Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Peridotite and Pyroxenite xenoliths from the Muskox kimberlite, northern Slave craton, Canada
Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Manuscript ID cjes-2015-0083.R1
Manuscript Type: Article
Date Submitted by the Author: 28-Sep-2015
Complete List of Authors: Newton, David; University of British Columbia, Earth Ocean and Atmospheric Science Kopylova, Maya;Draft University of British Columbia, Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science Burgess, Jennifer; Burgess Diamonds, ; Shear Minerals, Strand, Pamela; NWT Mines and Minerals, ; Shear Minerals,
cratonic peridotite, cratonic pyroxenite, mantle metasomatism, Keyword: thermobarometry, kimberlite xenoliths
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Page 1 of 55 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1 David E Newton*, Maya G Kopylova, Jennifer Burgess 2** , Pamela Strand 2***
2
3
4 Peridotite and pyroxenite xenoliths from the Muskox kimberlite, northern Slave craton,
5 Canada
6
7
8 University of British Columbia, 2207 Main Mall, Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4
9 2 Shear Minerals Ltd. 220 17010 103 rd Ave, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T5S 1K7
10
11 Submitted to CanadianDraft Journal of Earth Sciences
12 April 2015
13
14
15
16 * corresponding author, David E Newton, University of British Columbia Dept. of Earth, Ocean
17 and Atmospheric Sciences, 2020 2207 Main Mall
18 Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4. T: (778) 828 4636. [email protected].
19 ** present address: Burgess Diamonds, 5674 Annex Rd. Sechelt, BC, Canada, V0N 3A8
20 *** present address: NWT Mines and Minerals, Box 1320, 4601B 52 nd Ave, Yellowknife, NT,
21 Canada, X1A 2L9
22
23
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 55
24 Abstract
25 We present petrography, mineralogy and thermobarometry for 53 mantle derived
26 xenoliths from the Muskox kimberlite pipe in the northern Slave craton. The xenolith suite
27 includes 23% coarse peridotite, 9% porphyroclastic peridotite, 60% websterite and 8%
28 orthopyroxenite. Samples primarily comprise forsteritic olivine (Fo 89 94), enstatite (En 89 94),
29 Cr diopside, Cr pyrope garnet and chromite spinel. Coarse peridotites, porphyroclastic
30 peridotites, and pyroxenites equilibrated at 650 1220 °C and 23 63 kbar, 1200 1350 °C and 57
31 70 kbar, and 1030 1230 °C and 50 63 kbar, respectively. The Muskox xenoliths differ from the
32 neighboring and contemporaneous Jericho kimberlite by their higher levels of depletion, the
33 presence of a shallow zone of metasomatism in the spinel stability field, a higher proportion of
34 pyroxenites at the base of the mantle column,Draft higher Cr 2O3 in all pyroxenite minerals, and
35 weaker deformation in the Muskox mantle. We interpret these contrasts as representing small
36 scale heterogeneities in the bulk composition of the mantle, as well as the local effects of
37 interaction between metasomatizing fluid and mantle wall rocks. We suggest that asthenosphere
38 derived pre kimberlitic melts and fluids percolated less effectively through the less permeable
39 Muskox mantle resulting in lower degrees of hydrous weakening, strain and fertilization of the
40 peridotitic mantle. Fluids tended to concentrate and pool in the deep mantle causing partial
41 melting and formation of abundant pyroxenites.
42
43 Key Words
44 Cratonic peridotite, cratonic pyroxenite, mantle metasomatism, thermobarometry,
45 kimberlite xenoliths.
ii
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Page 3 of 55 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
46 Introduction
47 Kimberlite derived samples of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) are
48 commonly used for insights on the composition and structure of the ambient SCLM (Nixon and
49 Boyd 1973; Gurney and Harte 1980; Boyd et al. 1997a). Kimberlite associated processes,
50 however, may metasomatize the mantle in the vicinity of melt extraction and transport
51 (Artemieva 2009; Kopylova et al. 2009; Doyle et al. 2004). Thus, differences found in the mantle
52 sample in two adjacent contemporaneous kimberlites may reflect spatial compositional
53 heterogeneity of the mantle, like those reported by Griffin et al. 1999a; Grutter et al. 1999;
54 Carbno and Canil 2002; Davis et al. 2003; Hoffman 2003, or the varying effects of percolation of
55 pre kimberlitic fluids and kimberlite formation and ascent. To isolate the heterogeneity of the
56 ambient mantle from the kimberlite imposedDraft mantle wall rock metasomatism, we compared
57 peridotites and pyroxenite xenoliths of the Muskox and Jericho kimberlites. The Muskox pipe
58 was emplaced contemporaneously and within 15 km of the Jericho kimberlite that contains a
59 well studied suite of mantle xenoliths (Kopylova et al. 1999). Below we present petrography,
60 mineralogy and thermobarometry for 53 Muskox peridotite and pyroxenite xenoliths and use
61 their contrasting petrology to highlight interaction between pre kimberlitic fluids and the
62 ambient mantle.
63
64 Geological Setting
65 The Muskox and Jericho kimberlites belong to a mid Jurassic cluster (172 ± 2 Ma, Heaman
66 et al. 1997) of pipes located ~400 km NE of Yellowknife near the northern end of Contwoyto