2007/08 AMR Supplementary Data Chapters

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR SECTION 3 HOUSING

This section contains data tables and figures relating to the housing section of the RSS Monitoring Report. The tables/figures are presented under the relevant policy. Where the data is relevant to more than one policy it is presented under the policy which comes first.

POLICY 2- PROMOTING BETTER DESIGN

Table H.1- Density of New Housing 2007/08 New New New dwellings completed dwellings completed dwellings completed at less than 30 dph between 30 and 50 above 50 dph dph No. per cent No. per cent No. per cent Central Lincolnshire HMA 255 28.7 134 15.1 499 56.2 Coastal Lincolnshire HMA 99 26.6 102 27.4 171 46.0 Derby HMA 196 9.1 1161 53.7 806 37.3 Leicester & Leicestershire HMA 433 15.4 1329 47.4 1,043 37.2 North Northamptonshire HMA* 115 8.3974 70.6 290 21.0 Northern HMA 312 25.7 666 54.9 236 19.4 Nottingham Core HMA 128 5.8586 26.5 1495 67.7 Nottingham Outer HMA 313 32.0 509 52.0 156 16.0 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 242 52.5 97 21.0 122 26.5 Peterborough Partial HMA 147 16.7 500 56.9 232 26.4 West Northamptonshire HMA 26 2.1 498 39.9 724 58.0 East Midlands 2,266 15.5 6,556 44.9 5,774 39.6 Source: Local Authorities *No data for Wellingborough

Table H.2- Vacant dwellings, number and percentage vacant 2007/08 HMA Vacant Private Local RSL Other Public Total Sector Authority Sector **** No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Central Lincolnshire 4,496 4.2 87 1.4 147 1.2 351 23.6 5,081 4.0 Coastal Lincolnshire 2,765 3.5109 0.9 0 0.0 203 31.5 3,077 3.4 Derby 6,211 3.8 252 1.7 294 1.7 7 8.4 6,764 3.4 Leicester & Leicestershire* 9,838 **3.1 515 **3.1 696 **1.7 13 **2.7 11,062 **2.9 North Northamptonshire * 1,587 2.0 131 1.2 115 2.4 0 0.0 1,833 2.0 Northern 5,538 3.9 100 2.6 418 1.4 8 4.7 6,064 3.5 Nottingham Core* 9,217 4.2 769 3.5 718 2.2 0 0.0 10,704 3.9 Nottingham Outer 4,120 3.4 104 1.8 471 2.4 0 0.0 4,695 3.2 Peak, Dales & Park*** 2,205 4.147 1.5 28 0.7 0 0.0 2,2803.7 Peterborough Partial 2,600 2.7 25 1.0 142 1.2 0 0.0 2,767 2.5 West Northamptonshire * 3,811 3.6 53 0.7 191 1.6 1 2.6 4,056 3.2 East Midlands 52,388 **3.5 2,192 **2.1 3,220 **1.7 583 **15.0 58,383 **3.3 Source: Local Authorities * Data missing or incomplete from some authorities No data from Broxtowe, Daventry, Kettering No RSL data from Hinckley & Bosworth No other public sector data from Blaby, Hinckley & Bosworth **No stock data from Oadby & Wigston, no RSL vacant numbers from Blaby- these have been excluded from percentage calculations *** Excludes the Peak Park as vacancies are the responsibility of the constituent authorities **** includes Government departments and other public sector agencies (e.g. Regional Health Authorities, the Forestry Commission and county councils) POLICY 13- REGIONAL HOUSING PROVISION

Table H.3- Housing Targets- Housing provision in each district and unitary authority area should be made at the average annual rates set out below: Total District / HMA 2001-06 2006-11 2011-16 2016-26 Provision (2001-26) Central Lincs HMA 1,790 1,880 1,980 2,140 49,650 Lincoln * 400 640 870 1,230 21,850 N Kesteven 550 550 560 570 14,000 West Lindsey 840 690 550 340 13,800 Coastal Lincs HMA 950 880 820 20 13,450 Boston ** 370 300 240 - 4,550 East Lindsey** 580 580 580 20 8,900 Peterborough Partial HMA 1,480 1,350 1,310 1,080 31,500 Rutland 230 150 150 160 4,250 S Holland ** 610 550 490 220 10,450 S Kesteven 640 650 670 700 16,800 Nottingham Outer HMA 1,350 1,540 1,740 2,030 43,450 Ashfield 440 490 540 610 13,450 Mansfield 300 390 490 630 12,200 Newark & Sherwood 610 660 710 790 17,800 Northern HMA 1,250 1,360 1,470 1,630 36,700 Bolsover 260 320 380 460 9,400 Chesterfield 400 390 390 370 9,600 NE Derbyshire 230 290 350 450 8,850 Bassetlaw 360 360 350 350 8,850 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 500 500 500 500 12,500 Derbyshire Dales 160 170 190 220 4,800 High Peak 340 330 310 280 7,700 PDNPA - - - - - Derby HMA 1,650 2,150 1,930 1,610 44,750 Derby 670 1,120 850 450 17,700 Amber Valley 330 400 470 580 11,800 S Derbyshire 650 630 610 580 15,250 Leicester & Leics HMA 3,230 4,060 4,050 4,030 97,000 Leicester 850 1,520 1,370 1,130 30,000 Blaby 210 260 340 460 8,650 Charnwood 670 810 800 790 19,300 Harborough 340 440 380 300 8,800 Hinckley & Bosworth 540 330 410 530 11,700 Melton 150 240 190 120 4,100 NW Leicestershire 380 370 470 610 12,200 Oadby & Wigston 90 90 90 90 2,250 Nottingham Core HMA 2,060 2,460 2,820 3,380 70,500 Erewash 290 320 340 390 8,650 Nottingham 1,010 1,080 1,130 1,200 28,100 Broxtowe 230 280 320 390 8,050 Gedling 230 300 370 470 9,200 Rushcliffe 300 480 660 930 16,500 North Northamptonshire 2,225 2,605 2,795 2,795 66,075 Corby * 560 680 1,060 1,060 22,100 Kettering 550 810 630 630 16,250 East Northamptonshire 520 520 420 420 11,500 Wellingborough 595 595 685 685 16,225 West Northamptonshire 2,170 2,320 2,640 2,650 62,150 Daventry 540 540 540 540 13,500 Northampton * 1,300 1,450 1,770 1,780 40,400 South Northamptonshire 330 330 330 330 8,250 East Midlands 18,655 21,105 22,055 21,865 527,725 *Figures for Lincoln, Corby and Northampton include any provision made in urban extensions which may need to extend across local authority boundaries, or be located on the edge of the existing built up areas related to these local authorities, including sites which may be wholly located in adjacent authorities. Such provision would be subject to agreement by all relevant local planning authorities and would be additional to the original figures for the ‘receiving authorities’ in the above table. **All figures for 2006-2026 are minima except those for East Lindsey, Boston and South Holland which are maxima pending the agreement of a Lincolnshire Coast Strategy.

Table H.4- Dwelling Completions by Type 2007/08 Flats, Maisonettes or Apartments Whole Houses or Bungalows HMA 1 Bed 2 Beds 3 Beds 4+ Beds Total 1 Bed 2 Beds 3 Beds 4+ Beds Total Central Lincolnshire 38 263 23 0 324 9 145 501 494 1,149 Coastal Lincs. 33 110 4 1 148 14 321 377 167 879 Derby* 65 2907 0 362 10 187 465 317 979 Leicester & Leics.* 130 519 10 0 659 19 200 556 400 1,175 North Northants* ** 50 125 5 0 180 5 92 215 198 510 Northern* 52 81 0 0 133 42 237 430 192 901 Nottingham Core* 398 843 34 31 1,306 7 170 691 351 1,219 Nottingham Outer* 19 58 0 0 77 4 71 177 240 492 Peak, Dales & Park* 9 28 0 0 37 2 23 127 75 227 Peterborough Partial* 85 163 13 4 265 21 215 499 344 1,079 West Northants* 135 450 51 0 636 14 84 229 214 541 East Midlands 1,014 2,930 147 36 4,127 147 1,745 4,267 2,992 9,151 Source: Local Authorities * Data missing or incomplete from some authorities Data not returned from Ashfield, Chesterfield, Corby, Daventry, Derby, Derby Dales, Erewash, Kettering, Leicester, Melton, Peak, Rutland and Wellingborough and is therefore this is a large under representation. **East Northamptonshire data is not consistent with the rest of the data in their return HOUSING TRAJECTORIES

Notes for Table H.5 and H.6

The figures in these tables refer to Core indicators H2(a) Net additional dwellings in previous years, H2b) Net additional dwellings for the reporting year and H2(c) Net additional dwellings for future years a) Net Additions provided by district authorities.

Not all districts provided data up to 2025/26. Where data is not available cells have been greyed out. HMA figures have been calculated by summing their districts- HMA totals are only calculated for as many years as data is available for all their districts.

In some instances 2001/02 figures have been taken from data collected for the 2001/02 Annual Monitoring Report

Two target figures have been provided, the annual average requirement from the Draft RSS and an average annual requirement calculated from the 5 year targets given in the RSS Proposed Changes.

Districts have used estimates obtained from SHLAA studies where available, elsewhere they are best estimates of known supply, including uncommitted sites.

All districts are considered to have complied with the CLG guidance on production of housing supply figures for trajectories. Available at http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/coreoutputin dicators2

Known exceptions:

None

Most, but not all, districts accounted for the market downturn (spring - autumn 2008) to some extent in assessing deliverability timescales:

Known exceptions:

• North Kesteven • West Lindsey • Boston • South Kesteven

The figures in the table should comply with District LDF Annual Monitoring Reports; in some cases those have been used as the source of data. In some cases the data extends beyond the LDF AMR period.

Known exceptions:

• North Kesteven: combines two alternative approaches in the AMR to show identified land supply only • East Lindsey: recalculated to show identified land supply to 2016 only • Mansfield, supply relates to RSS period rather than N&N JSP; (adjustment by Notts CC) • South Kesteven: 2001-02 added

Additional notes on data provided for each HMA are presented under the relevant chart.

Table H.5- Past Provision and Targets Net additional dwellings in past years Targets RSS Draft Annual RSS Proposed Changes 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 Average Annual Average Central Lincs HMA 1,551 1,444 1,678 1,634 1,811 2,033 1,775 1,830 1,986 Lincoln 163 335 301 372 376 576 502 524 874 N Kesteven 1001 768 499 453 538 584 605 754 560 West Lindsey 387 341 878 809 897 873 668 552 552 Coastal Lincs HMA 923 1,227 1,018 797 815 999 1,037 940 538 Boston 228 616 441 284 268 271 503 290 182 East Lindsey 695 611 577 513 547 728 534 650 356 Peterborough Partial HMA 1,314 1,390 1,601 1,614 1,455 1,510 1,536 1,350 1,260 Rutland 260 116 189 352 251 191 90 170 170 S Holland 570 745 697 550 515 348 560 550 418 S Kesteven 484 529 715 712 689 971 886 630 672 Nottingham Outer HMA 1,075 1,511 1,340 1,219 1,435 1,633 1,164 1,465 1,738 Ashfield 321 582 402 361 548 652 574 455 538 Mansfield 268 373 345 164 325 497 260 410 488 Newark & Sherwood 486 556 593 694 562 484 330 600 712 Northern HMA 1,225 1,190 1,202 1,206 1,301 1,389 1,470 1,370 1,468 Bolsover 326 234 220 204 278 214 223 350 376 Chesterfield 375 561 369 428 286 351 428 360 384 NE Derbyshire 223 46 298 231 284 493 305 330 354 Bassetlaw 301 349 315 343 453 331 514 330 354 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 596 544 530 610 708 887 620 420 500 Derbyshire Dales 177 84 169 155 195 186 241 150 192 High Peak 319 371 223 384 454 599 353 270 308 PDNPA 100 89 138 71 59 102 26 0 - Derby HMA 1,657 1,301 1,647 1,795 1,760 2,033 2,461 1,770 1,790 Derby 584 488 622 780 883 1,052 1,104 700 708 Amber Valley 338 238 418 259 391 530 548 465 472 S Derbyshire 735 575 607 756 486 451 809 605 610 Leicester & Leics HMA 3,140 3,071 3,225 3,372 3,478 3,977 3,809 3,780 3,880 Leicester 463 831 874 962 1,131 1,215 942 1,180 1,200 Blaby 312 194 155 157 249 218 329 340 346 Charnwood 446 366 904 912 705 967 924 760 772 Harborough 731 283 279 197 255 450 586 345 352 Hinckley & Bosworth 485 742 421 583 454 438 398 460 468 Melton 146 175 168 112 157 199 237 160 164 NW Leicestershire 483 395 315 306 410 336 354 480 488 Oadby & Wigston 74 85 109 143 117 154 39 55 90 Nottingham Core HMA 1,641 1,632 2,097 2,326 2,572 2,753 2,970 2,370 2,820 Erewash 99 156 170 251 705 362 482 290 346 Nottingham 1134 791 1,093 1,049 981 1,272 1,172 945 1,124 Broxtowe 119 145 206 315 381 367 376 270 322 Gedling 133 202 355 236 244 296 447 310 368 Rushcliffe 156 338 273 475 261 456 493 555 660 North Northamptonshire 1,441 1,537 1,756 1,889 1,947 2,041 2,193 2,643 2,643 Corby 96 184 422 293 369 573 497 884 884 Kettering 572 572 572 572 572 572 685 650 650 East Northamptonshire 467 606 482 609 661 504 536 460 460 Wellingborough 306 175 280 415 345 392 475 649 649 West Northamptonshire 2,148 2,636 1,706 2,465 2,296 2,376 1,587 2,480 2,486 Daventry 417 435 266 247 360 295 319 540 540 Northampton 1084 1,208 1,009 1,623 1,626 1,824 1,020 - 1,616 South Northamptonshire 647 993 431 595 310 257 248 330 330 East Midlands 16,711 17,483 17,800 18,927 19,578 21,631 20,622 20,418 21,109

Table H.6- Future Provision Net additional dwellings for future years 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 Central Lincs HMA 1,641 1,691 1,873 1,783 1,983 2,033 2,033 2,033 1,209 1,134 675 Lincoln 390 440 622 532 732 782 782 782 525 450 541 466 466 N Kesteven 635 635 635 635 635 635 635 635 635 635 85 West Lindsey 616 616 616 616 616 616 616 616 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 Coastal Lincs HMA 894 894 1,044 676 676 676 676 676 Boston 444 444 444 76 76 76 76 76 76 1 1 1 0 0 0 East Lindsey 450 450 600 600 600 600 600 600 Peterborough Partial HMA 1,387 1,273 1,312 1,390 1,389 924 897 877 Rutland 109 75 64 92 91 95 68 48 S Holland 350 300 350 400 400 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 S Kesteven 928 898 898 898 898 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 Nottingham Outer HMA 900 1,119 1,588 1,682 1,887 2,009 1,819 1,795 2,049 1,743 1,670 1,458 1,433 1,358 1,259 1,161 1,049 1,005 Ashfield 265 466 591 594 556 643 502 513 684 657 708 569 544 473 424 451 339 245 Mansfield 250 250 300 300 300 250 200 200 250 250 200 200 200 200 150 50 50 50 Newark & Sherwood 385 403 697 788 1,031 1,116 1,117 1,082 1,115 836 762 689 689 685 685 660 660 710 Northern HMA 1,322 1,368 1,615 1,410 1,126 1,094 Bolsover 402 556 561 333 146 30 200 200 200 200 200 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 Chesterfield 351 297 380 361 308 301 373 393 405 407 427 421 415 399 426 373 370 370 NE Derbyshire 229 270 243 296 302 433 433 433 433 433 433 433 433 433 433 433 433 433 Bassetlaw 340 245 431 420 370 330 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 493 483 492 492 492 1,067 1,067 1,066 1,066 1,066 636 636 636 636 635 Derbyshire Dales 186 186 185 185 185 509 509 508 508 508 243 243 243 243 242 242 242 242 High Peak 264 264 264 264 264 515 515 515 515 515 350 350 350 350 350 PDNPA 43 33 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 Derby HMA 1,124 1,405 1,926 2,236 2,097 1,569 1,054 859 997 636 371 539 456 431 431 431 431 431 Derby 545 400 786 1,252 1,276 1,190 808 751 741 380 65 240 180 160 160 160 160 160 Amber Valley 160 555 721 618 412 286 182 108 256 256 256 249 226 221 221 221 221 221 S Derbyshire 419 450 419 366 409 93 64 0 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Leicester & Leics HMA 3,350 3,219 3,329 3,202 3,337 3,302 2,983 2,771 Leicester 850 650 850 1,100 1,350 1,550 1,450 1,400 1,450 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,550 1,582 Blaby 243 88 166 211 84 129 139 66 Charnwood 769 740 756 586 505 404 271 271 191 193 162 124 65 65 65 65 65 65 Harborough 393 471 294 170 191 170 170 145 52 50 50 50 8 0 0 0 0 0 Hinckley & Bosworth 513 816 631 362 347 225 225 223 40 42 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 Melton 219 90 90 158 272 281 255 232 188 151 207 205 220 205 105 105 105 105 NW Leicestershire 221 123 360 471 444 399 329 290 264 221 175 175 175 175 55 Oadby & Wigston 142 241 182 144 144 144 144 144 Nottingham Core HMA 2,603 2,420 2,824 2,785 2,896 2,253 Erewash 458 594 411 340 289 571 538 408 338 252 368 425 365 330 300 300 300 300 Nottingham 1,234 725 1,001 1,276 1,384 766 988 1,010 842 577 725 661 911 1,383 1,127 Broxtowe 263 427 413 221 165 144 Gedling 397 381 512 680 873 560 378 364 351 242 466 430 225 225 225 170 170 170 Rushcliffe 251 293 487 268 185 212 242 168 129 93 142 119 111 119 248 North Northants 1,597 1,993 2,558 3,370 3,639 3,530 3,654 3,743 3,494 3,294 3,104 2,960 2,421 Corby 672 927 1,227 1,050 1,000 1,179 1,262 1,300 1,299 1,118 988 988 986 Kettering 451 444 494 664 849 830 825 875 795 795 795 755 735 East Northants 238 316 393 626 665 441 521 548 381 361 331 331 331 Wellingborough 236 306 444 1,030 1,125 1,080 1,046 1,020 1,019 1,020 990 886 369 West Northants 1,371 1,349 2,095 3,618 3,569 3,104 2,825 2,668 2,929 2,620 2,239 1,955 1,905 Daventry 329 186 318 271 271 695 795 894 945 946 946 946 946 Northampton 775 944 1,422 2,814 2,744 1,859 1,530 1,299 1,509 1,299 968 684 634 South Northants 267 219 355 533 554 550 500 475 475 375 325 325 325 East Midlands 16,682 17,214 20,656 22,644 23,091 21,561

Figure H.1- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Central Lincolnshire HMA

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0 2 7 2 8 0 /03 /0 /08 /09 /1 /14 /16 1 /19 1/ 4/05 2/13 7/ 0 02 03/040 05/0606 07 08 09/1010/1111 1 13 14/1515 16/171 18 Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities West Lindsey contains a residual estimate of windfall supply only beyond 2016 Lincoln trajectory breakdown in the AMR includes two strategic urban extensions, which are not yet committed sites

Figure H.2- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Coastal Lincolnshire HMA

1,400 1,200 1,000 800

600 400 200 0 4 6 3 0 /05 /0 /07 /09 /12 1 /14 3/ 0/11 2/ 01/02 02/03 0 04 05 06 07/08 08 09/10 1 11 1 13 14/15 15/16 Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities

Figure H.3- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Derby HMA

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0 6 9 3 6 0 /0 /12 /1 /14 /15 /1 /18 /19 /21 /22 /25 2/03 5/ 6/07 9/10 01/020 03/0404/050 0 07/0808 0 10/1111 12 13 14 15 16/1717 18 19/2020 21 22/2323/2424 25/26 Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities Major housing sites subject to the conjoined inquiry in South Derbyshire District have not been included in supply assumptions due to the lack of definitive numbers.

Figure H.4- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Leicestershire HMA

4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2 3 5 7 8 9 0 1 2 4 5 6 /0 /0 /04 /0 /1 /1 /13 /1 /1 3 0 2 01 02 0 04/0 05/06 06/0 07 08/0 09 1 11/1 1 13/1 14 15

Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities Most authorities did not include urban extension trajectories, but some considered it appropriate to do so. There is still uncertainty to be resolved with CLG about the circumstances in which sustainable urban extensions are to be included Blaby's approach to 5 year land supply was supported by use of the trajectory in an appeal decision in November 2008.

Figure H.5- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed North Northamptonshire HMA

4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 5 8 0 1 3 0 0 /1 1 /12 /1 /15 /18 4/ 7/ 0/ 01/0202/0303/040 05/0606/070 08/0909 1 11 12 13/1414 15/1616/1717 18/1919/2020/21 Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities

Figure H.6- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Northern HMA

1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0

/02 /04 /06 /08 9/10 1/12 3/14 01 02/03 03 04/05 05 06/07 07 08/09 0 10/11 1 12/13 1 Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities

Figure H.7- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Nottingham Core HMA

3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000

1,500 1,000 500 0

/02 /04 /06 /08 9/10 1/12 3/14 01 02/03 03 04/05 05 06/07 07 08/09 0 10/11 1 12/13 1 Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities

Figure H.8- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Nottingham Outer HMA

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

Source: Local Authorities

Figure H.9- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Peak, Park* and Dales HMA

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0 4 6 7 9 2 /03 /0 /05 /0 /08 /10 /1 /1 /21 /2 /23 1/02 4/15 7/18 9/20 0 02 03 04 05 06/0707 08/0909 10/1111/1212/1313/141 15/1616 1 18 1 20 21 22 Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities *target figure does not include the Peak Park Peak Park Net additional dwellings for future years does not mirror that of the estimates for the RSS as they include a change to the definition of a dwelling (now exclude self contained ancillary dwellings with an occupancy restriction) and the LDF AMR core indicator requires them to be rebased each year taking into account the previous year completion rate.

Figure H.10- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Peterborough Partial HMA

1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 2 3 5 7 8 9 0 1 2 4 5 6 /0 /0 /04 /0 /1 /1 /13 /1 /1 3 0 2 01 02 0 04/0 05/06 06/0 07 08/0 09 1 11/1 1 13/1 14 15

Completions Projections Proposed Target Draft Target

Source: Local Authorities

Figure H.11- Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target West Northamptonshire HMA

Source: Local Authorities

POLICY 14- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Table H.7- Lower quartile house prices based on Land Registry Data First Quarter of the Year 2004 to 2008 (£) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Derby 75,950 88,500 92,000 99,000 97,202 Derbyshire 77,000 89,000 98,000 106,000 104,999 Leicester 80,500 93,44097,800 106,000 107,000 Leicestershire 102,500 115,000 118,000 125,000 126,000 Lincolnshire 85,950 97,000104,950 113,000 113,500 Northamptonshire 92,500 105,000 108,000 118,995 119,549 Nottingham 72,000 82,00081,000 85,150 82,125 Nottinghamshire 77,500 87,500 95,000 100,000 99,950 Rutland 118,250 134,000 142,000 152,000 160,000 East Midlands 84,000 95,000 101,000 110,000 109,971 Source: CLG Housing Statistics

Table H.8- Indexed Lower quartile house prices based on Land Registry data 1997 to 2007, by strategic authority, 1997=100 1997 2004 2005 2006 2007 Derby 100 176185 190 240 Leicester 100 218231 233 244 Rutland 100 194189 203 206 Nottingham 100 183193 191 190 Derbyshire 100 180191 196 207 Leicestershire 100 194 201 199 214 Lincolnshire 100 189204 208 221 Northamptonshire 100 194 216 220 225 Nottinghamshire 100 173 181 188 194 Source: Land Registry

Table H.9- Ratio of Lower Quartile House Prices to Lower Quartile Earnings 2008 2008 Amber Valley 6.06 Ashfield 5.34 Bassetlaw 5.60 Blaby 7.29 Bolsover 4.99 Boston 6.65 Broxtowe 6.29 Charnwood 7.35 Chesterfield 6.39 Corby 6.17 Daventry 8.67 Derby 4.91 Derbyshire Dales 9.58 East Lindsey 7.81 East Northamptonshire 8.11 Erewash 6.14 Gedling 6.47 Harborough 8.39 High Peak 6.56 Hinckley and Bosworth 7.16 Kettering 7.70 Leicester 6.64 Lincoln 5.70 Mansfield 5.71 Melton 8.45 Newark and Sherwood 6.85 North East Derbyshire 6.19 North Kesteven 8.65 North West Leicestershire 6.54 Northampton 6.99 Nottingham 4.86 Oadby and Wigston 8.11 Rushcliffe 8.79 Rutland 9.06 South Derbyshire 6.10 South Holland 8.01 South Kesteven 7.93 South Northamptonshire 9.62 Wellingborough 6.74 West Lindsey 6.01 Source: CLG Housing Statistics

POLICY 16- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR PROVISION FOR GYPSIES AND TRAVELLERS

Table H.10- Gypsy and Traveller Pitches 2007/08 Permanent Transit New New Total Pitches Total Pitches Unauthorised Pitches in Year Pitches in Year Caravans Central Lincolnshire HMA 67 *11 25 *0 *9 Coastal Lincolnshire HMA 24 0 0 0 0 Derby HMA 47 5 2 0 192 Leicester & Leicestershire HMA ***229 *0 *16 *0 *170 North Northamptonshire HMA *60 *0 *0 *0 *22 Northern HMA 74 5 32 0 33 Nottingham Core HMA *23 *0 *13 *0 *17 Nottingham Outer HMA **183 0 0 0 79 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 0 0 2 0 *0 Peterborough Partial HMA 53 30 18 0 71 West Northamptonshire HMA *59 *0 *0 *0 *323 East Midlands *819 *51 *108 *0 *916 Source: Local Authorities * Not all authorities in the area were able to return data. Figures should be taken as a minimum Central Lincs. No new pitches or unauthorised encampment data from W Lindsey Leicester & Leics. No Unauthorised encampment data from Leicester. North Northants No Unauthorised encampment data from Wellingborough. No data from Kettering Nottingham Core No Unauthorised encampment or new pitches data from Gedling. No data from Broxtowe Peak, Dales & Park No Unauthorised encampment data from the Peak West Northants No data from South Northants **Newark & Sherwood figures relate to caravans and not pitches ***Pitch figures for Blaby, Harborough, Leicester City and North West Leicestershire have been provided from the 2007 Gypsy and Travellers Accommodation Assessment.

POLICY 17- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR MANAGING THE RELEASE OF LAND FOR HOUSING

Table H.11- Authorities with Phasing Policies at 31st March 2008 Authorities with a policy Authorities with a for release of housing policy for release of across LA boundary housing across wider Housing Market Area Amber Valley Corby Broxtowe East Northamptonshire Chesterfield Kettering Corby Wellingborough East Northamptonshire Kettering North West Leicestershire Oadby and Wigston South Kesteven Wellingborough Source: Local Authorities

Table H.12– Percentage of New Dwellings on Previously Developed Land 2004/05 to 2007/08 (per cent) 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Total Number on PDL 2007/08 Central Lincolnshire 31.3 35.9 40.8 47.3 856 Coastal Lincolnshire 45.2 54.2 51.0 61.4 672 Derby 68.8 73.2 78.9 81.5 2,163 Leicester & Leicestershire 65.9 75.4 71.7 68.2 2,731 North Northamptonshire 45.9 60.9 62.0 44.6 1,054 Northern 70.7 64.1 72.3 80.1 1,246 Nottingham Core 86.1 97.0 94.8 88.1 2,772 Nottingham Outer 70.9 59.7 78.0 70.9 878 Peak, Dales & Park 60.6 67.4 58.9 72.1 460 Peterborough Partial 44.7 52.6 53.4 61.6 948 West Northamptonshire 64.1 76.6 83.6 62.0 985 East Midlands 61.9 67.8 70.9 68.3 14,765 Source: Local Authorities

THE IMPACT OF THE CREDIT CRUNCH

Table H.13- Permanent Dwellings Completed in the East Midlands 2007 and 2008 Registered Private Social Local All Enterprise Landlords Authorities Dwellings Q1 2007 4,350 270 20 4,650 Q2 2007 4,180 340 - 4,520 Q3 2007 3,870 300 - 4,160 Q4 2007 4,710 390 - 5,100 Q1 2008 3,250 350 - 3,610 Q2 2008 3,260 350 50 3,650 Q3 2008 2,000 330 - 2,330 Source: CLG Housing Statistics

Table H.14- Permanent Dwellings Started in the East Midlands 2007 and 2008 Registered Private Social Local All Enterprise Landlords Authorities Dwellings Q1 2007 3,890 190 20 4,090 Q2 2007 3,550 150 - 3,690 Q3 2007 3,890 180 - 4,070 Q4 2007 3,300 150 - 3,450 Q1 2008 3,150 250 - 3,400 Q2 2008 2,090 500 30 2,630 Q3 2008 1,310 470 - 1,780 Source: CLG Housing Statistics

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR SECTION 4 ECONOMY

This section contains data tables and figures relating to the economy section of the RSS Monitoring Report. The tables/figures are presented under the relevant policy. Where the data is relevant to more than one policy it is presented under the policy which comes first.

POLICY 19- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR REGENERATION

Table Econ.1- Benefit Claimants in Districts with ERDF Funding Feb 2006, 2007 and 2008 Proportion Proportion Proportion of of of Number Working Number Working Number Working of Age of Age of Age working Population working Population working Population age Claiming age Claiming age Claiming claimants any claimants any claimants any of any Benefit of any Benefit of any Benefit benefit (%) benefit (%) benefit (%) Feb 06 Feb 07 Feb 08 Ashfield 12,170 17.0 12,110 17.0 11,970 16.8 Bassetlaw 11,190 16.5 10,880 16.0 10,690 15.7 Bolsover 9,330 20.8 9,120 20.2 8,760 19.4 Boston 5,290 15.6 5,250 15.5 5,120 15.1 Chesterfield 11,730 19.1 11,570 18.9 11,000 18.0 Corby 5,760 16.9 5,700 16.7 5,620 16.4 Derby 24,170 16.5 23,740 16.0 23,230 15.7 East Lindsey 14,100 18.1 14,190 18.1 13,880 17.7 Leicester 36,780 19.6 36,660 19.2 35,770 18.7 Lincoln 9,320 16.3 9,360 16.3 9,190 16.0 Mansfield 12,490 20.3 12,320 20.0 12,220 19.8 Nottingham 37,300 19.0 37,620 18.9 36,960 18.6 East Midlands 364,010 13.4 363,430 13.3 355,380 13.0 England 4,448,760 14.1 4,411,890 13.9 4,296,520 13.5 Source: DWP Working Age Client Group Benefits Data

1 POLICY 20- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR EMPLOYMENT LAND

NET CHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT LAND

Table Econ.2- Floorspace 2004 to 2007 (thousand sqm) Derby Derbyshire Leicester Leicestershire Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottingham Nottinghamshire Rutland East Midlands

2004 568 1,111 705 907 1,476 1,176 752 1,233 49 7,979

2005 496 1,037 714 830 1,357 1,072 768 1,200 42 7,517

Retail 2006 494 1,065 721 862 1,367 1,081 777 1,205 46 7,621

2007 495 1,071 708 869 1,414 1,086 781 1,231 46 7,702

2004 442 576 614 717 577 835 871 664 23 5,321

2005 434 561 576 697 582 785 843 626 21 5,127

Office Office 2006 441 585 584 725 598 795 845 718 24 5,316

2007 444 604 580 750 629 824 869 734 24 5,459

2004 1,487 5,043 2,150 3,861 3,365 4,064 1,165 3,602 124 24,860

2005 1,466 5,061 2,078 3,735 3,205 3,939 1,125 3,565 160 24,334

Factory 2006 1,442 5,049 2,076 3,753 3,242 3,864 1,086 3,671 160 24,343

2007 1,348 4,840 1,999 3,750 3,264 3,863 1,040 3,652 159 23,916

2004 470 1,632 1,031 3,118 2,150 4,438 1,030 1,829 89 15,787

2005 543 1,719 1,015 3,116 2,030 4,634 1,033 1,867 91 16,047

2006 553 1,817 1,023 3,181 2,086 4,989 1,003 2,180 92 16,923 Warehouse Warehouse 2007 565 1,990 1,031 3,451 2,124 5,266 1,015 2,308 90 17,838 Source: Neighbourhood Statistics C&I Floorspace Statistics

2 Table Econ.3- Annual Percentage Change in Floorspace 2001/02 to 2006/07 (%) 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Retail East Midlands 1.6 0.7 0.9 -5.8 1.4 1.3 England 1.0 1.0 1.0 -7.1 1.1 1.0 Offices East Midlands 2.3 2.1 1.4 -3.6 3.7 1.1 England 2.3 2.1 1.3 -3.1 1.7 1.0 Factory East Midlands -0.3 -0.5 -1.6 -2.1 0.0 -1.8 England 0.0 -1.0 -1.9 -2.0 -1.2 -2.5 Ware- East Midlands 4.6 1.3 1.6 1.6 5.5 5.4 house England 2.7 1.7 1.9 -1.6 3.0 2.8 Source: Neighbourhood Statistics C&I Floorspace Statistics

Table Econ.4- Summary of Employment Land Data 2006/07 and 2007/08 2007/08 2007/08 2006/07 New Build Total Completed Land Area (hectares) 259.1 156.8 187.7 Completed Floorspace (thousand sqm) 731 561 732 Under Construction land area (hectares) 113.4 104.5 130.3 Source: Local Authorities Note that 2007/08 figures include extensions and redevelopment (except Nottingham) Missing or incomplete floorspace 2006/07: Ashfield, Bassetlaw, Bolsover, Chesterfield, Derby Dales, Corby, East Lindsey, South Derbyshire, NE Derbyshire, Lincoln, Nottingham Missing or incomplete floorspace data 2007/08: East Lindsey, West Lindsey, Wellingborough There were also a few sites for which a land area could not be given-2006/07 Boston, Corby; in 2007/08- some new build/redevelopment sites in Ashfield, Corby, Derby, West Lindsey

Table Econ.5- Completed 2007/08 Employment Land by Development Type (hectares) New Build Extensions Redevelopment Total Derby 3.6 0.0 *1.2 *4.8 Derbyshire 19.3 0.0 3.9 23.2 Leicester 12.9 0.0 0.0 12.9 Leicestershire 13.3 2.1 0.9 16.3 Lincolnshire 41.1 5.8 *2.6 *49.5 Northamptonshire *47.1 4.5 5.7 *57.3 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nottinghamshire 19.4 2.0 *2.3 *23.8 Peak District 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rutland 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 East Midlands *156.8 14.5 *16.5 *187.7 Source: Local Authorities *Land area not given for some sites in Ashfield, Corby, Derby, West Lindsey

Table Econ.6- Completed 2007/08 Employment Land Total (hectares) B1 B1 Mixed unsp.** B1a B1b B1c Total B2 B8 *** Total Derby 0.8 0.00.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 *0.3 3.6 *4.8 Derbyshire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 2.3 18.7 23.2 Leicester 1.9 0.00.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 10.8 0.2 12.9 Leicestershire 7.1 0.90.0 0.0 8.0 0.1 2.0 6.2 16.3 Lincolnshire *3.3 1.30.0 2.3 *6.8 0.6 5.8 36.3 *49.5 Northamptonshire 4.7 1.8 0.2 0.1 6.8 *3.9 19.2 27.3 *57.3 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nottinghamshire 4.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 5.2 7.6 *0.0 *11.0 *23.8 Peak District 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rutland 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 East Midlands *22.2 4.8 0.2 2.4 *29.6 *14.4 *40.5 *103.3 *187.7 Source: Local Authorities *Land area not given for some new build/redevelopment sites in Ashfield, Corby, Derby, West Lindsey **Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1) *** Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified

Table Econ.7 Part 1- Completed 2007/08 Employment Land Floorspace Total (Sqm) B1 unsp.** B1a B1b B1c B1 Total Derby 3,239 0 0 0 3,239 Derbyshire 0 0 0 690 690 Leicester 7,905 0 0 0 7,905 Leicestershire 34,073 4,072 0 0 38,145 Lincolnshire *13,220 6,467 0 2,264 *21,951 Northamptonshire 35,279 5,794 2,260 1,086 44,419 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire 9,375 2,320 0 0 11,695 Peak District 0 0 0 0 0 Rutland 390 0 0 0 390 East Midlands *103,481 18,653 2,260 4,040 *128,434 Source: Local Authorities *Missing or incomplete floorspace data from, West Lindsey **Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1)

Table Econ.7 Part 2- Completed 2007/08 Employment Land Floorspace Total (sqm) B1 Total B2 B8 Mixed ** Total Derby 3,239 03,840 15,645 22,724 Derbyshire 690 11,0625,514 74,622 91,888 Leicester 7,905 3,85945,252 1,949 58,965 Leicestershire 38,145 1,425*6,127 23,603 *69,300 Lincolnshire *21,951 9,92124,902 *62,936 *119,710 Northamptonshire 44,419 16,450 63,134 *101,694 *225,697 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire 11,695 45,96312,176 73,936 143,770 Peak District 0 0 0 0 0 Rutland 390 00 0 390 East Midlands *128,434 88,680 *160,945 *354,385 *732,444 Source: Local Authorities *Missing or incomplete floorspace data from East Lindsey, West Lindsey, Wellingborough ** Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified

Figure Econ.1- Employment Land Floorspace Completions 2007/08 (sqm)

400,000 Redevelopment Extensions 350,000 New Build

300,000

250,000

200,000 sqm

150,000

100,000

50,000

0 B1 unsp. B1a B1b B1c B2 B8 Mixed

Source: Local Authorities Mixed is either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified

Table Econ.8- Under Construction 2007/08 Employment Land (ha) Development Type (hectares) New Build Extensions Redevelopment Total Derby 2.5 0.0 6.8 9.3 Derbyshire 31.1 0.2 1.2 32.4 Leicester 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 Leicestershire 11.3 6.8 0.4 18.5 Lincolnshire 18.4 0.0 0.0 18.4 Northamptonshire 18.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nottinghamshire 18.1 0.0 *0.7 *18.8 Peak District 0.5 0.0 1.0 1.5 Rutland 4.3 5.4 3.4 13.0 East Midlands 104.5 12.4 *13.5 *130.3 Source: Local Authorities *No land area for a redevelopment site in Ashfield

Table Econ.9- Under Construction 2007/08 Employment Land Total (hectares) B1 B1 Mixed unsp** B1a B1b B1c Total B2 B8 *** Total Derby 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 8.4 9.3 Derbyshire 2.8 2.0 0.0 0.2 5.0 0.0 6.2 21.1 32.4 Leicester 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 Leicestershire 2.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.5 1.9 13.8 18.5 Lincolnshire 2.3 0.60.0 1.4 4.2 2.0 4.8 7.3 18.4 Northamptonshire 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 4.3 13.0 18.0 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nottinghamshire 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 1.6 0.0 *12.9 *18.8 Peak District 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Rutland 0.2 0.60.0 2.7 3.5 2.3 4.6 2.6 13.0 East Midlands 14.0 3.7 0.0 4.3 21.9 7.4 21.8 79.1 130.3 Source: Local Authorities *No land area for a redevelopment site in Ashfield **Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1) *** Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified

6 Figure Econ.2- Employment Land Under Construction 2007/08 (hectares)

90 Redevelopment 80 Extensions New Build 70

50 ha 40

0 B1 unsp. B1a B1b B1c B2 B8 Mixed

Source: Local Authorities Mixed is either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified

Table Econ.10- Employment Land Losses 2007/08 (hectares) With Under Allocated planning construction permission Completed Derby 4.7 0.00.0 0.0 Derbyshire 0.0 2.4 4.4 0.0 Leicester 0.0 62.0 0.0 0.0 Leicestershire 0.0 4.3 0.0 4.2 Lincolnshire 1.2 2.3 0.0 0.0 Northamptonshire 0.0 1.6 0.4 0.0 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nottinghamshire 1.1 11.1 0.0 5.1 Peak District 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rutland 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 East Midlands 7.0 83.8 4.8 9.3 Source: Local Authorities Data may be incomplete

PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED LAND

Table Econ.11- Percentage of development on Previously Developed Land- Completed and Under Construction 2007/08 (per cent) New Build Extension Redeveloped All Sites Total Derby 50.6 N/A 100.0 78.7 Derbyshire 51.2 0.0 100.0 55.4 Leicester 28.4 N/A N/A 28.4 Leicestershire 23.4 11.7 100.0 23.2 Lincolnshire 24.3 70.4 64.3 29.7 Northamptonshire 5.6 100.0 100.0 18.4 Nottingham N/A N/A N/A N/A Nottinghamshire 46.3 100.0 100.0 52.7 Peak District 0.0 N/A 100.0 64.2 Rutland 39.1 100.0 90.0 77.3 East Midlands 28.9 63.5 95.8 38.1 Source: Local Authorities N/A: not applicable as no land of this type was developed

Table Econ.12- Development on PDL (Brownfield) Employment Land - Completed and Under Construction 2005/06-2007/08 (%) Percentage on Percentage on Percentage on brownfield land brownfield land brownfield land 05/06 06/07 07/08 Derby 96.0 73.0 78.7 Derbyshire 76.4 68.1 55.4 Leicester 74.9 40.5 28.4 Leicestershire 59.1 81.9 23.2 Lincolnshire 45.5 36.1 29.7 Northamptonshire 17.1 21.8 18.4 Nottingham 70 (floorspace) 0.0 N/A Nottinghamshire 38.5 35.8 52.7 Peak District 100.0 51.8 64.2 Rutland 0.0 100.0 77.3 Source: Local Authorities 05/06 Note the following authorities are not included due to incomplete data: Northampton, Rutland, Newark and Sherwood, Nottingham, Lincoln, Ashfield, East Northamptonshire, Wellingborough, West Lindsey, Amber Valley, South Northamptonshire N/A: not applicable as no land of this type was developed 07/08 data includes extensions and redevelopments

Table Econ.13- Previously-developed land by whether vacant/derelict or in use/hectares 2001 to 2006 (hectares) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Vacant land and derelict buildings East Midlands 3,760 4,360 3,430 3,610 3,460 3,490 England 41,120 40,710 39,710 38,170 36,560 34,850 Currently in Use East Midlands 2,380 2,020 2,440 2,060 2,080 2,750 England 24,380 25,400 26,050 25,960 26,930 27,880 All land types East Midlands 6,140 6,390 5,870 5,660 5,540 6,240 England 65,500 66,110 65,760 64,130 63,490 62,730 Source: DCLG Planning Statistics ‘Currently in use’ refers to land which is currently being used but which has an allocation, planning permission or potential to be reused

Table Econ.14- Previously-developed land by whether vacant/derelict or in use/hectares and per cent, 2006

Land Area (hectares) Percentage

East Midlands England East Midlands England Previously developed vacant land 1,230 13,330 20 21 Derelict land and buildings 1,790 17,850 29 28 Vacant buildings 470 3,670 8 6 Vacant and Vacant and derelict land derelict All vacant and derelict land 3,490 34,850 56 56 Allocated in a local plan or with planning permission for any use 1,560 18,430 25 29 Known redevelopment potential but no planning allocation or permission 1,190 9,450 19 15

Currently in use All currently in use 2,750 27,880 44 44

All previously developed land that is unused or may be available for redevelopment 6,240 62,730 100 100 Source: DCLG Planning Statistics ‘Currently in use’ refers to land which is currently being used but which has an allocation, planning permission or potential to be reused

Table Econ.15- Previously-developed land as a proportion of all developed land, by land type 2006 (%) East Midlands England Total area of development land in 2001 (hectares) 100,900 1,158,900 Vacant and Previously developed vacant land 1.2 1.2 derelict land Derelict land and buildings 1.8 1.5 Vacant buildings 0.5 0.3 Allocated in a local plan or with planning permission for any use 1.5 1.6 Currently in Known redevelopment potential but no planning allocation or use permission 1.2 0.8 All previously developed land that is unused or may be available for redevelopment 6.2 5.4 Source: DCLG Planning Statistics ‘Currently in use’ refers to land which is currently being used but which has an allocation, planning permission or potential to be reused

Table Econ.16- Previously-developed land by planned use 2006 Land Area (hectares) Percentage East East Midlands England Midlands England Housing 805 8,612 13 14 Employment 1,462 14,793 23 24 Retail 32 489 1 1 Mixed Use 856 12,827 14 20 Open Space 126 2,220 2 4 Planning permission permission allocation or Other 197 3,116 3 5 None 2,758 20,670 44 33 All previously developed land which is unused or may be available for redevelopment 6,236 62,728 100 100 Source: DCLG Planning Statistics

Table Econ.17- Flows of previously-developed land 2005 to 2006: proportions and site size by development status (%) East

Midlands England Developed by 2006 7 7 Development Un-developed 89 87 status of 2005 Excluded in 2006 sites in 2006 return 4 6 of area All 2005 sites 100 100 Percentage Percentage New 2006 sites 19 11 Developed by 2006 1.3 1.1 Development Un-developed 1.9 2.2 status of 2005 Excluded in 2006 sites in 2006 return 1.6 1.5 All 2005 sites 1.8 2 of sites (ha) Average size New 2006 sites 1.7 1.3 Source: DCLG Planning Statistics

EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY

Table Econ.18- Employment Land Commitments 2007/08 by Development Type (hectares) New Build Extensions Redevelopment Total Derby 219.9 0.0 36.8 256.7 Derbyshire 487.2 0.0 35.5 522.7 Leicester 35.1 0.8 4.9 40.8 Leicestershire 229.6 5.7 41.0 276.4 Lincolnshire 660.8 25.9 15.2 701.9 Northamptonshire 271.5 14.0 43.2 328.7 Nottingham* 77.2 N/R N/R 77.2 Nottinghamshire 459.4 0.0 95.6 555.0 Peak District 0.5 0.0 5.0 5.5 Rutland 21.4 0.1 7.5 29.0 East Midlands 2,462.6 46.5 284.7 2,793.8 Source: Local Authorities N/R: Not returned *Nottingham data new build only

Table Econ.19- Employment Land Commitments 2007/08 Total (hectares) B1 B1 Mixed unsp. * B1a B1b B1c Total B2 B8 ** Total Derby 14.7 0.00.0 0.0 14.7 18.1 0.0 223.9 256.7 Derbyshire 5.1 3.50.0 2.3 10.9 17.3 19.8 474.7 522.7 Leicester 13.8 0.60.0 0.0 14.4 3.2 1.4 21.8 40.8 Leicestershire 23.1 1.00.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 40.6 211.7 276.4 Lincolnshire 50.0 4.10.0 2.4 56.5 13.7 14.8 616.8 701.9 Northamptonshire** 52.9 6.0 0.0 0.0 58.9 20.5 27.0 222.3 328.7 Nottingham*** 43.5 0.00.0 0.0 43.5 0.0 0.0 33.7 77.2 Nottinghamshire 53.8 3.30.0 0.7 57.9 20.2 2.6 474.3 555.0 Peak District 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 4.3 5.5 Rutland 8.6 2.40.0 0.1 11.0 0.9 1.7 15.4 29.0 East Midlands 266.2 21.0 0.0 5.5 292.6 94.4 107.9 2,298.8 2,793.8 Source: Local Authorities *Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1) **Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified ***Nottingham Data new build only

RENTAL AND LAND VALUES

Table Econ.20- Shop Rentals 2003 to 2008 (thousand pounds/sqm/annum)

Derby Leicester Lincoln Northampton Nottingham 2003 1.6 2.0 1.3 1.4 2.3 2004 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.4 2.4 2005 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.4 2.5 2006 1.7 2.0 1.5 1.4 2.6 Type 1 Type 1 2007 1.8 2.4 1.5 1.5 2.7 2008 1.5 2.3 1.5 1.4 2.3 2003 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.8 2004 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.0 2005 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.0 2006 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.1 Type 2 Type 2 2007 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.1 2008 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.1 2003 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 2004 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 2005 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 2006 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 Type 3 Type 3 2007 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 2008 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 Source: Valuation Office Property Reports (latest July 2008) Type 1 Prime position in principal shopping centre Type 2 Good secondary off peak position in principal shopping centre Type 3 Modern purpose built non food warehouse unit circa 2500sq.m. – 5000sq.m. Edge of town location with car parking

12 Table Econ.21- Office Rentals 2003 to 2008 (thousand pounds/sqm/annum) Derby Leicester Lincoln Northampton Nottingham

(type 1 and 2 edge of town) 2003 83 140 70 160 140 2004 83 140 100 140 140 2005 83 140 100 135 140 2006 95 145 105 140 145 Type 1 Type 1 2007 100 145 105 160 148 2008 95 145 110 150 140 2003 95 100 75 118 155 2004 95 100 90 140 150 2005 95 100 115 135 150 2006 105 100 120 135 155

Type 2 2007 110 155 120 145 158 2008 105 150 120 110 160 2003 105 100 70 135 100 2004 105 100 80 135 100 2005 105 100 85 135 100 2006 110 105 85 150 105

Type 3 2007 115 115 85 155 115 2008 110 115 85 135 140 Source: Valuation Office Property Reports (latest July 2008)

Type 1 Town centre location self contained suite over 1,000sq.m. in office block erected in last 10 years; good standard of finish with a lift and good quality fittings to common parts; limited car parking available Type 2 As Type 1 but suite in range of 150sq.m. – 400sq.m. Type 3 Converted former house usually just off town centre. Good quality conversion. Best quality fittings throughout; self contained suite in size range 50sq.m. – 150sq.m. with central heating and limited car parking

13 Table Econ.22- Industry Rentals 2003 to 2008 (thousand pounds/sqm/annum) Year Derby Leicester LincolnNorthampton Nottingham Type 2003 65 60 43 78 65 1 2004 65 60 50 85 68 2005 65 60 50 85 68 2006 75 66 53 85 68 2007 75 66 55 85 68 2008 75 66 62 85 75 Type 2003 63 50 38 68 58 2 2004 58 50 45 65 60 2005 58 55 45 65 60 2006 69 63 47 65 60 2007 70 63 49 65 60 2008 70 63 52 65 75 Type 2003 48 40 28 53 50 3 2004 48 40 40 55 50 2005 48 47 40 55 50 2006 64 56 42 55 50 2007 64 56 42 55 50 2008 64 56 47 55 70 Type 2003 40 40 27 53 48 4 2004 40 40 35 50 48 2005 40 50 37 50 48 2006 48 54 40 50 48 2007 48 54 40 50 48 2008 48 54 45 50 55 Type 2003 # 13 # 23 20 5 2004 # # # # 20 2005 # # # # 20 2006 # # # # 20 2007 # # # # 20 2007 # # # # 20 Source: Valuation Office Property Reports (latest July 2008) # indicates no data available Type 1 Small starter units 25sq.m. – 75sq.m. Type 2 Nursery units 150sq.m. – 200sq.m. Type 3 Industrial/warehouse units circa 500sq.m. Type 4 Industrial/warehouse units circa 1000sq.m. Type 5 Converted ex mill units

14 Table Econ.23- Industrial Land Values 2003 to 2008 (million pounds per hectare) Derby Leicester Lincoln Northampton Nottingham 2003 300 370 250 620 400 From 2004 375 370 275 450 475 2005 375 370 275 450 475 2006 375 450 300 450 475 2007 375 400 300 450 475 2008 375 400 300 450 475 2003 450 650 300 750 500 To 2004 525 660 325 700 625 2005 525 660 325 650 625 2006 525 700 350 650 625 2007 525 700 350 650 625 2008 525 700 350 650 625 2003 375 615 250 675 450 Typical 2004 425 650 300 500 525 2005 425 650 300 500 525 2006 425 650 325 500 525 2007 450 600 325 500 550 2008 450 600 325 500 550 Source: Valuation Office Property Reports (latest July 2008)

EMPLOYMENT LAND REVIEWS

Table Econ.24- Employment Land Reviews Undertaken in East Midlands 2002 - 2008

Employment Land Study Authorities Covered Date Quality of Employment Land East Midlands July 2002 Study (QUELS) Regional Employment Land East Midlands June 2003 Priorities Study

East Midlands Employment East Midlands Dec 2006 Land Provision Study Regional Regional

East Midlands Strategic East Midlands Nov 2006 Distribution Study Northern Sub Region Ashfield (minus Hucknall), Nov 2007 Employment Land Review Bassetlaw, Bolsover, Chesterfield, Mansfield, Newark & Sherwood, North East Derbyshire Bassetlaw Employment Land Bassetlaw April 2005

Northern Northern Study Bolsover Employment Land Bolsover 2006 Study Nottingham City Region Nottingham, Erewash, Broxtowe, Feb 2007 Employment Land Study Rushcliffe, Gedling, Hucknall area of Ashfield Derby HMA Derby, Amber Valley, South Nov 2007 Derbyshire S Derbyshire South Derbyshire 2007

Three Cities Leicester and Leicestershire Leicester Shire Economic October HMA Employment Land Study Partnership (Leicestershire and 2008 Leicester authorities)

15 Leicestershire, Leicester & Leicester, Leicestershire, Rutland 2007 Rutland Employment Land Availability Monitoring Report 06/07 Blaby Blaby Mar 2006 Charnwood Charnwood July 2006 Harborough Harborough Jan 2006 Hinckley and Bosworth Hinckley and Bosworth Borough May 2004 Borough Oadby and Wigston Oadby and Wigston Mar 2006 Melton Borough Melton Borough July 2006 North West Leicestershire North West Leicestershire May 2005 Leicester Leicester Jan 2006 Lincolnshire Utilities Study Lincolnshire Dec 2007 Central Lincolnshire HMA Lincoln, North Kesteven, West Tenders Employment Land Review Lindsey are currently being considered Lincoln Policy Area Lincoln, North Kesteven, West 2004 Lindsey Eastern Lincoln Lincoln - Boston Boston 2008 South Kesteven South Kesteven 2005 Rutland Rutland July 2008

Northamptonshire Commercial Northamptonshire Dec 2003 Property and Employment Land Assessment (Copela) Northamptonshire Commercial Northamptonshire Invite to Property and Employment Land tender in Assessment (Copela update) prep. North Northamptonshire North Northants 2005 Southern Employment Futures Study East Northamptonshire East Northamptonshire Dec 2006 Kettering Kettering 2005 Northampton Northampton 2006 Peak Dales and Park Peak National Park, Derby Dales , Aug 08 High Peak Peak Source: part of the emerging brief for the next regional employment land study- emda

16 POLICY 22- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR TOWN CENTRES AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENT

Table Econ.25- Retail Gains Total Completions 2007/08 (sqm) City Town District Local Edge of Out of Centre Centre Centre Centre Centre Centre Total Derby 43,770 000013,935 57,705 Derbyshire 0 01,309 0 0 45,546 46,855 Leicester 0 00000 0 Leicestershire 0 1,7980000 1,798 Lincolnshire 0 8,7000001,718 10,418 Northamptonshire 0 17,500 0 0 5,759 0 23,259 Nottingham 17,500 0 0 0 280 0 17,780 Nottinghamshire 0 5,568 0 0 5,120 2,497 13,185 Rutland 0 00000 0 East Midlands 6,1270 33,566 1,309 0 11,159 63,696 171,000 Source: Local Authorities Figures refer to only those sites reported on

Table Econ.26- Retail Gains Total Commitments and Under Construction 2007/08 (sqm) City Town District Local Edge of Out of Centre Centre Centre Centre Centre Centre Total Derby 3,000 00002,254 5,254 Derbyshire 0 2,428 0 0 3,343 0 5,771 Leicester 53,754 0 0 1,644 3,026 0 58,424 Leicestershire 0 00000 0 Lincolnshire 0 00003,283 3,283 Northamptonshire 0 0 0 0 15,409 11,384 26,793 Nottingham 0 00000 0 Nottinghamshire 0 2,775 7,612 0 9,608 15,948 35,943 Rutland 0 00000 0 East Midlands 56,754 5,203 7,612 1,644 31,386 32,869 135,468 Source: Local Authorities Figures refer to only those sites reported on

Table Econ.27- Leisure Completions by Location 2007/08 (sqm) City Town District Local Edge of Out of Total Centre Centres Centres Centres Centre Centre Derby 8,400 0 0 0 0 0 8,400 Derbyshire 0 0 0 0 0 4,375 4,375 Leicester 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leicestershire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincolnshire 0 0 0 0 1,260 0 1,260 Northamptonshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nottingham 5,140 0 0 0 0 430 5,570 Nottinghamshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak District 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rutland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Midlands 13,540 0 0 0 1,260 4,805 19,605 Source: Local Authorities Figures refer to only those sites reported on

17 Table Econ.28- Leisure Gains Commitments and Under Construction 2007/08 Floorspace (sqm) City Town District Local Edge of Out of Centre Centres Centres Centres Centre Centre Total Derby 8,500 0 0 0 0 0 8,500 Derbyshire 0 3,9000 3,343 0 0 7,243 Leicester 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leicestershire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincolnshire * 0 0 0 0 1,301 2,020 3,321 Northamptonshire* 0 1,4008 0 0 0 2,325 16,333 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire* 0 0 0 0 7,538 0 7,538 Peak District 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rutland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Midlands 8,500 17,908 0 3,343 8,839 4,345 42,935 Source: Local Authorities Figures refer to only those sites reported on *Sites in East Northants, Newark & Sherwood, South Holland and East Lindsey were returned without floorspace figures, a total of 22.4ha all Out of Centre

POLICY 24- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR RURAL DIVERSIFICATION

Table Econ.29- VAT registrations and deregistrations per 10,000 adult population 2004 to 2006 Rural Registrations per Deregistrations per Category 10,000 population 10,000 population 2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006 R80 42 41 41 34 32 33 R50 40 39 39 30 28 28 SR 37 35 34 30 27 26 OU 31 30 30 24 23 21 LU 31 31 31 27 26 23 East Midlands 36 35 35 29 27 26 Source: NOMIS VAT registrations data via ONS Defra rural definition pre April 2009

18 Table Econ.30- Change in number of jobs 2006 to 2007 Rural Jobs in Jobs in Percentage Category 2006 2007 Change 2006 to 2007 Daventry 32,000 34,300 7.1 R80 Derbyshire Dales 32,500 33,100 1.9 East Lindsey 40,300 42,300 5.0 Harborough 35,100 35,300 0.5 Melton 19,200 20,000 4.3 North Kesteven 30,400 31,800 4.6

Rutland 12,900 14,000 8.6 South Holland 31,600 32,700 3.5 South Northamptonshire 25,000 27,400 9.6 West Lindsey 23,400 24,300 3.8 Bassetlaw 41,900 41,900 0.1 East Northamptonshire 24,800 25,600 3.4 R50 High Peak 29,800 29,800 0.1

Newark & Sherwood 39,700 44,000 11.1

North East Derbyshire 24,200 25,400 4.8 North West Leicestershire 48,700 49,100 1.0 Rushcliffe 41,700 43,600 4.6 South Kesteven 49,400 52,600 6.4 Amber Valley 48,500 48,600 0.3 SR Bolsover 22,600 23,600 4.7 Boston 25,000 27,000 8.2 Charnwood 60,000 61,200 2.1

Hinckley & Bosworth 41,100 39,600 -3.7

Kettering 33,800 35,900 6.4 South Derbyshire 27,400 28,500 4.0 Wellingborough 31,800 32,200 1.0 Ashfield 43,800 46,000 5.1 OU Chesterfield 48,200 47,700 -1.1 Corby 29,500 30,500 3.2 Derby 119,300 128,200 7.5

Lincoln 52,500 55,400 5.4

Mansfield 38,300 39,400 2.9 Northampton 124,200 125,600 1.2 Blaby 44,500 48,000 7.9 Broxtowe 33,600 37,300 10.9 LU Erewash 38,300 38,400 0.2

Gedling 30,300 31,400 3.4 Leicester 160,000 161,700 1.1 Nottingham 183,300 184,700 0.8 Oadby & Wigston 18,700 18,800 0.6 East Midlands 1,837,100 1,897,000 3.3 Source: Annual Business Inquiry The rural classification used to identify the rural nature of local authorities is the Defra rural and urban classification (pre April 2009) which can be found at the following website: (http://statistics.defra.gov.uk/esg/rural_resd/rural_definition.asp) The classification shows the percentage of the area classified as rural, and then identifies the area as being either major urban (MU;1); large urban (LU;2); other urban (OU;3); significant rural (SR;4); rural-50 (R50;5) and rural-80 (R80;6) where R50 is where at 50% is rural and R80 where at least 80% is rural

Table Econ.31- Job Density in Rural Areas East Midlands 2003 to 2006 Rural Type 2003 2004 2005 2006 R80 0.75 0.74 0.77 0.78 R50 0.71 0.70 0.74 0.75 SR 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 OU 0.91 0.93 0.94 0.93 LU 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.93 East Midlands 0.78 0.78 0.80 0.81 England 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 Source NOMIS Defra rural definition pre April 2009

Table Econ.32- Percentage of residential delivery points within specified distance of service in the East Midlands 2008 (%) isolated Hamlet and dwellings - Sparse isolated Hamlet and dwellings - Less sparse Village - Sparse sparse Village - Less - fringe Town and Sparse - Less fringe Town and sparse Sparse - Urban>10K Less - Urban>10K sparse Banks and Building Societies (4km) 36.4 61.5 18.4 40.5 93.7 74.2 100.0 99.5 GP surgeries (principal sites) (4km) 58.6 78.6 38.8 65.9 93.7 92.3 93.8 99.9 GP surgeries (all sites) (4km) 61.7 83.2 59.6 73.2 100.0 97.7 100.0 100.0 Jobcentres (8km) 8.9 53.8 14.4 48.1 12.4 54.6 55.7 98.1 NHS Dentists (4km) 21.0 62.5 17.0 44.6 81.0 78.1 96.4 99.6 Petrol stations (4km) 50.3 84.8 75.7 75.7 87.3 93.6 100.0 100.0 Post offices (2km) 37.4 68.2 60.0 65.7 99.8 99.3 99.8 99.6 Primary schools (2km) 42.4 74.8 64.3 79.8 99.7 99.7 99.6 100.0 Public houses (2km) 60.1 83.7 74.8 87.6 99.9 98.7 99.5 99.9 Secondary schools (4km) 39.6 62.1 29.8 45.0 81.0 77.5 97.7 99.6 Supermarkets (4km) 37.2 75.0 19.3 54.2 100.0 93.7 96.3 100.0 Source: www.ruralcommunities.gov.uk

20 POLICY 25- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR ICT

Table Econ.33- Proportion of households covered by broadband (%) East Midlands UK Quarter Quarter 1 Quarter Quarter 3 Quarter Quarter 3 2004 2005 4 2005 2004 1 2005 4 2005 DSL 93 97 99.9 93 97 99.7 Cable 55 55 55 48 48 48 FWA 21 21 21 11 11 11 Total 94 98 99.9 94 98 99.8 Source: Ovum www.dti.gov.uk DSL- Digital Subscriber Line - a connection using the same wires as a regular telephone line Cable- uses a dedicated cable FWA- Fixed Wireless Access- uses a radio link and no wires or cables

Table Econ.34- Business Use of Broadband 2005 (%) Percentage of those with Percentage of all broadband businesses requiring faster broadband with broadband speed in future Derbyshire 52 17 Leicestershire 52 19 Lincolnshire 52 21 Northamptonshire 56 19 Nottinghamshire 54 16 Rutland 52 24 Source: emda 2006 eAdoption Survey

POLICY 41-REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR TOURISM

Table Econ.35- Employment Supported by Tourism Expenditure 2003 to 2005 (Full time Equivalents) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2006 Derbyshire 24,510 24,316 24,015 23,651 24,568 Leicestershire and Rutland 19,158 18,979 18,995 20,517 21,058 Lincolnshire 16,773 16,156 16,399 16,120 16,683 Northamptonshire 12,624 12,607 13,138 12,710 13,043 Nottinghamshire 21,622 21,547 22,547 22,132 22,476 East Midlands 94,563 93,635 95,124 95,130 97,828 Source: STEAM (Scarborough Tourism Economy Activity Model) www.eastmidlandstourism.co.uk

Table Econ.36- Spend by Visitors (Staying and Day) 2003 to 2005 (million pounds) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2006 Derbyshire 1,287 1,293 1,285 1,368 1,404 Leicestershire and Rutland 1,109 1,109 1,112 1,314 1,326 Lincolnshire 864 828 850 903 927 Northamptonshire 702 721 762 798 824 Nottinghamshire 1,257 1,264 1,342 1,436 1,437 East Midlands 5,206 5,216 5,351 5,820 5,918 Source: STEAM (Scarborough Tourism Economy Activity Model) www.eastmidlandstourism.co.uk

21 Table Econ.37- Number of Overnight Stays (Overseas and Domestic Visitors) 2003 to 2005 (millions) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2006 Derbyshire 9.05 9.5 9.67 9.4 9.9 Leicestershire and Rutland 6.2 6.2 6.32 9.3 9.5 Lincolnshire 12.36 12.1 12.35 12.1 12.7 Northamptonshire 5.92 6.08 6.32 6.4 6.6 Nottinghamshire 7.86 7.72 8.08 8.5 8.8 East Midlands 41.38 41.59 42.74 45.7 47.43 Source: STEAM (Scarborough Tourism Economy Activity Model) www.eastmidlandstourism.co.uk

22 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR SECTION 5 ENVIRONMENT

This section contains data tables and figures relating to the environment section of the RSS Monitoring Report. The tables/figures are presented under the relevant policy. Where the data is relevant to more than one policy it is presented under the policy which comes first.

POLICY 26- PROTECTING AND ENHANCING THE REGION’S NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE

Table Env.1- East Midlands SSSI comparison of 2006 to 2008 (per cent) SSSI Condition September September 2006 2008 Percentage Area Favourable 45 44 Percentage Area Unfavourable Recovering 23 48 Percentage Area Unfavourable No Change 11 6 Percentage Area Unfavourable Declining 21 2 Percentage Area Destroyed/Part Destroyed 0 0 Source: Natural England

Table Env.2- County SSSI condition September 2008 (per cent)

Area Meeting PSA Target 2007 PSA Target Area Meeting 2008 PSA Target Area Meeting Area Favourable Percentage Area Unfavourable Percentage no change Area Unfavourable Percentage Recovering Area Unfavourable Percentage Declining / Area Destroyed Percentage Part Destroyed Derbyshire 58.41 82.21 17.32 12.98 64.89 4.80 0.00 Leicestershire 70.59 77.08 22.05 16.75 55.03 5.95 0.23 Lincolnshire 74.22 99.38 59.50 0.30 39.88 0.32 0.00 Northamptonshire 89.39 90.97 57.28 7.32 33.69 1.64 0.07 Nottinghamshire 73.57 79.35 13.10 17.23 66.25 3.43 0.00 Source: Natural England

1 Table Env.3- Grade II Listed Buildings at Risk – Significant Effect Indicator as at 31st March 2008 Number of Grade Number of Grade Total number of Percentage of II listed II listed BUILDING Grade II listed Grade II listed BUILDINGS ENTRIES within BUILDING BUILDING within the the administrative ENTRIES within ENTRIES at administrative boundary on the the risk within the boundary on the local authorities’ administrative administrative local authorities’ buildings at risk boundaries boundaries buildings at risk registers (per cent) registers Derby 5 5 339 1.5 Derbyshire 204 194 4,158 4.7 Leicester 13 13 330 3.9 Leicestershire** 126 121 3,678 *3.6 Lincolnshire 329 317 6,161 *6.0 Northamptonshire 492 492 5,594 *14.5 Nottingham 85 72 745 9.7 Nottinghamshire 248 304 5,034 6.0 Peak District 198 178 2,080 8.6 Rutland N/R N/R 1,700 # East Midlands 1,399 1,428 24,625 *6.7 Source: Local Authorities * No buildings at risk data provided by Hinckley & Bosworth, North Kesteven, Northampton, Oadby & Wigston, Wellingborough, Rutland, East Northamptonshire. These districts are excluded in the percentage calculations. **No data in any category from Blaby Note there may have been some confusion amongst local authorities on the definitions of listed buildings and entries. A building ENTRY can include more than one BUILDING, e.g. a whole row of terraces could be under one ENTRY.

POLICY 27- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT

Table Env.4- Historic environment records at 31st March 2008 Number of Authorities With access to With access With direct access Historic through a service Environment level agreement (or Record (HERS) data similar) Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Derby 1 100 1 100 0 0 Derbyshire 8 100 6 75 2 25 Leicester 1 100 0 0 1 100 Leicestershire 4 57 3 43 1 14 Lincolnshire 7 100 4 57 3 43 Northamptonshire 3 43 0 0 3 43 Nottingham 1 100 1 100 0 0 Nottinghamshire 4 57 1 14 3 43 Peak District 1 100 1 100 0 0 Rutland 1 100 1 100 0 0 East Midlands 31 76 18 44 13 32 Source: Local Authorities

2 POLICY 28- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE

Table Env.5- Green infrastructure as at 31st March 2008 Authorities with Authorities where a Green Infrastructure an adopted Strategy being prepared Green Infrastructure Strategy Derbyshire None Amber Valley, Chesterfield, Derbyshire Dales, Erewash, NE Derbyshire, Bolsover, South Derbyshire Leicestershire None Blaby, Charnwood, Harborough, Hinckley & Bosworth, NW Leicestershire, Oadby & Wigston Lincolnshire West Lindsey Boston, Lincoln, N Kesteven, S Holland, W Lindsey Northamptonshire South None Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire None Ashfield, Bassetlaw, Gedling, Mansfield Unitaries and None None Peak District Source: Local Authorities

POLICY 29- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR ENHANCING THE REGIONS BIODIVERSITY

Table Env.6- Biodiversity- Local Wildlife Sites 2007/08 (hectares) Area lost Area Area Area likely Area lost Area through likely to enhanced to be by means expanded planning be through expanded other or newly decisions degraded planning or newly than designated as a decisions designated through by means direct as a direct planning other than result of result of decisions through planning planning planning decisions decisions decisions Derby 6.6 0 18.7 0 0 0 Derbyshire 3.4 0 2.9 0 8.8 9.4 Leicester 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leicestershire 7.3 2.6 0 0 0 0.4 Lincolnshire 0 2.0 0 0 0 0 Northamptonshire 60 0 0 0 0 0 Nottingham N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R Nottinghamshire 0 0 445.9 0 2,298.2 1,414.4 Peak District N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Rutland 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Midlands 77.3 4.6 467.5 0 2,307.0 1,424.2 Source: Local Authorities N/A Not applicable- does not have any local wildlife sites N/R Not returned Data not returned or only partially returned by: Blaby, Bolsover, Boston, Daventry, East Lindsey, Lincoln, North Kesteven, North West Leicestershire, Northampton, Oadby and Wigston, South Kesteven, South Northamptonshire, Wellingborough, West Lindsey, Nottingham Nottinghamshire have recently undertaken a review of their site designations, predominantly correcting digitisation errors, as well as designating new sites and removing sites which no

3 longer qualify. This may mean that the figures presented here may not be an accurate reflection of the true enhancement/loss/degradation

Table Env.7- Biodiversity- Internationally or Nationally Significant Sites 2007/08 (hectares) Area lost Area Area Area newly degraded enhanced designated Derby 0000 Derbyshire 0000 Leicester 0000 Leicestershire 0 0 11 0 Lincolnshire 0 0 0 0 Northamptonshire 0 0 0 0 Nottingham N/R N/R N/R N/R Nottinghamshire 0 0 0 0 Peak District 0 *N/R *7,850 0 Rutland 0 0 0 0 East Midlands 0 0 7,861 0 Source: Local Authorities N/R Not returned Data not returned or only partially returned by: Ashfield, Bassetlaw, Blaby, Boston, Daventry, East Lindsey, Gedling, High Peak, Lincoln, , Northampton, Oadby and Wigston, South Northamptonshire, Wellingborough, West Lindsey, Nottingham, Peak District North Kesteven and Chesterfield reported that they do not have any internationally or nationally significant sites. *Figure provided by the Peak is net enhancement

Figure Env.1– East Midlands wild bird indicators: 1994 to 2006 (numbers in brackets indicate the number of species) Index 1994=100

Source: Defra Excludes uplands species

4 Figure Env.2- Percentage Change in Wild Birds Indicator 1994 to 2006 (per cent)

Source: Defra Excludes uplands species

POLICY 30- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR MANAGING AND INCREASING WOODLAND COVER

Table Env.8- National Forest New Planting 1995/90 to 2007/08 (hectares) Mineral / National Tender Derelict Land Development Local Year Forest Other Total Scheme Land Acquisition Related Authorities Premium Restoration 1995/96 114 25 10 6 23 - 32 240 1996/97 318 69 15 23 10 - 66 501 1997/98 212 113 55 1 5 - 21 407 1998/99 246 98 20 3 - - 3 370 1999/00 242 91 94 13 2 25 13 480 2000/01 290 59 96 13 - 30 14 502 2001/02 417 25 93 7 - 19 14 575 2002/03 360 25 46 12 - 15 44 205 2003/04 299 58 49 15 - 1 28 450 2004/05 298 40 42 10 - - 4 394 2005/06 227 41 118 9 - - 18 413 2006/07 248 42 55 - - - 6 351 2007/08 - 30 52 12 - - 25 119 Total 3301 716 745 124 40 90 288 530 Source: Nationalforest.org

5 POLICY 31- PRIORITIES FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE REGION’S LANDSCAPE

Table Env.9- Landscape Character Assessments as at 31st March 2008 Areas Covered by Areas with LCAs Areas with LCAs with Historic Landscape Landscape Character Characterisation Assessment related Supplementary Planning Documents Derbyshire All districts Bolsover, Derby Amber Valley, Dales, South Derby Dales, Derbyshire Erewash, High Peak Leicestershire All districts Blaby, Melton, Oadby None & Wigston Lincolnshire North Kesteven, None* West Lindsey South Kesteven, West Lindsey Northamptonshire Corby, Daventry, Corby, Daventry, None East Northants, East Northants, Kettering, South Kettering, South Northants, Northants, Wellingborough Wellingborough Nottinghamshire Ashfield, Bassetlaw, Ashfield, Bassetlaw, None Gedling, Mansfield, Gedling, Mansfield Newark & Sherwood, Rushcliffe Unitaries and Leicester, Peak Rutland Peak Nottingham, Peak, Rutland Source: Local Authorities Information on Historic Landscape Characterisations may be under reported as stand alone documents will not be part of a Landscape Character Assessment and may not be included here. *Whole county assessment started Oct 08. East Lindsey, South Holland and south-east East Lindsey covered by The Wash Cultural and Historic Landscape Characterisation which is near completion

6 POLICY 32- A REGIONAL APPROACH TO THE WATER RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY

Table Env.10- Planning Permissions with SuDs 2007/08 Number of Approximate Number of Approximate domestic total number of industrial/ total number of dwelling sites dwellings business sites non-residential covered covered covered units covered Boston 43 69 9 13 East Lindsey 2 137 0 0 Gedling 1 21 0 0 Newark and Sherwood 0 0 1 2 North East Derbyshire 24 80 2 2 Leicester 349 1500 0 0 East Midlands 419 1807 12 17 Source: Local Authorities Note figures above relate only to those authorities who were able to return data and had some developments with SuDs

POLICY 33- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR STRATEGIC RIVER CORRIDORS

Table Env.11- East Midlands GQAHI grade Percentage River Length 1990 to 2007- Biology (per cent) Very Good Fairly good or and Good Fair Poor or Bad 1990 43.89 48.76 7.35

1995 48.79 44.74 6.47

2000 63.29 32.84 3.87 2002 61.35 35.34 3.31 2003 63.79 32.56 3.65 2004 62.80 33.20 4.00 2005 67.02 29.25 3.73 2006 69.72 27.20 3.08 2007 71.24 27.12 1.64 Source: Environment Agency

7 Table Env.12- East Midlands GQAHI grade Percentage River Length 1990 to 2007- Chemistry (per cent) Very Good Fairly good or and good Fair Poor or Bad 1990 34.46 55.13 10.41 1993 53.43 40.66 5.91 1994 60.93 36.20 2.87 1995 66.43 30.96 2.61 1996 63.00 33.55 3.45 1997 56.43 38.64 4.93 1998 58.93 37.65 3.42 1999 65.80 32.07 2.13 2000 72.80 25.21 1.99 2001 74.99 23.10 1.91 2002 72.93 25.95 1.12 2003 70.83 26.71 2.46 2004 68.52 27.77 3.71 2005 71.10 24.09 4.81 2006 71.87 23.34 4.79 2007 74.87 21.84 3.29 Source: Environment Agency

Table Env.13- East Midlands GQAHI grade Percentage River Length 1990 to 2007-Phospahtes (per cent) Very High or Very Low and Moderately or Excessively Low High High 1990 2.46 13.85 83.69

1995 11.66 19.71 68.64

2000 9.12 21.60 69.27 2001 8.23 21.21 70.57 2002 7.61 23.20 69.19 2003 6.83 23.73 69.44 2004 6.18 25.60 68.22 2005 8.89 24.33 66.78 2006 10.53 24.32 65.15 2007 12.63 27.74 59.63 Source: Environment Agency

8 Table Env.14- East Midlands GQAHI grade Percentage River Length 1990 to 2007- Nitrates (per cent) Moderately Very Low and low or High or Very Low Moderate High 1990 4.75 34.10 61.15

1995 4.92 25.55 69.54

2000 4.66 20.66 74.67 2001 4.67 23.91 71.43 2002 4.94 27.23 67.83 2003 5.79 32.52 61.69 2004 5.29 33.25 61.46 2005 5.32 35.30 59.38 2006 5.88 36.02 58.10 2007 8.03 37.00 54.97 Source: Environment Agency

POLICY 35- A REGIONAL APPROACH TO MANAGING FLOOD RISK

Table Env.15- Planning applications approved contrary to Environment Agency advice on flood risk grounds East Midlands Minor Major development development 2001/02 62 3 2002/03 39 4 2003/04 132 1 2004/05 19 1 2005/06 20 2 2006/07 16 4 Source: Environment Agency

9 Table Env.16- Strategic Flood Risk Assessments as at 31st March 2008- Significant Effects Indicator update Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment- Districts wholly or Assessment- Districts wholly or partially covered partially covered Current Planned or Current Planned or Underway Underway Amber Valley, Derbyshire Erewash Derby Dales, Bolsover, Derby High Peak Dales, Erewash, High Peak, NE Derbyshire Derbyshire Chesterfield Blaby, Charnwood, Harborough Hinckley & NW Leicestershire, Bosworth, Oadby & Wigston Melton, NW Leicestershire, Oadby & Leicestershire Wigston Lincoln, S Holland, N Kesteven, Boston S Kesteven, S S Kesteven W Lindsey Holland, N Kesteven, Lincoln, E Lindsey, W Lincolnshire Lindsey Corby, E Corby, E S Northants Northants, Northants, Kettering, Kettering, Northampton, S Wellingborough Northants, Northamptonshire Wellingborough Ashfield, Gedling, Newark & Broxtowe, Mansfield, Sherwood, Rushcliffe Nottinghamshire Rushcliffe Bassetlaw* Leicester, Peak, Derby Nottingham, Unitaries & Peak Rutland Rutland Source: Local Authorities * Type of SFRA not specified Level 1 SFRA: In local authority areas where flooding is not a major issue and where development pressures are low, a less detailed approach will be required (referred to as a Level 1 SFRA) compared to what is necessary in areas where there is high development pressure and flooding is a significant issue. Level 2 SFRA: Where a Level 1 SFRA shows that land outside flood risk areas cannot accommodate the necessary development and the Exception Test needs to be applied, the scope of the SFRA should be widened. This increased scope SFRA is referred to as a Level 2 SFRA.

10 POLICY 35A- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR AIR QUALITY

Table Env.17- End user carbon dioxide emissions 2004 to 2006 Per capita Total emissions(million emissions(tonnes carbon tonnes carbon dioxide) dioxide)

forestry) forestry) forestry) Domestic Domestic Domestic and public and public Road transport Road transport Road transport Industrial, commercial Industrial, commercial Industrial, commercial Total (inc.land use and Total (inc.land use and Total (inc.land

East Midlands 19 11 13 43 4.5 2.6 3 10.3 2004 England 194 128 126 450 3.9 2.6 2.6 9.2 East Midlands 18 10 12 41 4.3 2.5 3 9.9 2005 England 194 122 125 444 3.9 2.5 2.5 9 East Midlands 18 11 11 41 4.2 2.5 2.6 9.3 2006 England 193 126 113 434 3.8 2.5 2.2 8.6 Source: Defra

POLICY 38- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR ENERGY REDUCTION AND EFFICIENCY

Table Env.18- Authorities which have Adopted Supplementary Planning Documents underpinning sustainable energy policy as at 31st March 2008 Authorities in the Area Derby None Derbyshire None Leicester Leicester Leicestershire Oadby & Wigston Lincolnshire Lincoln Northamptonshire South Northants, Daventry Nottingham None Nottinghamshire None Peak Park Peak Park Rutland None Source: Local Authorities

11 Table Env.19- Gas Consumption in East Midlands 2005

Commercial Domestic and industrial consumers consumers All consumers Sales per consumer (kWh) (kWh) (kWh) (kWh) Domestic Domestic Number of of Number Number of of Number Number of of Number consumers consumers consumers consumers consumers consumers Commercial Commercial (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) and industrial and industrial

Derby 1,699 96.5 1,350 1.46 3,049 98.0 17,601 927,290 Derbyshire 5,943 298.6 3,253 5.02 9,196 303.6 19,905 648,331 Leicester 2,193 112.6 1,813 2.75 4,006 115.3 19,478 659,947 Leicestershire 4,730 233.7 2,853 4.35 7,583 238.0 20,244 655,798 Lincolnshire 4,010 214.6 1,957 3.51 5,966 218.1 18,681 557,623 Northamptonshire 4,614 245.0 2,903 4.43 7,517 249.4 18,835 655,850 Nottingham 2,019 112.3 1,590 2.43 3,609 114.7 17,975 655,604 Nottinghamshire 6,025 296.3 3,138 4.29 9,163 300.6 20,334 730,919 Rutland 236 11.2 80 0.28 316 11.5 21,065 288,363 East Midlands 31,469 1,620.8 18,936 28.50 50,405 1,649.3 19,416 664,388 Source: DTI Regional Energy Consumption Statistics

Table Env.20- Gas Consumption in East Midlands 2006 Commercial Domestic and industrial consumers consumers All consumers Sales per consumer (kWh) (kWh) (kWh) (kWh) Domestic Domestic Number of of Number Number of of Number Number of of Number consumers consumers consumers consumers consumers consumers Commercial Commercial (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) and industrial and industrial

Derby 1,642 97.5 1,199 1.4 2,841 98.9 16,833 856,442 Derbyshire 5,735 302.5 3,092 4.8 8,827 307.3 18,958 642,609 Leicester 2,102 113.2 1,600 2.5 3,703 115.7 18,563 645,347 Leicestershire 4,599 238.3 2,688 4.1 7,287 242.4 19,297 660,697 Lincolnshire 3,979 223.1 1,917 3.3 5,896 226.5 17,836 572,487 Northamptonshire 4,450 248.7 2,768 4.2 7,218 252.8 17,895 663,235 Nottingham 1,919 112.7 1,447 2.3 3,367 115.0 17,031 630,935 Nottinghamshire 5,834 301.3 2,709 4.1 8,543 305.4 19,363 659,309 Rutland 223 11.2 71 0.3 294 11.4 20,013 271,943 East Midlands 30,484 1,648.6 17,492 26.9 47,976 1,675.5 18,492 649,144 Source: DTI Regional Energy Consumption Statistics

12 Table Env.21- Electricity Consumption in East Midlands 2005 Commercial Domestic and industrial Sales per consumers consumers All consumers consumer Number of of Number of Number of Number consumers consumers consumers consumers (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) industrial (kWh) industrial (kWh) Domestic (kWh) (kWh) Domestic Commercial and Commercial

Derby 447 105.5 795 7.84 1,242 113.4 4,237 101,394 Derbyshire 1,457 329.7 2,982 28.59 4,440 358.3 4,420 104,333 Leicester 486 125.8 1,192 13.96 1,677 139.7 3,860 85,384 Leicestershire 1,239 264.3 2,061 22.28 3,300 286.6 4,689 92,506 Lincolnshire 1,515 308.8 2,293 32.11 3,808 341.0 4,905 71,414 Northamptonshire 1,409 292.3 2,393 25.64 3,802 317.9 4,822 93,325 Nottingham 529 131.5 1,054 13.28 1,583 144.8 4,019 79,374 Nottinghamshire 1,478 337.0 2,139 24.86 3,617 361.8 4,386 86,043 Rutland 84 15.4 379 1.82 462 17.2 5,432 208,248 East Midlands 8,644 1,910.4 15,288 170.38 23,932 2,080.8 4,525 89,733 Source: DTI Regional Energy Consumption Statistics

Table Env.22- Electricity Consumption in East Midlands 2006 Commercial Domestic and industrial Sales per consumers consumers All consumers consumer Number of of Number Number of of Number Number of of Number consumers consumers consumers consumers consumers consumers (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) Sales (GWh) industrial (kWh) industrial (kWh) Domestic (kWh) (kWh) Domestic Commercial and Commercial

Derby 439 106.3 763 7.4 1,202 113.7 4,131 103,003 Derbyshire 1,439 334.7 2,966 27.5 4,406 362.2 4,300 107,984 Leicester 479 126.0 1,145 13.0 1,624 139.0 3,805 88,070 Leicestershire 1,220 266.8 2,036 21.1 3,256 287.9 4,575 96,510 Lincolnshire 1,492 311.7 2,270 30.7 3,762 342.4 4,787 73,996 Northamptonshire 1,378 295.6 2,388 24.1 3,766 319.7 4,661 99,233 Nottingham 523 132.4 1,008 12.2 1,530 144.5 3,948 82,895 Nottinghamshire 1,457 338.5 2,104 23.7 3,561 362.2 4,305 88,777 Rutland 82 15.7 310 1.7 392 17.4 5,231 179,755 East Midlands 8,510 1,928 14,989 161 23,499 2,089 4,415 92,934 Source: DTI Regional Energy Consumption Statistics

13 POLICY 39- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR LOW CARBON ENERGY GENERATION

Table Env.23- Number of CHP schemes and their electrical capacity 2005 to 2007 Number of sites Electrical Capacity( MWe)

2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 East Midlands 75 76 81 237 209 242 England 1,195 1,204 1,242 4,741 4,724 4,797 Source: Energy Trends

Figure Env.3- Number of Sites Generating Renewable Energy by English Region, 2007

Source: Energy Trends

Table Env.24- Installed Capacity in East Midlands of Sites Generating Electricity from Renewable Sources 2003 to 2007 (MW) Hydro Wind/Wave Landfill Other Bio Total Gas fuels 2003 5.0 1.3 46.6 26.2 79.1 2004 5.0 # 54.4 15.0 74.4 2005 5.1 6.1 60.5 19.3 91.0 2006 5.1 54.6 55.7 31.7 147.1 2007 5.4 70.1 60.8 39.5 175.8 Source: Energy Trends # data not shown due to small number of sites

14 Table Env.25– Renewables Capacity - Northamptonshire Percentage of Installed capacity Target 2010 Total County (kW) (MWh) (kW) Consumption Wind Onshore (2 MW) 20,000 52,560 12,000 0.6 Wind Offshore (3 MW) 0 0 0 0.0 Hydro (330 kW) 0 0 0 0.0 Biomass (263 kW) 5,210 38,792 25,000 3.6 Biogas (263 kW) 1,000 7,884 4,200 0.6 Coal Mine Methane (1,300 kW) 0 0 0 0.0 Landfill Gas (1,578 kW) 11,410 94,954 14,000 2.2 CHP (1.6 MW) 0 0 0 0.0 Micro Wind (1 kW) 0 0 0 0.0 PV (2 kW) 0 0 300 0.0 Waste Incineration (7,000 kW) 0 0 0 0.0 Coal (2,000 MW) 0 0 0 0.0 Natural gas (700 MW) 350,000 2,606,100 0 0.0 TOTAL 387,620 2,800,290 55,500 7.1 Source: Best Foot Forward report on renewable energy scenarios NOTE: This data may not be complete. The 2010 Northamptonshire renewable target is 366 GWh or 10% of the electricity consumption of Northamptonshire.

Table Env.26- Renewables Capacity - Nottinghamshire Installed capacity Target 2010 Percentage of Total County (kW) (MWh) (kW) Consumption Wind Onshore (2 MW) 0 0 10,000 0.5 Wind Offshore (3 MW) 0 0 0 0.0 Hydro (330 kW) 1,676 7,635 7,800 0.7 Biomass (263 kW) 9,022 67,178 6,000 0.9 Biogas (263 kW) 3,274 25,812 5,400 0.8 Coal Mine Methane (1,300 kW) 9,000 67,014 0 0.0 Landfill Gas (1,578 kW) 8,064 67,109 5,000 0.8 CHP (1.6 MW) 20,234 150,662 0 0.0 Micro Wind (1 kW) 0 0 0 0.0 PV (2 kW) 176 200 500 0.0 Waste Incineration (7,000 kW) 7,000 55,188 0 0.0 Coal (2,000 MW) 0 0 0 0.0 Natural gas (700 MW) 0 0 0 0.0 TOTAL 58,446 440,798 34,700 3.7 Source: Best Foot Forward report on renewable energy scenarios NOTE: This data may not be complete. The 2010 Nottinghamshire renewable target is 183 GWh or 4% of the electricity consumption of Nottinghamshire.

15 Table Env.27- Renewables Capacity - Derbyshire Installed capacity Target 2010 Percentage of Total County (kW) (MWh) (kW) Consumption Wind Onshore (2 MW) 0 0 36,000 1.80 Wind Offshore (3 MW) 0 0 0 0.00 Hydro (330 kW) 1,760 8,017 2,800 0.20 Biomass (263 kW) 260 1,936 0 0.00 Biogas (263 kW) 1,034 8,152 5,800 0.90 Coal Mine Methane (1,300 kW) 9,000 67,014 0 0.00 Landfill Gas (1,578 kW) 9,762 81,239 8,500 1.40 CHP (1.6 MW) 407 3,031 0 0.00 Micro Wind (1 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 PV (2 kW) 106 121 500 0.00 Waste Incineration (7,000 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 Coal (2,000 MW) 0 0 2,000 0.30 Natural gas (700 MW) 214,000 1,593,444 0 0.00 TOTAL 236,329 1,762,954 55,600 4.6 Source: Best Foot Forward report on renewable energy scenarios NOTE: This data may not be complete. The 2010 Derbyshire renewable target is 224 GWh or 4% of its electricity consumption

Table Env.28- Renewables Capacity – Leicestershire and Rutland Installed capacity Target 2010 Percentage of Total County (kW) (MWh) (kW) Consumption Wind Onshore (2 MW) 65 171 22,000 1.10 Wind Offshore (3 MW) 0 0 0 0.00 Hydro (330 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 Biomass (263 kW) 3,008 22,398 10,000 1.40 Biogas (263 kW) 2,104 16,588 4,600 0.70 Coal Mine Methane (1,300 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 Landfill Gas (1,578 kW) 15,370 127,909 18,000 2.90 CHP (1.6 MW) 4,073 30,328 0 0.00 Micro Wind (1 kW) 0 0 4,000 0.20 PV (2 kW) 136 155 400 0.00 Waste Incineration (7,000 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 Coal (2,000 MW) 0 0 2,000 0.30 Natural gas (700 MW) 0 0 700 0.10 TOTAL 24,756 197,548 61,700 6.7 Source: Best Foot Forward report on renewable energy scenarios NOTE: This data may not be complete. The 2010 Leicestershire renewable target is 320 GWh or 6% of the electricity consumption of Leicestershire.

16 Table Env.29- Renewables Capacity - Lincolnshire Percentage of Installed capacity Target 2010 Total County (kW) (MWh) (kW) Consumption Wind Onshore (2 MW) 34,010 89,378 42,000 2.10 Wind Offshore (3 MW) 0 0 0 0.00 Hydro (330 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 Biomass (263 kW) 278 2,070 20,000 2.90 Biogas (263 kW) 0 0 3,500 0.50 Coal Mine Methane (1,300 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 Landfill Gas (1,578 kW) 7,055 58,712 7,000 1.10 CHP (1.6 MW) 0 0 0 0.00 Micro Wind (1 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 PV (2 kW) 26 30 300 0.00 Waste Incineration (7,000 kW) 0 0 0 0.00 Coal (2,000 MW) 0 0 0 0.00 Natural gas (700 MW) 1,650,000 12,285,900 0 0.00 TOTAL 1,691,369 12,436,090 72,800 6.6 Source: Best Foot Forward report on renewable energy scenarios NOTE: This data may not be complete. The 2010 Nottinghamshire renewable target is 346 GWh or 9% of the electricity consumption of Lincolnshire.

17 POLICY 40- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR CULTURE, SPORT AND RECREATION

Table Env.30- Total Area (m2) and Capacity per 1,000 Population: Sports Halls and Swimming Pools in the East Midlands Local Authority Sports Sports Swimming Swimming Halls/total Halls/Capacity Pools/total Pools/Capacity area (m2) Ratio Per 1000 area (m2) Ratio Per 1000 Amber Valley 7808 67.065 2421.25 20.797 Ashfield 7746 69.549 1518.03 13.63 Bassetlaw 8767 81.42 1782.5 16.554 Blaby 4316 47.839 2014 22.323 Bolsover 3915 54.53 258 3.594 Boston 6925.6 124.219 860 15.425 Broxtowe 7356 68.376 1219 11.331 Charnwood 15639 101.872 4216.87 27.469 Chesterfield 7616.94 77.07 1968.2 19.915 Derby 19297 87.025 3225.58 14.547 Leicester 24082.34 86.044 3733.5 13.34 Nottingham 24649.34 92.301 5607.25 20.997 Corby 3402 63.956 607 11.411 Daventry 5356.75 74.565 2121 29.524 Derbyshire Dales 7597 109.303 1945.5 27.991 East Lindsey 9553 73.232 3754.59 28.782 East 5569 72.756 1431 18.695 Northamptonshire Erewash 8322.2 75.576 1691.5 15.361 Gedling 5836.18 52.207 1200.94 10.743 Harborough 4481.4 58.524 1117 14.587 High Peak 6081.26 67.987 970 10.844 Hinckley & Bosworth 7063 70.502 1560.65 15.578 Kettering 7542 92.134 935 11.422 Lincoln 7412.79 86.626 1024.5 11.972 Mansfield 8116.3 82.685 1895 19.305 Melton 3782 78.938 827.82 17.278 Newark and 7617 71.711 1851 17.426 Sherwood North East 7233 74.632 1298.5 13.398 Derbyshire North Kesteven 6617 70.393 2490.84 26.498 North West 5970 69.816 2757 32.241 Leicestershire Northampton 14177 72.902 4051.3 20.833 Oadby and Wigston 6265 112.318 682.3 12.232 Rushcliffe 10463.34 99.058 2428.12 22.987 Rutland 4795.5 138.743 918.5 26.574 South Derbyshire 3774 46.264 1162.5 14.251 South Holland 4220 55.155 506.25 6.617 South Kesteven 10096.58 80.871 3453 27.658 South 7572 95.535 1142 14.408 Northamptonshire Wellingborough 4449 61.329 1380 19.023 West Lindsey 4395 55.287 1039.5 13.076 Source: Sport England Based on capacity of facilities by Output Areas (and aggregated up where necessary) Only looks at facilities within local authority areas, it does not look across borders The calculation performed is: Unit ÷ population x 1000. Unit defined by Facility Type Population based on 2001 Census

19 DATA APPENDIX - SECTION 6 MINERALS, AGGREGATES & WASTE

This section contains data tables and figures relating to the minerals and waste section of the RSS Monitoring Report. The tables/figures are presented under the relevant policy. Where the data is relevant to more than one policy it is presented under the policy which comes first.

POLICY 36- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR MINERALS

Table MW.1- Planning Permissions for Minerals Extraction 2007/08 (tonnes) Oil Clay rock Coal stone stone gravel Building Gypsum Gypsum Crushed Crushed Sand and Industrial limestone

Derby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/R Derbyshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leicester 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leicestershire 0 0 3,600,000 0 0 4,500,000 0 0 Lincolnshire 0 0 8,300,000 *25,000 *25,000 0 N/A N/A Northamptonshire N/A N/A 3,763,000 135,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire N/A N/A 8,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Peak District 0 0 0 0 37,500 0 0 0 Rutland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Source: Local Authorities NA: Data not applicable NR Data not returned * per year

1 Table MW.2- Comparison of East Midlands* Rock and Sand Landbanks 2003 to 2006 (million tonnes) Permitted Aggregate Sales Reserves Limestone / Dolomite 2003 14.11 1,528.2 2004 14.70 1,252.4 2005 14.54 1,007.4 2006 14.84 997.5 Igneous Rock / Sandstone 2003 14.24 410.1 2004 13.18 393.2 2005 14.14 376.0 2006 14.61 357.5 Chalk 2003 0.22 10.1 2004 0.28 11.5 2005 0.10 7.6 2006 0.23 13.6 Total Rock 2003 28.57 1,948.4 2004 28.15 1,657.1 2005 28.69 1,391.0 2006 29.69 1,368.6 Sand/Gravel 2003 10.77 94.1 2004 10.29 92.3 2005 10.07 77.0 2006 9.91 73.6 Source: EMAWP 2003,2004, 2005 and 2006 *Includes the whole Peak Park

POLICY 37- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT

Table MW.3- Existing capacity 2005 (thousand tonnes) Recycling/ Landfill Re-use Disposal Total composting Diversion Derbyshire*, Derby City 441 1,161 210 1,188 3,000 Leicestershire, Leicester City, Rutland** 478 264 296 1,199 2,237* Lincolnshire 570 316 113 567 1,566 Northamptonshire 906 205 19 1,479 2,609 Nottinghamshire, Nottingham City 636 961 288 1,150 3,035 Regional Total 3,031 1,907 926 5,583 12,447 Source: Waste Planning Guidance for EMRA, SLR Consulting Ltd (August 2006) * Information relating to the whole Peak District National Park included in Derbyshire figures ** Information from the Environment Agency indicates that in 2005 Leicestershire, Leicester City and Rutland handled 2,725,398 tonnes of waste which is in excess of the capacity estimated by SLR

2 Table MW.4- Capacity Requirement 2020 (thousand tonnes) Recycling/ Landfill Re-use Disposal Total composting Diversion Derbyshire*, Derby City 2,047 187 999 1,301 4,534 Leicestershire, Leicester City, Rutland 2,240 195 999 1,301 4,735 Lincolnshire 1,573 123 651 825 3,172 Northamptonshire 1,543 121 651 871 3,186 Nottinghamshire, Nottingham City 2,218 214 1,042 3,054 6,526 Regional Total 9,621 840 4,342 7,352 22,155 Source: Waste Planning Guidance for EMRA, SLR Consulting Ltd (August 2006) * Information relating to the whole Peak District National Park included in Derbyshire figures

Table MW.5- Existing MSW Capacity 2005 (thousand tonnes) Recycling/ Landfill Re-use Disposal Total composting Diversion * Derbyshire , Derby City 85 # 433 518 Leicestershire, Leicester City, Rutland 98 110 # 398 606 Lincolnshire 182 # 272 454 Northamptonshire 102 # 274 376 Nottinghamshire, Nottingham City 128 150 # 334 612 Regional Total 595 260 # 1,711 2,566 Source: Waste Planning Guidance for EMRA, SLR Consulting Ltd (August 2006) * Information relating to the whole Peak District National Park included in Derbyshire figures

Table MW.6- MSW Capacity Requirement 2020 (thousand tonnes) Recycling/ Landfill Re- Disposal Total composting Diversion use * Derbyshire , Derby City 326 187 # 138 651 Leicestershire, Leicester City, Rutland 333 195 # 139 667 Lincolnshire 213 123 # 90 426 Northamptonshire 222 121 # 101 444 Nottinghamshire, Nottingham City 386 214 # 172 772 Regional Total 1,480 840 # 640 2,960 Source: Waste Planning Guidance for EMRA, SLR Consulting Ltd (August 2006) * Information relating to the whole Peak District National Park included in Derbyshire figures

3 Table MW.7- Municipal Waste Planning Permissions East Midlands 2007/08 (thousand tonnes per annum) Peak Rutland Rutland Derby City Derby Derbyshire Derbyshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Leicester City City Leicester Leicestershire Leicestershire Nottingham City Nottingham Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire

Northamptonshire Anaerobic Digestion 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Autoclave 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Composting 0 3.5 0 0 N/R* 85 0 10 N/R 0 Household Recycling Centre 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/R 0 Landfill Total Void Space 0 8.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/R 0 Landfill Waste Disposed per annum 0 7.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/R 0 Pyrolysis and Gasification 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Recycling/recovery facility 0 60 0 0 0 140 0 0 N/R 0 Transfer Station 0 N/A 0 0 0 160 0 N/A N/R 0 Thermal Treatment 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Source: Local Authorities NA: Data not applicable NR: Data not returned * Permission of unknown size

4 Table MW.8– Commercial and Industrial Waste Planning Permissions East Midlands 2007/08 (thousand tonnes per annum) Peak Rutland Rutland Derby City Derby Derbyshire Derbyshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Leicester City City Leicester Leicestershire Leicestershire Nottingham City Nottingham Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire

Northamptonshire Anaerobic Digestion 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Autoclave 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Composting 0 1.4 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Household Recycling Centre 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Landfill Total Void Space 0 N/A 0 *5,500 0 0 0 0 N/R 0 Landfill Waste Disposed per annum 0 N/A 0 *275 0 0 0 0 N/R 0 Pyrolysis and Gasification 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Recycling/recovery facility 0 98.8 390 2 *50 11 0 N/A N/R 0 Transfer Station 0 N/A 0 0 *109 13.4 0 0 N/R 0 Thermal Treatment 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Source: Local Authorities NA: Data not applicable NR: Data not returned * Includes an unquantifiable element of municipal waste. Also an additional recycling/recovery facility in Lincolnshire of unknown size

5 Table MW.9– Construction and Demolition Waste Planning Permissions East Midlands 2007/08 (thousand tonnes per annum) Peak Rutland Rutland Derby City Derby Derbyshire Derbyshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Leicester City City Leicester Leicestershire Leicestershire Nottingham City Nottingham Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire

Northamptonshire Anaerobic Digestion 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Autoclave 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Composting 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Household Recycling Centre 0 N/A 156 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Landfill Total Void Space 0 13 0 38 0 158.6 0 130 N/R 0 Landfill Waste Disposed per annum 0 22.5 0 38 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Pyrolysis and Gasification 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Recycling/recovery facility 0 N/A 0 0 N/R* 109 0 0 N/R 0 Transfer Station 0 N/A 0 0 0 118 0 N/A N/R 0 Thermal Treatment 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/R 0 Source: Local Authorities NA: Data not applicable NR: Data not returned * Permission of unknown size

Table MW.10- Municipal Waste Management in the East Midlands 2000/01 to 2007/08 (million tonnes) 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Landfill 1,783 1,881 1,899 1,791 1,680 1,448 1,452 1,279 (percentage) 78% 78% 78% 73% 67% 60% 58% 53% Incineration 152 156 142 151 167 121 160 166 (percentage) 7% 6% 6% 6% 7% 5% 6% 7% Recycled/composted 354 371 393 492 678 772 865 969 (percentage) 15% 15% 16% 20% 27% 32% 35% 40% Other 0 2 15 11 0 88 13 0 (percentage) 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 4% 1% 0% Total 2,290 2,409 2,449 2,445 2,525 2,428 2,490 2,413 Source: Waste Data Flows

6 Table MW.11- Household Waste Disposal Method 2007/08 (per cent) BVPI 82b - BVPI 82c - BVPI 82a - household waste used to BVPI 82d - household waste recover energy disposed of waste recycled composted - incineration - landfill Derby City 21.59 18.98 3.48 55.95 Derbyshire 20.88 16.37 0.81 61.87 Leicester City 16.97 16.49 8.63 57.91 Leicestershire 22.92 25.52 0.10 50.93 Lincolnshire 29.33 21.22 0.22 50.27 Northamptonshire 22.72 19.55 0.02 57.70 Nottingham City 19.65 9.35 57.49 20.22 Nottinghamshire 26.11 13.16 14.89 45.89 Rutland 17.05 11.75 0.00 71.20 Peak* 21 17 5 58 Source: Waste Data Flows *Figures from the Peak are based on apportionment of district data and will include some data from Derbyshire and should therefore not be included in total calculations Totals may not sum to exactly 100%, this may be due to waste being collected and sent for recycling or disposal in different time periods (e.g. stockpiling).

Table MW.12- Household recycling rates 2000/01 to 2007/08 (per cent) 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 East Midlands 13.1 13.7 15.1 19.3 26.3 31.8 35.6 41.9 England 11.2 12.5 14.5 17.8 22.5 26.7 30.9 34.5 Source: Waste Data Flows

Table MW.13– Municipal Waste Arsing at Civic Amenity sites in the East Midlands 2006/07 and 2007/08 (tonnes) 2006/07 2007/08 Derby City 9,591 8,384 Derbyshire 23,046 22,886 Leicester City 5,000 4,216 Leicestershire 47,838 32,112 Lincolnshire 25,152 22,447 Northamptonshire 35,854 34,512 Nottingham City 3,340 1,763 Nottinghamshire 43,777 38,680 Rutland 2,411 2,549 Source: Waste Data Flows PDNP is excluded as there are no CA sites within its boundaries

Table MW.14– Percentage of Residents Served by Kerbside Recycling in Unitary Authorities (at least one recyclable) 2006/07 and 2007/08 (per cent) 2006/07 2007/08 Derby City 100 100 Leicester City 96 96 Nottingham City 89 91 Rutland 7 7 Source: Waste Data Flows

7 Table MW.15– Cost of household waste collection per household (UA only) 2006/07 and 2007/08 (pounds) 2006/07 2007/08 Derby City 49.23 56.51 Leicester City 33.26 42.19 Nottingham City 37.15 40.18 Rutland 57.16 60.29 Source: Waste Data Flows

Table MW.16– Commercial and Industrial Waste East Midlands 2002/03 (thousand tonnes)

TOTAL Derbyshire Derbyshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Leicestershire Leicestershire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Northamptonshire Northamptonshire

Industry Total 02/03 1,058 868 710 563 2,570 5,771 Commerce Total 02/03 464 551 345 394 568 2,322 Total 02/03 1,522 1,419 1,055 957 3,139 8,093 Source: C&I survey 2002/3

Table MW.17- Commercial and Industrial Waste Disposal Method East Midlands 2002/03 (thousand tonnes) Treatment Total per Land Land Re-used/ Not Thermal & sub- disposal recovery Recycled recorded Transfer region Industry 02/03 2,550 152 2,555 145 170 198 5,771 Commerce 02/03 1,178 33 863 113 67 69 2,322 Total 02/03 3,728 185 3,418 258 237 267 8,093 Source: C&I survey 2002/3

Table MW.18- Construction and Demolition Waste Disposal 2005 (million tonnes) Spread on Waste Recycled Registered entering Landfill Landfill Landfill Total Aggregate exempt licensed Engineering Capping Disposal Arisings and Soil sites landfills East Midlands 5.6 0.7 3.5 0.4 0.6 2.5 9.8 England 46.4 15.4 27.7 4.2 5.4 18.1 89.6 Source: Defra

8 Table MW.19- East Midlands Hazardous Waste 2007 (tonnes)

Disposal or recovery option Derbyshire Leicestershire Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Total Incineration with energy recovery 29,774 22,653 18,625 71,052 Incineration without energy recovery 1 4,574 4,575 Landfill 24,400 2,460 128,089 154,949 Long term storage 1 1 Recycling / reuse 185,050 3,311 12,733 9,671 35,333 246,098 Rejected 968 5 34 1,007 Transfer (D) 1,809 4,582 201 5,198 2,142 13,934 Transfer (R) 5,960 3,714 7,238 13,195 3,393 33,500 Treatment 58,170 24 8,992 67,186 Total all D&R options 306,133 36,749 29,200 156,153 64,068 592,302 Source: Environment Agency

Table MW.20- Hazardous Waste Deposit in East Midlands1998/99 to 2006 (tonnes)

Total Other Other Landfill storage storage Transfer Transfer recovery recovery Treatment Long term Long term Incineration without energy energy without energy recovery energy recovery Incineration with Recycled/ Reused Recycled/

1998/9 25,412 335 198,620 0 74,944 8,606 96,328 409 404,655 2000 28,820 0 140,494 0 71,190 11,971 73,310 0 325,785 2001 28,721 0 216,198 0 85,946 18,374 85,444 0 434,683 2002 52,991 0 150,701 0 93,959 19,519 83,250 0 400,421 2003 45,479 0 269,809 0 116,390 34,217 65,493 0 531,387 2004 47,726 0 433,514 0 150,508 20,485 90,263 0 742,495 2005* 2006 66,477 3,703 125,811 1 213,228 35,634 62,763 403 508,021 2007 71,052 4,575 154,949 1 246,098 47,434 67,186 1,007 592,302 Source: Environment Agency * 2005 was a transition year with data from old and new hazardous waste systems. There were comparability problems and some data was missing so returns for 2005 have not been included in the trend analysis. Note: The very large reduction in landfill deposits of wastes between 2004 and 2006 is a result of changes in legislation (particularly the Landfill Directive). Anticipation of the legislation seems to have caused an increase in imports of hazardous construction & demolition waste for landfill disposal in 2004, followed by a sharp reduction due to restrictions and more limited disposal opportunities in 2006.

9 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR SECTION 7 TRANSPORT

This section contains data tables and figures relating to the transport section of the RSS Annual Monitoring Report. The tables/figures are presented under the relevant policy. Where the data is relevant to more than one policy it is presented under the policy which comes first.

POLICY 44- REGIONAL APPROACH TO TRAFFIC GROWTH REDUCTION

Table T.1 - Estimated traffic flows for all motor vehicles by local authority: East Midlands: 1993-2007 (million vehicle kilometers) Local Authority 1993 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Derby 1,538 1,638 1,665 1,654 1,643 1,661 Derbyshire 6,079 7,287 7,418 7,480 7,563 7,631 Leicester 1,262 1,410 1,418 1,387 1,413 1,422 Leicestershire 5,566 7,146 7,290 7,317 7,355 7,376 Lincolnshire 4,487 5,517 5,619 5,719 5,831 5,937 Northamptonshire 6,421 8,318 8,453 8,293 8,423 8,479 Nottingham 1,411 1,529 1,536 1,536 1,539 1,531 Nottinghamshire 5,422 6,529 6,698 6,690 6,912 7,042 Rutland 471 565 558 557 576 579 East Midlands 32,658 39,938 40,654 40,633 41,253 41,658 Source: DfT Transport Statistics National Road Traffic Survey

Table T.2 - East Midlands Motor Vehicle Traffic (billion vehicle kilometres) A Roads Minor Motorway Rural Urban Rural Urban All 2001 6.2 14.5 4.8 5.9 6.7 38.0 2002 6.3 14.9 4.8 6.1 6.9 39.2 2003 6.5 15.4 4.8 6.1 7.0 39.9 2004 6.8 15.6 4.9 6.3 7.0 40.7 2005 6.8 15.7 4.8 6.4 7.0 40.6 2006 6.8 15.9 4.9 6.5 7.1 41.2 2007 6.8 16.1 4.8 6.8 7.2 41.7 Source: DfT Transport Statistics National Road Traffic Survey

1 Table T.3 - Distribution of Costs of Congestion Across the East Midlands (million pounds) Strategic Strategic Three Nationals Regional Cities Southern Northern Eastern Peak Total Direct Economic Impacts Delay costs (£m, 2005 values and prices) Strategic Roads 65 110 # # # # # 175 Principal Urban Areas # # 355 65 20 440 Other Urban Areas # # 60 60 20 15 5 160 Rural Areas # # 10 10 10 10 10 50 Total Direct Economic Impacts (£m) 65 110 425 135 30 45 15 825 Costs incurred by business users (£m) 40 70 205 70 15 20 10 430 Costs incurred by other users (£m) 25 40 220 65 15 25 5 395 Wider Economic Impacts (£m, 2005 values and prices) Agglomeration Impacts # # 55 15 # # # 70 Impacts on Imperfect competition 5 5 20 10 0 0 0 40 Impacts on Labour Market 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Wider Economic Impacts (£m) 5 5 75 25 0 0 0 110 Total Direct and Wider Impacts (£m) 70 115 500 160 30 45 15 935 Source: Atkins Economic Costs of Congestion in the East Midlands emda (July 2007)

POLICY 45- A REGIONAL APPROACH TO BEHAVIOURAL CHANGE

Table T.4- Travel Plans 2005/06 to 2007/08 County/Authority Businesses with travel Schools with travel plans plans 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Derby 25 29 29 59 79 96 Derbyshire 17 16 N/R 85 209 297 Greater Nottingham 79 49 75 90 86 165 Leicester 47 47 74 40 46 N/R Leicestershire 25 32 39* 117 161 194 Lincolnshire 37 47 55 229 301 337 North Nottinghamshire 52 54 59 78 74 103 Northamptonshire 44 82 60 165 212 263 Rutland 0 0 0 11 11 13 Source: Local Authorities *Leicestershire figure only includes businesses with 250+ employees N/R: Not returned

2 Table T.5- Proportion of Pupils and Workforce covered by Travel Plans 2005/06 to 2007/08 (per cent) Percentage of workforce employed by companies with Percentage of pupils attending travel plans schools with travel plans 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Derby 38 40 40 46 62 71* Derbyshire N/R N/R N/R 31.2 62.7 81.5 Greater Nottingham 15 22 36 36 35 61 Leicester N/R 20 34 37 33 N/R Leicestershire 7.8 10.1 10.9** 42 53.0 66 Lincolnshire N/R N/R N/R 67 75 90 North Nottinghamshire 23 22.5 25 32 30 45 Northamptonshire 3.6 N/R N/R 58.6 N/R 74 Rutland 0 0 0 30.5 43 49 Source: Local Authorities *Percentage of schools **Major employers (250+ employees) only N/R: Not returned

Table T.6- New cycle routes provided 2005/06 to 2007/08 Number of New Routes Length of New Routes (metres) County/Authority 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Derby 7 8 1 3,100 3,000 22,642 Derbyshire 1 11 7 3,000 15,100 30,660 Greater Nottingham 11 10 10 14,000 13,000 19,300 Leicester 7 1 N/R 12,000 1,000 N/R Leicestershire 15 12 18 14,000 15,450 22,000 Lincolnshire 13 11 12 25,700 6,390 8,020 North Nottinghamshire 8 5 4 9,000 7,800 3,000 Northamptonshire 2 2 N/R 2,000 2,000 N/R Rutland 1 1 2 2,000 3,100 3,000 East Midlands 65 61 54 84,800 66,840 108,622 Source: Local Authorities N/R: Not returned

POLICY 50- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR BUS AND LIGHT RAIL SERVICES

Table T.7 - Bus and Light Rail Journeys 2000/01 to 2007/08 (millions) 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Bus 216 212 212 211 200 201 232 219 Nottingham Tram - - - 0 8 10 10 10 East Midlands 216 212 212 212 208 211 242 229 Source: Department for Transport Public Transport Statistics

3 POLICY 52- REGIONAL TRUNK ROAD PRIORITIES

Table T.8- Traffic accidents 2007 Child Adult All Road Users All Children Pedestrians Pedestrians Killed Killed Killed Killed Injured Injured Injured Injured Killed or Killed or Killed or Killed or Seriously Seriously Seriously Seriously County/Authority Derby 0 19 2 22 13 156 0 26 Derbyshire 1 18 4 43 53 493 5 42 Greater Nottingham 1 28 8 64 28 382 1 43 Leicester 0 11 3 19 8 88 0 13 Leicestershire 0 8 9 23 49 266 0 14 Lincolnshire 0 16 3 32 79 424 7 36 North Nottinghamshire 1 10 5 41 33 319 2 26 Northamptonshire 1 15 6 41 56 461 3 28 Rutland 0 0 0 3 7 28 0 1 East Midlands 4 125 40 288 326 2,617 18 229 Source: Local Authorities

Table T.9- People Killed or Seriously Injured In East Midlands 2005 to 2007 All Road Users 2005 All Road Users 2006 All Road Users 2007 Killed or Killed or Killed or Seriously Seriously Seriously County/Authority Killed Injured Killed Injured Killed Injured Derby 15 141 7 156 13 156 Derbyshire 48 483 42 472 53 493 Greater Nottingham 30 434 33 393 28 376 Leicester 10 59 16 88 8 88 Leicestershire 49 308 53 302 49 266 Lincolnshire 69 442 66 399 79 424 North 33 319 Nottinghamshire 37 357 34 332 Northamptonshire 42 518 74 442 56 461 Rutland 2 27 4 21 7 28 East Midlands 302 2,769 329 2,605 326 2,611 Source: Local Authorities

4 Table T.10- Investment in the Road Network - length of principal A and B roads improved or constructed 2007/08 Total Length improved or constructed County/Authority /km Details Derby Osmaston Road A514 0.22km Chellaston Road A514 0.05km Osmaston Road A514 1.15km Derby Road A6005 0.23km 1.73 Nottingham Road A6005 0.08km Derbyshire 0 New motorway junction Greater A6005 Abbey Bridge 2 2km Nottingham A6005 University 0.5km 2.6 B6004 Strelley 0.1km Leicester 0.52 Upperton Road Viaduct 0.52km Leicestershire 0 None Lincolnshire 4.5 A158 Burgh Le Marsh 4.5km North Nottinghamshire 0 None Northamptonshire A Roads - 25 schemes 15.24km 16.44 B Roads - 2 schemes 1.2km Rutland A47 Glaston - Wireless 6km B1081 Great Casterton 0.5km B668 Cottesmore 1km 8.7 A6121 Ketton 1.2km East Midlands 34.49 As above Source: Local Authorities

POLICY 53- REGIONAL MAJOR HIGHWAY PRIORITIES

Table T.11- Roads Where Maintenance Should be Considered 2007/08 (per cent) Proportion of Proportion of B and C principal road non-principal road carriageway where carriageways where maintenance should maintenance should be County/Authority be considered (%) considered (%): Derby 7 9 Derbyshire 4 12 Leicester 8 7 Leicestershire 2 3 Lincolnshire 2 5 Nottingham City 8 8 Nottinghamshire 2.6 7 Northamptonshire 3 6 Rutland 1 5 Source: Local Authorities

5 POLICY 54- IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REGIONAL FREIGHT STRATEGY

Table T.12- Freight transport by road - Goods lifted by origin of goods – East Midlands and Country 1993 to 2007 (million tonnes) Origin 1993 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 East Midlands 163 155 163 169 158 172 180 196 203 England 1,347 1,345 1,277 1,390 1,404 1,483 1,490 1,546 1,869 Source: Continuing Survey of Road Goods Transport Regional Transport Statistics (2007)

Table T.13- Freight lifted at East Midlands airports: 1993 to 2007 (thousand tonnes) 1993 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 East Midlands 29.5 178.2 195 219.3 227.1 253.1 266.6 272 275 Source: Civil Aviation Authority Figures include some double counting because domestic traffic is counted at airport on arrival and departure and exclude mail and passengers' luggage

POLICY 55- REGIONAL PRIORITIES FOR AIR TRANSPORT

Table T.14- Air transport movements (aircraft landing or take-offs) at East Midlands airports 1993 to 2007 (thousands) 1993 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 East Midlands 27.1 39.9 40.9 48.6 54 55.9 53.8 56.3 61.5 Source: Civil Aviation Authority Figures include some double counting because domestic traffic is counted at airport on arrival

6 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR SECTION 8 SUB-AREAS

This section contains data tables and figures relating to the sub-area section of the RSS Monitoring Report. The tables/figures are presented under the relevant policy. Where the data is relevant to more than one policy it is presented under the policy which comes first.

THREE CITIES SUB-AREA

POLICY 12- DEVELOPMENT IN THE THREE CITIES SUB-AREA

Table 3cs.1- New Housing Developed Additional dwellings* 2004/05 to 2007/08 (new build, conversion and change of use) 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Derby 887 917 1,104 1,224 Amber Valley 292 416 558 573 South Derbyshire 777 506 472 857 Leicester 1,044 1,147 1,279 1,012 Blaby 162 252 229 342 Charnwood 920 713 981 938 Harborough 206 270 469 656 Hinckley & Bosworth 591 468 599 415 Melton 124 163 199 260 North West Leicestershire 309 412 343 364 Oadby & Wigston 149 127 154 39 Nottingham 1,277 1,389 1,526 1,295 Broxtowe 345 380 367 380 708 net change Erewash 252 in stock 358 492 Gedling 259 263 317 481 Hucknall - - - 254 Rushcliffe 483 322 466 499 3 Cities Derby 1,956 1,839 2,134 2,654 3 Cities Leicester 3,505 3,552 4,253 4,026 3 Cities Nottingham 2,616 3,062 3,034 3,401 3 Cities 8,077 8,453 9,421 10,081 Source: Local Authorities *figures shown are gross completions (excludes losses through demolitions, conversions and changes of use) Hucknall included in 3 cities data for 2007/08 only

Table 3cs.2- Number of Jobs 2006 and 2007

Percentage 2006 2007 change 2006 to 2007 Amber Valley 48,500 48,600 0.3 Blaby 44,500 48,000 7.9 Broxtowe 33,600 37,300 10.9 Charnwood 60,000 61,200 2.1 Derby 119,300 128,200 7.5 Erewash 38,300 38,400 0.2 Gedling 30,300 31,400 3.4 Harborough 35,100 35,300 0.5 Hinckley and 41,100 39,600 -3.7

1 Bosworth Leicester 160,000 161,700 1.1 Melton 19,200 20,000 4.3 North West Leicestershire 48,700 49,100 1.0 Nottingham 183,300 184,700 0.8 Oadby and Wigston 18,700 18,800 0.6 Rushcliffe 41,700 43,600 4.6 South Derbyshire 27,400 28,500 4.0 East Midlands 1,837,100 1,897,000 3.3 Source: Annual Business Inquiry Figures are rounded to the nearest 100 Data prior to 2006 are not comparable

Table 3cs.3- Benefit Claimants February 2007 and 2008 Feb-07 Feb-08 Proportion of Proportion of Number of Working Age Number of Working Age working age Population working age Population claimants of any Claiming any claimants of Claiming any benefit Benefit (%) any benefit Benefit (%) Amber Valley 9,750 13.3 9,370 12.7 Blaby 4,520 8.0 4,360 7.7 Broxtowe 7,710 10.9 7,440 10.5 Charnwood 9,140 8.5 9,100 8.5 Derby 23,740 16.0 23,230 15.7 Erewash 8,920 13.1 8,640 12.7 Gedling 8,180 12.0 8,010 11.7 Harborough 3,230 6.5 3,240 6.5 Hinckley & Bosworth 5,900 9.1 5,880 9.1 Leicester 36,660 19.2 35,770 18.7 Melton 2,340 7.8 2,180 7.3 North West Leicestershire 6,230 11.2 6,050 10.9 Nottingham 37,620 18.9 36,960 18.6 Oadby & Wigston 3,110 9.1 3,030 8.8 Rushcliffe 4,960 7.4 4,850 7.2 South Derbyshire 5,940 10.4 5,790 10.2 Three Cities Sub-area 177,950 13.3 173,900 13.0 East Midlands 363,430 13.3 355,380 13.0 England 4,411,890 13.9 4,296,520 13.5 Source: NOMIS

Table 3cs.4- Retail Floorspace Local Authority Area 2001 to 2007 (thousand sqm) 2001 2004 2005 2006 2007 Percentage Change 2001 to 2007 Derby 551 568 496 494 495 -10.2 Leicester 692 705 714 721 708 2.3 Nottingham 743 752 768 777 781 5.1 Three Cities Sub-area 3,732 3,811 3,655 3,707 3,720 -0.3 Source: Neighbourhood Statistics

2 Table 3cs.5- Completed Floorspace 2007/08 (sqm) City/Town/ Retail Percentage District/ Edge Total City/Town/ of Centre District/ Edge Retail of Centre Retail Amber Valley 0 0 # Blaby 0 0 # Broxtowe 0 2,497 0 Charnwood 0 0 # Derby 43,770 57,705 75.9 Erewash 0 0 # Gedling 0 0 # Harborough 0 0 # Hinckley and Bosworth 0 0 # Hucknall 0 0 # Leicester 0 0 # Melton 1,798 1,798 100 North West Leicestershire 0 0 # Nottingham 17,780 17,780 100 Oadby and Wigston 0 0 # Rushcliffe 0 0 # South Derbyshire 0 0 # Source: Local Authorities

NORTHERN SUB-AREA

POLICY 7- REGENERATION OF THE NORTHERN SUB-AREA

Table North.1- Economic Activity Rate Northern Sub-area (percentage of working age population) 2004 to 2007 (per cent) Jan 04- Jan 05- Jan 06- Jan 07- Dec 04 Dec 05 Dec 06 Dec 07 Ashfield 79.3 79.9 78.5 78.5 Bassetlaw 80.4 79.0 75.4 77.4 Bolsover 71.7 75.5 77.6 80.1 Chesterfield 74.9 81.0 82.9 79.5 Mansfield 74.4 75.5 76.3 80.3 Newark & Sherwood 80.2 80.7 80.3 83.0 North East Derbyshire 78.1 79.8 82.1 76.5 Northern Sub-area 77 79 79 79 East Midlands 78.8 79.5 80.5 80.0 Source: NOMIS Annual Population Survey 0 decimal places for Northern Sub-area as calculated using rounded data

Table North.2- Employment Rates Northern Sub-area (percentage working age population) 2004 to 2007 (per cent) Jan 04- Jan 05- Jan 06- Jan 07- Dec 04 Dec 05 Dec 06 Dec 07 Ashfield 75.6 75.4 73.6 72.9 Bassetlaw 76.3 76.0 70.9 76.4 Bolsover 67.8 69.4 71.2 71.8 Chesterfield 71.7 76.5 76.4 73.7

3 Mansfield 71.3 68.9 70.7 74.6 Newark & Sherwood 78.2 78.5 76.9 76.0 North East Derbyshire 75.1 76.4 79.3 71.4 Northern Sub-area 74 75 74 74 East Midlands 75.4 75.8 76.3 75.9 Source: NOMIS Annual Population Survey 0 decimal places for Northern Sub-area as calculated using rounded data

Table North.3- Benefit Claimants Northern Sub-area February 2006 to 2008 February 06 February 07 February 08 Number Proportion Number Number Proportion of of Working of of of Working working Age working Proportion of working Age age Population age Working Age age Population claimants Claiming claimants Population claimants Claiming of any any Benefit of any Claiming any of any any Benefit benefit (%) benefit Benefit (%) benefit (%) Ashfield 12,170 17.0 12,110 17.0 11,970 16.8 Bassetlaw 11,190 16.5 10,880 16.0 10,690 15.7 Bolsover 9,330 20.8 9,120 20.2 8,760 19.4 Chesterfield 11,730 19.1 11,570 18.9 11,000 18.0 Mansfield 12,490 20.3 12,320 20.0 12,220 19.8 Newark & Sherwood 9,140 13.6 9,190 13.6 8,910 13.2 North East Derbyshire 8,520 14.6 8,230 14.0 7,970 13.6 Northern sub-area 74,570 17.2 73,420 16.9 71,520 16.5 East Midlands 364,010 13.4 363,430 13.3 355,380 13.0 England 4,448,760 14.1 4,411,890 13.9 4,296,520 13.5 Source: NOMIS

NORTHERN POLICY 4- ENHANCING GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGH DEVELOPMENT

Table North.4- Green infrastructure as at 31st March 2008 Has an adopted A Green Infrastructure Area Covered Green Infrastructure Strategy is being by Strategies Strategy prepared Ashfield (whole district) No Yes District Bassetlaw No Yes District Bolsover No No N/A Chesterfield No Yes District Mansfield No Yes District Newark & Sherwood No No N/A North East Derbyshire No Yes N/R Source: Local Authorities N/R: Not returned

EASTERN SUB-AREA

POLICY 4- DEVELOPMENT IN THE EASTERN SUB-AREA

Table East.1– Visitor Spend in Lincolnshire 2003 to 2007 (million pounds) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Spend by staying visitors both overseas and domestic 526.97 502.45 506.34 529.1 556.29 Spend by day visitors 337.04 325.95 343.3 374.11 370.86 Total Spend 864.01 828.39 849.64 903.21 927.15 Source: STEAM Model www.eastmidlandstourism.co.uk

Table East.2- Job Density Number of Workforce jobs per Resident Working age Population 2001 to 2006 (per cent) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Boston 0.79 0.79 0.84 0.82 0.89 0.88 East Lindsey 0.68 0.68 0.70 0.69 0.68 0.76 Lincoln 1.09 1.06 1.03 1.01 1.03 1.06 North Kesteven 0.70 0.68 0.69 0.70 0.68 0.69 South Holland 0.81 0.86 0.85 0.79 0.83 0.85 South Kesteven 0.73 0.74 0.76 0.72 0.75 0.74 West Lindsey 0.62 0.62 0.63 0.56 0.57 0.60 Rutland 0.79 0.85 0.86 0.82 0.82 0.91 East Midlands 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.80 0.81 England 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 Source: NOMIS

LINCOLN POLICY AREA

LPA POLICY 4- HOUSING PROVISION

Table LPA.2- Housing Completions in Lincoln Policy Area 2004/05 to 2007/08 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 City of Lincoln 372 376 576 502 Part North Kesteven 247 298 372 365 Part West Lindsey 344 305 354 109 Total Policy Area 963 979 1,302 976 Source: Growth Point Housing Trajectory

LPA POLICY 7- DEPRIVATION AND EXCLUSION

Table LPA.3 - Affordable Housing 2007/08 Percentage of Number of New total additions Affordable to dwelling Dwellings stock Targets Total Total Intermediate Intermediate Requirement Requirement Social rented Social rented Social rented Social rented Total 2001-26 Total 2001-26 Average Annual Annual Average

Lincoln 14 0 14 2.7 0.0 2.7 North Kesteven 12 67 79 1.9 10.8 12.7 West Lindsey 2 41 43 0.3 6.1 6.4 Central Lincolnshire HMA 28 108 136 1.5 6.0 7.5 14,400 576 East Midlands 1,968 1,427 3,395 9.1 6.6 15.7 168,400 6,736 Source: Local Authorities

6 PEAK SUB-AREA

POLICY 8- DEVELOPMENT IN THE PEAK SUB-AREA

Table Peak.1- Employment Rates in Derbyshire part of Peak Sub-area 2004 to 2007 (per cent) Jan 04- Jan 05- Jan 06- Jan 07- Dec 04 Dec 05 Dec 06 Dec 07 Derbyshire Dales 77.7 82.0 76.0 70.7 High Peak 77.9 77.7 78.4 79.9 East Midlands 75.4 75.8 76.3 75.9 Source: NOMIS Annual Population Survey

Table Peak.3- Tourist Visitors and Spend in Derbyshire Dales and High Peak 2003 to 2007 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Spend by overseas and domestic staying visitors (million pounds) 420.4 442.1 446.1 475.3 505.4 Spend by day visitors (million pounds) 867.0 851.3 839.3 892.7 899.7 Total Tourism Spend (millions pounds) 1287.0 1293.0 1285.0 1368.0 1404.0 Average Spend per staying visitor (pounds) 131.77 127.4 128.19 137.38 140.00 Average Spend per day visitor (pounds) 25.96 25.97 25.94 27.72 27.72 Average Spend per visitor (pounds) 35.18 35.67 35.86 38.35 38.26 Number of overseas and domestic staying visitors (millions) 3.19 3.47 3.48 3.46 3.61 Number of day visitors (millions) 33.39 32.78 32.35 32.21 32.46 Total tourist Numbers (millions) 36.58 36.25 35.83 35.67 36.7 Source: STEAM Model www.eastmidlandstourism.co.uk