2021 Manoomin Workshop Proceedings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2021 Manoomin Workshop Proceedings Lake Michigan-Huron Manoomin/Mnomen/Mnoomin/Manomae Workshop Gimaada’oonidimin manoomini-gikendaasowin (We share wild rice knowledge) January 26-28, 2021 Objectives/Outcomes: ● Share cultural considerations for restoration, impacts from hunting practices, ● Share and discuss genetics research ● Share work on manoomin ecosystem services ● Reinforce the cultural roles/significance of manoomin in restoration and monitoring work ● Report on final geographies for data collection ● Issues and Actions - geese predation, genetics, future support from NOAA, strengthening inter-tribal knowledge sharing Slidedecks here - ftp://ftp.coast.noaa.gov/pub/manoomin/workshop2021/presentations/ Note: FTP site does not work with the latest version of Google Chrome. Day 1 - Understanding Manoomin/Mnomen Welcome and Opening Ceremony - Heather Stirratt (NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management) and Lauren Dey (Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians) Heather Stirratt - Welcome and boozhoo! Thank you for joining us. We are particularly grateful for Lauren Dey’s leadership and support as this meeting’s co-host. Lauren Dey - Chi-miigwech. Recognizing virtual format is not ideal, but glad we have this option. Would like to share a video produced by her colleague Spencer to open the workshop with a prayer and welcome all to this week’s meeting to honor and learn about this important plant. Recorded welcome featuring Renee Dillard: https://youtu.be/fQqxjZx7KRk. Heather Stirratt - Thank you to Lauren, Spencer, and especially Renee for sharing this beautiful video. We are pleased to have this option to gather during challenging times when being together in person is not possible. We are joined by participants from the four states bordering the two target lake basins - people have joined from Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois. Thank you to the NOAA staff helping to pull off this virtual gathering. 1 Map of workshop attendees’ locations provided in their workshop registration. Why is NOAA leading this engagement? Started in Lake Superior with FY’17 GLRI funds to work with BIA; we started by listening. Want to make sure that people have access to wild rice and can experience it, that the ecological role of wild rice is understood and preserved, but especially that the cultural context and tribal community needs are expressed. Convening - three workshops helped identify and share restoration, monitoring, and research efforts and needs. Outreach and Education - We heard that there was a persistent need for outreach - for example, landowners not respecting wild rice on their property in exchange for an unencumbered view. What does wild rice look like? What should people do to respect it? Also, how can both tribal nations and others reconnect to wild rice traditions through wild rice camps? Cultural and Ecosystem Study - what are the ecological services that wild rice provides? How do tribal nations value wild rice? We’ll share the details of this study later today to see if there is an interest in exploring something similar in the Lake Michigan-Huron basin. GIS and Remote Sensing - finally, we sought input on needs for mapping of wild rice and were able to fill some of those data gaps. Something very exciting since our last workshop is the addition of Jen Ballinger to the NOAA OCM team; we are very grateful for her leadership and engagement with all of you in the preparation for this gathering. COVID has changed our ability to meet in person, and also the level of effort. This virtual meeting has taken about three times as many staff as previous in-person meetings. We cannot commit to another such workshop remotely at this time; if we can gather in person safely, we 2 can explore that option down the road. Are we recording this week? No. There may be some conversations that come up that some folks would not be comfortable sharing or having recorded. What we will commit to is sharing results of what we learn together this week, to the extent you are comfortable with your work being shared more broadly. Break question: How do folks feel about the lack of ice on the Great Lakes this season? Are there any other climate related concerns related to wild rice that you’re noticing/concerned about? Wyatt Szpliet: the pole shift may be causing some climate change in the great lakes Peter David: In my area, we have been in a bit of a winter drought, which I think is good, but warm temps are a concern; a good hard winter seems to correlate with better crops. Allison Smart - LRBOI: warm temps and lack of ice cover are a concern not just for manoomin, but other native species. Dani Fegan: The ice has finally started to fill in on the St. Marys River, with more single digit lows expected this week. Nobody has been fishing out near our house yet, though. Kaylene Ritter: I grew up in northern Ontario, on a small lake. It was unheard of ever seeing the lake to go through thaws during the winter, in the past 5 years, this has started to happen - never ever seen the ice melt in Jan/Feb before - very unusual Panel Presentation: State of Manoomin in Lake Michigan/Huron ● Peter David, GLIFWC (Moderator) ● Jennifer Kanine, Pokagon Band (Panel) ● Lauren Dey, LTBB (Panel) ● Allison Smart, LRBOI (Panel) We have three panelists here today to share with us some of their insights and expertise they’ve gained from working with manoomin across the Lake Michigan-Huron basin. Moderating today is Peter David, a Wildlife Biologist with the Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission. Lauren Dey is a Water Quality Biologist who works for the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians whose lands today are in the northern lower Peninsula of Michigan. Dr. Jennifer Kanine is the Director of Natural Resources for the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi. While the band is located near Dowagiac, Michigan, the tribe is working extensively throughout southwestern Michigan and even into the Indiana portion of the basin. Our final panelist is Allison Smart. Allison works for the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians as their Environmental Division Manager. Little River is also in Michigan’s lower peninsula, south of LTBB and north of Pokagon and near where both northern and southern wild rice grow. 3 I hope this sets the stage for us to jump in and get a holistic overview of manoomin in the basin. Let’s start with a little more about our panelists from our panelists with our first question: What are some of the challenges you’ve seen in wild rice restoration and monitoring work in the Lake Michigan-Huron basin? Jennifer - Many challenges, both human and wildlife. For humans, lack of awareness and education, leading to lack of respect for manoomin. They want to cut or treat manoomin for views, drive through beds with boats, causing damage with motors or damage from wakes, climate change (storm intensity & frequency and watershed flashiness can quickly change water level - can damage the plants, particularly at vulnerable life stages. Brown spot can also increase with climate change. Wildlife can have big impacts, especially waterfowl. Flowers can get stunted from overgrazing. Muskrats and beavers can impact manoomin stands as well. Carp prevent reseeding efforts; they just eat the rice. Aquatic Invasive Species- phragmites, outcompete manoomin, especially in stands where it’s monogenetic. There are also some native plants that can outcompete manoomin as well. Allison - Jennifer has captured almost 99% of the issues. Another challenge is determining which species to plant, being on the frontier of Z. aquatica (southern rice) and Z. palustris (northern rice). Challenge getting access to manoomin seed for restoration. There are challenges of where to store manoomin where homeowners perceive manoomin as weeds and don’t want to support the work. Lauren - LTBB only has a few stands that have sizable rice stands in their service area. They struggle to figure out what conditions are the best for rice to grow. Often have to travel to get to other stands. Have been doing work on figuring out the right water quality, sedimentation. Education is a big challenge. Not many know that there is wild rice in the area so they’ve been working on getting the word out on that. Followup, what about the geese population? It can be hard for some people to understand they have a negative impact even though they’re part of the ecosystem. All - Education is needed to reestablish ricing culture. Can you share an example of a successful wild rice project in your community? Allison - Has had some success. Talked about Arcadia Lake restoration project. As they worked on the channel, not targeting wild rice, but wild rice just popped up. Likely due to lowering the water levels . Monitoring program- have been monitoring for about 9 years this field season. Collecting a lot 4 of data on bed fluctuations, locations, being able to compare year to year which is useful for seasonal impacts like storms. Lauren: Not sure if they can label anything a success yet. LTBB is establishing a monitoring program but more focused on trying to find rice/where rice could grow. Want to hire a staff person to go out and check out various waterbodies. But really looking forward to getting their long-term data set started. Jennifer - Prior to 2015, restoration in Pokagon band was using seed from N. MN, but weren’t seeing a lot of growth. Did not appear to be enough genetic plasticity for it to grow in SW MI and NE IN. They then seeded with local manoomin for three years and established 3 acres of wild rice in tribal waterbodies, up from 0.25 acres cumulatively prior to that.
Recommended publications
  • DRAFT REPORT Pt. 2
    Cultural and ecological characterization at Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake Manoomin and its associated habitat at the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake were characterized over two time periods. This characterization begins after the Net River was impounded as a wetland mitigation bank in 1990. 1990 to 2013: Before Manoomin seeding Based on the combined ranking of cultural and ecological metrics, conditions at the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake were characterized as “not very good” during this period. This ranking reflects the absence of Manoomin from the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake before 2013. Although Manoomin was absent, these areas were culturally and ecological important. Community members used these sites for gathering, fishing, and hunting activities; during these activities, families passed down knowledge to their children or grandchildren about traditional practices and resources. Given the intrinsic cultural and ecological value of these places, some metrics – including spirit relationships, food sovereignty, knowledge generation and sharing, and water level and quality – ranked higher in cultural and ecological characterization. 2014 to 2019: After Manoomin seeding Once KBIC began seeding the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake, Manoomin grew at these places. Currently, Manoomin supports wildlife and other ecosystem functions. These places have the potential for Manoomin harvesting in the future, although they cannot yet support it. The presence of Manoomin significantly improved the ranking of most of the cultural and ecological metrics. During this period, conditions at the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake ranked as “pretty good” based on cultural and ecological metrics. Although Manoomin provides many cultural and ecological functionality, additional management of water levels at the Net River Impoundment could continue to improve the abundance of Manoomin and the long-term sustainability of healthy Manoomin beds.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan
    2020–2025 MICHIGAN Statewide Historic Preservation Plan Working together, we can use the next five years to redefine the role of historic preservation in the state to ensure it remains relevant to Michigan’s future. State Historic Preservation Office Prepared by 300 North Washington Square Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner, Lansing, Michigan 48913 Michigan State Historic Preservation Office, Martha MacFarlane-Faes, Lansing, Michigan Deputy State Historic August 2020 Preservation Officer Mark Burton, CEO, With assistance from Michigan Economic Peter Dams, Dams & Associates, Development Corporation Plainwell, Michigan Gretchen Whitmer, Governor, This report has been financed entirely State of Michigan with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20240 Cover photo: Thunder Bay Island Lighthouse, Alpena County. Photo: Bryan Lijewski Michigan State Historic Preservation Office 2 Preservation Plan 2020–2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • About This Effort Acknowledgments References
    References Barton, B.J. 2018. Manoomin: The Story of Wild Rice in Michigan. About this effort Michigan State University Press. This case study is part of the Lake Superior Manoomin Barton, B. and R. Labine. 2013. Manoomin: Native Wild Rice in Cultural and Ecosystem Characterization Study. The Michigan. Presented at 2014 Michigan Inland Lakes Convention. project was initiated by a team of Lake Superior Basin Available: https://www.canr.msu.edu/michiganlakes/uploads/files/ Anishinaabe communities, and federal and state Convention_Presentations_Saturday_May_3/Roger_LaBine_Native_ agencies, with technical support from Abt Associates. Wild_Rice_in_Michigan.pdf. This project aims to describe the importance of GLIFWC. 2019. Lac Vieux Desert Manoomin (Wild Rice) Report. Great Manoomin to help foster community stewardship and Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission. October. education; and to inform Manoomin management, protection, and policy in the Lake Superior region and Labine, R. 2017. Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) Lake Lac Vieux throughout the Great Lakes. For additional information Desert. Presented at 2017 Michigan Wetlands Association Conference. about this effort and results from the other case studies, Available: https://miwetlands.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Wild- please see the full report at [insert URL]. Rice-Restoration-Case-Study.pdf. Onterra. 2012. Lac Vieux Desert Lake Comprehensive Management Acknowledgments Plan. Sponsored by Lac Vieux Desert Lake Association WDNR Grant Program. October. Onterra, LLC. Available: https://dnr.wi.gov/lakes/ The Project Team would like to acknowledge Roger grants/Project.aspx?project=29304967. Labine (LVD) and Peter David (GLIFWC) for their valuable input and feedback in the development of this case study, and for participating in the cultural and ecological characterization of Lac Vieux Desert’s Rice Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Statewide Preservation Plan 2020-2025
    Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan 2020-2025 [COVER PHOTO] 1 State Historic Preservation Office Michigan Economic Development Corporation 300 N. Washington Square Lansing, Michigan 48913 Brian D. Conway, State Historic Preservation Officer Jeff Mason, CEO, Michigan Economic Development Corporation Gretchen Whitmer, Governor, State of Michigan Prepared by Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner Michigan State Historic Preservation Office Lansing, Michigan December 2019 With assistance from Peter Dams, Dams & Associates This report has been financed entirely with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20240 2 Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………… Vision………………………………………………………………………… Goal Summary Page…………………………………………………………. Working Together – Stories of Success 2014-2019 …………………………… A Look to the Future: Challenges and Opportunities……………………….…. Goals and Objectives……………………………………………………………. Goal 1: Targeted Preservation Education……………………………………... Goal2: Expand Preservation Funding Opportunities………………………… Goal 3: Increase Diversity in Historic Preservation…………………………. Goal 4: Build Stronger Partnerships………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Manoomin (Wild Rice) Seeding Guidelines
    MANOOMIN Version 1.0 December 2019 Peter David Lisa David Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark Ph.D. Kekek Jason Stark Esq. Sean Niso-Asin Fahrlander Jason Manidoonoodin Schlender DEDICATION This document is dedicated to the elders, ricers, and especially the off-reservation rice chiefs who have shared their manoomin knowledge and insights with the authors over the years. The generous sharing from these knowledge holders provided the foundation and the framework for everything that follows. Additionally, these knowledge holders have unfailingly recognized the contributions of those who came before them by sharing their knowledge and stories of manoomin as well. It is therefore impossible to recognize all the individuals who contributed to this document in meaningful ways, but we recognize those who made extraordinary contributions, namely: Joe Chosa Lac du Flambeau Roger McGeshick Sr. Sokaogon Chippewa Dewey Isham Lac Courte Oreilles James Peterson Lac du Flambeau Roger LaBine Lac Vieux Desert Brian Poupart Lac du Flambeau Susie Matrious St. Croix Conrad St. John St. Croix Archie McGeshick Lac Vieux Desert William Wildcat Lac du Flambeau Peter McGeshick Jr. Sokaogon Chippewa A sincere Chi Miigwech for sharing your spirit, knowledge, dedication to and love of manoomin, and we ask your forgiveness for our failures to adequately capture your wisdom. The Authors ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS EXTERNAL REVIEWERS: Chi Miigwech for sharing your expertise and for your deep commitment to manoomin. Our appreciation is extended to Annette Drewes Ph.D., Dr. Jim Meeker and Ray Norgaard. INTERNAL REVIEWERS: Miigwech for your efforts to help shape and organize the final document. Thank you to Jonathan Gilbert Ph.D., Miles Falck, Ann McCammon-Soltis, Melonee Montano, Philomena Kebec, Emily Nelis and Candace Kraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan 2020-2025
    DRAFT MI STATEWIDE PRESERVATION PLAN 2020-2025 Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan 2020-2025 1 DRAFT MI STATEWIDE PRESERVATION PLAN 2020-2025 State Historic Preservation Office Michigan Economic Development Corporation 300 N. Washington Square Lansing, Michigan 48913 Brian D. Conway, State Historic Preservation Officer Jeff Mason, CEO, Michigan Economic Development Corporation Gretchen Whitmer, Governor, State of Michigan Prepared by Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner Michigan State Historic Preservation Office Lansing, Michigan December 2019 ** NEED CURRENT DISCLAIMER This report has been financed entirely with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20240 2 DRAFT MI STATEWIDE PRESERVATION PLAN 2020-2025 Table of
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Birmingham Historic District Commission Meeting
    AGENDA BIRMINGHAM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEETING MUNICIPAL BUILDING-COMMISSION ROOM-151 MARTIN STREET WEDNESDAY – February 5th, 2020 *********** 7:00 PM*********** 1) Roll Call 2) Approval of the HDC Minutes of January 15th, 2019 3) Courtesy Review 4) Historic Design Review 5) Sign Review 6) Study Session 7) Miscellaneous Business and Communication A. Pre-Application Discussions B. Staff Reports 1. Administrative Sign Approvals 2. Administrative Approvals 3. Draft Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan 2020-2025 4. January Demolitions 8) Adjournment Notice: Individuals requiring accommodations, such as interpreter services for effective participation in this meeting should contact the City Clerk's Office at (248) 530-1880 at least on day in advance of the public meeting. Las personas que requieren alojamiento, tales como servicios de interpretación, la participación efectiva en esta reunión deben ponerse en contacto con la Oficina del Secretario Municipal al (248) 530- 1880 por lo menos el día antes de la reunión pública. (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). A PERSON DESIGNATED WITH THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 2020 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the Historic District Commission (“HDC”) held Wednesday, January 15, 2020. Chairman John Henke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1) ROLLCALL Present: Chairman John Henke; Vice-Chairman Keith Deyer; Board Members, Gigi Debbrecht, Natalia Dukas, Patricia Lang (arrived 7:15 p.m.); Student Representative Klea Ahmet Absent: Board Members Doug Burley, Michael Willoughby; Alternate Member Kevin Filthaut Administration: Nicholas Dupuis, City Planner Laura Eichenhorn, Transcriptionist 01-01-20 2) Approval Of Minutes Motion by Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Lac Vieux Desert
    Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) Lake Lac Vieux Desert Roger LaBine Water Resource Technician Environmental and Planning Department Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Band of Chippewa Lake Lac Vieux Desert Lake Lac Vieux Desert U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) The National Register of Historic Places Traditional Cultural Properties (TCP) While it does not place any restrictions on ownership or use, Section 106 of NHPA does offer some protection from adverse impacts of activities that are licensed or funded by the federal government Rice Bay is significant under National register Criterion A Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (LVD) The LVD community has gathered rice from the lake since the mid to late eighteenth century, if not earlier The establishment of the village had a pattern of gradual intensification, intermittent or occasional use in the early 18th century, followed by seasonal habitation, and finally continuous habitation by 1900 Was federally recognized on September 8, 1988, and broke away from Keweenaw Bay Indian Community as designated in the 1854 LaPointe Treaty. History of the Rice Bay Manoomin Bed In the mid 18th century, bands moved inland from Madaline Island Lake Lac Vieux Desert was discovered and was the cross- roads or four corners for travel throughout the area In 1870, the first controlled structure was placed by a logging company on Lake Lac Vieux Desert with minimal impact Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company (WVIC) 1937, WVIC installed the current concrete and steel dam under a 50 year FERC permit This dam initiated the disappearance of wild rice on Lake Lac Vieux Desert In 1984, the Lac Vieux Desert Tribe, attempted to open discussions with WVIC Litigation In 1988, WVIC received a new permit with restrictions up to 2026 WVIC appealed the restrictions until 2002 In 2002, WVIC lowered the lake levels to that of 1937, and a ten year test period was initiated.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 103/Friday, May 29, 2015/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Notices 30723 Estimated Estimated completion Estimated total Activity annual number time per annual burden of responses response hours USPP Form (TBD) ‘‘Physician Consent Form’’ ............................................................................. 2,500 10 min ......... 417 USPP Form (TBD) ‘‘Physical Efficiency Battery ‘‘Waiver’’’’ ........................................................... 2,500 5 .................. 208 USPP Form (TBD) ‘‘Release to Obtain a Credit Report’’ .............................................................. 2,500 5 .................. 208 USPP Form (TBD) ‘‘Applicant Documentation Form’’ ................................................................... 2,500 5 .................. 208 USPP Form 1 ‘‘United States Park Police Personal History Statement’’ ...................................... 2,500 8 hours ........ 20,000 USPP Form (TBD) Personal Essay—‘‘Why I Want to Be a United States Park Police Officer’’ .. 2,500 30 min ......... 1,250 USPP Form (TBD) ‘‘Disqualification for Misdemeanor Convictions for Domestic Violence’’ ........ 2,500 5 min ........... 208 TOTALS .................................................................................................................................. 17,500 ................ 22,499 Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR IOWA Cost: $227,500, primarily for costs (1) Washington County associated with printing and notarizing National Park Service the application and (2) incurred to
    [Show full text]
  • [Nps-Waso-Nrnhl-18266]; [Ppwocradi0, Pcu00rp14.R50000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/29/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-12994, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NRNHL-18266]; [PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending Nominations and Related Actions Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before May 2, 2015. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being accepted concerning the significance of the nominated properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation. Comments may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW, MS 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye St. NW, 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by [INSERT DATE 15 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment – including your personal identifying information – may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 1 information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: May 6, 2015 J. Paul Loether, Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ National Historic Landmarks Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Preservation Program
    NationalNational Park Park Service Service U.S.U.S. Department Department of of the the Interior Interior Tribal Preservation Program Expanding Partnerships in a Second Century of Stewardship CulturalCultural Resources Resources, Stewardship, Partnerships, Partnerships, and Science and Science The National Park Service (NPS) preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this, and future generations. The Park Service collaborates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation TRIBAL PRESERVATION PROGRAM and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. NPS is a part of the national network of preservation partners who are committed to preserving the nation’s 2016 cultural heritage. We are specifically honored to work with our tribal partners to preserve the unique cul- tures within their communities. The Tribal Preservation Program supports the mission of the NPS by part- ANNUAL REPORT nering with tribes to preserve and protect our shared national cultural heritage. The Tribal Historic Preservation Program is dedicated to working with Indian tribes, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiian organizations. The mission is to preserve and protect resources and traditions of importance to Native Americans. The Tribal Program is engaged in strengthening capabilities for operating sustainable tribal preservation programs. The tribal line item of the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, supports two grant programs: Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) grants and Tribal Heritage Fund grants. These two grant programs provide much needed assistance to Native American communities interested in protecting their cultural heritage. The National Park Service’s preservation programs continue to expand and evolve to maintain relevancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Land and Resource
    United States Department of Chequamegon-Nicolet Agriculture Forest National Forest Land and Service January 2012 Resource Management Plan Monitoring and Midterm Evaluation Report: 2009 - 2010 For More Information Contact: Forest Monitoring Coordinator 500 Hanson Lake Road Rhinelander, WI 54501 715-362-1300 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ApPROVAL AND DECLARA nON OF INTENT I have reviewed the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forests Monitoring and Mid-term Evaluation Report: 2009-2010 which was prepared by an interdisciplinary team during 2011. I am satisfied with its findings and intend to consider recommendations made therein to maintain the Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). This monitoring and mid­ term evaluation report meets the intent of the Land and Resource Management Plan as well as the regulations contained in 36 CFR 219.
    [Show full text]