DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Rights in Asia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Rights in Asia Human Rights in Asia This book analyzes how human rights are viewed and implemented in Asia. Special- ists from fourteen countries and jurisdictions examine personal integrity, civil and political, social and economic, and cultural rights. Each chapter provides a general introduction to rights theory and practice, discussion of the relevant case law for each type of right, and concluding remarks that situate a country’s performance within a broader comparative context. The chapters on France and the USA provide a benchmark for assessing how human rights have emerged and been implemented in a civil law and a common law jurisdiction. These are then followed by twelve chapters on the major countries of East Asia and India, each of which follows a common template to consider the context of the legal system, black-letter law, legal discussions and debates, and controversial issues concerning human rights. This book will be of interest to scholars, government officials, NGOs and others seeking to promote human rights, democracy, rule of law, and law and development. The volume is well suited for undergraduate and graduate courses in a wide variety of fields, including political science, law, and sociology. Randall Peerenboom is a Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law, where he teaches courses in Chinese law, international human rights, and legal theory. He often serves as an expert witness on PRC legal issues, and has been a consultant to the Ford Foundation and the Asian Development Bank on legal reforms and rule of law in China. He is the author of several books and more than sixty articles on Chinese law and philosophy. Carole J. Petersen is a graduate of the University of Chicago and Harvard Law School and is currently an Associate Professor at the University of Hong Kong. She has published numerous articles and book chapters on women and the law, equality rights, and constitutional law. From 2001 to 2004, she served as the Director of the University of Hong Kong’s Centre for Comparative and Public Law, where she continues to oversee research projects on equality and the law. Albert H. Y. Chen is a graduate of the University of Hong Kong and Harvard University. He began his teaching career at the University of Hong Kong in 1984, and is currently a Professor in its Department of Law. He has written seven books and over 100 articles in English and Chinese, mainly on constitutional law and legal philosophy. Routledge Law in Asia Series editor: Randall Peerenboom Asian Discourses of Rule of Law Theories and implementation of rule of law in twelve Asian countries, France and the U.S. Edited by Randall Peerenboom Human Rights in Asia A comparative legal study of twelve Asian jurisdictions, France and the USA Edited by Randall Peerenboom, Carole J. Petersen and Albert H. Y. Chen Human Rights in Asia A comparative legal study of twelve Asian jurisdictions, France and the USA Edited by Randall Peerenboom, Carole J. Petersen and Albert H. Y. Chen First published 2006 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2006. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2006 Randall Peerenboom, Carole J. Petersen and Albert H. Y. Chen for selection and editorial matter; the contributors for individual chapters All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Peerenboom, R. P. (Randall P.), 1958– Human rights in Asia : a comparative legal study of twelve Asian jurisdictions, France, and the United States / Randall Peerenboom, Carole Petersen & Albert H. Y. Chen. p. cm. — (Routledge law in Asia) Includes bibliographical references. 1. Civil rights—Asia. 2. Civil rights—France. 3. Civil rights—United States. 4. Human rights—Asia. 5. Human rights—France. 6. Human rights—United States. I. Petersen, Carole. II. Chen, Hongyi, 1957– III. Title. IV. Series. KM572.P44 2005 342.508′5—dc22 2005017305 ISBN10: 0-415-36002-1 (hbk) ISBN10: 0-415-36003-X (pbk) ISBN13: 978-0-415-36002-9 (hbk) ISBN13: 978-0-415-36002-6 (pbk) Contents Notes on contributors vii Preface x Acknowledgements xii 1 An empirical overview of rights performance in Asia, France, and the USA: The dominance of wealth in the interplay of economics, culture, law, and governance 1 RANDALL PEERENBOOM 2 The protection of human rights in France: A comparative perspective 65 GUY SCOFFONI 3 Uncovering rights in the USA: Gauging the gap between the Bill of Rights and human rights 83 DINUSHA PANDITARATNE 4 The protection of “fundamental human rights” in Japan 121 SHIGENORI MATSUI 5 Taking rights seriously? Human rights law in Singapore 158 LI-ANN THIO 6 Human rights in Malaysia 191 H. P. LEE 7 From British colony to special administrative region of China: Embracing human rights in Hong Kong 224 CAROLE J. PETERSEN vi Contents 8 Human rights in Korea 265 HAHM CHAIHARK 9 The implementation of human rights law in Taiwan 298 FREDERICK CHAO-CHUN LIN 10 Human rights in the era of “Thailand Inc.” 320 VITIT MUNTARBHORN 11 The Philippines: The persistence of rights discourse vis-à-vis substantive social claims 346 RAUL C. PANGALANGAN 12 Human rights in Indonesia 364 HIKMAHANTO JUWANA 13 Protection of human rights and production of human rightlessness in India 384 UPENDRA BAXI 14 Human rights in China 413 RANDALL PEERENBOOM 15 Evolving concepts of human rights in Vietnam 452 JOHN GILLESPIE 16 Conclusion: comparative reflections on human rights in Asia 487 ALBERT H. Y. CHEN Index 517 Contributors Upendra Baxi, former Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, and South Gujarat University, is currently Professor of Law at Warwick University. His most recent work is The Future of Human Rights (2005, revised and enlarged edition, Delhi, Oxford University Press). His current publica- tions include: “Business ethics at the altar of human rights,” “Reading the politics of human rights,” and essays concerning the development of the right to development. He has pioneered and contributed to, through acts of public interest interventions, the development of social action litigation before the Supreme Court of India. Hahm Chaihark is Assistant Professor of Korean Studies, Yonsei Graduate School of International Studies, Korea. Dr Hahm received his early training in law at Seoul National University, and went on to receive advanced law degrees from Yale, Columbia, and Harvard. He also holds an MA in Religion from Yale Divinity School. His interests include American con- stitutional law, Confucian political philosophy, and Christian theology. Frederick Chao-Chun Lin is an Assistant Professor of Law at the National University of Kaohsiung. Professor Lin earned his SJD degree from North- western University of Law and has been a visiting scholar both at Harvard University Law School and the University of Tokyo. Albert H. Y. Chen is a graduate of the University of Hong Kong and Harvard University. He began his teaching career at the University of Hong Kong in 1984, and is currently a Professor in its Department of Law. He has written seven books and over 100 articles in English and Chinese, mainly on constitutional law and legal philosophy. John Gillespie is an Associate Professor in the Law School, Deakin Univer- sity, Melbourne, specializing in Asian comparative law. He teaches courses on comparative Asian commercial law and has published widely, espe- cially on Vietnamese legal reform. His publications include Commercial Legal Development in Vietnam (1997). In addition, he has worked as a consultant on legal reform projects for the World Bank, UNDP, IFC and AusAid in Vietnam, Laos, and Indonesia. viii Contributors Hikmahanto Juwana is a Professor of Law, and currently Dean, at the University of Indonesia. He received his LLB from the University of Indonesia, LLM from Keio University, Japan, and Ph.D. from the Uni- versity of Nottingham, UK. H. P. Lee is the Sir John Latham Professor of Law at Monash University. He teaches and researches in Australian constitutional law and comparative constitutional law. His major works include H. P. Lee and G. Winterton (eds), Australian Constitutional Landmarks (Cambridge University Press, 2003); E. Campbell and H. P. Lee, The Australian Judiciary (Cambridge University Press, 2001); H. P. Lee, Constitutional Conflicts in Contemporary Malaysia (Oxford University Press, 1995); H. P. Lee, P. J. Hanks and V. Morabito, In the Name of National Security: The Legal Dimensions (LBC Information Services, 1995); H. P. Lee and G. Winterton (eds), Australian Constitutional Perspectives (Law Book, 1992); and H. P. Lee, Emergency Powers (Law Book, 1984). He is currently the Vice Chairman of the Australian Press Council. Shigenori Matsui is a Professor in Osaka University’s School of Law. He received his LLB from Kyoto University, an LLM from Kyoto Univer- sity, a JSD from Stanford Law School (1986), and an LLD from Kyoto University (2000). Vitit Muntarbhorn is a Professor of Law at Chulalongkorn University and former United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the General Rapporteur for the Second World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of Area Studies Final Report
    Review of Area Studies A Vice‐Chancellor’s Work Slate Project Final Report October 2009 2 Contents 1. Letter from the Chair of the Review Panel .............................................................. 5 2. Terms of Reference ........................................................................................................... 6 3. Panel membership ............................................................................................................. 6 4. Executive summary and recommendations ........................................................... 7 5. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 11 5.1 Why Area Studies? ........................................................................................................................... 11 5.1.1 What are Area Studies? ................................................................................................... 11 5.1.2 The activities of Area Studies centres .............................................................................. 11 5.1.3 Reasons for the Review .................................................................................................... 12 5.1.4 Academic support for an Area Studies strategy at Sydney .............................................. 13 5.1.5 Objectives for an Area Studies strategy at Sydney .......................................................... 17 5.2 Obstacles to success .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • [2020] SGCA 16 Civil Appeal No 99 of 2019 Between Wham Kwok Han
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE [2020] SGCA 16 Civil Appeal No 99 of 2019 Between Wham Kwok Han Jolovan … Appellant And The Attorney-General … Respondent Civil Appeal No 108 of 2019 Between Tan Liang Joo John … Appellant And The Attorney-General … Respondent Civil Appeal No 109 of 2019 Between The Attorney-General … Appellant And Wham Kwok Han Jolovan … Respondent Civil Appeal No 110 of 2019 Between The Attorney-General … Appellant And Tan Liang Joo John … Respondent In the matter of Originating Summons No 510 of 2018 Between The Attorney-General And Wham Kwok Han Jolovan In the matter of Originating Summons No 537 of 2018 Between The Attorney-General And Tan Liang Joo John ii JUDGMENT [Contempt of Court] — [Scandalising the court] [Contempt of Court] — [Sentencing] iii This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore Law Reports. Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Attorney-General and other appeals [2020] SGCA 16 Court of Appeal — Civil Appeals Nos 99, 108, 109 and 110 of 2019 Sundaresh Menon CJ, Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, Judith Prakash JA, Tay Yong Kwang JA and Steven Chong JA 22 January 2020 16 March 2020 Judgment reserved. Sundaresh Menon CJ (delivering the judgment of the court): Introduction 1 These appeals arise out of HC/OS 510/2018 (“OS 510”) and HC/OS 537/2018 (“OS 537”), which were initiated by the Attorney-General (“the AG”) to punish Mr Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (“Wham”) and Mr Tan Liang Joo John (“Tan”) respectively for contempt by scandalising the court (“scandalising contempt”) under s 3(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 (Act 19 of 2016) (“the AJPA”).
    [Show full text]
  • Photo Gallery
    Cover Illustration The new Central Government Offices on the harbourfront are designed as an ‘open door’ to depict the administration as open and receptive to new ideas. The offices, which opened in August, are part of a major project at Tamar that houses the Legislative Council Complex and the Chief Executive’s Office and features an abundance of greenery and open space. End-paper Maps Front Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Back Hong Kong and Pearl River Delta Satellite Image Map Events in 2011 This year’s major events included a visit to Hong Kong in August by the Vice-Premier of the State Council, Mr Li Keqiang, pictured, delivering the keynote address at the Forum on the National 12th Five-Year Plan and Economic, Trade and Financial Co-operation and Development between the Mainland and Hong Kong at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre. Other major events included visits by foreign dignitaries as well as overseas visits by senior Hong Kong officials – and Guinness World Records. Events in 2011 Top left: The then Chief Secretary for Administration, Mr Henry Tang, calls on Singapore Prime Minister, Mr Lee Hsien Loong, during his trip to the island state in February. Above left: The Chief Secretary for Administration, Mr Stephen Lam, meets the German Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr Guido Westerwelle, in Berlin in October. Above right: The Chief Executive, Mr Donald Tsang (first row, first right), poses with other world leaders at the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation Economic Leaders’ Meeting in Honolulu in November. Right: The Chief Executive welcomes the US Secretary of State, Mrs Hillary Rodham Clinton, at Government House in Hong Kong on July 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncivilized: on the Issue of Racism in the 2019 Hong Kong Protest Movement
    This ThinkChina analysis is written by Mai Corlin, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Fine Arts, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Editor(s): Casper Wichmann and Silke Hult Lykkedatter. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this ThinkChina publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of ThinkChina. Copyright of this publication is held by ThinkChina. You may not copy, reproduce, republish or circulate in any way the content from this publication without acknowledgement of ThinkChina as the source, except for your own personal and non-commercial use. Any other use requires the prior written permission of ThinkChina or the author(s). ©ThinkChina and the author(s) 2020 Front page picture: Photograph by Mai Corlin. Caption: Graffiti drawn during a demonstration in the Hong Kong district of Mongkok. Winnie the Pooh (left) is a reference to Xi Jinping. The Chinese characters read the first part of the well-known slogan attributed Hong Kong activist and localist, Edward Leung: “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Time (光復香港, 時代革命 ).” ThinkChina, University of Copenhagen Karen Blixens Vej 4 2300 Copenhagen S Mail: [email protected] Web: www.thinkchina.dk ThinkChina Analysis 2020 Uncivilized: On the Issue of Racism in the 2019 Hong Kong Protest Movement Mai Corlin: Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Fine Arts, Chinese University of Hong Kong Since the introduction of an extradition bill in April 2019, which in some cases would have allowed extradition to mainland China, a new wave of civil unrest arose, and in June 2019, the streets of Hong Kong were once again flooded by public demonstrations – a new protest movement, not completely unlike the ‘Umbrella Movement’ for democracy in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • How Asian Should Asian Law Be? – an Outsider’S View Ralf Michaels, Duke Law School*
    How Asian Should Asian Law Be? – An Outsider’s View Ralf Michaels, Duke Law School* I. ASIAN LAW? THE EXAMPLE PRINCIPLES OF ASIAN CONTRACT LAW .......................... 3 II. A EUROPEAN ASIA: ORIENTALISM AND MODERNIZATION .............................................. 7 III. A CHINESE ASIA: SINOCENTRIC LAW ..................................................................................... 11 IV. A JAPANESE ASIA: PAN-ASIAN LAW ....................................................................................... 15 V. AN ESSENTIALIST ASIA: ASIAN VALUES ............................................................................... 23 VI. BEYOND SIMILARITY AND DIFFERENCE: ASIA AS METHOD? ....................................... 26 In 2016, Singapore saw a conference with the ambitious title “Doing Business Across Asia: Legal Convergence in an Asian Century”. 1 Amongst other things, the conference celebrated the inauguration of an Asian Business Law Institute (ABLI).2 The keynote address was given by Sundaresh Menon, Chief Justice of the Republic of Singapore and chair of ABLI’s board of governors.3 Menon invoked the demands of globalization and lamented the fragmentation of laws in Asia as appearing “somewhat out of kilter”. Legal convergence, he suggested, was necessary because “a fragmented Asia is holding business back;” inconsistent regulations and regimes across the Asia- Pacific were the single biggest barrier to trade. Menon juxtaposed this situation in Asia with that in Africa, where the Organization for the Harmonization of
    [Show full text]
  • Law Research Report Contents Final.Indd
    Faculty of Law 2005 Research Report Contents Message from the Associate Dean (Research) 1 Funded Research 2 Grants Commencing in 2005 3 Selected Grants in Progress 6 Grants Completed in 2005 9 Centres and Institutes 16 Asia Pacifi c Centre for Military Law 17 Asian Law Centre 20 Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law 23 Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies 26 Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation 28 Centre for the Study of Contemporary Islam 30 Institute for International Law and the Humanities 32 Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia 34 The Tax Group 36 Centre for Media and Communications Law 38 Academic Research Profi les 39 Jeremy Gans 40 Loane Skene 42 Miranda Stewart 44 Published Research 46 Journals and Newsletters 57 Journal Affi liations 61 Faculty Research Workshop 68 International Research Visitors Scheme 72 Student Published Research Prize 73 Academic Staff 74 Research Higher Degrees Completed in 2005 84 Research Higher Degrees in Progress 85 Message from the Associate Dean (Research) Faculty of Law 2005 Research Report 1 Message from the Associate Dean (Research) It is a great pleasure to present the 2005 Research Report, topics discussed at the Faculty Research Workshop convened which provides an overview of the research activities in the by Associate Professor Andrew Kenyon during 2005. Faculty of Law during 2005. The Faculty’s Research Higher Degree (RHD) candidates In 2005 Faculty members began work on nine new research make an important contribution to the Faculty’s research projects funded by the Australian Research Council. Details endeavours. Sixteen of the Faculty’s RHD candidates of those projects are provided in this report, along with an successfully completed their theses in 2005, making it a update on two funded projects in progress and the outcomes particularly successful year for our RHD program.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore
    Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore By Netina Tan PhD Candidate Political Science Department University of British Columbia Paper prepared for presentation at CPSA Conference, 28 May 2009 Ottawa, Ontario Work- in-progress, please do not cite without author’s permission. All comments welcomed, please contact author at [email protected] Abstract In the age of democracy, the resilience of Singapore’s hegemonic party autocracy is puzzling. The People’s Action Party (PAP) has defied the “third wave”, withstood economic crises and ruled uninterrupted for more than five decades. Will the PAP remain a deviant case and survive the passing of its founding leader, Lee Kuan Yew? Building on an emerging scholarship on electoral authoritarianism and the concept of institutionalization, this paper argues that the resilience of hegemonic party autocracy depends more on institutions than coercion, charisma or ideological commitment. Institutionalized parties in electoral autocracies have a greater chance of survival, just like those in electoral democracies. With an institutionalized leadership succession system to ensure self-renewal and elite cohesion, this paper contends that PAP will continue to rule Singapore in the post-Lee era. 2 “All parties must institutionalize to a certain extent in order to survive” Angelo Panebianco (1988, 54) Introduction In the age of democracy, the resilience of Singapore’s hegemonic party regime1 is puzzling (Haas 1999). A small island with less than 4.6 million population, Singapore is the wealthiest non-oil producing country in the world that is not a democracy.2 Despite its affluence and ideal socio- economic prerequisites for democracy, the country has been under the rule of one party, the People’s Action Party (PAP) for the last five decades.
    [Show full text]
  • The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore
    Damien Cheong ____________________________________________________________ Selling Security: The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore DAMIEN CHEONG Abstract The Internal Security Act (ISA) of Singapore has been transformed from a se- curity law into an effective political instrument of the Singapore government. Although the government's use of the ISA for political purposes elicited negative reactions from the public, it was not prepared to abolish, or make amendments to the Act. In the wake of September 11 and the international campaign against terrorism, the opportunity to (re)legitimize the government's use of the ISA emerged. This paper argues that despite the ISA's seeming importance in the fight against terrorism, the absence of explicit definitions of national security threats, either in the Act itself, or in accompanying legislation, renders the ISA susceptible to political misuse. Keywords: Internal Security Act, War on Terrorism. People's Action Party, Jemaah Islamiyah. Introduction In 2001/2002, the Singapore government arrested and detained several Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) operatives under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for engaging in terrorist activities. It was alleged that the detained operatives were planning to attack local and foreign targets in Singa- pore. The arrests outraged human rights groups, as the operation was reminiscent of the government's crackdown on several alleged Marxist conspirators in1987. Human rights advocates were concerned that the current detainees would be dissuaded from seeking legal counsel and subjected to ill treatment during their period of incarceration (Tang 1989: 4-7; Frank et al. 1991: 5-99). Despite these protests, many Singaporeans expressed their strong support for the government's actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Camille Robcis the Biopolitics of Dignity
    South Atlantic Quarterly Camille Robcis The Biopolitics of Dignity “Let us not allow, within a free nation, monuments of slavery, even voluntary.” —Pierre Anastase Torné, French deputy, April 6, 1792 A few days after the shocking attacks on the ofces of Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, several French political leaders called for the revival of the “crime of national indignity” as a possible sanction against terrorists of French citizenship. As the prime minister Manuel Valls put it, such a measure—backed up, according to surveys, by 76 percent of the French population—would “mark with symbolic force the consequences of the absolute transgression that a terrorist act con- stitutes” (Clavel 2015). Under French law, national indignity did indeed have a particular history and signifcation, one that was not simply “symbolic” but in fact quite concrete. As the historian Anne Simonin (2008) shows, “national indignity” was invented in 1944 by the legal experts of the Resis- tance as an exceptional measure to punish, retro- actively, the supporters of the Vichy regime who had collaborated with the Nazi occupiers and pro- moted anti-Semitic legislation. Between 1945 and 1951, around one hundred thousand citizens were The South Atlantic Quarterly 115:2, April 2016 doi 10.1215/00382876-3488431 © 2016 Duke University Press Published by Duke University Press South Atlantic Quarterly 314 The South Atlantic Quarterly • April 2016 accused of indignity and punished by “national degradation.” In practical terms, this meant that they were stripped of their civic rights and their pos- sessions, banned from exercising certain public positions and professions (lawyers, bankers, teachers), and forbidden to live in particular regions of France.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY An Jingfu (1994) The Pain of a Half Taoist: Taoist Principles, Chinese Landscape Painting, and King of the Children . In Linda C. Ehrlich and David Desser (eds.). Cinematic Landscapes: Observations on the Visual Arts and Cinema of China and Japan . Austin: University of Texas Press, 117–25. Anderson, Marston (1990) The Limits of Realism: Chinese Fiction in the Revolutionary Period . Berkeley: University of California Press. Anon (1937) “Yueyu pian zhengming yundong” [“Jyutpin zingming wandung” or Cantonese fi lm rectifi cation movement]. Lingxing [ Ling Sing ] 7, no. 15 (June 27, 1937): no page. Appelo, Tim (2014) ‘Wong Kar Wai Says His 108-Minute “The Grandmaster” Is Not “A Watered-Down Version”’, The Hollywood Reporter (6 January), http:// www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/wong-kar-wai-says-his-668633 . Aristotle (1996) Poetics , trans. Malcolm Heath (London: Penguin Books). Arroyo, José (2000) Introduction by José Arroyo (ed.) Action/Spectacle: A Sight and Sound Reader (London: BFI Publishing), vii-xv. Astruc, Alexandre (2009) ‘The Birth of a New Avant-Garde: La Caméra-Stylo ’ in Peter Graham with Ginette Vincendeau (eds.) The French New Wave: Critical Landmarks (London: BFI and Palgrave Macmillan), 31–7. Bao, Weihong (2015) Fiery Cinema: The Emergence of an Affective Medium in China, 1915–1945 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press). Barthes, Roland (1968a) Elements of Semiology (trans. Annette Lavers and Colin Smith). New York: Hill and Wang. Barthes, Roland (1968b) Writing Degree Zero (trans. Annette Lavers and Colin Smith). New York: Hill and Wang. Barthes, Roland (1972) Mythologies (trans. Annette Lavers), New York: Hill and Wang. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 203 G.
    [Show full text]
  • 155KB***The Courts and the Enforcement of Human Rights
    (2020) 32 SAcLJ 458 THE COURTS AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS This article examines how the Malaysian courts have dealt with substantive human rights issues in the cases that have come before them, focusing particularly on the last ten years. It highlights cases where the courts demonstrated greater willingness to review executive action and parliamentary legislation and test them against constitutional provisions that protect fundamental liberties such as the right to life, and freedom of expression, association and assembly. It also looks at cases which have taken a less flexible approach on these issues. The article also touches on the issues of access to justice, locus standi and justiciability of cases involving human rights issues before the Malaysian courts. Ambiga SREENEVASAN1 LLB (Exeter); Barrister-at-law (non-practising) (Gray’s Inn); Advocate and Solicitor (High Court in Malaya). DING Jo-Ann LLB (Manchester), MSt in International Human Rights Law (Oxford); Barrister-at-law (non-practising) (Lincoln’s Inn). Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people …[2] 1 Former President of the Malaysian Bar (2007–2009), former chairperson and co-chairperson of the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih 2.0) (2010–2013), former president of the National Human Rights Society (Hakam) (2014–2018), Commissioner of the International Commission of Jurists.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM
    Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law.
    [Show full text]