minister for Foreign Affairs;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY:

Mr Hans-Dietrich GENSCHER, Federal Minister for Foreign

Affairs;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC:

Mr Karolos PAPOULIAS, Minister for Foreign Affairs;

HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF SPAIN:

Mr Francisco FERNANDEZ ORDONEZ, Minister for Foreign

Affairs;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC:

Mr Roland DUMAS, Minister for External Relations;

THE PRESIDENT OF IRELAND:

Mr Peter BARRY, T D, Minister for Foreign Affairs;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC:

Mr Giulio ANDREOTTI, Minister for Foreign Affairs;

HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUKE OF LUXEMBOURG:

Mr Robert GOEBBELS, State Secretary, Minister for For­

eign Affairs;

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE NETHERLANDS:

Mr Hans VAN DEN BROEK, Minister for Foreign Affairs;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC:

Mr Pedro PIRES DE MIRANDA, Minister for Foreign Affairs; 218

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT

BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND:

Mrs Lynda CHALKER, Minister of State for Foreign and

Commonwealth Affairs;

WHO, having exchanged their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed as follows. 219

ARTICLE 1

The European Communities and European Political Coopera­ tion shall have as their objective to contribute together to making concrete progress towards European unity.

The European Communities shall be founded on the Treat­ ies establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, the

European Economic Community, the European Atomic Energy

Community and on the subsequent Treaties and Acts modifying or supplementing them.

Political Cooperation shall be governed by Title III.

The provisions of that Title shall confirm and supplement the procedures agreed in the reports of Luxembourg (1970),

Copenhagen (1973), London (1981), the Solemn Declaration on

European Union (1983) and the practices gradually estab­ lished among the Member States. 220

ARTICLE 2

The European Council shall bring together the Heads of

State or of Government of the Member States and the Presi­ dent of the Commission of the European Communities. They shall be assisted by the Ministers for Foreign Affairs and by a Member of the Commission.

The European Council shall meet at least twice a year.

ARTICLE 3

1. The institutions of the European Communities, henceforth designated as referred to hereafter, shall exercise their powers and jurisdiction under the conditions and for the purpose provided for by the Treaties establishing the Com­ munities and by the subsequent Treaties and Acts modifying

or supplementing them and by the provisions of Title II.

2. The institutions and bodies responsible for European

Cooperation shall exercise their powers and jurisdiction

under the conditions and for the purposes laid down in

Title III and in the documents referred to in the third

paragraph of Article 1. 221

TITLE V

Economic and Social Cohesion

Article 130a

In order to promote its overall harmonious development, the Community shall develop and pursue its actions leading to the strengthening of its economic and social cohesion.

In particular the Community shall aim at reducing dis­ parities between the various regions and the backwardness of the least-favoured regions.

Article 130b

Member States shall conduct their economic policies, and shall coordinate them, in such a way as, in addition, to attain the objectives set out in Article 130a. The imple­ mentation of the common policies and of the internal market shall take into account the objectives set out in Article

130a and in Article 130c and shall contribute to their achievement. The Community shall support the achievement of these objectives by the action it takes through the struc­ tural Funds (European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee

Fund, Guidance Section, European Social Fund, European

Regional Development Fund), the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments. 222

Article 130c

The European Regional Development Fund is intended to help redress the principal regional imbalances in the Com­ munity through participating in the development and struc­ tural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind and in the conversion of declining industrial regions.

Article 130d

Once the Single European Act enters into force the Com­ mission shall submit a comprehensive proposal to the Coun­ cil, the purpose of which will be to make such amendments to the structure and operational rules of the existing structural Funds (European Agricultural Guidance and Guar­ antee Fund, Guidance Section, European Social Fund, Europe­ an Regional Development Fund) as are necessary to clarify and rationalize their tasks in order to contribute to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 130a and

Article 130c, to increase their efficiency and to coordi­ nate their activities between themselves and with the oper­ ations of the existing financial instruments. The Council shall act unanimously on this proposal within a period of one year, after consulting the European Parliament and the

Economic and Social Committee. 223

Article 130e

After adopting of the decision referred to in Article

130d/ implementing decisions relating to the European

Regional Development Fund shall be taken by the Council,

acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Com­

mission and in cooperation with the European Parliament.

With regard to the European Agricultural Guidance and

Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section and the European Social

Fund, Articles 43, 126 and 127 remain applicable respec­

tively. Appendix C

TABLES OF CORRELATIONS AMONG PGDP, UNEMP AND NMIG

j. a u j . t r

Correlations among Per Capita GDP, Unemployment and Net Migration, the Reference Group = the State

PGDPUNEMPNMIG

PGDP 1.00000 -0.28559 -0.12525

UNEMP -0.28559 1.00000 -0.21705

NMIG -0.12525 -0.21705 1.00000

Table 34

Correlations among Per Capita GDP, Unemployment and Net ligration, the Reference Group = the Most Favored Region within the State

PGDP UNEMP NMIG

PGDP 1.00000 -0.00766 -0.20549

UNEMP -0.00766 1.00000 -0.26758

NMIG -0.20549 -0.26758 1.00000

Table 35

Correlations among Per Capita GDP, Unemployment and Net Migration, the Reference Group = the Community

PGDP UNEMP NMIG

PGDP 1.00000 -0.41484 0.06777

UNEMP -0.41484 1.00000 -0.15601

NMIG 0.06777 -0.15601 1.00000

224 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Achen, Christopher H., and Duncan Snidal. "Rational Deter­ rence Theory and Comparative Case Studies." World Poli­ tics 41 (January 1989); 143-69.

Aiken, Leona S., and Stephen G. West. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interaction. Newbury Park: Sage, 1991.

Ake, Claude. A Theory of Political Integration. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey, 1967.

Alger, Chadwick F. "Analytical Approaches: Functionalism and Integration." International Social Science Journal 29 (1977): 73-93.

Alker, Hayward R. "Integration Logics: A Review, Extension, and Critique." International Organization 24 (1970): 869-914.

Allum, Percy A. Italy - Republic without Government ? New York: W.W. Norton, 1973.

Allum, Percy A. "The Christian Democrat Regime in Italy: A Form of Bonapartism ?" Current Sociology 30 (1982): 83-95.

Althauser, Robert P. "Multicollinearity and Non-Additive Regression Models." Causal Models in the Social Sci­ ence. Ed. H.M. Blalock. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.

Andriani, Silvane. "Unification of the European Markets and the Mezzogiorno of Italy." Journal of Regional Pol­ icy 8 (1988): 357-65.

Arlett, Sarah, and John Sallnow. "European Centres of Dis­ sent." The Geographical Magazine 61 (1989): 6-9.

Armstrong, Harvey W., and Jim Taylor. Regional Economic Policy and Its Analysis. Oxford: Philip Allan, 1978.

- 225 - 226

Armstrong, Harvey W. "Community Regional Policy: A Survey and Critique." Regional Studies 12 (1978): 511-28.

Armstrong, Harvey W. "The Assignment of Regional Powers within the EC." Britain within the European Community. Ed. Ali M. El-Agraa. London: Macmillan, 1983.

Armstrong, Harvey W. "The Reform of the European Community Regional Policy." Journal of Common Market Studies 23 (1985): 319-43.

Armstrong, Harvey W. , and Jim Taylor. Regional Economics and Policy. Oxford: Philip Allan, 1985.

Axline, W. Andrew. "Underdevelopment, Dependence, and Integration: The Politics of Regionalism in the Third World." Economic Integration and Third World Develop­ ment. Ed. Pradip K. Ghosh. London: Greenwood, 1984.

Balassa, Bela. The Theory of Economic Integration. Home­ wood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1961.

Balassa, Bela. European Economic Integration. North- Holland, 1975.

Balassa, Bela. "Types of Economic Integration." Economic Integration: Worldwide, Regional, Sectoral. Ed. Fritz Machlup. London: Macmillan, 1976.

Bamford, C.G., and H. Robinson. Geography of the EEC: A Systematic Economic Approach. Essex: Longman, 1983.

Barrera, Mario, and Ernst B. Haas. "The Operationalization of Some Variables Related to Regional Integration: A Research Note." International Organization 23 (1969): 150-60.

Barzanti, Sergio. The Underdeveloped Areas within the Com­ mon Market. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965.

Blalock, H.M. "Correlated Independent Variables: The Problem of Multicollinearity." American Journal of Sociology 42 (1963): 233-37.

Blalock, H.M. Causal Models in the Social Science. Chica­ go: Aldine, 1971.

Boltho, A. The European Economy: Growth and Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982. 227

Boneau, C.A. "The Effects of Violations of Assumptions Underlying the t-Test." Psychological Bulletin 57 (I960): 49-64.

Borts, G.H., and J.L. Stein. Economic Growth in a Free Market. New Yorks Columbia University Press, 1964.

Boudeville, J.R. Problems of Regional Economic Planning. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966.

Box, G.E.P. "Non-normality and Tests on Variations." Biometrika 40 (1950): 318-35.

Bracey, H.E. People and the Countryside. London: Rout- ledge, 1970.

Brains, Steven J. "Transaction Flows in the International System." American Political Science Review 60 (1966): 880-98.

Brown, A.J. The Framework of Regional Economics in the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

Buck, Trevor. "Regional Policy and European Integration." Journal of Common Market Studies 13 (1975): 368-78.

Bunge, M. "Causality, Chance and Law." American Scientist 49 (1961): 432-48.

Butler, G.J., and T.D. Mandeville. Regional Economics. London: University of Queensland Press, 1981.

Bye, Maurice. "Customs Unions and National Interests." International Economic Papers 3 (1953): 208-34.

Caporaso, James A., and Alan L. Pelowski. "Economic and Political Integration in Europe: A Time-Series Quasi- Experimental Analysis." American Political Science Review 65 (1971): 418-33.

Carello, Adrian Nicola. The Northern Question: Italy*s Participation in the European Economic Community and the Mezzogiorno*s Underdevelopment. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1989.

Carlyle, Margaret. The Awakening of Southern Italy. West­ port, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1985.

Casteria, Joan F. Mra. "Rural Community Studies in Spain." Rural Community Studies in Europe. eds. Jean-Louis 228

Durand-Drouhin and Lili-Maria Szwengrub. Oxford: Perga- mon, 1981.

Cheshire, Paul C., and Dennis G. Hay. Urban Problems in Western Europe. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.

Ciero, Massimo Lo. "The Southern Economy and the Challenge of European Economy." Journal of Regional Policy 8 (1988): 569-86.

Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio, et al. Communication and Interac­ tion in Global Politics. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1987.

Clark, Cal, and S. Welch. "Western European Trade as a Measure of Integration: Untangling the Interpretations." Journal of Conflict Resolution 16 (1972): 363-82.

Clark, Cal, and Richard L. Merritt. "European Community and Intra-European Communications: The Evidence of Mail Flows." Communications and Interaction in Global Poli­ tics. eds. Claudio Cioffi-Revilla, et al. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1987.

Clark, Martin. Modern Italy: 1871-1982. London: Longman, 1984.

Cloke, Paul J. Key Settlements in Rural Areas. New York: Methuen, 1979.

Clough, Shepherd B. Economic History of Modern Italy. New York, 1964.

Clout, Hugh D. Regional Development in Western Europe. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975.

Clout, Hugh D. The Regional Problem in Western Europe. London: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

Clout, Hugh D. "Population and Urban Change." Regional Development in Western Europe. Ed. Hugh D. Clout. Lon­ don: David Fulton, 1987.

Clout, Hugh D. "Rural Space." Regional Development in Western Europe. Ed. Hugh D. Clout. London: David Ful­ ton, 1987.

Codding, George A. "Federalism: The Conceptual Setting." International Organization: A Conceptual Approach. eds. Paul Taylor and A.J.R. Groom. New York: Nicholas, 1978. 229

Cohen, Jacob, and Patricia Cohen. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sci­ ence. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975.

College of Europe. A Community of Twelve ? : The Impact of Further Enlargement on the European Communities. Belgium, 1978.

Commission of the European Communities. Report on the Regional Problems in the Enlarged Community (Thompson Report). Brussels, 1973.

Commission of the European Communities. "Community Region­ al Policy: New Guidelines." Bulletin of the European Communities. Brussels, 1977.

Commission of the European Communities. The Regions of Europe: First Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation of the Regions of the Community. Brussels, 1981.

Commission of the European Communities. The Regions of Europe: Second Periodic Report on the Social and Econom­ ic Situation of the Regions of the Community. Brussels, 1984.

Commission of the European Communities. The Regions of Europe: Third Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation of the Regions of the Community. Brussels, 1987.

Commission of the European Communities. Regional Imbalanc­ es and National Economic Performance. Brussels, 1985

Commission of the European Communities. Basic Statistics of the Community. 14 vols. Brussels, 1970-1983.

Commission of the European Communities. Community Support Frameworks 1989-91. Brussels, 1990

Commission of the European Communities. The Community Budget: The Facts and Figures. Brussels, 1988.

Commission of the European Communities. Financial Report. Brussels, 1987.

Commission of the European Communities. The European Com­ munity and its Regions: 10 Years of Community Regional Policy and of European Regional Development Fund. Brus­ sels, 1985. 230

Commission of the European Communities. Fourth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1970. Brussels, 1971.

Commission of the European Communities. Fifth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1971. Brussels, 1972.

Commission of the European Communities. Sixth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1972. Brussels, 1973.

Commission of the European Communities. Seventh General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1973. Brussels, 1974.

Commission of the European Communities. Eighth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1974. Brussels, 1975.

Commission of the European Communities. Ninth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1975. Brussels, 1976.

Commission of the European Communities. Tenth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1976. Brussels, 1977.

Commission of the European Communities. Eleventh General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1977. Brussels, 1978.

Commission of the European Communities. Twelfth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1978. Brussels, 1979.

Commission of the European Communities. Thirteenth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1979. Brussels, 1980.

Commission of the European Communities. Fourteenth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1980♦ Brussels, 1981.

Commission of the European Communities. Fifteenth General Report on the Activities of the European Communities, 1981. Brussels, 1982.

Commission of the European Communities. European Regional Development Fund: First Annual Report (1975). Brus­ sels, 1976. 231

Commission of the European Communities. European Regional Development Fund; Second Annual Report (1976). Brus­ sels, 1977.

Commission of the European Communities. European Regional Development Fund: Third Annual Report (1977). Brus­ sels, 1978.-

Commission of the European Communities. European Regional Development Fund: Fourth Annual Report (1978). Brus­ sels, 1979.

Commission of the European Communities. European Regional Development Fund: Fifth Annual Report (1979). Brus­ sels, 1980.

Commission of the European Communities. European Regional Development Fund: Sixth Annual Report (1980). Brus­ sels, 1981.

Commission of the European Communities. European Regional Development Fund: Seventh Annual Report (1981). Brus­ sels, 1982.

Compton, Paul. "An Evaluation of the Changing Religious Composition of the Population in Northern Ireland." Economic and Social Review 16 (1985): 201-24.

Curtis, Richard F., and Elton F. Jackson. "Multiple Indi­ cators in Survey Research." American Journal of Sociol­ ogy 68 (1962): 195-204.

Cutler, Tony, et al. 1992 - The Struggle for Europe: A Critical Evaluation of the European Community. New York: Berg, 1989.

Cowger, Charles D. "Statistical Significance Tests: Sci­ entific Ritualism or Scientific Method ?" Social Ser­ vice Review 58 (1984): 358-72.

Coyle, Dominick J. Minorities in Revolt: Political Vio­ lence in Ireland, Italy and Cyprus. London: Associated University Press, 1983.

Damianakos, Stathis. "Rural Community Studies in Greece." Rural Community Studies in Europe. eds. Jean-Louis Durand-Drouhin and Lili-Maria Szwengrup. Oxford: Perga- mon, 1981.

Deacon, David. "Competition Policy in the Common Market: Its Links with Regional Policy." Regional Studies 16 (1982): 53-63. 232

Dente, Bruno. "Centre-Local Relations in Italy: The Impact of the Legal and Political Structures." Centre- Periphery Relations in Western Europe. eds. Yves Meny and Vincent Wright. London: Allen & Unwin, 1985.

Denton, Geoffrey. "Regional Divergence and Policy in the Community with Special Reference to Enlargement." Eco­ nomic Divergence in the European Community. eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace. London: Allen & Unwin, 1981.

Deutsch, Karl W. Political Community at the International Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement. Gardens City, New York: Doubleday, 1954.

Deutsch, Karl W., et al. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.

Deutsch, Karl W. "Social Mobilization and Political Devel­ opment." American Political Science Review 55 (1961): 497-502.

Deutsch, Karl W. "The Price of Integration." The Integra­ tion of Political Communities. eds. Philip E. Jacob and James V. Toscano. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1964.

Deutsch, Karl W. International Political Communities: An Anthology. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1966.

Deutsch, Karl W. The Analysis of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1978.

Diebold, William. "The Process of European Integration." The Common Market: Progress and Controversy. Ed. Law­ rence S. Krause. Inglewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964.

Dutter, Lee E. "Changing Elite Perceptions of the Northern Irish Conflict, 1973-1983." Political Psychology 9 (1988): 129-54.

Earle, John. Italy in the 1970s. London: David & Charles, 1975.

Edwards, Allen L. Multiple Regression and the Analysis of Variance and Covariance. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1979.

El-Agraa, Ali M. The Economics of the European Community. New York: St. Martin's, 1985. 233

Elkan, Peter G. "Measuring the Impact of Economic Integra­ tion among Developing Countries." Journal of Common Market Studies. 14 (1975): 56-68.

Emerson, Michael. What Model for Europe ? Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.

Etzioni, Amitai. "European Unification: A Strategy for Change." World Politics 15 (1963): 32-50.

Etzioni, Amitai. Political Unification: A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces. New York: Rinehart and Winston, 1965.

European Commission Office in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland in Europe: The Impact of Membership. Belfast, 1983.

Eurostat. EC External Trade Indices. Brussels, 1988.

Eurostat. Monthly External Trade Bulletin. 12 vols. Brus­ sels, 1970-1981.

Eurostat. Statistical Yearbook, Transport, Communications, Tourism. 16 vols. Brussels, 1970-1985.

Eurostat. Review. 15 vols. Brussels, 1970-1984.

Eurostat. Rapid Reports: Regions. 3 vols. Brussels, 1989-1991.

Eurostat. Regional Statistics: Population, Employment, Living Standards. 5 vols. Brussels, 1973-1977.

Eurostat. Yearbook of Regional Statistics. 8 vols. Brus­ sels, 1981-1988.

Eurostat. Regional Statistics: Main Regional Indicators. 14 vols. Brussels, 1970-1983.

Eurostat. Regional Statistics: The Community's Financial Participation in Investments. 3 vols. Brussels, 1973-1975.

Farrar, Donald E., and Robert R. Glauber. "Multicollinear- ity in Regression Analysis: The Problem Revisited." Review of Economics and Statistics 49 (1967): 92-107.

Fitzmaurice, John. The Politics of Belgium: Crisis and Compromise in a Plural Society. London: C. Hurst, 1983. 234

Flockton, Christopher. Community Regional Policy. Chatham House, 1970.

Fontana, Josep. "Economic Development of Mediterranean Countries in Historical Perspective." The Enlargement of the European Community: Case-Studies of Greece, Por­ tugal and Spain. eds. Lyn Gorman and Marja-Liisa Kilju- nen. London: Macmillan, 1983.

Friedmann, J.R. Regional Development - A Case Study of Venezuela. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966.

Friedrich, Carl J. Man and His Government. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

Galtung, Johann. "A Structural Theory of Integration." Journal of Peace Research 4 (1968): 375-94.

Galtung, Johann. The European Community: A Superpower in the Making. London: Allen & Unwin, 1973.

Giersch, H. "Economic Union between Nations and the Loca­ tion of Industries." Review of Economic Studies 17 (1949): 87-97.

George, Alexander L. "Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison." Diploma­ cy. Ed. Paul Gordon Lauren. New York: Free Press, 1979.

Glisson, Charles. "In Defense of Statistical Tests of Sig­ nificance." Social Service Review 59 (1985): 377-86.

Gorz, Andre. Strategy for Labor: A Radical Proposal. Bos­ ton: Beacon Press, 1967.

Gurr, Ted Robert. Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.

Haack, W.G.C.M. "The Selectivity of Economic Integration Theories: A Comparison of Some Traditional and Marxist Approaches." Journal of Common Market Studies 21 (1983): 365-87.

Haas, Ernst B. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957. Stanford: Stanford Uni­ versity Press, 1958.

Haas, Ernst B. "International Integration: The European and the Universal Process." International Organization 14 (1961): 366-92. 235

Haas, Ernst B. Beyond the Nation-State. Stanford: Stan­ ford University Press, 1964.

Haas, Ernst B., and P. Schmitter. ’'Economics and Differen­ tial Patterns of Political Integration: Projects about Unity in Latin America.” International Political Commu­ nities. Ed. W. P. Davison. New York: Praeger, 1966.

Haas, Ernst B. "The Study of Regional Integration: Reflec­ tion on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing." Regional Integration: Theory and Research. eds. Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Haas, Ernst B. The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1975.

Haas, Ernst B. "Turbulent Fields and the Theory of Regional Integration." International Organization 30 (1976): 173-212.

Hahn, Walter. "Fiscal Policy in the EEC." Europe and the Andean Countries: A Comparison of Economic Policies and Institutions. London: Pinter, 1988.

Hainsworth, Paul. "The European Election of 1979 in North­ ern Ireland." Parliamentary Affairs 32 (1979): 470-81.

Hainsworth, Paul. "Direct Rule in Northern Ireland: The European Community Dimension 1972-1979." Administration 31 (1983): 53-69.

Hainsworth, Paul. "Northern Ireland - towards EC involve­ ment ?" The World Today 39 (1983): 483-9.

Hainsworth, Paul. "Northern Ireland in the European Commu­ nity." Regions in the European Community. eds. Michael Keating and Barry Jones. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.

Hallett, E.C. "Economic Convergence and Divergence in the European Community: A Survey of the Evidence." Economic Divergence in the European Community. eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace. London: Allen & Unwin, 1981.

Hansen, Niles M. Public Policy and Regional Economic Development: The Experience of Nine Western Countries. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1974. 236

Hansen, Roger D. "European Integration: Forward March, Parade Rest, or Dismissed ?" International Organiza­ tion. 27 (1973): 225-54.

Hayward, Jack, and Michael Watson. Planning, Politics and Public Policy: The British, French and Italian Experi­ ence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

Heise, David R. Causal Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975.

Hene, Derek H. Decision on Europe: An Explanation of the Common Market. London: Jordan & Sons, 1970.

Hermase, Thomas. "Development Poles and Related Theories: A Synoptic Overview." Growth Centers in Regional Eco­ nomics Development. Ed. Niles M. Hansen. New York: Free Press, 1972.

Heward, James H., and Peter M. Steele. Business Control Through Multiple Regression Analysis. London: Gower, 1972.

Hirschman, Albert 0. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.

Hodges, Michael. "Liberty, Equality, Divergency: The Lega­ cy of the Treaty of Rome." Economic Divergence in the European Community. eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace. London: Allen & Unwin, 1981.

Hoffmann, Stanley. "The European Process at Atlantic Crosspurposes." Journal of Common Market Studies 3 (1965) 85-101.

Holland, Stuart. The Regional Problem. London: Macmillan, 1976.

Holland, Stuart. Capital versus the Regions. London: Mac­ millan, 1976.

Hotelling, H. "Stability in Competition." Economic Journal 39 (1929): 41-57.

Huang, David S. Regression and Econometric Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1970.

Hughes, Barry B. "Transaction Analysis: The Impact of Operationalization." International Organization 25 (1971): 132-39. 237

Hughes, Barry B., and John E. Schwarz. "Dimensions of Political Integration and the Experience of the European Community." International Studies Quarterly 16 (1972): 263-94.

Hughes, Barry B. "Transaction Data and Analysis: In Search of Concepts." International Organization 26 (1972): 659-90.

Hurwitz, Leon. Contemporary Perspectives on EC Integra­ tion: Attitudes. Nongovernmental Behavior, and Collec­ tive Decision Making. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 1980.

Inglehart, Ronald A. "An End to European Integration." American Political Science Review 61 (1967): 91-105.

Inglehart, Ronald A. "Trends and Non-trends in the Western Alliance: A Review." Journal of Conflict Resolution 12 (1968): 120-8.

Inglehart, Ronald A. "Public Opinion and Regional Integra­ tion." International Organization 24 (1970): 764-95.

Inglehart, Ronald A. "Cognitive Mobilization and European Integration." Comparative Politics 2 (1970): 419-42.

Inglehart, Ronald A. "Ongoing Changes in West European Political Cultures." Integration 1 (1970): 250-73.

Inglehart, Ronald A. "Changing Value Priorities and Euro­ pean Integration." Journal of Common Market Studies 10 (1971): 1-36.

Inglehart, Ronald A. The Silent Revolution: Changing Val­ ues and Political Styles among Western Publics. Prince­ ton: Princeton University Press, 1977.

Itta, Emanuela. "Italy at a Crossroads: The Problem of the South and European Union." Journal of Regional Policy 10 (1990): 657-66.

Jaccard, James, et al. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.

Jacob, Philip E., and Henry Teune. "Integrative Process: Guidelines for Analysis of the Bases of Political Commu­ nity." The Integration of Political Communities. eds. Philip E. Jacob and James V. Toscano. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1964. 238

Jacquemin, Alexis, and Andre Sapir. "Europe post-1992: Internal and External Liberalization." American Econom­ ic Review 81 (1991): 166-70.

Jarett, R.J. "Disincentives: The Other Side of Regional Development Policy." Journal of Common Market Studies 13 (1975): 379-90.

Jensen, Finn B., and Ingo Walter. The Common Market: Eco­ nomic Integration in Europe. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippin- cott, 1965.

Johnson, Richard A., and Dean W. Wichern. Applied Multi­ variate Statistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1982.

Katzenstein, Peter J. "Hare and Tortoise: The Race toward Integration." International Organization 25 (1971): 290-95.

Keating, Michael, and Barry Jones. Regions in the European Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

Keating, Michael. State and Regional Nationalism. London: Harvester, 1988.

Keating, Michael, and Barry Jones. "Scotland and Wales: Peripheral Assertion and European Integration." Parlia­ mentary Affairs 44 (1991): 311-24.

Keeble, David, et al. Centrality, Periphery and EEC Regional Development. Cambridge: University of Cam­ bridge Press, 1981.

Keeble, et al. Peripheral Regions in a Community of Twelve Member States. Brussels, 1988.

Keeble, David. "Core-Periphery Disparities, Recession and New Regional Dynamisms in the European Community." Geography 74 (1989): 1-11.

Keefe, Euge K., et a l . Area Handbook for Italy. Washing­ ton, D.C.: American University Press, 1977.

Keesing's Research Report. The European Communities: Establishment and Growth. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1975.

Kellas, James. "European Integration and the Regions." Parliamentary Affairs 44 (1991): 226-39. 239

Keohane, Robert 0., and Joseph S. Nye. Transnational Rela­ tions and World Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.

Keohane, Robert 0., and Joseph S. Nye. "International Independence and Integration." International Politics. eds. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

Kiljunen, Marja-Liisa. "Regional Disparities and Policy in the EEC." Integration and Unequal Development: The Experience of the EEC. eds. Dudley Seers and Constan­ tine Vaitsos. New York: St. Martin's, 1980.

Kitzinger, Uwe. The European Common Market and Community. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1967.

Knox, P.L., and A. Scarth. "The Quality of Life in France." Geography 62 (1977): 9-16.

Kogan, Norman. A Political History of Italy. New York: Praeger, 1983.

Krause, Lawrence B. European Economic Integration and the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1968.

Kurran, George Thomas. National Profile: The Benelux Coun­ tries . New York, 1989.

Kurzer, Paulette. "Unemployment in Open Economies: The Impact of Trade, Finance, and European Integration." Comparative Political Studies 24 (1991): 3-30.

Lamont, Douglas F. Managing Foreign Investment in Southern Italy. New York: Praeger, 1973.

La Palombara, Joseph. Italy: The Politics of Planning. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1966.

Lausen, J.R. "On Growth Poles." Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development. Ed. Niles M. Hansen. New York: Free Press, 1972.

Levi-Strauss, Laurent, and Henri Mendas. "Rural Community Studies in France." Rural Community Studies in Europe. eds. Jean-Louis Durand-Drouhin and Lili-Maria Szwengrub. Oxford: Pergamon, 1981.

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. Applied Regression. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980. 240

Lichter, Daniel T., and Glenn V. Fuguitt. "Demographic Response to Transportation Innovations The Case of the Interstate Highway." Social Forces 59 (1980): 492-512.

Lichter, Daniel T., et al. "Components of Nonmetropolitan Population Change: The Contribution of Rural Areas." Rural Sociology 50 (1985): 88-98.

Lijphart, Arend. "Karl W. Deutsch and the New Paradigm in International Relations." From National Development to Global Community. eds. Richard L. Merritt and Bruce M. Russett. London: Allen & Unwin, 1981.

Lindberg, Leon N. The Political Dynamics of European Eco­ nomic Integration. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963.

Lindberg, Leon N. "The European Community as a Political System." Journal of Common Market Studies 5 (1967): 344-87.

Lindberg, Leon N. "Political Integration as Multidimension­ al Phenomenon Requiring Multivariate Measurement." International Organization 24 (1970): 649-731.

Lindberg, Leon N., and Stuart Scheingold. Europe1s Would- be Polity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1970.

Lizano, Eduardo. "Integration of Less Developed Areas and of Areas on Different Levels of Development." Economic Integration: Worldwide, Regional, Sectoral. Ed. Fritz Machlup. London: Macmillan, 1976.

Lodge, Juliet. The European Community: Bibliographical Excursions. London: Frances Pinter, 1983.

Losch, A. The Economics of Location. New Haven, 1954.

Machlup, Fritz. "A History of Thought on Economic Integra­ tion." Economic Integration: Worldwide, Regional, Sec­ toral . Ed. Fritz Machlup. London: Macmillan, 1976.

Mammarella, Giuseppe. Italy After Fascism: A Political History 1943-1965. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.

Marquand, David. Faltering Leviathan: National Sovereign­ ty, the Regions and Europe. Wyndham Place Trust, 1989.

Martins, Mario Rui, and John Mawson. "The Evolution of EEC Regional Policy - Cosmetics or Major Surjery ?" Local Government Studies 6 (1980): 29-56. 241

Mayes# David G. "The Problem of the Quantitative Estimation of Integration Effect." International Economic Integra­ tion. Ed. Ali M. El-Agraa. London: Macmillan# 1985.

McCrone, Gavin. "Regional Policy in the European Communi- ties." Economic Integration in Europe. Ed. G.R. Den­ ton. London: Weidenfeld# 1969.

McHale# Vincent E.# and Sandra Shaber. "Reflections on the Political Economy of Regional Development in Western Europe." Journal of Common Market Studies 15 (1977): 180-93.

McHugh# Richard, and Richard Widdows. "The Age of Capital and State Unemployment." Journal of Regional Science 24 (1984): 85-92.

McNamara# Brendan. "Regional Development: Case Studies from France and Italy." Administration 25 (1977): 35-56.

Mendes# A.J. Marques. "The Contribution of the European Community to Economic Growth." Journal of Common Market Studies 24 (1986): 261-77.

Merloni# Francesco. "Italian Regions in the European Com­ munity." Regions in the European Community. eds. Michael Keating and Barry Jones. Oxford: Clarendon# 1985.

Merritt, Richard L. "Locational Aspects of Political Inte­ gration." Locational Approaches to Power and Conflict. eds. K.R. Cox, et al. New York: John Wiley# 1974.

Mihailovic, Kosta. "Migration and Integration of Labour Markets." Economic Integration: Worldwide, Regional# Sectoral. Ed. Fritz Machlup. London: Macmillan, 1976.

Miller# Peter. Domination and Power. New York: Routledge & Kegan# 1987.

Minnes# L.B.M.# and Jacob Kol. "Introduction: Trade Poli­ tics and Their Effects." European Trade Politics and the Developing World. eds. L.B.M. Mennes and Jacob Kol. London: Croom Helm, 1988.

Minshell# G.N. The New Europe: An Economic Geography of the EEC. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1980.

Mitrany# David. A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadran­ gle# 1966. 242

Molle, Willem, and Jean Paelinck. "Regional Policy." Eco­ nomic Policies of the Common Market. Ed. Peter Coffey. London: Macmillan, 1979.

Molle, Willem. Regional Disparity and Economic Development in the European Community. Farnborough: Saxon House, 1980.

Molle, Willem. Industrial Location and Regional Develop­ ment in the European Community: The FLEUR Model. Brook­ field, Vermont: Gower, 1983.

Molle, Willem. "Regional Impact of Welfare Policies in the European Community." Human Behavior in Geographical Space: Essays in Honor of Leo H. Klaassen. Ed. J.H.P. Paelinck. Brookfield, Vermont: Gower, 1986.

Molle, Willem, and Riccardo Cappellin. Regional Impact of Community Policy in Europe. Brookfield, Vermont: Gower, 1988.

Molle, Willem, and Aad Van Mourik. "International Move­ ments of Labour under Conditions of Economic Integra­ tion: The Case of Western Europe." Journal of Common Market Studies 26 (1988): 317-42.

Molle, Willem. "Regional Policy." Main Economic Policy Areas of the EEC - Towards 1992. Ed. Peter Coffey. Nor- well: Kluwer Academic, 1989.

Molle, Willem. The Economics of European Integration. Brookfield, Vermont: Dartmouth, 1990.

Morrison, Denton E., and Ramon E. Henkel. The Significance Test Controversy. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.

Moseley, Macolm J. Growth Centers in Spatial Planning. Oxford: Pergamon, 1974.

Mountjoy, Alan B. Mezzogiorno. London: Oxford University Press, 1973.

Moxone-Browne, Edward. Nation, Class and Creed in Northern Ireland. Aldershot: Gower, 1983.

Mughan, Anthony. "Belgium: All Periphery and No Centre ?" Centre-Periphery Relations in Western Europe. eds. Yves Meny and Vincent Wright. London: Allen & Unwin, 1985.

Murphy, Alexander B. "Territorial Policies in Multiethnic States." The Geographical Review 79 (1989): 410-21. 243

Murphy, Alexander B. "The Emerging Europe of the 1990s." The Geographical Review 81 (1991): 1-17.

Myrdal, Gunnar. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: G. Duckworth, 1957.

Naylon, John. "Iberia." Regional Development in Western Europe. Ed. Hugh D. Clout. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975.

Nelson, Charles G. "European Integration: Trade Data and Measurement Problems." International Organization 28 (1974): 399-433.

Neter, John, and William Wasserman. Applied Linear Statis­ tical Models. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, 1974.

Nevin, E.T. "Regional Policy." The Economics of the Euro­ pean Community. Ed. Ali M. El-Agraa* New York: St. Mar­ tin's, 1985.

North, Douglas. "Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth." Journal of Political Economy 73 (June 1955).

Nye, Joseph S. Pan-Africanism and East African Integra­ tion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.

Nye, Joseph S. "Pattern and Catalysts in Regional Integra­ tion." International Organization. 19 (1965): 870-84.

Nye, Joseph S. "Comparable Regional Integration: Concept and Measurement." International Organization 22 (1968): 855-80.

Nye, Joseph S. "Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo- Functionalist Model." International Organization 24 (1970): 796-835.

Nye, Joseph S. Peace in Parts. Boston: Little & Brown, 1971.

Onyemelukwe, C. C. Economic Underdevelopment: An Inside View. London: Longman, 1974.

Parker, Geoffrey. The Logic of Unity. London: Longman, 1975.

Parker, Geoffrey. The Countries of Community Europe: A Geographical Survey of Contemporary Issues. London: Macmillan, 1979. 244

Pendergast, William R. "Roles and Attitudes of French and Italian Delegates to the European Community." Interna­ tional Organization 30 (1976): 669-77.

Pentland, Charles. International Theory and European Inte­ gration. Faber and Faber, 1973.

Perroux, Francois. Europe without Strands. Paris: Univer­ sity of France Press, 1954.

Peschel, Karin. The Effects of European Integration on Regional Development - Some Lessons from the Past. Kiel: Institut fur Regionalforschung der Univeristat, 1989.

Pinder, John, and Roy Price. Europe after de Gaulle. Mid­ dlesex, England: Penguine, 1969.

Pinder, John. European Community: The Building of a Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Planck, Ulrich. "Typologies of Rural Collectivities and the Study of Social Development: Theoretical and Metho­ dological Aspects." Theories and Methods in Rural Com­ munity Studies. eds. Henri Mendras and loan Mihailescu. Oxford: Pergamon, 1982.

Podbielski, Gisele. Italy: Development and Crisis in the Post-War Economy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.

Pomfret, Richard. Mediterranean Policy of the European Community: A Study of Discrimination in Trade. London: Macmillan, 1986.

Puchala, Donald J. "The Common Market and Political Feder­ ation in Western Europe." International Studies Quar­ terly 14 (1970): 32-59.

Puchala, Donald J. "Patterns in West European Integra­ tion." Journal of Common Market Studies 9 (1970): 117-42.

Puchala, Donald J. "National Distinctiveness and Transna­ tionality in West European Public Opinion." Integration 1 (1970): 273-87.

Puchala, Donald J. "International Transactions and Regional Integration." Regional Integration: Theory and Research. eds. Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Schein- gold. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971. 245

Puchala, Donald J. "Of Blind Men, Elephants and Interna­ tional Integration." Perspectives on World Politics. eds. Michael Smith, et al. London: The Open University Press, 1981.

Ratkowsky, David A. Handbook of Nonlinear Regression Mod­ els . New York: Marcel Dekker, 1990.

Reichenbach, Horst. "A Politico-economic Overview." Inte­ gration and Unequal Development: The Experience of the EEC. eds. Dudley Seers and Constantine Vaitsos. New York: St. Martin's, 1980.

Rhodes, R.A.W. "Regional Policy and a 'Europe of Regions': A Critical Assessment." Regional Studies 8 (1974): 105-14.

Richardson, Harry W. Regional Growth Theory. New York: Macmillan, 1973.

Riley, R.C., and G.J. Ashworth. Benelux. London: Chatto and Windus, 1975.

Riley, R.C. Belgium. Kent, England: Dawson, 1976.

Robson, Peter. The Economics of International Integration. London: Allen & Unwin, 1987.

Rodgers, Allan. Economic Development in Retrospect: The Italian Model and Its Significance for Regional Planning in Market-Oriented Economies. Washington, D.C.: V.H. Winston, 1979

Rokkan, Stein. "The Mobilization of the Periphery." Citi­ zens, Elections, Parties. Ed. Stein Rokkan. New York: Mckay, 1970.

Rokkan, Stein, et al. Centre-Periphery Structures in Europe: An ISSC Workbook in Comparative Analysis. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag, 1987.

Romus, Paul. "Regional Policy in the European Community." Economic Sovereignty and Regional Policy: A Symposium on Regional Problems in Britain and Ireland. Ed. John Vaizey. Dublin: Macmillan, 1975.

Rosenau, James N. "Foreign Policy as an Issue Area." Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. Ed. James N. Rose­ nau. The Free Press, 1967. 246

Rosenthal, R. Experimental Effects in Behavioral Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.

Rowthorn, Bob, and Naomi Wayne. Northern Ireland: The Political Economy of Conflict. Cambridge: Polity, 1988.

Russett, Bruce M., et al. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.

Russett, Bruce M. International Regions and the Interna­ tional System. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.

Russett, Bruce M. "International Behavior Research: Case Studies and Cumulation." Approach to the Study of Political Science. eds. Michael Haas and Henry S. Kar- iel. Scranton: Chandler, 1970.

Russett, Bruce M. "Transaction, Community, and Interna­ tional Political Integration." Journal of Common Market Studies 9 (1971): 224-45.

Salzman, Lawrence. Computerized Economic Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.

Sassoon, Donald. Contemporary Italy: Politics, Economy and Society since 1945. London: Longman, 1986.

Savage, I. Richard, and Karl W. Deutsch. "A Statistical Model of the Gross Analysis of Transaction Flows." Eco­ nomet rica 28 (1960): 551-72.

Scheingold, Stuart A. "Domestic and International Conse­ quences of Regional Integration." Regional Integration. eds. Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold. Cam­ bridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Schmitt, Hans 0. "The National Boundary in Politics and Economics." Communication in International Politics. Ed. Richard L. Merritt. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1972.

Schmitter, Philippe C. "Further Notes on Operationalizing Some Variables Related to Regional Integration." Inter­ national Organization 23 (1969): 327-36.

Seers, Dudley. "The Periphery of Europe." Underdeveloped Europe: Studies in Core-Periphery Relations. eds. Dud­ ley Seers, et al. Atlantic Highland, New Jersy: Humani­ ties, 1979. 247

Seers, Dudley, and Kjell Ostrom. The Crises of the Europe­ an Regions. London: Macmillan, 1983.

Selwyn, Percy. "Some Thoughts on Cores and Peripheries." Underdeveloped Europe: Studies in Core-Periphery Rela­ tions. eds. Dudley Seers, et al. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities, 1979.

Sevin, Hanan C. "A Critique of Tests of Significance in Survey Research." American Sociology Review 22 (1957): 519-27.

Shackleton, Michael. Financing the European Community. London: Pinter, 1990.

Shepherd, Robert J. Public Opinion and European Integra­ tion. Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1975.

Siebert, H. Regional Economic Growth: Theory and Policy. Scranton: International Textbook, 1969.

Simon, Herbert A. "Spurious Correlation: A Causal Inter­ pretation." Causal Models in the Social Science. Ed. H.M. Blalock. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.

Singlemann, Peter. Structures of Domination and Peasant Movements in Latin America. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1981.

Smith, David M. Industrial Location: An Economic Geograph­ ical Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.

Smith, Kim. "Tests of Significance: Some Frequent Misun­ derstandings." American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 53 (1983): 315-21.

Spooner, Derek. "The Tormented South." The Geographical Magazine 59 (1987): 452-57.

Stabenow, Wolfgang. "Regional Policy in the EEC." Regional Policy and Planning for Europe. Ed. Morgan Sant. West- mead, England: Saxon House, 1974.

Steward, Charles T. "The Urban-Rural Dichotomy: Concepts and Uses." American Journal of Sociology 64 (1958): 152-8.

Stohr, Walter B., and Franz Todtling. "An Evaluation of Regional Policies - Experience in Market and Mixed Econ­ omies." Human Settlement Systems: International Per­ spectives on Structure, Change and Public Policy. Ed. N.M. Hansen. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1978. 248

Stohr, Walter B., and Franz Todtling. "Spatial Equity: Some Anti-these to Current Regional Development Doc­ trine." Spatial Inequalities and Regional Development. eds. Hendrik Folmer and Jan Oosterhaven. Hingham: Mar- tinus Nijhoff, 1979.

Stohr, Walter B. "Alternative Strategies for Integrated Development of Peripheral Areas." The Crises of the European Regions. eds. Dudley Seers and Kjell Ostrom. London: Macmillan, 1983.

Strasser, Daniel. The Finances of Europe. Brussels: Com­ mission of the European Communities, 1980.

Sullivan, John L. "Multiple Indicators and Complex Causal Models." Causal Models in the Social Science. Ed. H.M. Blalock. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.

Symes, David G. "Rural Communities in Great Britain." Rural Community Studies in Europe. eds. Jean-Louis Durand-Drouhin and Lili-Maria Szwengrub. Oxford: Perga- mon, 1981.

Symes, David G. "Rural Community Studies in Ireland." Rural Community Studies in Europe. eds. Jean-Louis Durand-Drouhin and Lili-Maria Szwengrub. Oxford: Perga- mon, 1981.

Taber, George M. Patterns and Prospects of Common Market Trade. London: Peter Owen, 1974

Taylor, Paul. "Functionalism: The Theory of David Mitrany." International Organization: A Conceptual Approach. eds. Paul Taylor and A.J.R. Groom. New York: Nicholas, 1978.

Thompson, W.I. "Internal and External Factors in the Development of Urban Economies." Issues in Urban Econo­ mies. eds. H.S. Perloff and L. Wingo. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1968.

Tsoukalis, Loukas. "Economic Divergence and Enlargement." Economic Divergence in the European Community. eds. Michael Hodges and William Wallace. London: Allen & Unwin, 1981.

Tungendhat, Christopher. Making Sense of Europe. Middle­ sex, England: Viking, 1986.

Turner, Malcolm E., and Charles D. Stevens. "The Regres­ sion Analysis of Causal Paths." Causal Models in the Social Science. Ed. H.M. Blalock. Chicago: Aldine, 1971. 249

Tussie, Diana. The Less Developed Countries and the World Trading System. London: Frances Pinter, 1987.

UN Economic Commission for Europe. Economic Survey of Europe since 1953. Geneva, 1954.

Ungerer, Herbert. Telecommunications in Europe. Brussels, 1988.

Urciuoli, Antonio. "Economic and Social Integration of the Mezzogiorno in the United European Market." Journal of Regional Policy 9 (1989): 333-8.

Vanhove, Nobert, and Leo H. Klaassen. Regional Policy: A European Approach. Brookfield, Vermont: Gower, 1987.

Van Matre, John G., and Glenn H. Gilbreath. Statistics for Business and Economics. Plato, Texas: Business Publica­ tion, 1987.

Vernon, R. "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle." Quarterly Journal of Eco­ nomics 83 (1969): 190-204.

Vito, Francesco. "Problems of the Underdeveloped Regions of Italy." Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. Ed. E.A.G. Robinson. London: Macmillan and St. Martin's, 1969.

Wade, Robert. "Fast Growth and Slow Development in South Italy." Underdeveloped Europe: Studies in Core- Periphery Relations. eds. Dudley Seers, et al. Atlan­ tic Highlands: Humanities, 1979.

Waelbroek, Jean. "Measuring the Degree or Progress of Eco­ nomic Integration." Economic Integration: Worldwide, Regional, and Sectoral. Ed. Fritz Machlup. London: Mac­ millan, 1976.

Wallace, Helen. Budgetary Politics: The Finances of the European Communities. London: Allen & Unwin, 1980.

Wallace, William. "Walking Backwards towards Unity." Policy-Making in the European Communities. eds. Helen Wallace, et al. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Econo­ my in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press, 1976. 250

Wallerstein, Immannuel. ’’Rural Economy in Modern World Society." Studies in Comparative International Develop­ ment 12 (1977): 29-40.

Walter, Ingo. The European Common Market: Growth and Pat­ terns of Trade and Production. New York: Praeger, 1967.

Weber, A. Uber den Standort der Industrien. Tubingen, 1909.

Williamson, J.G. "Regional Inequality in the Process of National Development: A Description of the Patterns." Economic Development and Cultural Change 13 (1965): 3-43.

Williamson, J.G. "The Implication of European Monetary Integration for the Peripheral Areas." Economic Sover­ eignty and Regional Policy. Ed. John Vaizey. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1976.

Willis, F. Roy. Italy Chooses Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.

Winch, Robert F., and Donald T. Campbell. "Proof ? No. Evidence ? Yes. The Significance of Tests of Signifi­ cance." American Sociology 4 (1969): 140-3.

Wittink, Dick R. The Application of Regression Analysis. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon, 1968.

Wright, Sewall. "Path Coefficients and Path Regressions: Alternative or Complementary Concepts ?" Causal Models in the Social Science. Ed. H.M. Blalock. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.

Zariski, Raphael. "Ethnic Extremism among Ethnoterritorial Minorities in Western Europe." Comparative Politics 21 (1989): 253-72.

Zinnes, Dina A., and Robert G. Muncaster. "Transaction Flows and Integration Processes." Communications and Integration in Global Politics, eds. Claudio Cioffi- Revilla, et al. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1987.