Treatment of Comminuted Fractures of the Base of the Thumb Metacarpal Using a Cemented Bone-K-Wire Frame

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Treatment of Comminuted Fractures of the Base of the Thumb Metacarpal Using a Cemented Bone-K-Wire Frame Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation 38 (2019) 44–51 Available online at ScienceDirect www.sciencedirect.com Original article Treatment of comminuted fractures of the base of the thumb metacarpal using a cemented bone-K-wire frame Traitement des fractures comminutives de la base du premier me´tacarpien graˆce a` un cadre os-broches-ciment W. Duan, X. Zhang, Y. Yu, Z. Zhang *, X. Shao, W. Du Department of Hand Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, PR China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: We aimed to describe the treatment of comminuted fractures of the base of the thumb metacarpal using a Received 13 June 2018 cemented bone-K-wire frame. Between March 2010 and January 2016, 41 fractures of the base of the thumb Received in revised form 8 August 2018 were treated using a cemented bone-K-wire frame. The mean age of the patients was 34 years. The patients’ Accepted 7 September 2018 history included a fall onto the hand in 7 cases, direct trauma in 31 cases, and polytrauma with an unclear Available online 11 October 2018 mechanism of injury in 3 cases. At the final follow-up, hand grip and pinch strength were measured using a dynamometer. All measurements were compared with those of the opposite hand. The patients were assessed Keywords: functionally using the Smith and Cooney score.All K-wires were left in place until the bone healed. Bone healing Cemented K-wire frame was achieved in all thumbs in an average of 5.2 weeks. Follow-up averaged 27 months. The mean hand pinch External fixator Rolando fracture andgripstrengthwas8.7 kg Æ 2.4 kgand38.4 kg Æ 5.9 kg,respectively.Themeanmeasurementsontheopposite Thumb side were 9.2 kg Æ 2.5 kg and 40.2 kg Æ 6.6 kg, respectively. Based on the Smith and Cooney score,[13_TD$IF] we obtained an Range of motion averagescoreof87 Æ 9.3,with25excellent,9good,and2fairresults.Thecementedbone-K-wireframeisanexternal fixator alternative that can be used for treating comminuted intra-articular fractures of the base of the thumb metacarpal. The system is cheap, easy to apply, and provides rigid fixation, resulting in good functional recovery. C 2018 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of SFCM. RE´ SUME´ Mots cle´s: Notre objectif e´tait d’introduire le traitement des fractures comminutives de la base du premier Cadre os-broche-ciment me´tacarpien a` l’aide d’un cadre os-broches-ciment. De mars 2010 a` janvier 2016, 41 fractures de la base du Fixateur externe pouce ont e´te´ traite´s en utilisant le cadre os-broches-ciment. L’aˆge moyen des patients e´tait de 34 ans. Fracture de Rolando L’histoire raconte´e par les patients de´crivait une chute sur la main dans 7 cas, un traumatisme direct dans Pouce 31 cas, et un polytraumatisme avec un me´canisme peu clair de la le´sion dans 3 cas. Au recul final, les forces Amplitude de mouvements de poigne et de pince ont e´te´ mesure´es a` l’aide d’un dynamome`tre. Toutes les mesures ont e´te´ compare´es avec celles de la main oppose´e. Les patients ont e´te´ e´value´s sur le plan fonctionnel graˆce au score de Smith et Cooney. Toutes les broches de Kirschner ont e´te´ laisse´es en place jusqu’a` la consolidation osseuse. Celle-ci a e´te´ obtenue dans tous les pouces en 5,2 semaines en moyenne. Le recul moyen e´tait de 27 mois. Les forces moyennes de poigne et de pince e´taient respectivement de 8,7 kg Æ 2,4 kg et de 38,4 kg Æ 5,9 kg, pour des chiffres moyens du coˆte´ oppose´ respectivement de 9,2 kg Æ 2,5 kg et de 40,2 kg Æ 6,6 kg. Sur la base du score de Smith et Cooney, nous avons obtenu un score moyen de 87 Æ 9,3, correspondant a` 25 excellents, 9 bons et 2 moyens re´sultats. Le cadre os-broches-ciment est un fixateur externe intelligent et peut eˆtre une alternative pour le traitement des fractures articulaires comminutives de la base du premier me´tacarpien. Le syste`me est bon marche´, facile a` appliquer et offre une fixation rigide, permettant une bonne re´cupe´ration fonctionnelle. C 2018 Publie´ par Elsevier Masson SAS au nom de SFCM. * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (Z. Zhang). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2018.09.005 2468-1229/ C 2018 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of SFCM. W. Duan et al. / Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation 38 (2019) 44–51 45 1. Introduction skeletal immaturity (n = 1); combined tendon or neurovascular injury(n = 2); Thumb metacarpal fractures make up almost 25% of all extra-articular fracture (n = 5); metacarpal fractures [1]. Approximately 80% of thumb fractures old fractures exceeding 14 days; involve the metacarpal base and 20% of thumb basal fractures are diabetes, gout, ganglion, or bone tumors; intra-articular [2]. Comminuted fractures are usually treated [135_TD$IF] declined to participate in the study. surgically because it is difficult to maintain reduction with a cast [3]. The best treatment is still debated. Owing to the advantages of Thus, a total of 41 patients (41 thumbs) were analyzed for this minimally invasive procedures, closed and percutaneous reduction study (Table 1). and fixation may be a worthy strategy. Preoperative radiographs and CT images were obtained in all Fractures at the base of the thumb metacarpal are classified into patients (Fig. 1A–E). All procedures were performed by the same four types: Bennett fracture, Rolando fracture, comminuted senior hand surgeon using the same surgical technique. fracture, and extra-articular fracture [4]. The Rolando fracture was first described in 1910 by Silvio Rolando [5]. It consists of three 2.1. Surgical technique distinct fragments and is typically Y-shaped. This term now includes essentially all comminuted fractures of the base of thumb The procedure was performed under brachial plexus block metacarpal [6]. Therefore, we combined Rolando fractures and without tourniquet control. First, the intra-articular fracture of comminuted fractures into one group in our study. thumb base was reduced with axial traction in most cases (Fig. 2A). For the treatment of comminuted fractures, there are various Otherwise, adequate reduction could be achieved with the aid of surgical procedures, including open reduction and internal fixation percutaneous leveraging, hooking and joystick techniques (Fig. 2B, (ORIF) with K-wires [7], ORIF with Herbert screws, external C). Intra-articular reduction was verified under fluoroscopy as fixation, closed reduction with percutaneous K-wire fixation [8,9], needed. Second, we inserted an axial 1.0 mm K-wire into the oblique traction with a K-wire and splinting [10,11]. Although ORIF metacarpal, from the head to the base, to maintain the reduction can achieve good reduction, the major drawbacks are tendon temporarily (Fig. 2D). Third, two or three K-wires (1.0–1.5 mm) adhesions, wound infection, and decreased vascularity. were inserted into the basal fragments to maintain the intra- A mini plate-and-screw system can achieve more rigid fixation, articular reduction (Fig. 3A). Fourth, we inserted two K-wires (1.0– which allows almost full joint motion soon after surgery. However, 1.25 mm) into the distal fragment in a transverse manner. We the extensive dissection required carries a high risk of nonunion, inserted another two K-wires into the trapezium in a transverse infection, tendon excursion limitation and stiffness, as well as manner (Fig. 3B, C). During insertion, care was taken to avoid higher treatment costs and the need for secondary implant injuring the tendon and neurovascular structures (Fig. 4A). removal [12]. Longitudinal pinning is typically unable to maintain Acceptable K-wire positioning was confirmed under fluoroscopy satisfactory reduction [13]. An external fixator can be used to on Kapandji’s[136_TD$IF] six views [17]. The K-wires were bent about 1.5 cm achieve rigid fixation with the advantages of restoring the length of distal to the skin, toward the fracture site. The monomer (liquid) the metacarpal and controlling rotation [14]. However, owing to and polymer (powder) components of bone cement (Palacos1,[132_TD$IF] the inherent weakness in the design of small devices, mini-fixators Hanau, Germany) were mixed. The bone cement’s[137_TD$IF] viscosity are difficult to assemble, especially for a small thumb base and changed over time from a runny liquid into dough-like state that small bone fragments [15]. Usually, a maximum of four pins can be was applied to the K-wire ends, and then finally hardened into inserted. External fixators are expensive. To get around these solid material (Fig. 4B, C). The distance between the cement glob drawbacks, we used K-wires and bone cement to create a clever and skin was about 1 cm. The axial K-wire for temporary fixation external frame. Ebelin et al. [16] were the first to use bone cement was removed. Acceptable fracture reduction and alignment was and K-wires to build an external fixator. Ebelin’s[134_TD$IF] study encom- confirmed on radiographs. If the articular surface was still passed thumb to little finger injuries, and their surgical procedures displaced, complete reduction was achieved with the aid of included fixation of various fractures and joint fusion, as well as percutaneous techniques using a K-wire and arthroscope. compression and traction of phalanges. Their study did not specifically focus on thumb basal fractures. The purpose of this retrospective study was to report on closed Table 1 reduction and percutaneous fixation for the treatment of Demographic data for the patients.
Recommended publications
  • Approach to Hand Conditions
    Approach to Hand Conditions Alphonsus Chong Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore Senior Consultant, Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore http://bit.ly/39fuCIK [email protected] Scope • Introduction – Slides at http://bit.ly/39fuCIK • And other material at: https://nus.edu/2Mh4e4s • Physical examination http://bit.ly/39fuCIK : these slides • Traumatic injuries – open and closed • Peripheral nerve problems • Masses in the hand and wrist • Tendinopathy and tendinitis • Deformity https://nus.edu/2Mh4e4s: hand wiki 3 History Taking • Pain – different aspects • Handedness • Deformity • Job v – Congenital • Hobbies – Acquired - ? Traumatic • Previous injury/ surgery • Decreased rangev of motion • Weakness • For acute trauma/conditions: • Numbness – Last meal v • Others e.g. triggering, instability – Mechanism of injury – Time/date of injury Expose both sides: subcutaneous border Scars, wasting, deformity of ulna and elbow- rheumatoid nodules Completeness and fluidity of motion Scars, wasting, deformity Quick Nerve Screen Median Nerve Radial Nerve Ulnar nerve Traumatic Injuries – Open Injuries Open traumatic injuries are a staple work of hand surgeons. Assessment of Hand – Work through the tissues (see Apley) • Skin – note size and types of wounds • Vessels - circulation • Nerves – sensation and motor • Muscle and Tendons – individual flexor and extensor tendon testing • Bones & Joints – appropriate x-rays to assess fractures/ dislocation What do you see? • LOOK • LOOK – Loss of cascade •
    [Show full text]
  • Listen to the Associated Podcast Episodes: MSK: Fractures for the ABR Core Exam Parts 1-3, Available at Theradiologyreview.Com O
    MSK: Fractures for Radiology Board Study, Matt Covington, MD Listen to the associated podcast episodes: MSK: Fractures for the ABR Core Exam Parts 1-3, available Listen to associated Podcast episodes: ABR Core Exam, Multisystemic Diseases Parts 1-3, available at at theradiologyreview.com or on your favorite podcast directory. Copyrighted. theradiologyreview.com or on your favorite podcast direcry. Fracture resulting From abnormal stress on normal bone = stress Fracture Fracture From normal stress on abnormal bone = insuFFiciency Fracture Scaphoid Fracture site with highest risk for avascular necrosis (proximal or distal)? Proximal pole scaphoid Fractures are at highest risk For AVN Comminuted Fracture at the base oF the First metacarpal = Rolando Fracture Non-comminuted Fracture at base oF the First metacarpal = Bennett Fracture The pull oF which tendon causes the dorsolateral dislocation in a Bennett fracture? The abductor pollicus longus tendon. Avulsion Fracture at the base oF the proximal phalanx with ulnar collateral ligament disruption = Gamekeeper’s thumb. Same Fracture but adductor tendon becomes caught in torn edge oF the ulnar collateral ligament? Stener’s lesion. IF Stener’s lesion is present this won’t heal on its own so you need surgery. You shouldn’t image a Gamekeeper’s thumb with stress views because you can convert it to a Stener’s lesion. Image with MRI instead. Distal radial Fracture with dorsal angulation = Colle’s Fracture (C to D= Colle’s is Dorsal) Distal radial Fracture with volar angulation = Smith’s Fracture (S
    [Show full text]
  • Metacarpal Fractures
    METACARPAL FRACTURES BY LORYN P. WEINSTEIN, MD, AND DOUGLAS P. HANEL, MD The majority of metacarpal fractures are closed injuries amenable to conservative treatment with external immobilization and subsequent rehabilitation. Internal fixation is favored for unstable fracture patterns and patients who require early motion. Percutaneous pinning usually is successful for metacarpal neck fractures and comminuted head fractures. Shaft and base fractures can be treated with pinning or open reduction and internal fixation; the latter, being more rigid, allows early rehabilitation. External fixation has a limited yet defined role for metacarpal fractures with complex soft-tissue injury and/or segmental bone loss. The recent development of bioabsorbable implants holds promise for skeletal rigidity with minimal soft-tissue morbidity, but long-term in vivo data support- ing the use of these implants is not currently available. Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand arly treatment of metacarpal fractures was lim- Surgical techniques rapidly expanded to include ret- ited to the only tools available: manipulation rograde fracture pinning, intramedullary pinning, and Eand casting. The discovery of percutaneous transfixion pinning. Many of the K-wires in use today fracture fixation near the turn of the century opened have the same diamond-shaped tip and sizing speci- up a new world of possibilities. It was 25 years after fications as the original design. Bennett’s original manuscript that Lambotte de- The first plate and screw set for the hand was scribed the first surgical stabilization of a basilar introduced in the late 1930s. By today’s standards, the thumb fracture by using a thin carpenter’s nail.1 By Hermann Metacarpal Bone Set was quite lean; it 1913, Lambotte had authored a fracture text with included 3 longitudinal plates of 2, 3, and 4 holes, a multiple examples of pinning, wiring, and plating of drill, screwdriver, and 9 screws.1 Improvements in hand fractures.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Rolando and Bennett Fractures Treatment with Pin And
    Int J Med Invest 2019; Volume 8; Number 4; 85-90 http://www.intjmi.com Brief Report Management of Rolando and Bennett Fractures Treatment with Pin and Plaster (A New Technique) Masoud Shayesteh Azar 1, Mohammad Hossein Kariminasab 1*, Salman Ghaffari 1, Mani Mahmoudi 2, Abolfazl Kazemi 3, Shadi Shayesteh Azar 4. 1. Associated Professor of orthopedic surgery, Orthopedic Research center, Mazandaran university of medical science, Sari, Iran . 2. Assistant professor of orthopedic surgery, Orthopedic Research center, Mazandaran university of medical science, Sari, Iran. 3. Orthopedic resident, Orthopedic Research center, Mazandaran university of medical science, Sari, Iran 4. Medical Student, Ramsar International University, Mazandaran, Iran. *correspondence: Mohammad Hossein Kariminasab, Associated Professor of orthopedic surgery, Orthopedic Research center, Mazandaran university of medical science, Sari, Iran. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Intra-articular fractures of Thumb are the most common fractures occurred in children and elderly; divided into Bennett & Rolando fractures. The purpose of this article is to introduce new approach for these fractures. In this approach, after pre-surgery techniques; a 1.5-2 mm pin is placed in the proximal distal phalanx. Next, the best reduction is achieved by imposing pulling through the pin and rotating motion under C-Arm. Short forearm cast is then used after that cast changing to thumb Spica cast and the pin is incorporated in the cast, the position of thumb during casting in abduction and pronation depends on the reduction under C-Arm. After the operation, the reduction is controlled by radiography. Within 4-6 weeks, the cast is removed, the pin is taken out, and active and passive joint movements begin.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonly Missed Orthopedic Injuries
    Commonly Missed Orthopedic Injuries Holly Adams, PA-C Galveston-Texas City VA Outpatient Clinic Missed Orthopedic Injuries • Overlooking orthopedic injuries is a leading cause of medical malpractice claims out of the ED. • Am J Emergency Med 1996. 14(4):341-5. Karcz et al, 1996. • Massachusetts Joint Underwriters Association: Missed fractures comprised 20% (during1980-1987) and 10% (1988-1990) of malpractice claims. • Fractures are 2nd in claim amount and number of cases established against ED physicians. Radiographics Commonly Missed • Wei (Taipei, Acta Radiol 2006) identified specific regions of misinterpretation: • Foot 7.6% 18/238 • Knee 6.3% 14/224 • Elbow 6.0% 14/234 • Hand 5.4% 10/185 • Wrist 4.1% 25/606 • Hip 3.9% 20/512 • Ankle 2.8% 8/282 • Shoulder 1.9% 5/266 • Tibia/fibula 0.4% 1/226 • Total 3.7% 115/3081 Pitfalls of ER X-Rays • Incorrect interpretation (interpretation errors) • Inadequate (suboptimal) images • Over‐reliance on radiography • Inadequate clinical examination Fractures are a Clinical Diagnosis • 1) Mechanism of injury • 2) Findings on physical examination • 3) Age of the patient. • Radiography confirms the diagnosis and provides anatomical detail. • Fractures can be present without radiographic abnormality. Fractures are a Clinical Diagnosis • If a fracture is clinically suspected • but not radiographically apparent, treat the patient as though a fracture were present with • adequate immobilization and follow‐up (e.g., scaphoid fracture, femoral neck fracture). Fractures are a Clinical Diagnosis • Soft tissue injuries may be more significant that the skeletal injury (ligaments, articular cartilage, neurovascular injuries). • Diagnosis by physical exam or imaging studies: MRI, angiography, arthroscopy, stress views.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Overview
    Hand Fracture System with Small Bone External Fixation System Product Overview Acumed® Hand Fracture System The Acumed Hand Fracture System is designed to provide both standard and fracture-specific fixation for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures,s a well as fixation for fusions and osteotomies. This comprehensive system contains plates for fractures of the metacarpal neck, fractures of the base of the first metacarpal, avulsion fractures, and rotational malunions. Additionally, the system contains standard-shaped, cut-to-length and bend-to-fit plates and hexalobe lag screws for less complicated fractures. Low-profile plates and screws and a rounded-edge plate cutter are designed to minimize soft tissue irritation. Versatile screws, customizable plates, and dedicated instrumentation offer a comprehensive system to streamline the surgical experience. 1.3 mm thickness Plates and Screws The Acumed Hand Fracture System offers plates in 0.8 mm and 1.3 mm thicknesses. Metacarpal Neck Plate, Left and Right Rotational Correction Plate Rolando Fracture Hook Plate T-Plate Straight Plate Compression Plate System Features System Avulsion Fracture Plate Offset Plate Curved Medial/Lateral Plate 0.8 mm thickness Customizable Standard Plates Most plates can be cut to length and bent to fit to better treat a wide variety of fracture patterns. A plate cutter included in the system is designed to create a smooth, rounded edge. 0.8 mm T-Plate 1.3 mm Straight Plate Multiple Choices, Multiple Options Diaphyseal Fractures 0.8 Curved Medial/Lateral Plate Distal Phalangeal Fractures 0.8 Curved Medial/Lateral Plate Comminuted Fractures 0.8 Offset Plate Note: Not all configurations and options are shown Specialty Plates Avulsion Fracture The 0.8 mm Avulsion Hook Plate is designed for periarticular fractures where the fragment contains a soft tissue insertion.
    [Show full text]
  • Hand Fractures Metacarpal Fractures
    Version 2.0 Hand Fractures 20/05/2012 Common (5% of fractures) and mostly not requiring surgery. Metacarpal Fractures Features • Check tendons & neurovascular function • Check for any rotational deformity (extend then flex fingers fully) • Imaging: XR – AP, oblique, true lateral for carpo-metacarpal dislocation Classification • Open or closed • Type of fracture - transverse, oblique, spiral, intra-articular and avulsion • Location – head (rare), neck(weakest), shaft & base Bennett’s Fracture Fracture-dislocation of carpo-metacarpal joint of thumb. Commonest thumb fracture. Intra-articular oblique # runs from joint to ulna side of 1 st MC shaft. Larger distal MC fragment dislocated proximally & radially by APL. Mx: Closed reduction+pin/wires or ORIF if >3mm displacement. Rolando Fracture Comminuted intra-articular # at base of 1 st MC often a Y or T shaped. Similar to Bennets but in 3 parts and worse prognosis. Gamekeeper’s/Skier’s Thumb ± Fracture Ulnar collateral ligament injury at 1 st MCPJ. May avulse fragment (usually of phalanx) ± displacement. Examine with stress test (controversial) if ligament lax in flexion (>35º or >10º more than other side) or malrotations, sig displacement or large fracture → OT else treat conservatively in scaphoid POP for 6wk. Boxer’s Fracture Fracture of neck of 5 th MC, often with volar angulation. Punching injury. Management Head #: Commonly comminuted → surgery. Neck #: Usually 5 th MC. Up to 70º volar angulation tolerated (~15º with other MCs) with a splint for 1 week then mobilise. Otherwise closed reduction & wiring. Shaft #: Angulation of 30º (little), 20º (ring), 5º (index, middle) acceptable →splint MCPJ @ 70º. Basal #: Treated as shaft fractures.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence-Based Management of Acute Hand Injuries in The
    December 2014 Evidence-Based Management Volume 16, Number 12 Of Acute Hand Injuries In The Authors W. Talbot Bowen, MBBS Section of Emergency Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Emergency Department Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA Ellen M. Slaven, MD Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Section of Emergency Abstract Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA Although injuries of the hand are infrequently life-threatening, Peer Reviewers they are common in the emergency department and are associated Makini Chisolm-Straker, MD with significant patient morbidity and medicolegal risk for physi- International Emergency Medicine Fellow, Attending Physician and Instructor of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Columbia cians. Care of patients with acute hand injury begins with a fo- University Medical Center, New York, NY cused history and physical examination. In most clinical scenarios, Nicholas Genes, MD, PhD, FACEP a diagnosis is achieved clinically or with plain radiographs. While Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School most patients require straightforward treatment, the emergency of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY clinician must rapidly identify limb-threatening injuries, obtain CME Objectives critical clinical information, navigate diagnostic uncertainty, and Upon completion of this article, you should be able to: facilitate specialist consultation, when required. This review dis- 1. Perform a focused and complete history and physical cusses the clinical evaluation and management of high-morbidity examination pertinent to acute hand injuries. 2. Discuss the management strategies for a broad range of acute hand injuries in the context of the current evidence. hand injuries. 3. Identify limb-threatening hand injuries that require emergent hand surgery consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Extremity Fracture Eponyms
    What's in a name? Upper extremity fracture eponyms (Part 1) Philip Kin-Wai Wong, Emory University Tarek Hanna, Emory University Waqas Shuaib, Emory University Stephen Sanders, Emory University Faisal Khosa, Emory University Journal Title: International Journal of Emergency Medicine Volume: Volume 8, Number 1 Publisher: SpringerOpen | 2015-12-03, Pages 75-75 Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF Publisher DOI: 10.1186/s12245-015-0075-2 Permanent URL: https://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/q4b4k Final published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0075-2 Copyright information: © Wong et al. 2015 This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Accessed October 1, 2021 8:34 AM EDT Wong et al. International Journal of Emergency Medicine (2015) 8:27 DOI 10.1186/s12245-015-0075-2 REVIEW Open Access What's in a name? Upper extremity fracture eponyms (Part 1) Philip Kin-Wai Wong1, Tarek N. Hanna2*, Waqas Shuaib3, Stephen M. Sanders4 and Faisal Khosa2 Abstract Eponymous extremity fractures are commonly encountered in the emergency setting. Correct eponym usage allows rapid, succinct communication of complex injuries. We will review both common and less frequently encountered extremity fracture eponyms, focusing on imaging features to identify and differentiate these injuries. We focus on plain radiographic findings, with supporting computed tomography (CT) images. For each injury, important radiologic descriptors are discussed which may need to be communicated to consultants. Aspects of management and follow-up imaging recommendations are included. This is a two-part review: Part 1 focuses on fracture eponyms of the upper extremity, while Part 2 covers fracture eponyms of the lower extremity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Slides
    Slide 1 ___________________________________ Musculoskeletal Specialty Review ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ © 4 June 2014 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 2 ___________________________________ Musculoskeletal Specialty Review: ___________________________________ Trauma & Tumors ___________________________________ Christopher Cerniglia, DO, MEng Chief, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging Department of Radiology UMass Memorial Medical Center ___________________________________ Program Director, Musculoskeletal Fellowship Associate Director, Radiology Residency Program University of Massachusetts Medical School ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 3 ___________________________________ Outline • Cases ___________________________________ • Trauma ___________________________________ • Tumors ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 4 CASES ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 4 June 2014 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 5 ___________________________________ Case 1 • Hx: Trauma ___________________________________ ___________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • ASHT 2013 Review of Adult Fractures Distal Humerus to Distal Phalanx
    ASHT 2013 Review of Adult Fractures Distal 10/22/2013 Humerus to Distal Phalanx DISCLOSURE ASHT 36th Annual Meeting REVIEW OF ADULT FRACTURES Emily Altman, PT, DPT, CHT, OCS, CLT DISTAL HUMERUS TO DISTAL PHALANX Physical Therapist Hospital for Special Surgery New York, NY, USA Emily Altman, PT, DPT, CHT, OCS, CLT I have no financial relationships to disclose within the past 12 October 24, 2013 months relevant to my presentation 1 2 THANK YOU! HANDOUTS Robert Hotchkiss, MD Thomas Owen, MD www.handtherapyhub.com Nina Suh, MD Eugene Ek, MD • PDF of Powerpoint Edward Athanasian, MD • Reference List Aaron Daluiski, MD • Fracture Readings Kate Neighbors, PAC Contact: [email protected] Andrew Ghatan, MD 3 4 PROMISED LEARNING OBJECTIVES Ò Describe the fundamental principles of fracture healing Ò Describe the path of deforming forces seen in an Essex-Lopresti fracture Ò Explain to a patient why elbow extension against resistance is not permitted following repair of an olecranon fracture Ò Verbalize why a proximal phalanx fracture assumes an apex volar posture Ò Explain the pathomechanics of a Bennett’s fracture Ò Recognize how to find information regarding orthopedic fractures in relevant, up-to-date literature 5 6 1 ASHT 2013 Review of Adult Fractures Distal 10/22/2013 Humerus to Distal Phalanx FRACTURE UNIVERSITY BIG PICTURE OBJECTIVES Ò Educate ourselves about upper extremity Ò Improve our understanding of the physics fractures of fractures É How do fractures behave? Ò Understand the anatomical basis É What do they look like? of what we do Ò Build
    [Show full text]
  • A Safe Method for Early Rehabilitation of Articular Fracture at the Base of Thumb Metacarpal Bone
    Hindawi Advances in Orthopedics Volume 2021, Article ID 6632211, 5 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6632211 Research Article A Safe Method for Early Rehabilitation of Articular Fracture at the Base of Thumb Metacarpal Bone Yunus Oc ,1 Bekir Eray Kilinc ,2 Ali Varol ,3 and Adnan Kara 4 1Medilife Health Group, Bagcilar Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey 2Health Science University Istanbul Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey 3Health Ministry, Silopi State Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sirnak, Turkey 4Medipol University Istanbul, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey Correspondence should be addressed to Bekir Eray Kilinc; [email protected] Received 25 December 2020; Accepted 28 January 2021; Published 8 February 2021 Academic Editor: Benjamin Blondel Copyright © 2021 Yunus Oc et al. *is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of closed reduction, distraction using an external fixator, and percutaneous fixation in patients with Bennet and Rolando fractures. Methods. Patients over 18 years of age, who had isolated fracture at the base of the first metacarpal bone, had no previous functional limitations and pain complaints, were regularly followed up, and had fixation using K-wire combined with an external fixator, were included. Arthrosis was evaluated according to Eaton and Littler classification. Pain intensity was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) on a 0–10 scale. Furthermore, patients were questioned regarding limitations in their daily activities and hobbies.
    [Show full text]