43200-024: Hiritano Highway Updated Resettlement Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

43200-024: Hiritano Highway Updated Resettlement Plan Updated Resettlement Plan Final Report August 2014 Papua New Guinea: Bridge Replacement for Improved Rural Access Sector Project-Hiritano Highway Prepared by Department of Works, Port Moresby for the Government of Papua New Guinea and the Asian Development Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in December 2014 available on http://www.adb.org/projects/documents/bridge-replacement-improved-rural-access-sector- project-hiritano-highway-board-ap This Updated Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. L 2783/2784 PNG: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR IMPROVED RURAL ACCESS PROJECT (BRIRAP) INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA DEPARTMENT OF WORKS ` L2783/2784 PNG: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR IMPROVED RURAL ACCESS SECTOR PROJECT (BRIRAP) II. Resettlement Plan Update– Hiritano Highway Package 1: Sub-project II: Hiritano Highway – Central Province Department of Works August, 2014 L 2783/2784 PNG: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR IMPROVED RURAL ACCESS PROJECT (BRIRAP) II: Resettlement Plan – Hiritano Highway Resettlement Plan: Bridge Replacement for Improved Rural Access Project (BRIRAP) Document Stage: Final Draft Project Number: L2783/2784 - PNG May, 2014 Exchange Rate: 1USD = 2.8268 1PGK = 0.3538 Papua New Guinea: Bridge Replacement for Improved Rural Access Project (Hiritano Highway) Prepared by Department of Works, Port Moresby, for the Asian Development Bank. The Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and are final updates. L 2783/2784 PNG: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR IMPROVED RURAL ACCESS PROJECT (BRIRAP) Table of Contents Abbreviations and acronyms……………………………………………………………………………………………… IV Glossary of terms………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V Map 1: Project Coverage…………………………..………………………………………………………….. VI Map 2: Sub-Project location Map ..……….………………………………………………………………… VII A. Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Table 1: Summary of Eligibility and Entitlement Criteria Matrix for DPs…………………… 2 B. Project Description…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Table 2: Bridge Span and Estimated Cost new bridge replacement……………………………. 3 C. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement………………………………………………………………… 4 i. Projects Potential Impacts…………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 ii. Scope of Land Acquisition……………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Table 3: Scope of Land Acquisition……………………………………………………………………………… 5 iii. Effects of Assets Lost…………………………………………………………………………………………..……….. 5 iv. Common property resources………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 D. Socio Economic Information & Profile……………………………………………………………………… 6 i. Demographic features of affected peoples……………………………………………………………….... 6 ii. Impacts of Land & Assets Acquisition on affected peoples…………………………………. ……… 7 iii. Projects Impacts on poor, Different Ethnic groups, and other vulnerable groups………… 11 iv. Gender and Resettlement Impacts………………………………………………………………………………. 12 E. Information Disclosure, Consultation and Participation…………………………………………… 12 i. Project Stakeholders……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 Table 4: List of Stakeholders at each Bridge site ……………………………………………………… 13 ii. Consultation & Participation Mechanisms……………………………………………………………………. 13 iii. Activities undertaken to disseminate Project & Resettlement Information……………….. 13 Table 5: Key Dissemination and Resettlement Information Activities………. ………….. 14 iv. Results of Consultations with affected people……………………………………………………………. 14 v. Disclosure of the draft resettlement plan………………………………………………………………… 15 vi. Planned information disclosure measures during project implementation………………… 16 F. Grievance Redress Mechanism……………………………………………………………………………... 16 G. Legal Framework………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 i. National & Local Laws & ADB Policy requirements…………………………………………………..… 17 Table 6: Comparison of PNG Laws & ADB Policy & Gap –Filling Measures…………….. 20 ii. Resettlement Policy Principles for the project…………………………………………………………… 20 iii. Principles and Methodologies for determining valuations and compensation rates… 21 iv. Description of Land Acquisition…………………………………………………………………………………… 22 H. Entitlements, Assistance & Benefits……………………………………………………………………… 23 i. Displaced Persons Eligibility for Entitlements……………………………………………………………. 23 Package 1: Sub-project II – Three Bridges on Hiritano Highway I L 2783/2784 PNG: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR IMPROVED RURAL ACCESS PROJECT (BRIRAP) Table 7: Summary of Eligibility and Entitlement Criteria Matrix for DPs………………… 24 Table 8: Entitlement for Entitled Persons………….……………………………………………………. 24 ii. Assistance to Vulnerable Groups……………………………………………………………………………. 25 iii. Opportunities for affected persons to derive appropriate development benefits…. 25 I. Relocation of physical Structures………………………………………………………………………… 26 i. Options for relocating physical structures……………………………………………………………….. 26 Table 9: Physical Structures for Relocation…………………………………………………………… ii. Consideration of Alternative relocation sites…………………………………………………………… 26 iii. Time Table for site preparation and transfer…………………………………………………………… 26 iv. Legal requirements to regularise tenure and transfer title………………………………………. 26 v. Measures to assist displaced persons………………………………………………………………………. 27 J. Income Restoration and Rehabilitation……………………………………………………………….. 27 i. Possible Livelihood Risks…………………………………………………………………………………………… 27 ii. Income Restoration Program…………………………………………………………………………………… 28 iii. Special Measures to support vulnerable groups……………………………………………………… 28 iv. Specific gender considerations………………………………………………………………………………… 29 v. Suggested Training Programs………………………………………………………………………………….. 29 K. Resettlement Budget & Financing Plan……………………………………………………………….. 30 i. Itemised budget for Resettlement activities……………………………………………………………… 30 Table 10: Resettlement Budget………………………………………………………………………………… 30 Table 11: Resettlement Support Services Budget…………………………………………………….. 31 ii. Flow of funds……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31 iii. Justification for calculating compensation rates and other cost estimates………………… 31 iv. Sources of Financing…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31 L. Institutional Arrangements…………………………………………………………………………………… 32 i. Responsibilities and mechanisms for carrying out Resettlement Plan……………………….. 32 ii. Institutional capacity building program……………………………………………………………………… 33 iii. Role of Civil Society Groups……………………………………………………………………………………….. 33 iv. Involvement of Women’s groups in Resettlement Planning and Management…………. 33 M. Implementation Schedule……………………………………………………………………………………… 34 Table 12: Implementation Schedule (PPTA Report)…………………………………………………. 34 Table 13: Implementation Schedule Update…………………………………………………………….. 35 N. Monitoring &Reporting………………………………………………………………………………………………. 36 Table 14: Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators………………………………………………………. 37 Package 1: Sub-project II – Three Bridges on Hiritano Highway II L 2783/2784 PNG: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR IMPROVED RURAL ACCESS PROJECT (BRIRAP) Tables Table 1: Summary of Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix for DPs…………………………… 2 Table 2: Bridge span and estimated cost of new bridge replacement…………………… 3 Table 3: Scope of Land Acquisition………………………………………………………………………… 5 Table 4: List of Ethnic stakeholders at Bridge sites…………………………………………….. 13 Table 5: Key Dissemination &Resettlement Information Activities………………........ 14 Table 6: Comparison of GoPNG Laws & ADB –Policy & Gap – Filling Measures…… 20 Table 7: Summary of Eligibility and Entitlement Criteria Matrix DPs…………..………. 24 Table 8: Entitlements for Entitled Persons……………………………………………………………. 24 Table 9: Physical Structures for Relocation…………………………………………………………… 26 Table 10: Resettlement Budget……………………………………………………………………………….. 30 Table 11: Resettlement Support Services Budget……………………………………………………. 31 Table 12: Implementation Schedule 1..…………………………………………………………………… 34 Table 13: Implementation Schedule 2…………..…………………………………………………………… 35 Table 14: Draft Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators……………………………………………… 37 Appendices Appendix I: Socio-Economic Survey Questionnaire .………………………………………………..… 38 Appendix II: Public Information Bulletin……………………………………………………………………….. 39 Appendix III: Cadastral Survey Plan: Laloki Bridge…………………………………………………………. 40 Appendix IV: Cadastral Survey Plan: Brown River Bridge……………………………………………… 41 Appendix V: Cadastral Survey Plan: Angabanga Bridge………………………………………………… 42 Appendix VI: Land Investigation and Land Valuation Report: Laloki……………………………… 43 Appendix VII: Land Investigation and Land Valuation Report : Brown River…………………… 44 Appendix VIII: Land Investigation and Land Valuation Report: Angabanga…………………….. 45 Appendix IX: Improvement and Crop Valuation Report: Laloki…………………………………… 46 Appendix X: Improvement and Crop Valuation Report: Brown River………………………… 51 Appendix XI: Improvement and Crop Valuation Report: Angabanga…………………………. 56 Appendix XII: Contract of Sale between Niure Badia & the State: Laloki...................... 62 Appendix XIII: Contract of Sale between Annie Panchan & State:
Recommended publications
  • Financial Inclusion and Financial Capability
    Financial Inclusion and Financial Capability in Morobe and Madang Provinces, Papua New Guinea Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized An initial report of the Papua New Guinea Public Disclosure Authorized National Financial Capability Survey Bank of Papua New Guinea Institute of National Affairs 9363_PNG FinancialCapacitySurvey_1601939_CVR.indd 1 11/19/15 8:17 AM Bank of Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea Institute for National Affairs The World Bank Financial Inclusion and Financial Capability in Morobe and Madang Provinces Papua New Guinea An initial report of the Papua New Guinea National Financial Capability Survey This Project is financially supported by the Korean Poverty Reduction and Socio-Economic Development Trust Fund II 9363_PNG FinancialCapacitySurvey_1601939_CH00_FM.indd 1 11/18/15 10:15 AM Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ISBN 9980-77-182-8 National Library Service—Papua New Guinea First published: June 2015 Published by: Institute of National Affairs P.O. Box 1530 Port Moresby NCD Papua New Guinea Copyright: This report is a joint product of the project team composed of staff and consultants from Bank of Papua New Guinea, the Institute of National Affairs and The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the authors and should do not necessarily reflect the views of Board of the Bank of Papua New Guinea, the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent, or the Board of Institute of National Affairs. The Bank of Papua New Guinea, Institute of National Affairs, and The World Bank do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea Trans-Island Highway Construction Project (I) (II) Report Date: February 2003 Field Survey: October – November 2002 1
    Papua New Guinea Trans-Island Highway Construction Project (I) (II) Report Date: February 2003 Field Survey: October – November 2002 1. Project Profile and Japan’s ODA Loan Wewack Indonesia Papua New Guinea Lae Project site Port Moresby Australia Project site Section of the Bereina-Malalaua Road 1.1 Background In Papua New Guinea (PNG), the absence of road links between its capital, Port Moresby, the second city, Lae, and the Highland Province, home to vigorous mining and agricultural production activity, meant a sole reliance on marine and air transport, a situation that was highly inefficient both in economic and social terms. To address this, the government formulated plans to construct a road linking the cities of Port Moresby and Lae that would pass through the Owen Stanley mountains, and in 1979, the Australian government supported the implementation of a feasibility study (F/S) for this route. The plan for the trans-island Port Moresby – Lae highway comprised a stretch spanning 575 kilometers, and included construction of a new 80 kilometer road between Bereina and Malalaua, detailed designs for the 135 kilometer section between Malalaua and Aseki, and widening of the existing 90 kilometer stretch between Aseki and Latep (all distances are approximate). Other sections were excluded from the plan. In the southern Bereina-Malalaua section that was covered by this project, local residents were dependent upon marine transport, a situation that was, in fact, akin to living on an isolated inland islands. It was anticipated that the construction of a new road linking the area with the capital Port Moresby, would make a substantial contribution to economic development and to improving the services like health and education.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Action Plan Papua New Guinea
    Resettlement Action Plan Final Report December 2014 Papua New Guinea: Bridge Replacement for Improved Rural Access Sector Project-Hiritano Highway, Central Province Prepared by Department of Works-ADB Projects Coordination Branch for the Government of Papua New Guinea and the Asian Development Bank. This Resettlement Action Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA DEPARTMENT OF WORKS L2783/2784 PNG: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR IMPROVED RURAL ACCESS SECTOR PROJECT (BRIRAP) Resettlement Plan Update – Hiritano Highway November 2014 Document Stage: Final Project Number: L2783/2784 - PNG November 2014 Prepared by Department of Works, Port Moresby, for the Asian Development Bank The Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and are final updates. HIRITANO HIGHWAY RESETTLEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 2014 Page 1 Contents GLOSSARY OF TERMS ..................................................................................................... 6 A: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers Perceptions' of Teacher Appointments in the Central Province
    THE NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE PAPUA NEW GUINEA DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 135 TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS’ OF TEACHER APPOINTMENTS IN THE CENTRAL PROVINCE NRI The National Research Institute The National Research Institute Discussion Paper No. 135 Teachers’ Perceptions of Teacher Appointments in the Central Province by Arnold Kukari, Patricia Paraide, Kapa Kelep-Malpo, Sebastian Mugup and Wilson Pes NRI The National Research Institute ii First published in November 2012 Copyright © 2012 The National Research Institute. NRI Discussion Paper No. 135 The NRI is an independent statutory authority established by an Act of Parliament in 1988 and confirmed by the IASER (Amendment) Act 1993. NRI’s main aims are to undertake research into the social, political, economic, educational, legal, environmental, and cultural issues and problems of Papua New Guinea and to formulate practical solutions to these problems. Research results are published in the following NRI publication series: Monographs Spotlight with NRI Discussion Papers Post-Courier Index Special Publications Bibliographies Occasional Papers Additional Publications Direct any inquiries regarding these publications to: The Publications Sales Coordinator National Research Institute P.O. Box 5854 BOROKO. NCD. 111 Papua New Guinea Tel: (675) 326 0300/326 0061 Fax: (675) 326 0213 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.nri.org.pg ISBN 9980 75 219 X National Library Service of Papua New Guinea ABCDE 20165432 The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National
    [Show full text]
  • Water Law and the Nature of Customary Water Rights in Papua New Guinea
    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year 1998 Water law and the nature of customary water rights in Papua New Guinea Lawrence Kuna Kalinoe University of Wollongong Kalinoe, Lawrence Kuna, Water law and the nature of customary water rights in Papua New Guinea, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Wollongong, 1998. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1862 This paper is posted at Research Online. Water Law And the Nature of Customary Water Rights in Papua New Guinea LAWRENCE KUNA KALINOE Faculty of Law University of WoUongong February 1998 A thesis submitted in fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of WoUongong. Certification I certify that the substance of this thesis has not been submitted for any degree and is not being submitted currently for any other degree. I certify that any help received in preparing this thesis, and all sources used have been acknowledged. Lawrence Kuna Kalinoe 11 Abstract Majority of the indigenous people in Papua New Guinea (about 87 per cent) live on their customary land by engaging in fishing, hunting, gathering and subsistence agriculture for their daily sustenance. Water is obtained directly from rivers, lakes, and other watercourses. At present, Papua New Guinea is undergoing rapid economic growth in forestry, agroforestry, mining, and petroleum development activities. Most (if not all) of these natural resources development activities are conducted on customary land and in and around the environment in which the majority of the indigenous peoples live and on which they rely for their subsistence way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Review: Mining in the South Pacific Vol. 8, No. 1
    Press review: Mining in the South Pacific Vol. 8, No. 1, January – February 2016, 72 pages Compilation: Dr. Roland Seib, Hobrechtstr. 28, 64285 Darmstadt, Germany http://www.roland-seib.de/mining.html Copyright: The material is copyrighted by the media and authors quoted. Abbreviations in common use: BCL: Bougainville Copper Limited LNG: Liquid Natural Gas PIR: Pacific Islands Report PNG: Papua New Guinea Websites: Pacific Islands Report: http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/graphics.shtml PNG Post-Courier: http://www.postcourier.com.pg PNG The National. http://www.thenational.com.pg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Russian deal a shot-in-the arm for Fiji Venkat Raman, Indian Newslink, February 29, 2016 2 Fiji’s decision to purchase military weapons from the Russian Federation and the recent delivery of equipment in 25 containers not only demonstrated the Pacific country’s right to self-determination but also stupefied New Zealand and Australia, among others. International media was awash with varying interpretations to the latest development in this otherwise peaceful region. The Opposition in Fiji cried foul and said that arms had come into the country illegally and that there was no discus- sion about any military purchases, but none of these would impact on the thinking of the govern- ment led by Prime Minister Voreqe (Frank) Bainimarama. Pact in Moscow According to information made available to us, the seal to the deal was made when Mr Bainimara- ma visited Moscow in June 2013 and discussed bilateral relations and Fiji’s defense needs with his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Radio Tarana said that the deal, valued at $19 million is seen as an attempt by Russia to gain a foothold in the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Posts About Petromin on Papua New Guinea Mine Watch
    9/12/2016 Posts about Petromin on Papua New Guinea Mine Watch Posts about Petromin on Papua New Guinea Mine Watch Tolukuma mine owners deny profitering in sale to Singapore nightclub company One of the Singapore nightclubs owned by LifeBrandz Asidokona Mining Resources, the owner of Tolukuma mine, has put out a press release [see below] trying to calm fears over the proposed sale of the mine to a Singapore nightclub company and denying any profiteering. Asidokona is a Singapore company owned by financial speculator Philip Soh Sai Kiang (also known as Soh Sai Kiang, Mr Soh and Mr Kiang). Asidokona is the sole shareholder and owner of Tolukuma Gold Mines Ltd which it bought from Petromin for around K80 million in November 2015. Asidokona is now proposing to sell Tolukuma Gold Mines to another Singapore based company, LifeBrandz for US$212 million. But this will not signal the end of the involvement for Asidokona and Soh Sai Kiang, as LifeBrandz will pay for the purchase of Tolukuma Gold Mines by issuing shares in LifeBrandz to Asidokona. Asidokona will then become the largest shareholder in LifeBrandz which will in turn own TGM. Asidokona denies any “exchange of cash or profiteering by the shareholders of ASK” but the simple truth is they are making a huge profit – selling a mine they bought from Petromin for K80 million to LifeBrandz in exchange for shares worth US$212 million (around K670 million), shares which they will then be free to sell for cash. Rather tellingly, Asidokona says two of the main benefits of the sale will be be the short
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Rural Water Supply 1
    PROPOSED RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION PROGRAMME FOR CENTRAL PROVINCE PAPUA NEW GUINEA (1985 - 1990) MARCH 1985 • '· CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY l. Table A 11 l. lNTRODUCT ION 1 . l Background .....•••.•..........•... .....••....••..... 1 'l. PROJECT AREA l 2.1 Topography l 2.2 Rainfall 1 3. POPULATION 2 3.1 General 2 3.2 Population within project area 2 4. ~XISTING SITUATION 3 4. l General 3 4.2 Organization •...•• 3 L~. 3 Existing facilities 3 ,­ _1. PROJECT AREA SURVEY 4 5.1 General ..... 4 5.2 Objectives of the survey 4 .).3 Data collection ••.•••••••. 4 6. FINDINGS 5 6.1 General 5 6.2 Village water supplies 5 6.3 Village sanitation 9 6.4 Community schools 10 7. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT ll 7.1 General ............ 11 7.2 Village water supply 12 7.3 Priority villages 14 7.4 Village sanitation 14 7.5 Community schools 15 8. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED PROGRAMME RECOMMENDATIONS 1.6 Cl. 1 Genera 1 .....•... , .•. , ..•.... 16 8.2 Viilage water. supply systems 16 8.3 Sanitation •.••..•............ 17 8.4 Community school water supplies 18 8.5 Community school - sanitation 19 8.6 Programme implementation/support prograrmne 19 8.7 Re-organization of Environmental Health Department 21 8.8 Training needs ....•.....•...•••....•..•..•........ 23 9. WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE 24 9.1 Background ...•..•••••••••••• 24 9.2 Method of analysis 24 9.3 Proposed monitoring and surveillance plan for Central Province 24 9.4 New water sources .•••••. 25 9.5 Costs ..................... 25 10. SUMMARY 25 ,. - 2 - Page 11. ANNEXES ANNEX 1 Master List of Villages •.........•...• . .•.•. l ANNEX 2 Sanitation Excreta Disposal •••.••.••••.•.••• 6 ANNEX 3 Questionnaire .
    [Show full text]
  • 1-Tok-Kaunselin Helpim Lain Service Provider Directory 2017
    1-Tok Kaunselin Helpim Lain - 7150 8000 - Service Provider Directory A special thank you is extended to consultant Helen Haro who supported this work in partnership with ChildFund Papua New Guinea and to the 1-Tok Kaunselin Helpim Lain Counsellors who travelled to a range of provinces to carry out awareness with services across the referral network and collect new contact details. Thank you to all of the service providers across the network who work with the 1-Tok Kaunselin Helpim Lain to support survivors of gender based violence across Papua New Guinea. The 1-Tok Kaunselin Helpim Lain is a partnership between ChildFund Papua New Guinea, FSVAC (CIMC) and FHI 360, supported by the New Zealand Aid Programme, USAID, ChildFund New Zealand and ChildFund Australia. ChildFund Papua New Guinea ChildFund Papua New Guinea works in partnership with children and their communities to create lasting and meaningful change by supporting long-term community development and promoting child rights. ChildFund Papua New Guinea PO Box 671, Gordons NCD T: +675 323 2544 D: +675 7030 0297 W: www.childfund.org.au 1-Tok Kaunselin Helpim Lain - 7150 8000 - Service Provider Directory Contents Introduction to the 1-Tok Kaunselin Helpim Lain 3 The 1-Tok Kaunselin Helpim Lain Service Provider Directory 4 National Capital District 5 Bougainville 9 Central 12 Chimbu 13 Eastern Highlands 15 East New Britain 15 East Sepik 16 Enga 17 Gulf 18 Hela 18 Jiwaka 18 Madang 19 Manus 19 Milne Bay 20 Morobe 20 New Ireland 21 Oro 22 Sandaun 22 Southern Highlands 23 Western 23 Western
    [Show full text]
  • (COVID-19) Papua New Guinea Situation Report 23
    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Papua New Guinea Situation Report 23 31 May 2020 ThisThis Situation Health Situation Report is Reportissued twiceon coronavirus a week (Tuesday disease and2019 Friday) (COVID by-19) the is National issued by Emergency the PNG National Operations Department Center (NEOC) of Health for the(NDoH) coronavirus ONCE a disease WEEK. This2019 (COVID-19). The Report is not comprehensiveReport is not andcomprehensive covers information and covers that information we have as thatof reporting we have date. as of reporting date. HIGHLIGHTS GLOBAL SITUATION IN NUMBERS ❑ Papua New Guinea has eight cases of COVID-19, to date: six cases were mild and have fully The numbers are based on WHO Situation recovered; two were moderate cases, admitted Report as of 31 May 2020. to hospital and recovered, one of which was repatriated. Globally: 5 934 936 confirmed cases 367 166 deaths ❑ On 27 May, the PNG Defence Force (PNGDF) launched an aerial system of drones to be used Western Pacific Region: for surveillance in border and maritime 181 665 confirmed cases provinces. The Australian Defence Force (ADF) 7 028 deaths has supported and enhanced the work of PNG military with modern technology offered Countries/territories/areas affected: 216 together with training. Papua New Guinea: 8 confirmed cases ❑ On 28 May, NDoH led by A/Health Secretary Dr (all recovered) Paison Dakulala and WHO convened the 2nd East New Britain: 2 confirmed cases weekly virtual meeting with the CEOs of the Morobe: 1 confirmed case (repatriated) Provincial Health Authorities, to discuss the NCD: 1 confirmed case ongoing health sector preparedness and Western Province: 3 confirmed case response for COVID-19 and discuss ways forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Project on Assessment of Financial Capability of Low Income
    PROJECTOJECT ON ON ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT OF FINANCIAL OF FINANCIAL CAPABILITY CAPABILITY OF LOW INCOME OF LOW INCOMEHOUSEHOLDS HOUSEHOLDS IN PNG IN PNG PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT April 2013 Institute of National Affairs 0 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 3 TRANSLATION ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Hiri Motu ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Tok Pisin ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Technical Review Committee ............................................................................................................... 5 SAMPLING ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sampling Design .................................................................................................................................... 6 Major Rural Livelihood Types ................................................................................................................ 8 FIELD SURVEY .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Expenditure, Decentralisation and Service Delivery in Papua New Guinea
    Public Expenditure, Decentralisation and Service Delivery in Papua New Guinea: Tracking Budgets to Health Clinics Colin Wiltshire A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Australian National University October © Copyright by Colin James Wiltshire All Rights Reserved Declaration (i) This thesis comprises my original work towards the PhD except where indicated. (ii) Acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other materials used. (iii) The thesis is fewer than , words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. Colin Wiltshire October iii Dedication For the people of Deigam Village. v Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to colleagues, family, and friends who provided exceptional guidance and personal support to me throughout my PhD candidature. I would like to firstly thank my primary supervisor, Associate Professor Nicole Haley. Without her kind‐hearted encouragement and strong commitment to my research I may never have started, let alone managed to submit, this thesis. Professor Stephen Howes, my work supervisor for a significant part of my candidature and thesis panel member, demonstrated to me the leadership and dedication required to produce influential research. Academics from the State, Society and Governance in Melanesia Program (SSGM) in the Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs at the Australian National University (ANU) provided the ideal multi‐disciplinary academic unit for me to pursue my research. In particular, I thank my PhD panel members from SSGM. Associate Professor Richard Eves always found the time to provide considered advice and gave me the confidence to trust my own research and writing abilities. Anthony Regan provided both encouragement and critical feedback based on his immense knowledge of my subject matter, which challenged me to think deeply about how I interpreted my research findings.
    [Show full text]