DOCSLIB.ORG

Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Land and Resource

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Land and Resource United States Department of Chequamegon-Nicolet Agriculture Forest National Forest Land and Service January 2012 Resource Management Plan Monitoring and Midterm Evaluation Report: 2009 - 2010 For More Information Contact: Forest Monitoring Coordinator 500 Hanson Lake Road Rhinelander, WI 54501 715-362-1300 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ApPROVAL AND DECLARA nON OF INTENT I have reviewed the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forests Monitoring and Mid-term Evaluation Report: 2009-2010 which was prepared by an interdisciplinary team during 2011. I am satisfied with its findings and intend to consider recommendations made therein to maintain the Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). This monitoring and mid­ term evaluation report meets the intent of the Land and Resource Management Plan as well as the regulations contained in 36 CFR 219. This report is approved by: PAUL l.V. STRONG Date Forest Supervisor Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest FOREWORD Hi. I’m Paul Strong, Forest Supervisor of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest. I’d like to introduce you to our midterm report on the 2004 Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest (CNNF) Land and Resource Management Plan (also called the ―Forest Plan‖). In the late 1990s, I was part of the Forest Plan revision team. My career took me away from the CNNF before the revision was completed. Now I’m back, but in a different role at a time when we are reflecting on and assessing what has transpired during the first half of the plan’s lifespan, as well as looking forward to what may lie ahead during the second half. The Forest Plan we created in 2004 was based on predictions of the future that anticipated a dynamic environment and change, but did not and could not anticipate how change would be manifested. In looking back over the first half of the plan’s lifespan, I am impressed by the rapidity and magnitude of change that has occurred. During Forest Plan revision, northern Wisconsin was a few years into what turned out to be a prolonged drought that ended in the summer of 2010. Lake and stream levels, soil moisture, and groundwater changes affected tree growth and vigor, and fish and wildlife habitat. From the 1990s to the present, episodic weather events occurred including some of the heaviest rainfall in recent decades, severe windstorms, cold temperatures that lasted well into traditional spring months in some years, and exceptionally early warm and dry springs in others. Against this backdrop of weather variability, unpredictable changes in our administrative environment affected how we manage the CNNF. The mission of the Forest Service is still the same, but changes in policies and regulations at levels beyond the Chequamegon- Nicolet National Forest affect how we plan and carry out our work. The Travel Management Rule of 2005 steered us to evaluate and make decisions about motorized access at a pace faster than we anticipated during Forest Plan revision. In the future, we can expect to further address roads and trails under another part of the Travel Management Rule, which focuses on establishing the minimum road system needed for management of the National Forest. Other recent national Forest Service initiatives are focused on adapting to climate change and on improving watershed conditions; these initiatives have already shifted the way we prioritize, plan, implement, and report results of land management activities. An ―all lands conservation‖ approach nudges us toward broader and more inclusive efforts across ownership and administrative boundaries, as we seek greater and more meaningful outcomes from natural resources management projects we accomplish with federal, tribal, state, and county land management partners. Year 2009/2010 Monitoring and Midterm Evaluation Report i Foreword Nationally, the changing economic conditions have had far-reaching effects on communities and businesses, many of which revolve around use and enjoyment of natural resources and undeveloped land. As with the rest of the country, the social and economic fabric of the Northwoods has experienced change and variability beyond predictions. From my perspective, it appears that land and natural resources management agencies like the Forest Service are likely to operate in environments of greater variability and change than we are experiencing today. Management approaches and paradigms we have built on assumptions of stability and predictable change will have to be modified to address pressing resource management issues. Episodic events of weather, insect and disease outbreaks, rapid expansion of invasive species, and changing socioeconomic conditions will likely be the norm instead of the exception. What we predict for future conditions and effects of management in long-range planning documents will need to be regarded less as guarantees and more as our best read of a multi-factored environment. The report that follows provides substantial detail on the statutory requirements of National Forest management as well as the numerous objectives described in the current Forest Plan. Depending on your interests, some sections may be more valuable to you than others. Hopefully, you find enough information to satisfy your interest in how your National Forest is being managed. As I look back at what has been accomplished on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest and look forward to future opportunities and challenges, I feel fortunate to be surrounded by dedicated Forest Service employees and the many organizations with which we partner. I hope you find this midterm report informative, valuable, and something that helps inspire future conversations about National Forest management. Thank you for your continued interest in and support of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest. Paul I.V. Strong Forest Supervisor Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest ii Year 2009/2010 Monitoring and Midterm Evaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The National Forest Management Act requires periodic monitoring and evaluation of Forest Plan implementation to determine compliance with identified standards and guidelines. The Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest’s monitoring and evaluation protocols were established to evaluate appropriate and sustainable management of Forest resources and subsequent impacts on communities. There are eleven Forest Plan-required monitoring and evaluation items with varying frequency requirements. Ninety-seven monitoring questions aligned to Forest Plan objectives have been identified. Highlights from the monitoring and evaluation activities since 2004 include: Goal 1 – Ensure Healthy and Sustainable Ecosystems • Lands are being adequately restocked following timber management activities. • Spruce budworm, gypsy moth, leaf minor, leaf roller, and oak wilt continue to impact forest health. The CNNF is responsive to these insect and disease issues. • Endangered, threatened, and sensitive species are being managed in accordance with federal and state law and comply with existing conservation and recovery plans. • Northern goshawk numbers are stable and well distributed across suitable habitat. • Brook trout populations are responsive to stream water temperature. In- stream habitat restoration projects have been effective. • The regenerating aspen community type is declining in representation (acres) across the forest. • Mature northern hardwoods and red and white pine forest community types are increasing in representation (acres) across the forest. • The Forest is moving toward desired future conditions of vegetation composition structure and age class. • Water, air, and soil quality standards have been met or exceeded. • Treatments of non-native invasive species sites have been effective where implemented. Goal 2 – Provide Multiple Benefits for People within the Capability of Sustainable Ecosystems • A sample of National Forest acreage identified as suitable for timber production in the forest Plan was reevaluated; over 90% of those lands were judged to be suitable. Year 2009/2010 Monitoring and Midterm Evaluation Report iii Summary • An intensive-use ATV area in Bayfield County has been closed and rehabilitation is in progress. • Active vegetation management and natural events are changing forest composition and age class structure. • Twenty Research Natural Areas have been added to the existing eleven. • Non-motorized recreation opportunities in SPNMs are improving. • Additional miles of ATV routes and trails have been created. • Collection levels of special forest products appear to be sustainable. Goal 3 – Ensure Effective Public Service through Organizational Effectiveness • Approximately three million dollars are paid
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Superior Coastal Plain Regional Master Plan
    Superior Coastal Plain Regional Master Plan February 2019 PUB-LF-112 (2018) Superior Coastal Plain Regional Master Plan Approved by the Natural Resources Board February 27, 2019 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Preston D. Cole – Secretary Natural Resources Board Dr. Frederick Prehn, Chair Greg Kazmierski, Vice Chair Julie Anderson, Secretary William Bruins Terry N. Hilgenberg Gary Zimmer Fred Clark 101 S. Webster St, P.O. Box 7921 Madison, WI 53707-7921 DNR PUB–LF–112 i The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs and services and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. This publication is available in alternative formats (large print, Braille, audio tape, etc.) upon request. Please contact the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Facilities and Lands at 608-266-2135 for more information. This publication is available online at http://dnr.wi.gov, keyword search “Property Planning.” Click on the Superior Coastal Plain region to download this document in PDF form. Cover Photo by Kevin Feind, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ii REGIONAL MASTER PLAN TEAM MEMBERS CORE TEAM Pat Beringer Wildlife Management Supervisor Cameron Bump Northwest Recreation Liaison Nancy Christel Wildlife Biologist Robert Hanson Wildlife Biologist Steve Hoffman Wildlife Management Supervisor Dave Kafura Forest Hydrologist Nolan Kriegel Forester Ryan Magana
    [Show full text]
  • 48 Hours in La Crosse This Mississippi River City Is a Must-Stop 100 Years of Gridiron Glory the PACK CELEBRATES THEIR CENTENNIAL
    experience WISCONSIN Fall/Winter 2018-19 48 Hours in La Crosse This Mississippi River City is a Must-Stop 100 Years of Gridiron Glory THE PACK CELEBRATES THEIR CENTENNIAL Whitewater’s Farm Boy to Rising-Star Chef COME GET YOUR WE’RE YOUR FOR THAT PERFECT Bet DAY TRIP OVERB 1,200est SLOT MACHINES | 100% SMOKE-FREE | DINING | BAR BEEN WANTING TO TAKE A DAY TRIP? 51 39 Visit Madison’s Casino and have a little fun! We have the most 90 generous slot machines in the region with an average payout of 95%. Play any of our 1,200 themed slot machines while enjoying 12 your favorite adult beverage on our Smoke-Free gaming floor. 4002 EVAN ACRES RD., MADISON, WI 53718 | 608.223.9576 MADISON ho-chunkgaming.com/madison HCGM-FG.indd 1 8/7/18 4:16 PM US This Fall JOIN eat Events! for Gr ONEIDA BIG APPLE FEST September 22 Oneida Apple Orchard & Cultural Heritage Center GREAT NORTHEAST SCENERY WISCONSIN CRAFT BEER FESTIVAL October 6 GREAT Shopko Hall FOOD CIRQUE DU SOLEIL CRYSTAL October 11-14 Resch Center ZOO BOO October 12-13, 19-20, 26-27 NEW Zoo & Adventure Park GREAT PUMPKIN TRAIN GREAT October 13 & 20 National Railroad Museum TEAM For a complete listing of Green Bay events, visit GreenBay.com. Call for Your FREE Guide to Green Bay 888-867-3342 GREAT FUN fall/winter 2018-19 | experiencewisconsinmag.com | 3 Wisconsin’s Best Shopping SHOP • DINE • EXPLORE • EXPERIENCE Start planning your getaway today at FoxCities.org YOU ARE HERE BRINGING Lake Superior YOU HOME for over 70 years LUXURY PORTFOLIO LUXURY PORTFOLIO JEWEL OF KENOSHA COUNTY EXQUISITE ON 11+ ACRES Bayfield Apostle Superior Islands BRULE Washburn RIVER STATE Ashland Lake Brule Nebagamon FOREST 2 13 Montreal Hurley Solon Springs CHEQUAMEGON Gile Flowage St.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Country Trail in the with Mineral Soil
    ing a small fire. All fires should be put completely out by thor- oughly soaking the embers with water and then mixing them The North Country Trail Association is The North Country Trail in the with mineral soil. In dry conditions we suggest that you use a membership-driven, volunteer-based organization. The camp stoves rather than wood fires. In extremely dry condi- NCTA is a “friends” organization that unites the efforts of our Chequamegon-Nicolet tions open fires may be prohibited. To check on fire conditions local volunteer chapters and partner organizations with the contact the US Forest Service in that district. National Park Service to build, maintain, protect and promote the North Country National Scenic Trail. The trail is a 4,600 National Forest mile footpath through the northern tier of the United States, Parking - There is no charge for The North Country National Scenic Trail is traversing seven states. Though still under construction, more most parking areas shown on primarily a hiking trail. Horse use on the trail and more miles of trail are completed every year, the trail is the map, however, several of the is discouraged. Soils on the east end of the starting to draw national attention, alongside the likes of the more developed parking areas trail tend to be fairly wet and are not particu- Appalachian and Pacific Crest Trails. are fee areas. The following larly suitable for riding. areas require either a daily fee Mountain bikes are also discouraged and may not be ridden Our work uses federal or an annual sticker: Penokee where the trail crosses wilderness areas.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT REPORT Pt. 2
    Cultural and ecological characterization at Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake Manoomin and its associated habitat at the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake were characterized over two time periods. This characterization begins after the Net River was impounded as a wetland mitigation bank in 1990. 1990 to 2013: Before Manoomin seeding Based on the combined ranking of cultural and ecological metrics, conditions at the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake were characterized as “not very good” during this period. This ranking reflects the absence of Manoomin from the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake before 2013. Although Manoomin was absent, these areas were culturally and ecological important. Community members used these sites for gathering, fishing, and hunting activities; during these activities, families passed down knowledge to their children or grandchildren about traditional practices and resources. Given the intrinsic cultural and ecological value of these places, some metrics – including spirit relationships, food sovereignty, knowledge generation and sharing, and water level and quality – ranked higher in cultural and ecological characterization. 2014 to 2019: After Manoomin seeding Once KBIC began seeding the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake, Manoomin grew at these places. Currently, Manoomin supports wildlife and other ecosystem functions. These places have the potential for Manoomin harvesting in the future, although they cannot yet support it. The presence of Manoomin significantly improved the ranking of most of the cultural and ecological metrics. During this period, conditions at the Net River Impoundment and Vermillac Lake ranked as “pretty good” based on cultural and ecological metrics. Although Manoomin provides many cultural and ecological functionality, additional management of water levels at the Net River Impoundment could continue to improve the abundance of Manoomin and the long-term sustainability of healthy Manoomin beds.
    [Show full text]
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide Wisconsin State Highway #13
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Wisconsin State Highway #13 Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 State Highway 13 Start point of State Highway 13 in The Village of Lake Delton, WI. on the South of the highway. North of the highway is Hulbert Creek Woods State Natural Area and Rocky Arbor State Park to the East. Altitude: 830 feet 1.0 Kilbourn Dam Bridge, WI. Bridge over Kilbourn Dam in Wisconsin near Wisconsin Dells. Altitude: 830 feet 1.3 Wisconsin Dells, WI. Wisconsin Dells, WI - Beaver Springs Fishing Park (1-608-254-2735), Cave of the Mounds - Blue Mounds,Christmas Mountain Golf & Ski Resort (1-608-254-3971),Dells Army Ducks (1-608-254-6080),Ghost Out-Post Haunted House,Jeremy Allen's Grand Illusions at Chula Vista Resort,Noah's Ark Waterpark,Old Abe's Old Time Portraits,The Princess Kay Paddlewheel Riverboat,WildThing Jet Boats. Altitude: 902 feet 3.0 Blackhawk Island State Blackhawk Island State Natural Area, WI.-enjoy Natural Area, WI. hiking,fishing,hunting,trapping and skiing. Altitude: 902 feet 13.4 Junction State Highway 82 East of State Highway 82 is Lemonweir Bottomland Hardwood Forest State Natural Area and west of the highway is Oxford,WI. Limited service. Altitude: 869 feet 24.1 Junction Co. Rd. F, WI. East on Country Rd. F is Castle Rock Lake and Backhorn Barrens State Natural Area-hiking,fishing,trapping,hunting and skiing during the winter months. Altitude: 971 feet 26.3 Adams,WI. Community of Adams, WI. Limited service. Altitude: 965 feet 27.3 Friendship, WI. Community of Friendship, WI.
    [Show full text]
  • High Cliff State Park Sherwood, Wisconsin
    APRIL2009 VOLUME 36 NUMBER 4 NorthernDeer Herd GetHooked HealthyFollowing on the 2009 Intensive Te sting Project Wisconsin NTIGO,Wis.–Northern Wisconsin’sdeer herd has Fishing Report been given aclean bill of health. After testingmore Athan8,700 tissue samples from deer in 18 northern ADISON –Anglers look- Wisconsin counties,biologists found no signsofChronic ingfor places to fish, tips WastingDisease (CWD)orTuberculosis (TB). Mto hook their favorite The DepartmentofNatural Resourcesexceeded its goal to catch,orthe latestfishing reports for have 8,000 samples from acrossthe north thanks to coopera- the upcomingseasoncan catchthe tion from hunters,said Mike Zeckmeister,DNR Northern latestinformation in the2009 Region wildlifesupervisor. WisconsinFishing Report. TheDNR conducts periodic heath checks as adefense The 2009WisconsinFishing against seriousdiseaserisks.Being proactive is always better Report is nowavailable online. than being reactive whenitcomes to wildlife disease manage- ment, Zeckmeister explained. He added that havingaclean Thisfree,annual 16-pagenewspa- bill of health provides more justification to do everythingpos- per is an angler’s sible to keep the deer herd in northern Wisconsin freeofthese guide to the2009 seriousdiseases. fishing year, with “Unfortunately,” he said,“we arestill takingrisks withthe fishing forecasts health of our deer herdbyfeeding and baiting deer in that DepartmentofNatural Resources fish Wisconsin.” biologists provide for many popularwaters Wildlifeofficials saythe risk of spreadinginfections increas- statewide. es especiallywhere deer areartificially concentrated. Anglerslookingtotarget someof Infectious CWD prions and TB bacteria have been isolated Wisconsin’swell knownfish can dive into from deer saliva. Baitingand feeding sites foster conditions for “Hook Your FavoriteCatch” for tips on disease transfer throughincreaseddeer to deer contactand adjustingyoursights,techniquesand bait increased group sizeatfeeding sites.TBspreads from captive or domestic animals to wild deer and vice-versa.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan
    2020–2025 MICHIGAN Statewide Historic Preservation Plan Working together, we can use the next five years to redefine the role of historic preservation in the state to ensure it remains relevant to Michigan’s future. State Historic Preservation Office Prepared by 300 North Washington Square Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner, Lansing, Michigan 48913 Michigan State Historic Preservation Office, Martha MacFarlane-Faes, Lansing, Michigan Deputy State Historic August 2020 Preservation Officer Mark Burton, CEO, With assistance from Michigan Economic Peter Dams, Dams & Associates, Development Corporation Plainwell, Michigan Gretchen Whitmer, Governor, This report has been financed entirely State of Michigan with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20240 Cover photo: Thunder Bay Island Lighthouse, Alpena County. Photo: Bryan Lijewski Michigan State Historic Preservation Office 2 Preservation Plan 2020–2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MISCELLANEOUS (Ss, 23.09, 23.11, 27.01
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 373 NR 45 Chapter NR 45 STATE PARKS AND STATE FORESTS ( MISCELLANEOUS NR 46.01 State property (p. 373) NR 46.13 Camping (p. 384) NR 45.02 Property of others (p. 374) NR 45.14 Firearms (p, 389) NR 45.03 Refuse (p, 374) NR 45.16 Personal conduct- (p, 391) NR 45.05 Pets (p. 375) NR 45,16 Fees and charges (p. 39l) NR 45.06 Fires (p, 375) NR 45.17 . Admission fees (p. 396) NR 45.07 Peddling andsol !citing (p. 376) NR 46.18 Closing hours (p. 399) NR 45.08 Vehicular traffic (p. 376) NR 45.185 Closing (p, 400) NR 45.09 Boats (p, 377) NR 45.19 Beaches (p. 400) NR 45.10 Horses (p. 383) NR 45.20 Exceptions (p. 400) NR 45.11 Noise (p. 383) NR 46.21 Elevated devices (p. 400) NR 46.12 Parking (p. 383) NR 45.23 State scientific areas (p. 400) NR 45.126 Abandoned vehicles (p. 384) History. Chapter WCD 46 as it existed on June 30, 1964 was repealed and a new chapter WCD 46 was created effective July 1, 1964. (ss, 23.09, 23.11, 27.01 and 28.02, Stats.) NR 45.01 State property. (1) Except when the context provides otherwise the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all lands, struc- tures and property owned, under easement, leased or administered by the state of Wisconsin and under the management, supervision and con- trol of the department of natural resources. (2) It shall be unlawful for any person to destroy, molest, deface, re- move or attempt to remove any natural growth or natural or archaeologi- cal feature, or any state property; to enter or be in any building, installa- tion or area that may be locked or closed to public use or contrary to posted notice without a written permit from the property superintend- ent.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • About This Effort Acknowledgments References
    References Barton, B.J. 2018. Manoomin: The Story of Wild Rice in Michigan. About this effort Michigan State University Press. This case study is part of the Lake Superior Manoomin Barton, B. and R. Labine. 2013. Manoomin: Native Wild Rice in Cultural and Ecosystem Characterization Study. The Michigan. Presented at 2014 Michigan Inland Lakes Convention. project was initiated by a team of Lake Superior Basin Available: https://www.canr.msu.edu/michiganlakes/uploads/files/ Anishinaabe communities, and federal and state Convention_Presentations_Saturday_May_3/Roger_LaBine_Native_ agencies, with technical support from Abt Associates. Wild_Rice_in_Michigan.pdf. This project aims to describe the importance of GLIFWC. 2019. Lac Vieux Desert Manoomin (Wild Rice) Report. Great Manoomin to help foster community stewardship and Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission. October. education; and to inform Manoomin management, protection, and policy in the Lake Superior region and Labine, R. 2017. Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) Lake Lac Vieux throughout the Great Lakes. For additional information Desert. Presented at 2017 Michigan Wetlands Association Conference. about this effort and results from the other case studies, Available: https://miwetlands.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Wild- please see the full report at [insert URL]. Rice-Restoration-Case-Study.pdf. Onterra. 2012. Lac Vieux Desert Lake Comprehensive Management Acknowledgments Plan. Sponsored by Lac Vieux Desert Lake Association WDNR Grant Program. October. Onterra, LLC. Available: https://dnr.wi.gov/lakes/ The Project Team would like to acknowledge Roger grants/Project.aspx?project=29304967. Labine (LVD) and Peter David (GLIFWC) for their valuable input and feedback in the development of this case study, and for participating in the cultural and ecological characterization of Lac Vieux Desert’s Rice Bay.
    [Show full text]