Study on Knowledge and Practice Regarding Sanitation Application Among the Residents of Rangeli Municipality of Morang District, Nepal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Study on Knowledge and Practice Regarding Sanitation Application Among the Residents of Rangeli Municipality of Morang District, Nepal International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Biosciences Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2017, PP 6-12 ISSN 2394-5885 (Print) & ISSN 2394-5893 (Online) Study on Knowledge and Practice Regarding Sanitation Application among the Residents of Rangeli Municipality of Morang District, Nepal Sah RB1, Khadgi A2, Jha N3 1Associate Professor, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, BPKIHS, Dharan, Nepal 2Junior Resident, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, BPKIHS, Dharan, Nepal 3Professor & Chief, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, BPKIHS, Dharan, Nepal ABSTRACT Inadequate sanitation has direct effect on health of individual, family, communitiesand nation as a whole. This study was conducted to identify the knowledge and practice regarding sanitation application among the residents of Rangeli Municipality of Morang District and to measure the association between sociodemographic characteristics and disease pattern with sanitation practices of the study population.A Community based cross- sectional study was conducted from 27th November – 10th December 2016 in Rangeli Municipality where 300 households were taken as subjects. Simple random sampling method was applied. Semi-structured questionnaire was used and face to face interview was conducted. Chi-square test was applied to find out the association between sociodemographic characteristics and disease pattern with sanitation practices of the study population.Only 28% of residents were treat water before drinking. Most of the study population (98.7%) had latrines less than 50 feet away from the water source.Majority of respondents dispose of stool of children in toilet (54%) followed by left in open field (27%), Put/ rinsed in drain or ditch (14.3%) and throw with waste materials (4.6%) respectively.Majority of respondents manage solid wastes by burning (68%) followedby preparecompost (27.3%) and bury (4.7%) respectively.Almost58% of the study population had good sanitary conditions. The study population who studied SLC and above(89.9%), business in occupation(74.6%), above the poverty line (78.3%) and the study population who treat diarrhea using modern medicine had significantly more sanitary practices (p<0.05). We conclude that majority of respondents had average knowledge and practice regarding sanitation. Middle age and old age group, high education level, business in occupation, higher economic condition and study population who treat diarrhea using modern medicine was found significantly more sanitation practices. Keywords: Knowledge, Practice, Sanitation, Rangeli Municipality, Morang District INTRODUCTION Inadequate sanitation has direct effect on health of individual, family, communities and nation as a whole. Simply, having sanitation facilities increases health well-being and economic productivity. Sanitation includes use of latrine, clean surrounding, water treatment, and proper disposal of solid and liquid wastages. Toilet is taken as an essential and basic indicator of health and sanitation worldwide [1]. Proper sanitation is a necessary prerequisite for improvement in general health standards, productivity of labour force and good quality of life [2]. Every 20 seconds, a child around the world dies as a result of poor sanitation [3]. About 80% of all disease of the developing world is related to unsafe water and inadequate sanitation [4].Worldwide, 5.3% of all deaths and 6.8% of all disability are caused by poor sanitation and unsafe water. Nearly two-thirds (67%) of the total population go for open-air defecation and only one-third (33%) having access to a latrine [5]. The lack of access to sanitation in Nepal is striking. A total of 75% of the population is without access to sanitation, one of the highest proportions in Asia. However, the urban sanitation coverage is75% and the rural sanitation coverage is only 20% [6]. Every day, 16 million Nepalese (around 57% of the population) practice open defecation because they have no toilets [7]. Access to sanitary system, garbage disposal and toilets are lowest among the poorest population and is better in the richer quintiles of the population. There is huge gap in access to sanitary facilities between that available to the poorest population and the national average [8]. Therefore, the present study is undertaken to International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Biosciences V4 ● I1 ● January 2017 6 Sah RB, et al. ”Study on Knowledge and Practice Regarding Sanitation Application among the Residents of Rangeli Municipality of Morang District, Nepal” identify the knowledge and practice regarding sanitation conditions and to find out the association between sociodemographic characteristics and disease pattern with sanitation practices among residents of Rangeli Municipality. METHODS A Community based cross-sectional study was conducted from 27th November – 10th December 2016 in Rangeli Municipality of Morang District of Nepal. Rangeli is located in the eastern geographical region of Nepal. This was a two weeks study to fulfill epidemiological management carried out by students of MBBS 3rd year Batch 2014 of B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. This research was based on random selection of the study area Rangeli Municipality. This study considered 64% of world populations have good sanitation practices. It was calculated as 225.3 by using the formula, sample size (n) = 4 pq/L2 [(n=4 x 64 x 36 / (6.4)2 = 225.3] household as sample based on the prevalence of 64%, 95% confidence level and 10% allowable error. Adding of 15% on final sample for non-response, 226 x 15 / 100= 34, then sample size became 226 + 34 = 260 ≈300.The required sample size is 300 household of mixed ages, 18 years and above in Rangeli Municipality of Morang District (Vivas et al., 2010) [9]. The data was collected from 300 households of mixed ages, 18 years and above in Rangeli Municipality. There are 11 wards in Rangeli Municipality. Among 11 wards, 4 wards was randomly selected. The list of households of four selected wards was prepared and equal number of households (75) from each ward was selected on the basis of simple random sampling by lottery method. Each subject was selected till the sample size was fulfilled from the four wards of Rangeli Municipality. Ethical clearance was taken from Undergraduate Medical Research Protocol Review Board (UM- RPRB) of B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. Written permission was taken from each participants of the study. The participants of both sexes, aged 18 years and above, who were willing to participate in the study, those who gave written consent andthose individuals who were available after three visits were included in the study. Three visits means the selected study subject who was not present at the time of the first visit to the respective place, he or she was followed for three attempts so as to include in the study and in the case of unavailability next study subject was taken.Semi-structured questionnaire and an observational checklist were used for data collection and face to face interview was taken. The confidentiality and privacy of the study was maintained; name of the individuals or participating group was not disclose after the study. All interviewed questionnaires were indexed and kept on file. The collected data was entered in Microsoft Excel and converted into SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) software package 11.5 version for statistical analysis. Data was analysed to find out percentage and proportion, and Chi- square test was used to measure the association between socio demographic characteristics and disease pattern with sanitation practices of the study population. The confidence level was set at 5% in which probability of occurrence by chance is significant if P< 0.05 with 95% Confidence Interval. RESULTS Table1. Knowledge and practice regarding sanitation (N=300) Characteristics Frequency Percentage Source of drinking water River/Stream 10 3.3 Spring 4 1.3 Well 117 39.0 Tap 28 9.3 hand pump 141 47.0 Time take to reach the source of water Less than 5 min 296 98.7 More than 5 min 4 1.3 Water treat before drinking Yes 84 28.0 No 216 72.0 If water treat then method used for purification (n=84) Boil 47 56.0 Filter 36 42.9 7 International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Biosciences V4 ● I1 ● January 2017 Sah RB, et al. ”Study on Knowledge and Practice Regarding Sanitation Application among the Residents of Rangeli Municipality of Morang District, Nepal” Disinfection 1 1.2 Store drinking water Covered 173 57.7 Uncovered 127 42.3 Have Latrines Yes 209 69.7 No 91 30.3 If no latrine then where defecate (n=91) Public toilet 5 5.5 River 11 12.1 Open fields 75 82.4 If no latrine then why didn’t construct latrine (n=91) Not necessary 1 1.2 No money 40 43.9 No place 50 54.9 *Important to have Latrines To keep village clean 284 94.7 Free from odour 60 20.0 Safe from diseases 148 49.3 How often clean Latrines? (n=209) Daily 108 51.7 Every alternate day 11 5.3 Twice in a week 22 10.5 Once a week 64 30.6 Once in 15 days 4 1.9 Distance between water source and latrine <50 feet 296 98.7 ≥ 50 feet 4 1.3 Dispose of stool of children Put/ rinsed in drain or ditch 43 14.3 Left in open field 81 27.0 Throw with waste materials 14 4.6 Used toilet 162 54.0 Drainage Adequate 185 61.7 Inadequate 102 34.0 Absent 13 4.3 Animals at home Yes 148 49.3 No 152 50.7 Distance between cattle sheds & dwelling house (n=148) < 25 feet 124 83.8 ≥ 25 feet 24 16.2 Manage liquid wastes Use in kitchen garden 130 43.3 Feed to cattle 62 20.7 Surrounding home 108 36.0 Manage solid wastes Burn 204 68.0 Bury 14 4.7 Prepare compost 82 27.3 Mosquito breeding sites around the house Yes 271 90.3 No 29 9.7 Mosquito prevention Net 284 94.7 Coils 14 4.7 Smoke around house 2 0.7 Total 300 100.0 *Multiple Responses International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Biosciences V4 ● I1 ● January 2017 8 Sah RB, et al.
Recommended publications
  • English Updated
    Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development – JICA Technical Cooperation The Strengthening Community Mediation Capacity for Peaceful and Harmonious Society Project Phase II (JICA COMCAP - II) JICA COMCAP - II NEWSLETTER Volume 4 July, 2017 (Shrawan, 2074) Basic Community Mediation In This Volume Training for Social Mobilizers • Basic Community Mediation Training for Social Mobilizers Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) supported Ministry • Review of Community Mediation Implementation in of Federal Affairs and Local Development (MoFALD) to test impact Local Level of community mediation in development activities through • Publicity of Community Mediation through New Year COMCAP-I, which was implemented from 2010 to 2014. As a Calendar pilot event, COMCAP-I was implemented in then 20 VDCs of Sindhuli and Mahottari districts. Local Governance and • Orientation of Community Mediation for Social Community Development Program (LGCDP) was managing to Development Officers recruit Social Mobilizers in the commencement of the project. So, • Mapping of Community Mediation Implementation COMCAP-I coordinated with then VDCs to select 3 mediators from • Dispute Resolution through Community Mediation: My each ward, and included VDC Office Assistant and provided Experience different level of community mediation trainings. The project also supported in establishing Community Mediation Centers (CMCs) • Community Mediation for Easy Resolution of Local and in publicizing mediation among beneficiaries. Disputes During implementation of COMCAP-I, Social Mobilizers were mobilized in each and every VDC to facilitate in raising awareness on different facilities and services available for the local people. It was thus considered that there would be a need to take benefit from Social Mobilizers for awareness raising on community mediation.
    [Show full text]
  • S.N Local Government Bodies EN स्थानीय तहको नाम NP District
    S.N Local Government Bodies_EN थानीय तहको नाम_NP District LGB_Type Province Website 1 Fungling Municipality फु ङलिङ नगरपालिका Taplejung Municipality 1 phunglingmun.gov.np 2 Aathrai Triveni Rural Municipality आठराई त्रिवेणी गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 aathraitribenimun.gov.np 3 Sidingwa Rural Municipality लिदिङ्वा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 sidingbamun.gov.np 4 Faktanglung Rural Municipality फक्ताङिुङ गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 phaktanglungmun.gov.np 5 Mikhwakhola Rural Municipality लि啍वाखोिा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 mikwakholamun.gov.np 6 Meringden Rural Municipality िेररङिेन गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 meringdenmun.gov.np 7 Maiwakhola Rural Municipality िैवाखोिा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 maiwakholamun.gov.np 8 Yangworak Rural Municipality याङवरक गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 yangwarakmuntaplejung.gov.np 9 Sirijunga Rural Municipality लिरीजङ्घा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 sirijanghamun.gov.np 10 Fidhim Municipality दफदिि नगरपालिका Panchthar Municipality 1 phidimmun.gov.np 11 Falelung Rural Municipality फािेिुुंग गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 phalelungmun.gov.np 12 Falgunanda Rural Municipality फा쥍गुनन्ि गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 phalgunandamun.gov.np 13 Hilihang Rural Municipality दिलििाङ गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 hilihangmun.gov.np 14 Kumyayek Rural Municipality कु म्िायक गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 kummayakmun.gov.np 15 Miklajung Rural Municipality लि啍िाजुङ गाउँपालिका
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Finance Financial Comptroller General Office Anamnagar, Kathmandu
    An Integrated Financial Code, Classification and Explanation 2074 B.S (Second Revision) Government of Nepal Ministry of Finance Financial Comptroller General Office Anamnagar, Kathmandu WWW.fcgo.gov.np Approved for the operation of economic transaction of three level of government pursuant to the federal structure. Integrated Financial Code, Classification and Explanation, 2074 (Second Revision) (Date of approval by Financial Comptroller General: 2076/02/15) Government of Nepal Ministry of Finance Financial Comptroller General Office Anamnagar, Kathmandu Table of Contents Section – One Budget and Management of Office Code 1 Financial code and classification, and basis of explanation and implementation system 1.1 Budget Code of Government of Nepal 1.2 Office Code of expenditure units of Government of Nepal 1.3 Office Code of the Ministry/organizations of Provincial Government 1.4 Office Code of Local Level 1.5 Code indicating the nature of expenditure 1.6 Code of Donor Agency 1.7 Mode of Receipt/Payment 1.8 Budget Service and Functional Classification 1.9 Code of Province and District Section – Two Classification of Integrated Financial Code and Explanation 2.1 Code of Revenue, classification and explanation 2.2 Code of current expenditure, classification and explanation 2.3 Code of Capital expenditure/assets and liability, classification and explanation 2.4 Code of financial assets and liability (Financial System), classification and explanation 2.5 Code of the balance of assets and liability, description and explanation Section – Three Budget Sub-head of local level Part– one Management of Budget and Office Code 1. The basis of financial code and classification and explanation and its system of implementation The constitution of Nepal has made provision for a separate treasury fund in all three levels of government (Federal, Province and Local), and accounting format for economic transaction as approved by the auditor general.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Province 01, Preliminary Results, Nepal Economic Census 2018
    Number of Number of Persons Engaged District and Local Unit establishments Total Male Female Taplejung District 4,653 13,225 7,337 5,888 10101PHAKTANLUNG RURAL MUNICIPALITY 539 1,178 672 506 10102MIKWAKHOLA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 269 639 419 220 10103MERINGDEN RURAL MUNICIPALITY 397 1,125 623 502 10104MAIWAKHOLA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 310 990 564 426 10105AATHARAI TRIBENI RURAL MUNICIPALITY 433 1,770 837 933 10106PHUNGLING MUNICIPALITY 1,606 4,832 3,033 1,799 10107PATHIBHARA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 398 1,067 475 592 10108SIRIJANGA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 452 1,064 378 686 10109SIDINGBA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 249 560 336 224 Sankhuwasabha District 6,037 18,913 9,996 8,917 10201BHOTKHOLA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 294 989 541 448 10202MAKALU RURAL MUNICIPALITY 437 1,317 666 651 10203SILICHONG RURAL MUNICIPALITY 401 1,255 567 688 10204CHICHILA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 199 586 292 294 10205SABHAPOKHARI RURAL MUNICIPALITY 220 751 417 334 10206KHANDABARI MUNICIPALITY 1,913 6,024 3,281 2,743 10207PANCHAKHAPAN MUNICIPALITY 590 1,732 970 762 10208CHAINAPUR MUNICIPALITY 1,034 3,204 1,742 1,462 10209MADI MUNICIPALITY 421 1,354 596 758 10210DHARMADEVI MUNICIPALITY 528 1,701 924 777 Solukhumbu District 3,506 10,073 5,175 4,898 10301 KHUMBU PASANGLHAMU RURAL MUNICIPALITY 702 1,906 904 1,002 10302MAHAKULUNG RURAL MUNICIPALITY 369 985 464 521 10303SOTANG RURAL MUNICIPALITY 265 787 421 366 10304DHUDHAKOSHI RURAL MUNICIPALITY 263 802 416 386 10305 THULUNG DHUDHA KOSHI RURAL MUNICIPALITY 456 1,286 652 634 10306NECHA SALYAN RURAL MUNICIPALITY 353 1,054 509 545 10307SOLU DHUDHAKUNDA MUNICIPALITY
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan of Agricultural Marketing in Eastern Development Region of Nepal
    MASTER PLAN OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING IN EASTERN DEVELOPMENT REGION OF NEPAL Final Report Submitted To Government of Nepal Ministry of Agricultural Development Department of Agriculture Agri. Business Promotion & Marketing Development Directorate (ABPMDD) Harihar Bhawan, Lalitpur Submitted By: Business Promotion Research and Communication Pvt. Ltd., (BPRC) Putalisadak, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel # 0977-01-4442853/4436617, Fax # 0977-01-4436617 Post Box # 19006, Email # [email protected] July 2017 (Ashad, 2074) Preface BPRC is pleased to undertake this Study "Master Plan of Agri-Marketing in Eastern Development Region of Nepal". BPRC expresses its gratitude to Agri Business Promotion and Marketing Development Directorate (ABPMDD) to having entrusted this important task. It also expresses gratitude to Mr. Laxman Prasad Paudel, Program Director and his team for expert guidance and for providing suggestions throughout the study period and report writing. BPRC is also thankful to ABDMDD team for their valuable, constructive comments and suggestions which were provided during Inception report and draft report presentations. We also express graduate to Senior Agriculture Marketing Officers Mr. Rajendra Prasad Pradhan and Mr. Puspa Raj Shahi for providing necessary instructions during final report preparation. BPRC acknowledges with gratitude the contribution made by study team of the project, with their valuable contribution the project was successfully brought to its conclusion. BPRC is most grateful to Mrs. Naina Dhakal, Team Leader for the successful execution of this project and for steering the whole tasks of conducting field study till its conclusion. In addition, BPRC conveys its appreciation to the contribution made by Chief and SMS of District Agriculture Development Offices, Agro-Vets, Traders, Wholesalers, Representative of District Development Committee, Member of Market Management Committee, Commercial Farmers Representatives and Agri-Cooperatives etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitosis and Associated Risk Factors Among
    Gupta et al. Tropical Medicine and Health (2020) 48:73 Tropical Medicine https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00261-4 and Health RESEARCH Open Access Prevalence of intestinal parasitosis and associated risk factors among school children of Saptari district, Nepal: a cross- sectional study Ranjit Gupta1*, Binod Rayamajhee2,3, Samendra P. Sherchan4, Ganesh Rai1,5, Reena Kiran Mukhiya1, Binod Khanal1 and Shiba Kumar Rai1,5 Abstract Background: Intestinal parasitosis, caused by both helminths and protozoans, are among the most prevalent infections, especially in developing countries. Enteric parasites continue to be a major cause of parasitic diseases which is the most common among street and school going children with poor sanitation. This cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the prevalence and potential risk factors of intestinal parasitosis among school going children of two schools of Saptari district of southern Nepal. Stool samples were collected in a clean, dry, screw- capped, and wide-mouthed plastic container, fixed with 10% formal-saline solution, and transported to the laboratory for further microscopic analysis by following concentration technique. Results: Out of the 285 stool samples analysed, 94 (33%) were positive for the parasitosis. Presence of intestinal parasites was marginally more in rural school (44.6%) than in urban (30%) (P < 0.05). Giardia lamblia was highly prevalent (15.4%) followed by Entamoeba histolytica-like (7.7%), E. coli (7%), Ascaris lumbricoides (1.8%), and Hymenolepis nana (1.08%), respectively. Children of the age group 11–15 years were highly affected (44.2%) compared to younger age groups. The findings of intestinal parasitosis in the study population were statistically significant with family income, hand-washing habit, type of drinking water, and availability of a toilet facility at home (P < 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nepal RA Firm Renewal List from 2074-04-01 to 2075-03-21 Sno
    The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nepal RA Firm Renewal List From 2074-04-01 to 2075-03-21 SNo. Firm No. Name Address Phone 1 2002 D. A. & Associates Suswagat Marga, Mahankal Sthan, 01-4822252 Bouda -6,Kathmandu 2 2003 S. R. Neupane & Co. S. R. Neupane & Co., Birgunj 9845054857 3 2005 Kumar Jung & Co. Kumar Jung & Co. Hattiban, Dhapakhel- 5250079 1, Laitpur 4 2006 Ram & Co. Ram & Co. , Gaurigunj, Chitawan 5 2007 R. R. Joshi & Co. R.R. Joshi & Co. KMPC Ward No. -33, 4421020 Ga-1/319, Maitidevi, Kathmandu 6 2008 A. Kumar & Co. Tripureshowr Teku Road, Kathmandu 14260563 7 2009 Narayan & Co. Pokhara 11, Phulbari. 9846041049 8 2011 N. Bhandari & Co. N. Bhandari & Co. Maharajgunj, 9841240367 Kathmandu 9 2012 Giri & Co. Giri & Co. Dilli Bazar , Kathmandu 9851061197 10 2013 Laxman & Associates Laxman & Associates, Gaur, Rautahat 014822062, 9845032829 11 2014 Roshan & Co. Lalitpur -5, Lagankhel. 01 5534729, 9841103592 12 2016 Upreti Associates KMPC - 35, Shrinkhala Galli, Block No. 01 4154638, 9841973372 373/9, POB No. 23292, Ktm. 13 2018 K. M. S. & Associates KMPC 2 Balkhu Ktm 9851042104 14 2019 Yadav & Co. Kanchanpur-6, Saptari 0315602319 15 2020 M. G. & Co. Pokhara SMPC Ward No. 8, Pokhara 061-524068 16 2021 R.G.M. & Associates Thecho VDC Ward No. 7, Nhuchchhe 5545558 Tole, Lalitpur 17 2023 Umesh & Co. KMPC Ward No. -14, Kuleshwor, 014602450, 9841296719 Kathmandu 18 2025 Parajuli & Associates Mahankal VDC Ward No. 3, Kathmandu 014376515, 014372955 19 2028 Jagannath Satyal & Co. Bhaktapur MPC Ward No. -2, Jagate, 16614964 Bhaktapur 20 2029 R. Shrestha & Co. Lalitpur -16, Khanchhe 015541593, 9851119595 21 2030 Bishnu & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Summary of Fiscal Year 2077/78 BS (2020/21 AD) Including Fiscal Transfers
    Unofficial Translation Budget Summary of Fiscal Year 2077/78 BS (2020/21 AD) Including Fiscal Transfers Ministry of Economic Affairs and Planning Province No. 1 Biratnagar, Nepal Table of Contents Part (A) Title Page No. Objectives of the Budget 1 Sectoral Priorities of the Budget 2 Budget structure 3 Sources of Expenditure 4 Estimation of Internal Revenue 5 Ministry/ Central Body/ Grant Titled Expenditure Estimation 6 Operating Expenditure Estimation 7 Number and the Budget of the programs under federal Supplementary, Special and Conditional Grants Operated by 8 Sectoral Ministries Expenditure Estimates (Sustainable Development Goals) 9 Expenditure Estimates as per Provincial First Periodic Planning Strategy 10 Gender Responsive Budget & Climate Friendly Budget 11 State Government's Special programs for Fiscal Year 2077/78 BS (Flagship Programs) 12 Part (B) Inter-Governmental Fiscal Transfers (Local Level) 13-20 Part (C) Recommendation Regarding Vehicle Tax Sharing by the Provincial Government to Local Level 21-28 Objectives of the Budget To protect the lives of the people from all kinds of diseases including Corona pandemic, to make the life of the citizens safe and reliable. Coordinating policy and resources to revitalize the Corona pandemic while minimizing its impact on the economy and other sectors. To make people realize the presence of the welfare state by increasing the health, education, employment and development friendly policy interdependence. To increase the effectiveness of infrastructure, economic and social sectors by making maximum use of available resources and means through adopting economical and effective expenditure system. To guarantee civil security and social justice through effectiveness, transparency, good governance and accountability of public service.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Local Units Codes VEC 2
    3. Local units codes_VEC 2 S.N. District Local unit :yfgLo tx VEC_Code 1 Taplejung Phaktanlung Rural Municipality फ啍ता敍लु敍ग गाउँपा�लका 10101 2 Taplejung Mikwakhola Rural Municipality �म啍वाखोला गाउँपा�लका 10102 3 Taplejung Meringden Rural Municipality मे�र敍गदेन गाउँपा�लका 10103 4 Taplejung Maiwakhola Rural Municipality मैवाखोला गाउँपा�लका 10104 5 Taplejung Aatharai Tribeni Rural Municipality आठराई �त्रवेणी गाउँपा�लका 10105 6 Taplejung Phungling Municipality फुङ�ल敍ग नगरपा�लका 10106 7 Taplejung Yangwarak Rural Municipality या敍वरक गाउँपा�लका 10107 8 Taplejung Sirijanga Rural Municipality �सर�ज敍गा गाउंपा�लका 10108 9 Taplejung Sidingba Rural Municipality �स�द敍गवा गाउँपा�लका 10109 10 Sankhuwasabha Bhotkhola Rural Municipality भोटखोला गाउँपा�लका 10201 11 Sankhuwasabha Makalu Rural Municipality मकालु गाउँपा�लका 10202 12 Sankhuwasabha Silichong Rural Municipality �सल�चोङ गाउँपा�लका 10203 13 Sankhuwasabha Chichila Rural Municipality �च�चला गाउँपा�लका 10204 14 Sankhuwasabha Sabhapokhari Rural Municipality सभापोखर� गाउँपा�लका 10205 15 Sankhuwasabha Khandabari Municipality खाँदबार� नगरपा�लका 10206 16 Sankhuwasabha Panchakhapan Municipality पाँचखपन नगरपा�लका 10207 17 Sankhuwasabha Chainapur Municipality चैनपुर नगरपा�लका 10208 18 Sankhuwasabha Madi Municipality माद� नगरपा�लका 10209 19 Sankhuwasabha Dharmadevi Municipality धम셍देवी नगरपा�लका 10210 Khumbu Pasanglhamu Rural 20 Solukhumbu 10301 Municipality खु륍बु पासाङ쥍हामु गाउँपा�लका 21 Solukhumbu Mahakulung Rural Municipality माहाकुलुङ गाउँपा�लका 10302 22 Solukhumbu Sotang Rural Municipality सोताङ गाउँपा�लका
    [Show full text]
  • Source Book for Projects Financed with Foreign Assistance Fiscal Year 2021-22
    (Unofficial Translation) (For Official Use Only) Source Book for Projects Financed with Foreign Assistance Fiscal Year 2021-22 . Government of Nepal Ministry of Finance 2021 www.mof.gov.np TABLE OF CONTENTS Budget Head Description Page Summary of Ministrywise Development Partners 1 Development Partnerwise Summary 3 301 Office of Prime Minister and Council of Ministers 5 305 Ministry of Finance 5 307 Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Supply 6 308 Ministry of Energy, Water Resources and Irrigation 6 312 Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development 10 313 Ministry of Water Supply 12 314 Ministry of Home Affairs 14 325 Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation 15 329 Ministry of Forest and Environment 15 336 Ministry of Land Management, Cooperative and Poverty Alleviation 17 337 Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport 17 340 Ministry of Women, Children and Senior Citizen 23 347 Ministry of Urban Development 23 350 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology 24 365 Ministry of Federal Affairs and General Administration 26 370 Ministry of Health and Population 28 371 Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security 31 392 National Reconstruction Authority 31 501 MOF- Financing 32 701 Province 36 801 Local Level 38 Summary of Ministrywise Development Partners Fiscal Year 2021/22 (Rs. in '00000') Foreign Grant Foreign Loan Ministry GoN Total Budget Cash Reimbursable Direct Payment Commodity Total Grant Direct Payment Reimbursable Cash Total Loan 301 Office of Prime Minister and Council of Ministers 2938 1020 1020 0 1020
    [Show full text]
  • List of Borrowers Availing Interest Subsidized Loan As of Ashad End 2078
    LIST OF BORROWERS AVAILING INTEREST SUBSIDIZED LOAN AS OF ASHAD END 2078 व्यवशायिक कृ यि तथा पशुपꅍछी कर्ाा S.N BORROWER NAME PROVINCE DISTRICT LOCAL BODY 1 A CLASS KRISHI TATHA PASHUPANCHHI FIRM PROVINCE-5 Dang Tulsipur Sub Metropolitian City 2 A ONE PASHUPANCHHI TATHA MATSYA FARM PROVINCE-5 Rupandehi Tilottama Municipality 3 A TO Z BANGUR TATHA KRISHI FARM PROVINCE-3 Sindhuli Golanjor Rural Municipality 4 AADHUNIK KRISI TATHA PASHUPANKSHI FIRM PROVINCE-3 Sindhuli Golanjor Rural Municipality 5 AAGYA MULTIPURPOSE AGRO FARM PROVINCE-3 Chitawan Ratnanagar Municipality 6 AAHANA AGROFORESTRY AND RESEARCH CENTER PVT.LTD. PROVINCE-3 Kathmandu Kathmandu Metropolitian City 7 AAMA CHHORI AGRO FARM PROVINCE-5 Rupandehi Sainamaina Municipality 8 AAMCHOWK PHALPHUL TATHA KRISHI FARM PROVINCE-1 Ilam Ilam Municipality 9 AAMDADA BAKHRA FARM PROVINCE-3 Dhading Jwalamukhi Rural Municipality 10 AARAMBHA EKIKRIT KRISHI FIRM PROVINCE-5 Rupandehi Suddhodhan Rural Municipality 11 AARATI GAIPALAN FIRM PROVINCE-4 Syangja Bhirkot Municipality 12 AARUSH KRISHI FARM PROVINCE-3 Bhaktapur Suryabinayak Municipality 13 AARYA BHAISIPALAN FIRM PROVINCE-2 Parsa Parsagadhi Municipality 14 AASTHA BAHUDESIYA KRISHI FIRM PROVINCE-7 Kailali Dhangadhi Sub Metropolitian City 15 AASUTOSH PASHUPALAN FIRM PROVINCE-5 Rupandehi Butwal Sub Metropolitian City 16 AAUSELUCHAUR KRISHI TATHA PASHUPANKCHI FIRM PROVINCE-4 Kaski Pokhara Metropolitian City 17 AAYUS JUNAR UTPADAN KRISHI FIRM PROVINCE-3 Sindhuli Golanjor Rural Municipality 18 AAYUSHA POULTRY FIRM PROVINCE-3 Chitawan Bharatpur
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Nepal Population Report
    NEPAL POPULATION REPORT 2016 SUBMITED TO GOVEMENT OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF POPULATION & ENVIRONMENT SUBMITED BY POPULATION EDUCATION & HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER(P) Ltd. 1 Acronyms AHW : Auxiliary Health Worker AIDS : Acquired Immuno-deficiency Syndrome ANC : Antenatal Care ANM : Auxiliary Nurse Midwife ASRH : Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health BCC : Behavior Change Communication CBS : Central Bureaus of Statistics CEDPA : Central for Development and Population Activities CPR : Contraceptive Prevalence Rate DFID : Department for International Development FCHV : Female Community health Workers FP : Family Planning FPAN : Family Planning Association of Nepal GBV : Gender-based Violence GDP : Gross Domestic Products GFATM : Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria GoN : Government of Nepal GPI The Gender Parity Index HA : Health Assistant HDI : Human Development Index HDR : Human Development Report HIV : Human Immuno-deficiency Virus I/NGOs : International Non-governmental Organisation ICDP : The International Conference on Population and Development IEC : Information and Educatin Center ILO : International Labour Organization MCHWs : Maternal and Child Health Worker MCRW : Micro-Credit for Rural Women MDG : Millennium Development Goal 2 MMR : Maternal Mortality Ratio MOAC : Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives MOHP : Ministry of Health and Population MOPE : Ministry of Population and Environment MOYS : Ministry of Youth and Sports MSM : Men having Sex with Men MWCSW : Ministry of Women, Child and Social Welfare NAC : National AIDS Council NAYS ; Nepal Adolescents' and Youth Survey NCASC : National Centre for AIDS and STD Control ND : No Date NDHS : Nepal Demographic and Health Survey NFHP : Nepal Family Health Programme NGO : Non-Government Organization NHSP : Nepal Health Sector Programme NLSS : Nepal Living Standard Surveys NPC : National Planning Commission NTAG : National Technical Advisory Group NYP : National Youth Policy PAF : Poverty Alleviation Fund PHC : Primary Health Care Center P&D.
    [Show full text]