Upper Extremity Fracture Eponyms
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Treatment of Comminuted Fractures of the Base of the Thumb Metacarpal Using a Cemented Bone-K-Wire Frame
Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation 38 (2019) 44–51 Available online at ScienceDirect www.sciencedirect.com Original article Treatment of comminuted fractures of the base of the thumb metacarpal using a cemented bone-K-wire frame Traitement des fractures comminutives de la base du premier me´tacarpien graˆce a` un cadre os-broches-ciment W. Duan, X. Zhang, Y. Yu, Z. Zhang *, X. Shao, W. Du Department of Hand Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, PR China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: We aimed to describe the treatment of comminuted fractures of the base of the thumb metacarpal using a Received 13 June 2018 cemented bone-K-wire frame. Between March 2010 and January 2016, 41 fractures of the base of the thumb Received in revised form 8 August 2018 were treated using a cemented bone-K-wire frame. The mean age of the patients was 34 years. The patients’ Accepted 7 September 2018 history included a fall onto the hand in 7 cases, direct trauma in 31 cases, and polytrauma with an unclear Available online 11 October 2018 mechanism of injury in 3 cases. At the final follow-up, hand grip and pinch strength were measured using a dynamometer. All measurements were compared with those of the opposite hand. The patients were assessed Keywords: functionally using the Smith and Cooney score.All K-wires were left in place until the bone healed. Bone healing Cemented K-wire frame was achieved in all thumbs in an average of 5.2 weeks. Follow-up averaged 27 months. The mean hand pinch External fixator Rolando fracture andgripstrengthwas8.7 kg Æ 2.4 kgand38.4 kg Æ 5.9 kg,respectively.Themeanmeasurementsontheopposite Thumb side were 9.2 kg Æ 2.5 kg and 40.2 kg Æ 6.6 kg, respectively. -
Approach to Hand Conditions
Approach to Hand Conditions Alphonsus Chong Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore Senior Consultant, Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore http://bit.ly/39fuCIK [email protected] Scope • Introduction – Slides at http://bit.ly/39fuCIK • And other material at: https://nus.edu/2Mh4e4s • Physical examination http://bit.ly/39fuCIK : these slides • Traumatic injuries – open and closed • Peripheral nerve problems • Masses in the hand and wrist • Tendinopathy and tendinitis • Deformity https://nus.edu/2Mh4e4s: hand wiki 3 History Taking • Pain – different aspects • Handedness • Deformity • Job v – Congenital • Hobbies – Acquired - ? Traumatic • Previous injury/ surgery • Decreased rangev of motion • Weakness • For acute trauma/conditions: • Numbness – Last meal v • Others e.g. triggering, instability – Mechanism of injury – Time/date of injury Expose both sides: subcutaneous border Scars, wasting, deformity of ulna and elbow- rheumatoid nodules Completeness and fluidity of motion Scars, wasting, deformity Quick Nerve Screen Median Nerve Radial Nerve Ulnar nerve Traumatic Injuries – Open Injuries Open traumatic injuries are a staple work of hand surgeons. Assessment of Hand – Work through the tissues (see Apley) • Skin – note size and types of wounds • Vessels - circulation • Nerves – sensation and motor • Muscle and Tendons – individual flexor and extensor tendon testing • Bones & Joints – appropriate x-rays to assess fractures/ dislocation What do you see? • LOOK • LOOK – Loss of cascade • -
Listen to the Associated Podcast Episodes: MSK: Fractures for the ABR Core Exam Parts 1-3, Available at Theradiologyreview.Com O
MSK: Fractures for Radiology Board Study, Matt Covington, MD Listen to the associated podcast episodes: MSK: Fractures for the ABR Core Exam Parts 1-3, available Listen to associated Podcast episodes: ABR Core Exam, Multisystemic Diseases Parts 1-3, available at at theradiologyreview.com or on your favorite podcast directory. Copyrighted. theradiologyreview.com or on your favorite podcast direcry. Fracture resulting From abnormal stress on normal bone = stress Fracture Fracture From normal stress on abnormal bone = insuFFiciency Fracture Scaphoid Fracture site with highest risk for avascular necrosis (proximal or distal)? Proximal pole scaphoid Fractures are at highest risk For AVN Comminuted Fracture at the base oF the First metacarpal = Rolando Fracture Non-comminuted Fracture at base oF the First metacarpal = Bennett Fracture The pull oF which tendon causes the dorsolateral dislocation in a Bennett fracture? The abductor pollicus longus tendon. Avulsion Fracture at the base oF the proximal phalanx with ulnar collateral ligament disruption = Gamekeeper’s thumb. Same Fracture but adductor tendon becomes caught in torn edge oF the ulnar collateral ligament? Stener’s lesion. IF Stener’s lesion is present this won’t heal on its own so you need surgery. You shouldn’t image a Gamekeeper’s thumb with stress views because you can convert it to a Stener’s lesion. Image with MRI instead. Distal radial Fracture with dorsal angulation = Colle’s Fracture (C to D= Colle’s is Dorsal) Distal radial Fracture with volar angulation = Smith’s Fracture (S -
Metacarpal Fractures
METACARPAL FRACTURES BY LORYN P. WEINSTEIN, MD, AND DOUGLAS P. HANEL, MD The majority of metacarpal fractures are closed injuries amenable to conservative treatment with external immobilization and subsequent rehabilitation. Internal fixation is favored for unstable fracture patterns and patients who require early motion. Percutaneous pinning usually is successful for metacarpal neck fractures and comminuted head fractures. Shaft and base fractures can be treated with pinning or open reduction and internal fixation; the latter, being more rigid, allows early rehabilitation. External fixation has a limited yet defined role for metacarpal fractures with complex soft-tissue injury and/or segmental bone loss. The recent development of bioabsorbable implants holds promise for skeletal rigidity with minimal soft-tissue morbidity, but long-term in vivo data support- ing the use of these implants is not currently available. Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand arly treatment of metacarpal fractures was lim- Surgical techniques rapidly expanded to include ret- ited to the only tools available: manipulation rograde fracture pinning, intramedullary pinning, and Eand casting. The discovery of percutaneous transfixion pinning. Many of the K-wires in use today fracture fixation near the turn of the century opened have the same diamond-shaped tip and sizing speci- up a new world of possibilities. It was 25 years after fications as the original design. Bennett’s original manuscript that Lambotte de- The first plate and screw set for the hand was scribed the first surgical stabilization of a basilar introduced in the late 1930s. By today’s standards, the thumb fracture by using a thin carpenter’s nail.1 By Hermann Metacarpal Bone Set was quite lean; it 1913, Lambotte had authored a fracture text with included 3 longitudinal plates of 2, 3, and 4 holes, a multiple examples of pinning, wiring, and plating of drill, screwdriver, and 9 screws.1 Improvements in hand fractures. -
Distal Humerus Lateral Condyle Fracture and Monteggia Lesion in a 3-Year Old Child : a Case Report
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2008, 74, 542-545 CASE REPORT Distal humerus lateral condyle fracture and Monteggia lesion in a 3-year old child : A case report Rupen DATTANI, Surendra PATNAIK, Avdhoot KANTAK, Mohan LAL From East Surrey Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom We describe a case of a Monteggia fracture disloca- DISCUSSION tion and an ipsilateral lateral humeral condyle frac- ture in a 3-year-old child. This is a rare combination Lateral condyle physeal fractures comprise 17% of injuries with no previously reported cases in the of all paediatric distal humerus fractures with a literature. This case emphasises that when a fracture peak incidence at 6 years of age (8). The mechanism is detected around an elbow there should be a high of injury is either an avulsion by the pull of the index of suspicion for other injuries in the region. common extensor origin owing to a varus stress Keywords : Monteggia fracture dislocation ; fracture of exerted on the extended elbow (‘pull off’ theory) or the humeral condyle ; elbow dislocation ; humerus a fall onto an extended upper extremity resulting fracture. in an axial load transmitted through the forearm, causing the radial head to impinge on the lateral head (‘push off’ theory) (2). Milch classified these fractures into two types (12). In type I injuries, the CASE REPORT fracture line courses lateral to the trochlea and into the capitello-trochlear groove representing a Salter- A 3-year-old boy presented to the emergency Harris type IV fracture : the elbow is usually stable department following a fall from a height onto his because the trochlea is intact. -
Upper Extremity Fractures
Department of Rehabilitation Services Physical Therapy Standard of Care: Distal Upper Extremity Fractures Case Type / Diagnosis: This standard applies to patients who have sustained upper extremity fractures that require stabilization either surgically or non-surgically. This includes, but is not limited to: Distal Humeral Fracture 812.4 Supracondylar Humeral Fracture 812.41 Elbow Fracture 813.83 Proximal Radius/Ulna Fracture 813.0 Radial Head Fractures 813.05 Olecranon Fracture 813.01 Radial/Ulnar shaft fractures 813.1 Distal Radius Fracture 813.42 Distal Ulna Fracture 813.82 Carpal Fracture 814.01 Metacarpal Fracture 815.0 Phalanx Fractures 816.0 Forearm/Wrist Fractures Radius fractures: • Radial head (may require a prosthesis) • Midshaft radius • Distal radius (most common) Residual deformities following radius fractures include: • Loss of radial tilt (Normal non fracture average is 22-23 degrees of radial tilt.) • Dorsal angulation (normal non fracture average palmar tilt 11-12 degrees.) • Radial shortening • Distal radioulnar (DRUJ) joint involvement • Intra-articular involvement with step-offs. Step-off of as little as 1-2 mm may increase the risk of post-traumatic arthritis. 1 Standard of Care: Distal Upper Extremity Fractures Copyright © 2007 The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc. Department of Rehabilitation Services. All rights reserved. Types of distal radius fracture include: • Colle’s (Dinner Fork Deformity) -- Mechanism: fall on an outstretched hand (FOOSH) with radial shortening, dorsal tilt of the distal fragment. The ulnar styloid may or may not be fractured. • Smith’s (Garden Spade Deformity) -- Mechanism: fall backward on a supinated, dorsiflexed wrist, the distal fragment displaces volarly. • Barton’s -- Mechanism: direct blow to the carpus or wrist. -
Rare Presentation of a Type I Monteggia Fracture V K Peter
88 CASE REPORT Emerg Med J: first published as 10.1136/emj.19.1.88 on 1 January 2002. Downloaded from Rare presentation of a type I Monteggia fracture V K Peter ............................................................................................................................. Emerg Med J 2002;19:88–89 DISCUSSION A rare case is reported of a Monteggia equivalent injury Any dislocation of the radial head with an ulnar fracture con- where a dislocation of the radial head is associated with stitutes a Monteggia lesion. Of the various classifications fracture of the distal third of the radius and ulna. The available, Bado’s is the one that is almost universally in use. mechanism, treatment and outcome are described. Type I: anterior dislocation of the radial head, fracture of the ulnar diaphysis at any level with anterior (volar) angulation. Type II: posterior or posterolateral dislocation of the radial head, fracture of the ulnar diaphysis with posterior (dorsal) CASE REPORT angulation. 12 year old boy fell backwards off a chair onto his Type III: lateral or anterolateral dislocation of the radial outstretched left arm. He described a twisting injury to head with fracture of the ulnar metaphysis or diaphysis. Athe arm at the time. He was seen in the accident and Type IV: anterior dislocation of the radial head, fracture emergency department with an obvious deformity of the dis- proximal third radius and fracture of the ulna at the same tal forearm and tenderness over the ipsilateral elbow. level.1 Movements at the wrist and elbow were painful and Letts classified such fractures in children into five groups. A restricted, and no neurological or vascular deficits were noted. -
Fractures of the Proximal Ulna: Current Concepts in Surgical Management
3.1800EOR0010.1302/2058-5241.3.180022 research-article2019 EOR | volume 4 | January 2019 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180022 Trauma www.efortopenreviews.org Fractures of the proximal ulna: current concepts in surgical management Sebastian Siebenlist1 Arne Buchholz2 Karl F. Braun2 Fractures of the proximal ulna range from simple olec- or Monteggia-like lesions involving damage to stabilizing ranon fractures to complex Monteggia fractures or key structures of the elbow (i.e. coronoid process, radial Monteggia- like lesions involving damage to stabilizing key head).1,2 While these fractures are common injuries in the structures of the elbow (i.e. coronoid process, radial head, upper extremity at any age, in adults they peak during the collateral ligament complex). seventh decade of life.3 The anatomical restoration of In complex fracture patterns a computerized tomography ulnar alignment (in length, rotation and axis) has to be the scan is essential to properly assess the injury severity. primary goal of surgical treatment to regain an unre- stricted elbow function. Thus, the surgeon carefully needs Exact preoperative planning for the surgical approach is to address all aspects of the injury to allow early (active) vital to adequately address all fracture parts (base coro- rehabilitation and thereby prevent elbow stiffness.4 An noid fragments first). improper osseous reconstruction of the ulna as well as a The management of olecranon fractures primarily comprises failed/missed reattachment of elbow stabilizing structures tension-band wiring in simple fractures as a valid treatment will otherwise result in persistent pain, poor function and option, but modern plate techniques, especially in commi- progressive joint degeneration due to chronic elbow nuted or osteoporotic fracture types, can reduce implant instability.5 Consequently, the appropriate treatment of failure and potential implant-related soft tissue irritation. -
Management of Rolando and Bennett Fractures Treatment with Pin And
Int J Med Invest 2019; Volume 8; Number 4; 85-90 http://www.intjmi.com Brief Report Management of Rolando and Bennett Fractures Treatment with Pin and Plaster (A New Technique) Masoud Shayesteh Azar 1, Mohammad Hossein Kariminasab 1*, Salman Ghaffari 1, Mani Mahmoudi 2, Abolfazl Kazemi 3, Shadi Shayesteh Azar 4. 1. Associated Professor of orthopedic surgery, Orthopedic Research center, Mazandaran university of medical science, Sari, Iran . 2. Assistant professor of orthopedic surgery, Orthopedic Research center, Mazandaran university of medical science, Sari, Iran. 3. Orthopedic resident, Orthopedic Research center, Mazandaran university of medical science, Sari, Iran 4. Medical Student, Ramsar International University, Mazandaran, Iran. *correspondence: Mohammad Hossein Kariminasab, Associated Professor of orthopedic surgery, Orthopedic Research center, Mazandaran university of medical science, Sari, Iran. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Intra-articular fractures of Thumb are the most common fractures occurred in children and elderly; divided into Bennett & Rolando fractures. The purpose of this article is to introduce new approach for these fractures. In this approach, after pre-surgery techniques; a 1.5-2 mm pin is placed in the proximal distal phalanx. Next, the best reduction is achieved by imposing pulling through the pin and rotating motion under C-Arm. Short forearm cast is then used after that cast changing to thumb Spica cast and the pin is incorporated in the cast, the position of thumb during casting in abduction and pronation depends on the reduction under C-Arm. After the operation, the reduction is controlled by radiography. Within 4-6 weeks, the cast is removed, the pin is taken out, and active and passive joint movements begin. -
Commonly Missed Orthopedic Injuries
Commonly Missed Orthopedic Injuries Holly Adams, PA-C Galveston-Texas City VA Outpatient Clinic Missed Orthopedic Injuries • Overlooking orthopedic injuries is a leading cause of medical malpractice claims out of the ED. • Am J Emergency Med 1996. 14(4):341-5. Karcz et al, 1996. • Massachusetts Joint Underwriters Association: Missed fractures comprised 20% (during1980-1987) and 10% (1988-1990) of malpractice claims. • Fractures are 2nd in claim amount and number of cases established against ED physicians. Radiographics Commonly Missed • Wei (Taipei, Acta Radiol 2006) identified specific regions of misinterpretation: • Foot 7.6% 18/238 • Knee 6.3% 14/224 • Elbow 6.0% 14/234 • Hand 5.4% 10/185 • Wrist 4.1% 25/606 • Hip 3.9% 20/512 • Ankle 2.8% 8/282 • Shoulder 1.9% 5/266 • Tibia/fibula 0.4% 1/226 • Total 3.7% 115/3081 Pitfalls of ER X-Rays • Incorrect interpretation (interpretation errors) • Inadequate (suboptimal) images • Over‐reliance on radiography • Inadequate clinical examination Fractures are a Clinical Diagnosis • 1) Mechanism of injury • 2) Findings on physical examination • 3) Age of the patient. • Radiography confirms the diagnosis and provides anatomical detail. • Fractures can be present without radiographic abnormality. Fractures are a Clinical Diagnosis • If a fracture is clinically suspected • but not radiographically apparent, treat the patient as though a fracture were present with • adequate immobilization and follow‐up (e.g., scaphoid fracture, femoral neck fracture). Fractures are a Clinical Diagnosis • Soft tissue injuries may be more significant that the skeletal injury (ligaments, articular cartilage, neurovascular injuries). • Diagnosis by physical exam or imaging studies: MRI, angiography, arthroscopy, stress views. -
Product Overview
Hand Fracture System with Small Bone External Fixation System Product Overview Acumed® Hand Fracture System The Acumed Hand Fracture System is designed to provide both standard and fracture-specific fixation for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures,s a well as fixation for fusions and osteotomies. This comprehensive system contains plates for fractures of the metacarpal neck, fractures of the base of the first metacarpal, avulsion fractures, and rotational malunions. Additionally, the system contains standard-shaped, cut-to-length and bend-to-fit plates and hexalobe lag screws for less complicated fractures. Low-profile plates and screws and a rounded-edge plate cutter are designed to minimize soft tissue irritation. Versatile screws, customizable plates, and dedicated instrumentation offer a comprehensive system to streamline the surgical experience. 1.3 mm thickness Plates and Screws The Acumed Hand Fracture System offers plates in 0.8 mm and 1.3 mm thicknesses. Metacarpal Neck Plate, Left and Right Rotational Correction Plate Rolando Fracture Hook Plate T-Plate Straight Plate Compression Plate System Features System Avulsion Fracture Plate Offset Plate Curved Medial/Lateral Plate 0.8 mm thickness Customizable Standard Plates Most plates can be cut to length and bent to fit to better treat a wide variety of fracture patterns. A plate cutter included in the system is designed to create a smooth, rounded edge. 0.8 mm T-Plate 1.3 mm Straight Plate Multiple Choices, Multiple Options Diaphyseal Fractures 0.8 Curved Medial/Lateral Plate Distal Phalangeal Fractures 0.8 Curved Medial/Lateral Plate Comminuted Fractures 0.8 Offset Plate Note: Not all configurations and options are shown Specialty Plates Avulsion Fracture The 0.8 mm Avulsion Hook Plate is designed for periarticular fractures where the fragment contains a soft tissue insertion. -
Ipsilateral Supracondylar Fracture and Forearm Bone Injury in Children: a Retrospective Review of Thirty One Cases
Original Article VOL.9 | NO. 2 | ISSUE 34 | APR - JUN 2011 Ipsilateral Supracondylar Fracture and Forearm Bone Injury in Children: A Retrospective Review of Thirty one Cases Dhoju D, Shrestha D, Parajuli N, Dhakal G, Shrestha R Department of Orthopaedics and traumatology ABSTRACT Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital Background Dhulikhel, Nepal Supracondylar fracture and forearm bone fracture in isolation is common musculoskeletal injury in pediatric age group But combined supracondylar fracture with ipsilateral forearm bone fracture, also known as floating elbow is not common injury. The incidence of this association varies between 3% and 13%. Since the Corresponding Author injury is rare and only limited literatures are available, choosing best management options for floating elbow is challenging. Method Dr Dipak Shrestha In retrospective review of 759 consecutive supracondylar fracture managed in Department of Orthopaedics and traumatology between July 2005 to June 2011, children with combined supracondylar fracture Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital with forearm bone injuries were identified and their demographic profiles, mode of injury, fracture types, treatment procedures, outcome and complications were Dhulikhel, Nepal. analyzed. E-mail: [email protected] Result Thirty one patients (mean age 8.91 yrs, range 2-14 yrs; male 26; left side 18) had Mobile No: 9851073353 combined supracondylar fracture and ipsilateral forearm bone injury including four open fractures. There were 20 (64.51%) Gartland type III (13 type IIIA and 7 type III B), seven (22.58 %) type II, three (9.67 %) type I and one (3.22 %) flexion Citation type supracondylar fracture. Nine patients had distal radius fracture, six had distal third both bone fracture, three had distal ulna fracture, two had mid shaft both Dhoju D, ShresthaD, Parajuli N, Dhakal G, Shrestha R.