949 E 36th Ave., Suite 500 Anchorage, AK 99508, USA 907-762-1500 Fax 907-762-1600 Technical Memorandum
Date 25 October 2018
To Gary Fink (AFCEC)
From Kevin Maher (Jacobs)
Subject 2017 Groundwater Sampling Activities and Results for the PL001 and SS086 Monitoring Areas (Final)
INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum presents the results from the 2017 groundwater sampling conducted under U.S. Air Force (USAF) Contract No. FA8903-09-D-8568, Task Order No. 0002. Groundwater samples were collected at 13 monitoring wells at Source Areas PL001 and SS086 in accordance with Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) Title 18, Chapter 75, §335(c) [18 AAC 75.335(c)] (Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation [ADEC] 2017). The location and vicinity of PL001 and SS086 Monitoring Areas are presented on Figure 1 and associated subsites are presented on Figures 2 and 3 (Attachment 1). Subsite boundaries are defined as the point or area where contamination was discovered, whereas the monitoring area boundary incorporates all subsites within a monitoring area.
The following attachments are included with this memorandum:
• Attachment 1 – site figures • Attachment 2 – groundwater sampling forms • Attachment 3 – field notes • Attachment 4 – 2017 analytical data tables and ADEC laboratory data review checklists • Attachment 5 – waste management documentation • Attachment 6 – ADEC approval letter
SOURCE AREA PL001 BACKGROUND The ADEC Contaminated Sites Database file number for Source Area PL001 is 107.38.106. Source Area PL001 comprises approximately 235 acres and contains 13 subsites (Subsites A through M). Source Area PL001 subsites are associated with the former Type III hydrant refueling system (HRS) along the south ramp and Taxiway H (Figure 2), where fuel- contaminated soil was uncovered during excavation and construction in 2005. The Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) Documentation of Preliminary Interim Land Use Controls
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Technical Memorandum Page 2 of 8
(PILUC) for SS086 and PL001 memorandum for record clarifies and documents the boundaries for preliminary interim land-use controls (LUCs) and groundwater monitoring for Source Areas SS086 and PL001, as agreed to by AFCEC and ADEC (AFCEC 2016a). The PL001 Monitoring Area boundary incorporates the entire south loop (Figure 1).
SOURCE AREA SS086 BACKGROUND The ADEC Contaminated Sites Database file number 107.38.110 tracks SS086 subsites A through E. The SS086 source areas (approximately 50 acres) are located along the eastern edge of Taxiway Golf (Taxiway G) (Figure 3). In 2011, petroleum-affected soil was discovered during a runway upgrade project to install runway edge lights and construct a 3-meter-wide shoulder at Taxiway G. Past releases of aircraft fuel may have occurred during refueling of aircraft or overflow spillage from aircraft vents (USAF 2014b). Soil contamination within the SS086 Monitoring Area includes diesel-range organics (DRO), residual-range organics (RRO), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) confined to surface and near- surface soil; migration of contaminants to groundwater has not occurred at this time based on groundwater sampling results (USAF 2014b). The SS086 Monitoring Area boundary incorporates the entire area within the main airfield fence (Figure 1).
PRIOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS In 2015, groundwater samples were collected from the five newly installed monitoring wells in addition to nine existing wells (Figures 2 and 3) and one well requested by USAF (87MW01) for one-time sampling. Occasional low-level detections of DRO, gasoline-range organics (GRO), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified for two wells associated with PL001 (13MW16 and 19PS23). All 2015 results from the SS086 Monitoring Area wells were nondetect for fuel-related analytes. No fuel-related analytes exceed project screening levels (PSLs) for the historical groundwater samples. Arsenic, iron, and manganese were the only analytes to exceed PSLs (AFCEC 2016b). Arsenic exceeded the PSL of 0.01 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in seven primary and one duplicate sample results from seven monitoring wells with concentration ranges from 0.0105 to 0.0264 mg/L. Manganese exceeded the PSL of 4.3 mg/L in three samples from two monitoring wells, resulting in concentrations ranging from 4.59 to 12 mg/L. Iron exceeded the PSL of 14 mg/L at a concentration of 15.7 mg/L in one sample (AFCEC 2016b).
I:\WERC-AFCEE-09\TO02-Eielson PBR\WP\PL001\2017 PL001 TM\PL001 SS086 2017 TM.docx AFC-J07-05WC0902-J02-0008 Technical Memorandum Page 3 of 8
In 2016, four wells contained detections of contaminants of concern, including GRO, DRO, VOCs, and PAHs. Eight other monitoring wells across the study area contained PAHs and/or VOCs in low-level estimated concentrations, as signified using the qualifier J. The only analytes to exceed the PSLs were metals. Four monitoring wells (AFMW01, PL001MW02, PL001MW03, and CMW-1) contained arsenic above the PSLs ranging from 0.0111 to 0.029 mg/L. Arsenic exceedances in these four wells were between 2.7 and 5.4 times the background threshold value (BTV) in groundwater at Eielson Air Force Base (AFB) (USAF 2014a). Two monitoring wells (AFMW01 and CMW-1) also exceeded the PSL for manganese at approximately 1.6 to 3.8 times the BTV (AFCEC 2017) with concentrations ranging from 4.76 to 11.5 mg/L. Fuel-related compound results from the 2015 and 2016 groundwater results are presented on Figures 2 and 3.
2017 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING In 2017, groundwater sampling efforts were conducted in accordance with the Eielson Performance-Based Remediation Programmatic Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) (USAF 2015b) and the 2015 Field Sampling Plan (FSP) (USAF 2015a) for Source Area PL001. The objectives of the sampling efforts were identified during project scoping meetings with the USAF and ADEC. The primary objective described in the FSP is to monitor groundwater within the PL001 south loop and SS086 monitoring boundaries to ensure contaminated groundwater is not migrating out of the south loop (PL001) or main runway (SS086) areas. This goal was accomplished by sampling 13 existing wells. As described in this section, no fuel-related target analytes exceeded PSLs, which implies no significant contamination is migrating out of the south loop (PL001) or main runway (SS086) areas. Figures 2 and 3 present the 2017 sampling locations in relation to the monitoring boundaries.
A total of 13 monitoring wells were visited for groundwater sampling during the spring. Groundwater samples were collected using the low-flow sampling technique in accordance with JE-SOP-4000 Low-Flow Groundwater Sampling (Appendix C of USAF 2015a). Groundwater samples were acquired from the screened interval using tubing inserted approximately 1 foot below the static groundwater table and connected to a peristaltic pump at the surface, as specified in the FSP (USAF 2015a). Sample containers were filled once water quality parameters stabilized or a minimum of three submerged well casing volumes
I:\WERC-AFCEE-09\TO02-Eielson PBR\WP\PL001\2017 PL001 TM\PL001 SS086 2017 TM.docx AFC-J07-05WC0902-J02-0008 Technical Memorandum Page 4 of 8 were purged. Groundwater sampling forms are provided in Attachment 2. Figures 2 and 3 in Attachment 1 show the locations of all monitoring wells sampled.
DEVIATIONS TO THE FIELD SAMPLING PLAN Deviations to the 2015 FSP occurred during the 2017 sample collection effort. These deviations included:
• An equipment blank was not collected at PL001, as required. Although a blank was not collected, the results from the groundwater samples were significantly less than the PSL. • Samples were not collected from well 19PS20, similar to the 2015 and 2016 sampling events. Although this well remains in the sampling plan, the well does not produce sufficient quantity of groundwater to be sampled for all parameters. This issue was identified in past reports and the stakeholders have not required action for this issue at this time.
2017 GROUNDWATER RESULTS Groundwater samples were analyzed offsite at EMAX Laboratories, Inc. (EMAX) for GRO, DRO, VOCs, PAHs, and metals, as outlined on Worksheet #17 of the FSP (USAF 2015a). Analytical results were compared to the PSLs presented on Worksheet #15 of the Programmatic QAPP (USAF 2015b). Of the 13 primary groundwater samples and two duplicate samples analyzed by EMAX, no exceedances were reported except arsenic and manganese (Table 1). Groundwater sample analytical results for GRO, DRO, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) are summarized on Figures 2 and 3 (Attachment 1), and the complete groundwater analytical results are provided in Attachment 4.
Although no groundwater samples contained contaminants above the PSLs, six wells (03M03B, 13MW16, 44MW13, AFMW01, AFMW03, and MW-BKG-07) contained low-level estimated detections of GRO, DRO, and/or VOCs, as signified using the qualifier J. One well (13MW16) contained estimated concentrations of PAHs. Five additional wells (09M03, 44M03, AFMW02, PL001MW02, and PL001MW03) contained low-level detections of VOCs; refer to Attachment 4 for complete analytical results.
2017 Metals Exceedances in Groundwater Five monitoring wells (09M03, 13MW16, AFMW01, CMW-1, and PL001MW03) contained arsenic above the PSL. Arsenic in these five wells were between 2.1 and 4.8 times the BTV in groundwater at Eielson Air Force Base (Table 1).
I:\WERC-AFCEE-09\TO02-Eielson PBR\WP\PL001\2017 PL001 TM\PL001 SS086 2017 TM.docx AFC-J07-05WC0902-J02-0008 Technical Memorandum Page 5 of 8
A total of 10 monitoring wells (Table 1) contained manganese at concentrations exceeding the PSL. Three of these wells (13MW16, AFMW01, and CMW-1) additionally exceeded the BTV at concentrations of approximately 1.4 and 3.7 times the BTV. A complete set of groundwater results can be found in Attachment 4.
Table 1 2017 Groundwater Exceedances
Result PSL¹ BTV² Monitoring Well Analyte (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) 03M03B Manganese 0.691 0.43 3 Manganese 2.4 0.43 3 09M03 Arsenic 0.0174 0.01 0.0054 Manganese 4.97 0.43 3 13MW16 Arsenic 0.022 0.01 0.0054 44M03 Manganese 1.72 0.43 3 44MW13 Manganese 0.746 0.43 3 Manganese 4.11 0.43 3 AFMW01 Arsenic 0.0152 0.01 0.0054 Manganese 4.25 0.43 3 AFMW01* Arsenic 0.0151 0.01 0.0054 AFMW03 Manganese 2.56 0.43 3 Manganese 11 0.43 3 CMW-1 Arsenic 0.0261 0.01 0.0054 PL001MW02 Manganese 2.17 0.43 3 Manganese 1.99 0.43 3 PL001MW03 Arsenic 0.0114 0.01 0.0054 Notes: 1 Worksheet #15 of the Programmatic QAPP (USAF 2015b) 2 UTL for groundwater (USAF 2014a) *Duplicate sample collected Bold = exceed the PSL and the BTV
Data Quality Review An ADEC Laboratory Data Review Checklist was completed to assess the overall data quality and usability (Attachment 4). The Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Jacobs) project chemist performed a data quality review in accordance with the Programmatic QAPP (USAF 2015b). The overall quality of the data was acceptable.
I:\WERC-AFCEE-09\TO02-Eielson PBR\WP\PL001\2017 PL001 TM\PL001 SS086 2017 TM.docx AFC-J07-05WC0902-J02-0008 Technical Memorandum Page 6 of 8
Two samples (AFMW01-2017S and MW-BKG-07-2017S) and their associated field duplicates were qualified JD to indicate a relative percent difference greater than 30 percent for chromium. The higher detected result was used for reporting purposes.
Several samples had nondetect results for 8260 and 8270 analytes with limits of detection (LODs) greater than the corresponding cleanup levels. These results were qualified E and could be false negatives that exceed cleanup levels. Selective ion monitoring (SIM) methods were performed for some of the affected analytes to achieve LODs less than cleanup levels.
The following 8260 analytes were not able to achieve an LOD less than the corresponding project screening levels or were not analyzed by SIM method: 1,2,3-TCP, 1,2-dibromo-3- chloropropane, and 1,2-dibromomethane. The following 8270 analytes were not able to achieve an LOD less than the corresponding project screening levels or were not analyzed by SIM method: 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), 2,6-DNT, 3,3’-dichlorobenidine, bis(2-chlorethyl) ether, dibenzo(ah)anthracene, hexachlorobenzene, n-nitrosodimethylamine, n-nitrosodi-n- propylamine, and pentachlorophenol. None of these analytes are expected to be found based on previous source area investigations.
WASTE MANAGEMENT Project investigation-derived waste generated during the 2017 investigative activities included purge and decontamination water, spent personal protective equipment (PPE), and disposable sampling equipment, such as tubing. Waste management was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in EAFB-IWMP-SOP-2100 Waste Management Plan (Appendix C of QAPP Addendum No. 5 [USAF 2016]). All wastewater generated during the 2017 field season was nonhazardous. Purge/decontamination water was containerized in 55-gallon drums and stored at a secured waste storage cell near LF003. At the end of the season, waste transportation and disposal occurred in coordination with other Jacobs- generated Eielson investigation waste. Approval to transport waste off Eielson AFB was obtained in accordance with the Hazardous Waste Management Plan for Eielson AFB (USAF 2012). Waste profiles and interim transportation manifests are included in Attachment 5. The final manifests and certificates of disposal are pending. Disposable sampling equipment and PPE were disposed of at the Fairbanks North Star Borough Landfill.
I:\WERC-AFCEE-09\TO02-Eielson PBR\WP\PL001\2017 PL001 TM\PL001 SS086 2017 TM.docx AFC-J07-05WC0902-J02-0008 Technical Memorandum Page 7 of 8
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS All fuel-related analytes were either not detected or well below the PSLs. Arsenic and manganese were the only analytes identified exceeding PSLs in 2017.
Continued groundwater monitoring at the 13 existing wells is recommended at an annual frequency. It is recommended that a replacement well be installed for well 19PS20 if stakeholders determine that this area represents a significant gap in the monitoring network. Efforts to use 19PS23 as a replacement for 19PS20 during the 2016 sampling effort were not successful due to low water production/recharge; therefore, neither well was sampled in 2017. Monitoring at wells PL001MW02, PL001MW03, 09M03, and 03M03B appear to provide sufficient coverage to monitor groundwater leaving the monitoring area.
Institutional controls prohibiting groundwater access are already in place and will be retained until groundwater within the monitoring areas meets cleanup levels, as defined in the memorandum for record titled Documentation of Preliminary Interim Land Use Controls (PILUC) for SS086 and PL001 (AFCEC 2016a).
REFERENCES ADEC (Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation). 2017 (1 October). Oil and Other Hazardous Substances Pollution Control. 18 AAC 75.
AFCEC (Air Force Civil Engineer Center). 2016a (April). Documentation of Preliminary Interim Land Use Controls (PILUC) for SS086 and PL001. Memorandum for Record.
AFCEC. 2016b (September). Addendum to the 2014 Site Characterization Report at Source Area PL001 and 2014 Phase 2 Source Evaluation Report at Source Area SS086. Final. Prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
AFCEC. 2017 (June). 2016 Groundwater Sampling Activities and Results for the PL001 and SS086 Monitoring Areas. Final. Prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
USAF (U.S. Air Force). 2012 (February). Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Eielson AFB, Alaska.
USAF. 2014a (February). Report on the Background Study of Metals in Groundwater. Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Final. Prepared by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology. USAF. 2014b (February). Phase 2 Source Evaluation Report, SS086. Eielson AFB, Alaska. Draft. Prepared by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology.
I:\WERC-AFCEE-09\TO02-Eielson PBR\WP\PL001\2017 PL001 TM\PL001 SS086 2017 TM.docx AFC-J07-05WC0902-J02-0008 Technical Memorandum Page 8 of 8
USAF. 2015a (September). 2015 Field Sampling Plan for Source Area PL001. Final. Prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
USAF. 2015b (September). Programmatic Quality Assurance Project Plan, Eielson Performance-Based Remediation. Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Final. Prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
USAF. 2016 (May). 2016 Installation-Wide Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan, Addendum No. 5 Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Final. Prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Figures Figure 1 Site Location and Vicinity Figure 2 PL001 GRO, DRO, and BTEX Results in Groundwater Figure 3 SS086 GRO, DRO, and BTEX Results in Groundwater
Attachments Attachment 1 Site Figures Attachment 2 Groundwater Sampling Forms Attachment 3 Field Notes Attachment 4 2017 Groundwater Analytical Data Attachment 5 Waste Management Documentation Attachment 6 ADEC Approval Letter
I:\WERC-AFCEE-09\TO02-Eielson PBR\WP\PL001\2017 PL001 TM\PL001 SS086 2017 TM.docx AFC-J07-05WC0902-J02-0008
ATTACHMENT 1 Site Figures
MOOS E LAKE DRIVE
M
U LLI WILDLIFE WAY
N FRENCH CREEK DRIVE S T P I E T E S R COMAN AVENUE T T R S EE O R TR A E S D I Y C A W A R L D A A G O V D R E A B N O S R Y KOYUK AVENUE W R R A A Y U
Q CARGAIN ROAD KODIAK KODIAK STREET ARCTIC AVENUE INDUSTRIAL DRIVE PL001 Monitoring EAST LOOP Area
CENTRAL AVENUE D
A
O
R
S
S AMMO ROAD NORTH STREET NORTH WABASH AVENUE E
C
C
A KOBUK AVENUE STREET DIVISION P
O
O L FLIGHTLINE AVENUE
SS086 ACCESS SOUTH Monitoring Area
RICHARDSON HIGHWAY
Image Source: GeoBase, 2012
0 750 1,500 2,250 3,000 Barrow Legend Feet Railroad PL001 South Loop and SS086 Monitoring Boundary 1 inch equals 1,500 feet Fairbanks WGS 1984 UTM Zone 6N o Eielson AFB Anchorage
Juneau SS086 AND PL001 SITE LOCATION & VICINITY MAP Approximate Regional m Groundwater EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, ALASKA Flow Direction (2016 IWMP) DATE: PROJECT MANAGER: FIGURE NO: 10 JAN 2018 K. MAHER 1 P:\AK_Eielson_AFB\GIS\MXD\17EI_PBR\PL001_SS086TM\FigA01_PL001_SS086_IWMP_SiteLocation.mxd beatycj !U
!U
!U !U
!U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U
!U !U !U !U !U !U D OA W R I !U S L !U K D !U O L I !U O F ST019 R E B !U WA !U !U !U Y !U MULLINS PITS ROAD !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U
!U D A !U !U O R !U !U!U Y R CG527 !U !U R A !U U !U Q !U !U !U !U !U 19PS20 19PS23 !U !U ST020(E-9) !U !U !U !U !U PL001 U!!U MW-BKG-07 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE !U !U !U !U !U !U !U Monitoring !U !U PL001MW02 U! !U !U Area !U !U PL001 A !U !U CARGAIN ROAD !U PL001 B PL001 C !U !U !U !U U! 09M03 PL001 M !U ST020(E-8) PL001 H !U PL001 !U !U I !U !U !U !U T !U PL001 J EE !U !U R U! AMMO ROAD ST !U !U 03M03B !U !U ST020(E-7) !U E E D !U K !U A !U A !U !U !U PL001 K N !U O
!U E R !U T E AV !U !U S FLIGHTLIN ENUE !U !U S !U !U C !U !U E E N !U !U C T PL001MW03 R !U !U !U C U! Taxiway H A !U !U A PL001 L !U !U !U A P PL001 V O D & E EN !U U O G & L E !U !U L !U !U !U !U !U !U DP026 !U !U !U !U PL001 F FLIGHTLINE ACCESS 13MW16 !U !U U! !U !U
2015-2017 Groundwater Results - PL001 ST013 !U ACCESS SOUTH !U Location ID 03M03B 09M03 13MW16!U MW-BKG-07 PL001MW02 PL001MW03 Sampling Event 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 !U Screening Method Analyte Units Level¹ SS086 SS086 AK101 GROSS086 mg/L 2.2SS086 ND SS086[0.02] ND [0.01] ND [0.01]MonitoringND [0.01] ND [0.02] ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.01] 0.14 [0.02] 0.085 [0.01] J 0.078 [0.01] J 0.085 [0.01] J ND [0.02]* ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.01]* ND [0.02] ND [0.01]* ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.02] 0.013 [0.01] J ND [0.01]* ND [0.01] AK102/10TWY DROGOLF mg/L 1.5 ND [0.21] 0.17 [0.1] J ND [0.12] 0.11 [0.097] J ND [0.12] ND [0.11] ND [0.11] ND [0.11] 0.21 [0.21] J 0.39 [0.1] J 0.26 [0.11] J 0.31 [0.1] J ND [0.22]* ND [0.1] ND [0.097] 0.11 [0.11] J* ND [0.2] ND [0.11]* ND [0.1] ND [0.11] ND [0.19] ND [0.1] ND [0.11]* ND [0.098]
TWY DELTA
TWY CHARLIE NDArea [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] SW8260B Benzene mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00038 [0.0002] JTWY ECHO 0.0001 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] SW8260B Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.7 ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] SW8260B Toluene mg/L 1 ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0002] 0.00012 [0.0001] J, B* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] 0.00011 [0.0001] J,B ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] SW8260B Xylenes mg/L 10 ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00054 [0.0002] J,B 0.00024 [0.0001] J 0.00072 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001]
Image Source: GeoBase, 2012
0 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000 Monitoring Well Sampled in 2017 (6) Table Notes : Barrow U! 1 from Worksheet #15 of the Eielson PBR QAPP (USAF 2015b) Feet !U Existing Monitoring Well [ ] = Limit of detection Fence * = sample was part of a duplicate; greater value presented 1 inch = 800 feet Fuel, Spill Containment ND = nondetect Fairbanks mg/L = milligram per liter WGS 1984 UTM Zone 6N Source Area for SS086 o Eielson AFB J = The analyte was positively identified; values are approximate Anchorage Existing Source Area B = The analyte was detected in the method blank or trip blank Source Areas for PL001 PL001 GRO, DRO AND BTEX Juneau Approximate RESULTS IN GROUNDWATER PL001 and SS086 Monitoring Boundary Regional Installation Area m Groundwater Flow Direction EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, ALASKA (2016 IWMP) DATE: PROJECT MANAGER: FIGURE NO: 10 JAN 2018 K. MAHER 2 P:\AK_Eielson_AFB\GIS\MXD\17EI_PBR\PL001_SS086TM\FigA02_PL001_SS086_FSP_WellLocationsPL001.mxd beatycj !U !U !U !U !U !U !U
!U C !U !U A !U R G ST027 !U A SD022 !U IN !U R !U OAD !U !U T R !U E E A !U !U !U IV E V !U !U Loop TWY DR R E SS014 K T N ST010 !U !U
E T S S !U E !U !U Delta R E KOYUK AVENUE Y W LF006 !U !U !U !U
C E A A 19PS33 H R Y !U W !U !U
C T D !U S !U N !U LF002 A POLARIS STREETPOLARIS !U !U D LF043 !U E A O !U R 19MW08 !U !U O !U !U R !U R E !U R !U !U I F B !U !U Y !U C DP040 !U R !U Bravo !U LF007 A R 19PS23 L SS036 A
G !U U !U Alpha Charlie !U!U Q !U SD023 AR DP028 !U !U CTIC !U !U !U 20PMW03 !U AVENUE !U INDUSTRIAL DRIVE !U !U !U
!U !U !U T ST016 !U !U !U WP060 E !U !U !U !U !U !U D !U !U E A !U !U
R O !U !U T !U
!U SS031 R !U SD024 S SS067 S EAST LOOP !U !U S ST018 K E !U O C SS030 O C !U A !U N !U !U SS047 I !U
SS012 P SS042 H RAL AVENUE O CENT C !U !U O ST059 !U SS061 !U!U !U LF003 L SS068 !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U!U !U!U NORTH STREET NORTH !U !U ST011 !U !U !U KODIAK KODIAK STREET !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U South Ramp !U !U !U!U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U SS064 !U SS037 !U !U FT009 KOBUK AVENUE !U SS035 !U!U !U!U !U !U !U !U TAXI LANE HOTEL !U !U !U !U !U !U !U!U !U !U T E !U SS062 E !U !U R TAXI LANE JULIET !U T !U PL001 KIJIK LOOP !U !U S !U !U Loop TWY WP032 44M03 !U U! Z !U U! 44MW13 WP045 Y SS041 !U O B !U Monitoring SS057 T !U DP044 IR SD021 !U !U !U !U WP034 U! AFMW01 D !U Area !U DP026 !U !U 45MW32 !U 87MW01 !U !U TAXIWAY FOX U! SS086F ST013 Oscar Rows 1-5 Fueling Pits !U !U CMW-1 TAXIWAY FOX U! SS086G ARW Spots 11-22 !U !U SS086B SS086 SS086D SS086A
WP033 TAXIWAY ALPHA SS086C Monitoring TAXIWAY GOLF TAXIWAY GOLF
TAXIWAY CHARLIE SS086E TAXIWAY ECHO !U AFMW02 TWY BRAVO Area
U! TWY DELTA
NORTH - SOUTH RWY TRANSMITTER ROAD
AFMW03 Old Richardson U!
RICHARDSON HIGHWAY
2015-2017 Groundwater Results - RichardsonPL001 Highway Location ID 03M03B 09M03 13MW16 MW-BKG-07 PL001MW02 PL001MW03 Sampling Event 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 FallLF001 2016 2017 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 2017
Screening !U Method Analyte Units Level¹ !U !U !U !U AK101 GRO mg/L 2.2 ND [0.02] ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.02] ND [0.01] ND [0.01]!U ND [0.01] 0.14 [0.02] 0.085 [0.01] J 0.078 [0.01] J 0.085 [0.01] J ND [0.02]* ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.01]* ND [0.02] ND [0.01]* ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.02] 0.013 [0.01] J ND [0.01]* ND [0.01] AK102/10 DRO mg/L 1.5 ND [0.21] 0.17 [0.1] J ND [0.12] 0.11 [0.097] J ND [0.12] ND [0.11] ND !U[0.11] ND [0.11] 0.21 [0.21] J 0.39 [0.1] J 0.26 [0.11] J 0.31 [0.1] J ND [0.22]* ND [0.1] ND [0.097] 0.11 [0.11] J* ND [0.2] ND [0.11]* ND [0.1] ND [0.11] ND [0.19] ND [0.1] ND [0.11]* ND [0.098] SW8260B Benzene mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]!U SS063ND [0.0001] 0.00038 [0.0002] J 0.0001 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] SW8260B Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.7 ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] SW8260B Toluene mg/L 1 ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0002] 0.00012 [0.0001] J, B* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] 0.00011 [0.0001] J,B ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] SW8260B Xylenes mg/L 10 ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00054 [0.0002] J,B 0.00024 [0.0001] J 0.00072 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0002] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001]* ND [0.0001]
Image Source: GeoBase, 2012 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 Table Notes : U! Monitoring Well Sampled in 2017 (7) 1 Barrow from Worksheet #15 of the Eielson PBR QAPP (USAF 2015b) Feet !U Existing Monitoring Well [ ] = Limit of detection Fence * = sample was part of a duplicate; greater value presented ND = nondetect 1 inch = 1,250 feet Fuel, Spill Containment Fairbanks mg/L = milligram per liter WGS 1984 UTM Zone 6N o Eielson AFB Existing Source Area (55) J = The analyte was positively identified; values are approximate Anchorage SS086 Subsite Location (7) B = The analyte was detected in the method blank or trip blank SS086 GRO, DRO AND BTEX Juneau PL001 and SS086 Monitoring Boundary Approximate RESULTS IN GROUNDWATER Regional m Groundwater Flow Direction EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, ALASKA (2016 IWMP) DATE: PROJECT MANAGER: FIGURE NO: 11 JAN 2018 K. MAHER 3 P:\AK_Eielson_AFB\GIS\MXD\17EI_PBR\PL001_SS086TM\FigA03_PL001_SS086_FSP_WellLocationsSS086.mxd beatycj
ATTACHMENT 2 Groundwater Sampling Forms
C\oud
~ ~
1
PLOOI PLOOI
gL/3 gL/3
MS!X MS!X Q Q
Other: Other:
Purging Purging
·-·
Groundwater Groundwater
153~ 153~
1518 1518
Suggested Suggested
\5 \5
tSl~ tSl~
(HH:mm) (HH:mm)
lSI~ lSI~
tSi~ tSi~
R.
'14
Time Time
De!;!th De!;!th
~vtl ~vtl
\ \
NA-
5o9 5o9
=not =not
Pyrge Pyrge
33 33
, ,
Welllrilegritv Welllrilegritv
'1 '1
Cloudy Cloudy
§tart §tart
-t -t
reached
, ,
tQ tQ
Yl
Color Color
measured measured
wP"'d
VQIUm~ VQIUm~
Fair Fair
PrQdUQt PrQdUQt
Notation: Notation:
WeS!th~r WeS!th~r
'\ '\
1
..
1
2:2.. 2:2..
Change Change
Time Time
\
1
-
t t
(Gallons (Gallons
t
2.. 2..
-
.
., .,
. .
. .
.
.:
l l
15 15
0 0
15 15
Brown Brown
1-5 1-5
:
§ite §ite
v v
( (
Vol~ Vol~
.---
Stab
'l, 'l,
= = (
Poor Poor
(ft) (ft)
Sampling Sampling
QQngitiQ!ll2 QQngitiQ!ll2
NS!m~ NS!m~
JC, JC,
·
~~
t'-f. t'-f.
lt
f.6 f.6
I I \ \
6
q.
3
./
Previou
~1
i
.
Total Total
l_!l)i l_!l)i
. .
it;.~ it;.~
. .
·
2.5 2.5
.
.
.
=stable =stable
3 3
q
4 4
.
g g
3 3
v v
8 8
a a
h h
) )
Max Max
s s
Total Total
56"Fs 56"Fs
155( 155(
Q~12th Q~12th
~ ~ TQQ TQQ
~#'-I ~#'-I
±10% ±10%
L L
Mandatory Mandatory
o."' o."'
0
o o
b, b,
Vol. Vol.
o:ts o:ts
Depth Depth
L L
~
.. ..
J
Data Data
"+"=rising "+"=rising
Finish Finish
53 53
I.~
cmalll cmalll
62. 62.
§tiQkU!;! §tiQkU!;!
. .
I I
'Tv
tQ tQ
1'f 1'f
00 00
±0.3 ±0.3
' '
l l
1 1
3 3
Qdor Qdor
ft-
1 1
I I
~w ~w
'1 '1
~ ~
-
~ ~
Moderate Moderate
Purge Purge
t t
Tim~ Tim~
mgJL mgJL
Sheet Sheet
Stability Stability
Strong Strong
Depth Depth
Depth Depth
(ft (ft
(ft (ft
Ambient Ambient
" "
!;!toe) !;!toe)
agl2) agl2)
• •
to to
to to
water water
.. ..
~l..lf ~l..lf
VOi VOi
~0-b ~0-b
• •
S/r5 S/r5
.SPnn_j .SPnn_j
Top Top
45./ 45./
Water Water
60.C) 60.C)
6'1-·2-
W W
=falling =falling
Parameters Parameters
~3 ~3
± ±
1
,
(mVl (mVl
ORP ORP
10mV 10mV
of of
_QJ)_ _QJ)_
9 9
e e
was
PID PID
or or
Filter Filter
II II
. .
I I
i)Vt' i)Vt'
..., ...,
Well Well
!Qtal !Qtal
: :
D~12t!J D~12t!J
P P
R~S!gingl2 R~S!gingl2
'S". 'S".
Pack Pack
Sheen Sheen
~ ~
W~ll W~ll
-:J -:J
Treated Treated
urgmg urgmg
No No
Breath
Q!!l1!tl Q!!l1!tl
1-' 1-'
@ @
~
ft). ft).
IWMP IWMP
ecfl ecfl
b b
QS!l2ing QS!l2ing
Qf Qf
Information Information
J J
(,.8"3 (,.8"3
(;,
6 6
b b
6
6
l.
{stdun~ {stdun~
Additional Additional
Gallons Gallons
Iyging Iyging
I I
i
Qf Qf
0. 0.
.
ng ng
C) C)
-
.
. .
:1:0.1 :1:0.1
Qf Qf
@
~ ~
"T8' "T8' ,
J J
pH pH
Qa
~5 ~5
15 15
ao ao
'
~'f ~'f
Zone Zone
lS lS
TotS!I TotS!I
Purged Purged
I I
:~i
I I
MS!t~riS!I MS!t~riS!I
o
ss ss
n n
per per
ng ng
b b
~ ~
@ @
(ft (ft
f f
Yes Yes
..Q.:J__ ..Q.:J__
~ ~
(It (It
orma orma
Ft Ft
(final) (final)
Stability Stability
VQCs VQCs
!;!toe) !;!toe)
btoQ} btoQ}
Other Other
gal/ft gal/ft
DO£ DO£
2.52-
Conductivity Conductivity
21ft 21ft
2.l.#g 2.l.#g
2lfb 2lfb
_
248 248
2'16 2'16
2'{8" 2'{8"
fuS/cl'1'll fuS/cl'1'll
(!;!!;!m) (!;!!;!m)
Sample Sample
In In
f f
• •
±3% ±3%
Parameters Parameters
10n 10n
Well Well
3 3
Note
l.~ l.~
= =
ProdyQt ProdyQt
QS!l2ing QS!l2ing
Max Max
Bailer Bailer
=l =l
1/0.041 1/0.041
: :
0 0
LJ
Purge Purge
~
· ·
collection collection
---
. .
b b
(Need (Need
DiS!m~t~r(in) DiS!m~t~r(in)
ThiQkn~s ThiQkn~s
"
a.66 a.66
1 1
0
~
2
'-i '-i
0
/
(P
i
Vol Vol
~~cr
< <
.
Turbidity Turbidity
.
. .
_lNTU_l _lNTU_l
, ,
,
AFMW
// //
10 10
35 35
:n
62 62
(j}
ro ro
eristaltic eristaltic
5'2-
·
gal gal
'f 'f
One) One)
o
NTU NTU
512.0/loftl-
oina=nt oina=nt
• •
eter eter
1 1
o.163 o.163
information information
3. 3.
(ft} (ft}
~ ~
785 785
Date Date
I I
P
and and
~S!IIQns ~S!IIQns
O O
¥
~ ~
Durino Durino
sed sed
Ugal Ugal
Temperature Temperature
lf. lf.
lf
l/
'1. '1.
'l.s
LJ p p
VQium~ VQium~
4/0.653 4/0.653
~.s
Hach Hach
HM HM
.
(•cl (•cl
for for
. .
.
:Lai(:.C :Lai(:.C
-
S'6 S'6
5tlJ, 5tlJ,
= =
51 51
Other Other
12~r 12~r
if.? if.?
G3 G3
~5 ~5
Submersible Submersible
P
Puraino Puraino
Max Max
·
.JACOBS
on on
Turbidimet
u
·
z z
z z
, ,
roino roino
lineS!r lineS!r
R~QQV~r~d R~QQV~r~d
..,.
Purge Purge
Parameters Parameters
next next
PrQj~Qt PrQj~Qt
§S!m!;!l~r §S!m!;!l~r
_ _
i-1-IVI i-1-IVI
Prawdown Prawdown
S S
05WC0902 05WC0902
6/1.469 6/1.469
rr rr
Page Page
6.2-J 6.2-J
6. 6.
fQQt(gS!Ilft) fQQt(gS!Ilft)
5 5
t
~
i:,
Vol Vol
~
6
Water Water
6-2.1 6-2.1
(feet (feet
~ ~
l.. l..
. .
~ ~
page page
-
~
. .
L L
2-1 2-1
P
Z..J Z..J
2./ 2./
Zl Zl
Nymg~r Nymg~r
r
l.~ l.~
'l 'l
u
'LI 'LI
lnitiS!Il2 lnitiS!Il2
1 1
(m!,) (m!,)
btoc) btoc)
mp mp
level level
of2 of2
< <
7 7
0.3 0.3
. . fl fl
~ ~
' '
_ _
0.3 0.3
N N
~ ~
f f
u u
< <
1 1
.
·
level level
btoc)
z
c:S c:S
I I
IN IN
Initial:! Initial:!
QIO~ QIO~
2 2
"'Z "'Z
Ql Ql 3l~o 3l~o
Ill Ill
a.~ a.~
~d~ ~d~
ue.t ue.t
ttU ttU
(feet (feet
{1-pJ, {1-pJ,
Water Water
Pump Pump
l-t~ l-t~
P,.wdown P,.wdown
N03= N03=
DSWC!0102. DSWC!0102.
Samgl!;!r Samgl!;!r
Num!;!!;!r Num!;!!;!r Proj!;!ct
Parameters Parameters
ble ble
_ _
i
moling moling
~ ~
C! C!
~ ~
a
~ACOBS
ers
:~a.. :~a..
Ql~ Ql~
::lw ::lw
S
~
C/)~ C/)~
~~ ~~ ""
~~ ~~
C/)
m
Other Other
-
c·cl c·cl
for for
Sub
Temperature Temperature
ID ID
Used Used
C:N C:N
~~ ~~
~~ ~~
z.~ z.~
Oo Oo
tz.or=t tz.or=t
t t
DO= DO=
mp mp
Date Date
,.n
Well Well
'l.D 'l.D
P P
t t
~ ~
en en
ic ic
......
~ ~
~ ~
oinm
NTU NTU
s s
One) One)
A~W)WOI A~W)WOI
)(! )(!
QiS: QiS:
:::ii!~ :::ii!~
~~ ~~
10 10
(NTU). (NTU).
!=no !=no
Turbidity Turbidity
< <
eristalt
Fe= Fe=
(E'
(Choose (Choose
......
Ql Ql
QIC/) QIC/)
(l)m (l)m
'CCO 'CCO
c..~ c..~
~~ ~~
1on 1on
f f
Ferrous Ferrous
0 0 ......
~ ~
0 0
Ci.i Ci.i
:1: :1:
(~5/cml (~5/cml
Parameters Parameters
) )
(/)~ (/)~
-x· -x·
a:~ a:~
I$; I$;
Conductivity Conductivity
t: t:
btoc
norma norma
I I
{f! {f!
MSD MSD
0 0 ......
0 0
Stability Stability
/
Requested Requested
(/) (/)
C/)~ C/)~
g~ g~
uN uN
MS
units) units)
wl\;tp wl\;tp
0.1 0.1
f f
pH pH
l l
± ±
Event Event
Tybiog Tybiog
{std {std
Optional Optional
l l
eCIOn eCIOn
0 0
al al
10 10 N N
~ ~
of of
1i5 1i5
~ ~
Analyses Analyses
II II
• •
h h
w~ w~
al~ al~
OCI) OCI)
: :
0 0
!;!g!
T
C C
D
QC
0 0
10 10
iii' iii'
I I
'i 'i
.,N .,N
g~ g~
u~ u~
"'T "'T
10mV 10mV
ORP ORP
(mV) (mV)
ui
SprlV\1 SprlV\1
:1: :1:
Parameters Parameters
ample ample
S!!!il S!!!il
0 0
r> r>
s s
D
I I
a:~ a:~
a:~ a:~
o..-
Stability Stability
(-q) (-q)
mg/L mg/L
Sheet Sheet
3 3
.
Time Time
' '
/5/Z..o/l.
±0
0 0
N' N'
DO DO
I I
(riig/L) (riig/L)
'1..
i'lS i'lS
0~ 0~
a:~ a:~
o..-
Data Data
Finish Finish
o
21 21
Mandatory Mandatory
& ±10% ±10%
l
1
......
~ ~
I I
(!)~ (!)~
a:~ a:~
0§ 0§
X X
Total Total
Uters) Uters)
or or
Nam!;! Nam!;!
Sampling Sampling
E E
., .,
en en
Volume Volume
!;! !;!
A6 A6
. .
Vel\-
u.8 u.8
C)O... C)O... ~.!!! ~.!!!
Afi Afi §it!;! §it!;!
C.o:t C.o:t
C> C>
.!!!Cl .!!!Cl
Iff)~ Iff)~
AF('I\WO\ AF('I\WO\
C:Q(!) C:Q(!) ~ ~
......
Tim
:!<("~ :!<("~
8 8
(Gallons (Gallons
Change Change
art art
of2 of2
t
~ ~
:I :I
S
2 2
~ ~
''-
\L \L
~l ~l
-4DML -4DML
wd wd
51 51
mm) mm)
:
P
Time Time
IS IS
Page Page
:::1 :::1
Ill Ill
'E 'E
0 0 ~ ~
' '
2.. 2..
(HH
SAMPLEID:
1. 1.
(, (, Groundwater Groundwater e
~
Max
\1.~
Groundwater
Purg
rl5\
IZ71o
(HH:mm)
1..~\
"
Suggested
1JiU?
-
Q~pth
Time
YLOO\
"
Purge
i
ng
=not
.
W~lllnt~grity
rz."L
Cloudy
!;ltS!tl
reached:
~J~
tQ
~
measured
Volume
Fair
PrQgyct
Z/l
Notation
Time
Change
i L""\
f,
1,'"":}
(Gallons
..
\
+
Brown
Site
Vol _f Poor = ( = (ft} Sampling tabil Name ~ : C().'3 .l.j L..L\ ~. 1D " Pre -~' Total I ~ lters (.g' . viou " .S =stable ~ 9tush \ s Max ~ D~oth S:, TQQ !;ltiQkyp otal :1:10% 5:eo5 50~ Mandatory .Lt.~s- "5·'3£-\ AI Famt e. Vol. Depth Data -5: rz.s<6 Fini "+ (mg/L} I tQ CJ DO :1:0 " Qdor § ft- =rising ~w I hTime . {90 1WMi\ 3 L.i Moderate Purge Sheet mgll Stability Strong Depth Depth (tt (ft .J:5 Amb btQQ} 5!9!!} ~. to to ~ water ~?J-o ~,~ "-"=falling • '8'5 i Top Water ent (g Well . Parametars ±10mV ~ ( ORP of ~ mVl 0 was or Riter · ~ ~ Well T Lo \ D~pth Purging : ota Pack W~ll Sheen ® Treated Yes . l / BreathingZone D @.1 ft) 3 eo I(J.o.,z QS!l!ing (o,~ la.~ L; ~.q &~ Information t • h , (std Additional Gallons Q,/(J, o 1-~ f ~ Event :1:0 (S'f C pH ~ units) a . Pyrg~g sin Information Ma!~ri5!1 1 ss o · per 3 ~ ~ q 5 Yes Q. lfl Ft (final) Stability !;!tQQ} bt gal/ft Other 0 o Dri ?f/IJ c ?J~~ l ' Conductivity O~D 3 ~~ In ( p • Sample :1:3% Parameters S/cml ~ Well 3 = 3 Note P[oguct Q§!§ing ~ · ~ -:r 5 Max Bailer Q, 1/0.041 : . (9}~~~~ Purge () 1 collection l.P '3 Digm~t~r(i!:!ll ThiQ!sn~§ (Need ~/=;'0 .Z.'Lq ·:Z, ( I Vol Mul < Turbidity , ,Y'±_ -:> Egyipm~ot Peristaltic CNTU 10NTU ( .Z..,'\ gal ~ y One) J 2 L.t 1 l • )1\\J\) · \..) Z,"1--'/11 . 0 3 WeiiiD (fl} information . . 1 Date 785 ~ Pump ~§!lion§ and . ~ !.!§eg ~T -'-3; L/gal '3:-q.~ ~ _,..L Temperature OL..- '2._ VQiym~ 4/0 fQr JCJ.:\ C - *Cl . = .. p~r Z( ~ Other . Submersible 9"f{ 653 Puraina Pyrgiog Max JACOBS /1/s-3, on li!]~§!r urbid B~!!.Qvered . \~c;f- Purge . Parameters Project Sampler <;t? next 05WC0902 prawdown 6/1.469 -5: l .15, ~ m~ ~ "5/(p~ fQQt(gal/ft} Page Vol Water (feet page - L Pump Number .{9:1 (oL( . (gL( Initials (mL} (ol( bloc) 1 level < of2 0 ) 7 . 3 . f1 fl . 0.3 < level .... btoc) lniliS!Is (.) - N!,!mber -~ .:; I 0 z~ :I: ::eN ~ (feet Water Q) >-l~ co C! ~~i :;::(.) a. Drawdown G.v \A;(.\ Pump \-K,_\ ~S!mt!ler Proj!i!ct Parameters \\\JDo e ~ N63= l b i .JACOBS - g Other - Samolina Gil$ ::::sw Q)8 :::;sa. C"Cl "0<( en -<") !Ea. Oilq ~<( en\!:!- ~ / for h Temperature Submers ~ Used D51te '-1- C:N Glen 2:-~ Oo -g~ -l WeiiiD DO= 2 l- ~ NTU One) iJI'm!Al. i ic .,...-- ~ ...... ~ en ~ t ~ 10 l A."YM~oz... Jj j_NTU). Turbidity ou < II)N QiS: Iii~ :2 J sta (Choose Fe= ' s ...... g ~ u miD Q) Glen "lii~ "Cal ]~ a. 10n f Ferro ±3% _) (pS/cllll Parameters I ~ Ci5 c 0 ...... Conductivity i\ . ../ II>N :I:~ ~~ ~ btoc) norma Stability I , {ft . MSD / 6 0 ~ Requested ng 0.1 unitsl rn~'- i uN en 0~ >en pH MS fu!J! '5 ± ~ f . Optional jstd ec1on ofTub 1//. ~ ::J: Ci5 IJl 0 10 N ~ Dup II Analyses IJl~ Cen w o C W D~t!th QC: m g 10mV ORP jmVl /_ II>N ± g~ Parameters (.)~ \W . e ample s Dat 0 <'1 I Sheet Stability mg/L a::~ o....- a::$ ~~41\t:t me ±0.3 Ti DO I " (m!lfl) Data 0 N' m~~ nish \1 Mandatory i o....- a::~ c$ ±10% .... F ~\L · \ ~ 0 ...... I /_ Total Uters) o....- a::~ (!)$ or \ Sampling ) Volume ~i!!i!N§!me II> E co Ul e - \ ~~>co COOl 11>- u..c (Gallons "'6!lfi kvAJWOJ_ C!l U:l)IA f\G1 Change \t)l\ ~b ... ~ - c:o(!) : J!! · 8c~ of2 ~lc:o Q) ::I i~ E 0 > mm) 2 : r lomt..- \L- \1- 1 Time Q~L Groundwater (HH co ::I SAMPLEID ~ c: v 0 Page {g 1. /'}., Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet ..JACOBS- Site Name Project Number fm\I'JXD 05WC0902 Weather Conditions PID Readings ofTotal VOCs (ppm) Date Sampler Initials Ambient O,D Breathing ZoneO· In wenG..:_L D 5\ C7tl\lr-~- ADIE'K Well Information W!!lllnt!!Qritll TQQ l2tickup (ft ags) W!!ll QS!sing Mat!!rial CS!§ing DiS!meter(in)/ GaiiQnl! P!!r linear fQQt(gS!IIft) Fair Poor ss 1/0.041 4/0.653 6/1.469 ~- - e,·~ @) ~ D!!pth tQ PrQQYQt(ft) D!!pth to GW (ft !;!toQ) TQ!!!ID!i!r;!tb Qf Casing (fl btoc) PrQdyQtThicknes§ (ft) and VQIUm!! ReQQV!!r!!Q(mL) {\jf\ (_D a-?:> j3CG, (final) NA MS!XPurge Volume = ( lfi .'7 ff ft- (o ;23 ft)• t) • llo 3 gal/ft • 3 = 5-15 gal. 3.785 Ugal = I cr.s3 L Previous TotalDepth Depthto Wateror Gallonsp er Ft MaxPurge Vol MaxPurge V ol Depthto Topof Filter Pack We II Pur gmg In f ormat" 1on Finish Time D!!pth Qf Tubing (ft btoc) Equipment Used fQr Purging \L-\l24~e l5to\p '':\- • Q)I Bailer cEeristaltic PumP) Submersible Pump .QQ!Qr QQQrtJR- ~ Purged DO! M!!ter !.!lied During Purging Clear Cl@ None Moderate Yes Yes ~ YSI Multi Meter Other: Faint Strong (§) Hach Turbidimeter t+ ~ \9\\Q)~"lS'\a~tlo055.;t Purging reached: ~a~lityMax Vol. I Purge water was: Treated ~~ Other Note: Volume Mandatory Stability Parametars Additional Stability Parameters (Need One) Other Parameters Time (Gallons~±10% I ±0.3 nngll ±10mV ± 0.1 ±3 % < 10 NTU Drawdown < 0.3 fl (HH:mm) - DO ORP pH Conductivity Turbidity Temperature Water level Change Total ..- (mgll) (mV) (std units) '(liS/em) (NTU) (•C) (feet btoc) 1'-\SR ~.s 3.5 !.50 ~CO.?lCo. '6 \ ~-::leO5 4~ 4.~t G,_3\J aa.~.,.. 160d. l. 9 1,).~0.\d..- Cn."':tqV ~5¥ 3. r=1-v 3.~4 G. ~3' \q_--:}v d..\C~ \5\13 l.~~ .i- 0.\::r (Q.80 v d51- v v -?,,g.:{ c.o.a+ 0 . ()l{ v" to S{d...... ~51-v 16'D\£J \. \ '1--'iS \ct,·a""' . a. \.4 v 3 . d-D to.~~ .1\~- (; 'OS( l~ ..:::-(~ .1-L- ,J ~ u . Sample collection information on next page -7 Suggested Notation: "-" = not measured ""'"=stable "+"=rising "-"=falling Page 1 of2 ft ft ' ' 0.3 0.3 "' "' oz. oz. < < j: j: (.) (.) ~ ~ f f level level - - btoc) btoc) lnitiS!I§ lnitiS!I§ I I z~ z~ 0 0 :I: :I: Number Number "'-...,. "'-...,. S!~o S!~o o...z o...z c: c: Q) Q) lii:I:N lii:I:N !110:2 !110:2 a.~ a.~ ~d~ ~d~ (feet (feet Water Water Hct Hct t-IC t-IC I+NO~ I+NO~ Y\01\ Y\01\ prawdown prawdown Q..i) Q..i) N03= SS!m(!ler SS!m(!ler PrQj!;!Qt PrQj!;!Qt Parameters Parameters os~A~coct os~A~coct - g g JACOBS :Ia.. :Ia.. Q)~ Q)~ ::lw ::lw Samoling Samoling s~ s~ ~<( ~<( (f)!;!:!. (f)!;!:!. (/) (/) a!lq a!lq "Cc( "Cc( !Ea.. !Ea.. Other Other - ("C) ("C) for for SubmersiblePump SubmersiblePump --- Temperature Temperature Used Used Gl(f) Gl(f) c:N c:N ...J~ ...J~ al~ al~ -'='~ -'='~ Oo Oo 00= ~ ~ ~ ~ WeiiiD WeiiiD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (/) (/) ...... NTU NTU One) One) S-1-L{.-tl S-1-L{.-tl }( }( liS: liS: ~~ ~~ -*1~ -*1~ 10 10 -- (NTU) (NTU) AfMW63 AfMW63 Eouinment Eouinment Turbidity Turbidity < < nstaltlcPu (Choose (Choose ...... (fe Q)(/) Q)(/) Q) Q) .,ID .,ID a.~ a.~ '5i~ '5i~ "CCXI "CCXI ·oo ·oo FerrousFe= Sprl.~ Sprl.~ ±3% ±3% ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ...... en en I11S/cm) I11S/cm) Parameters Parameters ')(_ ')(_ rn"' rn"' a:~ a:~ :I:~ :I:~ Conductivity Conductivity B- btoc) btoc) Information Information 0[1 0[1 Cft Cft .. .. ...... 0 0 Stability Stability 6' 6' Requested Requested 2 2 ., ., (/)~ (/)~ >~ >~ g"' g"' 1 1 . MS!MS units) units) pH pH ±0 Event Event Tubing Tubing p p (std (std Optional Optional N N ~ ~ m m of of g g en en Analyses Analyses {.O' {.O' 0(/) 0(/) w~ w~ m~ m~ Hkl Collection Collection D!;!(!th D!;!(!th PLOOI PLOOI .QC m m 0 0 10 10 rn"' rn"' '/... '/... g~ g~ (.)~ (.)~ ORP ORP (mV) (mV) ±10mV ±10mV Parameters Parameters ~.l\-l-=1 ~.l\-l-=1 0 0 M" M" Sample Sample Date Date I I 0:::~ 0:::~ a::$. a::$. o..- 5- Stability Stability mg/L mg/L Sheet Sheet / 3 3 . ±0 DO DO 0 0 N' N' I I (rilg/L) (rilg/L) '-j_ '-j_ 0:::~ 0:::~ o::S. o::S. Data Data o..- 20ll5 20ll5 Time Time Finish Mandatory Mandatory - ±10% ±10% !5d..~ !5d..~ 0 0 ~ ~ I I 'A 'A 0:::~ 0:::~ (!):$. (!):$. o..- Total Total Liters) Liters) or or Name Name Sampling Sampling I I V V E E "' "' Cii' Cii' I I Volume Volume - Site Site nil nil "'Ill "'Ill liiOl liiOl .,_ .,_ G<( G<( C!> C!> "61'- AFMli\.l03 Do Do I I ~ ~ c:oC!> c:oC!> ...... Time Time (Gallons (Gallons :S<~ :S<~ 8 8 Change Change amber amber OvV\ber OvV\ber of2 of2 L L ~ ~ :I :I Start Start l l 0 0 > > 2 2 \509 \509 I I I I L{OMLUOA L{OMLUOA SJO!Yll SJO!Yll mm) mm) PLbO\ PLbO\ : Time Time Ill Ill :I :I Page Page c c ~ ~ 0 0 (HH SAMPLEID: SAMPLEID: Groundwater Groundwater l l ~ ~ '2 '2 '2 '2 Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet .JACOBS - Site Name Event WeiiJD Proj!;!ct Nymb!;!r PLOO\ S'pr I 1'\_j_ IWMP MW-B\<6)-o-=t 05WC0902 · W!i!i!ther CQnditiQn§ PID R!;!adings of Total VOCs (!2!2m} Date SS!m(;!l!;!r I nitiS!l:i Pc.tHI--j -~UI'\h.l:\\,-1\~'h50~sF Ambient ..Q..:.Q_Breathing Zone In Wen .Q...:Q_ S-24- 2cH1- HrvJ 1 ~ Well Information W!;!lllnt!ilgri~TOC Sti!:;kU!2(ft ag§} W!;!ll QS!§ingMat!;!rial C§!sing Diam!;!t!;!r(in}/ GaiiQns (;!!;!rlin!;!§!r fQQt(gS!llftl @ Fair Poor ss 11 o.041 @ o.163 410.653 6/1.469 2 ·42 @ c) De!,lth to Product (ft} De!,lth to GW (ft btQQ} TQ!!!lDg!!th Qf Ca§ ing (ft btoQ) Product ThiQkn!i!:i§ (ft} §!nd VQIUm!ilR!i!QQV!;!r!;!d (mL} i2-'T2- 2S.ro (final) Ntt MS!XPyrge VQiyme = ( '2..5 • 1- 4 ft - ll-l-1-- ft). t). i ~3 gal/ft • 3 = &.~'l gal• 3.785 Ugal = zt.f. i L PreviousTota l Depth Depthto Wateror Gallonsper Ft MaxPurge Vol MaxPurge Vol Depthto Topof FilterPa ck W e II P urgmg In f orma f 1on Start Time Finish Time D!;!!,lth Qf Tubing·(ft !:!toe} Egui(;!ment U§ed for Purging 132\ 135~ 13 .1- Bailer ~ ristalticPu~ Submersible Pump Color QQQr Sheen Purg!ild Dei M!;!t!;!r!J:i!i!d Dyring Pyrging ~ Cloudy Brown e Moderate Yes YSI Multi Meter Hach Turbidimeter Other: Famt Strong @0 ® crc -=-- =- titll 450 2.0JbD552.5 Purging reachec("' StabilitY) Max Vol. I Purge water was: Treated {star~ Other Note: Mandatory Stability Parameters Additional Stability Parameters (Need One) Other Parameters Vol Time (Gallons ~ Lit ±10% I ±0.3 mg/1.. ±10mV ±0.1 ±3% < 10 NTU ~prawdown< 0.3 ~ (HH:mm) - DO ORP pH Conductivity Turbidity Temperature Water level Change Total (mg/1..} CmVl . (std units) (ItS/em) (NTU) c·c> (feet btoc) 132~ 2 .1 1 . 1 i2.1-b 13'85 2.'\ S.b It 31 260· 0 b. L.t'tl IY b J • (J 3 2. b'iS l l. l-(; 1340 '2..o '1-• 6 \~.I'iS 204."1- 6.11 i4L /0. 3 I i. ~0 IZ. "T6 ,;«--s - '2~ q 9 lo. i2 1Cf'l.<3 e,.n IY2. I . 0 '3 I. &l /l.'l~ 135o L~ \1. t Cf.(:.8 loifS,b b.I":J- 142. I. b'-1 f . "1 I IZ. -1 b 1?>55 2. . 2 13. Cf '9.12 I q ·-\ .4 6- i ~ HI j. 02 i ."lS l ~.'7 b .. j .S \'l .l.\ L To·i-t:U uc pl.lf'l. ~\ Sample collection information on next page 7 Suggested Notation: "-"=not measured •./•= stable "+"=rising ·-·=falling Page 1 of2 ft ft · · 3 3 . _ _ 0 N N < < ~ ~ (.) (.) e... e... ~S!I§ ~S!I§ i Level Level -i -i - bioi!} ln z J: J: 0 0 V\ V\ Nl"\ Nl"\ Nym!;!gr Nym!;!gr j!!O~ j!!O~ Sl~o Sl~o 2! 2! IIIJ:N IIIJ:N QJ QJ a..~ a..~ ~d~ ~d~ feet feet 0 0 _( Water Water i'\ i'\ 1-\-C\ 1-\-C\ U.C.I U.C.I Pump Pump ~NC3 ~NC3 pawdown pawdown HM HM N03= N03= §§!miller §§!miller Projg"t Projg"t Parameters Parameters ble ble oswcoq02. oswcoq02. i ~ ~ ~ ~ g g "'Acoas ::~D.. ::~D.. GJ5l GJ5l ::lw ::lw Samolina Samolina .!!! en -D.. -D.. J!!<( J!!<( ~<( ~<( «JC! «JC! enw enw Other Other cl cl · - i for for ubmers N"' N"' ll- Temperature Temperature = = sed sed ID ID U C:N C:N !I i:); ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Zo Zo DO Date Date - We 8kGt-o1- Pum · · - oment oment ~ ('<; ('<; 24 i ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ v v en en NTU NTU One) One) - · N N Ul~ Ul~ X X Qj~ Qj~ :::!:~ :::!:~ iiif6 iiif6 10 10 CNTU). CNTU). 5 Ma Eau stalti Turbidity Turbidity = = < < Fe (Choose (Choose ...... c::::]5Eiri Glen Glen Uliii' Uliii' QJ QJ a..~ a..~ ~~ ~~ -o 1on 1on - f f Ferrous Ferrous ±3% ±3% ,.._ ,.._ ~ ~ 0 0 ii.i ii.i 0 0 CuS/cml CuS/cml Parameters Parameters X X ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Conductivity Conductivity J J btoc) btoc) norma norma I I (f1 (f1 MSD MSD 0 0 Stability Stability 0 0 / ) ) Requested Requested ts Ul,.._ Ul,.._ i ng ng en~ en~ g~ g~ uN uN i MS un pH pH f f ±0.1 ±0.1 Event Event Tub {std {std Optional Optional 1- _ ec1on ec1on of of N N ~ ~ 0 0 ii.i ii.i en en 10 10 lVJMP lVJMP · Analyses Analyses II II ~ ~ w~ w~ en~ en~ Oen Oen : 0 0 13 C C q q De11th De11th QC n n ) ) 10 10 0 0 iii' iii' UIN UIN y. y. g~ g~ (.)~ (.)~ 10mV 10mV ORP ORP CmV 'l) 'l) pri pri ± ± Parameters Parameters - ample ample -z.c;1 -z.c;1 S S · 0 0 M' M' s s D§!te D§!te z.y z.y a::~ a::~ - a::lili:: a::lili:: o...- g/ g/ Stability Stability mg/L mg/L Sheet Sheet s ~ ~ m i 3 3 . T I I 20l1S{ ±0 DO DO 0 0 N' N' I I §h §h - (maiL} (maiL} i Data Data 0~ 0~ a::lll::: a::lll::: o...- X X Fin Mandatory Mandatory c":l L!2.!J L!2.!J ±10% ±10% - 1 1 ~ ~ 0 0 I I (!)~ (!)~ a::lili:: a::lili:: o...- "A "A Total Total Liters) Liters) 13~6\ or or Name Name - Sampling Sampling II II E E Ul Ul Ill Ill Ui' Ui' Volume Volume - Site Site A&. A&. u.c u.c 11101 11101 ::!..!!! ::!..!!! H~PE H~PE A~ A~ \JOf\ \JOf\ <{, <{, G<( G<( (!) (!) am am mg mg MW i - C:Q(!) C:Q(!) ~ ~ ...... (Gallons (Gallons ,S ,S 8 8 · Change Change ML ML 'YIL 'YIL • of2 of2 '1 '1 ::J ::J ~ ~ StartT > > 0 0 2 2 5 5 oo oo 40 40 \L \L · ll ll s mm) mm) 3 3 : I I Tlme Tlme I I ::J ::J Ill Ill 2 2 Page Page 2 2 'E 'E 0 0 ~ ~ l> l> (HH SAMPLEID: SAMPLEID: PLOOI PLOOI Groundwater Groundwater . . ( ( ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ 15~2 15~2 1 \'5 \'5 Purging Purging Other MaxPurgeVo t511 t511 " Suggested Suggested Groundwater Groundwater (HH 50'1 50'1 -"=not -"=not ...... ::,21 ::,21 Time Time D!i!oth D!i!oth : \1. \1. mm) mm) : : 1 Welllntegritv Welllntegritv 502- Cloudy Cloudy Start Start (l\ (l\ reached to to fLCOj fLCOj ~ ~ measured measured Notation: Notation: Fair Fair Product Product W!;!ath§r W!;!ath§r 1 l.5 l.5 Change Change \. \. Tim§ Tim§ ll'\ ll'\ i.5 i.5 . . (Gallons (Gallons 0 0 l ume= 5 5 5" 5" Brown Brown Site Site : ( Volu St~ St~ Poor Poor (ftl (ftl Sampling Sampling CQnditiQns CQnditiQns Name Name ~ ~ G,o G,o ( ( 3 ~.5 ~.5 " 2..o 2..o ~.0 ~.0 "' P Total Total . revious revious · 1 te te " E) E) ] =stable =stable · 9-l 9-l . . Max Max 2.~ 2.~ T O!;!pth O!;!pth ~ ~ otal otal TOC TOC :1:10% :1:10% II II ~ ~ 1\'iandatory 1\'iandatory Faint Faint Vol. Vol. Cf Cf 152.1 152.1 j, j, L29 L29 b 1 2. 2. \ \ Data Data " e Finish Finish . . - ll ll +" (mg/L) (mg/L) . p .'2L\ .'2L\ Stick!.!o Stick!.!o I I th th (, (, to to DO DO :1:0.3 :1:0.3 21 21 . QQQr QQQr =rising =rising · z.o z.o ity ity ft I I GW GW 2.. 2.. - Moderate Moderate Purge Purge .._, .._, Tim§ Tim§ mg/L mg/L Sheet Sheet Stability Stability Strong Strong D D (ft (ft epth epth (ft (ft epth epth Amb ~j~r ~j~r !;!tQc) !;!tQc) -50.7 -50.7 agsl agsl "-"=falling "-"=falling -Y~ t t water water -43, -43, o o o o -33.\ -33.\ T i Wa e W W op op Parametars Parametars :1:10mV :1:10mV n t t te (mV ORP ORP of of _Q__ _Q__ e e r r was PID PID or or Riter Riter - II II ) ) Sp Sp 4 4 (o (o Well Well Tota D!i!oth D!i!oth : : P P Read Pa ~ ~ 6:> 6:> W!i!ll W!i!ll Treated Treated urgmg urgmg ...... ck ck l l Jl Jl B , , 8 8 Depth Depth 10.5 10.5 ft) r ~ ~ ea i nas nas Casing Casing 2f 2f 1. 1. r"Lq r"Lq Information Information . . 1-15 1-15 1./5 1./5 / • • t h (std (std Additional Additional Gallons Gallons IYt!iog IYt!iog 2.. 2.. in of of 0. :1:0 ill ill . g g Event Event i-3 i-3 pH pH Cas Y. Y. 15 15 ~ ~ units) units) Zone Zone Tota . P!,!rg§d P!,!rg§d 1 1 1 I I Mat§rial Mat§rial ss ss !0:) !0:) I~ I~ i n n p ng ng (§) (§) e (tt (tt IW.-V\.P IW.-V\.P f f r r F _Q_ _Q_ Yes Yes l l ( orma orma (final ft ft VOCs VOCs Stability Stability t t t!tQ! bt Other Other ga o D~ D~ c l/ Conductivity Conductivity ) ) l l 200 200 ft /'1(., /'1(., I I /~& /~& (uS/em) (uS/em) (ooml (ooml Sample Sample I t' t' n n • Cf Cf :1:3% :1:3% Parameters Parameters 1on 1on We 3= 3= Note · 1 1 PrQd!.!Cl PrQd!.!Cl Casiog Casiog ll ll Bailer Bailer Ma 0.~ 0.~ g, g, 1/0.041 1/0.041 : : x x ifs!M~ ifs!M~ Purge Purge collection collection ~ ~ 1 1 Diam!;!t§rCinl Diam!;!t§rCinl (Need (Need Thickn§ss Thickn§ss 5.52. 5.52. t~ t~ '3. '3. (. (. Vol Vol < < Turbidity Turbidity 6n'S Ea PLOOI PLOOI (NTU 10 10 M!;!l§r M!;!l§r s-o s-o 0 0 9t.J 9t.J gai 5-2..0-Ll 5-2..0-Ll '-\ '-\ One) One) ~ ~ ui NTU NTU oment oment ) taltic taltic (., (., • . . information information 3 !.!§!i!d !.!§!i!d (ftl (ftl Well Well . ~ ~ 785Ugal= 785Ugal= I I tt p Gallons Gallons and and !jjj) Used Used ID ID During During ~ Temperature Temperature z.. 2..~8 2..~8 9_,gz.. 9_,gz.. 2. 2. p p Vo 4/0.653 4/0.653 f ( - o l 13 13 •cJ •cJ - ume ume Other Other cg cg 12er 12er r r Submersible Submersible Pyrging Pyrging P M .JACOBS on on Lf Lf 1'-t ura ax ax lin§ar lin§ar . R!i!COV§r§d R!i!COV§r§d Purge Purge I I Parameters Parameters next next in PrQj§ct PrQj§ct - Sam!;!l§r Sam!;!l§r 1 1 05WC0902 05WC0902 ~ ~ a a Prawdown Prawdown 6/1.469 6/1.469 'l 'l Page Page C1.~ C1.~ foQt(gal/ftl foQt(gal/ftl Vol Vol 'l. 'l. Watarlevel Watarlevel ~.u ~.u ,,~ ,,~ { feet feet page page (q L L Pump Pump N r r ~Co ~Co loitiS~I !,! CmLl CmLl 1 1 btoc) btoc) "' "' lo lo m!;!er m!;!er of2 of2 < < ~ ~ to to 7 7 0 . :2 :2 3 3 . . ft ft r- ~ ~ ~ ~ - 0.3 0.3 ~ ~ (.) (.) :± :± < < 2 2 o.J o.J -e.. -e.. _ - level level btoc) btoc) ~ c5 c5 lnitiS!I:i lnitiS!I:i ct ct ~ym!;!er ~ym!;!er 1!,!0~ 1!,!0~ 2: 2: m:r:N m:r:N Ql Ql Sl2!o Sl2!o Q..~ Q..~ ~d'2 ~d'2 Ott Ott = = Ht\ Ht\ (feet (feet Water Water 1i 1i HN0 1'\ 1'\ Pump Pump Drawdown Drawdown 6...0 6...0 N03 §!S!ml21er §!S!ml21er PrQj~Qt PrQj~Qt oswco'W oswco'W Parameters Parameters ble ble - i g g ..JACOBS :::Ja. :::Ja. Qlg Qlg :::Jw :::Jw ~am121ing ~am121ing !!!~ !!!~ m~ m~ m m ~<( ~<( ~~ ~~ a!lq a!lq Other Other - (·c> (·c> fQr fQr Submers Temperature Temperature = = Us~d Us~d Qlm Qlm c:N c:N _..-- ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ DO ~ ~ WeiiiD WeiiiD 12ment 12ment ~ ~ ~ ~ i rn rn ~ ~ NTU NTU One) One) s-2c-q s-2c-q QiS: QiS: ~ {ij~ {ij~ '/. '/. 10 10 (NTU) (NTU) PLOO\~wrn_ PLOO\~wrn_ Egy Turbidity Turbidity < < Fe= Fe= (Choose (Choose ~ ~ Qlm Qlm Ql.,.... Ql.,.... IJ)m IJ)m a...._ a...._ ~~ ~~ -c 1on 1on f f Ferrous Ferrous 0 0 0 0 en en 1'- :? :? :1:3% :1:3% filS/em} filS/em} Parameters Parameters ) ) UlN UlN ..;.__ ..;.__ ~~ ~~ :r:~ :r:~ Conductivity Conductivity Q f f btQ norma norma I I (ft (ft MSD MSD 0 0 6 6 / Stability Stability ) ) Requested Requested Ul"- m~ m~ >m >m ng ng 0~ 0~ u"' u"' i MS 1on 1on units f f pH pH yses yses :1:0.1 :1:0.1 l Event Event (std (std Optional Optional ec ec .._ .._ N N 0 0 en en 10 10 ofTub :? :? m m Dup Dup Ana II II w co~ co~ Om Om : : 0 0 C C D~12th D~12th QC --rt:ee~ --rt:ee~ ~ ~ 10 10 0 0 m m .;..._ .;..._ IJIN IJIN > (.)~ (.)~ Om Om 10mV 10mV ORP ORP (mV) (mV) :1: :1: Parameters Parameters ample ample i!~ i!~ 5 5 M" M" 0 0 s s D I I ( ( o::::.O::: o::::.O::: a:::::;. a:::::;. o..- l l Stability Stability mg/L mg/L Sheet Sheet Time Time 'LO 'LO :1:0.3 :1:0.3 0 0 N' N' DO DO I I (mg/L) (mg/L) o::::.O::: o::::.O::: o::;. o::;. o..- I- Data Data Eini::!h Eini::!h Mandatory Mandatory 1545 1545 :1:10% :1:10% ~ ~ 0 0 vJ02- I I '1.. '1.. o::::.O::: o::::.O::: C)::;. C)::;. o..- M. M. Total Total Liters) Liters) or or Ngme Ngme J J Sampling Sampling II II Ill Ill E E ...... IJl IJl "iiJ "iiJ t~ t~ Volume Volume i " " - u..8 u..8 Ulm Ulm lllCl lllCl IJI- §! Pd~ Pd~ Cl Cl < c, c, PLOOI PLOOI c:oCJ c:oCJ - :!;! :!;! ...... Tim~ Tim~ J!! J!! (Gallons (Gallons QMk:e( QMk:e( · 8c.< 8c.< : : Change Change Ct~ Ct~ rr\LVOf.\ rr\LVOf.\ 10 of2 of2 L L PLDO~ PLDO~ E E :::J :::J Ql Ql Start Start 2 2 ~ ~ I I IL IL ~0 ~0 "'ioO.-...l "'ioO.-...l 152'5 152'5 mm) mm) : Time Time Page Page :::J :::J Ill Ill c c 0 0 ~ ~ \ \ sAMPLE sAMPLE (HH 2 2 L, L, '1- Groundwater Groundwater \5~3 \5~3 \61 \61 lh"d..\n lh"d..\n · Suggested Suggested \5a.D \5a.D \."t+ \."t+ \5a9 \5a9 Purg ~ ~ -·=not -·=not Max Max (HH:mm) (HH:mm) Groundwater Groundwater e e Time Time D!!gth D!!gth i r: r: Pure!! Pure!! ng ng \5D W~:lllntegd~ W~:lllntegd~ ' ).. ).. Cloudy Cloudy Start Start reached NA NA 1Q 1Q measured measured ~ ~ Notation: Notation: VQI!,!me VQI!,!me Fair Fair Produ! 3.~ 3.~ D D ~ Change Change \ \ Time Time I I \.0 \.0 \.\ \.\ (Gallons (Gallons . Brown Brown ~ ~ : : \ \ \ \ Volume Volume S~ S~ = ( ( = Poor Poor (ft) (ft) f7""'\ f7""'\ Sampling Sampling ' 1 ~·"' ~·"' or or 9 9 +.s +.s • 5.L\- Co.if Co.if ./ 3 Pre Liters) Liters) Total Total f=t • \ \ = = . loiou a a ' "::f- stable stable Max Max s s Oi8De ~ ~ Q!!(;!th Q!!(;!th :t10% :t10% TOC TOC q,--::Jlo q,--::Jlo ~-~ ~-~ Ma Faint Faint Vol. Vol. None None \s-~ \s-~ 4- ;:) ;:) "+"=rising "+"=rising ~ ~ d).?-.. d).?-.. Data Data ~{a() ~{a() Fin d (mg/L) (mg/L) datory datory pth pth StiC~!.!I2 StiC~!.!I2 I I _r to to 00 00 .91./- ±0.3 ±0.3 - _ i OdQr OdQr J.pfv J.pfv 96 96 sh sh l9- ft- I I GYJ.. GYJ.. Purge Purge Moderate Moderate I I T mgiL mgiL Stability Stability Sheet Sheet Strong Strong Depth Depth Depth Depth i ...... me me - (ft (ft (ft (ft tJ~ tJ~ 9 9 Ambient btoc) btoc) "- ag~) ag~) · -l~ -l~ to to water water -ll.Cf -ll.Cf to to -~6L:=t -~6L:=t " ~_c ~_c .' Top Top Water Water =falling =falling )...) )...) W W 3-'w 3-'w Parameters Parameters :t10mV :t10mV 3 s~ s~ l9.~ l9.~ CmV) CmV) ORP ORP of of ~ ~ e e . was: was: , PID PID F) F) 4 4 or or Filter Filter II II .. .. ')' Well Well Tota D!!(;!t!:J D!!(;!t!:J P P v v l'l-.0~ l'l-.0~ ...... Readings Readings Pack Pack { v v v v She!!n She!!n ~ ~ · · W~:ll W~:ll ' ' Treated Treated urgmg urgmg Yes Yes Yes Yes \J~ \J~ ~ l l Breathing Breathing \0.5 \0.5 Q!!l21!! Q!!l21!! ~ ~ ~ ~ ft)• ft)• 8 8 QfTUbinq QfTUbinq ~S!~ing ~S!~ing Information Information {, (std (std Additional Additional Gallons Gallons {o :J.. O of of (n ( ( (o ±0 of of D Event Event pH pH . Ca~ (t _ _ unftsl unftsl _ -J -J CfX" CfX" - Zone Zone _ . qg"' qg"' _ a.Dr=l a.Dr=l c . \\o3 \\o3 Total Total q q Q\ Q\ q·=J.V q·=J.V Purg~D~ Purg~D~ 1 1 I I i,3 i,3 or MS~t!:rli!l MS~t!:rli!l ss ss n n i per per ng ng ~ ~ ( j j (ft (ft f f Sl..l_ Sl..l_ It' It' ~ v v (tt (tt "" "" orma orma Ft Ft (final Stability Stability VOCs VOCs !2tQC) !2tQC) b!o!t) b!o!t) ~J.J\JU' ~J.J\JU' Other Other .- gal/ft•3= _ _ Conductivity Conductivity ) ) a\'6 a\'6 2_~lo 2_~lo rl.IK rl.IK ~lg ~lg ~ ~J3 a1'1.,.... a1'1.,.... c~.~stcm) c~.~stcm) Sample Sample Cppml Cppml In In f f :t3% :t3% Parameters Parameters 10n 10n Well Note: Note: PrQQY! 0 0 Ci!li!ing Ci!li!ing \ \ \ \ Bailer Bailer Max Max 3 , , ~ ~ v v v v v v 1/0 .. .. \-\ \-\ . Purge Purge collection collection 55 55 YSI YSI F= F= \ \ . (Need (Need 041 041 l~.~~ l~.~~ Dii!m!:ter(in) Dii!m!:ter(in) T!:Ji! 5.'1Ji 5.'1Ji 0QJ 0QJ dJn-4 dJn-4 ~ 5.9 5.9 .;> Multi Multi Vol Vol < < Turbid n_,_."l-1. n_,_."l-1. Eauioment Eauioment CNTUf CNTUf Peri · 10 10 Meter"ITsed Meter"ITsed - , 6":l- ga1•3.785Ugal= ga1•3.785Ugal= ~\ ~\ One) One) 1.-\5 1.-\5 @ NTU NTU Me ~ i ty ty tv tv information information NA-- o.1s3 o.1s3 ~ v v lti ~ ~ (ft) (ft) v v v v ,/ ,/ ~ I I Gi!IIOnli! Gi!IIOnli! §!nd §!nd Used Used ump ump Du Temperature Temperature 3 3 ;;) Q d d 1._ 1._ i. i. Volume Volume 4/0.653 4/0.653 ri ~ ~ _ _ na na C*Cl C*Cl for for . .~0 .~0 - 9 q q ()LJ ()LJ QCJ QCJ Other Other g~:r g~:r 05 05 Submersible Submersible Puraina Puraina ~ Max Max on on \\.Bto \\.Bto ' (Q (Q Turbidimeter Turbidimeter \5.1.\1\- -=t -=t u EJin_g EJin_g lin!!§!r lin!!§!r R!i!! Purge Purge Parameters Parameters next next Prawdown Prawdown Page Page 6/1.469 6/1.469 q foQt(ai!llft) foQt(ai!llft) q q ~ ~ Vol Vol q q q q Water Water lT' lT' q (feet (feet page page ._ L L Pump Pump _ ±lD ±lD . . ~-=\~ ~-=\~ _ _ ":J-"8' ":J-"8' -=l-1- n_ n_ -1-::} -1-::} 1 1 btocl btocl (ml) (ml) t t level level of2 of2 < < 7 7 0 . 3 3 ~ ~ ft ft .J .J 0.3 0.3 N N f f ...... < < f\. f\. · .u .u btoc) btoc) z z I I 6 6 Initials Initials \0()., \0()., tJ tJ """Z """Z 2: 2: RIIN RIIN QIO~ QIO~ Numb!i!r Numb!i!r Sl~o Sl~o Q) Q) a..~ a..~ ~f~ ~f~ ~d~ ~d~ YJ YJ \-\r~ \-\r~ er er l (feet (feet \--\ \--\ Waterlevei Waterlevei Pump Pump brawdown brawdown N03= N03= ~ ~ Samo PrQi!i!! Parameters Parameters g g ::Jw ::Jw ::Ia. ::Ia. Gl@ Gl@ ~~ ~~ m~ m~ Samolina Samolina a~~C! a~~C! ~~ ~~ mw mw ~<( ~<( Other Other - for for _ba _ba tJA- Submersible Submersible ~ ~ Temperature Temperature \":} \":} Used Used Q)m Q)m c:N c:N ~~ ~~ -1 -1 ~~ ~~ r<\W\)3 r<\W\)3 DO= DO= mp mp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ...... en en 3: 3: NTU NTU One) One) ~ ~ liS: liS: ::2~ ::2~ ~! ~! t-l~A t-l~A 10 10 INTUl. INTUl. Eauioment Eauioment '5\~o\ '5\~o\ ~\..-bO\ ~\..-bO\ Turbidity Turbidity < < Fe- Peris~ ...... (Choose (Choose Q)m Q)m Q) Q) 111m 111m a..~ a..~ iii~ iii~ :Q~ :Q~ 1on 1on r r Ferrous Ferrous N N 0 0 ,.... ,.... 0 0 ~ ~ Ci5 Ci5 ±3% ±3% /_ /_ luS/cml luS/cml Parametars Parametars UlCD UlCD ~~ ~~ I~ I~ Conductivity Conductivity ~ ~ btQ!<) btQ!<) norma norma I I {ft {ft 0 0 0 0 Stability Stability Requested Requested 11),.... 11),.... m~ m~ g~ g~ ts) ts) u"' u"' i 1 1 MS7MSO MS7MSO . un 0 t" t" pH pH ± ± Event Event (std (std Optional Optional N N eCIOn eCIOn co co 0 0 ~ ~ Ci5 Ci5 ID ID ofTu!;!ing ofTu!;!ing \0.5' \0.5' ccp ccp ~~t=l ~~t=l Analyses Analyses II II w~ w~ ID~ ID~ Om Om . . 0 0 C C Q!i!!;!th Q!i!!;!th -QC co co 0 0 m m I I IIIN IIIN v v >~ >~ Om Om (.)~ (.)~ n n '. '. . - 10mV 10mV ORP ORP (mV) (mV) · ± ± Parameters Parameters ample ample d-o 0 0 :I£ :I£ M" M" s~~\NG.. s~~\NG.. s s Date Date - I I 0::~ 0::~ a:: a:: o..- aGY"l- Js Stability Stability mg/1. mg/1. Sheet Sheet 3 3 . Tim_e Tim_e N" N" 0 0 :I£ :I£ ±0 DO DO I I (mg/l) (mg/l) ·./ ·./ 0~ 0~ a:: a:: o..- Data Data Finish Finish Mandatory Mandatory \5"1\\, \5"1\\, ±10% ±10% I I (!)~ (!)~ a:::~£ a:::~£ 0§ 0§ v v Total Total Uters) Uters) or or N51m~ N51m~ Sampling Sampling ro ro II II E E II) II) II) II) ...... Volume Volume - u.c u.c lll..!!! lll..!!! 11101 11101 C. C> C> l:lite l:lite PL~\rn~~- C:QC> C:QC> ~ ~ ...... Tim!;! Tim!;! J!! J!! 8 8 ·- (Gallons (Gallons Change Change of2 of2 ::J ::J Q) Q) E E l:ltS!rt l:ltS!rt 2 2 > > 0 0 PLO\l\ PLO\l\ \5~0 \5~0 mm) mm) : Time Time I I Page Page c: c: ro ro ::J ::J 0 0 ~ ~ 02 02 sAMPLEro: sAMPLEro: (HH d d <.o <.o Groundwater Groundwater B B 0'\'50 0'\'50 Ru 0'155 0'155 oqt.t oqt.t g g Purg Ms;!X Ms;!X 1 Other: Other: I I ·-· ·-· Groundwater Groundwater Suggested Suggested (HH 0 \)\._00\ \)\._00\ coo coo 05 05 i Time Time De12th De12th 0'\ n\ : NA NA mm) mm) i = = Purg!! Purg!! 4 4 ng ng 1 Welllntegri~ Welllntegri~ not not ' % % 1 1 Cloudy Cloudy Start Start reached c c t t to to ~ ~ t•r t•r measured measured Volyme Volyme Fair Fair Product Product Notation Weath!!r Weath!!r 2 1.5 1.5 · Change Change Time Time 2. 2. 2. j o (Gallons (Gallons I I - . . . , , l l 5 5 o o Brown Brown Site Site : : i i ~ ~ Volu 40t°F 40t°F ~ = = ( Poor Poor {ft) {ft) : : Sampling Sampling tability ~- Name Name Conditions Conditions or or ~ ~ •../•= •../•= s j() \l 12. ~ Pre 3 3 Total Total 15 15 . . . . ers) ers) . . viou . . ~ s s "2. "2. 0 0 () () • • 3 3 \ \ \ stable stable q q s s Total Total 1Mb 1Mb ax ax ~ ~ Oeoth Oeoth TQQ TQQ ( ±10% ±10% ~ ~ Mandatory Mandatory Toittl Toittl 4 Faint Faint - 4. 4. 4 Vol. Vol. ~· 4-SD 4-SD Depth Depth . Data Data 0 "+" "+" Fini§hTim!! Fini§hTim!! - (mall} (mall} 01 01 ~ti!;;kU12 ~ti!;;kU12 1'1 1'1 01. 01. I I 04 04 to to -4~\ -4~\ DO DO ±0.3 ±0.3 Odor Odor =rising =rising ft- I I GW GW Moderate Moderate Purge Purge mgiL mgiL Sheet Sheet Stability Stability Strong Strong Depth Depth Depth Depth \IC \IC tft tft {ft {ft Amb '? '? btoc ii!9!2) ii!9!2) lvme lvme ·-· ·-· to to to to water water l'lb ·C'l.. ·C'l.. Spl\nq Spl\nq lqo.-=t lqo.-=t lq lq 1'\0 1'\0 Top Top i Water Water e W W =falling =falling Parameters Parameters l l ±10mV ±10mV n t t ( ORP ORP 3 , of of mVl mVl ...Q.:Q_ ...Q.:Q_ e e was PID PID - S S · or or Filter Filter 0 0 II II q q Well Well TQta De12tb De12tb 1'5 : : P P Reading:2 Reading:2 DV.. DV.. ~ ~ Pack Pack ~ ~ W!!ll W!!ll urgmg urgmg Treated Treated Yes Yes l l B D!il!l!!l D!il!l!!l . . v ft) ft) r q eath 89- 95 95 QSI§ing QSI§ing q q Qf Qf 6-~"2. 6-~"2. Information Information b. b. \Wt-1\? \Wt-1\? • • . . 6 6 (std (std ed ed Additional Additional Gallons Gallons Iu!;!ing Iu!;!ing in Qf Qf 2., 2., . D D : ± ± Qf Qf g g Event Event go go ~ - pH pH QS!~ ·I(; ·I(; 1~ 1~ ~ 0.1 0.1 units} units} Zo TQts;!l TQts;!l 0 0 Purg!!d Purg!!d I I Miilt!!ris;!l Miilt!!ris;!l ore ss ss n i n n per per ng ng 3 3 e e (§:) (§:) (ft (ft f f ...Q....:.Q_ ...Q....:.Q_ Yes Yes ~ ~ (ft (ft orma orma Ft Ft (final) (final) VOCs VOCs Stability Stability btQ!;;) btQ!;;) bto~ bto~ Other Other gal/ft gal/ft 00£ 00£ 2 2 2 2 zqo zqo Conductivity Conductivity 293 293 IuS/em IuS/em q q Cl Cl {!l!lm) {!l!lm) In In Sample Sample f f • • ±3% ±3% Parameters Parameters 10n 10n We 3 3 2. 2. 2. 2. 151-11011 Note = = Product Product Cs;!§ing Cs;!§ing ll I I Max Max Bailer Bailer ~ ~ 3 3 1/0.041 1/0.041 : : .S1:J- Purge Purge YSI YSI collection collection 1 Oi§!m!!t!!r{ln) Oi§!m!!t!!r{ln) (Need (Need Thi 0 2 I I 5 - Multi Multi Vol Vol - . < < l.O l.O .6 Turbidity Turbidity \ \ 6r 6r !;; J\ J\ '1 Eauiomeot Eauiomeot CNTU). CNTU). 10 10 Meler Meler kn!!lili kn!!lili -45rv\W32 -45rv\W32 gal gal 0 0 @t ' One) One) 2. 2. ~ ristaltic ristaltic NTU NTU Meter Meter - • • o.163 o.163 2 2 information information 3. 3. Jsec Jsec {ft) {ft) Well Well b b Date Date 785 785 I I Pu Pu GaiiQh§ GaiiQh§ Sind Sind - - Used Used ~ 10 10 Du .20 .20 Ugal Ugal Temperature Temperature I I · I VQIUm!! VQIUm!! p p 4/0.653 4/0.653 / I I 2014 2014 1.$3 1.$3 ri Hach Hach · · . . . . na na ,.,.. ,.,.. for for ( 6 6 (, (, 6 6 · - = = c) c) Other Other 12!!r 12!!r Submersible Submersible 1- . t..j t..j P ,_ ,_ Puraina Puraina Max Max ~Acoas on on Turbidimeter Turbidimeter u C3H1 C3H1 I~·~ I~·~ lin!!Sir lin!!Sir rain R!!!;;QV!!r!!Q R!!!;;QV!!r!!Q Purge Purge Parameters Parameters next next P[Qj!!!;;t P[Qj!!!;;t Sam12!!!r Sam12!!!r a a 05WC0902 05WC0902 Qrawdown Qrawdown Hl"\ Hl"\ 6/1 Page Page fQQt{ggllft) fQQt{ggllft) Vol Vol '& '& 8 8 8' Water Water ~ ~ (feet (feet 8' page page . . - . . . L L Pump Pump 469 469 01.. 01.. o-z.. o-z.. ·0 Nym!;!!!r Nym!;!!!r . 0'2. 0'2. o o !oitis;!l!2 !oitis;!l!2 {mL) {mL) 1 1 btocl btocl Level Level 1.. 1.. 2. 2. < < of2 of2 7 7 0 . 3 3 · · ~ ~ Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet ~Acoas · Site Name Event WeiiiD Project Number ?\..DO\ S' ? l.\f'l5 \WN\f 45iV\\N32 (.)5WC0'\02- Date SamQI~rlnitiii!lli I+IV\ Mandatory Stabllity Parameters Optional Stability Parameters (Choose One) Other Parameters Volume Time (Gallons or Liters) ±10% I ±0.3 mgll ± 10mV ;!:0.1 ±3% < 10 NTU prawdown < 0.3 ~ (HH:mm) - DO ORP pH Conductivity Water level Change Total Temj.c~ture lma/U (mVI lstd units\ IuS/em\ r::~~~ (feetbtoc) s ample C 0 II ec1onf I normaf f 1on Start Tim~ I Finish Time I Date DeQth of Tubing (ft btoc) Eauiomelll Used for Samolinq IOOb JOl't I s ·2V 2cJil q . z. ~stalticP;;J Submersible Pump r.:.,... SAMPLE ID: 45 tv\IN 3'2.- 10 l"'tS r-errous r-e UU'- ,..,.....'"~- Analyses Requested :;(' Iii 0 ~ 6 - Ul 1-~ QIO lll..!!! ::!! !;;: -cO> z~ 11101 ~ !E<( J: "' am Ci5 Ci5 " ;: ::JD.. Ql .u co aJ 0 UICD en U)~ .... n.c 0 z.~ ~d~ 0 0 0 0 QIT" E N' c;;- CD CD Ul"'- 1"- -cal 0 0 UIN N UIN Oo Ql8 2: 0 (.)~ : -<"> ·f c: E S<{~ Q~ {ll~ 111 ::J o.- o.- o.- (.)~ Sl~o c:oC!> a:~ aJ~ 0~ J:~ Ui~ Qj~ al~~~ ::J a:~ a:~ OU) OU) >U) QIU) ::Jw '-ZQIO~ 0 ~ 8 C. Page 2 of2 \ Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet ~Acoas · Site Name Event WeiiiD Project Numb!;!r E.AFB LF003 I Proo q S pnn q IWMP 1)3tvl 03 B 05WC0902 Weather Conditions PID Readings of Total VOCs (1212ml Date §am12ler lnitiai!;Z H M Ambient __Q_,_L_Breath ing Zone f.:L...i_ In Well -S"ui'IVI'-1 \114 h & /Js F no~ ~ S/ib/2CJit , -J Well Information Well Integrity TQQ §ti! -iUY~St/4:. tJA G- ~ sc.; 13,iCf (final) 1-.~1- {f'J#' .S4 -_b ~,.,., Max Purge VQiume = ( i?l· q·).. ft- b . so~~'"ft) • O . b??> gal/ft • 3 = lY . ~ gal • 3.785 Ugal = L SI' ./Il ~ 11 Previous Total Depth Depth to W.ater or Gallons per Ft Max Purge Vol Max Purge Vol Depth to Top of Riter Pack W e II P urgmg In f orma f 1on §tart Time Fini!;ZhTime D!;!!:!th of Tubing (ft btoc) EouiomentUsedforPuroina i22 3 1258 1.ss· Bailer € eristaltic PumD Submersible Pump .QQ!Qr Odor Sheen Pyrgeg Drv Meter Used During Purging CloudyBrown Moderate Yes ~ ~ G s1Mu lti Meter C&ach Turbidimet"io . Strong @)0 @) IIH0045o 1-01,:-,oSS".l.4 Purging reached: (s tabilitY Max Vol. I Purge water was: Treated~ Other Note: Mandatory S~bllltyParameters Additional Stability Parameters (Need One) Other Parameters Volu llme (Gallons o~ Lite ±10% I ±0.3 mgll ±10mV ±0.1 < 10 NTU ~rawdown ±3% I < 0.3 fl (HH:mm) ~ - DO ORP pH Conductivity Turbidity Temperature Water level Change Total (NTU). (lfiii(L) (mV) (std units) c~.~slcml i•c> (feet bloc) r·:L'2.-:r :2 . I 1. i ~-~b 1.2.32. 2.0 'f .\ z.. 24 St . 4- (; . I Cj iCfo t8 .gs 4.58 b . 56 (:, .$ 12.~"1-·z. ~ . j o5T b2 . i b - i1- Ill I n. ·3c:t .j . ·1-'S 6- t)b, 1242. 2 -3 B, fo I. 3 =t 63 .0 G.2.o 191 4.11- 4.0"\ 6-5f. "'1 1'1"\ SG 17.4" i .~ lo. q 1. oe 6 2 .B c;. l l... 'f. 4-l~ b. Sb /1 f:,.Sb 1"252. 2 . 3 11,2 j . OI b I , l, b-20 '1CO 5~ 4.1'l 11S1 2 - 3 15 . 5 I• 00 5'1' 2. b -1.1 2 01 4.Jl::s 6.56 () .'1 \b. 2 ( Tofq i vol bj . + PV~"Cl ..J ' Sample collection information on next page 7 Suggested Notation: "-"=not measured •,/•= stable "+"=rising "·"=falling Page 1 of2 ~ ~ . . 3 3 . 0 ~ ~ "' "' + + (,) (,) < < . . • • btoc} btoc} z~ z~ c5 c5 ::r: ::r: lnitii!l§ lnitii!l§ Numb~r Numb~r c: c: 1!!5~ 1!!5~ m::r:N m::r:N Q) Q) SlQII SlQII I I ~d~ ~d~ a.6z a.6z (feet (feet Waterlevei Waterlevei I-t: I-t: Hl\!0~ Hl\!0~ He\ He\ Pump Pump j\'1 j\'1 WCOqC>7 Drawdown Drawdown N03= N03= i-1 i-1 §§!m!;!ler §§!m!;!ler PrQj~Qt PrQj~Qt Parameters Parameters . . g g -JACOBS ::::Jw ::::Jw ::::Jw ::::Jw S§!mj;!ling S§!mj;!ling .!!~ .!!~ rJJ rJJ odq odq rn~ rn~ ~~ ~~ !E~ !E~ -8g -8g Other Other CI CI " - C for for Submersible Submersible B B Temperature Temperature ~? Used Used c:N c:N GlrJJ GlrJJ a:~ a:~ Oo Oo ...J~ ...J~ ~~ ~~ p p DO= DO= Date Date We!IID We!IID ~ ~ en en 0 0 :;(' :;(' NTU NTU One) One) 03~o l{ l{ Cl)~ Cl)~ an: an: ::2~ ::2~ mg mg 10 10 INTUI. INTUI. 5/il-/).(.)\~., 5/il-/).(.)\~., l,;g!,!ij;!ment l,;g!,!ij;!ment Turbidity Turbidity < < Fe= Fe= (Choose (Choose ~ Q)..- "'m "'m -o -o Glrn Glrn ~~ ~~ a.~ a.~ · -ciXl -ciXl 1on 1on r r Ferrous Ferrous 0 0 0 0 I'- ~ ~ u; u; :1:3% :1:3% IuS/em) IuS/em) Parameters Parameters CIIN CIIN ~~ ~~ ::r:~ ::r:~ X X Conductivity Conductivity f f Er Er btoc} btoc} norma norma I I (ft (ft 0 0 6 6 Stability Stability ) ) Requested Requested X X Ul"'- uN uN rn~ rn~ 0~ 0~ >rn >rn MSfMS units p p f f pH pH :1:0.1 :1:0.1 Event Event Tubing Tubing tv') tv') s· s· {std {std Optional Optional 8CIOn 8CIOn N N 0 0 of of u; u; 81:1p 81:1p Analyses Analyses II II s s lv-.l lv-.l w~ w~ CD~ CD~ Om Om 0 0 1. · C C De!;!th De!;!th .QG. .QG. tO tO 0 0 m m I I rnq rnq 'f.. 'f.. >~ >~ 8~ 8~ ORP ORP lmVl lmVl Zal1 Zal1 ±10mV ±10mV Parameters Parameters - ample ample SPI SPI lb lb - 0 0 (t) (t) s s - Oat~ Oat~ I I 5 a:~ a:~ a:lo::: a:lo::: o..- / Stability Stability mgA. mgA. Sheet Sheet 3 3 . Time Time S S :1:0 0 0 ..- N' N' DO DO §h §h I I l- i (mall) (mall) l l X X n 0~ 0~ a:lil::: a:lil::: o Data Data i F Mandatory Mandatory 2ot ±10% ±10% i3u' - ~ ~ 0 0 ...... I I B a:lil::: a:lil::: (!)~ (!)~ o..- Total Total Uters) Uters) or or Name Name Sampling Sampling ~ ~ 10 10 E E ...... Ul Ul Cil Cil Volume Volume ~ ~ - FTooq FTooq " " 03iVto3 03iVto3 u.8 u.8 §it 01 01 "'m "'m Ul- C> C> ..!!!01 ..!!!01 VDl'{ VDl'{ A& A& \luA \luA ~ ~ - ...... c:oe> c:oe> Tim ~<{II ~<{II (Gallons (Gallons · 8c.~ 8c.~ / / Change Change art art of2 of2 t 3 3 ~ ~ ::I ::I S " " 2 2 > > 0 0 IL IL ~11\1.. ~11\1.. 4oi'IIL 4oi'IIL 00 00 mm) mm) : i'l.S:? i'l.S:? Time Time u: u: ::I ::I Page Page 10 10 ' ' 1 1 'E 'E ~ ~ 0 0 2 2 SAMPLEID: SAMPLEID: 3 3 (HH Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet JACOBS . Site Name Event WeiiiD PrQject Number 05WC0902 LfOc>~/Pr'Uoet .$prr l"" \ liN MP 03M09 Weather CQnditiQns PID Rei!dings of TQtal VQC§! (!212m} ~ Si!m12ler Initials Ambient ..£L..L Breathing Zone I)· '2. In Well 5/J5/2CI-=! ADt H "1 Svo111" vJI.SoVlle clouds ·-1Q~;:- ~ Well Information Well Integrity TQQ §ticku12 (ft ags} Well Ci!Sing Material Qi!§!ing Dii!m!;!t!;!r(in}/ !:2allons 12!i!rlin!;!g r foot(gal/ft} e? Fair Poor \,55 @ ss 1/0.041 ~ 410.653 6/1.469 De12thto Proguct (ft} De12thto GW (ft btoc} TQtalD!i!!!l!! of Qa§ing (ft btQg) PrQgy!;;tThi!;;kn§§l (ft} and Volume Recovered (mL} II ,g I }.l . 31 (final} Max Pyrg!;! VQiyme = ( -2\ -3l\ ft - 11- 1~51 1645 1'3 Bailer (P eristaltic P~ Submersible PumP.. Color Odor ~ Pyrg!;!d D~ tVJe\erJ:>e~: Durino Puroino Cloudy Brown Moderate Yes Yes ~ ~ Hach Turbidimeter Other: Strong @) ·jim 5/jS, i~~ a~t ® ~ Purging reached: ~~ axvoj I Purge water was: Treated 6 tore( ) )ther Note: Volu'""' Mandatory Stability Parameters Additional Stability Parameters (Need One) Other Parameters Time (Gallons- ~ ±10% I ±0.3 mg/L ±10mV ±0.1 ±3% < 10 NTU - [!rawdown < 0.3 ~ (HH:mm) DO ORP pH Conductivity Turbidity Water Level Change Total Tempe?,ture (mg/L) (mV) (std units) (J.IS/cm} (NTU) (•c (feet btoc) \bOo 2 2. (), 1'1 -(/1 . 6 ':f . Oi 34~ \. s-e 4 .Cf8 II.B3 \hOq l . 5 3.5 o. 28 -,22. 3 -=f./o 33'1 o.q5 4 . S2- li .S3 i€>14 2 5.5 -o.ct4 - i09 . ·:r 1 - II 336 OJ ·-tCJ 4. '3g ll.B3 \6 \q 2. ~Ls o. 2.'1 -100.0 t-tl 33b ::2..20 4-32. II -83 lf..-:14 2 q ,5 0.2CJ -11\.5' ·r .I 2. 33S I. I I 4· ib li . r;:, i6 2q )_ JI.S o . 2=1 - il3 . 4· 1.13 3?b o.·to 4.1b i) . %2 1- . jt.} 1634- 2- r,.; o.t.b -1()1 . '2- 3'39 0.4'1 4.06 II. '8 ~ lb39 2 15.6 D. 23 -il3. 4 1-.13 .343 if ..H ·I i' 11. ''· '8 3 \f.,LJ.tj- 1 . 1... \1. '6 0-24 -;'20 · 1- "f . IY 344 Q. 'jtf 4./() If. ~3 tb4S 0.5 }_ -rotcd pur~\e I 1<6''2 _, Sample collection information on next page 7 Suggested Notation: "-"=not measured •./•= stable "+"=rising "-"=falling Page 1 of2 ~ ~ · · 3 3 . § § 0 ...... ± ± < < _(.) _(.) - level level btoc) btoc) z~ z~ 0 0 :I: :I: J J lni!iS!I 1 1 Numb11r Numb11r 2: 2: CU:J:N CU:J:N Q) Q) J Q)O~ Q)O~ 5!~o 5!~o '-Z '-Z a.~ a.~ ~d~ ~d~ (feet (feet Water Water lt~ HCI HCI Pump Pump 'riC\ 'riC\ prawdown prawdown N03= N03= ~S!mJ;!Ier ~S!mJ;!Ier PrQj~!;;l PrQj~!;;l AD/HM AD/HM Parameters Parameters ble ble - i 09wCo<.Jo2.. 09wCo<.Jo2.. ~ ~ ..IAcoas :::Ja. :::Ja. :::Jw :::Jw Samoling Samoling ~~ ~~ (/)~ (/)~ ~:;l ~:;l (/) (/) ~<( ~<( ..,q ..,q !E~ !E~ Other Other - (•c) (•c) for for Submers Temperature Temperature D D I Used Used C:N C:N Oo Oo ~~ ~~ -g~ -g~ z.~ z.~ DO= DO= Date Date ~ ~ Well Well P 15/ZOI-=f- 03MO'-\ 03MO'-\ ~ ~ en en ,_ ,_ ~ ~ v v NTU NTU / One) One) ...( ...( U)~ U)~ 5 ' 4i~ 4i~ ::a:~ ::a:~ iiig iiig 10 10 (NTU) (NTU) E_n_urnment E_n_urnment Turbidity Turbidity < < ristalt!~ ristalt!~ Fe= Fe= (Choose (Choose ...... ~ Q)C/) Q)C/) mal mal Q) Q) a.~ a.~ -cCXI -cCXI ~~ ~~ 1on 1on f f Ferrous Ferrous 0 0 ,.... ,.... :1:3% :1:3% ~ ~ Cl Cl U5 U5 (J1S/cm) (J1S/cm) Parameters Parameters U)~ U)~ .x .x a.~ a.~ · :I:S: :I:S: Conductivity Conductivity f f - bloc) bloc) norma norma I I {ft {ft 0 0 6 6 Stability Stability '''14Sn '''14Sn Requested Requested ><. ><. ..,r-- f\1\? f\1\? uN uN (/)~ (/)~ g~ g~ 1 1 . units} units} 0 f f pH pH W W Event Event ± ± Ty!;!ing Ty!;!ing I ...... (std (std Optional Optional eCIOn eCIOn N N 0 0 ~ ~ Ill Ill 10 10 of of U5 U5 Analyses Analyses ~ ~ II II Clcn Clcn w~ w~ Ill~ Ill~ I?,: I?,: 0 0 C C ()5 ()5 DeJ;!Ih DeJ;!Ih """"· """"· ...... ' ' 10 10 m m 0 0 \)f\ \)f\ UIN UIN g~ g~ (.)~ (.)~ :;<. :;<. 10mV 10mV (mV) (mV) ORP .:) :1: :1: Parametars Parametars ~ ~ ample ample 0 0 s s ;;) ;;) Dat~ Dat~ I I 15/:ZtJir 15/:ZtJir a:~ a:~ a:~ a:~ o..- Stability Stability mg/1.. mg/1.. Sheet Sheet s; s; S S . . 3 3 . Tim~ Tim~ :!:0 N' N' DO DO 0 11- I I (mg/1..} (mg/1..} ;< ;< Cl~ Cl~ a:~ a:~ o..- Data Data Fini§h Fini§h Mandatory Mandatory 2.0 2.0 ±10% ±10% 101 101 ' \ - 0 0 .-. .-. I I (!)~ (!)~ a:~ a:~ o..- Total Total CJ CJ Liters) Liters) \11\o'i \11\o'i o o or or Sampling Sampling :, :, o- ·. ' ' cu cu E E .c .c (ii' (ii' Volume Volume o -tJJ -tJJ rr- Sit~N51me Sit~N51me A6 A6 II II U) U) CUOl CUOl ..,_ ..,_ C!> C!> c "61~ "61~ r-..a_~ r-..a_~ Af11 Af11 '-101\ '-101\ ' 1 1 ~ ~ '- C:QC!) C:QC!) Tim~ Tim~ (Gallons (Gallons ~<(~ ~<(~ 8 8 Change Change - 3 3 \ of2 of2 1'11 ~ ~ :::J :::J ~tart ~tart 2 2 0 0 > > I I I\ I\ .c!o .c!o 1 1 \b-'+5 \b-'+5 !xt:>ML !xt:>ML Foo Foo mm) mm) : L- llme llme :::J :::J cu cu Page Page E E ~ ~ 0 0 (HH \ \ SAMPLEID: SAMPLEID: 1 1 Groundwater Groundwater .l .l 3 3 Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet .JACOBS - Site Name Event Well ID Project Nymber ~'T0\3J D'P02.~ S))r'in ~ (WMP loMW\~ 05WC0902 W!i;!gth!';!rCongitiQns PID R!i;!adings of Total VQCs (ggm) Date ~5!mQI!i!rlniti5!l§ 5 "'l - l.o I 1- Hf'l\ 50°Sl=' Rai "'; "tt Ambient~BreathlngZone0.(.) In Well~ -2 ._} Well Information W!i;!lllntegritv TQC Stickug (ft 9g:2) W!i!ll Qa:2ing M51terial Qg§ing Digmeter(in)/ Gallon§ ger line51rfQot(gal/ft) 9 Fair Poor (... o.44) Gi 55 1/0.041 (1y o.163 410.653 6/1.469 D!i!Qthto Product (ft) Deeth to GW.fft. btoc) TotalDellt!! QfCasing (It btoc) PrQgyct Thickness (ft) 9nd Volume Recovered (mL) - e, ..g. 1'1.06 (final) ~A ft). .lb~ Max Purg!';!VQiume = ( 19 ·I ft- &-~' 0 gal/ft • 3 = 6 , 0 gal • 3. 785 Ugal = 2.2·a- L Previous Total Deplh Deplh to Waler or Gallons per Ft Max Purge Vol Max Purge Vol Deplh to Top of Riter Pack W e II P urging I n f ormat1on ~tartTime FinishTim!il D!i!QthQf Tybing (ft btQQ) EnuinmAnt Used for Puroina 1345 1'-1'33 1- .'T.;,_ Bailer P.(fistalti~Subm_ersible Pump QQ!Qr OdQr ~ Purg!';!d D!Y Meter U§!i!d During Purging Q Cloudy Brown Moderate Yes 'i'es ~ YSI Multi Meter Hach Turbidimeter other: Faint Strong (§> @ 1~11-tr.'l-.:t :2.CI{::.CS52S - :::: 51 Purging reached ( Stabi~Max Vol. I Purge water was: Treated @~ Other Note: Mandatory Stability Parametars Additional Stability Parameters (Need One) Other Parameters Volu~ Time (Gallonsor. ers ±10% I ±0.3 rngll ±10mV ±0.1 ±3% < 10 NTU prawdown < 0.3 ~ (HH:mm) - DO ORP pH Conductivity Temperature Water level Change Total I mall) lmVl lstd units) luS/cml T~~ i·c> (feet btoc) 1350 l .4 2·4 G.1t. 13~ 2.~ 4.'l o. «Bb -4.'3 1 -23 2.1~ 3.:t"3 3.i4 6.82 l.~ "l,o o...(,5 ·- 3~,' 't.3i 211 O."ll l. . tf 3 G.S"l '" 0'2. \4o7.J o.S"l -f>S.S ,. '~4 '21 '2.. 2.<;6 2-~~ 6. '83 2.3 ~-' J. . "'IO 14\"l. 2.3 l\ .q o.SI ·- ca4 .6 "1-.35 213 o. 62 ~h~3 l"tl'l 2.'3 14 ·2. o. 31 - '\6. Cf -=l-.35 214 CLl.+ 2 . ' Sample collection informatio!l on next page 7 Suggested Notation: "-" =not measured •,/•= stable "+" =rising "·" =falling Page 1 of2 f . 3 . 0 i!l~ i "' < N it () level btoc) - ln ai± z~ c5 :r: :r: Numb!;lr NPt !;lr Ql m ~ QIO~ IIICQ '-Z l ll.~ ~d~ NO~ (feet Water lQ IV\ HCI HCI It Pump Drawdown It na i N03 Saml:! Project Parameters ble i - g .JACOBS Ql~ ::::Jw Samol ::::Ja.. ~~ ~~ r.n!!:!. (/) ..,q :!<( Other c> • - z.- ( N~ for - Submers Temperature tiff \~ D s i ~ ) Used eN Gl(J) ...J .2-~ a:~ Oo p DO- Date *~ Weii Pum p., NTU One) R 13MW ~ < l\l 10 (NTU) QiS: ~j ~s taltic X Turbidity Eauioment s < eri Fe- (Choose € ..... us o Ql "'iii' Olr.n rso ll.~ ~~ -coo · 1on rr f Fe :t3% 0 ~ ..... N (ij 0 CuS/cml Parameters Conductivity x. ~~ a:~ · f .... btoc} norma I .... (ft Stability 0 6 Requested ,..,. , "'"' 1 ng (/)~ g~ oN i . . units) 1on pH f Event ±0 T!,!b (std Optional \WMP ec of ~ 0 (0 N m (ij Analyses II ..n. m~ w~ Or.n X: 1\j o . C ':\ De1:1th ~ inc:J 0 ID iii' - I x · !liN >~ ()~ Or.n ORP CmVl :t10mV Parameters s,n '10\'1 · amp1e s 0 Cil l'l Date · I 5 a::~ a::~ o.- Stability Sheet mg/l me 3 i . T $ ±0 DO h I 0 N' ~ (mg/L) i Data n a::~ 0~ o.- i X ~ F Mandatory ±10% .(L{ . 20\'::f p l ~ 0 ·- I a::~ X C)~ o.- Tota Uters) or N~me Sampling Ill m E II Volume ,2l Iii' !;] - Site Afu "'m II \'?JI"'W\6 Ill- Cl'- A6t CJ ..!!101 c.~ \tDPt VOA (Gallons ~ - Tim ._ CQC) Change .5 · 8 /OPu2b of2 'Ill Ql ::::J Start E 0 > 2 IL ll 40mL ~CD; 33 . Time &lo\:?, l4 m c ::::J (HH:mm) I Page 2 ~ Groundwater 0 SAMPLEID: "l 9 \ e. Max Purging Groundwater " (HH Suggested - llme " : Purge mm) = not Cloudy ~00\ Start reached measured Volume= Fair Notation: Time Change (Gallons Brown S ( i ~ -- te Stabili Poor Sampling Name ~ ( ~ " Pre -~' Total /fi. ~ " vi =stable WfC33 oo j . Max s Total v, ~ Depth TOC Jssq ±10% Mandatory Fa Vol. \ Depth Data Fl i " nt (ma/L Stickup + I ,4..-z.., to ni DO ~ " :1:0.3 sb.. ft- =rising GW j ) Purge Moderate f Ti Sheet mgiL Stability Strong Depth Depth o m Cft Cft -:J e btocl agsl to to water "-" :1- Top Water Well Parameters :1: =falling (mV) ORP 10 of 'L. was or Filter mV Well Depth : Purgmg Pack (fOj Treated Yes ft). of Information (std Additional Gallons Tubing o./l/~ :1:0 j pH units} . Purged tor Information 1 per <§) e.Q_ (ft Yes Ft Stability btocl gal/ft. Oiher Drv Conductivity , (uS/em Sample :1:3% Parameters 3 Note = ~ ) Bailer ~ : x . i Purge collection ( lp (Need Vat < Turbidity Peristaltic CNTUJ" 10 gal* One) NTU 3 information . 785 Pum 6 Purina Ugal Temperature j) for ( achTurbidi - *C = Other Submersible Puraina ) Puroino M ~Acoas l on ~ #k Parameters Project next rge 05WC0902 Drawdown (p ~ Page Vol Water O (feet page L Pump Number bloc) 1 Level < of2 0 7 . 3 · fl Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet .JACOBS . Site Name Event WeiiiD Proj!]lct Number ~LDO\ \WJvtQ Volume Mandatory Stai:JIIIty Parameters Optional Stability Parameters (Choose One) Other Parameters Time (Gallons or Liters) ±10% I ±0.3 mgll ± 10mV ± 0.1 ±3% < 10 NTU prawdown < 0.3 ft (HH:mm) - DO ORP pH Conductivity Change Total Temperature Water level (mgll) (mVJ (std units) (uS/em) T('~~~~C"C) Cfeetbtocl 5 ample Co II ec1onf I normaf f 10n §t§!rtTim!]l De(;!th of Tubing (ft btoc) '"' ,;"""""t Used for Samolina Tim r1r 1&5~\l 1: ;;; :J/iJ; ~.(_p 6ri staltic P§j} Submersible Pump SAMPLEID: t,M\1\)-\ .,.1_0\~~ QC: Dup MS/MSD Ferrous Fe= / DO= ,_- N03= ,- Analyses ·Requested ..; '"iii' g - U) ~ 0 UJ IU ..... UJ- ~ ~ -21~ z~ IUCI !Et Page 2 of2 Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet JACOBS - Project Number 05WC0902 Ambient ..{)_!Q_Breathing Zone~ In Well .f}_ll)_ Well Information ft) • 0' l (A:3 gal/ft • 3 = gal • 3.785 Ugal = 25". 3(o L Gallons per Ft Max Pu e Vol Max Purge Vol W e II P urgmg I nf ormaf 1on Start Time Finish Time I 04 y D!i!!;!th Qf Ty!;!ing (ft btQQ) Egyi!;!m!i!nl U!i!!i!!:lfQr Pyrging Bailer P ~ 6 ristaltic Submersible Pump OC1-34 ~ @8 tf#S{?!:> tZ ..dB ~ .QQ!Q!: Odor Sh!i!!i!n Pyrg!i!!:f Dri M!i!t!i!r !.!!i!!i!d During Pyrging CloudyBrown Moderate Yes Yes ~ ~ l YSI Multi 9 eter Hach oe idimeter Other: Faint Strong ® @ ot. \030 q ZO\\ \'14 Purging reached: ~ Max Vol. I Purge water was: Treatec(i tored:)::>ther Note: Mandatory Stability Parameters Additional Stability Parameters (Neea One) Other Parameters Volume Time (Gallons or Liters) ±10% I ±0.3 mgll ±10mV ±0.1 ±3% < 10 NTU - prawdown < 0.3 ~ (HH:mm) DO ORP pH ConductiVIty Turbidity Temperature Water Level Change Total (mgll) ,(mV) (std units) h.tS/cm) (NTUf (•c) {feet btoc) oq39 1#2.5 ------/f,3n nO,t.t4/,Z.S ·Z-·5() 3. (u '1 222. (o C:,.. 9& /7/ jz.,4 9 4.,r.io 11·30 3,1t-() 1.-(.(o 0 '-lo~!?CJ C)~4'lI , f . {"a 0 ~.. 5"5 Z,ZCJ, " /?CJ /(oct 11 .- 5o .. ~ ~GJ {/1 ~-;.. + 4 37 oq 54 /. 40 5 oOO 3 44 ../ ·2n v l65- 170 " S7 11.3o s-q IQ,DO ..01 - zz.oI ../ (O ?~~- Z-0 V' ~ o'l ' ..30 3 . i 11 v z. 4J'-'" II 8 i '2«3~ - 1004 I " 2.0 1 ··50 2iq. r:..J (g. 7 ,, .~ to, t.o() Z~t2. 2.Q:,~ \0~ \ • \Q \ - 1- l-.~" 7<...; v l-144-../ 4,45 I I " '30 .~o j ~82- 10\4 J ...3o 1 Lli\.~5'-ln.14v 114 V' / ..'lfv t/ 4~45 il .3() \O\ q l·lO Cf •110 1., ·7z - i '17~5- ~ ..--nv i7W . v i~5'5\/' .y,53 11·30 4'/{) I. ((II ·V' ls3~t.o- c/ I ..'f3 L.J,:i~ ll\2.11 /0 t'o~-r5v 17'1 v 1/.·30 ' " 3CJ I D2.9 J .. &> il ,10 Jtt21 - /7./}: 7 (o,71../ /75 v (. 06/ '-l,Sf 11··30 Lf ,~) 1034 1.3o io.uo t ..l~- l((,f&J - w."T1 ·J 11s·t/ / .. zsv /t·3C ..z.o t~ IG_~q ; /4.}J) d3/ tdJ~O- (/; .. 7'1 ,/ l?tb v IJ~?t/o/.,S/ II ·51 ) I' <.)0 I dX:n/ IDijLf JS.. 7o /{l~~~ff./i d .. C6S" J /77/ - L./.. 73 lt· 3n Sample collection information on next page 7 Suggested Notation: "-"=not measured •../·= stable "+"=rising "-"=falling Page 1 of2 Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet ~Acoas · Site Name Event WeiiiD Proj~QtNumber I.Dt>0LtLt tltdlV\ P - SPR \ fVG Z011 LJJ.iVI03 l~5u1ceq0z ~ Samj;!ler Initials 5/2~120)1li.P Optional Stability Parameters (Choose One) Other Parameters Volume Mandatory Stability Parameters (Gallons or Liters) Time ±10% I ±0.3 mg/L ± 10mV ± 0.1 ±3% < 10 NTU prawdown < 0.3 fl (HH:mm) - DO ORP pH Conductivity Turbidity Change Total Tempe~lure 1aterlevel (mg/L) (mV) (std units) (uS/em) CNTUl i·c feet btoc) "'-...... ~ --..... ""- ...... r--..._~ I~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ I""- ~ I' ""' ~ ~ I~ ~ " s ampeI C 0 II ect1on I normat f 1on StgrtT ime Finish Time I Date De12th of Tubing (ft btoc) Eguigment Used for Samj;!ling IO'f:S I 11o_? I si2'7J n il.-30 ~ristalticPui'Tiin Submersible Pump Fea.aus Ee- l'liQ3 :. SAMPLE ID: Li4 M 03 20i'l~ ee. Bap MSfMSB t' 89 Analyses Requested I 'iii' g - Ul c5 Ul Ill ~ Gl§l Ul- ~ ~ .... '0<( z~ 11101 !Ea.. J: "' 1i5 1i5 ~ Q) - (.) mcu en ::lw .... u.c m m 0 0 Ulm en - ~d~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Q)T"' .2:-~o6C! IIIJ:N ~ 10 Ul~"-- r-. C:N ~ Q) Cl E ..... N' M' 10 'OIXI U)N~ 0 0 UIN N N Oo .Sl~ 2: 'E E ]i<(~ uN -± Ill :I 0~ o.- o.- iiifiS .l!! Page 2 of2 ~ I I )LfD JL! JL! l?J&j<& l?J&j<& /J..J /J..J Max Max Othe Purg "-" "-" Groundwater Groundwater Suggested Suggested J-.\6~ J-.\6~ (HH:mm} (HH:mm} Time Time \3 \3 =not =not i Purge Purge r: r: I~ I~ ng ng · ~ ~ rtls-z-- Cloudy Cloudy Start Start reached ~ ~ measured measured Volume= Volume= Notation: Notation: J J J I I /.5 /.5 Change Change Time Time } } (Gallons (Gallons / .1 .1 ~75 ~75 ~ ~ /, /, Brown Brown : : ( vo: stab Sampling Sampling ~ ~ - 1 /L /L f) f) ( ( 1-, 1-, :2:'1 :2:'1 ) ) •,/ Pre Lite i~ i~ Total Total "\n "\n flp flp · .. .. lllous lllous = = , , -z., -z., l l ~ ~ stable stable Max Max ~ ~ Total Total ~ TOC TOC P~OO\ P~OO\ ±10% ±10% Mandatory Mandatory o o o.q~ o.q~ ~ ~ 0 0 / / Fa Vol. Vol. Depth Depth Depth Depth /L{"(_o /L{"(_o .. .. Data Data " Finish Finish i nt nt + (mg/L) (mg/L) . Stickup Stickup 2.?J 2.?J . . I I " .'15 .'15 DO DO ~~ ~~ 0'-l 0'-l ±0.3 ±0.3 OdQr OdQr =rising =rising ft- I I Moderate Moderate Purge Purge Time Time mgiL mgiL Sheet Sheet Stability Stability Strong Strong Depth Depth Itt Itt (& (& Ambient Ambient agsl agsl -=\S -=\S ·-· ·-· to to -=ti.t -=ti.t to to water water ~·lo ~·lo ~ ""8L. ""8L. • • Top Top Water Water W W =falling =falling U U Parametars Parametars ±10mV ±10mV (mV) (mV) ORP ORP of of Q.Q_ Q.Q_ was 2( 2( or or Filter Filter : II II -::r- . .'5 .'5 ~ Well Well ~ ~ Depth Depth 0 0 : : P P e Pack Pack §!!ml §!!ml urgmg urgmg Treated Treated Yes Yes ' Breathing Breathing ft) ft) ~ f.g. Co Co lo lo l,., l,., QfTYt!ing QfTYt!ing &.I~ &.I~ Information Information - • (std (std Additional Additional 0 Gallons Gallons : :1:0.1 :1:0.1 'Z.<.o 'Z.<.o · @ pH pH ~ ~ ,. zz.. zz.. units ~~ ~~ Zone Zone /Uf? C§:> C§:> Pyrg!i1Q Pyrg!i1Q tored I I n n per per \ \ ) ) (ft (ft f f .Q.,_Q_ .Q.,_Q_ Yes Yes ::::O orma orma Ft Ft Stability Stability !;!tQ!;;} !;!tQ!;;} gallft• gallft• q£..{ q£..{ DrL DrL 9'-\ 9'-\ ther ther /o~ /o~ q '1~ '1~ Conductivity Conductivity {pS/cm In In Sample Sample f f ±3% ±3% Parameters Parameters 1on 1on Well Well 3 = = 3 Note cv; Produc Produc Casing Casing ) ) Max Max Bailer Bailer Q_J)_ Q_J)_ Lf 1/0 : : Purge Purge . collection collection "/"1-: "/"1-: -2-.53 -2-.53 C5,4f_ C5,4f_ . -z.rA,-:3 -z.rA,-:3 041 041 2. D (Need (Need :Z.4~ :Z.4~ _0 i Vol Vol ameterlin) ameterlin) Multi < < Turbidity Turbidity f;;gyi(;!m!:lnt f;;gyi(;!m!:lnt (NTU . 10 10 M!ilt!i:r M!ilt!i:r gal• gal• 2:3 2:3 ~ ~ One) One) ristaltic ristaltic NTU NTU ~~ ~~ ) ) information information 3.785 3.785 U:ied U:ied I I j j Pu"!J? Pu"!J? Gallons Gallons !.!§!:ld !.!§!:ld -=\,(6\ -=\,(6\ 1:::fL._ 1:::fL._ During During ~ ~ Ugal Ugal -::} -=f,cr* -=f,cr* Temperature Temperature 4/0 for for ( . - " . = = C Other Other per per '8C) '8C) Submersible Submersible . Pyrging Pyrging 653 653 ) ) Purging Purging Max Max .JACOBS on on /"[."{ /"[."{ linear linear Purge Purge Parameters Parameters next next Project Project 05WC0902 05WC0902 Drawdown Drawdown 6/1.469 6/1.469 ~:11- Page Page ln ~- G::,.--==t--=+ G::,.--==t--=+ foot ~. Vo Watarlevel Watarlevel (feet (feet l l page page . L L Pump Pump - -:::t -:::t Number Number -=1-4- =r-:t =r-:t 1 1 btoc) btoc) -:q. -:q. < < of2 of2 7 7 0 . 3 3 . . ft ft ~ ~ fl fl · · 0.3 0.3 "' "' (...) (...) < < -:t -:t - level level btoc} btoc} ~ ~ z~ z~ J: J: c5 c5 Initial~ Initial~ M Numb!]lr Numb!]lr CliO~ CliO~ Sl~o Sl~o ~ ~ Cll Cll I'GJ:N I'GJ:N D: ~d~ ~d~ {feet {feet \£\G\ \£\G\ -- ~v ~v Water Water \.\L"'r\... \.\L"'r\... ~\. ~\. Pump Pump ~~ ~~ Drawdown Drawdown G.\' G.\' N03= N03= Samgler Samgler Project Project Parameters Parameters / / ble ble ; ; - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Acoas v :::lw :::lw cu:;: cu:;: :::lw :::lw l22m121ing l22m121ing .2!~ .2!~ (/) -a. -a. J!!< J!!< ..,~ ..,~ ~Cf ~Cf (/) (/) Other Other C) C) " - ~ ~ ( for for r r Submers Temperature Temperature Used Used c:C\1 c:C\1 3~ 3~ -g~ -g~ .2-~ .2-~ Oo Oo DO= DO= Date Date Mwf WeiiiD WeiiiD / / c~ c~ 4 ~ ~ ...... en en ~ ~ v v (j (j NTU NTU One) One) / / ~~~~ ~~~~ / / Gi~ Gi~ ::!!~ ::!!~ iii~ iii~ 10 10 1 (NTU} (NTU} Egui(!m!;!nt Egui(!m!;!nt stalti z:v/~S/1~ z:v/~S/1~ Turbidity Turbidity < < Fe= Fe= (Choose (Choose ~ II)(/) II)(/) cu..- "'iii" "'iii" a..~ a..~ '5i~ '5i~ :s:g :s:g 1on 1on f f Ferrous Ferrous / / 0 0 ...... 0 0 ~ ~ Ci5 Ci5 :1:3% :1:3% 1/' 1/' (pS/cm) (pS/cm) Parameters Parameters UJC\1 UJC\1 if~ if~ J:~ J:~ Conductivity Conductivity ~ ~ J J bloc) bloc) norma norma I I (ft (ft MSD MSD ~ ~ 0 0 ...... 0 0 Stability Stability / Requested Requested "' "' (/) 0~ 0~ uN uN >(/) >(/) -=:;- MS \ \ units} units} f f pH pH yses yses :1:0.1 :1:0.1 Event Event l Tubing Tubing ~-:>~NA ~-:>~NA (std (std Optional Optional ec10n ec10n ~ ~ C\1 C\1 0 0 10 10 of of Ill Ill ~ ~ Ci5 Ci5 '-1- Dup Dup Ana II II Ill~ Ill~ 0(/) 0(/) w : : 0 0 C C Degth Degth QC 10 10 0 0 iii" iii" I I UJC\1 UJC\1 ..,/ ..,/ ~~ ~~ (...)~ (...)~ ORP ORP (mV} (mV} /t+- \wMv \wMv ±10mV ±10mV Parameters Parameters ample ample 0 0 I') I') 5 5 51~ 0::~ 0::~ a:~ a:~ o..- Stability Stability mgiL mgiL Sheet Sheet Time Time :1:0.3 :1:0.3 0 0 N" N" DO DO / / I I (mgll) (mgll) tf tf 0~ 0~ 0::~ 0::~ o..- Data Data J: Mandatory Mandatory ±10% ±10% . . \'b-"2..0\'-::\~ \'b-"2..0\'-::\~ Jt-l 0 0 I I ../ ../ . . 0::~ 0::~ (.!)~ (.!)~ o..- l\ l\ Total Total I I Liters) Liters) . . MW MW or or ~ ~ Name Name ume ume Sampling Sampling l \ ra ra E E ra ra Ul Ul til til ~ ~\J ~\J ' ' Vo !]l !]l - Q. ( ( uil uil Cl'- l2it!]l l2it!]l "' "' "'- <{II <{II Cl Cl .!!!Ol .!!!Ol i.)J-t i.)J-t ~ ~ C:Q(.!) C:Q(.!) ...... J!! J!! 8c.~ 8c.~ (Gallons (Gallons ·- L L Change Change ~YM...(_ ~YM...(_ 9tMW 9tMW ID: ID: (f\I of2 of2 \)~ ::;] ::;] Cll Cll E E §tartTim ~ ~ e 2 2 e IL- )L )L ~V6t\ ~V6t\ \1-~' \1-~' 11.'SmL 11.'SmL /t.{Z\ /t.{Z\ '5dJ I mm) mm) g g : Time Time Pa Pa c: c: ::;] ::;] ra ra \ \ 0 0 ~ ~ \ \ \ \ {., {., SAMPLE SAMPLE (HH Groundwater Groundwater 1- /)_ /)_ ATTACHMENT 3 Field Notes ATTACHMENT 4 2017 Groundwater Analytical Data Table 4A Source Area PL001 Sample Summary - Eielson AFB, Alaska COC Collection Collection Container Analytical Method SDG Location ID Sampler Initials Qty Container Type Preservative Matrix QC Type TAT Notes COC Number Cooler Name Cooler Date Laboratory Sample ID Date Time Volume Requested Number AFMW01-2017S AFMW01 20-May-17 1551 HM 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B Primary 30 days GRO, VOCS 2017E28 Bubble Boy 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 AFMW01-2017S AFMW01 20-May-17 1551 HM 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM Primary 30 days PAHs 2017E36 TheBizarroJerry 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 AFMW01-2017S AFMW01 20-May-17 1551 HM 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 Primary 30 days DRO 2017E36 TheBizarroJerry 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 AFMW01-2017S AFMW01 20-May-17 1551 HM 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A Primary 30 days Metals 2017E34 TheMoops 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 AFMW01-2017S-9 AFMW01 20-May-17 1551 HM 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B Duplicate 30 days GRO, VOCS 2017E28 Bubble Boy 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 AFMW01-2017S-9 AFMW01 20-May-17 1551 HM 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM Duplicate 30 days PAHs 2017E36 TheBizarroJerry 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 AFMW01-2017S-9 AFMW01 20-May-17 1551 HM 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 Duplicate 30 days DRO 2017E36 TheBizarroJerry 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 AFMW01-2017S-9 AFMW01 20-May-17 1551 HM 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A Duplicate 30 days Metals 2017E34 TheMoops 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 CMW-1-2017S CMW-1 20-May-17 1554 GP 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B 30 days GRO, VOCS 2017E28 Bubble Boy 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 CMW-1-2017S CMW-1 20-May-17 1554 GP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E35 I'm Out 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PAHs/SVOCs, Limited CMW-1-2017S CMW-1 20-May-17 1554 GP 1 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM/SW8270 30 days 2017E36 TheBizarroJerry 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 Volume Pesticides, Limited CMW-1-2017S CMW-1 20-May-17 1554 GP 1 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8081B 30 days 2017E36 TheBizarroJerry 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 Volume CMW-1-2017S CMW-1 20-May-17 1554 GP 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E33 TheContest 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PL001MW02-2017S PL001MW02 20-May-17 1528 AD 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B 30 days GRO, VOCS 2017E28 Bubble Boy 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PL001MW02-2017S PL001MW02 20-May-17 1528 AD 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM 30 days PAHs 2017E35 I'm Out 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PL001MW02-2017S PL001MW02 20-May-17 1528 AD 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E35 I'm Out 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PL001MW02-2017S PL001MW02 20-May-17 1528 AD 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E35 I'm Out 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PL001MW03-2017S PL001MW03 20-May-17 1530 EK 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B 30 days GRO, VOCS 2017E28 Bubble Boy 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PL001MW03-2017S PL001MW03 20-May-17 1530 EK 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM 30 days PAHs 2017E35 I'm Out 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PL001MW03-2017S PL001MW03 20-May-17 1530 EK 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E35 I'm Out 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 PL001MW03-2017S PL001MW03 20-May-17 1530 EK 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E33 TheContest 22-May-17 EMAX 17E177 AFMW03-2017S AFMW03 24-May-17 1509 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM 30 days PAHs 2017E63 Manzier 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 AFMW03-2017S AFMW03 24-May-17 1509 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E63 Manzier 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 AFMW03-2017S AFMW03 24-May-17 1509 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E63 Manzier 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 AFMW03-2017S AFMW03 24-May-17 1509 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B 30 days GRO, VOCs 2017E59 The Pick 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 MW-BKG-07-2017S MW-BKG-7 24-May-17 1359 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM Primary 30 days PAHs 2017E65 Magic Loogie Theory 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 MW-BKG-07-2017S MW-BKG-7 24-May-17 1359 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 Primary 30 days DRO 2017E65 Magic Loogie Theory 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 MW-BKG-07-2017S MW-BKG-7 24-May-17 1359 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A Primary 30 days Metals 2017E65 Magic Loogie Theory 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 MW-BKG-07-2017S MW-BKG-7 24-May-17 1359 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B Primary 30 days GRO, VOCs 2017E59 The Pick 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 MW-BKG-7 24-May-17 1359 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM Duplicate 30 days PAHs 2017E65 Magic Loogie Theory 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 MW-BKG-7 24-May-17 1359 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 Duplicate 30 days DRO 2017E65 Magic Loogie Theory 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 MW-BKG-7 24-May-17 1359 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A Duplicate 30 days Metals 2017E65 Magic Loogie Theory 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 MW-BKG-7 24-May-17 1359 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B Duplicate 30 days GRO, VOCs 2017E59 The Pick 25-May-17 EMAX 17E220 45MW32-2017S 45MW32 26-May-17 1006 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B 30 days GRO, VOCs 2017E88 ICarryAPurse 27-May-17 EMAX 17E232 45MW32-2017S 45MW32 26-May-17 1006 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 250mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E87 Marble Rye 27-May-17 EMAX 17E232 45MW32-2017S 45MW32 26-May-17 1006 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM 30 days PAHs 2017E79 Stick A Fork In Me 27-May-17 EMAX 17E232 45MW32-2017S 45MW32 26-May-17 1006 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E79 Stick A Fork In Me 27-May-17 EMAX 17E232 AFMW02-2017S AFMW02 27-May-17 1258 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 250mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E91 Hey Buddy 29-May-17 EMAX 17E233 AFMW02-2017S AFMW02 27-May-17 1258 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM 30 days PAHs 2017E99 The Pothole 29-May-17 EMAX 17E233 AFMW02-2017S AFMW02 27-May-17 1258 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E100 The Calzone 29-May-17 EMAX 17E233 AFMW02-2017S AFMW02 27-May-17 1258 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B 30 days GRO, VOCs 2017E100 The Calzone 29-May-17 EMAX 17E233 44M03-2017S 44M03 25-May-17 1045 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E73 Butter Shave 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44M03-2017S 44M03 25-May-17 1045 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E73 Butter Shave 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44M03-2017S 44M03 25-May-17 1045 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM 30 days PAHs 2017E72 Calvin Kramer 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44M03-2017S 44M03 25-May-17 1045 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B 30 days GRO, VOCs 2017E75 The Puffy Shirt 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44MW13-2017S 44MW13 25-May-17 1421 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E72 Calvin Kramer 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44MW13-2017S 44MW13 25-May-17 1421 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM 30 days PAHs 2017E71 Cheever Letters 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44MW13-2017S 44MW13 25-May-17 1421 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E66 The Jerk Store 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44MW13-2017S 44MW13 25-May-17 1421 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 125 mL 4°C WG EPA 300.0 30 days Sulfate 2017E66 The Jerk Store 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44MW13-2017S 44MW13 25-May-17 1421 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 125 mL 4°C, ZnAC2/NaOH WG SM 4500-S2D 30 days Sulfide 2017E66 The Jerk Store 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 44MW13-2017S 44MW13 25-May-17 1421 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 6 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B 30 days GRO, VOCs 2017E75 The Puffy Shirt 26-May-17 EMAX 17E231 13MW16-2017S 13MW16 22-May-17 1433 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C WG SW8270D SIM 30 days PAHs 2017E38 SpongeWorthy 23-May-17 EMAX 17E199 13MW16-2017S 13MW16 22-May-17 1433 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E38 SpongeWorthy 23-May-17 EMAX 17E199 13MW16-2017S 13MW16 22-May-17 1433 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 9 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG AK101, SW8260B, SW8260SIM 30 days GRO, VOCs, EDB 2017E47 TippyToe 23-May-17 EMAX 17E199 13MW16-2017S 13MW16 22-May-17 1433 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 500mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A, SW7470A 30 days Metals 2017E47 TippyToe 23-May-17 EMAX 17E199 03M03B-2017S 03M03B 16-May-17 1258 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1 L 4°C WG SW8270D, SW8270DSIM 30 days SVOCs, PAHs 2017E02 George Costanza 17-May-17 EMAX 17E144 03M03B-2017S 03M03B 16-May-17 1258 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1 L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E02 George Costanza 17-May-17 EMAX 17E144 03M03B-2017S 03M03B 16-May-17 1258 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 250 mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A/7470 30 days Metals 2017E09 Morty Seinfeld 17-May-17 EMAX 17E144 03M03B-2017S 03M03B 16-May-17 1258 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 3 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG SW8260B 30 days VOCs 2017E09 Morty Seinfeld 17-May-17 EMAX 17E144 09M03-2017S 09M03 16-May-17 1129 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1 L 4°C, HCl WG AK102 30 days DRO 2017E08 Estelle Costanza 17-May-17 EMAX 17E144 09M03-2017S 09M03 16-May-17 1129 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 1 HDPE 250 mL 4°C, HNO3 WG SW6020A/7470 30 days Metals 2017E09 Morty Seinfeld 17-May-17 EMAX 17E144 09M03-2017S 09M03 16-May-17 1129 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 3 VOA vial 40 mL 4°C, HCl WG SW8260B 30 days VOCs 2017E09 Morty Seinfeld 17-May-17 EMAX 17E144 09M03-2017S 09M03 16-May-17 1129 AD/CE/EK/GP/HM/KP 2 glass amber 1 L 4°C WG SW8270D, SW8270DSIM 30 days SVOCs, PAHs 2017E06 Susan Ross 17-May-17 EMAX 17E144 Notes: COC = chain-of-custody WG = groundwater ID = identification EMAX = EMAX Laboratories, Inc. QC = quality control GRO = gasoline-range organics TAT = turnaround time DRO = diesel-range organics SDG = sample delivery group VOC = volatile organic compound mL = milliliter PAH = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon L = liter Page 1 of 1 Table 4B 2017 PL001 Groundwater Results – Eielson AFB, Alaska Location ID: 03M03B 09M03 13MW16 44M03 44MW13 45MW32 AFMW01 AFMW01 AFMW02 AFMW03 CMW-1 MW-BKG-07 Sample ID 2: 03M03B-2017S 09M03-2017S 13MW16-2017S 44M03-2017S 44MW13-2017S 45MW32-2017S AFMW01-2017S AFMW01-2017S-9 AFMW02-2017S AFMW03-2017S CMW-1-2017S MW-BKG-07-2017S SDG: 17E144 17E144 17E199 17E231 17E231 17E232 17E177 17E177 17E233 17E220 17E177 17E220 Sample Date: 5/16/2017 5/16/2017 5/22/2017 5/25/2017 5/25/2017 5/26/2017 5/20/2017 5/20/2017 5/27/2017 5/24/2017 5/20/2017 5/24/2017 Sample Type: MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW Screening Method Analyte Units Level ¹ 4500S2D Sulfide mg/L - - - - - 0.0289 [0.01] J ------6020A Aluminum mg/L 2 0.0217 [0.01] J ND [0.1] ND [0.05] ND [0.05] 0.048 [0.01] J ND [0.05] ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.05] ND [0.01] 0.0552 [0.01] J 6020A Antimony mg/L 0.006 ND [0.00025] ND [0.0025] ND [0.00125] ND [0.00125] 0.000262 [0.00025] J ND [0.00125] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00125] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] 6020A Arsenic mg/L 0.01 0.00722 [0.0001] 0.0174 [0.001] 0.022 [0.0005] 0.00127 [0.0005] J 0.00937 [0.0001] ND [0.0005] 0.0152 [0.0001] 0.0151 [0.0001] 0.000393 [0.0001] J 0.00279 [0.0005] J 0.0261 [0.0001] 0.000364 [0.0001] J 6020A Barium mg/L 2 0.118 [0.00025] 0.201 [0.0025] 0.243 [0.00125] 0.0948 [0.00125] 0.09 [0.00025] 0.0566 [0.00125] 0.203 [0.00025] 0.204 [0.00025] 0.0924 [0.00025] 0.205 [0.00125] 0.384 [0.00025] 0.0651 [0.00025] 6020A Beryllium mg/L 0.004 ND [0.00005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00005] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00005] ND [0.00005] ND [0.00005] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00005] ND [0.00005] 6020A Cadmium mg/L 0.005 0.000138 [0.0001] J ND [0.001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] 0.00101 [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 6020A Calcium mg/L - 47.2 [0.013] 62.6 [0.13] 60.8 [0.065] 54.7 [0.065] 23.8 [0.013] 89.7 [0.065] 72.5 [0.065] 76.2 [0.065] 107 [0.013] 76.7 [0.065] 77.4 [0.013] 34.4 [0.013] 6020A Chromium mg/L 0.1 0.000378 [0.0001] J ND [0.001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] 0.000447 [0.0001] J ND [0.0005] 0.000171 [0.0001] J, 0.000124 [0.0001] J, JD 0.000314 [0.0001] J, B ND [0.0005] 0.000264 [0.0001] J 0.000231 [0.0001] J, JD 6020A Cobalt mg/L 0.006 0.0023 [0.0001] ND [0.001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] 0.00463 [0.0001] ND [0.0005] 0.00354 [0.0001] 0.0041 [0.0005] J 0.000229 [0.0001] J 0.00348 [0.0005] J 0.000955 [0.0001] J 0.00018 [0.0001] J 6020A Copper mg/L 1 0.00375 [0.00025] ND [0.0025] ND [0.00125] ND [0.00125] 0.00236 [0.00025] 0.00192 [0.00125] J 0.00165 [0.00025] 0.00208 [0.00125] J 0.0011 [0.00025] 0.00298 [0.00125] J 0.00048 [0.00025] J 0.00931 [0.00025] 6020A Iron mg/L 14 1.38 [0.005] 6.67 [0.05] 12.3 [0.025] 0.564 [0.025] 8.62 [0.005] 0.025 [0.025] J 4.47 [0.005] 4.85 [0.025] 0.00751 [0.005] J 1.15 [0.025] 13.6 [0.005] 0.0561 [0.005] J 6020A Lead mg/L 0.015 0.000291 [0.00005] J ND [0.0005] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] 0.000546 [0.00005] J ND [0.00025] 0.000101 [0.00005] J ND [0.00025] 0.00024 [0.00005] J ND [0.00025] ND [0.00005] 0.0000692 [0.00005] J 6020A Magnesium mg/L - 12.9 [0.005] 12.8 [0.05] 12.1 [0.025] 9.68 [0.025] 4.22 [0.005] 15.3 [0.025] 12.8 [0.005] 14 [0.025] 22 [0.005] 17.2 [0.025] 15.9 [0.005] 9.62 [0.005] 6020A Manganese mg/L 0.43 0.691 [0.0001] 2.4 [0.001] 4.97 [0.0005] 1.72 [0.0005] 0.746 [0.0001] 0.0948 [0.0005] 4.11 [0.0005] 4.25 [0.0005] 0.0368 [0.0001] 2.56 [0.0005] 11 [0.0001] 0.0033 [0.0001] 6020A Nickel mg/L 0.1 0.00733 [0.0001] ND [0.001] 0.00054 [0.0005] J 0.000611 [0.0005] J 0.00508 [0.0001] ND [0.0005] 0.00482 [0.0001] 0.00519 [0.0005] 0.00104 [0.0001] B 0.00638 [0.0001] 0.000969 [0.0001] J 0.00307 [0.0001] 6020A Potassium mg/L - 9.82 [0.01] 4.57 [0.1] 3.66 [0.05] 2.88 [0.05] 13.8 [0.01] 4.91 [0.05] 6.54 [0.01] 7.33 [0.05] 4.81 [0.01] 9.54 [0.01] 5.1 [0.01] 3.08 [0.01] 6020A Selenium mg/L 0.05 ND [0.00015] ND [0.0015] ND [0.00075] ND [0.00075] 0.000324 [0.00015] J ND [0.00075] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00075] 0.00202 [0.00015] ND [0.00075] ND [0.00015] 0.000295 [0.00015] J 6020A Silver mg/L 0.1 ND [0.0001] ND [0.001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 6020A Sodium mg/L - 4.12 [0.025] 5.14 [0.25] 4.88 [0.125] 2.73 [0.125] 2.42 [0.025] 4.53 [0.125] 4.24 [0.025] 4.5 [0.125] 6.22 [0.025] 7.58 [0.025] 7.22 [0.025] 2.1 [0.025] 6020A Thallium mg/L 0.002 ND [0.0001] ND [0.001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 6020A Vanadium mg/L 0.26 0.00149 [0.00025] ND [0.0025] ND [0.00125] ND [0.00125] 0.00144 [0.00025] ND [0.00125] 0.00122 [0.00025] 0.00151 [0.00125] J 0.000347 [0.00025] J 0.000435 [0.00025] J 0.00104 [0.00025] ND [0.00025] 6020A Zinc mg/L 5 0.0731 [0.005] ND [0.05] ND [0.025] ND [0.025] 0.246 [0.005] 0.0286 [0.025] J ND [0.005] ND [0.025] ND [0.005] ND [0.005] ND [0.005] ND [0.005] 7470A Mercury mg/L 0.002 ND [0.000054] ND [0.000054] ND [0.000054] ND [0.000054] ND [0.000054] 0.000078 [0.000054] J 0.000089 [0.000054] J ND [0.000054] ND [0.000054] ND [0.000054] ND [0.000054] ND [0.000054] 8081B Aldrin mg/L 0.00005 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B alpha-BHC mg/L 0.00014 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B alpha-Chlordane mg/L 0.002 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B beta-BHC mg/L 0.00047 ------ND [0.0000083] - 8081B DDD mg/L 0.0035 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B DDE mg/L 0.0025 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B DDT mg/L 0.0025 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B delta-BHC mg/L ------ND [0.0000083] - 8081B Dieldrin mg/L 0.000053 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B Endosulfan I mg/L ------ND [0.0000094] - 8081B Endosulfan II mg/L ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate mg/L ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B Endrin mg/L 0.002 ------ND [0.0000094] - 8081B Endrin Aldehyde mg/L ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B Endrin Ketone mg/L ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B gamma-Chlordane mg/L 0.002 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B Heptachlor mg/L 0.0004 ------ND [0.0000083] - 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide mg/L 0.0002 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B Lindane mg/L 0.0002 ------ND [0.0000059] - 8081B Methoxychlor mg/L 0.04 ------ND [0.000059] - 8081B Toxaphene mg/L 0.003 ------ND [0.00029] - 8260B 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.2 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.0043 ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B 1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 7.3 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.007 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00011 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1-Dichloropropene mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,2,3-TCP mg/L 0.00012 ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E 8260B 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L - ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B 1,2,4-TMB mg/L 1.8 ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 0.00021 [0.00011] J ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.07 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.0002 ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E 8260B 1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.6 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,2-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,2-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,3,5-TMB mg/L 1.8 ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] 8260B 1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 3.3 ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B 1,3-Dichloropropane mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.075 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 2,2-Dichloropropane mg/L - ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] 8260B 2-Chlorotoluene mg/L - ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] 8260B 2-Hexanone mg/L - ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] 8260B 4-Chlorotoluene mg/L - ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B 4-Methyl-2-pentanone mg/L 2.9 ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] 8260B Acetone mg/L 33 ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] 0.004 [0.0026] J ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] 8260B Benzene mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] Page 1 of 6 Table 4B 2017 PL001 Groundwater Results – Eielson AFB, Alaska Location ID: 03M03B 09M03 13MW16 44M03 44MW13 45MW32 AFMW01 AFMW01 AFMW02 AFMW03 CMW-1 MW-BKG-07 Sample ID 2: 03M03B-2017S 09M03-2017S 13MW16-2017S 44M03-2017S 44MW13-2017S 45MW32-2017S AFMW01-2017S AFMW01-2017S-9 AFMW02-2017S AFMW03-2017S CMW-1-2017S MW-BKG-07-2017S SDG: 17E144 17E144 17E199 17E231 17E231 17E232 17E177 17E177 17E233 17E220 17E177 17E220 Sample Date: 5/16/2017 5/16/2017 5/22/2017 5/25/2017 5/25/2017 5/26/2017 5/20/2017 5/20/2017 5/27/2017 5/24/2017 5/20/2017 5/24/2017 Sample Type: MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW Screening Method Analyte Units Level ¹ 8260B Bromobenzene mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Bromochloromethane mg/L - ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.014 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Bromoform mg/L 0.11 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B Bromomethane mg/L 0.051 ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] 8260B Carbon Disulfide mg/L 3.7 ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] 8260B Carbon Tetrachloride mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Chlorobenzene mg/L 0.1 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Chloroethane mg/L 0.29 ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] 8260B Chloroform mg/L 0.14 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00048 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Chloromethane mg/L 0.066 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B cis-DCE mg/L 0.07 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00078 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00017 [0.0001] J 0.00016 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Cumene mg/L 3.7 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.0011 [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.01 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Dibromomethane mg/L 0.37 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B EDB mg/L 0.00005 ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E 8260B Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.7 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Freon-11 mg/L 11 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 0.0014 [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B Freon-12 mg/L 7.3 0.002 [0.00015] 0.0008 [0.00015] J ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.0073 ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] 8260B MEK mg/L 22 ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] 8260B Methylene Chloride mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] 8260B MTBE mg/L 0.47 ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] 8260B Naphthalene mg/L 0.73 ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] 8260B n-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.37 ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] 8260B PCE mg/L 0.005 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B p-Cymene mg/L - ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] 8260B Propylbenzene mg/L 0.37 ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] 8260B sec-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.37 ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] 8260B Styrene mg/L 0.1 ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] 8260B TCE mg/L 0.005 0.00012 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B tert-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.37 ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] 8260B Toluene mg/L 1 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B trans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/L - ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B trans-DCE mg/L 0.1 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00031 [0.0001] J ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B VC mg/L 0.002 ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] 8260B Xylene, m & p mg/L - ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] 8260B Xylene, o mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Xylenes mg/L 10 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260BSIM EDB mg/L 0.00005 - - ND [0.000013] ------8270D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.07 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.6 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 3.3 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.075 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 1-Methylnaphthalene mg/L 0.15 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol mg/L 3.7 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.077 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2,4-Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.11 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2,4-Dimethylphenol mg/L 0.73 ND [0.0029] ND [0.0029] ------ND [0.0031] - 8270D 2,4-Dinitrophenol mg/L 0.073 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2,4-DNT mg/L 0.0013 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D 2,6-DNT mg/L 0.0013 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D 2-Chloronaphthalene mg/L 2.9 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2-Chlorophenol mg/L 0.18 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2-Methylnaphthalene mg/L 0.15 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2-Methylphenol mg/L 1.8 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2-Nitroaniline mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 2-Nitrophenol mg/L 0.0037 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine mg/L 0.0019 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D 3-Nitroaniline mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 4-Chloroaniline mg/L 0.016 ND [0.0047] ND [0.0047] ------ND [0.005] - 8270D 4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 4-Methylphenol mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D 4-Nitroaniline mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Acenaphthene mg/L 2.2 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Acenaphthylene mg/L 2.2 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Anthracene mg/L 11 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - Page 2 of 6 Table 4B 2017 PL001 Groundwater Results – Eielson AFB, Alaska Location ID: 03M03B 09M03 13MW16 44M03 44MW13 45MW32 AFMW01 AFMW01 AFMW02 AFMW03 CMW-1 MW-BKG-07 Sample ID 2: 03M03B-2017S 09M03-2017S 13MW16-2017S 44M03-2017S 44MW13-2017S 45MW32-2017S AFMW01-2017S AFMW01-2017S-9 AFMW02-2017S AFMW03-2017S CMW-1-2017S MW-BKG-07-2017S SDG: 17E144 17E144 17E199 17E231 17E231 17E232 17E177 17E177 17E233 17E220 17E177 17E220 Sample Date: 5/16/2017 5/16/2017 5/22/2017 5/25/2017 5/25/2017 5/26/2017 5/20/2017 5/20/2017 5/27/2017 5/24/2017 5/20/2017 5/24/2017 Sample Type: MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW Screening Method Analyte Units Level ¹ 8270D Benzo(a)anthracene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L 0.0002 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.0029] E ND [0.0029] E ------ND [0.0031] E - 8270D Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/L 1.1 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/L 0.012 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Benzoic Acid mg/L 150 ND [0.022] ND [0.022] ------ND [0.024] - 8270D Benzyl Alcohol mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Benzyl Butyl Phthalate mg/L 7.3 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D bis(2-Chlorethoxy)methane mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether mg/L 0.00077 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether mg/L - ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate mg/L 0.006 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Carbazole mg/L 0.043 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Chrysene mg/L 0.12 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/L 0.00012 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D Dibenzofuran mg/L 0.073 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Dibutyl Phthalate mg/L 3.7 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Diethyl Phthalate mg/L 29 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Dimethyl Phthalate mg/L 370 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Di-n-octyl Phthalate mg/L 1.5 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Fluoranthene mg/L 1.5 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Fluorene mg/L 1.5 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Hexachlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.0073 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/L 0.05 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Hexachloroethane mg/L 0.04 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D Isophorone mg/L 0.9 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Naphthalene mg/L 0.73 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Nitrobenzene mg/L 0.018 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D n-Nitrosodimethylamine mg/L 0.000017 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/L 0.00012 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D n-Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/L 0.17 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Pentachlorophenol mg/L 0.001 ND [0.0028] E ND [0.0028] E ------ND [0.0029] E - 8270D Phenanthrene mg/L 11 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Phenol mg/L 11 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270D Pyrene mg/L 1.1 ND [0.0028] ND [0.0028] ------ND [0.0029] - 8270DSIM 1-Methylnaphthalene mg/L 0.15 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM 2-Methylnaphthalene mg/L 0.15 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Acenaphthene mg/L 2.2 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Acenaphthylene mg/L 2.2 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Anthracene mg/L 11 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Benzo(a)anthracene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00012] ND [0.0001] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.0001] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00012] 8270DSIM Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L 0.0002 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/L 1.1 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/L 0.012 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Chrysene mg/L 0.12 ND [0.000067] ND [0.000067] ND [0.000067] ND [0.000071] ND [0.000069] ND [0.000074] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000071] ND [0.000068] ND [0.000066] ND [0.000071] ND [0.000074] 8270DSIM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/L 0.00012 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Fluoranthene mg/L 1.5 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] 0.00027 [0.000058] J ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Fluorene mg/L 1.5 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Naphthalene mg/L 0.73 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000058] ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Phenanthrene mg/L 11 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] 0.00015 [0.000058] J ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] 8270DSIM Pyrene mg/L 1.1 ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.000056] ND [0.00006] 0.00014 [0.000058] J ND [0.000062] ND [0.000055] ND [0.00006] ND [0.000057] ND [0.000055] ND [0.000059] ND [0.000062] AK101 GRO mg/L 2.2 ND [0.01] ND [0.01] 0.085 [0.01] J ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.01] 0.065 [0.01] J 0.065 [0.01] J ND [0.01] 0.013 [0.01] J ND [0.01] ND [0.01] AK102 DRO mg/L 1.5 0.11 [0.097] J ND [0.11] 0.31 [0.1] J ND [0.11] 0.15 [0.11] J ND [0.13] ND [0.12] ND [0.11] ND [0.12] ND [0.11] ND [0.11] ND [0.11] E300.0 Sulfate mg/L - - - - - 5.99 [0.013] ------Notes: Data Qualifiers: 1 Screening level = Worksheet #15 of the Programmatic QAPP (USAF 2015b) J = The analyte is positively identified, but the associated result is less than the LOQ but greater than 2 S = Spring sampling event or equal to the detection limit. [ ] denotes the LOD B = The analyte is detected in the method blank or the trip blank above LOD, and the concentration in [LCSD]) exceeds the QC criteria. the sample does not exceed the blank concentration by a factor of five (factor of 10 for common ██ ≥ background (metals only) laboratory contaminants acetone and methylene chloride). Bold ≥ screening level E = The result is nondetect and the LOD exceeds the project action limit. ID = identification JD = The result is qualified because the RPD between the primary sample and the field duplicate Italics LOD ≥ screening level sample exceeds 30 percent and/or the RPD between the MS and MSD (or LCS/LCS duplicate mg/L = milligrams per liter MW = monitoring well ND = nondetect SDG = sample delivery goup Page 3 of 6 Table 4B 2017 PL001 Groundwater Results – Eielson AFB, Alaska Location ID: MW-BKG-07 PL001MW02 PL001MW03 Sample ID 2: MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 PL001MW02-2017S PL001MW03-2017S SDG: 17E220 17E177 17E177 Sample Date: 5/24/2017 5/20/2017 5/20/2017 Sample Type: MW MW MW Screening Method Analyte Units Level ¹ 4500S2D Sulfide mg/L - --- 6020A Aluminum mg/L 2 0.0541 [0.01] J ND [0.05] ND [0.01] 6020A Antimony mg/L 0.006 ND [0.00025] ND [0.00125] ND [0.00025] 6020A Arsenic mg/L 0.01 0.00039 [0.0001] J 0.00819 [0.0005] 0.0114 [0.0001] 6020A Barium mg/L 2 0.0649 [0.00025] 0.212 [0.00125] 0.181 [0.00025] 6020A Beryllium mg/L 0.004 ND [0.00005] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00005] 6020A Cadmium mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] 6020A Calcium mg/L - 33.8 [0.013] 64.6 [0.065] 54.4 [0.013] 6020A Chromium mg/L 0.1 0.000355 [0.0001] J, JD ND [0.0005] 0.000167 [0.0001] J 6020A Cobalt mg/L 0.006 0.000181 [0.0001] J 0.00181 [0.0005] J 0.0019 [0.0001] 6020A Copper mg/L 1 0.00954 [0.00025] 0.00128 [0.00125] J 0.000584 [0.00025] J 6020A Iron mg/L 14 0.057 [0.005] J 4.98 [0.025] 5.84 [0.005] 6020A Lead mg/L 0.015 0.0000692 [0.00005] J ND [0.00025] 0.000185 [0.00005] J 6020A Magnesium mg/L - 9.38 [0.005] 14 [0.025] 12.5 [0.005] 6020A Manganese mg/L 0.43 0.00337 [0.0001] 2.17 [0.0005] 1.99 [0.0001] 6020A Nickel mg/L 0.1 0.00302 [0.0001] 0.00225 [0.0005] J 0.00225 [0.0001] 6020A Potassium mg/L - 3.07 [0.01] 4.03 [0.05] 4.33 [0.01] 6020A Selenium mg/L 0.05 0.00027 [0.00015] J ND [0.00075] ND [0.00015] 6020A Silver mg/L 0.1 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] 6020A Sodium mg/L - 2.04 [0.025] 4.68 [0.125] 3.85 [0.025] 6020A Thallium mg/L 0.002 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0001] 6020A Vanadium mg/L 0.26 0.000418 [0.00025] J ND [0.00125] 0.000551 [0.00025] J 6020A Zinc mg/L 5 ND [0.005] ND [0.025] ND [0.005] 7470A Mercury mg/L 0.002 0.000098 [0.000054] J 0.000104 [0.000054] J 0.000066 [0.000054] J 8081B Aldrin mg/L 0.00005 --- 8081B alpha-BHC mg/L 0.00014 --- 8081B alpha-Chlordane mg/L 0.002 --- 8081B beta-BHC mg/L 0.00047 --- 8081B DDD mg/L 0.0035 --- 8081B DDE mg/L 0.0025 --- 8081B DDT mg/L 0.0025 --- 8081B delta-BHC mg/L - --- 8081B Dieldrin mg/L 0.000053 --- 8081B Endosulfan I mg/L - --- 8081B Endosulfan II mg/L - --- 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate mg/L - --- 8081B Endrin mg/L 0.002 --- 8081B Endrin Aldehyde mg/L - --- 8081B Endrin Ketone mg/L - --- 8081B gamma-Chlordane mg/L 0.002 --- 8081B Heptachlor mg/L 0.0004 --- 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide mg/L 0.0002 --- 8081B Lindane mg/L 0.0002 --- 8081B Methoxychlor mg/L 0.04 --- 8081B Toxaphene mg/L 0.003 --- 8260B 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.2 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.0043 ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B 1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 7.3 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,1-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.007 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 0.00026 [0.0001] J 8260B 1,1-Dichloropropene mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,2,3-TCP mg/L 0.00012 ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E 8260B 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L - ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B 1,2,4-TMB mg/L 1.8 ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.07 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.0002 ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E ND [0.00025] E 8260B 1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.6 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,2-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,2-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,3,5-TMB mg/L 1.8 ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] 8260B 1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 3.3 ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B 1,3-Dichloropropane mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.075 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B 2,2-Dichloropropane mg/L - ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] 8260B 2-Chlorotoluene mg/L - ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] 8260B 2-Hexanone mg/L - ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] ND [0.0023] 8260B 4-Chlorotoluene mg/L - ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B 4-Methyl-2-pentanone mg/L 2.9 ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] ND [0.0021] 8260B Acetone mg/L 33 0.0062 [0.0026] J ND [0.0026] ND [0.0026] 8260B Benzene mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] Page 4 of 6 Table 4B 2017 PL001 Groundwater Results – Eielson AFB, Alaska Location ID: MW-BKG-07 PL001MW02 PL001MW03 Sample ID 2: MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 PL001MW02-2017S PL001MW03-2017S SDG: 17E220 17E177 17E177 Sample Date: 5/24/2017 5/20/2017 5/20/2017 Sample Type: MW MW MW Screening Method Analyte Units Level ¹ 8260B Bromobenzene mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Bromochloromethane mg/L - ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.014 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Bromoform mg/L 0.11 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B Bromomethane mg/L 0.051 ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] ND [0.00016] 8260B Carbon Disulfide mg/L 3.7 ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] 8260B Carbon Tetrachloride mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Chlorobenzene mg/L 0.1 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Chloroethane mg/L 0.29 ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] ND [0.00027] 8260B Chloroform mg/L 0.14 ND [0.0001] 0.0022 [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Chloromethane mg/L 0.066 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B cis-DCE mg/L 0.07 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Cumene mg/L 3.7 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.01 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Dibromomethane mg/L 0.37 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B EDB mg/L 0.00005 ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E ND [0.0001] E 8260B Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.7 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Freon-11 mg/L 11 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B Freon-12 mg/L 7.3 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.0073 ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] ND [0.00022] 8260B MEK mg/L 22 ND [0.002] ND [0.002] ND [0.002] 8260B Methylene Chloride mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] 8260B MTBE mg/L 0.47 ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] 8260B Naphthalene mg/L 0.73 ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] ND [0.0005] 8260B n-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.37 ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] ND [0.00017] 8260B PCE mg/L 0.005 ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] ND [0.00015] 8260B p-Cymene mg/L - ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] ND [0.00014] 8260B Propylbenzene mg/L 0.37 ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] 8260B sec-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.37 ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] 8260B Styrene mg/L 0.1 ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] ND [0.00025] 8260B TCE mg/L 0.005 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B tert-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.37 ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] ND [0.00013] 8260B Toluene mg/L 1 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B trans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/L - ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] ND [0.00011] 8260B trans-DCE mg/L 0.1 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B VC mg/L 0.002 ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] 8260B Xylene, m & p mg/L - ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] ND [0.00021] 8260B Xylene, o mg/L - ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260B Xylenes mg/L 10 ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] ND [0.0001] 8260BSIM EDB mg/L 0.00005 --- 8270D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.07 --- 8270D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.6 --- 8270D 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine mg/L - --- 8270D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 3.3 --- 8270D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.075 --- 8270D 1-Methylnaphthalene mg/L 0.15 --- 8270D 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol mg/L 3.7 --- 8270D 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol mg/L 0.077 --- 8270D 2,4-Dichlorophenol mg/L 0.11 --- 8270D 2,4-Dimethylphenol mg/L 0.73 --- 8270D 2,4-Dinitrophenol mg/L 0.073 --- 8270D 2,4-DNT mg/L 0.0013 --- 8270D 2,6-DNT mg/L 0.0013 --- 8270D 2-Chloronaphthalene mg/L 2.9 --- 8270D 2-Chlorophenol mg/L 0.18 --- 8270D 2-Methylnaphthalene mg/L 0.15 --- 8270D 2-Methylphenol mg/L 1.8 --- 8270D 2-Nitroaniline mg/L - --- 8270D 2-Nitrophenol mg/L 0.0037 --- 8270D 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine mg/L 0.0019 --- 8270D 3-Nitroaniline mg/L - --- 8270D 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol mg/L - --- 8270D 4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether mg/L - --- 8270D 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/L - --- 8270D 4-Chloroaniline mg/L 0.016 --- 8270D 4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether mg/L - --- 8270D 4-Methylphenol mg/L - --- 8270D 4-Nitroaniline mg/L - --- 8270D Acenaphthene mg/L 2.2 --- 8270D Acenaphthylene mg/L 2.2 --- 8270D Anthracene mg/L 11 --- Page 5 of 6 Table 4B 2017 PL001 Groundwater Results – Eielson AFB, Alaska Location ID: MW-BKG-07 PL001MW02 PL001MW03 Sample ID 2: MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 PL001MW02-2017S PL001MW03-2017S SDG: 17E220 17E177 17E177 Sample Date: 5/24/2017 5/20/2017 5/20/2017 Sample Type: MW MW MW Screening Method Analyte Units Level ¹ 8270D Benzo(a)anthracene mg/L 0.0012 --- 8270D Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L 0.0002 --- 8270D Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/L 0.0012 --- 8270D Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/L 1.1 --- 8270D Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/L 0.012 --- 8270D Benzoic Acid mg/L 150 --- 8270D Benzyl Alcohol mg/L - --- 8270D Benzyl Butyl Phthalate mg/L 7.3 --- 8270D bis(2-Chlorethoxy)methane mg/L - --- 8270D bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether mg/L 0.00077 --- 8270D bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether mg/L - --- 8270D bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate mg/L 0.006 --- 8270D Carbazole mg/L 0.043 --- 8270D Chrysene mg/L 0.12 --- 8270D Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/L 0.00012 --- 8270D Dibenzofuran mg/L 0.073 --- 8270D Dibutyl Phthalate mg/L 3.7 --- 8270D Diethyl Phthalate mg/L 29 --- 8270D Dimethyl Phthalate mg/L 370 --- 8270D Di-n-octyl Phthalate mg/L 1.5 --- 8270D Fluoranthene mg/L 1.5 --- 8270D Fluorene mg/L 1.5 --- 8270D Hexachlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 --- 8270D Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.0073 --- 8270D Hexachlorocyclopentadiene mg/L 0.05 --- 8270D Hexachloroethane mg/L 0.04 --- 8270D Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/L 0.0012 --- 8270D Isophorone mg/L 0.9 --- 8270D Naphthalene mg/L 0.73 --- 8270D Nitrobenzene mg/L 0.018 --- 8270D n-Nitrosodimethylamine mg/L 0.000017 --- 8270D n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/L 0.00012 --- 8270D n-Nitrosodiphenylamine mg/L 0.17 --- 8270D Pentachlorophenol mg/L 0.001 --- 8270D Phenanthrene mg/L 11 --- 8270D Phenol mg/L 11 --- 8270D Pyrene mg/L 1.1 --- 8270DSIM 1-Methylnaphthalene mg/L 0.15 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM 2-Methylnaphthalene mg/L 0.15 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Acenaphthene mg/L 2.2 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Acenaphthylene mg/L 2.2 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Anthracene mg/L 11 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Benzo(a)anthracene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.00012] ND [0.00012] ND [0.00011] 8270DSIM Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L 0.0002 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/L 1.1 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/L 0.012 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Chrysene mg/L 0.12 ND [0.000075] ND [0.000078] ND [0.000067] 8270DSIM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/L 0.00012 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] E ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Fluoranthene mg/L 1.5 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Fluorene mg/L 1.5 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/L 0.0012 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Naphthalene mg/L 0.73 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Phenanthrene mg/L 11 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] 8270DSIM Pyrene mg/L 1.1 ND [0.000063] ND [0.000065] ND [0.000056] AK101 GRO mg/L 2.2 ND [0.01] ND [0.01] ND [0.01] AK102 DRO mg/L 1.5 0.11 [0.11] J ND [0.11] ND [0.098] E300.0 Sulfate mg/L - --- Notes: Data Qualifiers: 1 Screening level = Worksheet #15 of the Programmatic QAPP (USAF J = The analyte is positively identified, but the associated result is less than the LOQ but greater than 2 S = Spring sampling event or equal to the detection limit. [ ] denotes the LOD B = The analyte is detected in the method blank or the trip blank above LOD, and the concentration in [LCSD]) exceeds the QC criteria. the sample does not exceed the blank concentration by a factor of five(factor of 10 for common ██ ≥ background (metals only) laboratory contaminants acetone and methylene chloride). Bold ≥ screening level E = The result is nondetect and the LOD exceeds the project action limit. ID = identification JD = The result is qualified because the RPD between the primary sample and the field duplicate Italics LOD ≥ screening level sample exceeds 30 percent and/or the RPD between the MS and MSD (or LCS/LCS duplicate mg/L = milligrams per liter MW = monitoring well ND = nondetect SDG = sample delivery goup Page 6 of 6 Laboratory Data Review Checklist Completed by: Candace Ede Title: Chemist Date: 11 October 2017 CS Report Name: 2017 IWMP Report Report Date: 01 January 2018 Consultant Firm: Jacobs Laboratory Name: EMAX Laboratory Report Number: 17E144 ADEC File Number: 107.38.029 (LF003) 107.38.031 (FT009) Hazard Identification Number 379 (LF003) 381 (FT009) July 2017 Page 1 1. Laboratory a. Did an ADEC CS approved laboratory receive and perform all of the submitted sample analyses? Yes No Comments: All samples were analyzed by EMAX Laboratories of Torrance, CA. b. If the samples were transferred to another "network" laboratory or sub-contracted to an alternate laboratory, was the laboratory performing the analyses ADEC CS approved? Yes No Comments: No sub-contracted labs were used for the IWMP report. 2. Chain of Custody (COC) a. COC information completed, signed, and dated (including released/received by)? Yes No Comments: b. Correct analyses requested? Yes No Comments: AK101 (GRO) analyis was requested for wells 03M03B-2017S and 09M03-2017S via email correspondence. 3. Laboratory Sample Receipt Documentation a. Sample/cooler temperature documented and within range at receipt (0° to 6° C)? Yes No Comments: The sample/cooler temperatures were: Cooler Marty Seinfield: 2.7° C /5.7° C Cooler Jerry Seinfield: 3.6° C /5.2° C Cooler George Costanza: 3.0° C /4.5° C Cooler Elaine Benes: 3.7° C /4.8° C Cooler Newman: 3.8° C /5.0° C Cooler Kramer: 3.7° C /4.9° C Cooler Estelle Costanza: 3.2° C /4.8° C Cooler Frank Costanza: 3.4° C /4.9° C Cooler Susan Ross: 2.1° C /4.4° C July 2017 Page 2 b. Sample preservation acceptable - acidified waters, Methanol preserved VOC soil (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.)? Yes No Comments: c. Sample condition documented - broken, leaking (Methanol), zero headspace (VOC vials)? Yes No Comments: d. If there were any discrepancies, were they documented? - For example, incorrect sample containers/ preservation, sample temperature outside of acceptable range, insufficient or missing samples, etc.? Yes No Comments: There were no discrepancies noted on the cooler receipt form. e. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 4. Case Narrative a. Present and understandable? Yes No Comments: b. Discrepancies, errors or QC failures identified by the lab? Yes No Comments: There were no additional discrepancies identified by the lab. Other QC failures are discussed in the relevant sections of this checklist. c. Were all corrective actions documented? Yes No Comments: There were no corrective actions performed by the lab. July 2017 Page 3 d. What is the effect on data quality/usability according to the case narrative? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 5. Samples Results a. Correct analyses performed/reported as requested on COC? Yes No Comments: b. All applicable holding times met? Yes No Comments: c. All soils reported on a dry weight basis? Yes No Comments: There were no soils reported for the IWMP project. July 2017 Page 4 d. Are the reported LOQs less than the Cleanup Level or the minimum required detection level for the project? Yes No Comments: The following analytes had an LOD greater than the project Action Level in one or more non- detect samples: SW8260 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE SW8270 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(A)PYRENE BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE N-NITROSO-DI-N-PROPYLAMINE PENTACHLOROPHENOL BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 8270DSIM DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE e. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The sample results with LODs greater than the Action Level were qualified E and italicized in the analytical results table. EDB and the PAH analytes qualified E in were also analyzed by SIM methods to achieve lower detection limits, and those results were not qualified E, with the exception of dibenzo(a,h)anthracene. The results were considered acceptable for the purposes of the groundwater monitoring program. 6. QC Samples a. Method Blank i. One method blank reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 5 ii. All method blank results less than limit of quantitation (LOQ)? Yes No Comments: iii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: SW6020: Laboratory batch 17IME023W had the following detections in the method blank: CALCIUM (0.0555 mg/L) iv. Do the affected sample(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: All associated sample results were greater than five times the method blank contamination for calcium. v. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. b. Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate (LCS/LCSD) i. Organics - One LCS/LCSD reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? (LCS/LCSD required per AK methods, LCS required per SW846) Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD was analyzed for all methods. A DoD QSM required MS/MSD was assigned for sample EAMW2-2017S. ii. Metals/Inorganics - One LCS and one sample duplicate reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, serial dilution and analytical spike were analyzed for SW6020. An LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD were analyzed for SW7470. July 2017 Page 6 iii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods: AK101 60%-120%, AK102 75%-125%, AK103 60%-120%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270: The EAMW2-2017S MS recovery was outside of QC criteria in batch 17SVE031W for the following analytes: 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE (8%) SW6020: The EAMW2-2017S MS/MSD recoveries was outside of QC criteria in batch 17IME023W for the following analytes: CALCIUM (86.7%) MAGNESIUM (80%) MANGANESE (6.7% and 167%) POTASSIUM (133%) SODIUM (33.3% and 66.7%) iv. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) reported and less than method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. RPD reported from LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, and or sample/sample duplicate. (AK Petroleum methods 20%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270: The EAMW2-2017S MS/MSD RPD was outside of QC criteria (>20% RPD) in batch 17SVE031W for the following analytes: 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE (119%) v. If %R or RPD is outside of acceptable limits, what samples are affected? Comments: EAMW2-2017S July 2017 Page 7 vi. Do the affected samples(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: For MS/MSDs: These results were not qualified due to MS/MSD recoveries because the parent sample concentration was not detected and the MS/MSD recoveries were biased high or the parent sample concentration was greater than the spike amount: EAMW2-2017S Sample concentration greater than spike amount CALCIUM MAGNESIUM MANGANESE POTASSIUM SODIUM These results were qualified due to MS/MSD recoveries and/or RPD: EAMW2-2017S 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE (JM-, JD) vii. Data quality or usability affected? (Use comment box to explain.) Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability was minimally affected. The results qualified JM- are considered estimated and biased low. The SVOC analytes are known to be poor performing analytes and have never been detected and are not considered a contaminant of concern at LF003/FT009. c. Surrogates - Organics Only i. Are surrogate recoveries reported for organic analyses - field, QC and laboratory samples? Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 8 ii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods 50-150 %R; all other analyses see the laboratory report pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270 – The following samples had surrogates recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 03M01B-2017S (terphenyl-d14 at 49%) 03M01B-2017S-9 (terphenyl-d14 at 46%) 03M03B-2017S (terphenyl-d14 at 52.5%) 03M05-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 50% and nitrobenzene-d5 at 47%) 03M06-2017S (nitrobenzene-d5 at 51%) 03M08-2017S (terphenyl-d14 at 42%) 03M19-2017S (nitrobenzene-d5 at 47%) 03MW20-2017S (NITROBENZENE-D5 at 54% and TERPHENYL-D14 at 51%) 03MW21-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 55%) 09MW04-2017S (NITROBENZENE-D5 at 53%) EAMW2-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 32%) SW8270SIM – The following samples had surrogates recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 03M01B-2017S (terphenyl-d14 at 49%) 03M01B-2017S-9 (terphenyl-d14 at 46%) 03M03B-2017S (terphenyl-d14 at 52%) 03M05-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 45% and nitrobenzene-d5 at 50%) 03M06-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 48% and nitrobenzene-d5 at 54%) 03M08-2017S (terphenyl-d14 at 41%) 03M19-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 47% and nitrobenzene-d5 at 49%) 03MW20-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 52%, NITROBENZENE-D5 at 54% and TERPHENYL-D14 at 51%) 03MW21-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 56%) EAMW2-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 33%) July 2017 Page 9 iii. Do the sample results with failed surrogate recoveries have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: For SW8260/SW8270 results, samples are only qualified if two or more surrogates are outside of QC criteria. SW8270 – The following sample were qualified (see bracket) due to surrogate recovery outliers: 03M05-2017S (JS-) 03MW20-2017S (JS-) SW8270SIM – The following sample were qualified (see bracket) due to surrogate recovery outliers: 03M05-2017S (JS-) 03M06-2017S (JS-) 03M19-2017S (JS-) 03MW20-2017S (JS-) iv. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All PAH and SVOC results qualified JS- (estimated with an low bias) were either non-detect or significantly less than the action level. d. Trip Blank - Volatile analyses only (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.): Water and Soil i. One trip blank reported per matrix, analysis and for each cooler containing volatile samples? (If not, enter explanation below.) Yes No Comments: One water trip blank, TB-2017S-01, was submitted in cooler "Morty Seinfeld". ii. Is the cooler used to transport the trip blank and VOA samples clearly indicated on the COC? (If not, a comment explaining why must be entered below) Yes No Comments: CoC 2017E09: TB-2017S-01 iii. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: All results were non-detect for TB-2017S-01. July 2017 Page 10 iv. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Yes No Comments: NA v. Data quality or usability affected? Explain. Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. e. Field Duplicate i. One field duplicate submitted per matrix, analysis and 10 project samples? Yes No Comments: Two field duplicates were submitted with 16 primary samples. ii. Submitted blind to lab? Yes No Comments: Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 09MW04-2017S/ 09MW04-2017S-9 and 03M01B-2017S/ 03M01B-2017S-9 iii. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) less than specified DQOs? (Recommended: 30% water, 50% soil) (R1- R2) RPD (%) = Absolute Value of: x 100 ((R1+ R2)/2) Where R1 = Sample Concentration R2 = Field Duplicate Concentration Yes No Comments: All sample duplicate precision was met for 09MW04-2017S/ 09MW04-2017S-9 and 03M01B-2017S/ 03M01B-2017S-9. iv. Data quality or usability affected? (Use the comment box to explain why or why not.) Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. July 2017 Page 11 f. Decontamination or Equipment Blank (If not applicable, a comment stating why must be entered below.) Yes No Not Applicable One equipment blank, 56-FEB-2017S, was collected for this project (SDG 17E170). i. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: See SDG 17E170 ii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: NA iii. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: NA 7. Other Data Flags/Qualifiers (ACOE, AFCEE, Lab Specific, etc.) a. Defined and appropriate? Yes No Comments: Qualifiers applied are defined in the Data Quality Assessment appendix of the report. July 2017 Page 12 Laboratory Data Review Checklist Completed by: Nathaniel Gingery Title: Chemist Date: 17 October 2017 CS Report Name: 2017 IWMP Report Report Date: 01 January 2018 Consultant Firm: Jacobs Laboratory Name: EMAX Laboratory Report Number: 17E177 ADEC File Number: 107.38.057 (SS64) 107.38.055 (SS61) 107.38.058 (ST58) 107.38.106 (PL001) N/A (WP033) July 2017 Page 1 Hazard Identification Number 378 (SS64) 385 (SS61) 361 (ST58) 4394 (PL001) N/A (WP033) 1. Laboratory a. Did an ADEC CS approved laboratory receive and perform all of the submitted sample analyses? Yes No Comments: All samples were analyzed by EMAX Laboratories of Torrance, CA. b. If the samples were transferred to another "network" laboratory or sub-contracted to an alternate laboratory, was the laboratory performing the analyses ADEC CS approved? Yes No Comments: No sub-contracted labs were used for the IWMP report. 2. Chain of Custody (COC) a. COC information completed, signed, and dated (including released/received by)? Yes No Comments: b. Correct analyses requested? Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 2 3. Laboratory Sample Receipt Documentation a. Sample/cooler temperature documented and within range at receipt (0° to 6° C)? Yes No Comments: The sample/cooler temperatures were: Cooler Bubbleboy: 4.3° C / 5.4° C Cooler No Hugging No Learning: 2.2° C / 4.9° C Cooler Moes Southwest Grill: 2.3° C / 3.3° C Cooler Frogger: 2.5° C / 4.1° C Cooler Hipster Doofus: 2.3° C / 3.5° C Cooler The Contest: 5.4° C / 5.6° C Cooler The Moops: 2.9° C / 4.7° C Cooler I'm Out: 2.6° C / 4.6° C Cooler The Bizarro Jerry: 2.4° C / 5.2° C b. Sample preservation acceptable - acidified waters, Methanol preserved VOC soil (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.)? Yes No Comments: c. Sample condition documented - broken, leaking (Methanol), zero headspace (VOC vials)? Yes No Comments: d. If there were any discrepancies, were they documented? - For example, incorrect sample containers/ preservation, sample temperature outside of acceptable range, insufficient or missing samples, etc.? Yes No Comments: There were no discrepancies noted on the cooler receipt form. e. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 4. Case Narrative a. Present and understandable? Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 3 b. Discrepancies, errors or QC failures identified by the lab? Yes No Comments: Batch QC failures are discussed in the relevant sections of this checklist. c. Were all corrective actions documented? Yes No Comments: There were no corrective actions performed by the lab. d. What is the effect on data quality/usability according to the case narrative? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 5. Samples Results a. Correct analyses performed/reported as requested on COC? Yes No Comments: b. All applicable holding times met? Yes No Comments: c. All soils reported on a dry weight basis? Yes No Comments: There were no soils reported for the IWMP project. July 2017 Page 4 d. Are the reported LOQs less than the Cleanup Level or the minimum required detection level for the project? Yes No Comments: The following analytes had an LOD greater than the project Action Level in one or more non- detect samples: SW8260 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE SW8270 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(A)PYRENE BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE N-NITROSODIMETHAMINE N-NITROSO-DI-N-PROPYLAMINE PENTACHLOROPHENOL SW8270 SIM DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE e. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The sample results with LODs greater than the Action Level were qualified E and italicized in the analytical results table. The 8260 EDB results qualified E were also analyzed by SIM methods to achieve lower detection limits, and those results were not qualified E. The results were considered acceptable for the purposes of the groundwater monitoring program. 6. QC Samples a. Method Blank i. One method blank reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 5 ii. All method blank results less than limit of quantitation (LOQ)? Yes No Comments: SW6020: Laboratory batch 17IME037W had the following detections in the method blank: MANGANESE (0.000132 mg/L) iii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A iv. Do the affected sample(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: N/A v. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. b. Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate (LCS/LCSD) i. Organics - One LCS/LCSD reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? (LCS/LCSD required per AK methods, LCS required per SW846) Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD was analyzed for all methods. ii. Metals/Inorganics - One LCS and one sample duplicate reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, serial dilution and analytical spike were analyzed for SW6020. An LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD were analyzed for SW7470. July 2017 Page 6 iii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods: AK101 60%-120%, AK102 75%-125%, AK103 60%-120%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW6020: The AFMW01-2017-9 MS/MSD recoveries was outside of QC criteria in batch 17IMF004W for the following analytes: BARIUM (143%) POTASSIUM (118%) SODIUM (118%) CALCIUM (-33% and -40%) MANGANESE (-767% and -367%) iv. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) reported and less than method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. RPD reported from LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, and or sample/sample duplicate. (AK Petroleum methods 20%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270 - The LCS/LCSD (SVE042WL/SVE042WC) analyzed on 06/05/17 was outside of QC criteria ( v. If %R or RPD is outside of acceptable limits, what samples are affected? Comments: All associated samples are non detect for Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate. vi. Do the affected samples(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: For MS/MSDs: These results were not qualified due to MS/MSD recoveries that were biased high because the parent sample concentration was greater than the spike amount: MANGANESE CALCIUM These results were not qualified due to MS/MSD dilution factors that exceeded 5X: BARIUM POTASSIUM SODIUM vii. Data quality or usability affected? (Use comment box to explain.) Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. July 2017 Page 7 c. Surrogates - Organics Only i. Are surrogate recoveries reported for organic analyses - field, QC and laboratory samples? Yes No Comments: ii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods 50-150 %R; all other analyses see the laboratory report pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270SIM – The following samples had surrogates recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 61MW08-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 18.4%) iii. Do the sample results with failed surrogate recoveries have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: For SW8270 results, samples are only qualified if two or more surrogates are outside of QC criteria. iv. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. d. Trip Blank - Volatile analyses only (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.): Water and Soil i. One trip blank reported per matrix, analysis and for each cooler containing volatile samples? (If not, enter explanation below.) Yes No Comments: One water trip blank, TB-2017S-04, was submitted in cooler "BubbleBoy". ii. Is the cooler used to transport the trip blank and VOA samples clearly indicated on the COC? (If not, a comment explaining why must be entered below) Yes No Comments: CoC 2017E28: TB-2017S-04 July 2017 Page 8 iii. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: The following analytes were detected in TB-2017S-04: SW8260 ACETONE (0.0051 mg/L) BENZENE (0.00017 mg/L) ETHYLBENZENE (0.00016 mg/L) METHYLENE CHLORIDE (0.00051 mg/L) O-XYLENE (0.00021 mg/L) TOLUENE (0.0011 mg/L) XYLENE, ISOMERS M & P (0.00056 mg/L) XYLENES, TOTAL (0.00077 mg/L) iv. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Yes No Comments: SW8260 61PS4B-2017S 61PS2B-2017S 58PS9B-2017S 58MW09B-2017S 58MW09B-2017S-9 58MW08B-2017S 58MW10B-2017S v. Data quality or usability affected? Explain. Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All results qualified B are considered estimated and biased high. The results are less than the project action limit. e. Field Duplicate i. One field duplicate submitted per matrix, analysis and 10 project samples? Yes No Comments: Four field duplicates were submitted with 19 primary samples. ii. Submitted blind to lab? Yes No Comments: Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 64MW04-2017S/64MW04-2017S-9, 61PMW02B-2017S/61PMW02B-2017S-9, 58MW09B-2017S/58MW09B-2017S-9, AFMW01-2017S/AFMW01-2017S-9 July 2017 Page 9 iii. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) less than specified DQOs? (Recommended: 30% water, 50% soil) (R1- R2) RPD (%) = Absolute Value of: x 100 ((R1+ R2)/2) Where R1 = Sample Concentration R2 = Field Duplicate Concentration Yes No Comments: All sample duplicate precision requirements were met for 61PMW02B-2017S/61PMW02B-2017S-9. The following analytes had RPDs greater than 30% in sample/duplicate: 64MW04-2017S/64MW04-2017S-9 LEAD (43%) 58MW09B-2017S/58MW09B-2017S-9 PHENANTHRENE (35%) AFMW01-2017S/AFMW01-2017S-9 CHROMIUM (32%) iv. Data quality or usability affected? (Use the comment box to explain why or why not.) Comments: The data quality was minimally affected. The sample/duplicate results with RPDs greater than 30% were qualified “JD”. The higher or detected value will be used for reporting purposes. The qualified results are both less than than the groundwater action limit in all samples. f. Decontamination or Equipment Blank (If not applicable, a comment stating why must be entered below.) Yes No Not Applicable One equipment blank, 56-FEB-2017S, was collected for this project (SDG 17E170). i. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: See SDG 17E170. July 2017 Page 10 ii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A iii. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: N/A 7. Other Data Flags/Qualifiers (ACOE, AFCEE, Lab Specific, etc.) a. Defined and appropriate? Yes No Comments: Qualifiers applied are defined in the Data Quality Assessment appendix of the report. July 2017 Page 11 Laboratory Data Review Checklist Completed by: Nathaniel Gingery Title: Chemist Date: 17 October 2017 CS Report Name: 2017 IWMP Report Report Date: 01 January 2018 Consultant Firm: Jacobs Laboratory Name: EMAX Laboratory Report Number: 17E199 ADEC File Number: 107.38.024 (DP26) 107.38.066 (ST13) 107.38.027 (SS037) 107.38.055 (SS61) July 2017 Page 1 Hazard Identification Number 367 (DP26) 339 (ST13) 372 (SS037) 385 (SS61) 1. Laboratory a. Did an ADEC CS approved laboratory receive and perform all of the submitted sample analyses? Yes No Comments: All samples were analyzed by EMAX Laboratories of Torrance, CA. b. If the samples were transferred to another "network" laboratory or sub-contracted to an alternate laboratory, was the laboratory performing the analyses ADEC CS approved? Yes No Comments: No sub-contracted labs were used for the IWMP report. 2. Chain of Custody (COC) a. COC information completed, signed, and dated (including released/received by)? Yes No Comments: b. Correct analyses requested? Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 2 3. Laboratory Sample Receipt Documentation a. Sample/cooler temperature documented and within range at receipt (0° to 6° C)? Yes No Comments: The sample/cooler temperatures were: Cooler Master of My Domain: 2.0° C / 3.0° C Cooler TippyToe: 3.4° C / 4.5° C Cooler Showaboutnothing: 2.0° C / 3.6° C Cooler Spongeworthy: 3.1° C / 4.5° C Cooler Spare a Square: 2.6° C / 4.2° C Cooler Unused Stumps: 2.0° C / 3.0° C Cooler Kenny Rogers Roaster: 1.5° C / 2.9° C Cooler Muffintops: 2.6° C / 4.2° C Cooler Close Talker: 2.9° C / 4.0° C Cooler The Dingo: 3.4° C / 4.9° C Cooler The Jimmy: 3.1° C / 4.5° C Cooler Half-Man Half-Pig: 2.2° C / 3.4° C b. Sample preservation acceptable - acidified waters, Methanol preserved VOC soil (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.)? Yes No Comments: c. Sample condition documented - broken, leaking (Methanol), zero headspace (VOC vials)? Yes No Comments: d. If there were any discrepancies, were they documented? - For example, incorrect sample containers/ preservation, sample temperature outside of acceptable range, insufficient or missing samples, etc.? Yes No Comments: There were no discrepancies noted on the cooler receipt form. e. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. July 2017 Page 3 4. Case Narrative a. Present and understandable? Yes No Comments: Note: case narrative does not list LCS/LCSD for PAH SIM, however a LCS/LCSD pair was analyzed. b. Discrepancies, errors or QC failures identified by the lab? Yes No Comments: Batch QC failures are discussed in the relevant sections of this checklist. c. Were all corrective actions documented? Yes No Comments: There were no corrective actions performed by the lab. d. What is the effect on data quality/usability according to the case narrative? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 5. Samples Results a. Correct analyses performed/reported as requested on COC? Yes No Comments: b. All applicable holding times met? Yes No Comments: c. All soils reported on a dry weight basis? Yes No Comments: There were no soils reported for the IWMP project. July 2017 Page 4 d. Are the reported LOQs less than the Cleanup Level or the minimum required detection level for the project? Yes No Comments: The following analytes had an LOD greater than the project Action Level in one or more non- detect samples: SW8260 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE SW8270 SIM BENZO(A)PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE e. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The sample results with LODs greater than the Action Level were qualified E and italicized in the analytical results table. The 8260 EDB results qualified E were also analyzed by SIM methods to achieve lower detection limits, and those results were not qualified E. The results were considered acceptable for the purposes of the groundwater monitoring program. 6. QC Samples a. Method Blank i. One method blank reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: ii. All method blank results less than limit of quantitation (LOQ)? Yes No Comments: SW6020: Laboratory batch 17IMF004W had the following detections in the method blank: BARIUM (0.000553 mg/L) CALCIUM (0.018 mg/L) MANGANESE (0.000125 mg/L) POTASSIUM (0.0137 mg/L) July 2017 Page 5 iii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: All associated samples had results for barium, calcium, manganese, and potassium which were greater than five times the method blank contamination. iv. Do the affected sample(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: No flags were needed. v. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. b. Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate (LCS/LCSD) i. Organics - One LCS/LCSD reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? (LCS/LCSD required per AK methods, LCS required per SW846) Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD was analyzed for all methods. DoD QSM required MS/MSDs were assigned for samples E199-11 and E199-18. ii. Metals/Inorganics - One LCS and one sample duplicate reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, serial dilution and analytical spike were analyzed for SW6020. An LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD were analyzed for SW7470. An LCS/LCSD were analyzed for sulfate by EP300.0 and for sulfide by SM45002D. iii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods: AK101 60%-120%, AK102 75%-125%, AK103 60%-120%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 6 iv. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) reported and less than method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. RPD reported from LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, and or sample/sample duplicate. (AK Petroleum methods 20%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: v. If %R or RPD is outside of acceptable limits, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A vi. Do the affected samples(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: N/A vii. Data quality or usability affected? (Use comment box to explain.) Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. c. Surrogates - Organics Only i. Are surrogate recoveries reported for organic analyses - field, QC and laboratory samples? Yes No Comments: ii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods 50-150 %R; all other analyses see the laboratory report pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270SIM – The following samples had surrogate recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 37MW09-2017S (NITROBENZENE-D5 at 53% TERPHENYL-D14 at 53%) SW8260 – The following samples had surrogate recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 26-1-2017S (1,2-DICHOROETHANE-D4 at 218%) AK101 - The following sample had surrogate recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 37-5-2017S (4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE at 205%) July 2017 Page 7 iii. Do the sample results with failed surrogate recoveries have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: For SW8270/SW8260 results, samples are only qualified if two or more surrogates are outside of QC criteria. SW8260 - Sample 26-1-2017S was not qualified because only one surrogate was outside of QC criteria and the other three surrogates were in control. SW8270SIM – The following sample was qualified (see bracket) due to surrogate recovery outliers: 37MW09-2017S (JS-) AK101 - The following sample was qualified (see bracket) due to surrogate recovery outliers: 37-5-2017S (JS+) iv. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. PAH results for sample 37MW09-2017S are qualified JS- and are considered estimated and biased low, but all results are non-detect. The GRO results for sample 37-5-2017S are qualified JS+ and are considered estimated and biased high, but are less than the project action limit. d. Trip Blank - Volatile analyses only (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.): Water and Soil i. One trip blank reported per matrix, analysis and for each cooler containing volatile samples? (If not, enter explanation below.) Yes No Comments: One water trip blank, TB-2017S-05, was submitted in cooler "Master of My Domain". ii. Is the cooler used to transport the trip blank and VOA samples clearly indicated on the COC? (If not, a comment explaining why must be entered below) Yes No Comments: CoC 2017E48: TB-2017S-05 July 2017 Page 8 iii. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: The following analytes were detected in TB-2017S-05: SW8260 BENZENE (0.00012 mg/L) ETHYLBENZENE (0.00011 mg/L) O-XYLENE (0.00016 mg/L) TOLUENE (0.00091 mg/L) XYLENE, ISOMERS M & P (0.00044 mg/L) XYLENES, TOTAL (0.0006 mg/L) iv. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Yes No Comments: SW8260 13MW09B-2017S 41-2-2017S 41-2-2017S-9 37MW09-2017S 37MW07-2017S 61MW01-2017S 37-2B-2017S 37-2B-2017S-9 37-5-2017S v. Data quality or usability affected? Explain. Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All results qualified B are considered estimated and biased high. The results are less than the project action limit. e. Field Duplicate i. One field duplicate submitted per matrix, analysis and 10 project samples? Yes No Comments: Three field duplicates were submitted with 18 primary samples. ii. Submitted blind to lab? Yes No Comments: Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 41-2-2017S/41-2-2017S-9, 37-2B-2017S/37-2B-2017S-9, 26-6-2017S/26-6-2017S-9 July 2017 Page 9 iii. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) less than specified DQOs? (Recommended: 30% water, 50% soil) (R1- R2) RPD (%) = Absolute Value of: x 100 ((R1+ R2)/2) Where R1 = Sample Concentration R2 = Field Duplicate Concentration Yes No Comments: The following analytes had RPDs greater than 30% in sample/duplicate: 41-2-2017S/41-2-2017S-9 LEAD (108%) 37-2B-2017S/37-2B-2017S-9 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE (138%) FLUORENE (110%) NAPHTHALENE (34%) N-BUTYLBENZENE (160%) 26-6-2017S/26-6-2017S-9 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE (31%) 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE (31%) ACENAPHTHENE (37%) ACENAPHTHYLENE (31%) iv. Data quality or usability affected? (Use the comment box to explain why or why not.) Comments: The data quality was minimally affected. The sample/duplicate results with RPDs greater than 30% were qualified “JD”. The higher or detected value will be used for reporting purposes. The qualified results are both less than than the groundwater PSL in all samples. f. Decontamination or Equipment Blank (If not applicable, a comment stating why must be entered below.) Yes No Not Applicable One equipment blank, 56-FEB-2017S, was collected for this project (SDG 17E170). i. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: See SDG 17E170. July 2017 Page 10 ii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A iii. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: N/A 7. Other Data Flags/Qualifiers (ACOE, AFCEE, Lab Specific, etc.) a. Defined and appropriate? Yes No Comments: Qualifiers applied are defined in the Data Quality Assessment appendix of the report. July 2017 Page 11 Laboratory Data Review Checklist Completed by: Nathaniel Gingery Title: Chemist Date: 23 October 2017 CS Report Name: 2017 IWMP Report Report Date: Jan 2018 Consultant Firm: Jacobs Laboratory Name: EMAX Laboratory Report Number: 17E220 July 2017 Page 1 ADEC File Number: 107.38.065 (SS014) 107.38.064 (ST10) 107.38.023 (DP025) 107.38.025 (ST27) 107.38.018 (SS035) 107.38.35 (LF06) 107.38.030 (LF04) 107.38.026 (SS36) 107.38.034 (LF05) 107.38.106 (PL001) Hazard Identification Number 340 (SS014) 336 (ST10) 366 (DP025) 388 (ST27) 392 (SS035) 333 (LF06) 380 (LF04) 393 (SS36) 332 (LF05) 4394 (PL001) 1. Laboratory a. Did an ADEC CS approved laboratory receive and perform all of the submitted sample analyses? Yes No Comments: All analyses performed by EMAX Laboratory, Torrence CA b. If the samples were transferred to another "network" laboratory or sub-contracted to an alternate laboratory, was the laboratory performing the analyses ADEC CS approved? Yes No Comments: All analyses performed by EMAX Laboratory, Torrence CA July 2017 Page 2 2. Chain of Custody (COC) a. COC information completed, signed, and dated (including released/received by)? Yes No Comments: b. Correct analyses requested? Yes No Comments: 3. Laboratory Sample Receipt Documentation a. Sample/cooler temperature documented and within range at receipt (0° to 6° C)? Yes No Comments: The sample/cooler temperatures were: Cooler The Pick: 3.2° C / 4.8° C Cooler Vandelay Industries: 2.2° C / 4.5° C Cooler Chinese Chewing Gum: 3.2° C / 4.0° C Cooler The Big Salad: 2.2° C / 3.5° C Cooler Manzier: 2.1° C / 3.0° C Cooler Dr Van Nostrand: 2.7° C / 4.1° C Cooler Magic Loogie Theory: 1.3° C / 3.6° C b. Sample preservation acceptable - acidified waters, Methanol preserved VOC soil (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.)? Yes No Comments: c. Sample condition documented - broken, leaking (Methanol), zero headspace (VOC vials)? Yes No Comments: No issues were noted on the CoCs or SRF. d. If there were any discrepancies, were they documented? - For example, incorrect sample containers/ preservation, sample temperature outside of acceptable range, insufficient or missing samples, etc.? Yes No Comments: The metals containers for samples MW-BKG-07-2017S and MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 (primary and duplicate) were both labeled as MW-BKG-07-2017S. The lab logged them in as separate samples. July 2017 Page 3 e. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. MW-BKG-07-2017S/-9 were not submitted as blind dup for metals. 4. Case Narrative a. Present and understandable? Yes No Comments: b. Discrepancies, errors or QC failures identified by the lab? Yes No Comments: Batch QC failures are discussed in the relevant sections of this checklist. There were no additional discrepancies identified by the lab. c. Were all corrective actions documented? Yes No Comments: There were no corrective actions performed by the lab. d. What is the effect on data quality/usability according to the case narrative? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 5. Samples Results a. Correct analyses performed/reported as requested on COC? Yes No Comments: b. All applicable holding times met? Yes No Comments: c. All soils reported on a dry weight basis? Yes No Comments: There were no soils reported for the IWMP project. July 2017 Page 4 d. Are the reported LOQs less than the Cleanup Level or the minimum required detection level for the project? Yes No Comments: The following analytes had an LOD greater than the project Action Level in one or more non- detect samples: SW8260: 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE e. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The sample results with LODs greater than the Action Level were qualified E and italicized in the analytical results table. The 8260 EDB results for sites ST010/SS014, DP025/ST027, SS035, and SS036 that were qualified E were also analyzed by SIM methods to achieve lower detection limits. Those results were not qualified. 6. QC Samples a. Method Blank i. One method blank reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: ii. All method blank results less than limit of quantitation (LOQ)? Yes No Comments: SW6020: Laboratory batch IMF006W had the following detections in the method blank: CALCIUM (0.0161 mg/L) iii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: All associated samples have calcium concentrations greater than ten times the method blank contamination, therefore no flags were required. iv. Do the affected sample(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: N/A July 2017 Page 5 v. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. b. Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate (LCS/LCSD) i. Organics - One LCS/LCSD reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? (LCS/LCSD required per AK methods, LCS required per SW846) Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD was analyzed for all methods. DoD QSM required MS/MSDs were assigned for samples 35M02-2017S, 06M04B-2017S, and MW-BKG-2017S-9. ii. Metals/Inorganics - One LCS and one sample duplicate reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, serial dilution and analytical spike were analyzed for SW6020. An LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD were analyzed for SW7470. iii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods: AK101 60%-120%, AK102 75%-125%, AK103 60%-120%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW6020 – The following samples had recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: The MS (17E220-17M) analyzed on 06/08/17 was outside of QC criteria for BARIUM (117%, 86-114% limits), CALCIUM (130%, 87-118% limits), and MANGANESE (200%, 87-115% limits). The MSD (17E220-17S) analyzed on 06/08/17 was outside of QC criteria for MANGANESE (133%, 87-115% limits). iv. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) reported and less than method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. RPD reported from LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, and or sample/sample duplicate. (AK Petroleum methods 20%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: All RPD requirements were met. v. If %R or RPD is outside of acceptable limits, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A July 2017 Page 6 vi. Do the affected samples(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: These results were not qualified due to MS/MSD recoveries because the parent sample concentrations for barium and manganese were greater than the spike amount and the dilution factor for the calcium result was greater than 5x. vii. Data quality or usability affected? (Use comment box to explain.) Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected and did not require qualification. c. Surrogates - Organics Only i. Are surrogate recoveries reported for organic analyses - field, QC and laboratory samples? Yes No Comments: ii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods 50-150 %R; all other analyses see the laboratory report pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270 PAH SIM– The following samples had surrogates recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 10MW16-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 47%, NITROBENZENE-D5 at 52%, and TERPHENYL-D14 at 57%) 27PMW03-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 50% and TERPHENYL-D14 at 55%) iii. Do the sample results with failed surrogate recoveries have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: SW8270 PAH SIM– The following sample were qualified (see bracket) due to surrogate recovery outliers: 10MW16-2017S (JS-) 27PMW03-2017S (JS-) iv. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All PAH results qualified JS- (estimated with an low bias) were non-detect. July 2017 Page 7 d. Trip Blank - Volatile analyses only (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.): Water and Soil i. One trip blank reported per matrix, analysis and for each cooler containing volatile samples? (If not, enter explanation below.) Yes No Comments: One water trip blank, TB-2017S-07, was submitted in cooler "The Pick". ii. Is the cooler used to transport the trip blank and VOA samples clearly indicated on the COC? (If not, a comment explaining why must be entered below) Yes No Comments: CoC: 2017E59, TB: TB-2017S-07 iii. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: The following analytes were detected in TB-2017S-07: SW8260 - BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (0.0001 mg/L) BROMOFORM (0.00037 mg/L) DIBROMOCHOROMETHANE (0.00024 mg/L) TOLUENE (0.00012 mg/L) iv. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Yes No Comments: All associated samples were non-detect for the analytes found in the trip blank. v. Data quality or usability affected? Explain. Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. e. Field Duplicate i. One field duplicate submitted per matrix, analysis and 10 project samples? Yes No Comments: Four field duplicates were submitted with 19 primary samples. July 2017 Page 8 ii. Submitted blind to lab? Yes No Comments: Submitted blind: Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 35M14-2017S/35M14-2017S-9, Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 06M02B-2017S/06M02B-2017S-9, Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 36GP05B-2017S/36GP05B-2017S-9 Not submitted blind due to labeling error (see section 3d): Sample ID/Duplciate ID: MW-BKG-07-2017S/MW-BKG-07-2017S-9 iii. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) less than specified DQOs? (Recommended: 30% water, 50% soil) (R1- R2) RPD (%) = Absolute Value of: x 100 ((R1+ R2)/2) Where R1 = Sample Concentration R2 = Field Duplicate Concentration Yes No Comments: All sample duplicate precision requirements were met for: 36GP05B-2017S/36GP05B-2017S-9 The following analytes had RPDs greater than 30% in sample/duplicate: 06M02B-2017S/06M02B-2017S-9 COPPER (69%) LEAD (80%) ZINC (68%) 35M14-2017S/35M14-2017S-9 LEAD (43%) MW-BKG-07-2017S/MW-BKG-2017S-9 CHROMIUM (42%) iv. Data quality or usability affected? (Use the comment box to explain why or why not.) Comments: The data quality was minimally affected. The sample/duplicate results with RPDs greater than 30% were qualified “JD”. The higher or detected value will be used for reporting purposes. The qualified results are both less than than the groundwater PSL in all samples. July 2017 Page 9 f. Decontamination or Equipment Blank (If not applicable, a comment stating why must be entered below.) Yes No Not Applicable One equipment blank, 56-FEB-2017S, was collected for this project (SDG 17E170). i. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: See SDG 17E170. ii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A iii. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 7. Other Data Flags/Qualifiers (ACOE, AFCEE, Lab Specific, etc.) a. Defined and appropriate? Yes No Comments: Qualifiers applied are defined in the Data Quality Assessment appendix of the report. July 2017 Page 10 Laboratory Data Review Checklist Completed by: Nathaniel Gingery Title: Chemist Date: 23 October 2017 CS Report Name: 2017 IWMP Report Report Date: Jan 2018 Consultant Firm: Jacobs Laboratory Name: EMAX Laboratory Report Number: 17E231 ADEC File Number: 107.38.070 (ST48) 107.38.021 (DP44) N/A (WP033) July 2017 Page 1 Hazard Identification Number 352 (ST48) 382 (DP44) N/A (WP033) 1. Laboratory a. Did an ADEC CS approved laboratory receive and perform all of the submitted sample analyses? Yes No Comments: All samples were analyzed by EMAX Laboratories of Torrance, CA. b. If the samples were transferred to another "network" laboratory or sub-contracted to an alternate laboratory, was the laboratory performing the analyses ADEC CS approved? Yes No Comments: N/A 2. Chain of Custody (COC) a. COC information completed, signed, and dated (including released/received by)? Yes No Comments: "Relinquished by" signature missing on CoC Black&White Cookie. b. Correct analyses requested? Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 2 3. Laboratory Sample Receipt Documentation a. Sample/cooler temperature documented and within range at receipt (0° to 6° C)? Yes No Comments: The sample/cooler temperatures were: Cooler The Puffy Shirt: 3.1° C / 5.4° C Cooler The Jerk Store: 3.2° C / 4.3° C Cooler J. Peterman Catalog: 3.2° C / 4.5° C Cooler George Steinbrenner: 3.1° C / 4.1° C Cooler Fusilli Jerry: 3.5° C / 4.4° C Cooler They're Real...: 3.3° C / 4.7° C Cooler Cheever Letters: 3.0° C / 4.2° C Cooler Calvin Kramer: 2.4° C / 3.9° C Cooler Butter Shave: 3.7° C / 4.1° C Cooler Black&White Cookie: 2.0° C / 3.8° C b. Sample preservation acceptable - acidified waters, Methanol preserved VOC soil (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.)? Yes No Comments: c. Sample condition documented - broken, leaking (Methanol), zero headspace (VOC vials)? Yes No Comments: d. If there were any discrepancies, were they documented? - For example, incorrect sample containers/ preservation, sample temperature outside of acceptable range, insufficient or missing samples, etc.? Yes No Comments: Sample 48MW12-2017S was labeled 48MW14-2017S incorrectly. The lab matched the date and time on the CoC to correctly log in the sample. e. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. July 2017 Page 3 4. Case Narrative a. Present and understandable? Yes No Comments: b. Discrepancies, errors or QC failures identified by the lab? Yes No Comments: Batch QC failures are discussed in the relevant sections of this checklist. There were no additional discrepancies identified by the lab. c. Were all corrective actions documented? Yes No Comments: There were no corrective actions performed by the lab. d. What is the effect on data quality/usability according to the case narrative? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 5. Samples Results a. Correct analyses performed/reported as requested on COC? Yes No Comments: b. All applicable holding times met? Yes No Comments: c. All soils reported on a dry weight basis? Yes No Comments: There were no soils reported for the IWMP project. July 2017 Page 4 d. Are the reported LOQs less than the Cleanup Level or the minimum required detection level for the project? Yes No Comments: The following analytes had an LOD greater than the project Action Level in one or more non- detect samples: SW8260: 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE SW8270: 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(A)PYRENE BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE N-NITROSO-DI-N-PROPYLAMINE PENTACHLOROPHENOL SW8270 PAH SIM: DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(A)PYRENE e. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The sample results with LODs greater than the Action Level were qualified E and italicized in the analytical results table. The 8260 EDB results for site ST048 that were qualified E were also analyzed by SIM methods to achieve lower detection limits. Those results were not qualified.The results were considered acceptable for the purposes of the groundwater monitoring program. July 2017 Page 5 6. QC Samples a. Method Blank i. One method blank reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: ii. All method blank results less than limit of quantitation (LOQ)? Yes No Comments: SW8260: Laboratory batch VO01F02 had the following detections in the method blank: METHYLENE CHLORIDE (0.011 mg/L) SW6020: Laboratory batch IMF008 had the following detections in the method blank: IRON (0.006 mg/L) MANGANESE (0.000324 mg/L) iii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: No flags were required. iv. Do the affected sample(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: Results not flagged: All associated sample results are greater than five times the MB contamination for manganese and iron. All associated samples were non-detect for methylene chloride. v. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. b. Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate (LCS/LCSD) i. Organics - One LCS/LCSD reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? (LCS/LCSD required per AK methods, LCS required per SW846) Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD was analyzed for all methods. DoD QSM required MS/MSDs were assigned for samples 18-6C-2017S and 44M11i-2017S. July 2017 Page 6 ii. Metals/Inorganics - One LCS and one sample duplicate reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, serial dilution and analytical spike were analyzed for SW6020. An LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD were analyzed for SW7470. An LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD were analyzed for EP300.0 and SM4500S2D. iii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods: AK101 60%-120%, AK102 75%-125%, AK103 60%-120%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW8260 – The LCSD (VO01F02Y) analyzed on 06/02/17 was outside of QC criteria (74-124%) for 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (132%). iv. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) reported and less than method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. RPD reported from LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, and or sample/sample duplicate. (AK Petroleum methods 20%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: All precision requirements were met. v. If %R or RPD is outside of acceptable limits, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A vi. Do the affected samples(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: The associated samples were non-detect for 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE and did not require qualification. vii. Data quality or usability affected? (Use comment box to explain.) Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. July 2017 Page 7 c. Surrogates - Organics Only i. Are surrogate recoveries reported for organic analyses - field, QC and laboratory samples? Yes No Comments: ii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods 50-150 %R; all other analyses see the laboratory report pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270 – The following samples had surrogates recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 33MW01-2017S-9 (terphenyl-d14 at 53%) SW8270 PAH SIM – The following samples had surrogates recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 48MW12-2017S (nitrobenzene-d5 at 4%) 44MW13-2017S (terphenyl-d14 at 51%) iii. Do the sample results with failed surrogate recoveries have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: For SW8260/SW8270 results, samples are only qualified if two or more surrogates are outside of QC criteria. None of the affected samples had more than one surrogate out of control, therefore no qualification was required. iv. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. d. Trip Blank - Volatile analyses only (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.): Water and Soil i. One trip blank reported per matrix, analysis and for each cooler containing volatile samples? (If not, enter explanation below.) Yes No Comments: One water trip blank, TB-2017S-08, was submitted in cooler "The Puffy Shirt". July 2017 Page 8 ii. Is the cooler used to transport the trip blank and VOA samples clearly indicated on the COC? (If not, a comment explaining why must be entered below) Yes No Comments: CoC 2017E75: TB-2017S-08 iii. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: The following analyte was detected in TB-2017S-08: SW8260 - TOLUENE (0.00013 mg/L) iv. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Yes No Comments: SW8260 - Samples within five times the trip blank contamination: 48M08C-2017S v. Data quality or usability affected? Explain. Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All results qualified B are considered estimated and biased high. The results are less than the project action limit. e. Field Duplicate i. One field duplicate submitted per matrix, analysis and 10 project samples? Yes No Comments: Four field duplicates were submitted with 20 primary samples. ii. Submitted blind to lab? Yes No Comments: Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 48M04-2017S/48M04-2017S-9, 53M03B-2017S/53M03B-2017S-9, 44MW14-2017S/44MW14-2017S-9, 33MW01-2017S/33MW01-2017S-9 July 2017 Page 9 iii. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) less than specified DQOs? (Recommended: 30% water, 50% soil) (R1- R2) RPD (%) = Absolute Value of: x 100 ((R1+ R2)/2) Where R1 = Sample Concentration R2 = Field Duplicate Concentration Yes No Comments: All sample duplicate precision requirements were met for: 48M04-2017S/48M04-2017S-9 53M03B-2017S/53M03B-2017S-9 44MW14-2017S/44MW14-2017S-9 The following analytes had RPDs greater than 30% in sample/duplicate: 33MW01-2017S/33MW01-2017S-9 LEAD (31%) iv. Data quality or usability affected? (Use the comment box to explain why or why not.) Comments: The data quality was minimally affected. The sample/duplicate results with RPDs greater than 30% were qualified “JD”. The higher or detected value will be used for reporting purposes. The qualified results are both less than than the groundwater PSL in all samples. f. Decontamination or Equipment Blank (If not applicable, a comment stating why must be entered below.) Yes No Not Applicable One equipment blank, 56-FEB-2017S, was collected for this project (SDG 17E170). i. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: See SDG 17E170. ii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A July 2017 Page 10 iii. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 7. Other Data Flags/Qualifiers (ACOE, AFCEE, Lab Specific, etc.) a. Defined and appropriate? Yes No Comments: Qualifiers applied are defined in the Data Quality Assessment appendix of the report. July 2017 Page 11 Laboratory Data Review Checklist Completed by: Nathaniel Gingery Title: Chemist Date: 24 October 2017 CS Report Name: 2017 IWMP Report Report Date: Jan 2018 Consultant Firm: Jacobs Laboratory Name: EMAX Laboratory Report Number: 17E232 ADEC File Number: 107.38.019 (SS057) 107.38.028 (SS39) 107.38.056 (SS63) 107.38.069 (ST20) N/A (WP033) N/A (North Boundary Wells) July 2017 Page 1 Hazard Identification Number 360 (SS057) 374 (SS39) 387 (SS63) 346 (ST20) N/A (WP033) N/A (North Boundary Wells) 1. Laboratory a. Did an ADEC CS approved laboratory receive and perform all of the submitted sample analyses? Yes No Comments: All samples were analyzed by EMAX Laboratories of Torrance, CA. b. If the samples were transferred to another "network" laboratory or sub-contracted to an alternate laboratory, was the laboratory performing the analyses ADEC CS approved? Yes No Comments: No sub-contracted labs were used for the IWMP report. 2. Chain of Custody (COC) a. COC information completed, signed, and dated (including released/received by)? Yes No Comments: b. Correct analyses requested? Yes No Comments: Lab scheduled samples 20M06B-2017S, 20M06B-2017S-9, and 20M02B-2017S for DRO/RRO when they should have only had DRO. It was caught and corrected at log in review. Sample analysis was not affected. July 2017 Page 2 3. Laboratory Sample Receipt Documentation a. Sample/cooler temperature documented and within range at receipt (0° to 6° C)? Yes No Comments: The sample/cooler temperatures were: Cooler I Carry a Purse: 2.0° C / 2.2° C Cooler Marble Rye: 1.6° C / 2.0° C Cooler Feats of Strength: 2.2° C / 2.8° C Cooler Army of Grievences: 3.1° C / 3.4° C Cooler The Low Talker: 2.3° C / 2.8° C Cooler Stick a Fork in Me: 2.1° C / 3.1° C Cooler the Cleaning Woman: 2.5° C / 3.8° C Cooler The Red Dot: 1.4° C / 2.3° C Cooler Telemarketer: 2.3° C / 3.3° C Cooler In the Pool: 1.2° C / 2.9° C Cooler Merv Griffin Show: 1.3° C / 3.1° C Cooler Desperado: 1.8° C / 2.3° C Cooler Seven: 2.0° C / 2.3° C b. Sample preservation acceptable - acidified waters, Methanol preserved VOC soil (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.)? Yes No Comments: c. Sample condition documented - broken, leaking (Methanol), zero headspace (VOC vials)? Yes No Comments: There were no issues noted for sample condition. d. If there were any discrepancies, were they documented? - For example, incorrect sample containers/ preservation, sample temperature outside of acceptable range, insufficient or missing samples, etc.? Yes No Comments: There were no discrepancies noted on the cooler receipt form. e. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. July 2017 Page 3 4. Case Narrative a. Present and understandable? Yes No Comments: b. Discrepancies, errors or QC failures identified by the lab? Yes No Comments: Batch QC failures are discussed in the relevant sections of this checklist. There were no additional discrepancies identified by the lab. c. Were all corrective actions documented? Yes No Comments: There were no corrective actions performed by the lab. d. What is the effect on data quality/usability according to the case narrative? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 5. Samples Results a. Correct analyses performed/reported as requested on COC? Yes No Comments: See section 2b. b. All applicable holding times met? Yes No Comments: c. All soils reported on a dry weight basis? Yes No Comments: There were no soils reported for the IWMP project. July 2017 Page 4 d. Are the reported LOQs less than the Cleanup Level or the minimum required detection level for the project? Yes No Comments: The following analytes had an LOD greater than the project Action Level in one or more non- detect samples: SW8260: 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE SW8270: 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 3,3'-DICHLORBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(A)PYRENE BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE BIS(2-CHOROETHYL)ETHER DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE N-NITROSO-DI-N-PROPYLAMINE PENTACHLOROPHENOL SW8270 PAH SIM: DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE e. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The sample results with LODs greater than the Action Level were qualified E and italicized in the analytical results table. The 8260 EDB results for sites SS039/SS063, ST020, and the North Bound Wells that were qualified E were also analyzed by SIM methods to achieve lower detection limits. Those results were not qualified. The results were considered acceptable for the purposes of the groundwater monitoring program. 6. QC Samples a. Method Blank i. One method blank reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: A method blank was analyzed with every laboratory batch. July 2017 Page 5 ii. All method blank results less than limit of quantitation (LOQ)? Yes No Comments: SW6020: Laboratory batch 17IMF008WB had the following detections in the method blank: IRON (0.006 mg/L) MANGANESE (0.000324 mg/L) iii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: Samples within five times the method blank contamination for: Iron 45MW32-2017S All results for manganese were greater than five times the method blank contamination and did not require flags. iv. Do the affected sample(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: Iron result for 45MW32-2017S are considered biased high and flagged B. v. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. b. Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate (LCS/LCSD) i. Organics - One LCS/LCSD reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? (LCS/LCSD required per AK methods, LCS required per SW846) Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD was analyzed for all methods. DoD QSM required MS/MSDs were assigned for samples 51MB5-2017S and 20MW31-2017S. ii. Metals/Inorganics - One LCS and one sample duplicate reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, serial dilution and analytical spike were analyzed for SW6020. An LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD were analyzed for SW7470. July 2017 Page 6 iii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods: AK101 60%-120%, AK102 75%-125%, AK103 60%-120%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW8260 – The MS E232-09M analyzed on 06/05/17 was outside of QC criteria for: 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE at 59% (76-124% limit) XYLENE, ISOMERS M&P at 63% (80-121% limit) XYLENES, TOTAL at 73% (79-121% limit) The MSD E232-09S analyzed on 06/05/17 was outside of QC criteria for: 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE at 36% (76-124% limit) ETHYLBENZENE at 72% (79-121% limit) XYLENE, ISOMERS M&P at 41% (80-121% limit) XYLENES, TOTAL at 57% (79-121% limit) SW8270 PAH SIM - The LCSD (SVF004WC) analyzed on 06/12/17 was outside of QC criteria (53-120%) for Benzo(a)pyrene (123%). iv. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) reported and less than method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. RPD reported from LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, and or sample/sample duplicate. (AK Petroleum methods 20%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: All precision requirements were met. v. If %R or RPD is outside of acceptable limits, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A vi. Do the affected samples(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: Sample 20MW31-2017S is flagged JM- for ethylbenzene and is considered estimated and biased low. Sample 20MW40-2017S is flagged JL+ for benzo(a)pyrene and is considered estimated and biased high. vii. Data quality or usability affected? (Use comment box to explain.) Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability was minimally affected. The results qualified JM- are considered estimated and biased low. July 2017 Page 7 c. Surrogates - Organics Only i. Are surrogate recoveries reported for organic analyses - field, QC and laboratory samples? Yes No Comments: ii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods 50-150 %R; all other analyses see the laboratory report pages) Yes No Comments: SW8260 SIM – The following samples had surrogates recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 20M07B-2017S (TOLUENE-D8 at 511%) 20MW40-2017S (TOLUENE-D8 at 577%) 20MW41-2017S (TOLUENE-D8 at 272%) 20MW41-2017S-9 (TOLUENE-D8 at 310%) SW8270 PAH SIM – The following samples had surrogates recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 20M06B-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 57%) 20MW38-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 49%) 20MW43A-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 47%, NITROBENZENE-D5 at 44%, and TERPHENYL-D14 at 57%) 20MW40-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 37%) 20M06B-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 54%) iii. Do the sample results with failed surrogate recoveries have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: For SW8260/SW8270 results, samples are only qualified if two or more surrogates are outside of QC criteria. SW8270 PAH SIM– The following sample were qualified (see bracket) due to surrogate recovery outliers: 20MW43A-2017S (JS-) iv. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. PAH results for sample 20MW43A-2017S are qualified JS- and are considered estimated and biased low, but all results are non-detect. July 2017 Page 8 d. Trip Blank - Volatile analyses only (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.): Water and Soil i. One trip blank reported per matrix, analysis and for each cooler containing volatile samples? (If not, enter explanation below.) Yes No Comments: One water trip blank, TB-2017S-09, was submitted in cooler "I Carry a Purse". ii. Is the cooler used to transport the trip blank and VOA samples clearly indicated on the COC? (If not, a comment explaining why must be entered below) Yes No Comments: CoC: 2017E88, trip blank: TB-2017S-09 iii. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: The following analytes were detected in TB-2017S-09: SW8260 - O-XYLENE (0.00022 mg/L) TOLUENE (0.0011 mg/L) XYLENE, ISOMERS M&P ( 0.0006 mg/L) XYLENES, TOTAL (0.00082 mg/L) iv. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Yes No Comments: SW8260: Samples within five times the trip blank contamination: 20M07B-2017S 20MW31-2017S 20MW41-2017S 20MW41-2017S-9 45MW32-2017S v. Data quality or usability affected? Explain. Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All results qualified B are considered estimated and biased high. The results are less than the project action limit. July 2017 Page 9 e. Field Duplicate i. One field duplicate submitted per matrix, analysis and 10 project samples? Yes No Comments: Four field duplicates were submitted with 19 primary samples. ii. Submitted blind to lab? Yes No Comments: Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 51MB2B-2017S/51MB2B-2017S-9, 20MW41-2017S/20MW41-2017S-9, 20M05B-2017S/20M05B-2017S-9, 20M06B-2017S/20M06B-2017S-9 iii. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) less than specified DQOs? (Recommended: 30% water, 50% soil) (R1- R2) RPD (%) = Absolute Value of: x 100 ((R1+ R2)/2) Where R1 = Sample Concentration R2 = Field Duplicate Concentration Yes No Comments: All sample duplicate precision requirements were met for: 20MW41-2017S/20MW41-2017S-9 20M05B-2017S/20M05B-2017S-9 20M06B-2017S/20M06B-2017S-9 The following analytes had RPDs greater than 30% in sample/duplicate: 51MB2B-2017S/51MB2B-2017S-9 COPPER (37%) LEAD (31%) iv. Data quality or usability affected? (Use the comment box to explain why or why not.) Comments: The data quality was minimally affected. The sample/duplicate results with RPDs greater than 30% were qualified “JD”. The higher or detected value will be used for reporting purposes. The qualified results are both less than than the groundwater PSL in all samples. July 2017 Page 10 f. Decontamination or Equipment Blank (If not applicable, a comment stating why must be entered below.) Yes No Not Applicable One equipment blank, 56-FEB-2017S, was collected for this project (SDG 17E170). i. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: See SDG 17E170. ii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A iii. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 7. Other Data Flags/Qualifiers (ACOE, AFCEE, Lab Specific, etc.) a. Defined and appropriate? Yes No Comments: Qualifiers applied are defined in the Data Quality Assessment appendix of the report. July 2017 Page 11 Laboratory Data Review Checklist Completed by: Nathaniel Gingery Title: Chemist Date: 25 October 2017 CS Report Name: 2017 IWMP Report Report Date: Jan 2018 Consultant Firm: Jacobs Laboratory Name: EMAX Laboratory Report Number: 17E233 ADEC File Number: 107.38.028 (SS39) 107.38.069 (ST20) 107.38.063 (ST49) 107.38.106 (PL001) July 2017 Page 1 Hazard Identification Number 374 (SS39) 346 (ST20) 353 (ST49) 4394 (PL001) 1. Laboratory a. Did an ADEC CS approved laboratory receive and perform all of the submitted sample analyses? Yes No Comments: All samples were analyzed by EMAX Laboratories of Torrance, CA. b. If the samples were transferred to another "network" laboratory or sub-contracted to an alternate laboratory, was the laboratory performing the analyses ADEC CS approved? Yes No Comments: No sub-contracted labs were used for the IWMP report. 2. Chain of Custody (COC) a. COC information completed, signed, and dated (including released/received by)? Yes No Comments: The release time is missing from CoC 2017E99. b. Correct analyses requested? Yes No Comments: July 2017 Page 2 3. Laboratory Sample Receipt Documentation a. Sample/cooler temperature documented and within range at receipt (0° to 6° C)? Yes No Comments: The sample/cooler temperatures were: Cooler the Calzone: 3.3° C / 4.6° C Cooler Man Hands: 3.7° C / 4.9° C Cooler Mr Marbles: 2.7° C / 4.5° C Cooler Ugly Baby: 2.3° C / 4.3° C Cooler TPretzelsAMMT: 2.3° C / 4.4° C Cooler Mr Pennypacker: 1.7° C / 3.7° C Cooler The Frogger: 2.4° C / 4.2° C Cooler Feats of Strength: 2.2° C / 3.4° C Cooler Crook Eye: 1.9° C / 3.7° C Cooler Legit Business: 2.8° C / 4.6° C Cooler The Pothole: 2.5° C / 4.6° C Cooler Hey Buddy: 2.2° C / 3.9° C b. Sample preservation acceptable - acidified waters, Methanol preserved VOC soil (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.)? Yes No Comments: c. Sample condition documented - broken, leaking (Methanol), zero headspace (VOC vials)? Yes No Comments: No issues were noted on the CoCs or SRF. d. If there were any discrepancies, were they documented? - For example, incorrect sample containers/ preservation, sample temperature outside of acceptable range, insufficient or missing samples, etc.? Yes No Comments: The metals containers for samples 39MW09-2017S and 39MW09-2017S-9 (primary and duplicate) were both labeled as 39MW09-2017S. The lab logged them in as separate samples. e. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. July 2017 Page 3 4. Case Narrative a. Present and understandable? Yes No Comments: b. Discrepancies, errors or QC failures identified by the lab? Yes No Comments: SW8260 - The CCV RFD122 was outside of QC criteria (80-120%) for 1,2-Dichlorobenzene- D4 (122%). All associated samples were non-detect for 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-D4, therefore no qualification was required. Batch QC failures are discussed in the relevant sections of this checklist. c. Were all corrective actions documented? Yes No Comments: There were no corrective actions performed by the lab. d. What is the effect on data quality/usability according to the case narrative? Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. 5. Samples Results a. Correct analyses performed/reported as requested on COC? Yes No Comments: b. All applicable holding times met? Yes No Comments: c. All soils reported on a dry weight basis? Yes No Comments: There were no soils reported for the IWMP project. July 2017 Page 4 d. Are the reported LOQs less than the Cleanup Level or the minimum required detection level for the project? Yes No Comments: The following analytes had an LOD greater than the project Action Level in one or more non- detect samples: SW8260: 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE SW8270 PAH SIM: DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(A)PYRENE e. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The sample results with LODs greater than the Action Level were qualified E and italicized in the analytical results table. The 8260 EDB results for sites SS39, ST20, and ST49 that were qualified E were also analyzed by SIM methods to achieve lower detection limits. Those results were not qualified. 6. QC Samples a. Method Blank i. One method blank reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: ii. All method blank results less than limit of quantitation (LOQ)? Yes No Comments: SW6020: Laboratory batch IMF009W had the following detections in the method blank: CHROMIUM (0.000115 mg/L) NICKEL (0.000209 mg/L) CALCIUM (0.016 mg/L) MANGANESE (0.000129 mg/L) July 2017 Page 5 iii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: Flagged results: AFMW02-2017S iv. Do the affected sample(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: Results not flagged: All associated sample results are greater than five times the MB contamination for calcium and manganese. Flagged results: All nickel and chromium results are considered biased high and flagged B. v. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All results are less than the project action limit. b. Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate (LCS/LCSD) i. Organics - One LCS/LCSD reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? (LCS/LCSD required per AK methods, LCS required per SW846) Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD was analyzed for all methods. A DoD QSM required MS/MSDs was assigned for sample 39MW09-2017S. ii. Metals/Inorganics - One LCS and one sample duplicate reported per matrix, analysis and 20 samples? Yes No Comments: An LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, serial dilution and analytical spike were analyzed for SW6020. An LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD were analyzed for SW7470. July 2017 Page 6 iii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods: AK101 60%-120%, AK102 75%-125%, AK103 60%-120%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW8270 PAH SIM – The LCSD (SVF004WC) analyzed on 06/12/17 was outside of QC criteria (53-120%) for Benzo(a)pyrene (123%). SW8260 SIM - The MSD (17E233-06S) analyzed on 06/07/17 was outside of QC criteria (77-121%) for 1,2-dibromomethane (124%). iv. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) reported and less than method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. RPD reported from LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, and or sample/sample duplicate. (AK Petroleum methods 20%; all other analyses see the laboratory QC pages) Yes No Comments: SW8260 - The RPD for the MS/MSD E233-06M/E233-06S was outside of QC criteria (< 20%) for bromoform (29%). v. If %R or RPD is outside of acceptable limits, what samples are affected? Comments: The affected sample is 39MW09-2017S. vi. Do the affected samples(s) have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: These results were qualified due to MS/MSD RPD failure: 39MW09-2017S BROMOFORM (JD) No other samples required qualification because all associated results were non-detect for the affected analytes. vii. Data quality or usability affected? (Use comment box to explain.) Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability was minimally affected. July 2017 Page 7 c. Surrogates - Organics Only i. Are surrogate recoveries reported for organic analyses - field, QC and laboratory samples? Yes No Comments: All organic results were reported with surrogates. ii. Accuracy - All percent recoveries (%R) reported and within method or laboratory limits? And project specified DQOs, if applicable. (AK Petroleum methods 50-150 %R; all other analyses see the laboratory report pages) Yes No Comments: SW8260 – The following samples had surrogate recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 20M04B-2017S (1,2-DICHLOROETHANE-D4 at 130% and TOLUENE at 114%) 53M04B-2017S (1,2-DICHLOROETHANE-D4 at 146%) SW8260 SIM – The following samples had surrogate recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 20M04B-2017S (TOLUENE-D8 at 388%) 20MW42-2017S (TOLUENE-D8 at 136%) 20PP58B-2017S (TOLUENE-D8 at 197%) 53M04B-2017S (TOLUENE-D8 at 525%) SW8270 PAH SIM – The following samples had surrogate recoveries that were outside of QC criteria: 20M04B-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 56%) 39M01B-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 44%) 39MW07-2017S (2-FLUOROBIPHENYL at 41%, NITROBENZENE-D5 at 45%, and TERPHENYL-D14 at 56%) 49M06B-2017S (TERPHENYL-D14 at 55%) 49M06B-2017S-9 (TERPHENYL-D14 at 54%) July 2017 Page 8 iii. Do the sample results with failed surrogate recoveries have data flags? If so, are the data flags clearly defined? Yes No Comments: For SW8260/SW8270 results, samples are only qualified if two or more surrogates are outside of QC criteria. SW8260 – The following sample were qualified (see bracket) due to surrogate recovery outliers: 20M04B-2017S (JS+) SW8270 PAH SIM– The following sample were qualified (see bracket) due to surrogate recovery outliers: 39MW07-2017S (JS-) iv. Data quality or usability affected? Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All PAH results qualified JS- (estimated with a low bias) were either non-detect or significantly less than the project action level. All VOC results qualified JS+ are considered estimated and biased high. d. Trip Blank - Volatile analyses only (GRO, BTEX, Volatile Chlorinated Solvents, etc.): Water and Soil i. One trip blank reported per matrix, analysis and for each cooler containing volatile samples? (If not, enter explanation below.) Yes No Comments: One water trip blank, TB-2017S-10, was submitted in cooler "The Calzone". ii. Is the cooler used to transport the trip blank and VOA samples clearly indicated on the COC? (If not, a comment explaining why must be entered below) Yes No Comments: CoC 2017E100: TB-2017S-10 July 2017 Page 9 iii. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: The following analytes were detected in TB-2017S-10: SW8260 - ACETONE (0.0035 mg/L) GRO (0.015 mg/L) TOLUENE (0.00013 mg/L) iv. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Yes No Comments: SW8260 - Samples within five times the trip blank contamination: 20MW28-2017S 20MW33-2017S 20MW34-2017S 20MW42-2017S 20PMW02-2017S 20PP58B-2017S 49M01B-2017S 49M03B-2017S 49M05B-2017S 49M06B-2017S 49M06B-2017S-9 v. Data quality or usability affected? Explain. Yes No Comments: The data quality and usability were minimally affected. All results qualified B are considered estimated and biased high. The results are less than the project action limit. e. Field Duplicate i. One field duplicate submitted per matrix, analysis and 10 project samples? Yes No Comments: Two field duplicates were submitted with 20 primary samples. ii. Submitted blind to lab? Yes No Comments: Sample ID/Duplciate ID: 39MW06-2017S/39MW06-2017S-9, 49M06B-2017S/49M06B-2017S-9 July 2017 Page 10 iii. Precision - All relative percent differences (RPD) less than specified DQOs? (Recommended: 30% water, 50% soil) (R1- R2) RPD (%) = Absolute Value of: x 100 ((R1+ R2)/2) Where R1 = Sample Concentration R2 = Field Duplicate Concentration Yes No Comments: All sample duplicate precision requirements were met for: 39MW06-2017S/39MW06-2017S-9 The following analytes had RPDs greater than 30% in sample/duplicate: 49M06B-2017S/49M06B-2017S-9 ISOPROPYLBENZENE (40%) SEC-BUTYLBENZENE (40%) TOLUENE (62%) TRICHLOROETHENE (37%) iv. Data quality or usability affected? (Use the comment box to explain why or why not.) Comments: The data quality was minimally affected. The sample/duplicate results with RPDs greater than 30% were qualified “JD”. The higher or detected value will be used for reporting purposes. The qualified results are both less than than the groundwater PSL in all samples. f. Decontamination or Equipment Blank (If not applicable, a comment stating why must be entered below.) Yes No Not Applicable One equipment blank, 56-FEB-2017S, was collected for this project (SDG 17E170). i. All results less than LOQ? Yes No Comments: See SDG 17E170. ii. If above LOQ, what samples are affected? Comments: N/A July 2017 Page 11 iii. Data quality or usability affected? Comments: The data quality and usability were not affected. 7. Other Data Flags/Qualifiers (ACOE, AFCEE, Lab Specific, etc.) a. Defined and appropriate? Yes No Comments: Qualifiers applied are defined in the Data Quality Assessment appendix of the report. July 2017 Page 12 ATTACHMENT 5 Waste Management Documentation Waste Tracking at PL001 and SS086 Monitoring Areas Eielson ID/ Sites Included Generation Date Shipped Facility Received Certificate of Item Contents - Type Contents - W ell Manifest # Profile # Classification Container ID in Drum Date offsite Date Disposal Date Groundwater Monitoring 55-gallon LF003/FT009 Purge Water 03M03B 5/16/2017 Nonhazardous 17EIS0604 / 9281 2017-00366 CH1368478 Purge Water drum ST019 Purge Water 09M03 5/16/2017 Nonhazardous Purge Water PL001MW03 5/20/2017 Nonhazardous Groundwater Monitoring 55-gallon Purge Water CMW-1 5/20/2017 Nonhazardous 17EIS0618 / 9290 WP033 PL001 2017-00366 CH1368478 Purge Water drum Purge Water AFMW01 5/20/2017 Nonhazardous Purge Water PL001MW02 5/20/2017 Nonhazardous Groundwater Monitoring 55-gallon 17EIS0619 / 9290 ST013/DP026 Purge Water 13MW16 5/22/2017 2017-00366 CH1368478 Nonhazardous Purge Water drum Groundwater Monitoring 55-gallon 17EIS0621 / 9290 PL001 Purge Water AFMW03 5/24/2017 2017-00366 CH1368478 Nonhazardous Purge Water drum Groundwater Monitoring 55-gallon 17EIS0622 / 9290 PL001 Purge Water MW-BKG-07 5/24/2017 2017-00366 CH1368478 Nonhazardous Purge Water drum Groundwater Monitoring 55-gallon 17EISO626 / 9298 DP044 Purge Water 44MW13 5/25/2017 2017-00366 CH1368478 Nonhazardous Purge Water drum Groundwater Monitoring 55-gallon DP044 Purge Water 44M03 5/25/2017 Nonhazardous 17EISO627 / 9298 2017-00366 CH1368478 Purge Water drum WP045/SS057 Purge Water 45MW32 5/26/2017 Nonhazardous Groundwater Monitoring 55-gallon 17EIS0628 / 9298 PL001 Purge Water AFMW02 5/27/2017 Nonhazardous Purge Water drum Page 1 of 1 ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE Contaminated Sites and Prevention and Emergency Response Programs Transport, Treatment, & Disposal Approval Form for Contaminated Media DEC HAZARD/SPILL ID # NAME OF SPILL OR CONTAMINATED SITE Multiple Eielson Source Areas, Eielson Air Force Base SITE OR SPILL LOCATION IWMP and PBR Locations CURRENT LOCATION AND TYPE OF SOURCE OF THE CONTAMINATION CONTAMINATED MEDIA Waste Staging Cell #1 near LF03 Historic Spills COMPOUNDS OF CONCERN ESTIMATED VOLUME DATE(S) GENERATED VOCs, Metals, and PAHs (From fuel contaminated water) 15 x 55 gal drums of water, 4 x 55 gal drums of soil, and 2 x 1 cubic yard February, May-through August 2017 POST TREATMENT ANALYSIS REQUIRED (such as GRO, DRO, RRO, BTEX, and/or Chlorinated Solvents) None - Disposal at permitted landfill COMMENTS 11 drums of wastewater from the 2017 Spring IMWP sampling event (17ESI0603,17ESI0604, 17ESI0606, 17ESI0618 through 17ESI0622, 17ESI0626, 17ESI0627, and 17ESI0630) and 4 drums of wastewater from PBR Stage I (17ESI0631, 17ESI0726, 17ESI0727, and 17ESI0728). 4 x 55 drums (17EIS0769 through 17ESI0772) and2x1 cubic yard sacks (17ESI0758 and 17ESI0805) of soil cuttings and plastic core sleeves from the Stage I PBR drilling effort. All containers are designated as "non-hazardous" based on sample results obtained during the investigations (profiles - CH1368478 and CH1368906). Facility Accepting the Contaminated Media NAME OF THE FACILITY PHYSICAL ADDRESS/PHONE NUMBER CLEAN HARBORS GRASSY MOUNTAIN LLC 3 Miles East 7 Miles North of Knolls, Exit 41 off I-80, Grantsville, UT 84029 Responsible Party and Contractor Information BUSINESS/NAME ADDRESS/PHONE NUMBER Jacobs Engineering (contractor) 4300 B Street Suite 600, Anchorage, AK 99503 Kevin Maher Project Manager Name of the Person Requesting Approval (printed) Title/Association 10/11/2017 907-751-3429 Signature Date Phone Number ------DEC USE ONLY------Based on the information provided, ADEC approves transport of the above-described media for treatment in accordance with the approved facility operations plan. The Responsible Party or their consultant must submit to the DEC Project Manager a copy of weight/volume receipts of the loads transported to the facility and a post treatment analytical report. If the media is contaminated soil, it shall be transported as a covered load in compliance with 18 AAC 60.015. Monte Garroutte EPS III DEC Project Manager Name (printed) Project Manager Title 10/15/17 (907) 451-2131 Signature Date Phone Number Rev. 12/2014 CCN 707791 AK1570028646 3 800-424-9300 2017-00366 USAF EIELSON AFB 354 CES/CEOIC 2310 CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 100 EIELSON AFB, ALASKA 99702-2299 907-377-2574 ECC, INC. (907) 644-0428 AKR000202408 WEAVER BROTHERS (907) 278-4526 AKD002848372 CLEAN HARBORS GRASSY MOUNTAIN LLC 3 MILES EAST 7 MILES NORTH OF KNOLLS GRANTSVILLE, UT 84029 (435) 884-8900 UTD991301748 HM MATERIAL NOT REGULATED BY D.O.T. (IDW SOIL) 2 BA 4000 P MATERIAL NOT REGULATED BY D.O.T. (IDW SOIL) 4 DM 2900 P MATERIAL NOT REGULATED BY D.O.T. (IDW WATER) 15 DM 6750 P 2: CH1368906 17EIS0758,0805 1: CH1368906 17EIS0769-0772 3: CH1368478 17EIS0603-0604,0606,0618-0622,0626-0627,0630-0631,0726-0728 CERCLA WASTE AK1570028646 2 OF 3 2017-00366 USAF EIELSON AFB 354 CES/CEOIC 3 TOTEM OCEAN TRAILER EXPRESS WAD070397955 4 CARLILE TRANS SYSTEMS, Inc. (TACOMA) WAH000018747 HM AK1570028646 3 OF 3 2017-00366 USAF EIELSON AFB 354 CES/CEOIC 5 CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS. MAD039322250 HM 0DQLIHVW7UDFNLQJ86$)(,(/621$)%&(6&(2,& &/($1+$5%256*5$66<02817$,1//& /LQH 0$7(5,$/1275(*8/$7('%<'27 ,':62,/ 'RFXPHQW 3URILOH :DVWH1DPH 6DPSOH1XPEHU /RFDWLRQ FB50047278H501 CH1368906 IDW SOIL - NONHAZ, LF03 CERCLA-DERIVED 'UXP :HLJKW &RQW7\SH 17EIS0758 - 9391 2000 SUPER SACK Contents verified by: ______17EIS0805 - 9430 2000 SUPER SACK Contents verified by: ______ 7RWDO:W 'UXP&QW 4000 2 /LQH 0$7(5,$/1275(*8/$7('%<'27 ,':62,/ 'RFXPHQW 3URILOH :DVWH1DPH 6DPSOH1XPEHU /RFDWLRQ FB50047278H502 CH1368906 IDW SOIL - NONHAZ, LF03 CERCLA-DERIVED 'UXP :HLJKW &RQW7\SH 17EIS0769 - 9417 725 55 GL OT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0770 - 9417 725 55 GL OT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0771 - 9417 725 55 GL OT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0772 - 9417 725 55 GL OT DM Contents verified by: ______ 7RWDO:W 'UXP&QW 2900 4 /LQH 0$7(5,$/1275(*8/$7('%<'27 ,'::$7(5 'RFXPHQW 3URILOH :DVWH1DPH 6DPSOH1XPEHU /RFDWLRQ FB50047278H500 CH1368478 IDW WATER - CERCLA-DERIVED LF03 NONHAZ 'UXP :HLJKW &RQW7\SH 17EIS0603 - EAFB 9281 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0604 - EAFB 9281 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0606 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0618 - EAFB 9290 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0619 - EAFB 9290 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0620 - EAFB 9290 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0621 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0622 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0626 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0627 - EAFB 9298 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0630 - EAFB 9298 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0631 - EAFB 9298 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0726 - 9311 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0727 - 9311 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______17EIS0728 - 9311 450 55 GL BT DM Contents verified by: ______ 7RWDO:W 'UXP&QW 6750 15 WASTE MATERIAL PROFILE SHEET Clean Harbors Profile No. CH1368906 A. GENERAL INFORMATION GENERATOR EPA ID #/REGISTRATION # AK1570028646 GENERATOR NAME: USAF EIELSON AFB - 354 CES/CEOIC GENERATOR CODE (Assigned by Clean Harbors) US29981 CITYEIELSON AFB STATE/PROVINCE AK ZIP/POSTAL CODE 99702 ADDRESS 2310 CENTRAL AVENUE, SUITE 100 PHONE: (907) 830-1225 CUSTOMER CODE (Assigned by Clean Harbors) EN0497 CUSTOMER NAME: Environmental Compliance Consultants ADDRESS 1500 Post Road CITYAnchorage STATE/PROVINCE AK ZIP/POSTAL CODE 99501 B. WASTE DESCRIPTION WASTE DESCRIPTION: IDW SOIL (CERCLA-DERIVED, NON-HAZ) PROCESS GENERATING WASTE: Investigative derived waste - soil from sampling activities including soil borings, surface and subsurface sampling IS THIS WASTE CONTAINED IN SMALL PACKAGING CONTAINED WITHIN A LARGER SHIPPING CONTAINER ? No C. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES (at 25C or 77F) PHYSICAL STATE NUMBER OF PHASES/LAYERS VISCOSITY (If liquid present) COLOR SOLID WITHOUT FREE LIQUID 321 TOP 0.00 1 - 100 (e.g. Water) POWDER varies MIDDLE 101 - 500 (e.g. Motor Oil) MONOLITHIC SOLID % BY VOLUME (Approx.) 0.00 LIQUID WITH NO SOLIDS BOTTOM 0.00 501 - 10,000 (e.g. Molasses) LIQUID/SOLID MIXTURE > 10,000 % FREE LIQUID ODOR % SETTLED SOLID NONE BOILING POINT ºF (ºC) MELTING POINT ºF (ºC) TOTAL ORGANIC % TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLID CARBON <= 95 (<=35) SLUDGE MILD < 140 (<60) 95 - 100 (35-38) <= 1% GAS/AEROSOL STRONG 140-200 (60-93) 101 - 129 (38-54) 1-9% Describe: > 200 (>93) >= 130 (>54) >= 10% FLASH POINT ºF (ºC) pH SPECIFIC GRAVITY ASH BTU/LB (MJ/kg) < 73 (<23) <= 2 < 0.8 (e.g. Gasoline) < 2,000 (<4.6) < 0.1 > 20 73 - 100 (23-38) 2.1 - 6.9 0.8-1.0 (e.g. Ethanol) 2,000-5,000 (4.6-11.6) 0.1 - 1.0 Unknown 101 -140 (38-60) 7 (Neutral) 1.0 (e.g. Water) 5,000-10,000 (11.6-23.2) 1.1 - 5.0 141 -200 (60-93) 7.1 - 12.4 1.0-1.2 (e.g. Antifreeze) > 10,000 (>23.2) 5.1 - 20.0 > 200 (>93) >= 12.5 > 1.2 (e.g. Methylene Chloride) Actual: D. COMPOSITION (List the complete composition of the waste, include any inert components and/or debris. Ranges for individual components are acceptable. If a trade name is used, please supply an MSDS. Please do not use abbreviations.) CHEMICAL MIN -- MAX UOM 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0000000 -- 0.0020000 PPM 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0000000 -- 0.0120000 PPM 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 0.0000000 -- 0.0350000 PPM 2-BUTANONE 0.0000000 -- 0.0190000 PPM ARSENIC 0.0000000 -- 1.9200000 PPM BARIUM 0.0000000 -- 49.2500000 PPM BENZENE 0.0000000 -- 0.1140000 PPM CADMIUM 0.0000000 -- 0.0570000 PPM CHROMIUM 0.0000000 -- 1.9750000 PPM DEBRIS (ABSORBENTS, RAGS, PLASTIC, WOOD, SOIL, ETC) 0.0000000 -- 5.0000000 % DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN ANY HEAVY GAUGE METAL DEBRIS OR OTHER LARGE OBJECTS (EX., METAL PLATE OR PIPING >1/4” THICK OR YES NO >12” LONG, METAL REINFORCED HOSE >12” LONG, METAL WIRE >12” LONG, METAL VALVES, PIPE FITTINGS, CONCRETE REINFORCING BAR OR PIECES OF CONCRETE >3”)? If yes, describe, including dimensions: DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN ANY METALS IN POWDERED OR OTHER FINELY DIVIDED FORM? YES NO DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN OR HAS IT CONTACTED ANY OF THE FOLLOWING; ANIMAL WASTES, HUMAN BLOOD, BLOOD PRODUCTS, BODY YES NO FLUIDS, MICROBIOLOGICAL WASTE, PATHOLOGICAL WASTE, HUMAN OR ANIMAL DERIVED SERUMS OR PROTEINS OR ANY OTHER POTENTIALLY INFECTIOUS MATERIAL? I acknowledge that this waste material is neither infectious nor does it contain any organism known to be a threat to human health. This certification is based on my knowledge of the material. Select the answer below that applies: The waste was never exposed to potentially infectious material. YES NO Chemical disinfection or some other form of sterilization has been applied to the waste. YES NO I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS PROFILE MEETS THE CLEAN HARBORS BATTERY PACKAGING REQUIREMENTS. YES NO I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MY FRIABLE ASBESTOS WASTE IS DOUBLE BAGGED AND WETTED. YES NO SPECIFY THE SOURCE CODE ASSOCIATED WITH THE G19 SPECIFY THE FORM CODE ASSOCIATED WITH THE WASTE. W301 WASTE. Report Printed On : Thursday, October 05, 2017 /WINWEB/Profile\Waste Profile.rdl Page 1 of 4 Clean Harbors Profile No. CH1368906 E. CONSTITUENTS Are these values based on testing or knowledge? Knowledge Testing If constituent concentrations are based on analytical testing, analysis must be provided. Please attach document(s) using the link on the Submit tab. Please indicate which constituents below apply. Concentrations must be entered when applicable to assist in accurate review and expedited approval of your waste profile. Please note that the total regulated metals and other constituents sections require answers. RCRA REGULATED METALS REGULATORY TCLP TOTAL UOM NOT APPLICABLE LEVEL (mg/l) mg/l D004 ARSENIC 5.0 0.0080 1.9500000 PPM D005 BARIUM 100.0 1.9300 13.6520000 PPM D006 CADMIUM 1.0 0.0020 0.0570000 PPM D007 CHROMIUM 5.0 0.0410 1.9750000 PPM D008 LEAD 5.0 0.0120 2.1350000 PPM D009 MERCURY 0.2 0.0010 0.0040000 PPM D010 SELENIUM 1.0 0.0740000 PPM D011 SILVER 5.0 0.0170000 PPM VOLATILE COMPOUNDS OTHER CONSTITUENTS MAX UOM NOT D018 BENZENE 0.5 0.0550 APPLICABLE D019 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 0.5 BROMINE D021 CHLOROBENZENE 100.0 CHLORINE D022 CHLOROFORM 6.0 FLUORINE D028 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 0.5 IODINE D029 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.7 0.0001 SULFUR D035 METHYL ETHYL KETONE 200.0 POTASSIUM D039 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.7 0.0800 SODIUM D040 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0.5 0.0230 AMMONIA D043 VINYL CHLORIDE 0.2 CYANIDE AMENABLE SEMI-VOLATILE COMPOUNDS CYANIDE REACTIVE D023 o-CRESOL 200.0 CYANIDE TOTAL D024 m-CRESOL 200.0 SULFIDE REACTIVE D025 p-CRESOL 200.0 HOCs PCBs D026 CRESOL (TOTAL) 200.0 NONE NONE D027 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 7.5 0.0120 < 1000 PPM < 50 PPM D030 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 0.13 >= 1000 PPM >=50 PPM D032 HEXACHLOROBENZENE 0.13 IF PCBS ARE PRESENT, IS THE D033 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.5 WASTE REGULATED BY TSCA 40 D034 HEXACHLOROETHANE 3.0 CFR 761? D036 NITROBENZENE 2.0 YES NO D037 PENTACHLOROPHENOL 100.0 D038 PYRIDINE 5.0 D041 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 400.0 D042 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.0 PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES D012 ENDRIN 0.02 D013 LINDANE 0.4 0.0007 D014 METHOXYCHLOR 10.0 0.0023 D015 TOXAPHENE 0.5 D016 2,4-D 10.0 D017 2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 1.0 D020 CHLORDANE 0.03 D031 HEPTACHLOR (AND ITS EPOXIDE) 0.008 ADDITIONAL HAZARDS DOES THIS WASTE HAVE ANY UNDISCLOSED HAZARDS OR PRIOR INCIDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT, WHICH COULD AFFECT THE WAY IT SHOULD BE HANDLED? YES NO (If yes, explain) CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY DEA REGULATED SUBSTANCES EXPLOSIVE FUMING OSHA REGULATED CARCINOGENS POLYMERIZABLE RADIOACTIVE REACTIVE MATERIAL NONE OF THE ABOVE Report Printed On : Thursday, October 05, 2017 /WINWEB/Profile\Waste Profile.rdl Page 2 of 4 Clean Harbors Profile No. CH1368906 F. REGULATORY STATUS YES NO USEPA HAZARDOUS WASTE? YES NO DO ANY STATE WASTE CODES APPLY? Texas Waste Code OUTS3011 YES NO DO ANY CANADIAN PROVINCIAL WASTE CODES APPLY? YES NO IS THIS WASTE PROHIBITED FROM LAND DISPOSAL WITHOUT FURTHER TREATMENT PER 40 CFR PART 268? LDR CATEGORY: Not subject to LDR VARIANCE INFO: YES NO IS THIS A UNIVERSAL WASTE? YES NO IS THE GENERATOR OF THE WASTE CLASSIFIED AS VERY SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR (VSQG) OR A STATE EQUIVALENT DESIGNATION? YES NO IS THIS MATERIAL GOING TO BE MANAGED AS A RCRA EXEMPT COMMERCIAL PRODUCT, WHICH IS FUEL (40 CFR 261.2 (C)(2)(II))? YES NO DOES TREATMENT OF THIS WASTE GENERATE A F006 OR F019 SLUDGE? YES NO IS THIS WASTE STREAM SUBJECT TO THE INORGANIC METAL BEARING WASTE PROHIBITION FOUND AT 40 CFR 268.3(C)? YES NO DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN VOC'S IN CONCENTRATIONS >=500 PPM? YES NO DOES THE WASTE CONTAIN GREATER THAN 20% OF ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS WITH A VAPOR PRESSURE >= .3KPA (.044 PSIA)? YES NO DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN AN ORGANIC CONSTITUENT WHICH IN ITS PURE FORM HAS A VAPOR PRESSURE > 77 KPA (11.2 PSIA)? YES NO IS THIS CERCLA REGULATED (SUPERFUND ) WASTE ? YES NO IS THE WASTE SUBJECT TO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING NESHAP RULES? Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) rule (subpart G) Pharmaceuticals production (subpart GGG) YES NO IF THIS IS A US EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE, DOES THIS WASTE STREAM CONTAIN BENZENE? YES NO Does the waste stream come from a facility with one of the SIC codes listed under benzene NESHAP or is this waste regulated under the benzene NESHAP rules because the original source of the waste is from a chemical manufacturing, coke by-product recovery, or petroleum refinery process? YES NO Is the generating source of this waste stream a facility with Total Annual Benzene (TAB) >10 Mg/year? What is the TAB quantity for your facility? Megagram/year (1 Mg = 2,200 lbs) The basis for this determination is: Knowledge of the Waste Or Test Data Knowledge Testing Describe the knowledge : G. DOT/TDG INFORMATION DOT/TDG PROPER SHIPPING NAME: MATERIAL NOT REGULATED BY DOT, (SOIL) NON-REGULATED SOLID, (SOIL) H. TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS ESTIMATED SHIPMENT FREQUENCY ONE TIME WEEKLY MONTHLY QUARTERLY YEARLY OTHER CONTAINERIZED BULK LIQUID BULK SOLID 1-10 CONTAINERS/SHIPMENT GALLONS/SHIPMENT:0 Min -0 Max GAL. SHIPMENT UOM: TON YARD STORAGE CAPACITY: 10 CONTAINER TYPE: TONS/YARDS/SHIPMENT: 0 Min - 0 Max PORTABLE TOTE TANK BOX|CARTON|CASE CUBIC YARD BOX DRUM OTHER: DRUM SIZE: I. SPECIAL REQUEST COMMENTS OR REQUESTS: Request landfill disposal CNO GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION I certify that I am authorized to execute this document as an authorized agent. I hereby certify that all information submitted in this and attached documents is correct to the best of my knowledge.I also certify that any samples submitted are representative of the actual waste.If Clean Harbors discovers a discrepancy during the approval process, Generator grants Clean Harbors the authority to amend the profile, as Clean Harbors deems necessary, to reflect the discrepancy. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE NAME (PRINT) TITLE DATE [email protected] This waste profile has been submitted using Clean Harbors’ electronic signature system. Report Printed On : Thursday, October 05, 2017 /WINWEB/Profile\Waste Profile.rdl Page 3 of 4 Clean Harbors Profile No. CH1368906 Addendum D. COMPOSITION CHEMICAL MIN -- MAX UOM LEAD 0.00000 -- 3.6800 PPM 00 000 LINDANE 0.00000 -- 0.0010 PPM 00 000 MERCURY 0.00000 -- 0.0040 PPM 00 000 METHOXYCHLOR 0.00000 -- 0.0020 PPM 00 000 PCB 0.00000 -- 0.5700 PPM 00 000 PENTACHLOROPHENOL 0.00000 -- 0.0010 PPM 00 000 SELENIUM 0.00000 -- 0.0740 PPM 00 000 SILVER 0.00000 -- 0.0380 PPM 00 000 SOIL/SAND/GRAVEL 95.0000 -- 100.00 % 000 00000 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.00000 -- 0.0800 PPM 00 000 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0.00000 -- 0.0240 PPM 00 000 G. DOT/TDG INFORMATION Report Printed On : Thursday, October 05, 2017 /WINWEB/Profile\Waste Profile.rdl Page 4 of 4 +/1467.4 /.'3'/5 0./5 # " $! ! " ! ' /&14 ' 27&03 ' /&55 ' 1&46 ' 1&46 ' .&..0 ( ) * ' .&...5 ' .&..01 ' .&35 /%/( ' .&....2.3 /%2( ' .&./0 ' .&.33 )* ' .&.6 )* ' .&.02 0%2( ' .&.123 ' .&.067 ' .&.16 0( ' .&./7 WASTE MATERIAL PROFILE SHEET Clean Harbors Profile No. CH1368478 A. GENERAL INFORMATION GENERATOR EPA ID #/REGISTRATION # AK1570028646 GENERATOR NAME: USAF EIELSON AFB - 354 CES/CEOIC GENERATOR CODE (Assigned by Clean Harbors) US29981 CITYEIELSON AFB STATE/PROVINCE AK ZIP/POSTAL CODE 99702 ADDRESS 2310 CENTRAL AVENUE, SUITE 100 PHONE: (907) 830-1225 CUSTOMER CODE (Assigned by Clean Harbors) EN0497 CUSTOMER NAME: Environmental Compliance Consultants ADDRESS 1500 Post Road CITYAnchorage STATE/PROVINCE AK ZIP/POSTAL CODE 99501 B. WASTE DESCRIPTION WASTE DESCRIPTION: IDW WATER (CERCLA-DERIVED,NON-HAZ) PROCESS GENERATING WASTE: Investigative derived waste - water from monitoring well sampling activities including purging, development, and decon. IS THIS WASTE CONTAINED IN SMALL PACKAGING CONTAINED WITHIN A LARGER SHIPPING CONTAINER ? No C. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES (at 25C or 77F) PHYSICAL STATE NUMBER OF PHASES/LAYERS VISCOSITY (If liquid present) COLOR SOLID WITHOUT FREE LIQUID 321 TOP 95.00 1 - 100 (e.g. Water) POWDER varies MIDDLE 101 - 500 (e.g. Motor Oil) MONOLITHIC SOLID % BY VOLUME (Approx.) 0.00 LIQUID WITH NO SOLIDS BOTTOM 5.00 501 - 10,000 (e.g. Molasses) LIQUID/SOLID MIXTURE > 10,000 % FREE LIQUID 95.00 - 100.00 ODOR % SETTLED SOLID 0.00 - 5.00 NONE BOILING POINT ºF (ºC) MELTING POINT ºF (ºC) TOTAL ORGANIC % TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLID CARBON <= 95 (<=35) SLUDGE MILD < 140 (<60) 95 - 100 (35-38) <= 1% GAS/AEROSOL STRONG 140-200 (60-93) 101 - 129 (38-54) 1-9% Describe: > 200 (>93) >= 130 (>54) >= 10% FLASH POINT ºF (ºC) pH SPECIFIC GRAVITY ASH BTU/LB (MJ/kg) < 73 (<23) <= 2 < 0.8 (e.g. Gasoline) < 2,000 (<4.6) < 0.1 > 20 73 - 100 (23-38) 2.1 - 6.9 0.8-1.0 (e.g. Ethanol) 2,000-5,000 (4.6-11.6) 0.1 - 1.0 Unknown 101 -140 (38-60) 7 (Neutral) 1.0 (e.g. Water) 5,000-10,000 (11.6-23.2) 1.1 - 5.0 141 -200 (60-93) 7.1 - 12.4 1.0-1.2 (e.g. Antifreeze) > 10,000 (>23.2) 5.1 - 20.0 > 200 (>93) >= 12.5 > 1.2 (e.g. Methylene Chloride) Actual: D. COMPOSITION (List the complete composition of the waste, include any inert components and/or debris. Ranges for individual components are acceptable. If a trade name is used, please supply an MSDS. Please do not use abbreviations.) CHEMICAL MIN -- MAX UOM 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE -- Trace 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE -- Trace 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE -- Trace 2-BUTANONE -- Trace ARSENIC -- Trace BARIUM 0.0000000 -- 5.6800000 PPM BENZENE -- Trace CADMIUM -- Trace CHROMIUM -- Trace HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE -- Trace DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN ANY HEAVY GAUGE METAL DEBRIS OR OTHER LARGE OBJECTS (EX., METAL PLATE OR PIPING >1/4” THICK OR YES NO >12” LONG, METAL REINFORCED HOSE >12” LONG, METAL WIRE >12” LONG, METAL VALVES, PIPE FITTINGS, CONCRETE REINFORCING BAR OR PIECES OF CONCRETE >3”)? If yes, describe, including dimensions: DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN ANY METALS IN POWDERED OR OTHER FINELY DIVIDED FORM? YES NO DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN OR HAS IT CONTACTED ANY OF THE FOLLOWING; ANIMAL WASTES, HUMAN BLOOD, BLOOD PRODUCTS, BODY YES NO FLUIDS, MICROBIOLOGICAL WASTE, PATHOLOGICAL WASTE, HUMAN OR ANIMAL DERIVED SERUMS OR PROTEINS OR ANY OTHER POTENTIALLY INFECTIOUS MATERIAL? I acknowledge that this waste material is neither infectious nor does it contain any organism known to be a threat to human health. This certification is based on my knowledge of the material. Select the answer below that applies: The waste was never exposed to potentially infectious material. YES NO Chemical disinfection or some other form of sterilization has been applied to the waste. YES NO I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS PROFILE MEETS THE CLEAN HARBORS BATTERY PACKAGING REQUIREMENTS. YES NO I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MY FRIABLE ASBESTOS WASTE IS DOUBLE BAGGED AND WETTED. YES NO SPECIFY THE SOURCE CODE ASSOCIATED WITH THE G19 SPECIFY THE FORM CODE ASSOCIATED WITH THE WASTE. W113 WASTE. Report Printed On : Thursday, October 05, 2017 /WINWEB/Profile\Waste Profile.rdl Page 1 of 4 Clean Harbors Profile No. CH1368478 E. CONSTITUENTS Are these values based on testing or knowledge? Knowledge Testing If constituent concentrations are based on analytical testing, analysis must be provided. Please attach document(s) using the link on the Submit tab. Please indicate which constituents below apply. Concentrations must be entered when applicable to assist in accurate review and expedited approval of your waste profile. Please note that the total regulated metals and other constituents sections require answers. RCRA REGULATED METALS REGULATORY TCLP TOTAL UOM NOT APPLICABLE LEVEL (mg/l) mg/l D004 ARSENIC 5.0 0.8420000 PPM D005 BARIUM 100.0 5.6800000 PPM D006 CADMIUM 1.0 0.0310000 PPM D007 CHROMIUM 5.0 0.1460000 PPM D008 LEAD 5.0 0.9340000 PPM D009 MERCURY 0.2 0.0000000 PPM D010 SELENIUM 1.0 0.0310000 PPM D011 SILVER 5.0 0.0310000 PPM VOLATILE COMPOUNDS OTHER CONSTITUENTS MAX UOM NOT D018 BENZENE 0.5 APPLICABLE D019 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 0.5 BROMINE D021 CHLOROBENZENE 100.0 CHLORINE D022 CHLOROFORM 6.0 FLUORINE D028 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 0.5 IODINE D029 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.7 SULFUR D035 METHYL ETHYL KETONE 200.0 POTASSIUM D039 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.7 SODIUM D040 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0.5 AMMONIA D043 VINYL CHLORIDE 0.2 CYANIDE AMENABLE SEMI-VOLATILE COMPOUNDS CYANIDE REACTIVE D023 o-CRESOL 200.0 CYANIDE TOTAL D024 m-CRESOL 200.0 SULFIDE REACTIVE D025 p-CRESOL 200.0 HOCs PCBs D026 CRESOL (TOTAL) 200.0 NONE NONE D027 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 7.5 < 1000 PPM < 50 PPM D030 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 0.13 >= 1000 PPM >=50 PPM D032 HEXACHLOROBENZENE 0.13 IF PCBS ARE PRESENT, IS THE D033 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.5 WASTE REGULATED BY TSCA 40 D034 HEXACHLOROETHANE 3.0 CFR 761? D036 NITROBENZENE 2.0 YES NO D037 PENTACHLOROPHENOL 100.0 D038 PYRIDINE 5.0 D041 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 400.0 D042 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.0 PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES D012 ENDRIN 0.02 D013 LINDANE 0.4 D014 METHOXYCHLOR 10.0 D015 TOXAPHENE 0.5 D016 2,4-D 10.0 D017 2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 1.0 D020 CHLORDANE 0.03 D031 HEPTACHLOR (AND ITS EPOXIDE) 0.008 ADDITIONAL HAZARDS DOES THIS WASTE HAVE ANY UNDISCLOSED HAZARDS OR PRIOR INCIDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT, WHICH COULD AFFECT THE WAY IT SHOULD BE HANDLED? YES NO (If yes, explain) CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY DEA REGULATED SUBSTANCES EXPLOSIVE FUMING OSHA REGULATED CARCINOGENS POLYMERIZABLE RADIOACTIVE REACTIVE MATERIAL NONE OF THE ABOVE Report Printed On : Thursday, October 05, 2017 /WINWEB/Profile\Waste Profile.rdl Page 2 of 4 Clean Harbors Profile No. CH1368478 F. REGULATORY STATUS YES NO USEPA HAZARDOUS WASTE? YES NO DO ANY STATE WASTE CODES APPLY? Texas Waste Code YES NO DO ANY CANADIAN PROVINCIAL WASTE CODES APPLY? YES NO IS THIS WASTE PROHIBITED FROM LAND DISPOSAL WITHOUT FURTHER TREATMENT PER 40 CFR PART 268? LDR CATEGORY: Not subject to LDR VARIANCE INFO: YES NO IS THIS A UNIVERSAL WASTE? YES NO IS THE GENERATOR OF THE WASTE CLASSIFIED AS VERY SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR (VSQG) OR A STATE EQUIVALENT DESIGNATION? YES NO IS THIS MATERIAL GOING TO BE MANAGED AS A RCRA EXEMPT COMMERCIAL PRODUCT, WHICH IS FUEL (40 CFR 261.2 (C)(2)(II))? YES NO DOES TREATMENT OF THIS WASTE GENERATE A F006 OR F019 SLUDGE? YES NO IS THIS WASTE STREAM SUBJECT TO THE INORGANIC METAL BEARING WASTE PROHIBITION FOUND AT 40 CFR 268.3(C)? YES NO DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN VOC'S IN CONCENTRATIONS >=500 PPM? YES NO DOES THE WASTE CONTAIN GREATER THAN 20% OF ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS WITH A VAPOR PRESSURE >= .3KPA (.044 PSIA)? YES NO DOES THIS WASTE CONTAIN AN ORGANIC CONSTITUENT WHICH IN ITS PURE FORM HAS A VAPOR PRESSURE > 77 KPA (11.2 PSIA)? YES NO IS THIS CERCLA REGULATED (SUPERFUND ) WASTE ? YES NO IS THE WASTE SUBJECT TO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING NESHAP RULES? Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) rule (subpart G) Pharmaceuticals production (subpart GGG) YES NO IF THIS IS A US EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE, DOES THIS WASTE STREAM CONTAIN BENZENE? YES NO Does the waste stream come from a facility with one of the SIC codes listed under benzene NESHAP or is this waste regulated under the benzene NESHAP rules because the original source of the waste is from a chemical manufacturing, coke by-product recovery, or petroleum refinery process? YES NO Is the generating source of this waste stream a facility with Total Annual Benzene (TAB) >10 Mg/year? What is the TAB quantity for your facility? Megagram/year (1 Mg = 2,200 lbs) The basis for this determination is: Knowledge of the Waste Or Test Data Knowledge Testing Describe the knowledge : G. DOT/TDG INFORMATION DOT/TDG PROPER SHIPPING NAME: NON DOT REGULATED MATERIAL, (WATER) NON-REGULATED LIQUID, (WATER) H. TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS ESTIMATED SHIPMENT FREQUENCY ONE TIME WEEKLY MONTHLY QUARTERLY YEARLY OTHER CONTAINERIZED BULK LIQUID BULK SOLID 1-80 CONTAINERS/SHIPMENT GALLONS/SHIPMENT:0 Min -0 Max GAL. SHIPMENT UOM: TON YARD STORAGE CAPACITY: 80 CONTAINER TYPE: TONS/YARDS/SHIPMENT: 0 Min - 0 Max PORTABLE TOTE TANK BOX|CARTON|CASE CUBIC YARD BOX DRUM OTHER: DRUM SIZE: 55 I. SPECIAL REQUEST COMMENTS OR REQUESTS: REQUEST LANDFILL DISPOSAL CNOS. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION I certify that I am authorized to execute this document as an authorized agent. I hereby certify that all information submitted in this and attached documents is correct to the best of my knowledge.I also certify that any samples submitted are representative of the actual waste.If Clean Harbors discovers a discrepancy during the approval process, Generator grants Clean Harbors the authority to amend the profile, as Clean Harbors deems necessary, to reflect the discrepancy. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE NAME (PRINT) TITLE DATE [email protected] This waste profile has been submitted using Clean Harbors’ electronic signature system. Report Printed On : Thursday, October 05, 2017 /WINWEB/Profile\Waste Profile.rdl Page 3 of 4 Clean Harbors Profile No. CH1368478 Addendum D. COMPOSITION CHEMICAL MIN -- MAX UOM LEAD -- Trace PENTACHLOROPHENOL 0.00000 -- 0.0300 PPM 00 000 PERFLUOROOCTANESULFONIC ACID -- Trace PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID (PFOA) -- Trace SAND/GRIT/SOIL 0.00000 -- 5.0000 % 00 000 SELENIUM -- Trace SILVER -- Trace TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.00000 -- 0.0330 PPM 00 000 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0.00000 -- 0.0230 PPM 00 000 VINYL CHLORIDE 0.00000 -- 0.0060 PPM 00 000 WATER 95.0000 -- 100.00 % 000 00000 G. DOT/TDG INFORMATION Report Printed On : Thursday, October 05, 2017 /WINWEB/Profile\Waste Profile.rdl Page 4 of 4 *.035145 .-&2&.4 # /-.4 " ! & -%51/ & 2%35 & -%-0. & -%.13 & -%601 & -%-0.0 & -%-0-3 & -%---/23 & -%----00 .$.' & -%-/0 .$/' & -%-/2 .$1' & -%-.1 & -%0. & -%---34 & -%---40 & -%.4 () & -%-00 () & -%-/0 & -%--31 & -%-0 /' & -%.5 ATTACHMENT 6 ADEC Approval Letter Department of Environmental Conservation DIVISION OF SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE Contaminated Sites Program 610 University Avenue Fairbanks, AK, 99709 Main: 907.451.2156 Fax: 907.451.2155 www.dec.alaska.gov File: 107.38.106 October 23, 2018 Gary Fink Chief, Installation Restoration Program AFCEC CZOP 10471 20th Street, Suite 326 JBER, AK 99506-2201 RE: DEC Approval of the 2017 Groundwater Sampling Activities and Results for the PL001 and SS086 Monitoring Areas Technical Memorandum, dated 26 March 2018. Dear Mr. Fink: The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) reviewed the 2017 Groundwater Sampling Activities and Results for the PL001 and SS086 Monitoring Areas Technical Memorandum, dated 26 March 2018. The document details the results of the 2017 groundwater sampling at the listed source areas. Please provide a copy of the final document to DEC for public record. Sincerely, Bri Clark Environmental Program Specialist cc (via email): Melinda Brunner, DEC Dennis Shepard, DEC Joe Price, AFCEC Carolyn Tallant, AFCEC