Synthesis and Evaluation of Cocaine Analogs for Activity As Cocaine Antagonists and Synthesis of Novel Prodrugs with Antiarthritic Potential
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist. -
Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and Its Analogues in Biological Specimens
Recommended methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2017 Note Operating and experimental conditions are reproduced from the original reference materials, including unpublished methods, validated and used in selected national laboratories as per the list of references. A number of alternative conditions and substitution of named commercial products may provide comparable results in many cases. However, any modification has to be validated before it is integrated into laboratory routines. ST/NAR/53 Original language: English © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Acknowledgements The Laboratory and Scientific Section of the UNODC (LSS, headed by Dr. Justice Tettey) wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to Dr. Barry Logan, Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, at the Fredric Rieders Family Founda- tion and NMS Labs, United States; Amanda L.A. -
Lecture 10 Carbon-Nitrogen Bonds Formation I
NPTEL – Chemistry – Principles of Organic Synthesis Lecture 10 Carbon-Nitrogen Bonds Formation I 4.1 Principles The methods for the formation of bonds between nitrogen and aliphatic carbon can be broadly divided into two categories: (i) reaction of nucleophilic nitrogen with electrophilic carbon, and (ii) reaction of electrophilic nitrogen with nucleophilic carbon. In this section, we will try to cover some of the important reactions. 4.2 Substitution of Nitrogen Nucleophiles at Saturated Carbon 4.2.1 Ritter Reaction Treatment of a tertiary alcohol or the corresponding alkene with concentrated sulphuric acid and a nitrile affords an amide that in acidic conditions undergoes hydrolysis to give amine. First, a R H, RCN H3O + RCO H OH N O NH 2 H2O H 2 Mechanism OH2 H -H2O :NC-R H2O OH OH N N R N R 2 C R OH O H2O proton H3O + RCO2H N R N R NH2 -H3O transfer H Scheme 1 tertiary carbocation is formed which is attacked by the nitrile to give a quaternary ion. The latter is decomposed by water to provide an amide which, in acidic conditions, is hydrolyzed to give an amine (Scheme 1). Joint initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 1 of 35 NPTEL – Chemistry – Principles of Organic Synthesis Examples: Me H N H2SO4 + N Chlorobenzene O 91% S. J. Chang, Organic Process Research and Development 1999, 3, 232. Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me SnCl4 MeCN CH2 CH2 Cl N N T.-L. Ho, R.-J. Chein, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 591. Me Me O Ph HNCHO Ph OH Ph HN H2SO4 Me H2SO4 N TMSCN N MeCN N Bn Bn Bn H. -
Prohibited Substances List
Prohibited Substances List This is the Equine Prohibited Substances List that was voted in at the FEI General Assembly in November 2009 alongside the new Equine Anti-Doping and Controlled Medication Regulations(EADCMR). Neither the List nor the EADCM Regulations are in current usage. Both come into effect on 1 January 2010. The current list of FEI prohibited substances remains in effect until 31 December 2009 and can be found at Annex II Vet Regs (11th edition) Changes in this List : Shaded row means that either removed or allowed at certain limits only SUBSTANCE ACTIVITY Banned Substances 1 Acebutolol Beta blocker 2 Acefylline Bronchodilator 3 Acemetacin NSAID 4 Acenocoumarol Anticoagulant 5 Acetanilid Analgesic/anti-pyretic 6 Acetohexamide Pancreatic stimulant 7 Acetominophen (Paracetamol) Analgesic/anti-pyretic 8 Acetophenazine Antipsychotic 9 Acetylmorphine Narcotic 10 Adinazolam Anxiolytic 11 Adiphenine Anti-spasmodic 12 Adrafinil Stimulant 13 Adrenaline Stimulant 14 Adrenochrome Haemostatic 15 Alclofenac NSAID 16 Alcuronium Muscle relaxant 17 Aldosterone Hormone 18 Alfentanil Narcotic 19 Allopurinol Xanthine oxidase inhibitor (anti-hyperuricaemia) 20 Almotriptan 5 HT agonist (anti-migraine) 21 Alphadolone acetate Neurosteriod 22 Alphaprodine Opiod analgesic 23 Alpidem Anxiolytic 24 Alprazolam Anxiolytic 25 Alprenolol Beta blocker 26 Althesin IV anaesthetic 27 Althiazide Diuretic 28 Altrenogest (in males and gelidngs) Oestrus suppression 29 Alverine Antispasmodic 30 Amantadine Dopaminergic 31 Ambenonium Cholinesterase inhibition 32 Ambucetamide Antispasmodic 33 Amethocaine Local anaesthetic 34 Amfepramone Stimulant 35 Amfetaminil Stimulant 36 Amidephrine Vasoconstrictor 37 Amiloride Diuretic 1 Prohibited Substances List This is the Equine Prohibited Substances List that was voted in at the FEI General Assembly in November 2009 alongside the new Equine Anti-Doping and Controlled Medication Regulations(EADCMR). -
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 2,497,304 PREPARATION of OARBOXYLIC ACID ANHYDRIDES William F
Patented Feb. 14, 1950 ’ 2,491,304 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 2,497,304 PREPARATION OF OARBOXYLIC ACID ANHYDRIDES William F. Gresham and Richard E. Brooks, Wil mington, DeL, assignors to E. I. do ' Pont de Nemours & Company, Wilmington, Del., poration of Delaware No Drawing. Application November 23, 1945, Serial No. 630,540 , 10 Claims. (01. 260-546) This invention relates to the synthesis of or- ‘ propionic acid to form propionic anhydride in ganic compounds and particularly to the prepara substantially the following manner: tion of organic carboxylic acid anhydrides by the interaction of ole?nic substances, carbon monoxide, and carboxylic acids. 5 propylene and butylene ‘similarly react with Various processes have been proposed hereto propionic acid to form the corresponding mixed fore for the preparation of organic carboxylic anhydrides. respectively. By utilizing other all acid anhydrides. For example, acetic anhydride phatic carboxylic acids than propionic acid, nu has been prepared by pyrolysis of ethylldene merous organic carboxylic acid anhydrides can be diacetate, or by the direct high temperature de 10 prepared, such, for example, as the following: hydration of acetic acid. Other anhydrides have carbon monoxide reacting with formic acid and been prepared by reaction between acetic anhy ethylene to give formic propionic anhydride; car dride and the corresponding organic carboxylic bon monoxide reacting with acetic acid and acid. ‘ ethylene to give a mixed acetic propionic anhy An object of the present invention is to provide 15 dride; carbon monoxide reacting with propylene a novel process for the synthesis of organic car and butyric acid to give butyric anhydride; car boxylic acid anhydrides from relatively inexpen bon monoxide reacting with isobutylene and sive starting materials. -
MDA) Analogs and Homologs
Terry A. Dal Cason, 1 M.Sc. An Evaluation of the Potential for Clandestine Manufacture of 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) Analogs and Homologs REFERENCE: Dal Cason, T. A., "An Evaluation of the Potential for Clandestine Manu- facture of 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) Analogs and Homologs," Journal of Forensic Sciences, JFSCA, Vol. 35, No.3, May 1990, pp. 675-697. ABSTRACT: Encountering a novel controlled-substance analog (designer drug) has become a distinct possibility for all forensic drug laboratories. 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) in particular is a receptive parent compound for the molecular modifications which produce such homo logs and analogs. The identification of these compounds, however, can prove to be an arduous task. It would be desirable to direct the focus of the identification to those compounds which are the more likely candidates for clandestine-laboratory synthesis. The process of narrowing the range of theoretical possibilities to logical choices may be enhanced by using a suitable predictive scheme. Such a predictive scheme for MDA analogs is presented based on putative Central Nervous System activity, existence or formulation of a reasonable synthesis method, and availability of the required precursors. KEYWORDS: toxicology, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, drug identification To circumvent statutes enacted to control the use of various dangerous drugs (controlled substances), clandestine laboratory operators will sometimes make minor alterations in the molecular structure of a parent compound. These structural changes are reflected in the chemical nomenclature of the new analog or homolog, and, in the past/ had effectively removed it from the purview of the law. Such modifications, at least in the case of 3,4- methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), do not appear to be haphazard. -
Screening of 300 Drugs in Blood Utilizing Second Generation
Forensic Screening of 300 Drugs in Blood Utilizing Exactive Plus High-Resolution Accurate Mass Spectrometer and ExactFinder Software Kristine Van Natta, Marta Kozak, Xiang He Forensic Toxicology use Only Drugs analyzed Compound Compound Compound Atazanavir Efavirenz Pyrilamine Chlorpropamide Haloperidol Tolbutamide 1-(3-Chlorophenyl)piperazine Des(2-hydroxyethyl)opipramol Pentazocine Atenolol EMDP Quinidine Chlorprothixene Hydrocodone Tramadol 10-hydroxycarbazepine Desalkylflurazepam Perimetazine Atropine Ephedrine Quinine Cilazapril Hydromorphone Trazodone 5-(p-Methylphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin Desipramine Phenacetin Benperidol Escitalopram Quinupramine Cinchonine Hydroquinine Triazolam 6-Acetylcodeine Desmethylcitalopram Phenazone Benzoylecgonine Esmolol Ranitidine Cinnarizine Hydroxychloroquine Trifluoperazine Bepridil Estazolam Reserpine 6-Monoacetylmorphine Desmethylcitalopram Phencyclidine Cisapride HydroxyItraconazole Trifluperidol Betaxolol Ethyl Loflazepate Risperidone 7(2,3dihydroxypropyl)Theophylline Desmethylclozapine Phenylbutazone Clenbuterol Hydroxyzine Triflupromazine Bezafibrate Ethylamphetamine Ritonavir 7-Aminoclonazepam Desmethyldoxepin Pholcodine Clobazam Ibogaine Trihexyphenidyl Biperiden Etifoxine Ropivacaine 7-Aminoflunitrazepam Desmethylmirtazapine Pimozide Clofibrate Imatinib Trimeprazine Bisoprolol Etodolac Rufinamide 9-hydroxy-risperidone Desmethylnefopam Pindolol Clomethiazole Imipramine Trimetazidine Bromazepam Felbamate Secobarbital Clomipramine Indalpine Trimethoprim Acepromazine Desmethyltramadol Pipamperone -
Appendix-2Final.Pdf 663.7 KB
North West ‘Through the Gate Substance Misuse Services’ Drug Testing Project Appendix 2 – Analytical methodologies Overview Urine samples were analysed using three methodologies. The first methodology (General Screen) was designed to cover a wide range of analytes (drugs) and was used for all analytes other than the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs). The analyte coverage included a broad range of commonly prescribed drugs including over the counter medications, commonly misused drugs and metabolites of many of the compounds too. This approach provided a very powerful drug screening tool to investigate drug use/misuse before and whilst in prison. The second methodology (SCRA Screen) was specifically designed for SCRAs and targets only those compounds. This was a very sensitive methodology with a method capability of sub 100pg/ml for over 600 SCRAs and their metabolites. Both methodologies utilised full scan high resolution accurate mass LCMS technologies that allowed a non-targeted approach to data acquisition and the ability to retrospectively review data. The non-targeted approach to data acquisition effectively means that the analyte coverage of the data acquisition was unlimited. The only limiting factors were related to the chemical nature of the analyte being looked for. The analyte must extract in the sample preparation process; it must chromatograph and it must ionise under the conditions used by the mass spectrometer interface. The final limiting factor was presence in the data processing database. The subsequent study of negative MDT samples across the North West and London and the South East used a GCMS methodology for anabolic steroids in addition to the General and SCRA screens. -
Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Cocaine in Seized Materials
Recommended methods for the Identification and Analysis of Cocaine in Seized Materials MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES Photo credits: UNODC Photo Library; UNODC/Ioulia Kondratovitch; Alessandro Scotti. Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Cocaine in Seized Materials (Revised and updated) MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS New York, 2012 Note Operating and experimental conditions are reproduced from the original reference materials, including unpublished methods, validated and used in selected national laboratories as per the list of references. A number of alternative conditions and substitution of named commercial products may provide comparable results in many cases, but any modification has to be validated before it is integrated into laboratory routines. Mention of names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. ST/NAR/7/REV.1 Original language: English © United Nations, March 2012. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. ii Contents Page 1. Introduction ................................................. 1 1.1 Background .............................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and use of the manual .............................. 1 2. Physical appearance and chemical characteristics of coca leaf and illicit materials containing cocaine ................................ -
Systematic Evaluation of 1-Chlorobutane for Liquid-Liquid Extraction of Drugs U
Systematic evaluation of 1-chlorobutane for liquid-liquid extraction of drugs U. Demme1*, J. Becker2, H. Bussemas3, T. Daldrup4, F. Erdmann5, M. Erkens6, P.X. Iten7, H. Käferstein8, K.J. Lusthof9, H.J. Magerl10, L.v. Meyer11, A. Reiter12, G. Rochholz13, A. Schmoldt14, E. Schneider15, H.W. Schütz13, T. Stimpfl16, F. Tarbah17, J. Teske18, W. Vycudilik16, J.P. Weller18, W. Weinmann19 *On behalf of the “Workgroup Extraction“ of the GTFCh (Society of Toxicological and Forensic Chemistry, Germany) Institutes of Forensic Medicine of 1Jena, 2Mainz, 4Duesseldorf, 5Giessen, 7Zuerich (CH), 8Cologne, 10Wuerzburg, 11Munich, 12Luebeck, 13Kiel, 14Hamburg, 16Vienna (A), 18Hannover, 19Freiburg and 3Praxis Labormedizin Dortmund, 6Clin.-Chem. Central Laboratory, Aachen, 9Nat. For. Inst., Den Haag (NL), 15LKA Baden-Wuerttemberg, Stuttgart 17Dubai Police Dept. Introduction In systematic toxicological analysis (STA), chromatographic Experimental Buffer solutions (pH 9) were obtained by dissolving 10 g methods are widely used for the detection of drugs and other organic toxic substances in Na2HPO4 (VWR) in one liter of distilled water. 1-chlorobutane and methanol (analytical biological materials, such as blood, plasma, urine, hair and tissue samples. In most cases grade) were obtained from VWR International (Darmstadt, Germany). Drugs were the applied analytical methods like gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS), purchased as pure compounds or as salts from chemical suppliers (Sigma high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC/DAD), Deissenhofen/Germany and others) or from the pharmaceutical manufacturers and were HPLC/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), or thin-layer chromatography with remission first dissolved in methanol to achieve a concentration of 1 mg/mL. In some instances the spectroscopy (TLC/UV), require sample preparation by extraction prior to analysis. -
Cocaine/Benzoylecgonine-2 Elisa Kit Instructions Product #130319-2 & 130315-2 Forensic Use Only
Neogen Corporation 944 Nandino Blvd., Lexington KY 40511 USA 800/477-8201 USA/Canada | 859/254-1221 Fax: 859/255-5532 | E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.neogen.com/Toxicology COCAINE/BENZOYLECGONINE-2 ELISA KIT INSTRUCTIONS PRODUCT #130319-2 & 130315-2 FORENSIC USE ONLY INTENDED USE: For the determination of trace quantities of Cocaine, Benzoylecgonine and/or other metabolites in human urine, blood, oral fluid. DESCRIPTION Neogen Corporation’s Cocaine/Benzoylecgonine-2 ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay) test kit is a qualitative one-step kit designed for use as a screening device for the detection of drugs and/or their metabolites. The kit was designed for screening purposes and is intended for forensic use only. It is recommended that all suspect samples be confirmed by a quantitative method such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). ASSAY PRINCIPLES Neogen Corporation’s test kit operates on the basis of competition between the drug or its metabolite in the sample and the drug-enzyme conjugate for a limited number of antibody binding sites. First, the sample or control is added to the microplate. Next, the diluted drug-enzyme conjugate is added and the mixture is incubated at room temperature. During this incubation, the drug in the sample or the drug-enzyme conjugate binds to antibody immobilized in the microplate wells. After incubation, the plate is washed to remove any unbound sample or drug-enzyme conjugate. The presence of bound drug-enzyme conjugate is recognized by the addition of K-Blue Substrate (TMB). After a 30 minute substrate incubation, the reaction is halted with the addition of an acid stop. -
Catalytic Radical-Polar Crossover Ritter Reaction Eric E
Catalytic Radical-Polar Crossover Ritter Reaction Eric E. Touney‡, Riley E. Cooper‡, Sarah. E. Bredenkamp, David T. George†, and Sergey V. Pronin* Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2025, United States Supporting Information Placeholder Co(II) complex, ABSTRACT: A catalytic radical-polar crossover Ritter R3 R3 R3 silane, oxidant MeCN, H2O R1 R1 AcHN reaction is described. The transformation proceeds under R4 R4 R4 via R3 nuclephilic attack 1 2 acid-free conditions and tolerates a variety of functional R2 R2 & hydrolysis R R R1 R4 groups. The catalyst design overcomes limitations in the 32 examples substitution pattern of starting materials and enables hy- R2 droamidation of a diverse range of alkenes. Formation of Scheme 1. Catalytic radical-polar crossover Ritter reaction. hydrogen contributes to the background consumption of reductant and oxidant and competes with the desired path- polar crossover reactions of alkenes we observed that ap- way, pointing to a mechanistic link between hydrogen plication of acetonitrile as solvent occasionally resulted atom transfer-initiated organic reactions and hydrogen in formation of small amounts of side-products arising evolution catalysis. from apparent Markovnikov addition of acetamide to the carbon-carbon double bond.5,6 The electrophilic interme- diates in this formal Ritter reaction were proposed to arise from direct oxidation of alkyl radicals following the HAT Hydroamidation of alkenes with nitriles in the presence and diffusion from the solvent cage.7 Alternative path- of a strong Brønsted acid, discovered by Ritter, allows for ways involve radical pair collapse to generate the corre- a convenient access to tert-alkylamines and their deriva- 1 sponding alkylcobalt(III) complexes, which undergo oxi- tives from simple precursors.