DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Federation Forest Policy Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Federation Forest Policy Review ReportNo. 16222-RU Russian Federation ForestPolicy Review PromotingSustainable Sector Development During Transition Public Disclosure Authorized December10, 1996 Agriculture, Industry and Finance Division Country Department IlIl Europeand Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized I.4 1.. Public Disclosure Authorized XD, mn o h ordBn 1K Public Disclosure Authorized ii CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS Unit of Currency = Ruble (RB) Exchange Rate: Rubles per US Dollar Moscow Inter-Bank Foreign Currency Exchange/Foreign Exchange Auction Market (VEB) Rates Period E;ndof Period Average Period 1989 9 9 1990 19 23 1991 62 169 1992 228 415 1993 I Quarter 580 684 II Quarter 968 1,060 III Quarter 1,028 1,169 IV Quarter 1,206 1.247 1994 I Quarter 1,591 1,753 11 Quarter 1,877 1.989 III Quarter 2,166 2,633 IV Quarter 3,191 3,550 1995 I Quarter 4,311 4,899 11 Quarter 4,931 4,539 III Quarter 4.467 4,499 IV Quarter 4,554 4,640 1996 I Quarter 4,764 4,856 11 Quarter 4,980 5,105 III Quarter 5,271 5.407 IV Quarter' 5,463 5,525 As of December 10, 1996 Vice President: Johannes F. Lirn, ECAVP Director: Yukon Huang, EC3DR Division Chief: Michael A. Gould, EC3AI Task Manager: Mohinder S. Mudahar, EC3AI iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was managed by Mohinder S. Mudahar and Horst Wagner (joint Task Managers) and coordinatedby Hilmar Foelimi. They prepared the initial version of this report. Mohinder S. Mudahar led the discussions with the Russian Government and prepared the final version of this report, with contributions from the following Bank staff: Roger J. Batstone, Louis H. Carbonnier, David S. Cassells, Andrey V. Kushlin, William B. Magrath, Justin R. Mundy, Evgeny V. Polyakov; and international consultants: Kathy Abusow, Nicolaas Bech, Suzanne Gnaegy, Karl Kehr, Goetz Schuerholz, and William Turner. Significant input was provided by the Russian working group co-chaired by Alexander S. Isaev and Nikolai A. Burdin. The members of the working group were Georgy N. Korovin, Nikolai A. Moiseev, Dmitry V. Mozhaev, Anatoly P. Petrov, Anatoly 1. Ryzhenkov, Elena N. Samolyotova, Vladimir M. Shlykov, Pavel A. Sokolov, Valentin V. Strakhov, Vasily I. Sukhikh, Victor K. Teplyakov, Galina A. Verzhevikina, and Anatoly N. Yamskov. We want to thank the Russian Government for its support without which this project would not have been possible. This includes the participation and review by the Federal Forest Service, former Ministry of EnvironmentalProtection and Natural Resources, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economy, and the former Russian State Forest Industry Company. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions made by Anatoly I. Pisarenko (forestry) and Amirkhan M. Amirkhanov (enviromnent)who played leading roles, on behalf of the Russian Government. The support provided by the Khabarovsk and Krasnoyarsk RegionalAdministrations and Regional Institutes is also acknowledged with thanks. The report was reviewed by Bank staff members: Mary Canning (social services and employment), Shelton H. Davis (sociological and aboriginal issues), Philippe H. Le Houerou (macro-economic and fiscal issues), Dennis B. Whittle (macro-economicissues), and Lev Freinkman (fiscal issues). Luis F. Constantino, Kathleen S. Mackinnon, and Andrew H. Bond served as the peer reviewers. The report greatly benefitted from commentsby Michael A. Gould, Pradeep K. Mitra, Costas Michalopoulos, Marcelo Selowsky, and Laura Tuck. The report was edited by Meta de Coquereaumontand processed by Rathna Chiniah. Valuable comments were provided by Sten Nilsson, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Russian forest resources); Gail Osherenko, Institute of Arctic Studies, Darmouth College (indigenouspeople and traditional economies); Doug Norlen, Pacific Environment and Resources Center (protection of forests in Siberia and the Far East); Pat Rasmussen, Taiga Forest Project of EarthKind, USA and EarthKind, Russia; Josh Newell, SiberianHotspot Project of Friends of the Earth - Japan; David Ostergren, Division of Forestry of West Virginia University; and D. Carl Freeman, Department of Biological Sciences of Wayne State University. Steven Johnson, InternationalTropical Timber Organization and Thomas Waggener, College of Forest Resources of University of Washingtonfacilitated the search for forest product prices. The report benefitted a great deal from the contributions made by Russian and international NGOs. Alexei Grigoriev, Socio-Ecological Union (Moscow), was NGO liaison throughout the preparation of this report. Cindy Buhl, The Bank Information Center (Washington,D.C.) provided valuable comments and also facilitated comments from the international community. Sergei Ponomarenko, World Wildlife Fund (WWF) - Russia; Sergei Tsyplenkov, Greenpeace - Russia; and Evgeny Simonov, Biodiversity Conservation Center - Russia participated in the final review of the report in Moscow. John Clark of the Bank's NGO Liaison Office facilitateddiscussions with NGOs. The staff of the World Bank Resident Mission in Moscow facilitated work on this project. The valuable contributions made by many other individuals in the Bank and in Russia as well as by international forestry experts are also gratefully acknowledged. Besides Bank funding, significant cofinancing for this project was providedby the Canadian and the Dutch Trust Funds. The project was carried out under the general direction of Michael Gould, Costas Michalopoulos and YukonHuang. iv Weights and Measures Metric System Fiscal Year January 1 - December 31 Abbreviations AAC: AnnualAllowable Cut IMF: InternationalMonetary Fund BOD: BiologicalOxygen Demand rITO: InternationalTropical Timber Organization CAS: CountryAssistance Strategy IUCN: InternationalUnion for Conservationof CEM: CountryEconomic Memorandum Nature - WorldConservation Union CIS: Commonwealthof IndependentStates MEPNR: Ministryof EnvironmentalProtection COD: ChemicalOxygen Demand and Natural Resources (Russia) CPI: ConsumerPrice Index MEWB: Massive Edge-gluedWood Boards EBRD: EuropeanBank for Reconstructionand NASA: NationalAeronautic and Space Development Administration(USA) ECE: EconomicCommission for Europe(United NGOs: Non-GovernmentalOrganizations Nations NIPF: Non-IndustrialPrivate Forest EIA: EnvironmentalImpact Assessment OECD: Organizationfor EconomicCooperation EMP: EnvironmentManagement Project and Development PAO: Foodand AgricultureOrganization of the PERC: PacificEnvironment and Resources UnitedNations Center (USA) FFS: FederalForest Service (Russia) RAAS: RussianAcademy of AgriculturalSciences FMP: ForestManagement Plan RAS: RussianAcademy of Sciences FPR: ForestPolicy Review RFE: RussianFar East FSA: ForestState Account RSFSR: RussianSoviet Federative Socialist FSU: Former SovietUnion Republic FTO: ForeignTrade Organization SEU: Socio-EcologicalUnion (Russia) GDP: Gross DomesticProduct SOEs: State Owned Enterprises GEF: GlobalEnviromnent Facility TACIS: TechnicalAssistance to the Commonwealth GIS: GeographicInformation System of IndependentStates GKI: State Committeefor the Managementof UNCED: UnitedNations Conference on State Property(Russia) Environmentand Development GNP: Gross NationalProduct UNEP: UnitedNations Environment Program IFC: InternationalFinance Corporation USAID: U.S. Agencyfor InternationalDevelopment IIASA: InternationalInstitute for AppliedSystems USSR: Unionof SovietSocialist Republics Analysis VAT: ValueAdded Tax ILO: InternationalLabor Organizationof the WTO: WorldTrade Organization UnitedNations WWF: WorldWildlife Fund v Glossary of Russian Terms Dallesprom: Far Eastern regionalforest industryholding company in Khabarovsk Krays; subsidiaryof the former Roslesprom Goskomlesprom: State Committeefor Timber, Pulp and Paper, and Woodworking Industry; a federal agency establishedin June 1996 by reorganizing Roslesprom Kray: Administrativeregion; a constituentpart of the RussianFederation Les: Forest or timber Leskhoz: A forest managementdistrict; the primary operational unit (forestry administrativeand managerialbody) of the Federal Forest Service Lesnichestvo: A forest range; subunitof a Leskhoz Lespromkhoz: A forest industry (logging)enterprise Lesprojekt: Former associationof forestinventory enterprise Oblast: Administrativeregion; a constituentpart of the Russian Federation Okrug: Formerlyan administrativesubdivision within an oblast or a kray; set up especiallyfor indigenouspeople; currently a constituentpart of the Russian Federation Prom: Russian abbreviationfor Industryor industrial Rayon: Administrativedistrict; a constituentpart of a kray, oblast, or republic Republic: Administrativeregion; a constituentpart of the Russian Federation, but with relativelymore autonomythan others Roskomzem: Russian State Committeefor Land Resourcesand Land Administration Rosleskhoz: Federal Forest Service of Russia Roslesprom: Russian State Forest Industry Company; a state holding establishedon the basis of the former Ministryof Forest Industry (Minlesprom)and recently reorganized into Goskomlesprom State Forest Fund: Government-ownedforest and non-forestlands that are managedby the authorized forest managementagencies, primarily by the Federal Forest Service,of Russia. Zakaznik: A nature reserve and wildliferefuge set aside for the preservationof small ecosystemsand particular anirnalor plant species Zapovednik: A nature reserve that is strictlyprotected vi RussIANFEDERATION FORESTPOLICY REVIEW Promoting Sustainable Sector Development During Transition CONTENTS Page No. Executive Summary.............. 1 I. Forest Resources and Sectoral
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation. Assistance in The
    OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 300, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26026-0 · www.unido.org · [email protected] 1.0 ~j ·~ w 111 ~ . ·~ 12.2 ~ -~ ...... 111.1 I!' :~: 25 4 6 111111.
    [Show full text]
  • Siberian Expectations: an Overview of Regional Forest Policy and Sustainable Forest Management
    Siberian Expectations: An Overview of Regional Forest Policy and Sustainable Forest Management July 2003 World Forest Institute Portland, Oregon, USA Authors: V.A. Sokolov, I.M. Danilin, I.V. Semetchkin, S.K. Farber,V.V. Bel'kov,T.A. Burenina, O.P.Vtyurina,A.A. Onuchin, K.I. Raspopin, N.V. Sokolova, and A.S. Shishikin Editors: A. DiSalvo, P.Owston, and S.Wu ABSTRACT Developing effective forest management brings universal challenges to all countries, regardless of political system or economic state. The Russian Federation is an example of how economic, social, and political issues impact development and enactment of forest legislation. The current Forest Code of the Russian Federation (1997) has many problems and does not provide for needed progress in the forestry sector. It is necessary to integrate economic, ecological and social forestry needs, and this is not taken into account in the Forest Code. Additionally, excessive centralization in forest management and the forestry economy occurs. This manuscript discusses the problems facing the forestry sector of Siberia and recommends solutions for some of the major ones. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Research for this book was supported by a grant from the International Research and Exchanges Board with funds provided by the Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs, a division of the United States Department of State. Neither of these organizations are responsible for the views expressed herein. The authors would particularly like to recognize the very careful and considerate reviews, including many detailed editorial and language suggestions, made by the editors – Angela DiSalvo, Peyton Owston, and Sara Wu. They helped to significantly improve the organization and content of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Maturity Profile of the Innovative Development of the Administrative-Territorial Units of the Krasnoyarsk Region
    Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 5 (2011 4) 667-677 ~ ~ ~ УДК 338.24 (571.510) Maturity Profile of the Innovative Development of the Administrative-Territorial Units of the Krasnoyarsk Region Vladimir I. Kirko*, Anatoliy V. Bukharov and Anna V. Keusch Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia 1 Received 4.05.2011, received in revised form 11.05.2011, accepted 18.05.2011 The authors of the article have carried out a research of the innovative potential of typical administrative-territorial units. For our research, we have chosen some administrative-territorial units of different socio- economical levels of development that are situated in various climatic zones of the Krasnoyarsk Region: the Evenkiya Municipal Region; Minusinsk and the Minusinsk Municipal Region; Achinsk; Divnogorsk; Zheleznogorsk. In order to research the innovative potential of the chosen territories, we have chosen to use the modified TACIS methodology in the given work. The methodology is based upon carriage of working seminars with specialists of the subject, their questioning in a certain sphere and formation of a general indicator (maturity profile) and a certain scheme of analysis of the gained results. Maturity profile estimates the level of administrative-territorial units development in various aspects on the basis of selected factors, which define the development of the territory. Proceeding from the set task, the following eight factors have been defined: four of them characterize the resources and four rest characterize organizational structures and technologies. Its results are presented as a diagram, which visually illustrates relative levels of various activity spheres’ development. The form of the diagram also gives us an opportunity to compare the correlation between the levels of factors development of a separate territory and other administrative-territorial units.
    [Show full text]
  • YENISEYSK the Town of SPIRITUAL HERITAGE YENISEYSK IS the TOWN of SPIRITUAL HERITAGE, an OPEN AIR MUSEUM WHERE EVERYTHING IS SATURATED with CENTURIES-OLD HISTORY
    YENISEYSK THE town OF SPIRITUAL HERITAGE YENISEYSK IS THE TOWN OF SPIRITUAL HERITAGE, AN OPEN AIR MUSEUM WHERE EVERYTHING IS SATURATED WITH CENTURIES-OLD HISTORY. IT IS ONE OF THE OLDEST SIBERIAN TOWNS FOUNDED BY THE COSSACKS AS A FORTRESS ON THE LEFT BANK OF THE YENISEI RIVER IN 1619. FOR A CENTURY AND A HALF THIS TOWN WAS THE MAIN PORTAL TO EASTERN SIBERIA. IN THE XIX CENTURY YENISEYSK WAS THE LARGEST TOWN OF YENISEI PROVINCE AND ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL IN SIBERIA. IT WAS INCLUDED IN THE TOP TEN COUNTRY TOWNS OF THE RUSSIAN STATE. IT IS UNIQUE BECAUSE IT IS ALMOST COMPLETELY PRESERVED THE IMAGE OF THE SIBERIAN TOWN OF THE XVIII-XIX CENTURIES. 1 Yeniseysk, a town with four hundred years of history and Spassky Monastery in Yeniseysk is one of the oldest monasteries more than 100 cultural heritage sites, has been included in the Krasnoyarsk region and one of the most magnificent examples of Siberian architecture. in the UNESCO World Heritage Tentative List. Monastery Lake, which is 28 km out of the town, is infused with old Travelers, scientists, diplomats, whose way ran myths and legends. According to some of them, it has healing and through Yeniseysk, noted the magnificent therapeutic properties. MONUMENT TO THE FOUNDERS panorama of the town from the river. Norwegian OF YENISEYSK scientist Fridtjof Nansen, who visited the town Yenisei Museum of Local Lore, History and Economy named after in 1913, made a note in his travel diary: “Around A.I. Kytmanov is one of the oldest museums in Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Taymyr Reindeer Herding As a Branch of the Economy and a Fundamental Social Identification Practice for Indigenous Peoples of the Siberian Arctic
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 3 S5 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy June 2015 Taymyr Reindeer Herding as a Branch of the Economy and a Fundamental Social Identification Practice for Indigenous Peoples of the Siberian Arctic Yulia S. Zamarayeva Anastasiya V. Kistova Natalia N. Pimenova Kseniya V. Reznikova Natalia N. Seredkina Siberian Federal University, Russian Federation Email: [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s5p225 Abstract There are two factors affecting the way that Nenets and Dolgan people of Taymyr define their regional identity: 1) their traditional trade (reindeer herding); 2) ethnic art-making where the reindeer acts as an image and a symbol of ethnic traditions, touchstones, and values found among the indigenous peoples of Taymyr. Field research was conducted in Taymyr settlements (such as Nosok, Karaul, and Khatanga) from 2010 to 2014. The researchers interviewed Nenets and Dolgan people who belong to non-governmental organizations representing Taymyr indigenous peoples, run businesses or work in government agencies, schools, and other organizations implementing cultural policies. Indigenous peoples have very low economic and social activity. The Dolgans also have a very poor standard of living due to lack of reindeer. The Post-Soviet era has seen an income gap growing between the Dolgans and the Nenets and unequal economic groups being formed. Reviving reindeer herding is essential. Nenets and Dolgan reindeer herding is an economically inefficient subsidized branch of agriculture, but its role is symbolic rather than economic. Nenets and Dolgan reindeer herding is an ethnicity-forming and ethnicity-sustaining factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Yenisei River Tour: Siberian River Cruise with Crossing of the Arctic Circle Norilsk - Dudinka - Yeniseysk - Krasnoyarsk from 07Th to 15Th of August 2021
    Yenisei River Tour: Siberian River Cruise with crossing of the Arctic Circle Norilsk - Dudinka - Yeniseysk - Krasnoyarsk from 07th to 15th of August 2021 Post-Conference-Excursion-Programme: We are happy to offer a unique post-conference river cruise on the Yenisei River from 7 – 15 August, 2021. The trip will include: - Plane ticket from Moscow to Norilsk and from Krasnoyarsk to Moscow - All transfers - 3 meals per day (breakfast, lunch, dinner) - Hotel accommodation (2 persons per room) - Boat cruise (2 persons cabins with sofa, wardrobe and washbasin; toilets and showers on deck) - Excursions and entrance fees To apply for the trip please provide the organizers with your personal and accompanying persons’ credentials. Dudinka Yeniseysk Day 1 (Saturday, 7th of August 2021) In the morning arrival in the city of Norilsk at the airport “Alykel”. Group transfer to the hotel “Talnakh” with accommodation in double rooms. After lunch excursion to the “Museum of the History of the Norilsk Industrial Area”. Sightseeing tour of Norilsk. Return to the hotel. Dinner. Day 2 (Sunday, 8th of August 2021) After breakfast departure to Dudinka. Accommodation at the Yenisei Lights Hotel in double rooms. Excursion to the Taimyr Museum of Local Lore (special motto “Initiation into the Taimyrs”). Sightseeing tour of the city of Dudinka. Lunch. Free time. Dinner. Day 3 (Monday, 9th of August 2021) Transfer to the pier. Boarding of the scheduled motor ship "V. Chkalov", accommodation in 2-persons cabins (each cabin with soft sofas, wardrobe, washbasin). Departure of the ship at 12:00 from the river port of Dudinka. Lunch. Boat tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Yenisei Is the Heart of Siberia
    Yenisei is the heart of Siberia Day 1. First meeting with Krasnoyarsk After the tourists' arrival at Krasnoyarsk they are transferred to the Amaks City Hotel, center located. Meeting at the railway station is also possible. Breakfast at the hotel (buffet), short rest. At 12:00 meeting with the guide in the hotel lobby. This day there is Krasnoyarsk city tour to the symbols of Krasnoyarsk - the Paraskeva Pyatnitsa chapel situated on the Karaulnaya mountain and shown in the 10-ruble banknote. In the 17th century the Cossacks who founded the city built a watch tower on this mountain. One can enjoy a picturesque view of the city, of the river Yenisei, of the surrounding mountains and the nature reserve Stolby. You will pass the historical town part with its monuments of the 18th-19th centuries, the former mansions of Siberian merchants and patrons, you will see the monument to Krasnoyarsk founder Andrey Dubensky, the Annunciation Cathedral, the Theatre Square, etc. We are going to visit the Ethnographical Museum which is considered to be among the best historical and ethnographical museums in Siberia. The next point of the excursion is the park Bobrovy log. In the park you will have a chance to discover a beautiful view on the nature reserve Stolby (Takmak rock) going uphill by the ropeway to an observation point overlooking the magnificent views of the city and surroundings. This tour is a wonderful opportunity to plunge into the wild nature without leaving the city. Transfer to the pier. 19:00 boarding the passenger ship Kuprian. The passenger ship Kuprian was constructed by the project 623/025, class “O” (Russian River Register) in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Departure City City ​​Of Delivery Region Delivery Delivery Time
    Cost of Estimated Departure city city ​​of delivery Region delivery delivery time Moscow Ababurovo Moscow 655 1 Moscow Abaza The Republic of Khakassia 1401 6 Moscow Abakan The Republic of Khakassia 722 2 Moscow Abbakumova Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abdrakhmanovo Republic of Tatarstan 682 on request Moscow Abdreevo Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abdulov Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abinsk Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Abramovka Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abramovskikh Sverdlovsk region 1360 1 Moscow Abramtsevo Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abramtzevo (Dmitrovsky reg) Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Abrau Durso Krasnodar region 682 1 Moscow Avvakumova Tver region 655 5 Moscow Avdotyino Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Avdotyino (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Averkieva Moscow Moscow region 1360 2 (Pavlovsky Posadskiy reg) Aviation workers Moscow Moscow region 1360 1 (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow aviators Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Motorist Arhangelsk region 655 1 Moscow avtopoligone Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Autoroute Moscow region 655 1 Moscow agarin Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Agarin (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agafonov Moscow region 655 1 Moscow AGAFONOVA (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agashkino Moscow region 655 5 Moscow Ageevka Oryol Region 655 1 Moscow Agidel Republic of Bashkortostan 1360 3 Moscow Agha Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Agrarnik Tver region 1306 6 Moscow agricultural Republic of Crimea 682 4 Moscow agrogorodok Moscow region
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Special Issue
    Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences Research Article ISSN 1112-9867 Special Issue Available online at http://www.jfas.info THE CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A BASIS FOR CREATING A VIRTUAL IMAGE OF THE CITY E. V. Semenova1,*, V. I. Semenov1, M. V. Rumyantsev2 1Lesosibirskij Pedagogical Institute –branch of Siberian Federal University Russia 662544 Krasnoyarskii krai, Lesosibirsk, 42, Pobedastreet 2Siberian Federal University, Russia 660041 Krasnoyarsk,79, Svobodny pr. Published online: 08 August 2017 ABSTRACT The article presents the experience of studying and using the cultural heritage of the ancient Siberian Russian city of Yeniseysk, which 400th anniversary will be celebrated in 2019, as a basis for creating a virtual image of the city. The objective of this work was to study the attitudes towards the city in the student youth of Yeniseysk and the young growing city of Lesosibirsk. The following materials were studied: the history of Yeniseysk, cultural heritage, the city as a concentration of cultural heritage, the cultural heritage of Yeniseysk.The paper describes the history of Yeniseysk as a city with a rich cultural heritage, which needs to be studied and preserved. Much of the study is devoted to the analysis of "cultural heritage" category, and various aspects of the concept,which are presented in the national and foreign scientific literature. It is proved that the city as a place for developing the cultural values includes the possibility of their preservation. A brief description of the cultural heritage of Yeniseysk and its natural cultural landscape is presented.Methods of study: questioning, content analysis, survey and results analysis of the integrated database to achieve the goals of this scientific work.Trial and experimental part of the study was the development of website "My Yeniseysk.
    [Show full text]
  • Discharges and Yields of Suspended Sediment in the Ob' and Yenisey
    Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives (Proceedings of the Exeter Symposium, July 1996). IAHS Publ. no. 236, 1996. 115 Discharges and yields of suspended sediment in the Ob’ and Yenisey Rivers of Siberia NELLY N. BOBROVITSKAYA, CLAUDIA ZUBKOVA State Hydrological Institute, 23 Second Line, 199053 St Petersburg, Russia ROBERT H. MEADE US Geological Survey, MS 413, Box 25046, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA Abstract The northward-flowing rivers of Siberia deliver immense quantities of water but only relatively small quantities of sediment to the Arctic Ocean. The relatively low delivery of sediment to the ocean by these rivers is explained by the large areas of forest and swamp in their basins. In the Ob’ River, sediment yields tend to increase between the headwaters and Kamen’ na Obi. Further downstream, sediment yields gradually decrease. Near the mouth of the Ob’ River, at Salekhard, sedi­ ment yield has remained constant at about 5.3 t km-2 year'1. In the lower Yenisey River, the already small natural sediment yield of 5.41 km'2 year'1 has been decreased several fold by the construction of massive reservoirs on the main stem and on the tributary Angara River, and presently equals 1.8 t km'2 year"1. INTRODUCTION Intensive collection of sediment data in the rivers of the Soviet Union (including Siberia) began during 1935-1938. The stations where sediment discharge is measured presently number about 240 in the Ob’ River basin and about 220 in the Yenisey River basin. The rivers are divisible into three parts: the upper reaches where suspended sediment is mobilized; the middle reaches where sediment is transported, deposited, and re­ mobilized downstream; and the lower reaches where sediment accumulates (Polyakov, 1935; Lopatin, 1939; 1952; Shamov, 1954).
    [Show full text]