DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 3 Tfgm Bus Reform Consultation Research , Item 13. PDF 3 MB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 3 Tfgm Bus Reform Consultation Research , Item 13. PDF 3 MB Ipsos MORI | Bus Reform Consultation – Summary Report 1 June 2020 Doing Buses Differently: Consultation on a Proposed Franchising Scheme for Greater Manchester Summary Report Produced by Ipsos MORI for Transport for Greater Manchester (Instructed by Greater Manchester Combined Authority) Ipsos MORI | Bus Reform Consultation – Summary Report 2 Contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 35 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................................ 35 1.2 Context................................................................................................................................................................... 35 1.3 Why GMCA believes changes are necessary .................................................................................................... 36 1.4 Scope of the consultation ................................................................................................................................... 37 1.5 Report structure ................................................................................................................................................... 37 1.6 Reading the report ............................................................................................................................................... 38 2. The consultation process ......................................................................................................... 39 2.1 Publicising the consultation ............................................................................................................................... 39 2.2 Consultation response channels ........................................................................................................................ 39 2.3 Number of responses to the consultation ........................................................................................................ 40 2.4 Campaign and petitions ...................................................................................................................................... 41 2.5 Late responses ...................................................................................................................................................... 42 2.6 Deliberative research ........................................................................................................................................... 42 3. Analysis methodology ............................................................................................................. 44 3.1 Receipt and handling of responses ................................................................................................................... 44 3.2 Analysis of responses ........................................................................................................................................... 44 3.3 Interpreting the consultation findings ............................................................................................................. 45 3.4 Defining organisational responses including statutory consultees ............................................................. 47 3.5 General public responses .................................................................................................................................... 47 3.6 Organised campaign responses and petitions ................................................................................................. 47 4. Summary of overall opinion .................................................................................................... 48 4.1 Overall views on the introduction of the Proposed Franchising Scheme ................................................... 49 4.1.1 Statutory consultees ......................................................................................................................................... 50 4.1.2 Non-statutory consultees ................................................................................................................................ 53 4.1.3 Members of the public ..................................................................................................................................... 57 4.2 Comments received about the Assessment ..................................................................................................... 61 4.2.1 Statutory consultees ......................................................................................................................................... 61 4.2.2 Non-statutory consultees ................................................................................................................................ 64 4.2.3 Members of the public ..................................................................................................................................... 67 5. Proposed changes to the Proposed Franchising Scheme .................................................... 70 5.1 Overall views on proposed changes made to the Proposed Franchising Scheme ..................................... 70 5.1.1 Statutory consultees ......................................................................................................................................... 71 5.1.2 Non-statutory consultees ................................................................................................................................ 74 Ipsos MORI | Bus Reform Consultation – Summary Report 3 5.1.3 Members of the public ..................................................................................................................................... 77 5.2 Likelihood of support if suggested changes were made ............................................................................... 79 6. The Proposed Bus Franchising Scheme .................................................................................. 81 6.1 Overall views on corrections and changes made to the Proposed Franchising Scheme .......................... 81 6.1.1 Statutory consultees ......................................................................................................................................... 82 6.1.2 Non-statutory consultees ................................................................................................................................ 83 6.1.3 Members of the public ..................................................................................................................................... 83 6.2 Applicability to entirety of Greater Manchester ............................................................................................. 84 6.2.1 Statutory consultees ......................................................................................................................................... 84 6.2.2 Non-statutory consultees ................................................................................................................................ 85 6.2.3 Members of the public ..................................................................................................................................... 86 6.3 Local services proposed to be franchised ......................................................................................................... 87 6.3.1 Statutory consultees ......................................................................................................................................... 87 6.3.2 Non-statutory consultees ................................................................................................................................ 88 6.3.3 Members of the public ..................................................................................................................................... 88 6.4 Sub-areas ............................................................................................................................................................... 89 6.4.1 Statutory consultees ......................................................................................................................................... 89 6.4.2 Non-statutory consultees ................................................................................................................................ 90 6.4.3 Members of the public ..................................................................................................................................... 92 6.5 Services excepted from regulation .................................................................................................................... 92 6.5.1 Statutory consultees ......................................................................................................................................... 93 6.5.2 Non-statutory consultees ................................................................................................................................ 93 6.5.3 Members of the public ..................................................................................................................................... 94 6.6 Date of implementation .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GM Bus Reform Consultation PDF 2 MB
    Public Document GREATER MANCHESTER HOUSING PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY DATE: Thursday, 11th June, 2020 TIME: 10.00 am VENUE: Microsoft Teams Meeting ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTARY AGENDA WITH ADDITIONAL MEETING PAPER 10. GM BUS REFORM CONSULTATION 1 - 34 Report by Kate Brown and Emma Flynn TfGM providing Members with an update on the approach, methodology and outputs of the Proposed Franchising Scheme following the public consultation close on 8 January 2020. This Supplementary agenda with Bus Reform Consultation was issued 05.06.20 on behalf of Julie Connor, Secretary to the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, Churchgate House, 56 Oxford Street, Manchester M1 6EU BOLTON MANCHESTER ROCHDALE STOCKPORT TRAFFORD BURY OLDHAM SALFORD TAMESIDE WIGAN Please note that this meeting will be livestreamed via www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk, please speak to a Governance Officer before the meeting should you not wish to consent to being included in this recording. This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 10 Housing, Planning & Environment Overview & Scrutiny Committee Date: Thursday 11 June 2020 Subject: Bus Reform Consultation Report of: GMCA Solicitor and Monitoring Officer PURPOSE OF REPORT Following the report to the Housing, Planning and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee on 23 September 2019, setting out the proposed approach to a consultation on a Proposed Franchising Scheme for Greater Manchester, this report provides an update on the approach, methodology and outputs of the consultation following its close on 8 January 2020. Reports on the outcome of the consultation process will be considered by Greater Manchester Combined Authority at its meeting on 26 June 2020 and comments or recommendations made by this Committee regarding the consultation process will be reported to that meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • English Counties
    ENGLISH COUNTIES See also the Links section for additional web sites for many areas UPDATED 23/09/21 Please email any comments regarding this page to: [email protected] TRAVELINE SITES FOR ENGLAND GB National Traveline: www.traveline.info More-detailed local options: Traveline for Greater London: www.tfl.gov.uk Traveline for the North East: https://websites.durham.gov.uk/traveline/traveline- plan-your-journey.html Traveline for the South West: www.travelinesw.com Traveline for the West & East Midlands: www.travelinemidlands.co.uk Black enquiry line numbers indicate a full timetable service; red numbers imply the facility is only for general information, including requesting timetables. Please note that all details shown regarding timetables, maps or other publicity, refer only to PRINTED material and not to any other publications that a county or council might be showing on its web site. ENGLAND BEDFORDSHIRE BEDFORD Borough Council No publications Public Transport Team, Transport Operations Borough Hall, Cauldwell Street, Bedford MK42 9AP Tel: 01234 228337 Fax: 01234 228720 Email: [email protected] www.bedford.gov.uk/transport_and_streets/public_transport.aspx COUNTY ENQUIRY LINE: 01234 228337 (0800-1730 M-Th; 0800-1700 FO) PRINCIPAL OPERATORS & ENQUIRY LINES: Grant Palmer (01525 719719); Stagecoach East (01234 220030); Uno (01707 255764) CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE Council No publications Public Transport, Priory House, Monks Walk Chicksands, Shefford SG17 5TQ Tel: 0300 3008078 Fax: 01234 228720 Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • The Report from Passenger Transport Magazine
    MAKinG TRAVEL SiMpLe apps Wide variations in journey planners quality of apps four stars Moovit For the first time, we have researched which apps are currently Combined rating: 4.5 (785k ratings) Operator: Moovit available to public transport users and how highly they are rated Developer: Moovit App Global LtD Why can’t using public which have been consistent table-toppers in CityMApper transport be as easy as Transport Focus’s National Rail Passenger Combined rating: 4.5 (78.6k ratings) ordering pizza? Speaking Survey, have not transferred their passion for Operator: Citymapper at an event in Glasgow customer service to their respective apps. Developer: Citymapper Limited earlier this year (PT208), First UK Bus was also among the 18 four-star robert jack Louise Coward, the acting rated bus operator apps, ahead of rivals Arriva trAinLine Managing Editor head of insight at passenger (which has different apps for information and Combined rating: 4.5 (69.4k ratings) watchdog Transport Focus, revealed research m-tickets) and Stagecoach. The 11 highest Operator: trainline which showed that young people want an rated bus operator apps were all developed Developer: trainline experience that is as easy to navigate as the one by Bournemouth-based Passenger, with provided by other retailers. Blackpool Transport, Warrington’s Own Buses, three stars She explained: “Young people challenged Borders Buses and Nottingham City Transport us with things like, ‘if I want to order a pizza all possessing apps with a 4.8-star rating - a trAveLine SW or I want to go and see a film, all I need to result that exceeds the 4.7-star rating achieved Combined rating: 3.4 (218 ratings) do is get my phone out go into an app’ ..
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
    ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Statistics – Notes and Definitions – Page 1 of 27
    Annual Bus Statistics: 2011/12 Notes and Definitions This document provides information about DfT These Notes and Definitions include: bus statistics. 1. Introduction to the statistics Bus statistics are published annually by the 2. Information on data sources and methods Department for Transport, and include figures 3. Information relating to the published tables relating to bus passenger journeys, vehicle miles including key definitions travelled, revenue and costs, fare levels, 4. Sources of further information related to but Government support, vehicles owned by PSV not covered by these statistics operators and number of staff employed. In 5. Background and contextual information addition to the annual publication, estimates of patronage are available on a quarterly basis. Section 1 presents a brief overview of the statistics, covering the following questions: What do these statistics cover? Why are the statistics collected and how are they used? What are the sources of data used to compile the statistics? What methods are used to compile the published information? How reliable are the statistics? What should be considered when using them? How often are these statistics updated? What other information is available on buses and bus travel? Section 2 provides further general information about the main data sources used to compile the statistics, including the methods used to produce figures for publication and data quality issues. Section 3 presents information relevant to specific aspects of the published figures, including definitions of key terms and specific issues relevant to the interpretation of individual tables or sections. Section 4 provides details of further sources of statistics on buses and bus travel which are not covered by these statistics Section 5 provides links to relevant contextual information about the bus industry and bus policy The annexes contain more detailed information as referenced in the appropriate section above.
    [Show full text]
  • The Go-Ahead Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2019 1 Stable Cash Generative
    Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 29 June 2019 Taking care of every journey Taking care of every journey Regional bus Regional bus market share (%) We run fully owned commercial bus businesses through our eight bus operations in the UK. Our 8,550 people and 3,055 buses provide Stagecoach: 26% excellent services for our customers in towns and cities on the south FirstGroup: 21% coast of England, in north east England, East Yorkshire and East Anglia Arriva: 14% as well as in vibrant cities like Brighton, Oxford and Manchester. Go-Ahead’s bus customers are the most satisfied in the UK; recently Go-Ahead: 11% achieving our highest customer satisfaction score of 92%. One of our National Express: 7% key strengths in this market is our devolved operating model through Others: 21% which our experienced management teams deliver customer focused strategies in their local areas. We are proud of the role we play in improving the health and wellbeing of our communities through reducing carbon 2621+14+11+7+21L emissions with cleaner buses and taking cars off the road. London & International bus London bus market share (%) In London, we operate tendered bus contracts for Transport for London (TfL), running around 157 routes out of 16 depots. TfL specify the routes Go-Ahead: 23% and service frequency with the Mayor of London setting fares. Contracts Metroline: 18% are tendered for five years with a possible two year extension, based on Arriva: 18% performance against punctuality targets. In addition to earning revenue Stagecoach: 13% for the mileage we operate, we have the opportunity to earn Quality Incentive Contract bonuses if we meet these targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Art, Antiques, Jewellery, Gold and Silver, Porcelain and Quality Collectables Friday 21 June 2013 10:00
    Fine Art, Antiques, Jewellery, Gold and Silver, Porcelain and Quality Collectables Friday 21 June 2013 10:00 Gerrards Auctioneers & Valuers St Georges Road St Annes on Sea Lancashire FY8 2AE Gerrards Auctioneers & Valuers (Fine Art, Antiques, Jewellery, Gold and Silver, Porcelain and Quality Collectables) Catalogue - Downloaded from UKAuctioneers.com Lot: 800 wooden frame. 2 Limited Edition Pencil Signed by Trevor Grimshaw Sepia Estimate: £160.00 - £200.00 Colours: Numbered 332/350 and 224/450. 10 1/2 in. x 8 in.. In Portfolio. Estimate: £60.00 - £80.00 Lot: 808 Prudence Turner (Born 1930), in India, watercolour, Scottish lake landscape, signed with certificate of Authenticity verso, 11 Lot: 801 by 15 inches, in a grey and gilt swept frame. Oiligraph of Kittens in a Basket: in a heavy gilded frame. 19 in. Estimate: £120.00 - £150.00 x 18 in. Estimate: £20.00 - £30.00 Lot: 808B Keith Sutton Oil on Board. 'Country Village Scene with river in Lot: 802 foreground' Signed and dated lower right. 30.5 by 17 inches. H.S. Day, Portrait of George V, watercolour, signed with Estimate: £70.00 - £120.00 monogram, 19 by 9 inches, mounted and framed. Estimate: £50.00 - £70.00 Lot: 809 James Lawrence Isherwood (1917-1989) Oil On Board, ''Nude Lot: 802B Lady Charlotte Ponsonby'' 20 x 16 Inches. Signed Lower Left, Bill Illich, Canadian artist and musician, pencil signed. Artists Inscribed To Reverse. Comes Complete With A Clive proof drawing. Title ''Harmony''. Charcoal/pencil with highlights Isherwood Signed Certificate Stating The Painting To Be A in colour. 24x31 inches.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Recovery Renewing the Transport System
    Covid-19 Recovery Renewing the transport system July 2020 Covid-19 Recovery • Renewing the transport system 1 Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Impact of the crisis 7 Opportunity for renewal 15 Facilitating the shift to a rapid renewal 34 References 36 Acknowledgements This paper was developed by Campaign for Better Transport and is solely its view. Organisations were engaged directly and through four virtual roundtable discussions in May 2020, with senior representatives of train and bus operators, government representatives, local authorities, passenger bodies, technology companies and other stakeholders. Thanks go to the following organisations that were engaged or participated in discussions to inform the contents of this report, including: Abellio Group, Angel Trains, Arriva Group, Avis Budget Group, Bird, Bombardier, Bus Users UK, BVRLA, Cambridge and Peterborough Combined Authority, Client Earth, Community Rail, Community Transport Association, CoMoUK, Confederation of Passenger Transport, Essex County Council, Eversholt Rail, First Group, Five AI, Go-Ahead Group, Grand Central Railway, GTR, HCT Group, Liverpool City Region, Living Streets, Local Government Association, Network Rail, North East Combined Authority, Rail Delivery Group, Rail Freight Group, Rail Industry Association, RSSB, Ryse Hygrogen, South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive, Stagecoach Group, Sustrans, The AA, Trainline, Transdev, Transport & Environment, Transport Focus, Transport for Greater Manchester, Transport for London, Transport for the North, Transport for West Midlands, Uber, Urban Transport Group, ViaVan, Wrightbus, Zeelo. The paper has also been peer reviewed by the Campaign for Better Transport Policy Associates Network. Thank you to Isabel Dedring, Jim Steer, Keith Buchan, Kris Beuret, Leon Daniels, Lilli Matson, Lynda Addison, Matt Lovering, Phil Jones, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Profile
    A PROFILE OF NEEDS AND SERVICES ABOUT CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE & THEIR FAMILIES IN THE DUKINFIELD, STALYBRIDGE & MOSSLEY AREAS OF TAMESIDE SEPTEMBER 2007 CONTENTS Page No Dukinfield,Stalybridge & Mossley: Profile of need and services Introduction 2 Contents 3 Part 1: Basic need data 6 Population 6 Index of Multiple Deprivation 7 Ward Profiles 9 Dukinfield profile 9 1: Population data 9 2:Household Composition 9 3:Housing 10 4:Health 10 5:Unemployment 11 6:Education 11 7:Occupation 12 Dukinfield/Stalybridge profile 13 1: Population data 13 2:Household Composition 13 3:Housing 14 4:Health 14 5:Unemployment 14 6:Education 15 7:Occupation 16 Stalybridge North Profile 16 1:Population data 16 2:Household Composition 17 3:Housing 17 4:Health 18 5:Unemployment 18 6:Education 19 7:Occupation 19 Stalybridge South profile 20 1:Population data 20 2:Household Composition 21 3:Housing 21 4:Health 22 5:Unemployment 22 6.Education 23 7:Occupation 24 Mossley profile 24 1:Population data 24 2:Household Composition 25 3:Housing 25 4:Health 26 5:Unmployment 26 6:Education 27 7:Occupation 27 Selected Comparison Tables 28 Teenage Pregnancy Trend 29 Regeneration Profile 30 Part 2: Service Profile 33 Introduction 33 Section 1: Universal Offices 33 School and childcare data 33 1:Nursery Education and childcare 33 2:Primary Schools 34 3:Secondary Schools 34 4:Children’s Centres 35 5:Extended School Services 36 6: Childcare provision:summary 36 A. Childminders 37 B. Day Nurseries 37 C. Playgroups/Pre­schools 37 D. Out of School Clubs 38 Section 2: Additional services
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics of Concession Contracts
    Designing Transit Concession Contracts to Deal with Uncertainty by MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Tara Naomi Chin Blakey OF TECHNOLOGY B.S., Civil Engineering (2004) ARE62009 University of Florida LIBRARIES Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2006 ©2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author............ ... Civil and Environmental Engineering May 26, 2006 Certified by.......................... ............ Prof Nigel H. M. Wilson Professor of Civil aid Environmental Engineering - The1 is Supervisor Accepted by.............................................. And? 4. Whittle Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Studies 1 BARKER Designing Transit Concession Contracts to Deal with Uncertainty By Tara Naomi Chin Blakey Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering On May 25, 2006 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation ABSTRACT This thesis proposes a performance regime structure for public transit concession contracts, designed so incentives to the concessionaire can be effective given significant uncertainty about the future operating conditions. This is intended to aid agencies in designing regimes that will encourage continually improving performance through the use of relevant and adaptive incentives. The proposed incentives are adjusted annually based on actual circumstances. An adaptive regime can also allow the incentives to be more cost and resource efficient and is especially well-suited to so-called "gross-cost" contracts when the public agency retains the fare revenue and absorbs the revenue risk for the services. The motivation for this research is the anticipated transfer of the oversight responsibilities for the Silverlink Metro regional rail services, in outer London, from the UK Department for Transport to Transport for London.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater London Authority London Assembly – 6 September 2000
    Greater London Authority London Assembly – 6 September 2000 Greater Greater London Authority London Authority London Assembly Minutes of the meeting of the London Assembly held on Wednesday, 6 September 2000 at 10 a.m. In Room AG16 at Romney House, Marsham Street, Westminster Present: Trevor Phillips (Chair) Sally Hamwee (Deputy Chair) Jennette Arnold Victor Anderson Tony Arbour Richard Barnes John Biggs Louise Bloom Graham Tope Brian Coleman Lynne Featherstone Roger Evans Toby Harris Nicky Gavron Meg Hillier Samantha Heath Andrew Pelling Jennifer Jones Elizabeth Howlett Eric Ollerenshaw Bob Neill Angie Bray Darren Johnson Valerie Shawcross 16jul00version 1 Greater London Authority London Assembly – 6 September 2000 00/50 APOLOGIES Apologies for absence were received from Len Duvall and for lateness from Nicky Gavron, Roger Evans and Bob Neill. 00/51 MINUTES OF MEETINGS HELD ON 24, 27 and 28 JULY 2000 The Minutes of these meetings were confirmed as a correct record subject to the following amendments: 24 July 2000 That Graham Tope and Elizabeth Howlett be recorded as attending the meeting. Minute 35/00 - replace "group" with "party" in the last line of the first paragraph. That the Deputy Chair be given authority to approve the correction of various typographical errors in the minutes. 28 July Resolution 3 (3) (iv) to read: To obtain Leading Counsel's opinion where necessary on all of (i) to (iii) above. Resolution 3 (3) (v) to read: To act and instruct the relevant Chief Officers to act, on Leading Counsels' advice including recruitment based on that advice. 00/52 CHAIR’S BUSINESS With the agreement of the meeting, the Chair deferred consideration of the minutes of the previous three Assembly meetings until the end of the proceedings, and announced the intention to allow two urgent items: (i) Notting Hill Carnival The Chair introduced the matter of the Notting Hill Carnival by referring to the deep concern over the events that took place there over the weekend of XXXX.
    [Show full text]
  • 131 . David A. Hensher.Pdf
    BUS TRANSPORT: ECONOMICS, POLICY AND PLANNING RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS Series Editor: Martin Dresner Volumes 1–6: Research in Transportation Economics – B. Starr McMullen Volume 7: Railroad Bankruptcies and Mergers from Chicago West 1975–2001: Financial Analysis and Regulatory Critique – Michael Conant Volume 8: Economic Impacts of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Innovations and Case Studies – Evangelos Bekiaris and Yuko Nakanishi Volume 9: Road Pricing: Theory and Evidence – Georgina Santos Volume 10: Transportation Labor Issues and Regulatory Reform – James Peoples and Wayne K. Talley Volume 11: Interurban Road Charging for Trucks in Europe – Jose´Manuel Viegas Volume 12: Shipping Economics – Kevin Cullinane Volume 13: Global Competition in Transportation Markets: Analysis and Policy Making – Katsuhiko Kuroda and Adib Kanafani Volume 14: Measuring the Marginal Social Cost of Transport – Christopher Nash and Bryan Matthews Volume 15: Procurement and Financing of Motorways in Europe – Giorgio Ragazzi and Werner Rothengatter Volume 16: Port Economics – Kevin Cullinane and Wayne K. Talley Volume 17: Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance – Mary R. Books and Kevin Cullinane RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS VOLUME 18 BUS TRANSPORT: ECONOMICS, POLICY AND PLANNING BY DAVID A. HENSHER Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia Amsterdam – Boston – Heidelberg – London – New York – Oxford Paris – San Diego – San Francisco – Singapore – Sydney – Tokyo JAI Press is an imprint of Elsevier JAI Press is an imprint of Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA First edition 2007 Copyright r 2007 Elsevier Ltd.
    [Show full text]