Important Notice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Important Notice IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN, OR INTO, THE UNITED STATES EXCEPT TO QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS (“QIBs”), AS DEFINED IN, AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH, RULE 144A UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”) OR OTHERWISE THAN TO PERSONS TO WHOM IT CAN LAWFULLY BE DISTRIBUTED. IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the Prospectus following this page, whether received by e-mail, accessed from an internet page or received as a result of electronic transmission, and you are therefore required to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Prospectus. In accessing the Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. The Prospectus has been prepared solely in connection with the proposed offering to certain institutional and professional investors of the securities described herein, which are exempt from registration under the Securities Act. Nothing in this electronic transmission constitutes an offer of securities for sale in the United States. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER, SALE OR SOLICITATION IS NOT PERMITTED. ANY SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE, REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS. THE FOLLOWING PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED, ELECTRONICALLY OR OTHERWISE, TO ANY OTHER PERSON AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER. ANY FORWARDING, DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS UNAUTHORISED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE MAY RESULT IN A VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS. Confirmation of your Representation: In order to be eligible to view the Prospectus or make an investment decision with respect to the securities, you must be either: (i) outside of the United States; or (ii) a QIB (within the meaning of Rule 144A under the Securities Act). The Prospectus is being sent at your request, and by accessing the Prospectus, you shall be deemed to have represented to the Issuer and the Joint Lead Managers (as defined below) that (1) you understand and agree to the terms set out herein; (2) in respect of securities being offered in an offshore transaction pursuant to Regulations S, you are outside the United States, and that, to the extent the Prospectus is delivered via e-mail, the e-mail address to which, pursuant to your request, the Prospectus has been delivered by electronic transmission is not located in the United States for the purposes of Regulation S under the Securities Act; (3) in respect of securities offered and sold in reliance on Rule 144A, you are a QIB; (4) you consent to delivery by electronic transmission; (5) you will not transmit the Prospectus (or any copy of it or part thereof) or disclose, whether orally or in writing, any of its contents to any other person except with the consent of the Joint Lead Managers and the Issuer (each as defined in the Prospectus); and (6) you acknowledge that you will make your own assessment regarding any legal, taxation or other economic considerations with respect to your decision to subscribe for or purchase any of the securities. The Prospectus is being distributed only to and directed only at (i) persons who are outside the United Kingdom, or (ii) persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Order”), or (iii) high net worth entities and other persons falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order, or (iv) those persons to whom it may otherwise lawfully be distributed in accordance with the Order (all such persons collectively being referred to as “relevant persons”). The Prospectus is directed only at relevant persons and must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which the Prospectus relates is available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. No other person should rely on it. Solely for the purposes of each manufacturer’s product approval process, the target market assessment in respect of the Notes has led to the conclusion that: (i) the target market for the Notes is eligible counterparties and professional clients only, each as defined in MiFID II; and (ii) all channels for distribution of the Notes to eligible counterparties and professional clients are appropriate. Any person subsequently offering, selling or recommending the Notes (a “distributor”) should take into consideration the manufacturers’ target market assessment; however, a distributor subject to MiFID II is responsible for undertaking its own target market assessment in respect of the Notes (by either adopting or refining the manufacturers’ target market assessment) and determining appropriate distribution channels. You are reminded that the Prospectus has been delivered to you on the basis that you are a person into whose possession the Prospectus may be lawfully delivered in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which you are located and you may not, nor are you authorised to, deliver the Prospectus, electronically or otherwise, to any other person. The materials relating to the offering do not constitute, and may not be used in connection with, an offer or solicitation in any place where offers or solicitations are not permitted by law. No action has been or will be taken in any jurisdiction by the Joint Lead Managers or the Issuer that would, or is intended to, permit a public offering of the securities, or possession or distribution of the Prospectus or any other offering or publicity material relating to the securities, in any country or jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. If a jurisdiction requires that the offering be made by a licensed broker or dealer and any underwriter or any affiliate of any underwriter is a licensed broker or dealer in that jurisdiction, the offering shall be deemed to be made by such underwriter or such affiliate on behalf of the Issuer in such jurisdiction. The attached Prospectus has been sent to you in an electronic form. You are reminded that documents transmitted via this medium may be altered or changed during the process of electronic transmission and consequently none of Banca IMI S.p.A., London Branch, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, J.P. Morgan Securities plc or Raiffeisen Bank International AG (collectively, the “Joint Lead Managers”) or the Issuer and their respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees, representatives and agents or any other person controlling the Issuer, the Joint Lead Managers or any of their respective affiliates accepts any liability or responsibility whatsoever in respect of any difference between the Prospectus distributed to you in electronic format and the hard copy version available to you on request from the Joint Lead Managers. THE REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA €650,000,000 3.500% Notes due 16 June 2027 Issue Price: 99.239% The issue price of the €650,000,000 3.500% Notes due 16 June 2027 (the “Notes”) of the Republic of Albania (the “Issuer”, the “Republic” or “Albania”) is 99.239% of their principal amount. Unless previously redeemed or cancelled, the Notes will be redeemed at their principal amount on 16 June 2027 (the “Maturity Date”). The Notes will bear interest from, and including, 16 June 2020 at the rate of 3.500% per annum payable annually in arrear on 16 June in each year, commencing on 16 June 2021. Payments on the Notes will be made in Euros without deduction for, or on account of, taxes imposed or levied by Albania to the extent described under “Terms and Conditions of the Notes – 8. Taxation”. This Prospectus has been approved by the Central Bank of Ireland, as competent authority under the Prospectus Regulation. “Prospectus Regulation” means Regulation (EU) 2017/1129. Such approval only relates to Notes, which are to be admitted to trading on a regulated market for the purposes of Directive 2014/65/EU (“MiFID II”) and/or which are to be offered to the public in any member state of the European Economic Area (which, for these purposes, includes the United Kingdom (“UK”)). The Central Bank of Ireland only approves this prospectus as meeting the standards of completeness, comprehensibility and consistency imposed by the Prospectus Regulation. Approval by the Central Bank of Ireland should not be considered as an endorsement of the Issuer or the quality of the Notes. Investors should make their own assessment as to the suitability of investing in the Notes. Application has been made to the Irish Stock Exchange plc trading as Euronext Dublin (“Euronext Dublin”) for the Notes to be admitted to the Official List (the “Official List”) and to trading on its regulated market (the “Market”). Reference in this prospectus to being “listed” (and all date references) shall mean that such Notes have been admitted to the Official List and have been admitted to trading on the Market. The Market is a regulated market for the purposes of MiFID II. The Notes are expected to be assigned a rating of B1 by Moody’s Investors Service Limited (“Moody’s”) and B+ by S&P Global Ratings Europe Limited (“S&P”).
Recommended publications
  • Interim Opinion on the Draft Law on the Reform of the Supreme Court Of
    Warsaw, 16 October 2019 Opinion-Nr.: JUD-MDA/358/2019 [AlC] http://www.legislationline.org/ INTERIM OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON THE REFORM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICES OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (AS OF SEPTEMBER 2019) based on an unofficial English translation of the Draft Law provided by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova This Opinion has benefited from contributions made by the following experts: Dr. Grzegorz Borkowski, Judge, International Legal Expert and former Head of Office of the National Council of the Judiciary of Poland; Ms. Michèle Rivet, C.M., Honorary Member and Former Vice-President of the International Commission of Jurists; Professor Andras Sajo, Central European University in Budapest and former judge and Vice-President of the European Court of Human Rights; Mr. Maarten Steenbeek, International Rule of Law Expert; and Mr. Arman Zrvandyan, International Human Rights Lawyer. The Opinion represents the position of ODIHR only and does not necessarily reflect the position of the experts. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Ulica Miodowa 10 PL-00-251 Warsaw ph. +48 22 520 06 00 fax. +48 22 520 0605 This Opinion is also available in Romanian. However, the English version remains the only official version of the document. ODIHR Interim Opinion on the Draft Law on the Reform of the Supreme Court of Justice and the Prosecutor’s Offices of the Republic of Moldova (as of September 2019) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 3 II. SCOPE OF REVIEW .................................................................................................... 3 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law in the Western Balkans: ASPEN 5 Exploring the New EU Enlargement Strategy and Necessary Steps Ahead POLICY PROGRAM
    RULE OF LAW IN THE WESTERN BALKANS: EXPLORING THE NEW EU ENLARGEMENT STRATEGY AND NECESSARY STEPS AHEAD April 16-19, 2018 | Alt Madlitz In cooperation with: The Aspen Institute Germany wishes to thank the German Federal Foreign Office for its sponsorship of the Aspen Southeast Europe Program 2018 through the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe. The mission of the Aspen Institute Germany is to improve the quality of leadership through dialog about the values and ideals essential to meeting the challenges facing organizations and governments at all levels. Over its forty-year history, Aspen Germany has been devoted to advancing values-based leadership – to creating a safe, neutral space in which leaders can meet in order to discuss the complex challenges facing modern societies confidentially and in depth, with respect for differing points of view, in a search for common ground. This reader includes conference papers and proceedings of Aspen Germany’s Western Balkans conference in 2018. The Aspen Institute’s role is limited to that of an organizer and convener. Aspen takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. or German governments. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion contained in all Aspen publications are the sole responsibility of the author or authors. For further information about the Aspen Institute Germany, please write to Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V. Friedrichstraße 60 10117 Berlin Germany or call at +49 30 80 48 90 0. Visit us at www.aspeninstitute.de www.facebook.com/AspenDeutschland www.twitter.com/AspenGermany Copyright © 2018 by The Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania
    An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Policy Analysis - No. 01/2017 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania ABOUT GLPS Group for Legal and Political Studies is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit public policy organization based in Prishtina, Kosovo. Our mission is to conduct credible policy research in the fields of politics, law and economics and to push forward policy solutions that address the failures and/or tackle the problems in the said policy fields. www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Policy Analysis No. 01/2017 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Authors: *Bardha Maxhuni, **Umberto Cucchi June 2017 For their contribution, we would like to thank the external peer reviewers who provided excellent comments on earlier drafts of this policy product. GLPS internal staff provided very helpful inputs, edits and contributed with excellent research support. © Group for Legal and Political Studies, June, 2017. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies donors, their staff, associates or Board(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any mean without the permission. Contact the administrative office of the Group for Legal and Political Studies for such requests. Group for Legal and Political Studies ‟ “Rexhep Luci str. 16/1 Prishtina 10 000, Kosovo Web-site: www.legalpoliticalstudies.org E-mail: [email protected] Tel/fax.: +381 38 234 456 *Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies ** International Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania This page intentionally left blank www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania AN ANALYSIS OF THE VETTING PROCESS IN ALBANIA I.
    [Show full text]
  • Albania's Collapse and Reconstruction
    PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS March - May 1998 Volume III - Number 1 ALBANIA’S COLLAPSE AND RECONSTRUCTION PAUL KUBICEK Paul Kubicek is Assistant Professor in Department of International Relations at Koç University, Istanbul. In the first months of 1997, just as the world celebrated one year of peace in Bosnia, another Balkan state, Albania, plunged into crisis. The mayhem in Albania was triggered by a collapse in shady pyramid investment schemes, but its root causes were decades of economic mismanagement and political corruption. These continued to plague the country even after the collapse of communism in 1991-1992. Many Albanians targeted their wrath on President Sali Berisha, who was held by many to be responsible for the country’s slide into the abyss. Despite his efforts to restore order, government authority collapsed, and the state fell into anarchy as marauding gangs took control of several cities. International forces were eventually called in to help provide humanitarian assistance, control lawlessness, and prepare for new elections. The elections were held in June, and a new government was formed and quickly garnered much-needed international support. However, questions remain over what it and the international community can further do to foster reconciliation and stability in the country. In this paper I will focus on the role of international actors—the UN, OSCE, EU, IMF, non-governmental organisations and interested states—in putting Albania back together. All parties recognise that their effort will be crucial simply because Albania itself lacks the wherewithal to recover on its own. In order to assess whether and how international actors will succeed in their efforts I will extend the analysis beyond the immediate crisis in Albania and look for lessons and parallels with other international efforts to reconstruct or preserve troubled states.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 5 No 3 S1 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy December 2016 Teachers Civic Education and Their Methodological Skills Affect Student Engagement in Civic Participation Dr. Lindita Lutaj University "Aleksander Moisiu", Faculty of Education, Department of Pedagogy, Albania Email: [email protected] Doi:10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p336 Abstract Civic education is important, because the society needs people to contribute in the most effective way. The teacher plays an important role in encouraging pupils to civic actions. The aim of this study is find out the relationship between teachers civic education and their methodological skills in students civic participation. The statistical package of social sciences (SPSS 20) was used for data analysis. Questionnaires were administered to 34 teachers who give social education subject in 6th-9th grade and 414 students of these teachers, in Durres and Elbasan. The factorial analysis of the questionnaire on teachers civic education discovered two important factors: civic responsibility and civic values, while according to teachers’ methodological skills discovered three factors: the quality of the class, learning and student assessment. It was also observed that there is a positive relationship between teachers’ civic education and their methodological skills with students’ civic participation, which it was reported by teachers or perceived by students. There is a significant statistical relationship between teachers civic education and students civic participation: r = .40 (p <0:01), which is stronger than teachers methodological skills and students civic participation: r = .28 (p <0:01). According to the findings of this study should be increased teachers training programs at local and national level.
    [Show full text]
  • 90 Vjet Kontrolli I Lartë I Shtetit
    KALIOPI NASKA BUJAR LESKAJ 1925 KLSH 902015 90 VJET KONTROLLI I LARTË I SHTETIT Tiranë, 2015 Prof. dr. Kaliopi Naska Dr. Bujar Leskaj 90 Vjet Kontrolli i Lartë i Shtetit 1925 - 2015 Tiranë, 2015 1 Ky album është përgatitur në kuadrin e 90 vjetorit të Kontrollit të Lartë të Shtetit Autorë: Prof. dr. Kaliopi Naska Dr. Bujar Leskaj Arti grafik: DafinaKopertina: Stojko Kozma Kondakçiu Tonin Vuksani © Copyright: Kontrolli i Lartë i Shtetit Seria: botime KLSH - 16/2015/51 ISBN: 978-9928-159-41-0 Shtypur në shtypshkronjën: “Classic PRINT” Printing & Publishing Home Tiranë, 2015 2 SHPALLJA E PAVARËSISË DHE ELEMENTË TË KËSHILLIT KONTROLLUES 1912 – 1924 Qeveria e Vlorës dhe fillesat e Këshillit Kontrollues Akti i Shpalljes së Pavarësisë së Shqipërisë. Vlorë 28 nëntor 1912 Ismail Qemal Vlora Themelues i Shtetit Shqiptar Ismail Qemali duke përshëndetur popullin e Vlorës, në ceremoninë e 1-vjetorit të Pavarësisë, Vlorë 2013 Më 28 nëntor 1912 në mbledhjen e parë t i të Kuvendit Kombëtar të Vlorës u nënshkrua nga t e t delegatët Deklarata e Pavarësisë së Shqipërisë. h S i ë rt 90 vjet Kontrolli i La 3 Delegatët e Kuvendit të Vlorës Firmëtarët e Pavarësisë së Shqipërisë: Ismail Kemal Beu, Ilias bej Vrioni, Hajredin bej Cakrani, Xhelal bej Skrapari (Koprencka), Dud (Jorgji) Karbunara, Taq (Dhimitër) Tutulani, Myfti Vehbi Efendiu (Agolli), Abas Efendi (Çelkupa), Mustafa Agai (Hanxhiu), Dom Nikoll Kaçorri, Shefqet bej Daiu, Lef Nosi, Qemal Beu (Karaosmani), Midhat bej Frashëri, Veli Efendiu (Harçi), Elmas Efendiu (Boce), Rexhep Beu (Mitrovica), Bedri Beu (Pejani), Salih Xhuka (Gjuka), Abdi bej Toptani, Mustafa Asim Efendiu (Kruja), Kemal Beu (Mullaj), Ferid bej Vokopola, Nebi Efendi Sefa (Lushnja), Zyhdi Beu (Ohri), Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ligjvënësit Shqipëtarë Në Vite
    LIGJVËNËSIT SHQIPTARË NË VITE Viti 1920 Këshilli Kombëtar i Lushnjës (Senati) Një dhomë, 37 deputetë 27 mars 1920–20 dhjetor 1920 Zgjedhjet u mbajtën më 31 janar 1920. Xhemal NAIPI Kryetar i Këshillit Kombëtar (1920) Dhimitër KACIMBRA Kryetar i Këshillit Kombëtar (1920) Lista emërore e senatorëve 1. Abdurrahman Mati 22. Myqerem HAMZARAJ 2. Adem GJINISHI 23. Mytesim KËLLIÇI 3. Adem PEQINI 24. Neki RULI 4. Ahmet RESULI 25. Osman LITA 5. Bajram bej CURRI 26. Qani DISHNICA 6. Bektash CAKRANI 27. Qazim DURMISHI 7. Beqir bej RUSI 28. Qazim KOCULI 8. Dine bej DIBRA 29. Ramiz DACI 9. Dine DEMA 30. Rexhep MITROVICA 10. Dino bej MASHLARA 31. Sabri bej HAFIZ 11. Dhimitër KACIMBRA 32. Sadullah bej TEPELENA 12. Fazlli FRASHËRI 33. Sejfi VLLAMASI 13. Gjergj KOLECI 34. Spiro Jorgo KOLEKA 14. Halim bej ÇELA 35. Spiro PAPA 15. Hilë MOSI 36. Shefqet VËRLACI 16. Hysein VRIONI 37. Thanas ÇIKOZI 17. Irfan bej OHRI 38. Veli bej KRUJA 18. Kiço KOÇI 39. Visarion XHUVANI 19. Kolë THAÇI 40. Xhemal NAIPI 20. Kostaq (Koço) KOTA 41. Xhemal SHKODRA 21. Llambi GOXHAMANI 42. Ymer bej SHIJAKU Viti 1921 Këshilli Kombëtar/Parlamenti Një dhomë, 78 deputetë 21 prill 1921–30 shtator 1923 Zgjedhjet u mbajtën më 5 prill 1921. Pandeli EVANGJELI Kryetar i Këshillit Kombëtar (1921) Eshref FRASHËRI Kryetar i Këshillit Kombëtar (1922–1923) 1 Lista emërore e deputetëve të Këshillit Kombëtar (Lista pasqyron edhe ndryshimet e bëra gjatë legjislaturës.) 1. Abdyl SULA 49. Mehdi FRASHËRI 2. Agathokli GJITONI 50. Mehmet PENGILI 3. Ahmet HASTOPALLI 51. Mehmet PILKU 4. Ahmet RESULI 52. Mithat FRASHËRI 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 LIGJVËNËSIT SHQIPTARË NË VITE Viti 1920 Këshilli Kombëtar I
    LIGJVËNËSIT SHQIPTARË NË VITE Viti 1920 Këshilli Kombëtar i Lushnjës (Senati) Një dhomë, 37 deputetë 27 mars 1920–20 dhjetor 1920 Zgjedhjet u mbajtën më 31 janar 1920. Xhemal NAIPI Kryetar i Këshillit Kombëtar (1920) Dhimitër KACIMBRA Kryetar i Këshillit Kombëtar (1920) Lista emërore e senatorëve 1. Abdurrahman Mati 22. Myqerem HAMZARAJ 2. Adem GJINISHI 23. Mytesim KËLLIÇI 3. Adem PEQINI 24. Neki RULI 4. Ahmet RESULI 25. Osman LITA 5. Bajram bej CURRI 26. Qani DISHNICA 6. Bektash CAKRANI 27. Qazim DURMISHI 7. Beqir bej RUSI 28. Qazim KOCULI 8. Dine bej DIBRA 29. Ramiz DACI 9. Dine DEMA 30. Rexhep MITROVICA 10. Dino bej MASHLARA 31. Sabri bej HAFIZ 11. Dhimitër KACIMBRA 32. Sadullah bej TEPELENA 12. Fazlli FRASHËRI 33. Sejfi VLLAMASI 13. Gjergj KOLECI 34. Spiro Jorgo KOLEKA 14. Halim bej ÇELA 35. Spiro PAPA 15. Hilë MOSI 36. Shefqet VËRLACI 16. Hysein VRIONI 37. Thanas ÇIKOZI 17. Irfan bej OHRI 38. Veli bej KRUJA 18. Kiço KOÇI 39. Visarion XHUVANI 19. Kolë THAÇI 40. Xhemal NAIPI 20. Kostaq (Koço) KOTA 41. Xhemal SHKODRA 21. Llambi GOXHAMANI 42. Ymer bej SHIJAKU Viti 1921 Këshilli Kombëtar/Parlamenti Një dhomë, 78 deputetë 21 prill 1921–30 shtator 1923 Zgjedhjet u mbajtën më 5 prill 1921. Pandeli EVANGJELI Kryetar i Këshillit Kombëtar (1921) Eshref FRASHËRI Kryetar i Këshillit Kombëtar (1922–1923) 1 Lista emërore e deputetëve të Këshillit Kombëtar (Lista pasqyron edhe ndryshimet e bëra gjatë legjislaturës.) 1. Abdyl SULA 49. Mehdi FRASHËRI 2. Agathokli GJITONI 50. Mehmet PENGILI 3. Ahmet HASTOPALLI 51. Mehmet PILKU 4. Ahmet RESULI 52. Mithat FRASHËRI 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of the Venice Commission on to the Albanian Legal System Dr
    International Journal of Law and Interdisciplinary Legal Studies | 5 JP1. DK15-8106 THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE VENICE COMMISSION ON TO THE ALBANIAN LEGAL SYSTEM DR. JONIDA MEHMETAJ1 ABSTRACT In their legal activity, states are often assisted by international actors to draft their legislative acts in line with international standards. One of these bodies is the Venice Commission, a Council of Europe body that, through its Opinions and legal advice, assists and supervises states in complying with the principles of democracy. The present study addresses the case of Albania and its relationship with the Commission. It seeks to identify the impact of the Opinions announced by the Commission on Albania and the issues for which it was necessary to submit a request for an Opinion. A recent case in which the Venice Commission has lent its expertise to Albania is the undertaking of a reform of the justice system. In this difficult process, the Venice Commission’s recent Opinions have served as a guide for taking appropriate steps and for adopting a reform that guarantees an efficient and impartial justice system. Key words: Opinions, Contribution, Venice Commission, Albania, Justice reform INTRODUCTION The European Commission for Democracy Through Law, otherwise known as the Venice Commission, has continuously contributed to Albania through its Opinions on legal issues. Albania’s relationship with the Venice Commission has been long-lived, since the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in 1995 expressed a favourable Opinion on Albania's application for membership in the Council of Europe (Parliamentary Assembly, 1995). The ratification of the Statute of the Council of Europe on 13 July 1995 and its entry into force on that day enabled Albania to become a member of the Council of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • With an English Translation
    THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY FOUNDED BY JAMES LOEB, LX,.D. EDITED BY fT. E. PAGE, C.H., LITT.D. E. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. tW. H. D. ROUSE, litt.d. A. POST, M.A. E. H. WARMINGTON, m.a., f.r.hist.soc. LIVY XIII BOOKS XLIII—XLV m^( LIYY WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION IN FOURTEEN VOLUMES XIII BOOKS XLIII—XLV TRANSLATED BY ALFRED C. SCHLESINGER, Ph.D. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OP CLASSICS IN OBERLIN COLLEGE LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN LTD CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS MCMLI Printed in Great Britain V.I3 TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE A FULLER report of the text is given in this vohmie than in the immediately preceding volume. The attempt has been made to present all emendations subsequent to the editio pri?iceps ; but a few repeated misspellings of proper names and similarly obvious corrections are not reported. A few of the emenda- tions of the princeps have been included exempli gratia. The apparatus of Giarratano (Titi Livi Ah Urhe Condita Libri XLI-XLF, Rome, 1933) has been constantly consulted, but not always followed. The maps are intended to show the location of all places mentioned in the volume, if the location is known. Kiepert's Atlas Antiquus has been used in preparing these maps ; places not located by Kiepert have a question-mark following the name. Where the name is spelled by Kiepert in a way conspicuously different from the Livy text, the Kiepert spelling will be found in parentheses in the Index. The map of Rome is taken from O. Richter, Topograpkie der Stadt Rom, Miinchen, Beck, 1901 (Iwan MuUer, Handbuch, III, 3), by kind permission of the pub- lishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista De Investigações Constitucionais
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGAÇÕES CONSTITUCIONAIS vol. 4 | n. 3 | setembro/dezembro 2017 | ISSN 2359-5639 | Periodicidade quadrimestral Curitiba | Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR | www.ninc.com.br Licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Licensed under Creative Commons Revista de Investigações Constitucionais ISSN 2359-5639 DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v4i2.50287 Constitutional reform in Brazil: lessons from Albania? Reforma constitucional no Brasil: lições da Albânia? RICHARD ALBERT* Boston College Law School (United States of America) [email protected] JULIANO ZAIDEN BENVINDO** Universidade de Brasília (Brasil) [email protected] KLODIAN RADO*** Osgoode Hall Law School (Canada) [email protected] FABIAN ZHILLA**** Canadian Institute of Technology (Albania) [email protected] Recebido/Received: 07.08.2017 / August 7th, 2017 Aprovado/Approved: 20.08.2017 / August 20th, 2017 Como citar esse artigo/How to cite this article: ALBERT, Richard; BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden; RADO, Klodian; ZHILLA, Fabian. Cons- titutional reform in Brazil: lessons from Albania? Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Curitiba, vol. 4, n. 3. p. 11-34, set./ dez. 2017. DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v4i3.54372. * Professor at Boston College Law School (Newton, USA); as of January 1, 2018, Professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law (Austin, USA). Juris Doctor – J.D. (Yale University). Master of Laws – LL.M. (Harvard University). Bachelor of Civil Law – B.C.L. (Oxford University). E-mail: [email protected]. ** Professor of Constitutional Law at University of Brasília (Brasília-DF, Brazil). PhD from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (Ger- many). CNPq Research Fellow (3087332015-0). E-mail: [email protected]. *** Ph.D. candidate from Osgoode Hall Law School (Toronto, Canada).
    [Show full text]
  • Revista De Investigações Constitucionais ISSN: 2359-5639 Universidade Federal Do Paraná
    Revista de Investigações Constitucionais ISSN: 2359-5639 Universidade Federal do Paraná ALBERT, RICHARD; BENVINDO, JULIANO ZAIDEN; RADO, KLODIAN; ZHILLA, FABIAN Constitutional reform in Brazil: lessons from Albania? Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, vol. 4, no. 3, 2017, September-December, pp. 11-34 Universidade Federal do Paraná DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v4i2.50287 Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=534057808002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative REVISTA DE INVESTIGAÇÕES CONSTITUCIONAIS vol. 4 | n. 3 | setembro/dezembro 2017 | ISSN 2359-5639 | Periodicidade quadrimestral Curitiba | Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR | www.ninc.com.br Licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Licensed under Creative Commons Revista de Investigações Constitucionais ISSN 2359-5639 DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v4i2.50287 Constitutional reform in Brazil: lessons from Albania? Reforma constitucional no Brasil: lições da Albânia? RICHARD ALBERT* Boston College Law School (United States of America) [email protected] JULIANO ZAIDEN BENVINDO** Universidade de Brasília (Brasil) [email protected] KLODIAN RADO*** Osgoode Hall Law School (Canada) [email protected] FABIAN ZHILLA**** Canadian Institute of Technology (Albania) [email protected] Recebido/Received: 07.08.2017 / August 7th, 2017 Aprovado/Approved: 20.08.2017 / August 20th, 2017 Como citar esse artigo/How to cite this article: ALBERT, Richard; BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden; RADO, Klodian; ZHILLA, Fabian. Cons- titutional reform in Brazil: lessons from Albania? Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Curitiba, vol.
    [Show full text]