[ 1965 ] Part 1 Sec 1 Chapter 14 Questions Relating to the Middle East

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[ 1965 ] Part 1 Sec 1 Chapter 14 Questions Relating to the Middle East QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE MIDDLE EAST 215 S/6285, S/6287. Letters of 12 and 19 April 1965 S/6728. Letter of 29 September 1965 from Turkey. from Turkey. S/6732, S/6734. Letters of 1 October 1965 from S/6288. Letter of 7 April 1965 from Greece. Greece. S/6289, S/6351. Letters of 20 April and 12 May S/6758. Letter of 7 October 1965 from Turkey. 1965 from Turkey. S/6783, S/6787. Letters of 13 and 12 October 1965 S/6362, S/6385, S/6403, S/6405, S/6410, S/6425, from Greece. S/6441, S/6470, S/6506. Letters of 15 and 27 S/6809. Letter of 18 October 1965 from Turkey. May, 1, 2, 8, 12 and 21 June, and 6 July 1965 from S/6820, S/6830. Letters of 18 and 25 October 1965 Greece. from Greece. S/6526, S/6527 and Corr.1. Letters of 14 July 1965 S/6831, S/6837. Letters of 25 and 27 October 1965 from Turkey. from Turkey. S/6538. Letter of 15 July 1965 from Greece. S/6853, S/6872. Letters of 30 October and 4 No- S/6550, S/6551. Letters of 22 July 1965 from vember 1965 from Greece. Turkey. S/6914, S/7065. Letters of 11 November 1965 and S/6618, S/6619, S/6623, S/6679, S/6684, S/6718, 3 January 1966 from Turkey. S/6721, S/6723, S/6729. Letters of 16 and 19 A/6002. Report of Security Council to General As- August, 11, 14, 24, 25, 27 and 29 September 1965 sembly, Chapter 4 C. from Greece. CHAPTER XIV QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE MIDDLE EAST THE PALESTINE QUESTION No aspects of the Palestine question were In connexion with the Israel complaint of brought before the Security Council for its con- 1 March, Jordan stated on 8 March that in- sideration during 1965. However, the parties to vestigations carried out by United Nations ob- the General Armistice Agreements informed the servers had produced no evidence that there Council from time to time of incidents which had been any infiltrators entering Israel from they considered to be important violations of Jordan territory. the Armistice Agreements. On 1 March, Jordan maintained that prepa- rations by Israel authorities to review a mili- COMMUNICATIONS FROM tary parade in the city of Jerusalem and to ISRAEL AND JORDAN show their military equipment and heavy arms On 26 January 1965, in a letter to the Sec- was in violation of the Armistice Agreement retary-General, Jordan said that Israel authori- and of the Security Council resolution of 11 ties had committed provocative military acts April 1961.1 in the Mount Scopus area in Jerusalem. In view In a further communication dated 15 March, of the dangerous and explosive situation aris- Jordan said that an Israel "Independence Day" ing from the Israel violations, Jordan requested military parade in Jerusalem would be con- that immediate inspection of Israel positions in trary to the verbal assurance which Jordan the area should be carried out through a special had received from Ralph J. Bunche, to the representative of the Secretary-General. effect that the parade would be held at Tel On 1 March, Israel alleged that a recent Aviv. However, it now seemed that the Israel series of acts of sabotage or attempted sabotage authorities were planning to hold a "symbolic in Israel territory had been perpetrated by per- military parade" in Jerusalem, as well as in sons crossing the Armistice Demarcation Line Tel Aviv. Should this take place, Jordan held, from Jordan. It was held that, under the then Israel would definitely be exposing the Armistice Agreement, the Government of Jor- situation in the Holy City to grave repercus- dan must accept full responsibility for those sions. acts. 1 See Y.U.N., 1961, p. 155. 216 POLITICAL AND SECURITY QUESTIONS On 15 March, referring to the mission of Agreement and condemning Jordan for it. On the Secretary-General's representative, Jordan 7 July, Jordan charged that the Israel letter stated that in spite of the good efforts of the had misrepresented the decision of the Mixed Secretary-General, Israel authorities had re- Armistice Commission, which had confirmed sumed their acts of aggression in the Latrun that the shooting had been started by Israel area in violation of the Jordan-Israel Armi- military forces. stice Agreement and had refused to comply On 4 June, Israel informed the Council of with the decisions of the Mixed Armistice Com- two incidents on 1 June, the first by saboteurs mission (MAC) in this respect. from across the Lebanese border and the other On 27 May, Israel drew attention to renewed by infiltrators from across the Jordan border. acts of violence and sabotage committed by In reply, Jordan denied the Israel allegation armed groups penetrating into Israel from and stated that it had complained to the Mixed Jordanian territory and asserted that, although Armistice Commission, which had found that its allegations of acts of sabotage on 2 and 4 Israel had fired shots on the walls of Jerusalem March had been confirmed by the Chairman and on Jordan army posts. (For Lebanon's of the Mixed Armistice Commission in a state- reply, see below.) ment of 16 March, such incidents had not On 1 November, Jordan complained that a ceased. fully-equipped detachment of the Israel regu- On 28 May, Jordan complained that on 27 lar army had escorted 24 tractors into no-man's May Israel army units had attacked houses, a land in the Latrun sector on 30 October. The factory and fuel stations in Jordan, leaving four United Nations authorities had requested an civilians killed and seven wounded. Although immediate withdrawal of the Israel forces from Israel had sought to blame Jordan for having the area, but instead reinforcements had been provoked that aggression, Jordan denied most called in. emphatically any knowledge of or responsibility In reply, Israel on 2 November said that the for the occurrence of alleged acts of sabotage Jordanian account of recent border incidents inside Israel-held territory. On 16 June, Jordan in the Latrun area did not reflect the true facts. informed the Security Council that the Mixed Ever since the Armistice Agreement of 1949, Armistice Commission had found, in connexion farmers from the neighbouring villages on both with this incident, that the Israel forces had sides had been cultivating fields situated within crossed the Armistice Demarcation Line into no-man's land in the Latrun area. Israel stated Jordan and that the raid had resulted in the further that these incidents were being dealt death of two men and three children and the with through the Armistice machinery. wounding of two adults and three children. In another communication, dated 28 May, COMMUNICATIONS FROM Jordan informed the Council that orders had ISRAEL AND LEBANON been issued to the Jordanian armed forces to re- On 15 June, Lebanon, in reply to the Israel pel with the "utmost severity and determination" letter of 4 June (see above), said that no evi- any new Israel act of aggression. dence had been found to substantiate .the alle- On 1 June, Israel said that on 31 May Jor- gations that saboteurs had crossed the Lebanese danian army posts had opened fire from the border into Israel and that this had been con- Old City of Jerusalem across the Armistice firmed by investigations carried out by the Demarcation Line into Israel territory, killing United Nations Truce Supervision Organiza- two civilians and wounding four. There had tion (UNTSO). been no firing from the Israel side. In the same On 11 November, Lebanon asserted that, connexion, Israel informed the Council on during the night of 28-29 October, Israel armed 1 July that on 28 June the Mixed Armistice forces in uniform had penetrated into Leba- Commission had justly upheld the Israel com- nese territory and carried out acts of sabotage plaint by deciding that the shooting had been in two different places; this had been confirmed a gross violation of the General Armistice by United Nations observers. These acts of ag- QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE MIDDLE EAST 217 gression, Lebanon stated, constituted a serious On 30 September, Syria transmitted to the and specific violation of the Armistice Agree- Secretary-General a memorandum from the ment and were creating a dangerous threat to Palestine Liberation Organization relating to a peace in the region. mob attack against the Arab population in In reply, Israel said on 19 November that its Ramleh, alleged to have taken place on 22 Au- action on the night of 28-29 October had been gust 1965. preceded by three acts of sabotage perpetrated In reply, Israel said on 13 October that in against Israel border villages on 2 June, 26-27 publicly condemning the outbreak the Prime August and 27 October. Israel's action had been Minister of Israel had affirmed that all citi- taken to impress upon all concerned the ex- zens were assured of equal rights and protec- treme gravity with which its Government tion under the laws of Israel, and that this viewed the continuation of these sabotage ac- would be rigidly enforced by the authorities. tivities, and the imperative need to put a stop to them. REPORT OF CONCILIATION COMMISSION FOR PALESTINE COMMUNICATIONS FROM In its twenty-third progress report covering ISRAEL AND SYRIA the period from 1 May 1964 to 23 December On 17 March, Israel drew the attention of 1965, the United Nations Conciliation Com- the Security Council to what it described as mission for Palestine stated that it could make the tense and dangerous situation which had no progress in finding a practical means, ac- developed during the previous two weeks on ceptable to the parties concerned, for assisting the Israel-Syrian border, in the vicinity of the in achieving a final settlement of the questions village of Almagor.
Recommended publications
  • The Independent Personal1ty of the Palestinians*
    THE INDEPENDENT PERSONAL1TY OF THE PALESTINIANS* Türkkaya ATAÖV The exodus and the dispersal of the Palestinian people af- ter the occupation of their land by the racist Zionist entity could not hinder the tradition of national expression. This expression, linked to the national question, was even developed as a reaction to foreign invasion. No doubt, the Palestinian armed struggle, follovving the Israeli attack in 1967, has caused an explosion of a potential energy not only in terms of military force, but in the realm of culture and arts. Palestinian culture, in the form of poetry, folk tales, popular singing, dancing, national costumes, embroidery, ceramics, carving, glass and metal work or various other forms of expression, is the vivid proof of the existence of a homeland and a people's yearning for it. The Palestinian masses, under occupation or in exile, are gathering, safeguarding and developing their ovvn culture, knowing ful 1 well that the preservation of culture is an effective vvay of resistance to attempts undermining national consciousness. The Zionist entity has not only looted the land of the Palestini- ans, but is also suppressing their culture and what is more,trying to usurpe it from them. But the Palestinians are engaged in a struggle to obtain recognition of their independent personality and existence. In spite of Zionist aggression, the ı oots of a peop- le, deep in the Palestinian soil, cannot be erased. * The Palestinians were avvare of the dangers posed by Zio- nist immigration, much earlier than generally accepted. Throug- hout many centuries, the Holy Land prospered under the tolerant rule of Arab and Ottoman Turkish sovereigns, who safeguarded * This paper was prepared for an international conference in Baghdad (Iraq) in 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • P.L.O. Lnlonaatlon Bulletin CONTENTS to OUR READERS
    P.L.O. lnlonaatlon bulletin CONTENTS TO OUR READERS Solidarity is an important weJpon for helping the peoples of the world overcome: oppres­ sion and injustice. The support <~nd solidJrity which the Palesti­ nian people receive helps us to continue our just struggle for our just cause. We <~re grateful for the_ solidJrity Jnd support we get, ' but although we hJve many friend~ around the world, our enemies Me still strong Jnd fmmiddble. They arc better Jrmed, better equipped, and much wealthier thJn we. Nevertheless, though we may Editorial ....................................3 possess limited nJeJns, our dcter­ Palestine Notes .............................. .4 min<ltion Jnd willingness to PLO Communique On Arab Summit ...............7 sacrifice is unlimited. The world forces of liberation, of which we Israeli Terror Cannot Break Our People's Resistance ... 9 are proud to be a part, are the Occupation Diary ............................ 1 2 emerging forces, and it is to us Israeli Government Re-expels Oawasmeh And Milhem 14 that the future belongs. The Israeli Military Occupation In Galilee ............. 16 forces of oppression have had Z ionism In Practice ...........................22 their dJy, Jnd shall be consigned to the dusthin of history . Document: "There Is No Palestinian People" By Meir Kahane ...........................25 We thank all of our friends Establishing The Zionist Stranglehold throughout the world for the By Faris Glubb ............................28 letters of support and encoura­ gement you have sent to us. World Events ................................31 Surely, we and other liberation 29th November: movements will continue on the International Palestine Solidarity Day .......... 33 road to victory. Solidarity ..................................35 Letters to "Palestine" .........................35 PRICE ... ............ .. .......... L.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp David's Shadow
    Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Seth Anziska All rights reserved ABSTRACT Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska This dissertation examines the emergence of the 1978 Camp David Accords and the consequences for Israel, the Palestinians, and the wider Middle East. Utilizing archival sources and oral history interviews from across Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, the United States, and the United Kingdom, Camp David’s Shadow recasts the early history of the peace process. It explains how a comprehensive settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict with provisions for a resolution of the Palestinian question gave way to the facilitation of bilateral peace between Egypt and Israel. As recently declassified sources reveal, the completion of the Camp David Accords—via intensive American efforts— actually enabled Israeli expansion across the Green Line, undermining the possibility of Palestinian sovereignty in the occupied territories. By examining how both the concept and diplomatic practice of autonomy were utilized to address the Palestinian question, and the implications of the subsequent Israeli and U.S. military intervention in Lebanon, the dissertation explains how and why the Camp David process and its aftermath adversely shaped the prospects of a negotiated settlement between Israelis and Palestinians in the 1990s. In linking the developments of the late 1970s and 1980s with the Madrid Conference and Oslo Accords in the decade that followed, the dissertation charts the role played by American, Middle Eastern, international, and domestic actors in curtailing the possibility of Palestinian self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitors to College
    E X E T E R C O L L E G E Register 2011 Contents Editorial 4 From the Rector 4 From the President of the MCR 7 From the President of the JCR 9 Elizabeth Helen Gili (1913–2011) 11 Leslie Philip Le Quesne CBE (1919–2011) 12 Sidney Martin Starkie (1922–2010) 13 Robert Henry Robinson (1927–2011) 15 William Aaron DeJanes (1978–2011) 18 Armin Kroesbacher (1990–2011) 19 Sandra Fredman, FBA, by Jonathan Herring 20 The Chapel, by Helen Orchard and Lister Tonge 21 The College Staff, by William Jensen 24 Ruskin College and Exeter, by Tony Moreton 26 B.W. Henderson, by Keith Bradley 28 William Lockhart, by Nicholas Schofield 31 A Spitfire Pilot Celebrates his Failures, by Richard Gilman 33 Uncovering the Secrets of the Old Masters, by Rachel Billinge 36 What Now for Higher Education?, by Reeta Chakrabarti 38 The Patient Doctor, by B.L.D. Phillips 40 Pre-prandial, by John Symons 42 Poems of Oxford, by Virginie Basset 44 Population Ageing in Vietnam, by Matthew Tye 45 Failed States and Extralegal Groups, by Christine Cheng 47 Solving Climate Change with Wind and Solar Power, by Matthias Fripp 49 College Notes and Queries 51 The Governing Body 56 Honours and Appointments 58 Publications Reported 59 Class Lists in Honour Schools and Honour Moderations 2011 61 Distinctions in Moderations and Prelims 2011 63 Graduate Degrees 2010–11 63 Major Scholarships, Studentships, Bursaries 2011–12 66 College Prizes 2010–11 68 University Prizes 2010–11 68 Graduate Freshers 2011 69 Undergraduate Freshers 2011 71 Visiting Students 2011–12 73 Deaths 74 Marriages 76 Births 77 Notices 79 1 Editor Christopher Kirwan was Official Fellow and Lecturer in Philosophy from 1960 to 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Silent Revolution: Education and Instability in the Gulf Monarchies
    THE SILENT REVOLUTION: EDUCATION AND INSTABILITY IN THE GULF MONARCHIES GAWDAT BAHGAT Since the end of World War II, the global economy has grown dependent on oil supplies from the Persian Gulf. Given the immense reserves in the region, this dependence is likely to increase. The Gulf War of 1991 showed the un- compromising world determination to guarantee the safety of oil fields and shipments. A heavy Western, particularly American, military presence in the region since the Gulf War, has served as a deterrent against any threat to the security of the six Gulf monarchies: Bahrain; Kuwait; Oman; Qatar; Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This alliance, formal and infor- mal, between the Gulf regimes and the Western powers has reduced tremen- dously the likelihood of another full-scale war similar to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. This relative security from an outside enemy does not, however, elim- inate other sources of threat to regional off supplies. For the last several years, there have been signs of growing internal insta- bility in a number of the Gulf monarchies. The domestic environment reflects a fundamental structural imbalance between economic growth on the one hand and social and political developments on the other hand. The former has sur- passed the latter. Due to the huge oil revenues, Gulf citizens have enjoyed a substantial improvement in their standard of living. Meanwhile, social atti- tudes and political structures have changed at a much slower pace. This im- balance in the speed of change challenges the stability of the region. Increasingly, the six Gulf regimes have been unable to peacefully assimilate the growing number of emerging social forces, particularly educated youths, into existing economic and political structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Kabul Times Digitized Newspaper Archives
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Kabul Times Digitized Newspaper Archives 9-24-1964 Kabul Times (September 24, 1964, vol. 3, no. 169) Bakhtar News Agency Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/kabultimes Part of the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bakhtar News Agency, "Kabul Times (September 24, 1964, vol. 3, no. 169)" (1964). Kabul Times. 703. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/kabultimes/703 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Digitized Newspaper Archives at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kabul Times by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact unodigitalcommons@unomaha.edu. '- I. ~. , , " ':..- ". , , " ' ". : -' ~ I, " - - . '. -" J. , . " . -. -.. '. , " .' . : - ~ ...-" ~. .. .. [ -- - '. , .... - . 1 , . " , '. - . I , " KABUL TIMES SEPTEMBER 23; 1964 " .... .-~ ".-- - - . PAGE 4 > • THE WEATHER •. '- former Ka~miri, SfWlents Leave For Beirut To Further Their Studies Yesterday's Temperatures .' - '. -' ,Max, + 24"(;. Minimum, +9°C. ' Premi~r Sun sets today at 6.5 p.m. Arreste4 Sun rises tomorrow at 5.5 a.m. , , ,C "St23 "E\\" DELHI, ,ll1dla, e~: . ,' Tomorrow's Outlook: Cloudy ., G Prime MinISter -Forecast by Air Authority APJ- nutan a' . " , , '- '-, JIB h dur Shastri Tuesday 15', - " 5" -.~ ..... a a.-a ponsJbllity for the aI'­ PARK CLVEMA: ' dalmea re.s I' Mohammad . IGhu am, . At :;:'30 ~ and 10 p.m. Russian VOL III. NO 169 'KABUL: THURSDA.' Y, i ' SEPI'El'4~,ER 24, !964~ MI~, ~.1·343! S~~ ~', ',':: ,,C- ~', I cst ,ot . r' Pnme Mims' Bakh;;hl. a; orm:r ,. 'film; BICYCLISTS With transla­ Kasr~I~:ere tIOn 10 Persian. ~U:::'.S=.~S:':"'.a':'::y~s~1 -R-e-ce-i-'Y-'e;,--'-,~~H;;-;R~'H:~ince.
    [Show full text]
  • BRITAIN and 'THE OMAN WAR': an Arabian Entanglement J
    BRITAIN AND 'THE OMAN WAR': An Arabian Entanglement J. E. PETERSON Mr. Peterson is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Advanced International Studies of the Johns Hopkins University in Washington, D.C. and is in the process of completing a dissertation on the political development of Oman in the twentieth century, in which connexion he spent four months in Oman during the winter of 1974-75. He is co-author of An Historical- Cultural Dictionary of the Sultanate of Oman and the Amirates of Eastern Arabia (in print). IN MAY 1954, the Imam of interior Oman, Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah al- Khalill, died. His death was followed by a series of essentially minor skirmishes; yet this activity signalled the end to over three decades of peaceful slumber in that isolated and hitherto forgotten corner of Arabia. The conflict between the Sultan of Muscat and Oman and several rebellious tribes of the interior arose in an atmosphere of incipient Arab nationalism, amidst Saudi Arabian claims to al-Burayml oasis, and was compounded by the British-French-Israeli invasion of Suez in 1956. Thus, it is not surprising that the local nature of the events was distorted into a wider question of Arab-British relations in the Middle East. In Oman, the end result was the total unification of a country which had been marked since the early twentieth century by the existence of a semi-autonomous, tribally organized territory in the interior, nominally obeisant to an Imam of the Ibadi sect of Islam.1 Jurisdiction by the Sultanate of Muscat and Oman over this interior region had been limited by the weakness of the Sultans in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries - creating a situation which had been formalized by an agreement between Sultan Downloaded By: [Peterson, J.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly - Twentieth Session - Fourth Committee
    United Nations FOURTH COMMITTEE, 1573rd GENERAL MEETING ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 1 Decem1Jer 1965, at 10.55 a.m. TJrEI\'TIETII SE8810lV Official Records NEW YORK CONTENTS some officers had gone so far as to resign their Page commissions. Agenda item 73: 4. Mr. StL\l\IMOt:T (Yemen). referring to reports Question of Oman: report of the Ad Hoc Com­ that the Cnited Kingdom authorities were planning mittee on Oman (continued) to equip the military bases in the area with nuclear HParing of petitioners (continued) • 351 weapons, asked the petitioners whether they were General debate (continued). 354 aware of a so-called secret agreement concerning the l\Iasirah base between 1\Ir. Selwyn Lloyd, the Organization of work . 355 former Secretary of State for Foreign A.ffairs, and the Sultan. Chairman: Mr. MaJid RAHNEMA (Iran). 5. Mr. GLl'BB (Committee for the Rights of Oman) said that he was unable to reply to that question since In the absence of the Chairman, Mr. Bruce (Togo), it involved a complex and delicate matter and he Vice-Chairman, took the Chair. might unwittingly divulge information which came within the scope of the Official Secrets Act, causing AGENDA ITEM 73 difficulties for himself and the other llnited Kingdom citizens on the Committee he represented. Question of Oman: report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Oman (continued) (A/5846) 6. Sheikh TALIB BIN ALI AL-HANI satd that the question was a complex one and that he would need HEARING OF PETITIONERS (continued) time to study it. He would he glad to give a reply at At the invitation of the Chairman, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • America Versus the Middle East the Middle East and New US Military Policies Bahig Nassar
    Appointment in Cordoba 17 America versus the Middle East The Middle East and New US Military Policies Bahig Nassar Bahig Nassar works at the Arab Co-ordinating Centre of Non-Governmental Organisations in Cairo, and also with the Afro-Asian People’s Solidarity Organisation. He prepared this keynote paper for the Cordoba Dialogue. This article examines the relationship between the Middle East and the new military policies of the United States from the point of view of the peace movements. It is based on the concept that, at present, the United States relies mainly on its military power to impose its conditions on the process of globalisation. This serves its interests globally and regionally. If its allies refuse to follow suit, the United States will act unilaterally. Big powers can compete globally with the United States in the economic field, and within the framework of the international division of labour. But they cannot compete militarily, as the United States alone can act globally, while all others act regionally Introduction The security environment, worldwide and in all regions, changed totally with the end of the Cold War and the dismantling of the Soviet Union. A gradual transformation of this environment had been under way since 1990, and led to the adoption of new military policies by George W. Bush’s administration. They are incorporated in two main documents: the ‘Nuclear Posture Review’ and the ‘National Security Strategy of the United States’. Nuclear confrontations in the North between the United States and Russia (the former Soviet Union) have receded. They are now emerging in regions in the South and East, mainly in the Middle East, South Asia and North East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Brotherhood Cult That Runs the New Arab World, Turkey, Pakistan, and Afghanistan
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 6, Number 18, May 8, 1979 ( COUNTE.,NTE"'GENCE Muslim B rotherhood: London's insane cultist followers of Reverend Jim Jones's People's Temple, the mindless "Islamic revolutionaries" I. Introduction of Iran have lost their human souls. Led by confused and fanatical mullahs, of whom Khomeini is only the best known, the masses of Iran's revolt have been The period from the fall of the Shah of Iran' to plunged into the abyss of sheer insanity. Without Ayatollah Khomeini marked a turning point in the immediate assistance from outside Iran, the population history of the Middle East and of the Islamic World. of that unfortunate nation will shortly become an The establishment of the Ayatollah's Islamic Republic unsalvageable mob: of Iran inaugurated the implementation of the Anglo­ In this report, we will demonstrate that the upsurge American financial interests and .British Intelligence's of Islamic orthodoxy-whether of the Iran variety, or strategy to impose a "New Dark Age" across the that of the more commonly known Muslim Brother­ region. hood, or the Jamaati Islam of Pakistan, or even the To appreciate the enormity of the implications of mystical Sufi brotherhoods of Asia-is a project of the the Khomeini revolution in Iran, it is necessary to look City of London. beyond the geopolitical struggle along Zbigniew Two interrelated consequences-and policy goals­ Brzezinski's "arc of crisis," and beyond the strategic can be identified with regard to the New Dark Ages debates about the viability of an Islamic movement to strategy of the London Islamic mafia.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalaseembly Distr
    UNITED NATIONS GeneralAseembly Distr. GENERAI A/ 43 / 694 24 Octobor 1988 EtrGtISE OAIGINAL: ENGLISE/FRENCE Forty-third sessLon Ageada iten 77 REPORT OP lSE SPECIAL COIO'TITTEE TO INIIESIIGATE ISRAE 'I PRACIICES AFTECTING IBE ET'UATT AIGETS OP TIIB POPI'LATIOtr OF THE OCq'PIED TERBIIORIES Note bv the Sscretary-Ganeral The secretary-e€ueral bas the bonour to transnit to th€ tnenbers of the Goneral Assembty the attacbett rePort, wbich Yas submitteal to hirn, in acc-rdance with p"t"g".!u 17 of Assenbly resolutloa 42/J,60 D of I December 198?, by the speclal Co,*ittee to Iuvestigato Israeli Practic.s Affectiug the Eurnan Rights of the Population of the OccuPi€d Torf,itories. 88-26346 0508-109 (E) Digitized by Dag Hammarskjöld Library Al43r694 EtrEltBb Prge 2 coxrExTs paragrrphs pao€ LE:nlEB Or IBAIISMIIIAL 4 I. INARODUCTTOtr l_s 7 II. oacNrlzArlof, oF l|onx 6 _ 19 7 rrr. MANDATE zo _ 24 10 IV. IXFORII^TION Af,D EVIDENCB BECEIVED BY lEE SPBCIIL COIOII''EE 25 - 606 L2 A. G6!€ral sltuatlo! 3l _ zSZ 13 1. Ihe uprislng- of the palestlaia'D Populatloa agalltt th6 occupatto! ..... .....:.:. 31 _ 247 13 (a) General d€v.lopnelts adt pollcy stltelletrt! .... 33 _ ?g 14 (b) Wave of dlsturbalcea ..... 7g _ 247 23 2. Other goloral pollcy itevelotrnrett! .... 24g _ z5Z 5l B. Aalniaistration Jultica, iDctuaH.lg tho trial . ,of rlgbt to fllr 253 _ 332 53 l. palestinian populatlo! A56 _ 318 54 (a) Coasequences of tlr€ uprislng A56 _ 316 54 (b) Otber devoloprneats 317 _ 3rE 65 2.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan
    MASTER'S THESIS M-1108 ALEM, Fehmi THE QUESTION OF OMAN IN THE UNITED NATIONS. The American University, M Jl., 1967 P olitical Science, international law and relations University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright hy FEHMI ALEM 1968 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE QUESTION OF OMAN IN THE UNITED NATIONS by Fehmi Alem Submitted to the Faculty of the School of International Service of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Signatures of Committee: Chairman : Date: Dean of the School Date: AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY July, 1966 The American University M A R 1 7 196? Washington, D. C. 5 yc,Q Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT THE QUESTION OF OMAN IN THE UNITED NATIONS "b y Fehmi Alem Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT The question of Omein was first introduced to the United Nations Security Council in 1957. In the past five years, it has been included in the Agenda of the General Assembly for discussion during its annual regular sessions. It is now considered a question related to colonialism eind, therefore, was placed before the committee concerned with the liquida­ tion of colonialism and trust territories. The issue centers around the claim by the Imam of Oman of the independence of Central Oman, and the counter­ claim by the Sultan of Muscat and Oman that the territory in question forms an integral part of his Sultanate® Both sides support their respective claims with historical, legal, and political arguments; hence, the conflict has arisen as regards the interpretation of historical and legal data.
    [Show full text]