DOCSLIB.ORG

The Patten Commission Report on Policing in Northern Ireland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Patten Commission Report on Policing in Northern Ireland THE PATTEN COMMISSION REPORT ON POLICING IN NORTHERN IRELAND OPEN MEETING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 24, 1999 Serial No. 106–103 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 64–523 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:14 Feb 12, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\64523 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois CYNTHIA A. MCKINNEY, Georgia EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida PETER T. KING, New York PAT DANNER, Missouri STEVE CHABOT, Ohio EARL F. HILLIARD, Alabama MARSHALL ‘‘MARK’’ SANFORD, South BRAD SHERMAN, California Carolina ROBERT WEXLER, Florida MATT SALMON, Arizona STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey AMO HOUGHTON, New York JIM DAVIS, Florida TOM CAMPBELL, California EARL POMEROY, North Dakota JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts KEVIN BRADY, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BARBARA LEE, California PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York GEORGE P. RADANOVICH, California JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL, Pennsylvania JOHN COOKSEY, Louisiana THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado RICHARD J. GARON, Chief of Staff KATHLEEN BERTELSEN MOAZED, Democratic Chief of Staff SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania CYNTHIA A. MCKINNEY, Georgia HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina EARL F. HILLIARD, Alabama PETER T. KING, New York BRAD SHERMAN, California MATT SALMON, Arizona WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York GROVER JOSEPH REES, Subcommittee Staff Director DOUGLAS C. ANDERSON, Counsel GGARY STEPHEN COX, Democratic Staff Director NICOLLE A. SESTRIC, Staff Associate (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:14 Feb 12, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\64523 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 C O N T E N T S Page WITNESSES The Right Honorable Chris Patten, Chairman, Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland; Accompanied by Senator Maurice Hayes ........ 4 Michael Posner, Executive Director, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights .... 16 Michael Finucane, Son of Patrick Finucane, Slain Defense Attorney ................. 19 Maggie Beirne, Committee on the Administration of Justice, Belfast ................ 35 Julia Hall, Northern Ireland Researcher, Human Rights Watch ........................ 39 Jane Winter, Director, British Irish Rights Watch ............................................... 44 APPENDIX The Honorable Christopher H. Smith, a Representative in Congress from The State of New Jersey, Chairman, Subcommittee on International Oper- ations and Human Rights ................................................................................... 00 The Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman, a Representative in Congress from New York and Chairman, Committee on International Relations Committee ........ 00 Mr. Chris Patten ...................................................................................................... 00 Mr. Michael Finucane ............................................................................................. 00 Mr. Michael Posner ................................................................................................. 00 Ms. Jane Winter ...................................................................................................... 00 Ms. Maggie Beirne ................................................................................................... 00 Ms. Julia Hall .......................................................................................................... 00 Additional material submitted for the record: Letter to Mr. Chris Patten, submitted by Rep. Gilman ....................................... 00 Excerpt from the House of Commons, submitted by Rep Gilman ....................... 00 Submission from Irish American Unity Conference ............................................. 00 Submission from The Brehon Law Society ............................................................ 00 (III) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:14 Feb 12, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\64523 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:14 Feb 12, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\64523 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 THE PATTEN COMMISSION REPORT ON POLICING IN NORTHERN IRELAND Friday, September 24, 1999 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, Committee on International Relations, WASHINGTON, D.C. The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:45 a.m. In Room 2172 Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Christopher H. Smith (chairman of the Subcommittee) Presiding. Mr. SMITH. Let me just begin by saying that the purpose of this public meeting is for the Subcommittee with primary jurisdiction over human rights to review the recent publication ‘‘A New Begin- ning: Policing in Northern Ireland,’’ and to hear from its principal author, the Right Honorable Chris Patten. This report was released on September 9 by the Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland which was established by the Good Friday Agree- ment in April 1998. [Copies of the report are available by contacting the Sub- committee office.] Mr. SMITH. Mr. Patten, welcome to the Congress and thank you for your generous commitment of time and talent in reviewing po- licing in Northern Ireland. We are grateful for your presence. After 15 months of exhaustive study and outreach which in- cluded over 10,000 people participating in public meetings; 1,000 individuals speaking at those meetings; more than 3,000 submit- ting written reviews; and countless small group meetings, there is little doubt that the Commission moved comprehensively and ag- gressively to pursue its mandate for ‘‘a new beginning in policing in Northern Ireland with a police service capable of attracting and sustaining the support of the community as a whole.’’. With over 175 recommendations for change and reform, it is our sincerest hope that the recommendations contained within the re- port become the starting point, the floor, and not the ceiling, for po- licing reforms in Northern Ireland. This report, promising because of the recommendations it contains, yet disappointing for the prob- lems it chose not to tackle, must be a base from which the human rights and policing reforms are built, rather than a high-water mark that recedes over the next few weeks of public review. I am encouraged by the Commission’s own plea that ‘‘the essen- tials of our recommendations present a package which must be im- plemented comprehensively. We advise in the strongest terms against cherry-picking from this report.’’ . (1) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:14 Feb 12, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 F:\WORK\64523 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 2 I am encouraged by the Commission’s candid admission ‘‘that po- licing was at the heart of many of the problems that politicians have been unable to resolve in Northern Ireland and by the report’s definition of policing as the protection of human rights.’’ The Com- mission’s stated desire to reorient policing onto an approach based on upholding human rights is a recognition that Northern Ireland’s police force, the RUC, has failed at protecting human rights for Northern Ireland’s citizens for years. Today’s public session is the fourth in a series of meetings held by this Subcommittee as it has focused on human rights abuses in Northern Ireland. In each of our previous proceedings, the subject of policing and human rights abuses by the RUC was central. In fact, next week will mark the 1-year anniversary of testimony we received from defense attorney Rosemary Nelson who told us that she feared the RUC, had been harassed by it, and even physically assaulted by RUC members. She received death threats, and she told us right from where you are sitting, Mr. Patten, that she lit- erally feared for her life. We find it appalling that still not a single RUC officer has been disciplined for the death threats and other harassments that she endured. I am disappointed that while the Commission acknowledged that the RUC has had several officers within its ranks over the years who have abused their position, it nevertheless declined to com- ment on a vetting mechanism to rid the force of those who have committed egregious acts of abuse and violence. It is worth noting with regret that the RUC officers who harassed Rosemary Nelson and perhaps were connected with her assassination are still on the job today. Even the police officers who beat David Adams while he was in detention at Castlereagh in 1994 have never been criminally prosecuted. Last year, after meeting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRIME MINISTER Lunch for Collea Ues You Were Concerned About The
    PRIME MINISTER Lunch for Collea ues You were concerned about the list of colleagues which I put to you last night as possible guests for 18th April. 1 As you know, almost ail the Ministers of State and the Parliamentary Under Secretaries have now been included in a Monday lunch, and we are getting through the outstanding ones quite quickly. Three of the outstanding PUSSs are from the Scottish, Irish and Welsh Offices, and because they are not often in London on Mondays, I have liaised with their Private Offices for a suitable date_„ I know that James Douglas Hamilton and Peter Vidgers- are able to come on 18th April, and Ian Grist is available on 25th April. I know you are worried about the Senior/Junior mix. The last lunch was rather unbalanced because both John Wakeham and David Waddington were not present. This would not normally be the case, and I know that your invitations to senior backbenchers and to Parliamentary Private Secretaries have been very well received. However, you mav prefer to go through the list of Ministers of State again. Overleaf are two bossible lists for 18th April, and also two possible lists for 25th April (reserves in brackets). One set of lists includes senior backbenchers and PPSs, and one set reverts to Ministers of State. Please would you indicate which you prefer? • Page Two i8th APRIL John MacGregor (Lord Mackay) James Douglas-Hamilton Peter Viggers Mark Lennox-Boyd (Tristan Garel-Jones) Geoffrey Johnson-Smith (John Hannam or John MacGregor (Lord Mackay) David Mellor (Chris Patten) Tim Renton (John Patten)
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Days in Palestine,’ Was Written in April 1989, Soon After a Brief Trip to the Occupied Territories with Some Colleagues
    Note The following essay, ‘Two Days in Palestine,’ was written in April 1989, soon after a brief trip to the occupied territories with some colleagues. It was published in two parts in the August 1989 (pp. 11–18) and September 1989 (pp. 21–27, 36) issues of The Message International (New York), the monthly magazine published by the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). The editors, in their wisdom, changed the title to ‘In the Eye of the Intifada, A Muslim’s Journey to the Land of Oppression;’ they also added pictures and inserts of their own. Here is the original text, with some minor corrections. The first Intifada began in December 1987 and is generally considered to have continued till the signing of the Oslo Accords in September 1993. During that time Israeli security forces killed 1070 Palestinians in the Occupied Territories (including East Jerusalem), including 237 minors; in addition 54 Palestinians, including 13 minors were killed by Israeli civilians. The Israeli casualties at the hands of the Palestinians during the same time were 47 civilians, including 3 minors, and 43 army personnel. (Source: B'tSelem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories. <<http://www.btselem.org/english/statistics/first_Intifada_ Tables.asp>> as viewed on 10 April 2009.) (April 2009) 1 C. M. Naim Two Days In Palestine Introduction There were six of us in the group: five academics from the University of Chicago and one lawyer. Five males and one female. One of us was a devout Catholic, three claimed Islam as their religion, while the remaining two identified with Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Download from Anywhere in the World
    Volume 11 / Number 2 FROM THE PRESIDENT CARNEGIE CONVERSATION Fall 2019 02 10 Power Houses Vartan Gregorian pays tribute to Reassessing U.S.-China Relations Competition American libraries. But do we deserve them? … confrontation … or collision course? An Asia Society Can we keep them? Andrew Carnegie’s visionary report proposes a strategy of “smart competition.” philanthropy points the way. Chief Communications and FEATURE FEATURE Digital Strategies Officer Julia Weede 18 32 Executive Director of Communications The Boundless Library Technology has brought to Saving the Bits Richard Ovenden, Bodley’s Librarian and Content Strategy much of the world a true “digital commons,” creating at the University of Oxford, warns that libraries must Robert Nolan a virtual public square. rise to the challenge of the digital era. Editor/Writer Kenneth Benson Assistant Editor CARNEGIE RESULTS CENTER POINT Anita Jain Principal Design Director 38 46 Daniel Kitae Um The Kids Are Alright At a time of heightened Librarians? What’s not to love? A colorful port- Researcher tensions between the United States and Russia, the PIR folio of portraits by artist Sean Qualls celebrates 10 of Ronald Sexton Center is “keeping the conversation going.” the most downright inspirational librarians in America — winners of the 2018 I Love My Librarian Award. Carnegie Corporation of New York is a philan- thropic foundation created by Andrew Carnegie in 1911 to promote the advancement and diffusion CARNEGIE ON THE GROUND of knowledge and understanding among the people of the United States. Subsequently, its charter was amended to permit the use of funds 54 for the same purposes in certain countries that There’s Hope Could social-emotional learning (SEL) are or have been members of the British Overseas foster the “soft skills” needed to direct students toward Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.62×51Mm NATO 1 7.62×51Mm NATO
    7.62×51mm NATO 1 7.62×51mm NATO 7.62×51mm NATO 7.62×51mm NATO rounds compared to AA (LR6) battery. Type Rifle Place of origin United States Service history In service 1954–present Used by United States, NATO, others. Wars Vietnam War, Falklands Conflict, The Troubles, Gulf War, War in Afghanistan, Iraq War, Libyan civil war, among other conflicts Specifications Parent case .308 Winchester (derived from the .300 Savage) Case type Rimless, Bottleneck Bullet diameter 7.82 mm (0.308 in) Neck diameter 8.77 mm (0.345 in) Shoulder diameter 11.53 mm (0.454 in) Base diameter 11.94 mm (0.470 in) Rim diameter 12.01 mm (0.473 in) Rim thickness 1.27 mm (0.050 in) Case length 51.18 mm (2.015 in) Overall length 69.85 mm (2.750 in) Rifling twist 1:12" Primer type Large Rifle Maximum pressure 415 MPa (60,200 psi) Ballistic performance Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy 9.53 g (147 gr) M80 FMJ 833.0 m/s (2,733 ft/s) 3,304 J (2,437 ft·lbf) 11.34 g (175 gr) M118 Long 786.4 m/s (2,580 ft/s) 3,506 J (2,586 ft·lbf) Range BTHP Test barrel length: 24" [1] [2] Source(s): M80: Slickguns, M118 Long Range: US Armorment 7.62×51mm NATO 2 The 7.62×51mm NATO (official NATO nomenclature 7.62 NATO) is a rifle cartridge developed in the 1950s as a standard for small arms among NATO countries. It should not to be confused with the similarly named Russian 7.62×54mmR cartridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and Europe
    Britain and Europe ROBERT COOPER Forty years after Britain joined Europe both have changed, mostly for the better. This story does not, however, begin in 1972 when the negotiations finished and were ratified by parliament, nor in 1973 when the UK took its place at the Council table as a full member, but ten years before with the first British application and the veto by General de Gaulle. Sometimes, going further back still, it is suggested that if Ernest Bevin’s ideas for West European cooperation had been pursued,1 or if Britain had decided to join talks on the Schuman Plan,2 or to take the Spaak Committee seriously,3 things might have been different. But the truth is there was no Robert Schuman or Jean Monnet in Britain, and no readiness to think in radically new terms. Had the UK been present at the negotiations that led to the European Coal and Steel Community, the outcome for Britain would probably still have been the same, precisely because the vision was lacking. The decision on the Schuman Plan was a close-run thing—the idea of planning for heavy industry being in accordance with the ideas of the Labour government. But British ideas were very different from those of the French or the Americans, who were thinking in terms of supranational bodies—indeed, for Monnet this was a cardinal point. His approach was supported by the Benelux countries, which were already setting up their own customs union. Bevin had an ambition to lead Europe, but it is not clear where he wanted to take it.
    [Show full text]
  • How New Is New Loyalism?
    HOW NEW IS NEW LOYALISM? CATHERINE MCGLYNN EUROPEAN STUDIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD SALFORD, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page 1 Chapter One Hypothesis and Methodology Page 6 Chapter Two Literature Review: Unionism, Loyalism, Page 18 New Loyalism Chapter Three A Civic Loyalism? Page 50 Chapter Four The Roots of New Loyalism 1966-1982 Page 110 Chapter Five New Loyalism and the Peace Process Page 168 Chapter Six New Loyalism and the Progressive Page 205 Unionist Party Chapter Seven Conclusion: How New is New Loyalism? Page 279 Bibliography Page 294 ABBREVIATONS CLMC Combined Loyalist Military Command DENI Department of Education for Northern Ireland DUP Democratic Unionist Party IOO Independent Orange Order IRA Irish Republican Army LAW Loyalist Association of Workers LVF Loyalist Volunteer Force NICRA Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association NIHE Northern Ireland Housing Executive NILP Northern Ireland Labour Party PUP Progressive Unionist Party RHC Red Hand Commandos RHD Red Hand Defenders SDLP Social Democratic and Labour Party UDA Ulster Defence Association UDP Ulster Democratic Party UDLP Ulster Democratic and Loyalist Party UFF Ulster Freedom Fighters UUP Ulster Unionist Party UUUC United Ulster Unionist Council UWC Ulster Workers' Council UVF Ulster Volunteer Force VPP Volunteer Political Party ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my PhD supervisor, Jonathan Tonge for all his support during my time at Salford University. I am also grateful to all the staff at the Northern Irish Political collection at the Linen Hall Library in Belfast for their help and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party Leaders and Officials Since 1975
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07154, 6 February 2020 Conservative Party and Compiled by officials since 1975 Sarah Dobson This List notes Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975. Further reading Conservative Party website Conservative Party structure and organisation [pdf] Constitution of the Conservative Party: includes leadership election rules and procedures for selecting candidates. Oliver Letwin, Hearts and Minds: The Battle for the Conservative Party from Thatcher to the Present, Biteback, 2017 Tim Bale, The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron, Polity Press, 2016 Robert Blake, The Conservative Party from Peel to Major, Faber & Faber, 2011 Leadership elections The Commons Library briefing Leadership Elections: Conservative Party, 11 July 2016, looks at the current and previous rules for the election of the leader of the Conservative Party. Current state of the parties The current composition of the House of Commons and links to the websites of all the parties represented in the Commons can be found on the Parliament website: current state of the parties. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975 Leader start end Margaret Thatcher Feb 1975 Nov 1990 John Major Nov 1990 Jun 1997 William Hague Jun 1997 Sep 2001 Iain Duncan Smith Sep 2001 Nov 2003 Michael Howard Nov 2003 Dec 2005 David Cameron Dec 2005 Jul 2016 Theresa May Jul 2016 Jun 2019 Boris Johnson Jul 2019 present Deputy Leader # start end William Whitelaw Feb 1975 Aug 1991 Peter Lilley Jun 1998 Jun 1999 Michael Ancram Sep 2001 Dec 2005 George Osborne * Dec 2005 July 2016 William Hague * Dec 2009 May 2015 # There has not always been a deputy leader and it is often an official title of a senior Conservative politician.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Crowd Control Technology Options for the European Union(
    )Crowd Control Technologies : An Assessment Of Crowd Control Technology Options For The European Union( (An Appraisal of the Technologies of Political Control) (EP/1/1V/B/STOA/99/14/01) SECTION C TECHNICAL ANNEX The Omega Foundation. May 2000. Appendix 1 : 1 Table of Contents SECTION C: TECHNICAL ANNEX Appendix 1. Manufacturers, Suppliers or Distributers of Crowd Control products 1990-2000. Appendix 2. >Less-than-Lethal= Weapon Survey. Appendix 3. Tabular Summary of >Less Lethal= weapons and technologies Appendix 4. 2nd Generation >Less Lethal= Weapons Appendix 5. Countries deploying Chemical Irritant Weapons and Selected Injuries and Deaths Associated with deployment. Appendix 6. Use of >Less Lethal= technologies in Conjunction with Lethal firearms. Appendix 7. Worldwide deployment of Crowd Control Weapons. 1990-2000. Appendix 8. European Inventory of Crowd Control Technologies. Appendix 1 : 2 APPENDIX 1 SUMMARY TABLE (BY REGION) OF MANUFACTURERS, SUPPLIERS OR DISTRIBUTERS OF CROWD CONTROL PRODUCTS. 1990 - 2000. Chemical Kinetic Water Stun Electro- Irritants Weapons Cannon grenade shock s weapons Europe 88 61 19 22 30 Central / 7 9 - 5 6 East Europe Africa 10 6 2 1 3 Asia / 27 14 1 6 24 Pacific Latin 12 4 - 2 9 America Middle East 11 10 7 2 9 North 113 57 14 16 42 America Notes: (1) These figures are extracted from the larger table shown below. The data for this table comes from company information held by the Omega Foundation database on worldwide MSP (Military, Security, Police) products and services. The database is regularly updated but these figures should be taken as indicative only. They are not totally comprehensive and can not represent the true scale of the industry sectors identified.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BLANKET * Index: Current Articles
    THE BLANKET * Index: Current Articles There is no such thing as a dirty word. Nor is there a word so powerful, that it's going to send the listener to the lake of fire upon hearing it. - Frank Zappa Collusion revelations: disturbing but Printer Friendly The Blanket not shocking http://lark. phoblacht. net Ten-year-late handwringing admissions that the NI security Index: Current Articles forces were in cahoots with loyalist gunmen are like therapy for the British state. 28 January 2007 ‘Shocking…disturbing…extraordinary.’ Latest News & Other Articles From Views This Issue: Index: Current Articles Done & Dusted Brendan O'Neill • spiked, January 24, 2007 Anthony McIntyre Book Reviews Letters Once Again, The Big Those are some of the words that have been used to describe a report by the Police Transition Ombudsman of Northern Ireland, Nuala O’Loan, which shows that there was Archives Dolours Price collusion between Special Branch officers of the then Royal Ulster Constabulary The Blanket (RUC) and members of the loyalist outfit the Ulster Volunteer Force. Plastic Bullet Magazine Winter John Kennedy 2002 O’Loan’s report focuses on north Belfast in the 1980s and 90s, when a gang of UVF gunmen carried out 10 murders, 10 attempted murders, 10 punishment shootings, Republican Voices 13 punishment attacks, a bomb attack in Monaghan and 72 other criminal offences Provos Embrace Total while simultaneously working as informers for Special Branch. Some were being Collaboration with British To contact the Blanket paid £80,000 a year, and if ever arrested by the RUC they were ‘babysat’ through project with a comment, Rule to contribute an article, their interviews by their Special Branch handlers to help them avoid incriminating Ruairí Ó Brádaigh or to make a donation, themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Peace Initiative
    Northern Ireland Peace Initiative JOURNEY TO BELFAST AND LONDON Report and Policy Recommendations by William J. Flynn and George D. Schwab February 1999 Contents • Acknowledgment • Foreword • Policy Recommendations • From Hate to Hope • Conclusion ACKNOWLEDGMENT At the invitation of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, a National Committee on American Foreign Policy mission consisting of William J. Flynn, chairman, and George D. Schwab, president, spent a week (November 2-7, 1998) in Belfast discussing the peace process in Northern Ireland and in London where we also discussed U.S. and British global security interests with leading statesmen, politicians, diplomats, and academics. The meetings took place at Stormont Estate, 10 Downing Street, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the House of Commons, think tanks, and the American embassy in London, among other sites. Before embarking, Dr. Schwab was briefed at the State Department by James I. Gadsden, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Canadian affairs; James M. Lyons, special adviser to the president and the secretary of state for economic initiatives in Ireland; Katharine E. Koch, special assistant, office of the special adviser to the president and the secretary of state for economic initiatives in Ireland; and Patricia Nelson-Douvelis, Ireland desk officer. Although this report and the policy recommendations it contains focus on Northern Ireland, the material gathered on U.S. and British national security interests will be incorporated in relevant NCAFP publications, including those forthcoming on NATO and the Middle East. The sensitivity of some of the issues discussed led a number of people to request that they not be quoted by name or identified in other ways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservatives and Europe, 1997–2001 the Conservatives and Europe, 1997–2001
    8 Philip Lynch The Conservatives and Europe, 1997–2001 The Conservatives and Europe, 1997–2001 Philip Lynch As Conservatives reflected on the 1997 general election, they could agree that the issue of Britain’s relationship with the European Union (EU) was a significant factor in their defeat. But they disagreed over how and why ‘Europe’ had contributed to the party’s demise. Euro-sceptics blamed John Major’s European policy. For Euro-sceptics, Major had accepted develop- ments in the European Union that ran counter to the Thatcherite defence of the nation state and promotion of the free market by signing the Maastricht Treaty. This opened a schism in the Conservative Party that Major exacer- bated by paying insufficient attention to the growth of Euro-sceptic sentiment. Membership of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) prolonged recession and undermined the party’s reputation for economic competence. Finally, Euro-sceptics argued that Major’s unwillingness to rule out British entry into the single currency for at least the next Parliament left the party unable to capitalise on the Euro-scepticism that prevailed in the electorate. Pro-Europeans and Major loyalists saw things differently. They believed that Major had acted in the national interest at Maastricht by signing a Treaty that allowed Britain to influence the development of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) without being bound to join it. Pro-Europeans noted that Thatcher had agreed to an equivalent, if not greater, loss of sovereignty by signing the Single European Act. They believed that much of the party could and should have united around Major’s ‘wait and see’ policy on EMU entry.
    [Show full text]