A Critical Institutionalist Analysis of Youth Participation in Jordan's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Critical Institutionalist Analysis of Youth Participation in Jordan's A Critical Institutionalist Analysis of Youth Participation in Jordan’s Spatial Planning The case of Amman 2025 Zayed F. Zeadat Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society September 2018 The copyright in this thesis is owned by the author. Any quotation from the thesis or use of any of the information contained in it must acknowledge this thesis as the source of the quotation or information I Critical Institutionalist Analysis of Youth Participation in Spatial Planning: Zayed F. Zeadat The case of Jordan – Abstract Abstract By 2050, it is estimated that 84% of the population in the Global South will be living in urban areas. As a country of the Global South, Jordan has experienced dramatic growth of urban areas over the past decades. Cities in Jordan contain 83% of the population, of which, it is estimated, 24% are in the age group 15–24. Youth input, effort and experience in the planning process are recognised by academic research and international aid donors as a significant element in catalysing positive social and economic change and ensuring sustainable development across the Global South. Consequently, this research aims to investigate whether young groups’ vision and aspirations for, and perspectives on the city of Amman were translated into strategies or projects in urban policy. In doing so, it aims to explore the wide range of institutional challenges and opportunities that either hinder or encourage youth participation in policymaking. To achieve this aim, this study followed the inductive–deductive cycle of knowledge. This research starts with a critical literature review of theories in planning, governance, youth participation and spatial planning in Jordan. Healey’s systemic institutional design for collaborative planning was employed to critically analyse the planning system (hard infrastructure) and planning practice (soft infrastructure) within the chosen case study of Amman 2025. Amman 2025 is a significant and unique strategic spatial planning project in Jordan designed to encourage public participation in the policymaking process regarding urban development in Amman. New primary data were collected through extensive qualitative research in the form of semi-structured interviews and focus groups to cover the period from the start of Amman 2025, in 2006, to the conducting of data collection in 2015. With the research objectives in mind, a thematic analysis was conducted to identify salient themes in order to address the research aims. The findings of this study show that youth participation in Jordan is neither inherent in the legal, political and administrative framework of the planning system nor in the embedded institutional settings within the planning practice of Jordan. Most importantly, cultural imperialism in Jordan weakens young people’s chances of being considered for any decision-making roles relevant to planning activities. Enhancing youth participation in spatial planning in Jordan requires the institutional capacity of urban governance to be built up to enable a more collaborative planning practice, in addition to applying principles of good governance in the planning system. ii Critical Institutionalist Analysis of Youth Participation in Spatial Planning: Zayed F. Zeadat The case of Jordan – Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The author wishes to acknowledge the many people and institutions who contributed to this research. In particular, the author would like to thank his mum, Swsan Mashal, and his dad, Freih Zeadat. Also, the author would like to thank his aunts Hila and Helda Zeadat for their continuous support. Also, the author acknowledges the support of both his supervisors, Dr Chris McWilliams and Dr Ryan Woolrych, for their cooperation and help and for providing the author with assistance during the course of this research. iii Declaration statement ACADEMIC REGISTRY Research Thesis Submission Name: ZAYED FREIH ZAYED ZEADAT School: School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society (EGIS) Version: (i.e, First, Final Degree Sought: PhD in Urban Studies Resubmission, Final) Declaration In accordance with the appropriate regulations I hereby submit my thesis and I declare that: 1) the thesis embodies the results of my own work and has been composed by myself 2) where appropriate, I have made acknowledgement of the work of others and have made reference to work carried out in collaboration with other persons 3) the thesis is the correct version of the thesis for submission and is the same version as any electronic versions submitted*. 4) my thesis for the award referred to, deposited in the Heriot-Watt University Library, should be made available for loan or photocopying and be available via the Institutional Repository, subject to such conditions as the Librarian may require 5) I understand that as a student of the University I am required to abide by the Regulations of the University and to conform to its discipline. 6) I confirm that the thesis has been verified against plagiarism via an approved plagiarism detection application e.g. Turnitin. * Please note that it is the responsibility of the candidate to ensure that the correct version of the thesis is submitted. Signature of Date: Candidate: Submission Submitted By (name in capitals): Signature of Individual Submitting: Date Submitted: For Completion in the Student Service Centre (SSC) Received in the SSC by (name in capitals): Method of Submission (Handed in to SSC; posted through internal/external mail): E-thesis Submitted (mandatory for final theses) Signature: Date: IV Critical Institutionalist Analysis of Youth Participation in Spatial Planning: Zayed F. Zeadat The case of Jordan – Table of contents Table of contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….ii Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... iii Declaration statement ................................................................................................IV Table of contents .......................................................................................................... v List of tables................................................................................................................. ix List of figures ................................................................................................................ x List of abbreviations ................................................................................................... xi List of appendices ...................................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1: Research overview ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Youth participation in spatial planning ........................................................... 2 1.1.1 The importance of youth participation in spatial planning ...................... 5 1.2 Research problem ............................................................................................ 6 1.3 Research importance ....................................................................................... 7 1.4 Research rationale ........................................................................................... 9 1.5 Research motivation ...................................................................................... 10 1.6 Scope of the study ......................................................................................... 11 1.7 Research objectives and key questions ......................................................... 12 1.8 Methodological framework ........................................................................... 14 1.9 Analytical framework .................................................................................... 15 1.10 Developing a theoretical model ..................................................................... 16 1.11 The layout of the thesis ................................................................................. 17 Chapter 2: Setting the theoretical framework for institutional analysis............ 19 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 20 2.2 Analytical models of planning ...................................................................... 21 2.3 An institutionalist approach to policy analysis ............................................. 30 2.3.1 Communicative rationality..................................................................... 39 2.3.2 Structuration theory ............................................................................... 41 2.3.3 Criticising the institutionalist and collaborative planning model .......... 42 2.4 Institutional analytical frameworks ............................................................... 43 2.4.1 Systemic institutional design for collaborative planning ....................... 46 2.5 Writing young people into planning theory .................................................. 54 2.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 57 Chapter 3: Research methodology and data collection methods ........................ 59 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 60 v Critical Institutionalist Analysis of Youth Participation in Spatial
Recommended publications
  • Volume 48, Number 1, Spring
    Volume 48, Number 1 Spring 1998 IN THIS ISSUE Rx for ASOR: Shanks May be Right! Lynch's Expedition to the Dead Sea News & Notices Tall Hisban 1997 Tell Qarqur 1997 Project Descriptions of Albright Appointees Endowment for Biblical Research Grant Recipient Reports Meeting Calendar Calls for Papers Annual Meeting Information E-mail Directory Rx for ASOR: SHANKS MAY BE RIGHT! If any would doubt Herschel Shanks' support for ASOR and its work mark this! His was among the earliest contributions received in response to our 1997-98 Annual Appeal and he was the very first person to register for the 1998 fall meeting in Orlando! So I urge everyone to give a serious reading to his post-mortem on "The Annual Meeting(s)" just published in Biblical Archaeology Review 24:2 (henceforth BAR). Like most spin doctors his "Rx for ASOR" (p. 6) and "San Francisco Tremors" (p. 54) are burdened with journalistic hyperbole, but within and beyond the hype he scores a number of valid points. However, while several of his comments warrant repetition and review, a few others need to be corrected and/or refocused. ASOR's constituency does indeed, as he notes (BAR p. 6), represent a broad spectrum of interests. These reach from Near Eastern prehistory to later classical antiquity and beyond, and from a narrower focus on bible related material culture to a broader concern with the full range of political and cultural entities of the Ancient Near East and of the eastern and even western Mediterranean regions. Throughout its nearly 100 year history, by initiating and supporting field excavation efforts, by encouraging scholarly and public dialogue via an active publications program, and through professional academic meetings, ASOR's mission has included service to all facets of this wide spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Investments for Jordan
    STRATEGIC AssESSMENT: The 2019 Project Pipeline for Jordan Public Disclosure Authorized AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES Wissam Harake | February 28, 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. STRATEGIC AssEssMENT: The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the The 2019 Project Pipeline for Jordan accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 8400-750-978, fax 4470- Wissam Harake 750-978, http://www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 2422-522-202, e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Water Sector Capital Investment Plan 2016 – 2025
    The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Ministry of Water and Irrigation WATER SECTOR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN 2016 – 2025 2016 This document is an integral part of the National Water Strategy, and related policies and action plans. 1. National Water Strategy 2016-2025. 2. Water Sector Capital Investment Program (2016-2025). 3. Water Demand Management Policy. 4. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in the water sector Policy. 5. Water Substitution and Re-Use Policy. 6. Water Reallocation Policy. 7. Surface Water Utilization Policy. 8. Groundwater Sustainability Policy. 9. Climate Change Policy for a Resilient Water Sector. 10. Decentralized Wastewater Management Policy. 11. Action Plan to Reduce Water Sector Losses (Structural Benchmark). TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................................................... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 2 Water Supply and Demand ........................................................................................................................... 2 Delivery of Water and wastewater
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Evolution of the Azraq Basin, Eastern Jordan: an Overview
    6 Jordan Journal of Natural History Geological evolution of the Azraq basin, eastern Jordan: An overview Abdulkader M. Abed Department of Geology, the University of Jordan, Amman 11942 Jordan [email protected] ABSTRACT The Azraq basin is some 100 Km east of Amman, the capital of Jordan. Hydrologically, it occupies ~12700Km2, mostly in Jordan, but it also extends to southern Syrian and NW Saudi Arabia. The Azraq area seems to have developed as a basin during the Paleozoic testified by the total thickness of both Ram and Khreim Groups in the Azraq subsurface being slightly less than twice those in the southern outcrops. In this case, the Azraq basin is similar to the Wadi Sirhan basin. From the Carboniferous, Late Paleozoic, to the top Ajlun Group, Mid Cretaceous, no basinal development took place in the Azraq area. Dramatic changes seem to have taken place in the Azraq basin during the deposition of the Belqa Group. Northwest-trending faults became active since the Coniacian? such as the Fuluk Fault and Rajil Fault. A subsiding graben, called Hamza Graben, was the scene for a thick, fast sedimentation of more than 2000m during the Coniacian-Campanian represented by the Rajil, Hamza and Hazim Formation which are dominated by carbonates. This is explained by synsedimentary deposition in a subsiding basin. The basin continued up till the Eocene albeit being at a slower rate during the rest of the Belqa Group. By the end of the Eocene, the Neo-Tethys Ocean had migrated from the eastern Mediterranean and the Azraq area, as well as almost all Jordan, and the area became terrestrial, and subjected to erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan Architecture, Architectural Heritage, Architectural Identity, Architectural Type
    Architecture Research 2016, 6(1): 1-12 DOI: 10.5923/j.arch.20160601.01 The Relationship between Heritage Resources and Contemporary Architecture of Jordan Abdelmajeed Rjoub Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, al-Albayt University, al-Mafraq, Jordan Abstract This Research concerned in studying the conditions of the emergence and development of Jordanian architecture and the extent of its communication with the architectural heritage resources of civilizations that have passed on Jordan. The main aim of research is to identify the heritage resources that Jordanian architects contacted with, and to classify the architectural styles and design relations which he used to achieve that communication. The author adopted descriptive and analytical methods to analyse the selected projects as models of contemporary architecture. The research found out that Jordanian architects preferred to communicate with Roman, Nabataea, Islamic and local heritage resources by expressing them at planning and architectural levels, and variations of design relationships. Research recommends increasing more attention to communicate with heritage because of its role in creating the original identity of Jordanian architecture. Keywords Jordan architecture, Architectural heritage, Architectural identity, Architectural type developments in technology and multimedia. The idea of this 1. Introduction research deals with the conditions of emergence of modern architecture in Jordan and its relation with the heritage Jordan in the last years of twentieth century
    [Show full text]
  • EMERGING PUBLIC SPACES in the CITY of AMMAN, JORDAN: an Analysis of Everyday Life Practices
    EMERGING PUBLIC SPACES IN THE CITY OF AMMAN, JORDAN: An Analysis of Everyday Life Practices Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Spatial Planning at Dortmund University for the award of the degree of Dr. Ing. Mais Aljafari 2014 Supervised by Prof. Christa Reicher Department of Urban Design and Land Use Planning |TU Dortmund Prof. Dietwald Gruehn Department of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning |TU Dortmund Examiner: Dr. Maram Tawil School of Architecture and Built Environment |German Jordanian University Faculty of Spatial Planning ABSTRACT In the recent urban development of Amman in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the provision of public space has been shaped by various political and socio-economic dynamics. This has made it one of the main challenges and focuses of the contemporary planning of Amman. With the adaptation of global policies in Amman, the new emerging representational spaces tend to promote contradictions of non- harmonious ideologies, between locality and globalism in many terms. Therefore, this research studied emerging public spaces in Amman that are produced, reproduced and co-produced through interactions between different modes at the global level and ongoing relations of social practices at the local level. This research attempts to conceptualize public space in Amman relying on Lefebvre critiques of spatial practices (perceived space) and of representations of space (conceived space) in order to examine the current transformation of Amman’s lived space (representational space). In addition to Lefebvre’s theory of “Production of Space”, this research endorses Hillier and Hanson’s theory of “Space Syntax” to understand how the cultural and social structure of public space in Amman articulates with the spatial one.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Global Amman: Petrodollars, Identity, and the Built Environment in the Early Twenty-First Century
    Copyright 2013 Majd Abdallah Nemer Musa CONSTRUCTING GLOBAL AMMAN: PETRODOLLARS, IDENTITY, AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT IN THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BY MAJD ABDALLAH NEMER MUSA DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor John Charles Stallmeyer, Chair Associate Professor Lynne Marie Dearborn Professor D. Fairchild Ruggles Associate Professor Kenneth M. Cuno ii Abstract This study investigates the influences of capital flows, particularly petrodollars from the Gulf states, to Amman in the early twenty-first century on the city’s urban built environment. The study is carried out through an in-depth analysis of three case studies of contemporary megaprojects in Amman: the Abdali New Downtown, Sanaya Amman, and Jordan Gate. The research methods include reviewing relevant theoretical work and historical and contemporary resources on Amman and its built environment, analyzing advertising discourse on the study cases, conducting site visits, and interviewing stakeholders. The study concludes that capital flows to Amman led to the introduction of new urban forms and functions to the city, significantly transforming the city’s built environment and influencing the city residents’ identity in ways that mostly served the interest of capital. Capital flows produced several upscale mixed- use megaprojects, large-scale developments including high-end office, residential, shopping, and entertainment spaces, as modern, spectacular, upscale commodified spaces for display and consumption. Amman’s megaprojects showed commonalities in shape and function with megaprojects in other cities, particularly in the Gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Identity of Amman (A Dialogue Between Tradition and Modernity)
    Journal of Engineering and Architecture June 2019, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 68-82 ISSN: 2334-2986 (Print), 2334-2994 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jea.v7n1a8 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/jea.v7n1a8 Urban identity of Amman (A Dialogue between Tradition and Modernity) Vlada Melnik1, Ph.D. Abstract The main problems of identity and planning in the modern Arab architecture are discussed, as exemplified by Jordan's capital city, Amman. The essence of the concepts is revealed in; tradition, integrity, morphology and association with urban principles in the design of modern Amman. Particular attention is paid to the ways of combining the historical and cultural heritage of Arab countries with the example of Jordan and their connection with modern directions in architecture that violate local identity. Keywords: tradition, integrity, morphology; architecture; tradition. Introduction Amman is the capital and largest city of the Kingdom of Jordan (Figure 1). From ancient times, the settlement in this place was known as Rabbat-Ammon, and in the Hellenistic-Roman period, the name of Philadelphia is acquired. The city is located on Seven Hills, which are represented on Jordan's flag as a seven-pointed star. It is located 35 km northeast of the Dead Sea, 110 km east of the Mediterranean Sea and 65 km east of Jerusalem. The climate of Amman is fairly mild, ranging between the Mediterranean and the Continental. Height above sea level ranges from 773 to 1200 m. In Amman, it has long been asked whether there is a need to develop scientifically sound regulations on the city's architectural and planning structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Evolution of the Water Resources Development in the Jordan River Basin in Jordan
    The Historical Evolution of the Water Resources Development in the Jordan River Basin in Jordan Rebhieh Suleiman Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), SE- 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Rebhieh Suleiman JRBJ-Study Report, June, 2003 Foreword This study is being carried out within the scope of the overall River basin comparative study of the historical development of the nine selected River Basins around the World, which is considered as apart of an international research program titled “The Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture”. The research program aim to improve the rural development through agricultural water uses strategies in developing countries. The aim of the River basin comparative study is to derive generic understanding on how societies manage water resources under growing population and basin closure, which problems were forced, and which range of solutions are available for a given physical and social context. It will also focus on both the historical development and the present state of each basin. The study is also expected to provide in-depth basin studies synthesized along the same methodological lines in order to be comparable and to be used as a knowledge base for multidisciplinary researchers. The Jordan River basin was one of the selected basins for the study, which represent the situation of arid and semi arid catchments suffering from sever water shortage. The pressure on water resources in this basin is very high and the competition between water users is tough. Furthermore, this basin lies in a very political tense region where conflict over scarce water resources is internationally recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan, September 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Jordan, September 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: JORDAN September 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (Al Mamlakah al Urduniyah al Hashimiyah). Short Form: Jordan (Al Urdun). Term for Citizen(s): Jordanian(s). Capital: Amman (with a population of about 2 million). Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities: Az Zarqa (472,830 inhabitants) and Irbid (272,681). Independence: Jordan celebrates its independence on May 25, the day in 1946 on which Abdullah ibn Hussein al Hashimi was proclaimed King of Transjordan and a new constitution was enacted, replacing the British Mandate that ended three days before. Public Holidays: Public holidays observed in Jordan include New Year’s Day (January 1), King Abdullah’s birthday (January 30), Labor Day (May 1), Independence Day (May 25), King Abdullah’s accession to the throne (June 9), King Hussein Remembrance Day (November 14), and Christmas Day (December 25). In addition, religious holidays with movable dates dependent on the Islamic lunar calendar include Eid al Adha, the Feast of the Sacrifice; Eid al Fitr, the end of Ramadan; Muharram, the Islamic New Year; Mawlid al Nabi, celebration of the birth of Muhammad; and Leilat al-Meiraj, the Ascension of Muhammad. Flag: The Jordanian flag consists of three equal horizontal bands of black (top), white, and green; a crimson isosceles triangle laid over the hoist side; and a small white seven-pointed Islamic star set in the middle of the triangle. Click to Enlarge Image The flag is an adaptation of the banner used in the Great Arab Revolt of 1916.
    [Show full text]