DOCSLIB.ORG

NSC IDDATE TITLE Internal Organization Europe/NATO Africa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NSC IDDATE TITLE Internal Organization Europe/NATO Africa REAGAN ADMINISTRATION SUBJECTS NSC ID DATE TITLE Inter nal Or nal Inter ganization E ur ope/N A TO Africa Asia EMiddle ast Latin A m er ica S Union oviet China Control Arms E conom ics N on-Tr aditional Issues Caribbean Basin, 00001 81 Feb 06 Poland 1 1 Nicaragua Finding & 00002 81 Feb 11 Central 1 Caribbean Basin, 00003 81 Feb 18 Poland, F-15 Aircraft 1 1 Caribbean Basin, 00004 81 Feb 27 Poland, F-15 Aircraft 1 1 Pakistan, Sinai 00005 81 Mar 19 Peacekeeping 1 1 Poland, Nicaragua, Central America, 00006 81 Mar 26 Southern Africa 1 1 1 Haig Middle East & Europe Trip, AWACS for Saudi 00007 81 Apr 01 Arabia, Aid to 1 1 1 00008 81 Apr 30 TNF 1 US-USSR Standing Consultative Commission, US Policy Towards 00009 81 May 22Caribbean Basin 1 Sinai MFO, China, Caribbean Basin & 00010 81 May 28Arms Transfers 1 1 1 Caribbean Basin, Conventional Arms Transfer of F-165 to 00011 81 Jun 01 Venezuela & Libya 1 China, Cuba, Sec 00012 81 Jun 04 Haig Trip to Far East 1 1 1 00013 81 Jun 10 China, Greece, 1 1 Non-Proliferation & Peaceful Nuclear 00014 81 Jun 12 Cooperation Policy 1 Police Training Forces Overseas, Israeli Politics, 00015 81 Jul 02 AWACS 1 1 East-West Trade Controls, Siberian 00016 81 Jul 06 Pipeline 1 1 East-West Trade Controls, Caribbean 00017 81 Jul 09 Basin 1 1 Gulf of Sidra Exercise, US Naval Presence in Indian Ocean, Security 00018 81 Jul 31 Assist. in Egypt 1 1 00019 81 Aug 03 Space Shuttle Policy 1 East-West Trade, Central America, 00020 81 Aug 17 Strategic Forces 1 1 1 Further Economic Aid 00021 81 Sep 15 to Poland 1 Theater Nuclear 00022 81 Oct 13 Forces, Egypt 1 1 East-West Trade 00023 81 Oct 16 Controls 1 Strategy Toward 00024 81 Nov 10 Cuba & Central 1 Theater Nuclear 00025 81 Nov 12 Forces 1 Strategy Toward Cuba & Central America, Proposed 00026 81 Nov 16 US Peacekeepers in 1 1 Monitoring Overseas Direct Employment, 00027 81 Dec 03 Civil Defense 1 Counter-terrorism Planning Towards 00028 81 Dec 07 Libya 1 Global Negotiations, 00029 81 Dec 08 Libya 1 FY 83 Foreign 00030 81 Dec 08 Assistance Budget 1 US Assistance 00031 81 Dec 10 Program for Poland 1 Peacetime Draft 00032 81 Dec 18 Registration 1 00033 81 Dec 21 Poland 1 00034 81 Dec 22 Poland 1 00035 81 Dec 23 Poland 1 00036 82 Jan 05 Poland, Golan 1 1 00037 82 Jan 21 Law of the Sea 1 00038 82 Jan 21 Libya 1 00039 82 Feb 04 Poland, Libya 1 1 00040 82 Feb 10 Caribbean Basin 1 00041 82 Feb 19 Caribbean Basin 1 00042 82 Feb 25 Libya 1 Poland, High Level 00043 82 Feb 26 Mission to Europe 1 Buckley High Level 00044 82 Mar 25 Mission 1 00045 82 Apr 16 NSSD 1-82 1 00046 82 Apr 21 START 1 00047 82 Apr 27 NSSD 1-82 1 00048 82 Apr 30 Falkland Islands 1 00049 82 May 03START 1 START III Issues, 00049A 82 May 21NSDD 33 1 East West Credit, 30 00050 82 May 24Dec 1981 Sanctions 1 Sanctions on Oil & Gas Equipment to 00051 82 Jun 18 Soviet Union 1 00052 82 Jun 25 START 1 00053 82 Jun 29 Law of the Sea 1 US-EC Economic 00054 82 Jul 16 Relations 1 00055 82 Jul 19 US Nuclear Testing 1 00056 82 Jul 21 Eastern Europe 1 00057 82 Aug 04 Lebanon Situation 1 00058 82 Aug 06 Intl Economic Policy 1 00059 82 Aug 09 START 1 00060 82 Sep 20 Lebanon 1 00061 82 Sep 22 Pipeline Sanctions 1 Polish Debt Situation, Polish Private Sector Initiative, Latin 00062 82 Sep 30 America Debt 1 00063 82 Oct 13 NSDD on Japan 1 Allied Discussions on East West Relations, Poland 00064 82 Oct 15 Related Sanctions 1 Allied Agreement on East West Trade, Poland Related 00065 82 Nov 09 Sanctions 1 00066 82 Nov 18 MX Basing Decision 1 Pres Latin America 00067 82 Nov 23 Trip 1 00068 82 Dec 07 MX 1 00069 82 Dec 10 Alternative Energy 1 Review of Draft 00070 82 Dec 16 NSDD RE NSSD 1 Visit of PM 00071 83 Jan 14 Nakasone of Japan 1 Preparations for 00072 83 Jan 25 START III 1 00073 83 Jan 28 Defense Program 1 Vice Pres Trip to Western Europe, Sec 00074 83 Feb 11 Shultz Visit to Asia 1 1 00075 83 Feb 25 Defense Guidance 1 Export Administration 00076 83 Mar 23 Act Renewal 1 Strategic Forces 00077 83 Apr 14 Modernization 1 USSR Technology 00078 83 Apr 29 Acquisition Effort 1 START Proposals, Scowcroft 00079 83 May 10Commission Report 1 00080 83 May 18MBFR 1 START Build Down 00081 83 Jun 07 Proposals 1 Nuclear Weapons 00082 83 Jun 10 Security 1 00083 83 Jun 16 Intl Debt Crisis 1 00084 83 Jul 08 Central America 1 NSSD 4-82, Near 00084A 83 Jul 12 East, Southwest 1 00085 83 Aug 09 Mexico 1 00086 83 Aug 12 INF 1 00087 83 Sep 06 MBFR, Lebanon 1 1 00088 83 Sep 10 START, Lebanon 1 1 00089 83 Sep 20 China 1 00090 83 Sep 23 Central America 1 00091 83 Oct 25 Japan Trip 1 Japan - Financial 00092 83 Nov 01 Issues 1 Foreign Assistance - 00093 83 Nov 03 Aspects of Japan Trip 1 Overall Trip Strategy - 00094 83 Nov 03 Japan 1 East Asia, Visit 00095 83 Nov 07 Preparations 1 00096 83 Nov 30 Strategic Defense 1 Oil & Gas Export 00097 83 Dec 02 Cntrols, Libya, 1 1 1 State Visit of Premier 00098 84 Jan 05 Zhao Ziyang (China) 1 00099 84 Jan 09 Compliance 1 00100 84 Jan 13 MBFR 1 00101 84 Feb 24 Lebanon 1 00102 84 Mar 13 Mitterand Visit 1 00103 84 Mar 20 Iran-Iraq War 1 00104 84 Mar 27 START, INF 1 Multilateral Chemical 00105 84 Mar 29 Weapons Treaty 1 00106 84 Apr 16 Pres Trip to China 1 00107 84 May 22Nuclear Safeguards 1 00108 84 Jul 27 Central America 1 00109 84 Aug 28 Poland 1 00110 84 Oct 30 Central America 1 PM Nakasone Visit 00111 84 Dec 21 (Japan) 1 King Fahd Visit 00112 85 Feb 05 (Saudi Arabia) 1 00113 85 Feb 19 Canada 1 00114 85 Mar 04 Geneva Negotiations 1 00115 85 Mar 15 Canada 1 00116 85 May 14Stockpiles 1 Central America - 00117 85 May 24NSSD 2-85 1 00118 85 Jun 03 Interim Restraints 1 00119 85 Jul 26 South Africa 1 00120 85 Sep 05 South Africa 1 Shevardnadze Visit 00121 85 Sep 20 (USSR) 1 00122 85 Oct 01 SDI 1 00123 85 Oct 18 MBFR 1 Pres Participation in 00124 85 Oct 21 UNGA 1 Regional/Bilateral 00125 85 Nov 13 Issues 1 S-812 - Financial 00127 85 Dec 03 Export Act 1 00128 86 Jan 10 Central America 1 00129 86 Feb 18 Canada 1 Nicaraguan Democratic 00129A 86 Mar 20 Resistance 1 00130 86 Mar 26 Machine Tools 1 Space Launch 00131 86 May 15Strategy 1 00132 86 Jul 01 SDI 1 00133 86 Jul 11 Pakistan 1 Space Launch 00134 86 Jul 29 Capabilities 1 00135 86 Aug 11 Mexico 1 00136 86 Aug 15 Brazil 1 00137 86 Sep 16 Philippines 1 00138 86 Oct 03 South Asia 1 00139 86 Nov 18 Chile 1 00140 86 Dec 16 ICBM Modernization 1 00141 87 Mar 03 Canada 1 00142 87 Mar 13 South America 1 00143 87 Mar 27 Visit of PM Chirac 1 Pres Official Visit to 00144 87 Apr 02 Canada 1 PM Nakasone Visit 00145 87 Apr 28 (Japan) 1 00146 87 May 05Guatemala 1 Political Agenda for 00147 87 May 21Pres Trip to Europe 1 Security at DOE Nuclear Weapons 00148 87 Jun 24 Related Facilities 1 00149 ? ? 00150 88 Jan 12 US-Japan 1 00151 88 Apr 22 Canada 1 Security at Nuclear Weapons Related 00152 88 Oct 11 Facilities 1 TOTAL 1181015102056332142 % of all Meetings## ### ## ### ## ### ## ## ### ### ###.
Load more
Loading...

—— Preview end. ——

Recommended publications
  • Part Ii; Self Defense and the New Law of the Sea Regimes
    PART II; SELF DEFENSE AND THE NEW LAW OF THE SEA REGIMES INTRODUCTION Admiral Bruce Harlow, USN Retired! Poulsbo, Washington It is a distinct pleasure for me to be here this afternoon to introduce a distinguished panel to you. I think the papers, commen- taries, aad discussion will be stimulating and will be of interest to all of you. I' ve had the pleasure of a personal association with the Law of the Sea Institute since its inception in Rhode Island in 1966. Believe me, that year is etched in my memory because as a somewhat idealistic lieutenant commander I presented a paper that damn near got me fired. Several weeks ago I reviewed the proceedings of that session for two reasons, One, I wanted to see the rate of survivorship of the charter members. I'm happy to report that membership does aot endanger your health, as evidenced by the large number of old fogies around here. The second reason to review the proceedings of that first meeting was to see if there was any relevance to the organization. I was frankly surprised when I looked at those proceedings to see how raaay of the thoughts and discussion points raised and reported in the pro- ceedings found their way into emerging customary law and indeed into provisions of the 1982 Convention. I think it is safe to say that over the years the Law of the Sea Institute has been one of the focal points for the discussion, albeit informal but authorititative, of important law of the sea issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 Location the Nation of Libya Is Located in North Africa And
    Libya Location The nation of Libya is located in North Africa and covers approximately one million seven hundred fifty square kilometers, which is slightly larger than the United State’s Alaska. It is one of the largest countries in Africa. Libya lies in the geographic coordinates 25°N and 17°E. It is bordered in the north by the Mediterranean Sea and by Niger and Chad in the south. Libya’s western border connects to Algeria and Tunisia, and connects to Egypt and Sudan in the east. Geography The highest point in Libya is the Bikku Bitti, also known as Bette Peak, which stands at seven thousand four hundred and thirty eight feet at its highest point. It is located in the Tibesti Mountains in southern Libya near the Chadian border. The Sahara, an immense North African desert, covers most of Libya. Much of the country’s land consists of barren, rock-strewn plains and sand sea, with flat to underlying plains, plateaus, and depressions. Two small areas of hills ascend in the northwest and northeast, and the Tibesti mountains rise near the southern border. There are no permanent rivers or streams in Libya. The coastline is sunken near the center by the Gulf of Sidra, where barren desert reaches the Mediterranean Sea. Libya is divided into three natural regions. The first and largest, to the east of the Gulf of Sidra, is Cyrenaica, which occupies the plateau of Jabal al Akhdar. The majority of the area of Cyrenaica is covered with sand dunes, especially along the border with Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa Command: U.S
    Order Code RL34003 Africa Command: U.S. Strategic Interests and the Role of the U.S. Military in Africa Updated July 6, 2007 Lauren Ploch Analyst in African Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Africa Command: U.S. Strategic Interests and the Role of the U.S. Military in Africa Summary On February 6, 2007, the Bush Administration announced its intention to create a new unified combatant command, U.S. Africa Command or AFRICOM, to promote U.S. national security objectives in Africa and its surrounding waters. U.S. military involvement on the continent is currently divided among three commands: U.S. European Command (EUCOM), U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), and U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM). As envisioned by the Administration, the command’s area of responsibility (AOR) would include all African countries except Egypt. In recent years, analysts and U.S. policymakers have noted Africa’s growing strategic importance to U.S. interests. Among those interests are Africa’s role in the Global War on Terror and the potential threats posed by ungoverned spaces; the growing importance of Africa’s natural resources, particularly energy resources; and ongoing concern for the continent’s many humanitarian crises, armed conflicts, and more general challenges, such as the devastating effect of HIV/AIDS. In 2006, Congress authorized a feasibility study on the creation of a new command for Africa. As defined by the Department of Defense (DOD), AFRICOM’s mission will be to promote U.S. strategic objectives by working with African states and regional organizations to help strengthen stability and security in the region through improved security capability, military professionalization, and accountable governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Spring 2004 Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 57 Article 1 Number 2 Spring 2004 Full Spring 2004 Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2004) "Full Spring 2004 Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 57 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol57/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact repository.inquiries@usnwc.edu. Naval War College: Full Spring 2004 Issue N A V A L W A R C O L L E G E NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW R E V I E W Spring 2004 Volume LVII, Number 2 Spring 2004 Spring N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2004 1 Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Naval War College Review, Vol. 57 [2004], No. 2, Art. 1 Cover A Landsat-7 image (taken on 27 July 2000) of the Lena Delta on the Russian Arctic coast, where the Lena River emp- ties into the Laptev Sea. The Lena, which flows northward some 2,800 miles through Siberia, is one of the largest rivers in the world; the delta is a pro- tected wilderness area, the largest in Rus- sia.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya: the First Totally Privatized War in Modern History
    LIBYA: THE FIRST TOTALLY PRIVATIZED WAR IN MODERN HISTORY A report by Javier Martín Only Turkey has officially sent troops, THE FIRST although not for combat. And the LNA has a structure that could bring it closer to that of a regular armed force, with uniforms and TOTALLY a clear consolidated chain of command. The rest of the combatants are native PRIVATIZED militias and local and foreign PMSCs contracted by both rival governments in a sort of outsourcing that offers multiple WAR IN advantages, especially for foreign powers. MODERN COSTS, WITHDRAWALS HISTORY AND ACCOUNTABILITY Javier Martín The existence of mercenaries and PMSCs is nothing new, true. They have existed since ancient times, but their pattern has changed in the last forty years. From the Alsa Masa, the anti-communist forces A victim of chaos and war since March created in the Philippines in 1984 during 2011, when NATO -pushed by France- the presidency of the controversial decided to intervene and contribute with its Ferdinand Marcos, to the armed groups missiles to the victory of the different rebel "the awakening", promoted by the United factions over the long dictatorship of States in 2006 to fight the insurgency in Muammar Al Gaddafi, Libya has been since the Sunni regions of Iraq, to the Janjaweed then the scene of an armed conflict that in tribes in the Darfur region of Sudan, the ten years has evolved from a rudimentary Community Guards in Mexico and even the civil war conditioned by the terrorism of LAGs in Spain, the militias and jihadist ideology to a highly sophisticated paramilitary organizations associated with multinational conflict, becoming the first governments have been a planetary totally privatized armed conflict in constant since at least the end of World contemporary history.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 · the Culmination of Greek Cartography in Ptolemy
    11 · The Culmination of Greek Cartography in Ptolemy o. A. w. DILKE WITH ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY THE EDITORS By the time of Marinus of Tyre (fl. A.D. 100) and Clau­ about his work remain unanswered. Little is known dius Ptolemy (ca. A.D. 90-168), Greek and Roman in­ about Ptolemy the man, and neither his birthplace nor fluences in cartography had been fused to a considerable his dates have been positively established.4 Moreover, extent into one tradition. There is a case, accordingly, in relation to the cartographic component in his writings, for treating them as a history of one already unified we must remember that no manuscript earlier than the stream of thought and practice. Here, however, though twelfth century A.D. has come down to us, and there is we accept that such a unity exists, the discussion is fo­ no adequate modern translation and critical edition of cused on the cartographic contributions of Marinus and the Geography.5 Perhaps most serious of all for the stu­ Ptolemy, both writing in Greek within the institutions dent of mapping, however, is the whole debate about of Roman society. Both men owed much to Roman the true authorship and provenance of the general and sources of information and to the extension ofgeograph­ regional maps that accompany the several versions of ical knowledge under the growing empire: yet equally, the Byzantine manuscripts (pp. 268-74 below). AI- in the case of Ptolemy especially, they represent a cul­ mination as well as a final synthesis of the scientific tradition in Greek cartography that has been traced through a succession of writers in the previous three 1.
    [Show full text]
  • American Bombing of Libya: an International Legal Analysis Gregory Francis Intoccia
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 19 | Issue 2 1987 American Bombing of Libya: An International Legal Analysis Gregory Francis Intoccia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Gregory Francis Intoccia, American Bombing of Libya: An International Legal Analysis, 19 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 177 (1987) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol19/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. AMERICAN BOMBING OF LIBYA: AN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ANALYSIS by Gregory FrancisIntoccia* I. INTRODUCTION The United States-initiated aerial bombing of targets inside the borders of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriyah which took place on April 15, 1986,1 was met with substantial and immediate criticism by the world commu- nity.2 The positive reaction from the U.S. congress3 and the American public4 was not shared by much of the world. Arab nations denounced the American action,5 as did the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. 6 In meetings of the UN Security Council,7 countries de- nouncing the raid outnumbered those which supported it.8 Even Ameri- can allies responded with heated rhetoric.9 However, in the weeks which followed the bombing, world opinion softened significantly. Cooperation became evident amongst the Western Allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Destroying Libya and World Order
    DESTROYING LIBYA DESTROYING LIBYA Political Science • International Law AN D t took three decades for the United States government—spanning and WOR working assiduously over five different presidential administrations (Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, and Obama)—to terminate the 1969 Qaddafi Revolution, seize control over Libya’s oil fields, and dismantle LD its Jamahiriya system. This book tells the story of what happened, why O it happened, and what was both wrong and illegal with that from the perspective R I D of an international law professor and lawyer who tried for over three decades to ER stop it. Francis Boyle provides a comprehensive history and critique of American TERMINA foreign policy toward Libya from when the Reagan administration came to power Three-Deca THE in January of 1981 up to the 2011 NATO war on Libya that ultimately achieved the US goal of regime change, and beyond. He sets the record straight on the T series of military conflicts and crises between the United States and Libya over the E T Gulf of Sidra, exposing the Reagan administration’s fraudulent claims of Libyan HE QA instigation of international terrorism put forward over his eight years in office. D E U.S. E U.S. Boyle reveals the inside story behind the Lockerbie bombing cases against the DD United States and the United Kingdom that he filed at the World Court for Colonel AFI Qaddafi acting upon his advice—and the unjust resolution of those disputes. C AMPAIGN AMPAIGN R Deploying standard criteria of international law, Boyle analyzes and debunks EVOL the UN R2P “responsibility to protect” doctrine and its immediate predecessor, “humanitarian intervention”.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Law of the Sea and MEDITERRANEAN Security
    MEDITERRANEAN PAPER SERIES 2010 THE LAW OF THE SEA AND MEDITERRANEAN SECURITY Natalino Ronzitti © 2010 The German Marshall Fund of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). Please direct inquiries to: The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1744 R Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 F 1 202 265 1662 E info@gmfus.org This publication can be downloaded for free at http://www.gmfus.org/publications/index.cfm. Limited print copies are also available. To request a copy, send an e-mail to info@gmfus.org. GMF Paper Series The GMF Paper Series presents research on a variety of transatlantic topics by staff, fellows, and partners of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of GMF. Comments from readers are welcome; reply to the mailing address above or by e-mail to info@gmfus.org. About GMF The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) is a non-partisan American public policy and grantmaking institu- tion dedicated to promoting better understanding and cooperation between North America and Europe on transatlantic and global issues. GMF does this by supporting individuals and institutions working in the transatlantic sphere, by convening leaders and members of the policy and business communities, by contributing research and analysis on transatlantic topics, and by pro- viding exchange opportunities to foster renewed commitment to the transatlantic relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection: Mandel, Judyt: Files Folder Title: [Terrorism – Libya Public Diplomacy – Libya Under Qadhafi: a Pattern of Aggression] Box: 91721
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Mandel, Judyt: Files Folder Title: [Terrorism – Libya Public Diplomacy – Libya Under Qadhafi: A Pattern of Aggression] Box: 91721 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: reagan.library@nara.gov Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ Libya Under Qadhafi: A Pattern of Aggression Contents Page Libya Under Qadhafi: A Pattern of Aggression Character of Libyan Policy Libyan Involvement in Terrorism Libyan Links to Middle East Radicals 2 Libyan Terrorism Against the United States 2 Radicalism in the Arab World 2 Involvement in Sub-Saharan Africa 4 Meddling in Latin America and the Caribbean 4 South and Southeast Asia 5 The Erosion of International Norms 5 Chronology of Libyan Support for Terrorism 1980-85 7 The Abu Nida! Group 13 Introduction 13 Background 13 Current Operations and Trends 14 iii Libya U oder Qadhafi: A Pattern of Aggression Character of Libyan Policy establishment in their country. Qadhafi generally uses Mu'ammar Qadhafi seized power in a military coup Libyans for antiexile operations; for other types of in 1969. Since then he has forcibly sought to remake attacks he tends to employ surrogates or mercenaries. Libyan society according to his own revolutionary precepts. Qadhafi's ambitions are not confined within The Libyan Government in 1980 began a concerted Libya's borders, however. He fancies himself a leader effort to assassinate anti-Qadhafi exiles.
    [Show full text]
  • PART 11 the Diamond Anniversary Decade 1981–1990
    UNITED STATES NAVAL AVIATION 1910–1995 331 PART 11 The Diamond Anniversary Decade 1981–1990 The eighth decade of Naval Aviation was character- Naval Aviation’s involvement in international ized by a buildup of its forces, the rise of world-wide events—major highlights of the 1980s—began with acts of terrorism and Naval Aviation’s involvement in Iran and the continuing hostage crisis, 1979–1981. response to the various crises throughout the world. Libyan operations in 1981, 1986 and 1989 demonstrat- The decade began with American Embassy person- ed Naval Aviation’s air-to-air and strike capabilities. In nel being held as hostages in Iran. As had been the 1983, a carrier and amphibious task force took part in case since the Cold War began, carriers were on sta- Operation Urgent Fury and the re-establishment of tion in response to the crisis. The latter part of the democracy in the Caribbean island of Grenada. 1970s had seen an increase in the number of carrier Operations in and around Lebanon kept Naval deployments to the Indian Ocean. In the 1980s that Aviation occupied during the mid-1980s. Responding trend was increased and strengthened. Undoubtedly, to hijacking and terrorism in the Mediterranean basin this was the result of the ongoing and increasing prob- was an ongoing requirement for most of the 1980s. lems in the Middle East, eastern Africa and the sub- The other hot spot for Naval Aviation was the Persian continent of Asia. Gulf and the Iran-Iraq war. Naval Aviation was During the 1980s, Naval Aviation saw a resurgence involved in numerous periods of short-lived combat in its strength and capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf of Sidra Incident of 1981: a Study of the Lawfulness of Peacetime Aerial Engagements
    The Gulf of Sidra Incident of 1981: A Study of the Lawfulness of Peacetime Aerial Engagements Steven R. Ratnert I. Problem On August 19, 1981, U.S. F-14 fighter aircraft engaged in combat with two Libyan Sukhoi-22 fighters above the Gulf of Sidra, approximately sixty miles off the coast of Libya.' By the end of the encounter, both Libyan planes had been destroyed and one Libyan pilot killed. According to Libyan assertions, one of its fighters destroyed one of the U.S. F-14s, but this contention was denied by the United States. Although Libyan aircraft had on previous occasions fired upon U.S. military planes, 2 the Gulf of Sidra incident marked the first time that U:S. aircraft returned fire. The Gulf of Sidra incident indicates that aerial rules of engagement formulated by individual states are subject to an identifiable and widely accepted norm. This norm requires that, in peacetime, military aircraft attempt to avoid the first use of force during potentially hostile en- counters with the aircraft of another state. The norm permits a first use of force only when necessary for immediate unit or national self-defense, and then usually only after giving warning. Rules of engagement (ROE) is the general term used to describe the "directives that a government may establish to delineate the circum- stances and limitations under which its own naval, ground, and air forces will initiate and/or continue combat engagement with enemy forces. ' 3 With reference to the particular form of ROE to be discussed in this Study, the practice followed by most states appears to have consisted in t A.B., Princeton University, 1982; J.D.
    [Show full text]